Association between vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and non-infectious uveitis: a population-based study

Uveitis Risk After the First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccination Based on Uveitis History: Matched Cohort and Crossover Case Series Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the risk of noninfectious uveitis following the first dose of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination based on the uveitis history.

DESIGN

Retrospective matched cohort and crossover case series study.

METHODS

A random sample of 7 917 457 individuals who received COVID-19 vaccine between January 2021 and March 2022 in Korea, and had no recorded history of COVID-19 were categorized into the control and uveitis groups based on their uveitis history. After performing 3:1 propensity score matching, we assessed the cumulative incidence and risk of noninfectious uveitis in the 180 days after COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, we performed a crossover case series analysis to compare the pre- and postvaccination incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of uveitis in individuals with and without a history of uveitis.

RESULTS

In the matched cohort analysis, uveitis group had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of uveitis (15.4%) than control group (0.10%). The uveitis group exhibited increased risks of all uveitis types, anterior, and nonanterior uveitis in the first 60 days (hazard ratio [HR]: 169, 158, and 253, respectively) and in days 61 to 180 (HR: 166, 164, and 143, respectively) after vaccination. In the crossover case series analysis, uveitis occurred with relatively equal frequency in 20-day intervals during the 180 days before and after vaccination, regardless of uveitis history. For uveitis group, the adjusted IRRs for early and late postvaccination events were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.88-0.96) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.85), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 vaccination did not increase the risk of uveitis, regardless of uveitis history.

The association between BNT162b2 vaccinations and incidence of immune-mediated comorbidities

BACKGROUND

A large vaccination campaign was initiated worldwide in December 2020 in order to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 and severe Covid-19 disease. However, long-term adverse effects of vaccination remain unclear. Therefore, our objective was to examine the association between vaccination and the incidence of autoimmune diagnoses in the first year after vaccine uptake.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study based on Clalit Health Services (CHS) comprehensive database compared the rates of immune-mediated diagnoses among BNT162b2 vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals. As a reference, a secondary cohort compared individuals infected with Sars-CoV-2 versus uninfected individuals. The minimum follow-up period was 4 months. The cohorts were divided into 4 age groups (12-17, 18-44, 45-64, 65 years or older). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied, followed by a correction for multiple comparisons using the False Discovery Rate (FDR) method, hence accounting for the investigation of multiple clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Increased risk for immune-mediated diagnoses following vaccination with BNT162b2 was observed for psoriasis in all age groups (HR 1.41-1.69), colitis among patients younger than 65 years (HR 1.38-1.93), vitiligo in patients aged 45-64 (HR 2.82, 95 %CI: 1.57-5.08) and for polymyalgia-rheumatica in patients aged 65 years or older (HR 2.12, 95 % CI: 1.3-3.47). In the reference cohort, patients who were infected by Covid-19 were at increased risk for fibromyalgia (HR 1.72, 95 % CI: 1.36-2.19 in individuals aged 18-44; HR 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.31-2.22 in individuals aged 45-64), and hypothyroidism (HR 1.54, 95 % CI: 1.15-2.07 in individuals aged 65 years or older).

CONCLUSIONS

The BNT162b2 vaccine was associated with increased risk (though rare) for psoriasis, colitis and polymyalgia rheumatica. These findings should be considered as a part of the risk-benefit assessment when planning future vaccination programs for various population groups.

New-onset or relapse of uveitis after rapid spreading of COVID-19 infection in China and risk factor analysis for relapse

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to report the clinical profile of new-onset and relapse of uveitis following rapid spreading of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection due to change of anti-COVID-19 policies in China and investigate potential risk factors for inflammation relapse.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, patients with new-onset or a history of uveitis between December 23, 2022, and February 28, 2023, were included to assess the influence of COVID-19 infection on uveitis. Detailed information on demographic data, clinical characteristics, treatment measures, treatment response, and ocular inflammatory status before and after COVID-19 infection was collected.

RESULTS

This study included 349 patients with a history of uveitis. The uveitis relapse rate was higher (28.8%, n = 288) in those with COVID-19 infection than in patients without COVID-19 infection (14.8%, n = 61) (P = 0.024). Among the relapse cases, 50.8% experienced a relapse of anterior uveitis, while 49.2% had a relapse of uveitis involving the posterior segment. Multivariable regression analysis indicated a positive correlation between disease duration and uveitis relapse, while the last relapse exceeding one year before COVID-19 infection and the use of methotrexate during COVID-19 infection were negatively correlated with relapse of uveitis. Thirteen patients who developed new-onset uveitis following COVID-19 infection were included; among them, three (23.1%) had anterior uveitis and 10 (76.9%) had uveitis affecting the posterior segment. Regarding cases involving the posterior segment, four patients (30.8%) were diagnosed with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 infection increases the rate of uveitis relapse. Long disease duration is a risk factor, while time since the last relapse more than 1 year and methotrexate use are protective factors against uveitis relapse.

COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Uveitis in Patients With a History of Uveitis

Importance

Understanding the potential risk of uveitis recurrence after COVID-19 vaccination in individuals with a history of uveitis is crucial for vaccination strategies and clinical monitoring.

Objective

To investigate the risk of uveitis recurrence after COVID-19 vaccination in a cohort of individuals with a history of uveitis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective population-based cohort study included individuals diagnosed with uveitis between January 1, 2015, and February 25, 2021, in South Korea. After excluding individuals without COVID-19 vaccination or with SARS-CoV-2 infection, individuals with a history of uveitis who had received at least 1 dose of a messenger RNA (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) or adenovirus vector-based (ChAdOx1 [AstraZeneca] or Ad26.COV2.S [Janssen]) COVID-19 vaccine were included. Data were analyzed from February 26, 2021, to December 31, 2022.

Exposure

Demographic and clinical data, along with vaccination details, were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service and Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency databases.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes of interest were incidence and risk of postvaccination uveitis in association with different COVID-19 vaccines and periods before and after COVID-19 vaccination. Uveitis was categorized by onset (early, within 30 days, or delayed) and type (anterior or nonanterior). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the risk of uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination, stratified according to vaccine type and vaccination period.

Results

Of 543 737 individuals with history of uveitis, 473 934 individuals (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [17.4] years; 243 127 [51.3] female) had documented COVID-19 vaccination and were included in analysis. The cumulative incidence of postvaccination uveitis was 8.6% at 3 months, 12.5% at 6 months, and 16.8% at 1 year, predominantly of the anterior type. Variations in the risk of postvaccination uveitis were observed across different vaccines and intervaccination periods. The risk of early postvaccination uveitis was increased for individuals receiving the BNT162b2 (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.52-1.86), mRNA-1273 (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.21-1.89), ChAdOx1 (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.43-1.79), and Ad26.COV2.S (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.40-3.07) vaccines. The risk of uveitis was higher particularly between the first and second vaccination doses (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.55-1.73).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that there was an elevated risk of uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination, with the vaccine type and period mediating this risk. For individuals with a history of uveitis, clinicians should consider the potential risk of uveitis recurrence in vaccination strategies and clinical monitoring.

Global Research Status Regarding Uveitis in the Last Decade

PURPOSE

To provide an overview on global uveitis research in the last decade in terms of countries/regions, organizations, scholars, journals, trending topics, and fundings.

METHODS

This cross-sectional bibliometric analysis yielded 10656 uveitis publications in English for subsequent bibliometric analysis.

RESULTS

In terms of the number of publications, the leading country/region was the USA (3007). The most productive organization was the University College London (420). The most productive research team was Professor Yang's group (146). A higher h-index was noted in University College London (48). Professor Rosenbaum was the first h-index holder (32). Keywords of interest included topics such as biologics, COVID and OCT. Publications by Ocular Immunology and Inflammation (968) ranked the first position.

CONCLUSIONS

The USA is the leading force in uveitis study. Asian countries/regions, such as China (mainland) and India, are exerting a substantial role worldwide. Trendy topics cover COVID-19, OCTA.

Noninfectious Uveitis Risk After COVID-19 Vaccination: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence and risk of noninfectious uveitis (NIU) following COVID-19 vaccination compared with an unvaccinated, uninfected control group.

DESIGN

Retrospective population-based cohort study.

METHODS

We included 5,185,153 individuals who received the first vaccine dose in the exposed group and 2,680,164 individuals in the unexposed, uninfected control group. The study observed for 180 days from their index date. Cumulative incidence and risk of NIU following COVID-19 vaccination, and attributable risk factors were assessed.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis showed elevated risk of nonanterior NIU within 60 days (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.03-1.55] and 61-180 days (HR 1.39 [95% CI 1.20-1.62]). Subgroup analysis highlighted an increased risk in females for early and delayed nonanterior uveitis (HR 1.44 [95% CI 1.08-1.92]; HR 1.78 [95% CI 1.43-2.20], respectively). Regardless of the location and onset timing of uveitis, a history of NIU was identified as the most significant risk factor, with a high hazard ratio ranging from 100 to 200.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 vaccination may modestly increase the risk of nonanterior uveitis especially in females. Despite adjustments, bias may persist in the exposed group, owing to significant differences between unexposed and exposed groups and low incidence of nonanterior uveitis in the unexposed group. Future research should aim to refine these findings by assessing uveitis risk in prior NIU patients and by enlarging the sample size or cohort matching.

Association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and new-onset atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. New-onset AF (NOAF) has been related recently to SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, the evidence supporting this link is still scarce. We aimed to examine the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and NOAF.

METHODS

We conducted a nested-case control study in a cohort of 2,931,046 adults from the largest healthcare provider in Israel. Subjects were followed from March 1st, 2020, until June 30th, 2022, for the occurrence of NOAF. Ten randomly selected controls were matched to each case of NOAF on age, sex, and duration of follow-up. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection in the prior 30 days was assessed in cases and controls. To account for surveillance bias we performed a lag-time analysis and assessed the association with a negative control exposure (low back pain). Data was analyzed using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

During the follow-up 18,981 patients developed NOAF and were matched to 189,810 controls. The mean age of cases and matched controls was 73.8 ± 13 years, and 51.1% of them were women. Multivariable analysis showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with an increased risk of NOAF; adjusted-OR, 4.24 (95% CI, 3.89-4.62). The association remained significant on lag-time analysis; however, the strength of the association was gradually attenuated with increasing lag-time but stabilized around a lag-time of 20 days. The negative control exposure (low back pain) was associated only with small increased risk of NOAF; adjusted-OR of 1.13 (95% CI, 1.02-1.26).

CONCLUSION

SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to be associated with increased risk of NOAF.

Risk of Noninfectious Uveitis after Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in a United States Claims Database

PURPOSE

To assess noninfectious uveitis (NIU) risk after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in patients without a history of uveitis.

DESIGN

A retrospective matched cohort study and self-controlled case series (SCCS) analysis using a longitudinal data asset with claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse from December 11, 2020, through November 30, 2021.

PARTICIPANTS

The matched cohort analysis included patients continuously enrolled for 730 days before December 11, 2020, who received a COVID-19 vaccination during the study period. This COVID-19-vaccinated group was matched to a COVID-19-unvaccinated historical cohort enrolled in 2018 and 2019. The SCCS design included individuals from the vaccinated cohort who experienced an NIU event during the study period. Enrollees with a history of uveitis were excluded.

METHODS

Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models in the matched cohort design. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing NIU incidence in exposed risk periods after vaccination and unexposed control periods within individuals were calculated using conditional Poisson regression models in the SCCS design. Models were adjusted for age, recent receipt of non-COVID-19 vaccinations, corticosteroid or immunosuppressive use, and smoking history. Subgroup analyses were conducted by vaccination type and age group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of NIU identified with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes.

RESULTS

The matched cohort analysis included 4 611 378 patients, with 2 305 689 per cohort. The adjusted HR comparing NIU incidence in the COVID-19-vaccinated and unvaccinated cohort was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.10; P = 0.33). The SCCS analysis included 686 patients. The IRR comparing NIU risk after vaccination with risk during control intervals was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.89-1.23; P = 0.57). An increased risk was found in the subgroup aged 5 to 44 years (IRR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.87; P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

The matched cohort and SCCS analyses did not detect increased NIU risk after COVID-19 vaccination overall in individuals without history of uveitis, providing reassurance about the vaccine's safety. The finding of increased risk in the youngest subgroup suggests heightened immune responses in younger individuals, warranting further investigation.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Association between COVID-19 vaccination and myasthenia gravis: A population-based, nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Existing data regarding the link between COVID-19 vaccine and myasthenia gravis (MG) are scarce. We aimed to assess the association between Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine with both new-onset MG and MG exacerbation.

METHODS

For the first aim, we conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of 3,052,467 adults, without a diagnosis of MG, from the largest healthcare provider in Israel. Subjects were followed from January 1, 2021 until June 30, 2022 for the occurrence of MG. Ten randomly selected controls were matched to each case of new-onset MG on age and sex. For the second aim, a nested case-control study was conducted in a cohort of 1446 MG patients. Four randomly selected MG patients (controls) were matched to each case of MG exacerbation. Exposure to COVID-19 vaccine in the prior 4 weeks was assessed in cases and controls.

RESULTS

Overall, 332 patients had new-onset MG and were matched with 3320 controls. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models showed that the odds ratio (OR) for new-onset MG, associated with COVID-19 vaccine, was 1.14 (95% CI 0.73-1.78). The results were consistent in sensitivity analysis that used more stringent criteria to define MG. Overall, 62 patients with MG exacerbation were matched to 248 MG controls. The multivariable OR for MG exacerbation, associated with COVID-19 vaccine, was 1.35 (95% CI 0.37-4.89). All results were similar when the prior exposure to COVID-19 vaccine was extended to 8 weeks.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is not associated with increased risk of new-onset nor exacerbation of MG.

Association Between Guillain-Barré Syndrome and COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination: A Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Existing data regarding occurrence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and vaccination are inconclusive. We aimed to assess the association between GBS and both severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19 vaccine.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of 3,193,951 patients aged 16 years or older, without a diagnosis of prior GBS, from the largest health care provider in Israel. Participants were followed from January 1, 2021, until June 30, 2022, for the occurrence of GBS. Ten randomly selected controls were matched to each case of GBS on age and sex. We assessed both SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine administration in the prior 6 weeks in cases and controls.

RESULTS

Overall, 76 patients were diagnosed with GBS during follow-up and were matched to 760 controls. A positive test for SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 9 (11.8%) cases and 18 (2.4%) controls. An administration of COVID-19 vaccine was detected in 8 (10.5%) cases (all Pfizer-BioNTech [BNT162b2] vaccine) and 136 (17.9%) controls (134 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine). Multivariable conditional logistic regression models showed that the odds ratio for GBS associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccine administration was 6.30 (95% CI 2.55-15.56) and 0.41 (95% CI 0.17-0.96), respectively. The results were similar when exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccine administration was ascertained in the prior 4 and 8 weeks, although did not reach statistical significance for COVID-19 vaccine at 4 weeks.

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with increased risk of GBS, whereas Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is associated with decreased risk of GBS.

The risk assessment of uveitis after COVID-19 diagnosis: A multicenter population-based study

Reports on uveitis after COVID-19 have been limited. Our objective was to examine the risk of uveitis among COVID-19 patients. This was a retrospective cohort study based on the TriNetX platform. The exposure group was patients with positive laboratory test result for SARS-CoV-2 and the comparison group was those tested negative for COVID-19 throughout the study period. The endpoint is the new diagnoses of uveitis. This study composed of 2 105 424 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (55.4% female; 62.5% white; mean age at index 40.7 years) and 2 105 424 patients (55.4% female; 62.4% white; mean age at index 40.7 years) who never had COVID-19. There was significantly increased risk of new diagnosis of uveitis since the first month after diagnosis of COVID-19 compared with matched controls (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03-1.34) up to 24 months (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.09-1.22). Our findings strengthen those previously raised by case series with a larger and multicenter study. We found that uveitis was significantly associated with COVID-19 infection. Our findings reiterate the need for careful investigation as well as increased awareness from ophthalmologists in considering the possibility of COVID-19 in vulnerable patients with new presentation of uveitis.

Challenges in posterior uveitis-tips and tricks for the retina specialist

PURPOSE

Posterior uveitis is a common chorioretinal pathology affecting all ages worldwide and is a frequent reason for referral to the retina clinic. The spectrum of etiologies for uveitis is very broad and includes infectious and auto-immune diseases. Inflammation can be confined to the eye or may be a part of systemic disease. A useful outline is therefore proposed to aid in the correct diagnosis of these challenging entities. The situation is further complicated by the fact that many neoplastic conditions resemble features of posterior uveitis; they are known as "masqueraders of uveitis". Here, we summarize different posterior uveitides that present with rare findings, along with masqueraders that can be difficult to distinguish. These conditions pose a diagnostic dilemma resulting in delay in treatment because of diagnostic uncertainty.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed on the MEDLINE/PUBMED, EBSCO and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from January 1985 to January 2022 for original studies and reviews of predetermined diagnoses that include posterior uveitic entities, panuveitis and masquerade syndromes.

RESULTS

We described conditions that can present as mimickers of posterior uveitis (i.e., immune check-points inhibitors and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like uveitis; leukemia and lymphoma associated posterior uveitis), inflammatory conditions that present as mimickers of retinal diseases (i.e., Purtscher-like retinopathy as a presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus; central serous chorioretinopathy masquerading inflammatory exudative retinal detachment), and uveitic conditions with rare and diagnostically challenging etiologies (i.e., paradoxical inflammatory effects of anti-TNF-α; post vaccination uveitis; ocular inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs).

CONCLUSION

This review of unique posterior uveitis cases highlights the overlapping features of posterior uveitis (paradoxical inflammatory effects of anti -TNF α and uveitis; Purtscher-like retinopathy as a presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus, …) and the nature of retinal conditions (ischemic ocular syndrome, or central retinal vein occlusion, amyloidosis, inherited conditions like retinitis pigmentosa, autosomal dominant neovascular inflammatory vitreoretinopathy (ADNIV), etc.…) that may mimic them is represented. Careful review of past uveitis history, current medications and recent vaccinations, detailed examination of signs of past or present inflammation, eventually genetic testing and/ or multimodal retinal imaging (like fluorescein angiography, EDI-OCT, OCT-angiography for lupus Purtscher-like retinopathy evaluation, or ICG for central serous retinopathy, or retinal amyloid angiopathy) may aid in correct diagnosis.

COVID Vaccine-Associated Uveitis

PURPOSE

Following the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, different vaccines were developed and approved by the main medical authorities under emergency protocol regulations. Although highly effective and well-tolerated in most patients, vaccines can uncommonly cause ocular adverse effects. In this article, the current evidence related to vaccine-associated uveitis is reviewed.

METHODS

A literature review of uveitis post various SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations.

RESULTS

Uveitis was reported following various forms of vaccinations but was more commonly seen following the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which is the most used vaccination worldwide. In western countries, the most common uveitis is mild anterior uveitis, developing within a week of first or subsequent vaccination with good resolution following appropriate topical steroid therapy in most cases. Posterior uveitis and particularly Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease was more prevalent in Asia. Uveitis may develop among known uveitis patients and those with other autoimmune diseases.

CONCLUSION

Uveitis following Covid vaccinations is uncommon and has a good prognosis.

Optic Neuritis After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination

BACKGROUND

To describe recent cases of optic neuritis in patients who received a vaccine for COVID-19.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with optic neuritis after a recent COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), in one university-affiliated tertiary hospital, from January 2021 to June 2021. Data were obtained from medical charts.

RESULTS

We describe 7 patients who developed optic neuritis after immunization with the BNT162b2 vaccine.

CONCLUSIONS

A causal relationship cannot be deduced, and the importance of COVID-19 vaccination is not challenged. However, the authors encourage a prospective monitoring and reporting system for all patients receiving COVID-19 vaccines, to further assess the spectrum of adverse events in large databases.

Ocular Adverse Events after Coronavirus Disease 2019 mRNA Vaccination: Matched Cohort and Self-Controlled Case Series Studies Using a Large Database

PURPOSE

To investigate the risk of ocular adverse events after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination.

DESIGN

Matched cohort and self-controlled case series (SCCS) studies.

PARTICIPANTS

We used a population-based database of medical claims and vaccination records in a large Japanese city. In the matched cohort study, we identified individuals who received COVID-19 vaccination (BNT162b2) from February 2021 to September 2021. One control was selected from nonvaccinated individuals by matching time, date of birth, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and the enrollment period for health insurance. In the SCCS study, we analyzed individuals who developed ocular adverse events.

METHODS

In the matched cohort study, we applied the Kaplan-Meier estimator to estimate the cumulative incidence of ocular adverse events over 21 days after the first dose and 84 days after the second dose. In the SCCS method, we used conditional Poisson regression to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of ocular adverse events during the risk periods (0-21 days after the first dose and 0-84 days after the second dose) compared with the remaining periods.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Composite outcome of uveitis, scleritis, retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and optic neuritis.

RESULTS

There were 99 718 pairs eligible for the matched cohort study after the first dose (mean age, 69.3 years; male, 44%). The vaccinated and control groups developed 29 and 21 events, respectively, over 21 days after the first dose, and 79 and 28 events, respectively, over 84 days after the second dose. The differences in cumulative incidence (reference, the control group) were 2.9 (95% confidence interval, -14.5 to 19.1) events/100 000 persons and 51.3 (16.2-84.3) events/100 000 persons, respectively, for the first and second doses. The SCCS study showed the IRRs of 0.89 (0.62-1.28) and 0.89 (0.71-1.11) for the first and second doses, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The matched cohort analysis found an increased risk for the composite outcome after the second dose; however, the SCCS analysis showed no increased risk. Considering that the SCCS can cancel out time-invariant confounders, the current results suggest that COVID-19 vaccination is unlikely to causally increase the risk of ocular adverse events.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Early vs Deferred Non-Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccination Among Chinese Patients With a History of Inactive Uveitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Improper host response to COVID-19 vaccines could trigger immune-mediated adverse events. The question remains whether COVID-19 vaccination should be postponed until complete remission in patients with uveitis, a preexisting immune-related condition.

OBJECTIVE

To compare recommendations for early and deferred COVID-19 vaccination with respect to uveitis outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This open-label, randomized clinical trial at a large, specialized teaching center for uveitis care in China enrolled unvaccinated patients with inactive uveitis between August 10, 2021, and February 22, 2022, with follow-up to June 6, 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive recommendation for early or deferred COVID-19 vaccination after complete remission of uveitis. Non-messenger RNA (non-mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines were available in China during the trial.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the time to symptomatic uveitis worsening during 3 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included uveitis activity and best-corrected visual acuity at 3 months.

RESULTS

Of the 543 participants (304 women [56.0%]; median age, 35 [IQR, 26-49] years), 262 were recommended for early vaccination and 281 for deferred vaccination. By month 3, 109 patients (41.6%) in the early group had been vaccinated compared with 14 (5.0%) in the deferred recommendation group. In the intention-to-treat population, the time to symptomatic uveitis worsening was shorter in the early group than in the deferred group (hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.09-2.59]; P = .01 by log-rank test). Changes in anterior chamber cells, vitreous haze, and best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to month 3 appeared similar in the 2 groups in the evaluable population after the month 3 in-person visit.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial of patients with inactive uveitis, recommendation for early non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccination resulted in a higher incidence of self-reported symptomatic uveitis worsening with possible reporting bias compared with recommendation for deferred vaccination, but no adverse effects were observed in disease and visual prognosis at 3 months. These findings would be useful to guide the individual timing choices of non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in this clinically vulnerable population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2100049467.

Navigating Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination and Uveitis: Identifying the Rates and Risk of Recurrent Uveitis after Coronavirus Disease Vaccination

PURPOSE

To identify rates of uveitis reactivation both before and after the coronavirus disease (COVID) 2019 vaccine in subjects with a previous diagnosis of uveitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects were identified from the Inflammatory Eye Disease Registry at Auckland District Health Board diagnosed with uveitis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020.

METHODS

Date of COVID vaccination was determined from the patient clinical record. Rate of flare was calculated for 3 months before vaccination and 3 months after each vaccination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Uveitis flare was defined as the presence of new uveitis activity or increased activity that required a change in uveitis treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 4184 eyes of 3008 patients were included in the study with a total of 8474 vaccinations given during the study period. Median age was 54.8 years, and 1474 (49.0%) were female. Noninfectious etiology was most common, occurring in 2296 patients (76.3%) and infectious etiology occurring in 712 patients (23.7%). Rate of uveitis flare was 12.3 per 1000 patient-months at baseline, 20.7 after the first dose, 15.0 after the second dose, 12.8 after the third dose, and 23.9 after the fourth dose. The median period of quiescence before flare was 3.9 years. An increase in uveitis flare was seen in both infectious uveitis (baseline 13.1 compared with 20.2 after first dose, 154% increase) and noninfectious uveitis (baseline 12.4 compared with 20.9 after first dose, 169% increase). Risk factors for uveitis flare were identified to be recurrent uveitis, chronic uveitis, shorter period of quiescence, and first dose of vaccine. Median time to uveitis flare was 0.53 months after the first vaccination, 1.74 months after the second vaccination, and 1.35 months after the third vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates an increased risk of uveitis flare after the first dose of COVID vaccination. This risk was highest in those with previous recurrences, chronic uveitis, and shorter period of quiescence.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Posterior ocular manifestations following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: a case series

Purpose

To report the occurrence of posterior ocular adverse events following the administration of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.

Methods

A retrospective consecutive case series, in which the medical files of patients presenting with ocular adverse events within 30 days of the vaccine inoculation, were analyzed.

Results

Four patients (2 females) were included in the study. The diagnoses included: posterior scleritis, paracentral acute middle maculopathy, herpes panuveitis, and Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada (VKH)-like uveitis. Three of the patients had no relevant ocular history, but the patient who developed scleritis was in remission without medical therapy for four years, until the flare-up, which occurred one day after the vaccine. All patients improved with treatment.

Conclusion

Though a causal relationship cannot be definitively established, the temporal relationship suggests a possible link between the COVID-19 vaccine and the posterior ocular complications. The benefits of vaccination clearly outweigh the potential adverse effects; however, ophthalmologists should be aware of the potential for vaccine-associated uveitis.