Effects of Pantoprazole in experimental acute pancreatitis

Chronic Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors Is Associated With Reduced 30-Day Mortality From Acute Pancreatitis

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) decrease pancreatic exocrine secretions. There has been interest in the impact of their short-term in-hospital administration on acute pancreatitis (AP) outcomes. It is unknown whether long-term use affects AP outcomes. We investigated the association between chronic PPI use and short-term AP outcomes. We included all (2308) patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of AP (625 on chronic PPI use) between January 2008 and June 2021 and evaluated any association between chronic PPI use and 30-day all-cause mortality by univariate logistic regression. Compared to non-users, patients on chronic PPIs were older (p < 0.001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (p < 0.001). Mortality rates at 30 days were 1.6% in chronic PPI users and 4.4% in non-users (OR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.66; p < 0.002). [Correction added on 18 February 2025, after first online publication: Mortality rates at 30 days in chronic PPI users and non-users were updated in this version.].

Use of proton pump inhibitors improves outcomes in mild acute pancreatitis: A nationwide cohort study

Previous studies showed a potential anti-inflammatory effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) as well as possible inhibition of pancreatic secretion. This presents the question of their possible use in acute pancreatitis (AP). Current clinical evidence does not address the role of PPI and the present review for possible therapeutic use and safety is lacking. Therefore, our study aims to address the role of PPI in the management of AP and their association with the different outcomes of AP. We queried the Diamond Network through TriNetX-Research Network. This network included 92 healthcare organizations. Patients with mild AP with Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) score of Zero regardless of etiology were divided into 2 cohorts; 1st cohort included patients on PPI, and 2nd cohort included patients not on any PPI. Patients with BISAP score equal to or more than 1 or on PPI prior to the study date were excluded. Two well-matched cohorts were created using 1:1 propensity-scored matching model between cohorts. We compared the incidence of intensive care unit admission, mortality, and other associated complications. A total of 431,571 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 32.9% (n = 142,062) were on PPI, and 67% (n = 289,509) were not on any PPI. After propensity matching, the sample included 115,630 patients on PPI vs 115,630 patients not on PPI. The PPI group had a lower rate of mortality (3.7% vs 4.4%, P < .001), a lower rate of intensive care unit admission (3.9% vs 5.5%, P < .001), a lower rate of necrotizing pancreatitis (1.1% vs 1.9%, P < .001), a lower rate of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (3.6% vs 4.9%, P < .001), a lower rate of respiratory failure (2.8% vs 4.2%, P < .001), and a lower rate of acute kidney injury (6.9% vs 10.1%, P < .001). There was no statistical difference in the rate of Clostridium difficile infection between the 2 cohorts (0.9% vs 0.8%, P = .5). The use of PPI in mild AP with a BISAP-score of zero is associated with reduced pancreatitis-related complications and improved mortality. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Endoscopic changes in patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

There have been long debates on the introduction of proton pump inhibitors into acute pancreatitis therapy as standard treatment. The aim of the study was to assess endoscopic lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract in patients hospitalized for acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective analysis of patients hospitalized in one surgical center who had an upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic examination performed during the first 48 hours of hospitalization. We performed analysis of basic descriptive statistics along with the Shapiro-Wilk Test, logistic order regression analysis, One-Way Analysis of Variance, and Student's t-test for independent trials.

RESULTS

From January 2016 to December 2019, 476 patients were hospitalized because of acute pancreatitis. The upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic examination was performed in 85 patients (N.) in the first 48 hours. From the examined group 45 patients (52.94%) developed mild acute pancreatitis, 28 (32.94%) moderate pancreatitis, and 12 (14.12%) severe pancreatitis. Lesions in the endoscopic imaging were observed in 80 patients (94.12%).

CONCLUSIONS

A very high percentage of patients hospitalized for acute pancreatitis present lesions in the endoscopic imaging of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The standard treatment of AP is the administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which themselves can cause gastric and duodenal mucosal defects. All these factors indicate the need for standard use of proton pump inhibitors in patients hospitalized for acute pancreatitis.

Pancreatitis-Associated Medication Use in Hospitalized Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Acute Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is (1) to describe the prevalence of pancreatitis-associated medication (PAM) use at admission and discharge in pediatric and young adult patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis (AP) and (2) to describe the prevalence of PAM use at admission in patients classified as having idiopathic AP.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-center retrospective study of patients <21 years who were hospitalized with AP or acute recurrent pancreatitis from March 2015 to July 2017 was performed. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, etiology of pancreatitis, comorbidities, and use of PAMs at admission and discharge. PAMs were defined and scored based on an evidence-based classification system, with class I PAMs having strongest evidence for causation. Standard descriptive statistics were used to report prevalence data.

RESULTS

Our cohort was comprised of 119 patients; 50% of patients were using a PAM at admission and 67% were taking a PAM at discharge, reflecting a significant change (P = 0.0009); 44% of patients classified as having idiopathic pancreatitis were taking a PAM on admission, reflecting a possibly missed role of medication in their presentation. Comorbidities significantly associated with PAM use included seizure disorder (P = 0.005) and oncologic disease (P = 0.005). The most commonly used class I PAMs were omeprazole, trimethoprim-sulfamethazole, valproic acid, and 6-mercaptopurine. The increase in prevalence of PAM use at discharge compared to admission was partially driven by addition of omeprazole to the outpatient medication regimen during the hospital stay (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Medications likely play an under-recognized role in pediatric AP. The practice of using proton pump inhibitors in management of AP warrants further study.

No evidence for the benefit of PPIs in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Although current guidelines do not recommend the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the standard of care of acute pancreatitis (AP), they are often prescribed in clinical practice, mainly for ulcer stress prophylaxis. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we evaluated the association between the use of PPIs in the management of AP and various clinical outcomes. We conducted the systematic research in six databases without restrictions on January 24th, 2022. We investigated adult patient with AP, who were treated with PPI compared to conventional therapy. The pooled odds ratios, mean differences, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated with random effect model. We included six RCTs and three cohort studies, consisting of 28,834 patients. We found a significant decrease in the rate of pancreatic pseudocyst formation in patients who received PPI treatment. PPI use was associated with a higher risk of GI bleeding, however this finding could be due to the patients' comorbid conditions. We found no significant difference in the rates of 7-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and acute respiratory distress syndrome between the groups. The available data on this topic are limited; therefore, further well designed RCTs are needed to evaluate the potential benefits and adverse effects of PPIs in AP.

Analysis of acute pancreatitis associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors and predictive factors of the death risk: Based on food and drug administration adverse event report system database

Background and objectives: The US FDA and Health Canada have successively published potential red flags for acute pancreatitis caused by sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). However, existing studies have focused on case reports. We aimed to assess the possible association of SGLT-2i with acute pancreatitis by analyzing postmarketing adverse events reported in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS), to explore risk factors for SGLT-2i-related acute pancreatitis death, and to build a nomogram. Methods and Results: We used a disproportionality analysis of suspected acute pancreatitis-related reports in the FAERS database of patients from the use of SGLT-2i from the first quarter of 2013 to the fourth quarter of 2021. Single-factor and multi-factor logistic regression analyses were performed using the relevant clinical information of patients, and risk factors were combined with the age of patients to construct a SGLT-2i risk prediction model for acute pancreatitis-related death. A total of 757 reports were retrieved. The largest number of acute pancreatitis-related cases were caused by canagliflozin (317 reports), which was also the strongest agent associated with acute pancreatitis, with the information component (IC 2.41, lower 95% one-sided confidence interval 2.16), the reporting odds ratio (ROR 5.37, 95% two-sided confidence interval 4.8-5.99), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM 5.32, lower 90% one-sided confidence interval 4.85). The median time to acute pancreatitis was 54 (interquartile range [IQR] 14-131) days, and approximately 83% of adverse events occurred within 6 months. Odds ratio(OR) adjusted by acute pancreatitis and the coadministration of SGLT-2i with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), glucagon-like peptide 1 analog (GLP-1RA), and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEIs) was 1.39, 1.97, and 1.34, respectively, all of which were statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis showed that different SGLT-2i type and their combinations with statins were independent risk factors for acute pancreatitis mortality in the patients (p < 0.05). The mortality risk prediction model showed good discrimination and clinical applicability in both the training set (AUC 0.708) and the validation set (AUC 0.732). Conclusion: SGLT-2i may increase the risk of acute pancreatitis especially within the first 6 months of drug administration. Combination with DPP-4i, GLP-1RA or ACEIs significantly increases the risk of acute pancreatitis. In addition, different SGLT-2i type and their combination with statins are risk factors that can predict the risk of death following acute pancreatitis.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Were Associated With Reduced Pseudocysts in Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a systemic inflammatory disorder with a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms that can range from mild to severe. Previous preclinical study results suggest that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can inhibit exocrine pancreatic secretion and exert anti-inflammatory properties, which might in turn improve the outcome of AP.

Aim: We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study to investigate the potential effects of PPIs on the mortality, and total duration of hospital stay and local complication occurrence of patients with AP.

Methods: A total of 858 patients with AP were included. All patients presented to the hospital within 48 h of symptom onset and were divided into the following two groups: patients who were treated with PPIs (n = 684) and those not treated with PPIs (n = 174). We used propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to reduce confounding bias before comparing the outcomes between the two groups.

Results: Before PSM analysis, there were significant differences in a number of parameters between the two groups, including age, sex, hematocrit, blood urea nitrogen, peritonitis signs, Ranson’s score, and Acute Physiology Chronic Health Evaluation II score and organ failure occurrence. Before PSM, the PPIs group had a higher rate of mortality than the control group [RR = 1.065; 95% confidence ratio (CI) 1.045–1.086; p = 0.001]. After PSM, there was no significant difference in mortality (RR = 1.009; 95% CI, 0.999–1.019; p = 0.554) or total hospital stay (p = 0.856), although the PPIs group had a lower occurrence of pancreatic pseudocyst (RR = 0.416; 95% CI 0.221–0.780; p = 0.005).

Conclusion: This study showed that PPIs therapy was not associated with reduced mortality or total hospital stay, but was associated with a reduction in the occurrence of pseudocysts in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Effectiveness and safety of proton pump inhibitors for treating acute pancreatitis: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have showed that anti-acid therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can inhibit pancreatic secretion and it may be used in treating acute pancreatitis (AP). But at present, there is no systematic reviews for the evidence and the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of anti-acid therapy with PPIs in AP were not unclear. Therefore, we will undertake a systematic review of the literature to summarize previous evidence regarding this topic, in order to clarify the effectiveness and safety of anti-acid therapy with PPIs in AP.

METHODS

We will search the EMBASE, WANFANG DATA, Web of Knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library from inception to June 30,2021 to retrieve relevant studies using the search strategy: ("Proton pump inhibitors" OR "PPI" OR "PPIs" OR "Omeprazole" OR "Tenatoprazole" OR "Pantoprazole" OR "acid suppression therapy" OR "acid suppression drugs") AND ("pancreatitis" OR "pancreatitides"). Two authors independently judged study eligibility and extracted data. Heterogeneity will be examined by computing the Q statistic and I2 statistic.

RESULTS

This study assessed the efficiency and safety of proton pump inhibitors for treating acute pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will provide reliable evidence-based evidence for the clinical application of PPIs for treating AP.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is unnecessary as this protocol is only for systematic review and does not involve privacy data. The findings of this study will be disseminated electronically through a peer-review publication or presented at a relevant conference.

Preventive and therapeutic significance of octreotide combined with lansoprazole on post-ERCP pancreatitis and its effect on serum amylase, inflammatory factors and immune function

The study aimed to investigate the preventive and therapeutic significance of octreotide combined with lansoprazole on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) and its effects on serum amylase (AMS), inflammatory factors and immune function. A total of 132 patients who underwent ERCP in Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing, China) were enrolled in the study and allocated into two groups: The study group (octreotide plus lansoprazole, 68 cases) and the control group (octreotide alone, 64 cases). The incidence of PEP and post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (PEH), the concentrations of serum AMS, interleukin-17 (IL-17) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), as well as the T-lymphocyte population in peripheral blood were detected. The AMS levels in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 6 and 24 h after treatment (P<0.001). The incidence of PEP and PEH, symptom disappearance time and hospital stay in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group after treatment (P<0.05). The levels of IL-17 and TNF-α in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group after treatment (all P<0.05). The percentage of CD3⁺, CD4⁺, CD8⁺ cells and the ratio of CD4⁺/CD8⁺ in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group after treatment (all P<0.05). The results indicated that octreotide combined with lansoprazole reduces AMS levels and the incidence of PEP, alleviates inflammation and improves the immune function.

Acid suppression therapy, gastrointestinal bleeding and infection in acute pancreatitis - An international cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acid suppressing drugs (ASD) are generally used in acute pancreatitis (AP); however, large cohorts are not available to understand their efficiency and safety. Therefore, our aims were to evaluate the association between the administration of ASDs, the outcome of AP, the frequency of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and GI infection in patients with AP.

METHODS

We initiated an international survey and performed retrospective data analysis on AP patients hospitalized between January 2013 and December 2018.

RESULTS

Data of 17,422 adult patients with AP were collected from 59 centers of 23 countries. We found that 23.3% of patients received ASDs before and 86.6% during the course of AP. ASDs were prescribed to 57.6% of patients at discharge. ASD administration was associated with more severe AP and higher mortality. GI bleeding was reported in 4.7% of patients, and it was associated with pancreatitis severity, mortality and ASD therapy. Stool culture test was performed in 6.3% of the patients with 28.4% positive results. Clostridium difficile was the cause of GI infection in 60.5% of cases. Among the patients with GI infections, 28.9% received ASDs, whereas 24.1% were without any acid suppression treatment. GI infection was associated with more severe pancreatitis and higher mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ASD therapy is widely used, it is unlikely to have beneficial effects either on the outcome of AP or on the prevention of GI bleeding during AP. Therefore, ASD therapy should be substantially decreased in the therapeutic management of AP.

A Retrospective Clinical Investigation of the Safety and Adverse Effects of Pantoprazole in Hospitalized Ruminants

Clinical safety data for the use of gastroprotectants in hospitalized ruminants is lacking. In human patients, multiple adverse effects are possible from the use of pantoprazole including hematologic and electrolyte abnormalities as well as anaphylaxis and edema. The medical records of all hospitalized cattle, goats, and sheep administered pantoprazole over an ~5-year period were retrospectively analyzed for adverse effects. Seventy-nine eligible patients were observed. Hypomagnesemia was observed after pantoprazole administration in 10 cattle; however, no significant changes were noted when compared to baseline before pantoprazole administration. Significant changes were noted in serum indicators of hepatic and renal function; however, these represented downward trends that were most likely clinically insignificant. Anaphylaxis after pantoprazole administration was not observed; however, seven cattle displayed edema after pantoprazole administration. Veterinary clinicians should be aware of the potential for hypomagnesemia in hospitalized ruminants being administered pantoprazole and monitor patients accordingly. While these preliminary retrospective results indicate that pantoprazole may be a safe adjunctive therapy in hospitalized ruminants, additional studies are necessary to further determine the safety and toxicity of pantoprazole in ruminants.

ACVIM consensus statement: Support for rational administration of gastrointestinal protectants to dogs and cats

The gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal barrier is continuously exposed to noxious toxins, reactive oxygen species, microbes, and drugs, leading to the development of inflammatory, erosive, and ultimately ulcerative lesions. This report offers a consensus opinion on the rational administration of GI protectants to dogs and cats, with an emphasis on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine type-2 receptor antagonists (H2 RAs), misoprostol, and sucralfate. These medications decrease gastric acidity or promote mucosal protective mechanisms, transforming the management of dyspepsia, peptic ulceration, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. In contrast to guidelines that have been established in people for the optimal treatment of gastroduodenal ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux disease, effective clinical dosages of antisecretory drugs have not been well established in the dog and cat to date. Similar to the situation in human medicine, practice of inappropriate prescription of acid suppressants is also commonplace in veterinary medicine. This report challenges the dogma and clinical practice of administering GI protectants for the routine management of gastritis, pancreatitis, hepatic disease, and renal disease in dogs and cats lacking additional risk factors for ulceration or concerns for GI bleeding. Judicious use of acid suppressants is warranted considering recent studies that have documented adverse effects of long-term supplementation of PPIs in people and animals.

Effects of Ischemic and Proton Pump Inhibitors Preconditioning on Oxidative Stress of Isolated Rat Heart

Aim of present study was to determine the participation of various biomarkers of oxidative damage: nitrite (NO2 −), superoxide anion radicals (O2 −), index of lipid peroxidation (TBARS) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in coronary circulation after application of the different models of preconditioning such as ischemic and preconditioning with proton pump inhibitors.

Examining a biochemical markers of oxidative damage we did not notice any increased production values of any parameter, according to that we can hypothesize that possible occurrence of reperfusion injury after ischemia and PPIs preconditioning is not mediated by this mechanism.

Due to the very difficult and controversial application of ischemic preconditioning in clinical practice, the results of this study suggest that in the future proton pump inhibitors can contribute to the prevention of myocardial damage following ischemia

Effective and safe proton pump inhibitor therapy in acid-related diseases - A position paper addressing benefits and potential harms of acid suppression

BACKGROUND

The introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical practice has revolutionized the management of acid-related diseases. Studies in primary care and emergency settings suggest that PPIs are frequently prescribed for inappropriate indications or for indications where their use offers little benefit. Inappropriate PPI use is a matter of great concern, especially in the elderly, who are often affected by multiple comorbidities and are taking multiple medications, and are thus at an increased risk of long-term PPI-related adverse outcomes as well as drug-to-drug interactions. Herein, we aim to review the current literature on PPI use and develop a position paper addressing the benefits and potential harms of acid suppression with the purpose of providing evidence-based guidelines on the appropriate use of these medications.

METHODS

The topics, identified by a Scientific Committee, were assigned to experts selected by three Italian Scientific Societies, who independently performed a systematic search of the relevant literature using Medline/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases. Search outputs were distilled, paying more attention to systematic reviews and meta-analyses (where available) representing the best evidence. The draft prepared on each topic was circulated amongst all the members of the Scientific Committee. Each expert then provided her/his input to the writing, suggesting changes and the inclusion of new material and/or additional relevant references. The global recommendations were then thoroughly discussed in a specific meeting, refined with regard to both content and wording, and approved to obtain a summary of current evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-five years after their introduction into clinical practice, PPIs remain the mainstay of the treatment of acid-related diseases, where their use in gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, Helicobacter pylori infection, peptic ulcer disease and bleeding as well as, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is appropriate. Prevention of gastroduodenal mucosal lesions (and symptoms) in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or antiplatelet therapies and carrying gastrointestinal risk factors also represents an appropriate indication. On the contrary, steroid use does not need any gastroprotection, unless combined with NSAID therapy. In dyspeptic patients with persisting symptoms, despite successful H. pylori eradication, short-term PPI treatment could be attempted. Finally, addition of PPIs to pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with refractory steatorrhea may be worthwhile.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, PPIs are irreplaceable drugs in the management of acid-related diseases. However, PPI treatment, as any kind of drug therapy, is not without risk of adverse effects. The overall benefits of therapy and improvement in quality of life significantly outweigh potential harms in most patients, but those without clear clinical indication are only exposed to the risks of PPI prescription. Adhering with evidence-based guidelines represents the only rational approach to effective and safe PPI therapy. Please see related Commentary: doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0724-1 .

Therapeutic implications of innate immune system in acute pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disorder of the pancreas encompassing a cascade of cellular and molecular events. It starts from premature activation of zymogens with the involvement of innate immune system to a potential systemic inflammatory response and multiple organ failure. Leukocytes are the major cell population that participate in the propagation of the disease. Current understanding of the course of AP is still far from complete, limiting treatment options mostly to conservative supportive care. Emerging evidence has pointed to modulation of the immune system for strategic therapeutic development, by mitigating the inflammatory response and severity of AP. In the current review, we have focused on the role of innate immunity in the condition and highlighted therapeutics targeting it for treatment of this challenging disease.

AREAS COVERED

The current review has aimed to elaborate in-depth understanding of specific roles of innate immune cells, derived mediators and inflammatory pathways that are involved in AP. Summarizing the recent therapeutics and approaches applied experimentally that target immune responses to attenuate AP.

EXPERT OPINION

The current state of knowledge on AP, limitations of presently available therapeutic approaches and the promise of therapeutic implications of innate immune system in AP are discussed.

Management of acute pancreatitis in dogs: a critical appraisal with focus on feeding and analgesia

Knowledge about acute pancreatitis has increased recently in both the medical and veterinary fields. Despite this expansion of knowledge, there are very few studies on treatment interventions in naturally occurring disease in dogs. As a result, treatment recommendations are largely extrapolated from experimental rodent models or general critical care principles. General treatment principles involve replacing fluid losses, maintaining hydrostatic pressure, controlling nausea and providing pain relief. Specific interventions recently advocated in human medicine include the use of neurokinin-1 antagonists for analgesia and early interventional feeding. The premise for early feeding is to improve the health of the intestinal tract, as unhealthy enterocytes are thought to perpetuate systemic inflammation. The evidence for early interventional feeding is not supported by robust clinical trials to date, but in humans there is evidence that it reduces hospitalisation time and in dogs it is well tolerated. This article summarises the major areas of management of acute pancreatitis in dogs and examines the level of evidence for each recommendation.

Effects of proton pump inhibitor on outcomes of patients with severe acute pancreatitis based on a national administrative database

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) affect the outcomes of patients with severe acute pancreatitis based on a national administrative database.

METHODS

A total of 10,400 patients with severe acute pancreatitis were referred to 1021 hospitals between 2010 and 2012 in Japan. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who used PPIs (n = 3879) and those without PPIs (n = 6521). We collected patients' data from the administrative database to compare in-hospital mortality within 7, 14, and 28 days, and overall in-hospital mortality between groups, using propensity score analysis to adjust for treatment selection bias.

RESULTS

Multiple logistic regression showed that use of PPIs did not affect in-hospital mortality within 7 and 14 days. The odds ratio (OR) for mortality within 7 days was 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-1.42, p = 0.236) while that within 14 days was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.89-1.35, p = 0.349). No significant association was observed for in-hospital mortality within 28 days and overall in-hospital mortality (OR for within 28 days: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.92-1.37, p = 0.224; OR for overall in-hospital mortality: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.97-1.87, p = 0.065).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that use of PPIs does not affect clinical outcomes of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Prospective or randomized studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of PPIs on outcomes of patients with severe acute pancreatitis in the future.

Inflammatory profiling of early experimental necrotizing pancreatitis

AIMS

Inflammatory mediators play a pivotal role in severe necrotizing pancreatitis (SNP). Therapeutic approaches aim at the early inflammatory liberation of cytokines to avoid systemic complications. The present study evaluates the kinetics of inflammatory mediator release in SNP.

MAIN METHODS

Experimental SNP was induced in male Wistar rats using the GDOC model. The animals were allocated into seven groups (n = 6/group). In group 1, sample harvesting was performed after sham operation while in groups 2-7 this was performed 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 9 h, and 12 h after initiation of SNP, respectively. Inflammatory mediator release,morphologic injury, and tissue MPO concentrations were evaluated between 1 and 12 h after induction.

KEY FINDINGS

Pancreatic injury showed a continuous increase over the observation period (p b 0.05, respectively). MPO levels in the pancreas and lungs increased until 12 h after induction (p b 0.05, respectively). Antiinflammatory IL-10 showed an early peak and the pro-inflammatory mediators TNFα and IL-1β peaked after 6 and 9 h, respectively (p b 0.05, respectively). HMGB1 levels constantly increased over time (p b 0.05, respectively).

SIGNIFICANCE

The present study shows the release of relevant pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators in SNP for the first time in one single experimental setup. Inflammatory mediators peak within the first few hours after SNP induction. Consequently, the effect of therapeutic approaches on early changes in cytokine release should be evaluated later than 2 h after initiation.

Pharmacological cholinergic stimulation as a therapeutic tool in experimental necrotizing pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

The endogenous immune response is influenced by the stimulation of the vagal nerve. Stimulation or ablation has a direct impact on the release of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators. In the progression of acute pancreatitis from local to systemic disease, these mediators play a pivotal role. This study evaluates the effect of pharmacologic stimulation of the cholinergic system on pancreatic damage in experimental necrotizing pancreatitis.

METHODS

Experimental severe necrotizing pancreatitis was induced in male Wistar rats using the glycodeoxycholic acid model. Animals with acute pancreatitis (n = 6) were compared with animals with acute pancreatitis and prophylactic or therapeutic pharmacologic activation of the cholinergic system using nicotine, physostigmine, or neostigmine (n = 36). Twelve hours after the induction of acute pancreatitis, morphological damage as well as the myeloperoxidase levels of the pancreas and the serum levels of high-mobility group box 1 protein were evaluated.

RESULTS

Prophylactic and delayed therapeutic application of nicotine, physostigmine, or neostigmine significantly attenuated the severity of acute pancreatitis 12 hours after the induction of severe necrotizing pancreatitis compared with untreated controls as evaluated with histological scores, myeloperoxidase, and high-mobility group box 1 levels (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Stimulation of the cholinergic system is useful to attenuate damage in experimental acute pancreatitis. Not only prophylactic but also delayed application was effective in the present study.

Pancreatitis in cats

Pancreatitis was considered a rare disease in the cat until a couple of decades ago when several retrospective studies of severe acute pancreatitis were published. It was apparent that few of the diagnostic tests of value in the dog were helpful in cats. With increasing clinical suspicion, availability of abdominal ultrasonography, and introduction of pancreas-specific blood tests of increasing utility, it is now accepted that acute pancreatitis is probably almost as common in cats as it is in dogs, although the etiology(s) remain more obscure. Pancreatitis in cats often co-exists with inflammatory bowel disease, less commonly with cholangitis, and sometimes with both. Additionally, pancreatitis may trigger hepatic lipidosis, while other diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, may be complicated by pancreatitis. Therapy is similar to that used in dogs, with added emphasis on early nutritional support to prevent hepatic lipidosis. Less is known about chronic pancreatitis than the acute form, but chronic pancreatitis is more common in cats than it is in dogs and may respond positively to treatment with corticosteroids.

Antioxidant therapy in acute pancreatitis: experimental and clinical evidence

SIGNIFICANCE

Oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathogenesis of both acute and chronic pancreatitis. Although its impact is well investigated and has been studied clinically in chronic pancreatitis, it is less well defined for acute pancreatitis.

RECENT ADVANCES

Pathophysiological aspects of oxidative stress in acute pancreatitis have shown that reactive oxidative species (ROS) participate in the inflammatory cascade, and mediate inflammatory cell adhesion and consecutive tissue damage. Furthermore, ROS are involved in the generation of pain as another important clinical feature of patients suffering from acute pancreatitis.

CRITICAL ISSUES

Despite sufficient basic and experimental knowledge and evidence, the step from bench to bedside has not been successfully performed. Only a limited number of clinical studies are available that can give convincing evidence for the use of antioxidants in the clinical setting of acute pancreatitis.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future studies are required to evaluate potential benefits of antioxidative substances to attenuate the severity of acute pancreatitis. Special focus should be put on the aspect of pain generation and the progression from mild to severe acute pancreatitis in the clinical setting.