Laboratory tests used to help diagnose von Willebrand disease: an update

A Ten-Year Experience with the Diagnosis of Von Willebrand Disease in Mexico Based on a Cost-Effective Strategy

BACKGROUND

Von Willebrand disease (VWD), is the most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide, but its diagnosis is complicated, expensive, and poorly evaluated in several countries.

OBJECTIVE

To report our long-term experience with the diagnosis of VWD based on a cost-effective strategy.

METHODS

We studied 802 Mexican patients, men and women, children, and adults, with clinical suspicion of VWD. The following tests were performed: blood count, bleeding time, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen concentration, VWF antigen, ristocetin cofactor activity, collagen binding assay, ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation, FVIII activity, and VWF multimers analysis.

RESULTS

VWD was diagnosed in 639 patients; 582 had type 1 VWD (91.1%). Type 2 VWD was found in 52 patients (8.1%). Type 2A was present in 25 cases (48.1%), while types 2B and 2 M accounted for 21 (40.4) and six (11.5%) cases, respectively. Type 3 VWD was present in five patients (0.8%). The mean age of patients with VWD was 25.3 years (range: 2-71) for males and 22.1 (range: 1-54) for females. The diagnosis was inconclusive in 40 cases (5.0%) and was discarded in 123 (15.3%). Blood group O was the most common among patients with VWD.

CONCLUSION

Using a low-cost diagnostic strategy, we confirmed that VWD is as common in Mexico as in other countries. Review of the patient's history is mandatory when VWD is suspected, although laboratory confirmation may be difficult and expensive. The consequences of a lack of accurate and timely diagnosis affect the promptness and quality of treatment.

The future of siRNA-mediated approaches to treat von Willebrand disease

INTRODUCTION

The clinical management of the inherited bleeding disorder von Willebrand disease (VWD) focuses on normalizing circulating levels of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) to prevent or control bleeding events. The heterogeneous nature of VWD, however, complicates effective disease management and development of universal treatment guidelines.

AREAS COVERED

The current treatment modalities of VWD and their limitations are described and why this prompts the development of new treatment approaches. In particular, RNA-based therapeutics have gained significant interest because of their ability to reversibly alter gene expression with long-term efficacy. In the field of VWD, small-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) have been explored through various strategies to improve disease phenotypes. These different approaches are discussed as well as their potential impact on reshaping the future therapeutic landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

Current treatments for VWD often require frequent intravenous administration of VWF concentrates or desmopressin, with only short-term benefits. Moreover, remaining circulating mutant VWF can cause detrimental effects. Allele-selective siRNA-based therapies could provide more reliable and long-term disease correction by specifically targeting mutant VWF. This approach could be applied to a large part of the population aligning with the growing emphasis on personalized treatment and patient-centered care in VWD management.

Progress in von Willebrand Disease Treatment: Evolution towards Newer Therapies

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a very heterogenous disease, resulting in different phenotypes and different degrees of bleeding severity. Established therapies (i.e., desmopressin, antifibrinolytic agents, hormone therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding, and von Willebrand factor [VWF] concentrates) may work in some subtypes, but not in all patients. In recent years, progress has been made in improving the diagnosis of VWD subtypes, allowing for more specific therapy. The impact of VWD on women's daily lives has also come to the fore in recent years, with hormone therapy, tranexamic acid, or recombinant VWF as treatment options. New treatment approaches, including the replacement of lacking factor VIII (FVIII) function, may work in those subgroups affected by severe FVIII deficiency. Reducing the clearance of VWF is an alternative treatment pathway; for example, rondaptivon pegol is a VWFA1 domain-binding aptamer which not only improves plasma VWF/FVIII levels, but also corrects platelet counts in thrombocytopenic type 2B VWD patients. These approaches are currently in clinical development, which will be the focus of this review. In addition, half-life extension methods are also important for the improvement of patients' quality of life. Targeting specific mutations may further lead to personalized treatments in the future. Finally, a few randomized controlled trials, although relatively small, have been published in recent years, aiming to achieve a higher level of evidence in future guidelines.

Nanotopography of Polystyrene/Poly(methyl methacrylate) for the Promotion of Patient Specific Von Willebrand Factor Entrapment and Platelet Adhesion in a Whole Blood Microfluidic Assay

Platelet function testing is essential for the diagnosis of patients with bleeding disorders. Specifically, there is a need for a whole blood assay that is capable of analysing platelet behaviour in contact with a patient-specific autologous von Willebrand factor (vWF), under physiologically relevant conditions. The creation of surface topography capable of entrapping and uncoiling vWF for the support of subsequent platelet adhesion within the same blood sample offers a potential basis for such an assay. In this study, spin coating of polystyrene/poly (methyl methacrylate) (PS/PMMA) demixed solutions onto glass substrates in air has been used to attain surfaces with well-defined topographical features. The effect of augmenting the PS/PMMA solution with uniform 50 µm PS microspheres that can moderate the demixing process on the resultant surface features has also been investigated. The topographical features created here by spin coating under ambient air pressure conditions, rather than in nitrogen, which previous work reports, produces substrate surfaces with the ability to entrap vWF from flowing blood and facilitate platelet adhesion. The direct optical visualisation of fluorescently-labelled platelets indicates that topography resulting from inclusion of PS microspheres in the PS/PMMA spin coating solution increases the total number of platelets that adhere to the substrate surface over the period of the microfluidic assay. However, a detailed analysis of the adhesion rate, mean translocating velocity, mean translocation distance, and fraction of the stably adhered platelets measured during blood flow under arterial equivalent mechanical shear conditions indicates no significant difference for topographies created with or without inclusion of the PS microspheres.

Plasma VWF: Ag levels predict long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Background

A vital role in coronary artery disease is played by Von Willebrand factor (VWF), which serves as a bridge between platelets and the subendothelial matrix after vessel damage. The purpose of the study was to assess the validity of plasma VWF antigen (VWF: Ag) levels as a predictor of clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods

Three hundred and seventy-four patients were studied following coronary angiography, including 209 patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction and 165 healthy participants. Coronary angiography was followed by measurement of plasma VWF: Ag levels. Over a 2-year follow-up period, major adverse cardiopulmonary and cerebrovascular events (MACEs) were the primary endpoint. All-cause mortality was investigated as a secondary endpoint.

Results

When compared to controls, patients with AMI had mean plasma VWF: Ag levels that were ~1.63 times higher (0.860 ± 0.309 vs. 0.529 ± 0.258 IU/ml; P < 0.001). The plasma VWF: Ag levels were substantially higher in patients who experienced MACEs after myocardial infarction vs. those without MACEs (1.088 ± 0.253 vs. 0.731 ± 0.252 IU/ml; P < 0.001). For predicting long-term MACEs using the optimal cut-off value (0.7884 IU/ml) of VWF: Ag, ROC curve area for VWF: Ag was 0.847, with a sensitivity of 87.2% and a specificity of 66.3% (95%CI: 0.792-0.902; P = 0.001). Two-year follow-up revealed a strong link between higher plasma VWF: Ag levels and long-term MACEs. At the 2-year follow-up, multivariate regression analysis revealed an independent relationship between plasma VWF: Ag levels and MACEs (HR = 6.004, 95%CI: 2.987-12.070).

Conclusion

We found evidence that plasma VWF: Ag levels were independent risk factors for AMI. Meanwhile, higher plasma VWF: Ag levels are associated with long-term MACEs in people with AMI.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Activity by a Glycoprotein Ib-Binding Assay (VWF:GPIbR): HemosIL von Willebrand Factor Ristocetin Cofactor Activity on ACL TOP®

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a lifelong and common inherited bleeding disorder caused by a quantitative deficiency and/or qualitative defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF). In order to establish the correct diagnosis of VWD, various tests must be conducted, including evaluation of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), and VWF functional activity. The platelet-dependent VWF activity is measured in different ways, with the historical ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) using platelet aggregometry now replaced with newer assays that offer better precision, lower limits of detection, low coefficient of variation, and are fully automated. The VWF activity by glycoprotein Ib-binding assays (VWF:GPIbR) measured on the ACL TOP^® platform represents an automated assay that instead of using platelets employs latex beads coated with recombinant wild-type GPIb. VWF in the test sample agglutinates the polystyrene beads coated with GPIb in the presence of ristocetin. The reduction of turbidity as beads agglutinate represents a linear relationship with VWF:GPIbR activity. Using a ratio of VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag, the VWF:GPIbR assay also provides good sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing type 1 VWD from type 2. The following chapter describes a detailed protocol for the VWF:GPIbR assay.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Disease Using a Composite Rapid 3-Test Chemiluminescence-Based von Willebrand Factor Assay Panel

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most commonly reported inherited bleeding disorder and may alternatively occur as an acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS). VWD/AVWS develops from defects and/or deficiency in the adhesive plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD/AVWS diagnosis/exclusion remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of VWF defects and the technical limitations of many VWF tests, as well as the VWF test panels (number and type of tests) chosen by many laboratories. Laboratory testing for these disorders utilizes evaluation of VWF level and activity, with activity assessment needing several tests due to the many functions performed by VWF in order to help counteract bleeding. This report explains procedures for evaluating VWF level (antigen; VWF:Ag) and activity by means of a chemiluminescence-based panel. Activity assays comprise collagen binding (VWF:CB) and a ristocetin-based recombinant glycoprotein Ib-binding (VWF:GPIbR) assay that reflects a contemporary alternative to classical ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). This 3-test VWF panel (Ag, CB, GPIbR [RCo]) reflects the only such composite panel available on a single platform and is performed on an AcuStar instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory). Certain regional approvals may also allow this 3-test VWF panel to be performed on the BioFlash instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory).

Hemostasis and Thrombosis: An Overview Focusing on Associated Laboratory Testing to Diagnose and Help Manage Related Disorders

Hemostasis is a complex but balanced process that permit normal blood flow, without adverse events. Disruption of the balance may lead to bleeding or thrombotic events, and clinical interventions may be required. Hemostasis laboratories typically offer an array of tests, including routine coagulation and specialized hemostasis assays used to guide clinicians for diagnosing and managing patients. Routine assays may be used to screen patients for hemostasis-related disturbances but may also be used for drug monitoring, measuring efficacy of replacement or adjunctive therapy, and other indications, which may then be used to guide further patient management. Similarly, "specialized" assays are used for diagnostic purposes or may be used to monitor or measure efficacy of a given therapy. This chapter provides an overview of hemostasis and thrombosis, with a focus on laboratory testing that may be used to diagnose and help manage patients suspected of hemostasis- and thrombosis-related disorders.

Polyphosphate Activates von Willebrand Factor Interaction with Glycoprotein Ib in the Absence of Factor VIII In Vitro

Polyphosphate (polyP), a phosphate polymer released by activated platelets, may modulate various stages of hemostasis by binding to blood proteins. In this context, we previously reported that polyP binds to the von Willebrand factor (VWF). One of the most significant functions of VWF is to bind to and protect the blood circulating Factor VIII (FVIII). Therefore, here, we study the role of polyP in the VWF-FVIII complex in vitro and suggest its biological significance. Surface plasmon resonance and electrophoretic mobility assays indicated that polyP binds dynamically to VWF only in the absence of FVIII. Using the VWF Ristocetin Cofactor assay, the most accepted method for studying VWF in platelet adhesion, we found that polyP activates this role of VWF only at low levels of FVIII, such as in plasmas with chemically depleted FVIII and plasmas from severe hemophilia A patients. Moreover, we demonstrated that FVIII competes with polyP in the activation of VWF. Finally, polyP also increases the binding of VWF to platelets in samples from patients with type 2 and type 3 von Willebrand disease. We propose that polyP may be used in designing new therapies to activate VWF when FVIII cannot be used.

Evaluating for Suspected Child Abuse: Conditions That Predispose to Bleeding

Child abuse might be suspected when children present with cutaneous bruising, intracranial hemorrhage, or other manifestations of bleeding. In these cases, it is necessary to consider medical conditions that predispose to easy bleeding or bruising. When evaluating for the possibility of bleeding disorders and other conditions that predispose to hemorrhage, it is important for pediatricians to consider the child's presenting history, medical history, and physical examination findings before initiating a laboratory investigation. Many medical conditions can predispose to easy bleeding. Before ordering laboratory tests for a disease, it is useful to understand the biochemical basis and clinical presentation of the disorder, condition prevalence, and test characteristics. This technical report reviews the major medical conditions that predispose to bruising or bleeding and should be considered when evaluating for abusive injury.

How Do Laboratories Perform von Willebrand Disease Diagnostics and Classification of von Willebrand Disease Patients? Results from External Quality Data and an International Survey

BACKGROUND

 Reduced or dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) may lead to von Willebrand disease (VWD), which is a common inherited bleeding disorder. VWD is classified into three major types: type 1 is a partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 is a complete quantitative deficiency of VWF, and type 2 consists of qualitative abnormalities of VWF. To arrive at a correct VWD diagnosis, multiple tests and a correct interpretation of these tests are needed.

AIM

 The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the approach of laboratories toward VWD diagnosis.

METHODS

 Data from four samples of the external quality assessment (EQA) VWF surveys of the ECAT (External Quality Control for Assays and Tests) were evaluated. Furthermore, results were analyzed of a questionnaire that was sent to hemostasis laboratories about VWD diagnostic approaches.

RESULTS

 For most EQA samples, the majority of participants indicated the correct classification. However, 6 to 60% indicated another classification. For all samples, significant differences in VWF results were observed between the correct and incorrect classifications. The questionnaire demonstrated that the testing approach varied between the laboratories, especially for parameters that were essential for discrimination between VWD type 1 and healthy individuals, as well as the cutoff values used to discriminate VWD types 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

 Diagnosis of VWD is heterogeneous in diagnostic approach, guidelines, and cutoff values within large ranges of VWF results between laboratories. Harmonization of approaches and increased accuracy of VWF measurements may help to establish a correct diagnosis.

How Do Laboratories Perform von Willebrand Disease Diagnostics and Classification of von Willebrand Disease Patients? Results from External Quality Data and an International Survey

Background Reduced or dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) may lead to von Willebrand disease (VWD), which is a common inherited bleeding disorder. VWD is classified into three major types: type 1 is a partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 is a complete quantitative deficiency of VWF, and type 2 consists of qualitative abnormalities of VWF. To arrive at a correct VWD diagnosis, multiple tests and a correct interpretation of these tests are needed.

Aim The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the approach of laboratories toward VWD diagnosis.

Methods Data from four samples of the external quality assessment (EQA) VWF surveys of the ECAT (External Quality Control for Assays and Tests) were evaluated. Furthermore, results were analyzed of a questionnaire that was sent to hemostasis laboratories about VWD diagnostic approaches.

Results For most EQA samples, the majority of participants indicated the correct classification. However, 6 to 60% indicated another classification. For all samples, significant differences in VWF results were observed between the correct and incorrect classifications. The questionnaire demonstrated that the testing approach varied between the laboratories, especially for parameters that were essential for discrimination between VWD type 1 and healthy individuals, as well as the cutoff values used to discriminate VWD types 1 and 2.

Conclusions Diagnosis of VWD is heterogeneous in diagnostic approach, guidelines, and cutoff values within large ranges of VWF results between laboratories. Harmonization of approaches and increased accuracy of VWF measurements may help to establish a correct diagnosis.

How Do Laboratories Perform von Willebrand Disease Diagnostics and Classification of von Willebrand Disease Patients? Results from External Quality Data and an International Survey

BACKGROUND

 Reduced or dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) may lead to von Willebrand disease (VWD), which is a common inherited bleeding disorder. VWD is classified into three major types: type 1 is a partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 is a complete quantitative deficiency of VWF, and type 2 consists of qualitative abnormalities of VWF. To arrive at a correct VWD diagnosis, multiple tests and a correct interpretation of these tests are needed.

AIM

 The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the approach of laboratories toward VWD diagnosis.

METHODS

 Data from four samples of the external quality assessment (EQA) VWF surveys of the ECAT (External Quality Control for Assays and Tests) were evaluated. Furthermore, results were analyzed of a questionnaire that was sent to hemostasis laboratories about VWD diagnostic approaches.

RESULTS

 For most EQA samples, the majority of participants indicated the correct classification. However, 6 to 60% indicated another classification. For all samples, significant differences in VWF results were observed between the correct and incorrect classifications. The questionnaire demonstrated that the testing approach varied between the laboratories, especially for parameters that were essential for discrimination between VWD type 1 and healthy individuals, as well as the cutoff values used to discriminate VWD types 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

 Diagnosis of VWD is heterogeneous in diagnostic approach, guidelines, and cutoff values within large ranges of VWF results between laboratories. Harmonization of approaches and increased accuracy of VWF measurements may help to establish a correct diagnosis.

Advances in laboratory assessment of thrombosis and hemostasis

Technologies in laboratory diagnostics are changing fast with progress in understanding and therapy of diseases. Unfortunately, new analyzers are often needed to be installed in a clinical laboratory to implement such techniques. The demand for new hardware is a bottleneck in improving the diagnostic services for many facilities with limited resources. In this regard, hemostasis laboratories take a slightly different position. Because many in vitro diagnostic tests target the functional aspects of hemostasis, further meaningful information can be obtained from the same analyzers as in current use. Automated coagulometers are good candidates for such further utilization. Clot waveform analysis is a leading example. Behind the simple values reported as clotting time, clotting curves exist that represent the process of fibrin clot formation. Clot waveform analysis examines the clotting curves and derives new parameters other than clotting times. The clot waveform parameters are now in active use in assessing the hemostatic potential of hemorrhagic patients. Clinical application of coagulometers can also be widened by modifying the reagent formulation. For example, the chromogenic factor VIII assay with bovine source reagent compositions has recently been introduced for hemophilia A patients on emicizumab prophylaxis. Also, new immunoturbidimetric functional assays for von Willebrand factor have been developed recently. Thus, new clinically relevant information can be mined from the automated coagulometers that are based on old technology.

The Intriguing Connections between von Willebrand Factor, ADAMTS13 and Cancer

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a complex and large protein that is cleaved by ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13), and together they serve important roles in normal hemostasis. Malignancy can result in both a deficiency or excess of VWF, leading to aberrant hemostasis with either increased bleeding or thrombotic complications, as respectively seen with acquired von Willebrand syndrome and cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. There is emerging evidence to suggest VWF also plays a role in inflammation, angiogenesis and tumor biology, and it is likely that VWF promotes tumor metastasis. High VWF levels have been documented in a number of malignancies and in some cases correlate with more advanced disease and poor prognosis. Tumor cells can induce endothelial cells to release VWF and certain tumor cells have the capacity for de novo expression of VWF, leading to a proinflammatory microenvironment that is likely conducive to tumor progression, metastasis and micro-thrombosis. VWF can facilitate tumor cell adhesion to endothelial cells and aids with the recruitment of platelets into the tumor microenvironment, where tumor/platelet aggregates are able to form and facilitate hematogenous spread of cancer. As ADAMTS13 moderates VWF level and activity, it too is potentially involved in the pathophysiology of these events. VWF and ADAMTS13 have been explored as tumor biomarkers for the detection and prognostication of certain malignancies; however, the results are underdeveloped and so currently not utilized for clinical use. Further studies addressing the basic science mechanisms and real word epidemiology are required to better appreciate the intriguing connections between VWF, ADAMTS13 and malignancy. A better understanding of the role VWF and ADAMTS13 play in the promotion and inhibition of cancer and its metastasis will help direct further translational studies to aid with the development of novel cancer prognostic tools and treatment modalities.

Establishing reference intervals for von Willebrand factor multimers

Background

von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers (VWF:MM) methodologies are technically difficult, laborious, time consuming, non-standardized and results vary between laboratories. A new semi automated VWF:MM assay is available for routine use (Sebia). Due to lack of reference values for VWF:MM fractions, results interpretation can be challenging in some cases. The aim of this study was to determine reference intervals for low molecular weight (LMWM), intermediate molecular weight (IMWM) and high molecular weight (HMWM) multimers.

Methods

By the international cooperation initiated between 4 countries (Estonia, Latvia, France, and USA) 131 samples of relatively healthy individuals were analyzed for VWF:MM (in total 51 males and 80 non-pregnant females aged 17-69 years). Reference intervals were calculated according to CLSI C28-A3 standard.

Results

The proposed reference intervals for VWF:MM were calculated for LMWM 10.4-22.5%, IMWM 22.6-37.6%, HMWM 45.6-66.6%. Age related differences were seen in IMWM and HMWM (p<0.001 and 0.038). There was no gender related difference observed. Geographically LMWM results of France were different from the other regions (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Quantification of VWF:MM fractions, in addition to qualitative assessment of VWF:MM patterns, has the potential to aid in differential diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) subtypes. The reference values calculated in this study can be used in future research to establish clinical decision limits.

Involvement of von Willebrand factor and botrocetin in the thrombocytopenia induced by Bothrops jararaca snake venom

Patients bitten by snakes consistently manifest a bleeding tendency, in which thrombocytopenia, consumption coagulopathy, mucous bleeding, and, more rarely, thrombotic microangiopathy, are observed. Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is required for primary hemostasis, and some venom proteins, such as botrocetin (a C-type lectin-like protein) and snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMP), disturb the normal interaction between platelets and VWF, possibly contributing to snakebite-induced bleedings. To understand the relationship among plasma VWF, platelets, botrocetin and SVMP from Bothrops jararaca snake venom (BjV) in the development of thrombocytopenia, we used (a) Wistar rats injected s.c. with BjV preincubated with anti-botrocetin antibodies (ABA) and/or Na2-EDTA (a SVMP inhibitor), and (b) VWF knockout mice (Vwf-/-) injected with BjV. Under all conditions, BjV induced a rapid and intense thrombocytopenia. In rats, BjV alone reduced the levels of VWF:Ag, VWF:CB, high molecular weight multimers of VWF, ADAMTS13 activity, and factor VIII. Moreover, VWF:Ag levels in rats that received BjV preincubated with Na2-EDTA and/or ABA tended to recover faster. In mice, BjV caused thrombocytopenia in both Vwf-/- and C57BL/6 (background control) strains, and VWF:Ag levels tended to decrease in C57BL/6, demonstrating that thrombocytopenia was independent of the presence of plasma VWF. These findings showed that botrocetin present in BjV failed to affect the extent or the time course of thrombocytopenia induced by envenomation, but it contributed to decrease the levels and function of plasma VWF. Thus, VWF alterations during B. jararaca envenomation are an ancillary event, and not the main mechanism leading to decreased platelet counts.

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: An assessment of the quality of testing in North American laboratories

BACKGROUND

Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is complex. Reliance on laboratory testing can be problematic as different VWD screening panels, assays and methodologies can produce analytic variability in test results.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the degree of imprecision among the VWD assays and within the platelet binding activity (PBA) assays, to determine the consensus among the VWD assays for correct classification of sample results, and to determine consensus among laboratories' von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer interpretations and final interpretations of the VWD panels.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Proficiency testing results from the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA) submitted by laboratories from 2010 to 2019 for all normal, type (T) 1 VWD and T2 VWD samples were analysed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Imprecision was lowest for VWF antigen and highest for collagen binding activity (CBA) with median coefficient of variation (CV) of 12% (interquartile range (IQR) 7%) and 23% (IQR 21%) respectively. Within the VWF PBA assays, the gain-of-function mutant GP1b binding (VWF: GP1bM) methods had the least imprecision (CV 9%, IQR 10%). All assays, including the various PBA methods had excellent consensus. The majority of laboratories agreed that normal (median consensus-82%, IQR 16%) and T1 VWD (median consensus-100%, IQR 9%) samples had normal multimer distribution. Consensus among laboratories for final interpretations was excellent for normal samples (median 81%, IQR 8%), good for T1 VWD samples (median 59%, IQR 9%), and fair for T2 VWD samples (median 44%, IQR 21%). Consensus on final interpretation decreased as sample complexity increased.

Why is Misdiagnosis of von Willebrand Disease Still Prevalent and How Can We Overcome It? A Focus on Clinical Considerations and Recommendations

Despite von Willebrand disease (VWD) being the most common inherited bleeding disorder, its accurate diagnosis is frequently shrouded by diagnostic pitfalls. VWD is frequently under-diagnosed, over-diagnosed and misdiagnosed, leading to significant avoidable patient morbidity and health care system burden. At the heart of this dilemma lies the heterogeneity and complexity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and associated defects, and the necessity of coalescing clinical and laboratory features to obtain an accurate diagnosis. Common pitfalls include poor clinical and scientific understanding and familiarity with VWD, incomplete clinical history and lack of routine use of standardised bleeding assessment tools (BAT), difficulty in accessing a comprehensive repertoire of laboratory tests, significant pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical issues, and lack of expertise in laboratory testing and interpretation. Errors, resulting in under-diagnosis, over-diagnosis, and misdiagnosis of VWD, are presented and discussed. Strategies to minimise errors include better education of clinicians and laboratory staff on VWD, routine use of validated BAT, utilising a comprehensive gamut of laboratory investigations according to a standardised algorithm, and repeating testing to minimise pre-analytical errors. Recommendations on appropriate patient selection for VWD testing, how VWD should be investigated in the laboratory, and how to ensure test results are accurately interpreted in the correct clinical context are detailed.

ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

BACKGROUND

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder known in humans. Accurate and timely diagnosis presents numerous challenges.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about VWD diagnosis.

METHODS

ASH, ISTH, NHF, and WFH established a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 4 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) supported the guideline-development process, including performing or updating systematic evidence reviews up to 8 January 2020. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subsequently subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 11 recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Key recommendations of these guidelines include the role of bleeding-assessment tools in the assessment of patients suspected of VWD, diagnostic assays and laboratory cutoffs for type 1 and type 2 VWD, how to approach a type 1 VWD patient with normalized levels over time, and the role of genetic testing vs phenotypic assays for types 2B and 2N. Future critical research priorities are also identified.

Potential misdiagnosis of von Willebrand disease caused by insufficient mixing after thawing frozen plasma

INTRODUCTION

von Willebrand disease (vWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency in von Willebrand factor (vWF), but many laboratories and clinicians continue to struggle with diagnosing or excluding vWD. Its diagnosis requires laboratory testing, which may be compromised by preanalytical events, including poor specimen quality. This study assessed 17 different preanalytical conditions as potential causes of vWD misdiagnosis.

METHODS

Specimens from healthy controls (N = 21) were obtained. vWF antigen and vWF activity were analyzed using a newly developed automatic coagulation analyzer according to various preanalytic conditions such as centrifugation conditions, storage room temperature before centrifugation, cold storage temperature after centrifugation, thawing conditions, and inadequate mixing of thawed citrated plasma following the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H21-A5 guidelines.

RESULTS

The only condition that was significantly different from the reference condition was lack of mixing after thawing frozen citrated plasma (vWF activity and antigen were reduced by 58.7% and 49.6%, respectively). Our study showed that mixing after thawing was more important than the chosen method of mixing.

CONCLUSION

Thawed plasma should be mixed because of the risk of misdiagnosing vWD. Further education regarding the importance of appropriate mixing is warranted to achieve results comparable to those of freshly centrifuged samples.

How we diagnose 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD): Use of a strategic algorithmic approach to distinguish 2M VWD from other VWD types

INTRODUCTION

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and caused by an absence, deficiency or defect in von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD is currently classified into six different types: 1, 2A, 2B, 2N, 2M, 3. Notably, 2M VWD is more often misdiagnosed as 2A or type 1 VWD than properly identified as 2M VWD.

AIM

To describe an algorithmic approach to better ensure appropriate identification of 2M VWD, and reduce its misdiagnosis, as supported by sequential laboratory testing.

METHODS

Comparative assessment of types 1, 2A, 2B and 2M VWD using various laboratory tests, including VWF antigen and several VWF activity assays, plus DDAVP challenge data, ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination (RIPA) data, multimer analysis and genetic testing.

RESULTS

Types 1, 2A, 2B and 2M VWD give characteristic test patterns that can provisionally classify patients into particular VWD types. Notably, type 1 VWD shows low levels of VWF, but VWF functional concordance (VWF activity/Ag ratios >0.6), with both baseline assessment and post-DDAVP. Types 2A, 2B and 2M VWD show VWF functional discordance (low VWF activity/Ag ratio(s)) dependent on the defect, but type 2M separates from 2A/2B VWD based on specific test patterns, especially with collagen binding vs glycoprotein Ib binding assays. RIPA identifies 2B VWD. Multimers separate 2M from 2A/2B.

CONCLUSION

We provide strategies to improve correct diagnosis of VWD, especially focussed on 2M VWD, and which can be used by most diagnostic haemostasis laboratories, reserving genetic analysis (if required) for confirmation.

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease in Western Mexico

INTRODUCTION

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder with a prevalence of 0.1%, characterised by quantitative or functional deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD diagnosis is based on symptomology, biochemical and genetic tests, but limited laboratory resources and VWD heterogeneity still generate an important subdiagnosis gap worldwide and in our country.

AIM

To identify the type and subtype of VWD in a cohort of patients with a history of excessive bleeding in Western Mexico.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study from 2012 to 2019 included patients with mucocutaneous bleeding or abnormal laboratory tests. A standardised questionnaire and confirmatory tests were applied: FVIII:C, VWF activity, VWF antigen, and VWF multimeric analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 297 patients recruited, 207 (69.7%) were excluded because their values exceeded 50% in VWF activity and VWF antigen. Of those 90 remaining, 54 (18.2%) had low VWF, and only 36 patients (12.1%) were diagnosed with VWD. Among them, 17 (47.2%) had quantitative deficiencies, of whom 14 were assigned as type 1 and 3 as type 3.The remaining 19 cases were diagnosed as type 2 (52.8%): type 2A and 2B were the most frequent with 6 and 7 cases respectively; 4 cases were possible type 2M and two suggestive of 2N, however, this was not confirmed.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the challenges of VWD diagnosis using a comprehensive panel of diagnostic tests which should extend to supplemental tests of VWF:CB, VWF:FVIIIB, and sequencing the VWD gene to confirm the results from the panel assays.

Navigating the Myriad of von Willebrand Factor Assays

von Willebrand factor (VWF) represents a large and complex adhesive plasma protein whose main function is to provide a bridge between blood platelets and damaged endothelium, and thus facilitate primary hemostasis. VWF also binds to FVIII, preventing early proteolysis, and delivers this cargo to sites of vascular injury, thereby promoting clot formation and secondary hemostasis. An absence, deficiency, or defect in VWF can lead to a bleeding diathesis called von Willebrand disease (VWD), considered the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Contemporary laboratory assays used in VWD diagnosis/exclusion comprise a myriad of assays that identify the quantity (level) of VWF, as well as the multitude of VWF activities. These may use the following test abbreviations: VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, VWF:CB, VWF:GPIbR, VWF:GPIbM, VWF:FVIIB, VWF:Ab. The current review explains what these assays are, as well as their place in VWD diagnostics.

Comparative assessment of von Willebrand factor multimers vs activity for von Willebrand disease using modern contemporary methodologies

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is challenging due to heterogeneity of VWD and test limitations. Many von Willebrand factor (VWF) assays are utilized, including antigen (Ag), activity and multimer analysis. Activity assays include ristocetin cofactor using platelets (VWF:RCo) or other particles incorporating recombinant glycoprotein I ('VWF:GPIbR'), or other GPI binding assays using gain-of-function mutations ('VWF:GPIbM'), or collagen binding (VWF:CB).

AIM

To comparatively evaluate modern contemporary VWF activity assays vs VWF multimer analysis using modern contemporary methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Several VWF activity assays (VWF:RCo, VWF:GPIbR, VWF:GPIbM, VWF:CB) assessed (typically as a ratio against VWF:Ag) against a new semi-automated procedure for different types of VWD (1, 3, 2A, 2B, 2M), plus control material (n = 580). The evaluation also focussed on relative loss of high and very high molecular weight multimers (HMWM and VHMWM) by densitometric scanning.

RESULTS

All evaluated VWF activity/Ag ratios showed high correlation to the presence/absence of HMWM and VHMWM, although VWF:CB/Ag and VWF:GPIbR/Ag ratios using an automated chemiluminescence method yielded highest correlation coefficients (r = .909 and .874, respectively, for HMWM). Use of the investigative procedure (VHMWM) identified fewer false positives for 'loss' in type 1 VWD.

CONCLUSIONS

This comparative investigation identified that new automated chemiluminescence VWF activity assays best identified relative loss or presence of HMWM and VHMWM according to activity to Ag ratios and an alternative investigative method for identifying VHMWM in multimer testing for a new commercial multimer method may lead to fewer false identifications of HMW loss in type 1 VWD.

Utility of the platelet function analyser (PFA-100/200) for exclusion or detection of von Willebrand disease: A study 22 years in the making

INTRODUCTION

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and may alternatively arise as an acquired condition (AVWS). These represent deficiency and/or defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF). Closure times (CTs) obtained from the platelet function analyser (PFA) are highly sensitive to both VWD/AVWS. The current study has evaluated the utility of the PFA-100/-200 to exclude or detect laboratory identified VWD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An evaluation of the success or otherwise of prospective PFA testing to help exclude or detect VWD using data from a locally maintained database. This database contains patient information, results of PFA testing, results of VWF testing, platelet count and hematocrit, and additional information, for a current total of 3678 entries representing over 2 decades of testing.

RESULTS

According to selection criteria, a total of 142 samples were identified as derived from patients with VWD. All but one of these were also identified to have abnormal PFA CTs. Additional data sets of patients with 'low VWF' (n = 137), or borderline normal VWF (n = 163) were also identified, as well as patients with thrombocytopenia and/or low hematocrit (n = 487). In these cohorts, PFA CTs were often (but not always) abnormal. There was a strong association between VWF test parameter values and PFA CTs. Additional study samples comprised cases with normal VWF parameters but prolonged CTs (n = 594), as well as cases with normal VWF and normal CTs (n = 1292), permitting calculation of sensitivity of abnormal PFA for VWD (99.3%), as well as specificity (68.5%), negative predictive value (99.9%) and positive predictive value (19.2%), for a prevalence of 7.0%. Comparatively, normal PFA CTs were better able to exclude VWD than normal test results for individual VWF parameters.

CONCLUSION

This study reports on an evaluation of PFA CTs for identification or exclusion of VWD. In our dataset, representing over 22 years of experience, normal PFA CTs were able to predict absence of VWD with higher sensitivity than individual VWF test results.

Elevated Plasma von Willebrand Factor Antigen and Activity Levels Are Associated With the Severity of Coronary Stenosis

von Willebrand factor (VWF) acts as a bridge between platelets and the subendothelial matrix following vessel damage and plays a vital role in coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between VWF and the severity of coronary stenosis quantified by the Gensini score in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the most dangerous complication of CAD. Plasma VWF antigen (VWF: Ag) and VWF-collagen binding (VWF: CB) in normal controls (n = 123) and in patients with AMI (n = 205) were tested, and then the patients were divided based on Gensini scores. The levels of VWF: Ag and VWF: CB in patients with AMI were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < .001). Plasma levels of VWF: Ag and VWF: CB were positively correlated with both Gensini score and the number of affected vessels. Both VWF: Ag and VWF: CB were independent factors for coronary stenosis, adjusting confounding factors. Thus, the levels of VWF: Ag and VWF: CB were positively correlated with the severity of coronary stenosis. Screening of VWF at time of AMI may have prognostic value in terms of the severity of coronary stenosis.

Potential Undiagnosed VWD Or Other Mucocutaneous Bleeding Disorder Cases Estimated From Private Medical Insurance Claims

Introduction

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder, but awareness among health care professionals is low. We estimated the number of cases of undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorders among commercially insured patients in the United States with a recent history of bleeding events.

Methods

Patients with a VWD diagnosis who were users of or candidates for von Willebrand factor replacement were identified from the IMS PharMetrics Plus Database (2006–2015). We constructed a unary patient-finding model based on 12 prediagnosis variables that best defined this population, and applied this to undiagnosed patients with recent bleeding events from the same database. Cases of symptomatic undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorders in the commercially insured population were estimated from the “best fit” (positive predictive value [PPV] 83%) and “good fit” (PPV 75%) patients thus identified.

Results

Overall, 507,668 undiagnosed patients with recent bleeding events were identified (86% female, 14% male). Application of the VWD model identified 3318 best-fit and 37,163 good-fit patients; 91% of best-fit patients were females aged <46 years, with heavy menstrual bleeding as the most common claim. Projection to the full commercially insured US population suggested that 35,000–387,000 patients may have symptomatic, undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorders.

Discussion

Computer modeling suggests there may be a significant number of patients with symptomatic, undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorder in the commercially insured population. Enhanced awareness of VWD symptoms and their impact, and of screening and testing procedures, may improve the diagnosis of VWD and reduce disease burden.

Semi-automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay for von Willebrand disease: Further validation, benefits and limitations

INTRODUCTION

Accurate diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) enables effective patient management. von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer analysis provides useful information regarding VWF multimer structure, thereby aiding VWD subtyping and management; however, historically technically challenging assays have had limited utility. This study evaluates the Sebia Hydrasys Hydragel-11 semi-automated VWF multimer assay and further validates the Hydragel-5 gel system, as primarily pertaining to VWD diagnostics and monitoring of therapy.

METHODS

Provisionally diagnosed (via a reference assay test panel) archived patient samples and prospective test patient samples, including those undergoing desmopressin trial or therapy monitoring, along with commercial and in-house control material and various external quality assessment (EQA) samples, were analysed. VWF multimers were evaluated for presence, loss or partial loss of high molecular weight (HMWM) and intermediate molecular weight (IMWM) multimers by both visual inspection and densitometric scanning, and comparison with reference assay results.

RESULTS

All anticipated multimer patterns were reproduced, with patients generally showing multimer profiles matching expected patterns according to VWD type based on reference test panel 'diagnosis'. Occasional discrepancies were resolved by retesting. The increase in plasma VWF following desmopressin therapy was also clearly demonstrated. Multimer profiles of EQA samples complemented reference test panel results and matched EQA targets. There were some 'technical' limitations noted.

CONCLUSION

This easy to use, standardised, semi-automated multimer analysis system can demonstrate the multimer profile of VWD patients, thus representing an additional laboratory tool for improved diagnosis, thereby facilitating appropriate patient management.

The Importance and Complications of Sequencing of Von Willebrand Gene in Von Willebrand Disease

Genetic testing in patients with von Willebrand disease completes phenotypic testing with an aim to confirm the von Willebrand factor defect at a molecular level. Structure of the VWF gene was described 30 years ago; since then a large number of mutations leading to VWD have been described in this gene. Thanks to describing these mechanisms it is possible to understand the pathogenesis of the most common congenital bleeding disorder.

In the Slovak Republic genetic testing is still not a routine part of VWD diagnostics. The National Center of Hemostasis and Thrombosis in Martin is the first department in Slovakia which has begun genetic testing of patients with VWD. Sequencing of the VWF gene has many limitations which are referred in more details within this article. Therefore, we decided to use the methods of new generation sequencing in combination with Sanger sequencing. We believe that soon we will have the first results which will help us to identify the possible cause of VWD in these patients.

Automated assays for von Willebrand factor activity

von Willebrand factor (VWF) ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) by platelet aggregometry has been considered the gold standard for evaluating the ability of VWF to bind platelets for over 40 years. Many automated systems no longer require platelets and rather rely on agglutination of latex particles. Automated methods of measuring VWF activity have improved performance characteristics and are performed on the same coagulation instruments used for routine testing via immunoturbidimetric methodology. Alternatively, a newer chemiluminescence assay system for measuring VWF activity demonstrates excellent performance characteristics. As these methods are becoming widely used, it is important to assess their performance in diagnosing and monitoring different types of von Willebrand disease. We review the automated methodologies and the published performance of these VWF assays. Advantages and limitations of these automated methods are discussed.

von Willebrand factor/ADAMTS-13 interactions at birth: implications for thrombosis in the neonatal period

von Willebrand factor (VWF) and its cleaving protease ADAMTS-13 (A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase with Thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) are essential components to hemostasis. These plasma proteins have also been implicated in a number of disease states, including those affecting children. The best described abnormality is the congenital form of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) resulting from germline mutations in the ADAMTS-13 gene. The VWF/ADAMTS-13 interaction has more recently emerged as a causative risk factor in the pathogenesis of pediatric stroke and secondary microangiopathies. There is now increasing interest and need to measure these coagulation factors during the neonatal period and throughout childhood. Methods adopted from a multitude of technically diverging studies have been used to understand their role during this period. To date, studies of VWF/ADAMTS-13 in this group of patients have reported conflicting results, which makes interpreting values in the clinical setting especially challenging. In this review we describe the historical evolution of the methodology used to measure VWF/ADAMTS-13 and how it may influence the results obtained during the first days of life. We review the individual assays used to analyze VWF/ADAMTS-13 as well as published reference values. Finally, we bring attention to the potential pathophysiologic role of VWF/ADAMTS-13 in neonatal thrombosis. This has significant implications because the pathologic processes that explain thrombosis in neonates remain poorly characterized and thromboembolism remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality, particularly in sick children.

Optimization of von Willebrand factor multimer analysis in vertical mini-gel electrophoresis systems: A rapid procedure

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common cause of bleeding worldwide. Analysis of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer distribution (VWF:MD) is essential to properly classify and treat different types of VWD, and it is performed using a SDS agarose gel electrophoresis followed by Western blotting, a handmade technique that demands days to be completed and requires skillful execution. Aiming both to facilitate gel production and to shorten the preparation time, we developed an uncomplicated technique to provide agility in the analysis of VWF:MD, so that it can be easily accomplished in the routine practice of hemostasis laboratories. On that account, we used a commercial vertical mini-gel electrophoresis system for SDS-PAGE and a semi-dry transfer system, which allowed us to analyze VWF:MD of various samples in a period shorter than 12 h. This technique differentiated VWF:MD in human and animal plasmas under normal, congenital and acquired (experimental envenomation by Bothrops jararaca snake) conditions. This optimized method is cheap, rapid, reproducible, easy to be performed, and uses electrophoresis and Western blotting systems available in most laboratories. All these advantages encourage hemostasis professionals to use it in their routine practices. In order to facilitate the setup and accomplishment of the whole procedure step by step, videos were appended to the article.

Rare forms of von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) arises from deficiency and/or defect(s) of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF). In turn, plasma VWF is an adhesive protein which primarily functions by anchoring platelets to regions of vascular injury, thereby assisting prevention of bleeding. There is a proportional reduction also in Factor VIII, due to the absence of the stabilizing and anti-proteolytic effect that VWF normally exerts. VWD is reportedly the most common inherited bleeding disorder and can be classified into quantitative and qualitative defects, with type 1 and 3 VWD respectively identifying partial and total quantitative deficiency of VWF, and type 2 VWD identifying qualitative defects of VWF. The relative incidence of each subtype of VWD differs according to the locality and the ability of clinicians and laboratories to correctly diagnose and classify cases. In general, type 1 VWD is considered the most common type of VWD, whereas types 2 and 3 represent rarer forms. However, in developing countries, and partly because of consanguinity, type 3 VWD is over-represented. This review primarily focuses on the rarer forms of VWD, which typically comprise types 2 (A, B, M and N) and 3 VWD. The review also mentions type 1 VWD, largely for completeness and comparability, and since purportedly "severe" type 1 VWD, albeit not a formally recognized subtype of type 1 VWD, would represent a relatively "rare" form of VWD.

Postanalytical considerations that may improve the diagnosis or exclusion of haemophilia and von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) and haemophilia represent the most common inherited or acquired bleeding disorders. However, many laboratories and clinicians may be challenged by their accurate diagnosis or exclusion. Difficulties in diagnosis/exclusion may include analytical issues, where assays occasionally generate an incorrect result (ie representing an analytical error) or have limitations in their measurement range of and/or low analytical sensitivity. Also increasingly recognized is the influence of preanalytical issues on the diagnosis of VWD or haemophilia. Unfortunately, postanalytical considerations are often not well considered in the diagnostic process. Therefore, this narrative review aims to provide an overview of some important postanalytical considerations that may help improve the diagnosis of VWD and haemophilia. This review primarily discusses aspects around reporting of test results. However, we also discuss other less well-recognized postanalytical considerations, including the use of assay ratios to help identify differential diagnoses and then guide further investigation.

Targeting von Willebrand Factor in Ischaemic Stroke: Focus on Clinical Evidence

Despite great efforts in stroke research, disability and recurrence rates in ischaemic stroke remain unacceptably high. To address this issue, one potential target for novel therapeutics is the glycoprotein von Willebrand factor (vWF), which increases in thrombogenicity especially under high shear rates as it bridges between vascular sub-endothelial collagen and platelets. The rationale for vWF as a potential target in stroke comes from four bodies of evidence. (1) Animal models which recapitulate the pathogenesis of stroke and validate the concept of targeting vWF for stroke prevention and the use of the vWF cleavage enzyme ADAMTS13 in acute stroke treatment. (2) Extensive epidemiologic data establishing the prognostic role of vWF in the clinical setting showing that high vWF levels are associated with an increased risk of first stroke, stroke recurrence or stroke-associated mortality. As such, vWF levels may be a suitable marker for further risk stratification to potentially fine-tune current risk prediction models which are mainly based on clinical and imaging data. (3) Genetic studies showing an association between vWF levels and stroke risk on genomic levels. Finally, (4) studies of patients with primary disorders of excess or deficiency of function in the vWF axis (e.g. thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and von Willebrand disease, respectively) which demonstrate the crucial role of vWF in atherothrombosis. Therapeutic inhibition of VWF by novel agents appears particularly promising for secondary prevention of stroke recurrence in specific sub-groups of patients such as those suffering from large artery atherosclerosis, as designated according to the TOAST classification.

Towards harmonization of external quality assessment/proficiency testing in hemostasis

Quality in diagnostic testing represents a key target of laboratory medicine, for which an assurance around the quality of testing is expected from all involved in the process. Laboratories attempt to assure the quality of their testing by various processes, but especially by performance of internal quality control and external quality assessment (EQA). This is especially true for tests of hemostasis and coagulation. EQA in general provides information on test accuracy and on evaluation of long-term laboratory performance. EQA providers support laboratory performance by various means, including distribution of material for testing of analytes (“proficiency testing”), educational support through expert advice, distribution of publications or case series. Participation in EQA is often a laboratory accreditation requirement. This review aims to identify some of the strengths and weaknesses of EQA, and targets attempts towards harmonization of EQA practice, in order to achieve the best outcome for participant laboratories and, thus, for patients and their clinical care providers.

Preclinical evaluation of a semi-automated and rapid commercial electrophoresis assay for von Willebrand factor multimers

BACKGROUND

The von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer test is required to correctly subtype qualitative type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD). The current VWF multimer assays are difficult, nonstandardized, and time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of the commercial VWF multimer kit by Sebia (Lisses, France), an electrophoresis technique yielding same-day results.

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteer plasma samples, in-house reference plasma (IRP) and commercial normal plasma (CNP) samples, 10 plasma samples from patients with a known VWD type, 1 hemophilia A plasma sample, and 7 external quality assurance (EQA) samples were analyzed using the commercial VWF multimer kit. Additional coagulation testing included measurements of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF activity (VWF:Ac), and FVIII activity (FVIII:C).

RESULTS

The CNP results revealed a relative loss of the highest molecular weight multimers; therefore, IRP was preferred as the reference sample. The interpretations of 10 patients with a known VWD type could be successfully reproduced and agreed with previous VWF multimer results. In all EQA surveys, the multimer results and final VWD diagnosis agreed with expert opinion.

CONCLUSIONS

The VWF multimer assay by Sebia is easy to perform and can be successfully implemented in any clinical laboratory for second-stage evaluation of VWD. The resolution power of multimer distribution is adequate to correctly classify VWD types 1, 2A, 2B, and 3.

Gender related issues in thrombosis and hemostasis

INTRODUCTION

Many aspects of hemostasis, both primary and secondary, as well as fibrinolysis display sex differences. From a clinical viewpoint, certain differential phenotypic presentations clearly arise within various disorders of thrombosis and hemostasis. Areas covered: The present mini-review summarizes selected clinical entities where sex differences are reflected in both frequency and clinical presentation of hemostasis disorders. Sex differences are discussed within the settings of cardiovascular disease, including coronary artery disease and ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism and inherited bleeding disorders. Moreover, pregnancy and labor present particular challenges in terms of increased thromboembolic and bleeding risk, and this is also summarized. Expert commentary: Available knowledge on sex differences in risk factors and clinical presentation of disorders within thrombosis and hemostasis is increasing. However, more evidence is needed to further clarify different risk factors and treatment effect in men and women, both as regards to cardiovascular disease and venous thromboembolism. This should facilitate improved gender guided risk stratification, and prevention and treatment of these diseases. Finally, risk assessment during pregnancy remains a challenge; this applies both to thromboembolic risk assessment during normal pregnancy and special care of women with inherited bleeding disorders during labor.