Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health and Health Care

Racial/ethnic disparities on resource utilization and outcomes for patients undergoing spine surgery: A NSQIP analysis of 402,765 patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of race/ethnicity on postoperative adverse events (AEs), prolonged length of stay (LOS), non-routine discharge (NRD), and unplanned readmission in spine surgery patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016-2023 ACS NSQIP database. Adults receiving spine surgery for trauma, degenerative disease, tumor, and infectious causes were identified using CPT codes and stratified based on race/ethnicity. The primary categories included Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic patients. Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, postoperative AEs, and healthcare resource utilization were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify predictors of AEs, prolonged LOS, NRD, and unplanned admission.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 402,765 patients, postoperative outcomes displayed significant ethnic disparities in AEs, with the highest in Non-Hispanic Blacks (p < 0.001). Similarly, Non-Hispanic Blacks had prolonged operation times and increased rates of unplanned readmissions and reoperations (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed Non-Hispanic Blacks had an increased risk for extended LOS (aOR: 1.83, 95 % CI: 1.78-1.88, p < 0.001) and AEs (aOR: 1.10, 95 % CI: 1.06-1.15, p < 0.001). Non-Hispanic Blacks (aOR: 1.84, 95 % CI: 1.78-1.90, p < 0.001), Non-Hispanic Asians (aOR: 1.14, 95 % CI: 1.07-1.21, p < 0.001), and Hispanics (aOR: 1.48, 95 % CI: 1.43-1.54, p < 0.001) had higher odds of NRD. For unplanned readmissions, Non-Hispanic Blacks (aOR: 1.13, 95 % CI: 1.08-1.19, p < 0.001) had increased odds, while Non-Hispanic Asians showed decreased odds (aOR: 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.72-0.90, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates prominent racial/ethnic disparities in postoperative outcomes among spine surgery patients, with particularly elevated risks observed in Non-Hispanic Black individuals.

Disparities in Access to, Use of, and Quality of Rehabilitation After Stroke in the United States: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

To summarize current reports in the literature on disparities in rehabilitation after stroke; identify gaps in our understanding of rehabilitation disparities; and make recommendations for future research.

DATA SOURCES

A health sciences librarian developed a search string based on an a priori protocol and searched Medline (Ovid) Embase (Elsevier), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL and EBSCO).

STUDY SELECTION

A 2-step screening process of titles and abstracts followed by full-text review was conducted. Primary observational studies conducted in the United States that reported on disparities in rehabilitation (ie, physical, occupational, or speech therapy) among adults after stroke were retained. Eligible disparity populations included racial minorities; ethnic minorities; sex and gender minorities; older populations; socioeconomically disadvantaged populations; and geographic minorities (inner city/rural).

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extracted from retained articles included: aims/objectives; data source; sample characteristics, rehabilitation outcomes examined; types of disparities examined; statistical methods used; and disparity findings.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Seven thousand eight hundred fifty-three titles and abstracts were screened, and 473 articles underwent full-text review. Forty-nine articles were included for data extraction and analysis. Many articles examined more than 1 disparity type with most examining disparities in race and/or ethnicity (n=43, 87.7%), followed by sex (n=25, 53.0%), age (n=23, 46.9%), socioeconomic status (n=22, 44.9%), and urban/rural status (n=8, 16.3%). Articles varied widely by sample characteristics, data sources, rehabilitation outcomes, and methods of examining disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we found some consistent evidence of disparities in rehabilitation for older individuals, non-White races, and individuals of lower socioeconomic status, the variability in methods made the synthesis of findings challenging. Further work, including additional well-designed studies and systematic reviews, and/or meta-analyses of current studies, is needed to better understand the extent of rehabilitation disparities after stroke.

The effectiveness of emergency medicine follow-up in attaining closed loop communication and downstream follow-up

BACKGROUND

Utilization of different Electronic Health Records (EHR) impedes communication between Emergency Medicine (EM) and Primary Care Provider (PCP) necessitating study on EM's effectiveness in enabling continuity of care following patient discharge. This study's objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of an EM-based follow-up program using secure email for closed-loop communication and follow-up of incidental findings (IF) after EM discharge.

METHODS

Retrospective study of IFs from two Emergency Departments (ED) and one urgent care between 9/1/20-8/30/21. Preceding day IFs were identified by an EM Quality Assurance (QA) team who then notified the patient's PCP via email. Automated rules-based natural language processing (NLP) of emails linking data to EHRs. Chart reviewing of outcomes included whether closed loop communication was established (via a PCP reply acknowledging IF receipt) and whether follow-up care occurred within 12 months. Multivariate logistic regression models examined factors associated with each outcome.

RESULTS

Of 1781 IF notifications, 62 % were female, 77 % white, and 91 % English speaking. PCP replied to 39.1 %; 64.9 % were ultimately followed-up. Patient and IF characteristics were not associated with PCP reply. PCP tenure and EM/PCP EHR system concordance were associated with higher adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) of PCP reply (aOR 1.05 [1.04-1.07] vs 2.6 [2.0-3.3]). Laboratory IFs were followed-up more than imaging IFs (aOR 1.94 [1.46-2.6]). EM/PCP Use of same EHR was associated with higher odds of some form of follow-up (aOR: 2.1 [1.7-2.7]).

CONCLUSIONS

While email notifications and using the same EHR improve continuity of care, they are insufficient on their own. More comprehensive solutions are needed to enable EM-PCP communication and patient follow-up.

Healthcare disparities in adult and pediatric spinal deformity: a state of the art review

PURPOSE

A health disparity refers to a greater disease burden or negative health outcomes influenced by social, economic, and environmental factors. Numerous studies in the surgical literature show that social drivers of health affect health outcomes. Similar disparities may affect treatment and outcomes of spine deformity patients. This study aims to review existing literature on healthcare disparities in patients with spinal deformities.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of articles from 1/2002 to 7/2024 in two databases included keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms: "health disparities," "scoliosis," "social determinant of health," "disparities," "spine deformity," and "race". The 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria were U.S.-based, English-language, peer-reviewed research covering all age groups. Exclusion criteria excluded studies unrelated to spinal deformity and case reports.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 22 potential articles investigating health care disparities in spinal deformity patients. Black patients were noted to present with disease progression compared to White patients. Females have a longer length of stay (LOS) than males. The Black and Hispanic patients had longer LOS than Whites. The privately insured patients were more likely to receive timely care than Medicaid recipients.

CONCLUSION

The consensus across much of the literature reviewed indicate that surgeon volume, hospital volume, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance status impact patient outcomes in adult and pediatric spinal deformity. Prospective studies and solutions to address these disparities are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Cancer Treatment Referrals in Patients Living with HIV in the United States: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

This narrative review aims to identify and explore the social determinants that prevent people living with HIV (PWH) from accessing specialized cancer centers in the United States and compare to patient experiences in other countries.

METHODS

The review includes randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, qualitative studies, case series, and non-peer reviewed articles. The risk of bias was assessed using standardized tools, and data were synthesized narratively due to the heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes.

RESULTS

Our findings highlight that PWH in the U.S. typically depend on public insurance or programs such as the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHP), which offer better cancer care outcomes but are limited by income restrictions. Integrated health systems, such as Veterans Affairs (VA) centers, have successful cancer screening programs but limited accessibility. Limited health literacy among PWH is associated with poor clinical knowledge, misinterpretation of treatment outcomes, and underreporting of medical conditions. Although higher health literacy improves screening rates, its impact on referrals to specialized cancer centers is unclear. Racial and ethnic disparities result in lower screening rates and fewer referrals to specialized care, with Hispanic, Asian, and Black patients facing barriers like distrust in healthcare, cultural factors, and insurance status. HIV stigma further leads to healthcare avoidance and delayed interventions.

CONCLUSION

The review addresses systemic barriers including healthcare access, health literacy, racial, and ethnic disparities, and cultural stigma and highlights solutions to improve cancer treatment referrals among PWH. Recommendations include improving access to integrated health centers and developing culturally competent interventions to enhance referrals to advanced cancer care for PWH.

Prenatal and Postpartum Care Experiences Among Black Birthing People in the United States: An Integrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Among Black birthing people, high-quality, respectful care throughout pregnancy and postpartum is hindered by distrust, racial discrimination, and unsatisfactory care. The purpose of this integrative review was to examine prenatal and postpartum care experiences among Black birthing people in the United States.

METHODS

A literature search, spanning from inception through October 6, 2022, across 4 research databases, used a combination of keywords to capture reports on care experiences among Black birthing people. We included quantitative and qualitative studies in the United States with people who self-identified as Black or African American and reported prenatal or postpartum health care experiences. Intrapartum experiences were excluded. All studies were evaluated with the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool, National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment tool, or Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Data were analyzed and synthesized using the Joanna Briggs Institute convergent integrated approach to incorporate quantitative and qualitative research.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies published over 27 years met the inclusion criteria. All studies examined the health care experiences of Black birthing people during prenatal or postpartum care. None of the studies focused solely on postpartum care experiences. The 2 most prominent themes were models of care and patient-provider interactions, encompassing both positive and negative experiences. Positive care experiences included collaborative patient-provider interactions, continuity of care, and culturally centered care. Adverse experiences were more frequently noted and involved discriminatory treatment during patient-provider interactions, fragmented care models, and a lack of cultural awareness.

DISCUSSION

Black birthing people in the United States report some positive but more negative health care experiences during pregnancy and postpartum care, which may play an important role in health inequities. Promoting prenatal and postpartum care models that provide continuity and are high-quality, collaborative, and culturally centered were identified as high-priority targets to foster patient safety and improve clinical outcomes.

Chorioamnionitis, Cesarean Deliveries, and Racial Disparities in the USA

BACKGROUND

Studies showed disparities in management and outcomes of African American when compared to Caucasian population. The presence of chorioamnionitis may affect the decision to have a cesarean delivery (CD); however, it is not known if such a decision is affected by the mothers' race/ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the interaction between African American race/ethnicity and CD in women with chorioamnionitis.

METHODS

Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample dataset, we examined the association of CD with chorioamnionitis in the overall population and within Caucasian and African American. Logistic regression models were used to control for confounders.

RESULTS

The study included 6,648,883 women who delivered 6,925,920 infants. The prevalence of chorioamnionitis was 0.78 and 1.1 in Caucasian and African American, respectively. CD with and without chorioamnionitis was 41.2% and 32.4%, respectively (aOR 1.46 (1.43-1.49), p < 0.001), in Caucasian population and 45.0% and 36.6% in African American population aOR 1.42 (1.37-1.47), p < 0.001. African American population had significantly higher CD after controlling for chorioamnionitis and other confounding variables (aOR of 1.18 (1.17-1.18), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Chorioamnionitis is associated with increased rate of CD. Ethnic disparities exist in CD rates regardless of the chorioamnionitis status. Such findings warrant further investigation to explore factors associated with this discrepancy.

DNA methylation of transposons pattern aging differences across a diverse cohort of dogs from the Dog Aging Project

Within a species, larger individuals often have shorter lives and higher rates of age-related disease. Despite this well-known link, we still know little about underlying age-related epigenetic differences, which could help us better understand inter-individual variation in aging and the etiology, onset, and progression of age-associated disease. Dogs exhibit this negative correlation between size, health, and longevity and thus represent an excellent system in which to test the underlying mechanisms. Here, we quantified genome-wide DNA methylation in a cohort of 864 dogs in the Dog Aging Project. Age strongly patterned the dog epigenome, with the majority (66% of age-associated loci) of regions associating age-related loss of methylation. These age effects were non-randomly distributed in the genome and differed depending on genomic context. We found the LINE1 (long interspersed elements) class of TEs (transposable elements) were the most frequently hypomethylated with age (FDR < 0.05, 40% of all LINE1 regions). This LINE1 pattern differed in magnitude across breeds of different sizes- the largest dogs lost 0.26% more LINE1 methylation per year than the smallest dogs. This suggests that epigenetic regulation of TEs, particularly LINE1s, may contribute to accelerated age and disease phenotypes within a species. Since our study focused on the methylome of immune cells, we looked at LINE1 methylation changes in golden retrievers, a breed highly susceptible to hematopoietic cancers, and found they have accelerated age-related LINE1 hypomethylation compared to other breeds. We also found many of the LINE1s hypomethylated with age are located on the X chromosome and are, when considering X chromosome inactivation, counter-intuitively more methylated in males. These results have revealed the demethylation of LINE1 transposons as a potential driver of intra-species, demographic-dependent aging variation.

Healthcare providers' psychological investment in clinical recommendations: Investigating the role of implicit racial attitudes

Racial disparities in clinical recommendations can result in racial disparities in health. While healthcare providers' implicit racial attitudes (affective component of bias) are theorized to be one major factor contributing to racial disparities in clinical recommendations, empirical evidence to support the link is lacking. This study aimed to bridge this gap by moving beyond the standard approach of operationalizing the quality of clinical recommendations as a guideline-consistent vs. -inconsistent dichotomy. The present secondary study examined the role of provider implicit racial attitudes in the quality of clinical recommendations, operationalized as behaviors reflecting providers' psychological investment in patient care (i.e., number of words used to describe clinical recommendations, and number of treatment options recommended). Two-hundred-and-ten White medical trainees reviewed a clinical vignette of either a White or Black male patient and provided clinical recommendations. Their implicit racial attitudes were evaluated using the Implicit Association Test. Participants with more biased implicit racial attitudes (i.e., stronger implicit preference for White vs. Black individuals) used fewer words to describe their clinical recommendations and provided fewer clinical recommendations for the Black (vs. White) patient, while there were no significant differences between Black and White patients among participants with less biased implicit racial attitudes. These results illustrate the insidious impact of implicit racial attitudes in healthcare provision and underscore the need for researchers to consider the complex, nuanced ways in which provider implicit racial attitudes might manifest in clinical decision-making.

Racial disparities in early postoperative proximal humerus fracture outcomes: Do minorities face longer operative times, extended hospital stays, and higher risks?

Background

Racial disparities in orthopedic surgery outcomes have been extensively documented, highlighting systemic biases in care. Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), about 6% of all fractures, are rising, especially among the elderly. Despite the prevalence of PHFs, a research gap exists regarding racial disparities in postoperative complications and outcomes.

Methods

Data from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database from 2006 to 2021 were analyzed, including 41,285 patients with PHFs. CPT and ICD codes guided inclusion and exclusion criteria. Propensity-score matching balanced a cohort of 17,052 patients. Demographic variables, comorbidities, and outcomes were analyzed using univariate statistics, chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact tests.

Results

Post propensity-score matching, significant demographic disparities emerged between white and minority patients. Minority patients had longer operative times (p < .001) and hospital stays (p = .001) than white patients. Minority patients also exhibited higher rates of mortality (p = .04) and unplanned re-intubation (p = .04).

Conclusion

This study revealed significant racial disparities in early postoperative outcomes for PHFs. Despite surgical advancements, minorities have prolonged operative times, extended hospital stays, and heightened risks of adverse events. Action is needed to ensure healthcare equity and justice and to address disparities in PHF surgical management across diverse demographics.

Level of evidence

III.

Automatic Enrollment in Patient Portal Systems Mitigates the Digital Divide in Healthcare: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis of an Autoenrollment Workflow Intervention

PURPOSE

Racial and ethnic healthcare disparities require innovative solutions. Patient portals enable online access to health records and clinician communication and are associated with improved health outcomes. Nevertheless, a digital divide in access to such portals persist, especially among people of minoritized race and non-English-speakers. This study assesses the impact of automatic enrollment (autoenrollment) on patient portal activation rates among adult patients at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), with a focus on disparities by race, ethnicity, and primary language.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Starting March 2020, autoenrollment offers for patient portals were sent to UCSF adult patients aged 18 or older via text message. Analysis considered patient portal activation before and after the intervention, examining variations by race, ethnicity, and primary language. Descriptive statistics and an interrupted time series analysis were used to assess the intervention's impact.

RESULTS

Autoenrollment increased patient portal activation rates among all adult patients and patients of minoritized races saw greater increases in activation rates than White patients. While initially not statistically significant, by the end of the surveillance period, we observed statistically significant increases in activation rates in Latinx (3.5-fold, p = < 0.001), Black (3.2-fold, p = 0.003), and Asian (3.1-fold, p = 0.002) patient populations when compared with White patients. Increased activation rates over time in patients with a preferred language other than English (13-fold) were also statistically significant (p = < 0.001) when compared with the increase in English preferred language patients.

CONCLUSION

An organization-based workflow intervention that provided autoenrollment in patient portals via text message was associated with statistically significant mitigation of racial, ethnic, and language-based disparities in patient portal activation rates. Although promising, the autoenrollment intervention did not eliminate disparities in portal enrollment. More work must be done to close the digital divide in access to healthcare technology.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Speech-Language Pathology Utilization for Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Acute Care

PURPOSE

Disparities in health care utilization are modifiable drivers of disparities in health outcomes but have not been explored regarding speech-language pathology utilization for patients with dysphagia. This study explores racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization of speech-language pathology services among adult patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia during acute care hospitalizations.

METHOD

We analyzed New York State Inpatient Data on acute care hospitalizations in 2019. We identified adults with a diagnosis of oropharyngeal dysphagia and determined whether they received speech-language pathology services via revenue center codes, which indicate receipt of a speech-language pathology evaluation or treatment. Using generalized estimating equations, we estimated the effect of race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, and Other race) on speech-language pathology utilization (yes, no) during the acute care hospitalization, controlling for patient clinical characteristics (e.g., acute diagnoses and clinical comorbidities), demographic characteristics (e.g., insurance status, rural-urban status), and health system factors (e.g., hospital size). Subgroup analyses were conducted for select primary diagnoses (i.e., stroke, sepsis, and aspiration pneumonia).

RESULTS

We identified 56,198 individuals with a diagnosis of oropharyngeal dysphagia; 60.7% received speech-language pathology services. In the full sample analysis, the adjusted odds of speech-language pathology utilization were lower in Black relative to White individuals (odds ratio [OR] = 0.87 [0.76, 0.98], p = .026). Racial and ethnic disparities were present in the subgroup analyses, most notably for sepsis, where speech-language pathology utilization was significantly lower for Black, Hispanic, and Other race individuals (ORs from 0.61 to 0.77) relative to White individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

We found evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization of speech-language pathology services for patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia in the acute care setting that varied by primary diagnosis. Further research is needed to replicate these findings and to begin to understand the reasons behind these disparities.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.26791741.

Association between low cognitive performance and diabetes-related health indicators across racial and ethnic groups in adults with diabetes

AIM

To examine the associations between low cognitive performance (LCP) and diabetes-related health indicators (including body mass index [BMI], HbA1c, systolic blood pressure [SBP], low-density lipoprotein [LDL] and self-reported poor physical health) and whether these associations vary across racial/ethnic subgroups.

METHODS

We identified adults aged 60 years or older with self-reported diabetes from the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Individuals with cognitive test scores in the lowest quartile were defined as having LCP. We used regression models to measure the associations of LCP with diabetes-related biometrics (BMI, HbA1c, SBP and LDL); and self-reported poor physical health. Moreover, we explored potential variations in these associations across racial/ethnic subgroups.

RESULTS

Of 873 (261 with LCP) adults with diabetes, LCP was associated with higher HbA1c, SBP and LDL (adjusted difference: 0.41%, 5.01 mmHg and 5.08 mg/dL, respectively; P < .05), and greater odds of reporting poor physical health (adjusted odds ratio: 1.59, P < .05). The association between LCP and HbA1c was consistent across racial/ethnic groups, and notably pronounced in Hispanic and Other. BMI worsened with LCP, except for non-Hispanic Black. Excluding the Other group, elevated SBP was observed in people with LCP, with Hispanic showing the most significant association. LDL levels were elevated with LCP for Hispanic and Other. Physical health worsened with LCP for both non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic.

CONCLUSIONS

We quantified the association between LCP and diabetes-related health indicators. These associations were more pronounced in Hispanic and Other racial/ethnic groups.

Social Determinants of Health and the Use of Community-Based Rehabilitation Following Stroke: Methodologic Considerations

Social determinants are nonmedical factors frequently used to study disparities in health outcomes but have not been widely explored in regard to rehabilitation service utilization. In our National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development-funded study, Access to and Effectiveness of Community-Based Rehabilitation After Stroke, we reviewed several conceptual models and frameworks for the study of social determinants to inform our work. The overall objective of this special communication is to describe our approach to identifying, selecting, and using area-level measures of social determinants to explore the relationship between social determinants and rehabilitation use. We present our methods for developing a conceptual model and a methodologic framework for the selection of social determinant measures relevant to rehabilitation use, as well as an overview of publicly available data on social determinants. We then discuss the methodologic challenges encountered and future directions for this work.

Depressive Symptoms Affect Cognitive Functioning from Middle to Late Adulthood: Ethnoracial Minorities Experience Greater Repercussions

Cognitive deficits, a diagnostic criterion for depressive disorders, may precede or follow the development of depressive symptoms and major depressive disorder. However, an individual can report an increase in depressive symptoms without any change in cognitive functioning. While ethnoracial minority group differences exist, little is known to date about how the relationship between depressive symptoms and cognitive function may differ by ethnoracial minority status. Utilizing data from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study waves II (M2) and III (M3), this study examines the relationship between depressive symptoms and cognitive functioning concurrently and longitudinally in community-dwelling adults, as well as whether the results differed by ethnoracial minority status. Our participants included 910 adults (43.8% male, 80.8% White, 54.4 ± 11.5 years old at M2). Cross-sectionally, depressive symptoms, ethnoracial minority status, and their interaction had significant effects on cognitive function, consistent with previous investigations. Longitudinally, higher M2 depressive symptoms predicted poorer cognitive function at M3 over and above M2 cognitive functioning, but only within the ethnoracial minority sample. Our finding suggests that depressive symptoms predict cognitive functioning both concurrently and across time, and this relationship is moderated by ethnoracial identity, resulting in greater cognitive deficits among ethnoracial minority groups compared to their non-Hispanic White counterparts.

Racial, ethnic and sex disparity in acute heart failure patients with COVID-19: A nationwide analysis

Background

Patients with acute heart failure (AHF) exacerbation are susceptible to complications in the setting of COVID-19 infection. Data regarding the racial/ethnic and sex disparities in patients with AHF and COVID-19 remains limited.

Objective

We aim to evaluate the impact of race, ethnicity, and sex on the in-hospital outcomes of AHF with COVID-19 infection using the data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).

Methods

We extracted data from the NIS (2020) by using ICD-10-CM to identify all hospitalizations with a diagnosis of AHF and COVID-19 in the year 2020. The associations between sex, race/ethnicity, and outcomes were examined using a multivariable logistic regression model.

Results

We identified a total of 158,530 weighted AHF hospitalizations with COVID-19 infection in 2020. The majority were White (63.9 %), 23.3 % were Black race, and 12.8 % were of Hispanic ethnicity, mostly males (n = 84,870 [53.5 %]). After adjustment, the odds of in-hospital mortality were lowest in White females (aOR 0.83, [0.78-0.98]) and highest in Hispanic males (aOR 1.27 [1.13-1.42]) compared with White males. Overall, the odds of cardiac arrest (aOR 1.54 [1.27-1.85]) and AKI (aOR 1.36 [1.26-1.47] were higher, while odds for procedural interventions such as PCI (aOR 0.23 [0.10-0.55]), and placement on a ventilator (aOR 0.85 [0.75-0.97]) were lower among Black males in comparison to White males.

Conclusion

Male sex was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in white and black racial groups, while no such association was noted in the Hispanic group. Hispanic males had the highest odds of death compared with White males.

Assessing fairness in machine learning models: A study of racial bias using matched counterparts in mortality prediction for patients with chronic diseases

OBJECTIVE

Existing approaches to fairness evaluation often overlook systematic differences in the social determinants of health, like demographics and socioeconomics, among comparison groups, potentially leading to inaccurate or even contradictory conclusions. This study aims to evaluate racial disparities in predicting mortality among patients with chronic diseases using a fairness detection method that considers systematic differences.

METHODS

We created five datasets from Mass General Brigham's electronic health records (EHR), each focusing on a different chronic condition: congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic liver disease (CLD), and dementia. For each dataset, we developed separate machine learning models to predict 1-year mortality and examined racial disparities by comparing prediction performances between Black and White individuals. We compared racial fairness evaluation between the overall Black and White individuals versus their counterparts who were Black and matched White individuals identified by propensity score matching, where the systematic differences were mitigated.

RESULTS

We identified significant differences between Black and White individuals in age, gender, marital status, education level, smoking status, health insurance type, body mass index, and Charlson comorbidity index (p-value < 0.001). When examining matched Black and White subpopulations identified through propensity score matching, significant differences between particular covariates existed. We observed weaker significance levels in the CHF cohort for insurance type (p = 0.043), in the CKD cohort for insurance type (p = 0.005) and education level (p = 0.016), and in the dementia cohort for body mass index (p = 0.041); with no significant differences for other covariates. When examining mortality prediction models across the five study cohorts, we conducted a comparison of fairness evaluations before and after mitigating systematic differences. We revealed significant differences in the CHF cohort with p-values of 0.021 and 0.001 in terms of F1 measure and Sensitivity for the AdaBoost model, and p-values of 0.014 and 0.003 in terms of F1 measure and Sensitivity for the MLP model, respectively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study contributes to research on fairness assessment by focusing on the examination of systematic disparities and underscores the potential for revealing racial bias in machine learning models used in clinical settings.

From database to practice: the MBSAQIP in the surgical literature

BACKGROUND

The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) has been a game changer for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), with continuous improvements in safety and outcomes throughout the years of its usage. It allows in-depth evaluations of MBS procedures, presenting practitioners and researchers with unparalleled opportunities for quality assessment, research and clinical advancement.

OBJECTIVES

To offer an updated overview of MBSAQIP-related publications.

SETTING

United States.

METHODS

PubMed was queried using keywords "MBSAQIP" and "Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program." Letters to editors, duplicates, commentaries, and retracted articles were excluded. Studies that mentioned MBSAQIP but did not use the data within were also excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 400 search items were returned as of August 2023. After exclusions, 289 studies were reviewed. Articles were published in a total of 28 unique journals, the majority of which were featured in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (SOARD), with 114 articles (39.4%). Sixty-one articles were focused on creating predictive models or risk calculators, 58 on investigating the safety of procedures, and 52 on exploring complications. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were the 2 most commonly discussed procedures, at 80.3% and 80% respectively. Forty-three studies included patients who underwent robotic-assisted MBS.

CONCLUSIONS

The MBSAQIP is a valuable resource that has generated a wealth of studies in the literature. It has allowed for intense analysis of clinical issues and fostered a culture of safety and quality improvement. Participating surgeons must pledge commitment to extended follow-up periods to maximize its effectiveness.

Differences in quality of anticoagulation care delivery according to ethnoracial group in the United States: A scoping review

Anticoagulation therapy is standard for conditions like atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and valvular heart disease, yet it is unclear if there are ethnoracial disparities in its quality and delivery in the United States. For this scoping review, electronic databases were searched for publications between January 1, 2011 - March 30, 2022. Eligible studies included all study designs, any setting within the United States, patients prescribed anticoagulation for any indication, outcomes reported for ≥ 2 distinct ethnoracial groups. The following four research questions were explored: Do ethnoracial differences exist in 1) access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy, 2) quality of anticoagulation therapy management, 3) clinical outcomes related to anticoagulation care, 4) humanistic/educational outcomes related to anticoagulation therapy. A total of 5374 studies were screened, 570 studies received full-text review, and 96 studies were analyzed. The largest mapped focus was patients' access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy (88/96 articles, 91.7%). Seventy-eight articles made statistical outcomes comparisons among ethnoracial groups. Across all four research questions, 79 articles demonstrated favorable outcomes for White patients compared to non-White patients, 38 articles showed no difference between White and non-White groups, and 8 favored non-White groups (the total exceeds the 78 articles with statistical outcomes as many articles reported multiple outcomes). Disparities disadvantaging non-White patients were most pronounced in access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy (43/66 articles analyzed) and quality of anticoagulation management (19/21 articles analyzed). Although treatment guidelines do not differentiate anticoagulant therapy by ethnoracial group, this scoping review found consistently favorable outcomes for White patients over non-White patients in the domains of access to anticoagulation therapy for guideline-based indications and quality of anticoagulation therapy management. No differences among groups were noted in clinical outcomes, and very few studies assessed humanistic or educational outcomes.

History and Social Implications of the Pulse Oximeter

The pulse oximeter is a portable, bedside tool that allows for the measurement of oxygen saturation in a patient's red blood cells. The technology is based on oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin absorbing light at different wavelengths. The device calculates the ratio of oxygenated to deoxygenated hemoglobin in the blood, and an algorithm produces a percentage oxygen saturation value. Due to its portability and ease of use, it is a ubiquitous medical tool that is commonly used in medical practice. This paper reviews the history and evolution of this tool, and the scientific laws behind oximetry. It also introduces the importance of the pulse oximeter and its basic functions. In addition, the limitations of pulse oximetry are discussed, especially as they pertain to pigmented skin.

Racial disparity in postoperative complications following shoulder arthroplasty (SA): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

There has been an emphasis on racial disparities in orthopedic surgery. Recently, literature suggested Black and Hispanic patients at increased risk for adverse outcomes after Shoulder Arthroplasty (SA), but data regarding it is sparse and inconclusive. Therefore, we aim to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the role of racial disparity in causing adverse outcomes after SA.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were queried. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were included. Results were analyzed by pooling Odds ratios along 95% Confidence interval, using random-effects model on RevMan 5.3.

Results

A total of 14 selected studies evaluated 1,781,783 patients. We found Black patients at higher risk of post-SA complications than White patients (OR 1.32(95% CI 1.25-1.39; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). No significant risk in Hispanics compared to white patients (OR 0.94(95% CI 0.81-1.09); p = 0.41; I2 = 65%). Compared to whites, black patients were at higher risk of an extended length of stay, postoperative blood transfusion, sepsis, venous thromboembolism, and non-home discharge. Compared to white patients, Hispanics were at higher risk for postoperative blood transfusion. Whites showed increased risk for readmission.

Conclusion

Following SA, Black patients were likely to develop complications compared to White patients but no significant risk in Hispanics compared to Whites.

Supportive care interventions in metastatic bone disease: scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patients with secondary metastatic involvement of the musculoskeletal system due to primary cancers are a rapidly growing population with significant risks for health-related end-of-life morbidities. In particular, bone metastases or metastatic bone disease (MBD) imparts significant adversity to remaining quality of life. No rigorous review of clinical trials on the use of supportive care interventions for MBD has been conducted. The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics of supportive care interventions for MBD and critically appraise study designs, key findings, and quality of evidence of the research.

METHODS

We searched for published clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses in PubMED, CINAHL and Google Scholar for articles published between September 2017 and September 2022. Some examples of Medical Subject Headings terms were: 'secondary neoplasm', 'metastatic bone disease', 'palliative care' and 'supportive care intervention'. Quality of published evidence was evaluated based on treatment types and study design.

RESULTS

After reviewing 572 publications, 13 articles were included in the final review and evaluation including seven clinical trials, two trial protocols and four systematic reviews. Feasible interventions included enhanced palliative care consultation, palliative radiotherapy and alternative medicines. Interventions addressed primary endpoints of fatigue (N=4, 31%), pain (N=3, 23%) or cancer-related symptoms (N=3, 23%) with patient-reported outcome instruments. No interventions reported on fracture complications or endpoints, specifically. The quality of most studies was moderate to strong.

CONCLUSION

Supportive care interventions for MBD are feasible and the impact is measurable via patient-reported outcome measures. While the evidence for interventions was moderate to strong, there are very few specific controlled trials for skeletal-related events and impacts of social determinants of health. Further clinical trials are needed to define supportive care interventions for MBD that demonstrate reduced risk of fracture and that mitigate the reduced quality of life when negative musculoskeletal outcomes arise.

Clinical Trial Inclusion and Impact on Early Adoption of Medical Innovation in Diverse Populations

BACKGROUND

Inadequate inclusion in clinical trial enrollment may contribute to health inequities by evaluating interventions in cohorts that do not fully represent target populations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine if characteristics of patients with heart failure (HF) enrolled in a pivotal trial are associated with who receives an intervention after approval.

METHODS

Demographics from 2,017,107 Medicare patients hospitalized for HF were compared with those of the first 10,631 Medicare beneficiaries who received implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors. Characteristics of the population studied in the pivotal CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in NYHA Class III Heart Failure Patients) clinical trial (n = 550) were compared with those of both groups. All demographic data were analyzed nationally and in 4 U.S. regions.

RESULTS

The Medicare HF cohort included 80.9% White, 13.3% African American, 1.9% Hispanic, 1.3% Asian, and 51.5% female patients. Medicare patients <65 years of age were more likely to be African American (33%) and male (58%), whereas older patients were mostly White (84%) and female (53%). Forty-one percent of U.S. HF hospitalizations occurred in the South; demographic characteristics varied significantly across all U.S. regions. The CHAMPION trial adequately represented African Americans (23% overall, 35% <65 years of age), Hispanic Americans (2%), and Asian Americans (1%) but underrepresented women (27%). The trial's population characteristics were similar to those of the first patients who received pulmonary artery sensors (82% White, 13% African American, 1% Asian, 1% Hispanic, and 29% female).

CONCLUSIONS

Demographics of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services beneficiaries hospitalized with HF vary regionally and by age, which should be considered when defining "adequate" representation in clinical studies. Enrollment diversity in clinical trials may affect who receives early application of recently approved innovations.

Health Disparities in Cardiac Critical Care: Understanding Inequities, Barriers, and Pathways Toward Equitable Access and Enhanced Outcomes

Health disparities in cardiac critical care continue to pose significant challenges in achieving equitable access and outcomes for diverse populations. This literature review examines the disparities in access to and outcomes of cardiac critical care interventions across different populations, identifies barriers contributing to these disparities, and explores strategies to address them. A literature review was conducted by searching electronic databases for relevant articles published between January 2000 and May 2023. Studies focusing on health disparities in cardiac critical care, access to interventions, outcomes, and equity were included. Data were extracted and synthesized using a narrative approach. Disparities in access to cardiac critical care interventions were identified, including socioeconomic factors, lack of health insurance, geographic barriers, racial and ethnic disparities, language and cultural barriers, limited health literacy, and lack of awareness and education. These barriers led to delayed diagnoses, suboptimal utilization of interventions, and limited access to specialized cardiac care. Disparities in outcomes were also observed, with certain populations experiencing worse clinical outcomes and higher morbidity and mortality rates. This review emphasizes the existence of disparities in cardiac critical care and emphasizes the necessity for interventions to address these disparities. Specific strategies should concentrate on enhancing healthcare access, diminishing financial obstacles, expanding health insurance coverage, fostering patient-centered approaches, and harnessing telemedicine and technology. Collaborative efforts among policymakers, healthcare providers, researchers, and patient advocates are vital to advocate for policy changes and implement evidence-based interventions that foster equitable care. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies, implementation science, patient engagement, global perspectives, and rigorous evaluation of intervention strategies to advance our knowledge and guide endeavors in reducing health disparities in cardiac critical care.

Comparing the frequency of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) between ancestry groups in a paediatric epilepsy cohort

BACKGROUND

Studies indicate that variants of uncertain significance are more common in non-European populations due to lack of a diversity in population databases. This difference has not been explored in epilepsy, which is increasingly found to be genetic in paediatric populations, and has precision medicine applications. This study examines the differences in the frequency of uncertain next-generation sequencing (NGS) results among a paediatric epilepsy cohort between ancestral groups historically under-represented in biomedical research (UBR) and represented in biomedical research (RBR).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with epilepsy seen at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC). One hundred seventy-eight cases met the following criteria: (1) visited any provider within the Pediatric Neurology Clinic at CUIMC, (2) had an ICD code indicating a diagnosis of epilepsy, (3) underwent NGS testing after March 2015 and (4) had self-reported ancestry that fit into a single dichotomous category of either historically represented or under-represented in biomedical research.

RESULTS

UBR cases had significantly higher rates of uncertain results when compared with RBR cases (79.2% UBR, 20.8% RBR; p value=0.002). This finding remained true after controlling for potential confounding factors, including sex, intellectual disability or developmental delay, epilepsy type, age of onset, number of genes tested and year of testing.

CONCLUSION

Our results add to the literature that individuals who are of ancestries historically under-represented in genetics research are more likely to receive uncertain genetic results than those of represented majority ancestral groups and establishes this finding in an epilepsy cohort.

Association of geographical disparities and segregation in regional treatment facilities for Black patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the United States

Background and objectives

This study investigates geographic disparities in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) care for Black patients and aims to explore the association with segregation in treatment facilities. Understanding these dynamics can guide efforts to improve healthcare outcomes for marginalized populations.

Methods

This cohort study evaluated regional differences in segregation for Black patients with aSAH and the association with geographic variations in disparities from 2016 to 2020. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for admission data on aSAH. Black patients were compared to White patients. Segregation in treatment facilities was calculated using the dissimilarity (D) index. Using multivariable logistic regression models, the regional disparities in aSAH treatment, functional outcomes, mortality, and end-of-life care between Black and White patients and the association of geographical segregation in treatment facilities was assessed.

Results

142,285 Black and White patients were diagnosed with aSAH from 2016 to 2020. The Pacific division (D index = 0.55) had the greatest degree of segregation in treatment facilities, while the South Atlantic (D index = 0.39) had the lowest. Compared to lower segregation, regions with higher levels of segregation (global F test p < 0.001) were associated a lower likelihood of mortality (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-1.00, p = 0.044 vs. OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83, p < 0. 001) (p = 0.049), greater likelihood of tracheostomy tube placement (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.22-1.73, p < 0.001 vs. OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.59-2.21, p < 0.001) (p < 0. 001), and lower likelihood of receiving palliative care (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.76-0.93, p < 0.001 vs. OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59-0.77, p < 0.001) (p = 0.029).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates regional differences in disparities for Black patients with aSAH, particularly in end-of-life care, with varying levels of segregation in regional treatment facilities playing an associated role. The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions and policy changes to address systemic healthcare inequities, reduce segregation, and ensure equitable access to high-quality care for all patients.

Socioeconomic deprivation and racialised disparities in competitive athletes with sudden cardiac arrest from the USA

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association of socioeconomic deprivation and racialised outcomes in competitive athletes with sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the USA.

METHODS

SCA cases from the National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research (July 2014 to June 2021) were included. We matched Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores (17 metrics to grade socioeconomic conditions) to the 9-digit zip codes for each athlete's home address. ADI is scored 1-100 with higher scores indicating greater neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation. Analysis of variance was used to assess differences in mean ADI by racial groups. Tukey post hoc testing was used for pairwise comparisons.

RESULTS

391 cases of SCA in competitive athletes (85.4% male; 16.9% collegiate, 68% high school, 10.7% middle school, 4.3% youth) were identified via active surveillance. 79 cases were excluded due to missing data (19 race, 60 ADI). Of 312 cases with complete data, 171 (54.8%) were white, 110 (35.3%) black and 31 (9.9%) other race. The mean ADI was 40.20 (95% CI 36.64, 43.86) in white athletes, 57.88 (95% CI 52.65, 63.11) in black athletes and 40.77 (95% CI 30.69, 50.86) in other race athletes. Mean ADI was higher in black versus white athletes (mean difference 17.68, 95% CI 10.25, 25.12; p=0.0036) and black versus other race athletes (mean difference 17.11, 95% CI 4.74, 29.47; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Black athletes with SCA come from areas with higher neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation than white or other race athletes with SCA. Our findings suggest that socioeconomic deprivation may be associated with racialised disparities in athletes with SCA.

Ethnoracial Identity and Cognitive Impairment: A Community Study

BACKGROUND

Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors associated with MCI in different ethnoracial groups could reduce MCI burden and health inequity in the population.

METHODS

Among 2845 adults aged 65+ years, we investigated potential risk exposures including education, physical and mental health, lifestyle, and sensory function, and their cross-sectional associations with MCI. We compared proportions of exposures between Black and White participants and explored relationships among race, MCI, and exposures. Logistic regression modeled MCI as a function of each exposure in the overall sample adjusting for age, sex, educational level, and race, and investigating race*exposure interactions.

RESULTS

Compared with White participants, Black participants had greater odds of MCI (OR 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.06) and were more likely to report depressive symptoms, diabetes, and stroke, to have high blood pressure and BMI, and to be APOE - 4 carriers. Exposures associated with higher odds of MCI were diabetes, stroke, lifetime smoking, sleep disturbances, social isolation, loneliness, depression and anxiety symptoms, and vision and hearing loss. There were no significant interactions between race and any exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Black participants had 53% higher odds of MCI adjusting for age, sex, and education. The same exposures were associated with MCI in Black and White participants.

Examining Racial/Ethnic Differences in Patterns of Opioid Prescribing: Results from an Urban Safety-Net Healthcare System

Prescription opioids still account for a large proportion of overdose deaths and contribute to opioid use dependence (OUD). Studies earlier in the epidemic suggest clinicians were less likely to prescribe opioids to racial/ethnic minorities. As OUD-related deaths have increased disproportionately amongst minority populations, it is essential to understand racial/ethnic differences in opioid prescribing patterns to inform culturally sensitive mitigation efforts. The purpose of this study is to estimate racial/ethnic differences in opioid medication use among patients prescribed opioids. Using electronic health records and a retrospective cohort study design, we estimated multivariable hazard models and generalized linear models, assessing racial/ethnic differences in OUD diagnosis, number of opioid prescriptions, receiving only one opioid prescription, and receiving ≥18 opioid prescriptions. Study population (N=22,201) consisted of adult patients (≥18years), with ≥3 primary care visits (ensuring healthcare system linkage), ≥1 opioid prescription, who did not have an OUD diagnoses prior to the first opioid prescription during the 32-month study period. Relative to racial/ethnic minority patients, White patients, in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, had a greater number of opioid prescriptions filled, a higher proportion received ≥18 opioid prescriptions, and a greater hazard of having an OUD diagnosis subsequent to receiving an opioid prescription (all groups p<0.001). Although opioid prescribing rates have declined nationally, our findings suggest White patients still experience a high volume of opioid prescriptions and greater risk of OUD diagnosis. Racial/ethnic minorities are less likely to receive follow-up pain medications, which may signal low care quality. Identifying provider bias in pain management of racial/ethnic minorities could inform interventions seeking balance between adequate pain treatment and risk of opioid misuse/abuse.

Trust in prenatal exome sequencing for expectant families facing unexplained fetal anomalies

OBJECTIVE

Despite exome sequencing (ES) becoming increasingly incorporated into the prenatal setting, few studies have elucidated motivations for and trust in ES and genomic research among a diverse cohort of patients and their partners.

METHODS

This is a qualitative study that involved semi-structured interviews with pregnant or recently pregnant individuals and their partners, interviewed separately, in the setting of ES performed through research for a fetal structural anomaly. All interview transcripts were coded thematically and developed by a multidisciplinary team.

RESULTS

Thirty-five individuals participated, the majority of whom (66%) self-identified as a racial or ethnic group underrepresented in genomic research. Many patients and their partners expressed trust in the healthcare system and research process and appreciated the extensive testing for information and closure. There were nonetheless concerns about data privacy and protection for individuals, including those underrepresented, who participated in genomic testing and studies.

CONCLUSION

Our findings illustrate important elements of motivation, trust and concern related to prenatal ES performed in the research setting, taking into account the perspectives not only of diverse and underrepresented study participants but also partners of pregnant individuals.

When I Don't see me, Am I seen? Race and student perception of the surgery clerkship

INTRODUCTION

Increasing interest in general surgery from students who are Under-Represented in Medicine (URiM) is imperative to advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. We examined medical student third year surgery clerkship evaluations quantitatively and qualitatively to understand the experiences of URiM and non-URiM learners at our institution.

METHODS

Evaluations from 235 graduated medical students between the years of 2019 and 2021 were analyzed. T-tests were used to compare numerical data. Free-text comments were qualitatively analyzed using inductive thematic analysis by two independent reviewers with conflicts resolved by a third.

RESULTS

Evaluations were completed by 214 non-URiM students (91.1 ​%) and 21 (8.9 ​%) URiM students. There were no significant differences between URiM and non-URiM students in ratings of faculty and resident teaching. When asked whether residents were positive role models for patient care, non-URiM students were more likely than URiM students to agree (3.284 vs. 2.864, p ​= ​0.040). When asked whether they considered faculty to be positive role models, non- URM students were also more likely to answer affirmatively than URiM students (3.394 vs. 2.909 p ​= ​0.013). Qualitative comments were similar between the two groups. When asked what the strengths of the clerkship were, the most commonly evoked theme was "interactions with team" with subthemes of "team integration" "feeling valued" and positive "faculty" or "resident" interactions. "Operative experience" was the second most commonly evoked strength of the clerkship. The most common criticisms of the clerkship involved "negative interactions with team" with subthemes of "not prioritized above other learners" and "ignored." Negative "academic experience" was the next most commonly evoked weakness, with an affiliated theme of "lack of teaching."

CONCLUSIONS

URiM students are less likely than non-URiM students to see surgical residents and faculty as positive role models. Integrating medical students into the team, taking time to teach, and allowing students to feel valued in their roles improves the clerkship experience for trainees and can contribute to recruitment efforts.

The Comparative Effectiveness and Provider-induced Demand Collaboration Project: A Pioneering Military-Civilian Academic Partnership to Build Health Services Research Capacity for the Military Health System

INTRODUCTION

Like civilian health systems, the United States Military Health System (MHS) confronts challenges in achieving the aims of reducing cost, and improving quality, access, and safety, but historically has lacked coordinated health services research (HSR) capabilities that enabled knowledge translation and iterative learning from its wealth of data. A military-civilian academic partnership called the Comparative Effectiveness and Provider-Induced Demand Collaboration (EPIC), formed in 2011, demonstrated early proof-of-concept in using the MHS claims database for research focused on drivers of variation in health care. This existing partnership was reorganized in 2015 and its topics expanded to meet the need for HSR in support of emerging priorities and to develop current and HSR capacity within the MHS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Donabedian framework of structure, process, and outcomes was applied to support the project, through a core of principal investigators, researchers, analysts, and administrators. Within this framework, new researchers and student trainees learn foundations of HSR while performing secondary analysis of claims data from the MHS Data Repository (MDR) focusing on Health and Readiness, Pediatrics, Policy, Surgery, Trauma, and Women's Health.

RESULTS

Since 2015, the project has trained 25 faculty, staff, and providers; 51 students and residents; 21 research fellows across multiple disciplines; and as of 2022, produced 107 peer-reviewed publications and 130 conference presentations, across all five themes and six cores. Research results have been incorporated into Federal and professional policy guidelines. Major research areas include opioid usage and prescribing, value-based care, and racial disparities. EPIC researchers provide direct support to MHS leaders and enabling expertise to clinical providers.

CONCLUSIONS

EPIC, through its Donabedian framework and utilization of the MHS Data Repository as a research tool, generates actionable findings and builds capacity for continued HSR across the MHS. Eight years after its reorganization in 2015, EPIC continues to provide a platform for capacity building and knowledge translation.

Association Between Race and Short-Term Outcomes Across 3988 Consecutive Single-Level Spinal Fusions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Race has implications for access to medical care. However, the impact of race, after access to care has been attained, remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to isolate the relationship between race and short-term outcomes across patients undergoing a single, common neurosurgical procedure.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 3988 consecutive patients undergoing single-level, posterior-only open lumbar fusion at a single, multihospital, academic medical center were enrolled over a 6-year period. Among them, 3406 patients self-identified as White, and 582 patients self-identified as Black. Outcome disparities between all White patients vs all Black patients were estimated using logistic regression. Subsequently, coarsened exact matching controlled for outcome-mitigating factors; White and Black patients were exact-matched 1:1 on key demographic and health characteristics (matched n = 1018). Primary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day hospital readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, mortality, discharge disposition, and intraoperative complication.

RESULTS

Before matching, Black patients experienced increased rate of nonhome discharge, readmissions, ED visits, and reoperations (all P < .001). After exact matching, Black patients were less likely to be discharged to home (odds ratio [OR] 2.68, P < .001) and had higher risk of 30-day and 90-day readmissions (OR 2.24, P < .001; OR 1.91, P < .001; respectively) and ED visits (OR 1.79, P = .017; OR 2.09, P < .001). Black patients did not experience greater risk of intraoperative complication (unintentional durotomy).

CONCLUSION

Between otherwise homogenous spinal fusion cohorts, Black patients experienced unfavorable short-term outcomes. These disparities were not explained by differences in intraoperative complications. Further investigation must characterize and mitigate institutional and societal factors that contribute to outcome disparities.

Historical Redlining, Persistent Mortgage Discrimination, and Race in Breast Cancer Outcomes

Importance

Inequities created by historical and contemporary mortgage discriminatory policies have implications for health disparities. The role of persistent mortgage discrimination (PMD) in breast cancer (BC) outcomes has not been studied.

Objective

To estimate the race-specific association of historical redlining (HRL) with the development of BC subtypes and late-stage disease and a novel measure of PMD in BC mortality.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based cohort study used Georgia Cancer Registry data. A total of 1764 non-Hispanic Black and White women with a BC diagnosis and residing in an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) in Georgia were included. Patients were excluded if they did not have a known subtype or a derived American Joint Committee on Cancer stage or if diagnosed solely by death certificate or autopsy. Participants were diagnosed with a first primary BC between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017, and were followed through December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed between May 1, 2022, and August 31, 2023.

Exposures

Scores for HRL were examined dichotomously as less than 2.5 (ie, nonredlined) vs 2.5 or greater (ie, redlined). Contemporary mortgage discrimination (CMD) scores were calculated, and PMD index was created using the combination of HRL and CMD scores.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Estrogen receptor (ER) status, late stage at diagnosis, and BC-specific death.

Results

This study included 1764 women diagnosed with BC within census tracts that were HOLC graded in Georgia. Of these, 856 women (48.5%) were non-Hispanic Black and 908 (51.5%) were non-Hispanic White; 1148 (65.1%) were diagnosed at 55 years or older; 538 (30.5%) resided in tracts with HRL scores less than 2.5; and 1226 (69.5%) resided in tracts with HRL scores 2.5 or greater. Living in HRL areas with HRL scores 2.5 or greater was associated with a 62% increased odds of ER-negative BC among non-Hispanic Black women (odds ratio [OR], 1.62 [95% CI, 1.01-2.60]), a 97% increased odds of late-stage diagnosis among non-Hispanic White women (OR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.15-3.36]), and a 60% increase in BC mortality overall (hazard ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.17-2.18]). Similarly, PMD was associated with BC mortality among non-Hispanic White women but not among non-Hispanic Black women.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that historical racist policies and persistent discrimination have modern-day implications for BC outcomes that differ by race. These findings emphasize the need for a more nuanced investigation of the social and structural drivers of disparate BC outcomes.

Impact of the Affordable Health Care Act (ACA) on Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Access to and Utilization of Healthcare in New York City

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded health insurance coverage in the USA, but whether it increased healthcare utilization or reduced racial/ethnic inequities in access to and utilization of care is unclear. We evaluated the ACA impact on health insurance coverage, unmet medical need, and having a personal doctor and whether this impact was modified by racial/ethnic identity among New York City (NYC) residents. We used data from multiple years of the Community Health Survey (2009-2017) and used logistic regression to assess whether having health insurance, unmet medical need, or a personal doctor varied pre- (2009-2012) versus post-ACA (2013-2017), adjusting for age, sex, nativity status, and general health. We assessed effect measure modification by race/ethnicity and stratified if we found significant interaction. We found that health insurance coverage and having a personal doctor increased post-ACA (aOR = 1.44, p < 0.001 and aOR = 1.09, p = 0.024, respectively) while having unmet medical need decreased (aOR = 0.90, p = 0.004). There was little indication of interaction between ACA and race/ethnicity; in stratified models, the ACA had a stronger impact on health insurance coverage for those of other race than all other groups (aOR = 2.16, p = 0.002 versus aOR 1.22-1.54 for white, Black, and Hispanic adults) and a stronger impact on having a personal doctor for Hispanic adults (aOR 1.27, p < 0.001 versus weaker non-significant associations for other groups), with no effect modification for unmet medical need. Thus, it appears that ACA improved healthcare access and utilization but did not have a major impact on reducing racial/ethnic inequities in these outcomes in NYC.

Characteristics Associated With Survival in Surgically Nonresected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in the Military Health System

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic cancer is often diagnosed at advanced stages with high-case fatality. Many tumors are not surgically resectable. We aimed to identify features associated with survival in patients with surgically nonresected pancreatic cancer in the Military Health System.

METHODS

We used the Military Cancer Epidemiology database to identify the Department of Defense beneficiaries aged 18 and older diagnosed with a primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 1998 and December 2014 who did not receive oncologic surgery as treatment. We used Cox Proportional Hazard regression with stepwise procedures to select the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics related to 2-year overall survival, expressed as adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Among 1148 patients with surgically nonresected pancreatic cancer, sex, race-ethnicity, marital status, and socioeconomic indicators were not selected in association with survival. A higher comorbidity count (aHR 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.59 for 5 vs. 0), jaundice at diagnosis (aHR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.33-1.85 vs. no), tumor grade G3 or G4 (aHR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.05-1.67 vs. G1/G2), tumor location in pancreas tail (aHR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.22-1.83 vs. head) or body (aHR 1.30, 95% CI: 1.04-1.62 vs. head), and metastases were associated with survival. Patients receiving chemotherapy (aHR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.57-0.76) had better survival compared with no treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In a comprehensive health system, sociodemographic characteristics were not related to survival in surgically nonresected pancreatic cancer. This implicates access to care in reducing survival disparities in advanced pancreatic cancer and emphasizes the importance of treating patients based on clinical features.

Sleep quality and executive function in a diverse sample of healthy young adults

Few studies examine the relationship between sleep and executive function in diverse samples of young adults. Our research aims to fill this gap by analyzing how self-reported sleep quality is related to informant-rated executive function as a whole and its working memory component in a diverse sample of 29 healthy college students. Using the self-report measure, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), we divided our sample into two groups based on cutoff criteria (score ≥5: poor sleep): good sleep quality (n = 11) and poor sleep quality (n = 18). Participants were on average 20.86 years old. Informants rated participants' executive functioning and working memory using the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Individuals in the poor sleep quality group were reported as having significantly worse executive function and working memory scores. Young adult college students who report less than 7 hours of sleep per night have lower scores on informant measures of working memory and executive function. This study raises awareness about how self-reported sleep experiences are related to other's observation of cognitive abilities in everyday life in a diverse young adult sample.

Immigration bias among medical students: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Racial bias is found in both physicians and medical students. Immigrants in many parts of the world face challenges similar to racial minorities. Identification of immigrants might however be more subtle than identification by race, and currently, no data are available on a possible bias against the large minority group of migrants in Europe.

DESIGN

Randomized control trial.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Second-year medical students were randomized into four groups to watch a video of either a male or female patient with pain, with or without immigrant status.

INTERVENTION

Students were asked whether they would administer pain medication (primary outcome).

OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS

Immigrant status, patient's gender, student's gender, age, and language skills were covariates in a logistic regression model. Secondary outcomes included pain medication potency and the student's rating of the patient's pain intensity.

MAIN RESULTS

We recruited 607 students [337 females (56%), 387 (64%) between 18 and 22 years old]. Analgesia was administered in 95% (n = 576). Immigrant status was not associated with the probability of receiving pain medication [95 vs. 95%, odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-1.70, P  = 0.58]. Immigrants received high-potency analgesia less often (26 vs. 33%, OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.96, P  = 0.03). Female students administered pain medication more frequently (96 vs. 93%, OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.05-5.02, P  = 0.04), and rated the patients' pain higher (mean numeric rating scale 7.7, SD 0.9 vs. 7.4, SD 1.0, OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.16-1.60, P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Medical students showed no immigration bias with regard to administering pain medication but were less likely to choose high-potency analgesia in immigrants. We also found a gender difference in pain management. These results demonstrate the importance of including knowledge about immigration bias in medical training.

Equity in Obesity Review

Obesity disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minoritized populations and those of lower socioeconomic status. Similarly, disparities exist in the development of its downstream consequences, such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension. The causes of these disparities are multifactorial and are influenced by structural factors such as segregation and healthcare access, and individual-level factors such as weight stigma. Interventions to decrease disparities in obesity should consider macro-level, community, and individual-level factors that might reduce disparities and improve equity in obesity care. Clinicians must also recognize the chronic nature of obesity, and how bias and stigma may impact patient care.

Retrospective study of disparities in regional anesthesia and discharge opioid prescriptions at a veterans affairs medical center

Background: Abundant literature acknowledges healthcare disparities exist in medicine, especially in pain management, but disparities related to peri-operative pain management in veterans undergoing total knee arthroplasties (TKA) has not been previously described. TKAs are becoming increasingly common, and evidence suggests that perioperative regional anesthesia improves post TKA outcomes. This study aimed to determine if healthcare disparities exist pertaining to the use of regional anesthesia and the prescribing of discharge opioids for TKAs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System (VAHCS). We hypothesized that race-based disparities would be present in the use of regional anesthesia and discharge opioid prescribing at our institution. Our secondary hypothesis was that older patients would be more likely to receive regional anesthesia and lower quantities of opioids at discharge. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of Atlanta VAHCS patients who underwent elective unilateral primary or revision TKA surgery between 2014 and 2020. A total of 653 patients were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the impact of patient demographics on nerve block use and multivariate linear regression was used to model the impact of patient demographics on total oral morphine equivalents prescribed. Results: Our results showed that Black patients were as likely to receive regional anesthesia for their TKAs (p=0.85) but did receive less opioid pain medications at discharge (p<0.001) than White patients. We also found that older patients ( > 50 years old) had significantly lower odds ratio of receiving regional anesthesia and received less opioid pain medications post TKA discharge. Conclusions: Our study showed age-based disparities in regional anesthesia utilization and discharge opioid prescriptions. It also showed race-based disparities in discharge opioid prescriptions. Our results demonstrate the need to better understand why these differences exist within this open access system and suggests solutions based on the socioecological model to diminish them.

Does race impact outcomes after parathyroidectomy for secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism?

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities in care exist for diseases with heterogeneous treatment guidelines. The impact of these disparities on outcomes after parathyroidectomy for secondary(2HPT) and tertiary hyperparathyroidism(3HPT) was explored.

METHODS

The 2015-2019 NSQIP datasets were used. Patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for 2HPT and 3HPT were identified and analyzed separately. Patients were stratified by race (white vs. non-white); demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared. Studied outcomes included 30-day morbidity, mortality, unplanned reoperation, readmission, and postoperative length of stay(LOS).

RESULTS

There were 1,150 patients with 2HPT and 262 with 3HPT. For 2HPT, 65.5% were non-white; morbidity, reoperation, and prolonged LOS(>3days) occurred disproportionately more often in non-white patients. Non-white race was independently associated with morbidity; higher ASA class and alkaline phosphatase levels were associated with prolonged LOS. For 3HPT, 53.1% were non-white; a prolonged LOS(>1day) occurred disproportionately more often in non-white patients. Higher alkaline phosphatase levels were independently associated with prolonged LOS.

CONCLUSION

Race and markers of advanced disease negatively impact outcomes after parathyroidectomy for 2HPT and 3HPT. Attention to racial disparities and earlier referral may positively impact outcomes.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Abnormal Birth Weight

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether exposure to community or neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage as measured by the ADI (Area Deprivation Index) is associated with risk of abnormal birth weight among nulliparous individuals with singleton gestations.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis from the prospective cohort NuMoM2b study (Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-To-Be). Participant addresses at cohort enrollment between 6 and 13 weeks of gestation were geocoded at the Census tract level and linked to the 2015 ADI. The ADI, which incorporates the domains of income, education, employment, and housing quality into a composite national ranking of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, was categorized by quartiles (quartile 1, least disadvantaged, reference; quartile 4, most disadvantaged). Outcomes were large for gestational age (LGA; birth weight at or above the 90th percentile) and small for gestational age (SGA; birth weight below the 10th percentile) compared with appropriate for gestational age (AGA; birth weight 10th-90th percentile) as determined with the 2017 U.S. natality reference data, standardized for fetal sex. Multinomial logistic regression models were adjusted for potential confounding variables.

RESULTS

Of 8,983 assessed deliveries in the analytic population, 12.7% (n=1,143) were SGA, 8.2% (n=738) were LGA, and 79.1% (n=7,102) were AGA. Pregnant individuals living in the highest ADI quartile (quartile 4, 17.8%) had an increased odds of delivering an SGA neonate compared with those in the lowest referent quartile (quartile 1, 12.4%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.55). Pregnant individuals living in higher ADI quartiles (quartile 2, 10.3%; quartile 3, 10.7%; quartile 4, 9.2%) had an increased odds of delivering an LGA neonate compared with those in the lowest referent quartile (quartile 1, 8.2%) (aOR: quartile 2, 1.40, 95% CI 1.19-1.61; quartile 3, 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.61; quartile 4, 1.47, 95% CI 1.20-1.74).

CONCLUSION

Neonates of nulliparous pregnant individuals living in U.S. neighborhoods with higher area deprivation were more likely to have abnormal birth weights at both extremes.

Frequency of Medical Claims for Diastasis Recti Abdominis Among U.S. Active Duty Service Women, 2016 to 2019

Background

Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is a condition in pregnant and postpartum women. Proposed risk factors include age, sex, multiparity, cesarean delivery, diabetes, gestational weight gain, and high birth weight. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of DRA using medical claims data among U.S. active duty service women (ADSW) and determine associated risk factors.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of ADSW aged 18 years and older in the U.S. Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps during fiscal years (FYs) 2016 to 2019. Utilizing claims data, we identified ADSW with a diagnosis of DRA during the study period. Risk factors, including age, race, socioeconomic status, branch of service, military occupation, delivery type, and parity, were evaluated through descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 340,748 ADSW were identified during FYs 2016 to 2019, of whom 2,768 (0.81%) had a medical claim for DRA. Of those with deliveries during the study period, 1.41% were multiparous and 84.53% had a cesarean delivery. Increased risk of DRA was found in ages 30 to 39 years, Black women, ranks representing a higher socioeconomic status, and women with overweight and obese body mass indices.

Conclusions

Although the prevalence of DRA, defined as a medical claim for DRA, in the study population is low, subpopulations may be disproportionately affected by the condition. Further research could potentially detail the impact of DRA on the functional impairment and operational readiness of ADSW in the U.S. military and any possible means of prevention.

Race, sex, and socioeconomic disparities affect the clinical stage of patients presenting for treatment of superficial venous disease

OBJECTIVE

Superficial venous disease has a U.S. prevalence of nearly 30%, with advanced disease contributing to a significant healthcare burden. Although the risk factors for venous disease are well known, the correlation between race, sex, socioeconomic status, and disease severity on presentation is not well established. The area deprivation index (ADI) is a validated metric with respect to regional geography, social determinants of health, and degree of socioeconomic disadvantage. In the present study, we aimed to identify the disparities and the effect that the ADI, in addition to race and sex, has among patients associated with an advanced venous disease presentation.

METHODS

A retrospective review between 2012 and 2022 was performed at four tertiary U.S. institutions to identify patients who underwent endovenous closure of their saphenous veins. Patient demographics, state ADI, comorbidities, CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification, and periprocedural outcomes were included. Pearson's correlation was performed between the CEAP classification and ADI. Poisson regression analysis was performed to identify factors predicting for an increasing CEAP classification at presentation. Variables with P < .05 were deemed significant.

RESULTS

A total of 2346 patients underwent endovenous saphenous vein closure during the study period, of whom 7 were excluded because of a lack of follow-up data. The mean age was 60.4 ± 14.9 years, 65.9% were women, and 55.4% were White. Of the 2339 patients, 73.3% presented with an advanced CEAP class (≥3). The mean state ADI for the entire cohort was 4.9 ± 3.1. The percent change in the CEAP classification is an increase of 2% and 1% for every level increase in the state ADI for unadjusted (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.02; P < .001) and adjusted (IRR = 1.01; P < .001) models, respectively. Black race has a 12% increased risk of a higher CEAP class on presentation compared with White race (IRR = 1.12; P = .005). Female sex had a 16% lower risk of a higher CEAP presentation compared with male sex (IRR = 0.84; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Low socioeconomic status, Black race, and male sex are predictive of an advanced CEAP classification on initial presentation. These findings highlight the opportunity for improved mechanisms for identification of venous disease and at-risk patients before advanced disease progression in known disadvantaged patient populations.

Disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Outcomes Among Subgroups of Asians and Pacific Islanders: A SEER Database Study

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly prevalent in Asians and Pacific Islanders (API) but this heterogenous group is often aggregated into a single category, despite vast differences in culture, socioeconomic status, education, and access to care among subgroups. There remains a significant knowledge gap in HCC outcomes among different subgroups of API. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was accessed, and site/ICD codes were used to identify HCC patients during 2010-2019 who were API ethnicity. Data collected: demographics, socioeconomic status, tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival. Subgroup analyses were performed among different Asian ethnicities in a secondary analysis. 8,249 patients were identified/subdivided into subgroups of Asian ethnicities and Other Pacific Islanders (NHOPI) groups. The median age was 65 years for Asians and 62 years for NHOPI (p < 0.01), and significant differences were found in income (p < 0.01). A higher proportion of NHOPI lived in rural areas compared to Asians (8.1 vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in tumor size, stage, pre-treatment AFP level, or surgical treatments between the two groups. However, Asians had higher overall median survival than NHOPI (20 months v 12 months, p < 0.01). Secondary analyses among different subgroups of Asian ethnicities revealed significant differences in tumor size and staging, surgical resection, transplant rates, and median survival. While API had similar tumor characteristics and treatment, Asians had much higher survival than NHOPI. Socioeconomic differences and access to care may contribute to these differences. This study also found significant survival disparities within API ethnicities.

Impact of Race, Gender, and Socioeconomic Status on Symptom Severity at Time of Urologic Referral

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Dysfunctional Voiding and Incontinence Scoring System (DVISS) is a validated tool to evaluate lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) severity in children. DVISS provides a quantitative score (0-35) including a quality-of-life measure, with higher values indicating more/worse symptoms. Clinically, variability exists in symptom severity when patients present to pediatric urology with LUTD. We hypothesized that symptom severity at consultation varied based on race, gender, and/or socioeconomic status.

METHODS

All urology encounters at a single institution with completed modified DVISS scores 6/2015-3/2018 were reviewed. Initial visits for patients 5-21 years old with non-neurogenic LUTD were included. Patients with neurologic disorders or genitourinary tract anomalies were excluded. Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared scores between White and Black patients and between male and female patients. Multiple regression models examined relationships among race, gender, estimated median household income, and insurance payor type. All statistics were performed using Stata 15.

RESULTS

In total, 4086 initial patient visits for non-neurogenic LUTD were identified. Median DVISS scores were higher in Black (10) versus White (8) patients (p < 0.001). Symptom severity was higher in females (9) versus males (8) (p < 0.001). When estimated median income and insurance payer types were introduced into a multiple regression model, race, gender, and insurance payer type were significantly associated with symptom severity at presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Race, gender, and socioeconomic status significantly impact LUTS severity at the time of urologic consultation. Future studies are needed to clarify the etiologies of these disparities and to determine their clinical significance.

Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Perception of Health Status and Literacy in Spine Oncological Patients: Insights from the All of Us Research Program

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was performed using the National Institutes of Health All of Us survey database.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess socioeconomic and racial disparities in the perception of personal health, health literacy, and healthcare access among spine oncology patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in health literacy and perception of health status have been described for many disease processes. However, few studies have assessed the prevalence of these disparities among spine oncology patients.

METHODS

Adult spine oncology patients, identified using ICD-9/10-CM codes, were categorized by race/ethnicity: White/Caucasian (WC), Black/African-American (BAA), and Non-White Hispanic (NWH). Demographics and socioeconomic status were assessed. Questionnaire responses regarding baseline health status, perception of health status, health literacy, and barriers to healthcare were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 1,175 patients identified, 207 (17.6%) were BAA, 267 (22.7%) were NWH, and 701 (59.7%) were WC. Socioeconomic status varied among cohorts, with WC patients reporting higher levels of education ( P<0.001 ), annual income greater than $50K ( P<0.001 ), and home ownership ( P<0.001 ). BAA and NWH patients reported greater rates of 7-day "Severe fatigue" ( P<0.001 ) and "10/10 pain" ( P<0.001 ) and lower rates of "Completely" able to perform everyday activities ( P<0.001 ). WC patients had a higher response rate for "Excellent/Very Good" regarding their own general health ( P<0.001 ) and quality ( P<0.001 ). The WC cohort had a significantly higher proportion of patients responding "Never" when assessing difficulty understanding ( P<0.001 ) and needing assistance with health materials ( P<0.001 ). BAA and NWH were significantly less likely to report feeling "Extremely" confident with medical forms ( P<0.001 ). BAA and NWH had significantly higher response rates to feeling "Somewhat Worried" about healthcare costs ( P<0.001 ) and with delaying medical care given "Can't Afford Co-pay" ( P<0.001 ).

CONCLUSION

We identified disparities in perception of health status, literacy, and access among spine oncology patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.