1
|
Chen L, Du H, Liu Q, Cui J, Chen Y. Trade-offs between crop production and GHG emissions following organic material inputs in wheat-maize systems. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2025; 381:125356. [PMID: 40233616 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2024] [Revised: 04/07/2025] [Accepted: 04/11/2025] [Indexed: 04/17/2025]
Abstract
The recycling of agricultural organic wastes into fields is as a viable strategy to increase crop yields while mitigating pollution and fostering environmental protection. However, the effects of various organic amendments on crop productivity and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions need to be comprehensively assessed. Thus, in this study, we conducted a field experiment from 2019 to 2022 in the North China Plain, investigating the effects of recycling straw, pig manure, and biogas residue and applying chemical nitrogen fertilizer as a control on crop yields, GHG emissions, and the synergistic effects of yield benefits, agricultural operational costs, and environmental benefits in a wheat-maize cropping system. The results revealed a disparity in the effects of different organic amendments on crop yields. Compared to chemical fertilizers, pig manure significantly enhanced yield and stability (5.82 %), whereas straw significantly decreased the yield of wheat and maize. The addition of organic amendments stimulated GHG emissions, with treatments involving pig manure resulting in the highest emissions, which significantly increased by 39.87 % compared to those of the control. Straw, manure, and biogas residue increased the greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) of the cropping system. Biogas residue and straw applications increased the in GHGI during the wheat season, whereas the application of manure significantly increased the GHGI during the maize season. The synergy indices for yield - agricultural activity cost and yield - GHG cost during the wheat season and across years for pig manure incorporation both had a value of 10, indicating its advantage in average crop yield during the wheat season and throughout the year. The findings of the study indicated that the incorporation of organic materials not only achieves high yield benefits but also maintains lower GHG costs and agricultural activity costs. Although soil GHG emissions increased, pig manure incorporation remained the optimal nitrogen application strategy when the comprehensive factors of yield benefits, agricultural activity costs, and GHG costs were considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Chen
- College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Hailun Du
- College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China; Heilongjiang Academy of Black Soil Conservation and Utilization, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150086, China
| | - Qing Liu
- College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China; National Engineering Research Center of Wheat and Maize, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China
| | - Jixiao Cui
- Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
| | - Yuanquan Chen
- College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang H, Wang D, Zhang X, Wang Y, Liu H, Tang Q, Lin T. Response of the soil hydrothermal environment and cotton yield to different irrigation quotas under biodegradable mulch film in oasis cotton fields: a three-year study. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2025; 16:1521635. [PMID: 40190651 PMCID: PMC11968355 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1521635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2025] [Indexed: 04/09/2025]
Abstract
Introduction Polyethylene mulch film (PE) is a key agricultural practice for enhancing crop production and income in water-scarce regions. However, the complete recycling of PE remains challenging, resulting in the persistence of residual film fragments in the soil, which compromises soil structure and negatively impacts crop growth and yield potential. Although biodegradable mulch film (BEMF) is considered a promising alternative, the underlying mechanisms governing its regulation of soil water and thermal dynamics, as well as its subsequent impacts on crop productivity, are yet to be fully elucidated. Methods Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of how BEMF influences soil water dynamics, thermal regimes, and crop growth and development is crucial for assessing its ecological adaptability. In this study field plot experiments were carried out over three consecutive growing seasons (2021 - 2023) under three irrigation quotas: W1 (63.6% crop evapotranspiration [ETc], 315 mm), W2 (81.8% ETc, 405 mm), and W3 (100% ETc, 495 mm). Results This study systematically evaluated the impacts of PE and biodegradable mulch films (BEMF: B1 and B2) on soil hydrothermal dynamics, cotton photosynthetic productivity, and water use efficiency under varying irrigation quotas. Furthermore, the economic and ecological benefits of cotton fields under these treatments were analyzed. The findings revealed that PE left residual film fragments of 12.95 kg·ha-1 in the soil after mechanical recovery, while BEMF exhibited no such residue accumulation. However, BEMF reduced soil effective temperature by 100 - 111°C and soil water content (SWC) by 2.82 - 9.42% compared to PE. These adverse effects under BEMF significantly impaired cotton net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and photosynthetic product accumulation. Specifically, BEMF decreased cotton net Pn by 8.42 - 18.09%, photosynthetic product accumulation by 10.74 - 26.41%, and yield by 651 - 1079 kg·ha-1 relative to PE, particularly under the W1 irrigation level. Increasing the irrigation quota mitigated soil water and heat deficits, enhanced cotton net Pn and photosynthetic productivity, boosted yield by 1.76 - 31.72%, and increased economic income by 552 - 12,423 CNY·ha-1. Discussion In summary, this study provides a new ecological regional adaptation scheme for BEFM, highlighting that under conventional conditions, BEFM cannot fully substitute the yield advantages of PEFM. Nevertheless, the application of an additional 90 mm of irrigation water effectively mitigates the yield and economic losses associated with BEMF while eliminating the risk of residual film fragment accumulation in the soil. These findings offer valuable insights for advancing the green and sustainable management of agricultural ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zhang
- College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China
| | - Dong Wang
- Xinjiang Jinfengyuan Seed Industry Co., LTD., Xinjiang, China
| | - Xun Zhang
- College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China
| | - Yifan Wang
- College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China
| | - Haijun Liu
- College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China
| | - Qiuxiang Tang
- College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China
| | - Tao Lin
- Xinjiang Cotton Technology Innovation Center/Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Cotton Genetic Improvement and Intelligent Production/National Cotton Engineering Technology Research Center, Cotton Research Institute of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dada OI, Habarakada Liyanage TU, Chi T, Yu L, DeVetter LW, Chen S. Towards sustainable agroecosystems: A life cycle assessment review of soil-biodegradable and traditional plastic mulch films. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECOTECHNOLOGY 2025; 24:100541. [PMID: 40034612 PMCID: PMC11875804 DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2025.100541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2025] [Accepted: 02/10/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025]
Abstract
The increasing use of traditional agricultural plastic mulch films (PMs) has raised significant environmental concerns, prompting the search for sustainable alternatives. Soil-biodegradable mulch films (BDMs) are often proposed as eco-friendly replacements; however, their widespread adoption remains contentious. This review employs a comparative life cycle assessment perspective to evaluate the environmental impact of PMs and BDMs across their production, use, and end-of-life stages, providing strategies to mitigate their impact on agroecosystems. BDMs generally exhibit lower energy use and greenhouse gas emissions than PMs but contribute to greater land-use demands. Reported eutrophication and acidification potentials are less consistent, varying based on feedstock types and the scope of assessment of BDM, as well as the end-of-life management of PM. The environmental burden of both mulch types is influenced by the life cycle stage, polymer composition, farming practices, additives, film thickness, and local climatic conditions. The manufacturing stage is a major contributor to energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for both PMs and BDMs, despite their shared benefits of increasing crop yields. However, post-use impacts are more pronounced for PMs, driven by end-of-life strategy and adsorbed waste content. While starch-based BDMs offer a more sustainable alternative to PMs, uncertainties regarding the residence time of BDM residues in soil (albeit shorter than PM residues) and their effects on soil health, coupled with higher production costs, impede widespread adoption. For BDM end-of-life, soil biodegradation is recommended. Energy and material recovery options are crucial for PM end-of-life, with mechanical recycling preferred, although it requires addressing eutrophication and human toxicity. This review discusses these complexities within specific contexts and provides actionable insights to guide the sustainable integration of mulch films into agricultural practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwatunmise Israel Dada
- Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-6120, USA
| | | | - Ting Chi
- Department of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-6406, USA
| | - Liang Yu
- Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY, 40601, USA
| | - Lisa Wasko DeVetter
- Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center, Mount Vernon, WA, 98273, USA
| | - Shulin Chen
- Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-6120, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ji C, Wang J, Xu C, Gu Y, Yuan J, Liang D, Wang L, Ning Y, Zhou J, Zhang Y. Amendment of straw with decomposing inoculants benefits the ecosystem carbon budget and carbon footprint in a subtropical wheat cropping field. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 923:171419. [PMID: 38442752 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
The incorporation of straw with decomposing inoculants into soils has been widely recommended to sustain agricultural productivity. However, comprehensive analyses assessing the effects of straw combined with decomposing inoculants on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, net primary production (NPP), the net ecosystem carbon budget (NECB), and the carbon footprint (CF) in farmland ecosystems are scant. Here, we carried out a 2-year field study in a wheat cropping system with six treatments: rice straw (S), a straw-decomposing Bacillus subtilis inoculant (K), a straw-decomposing Aspergillus oryzae inoculant (Q), a combination of straw and Bacillus subtilis inoculant (SK), a combination of straw and Aspergillus oryzae inoculant (SQ), and a control with no rice straw or decomposing inoculant (Control). We found that all the treatments resulted in a positive NECB ranging between 838 and 5065 kg C ha-1. Relative to the Control, the S treatment increased CO2 emissions by 16%, while considerably enhancing the NECB by 349%. This difference might be attributed to the straw C input and an increase in plant productivity (NPP, 30%). More importantly, in comparison to that in S, the NECB in SK and SQ significantly increased by 27-35% due to the positive response of NPP to the decomposing inoculants. Although the combination of straw and decomposing inoculants yielded a 3% increase in indirect GHG emissions, it also exhibited the lowest CF (0.18 kg CO2-eq kg-1 of grain). This result was attributed to the synergistic effects of straw and decomposing inoculants, which reduced direct N2O emissions and increased wheat productivity. Overall, the findings of the present study suggested that the combined amendment of straw and decomposing inoculants is an environmentally sustainable management practice in wheat cropping systems that can generate win-win scenarios through improvements in soil C stock, crop productivity, and GHG mitigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Ji
- National Agricultural Experimental Station for Agricultural Environment, Luhe, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China; School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
| | - Jidong Wang
- National Agricultural Experimental Station for Agricultural Environment, Luhe, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China; School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
| | - Cong Xu
- National Agricultural Experimental Station for Agricultural Environment, Luhe, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China; School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
| | - Yian Gu
- College of Food Science and Light Industry, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
| | - Jie Yuan
- National Agricultural Experimental Station for Agricultural Environment, Luhe, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
| | - Dong Liang
- National Agricultural Experimental Station for Agricultural Environment, Luhe, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
| | - Lei Wang
- National Agricultural Experimental Station for Agricultural Environment, Luhe, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
| | - Yunwang Ning
- National Agricultural Experimental Station for Agricultural Environment, Luhe, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
| | - Jie Zhou
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Yongchun Zhang
- National Agricultural Experimental Station for Agricultural Environment, Luhe, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China; School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taoumi H, Elouahbi K, Adnane I, Lahrech K. Sustainable crop production: Highlights on economic, environmental and social life cycle thinking. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 916:170267. [PMID: 38253108 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Seeking multi-dimensional inclusion is one of the most global concerns of the crop production sector worldwide. Socio-eco-effectiveness or socio-eco-efficiency optimization plays a crucial role in future strategy establishment. Life cycle is a widely used approach examining economic, environmental, and social impacts. Recently, life cycle thinking approaches have been increasingly utilized to bring to light useful perceptions of the crop production processes. This study aims to apply a systematic review and prescriptive analytics to critically investigate the life cycle thinking approaches application according to sustainability pyramid aspects, life cycle thinking unicity, goal and scope variability, functional units' causality, system boundary' diversity, involved aspect' concentration, indicators, impacts categories and influencing variables distribution, as well as to define a first datasheet model and directive axis to apply per aspect and family for socio-eco-effectiveness or socio-eco-efficiency evaluation. Over 295 peer-reviewed studies from 2019 to the middle of 2023, 52 reviews and articles gathered from Web of Science and Scopus meet the criteria to be analyzed. Our inspection revealed that related reviews are few, approximately 2 %. Moving from the traditional life cycle perspective to the sustainability pyramid approach, the indicators applied by researchers were classified per aspect and family belonging. A deductive analysis was carried out to narrow the impact categories, and the influencing factors to the population's main interests: four economic (input status, resources consumption, waste, and Costs of Life Cycle), eight environmental (Climate Change, Global Warming, Ozone, Acidification, Eutrophication, Photochemical Oxidation, Abiotic Depletion, and Toxicity), and three social families (Human Toxicity, employment, and Ionizing Radiation). The results combination highlights the construction need for a directive datasheet model to address the optimizing problem under the identified families and aspects constraints, as well as to envisage the units and methods worldwide standardization's necessity for spatial-temporal studies comparison in the present, the past, and the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza Taoumi
- Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University (USMBA), IPI Laboratory, ENS, Fez, Morocco.
| | - Karim Elouahbi
- Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University (USMBA), IPI Laboratory, ENS, Fez, Morocco
| | - Imane Adnane
- Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University (USMBA), IPI Laboratory, ENS, Fez, Morocco.
| | - Khadija Lahrech
- Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University (USMBA), ENSA, Fez, Morocco.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang Y, Qin R, Wei H, Chai N, Yang Y, Li Y, Wan P, Li Y, Zhao W, Lawawirojwong S, Suepa T, Zhang F. Plastic film mulching application improves potato yields, reduces ammonia emissions, but boosts the greenhouse gas emissions in China. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 353:120241. [PMID: 38301473 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
With global population growth and climate change, food security and global warming have emerged as two major challenges to agricultural development. Plastic film mulching (PM) has long been used to improve yields in rain-fed agricultural systems, but few studies have focused on soil gas emissions from mulched rainfed potatoes on a long-term and regional scale. This study integrated field data with the Denitrification-Decomposition (DNDC) model to evaluate the impacts of PM on potato yields, greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions in rainfed agricultural systems in China. We found that PM increased potato yield by 39.7 % (1505 kg ha-1), carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 15.4 % (123 kg CO2 eq ha-1), nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions by 47.8 % (1016 kg CO2 eq ha-1), and global warming potential (GWP) by 38.9 % (1030 kg CO2 eq ha-1), while NH3 volatilization decreased by 33.9 % (8.4 kg NH3 ha-1), and methane (CH4) emissions were little changed compared to CK. Specifically, the yield after PM significantly increased in South China (SC), North China (NC), and Northwest China (NWC), with increases of 66.1 % (2429 kg ha-1), 44.1 % (1173 kg ha-1), and 43.6 % (956 kg ha-1) compared to CK, respectively. The increase in GWP and greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI) under PM was more pronounced in the Northeast China (NEC) and NWC regions, with respective increases of 57.1 % and 60.2 % in GWP, 16.9 % and 10.3 % in GHGI. While in the Middle and Lower reaches of the Yangtze River (MLYR) and SC, PM decreased GHGI with 10.2 % and 31.1 %, respectively. PM significantly reduced NH3 emissions in all regions and these reductions were most significant in Southwest China (SWC), SCand MLYR, which were 41 %, 38.0 %, and 38.0 % lower than CK, respectively. In addition, climatic and edaphic variables were the main contributors to GHG and NH3 emissions. In conclusion, it is appropriate to promote the use of PM in the MLYR and SC regions, because of the ability to increase yields while reducing environmental impacts (lower GHGI and NH3 emissions). The findings provide a theoretical basis for sustainable agricultural production of PM potatoes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yalan Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, 222 Tian Shui South Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Rongzhu Qin
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, 222 Tian Shui South Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Huihui Wei
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, 222 Tian Shui South Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Ning Chai
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, 222 Tian Shui South Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Yang Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, 222 Tian Shui South Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Yuling Li
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, 222 Tian Shui South Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Pingxing Wan
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, 222 Tian Shui South Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Yufei Li
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, 222 Tian Shui South Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Wucheng Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, 222 Tian Shui South Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | | | - Tanita Suepa
- Geo-Informatics & Space Technology Development Agency, Thailand
| | - Feng Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, 222 Tian Shui South Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yao Z, Guo H, Wang Y, Zhan Y, Zhang T, Wang R, Zheng X, Butterbach-Bahl K. A global meta-analysis of yield-scaled N 2 O emissions and its mitigation efforts for maize, wheat, and rice. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2024; 30:e17177. [PMID: 38348630 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Maintaining or even increasing crop yields while reducing nitrous oxide (N2 O) emissions is necessary to reconcile food security and climate change, while the metric of yield-scaled N2 O emission (i.e., N2 O emissions per unit of crop yield) is at present poorly understood. Here we conducted a global meta-analysis with more than 6000 observations to explore the variation patterns and controlling factors of yield-scaled N2 O emissions for maize, wheat and rice and associated potential mitigation options. Our results showed that the average yield-scaled N2 O emissions across all available data followed the order wheat (322 g N Mg-1 , with the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 301-346) > maize (211 g N Mg-1 , CI: 198-225) > rice (153 g N Mg-1 , CI: 144-163). Yield-scaled N2 O emissions for individual crops were generally higher in tropical or subtropical zones than in temperate zones, and also showed a trend towards lower intensities from low to high latitudes. This global variation was better explained by climatic and edaphic factors than by N fertilizer management, while their combined effect predicted more than 70% of the variance. Furthermore, our analysis showed a significant decrease in yield-scaled N2 O emissions with increasing N use efficiency or in N2 O emissions for production systems with cereal yields >10 Mg ha-1 (maize), 6.6 Mg ha-1 (wheat) or 6.8 Mg ha-1 (rice), respectively. This highlights that N use efficiency indicators can be used as valuable proxies for reconciling trade-offs between crop production and N2 O mitigation. For all three major staple crops, reducing N fertilization by up to 30%, optimizing the timing and placement of fertilizer application or using enhanced-efficiency N fertilizers significantly reduced yield-scaled N2 O emissions at similar or even higher cereal yields. Our data-driven assessment provides some key guidance for developing effective and targeted mitigation and adaptation strategies for the sustainable intensification of cereal production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhisheng Yao
- State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
- College of Earth and Planetary Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Haojie Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
- College of Earth and Planetary Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yang Zhan
- State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
- College of Earth and Planetary Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Tianli Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Rui Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xunhua Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
- College of Earth and Planetary Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Klaus Butterbach-Bahl
- State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
- Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
- Pioneer Center Land-CRAFT, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang A, Chang Q, Chen C, Zhong X, Yuan K, Yang M, Wu W. Degradation characteristics of biodegradable film and its effects on soil nutrients in tillage layer, growth and development of taro and yield formation. AMB Express 2022; 12:81. [PMID: 35732981 PMCID: PMC9218028 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-022-01420-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This study investigated the degradation characteristics of different biodegradable film and its effects on soil nutrients in tillage layer, growth and development of taro and yield formation. Field experiment with biodegradable films, including poly-(butylene adipate-co-butylene terephthalate) PBAT, (poly-carbon dioxide) PCO2, (poly propylene carbonate) PPC, as well as common mulch film (CK1) and uncovered mulch film (CK2) were conducted on Longxiang taro in 2020 and 2021 respectively. The degradation rate of the three biodegradable films was PBAT > PPC > PCO2. Compared with CK1, the alkali-hydrolyzed N of PBAT at the growth stage and fruiting stage significantly increased in 2020 and 2021, respectively (both, P < 0.05). The average content of available P of PPC at seedling stage was higher than that in PCO2, and CK1 was significantly decreased compared with that in CK2 (all, P < 0.05). The content of soil available K and organic matter in different growth stages of taro in all film mulching treatments were decreased in comparison to CK2. Moreover, compared with CK2, PCO2 biodegradable film significantly increased plant height at seedling and growth stage, stem diameter at growth stage, and leaf area index at fruiting stage (all, P < 0.05). Similarly, the yield of mother and filial bulbs of PPC, PCO2 and PBAT were significantly higher than those of CK2 in 2020 and 2021, respectively (all, P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in starch, polysaccharide and protein contents among different treatments. The three biodegradable films, especially PCO2, can significantly affect soil nutrient content, promote plant growth and improve taro yield.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Wang
- Special Grain Classics Laboratory, Taizhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 56 Autumn Snow Lake Avenue, Taizhou, 225300, China
| | - Qingtao Chang
- Special Grain Classics Laboratory, Taizhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 56 Autumn Snow Lake Avenue, Taizhou, 225300, China
| | - Chunsheng Chen
- Department of Vegetable, Xinghua Modern Agriculture Development Service Center, Taizhou, 225700, China
| | - Xiaoquan Zhong
- Department of Vegetable, Xinghua Modern Agriculture Development Service Center, Taizhou, 225700, China
| | - Kexiang Yuan
- Department of Vegetable, Xinghua Modern Agriculture Development Service Center, Taizhou, 225700, China
| | - Meihua Yang
- Xinghua Meihua Vegetable Planting Cooperative, Taizhou, 225700, China
| | - Wei Wu
- Special Grain Classics Laboratory, Taizhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 56 Autumn Snow Lake Avenue, Taizhou, 225300, China.
| |
Collapse
|