Systematic review of instruments aimed at evaluating the severity of bronchiolitis

Clinical Features of Patients With Bronchiolitis Prior to the Initiation of Noninvasive Respiratory Support

Background: Effective management of infants hospitalized with bronchiolitis depends on clinician assessment of disease severity. Although environmental and demographic risk factors help identify severe cases, there is limited research on specific clinical and physiological characteristics associated with respiratory deterioration. This study aimed to identify physiologic variables and clinical parameters associated with respiratory deterioration in hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study included previously healthy infants <2 years of age hospitalized for bronchiolitis. The primary outcome measure, deterioration, was defined as respiratory distress requiring noninvasive (including high-flow nasal cannula) or invasive respiratory support within 48 h of admission. A multivariable logistic regression analysis with preselected factors was used to assess the odds of deterioration. Variables included sex, age, affect and behavior, nasopharyngeal suctioning, number, location of retractions, SpO2/FIO2 (S/F ratio), breathing frequency, pulse rate, and respiratory severity score. A secondary analysis assessed retraction locations. Results: Of the 584 eligible patients, 154 (26%) experienced a deterioration event and required noninvasive or invasive respiratory support. Respiratory score (odds ratio [OR] 1.9 [95% CI 1.5-2.4]), total number of retractions (OR: 2.5 [95% CI 1.6-3.8]), S/F ratio (OR: 1.0 [95% CI 0.99-0.998), pulse rate (OR: 1.0 [95% CI 1.0-1.1]), nasopharyngeal suctioning (OR: 5.5 [95% CI 2.6-11.7]), and positive affect and behavior descriptors (OR: 0.3 [95% CI 0.1-0.7]) were associated with deterioration. Age, sex, negative affect and behavior descriptors, and breathing frequency were not statistically significant. Conclusions: These variables may be used to design predictive algorithms that alert clinicians of impending respiratory deterioration in infants with bronchiolitis.

Assessing bronchiolitis severity: a comparative analysis of two commonly used clinical scoring systems

The purpose of this study to compare the effectiveness of the Bronchiolitis Severity Score (BSS) and the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) in determining bronchiolitis severity and predicting outcomes. Additionally, it aimed to establish optimum cutoff points for both scores. In this prospective observational study, clinical details of enrolled infants, along with assessments using both scoring tools, were recorded. The performance of these scores in predicting "severe disease," defined by respiratory support requirements other than nasal prongs, PICU admission, respiratory acidosis, and/or altered consciousness, was evaluated. A total of 64 infants diagnosed with bronchiolitis were enrolled with a median age of 5 (3.8) months, and 16 (25%) infants had severe disease. BSS showed 25% sensitivity and 97.9% specificity at established cutoffs of > 8 for severe bronchiolitis. BSS performed better than RDAI in differentiating severe bronchiolitis [AUC, 0.733 vs 0.605; p = 0.035]. New cutoffs of > 5 points for BSS and > 8 points for RDAI increased BSS sensitivity to 68.8% and RDAI sensitivity to 56.3%.

CONCLUSION

BSS demonstrated superior discriminative ability compared to RDAI in identifying severe bronchiolitis. New cutoff points enhanced BSS's ability to classify severe cases while establishing a cutoff for RDAI. Additional studies are required to validate these revised cutoffs.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Bronchiolitis severity score (BSS) and Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) helps in determining bronchiolitis severity.

WHAT IS NEW

• BSS has superior discriminatory ability as compared to RDAI in determining bronchiolitis severity. • This study also highlights that neither BSS nor RDAI is perfect, emphasizing the importance of clinical judgment over scoring systems.

Effect of a prolonged slow expiration technique on 24-h food intake in children hospitalized for moderate bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Chest physiotherapy for airway clearance is not recommended in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. The updated Cochrane meta-analysis suggests that slow expiratory techniques could slightly improve clinical severity, but the evidence certainty is low and the clinical significance of this change is unknown. We investigated whether the prolonged slow expiration technique (PSET) would impact the 24-h food intake of these children.

METHODS

We conducted a two-arm double-blind randomized controlled trial. Hospitalized children aged from 1 to 12 months, bottle-fed or diversified and referred for airway clearance were included. Both groups received upper airway clearance at inclusion and standard treatments. The experimental group received PSET including rhinopharyngeal unclogging and targeted unprovoked cough. The primary outcome was the 24-h food intake. Clinical severity, vomit episodes and sleep quality were also recorded. An ordinary least squares linear regression for quantitative variables was modelled for between-group comparisons.

RESULTS

From January 9, 2019, to December 1, 2022, 42 children were randomized with a 1:1 ratio (mean age: 5.0 (± 2.9) months). The 24-h food intake did not differ between groups (estimate: 1.8% (95%CI -7.0 to 10.6); p = 0.68). PSET had no effect on SpO2, clinical severity, RR and HR at the follow-up assessments (5 min, 30 min and 24 h after intervention), nor on the number of vomit episodes, total sleep time and SpO2 during sleep.

CONCLUSIONS

PSET did not affect food intake or the 24-h course of bronchiolitis more than standard treatment in children hospitalized for moderate bronchiolitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03738501  registered on 13/11/2018, Slow Expiratory Technique to Improve Alimentation in Children With Bronchiolitis (BRONCHIOL-EAT); https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT03738501.

"Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in children with acute respiratory failure by bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial"

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare HFNC therapy to noninvasive ventilation (NIV/BiPAP) in children with bronchiolitis who developed respiratory failure. We hypothesized that HFNC therapy would not be inferior to NIV.

METHODS

This was a noninferiority open-label randomized single-center clinical trial conducted at a tertiary Brazilian hospital. Children under 2 years of age with no chronic conditions admitted for bronchiolitis that progressed to mild to moderate respiratory distress (Wood-Downes-Férres score < 8) were randomized to either the HFNC group or NIV (BiPAP) group through sealed envelopes. Vital signs, FiO2, Wood-Downes-Férres score and HFNC/NIV parameters were recorded up to 96 h after therapy initiation. Children who developed respiratory failure despite receiving initial therapy were intubated. Crossover was not allowed. The primary outcome analyzed was invasive mechanical ventilation requirement. The secondary outcomes were sedation usage, invasive mechanical ventilation duration, the PICU LOS, the hospital LOS, and mortality rate.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were allocated to the NIV group (132 randomized and 6 excluded), and 126 were allocated to the HFNC group (136 randomized and 10 excluded). The median age was 2.5 (1-6) months in the NIV group and 3 (2-7) months in the HFNC group (p = 0,07). RSV was the most common virus isolated in both groups (72% vs. 71.4%, NIV and HFNC, respectively). Thirty-seven patients were intubated in the NIV group and 29 were intubated in the HFNC group (29% vs. 23%, p = 0.25). According to the Farrington-Manning test, with a noninferiority margin of 15%, the difference was 6.3% in favor of HFNC therapy (95% confidence interval: -4.5 to 17.1%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the PICU LOS or sedation duration. Sedation requirement, hospital LOS and invasive mechanical ventilation duration were lower in the HFNC group.

CONCLUSION

HFNC therapy is noninferior to NIV in infants admitted with mild to moderate respiratory distress caused by bronchiolitis that progresses to respiratory failure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

U1111-1262-1740; RBR-104z966s. Registered 03/01/2023 (retrospectively registered). ReBEC: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-104z966s .

Bronchiolitis guidelines: what about the Italian situation in a primary care setting?

Acute viral bronchiolitis is the most common cause of hospitalization in children under 12 months of age. The variable clinical presentation and the potential for sudden deterioration of the clinical conditions require a close monitoring by healthcare professionals.In Italy, first access care for children is provided by primary care physicians (PCPs) who often must face to a heterogeneous disease presentation that, in some cases, make the management of patient with bronchiolitis challenging. Consequently, Italian studies report poor adherence to national and international guidelines processed to guide the clinicians in decision making in acute viral bronchiolitis.This paper aims to identify the potential factors contributing to the lack of adherence to the suggested guidelines derived by clear and evidence-based recommendations among primary care physicians operating in an outpatient setting, with a specific focus on the context of Italy. Particularly, we focus on the prescription of medications such as β2-agonists, systemic steroids, and antibiotics which are commonly prescribed by PCPs to address conditions that can mimic bronchiolitis.

Gut, oral, and nasopharyngeal microbiota dynamics in the clinical course of hospitalized infants with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis

Introduction

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of bronchiolitis and hospitalization in infants worldwide. The nasopharyngeal microbiota has been suggested to play a role in influencing the clinical course of RSV bronchiolitis, and some evidence has been provided regarding oral and gut microbiota. However, most studies have focused on a single timepoint, and none has investigated all three ecosystems at once.

Methods

Here, we simultaneously reconstructed the gut, oral and nasopharyngeal microbiota dynamics of 19 infants with RSV bronchiolitis in relation to the duration of hospitalization (more or less than 5 days). Fecal samples, oral swabs, and nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected at three timepoints (emergency room admission, discharge and six-month follow-up) and profiled by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.

Results

Interestingly, all ecosystems underwent rearrangements over time but with distinct configurations depending on the clinical course of bronchiolitis. In particular, infants hospitalized for longer showed early and persistent signatures of unhealthy microbiota in all ecosystems, i.e., an increased representation of pathobionts and a depletion of typical age-predicted commensals.

Discussion

Monitoring infant microbiota during RSV bronchiolitis and promptly reversing any dysbiotic features could be important for prognosis and long-term health.

Risk Factors Associated with Severe RSV Infection in Infants: What Is the Role of Viral Co-Infections?

The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) represents the leading cause of viral lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in children worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. The clinical picture of an RSV infection differs substantially between patients, and the role of viral co-infections is poorly investigated. During two consecutive winter seasons from October 2018 until February 2020, we prospectively included children up to 2 years old presenting with an acute LRTI, both ambulatory and hospitalized. We collected clinical data and tested nasopharyngeal secretions for a panel of 16 different respiratory viruses with multiplex RT-qPCR. Disease severity was assessed with traditional clinical parameters and scoring systems. A total of 120 patients were included, of which 91.7% were RSV positive; 42.5% of RSV-positive patients had a co-infection with at least one other respiratory virus. We found that patients suffering from a single RSV infection had higher pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission rates (OR = 5.9, 95% CI = 1.53 to 22.74), longer duration of hospitalization (IRR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.52), and a higher Bronchiolitis Risk of Admission Score (BRAS) (IRR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.70) compared to patients with RSV co-infections. No significant difference was found in saturation on admission, O2 need, or ReSViNET-score. In our cohort, patients with a single RSV infection had increased disease severity compared to patients with RSV co-infections. This suggests that the presence of viral co-infections might influence the course of RSV bronchiolitis, but heterogeneity and small sample size in our study prevents us from drawing strong conclusions. IMPORTANCE RSV is worldwide the leading cause of serious airway infections. Up to 90% of children will be infected by the age of 2. RSV symptoms are mostly mild and typically mimic a common cold in older children and adolescents, but younger children can develop severe lower respiratory tract disease, and currently it is unclear why certain children develop severe disease while others do not. In this study, we found that children with a single RSV infection had a higher disease severity compared to patients with viral co-infections, suggesting that the presence of a viral co-infection could influence the course of an RSV bronchiolitis. As preventive and therapeutic options for RSV-associated disease are currently limited, this finding could potentially guide physicians to decide which patients might benefit from current or future treatment options early in the course of disease, and therefore, warrants further investigation.

Bronchiolitis versus bronchopneumonia: navigating antibiotic use within the LRTI spectrum

Bronchiolitis, a common reason for infant hospitalisation in South Africa (SA), is caused by viral pathogens. Bronchiolitis is typically an illness of mild to moderate severity that occurs in well-nourished children. Hospitalised SA infants frequently have severe disease and/or coexisting medical conditions, and these cases of bronchiolitis may have bacterial co-infection that requires antibiotic therapy. However, the existence of widespread antimicrobial resistance in SA warrants the judicious use of antibiotics. This commentary describes: (i) common clinical pitfalls leading to an incorrect diagnosis of bronchopneumonia; and (ii) considerations for antibiotic therapy in hospitalised infants with bronchiolitis. If antibiotics are prescribed, the indication for their use should be clearly stated, and antibiotic therapy must be stopped promptly if investigations indicate that bacterial co-infection is unlikely. Until more robust data emerge, we recommend a pragmatic management strategy to inform antibiotic use in hospitalised SA infants with bronchiolitis in whom bacterial co-infection is suspected.

Lung ultrasound systematic review shows its prognostic and diagnostic role in acute viral bronchiolitis

AIM

Lung ultrasound (LUS) has not been included in the current guidelines for the diagnosis of bronchiolitis so far, even though data concerning its effectiveness have been published.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was carried out to determine the role of LUS scores in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients aged 0-2 years with bronchiolitis, using MEDLINE, Scopus and ScienceDirect databases from their inception to December 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies matching our eligibility criteria were analysed for the purposes of this review and 1249 patients with bronchiolitis were included. The sonographic and radiological findings were comparable and chest radiography was found to have a higher sensitivity in ruling out severe complications such as concomitant pneumonia. The LUS scores were correlated to the clinical course of bronchiolitis and it was able to predict the need of admission in paediatric intensive care unit, the duration of hospitalisation and the need for respiratory support.

CONCLUSION

This review suggests that LUS could have both a diagnostic and a prognostic role in bronchiolitis during first evaluation in the emergency department and hospitalisation. Physicians could adjust management according to sonographic findings as a useful adjunct to the clinical ones.

RSV-CLASS -Clinical Assessment Severity Score: An easy-to-use clinical disease severity score for respiratory syncytial virus infection in hospitalized children

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of acute respiratory tract infection in infants and young children often leading to severe disease requiring hospitalization. However, validated tools for systematic assessment of disease severity are lacking. This study aimed at creating and validating a standardized, simple-to-use disease severity score for RSV infection in children-the RSV-CLASS (Clinical Assessment Severity Score). Therefore, data from over 700 RSV-infected children over six winter seasons (2014-2020) was analyzed using univariate and multiple regression analyses for the prediction of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) as a proxy for a severe course of the disease. Testing a broad range of respiratory symptoms, they eventually yielded seven items. Performing stepwise selection, these were reduced to the final four items: cough, tachypnea, rales, and wheezing, each receiving one point in the proposed score named RSV-CLASS. The score was calculated for children in two cohorts A and B, one for development and one for validation, with an area under the curve of 0.90 and 0.87, respectively. With a score value of 3 or 4, 97.8% and 100% of the children, respectively, were admitted with LRTI and classified correctly. The RSV-CLASS is a disease severity score based on a neutral, analytical approach using prospective data from a large study cohort. It will contribute to systematically assessing the disease severity of RSV infection and can be used for evidence-based clinical decision-making as well as for research settings.

Comparison of three clinical scoring tools for bronchiolitis to predict the need for respiratory support and length of stay in neonates and infants up to three months of age

BACKGROUND

Bronchiolitis severity can be assessed using different clinical scores. Some of the most used are the Wang Bronchiolitis Severity Score (WBSS), the Kristjansson Respiratory Score (KRS), and the Global Respiratory Severity Score (GRSS), calculated on the vital parameters and the clinical conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess which of the three clinical scores better predicts the need for respiratory support and length of hospital stay in neonates and infants younger than three months, admitted to neonatal units for bronchiolitis.

METHODS

Neonates and infants younger than three months admitted to neonatal units from October 2021 to March 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The scores were calculated in all patients soon after admission.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (of whom 61 neonates) admitted for bronchiolitis were included in the analysis. Median WBSS at admission was 4.00 (interquartile range, IQR 3.00-6.00), median KRS was 4.00 (IQR 3.00-5.00), and median GRSS 4.90 (IQR 3.89-6.10). We found significant differences in all three scores between infants who needed respiratory support (72.9%) and those who did not (27.1%) (p < 0.001). A value >3 for WBSS, > 3 for KRS, and >3.8 for GRSS were accurate in predicting the need for respiratory support, with a sensitivity of 85.71%, 75.71%, and 93.75% and a specificity of 80.77%, 92.31%, and 88.24%, respectively. The three infants who required mechanical ventilation had a median WBSS of 6.00 (IQR 5.00-6.50), a KRS of 7.00 (IQR 5.00-7.00), and a GRSS of 7.38 (IQR 5.59-7.39). The median length of stay was 5 days (IQR 4-8). All three scores were significantly correlated with the length of stay, although with a low correlation coefficient: WBSS with an r² of 0.139 (p < 0.001), KRS with an r² of 0.137 (p < 0.001), and GRSS with an r² of 0.170 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Clinical scores WBSS, KRS, and GRSS calculated on admission accurately predict the need for respiratory support and the length of hospital stay in neonates and infants younger than three months with bronchiolitis. The GRSS score seems to better discriminate the need for respiratory support than the others.

Something Is Changing in Viral Infant Bronchiolitis Approach

Acute Viral Bronchiolitis is one of the leading causes of hospitalization in the first 12-24 months of life. International guidelines on the management of bronchiolitis broadly agree in recommending a minimal therapeutic approach, not recommending the use of bronchodilators. Guidelines, generally, consider bronchiolitis as a "unique disease" and this runs the risk of not administering therapy in some patients who could benefit from the use of bronchodilators, for instance, in those who will develop asthma later in their life and face first episode in the age of bronchiolitis. Today, there is growing evidence that bronchiolitis is not a single illness but can have different "endotypes" and "phenotypes," based on age, personal or family history of atopy, etiology, and pathophysiological mechanism. There is evidence that some phenotypes of bronchiolitis are more strongly associated with asthma features and are linked to higher risk for asthma development. In these populations, possible use of bronchodilators might have a better impact. Age seems to be the main feature to suggest a good response to a bronchodilator-trial, because, among children > 6 months old with bronchiolitis, the presence of a subset of patients with virus-induced wheezing or the first episode of asthma is more likely. While waiting for new research to define the relationship between therapeutic options and different phenotypes, a bronchodilator-trial (using short-acting β2 agonists with metered-dose inhalers and valved holding chambers) seems appropriate in every child with bronchiolitis and age > 6 months.

Interhospital transport of children with bronchiolitis by a statewide emergency transport service

Objective: To investigate the rate of interhospital emergency transport for bronchiolitis and intensive care admission following the introduction of high flow nasal cannula and standardised paediatric observation and response charts. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A statewide paediatric intensive care transport service and its two referral paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Victoria, Australia. Participants: Children less than 2 years old emergently transported with bronchiolitis during two time periods: 2008-2012 and 2015-2019. Main outcome measures: Incidence rates of bronchiolitis transport episodes, PICU admissions and respiratory support. Results: 802 children with bronchiolitis were transported during the study period, 233 in the first period (2008-2012) and 569 in the second period (2015-2019). The rate of interhospital transport for bronchiolitis increased from 32.9 to 71.8 per 100 000 children aged 0-2 years. The population-adjusted rate of PICU admission increased from 16.2 to 36.6 per 100 000 children aged 0-2 years. Metropolitan hospitals were the predominant referral source and this increased from 60.1% of transports to 78.6% (P < 0.001). In children admitted to a PICU, the administration of high flow nasal cannula during transport increased significantly from 1.7% to 75.9% (P < 0.001) and a concomitant reduction in continuous positive airway pressure and mechanical ventilation occurred (40-12.4% and 27-6.9% respectively; P < 0.001). The proportion of mechanical ventilation as well as PICU and hospital length of stay decreased over time. Conclusions: The population-adjusted rate of interhospital transport and admission to the PICU for bronchiolitis increased over time. This occurred despite a lower rate of non-invasive and invasive mechanical ventilation during transport and in the PICU.

Viral lower respiratory tract infections-strict admission guidelines for young children can safely reduce admissions

Viral lower respiratory tract infection (VLRTI) is the most common cause of hospital admission among small children in high-income countries. Guidelines to identify children in need of admission are lacking in the literature. In December 2012, our hospital introduced strict guidelines for admission. This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of the guidelines. We performed a single-center retrospective administrative database search and medical record review. ICD-10 codes identified children < 24 months assessed at the emergency department for VLRTI for a 10-year period. To identify adverse events related to admission guidelines implementation, we reviewed patient records for all those discharged on primary contact followed by readmission within 14 days. During the study period, 3227 children younger than 24 months old were assessed in the ED for VLRTI. The proportion of severe adverse events among children who were discharged on their initial emergency department contact was low both before (0.3%) and after the intervention (0.5%) (p=1.0). Admission rates before vs. after the intervention were for previously healthy children > 90 days 65.3% vs. 53.3% (p<0.001); for healthy children ≤ 90 days 85% vs. 68% (p<0.001); and for high-risk comorbidities 74% vs. 71% (p=0.5).Conclusion: After implementation of admission guidelines for VLRTI, there were few adverse events and a significant reduction in admissions to the hospital from the emergency department. Our admission guidelines may be a safe and helpful tool in the assessment of children with VLRTI. What is Known: • Viral lower respiratory tract infection, including bronchiolitis, is the most common cause of hospitalization for young children in the developed world. Treatment is mainly supportive, and hospitalization should be limited to the cases in need of therapeutic intervention. • Many countries have guidelines for the management of the disease, but the decision on whom to admit for inpatient treatment is often subjective and may vary even between physicians in the same hospital. What is New: • Implementation of admission criteria for viral lower respiratory tract infection may reduce the rate of hospital admissions without increasing adverse events.

Use of the ReSVinet Scale for parents and healthcare workers in a paediatric emergency service: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Most scales for acute respiratory infection (ARI) are limited to healthcare worker (HCW) use for clinical decision-making. The Respiratory Syncytial Virus network (ReSVinet) Scale offers a version for parents that could potentially help as an early warning system.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether or not the ReSVinet Scale for ARI in infants can be reliably used by HCWs and parents in an emergency service.

METHODS

A prospective study was done of infants with ARI who were admitted to a paediatric emergency room to assess the ReSVinet Scale when used by faculty (paediatric doctor-professors), residents (doctors doing their first specialty in paediatrics) and parents. Spearman's correlation and a weighted kappa coefficient were used to measure interobserver agreement. Internal consistency was also tested by Cronbach's alpha test.

RESULTS

Overall, 188 patients, 58% male, were enrolled. A Spearman's correlation of 0.92 for faculty and resident scoring and 0.64 for faculty or resident and parent scoring was found. The weighted kappa coefficients were 0.78 for faculty versus residents, 0.41 for faculty versus parents, and 0.41 for residents versus parents. Cronbach's alpha test was 0.67 for faculty, 0.62 for residents and 0.69 for parents.

CONCLUSION

There was good correlation in the ReSVinet scores between health professionals when used in the paediatric emergency area. Agreement between parents and health professionals was found to be more variable. Future studies should focus on finding ways to improve its reliability when used by parents before the scale is used in the emergency room.

Phenotypical Sub-setting of the First Episode of Severe Viral Respiratory Infection Based on Clinical Assessment and Underlying Airway Disease: A Pilot Study

Introduction: Viral bronchiolitis is a term often used to group all infants with the first episode of severe viral respiratory infection. However, this term encompasses a collection of different clinical and biological processes. We hypothesized that the first episode of severe viral respiratory infection in infants can be subset into clinical phenotypes with distinct outcomes and underlying airway disease patterns. Methods: We included children (≤2 years old) hospitalized for the first time due to PCR-confirmed viral respiratory infection. All cases were categorized based on primary manifestations (wheezing, sub-costal retractions and hypoxemia) into mild, hypoxemia or wheezing phenotypes. We characterized these phenotypes using lung-X-rays, respiratory outcomes and nasal protein levels of antiviral and type 2 cytokines (IFNγ, IL-10, IL-4, IL-13, IL-1β, and TNFα). Results: A total of 50 young children comprising viral respiratory infection cases (n = 41) and uninfected controls (n = 9) were included. We found that 22% of viral respiratory infection cases were classified as mild (n = 9), 39% as hypoxemia phenotype (n = 16) and 39% as wheezing phenotype (n = 16). Individuals in the hypoxemia phenotype had more lung opacities, higher probability of PICU admission and prolonged hospitalizations. Subjects in the wheezing phenotype had higher probability of recurrent sick visits. Nasal cytokine profiles showed that individuals with recurrent sick visits in the wheezing phenotype had increased nasal airway levels of type 2 cytokines (IL-13/IL-4). Conclusion: Clinically-based classification of the first episode of severe viral respiratory infection into mild, hypoxemia or wheezing phenotypes provides critical information about respiratory outcomes, lung disease patterns and underlying airway immunobiology.

The impact of viral bronchiolitis phenotyping: Is it time to consider phenotype-specific responses to individualize pharmacological management?

Although recent guidelines recommend a minimalist approach to bronchiolitis, there are several issues with this posture. First, there are concerns about the definition of the disease, the quality of the guidelines, the method of administration of bronchodilators, and the availability of tools to evaluate the response to therapies. Second, for decades it has been assumed that all cases of viral bronchiolitis are the same, but recent evidence has shown that this is not the case. Distinct bronchiolitis phenotypes have been described, with heterogeneity in clinical presentation, molecular immune signatures and clinically relevant outcomes such as respiratory failure and recurrent wheezing. New research is critically needed to refine viral bronchiolitis phenotyping at the molecular and clinical levels as well as to define phenotype-specific responses to different therapeutic options.

Bedside clinical assessment predicts recurrence after hospitalization due to viral lower respiratory tract infection in young children

Infants requiring hospitalization due to a viral lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) have a high risk of developing recurrent respiratory illnesses in early life and asthma beyond childhood. Notably, all validated clinical scales for viral LRTI have focused on predicting acute severity instead of recurrence. We present a novel clinical approach combining individual risk factors with bedside clinical parameters to predict recurrence after viral LRTI hospitalization in young children. A retrospective longitudinal cohort of young children (≤3 years) designed to define clinical predictive factors of recurrent respiratory illnesses within 12 months after hospitalization due to PCR-confirmed viral LRTI. Data collection was through electronic medical record. We included 138 children hospitalized with viral LRTI. Using automatic stepwise logistic model selection, we found that the strongest predictors of recurrence in infants hospitalized for the first time were severe prematurity (≤32 weeks' gestational age, OR=5.19; 95% CI 1.76 to 15.32; p=0.002) and a clinical score that weighted hypoxemia, subcostal retractions and wheezing (OR=3.33; 95% CI 1.59 to 6.98; p<0.001). After the first hospitalization, the strongest predictors of subsequent episodes were wheezing (OR=5.62; 95% CI 1.03 to 30.62; p=0.04) and family history of asthma (OR=5.39; 95% CI 1.04 to 27.96; p=0.04). We found that integrating individual risk factors (eg, prematurity or family history of asthma) with bedside clinical assessment (eg, wheezing, subcostal retractions or hypoxemia) can predict the risk of recurrence after viral LRTI hospitalization in infants. This strategy may enable clinically oriented subsetting of infants with viral LRTI based on individual predictors for recurrent respiratory illnesses during early life.

Clinical respiratory scales: which one should we use?

INTRODUCTION

There are countless clinical respiratory scales for acute dyspnoea. Most healthcare professionals choose one based on previous personal experience or following local practice, unaware of the implications of their choice. The lack of critical comparisons between those different tools has been a widespread problem that only recently has begun to be addressed via score validation studies. Here we try to assess and compare the quality criteria of measurement properties of acute dyspnoea scores. Areas covered: A literature review was conducted by searching the PubMed database. Forty-five documents were deemed eligible as they reported the use or building of clinical scales, using at least two parameters, and applied these to an acute episode of respiratory dyspnoea. Our primary focus was the description of the validity, reliability and utility of 41 suitable scoring instruments. Differences in sample selection, study design, rater profiles and potential methodological shortcomings were also addressed. Expert commentary: All acute dyspnoea scores lack complete validation. In particular, the areas of measurement error and interpretability have not been addressed correctly by any of the tools reviewed. Frequent modification of pre-existing scores (in items composition and/or name), differences in study design and discrepancies in reviewed sources also hinder the search for an adequate tool.