Breastfeeding and the Affordable Care Act

Examining Associations Between Sociodemographic Characteristics and Ever Breastfed Children, NHANES 1999-2020

Although breastfeeding provides health benefits to both mother and child, this study aimed to explore whether disparities in breastfeeding continue to exist, particularly among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) mothers and children. We performed a cross-sectional analysis among 19,830 children in the United States (US) using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 1999 to 2020. Breastfeeding initiation and duration rates increased overall from 1999 to 2020. Children who were ever breastfed were more likely to have higher body weight, older mothers, mothers who did not smoke during pregnancy, a higher family poverty-income ratio (PIR), food security, mothers in excellent health, and mothers who had not seen a mental health professional in the past year. NHB children were breastfed at significantly lower rates and for shorter duration than non-Hispanic White (NHW), Mexican, Other Hispanic, and Other/Multi-Racial children. NHB children were breastfed less than other racial groups, including minority Mexican children with similar average PIR, suggesting a possible unique experience for NHB mothers and children. Strategies include impacting social norms and offering culturally tailored breastfeeding supports. The provision of structural supports to remove barriers to breastfeeding is a social justice issue. Breastfeeding confers health benefits to mother and child, and disparities exist among mothers and children, particularly among NHB mothers and children. The current study provides data on the most recent breastfeeding trends, showing that these disparities by race/ethnicity are present. Interestingly, even among Mexican participants of a similar PIR, NHB children were still breastfed less.

Quantifying the Association between Pump Use and Breastfeeding Duration

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the extent to which pump use is associated with breastfeeding duration.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of weighted data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from Maine, Michigan, New Mexico, and Utah between 2016 and 2021. Included respondents had a live-born infant at survey completion, initiated breastfeeding, and had nonmissing data for reported pump use and breastfeeding duration. Using Cox proportional hazard regression, we quantified the hazard of breastfeeding cessation and median duration (weeks) of breastfeeding by pump use. Pump use was suspected to be differentially impacted by race and ethnicity; an interaction was tested in our regression model.

RESULTS

Our sample included 19 719 mothers (weighted n = 723 808) with mean age (SD) 29.5 years (5.6). Mothers with age <18 years, Medicaid enrollment, race, and ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White, lower income or education, and unmarried status demonstrated lower pump use (P < .001). Pump use was associated with 37% lower hazard of breastfeeding cessation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.63; 95% CI: 0.56-0.70) and 21 additional weeks of breastfeeding on average. The association varied by race and ethnicity (significant interaction observed between pump use and non-Hispanic Black mothers, P = .013); stratified analysis demonstrated the lowest hazard of breastfeeding cessation among non-Hispanic Black and Native American pump users (adjusted hazard ratio 0.47 [0.40-0.54] and 0.51 [0.37-0.70], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pump use was associated with longer breastfeeding duration; the greatest magnitudes of association were found among non-Hispanic Black and Native American participants, groups disproportionately affected by breastfeeding inequities. Future research examining the context around and causal impact of pump use on breastfeeding outcomes is needed.

Relationship Between Sex-Specific Labor Market Performance and Breastfeeding Prevalence

BACKGROUND

Prior research has explored the association between women's employment status and breastfeeding at the individual level, however; a notable gap in scholarly inquiry exists regarding the relationship between labor market performance and breastfeeding at the population level.

RESEARCH AIM

The aim of this paper is to investigate the association between labor market performance and breastfeeding prevalence in the United States.

METHODS

This study is a cross-sectional analysis of the association between labor market performance and the prevalence of breastfeeding. Our analysis is conducted at the state level using data published up to late 2021 from the Current Population Survey and the National Immunization Survey. The first dataset was used to construct aggregate and sex-specific state level indicators of labor market performance for both males and females. The second dataset supplied the proportion of mothers breastfeeding for the corresponding birth cohort from each state.

RESULTS

Higher average weekly hours worked by females in the year before giving birth was associated with a lower prevalence of breastfeeding, but employment rates among females did not significantly affect breastfeeding prevalence. Among males, current employment rates were positively associated with breastfeeding prevalence; however, no significant relationship was observed between breastfeeding prevalence and average weekly work hours worked.

CONCLUSION

Sex-specific labor market performance may play a role in breastfeeding decisions and the timing of labor market performance relative to childbirth is important. Furthermore, these results highlight that employment rates and hours worked might be associated with child health through breastfeeding prevalence.

Pumps: A Possible Tool to Promote More Equitable Lactation Outcomes

Pregnant individuals and infants in the US are experiencing rising morbidity and mortality rates. Breastfeeding is a cost-effective intervention associated with a lower risk of health conditions driving dyadic morbidity and mortality, including cardiometabolic disease and sudden infant death. Pregnant individuals and infants from racial/ethnic subgroups facing the highest risk of mortality also have the lowest breastfeeding rates, likely reflective of generational socioeconomic marginalization and its impact on health outcomes. Promoting breastfeeding among groups with the lowest rates could improve the health of dyads with the greatest health risk and facilitate more equitable, person-centered lactation outcomes. Multiple barriers to lactation initiation and duration exist for families who have been socioeconomically marginalized by health and public systems. These include the lack of paid parental leave, increased access to subsidized human milk substitutes, and reduced access to professional and lay breastfeeding expertise. Breast pumps have the potential to mitigate these barriers, making breastfeeding more accessible to all interested dyads. In 2012, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) greatly expanded access to pumps through the preventative services mandate, with a single pump now available to most US families. Despite their near ubiquitous use among lactating individuals, little research has been conducted on how and when to use pumps appropriately to optimize breastfeeding outcomes. There is a timely and critical need for policy, scholarship, and education around pump use given their widespread provision and potential to promote equity for those families facing the greatest barriers to achieving their personal breastfeeding goals.

Premarket Notifications and Patents for Breast Pumps Before and After the ACA

This study investigates whether ACA policies to increase access to breast pumps and lactation care were associated with innovation in the market for breast pumps.

The impact of the baby friendly hospital initiative on healthcare utilization among newborns insured by Medicaid in Delaware

BACKGROUND

The Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative was created to enhance breastfeeding, although its impact on infant healthcare utilization is unclear. Breast feeding infants are vulnerable to readmission soon after birth secondary to dehydration and hyperbilirubinemia. Breastfeeding can also protect infants from unnecessary health care utilization later in life by preventing infection. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative on readmissions and emergency department utilization among Medicaid births in Delaware.

METHODS

The study was a quasi-experimental design. Medicaid claims files were used to study births at five hospitals in Delaware born between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, and covered under Medicaid at time of birth. Three hospitals were designated Baby Friendly, two were not and served as controls. Outcomes included Emergency Department (ED) utilization and readmissions within 30 days and one-year of birth hospitalization. Exposure to the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative was determined by year and hospital of birth. Logistic regression and interrupted time series segmented regression analysis with controls were used to assess the effect of Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative on healthcare utilization.

RESULTS

In total, 19,695 infants were born at five hospitals with 80% (15,939) born at hospitals that were designated Baby Friendly. ED utilization and readmissions over the 1st year of life for breastfeeding related diagnosis at the Baby Friendly hospitals occurred in 240 (1.5%) and 226 (1.4%) of infants, respectively. Exposure to the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative was associated with increased odds of all cause 30-day readmission (AOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.28) but not readmissions over the 1st year of life. While 30-day ED visits did not change after BFHI, one-year ED visits were reduced (0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97). A significant negative trend was seen over time for ED utilization post BFHI compared to controls (B: -5.90, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

There was a small observed increase in the odds of all cause 30-day readmissions with no change in one-year readmissions after BFHI in Delaware. Although there were no observed changes in 30-day ED utilization, there was a reduction in one-year ED utilization following the implementation of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative in Delaware birth hospitals. Our data help to inform policy and decision making for statewide systems of care that may be used to support breast feeding.

An Integrative Review of Breastfeeding and Homelessness

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the current literature surrounding breastfeeding and homelessness, and to determine the impact of disparities in this population.

DATA SOURCES

An integrative search was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and using the search terms "breastfeeding" and "homelessness" throughout electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria were articles published in English from January 2007 to September 2022. Exclusion criteria were studies published more than 15 years ago, studies published in a language other than English, opinion articles, and irrelevance to breastfeeding and homelessness. The initial search yielded 100 results. After removing duplicates and articles because of irrelevance, the final number of articles for this synthesis was seven.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted from each article, critically appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute criteria, and summarized in a table of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Three common themes were identified: Decreased Breastfeeding Initiation Rates and Duration in the Homeless Population, Impact of Community and Clinical Support, and Breastfeeding Practices Influenced by Individual Factors.

CONCLUSION

Providers and nurses should refer patients to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children; use techniques to instill a parent's intent to breastfeed; provide early breastfeeding education; promote breastfeeding initiation within 1 hour of birth; and encourage peer support groups. Although current researchers provide insight into potential barriers and interventions, more research is needed to gain additional data on how to overcome identified barriers to breastfeeding.

Barriers and facilitators to expressing milk on campus as a breastfeeding student

Objective: Despite the growing student parent population, many postsecondary institutions in the United States (U.S.) lack sufficient lactation policies for students. The objective of this study was to explore breastfeeding students' perceived awareness and use of on-campus lactation rooms and identify barriers and facilitators to expressing milk on campus.Participants:A convenience sample of breastfeeding students enrolled in colleges/universities in the U.S.Methods:Information about students' experiences expressing milk on campus was collected via an online survey. Thematic analysis was used to qualitatively analyze self-reported barriers/facilitators to expressing.Results:Ninety-three participants representing 68 unique institutions completed the survey. Barriers to expressing on campus included inadequate lactation spaces, lack of storage for breast pump equipment/expressed milk, and lack of time to express. Conversely, access to adequate lactation spaces, having appropriate breast pump equipment, and on-campus social support, were important facilitators.Conclusion:Comprehensive lactation policies may improve on-campus breastfeeding experiences among students.

Affordable Care Act and Breastfeeding

In 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was the first federal legislation to protect breastfeeding on a broad scale. Since its implementation, several provisions have been made, including the recent Providing Urgent Maternal Protections for Nursing Mothers (PUMP) Act, which went into effect in April 2023. In this column, I review current breastfeeding recommendations, the policy landscape related to state and federal laws that protect breastfeeding, research findings on breastfeeding policies, and recommendations from professional organizations that support women's breastfeeding decisions.

Case-control study of exclusive breast feeding and severe bronchiolitis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Bronchiolitis is a major cause of infant illness, with few known modifiable risk factors. Breast feeding may reduce risk of severe bronchiolitis, but the association of exclusive vs. partial breast feeding with severe bronchiolitis is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association of exclusive vs. partial breast feeding during ages 0-2.9 months with bronchiolitis hospitalisation during infancy.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study as a secondary analysis of two prospective US cohorts in the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration. Cases were enrolled in a 17-centre study of infants hospitalised for bronchiolitis during 2011-2014 (n = 921). Controls were enrolled in a five-centre study of healthy infants during 2013-2014 and 2017 (n = 719). Breast feeding history during ages 0-2.9 months was collected by parent interview. Among breastfed infants, the association of exclusive vs. partial breast feeding with odds of bronchiolitis hospitalisation was estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for demographic variables, parental asthma history, and early-life exposures. As a secondary analysis, we estimated the associations of exclusive, predominant, and occasional breast feeding vs. no breast feeding with the odds of bronchiolitis hospitalisation.

RESULTS

Among 1640 infants, the prevalence of exclusive breast feeding was 187/921 (20.3%) among cases and 275/719 (38.3%) among controls. Exclusive vs. partial breast feeding was associated with 48% reduced odds of bronchiolitis hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39, 0.69). In the secondary analysis, exclusive vs. no breast feeding was associated with 58% reduced odds of bronchiolitis hospitalisation (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23, 0.77), whereas predominant breast feeding (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.37, 1.57) and occasional breast feeding (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.57, 1.69) were not associated with meaningfully reduced odds of bronchiolitis hospitalisation.

CONCLUSION

Exclusive breast feeding had a strong protective association against bronchiolitis hospitalisation.

The financial need of feeding infants for the first six months of life in West Java Province of Indonesia and the implications of socioeconomic and mental health factors

BACKGROUND

In Indonesia, nearly half of all children aged less than six months were not exclusively breastfed in 2017. This study aimed to compare the cost of providing direct or indirect exclusive breastfeeding 0-6 months, partial exclusive breastfeeding and commercial milk formula only. This study also assessed the maternal socioeconomic and mental health factors to providing exclusive breastfeeding.

METHODS

Data were collected in 2018 via a cross-sectional survey of 456 mothers in Bandung City and Purwakarta District, West Java Province, Indonesia, who had children aged less than six months. We used micro-costing to calculate the cost of productivity, equipment, supplies, and training of mothers when providing direct exclusive breastfeeding, indirect exclusive breastfeeding, partial exclusive breastfeeding (a mix of breastfeed and commercial milk formula), and infant formula/commercial milk formula only. Logistic regression was used to determine the impact of several independent variables, including mother's level of depression, on exclusive breastfeeding.

RESULTS

To provide direct exclusive breastfeeding, the cost per mother in the first six months is US$81.08, which is less expensive than indirect exclusive breastfeeding (US$171.15), partial exclusive breastfeeding (US$487.8) and commercial milk formula (US$494.9). We also found that education and age are associated with the decision to provide direct exclusive breastfeeding. Mothers who work will most likely provide indirect exclusive breastfeeding, commercial milk formula, or partial breastfeeding as opposed to direct exclusive breastfeeding. Finally, although severe depression symptoms have a positive relationship with the decision to provide commercial milk formula over direct exclusive breastfeeding, the evidence here is not strong.

CONCLUSIONS

The total cost of providing only commercial milk formula is 6-times higher than the cost of direct exclusive breastfeeding. The presence of severe depression symptoms is positively related to mothers opting for other feeding methods aside of direct exclusive breastfeeding and indirect exclusive breastfeeding. This study shows that direct exclusive breastfeeding is economically preferable to other methods, supports policies to reduce the time cost of exclusive breastfeeding (e.g., paid maternity leave and maternal cash transfers), and addresses the importance of mother's mental health to ensure successful breastfeeding.

Breastfeeding Initiation Trends by Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Participation and Race/Ethnicity Among Medicaid Births

OBJECTIVE

Describe long-term breastfeeding initiation trends by prenatal Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participation and race/ethnicity.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of birth certificate data from 2009 to 2017 in 24 states that adopted the 2003 birth certificate revision by 2009.

PARTICIPANTS

Term births with hospital costs covered by Medicaid (N = 6,402,704).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Breastfeeding initiation.

ANALYSIS

The descriptive characteristics of WIC participants and WIC-eligible nonparticipants were compared by year and race/ethnicity using the chi-square test of independence or t tests. Adjusted breastfeeding initiation prevalence was estimated using linear regression models with county fixed effects, controlling for sociodemographic and obstetric/health factors. Trends were compared by WIC status overall and within racial/ethnic groups. Differences and P values were assessed using interaction terms between WIC and year.

RESULTS

Breastfeeding initiation increased for WIC participants and nonparticipants. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children participants had lower adjusted breastfeeding initiation (2009: 69.0%; 2017: 78.5%) than nonparticipants (2009: 70.8%; 2017: 80.1%) (P < 0.001 per year). Breastfeeding initiation increased more rapidly in WIC participants than in nonparticipants for non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander (21.4% and 8.6%, respectively; P < 0.001) and American Indian/Alaskan Native (13.6% and 8.1%, respectively; P = 0.02)-narrowing the gap between WIC participants and nonparticipants over time.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Annual birth certificate data provide detailed information for monitoring trends and disparities in breastfeeding initiation by prenatal WIC status. These findings can inform WIC and maternal child health program efforts to improve breastfeeding promotion for populations with low-income and racial/ethnic groups.

Pandemic policies and breastfeeding: A cross-sectional study during the onset of COVID-19 in the United States

The United States is one of the few countries, and the only high-income country, that does not federally mandate protection of postpartum employment through paid postpartum maternity and family leave policies. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S., stay-at-home orders were implemented nationally, creating a natural experiment in which to document the effects of de facto paid leave on infant feeding practices in the first postpartum year. The purpose of this cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was to describe infant and young child feeding intentions, practices, decision-making, and experiences during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected March 27-May 31, 2020 via online survey among a convenience sample of respondents, ages 18 years and older, who were currently feeding a child 2 years of age or younger, yielding 1,437 eligible responses. Nearly all (97%) respondents indicated an intention to feed their infant exclusively with human milk in the first 6 months. A majority of respondents who were breastfeeding (66%) reported no change in breastfeeding frequency after the implementation of COVID-19 stay-at-home orders. However, thirty-one percent indicated that they breastfed more frequently due to stay-at-home orders and delayed plans to wean their infant or young child. Key themes drawn from the qualitative data were: emerging knowledge and perceptions of the relationship between COVID-19 and breastfeeding, perceptions of immune factors in human milk, and the social construction of COVID-19 and infant and young child feeding perceptions and knowledge. There were immediate positive effects of stay-at-home policies on human milk feeding practices, even during a time of considerable uncertainty about the safety of breastfeeding and the transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 via human milk, constrained access to health care services and COVID-19 testing, and no effective COVID-19 vaccines. Federally mandated paid postpartum and family leave are essential to achieving more equitable lactation outcomes.

Breastfeeding Among Pediatric Emergency Physicians: Rates, Barriers, and Support

OBJECTIVES

Physician mothers are at risk for early cessation of breastfeeding, in part because of challenges associated with returning to work. Given the inherent unpredictability of emergency medicine practice, we hypothesized that pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians would face unique challenges in continuing breastfeeding while working in their field. The aims of this study were to determine the 6-month breastfeeding rates of PEM physicians, gain insight into their experiences expressing breast milk while working in pediatric emergency departments, and determine factors that support or discourage successful breastfeeding.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional survey of members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine via its quarterly membership survey program. Separate survey pathways were developed for respondents who had ever breastfed and those who had not.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-three responded; 91 had breastfed, and 102 had not. Of those who breastfed, 90% did so for 6 months or longer. Mean (SD) duration was 12.5 (7.1) months (range, 2-48 months). Of those who expressed milk at work, only 7.6% felt they "always" had sufficient time to pump; 32% felt they "always" had what they considered to be an appropriate location to pump. Breastfeeding duration rate of at least 6 months was higher for those (66%) who "sometimes" to "always" had access to what they felt were appropriate locations to pump than for those (34%) who "never" or "occasionally" did (98 vs 85%, P = 0.048). Eighty-six percent of respondents who had never breastfed reported being "very supportive" of expressing milk at work.

CONCLUSIONS

Breastfeeding PEM physicians have high 6-month breastfeeding rates, and many express milk at work. Although colleagues report being supportive, barriers of perceived lack of sufficient time to pump and appropriate pumping locations remain.

The Impact of Wearable Breast Pumps on Physicians' Breastfeeding Experience and Success

Background: Physician mothers face many barriers in their ability to meet their lactation goals. This is often due to short maternity leaves and an often busy, inflexible work schedule at the time of return to work. We aimed to characterize the effect of using wireless, wearable breast pumps in the workplace and determine if these devices may help overcome barriers to breastfeeding success for physician mothers. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to female physicians and trainees identified through the group "Doctor Mothers Interested in Lactation Knowledge (Dr. MILK)" using an anonymous, Qualtrics^® survey on the group's social media site. Participants were analyzed in two groups: those who had used wearable pumps versus those who had only used traditional breast pumps. Results: Of the 542 respondents analyzed, 321 (59%) had used a wearable pump in the workplace and 221 (41%) had only used a traditional electric breast pump. Those who had used a wearable pump reported statistically significant shorter lactation breaks (p < 0.00001) and were more likely to be able to provide breast milk to their infants for their entire intended duration (p = 0.005) compared to the traditional pump group. The ability to pump as often as needed while at work (p = 0.16) and the frequency of lactation breaks throughout the day (p = 0.223) were not significantly different when comparing the two groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a benefit to using wearable breast pumps for women physicians as they return to work after maternity leave. Utilization of these new wearable pumps correlates with shorter lactation breaks and the ability of physician mothers to provide breast milk to their infants for their intended duration.

Impact of Insurance Status on Initiation of Breast Milk Feeding Among Infants With CL ± P

To evaluate rates of breast milk feeding among infants with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL ± P) enrolled in Medicaid compared to Private Insurance/Self-Pay.

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study.

The 2018 US National Vital Statistics System-Natality component (NVSS-N) was used to examine nationwide birth certificate data.

Infants with cleft lip with or without cleft palate and either Medicaid or Private Insurance/Self-Pay were included.

Breast milk feeding rates among infants with CL ± P, as a function of insurance status.

Chi-square tests of independence revealed that of 896 infants with CL ± P and insured by Medicaid, 527 (58.8%) were breast milk fed at discharge. Of 865 infants with CL ± P and insured by Private Insurance/Self-Pay, 621 (71.8%) were breast milk fed at discharge. Using logistic regression models and controlling for baseline demographic differences, results indicated that infants with CL ± P in the Medicaid group had reduced odds of breast milk feeding compared to the Private Insurance/Self-Pay group (OR = 0.08; 95% CI 0.56, 0.96).

Breast milk support services are often necessary for the initiation of breast milk feeding among infants with CL ± P. However, these resources are likely not as readily available for those enrolled in Medicaid. These results suggest that infants with CL ± P, enrolled in Medicaid, may experience reduced breast milk feeding rates due to limited resources to initiate breast milk feeding. Factors that may promote breast milk feeding among this population are discussed.

ACA and Medicaid Expansion Increased Breast Pump Claims and Breastfeeding for Women with Public and Private Insurance

BACKGROUND

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) required new private insurance plans to provide breast pumps with no cost sharing beginning August 2012, and in January 2014 expanded this requirement to Marketplace plans and expanded Medicaid coverage. We first examined the associations between the ACA reforms in 2012 and 2014 with rates of breast pump claims between Medicaid enrollees and those with private insurance. We next examined the associations between the monthly rate of breast pump claims with breastfeeding initiation and duration by insurance type.

METHODS

Using 2011-2015 public and private health insurance claims in All-Payer Claims Databases from Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire, we conducted a linear regression model to evaluate the associations between the 2012 and 2014 ACA health insurance reforms with rates of breast pump claims by health insurance status. We then linked the monthly rates of breast pump claims per 1,000 live births to the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System with self-reported breastfeeding initiation and duration. We estimated probit regression models to examine the associations between monthly rates of breast pump claims per state, insurance type, age group, and breastfeeding outcomes.

RESULTS

For the 2012 ACA reform, breast pump claims increased by 183.4 (143.7-223.1) per 1,000 live births for women with private insurance, but decreased for Medicaid enrollees (-99.3 [-139.0 to -59.6]). For the 2014 ACA reforms, the opening of health insurance Marketplaces had no effect on breast pump claims for women with private insurance (8.3 [-43.6 to 60.2]), whereas Medicaid expansion increased claims by 119.4 (67.5-171.3) per 1,000 live births for Medicaid enrollees. Every additional 10 breast pump claims per 1,000 live births was associated with a 1.08 percentage point increase in breastfeeding initiation among women with private insurance (0.108 [0.018-0.198]), but not Medicaid enrollees (0.076 [-0.078 to 0.230]). In contrast, every additional 10 breast pump claims per 1,000 live births was associated with a 1.79 percentage point increase in breastfeeding for 4 or more weeks for women with private insurance (0.179 [0.063-0.294]) and a 2.05 percentage point increase among women with public insurance (0.205 [0.033-0.376]). Interaction analysis revealed no significant differences in associations by insurance type across breastfeeding outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACA breastfeeding coverage requirements fill a gap for women wanting to obtain a breast pump to support breastfeeding. The monthly rate of breast pump claims, as an indicator of access, translated into higher levels of breastfeeding for women with private and public insurance with the potential to reduce socioeconomic disparities.

Study protocol for reducing disparity in receipt of mother's own milk in very low birth weight infants (ReDiMOM): a randomized trial to improve adherence to sustained maternal breast pump use

BACKGROUND

Black very low birth weight (VLBW; < 1500 g birth weight) and very preterm (VP, < 32 weeks gestational age, inclusive of extremely preterm, < 28 weeks gestational age) infants are significantly less likely than other VLBW and VP infants to receive mother's own milk (MOM) through to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The costs associated with adhering to pumping maternal breast milk are borne by mothers and contribute to this disparity. This randomized controlled trial tests the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to offset maternal costs associated with pumping.

METHODS

This randomized control trial will enroll 284 mothers and their VP infants to test an intervention (NICU acquires MOM) developed to facilitate maternal adherence to breast pump use by offsetting maternal costs that serve as barriers to sustaining MOM feedings and the receipt of MOM at NICU discharge. Compared to current standard of care (mother provides MOM), the intervention bundle includes three components: a) free hospital-grade electric breast pump, b) pickup of MOM, and c) payment for opportunity costs. The primary outcome is infant receipt of MOM at the time of NICU discharge, and secondary outcomes include infant receipt of any MOM during the NICU hospitalization, duration of MOM feedings (days), and cumulative dose of MOM feedings (total mL/kg of MOM) received by the infant during the NICU hospitalization; maternal duration of MOM pumping (days) and volume of MOM pumped (mLs); and total cost of NICU care. Additionally, we will compare the cost of the NICU acquiring MOM versus NICU acquiring donor human milk if MOM is not available and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention (NICU acquires MOM) versus standard of care (mother provides MOM).

DISCUSSION

This trial will determine the effectiveness of an economic intervention that transfers the costs of feeding VLBWand VP infants from mothers to the NICU to address the disparity in the receipt of MOM feedings at NICU discharge by Black infants. The cost-effectiveness analysis will provide data that inform the adoption and scalability of this intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04540575 , registered September 7, 2020.

Examination of Factors That Contribute to Breastfeeding Disparities and Inequities for Black Women in the US

Breastmilk is considered the optimal nutrition for newborns. US Black women continue to have the lowest breastfeeding initiation and duration rates. This Perspective examines factors associated with breastfeeding disparities and inequities among Black women through the lens of critical race theory and the social-ecological model. Recommendations to increase breastfeeding rates in this population include increased communication and educational strategies by health care professionals, education to recognize implicit bias and systemic racism in our health care system, early prenatal and ongoing postpartum breastfeeding support, increased community support, and breastfeeding groups developed by and for Black women. In addition, equity policies such as paid maternity leave and work policies that support milk expression would provide needed institutional support for women in the workplace.

Understanding Factors Influencing Breastfeeding Outcomes in a Sample of African American Women

OBJECTIVES

Persistent disparities in breastfeeding rates among African American (AA) women compared to other population groups have motivated researchers to understand factors influencing breastfeeding choices using a variety of methods. Quantitative surveys are more commonly reported, however, qualitative work that amplifies voices of AA women is limited.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from a randomized controlled feasibility trial focused on breastfeeding support for AA women in Detroit, MI. Thirteen women were enrolled in the qualitative portion of the study described here. Using the Socioecological model (SEM) as the theoretical foundation, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted to explore perceived facilitators and barriers to breastfeeding. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Theoretical thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Women reported factors ranging from micro to macro SEM levels that discouraged or reinforced breastfeeding. Key challenges included breastfeeding-related discouragement issues, including factors that decreased confidence and led women to terminate breastfeeding (e.g., problems with latching, pumping, lack of comfort with breastfeeding in public, and work constraints). Facilitators included perceived mother and infant benefits, perseverance/commitment/self-motivation, pumping ability, and social support. Participant suggestions for expanding breastfeeding promotion and support included: (1) tangible, immediate, and proactive support; (2) positive non-judgmental support; (3) "milk supply" and "use of pump" education; and (4) self-motivation/willpower/perseverance.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

Despite the identification of common facilitators, findings reveal AA women face many obstacles to meeting breastfeeding recommendations. Collaborative discussions between women and healthcare providers focused on suggestions provided by AA women should be encouraged.

Breastfeeding, Personal Responsibility and Financial Incentives

Should financial incentives be offered to mothers for breastfeeding? Given the significant socioeconomic and sociodemographic differences in breastfeeding in the USA, researchers and policymakers are exploring the role of financial incentives for breastfeeding promotion with the objective of increasing uptake and reducing disparities. Despite positive outcomes in other health domains, the acceptability of financial incentives is mixed. Financial incentives in the context of infant feeding are particularly controversial given the complex obligations that characterize decisions to breastfeed. After situating the specific ethical tensions related to personal responsibility, fairness, and intrusiveness, we argue that exploring carefully designed financial incentives can be ethically justified to support breastfeeding uptake particularly given (i) established medical guidelines that support breastfeeding benefits, (ii) wide socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities and (iii) notable influences in the broader choice architecture of infant feeding in the USA. Additional empirical research is warranted to better understand effectiveness, cost and specific ethical concerns related to free and informed choice.

Perceptions About Lactation Consultant Support, Breastfeeding Experiences and Postpartum Psychosocial Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Many women seek lactation consultant support in the postpartum period. Lactation consultant support in community or clinical settings is often assumed to extend breastfeeding duration, improve breastfeeding experiences, and be well-received. Few studies have assessed women's perceptions of the support they received, nor have perceptions been examined in relationship to breastfeeding outcomes and maternal well-being. Our objective was to characterize the lactation consultant support women received and examine how women's perceptions about the support related to their breastfeeding outcomes, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and parenting stress.

METHODS

This observational, cross-sectional study examined receipt of postpartum lactation consultant support among 210 US women. Perceptions of lactation consultant support were examined in relation to breastfeeding outcomes, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and parenting stress to explore outcomes of negative versus positive lactation consultant support experiences, using linear and proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

While overall perceptions of lactation consultant support were positive for most recipients (71%, n = 98), 29% (n = 40) reported negative perceptions of lactation consultant support. Negative perceptions were associated with lower breastfeeding self-efficacy (β =  - 11.7, 95% CI - 17.3, - 6.0), a less successful breastfeeding experience (β =  - 19.5, CI - 27.8, - 11.3), greater general anxiety (β = 6.5, CI 2.1, 10.9), and shorter total duration of milk production (HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.18, 0.84). Perceptions were not associated with depressive symptoms or parenting stress.

DISCUSSION

Findings highlight the importance of ensuring that postpartum breastfeeding support provided by lactation consultants is perceived as positive by women.

Perceptions, Experiences, and Outcomes of Lactation Support in the Workplace: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Despite legislation requiring break time and a private space to express milk, variations exist in accommodations for breastfeeding employees in the United States.

RESEARCH AIMS

We aimed to describe employee and employer perceptions of and experiences with workplace lactation support in the United States and to identify research needed to inform workplace lactation support programs.

METHODS

We searched Academic Search Complete, Business Search Complete, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsycInfo for peer-reviewed articles published from 2009 to 2019 (n = 1638). We included 27 articles. Studies were categorized into four non-exclusive themes: (a) employee perceptions of and experiences with workplace lactation support; (b) employer reports of workplace lactation support; (c) association between workplace lactation support and business outcomes; and (d) association between workplace lactation support and breastfeeding outcomes.

RESULTS

Analyses of associations between lactation support at work and employee breastfeeding outcomes (n = 14, 52%), and employee perceptions of and experiences with lactation support at work (n = 14, 52%) were most common, followed by employer reports of lactation support (n = 3, 11%) and associations between lactation support at work and job satisfaction (n = 3, 11%). Results indicated that workplace lactation support varied by employer, and that employee perceptions of and experiences with workplace lactation support varied by demographic and employment characteristics. The use of cross-sectional designs, unvalidated instruments, and limited representation from women with low incomes and minorities were common study limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

More research is needed to learn about experiences of employers and low-income and minority women with workplace lactation support and associations with business-relevant outcomes.

Breastfeeding is Possible: A Systematic Review on the Feasibility and Challenges of Breastfeeding Among Breast Cancer Survivors of Reproductive Age

BACKGROUND

Breastfeeding is the biologically normative mode of feeding human infants, and reduces the risk of breast cancer for mothers. This systematic review assesses engagement in breastfeeding and the factors associated with breastfeeding among breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

An online literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria were original research articles written in English, published in peer-reviewed journals from 1 January 1990 to 25 November 2019, and included data on breast cancer survivors who attempted breastfeeding.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review. Between 7.7 and 90.9% of women attempted breastfeeding. Breastfeeding among participants varied from a few weeks to approximately 2 years. Common factors leading to breastfeeding were use of the contralateral breast, support from others, lactation counseling and advice from an International Board-Certified Lactation Consultant, being motivated to breastfeed, frequent feedings, and use of galactagogues. Common barriers were medical counseling against breastfeeding, insufficient milk production, lack of support, refusal of the infant to breastfeed from the treated breast, and being tired from relying on one breast.

CONCLUSIONS

Breastfeeding from the unaffected breast is feasible for some breast cancer survivors. Successful breastfeeding may require multilevel support and expert advice.

Lactation Care: Advocating for Equitable Access at the Ohio Department of Medicaid

Background

Lactation consultants understand the mechanisms and research supporting breastfeeding's positive impact on infant mortality reduction, including lifelong health outcomes and associated cost savings. Lactation services can enhance the success of programs intended to improve infant mortality rates, health outcomes, and cost effectiveness.

Program

As leaders serving the Ohio Lactation Consultant Association (OLCA), we pursued engagement with Ohio Department of Medicaid policy chiefs to ensure incorporation of these facts as programs are created to improve health and optimize allocation of Medicaid resources.

Result

After a productive meeting, we specifically proposed that professional lactation services be standard care and fully integrated across the healthcare continuum regardless of setting and ability to pay.

Childhood Obesity and Breastfeeding Rates in Pennsylvania Counties-Spatial Analysis of the Lactation Support Landscape

Childhood obesity is a global public health issue. As the prevalence of childhood obesity continues to rise, identification of potential interventions by public health policy makers, and health care providers is imperative. Breastfeeding, the most optimal method of infant feeding, has been demonstrated to protect against childhood obesity. Lactation support providers (LSPs) play a key role in providing education, care, and support to families considering a feeding choice. Access to professional lactation care increases breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity, and duration rates, regardless of the credential that the LSP holds. The aims of the current study were to examine the relationship between childhood obesity and breastfeeding rates in Pennsylvania (PA) counties; to examine the relationship between geographic access to professional LSPs in PA counties and breastfeeding rates; and to examine the relationship between geographic access to professional LSPs and childhood obesity in PA counties. Data were collected on 617 professional LSPs in 67 PA counties. There are 608 Certified Lactation Counselors (CLCs) and 144 International Board Certified Lactation Consultants (IBCLCs) in PA. County-level breastfeeding rates, childhood obesity rates, and the number of CLCs and IBCLCs were tested for significance at the p < 0.01 level using a two-tailed significance test and bivariate Pearson's correlation. The results show a significant, inverse relationship between breastfeeding rates and childhood obesity prevalence at the county level, p < 0.01. There is also a significant, inverse relationship between the number of CLCs and the number of all professional LSPs and childhood obesity rates at the county level, p < 0.01. Thus, the availability of breastfeeding support is significantly related to breastfeeding rates and inversely related to childhood obesity rates across Pennsylvania.

Interchanging Breast Pump Kit Brands Alters Breast Pump Suction Pressure

Background: Postpartum mothers express and store breast milk using a hospital-grade pump and manufacturer-specific kit (flanges, bottles, tubing, valves, and membranes). After hospital discharge, mothers may attempt to interchange kits from different manufacturers. The objective of this study is to determine whether pump performance is affected by the use of a different manufacturer's kit. Materials and Methods: Suction pressure was tested using kits and six pumps from three manufacturers (Ameda, Medela, and Spectra). Pump settings (speed and vacuum strength) simulated maximum, minimum, and commonly used median settings. Suction pressure (mmHg) was measured using an analog gauge and repeated six times for each pump-kit combination. Measurements were compared using repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to determine whether kit was an independent predictor of suction pressure. Results: The kit type was a significant independent predictor (p < 0.05) of suction pressure for all at medium vacuum strength and many at maximum and minimum vacuum strengths. Upon further analysis interchanging kits resulted in both significantly increased and decreased suction pressures compared to the manufacturer-specific kit. Conclusion: Breast pump kits generate variable suction pressures when interchanged between pumps from different manufacturers. Interchanging combinations of kits and breast pumps could potentially lead to low milk expression due to ineffective suction pressure or increased discomfort from excessive pressure. The results of this study emphasize the importance of maternal education regarding the use of manufacturer-specific kits and breast pumps.

What Is the Impact of NICU-Dedicated Lactation Consultants? An Evidence-Based Practice Brief

BACKGROUND

Benefits of exclusive human milk diets for preterm and low birth-weight infants are well established. Despite known benefits, supporting mothers in the provision of mother's own milk for high-risk infants is challenging. Lactation support in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is highly variable. Lactations consultants (LCs) are often shared between postpartum units and the NICU, potentially increasing LC workload with less time spent with high-risk mothers. Furthermore, less than half of NICUs in the United States staff an international board-certified lactation consultant. Limited understanding exists regarding impacts of NICU-specific lactation support on breastfeeding outcomes.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this evidence-based practice brief is to synthesize the literature on the impact of NICU-specific lactation support, LCs who work exclusively in the NICU, and provide guidance about how NICU staffing with LCs solely focused on supporting mothers of high-risk infants impacts breastfeeding outcomes for low birth-weight infants.

SEARCH STRATEGY

CINAHL PLUS, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and OVID databases were searched using key words and restricted to English language.

FINDINGS

During hospitalization, NICUs staffed with dedicated board-certified LCs have increased potential to yield improved breastfeeding rates through hospital discharge, increased proportion of infants who receive mother's own milk, and increased duration of breastfeeding or human milk expression through hospital discharge.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Human milk nutrition is related to improved outcomes for high-risk infants. Neonatal intensive care unit-specific lactation support can potentially optimize maternal breastfeeding practices and improve outcomes for high-risk infants.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

There is a need for further studies pertaining to NICU-specific lactation consultants and influences on breastfeeding outcomes.

A Pilot Study of Mothers' Breastfeeding Experiences in Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate

BACKGROUND

Despite the recognized importance of human milk (HM) use, breastfeeding is often discouraged for infants with cleft lip and/or palate because of their anatomical abnormalities. Poor weight gain may require formula for calorie supplementation. Stresses associated with caring for infants with cleft lip/palate may decrease rates of HM provision to these infants.

PURPOSE

This study investigates the experiences of mothers of infants with cleft lip/palate (CL/P) to determine choices and factors associated with providing HM to their infants.

METHODS

A retrospective telephone survey was administered to a cohort of mothers of infants with CL/P.

RESULTS

Fifty mothers agreed to participate in the survey. Most (78%) initiated use of HM for a median duration of 4 months, 32% provided HM for 6 months or more, and 79% exclusively expressed their HM. Poor supply was the most frequent challenge to providing HM and led to cessation in 46% of the mothers. Formula was used to supplement for poor supply or poor infant weight gain in 90% of the mothers. The best predictors of a mother's use of HM were child not in day care, genetic diagnosis, and gestational age at birth. Only 36% of mothers reported individual encouragement to provide HM, and 18% reported they were specifically discouraged from providing HM for their infants.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Although initiation rates were high, there are opportunities to improve support for mothers to increase duration of HM provision in children with CL/P.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

This study establishes a baseline for future prospective studies looking at the impact of active encouragement and provision of lactation support within the cleft team setting.

Factors That Modify the Association of Maternal Postpartum Smoking and Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Maternal postpartum smoking increases the risk for poor infant health outcomes, while exclusive breastfeeding has been shown to support infant health. Limited population-based research has been published on the interaction between maternal smoking and exclusive breastfeeding. The objective of this study was to examine factors modifying the association between maternal postpartum smoking and exclusive breastfeeding among women in the United States.

METHODS

Secondary data analysis was conducted using the 2009-2011 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Stratified analyses were used to examine the associations between maternal postpartum smoking and exclusive breastfeeding by sociodemographic factors.

RESULTS

The postpartum smoking rate was 17.1%. The relationship between postpartum smoking and exclusive breastfeeding at 12 weeks varied by maternal education level, race/ethnicity, Medicaid use, and pregestational or gestational diabetes. The magnitude of reduction in the odds of exclusive breastfeeding at 12 weeks postpartum among the women who smoked in the postpartum period ranges from odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.52 (0.37-0.74) for non-Hispanic blacks to 0.31 (0.22-0.43) for women who had <12 years of education.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who smoked in the postpartum period, who also suffered from socioeconomic disadvantages, had a higher likelihood of not continuing exclusive breastfeeding. Identification of women at high risk for not exclusively breastfeeding is important for targeting populations in need of appropriate and timely support for prenatal and postpartum smoking cessation and breastfeeding promotion.

Barriers to Breastfeeding in Female Physicians

BACKGROUND

Breast milk is considered the normative nutrition for human infants, and exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life is recommended by several national and global societies. Female physicians are a high-risk group for early unintended weaning. We aimed to assess and compare the most common barriers to successful breastfeeding perceived by female physicians in various stages of training and practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female faculty physicians and trainees (medical students, resident physicians, and fellows) affiliated with a large medical university in 2016 were surveyed via an anonymous web-based survey distributed through institutional e-mail lists. The three-item survey assessed role, breastfeeding experience, and perceived barriers to successful breastfeeding. Comparisons between groups were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests or Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

The survey was distributed to 1,301 women with 223 responses included in analysis. The majority (57%) of respondents had never breastfed; of those, 87% reported plans to breastfeed in the future. Ninety-seven percent of women with breastfeeding experience reported at least one perceived barrier to successful breastfeeding. Trainees identified more barriers compared with faculty physicians (median count 5 versus 3, p = 0.014). No individual barrier reached statistical significance when comparing between faculty and trainees. The most frequently identified barriers to breastfeeding were lack of time and appropriate place to pump breast milk, unpredictable schedule, short maternity leave, and long working hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians and medical students who breastfeed face occupation-related barriers that could lead to early unintended weaning. Trainees and faculty report similar barriers. Institutional support may help improve some barriers to successful breastfeeding in female physicians.

A Call to Action to Address Barriers to Breastfeeding and Lactation Faced by Student-Mothers

Many new mothers returning to school after childbirth face barriers within their academic settings to meeting their goals for exclusive breastfeeding. Potential barriers to breastfeeding faced by student-mothers include lack of legal protection, lack of breastfeeding-friendly university policies, inadequate availability of breastfeeding facilities, and insufficient awareness of the importance of breastfeeding among mothers, health care providers, and university administrators and faculty. Here we advocate for six action steps to help remove barriers to breastfeeding faced by student-mothers.

Early feeding in child care in the United States: Are state regulations supporting breastfeeding?

Most women in the US are not meeting the recommendation of exclusively breastfeeding their infants for the first 6months of life. The child care environment can be especially influential in a mother's ability to continue breastfeeding after returning to employment. For this study, we reviewed child care regulations related to breastfeeding for centers and homes in all 50 states and the District of Colombia in late 2016, and compared them to 5 national standards. We coded regulations as either not meeting, partially meeting, or fully meeting each standard. We assessed correlations between number of regulations consistent with standards and 1) geographic census region and 2) last year of update. This study provides an update to a previous review conducted in 2012. No state met all 5 of the included standards, and only 2 states for centers and 1 state for homes at least partially met 4 of the 5 standards. More states had regulations consistent with standards encouraging general support for breastfeeding and requiring a designated place for mothers to breastfeed onsite. Number of regulations consistent with standards was associated with geographic census region, but not last year of update. States in the South had a greater number of regulations consistent with standards and states in the West had the fewest number of regulations consistent with standards. Overall support for breastfeeding at the state child care regulation level continues to be insufficient. States should improve child care regulations to include greater support for breastfeeding in child care facilities.

Effect of the Affordable Care Act on Disparities in Breastfeeding: The Case of Maine

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the Affordable Care Act (ACA) breastfeeding provision and test whether changes in coverage affected women differently according to health insurance status.

METHODS

We used the All-Payer Claims Database from Maine (2012-2014) to compare health insurance claims for lactation classes and breast pumps between women with private insurance and women with Medicaid (1) before the ACA breastfeeding provision, (2) after the provision came into effect, and (3) after health insurance expansion through the Marketplace.

RESULTS

We found limited change in claims for lactation classes over the study period. By contrast, the number of claims for breast pumps among women with private insurance increased from 70 claims in the third quarter of 2012 to 629 claims 1 year later and 803 claims in the third quarter of 2014. Women with Medicaid had only 11 claims for breast pumps over the entire study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This 11-fold rise in claims for breast pumps by women with private insurance suggests that these women will likely increase breastfeeding initiation or duration; however, without additional support for women with Medicaid, disparities in breastfeeding may increase.

Massachusetts Parents’ Experiences With Insurance Coverage for Lactation Consultant Services

The Women’s Preventive Services component of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires coverage of “lactation supplies and services” with no out-of-pocket cost to the patient. However, as IBCLCs providing in-home lactation consults, we found that during the first year of the ACA mandate, clients often described disappointment with coverage for home visits and for breastfeeding support in general. To have a more specific picture of women’s experiences, our association conducted an online survey of families in Massachusetts who sought insurance coverage for IBCLC care outside of the hospital since the ACA provisions came into effect. The goal was to identify the barriers that families who need these services commonly dealt with. Barriers reported by survey respondents included confusing and inconsistent information provided by insurance companies about coverage, lack of coverage for the time and place they sought IBCLC services, lack of coverage for IBCLCs at all, and restriction to a network that did not include IBCLC providers. These findings suggest that many women are not yet receiving the benefits of insurance coverage for lactation support and point to specific changes that insurance providers should make to provide adequate coverage as mandated under the ACA.

Assessing the Variability in Insurance Coverage Transparency for Male Sexual Health Conditions in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degree of transparency of health insurance policies regarding coverage of male sexual health conditions, we examined the publicly available policy coverage documents of the largest U.S. medical insurance plans.

METHODS

We selected 2 index patients across the male sexual health spectrum: (1) a phosphodiesterase type 5 refractory erectile dysfunction (ED) patient requiring intracavernosal injection therapy or penile prosthesis and (2) a 50-year-old male patient with laboratory-confirmed, symptomatic hypogonadism requiring testosterone replacement therapy as defined by endocrine society criteria. We researched the policy documents regarding coverage for standard therapies. We used breast reconstruction after mastectomy as a control.

RESULTS

We queried the publicly available policy statements for 84 of the largest health-care plans in the United States. Whereas breast reconstruction policies are publicly available for 94% of the plans examined, policies of only 39% of the plans for advanced ED treatment options and 62% for hypogonadism are publicly available. Of the plans that had publicly accessible data for ED coverage, 85% viewed penile prosthesis and intracavernosal injection as medically necessary, whereas 91% viewed androgen replacement as medically necessary for our index patient.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of transparency among medical insurers regarding coverage of ED and hypogonadism in stark contrast to reconstructive breast surgery.

Do American Colleges and Universities Support the Lactation Needs of Students?

BACKGROUND

Despite strong evidence for the health benefits of breastfeeding, many mothers cannot continue breastfeeding their infants upon their return to work or school. Students are especially affected by this transition because they do not have legal protection that requires designated lactation space or time to express milk to be provided by places of education. Furthermore, limited research has been completed that specifically addresses the return to school of mothers who are students.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-seven colleges and universities from across the United States were contacted through telephone and/or e-mail, and their websites were searched to assess the support they offer for lactating students. The presence of a formal policy for lactating students and designated lactation rooms, accessible to students, were the key measures.

RESULTS

Information was gathered from 88.53% (n = 139) of the colleges and universities. A mere 3.6% (n = 5) had an official policy for lactating students and/or had the lactation spaces mentioned in the student handbook. However, more than half of the colleges and universities (54.68%; n = 76) had designated lactation spaces accessible to their students.

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of the sample did not have a policy for lactating students, and almost half of the schools did not have designated space for milk expression accessible to students. Lactating students will likely encounter challenges in simultaneously sustaining breastfeeding and meeting their educational goals in these contexts. To meet the recommendation of the American Academy of Pediatrics of 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding and continued breastfeeding for 1 year or more, American colleges and universities must establish not only designated spaces for milk expression but also policies to support lactating students.