1
|
Burley SK, Piehl DW, Vallat B, Zardecki C. RCSB Protein Data Bank: supporting research and education worldwide through explorations of experimentally determined and computationally predicted atomic level 3D biostructures. IUCRJ 2024; 11:279-286. [PMID: 38597878 PMCID: PMC11067742 DOI: 10.1107/s2052252524002604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
The Protein Data Bank (PDB) was established as the first open-access digital data resource in biology and medicine in 1971 with seven X-ray crystal structures of proteins. Today, the PDB houses >210 000 experimentally determined, atomic level, 3D structures of proteins and nucleic acids as well as their complexes with one another and small molecules (e.g. approved drugs, enzyme cofactors). These data provide insights into fundamental biology, biomedicine, bioenergy and biotechnology. They proved particularly important for understanding the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic. The US-funded Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB) and other members of the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) partnership jointly manage the PDB archive and support >60 000 `data depositors' (structural biologists) around the world. wwPDB ensures the quality and integrity of the data in the ever-expanding PDB archive and supports global open access without limitations on data usage. The RCSB PDB research-focused web portal at https://www.rcsb.org/ (RCSB.org) supports millions of users worldwide, representing a broad range of expertise and interests. In addition to retrieving 3D structure data, PDB `data consumers' access comparative data and external annotations, such as information about disease-causing point mutations and genetic variations. RCSB.org also provides access to >1 000 000 computed structure models (CSMs) generated using artificial intelligence/machine-learning methods. To avoid doubt, the provenance and reliability of experimentally determined PDB structures and CSMs are identified. Related training materials are available to support users in their RCSB.org explorations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen K. Burley
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Biology Protein Data Bank, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Dennis W. Piehl
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Brinda Vallat
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Christine Zardecki
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vallat B, Berman HM. Structural highlights of macromolecular complexes and assemblies. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2024; 85:102773. [PMID: 38271778 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
The structures of macromolecular assemblies have given us deep insights into cellular processes and have profoundly impacted biological research and drug discovery. We highlight the structures of macromolecular assemblies that have been modeled using integrative and computational methods and describe how open access to these structures from structural archives has empowered the research community. The arsenal of experimental and computational methods for structure determination ensures a future where whole organelles and cells can be modeled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brinda Vallat
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank and the Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
| | - Helen M Berman
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank and the Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA 90089, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vallat B, Webb BM, Westbrook JD, Goddard TD, Hanke CA, Graziadei A, Peisach E, Zalevsky A, Sagendorf J, Tangmunarunkit H, Voinea S, Sekharan M, Yu J, Bonvin AAMJJ, DiMaio F, Hummer G, Meiler J, Tajkhorshid E, Ferrin TE, Lawson CL, Leitner A, Rappsilber J, Seidel CAM, Jeffries CM, Burley SK, Hoch JC, Kurisu G, Morris K, Patwardhan A, Velankar S, Schwede T, Trewhella J, Kesselman C, Berman HM, Sali A. IHMCIF: An Extension of the PDBx/mmCIF Data Standard for Integrative Structure Determination Methods. J Mol Biol 2024:168546. [PMID: 38508301 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
IHMCIF (github.com/ihmwg/IHMCIF) is a data information framework that supports archiving and disseminating macromolecular structures determined by integrative or hybrid modeling (IHM), and making them Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). IHMCIF is an extension of the Protein Data Bank Exchange/macromolecular Crystallographic Information Framework (PDBx/mmCIF) that serves as the framework for the Protein Data Bank (PDB) to archive experimentally determined atomic structures of biological macromolecules and their complexes with one another and small molecule ligands (e.g., enzyme cofactors and drugs). IHMCIF serves as the foundational data standard for the PDB-Dev prototype system, developed for archiving and disseminating integrative structures. It utilizes a flexible data representation to describe integrative structures that span multiple spatiotemporal scales and structural states with definitions for restraints from a variety of experimental methods contributing to integrative structural biology. The IHMCIF extension was created with the benefit of considerable community input and recommendations gathered by the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) Task Force for Integrative or Hybrid Methods (wwpdb.org/task/hybrid). Herein, we describe the development of IHMCIF to support evolving methodologies and ongoing advancements in integrative structural biology. Ultimately, IHMCIF will facilitate the unification of PDB-Dev data and tools with the PDB archive so that integrative structures can be archived and disseminated through PDB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brinda Vallat
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank and the Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
| | - Benjamin M Webb
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, the Quantitative Biosciences Institute (QBI), and the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94157, USA
| | - John D Westbrook
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank and the Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Thomas D Goddard
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Christian A Hanke
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Graziadei
- Bioanalytics, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany; Human Technopole, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Ezra Peisach
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank and the Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Arthur Zalevsky
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, the Quantitative Biosciences Institute (QBI), and the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94157, USA
| | - Jared Sagendorf
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, the Quantitative Biosciences Institute (QBI), and the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94157, USA
| | - Hongsuda Tangmunarunkit
- Information Sciences Institute, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Serban Voinea
- Information Sciences Institute, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Monica Sekharan
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank and the Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Jian Yu
- Protein Data Bank Japan, Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Alexander A M J J Bonvin
- Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank DiMaio
- Department of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Gerhard Hummer
- Department of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Institute for Biophysics, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jens Meiler
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, 465 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37221, USA; Institute for Drug Discovery, Leipzig University Medical School, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Emad Tajkhorshid
- NIH Resource for Macromolecular Modeling and Visualization, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, Department of Biochemistry, and Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Thomas E Ferrin
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Catherine L Lawson
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank and the Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Alexander Leitner
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Juri Rappsilber
- Bioanalytics, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany; Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK
| | - Claus A M Seidel
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Cy M Jeffries
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Hamburg Unit, c/o Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephen K Burley
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank and the Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Jeffrey C Hoch
- Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank, Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030-3305, USA
| | - Genji Kurisu
- Protein Data Bank Japan, Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Kyle Morris
- Electron Microscopy Data Bank, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Ardan Patwardhan
- Electron Microscopy Data Bank, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Sameer Velankar
- Protein Data Bank in Europe, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Torsten Schwede
- Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Computational Structural Biology & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jill Trewhella
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Carl Kesselman
- Information Sciences Institute, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Helen M Berman
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank and the Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA 90089, USA
| | - Andrej Sali
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, the Quantitative Biosciences Institute (QBI), and the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94157, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Caparotta M, Perez A. Advancing Molecular Dynamics: Toward Standardization, Integration, and Data Accessibility in Structural Biology. J Phys Chem B 2024; 128:2219-2227. [PMID: 38418288 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have become a valuable tool in structural biology, offering insights into complex biological systems that are difficult to obtain through experimental techniques alone. The lack of available data sets and structures in most published computational work has limited other researchers' use of these models. In recent years, the emergence of online sharing platforms and MD database initiatives favor the deposition of ensembles and structures to accompany publications, favoring reuse of the data sets. However, the lack of uniform metadata collection, formats, and what data are deposited limits the impact and its use by different communities that are not necessarily experts in MD. This Perspective highlights the need for standardization and better resource sharing for processing and interpreting MD simulation results, akin to efforts in other areas of structural biology. As the field moves forward, we will see an increase in popularity and benefits of MD-based integrative approaches combining experimental data and simulations through probabilistic reasoning, but these too are limited by uniformity in experimental data availability and choices on how the data are modeled that are not trivial to decipher from papers. Other fields have addressed similar challenges comprehensively by establishing task forces with different degrees of success. The large scope and number of communities to represent the breadth of types of MD simulations complicates a parallel approach that would fit all. Thus, each group typically decides what data and which format to upload on servers like Zenodo. Uploading data with FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles in mind including optimal metadata collection will make the data more accessible and actionable by the community. Such a wealth of simulation data will foster method development and infrastructure advancements, thus propelling the field forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Caparotta
- Department of Chemistry and Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States
| | - Alberto Perez
- Department of Chemistry and Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Agam G, Gebhardt C, Popara M, Mächtel R, Folz J, Ambrose B, Chamachi N, Chung SY, Craggs TD, de Boer M, Grohmann D, Ha T, Hartmann A, Hendrix J, Hirschfeld V, Hübner CG, Hugel T, Kammerer D, Kang HS, Kapanidis AN, Krainer G, Kramm K, Lemke EA, Lerner E, Margeat E, Martens K, Michaelis J, Mitra J, Moya Muñoz GG, Quast RB, Robb NC, Sattler M, Schlierf M, Schneider J, Schröder T, Sefer A, Tan PS, Thurn J, Tinnefeld P, van Noort J, Weiss S, Wendler N, Zijlstra N, Barth A, Seidel CAM, Lamb DC, Cordes T. Reliability and accuracy of single-molecule FRET studies for characterization of structural dynamics and distances in proteins. Nat Methods 2023; 20:523-535. [PMID: 36973549 PMCID: PMC10089922 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-01807-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Single-molecule Förster-resonance energy transfer (smFRET) experiments allow the study of biomolecular structure and dynamics in vitro and in vivo. We performed an international blind study involving 19 laboratories to assess the uncertainty of FRET experiments for proteins with respect to the measured FRET efficiency histograms, determination of distances, and the detection and quantification of structural dynamics. Using two protein systems with distinct conformational changes and dynamics, we obtained an uncertainty of the FRET efficiency ≤0.06, corresponding to an interdye distance precision of ≤2 Å and accuracy of ≤5 Å. We further discuss the limits for detecting fluctuations in this distance range and how to identify dye perturbations. Our work demonstrates the ability of smFRET experiments to simultaneously measure distances and avoid the averaging of conformational dynamics for realistic protein systems, highlighting its importance in the expanding toolbox of integrative structural biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesh Agam
- Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, München, Germany
| | - Christian Gebhardt
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Milana Popara
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Rebecca Mächtel
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Julian Folz
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Neharika Chamachi
- B CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sang Yoon Chung
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Marijn de Boer
- Molecular Microscopy Research Group, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, AG Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Dina Grohmann
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Single-Molecule Biochemistry Laboratory, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Taekjip Ha
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andreas Hartmann
- B CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jelle Hendrix
- Dynamic Bioimaging Laboratory, Advanced Optical Microscopy Center and Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Agoralaan C (BIOMED), Hasselt, Belgium
- Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Thorsten Hugel
- Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Signalling Research Centers BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Kammerer
- Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hyun-Seo Kang
- Bayerisches NMR Zentrum, Department of Bioscience, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of München, Garching, Germany
| | - Achillefs N Kapanidis
- Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Georg Krainer
- B CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kevin Kramm
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Single-Molecule Biochemistry Laboratory, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Edward A Lemke
- Biocenter, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Molecular Biology, Mainz, Germany
- Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eitan Lerner
- Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, and The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, The Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Emmanuel Margeat
- Centre de Biologie Structurale (CBS), University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Kirsten Martens
- Biological and Soft Matter Physics, Huygens-Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jaba Mitra
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Gabriel G Moya Muñoz
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Robert B Quast
- Centre de Biologie Structurale (CBS), University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Nicole C Robb
- Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Michael Sattler
- Bayerisches NMR Zentrum, Department of Bioscience, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of München, Garching, Germany
- Institute of Structural Biology, Molecular Targets and Therapeutics Center, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Schlierf
- B CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jonathan Schneider
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Tim Schröder
- Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, München, Germany
| | - Anna Sefer
- Institute for Biophysics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Piau Siong Tan
- Biocenter, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Molecular Biology, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johann Thurn
- Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Technical Physics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Philip Tinnefeld
- Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, München, Germany
| | - John van Noort
- Biological and Soft Matter Physics, Huygens-Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Shimon Weiss
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicolas Wendler
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Niels Zijlstra
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Anders Barth
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
| | - Claus A M Seidel
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Don C Lamb
- Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, München, Germany.
| | - Thorben Cordes
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trewhella J, Jeffries CM, Whitten AE. 2023 update of template tables for reporting biomolecular structural modelling of small-angle scattering data. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 2023; 79:122-132. [PMID: 36762858 PMCID: PMC9912924 DOI: 10.1107/s2059798322012141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2017, guidelines were published for reporting structural modelling of small-angle scattering (SAS) data from biomolecules in solution that exemplified best-practice documentation of experiments and analysis. Since then, there has been significant progress in SAS data and model archiving, and the IUCr journal editors announced that the IUCr biology journals will require the deposition of SAS data used in biomolecular structure solution into a public archive, as well as adherence to the 2017 reporting guidelines. In this context, the reporting template tables accompanying the 2017 publication guidelines have been reviewed with a focus on making them both easier to use and more general. With input from the SAS community via the IUCr Commission on SAS and attendees of the triennial 2022 SAS meeting (SAS2022, Campinas, Brazil), an updated reporting template table has been developed that includes standard descriptions for proteins, glycosylated proteins, DNA and RNA, with some reorganization of the data to improve readability and interpretation. In addition, a specialized template has been developed for reporting SAS contrast-variation (SAS-cv) data and models that incorporates the additional reporting requirements from the 2017 guidelines for these more complicated experiments. To demonstrate their utility, examples of reporting with these new templates are provided for a SAS study of a DNA-protein complex and a SAS-cv experiment on a protein complex. The examples demonstrate how the tabulated information promotes transparent reporting that, in combination with the recommended figures and additional information best presented in the main text, enables the reader of the work to readily draw their own conclusions regarding the quality of the data and the validity of the models presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Trewhella
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia,Correspondence e-mail:
| | - Cy M. Jeffries
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Hamburg Unit, Notkestrasse 85, c/o Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrew E. Whitten
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, New Illawarra Road, Lucas Heights, NSW 2234, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Data quality assurance, model validation, and data sharing for biomolecular structures from small-angle scattering. Methods Enzymol 2022; 678:1-22. [PMID: 36641205 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Key to small-angle scattering (SAS) maturing and becoming a mainstream structural biology technique was the work done by the SAS community to establish standards for data quality, model validation and data sharing. Through a consultative process spanning more than a decade and a half, guidelines for publication have been established that include criteria for evaluating data quality and for model validation. In this process gaps were identified that stimulated innovation and development of new tools, for example new measures of model ambiguity and of the goodness-of-fit of a model to SAS data that complement the traditional global fit parameter χ2. The need for a global repository for biomolecular SAS data and models was identified and the SASBDB was established as a searchable, curated, freely accessible, downloadable database of experimental data, experimental conditions, sample details, derived models, and their fit to the data. Importantly, the SASBDB uses a common dictionary format that supports archiving of structures solved using integrative methods to support seamless data exchange with a federated system of public databanks that includes the world-wide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) as the major repository for structural biology. Thus, biomolecular SAS is now well-positioned to achieve its full potential as a mainstream structural biology technique contributing at the frontier of integrative structural biology and meeting "best practice" standards for data quality assurance and data sharing.
Collapse
|
8
|
Burley SK, Berman HM, Chiu W, Dai W, Flatt JW, Hudson BP, Kaelber JT, Khare SD, Kulczyk AW, Lawson CL, Pintilie GD, Sali A, Vallat B, Westbrook JD, Young JY, Zardecki C. Electron microscopy holdings of the Protein Data Bank: the impact of the resolution revolution, new validation tools, and implications for the future. Biophys Rev 2022; 14:1281-1301. [PMID: 36474933 PMCID: PMC9715422 DOI: 10.1007/s12551-022-01013-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
As a discipline, structural biology has been transformed by the three-dimensional electron microscopy (3DEM) "Resolution Revolution" made possible by convergence of robust cryo-preservation of vitrified biological materials, sample handling systems, and measurement stages operating a liquid nitrogen temperature, improvements in electron optics that preserve phase information at the atomic level, direct electron detectors (DEDs), high-speed computing with graphics processing units, and rapid advances in data acquisition and processing software. 3DEM structure information (atomic coordinates and related metadata) are archived in the open-access Protein Data Bank (PDB), which currently holds more than 11,000 3DEM structures of proteins and nucleic acids, and their complexes with one another and small-molecule ligands (~ 6% of the archive). Underlying experimental data (3DEM density maps and related metadata) are stored in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB), which currently holds more than 21,000 3DEM density maps. After describing the history of the PDB and the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) partnership, which jointly manages both the PDB and EMDB archives, this review examines the origins of the resolution revolution and analyzes its impact on structural biology viewed through the lens of PDB holdings. Six areas of focus exemplifying the impact of 3DEM across the biosciences are discussed in detail (icosahedral viruses, ribosomes, integral membrane proteins, SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins, cryogenic electron tomography, and integrative structure determination combining 3DEM with complementary biophysical measurement techniques), followed by a review of 3DEM structure validation by the wwPDB that underscores the importance of community engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen K. Burley
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 174 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| | - Helen M. Berman
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 174 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| | - Wah Chiu
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA
- Division of CryoEM and Bioimaging, SSRL, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA USA
| | - Wei Dai
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| | - Justin W. Flatt
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| | - Brian P. Hudson
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| | - Jason T. Kaelber
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| | - Sagar D. Khare
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 174 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| | - Arkadiusz W. Kulczyk
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08901 USA
| | - Catherine L. Lawson
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| | | | - Andrej Sali
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Brinda Vallat
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | - John D. Westbrook
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
| | - Jasmine Y. Young
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| | - Christine Zardecki
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Burley SK, Bhikadiya C, Bi C, Bittrich S, Chao H, Chen L, Craig PA, Crichlow GV, Dalenberg K, Duarte JM, Dutta S, Fayazi M, Feng Z, Flatt JW, Ganesan SJ, Ghosh S, Goodsell DS, Green RK, Guranovic V, Henry J, Hudson BP, Khokhriakov I, Lawson CL, Liang Y, Lowe R, Peisach E, Persikova I, Piehl DW, Rose Y, Sali A, Segura J, Sekharan M, Shao C, Vallat B, Voigt M, Webb B, Westbrook JD, Whetstone S, Young JY, Zalevsky A, Zardecki C. RCSB Protein Data bank: Tools for visualizing and understanding biological macromolecules in 3D. Protein Sci 2022; 31:e4482. [PMID: 36281733 PMCID: PMC9667899 DOI: 10.1002/pro.4482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Now in its 52nd year of continuous operations, the Protein Data Bank (PDB) is the premiere open-access global archive housing three-dimensional (3D) biomolecular structure data. It is jointly managed by the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) partnership. The Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB) is funded by the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and US Department of Energy and serves as the US data center for the wwPDB. RCSB PDB is also responsible for the security of PDB data in its role as wwPDB-designated Archive Keeper. Every year, RCSB PDB serves tens of thousands of depositors of 3D macromolecular structure data (coming from macromolecular crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, electron microscopy, and micro-electron diffraction). The RCSB PDB research-focused web portal (RCSB.org) makes PDB data available at no charge and without usage restrictions to many millions of PDB data consumers around the world. The RCSB PDB training, outreach, and education web portal (PDB101.RCSB.org) serves nearly 700 K educators, students, and members of the public worldwide. This invited Tools Issue contribution describes how RCSB PDB (i) is organized; (ii) works with wwPDB partners to process new depositions; (iii) serves as the wwPDB-designated Archive Keeper; (iv) enables exploration and 3D visualization of PDB data via RCSB.org; and (v) supports training, outreach, and education via PDB101.RCSB.org. New tools and features at RCSB.org are presented using examples drawn from high-resolution structural studies of proteins relevant to treatment of human cancers by targeting immune checkpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen K. Burley
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickNew JerseyUSA,Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data BankSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of CaliforniaLa JollaCaliforniaUSA,Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, RutgersThe State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Charmi Bhikadiya
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Chunxiao Bi
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data BankSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of CaliforniaLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sebastian Bittrich
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data BankSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of CaliforniaLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Henry Chao
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Li Chen
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Paul A. Craig
- School of Chemistry and Materials ScienceRochester Institute of TechnologyRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Gregg V. Crichlow
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Kenneth Dalenberg
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Jose M. Duarte
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data BankSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of CaliforniaLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Shuchismita Dutta
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickNew JerseyUSA
| | - Maryam Fayazi
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Zukang Feng
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Justin W. Flatt
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Sai J. Ganesan
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic SciencesQuantitative Biosciences Institute, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA,Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Department of Pharmaceutical ChemistryQuantitative Biosciences Institute, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sutapa Ghosh
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - David S. Goodsell
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickNew JerseyUSA,Department of Integrative Structural and Computational BiologyThe Scripps Research InstituteLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Rachel Kramer Green
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Vladimir Guranovic
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Jeremy Henry
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data BankSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of CaliforniaLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Brian P. Hudson
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Igor Khokhriakov
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data BankSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of CaliforniaLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Catherine L. Lawson
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Yuhe Liang
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Robert Lowe
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Ezra Peisach
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Irina Persikova
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Dennis W. Piehl
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Yana Rose
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data BankSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of CaliforniaLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Andrej Sali
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic SciencesQuantitative Biosciences Institute, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA,Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Department of Pharmaceutical ChemistryQuantitative Biosciences Institute, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Joan Segura
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data BankSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of CaliforniaLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Monica Sekharan
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Chenghua Shao
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Brinda Vallat
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Maria Voigt
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Benjamin Webb
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic SciencesQuantitative Biosciences Institute, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA,Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Department of Pharmaceutical ChemistryQuantitative Biosciences Institute, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - John D. Westbrook
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Shamara Whetstone
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Jasmine Y. Young
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| | - Arthur Zalevsky
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic SciencesQuantitative Biosciences Institute, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA,Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Department of Pharmaceutical ChemistryQuantitative Biosciences Institute, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Christine Zardecki
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA,Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayNew JerseyUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burley SK, Berman HM, Duarte JM, Feng Z, Flatt JW, Hudson BP, Lowe R, Peisach E, Piehl DW, Rose Y, Sali A, Sekharan M, Shao C, Vallat B, Voigt M, Westbrook JD, Young JY, Zardecki C. Protein Data Bank: A Comprehensive Review of 3D Structure Holdings and Worldwide Utilization by Researchers, Educators, and Students. Biomolecules 2022; 12:1425. [PMID: 36291635 PMCID: PMC9599165 DOI: 10.3390/biom12101425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB), funded by the United States National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and Department of Energy, supports structural biologists and Protein Data Bank (PDB) data users around the world. The RCSB PDB, a founding member of the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) partnership, serves as the US data center for the global PDB archive housing experimentally-determined three-dimensional (3D) structure data for biological macromolecules. As the wwPDB-designated Archive Keeper, RCSB PDB is also responsible for the security of PDB data and weekly update of the archive. RCSB PDB serves tens of thousands of data depositors (using macromolecular crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, electron microscopy, and micro-electron diffraction) annually working on all permanently inhabited continents. RCSB PDB makes PDB data available from its research-focused web portal at no charge and without usage restrictions to many millions of PDB data consumers around the globe. It also provides educators, students, and the general public with an introduction to the PDB and related training materials through its outreach and education-focused web portal. This review article describes growth of the PDB, examines evolution of experimental methods for structure determination viewed through the lens of the PDB archive, and provides a detailed accounting of PDB archival holdings and their utilization by researchers, educators, and students worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen K. Burley
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Helen M. Berman
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Jose M. Duarte
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Zukang Feng
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Justin W. Flatt
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Brian P. Hudson
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Robert Lowe
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Ezra Peisach
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Dennis W. Piehl
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Yana Rose
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Andrej Sali
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Monica Sekharan
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Chenghua Shao
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Brinda Vallat
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Maria Voigt
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - John D. Westbrook
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Jasmine Y. Young
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Christine Zardecki
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chua EYD, Mendez JH, Rapp M, Ilca SL, Tan YZ, Maruthi K, Kuang H, Zimanyi CM, Cheng A, Eng ET, Noble AJ, Potter CS, Carragher B. Better, Faster, Cheaper: Recent Advances in Cryo-Electron Microscopy. Annu Rev Biochem 2022; 91:1-32. [PMID: 35320683 PMCID: PMC10393189 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-032620-110705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) continues its remarkable growth as a method for visualizing biological objects, which has been driven by advances across the entire pipeline. Developments in both single-particle analysis and in situ tomography have enabled more structures to be imaged and determined to better resolutions, at faster speeds, and with more scientists having improved access. This review highlights recent advances at each stageof the cryo-EM pipeline and provides examples of how these techniques have been used to investigate real-world problems, including antibody development against the SARS-CoV-2 spike during the recent COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Y D Chua
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
- National Center for CryoEM Access and Training, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua H Mendez
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
- National Center for CryoEM Access and Training, New York, NY, USA
| | - Micah Rapp
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Serban L Ilca
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yong Zi Tan
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore;
- Disease Intervention Technology Laboratory, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore
| | - Kashyap Maruthi
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
- National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, New York, NY, USA
| | - Huihui Kuang
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
- National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christina M Zimanyi
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
- National Center for CryoEM Access and Training, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anchi Cheng
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
- National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edward T Eng
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
- National Center for CryoEM Access and Training, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex J Noble
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
- National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, New York, NY, USA
- National Center for In-Situ Tomographic Ultramicroscopy, New York, NY, USA
- Simons Machine Learning Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Clinton S Potter
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
- National Center for CryoEM Access and Training, New York, NY, USA
- National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, New York, NY, USA
- National Center for In-Situ Tomographic Ultramicroscopy, New York, NY, USA
- Simons Machine Learning Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bridget Carragher
- New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA; , , , , , , , , , , ,
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York, NY, USA
- National Center for CryoEM Access and Training, New York, NY, USA
- National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, New York, NY, USA
- National Center for In-Situ Tomographic Ultramicroscopy, New York, NY, USA
- Simons Machine Learning Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ullanat V, Kasukurthi N, Viswanath S. PrISM: Precision for Integrative Structural Models. Bioinformatics 2022; 38:3837-3839. [PMID: 35723541 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION A single precision value is currently reported for an integrative model. However, precision may vary for different regions of an integrative model owing to varying amounts of input information. RESULTS We develop PrISM (Precision for Integrative Structural Models), to efficiently identify high and low-precision regions for integrative models. AVAILABILITY PrISM is written in Python and available under the GNU General Public License v3.0 at https://github.com/isblab/prism; benchmark data used in this paper is available at doi:10.5281/zenodo.6241200. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varun Ullanat
- National Center for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India
| | - Nikhil Kasukurthi
- National Center for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India
| | - Shruthi Viswanath
- National Center for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Trewhella J. Recent advances in small-angle scattering and its expanding impact in structural biology. Structure 2022; 30:15-23. [PMID: 34995477 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Applications of small-angle scattering (SAS) in structural biology have benefited from continuing developments in instrumentation, tools for data analysis, modeling capabilities, standards for data and model presentation, and data archiving. The interplay of these capabilities has enabled SAS to contribute to advances in structural biology as the field pushes the boundaries in studies of biomolecular complexes and assemblies as large as whole cells, membrane proteins in lipid environments, and dynamic systems on time scales ranging from femtoseconds to hours. This review covers some of the important advances in biomolecular SAS capabilities for structural biology focused on over the last 5 years and presents highlights of recent applications that demonstrate how the technique is exploring new territories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Trewhella
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Graziadei A, Rappsilber J. Leveraging crosslinking mass spectrometry in structural and cell biology. Structure 2021; 30:37-54. [PMID: 34895473 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Crosslinking mass spectrometry (crosslinking-MS) is a versatile tool providing structural insights into protein conformation and protein-protein interactions. Its medium-resolution residue-residue distance restraints have been used to validate protein structures proposed by other methods and have helped derive models of protein complexes by integrative structural biology approaches. The use of crosslinking-MS in integrative approaches is underpinned by progress in estimating error rates in crosslinking-MS data and in combining these data with other information. The flexible and high-throughput nature of crosslinking-MS has allowed it to complement the ongoing resolution revolution in electron microscopy by providing system-wide residue-residue distance restraints, especially for flexible regions or systems. Here, we review how crosslinking-MS information has been leveraged in structural model validation and integrative modeling. Crosslinking-MS has also been a key technology for cell biology studies and structural systems biology where, in conjunction with cryoelectron tomography, it can provide structural and mechanistic insights directly in situ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Graziadei
- Bioanalytics, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, 13355 Berlin, Germany
| | - Juri Rappsilber
- Bioanalytics, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, 13355 Berlin, Germany; Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vallat B, Webb B, Fayazi M, Voinea S, Tangmunarunkit H, Ganesan SJ, Lawson CL, Westbrook JD, Kesselman C, Sali A, Berman HM. New system for archiving integrative structures. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 2021; 77:1486-1496. [PMID: 34866606 PMCID: PMC8647179 DOI: 10.1107/s2059798321010871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Structures of many complex biological assemblies are increasingly determined using integrative approaches, in which data from multiple experimental methods are combined. A standalone system, called PDB-Dev, has been developed for archiving integrative structures and making them publicly available. Here, the data standards and software tools that support PDB-Dev are described along with the new and updated components of the PDB-Dev data-collection, processing and archiving infrastructure. Following the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) principles, PDB-Dev ensures that the results of integrative structure determinations are freely accessible to everyone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brinda Vallat
- RCSB PDB, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Benjamin Webb
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Maryam Fayazi
- RCSB PDB, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Serban Voinea
- Information Sciences Institute, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Hongsuda Tangmunarunkit
- Information Sciences Institute, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sai J. Ganesan
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Catherine L. Lawson
- RCSB PDB, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - John D. Westbrook
- RCSB PDB, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Carl Kesselman
- RCSB PDB, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Andrej Sali
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Helen M. Berman
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schiemann O, Heubach CA, Abdullin D, Ackermann K, Azarkh M, Bagryanskaya EG, Drescher M, Endeward B, Freed JH, Galazzo L, Goldfarb D, Hett T, Esteban Hofer L, Fábregas Ibáñez L, Hustedt EJ, Kucher S, Kuprov I, Lovett JE, Meyer A, Ruthstein S, Saxena S, Stoll S, Timmel CR, Di Valentin M, Mchaourab HS, Prisner TF, Bode BE, Bordignon E, Bennati M, Jeschke G. Benchmark Test and Guidelines for DEER/PELDOR Experiments on Nitroxide-Labeled Biomolecules. J Am Chem Soc 2021; 143:17875-17890. [PMID: 34664948 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c07371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Distance distribution information obtained by pulsed dipolar EPR spectroscopy provides an important contribution to many studies in structural biology. Increasingly, such information is used in integrative structural modeling, where it delivers unique restraints on the width of conformational ensembles. In order to ensure reliability of the structural models and of biological conclusions, we herein define quality standards for sample preparation and characterization, for measurements of distributed dipole-dipole couplings between paramagnetic labels, for conversion of the primary time-domain data into distance distributions, for interpreting these distributions, and for reporting results. These guidelines are substantiated by a multi-laboratory benchmark study and by analysis of data sets with known distance distribution ground truth. The study and the guidelines focus on proteins labeled with nitroxides and on double electron-electron resonance (DEER aka PELDOR) measurements and provide suggestions on how to proceed analogously in other cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olav Schiemann
- Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Wegelerstraße 12, 53115 Bonn, Germany
| | - Caspar A Heubach
- Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Wegelerstraße 12, 53115 Bonn, Germany
| | - Dinar Abdullin
- Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Wegelerstraße 12, 53115 Bonn, Germany
| | - Katrin Ackermann
- EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, and Centre of Magnetic Resonance, University of St Andrews North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9ST, U.K
| | - Mykhailo Azarkh
- Department of Chemistry and Konstanz Research School Chemical Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
| | - Elena G Bagryanskaya
- N.N. Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry, Lavrentieva aven 9, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Malte Drescher
- Department of Chemistry and Konstanz Research School Chemical Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
| | - Burkhard Endeward
- Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Center of Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jack H Freed
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, and ACERT, National Biomedical Center for Advanced Electron Spin Resonance Technology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-1301, United States
| | - Laura Galazzo
- Faculty of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Daniella Goldfarb
- Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Tobias Hett
- Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Wegelerstraße 12, 53115 Bonn, Germany
| | - Laura Esteban Hofer
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Hönggerberg, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Luis Fábregas Ibáñez
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Hönggerberg, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Eric J Hustedt
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
| | - Svetlana Kucher
- Faculty of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Ilya Kuprov
- School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, U.K
| | - Janet Eleanor Lovett
- SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy and BSRC, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, U.K
| | - Andreas Meyer
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Sharon Ruthstein
- Department of Chemistry, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
| | - Sunil Saxena
- Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States
| | - Stefan Stoll
- Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
| | - Christiane R Timmel
- Department of Chemistry, Centre for Advanced Electron Spin Resonance, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QR, U.K
| | - Marilena Di Valentin
- Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padova, via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy
| | - Hassane S Mchaourab
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
| | - Thomas F Prisner
- Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Center of Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Bela Ernest Bode
- EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, and Centre of Magnetic Resonance, University of St Andrews North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9ST, U.K
| | - Enrica Bordignon
- Faculty of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Marina Bennati
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Gunnar Jeschke
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Hönggerberg, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Raveh B, Sun L, White KL, Sanyal T, Tempkin J, Zheng D, Bharath K, Singla J, Wang C, Zhao J, Li A, Graham NA, Kesselman C, Stevens RC, Sali A. Bayesian metamodeling of complex biological systems across varying representations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2104559118. [PMID: 34453000 PMCID: PMC8536362 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2104559118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Comprehensive modeling of a whole cell requires an integration of vast amounts of information on various aspects of the cell and its parts. To divide and conquer this task, we introduce Bayesian metamodeling, a general approach to modeling complex systems by integrating a collection of heterogeneous input models. Each input model can in principle be based on any type of data and can describe a different aspect of the modeled system using any mathematical representation, scale, and level of granularity. These input models are 1) converted to a standardized statistical representation relying on probabilistic graphical models, 2) coupled by modeling their mutual relations with the physical world, and 3) finally harmonized with respect to each other. To illustrate Bayesian metamodeling, we provide a proof-of-principle metamodel of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by human pancreatic β-cells. The input models include a coarse-grained spatiotemporal simulation of insulin vesicle trafficking, docking, and exocytosis; a molecular network model of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion signaling; a network model of insulin metabolism; a structural model of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation; a linear model of a pancreatic cell population; and ordinary differential equations for systemic postprandial insulin response. Metamodeling benefits from decentralized computing, while often producing a more accurate, precise, and complete model that contextualizes input models as well as resolves conflicting information. We anticipate Bayesian metamodeling will facilitate collaborative science by providing a framework for sharing expertise, resources, data, and models, as exemplified by the Pancreatic β-Cell Consortium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barak Raveh
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190416, Israel
| | - Liping Sun
- iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
| | - Kate L White
- Department of Biological Sciences, Bridge Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
| | - Tanmoy Sanyal
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Jeremy Tempkin
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Dongqing Zheng
- Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
| | - Kala Bharath
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Jitin Singla
- Department of Biological Sciences, Bridge Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
- Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
- Information Science Institute, The Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
| | - Chenxi Wang
- iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
- School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
| | - Jihui Zhao
- iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
| | - Angdi Li
- iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
- School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
| | - Nicholas A Graham
- Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
| | - Carl Kesselman
- Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
- Information Science Institute, The Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
| | - Raymond C Stevens
- iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
- Department of Biological Sciences, Bridge Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
- School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
| | - Andrej Sali
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158;
- Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Trewhella J. Growing a thriving international community for small-angle scattering through collaboration. J Appl Crystallogr 2021; 54:1029-1033. [PMID: 34429717 PMCID: PMC8366426 DOI: 10.1107/s1600576721007561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Small-angle scattering emerged as a tool for studying noncrystalline structures from early observations around 1930 that there was a relationship between the extent of the scattering and the size of the scattering object. André Guinier, a leading figure in the development of the field, noted in his summary findings from the first Conference on Small Angle Scattering in 1958 that the technique would be of value to study 'submicroscopical inhomogeneities' and further provided a means of 'observation [that had] in the past restricted the field of application of the X-ray method.' In 1965 the first of what became a highly successful series of Small-Angle Scattering (SAS) meetings held approximately every three years took place in Syracuse, NY, USA, and many of these ongoing meetings published their proceedings and highlights in the International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) Journal of Applied Crystallography. Since the early 2000s, the relationship between the international SAS community represented at the triennial SAS meetings and the IUCr has been strengthened and deepened through formal cooperation and collaboration in a number of mutually beneficial activities that have supported the growth and health of the field and the IUCr.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Trewhella
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Building G08, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Structural interactions define assembly adapter function of a type II secretion system pseudopilin. Structure 2021; 29:1116-1127.e8. [PMID: 34139172 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2021.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The type IV filament superfamily comprises widespread membrane-associated polymers in prokaryotes. The type II secretion system (T2SS), a virulence pathway in many pathogens, belongs to this superfamily. A knowledge gap in understanding of the T2SS is the molecular role of a small "pseudopilin" protein. Using multiple biophysical techniques, we have deciphered how this missing component of the Xcp T2SS architecture is structurally integrated, and thereby unlocked its function. We demonstrate that low-abundance XcpH is the adapter that bridges a trimeric initiating tip complex, XcpIJK, with a periplasmic filament of XcpG subunits. Each pseudopilin protein caps an XcpG protofilament in an overall pseudopilus compatible with dimensions of the periplasm and the outer membrane-spanning secretin through which substrates pass. Unexpectedly, to fulfill its adapter function, the XcpH N-terminal helix must be unwound, a property shared with XcpG subunits. We provide an experimentally validated three-dimensional structural model of a complete type IV filament.
Collapse
|
20
|
Burley SK, Berman HM. Open-access data: A cornerstone for artificial intelligence approaches to protein structure prediction. Structure 2021; 29:515-520. [PMID: 33984281 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The Protein Data Bank (PDB) was established in 1971 to archive three-dimensional (3D) structures of biological macromolecules as a public good. Fifty years later, the PDB is providing millions of data consumers around the world with open access to more than 175,000 experimentally determined structures of proteins and nucleic acids (DNA, RNA) and their complexes with one another and small-molecule ligands. PDB data users are working, teaching, and learning in fundamental biology, biomedicine, bioengineering, biotechnology, and energy sciences. They also represent the fields of agriculture, chemistry, physics and materials science, mathematics, statistics, computer science, and zoology, and even the social sciences. The enormous wealth of 3D structure data stored in the PDB has underpinned significant advances in our understanding of protein architecture, culminating in recent breakthroughs in protein structure prediction accelerated by artificial intelligence approaches and deep or machine learning methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen K Burley
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA; Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
| | - Helen M Berman
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; The Bridge Institute, Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Miller MD, Phillips GN. Moving beyond static snapshots: Protein dynamics and the Protein Data Bank. J Biol Chem 2021; 296:100749. [PMID: 33961840 PMCID: PMC8164045 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Proteins are the molecular machines of living systems. Their dynamics are an intrinsic part of their evolutionary selection in carrying out their biological functions. Although the dynamics are more difficult to observe than a static, average structure, we are beginning to observe these dynamics and form sound mechanistic connections between structure, dynamics, and function. This progress is highlighted in case studies from myoglobin and adenylate kinase to the ribosome and molecular motors where these molecules are being probed with a multitude of techniques across many timescales. New approaches to time-resolved crystallography are allowing simple “movies” to be taken of proteins in action, and new methods of mapping the variations in cryo-electron microscopy are emerging to reveal a more complete description of life’s machines. The results of these new methods are aided in their dissemination by continual improvements in curation and distribution by the Protein Data Bank and their partners around the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - George N Phillips
- Department of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shahfar H, Forder JK, Roberts CJ. Toward a Suite of Coarse-Grained Models for Molecular Simulation of Monoclonal Antibodies and Therapeutic Proteins. J Phys Chem B 2021; 125:3574-3588. [PMID: 33821645 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c01903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A series of coarse-grained models for molecular simulation of proteins are considered, with emphasis on the application of predicting protein-protein self-interactions for monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). As an illustrative example and for quantitative comparison, the models are used to predict osmotic virial coefficients over a broad range of attractive and repulsive self-interactions and solution conditions for a series of MAbs where the second osmotic virial coefficient has been experimentally determined in prior work. The models are compared based on how well they can predict experimental behavior, their computational burdens, and scalability. An intermediate-resolution model is also introduced that can capture specific electrostatic interactions with improved efficiency and similar or improved accuracy when compared to the previously published models. Guidance is included for the selection of coarse-grained models more generally for capturing a balance of electrostatic, steric, and short-ranged nonelectrostatic interactions for proteins from low to high concentrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Shahfar
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
| | - James K Forder
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
| | - Christopher J Roberts
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ritsch I, Esteban-Hofer L, Lehmann E, Emmanouilidis L, Yulikov M, Allain FHT, Jeschke G. Characterization of Weak Protein Domain Structure by Spin-Label Distance Distributions. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8:636599. [PMID: 33912586 PMCID: PMC8072059 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.636599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Function of intrinsically disordered proteins may depend on deviation of their conformational ensemble from that of a random coil. Such deviation may be hard to characterize and quantify, if it is weak. We explored the potential of distance distributions between spin labels, as they can be measured by electron paramagnetic resonance techniques, for aiding such characterization. On the example of the intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain 1-267 of fused in sarcoma (FUS) we examined what such distance distributions can and cannot reveal on the random-coil reference state. On the example of the glycine-rich domain 188-320 of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNP A1) we studied whether deviation from a random-coil ensemble can be robustly detected with 19 distance distribution restraints. We discuss limitations imposed by ill-posedness of the conversion of primary data to distance distributions and propose overlap of distance distributions as a fit criterion that can tackle this problem. For testing consistency and size sufficiency of the restraint set, we propose jack-knife resampling. At current desktop computers, our approach is expected to be viable for domains up to 150 residues and for between 10 and 50 distance distribution restraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Ritsch
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Laura Esteban-Hofer
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Maxim Yulikov
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Gunnar Jeschke
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lerner E, Barth A, Hendrix J, Ambrose B, Birkedal V, Blanchard SC, Börner R, Sung Chung H, Cordes T, Craggs TD, Deniz AA, Diao J, Fei J, Gonzalez RL, Gopich IV, Ha T, Hanke CA, Haran G, Hatzakis NS, Hohng S, Hong SC, Hugel T, Ingargiola A, Joo C, Kapanidis AN, Kim HD, Laurence T, Lee NK, Lee TH, Lemke EA, Margeat E, Michaelis J, Michalet X, Myong S, Nettels D, Peulen TO, Ploetz E, Razvag Y, Robb NC, Schuler B, Soleimaninejad H, Tang C, Vafabakhsh R, Lamb DC, Seidel CAM, Weiss S. FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices. eLife 2021; 10:e60416. [PMID: 33779550 PMCID: PMC8007216 DOI: 10.7554/elife.60416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) has become a mainstream technique for studying biomolecular structural dynamics. The rapid and wide adoption of smFRET experiments by an ever-increasing number of groups has generated significant progress in sample preparation, measurement procedures, data analysis, algorithms and documentation. Several labs that employ smFRET approaches have joined forces to inform the smFRET community about streamlining how to perform experiments and analyze results for obtaining quantitative information on biomolecular structure and dynamics. The recent efforts include blind tests to assess the accuracy and the precision of smFRET experiments among different labs using various procedures. These multi-lab studies have led to the development of smFRET procedures and documentation, which are important when submitting entries into the archiving system for integrative structure models, PDB-Dev. This position paper describes the current 'state of the art' from different perspectives, points to unresolved methodological issues for quantitative structural studies, provides a set of 'soft recommendations' about which an emerging consensus exists, and lists openly available resources for newcomers and seasoned practitioners. To make further progress, we strongly encourage 'open science' practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eitan Lerner
- Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, and The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics & Science, The Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Anders Barth
- Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-UniversitätDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Jelle Hendrix
- Dynamic Bioimaging Lab, Advanced Optical Microscopy Centre and Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), Hasselt UniversityDiepenbeekBelgium
| | - Benjamin Ambrose
- Department of Chemistry, University of SheffieldSheffieldUnited Kingdom
| | - Victoria Birkedal
- Department of Chemistry and iNANO center, Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
| | - Scott C Blanchard
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisUnited States
| | - Richard Börner
- Laserinstitut HS Mittweida, University of Applied Science MittweidaMittweidaGermany
| | - Hoi Sung Chung
- Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Thorben Cordes
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenPlanegg-MartinsriedGermany
| | - Timothy D Craggs
- Department of Chemistry, University of SheffieldSheffieldUnited Kingdom
| | - Ashok A Deniz
- Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research InstituteLa JollaUnited States
| | - Jiajie Diao
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Cincinnati School of MedicineCincinnatiUnited States
| | - Jingyi Fei
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and The Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
| | - Ruben L Gonzalez
- Department of Chemistry, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUnited States
| | - Irina V Gopich
- Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Taekjip Ha
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteBaltimoreUnited States
| | - Christian A Hanke
- Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-UniversitätDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Gilad Haran
- Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
| | - Nikos S Hatzakis
- Department of Chemistry & Nanoscience Centre, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
- Denmark Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Sungchul Hohng
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, and Institute of Applied Physics, Seoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Seok-Cheol Hong
- Center for Molecular Spectroscopy and Dynamics, Institute for Basic Science and Department of Physics, Korea UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Thorsten Hugel
- Institute of Physical Chemistry and Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, University of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
| | - Antonino Ingargiola
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Department of Physiology, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
| | - Chirlmin Joo
- Department of BioNanoScience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
| | - Achillefs N Kapanidis
- Biological Physics Research Group, Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Harold D Kim
- School of Physics, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUnited States
| | - Ted Laurence
- Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermoreUnited States
| | - Nam Ki Lee
- School of Chemistry, Seoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Tae-Hee Lee
- Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUnited States
| | - Edward A Lemke
- Departments of Biology and Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg UniversityMainzGermany
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB)MainzGermany
| | - Emmanuel Margeat
- Centre de Biologie Structurale (CBS), CNRS, INSERM, Universitié de MontpellierMontpellierFrance
| | | | - Xavier Michalet
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Department of Physiology, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
| | - Sua Myong
- Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUnited States
| | - Daniel Nettels
- Department of Biochemistry and Department of Physics, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Thomas-Otavio Peulen
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
| | - Evelyn Ploetz
- Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Center for Nanoscience (CeNS), Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM) and Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMünchenGermany
| | - Yair Razvag
- Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, and The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics & Science, The Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Nicole C Robb
- Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickCoventryUnited Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Schuler
- Department of Biochemistry and Department of Physics, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Hamid Soleimaninejad
- Biological Optical Microscopy Platform (BOMP), University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
| | - Chun Tang
- College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, PKU-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Reza Vafabakhsh
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUnited States
| | - Don C Lamb
- Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Center for Nanoscience (CeNS), Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM) and Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMünchenGermany
| | - Claus AM Seidel
- Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-UniversitätDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Shimon Weiss
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Department of Physiology, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
- Department of Physiology, CaliforniaNanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
An RNA-centric historical narrative around the Protein Data Bank. J Biol Chem 2021; 296:100555. [PMID: 33744291 PMCID: PMC8080527 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Some of the amazing contributions brought to the scientific community by the Protein Data Bank (PDB) are described. The focus is on nucleic acid structures with a bias toward RNA. The evolution and key roles in science of the PDB and other structural databases for nucleic acids illustrate how small initial ideas can become huge and indispensable resources with the unflinching willingness of scientists to cooperate globally. The progress in the understanding of the molecular interactions driving RNA architectures followed the rapid increase in RNA structures in the PDB. That increase was consecutive to improvements in chemical synthesis and purification of RNA molecules, as well as in biophysical methods for structure determination and computer technology. The RNA modeling efforts from the early beginnings are also described together with their links to the state of structural knowledge and technological development. Structures of RNA and of its assemblies are physical objects, which, together with genomic data, allow us to integrate present-day biological functions and the historical evolution in all living species on earth.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Protein Data Bank is the single worldwide archive of experimentally determined macromolecular structure data. Established in 1971 as the first open access data resource in biology, the PDB archive is managed by the worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) consortium which has four partners-the RCSB Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB; rcsb.org), the Protein Data Bank Japan (PDBj; pdbj.org), the Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe; pdbe.org), and BioMagResBank (BMRB; www.bmrb.wisc.edu ). The PDB archive currently includes ~175,000 entries. The wwPDB has established a number of task forces and working groups that bring together experts form the community who provide recommendations on improving data standards and data validation for improving data quality and integrity. The wwPDB members continue to develop the joint deposition, biocuration, and validation system (OneDep) to improve data quality and accommodate new data from emerging techniques such as 3DEM. Each PDB entry contains coordinate model and associated metadata for all experimentally determined atomic structures, experimental data for the traditional structure determination techniques (X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy), validation reports, and additional information on quaternary structures. The wwPDB partners are committed to following the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reproducibility) principles and have implemented a DOI resolution mechanism that provides access to all the relevant files for a given PDB entry. On average, >250 new entries are added to the archive every week and made available by each wwPDB partner via FTP area. The wwPDB partner sites also develop data access and analysis tools and make these available via their websites. wwPDB continues to work with experts in the community to establish a federation of archives for archiving structures determined using integrative/hybrid method where multiple experimental techniques are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Velankar
- Protein Data Bank in Europe, European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Stephen K Burley
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.,Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.,Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.,Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Genji Kurisu
- Protein Data Bank Japan, Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jeffrey C Hoch
- BioMagResBank, Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - John L Markley
- BioMagResBank, Biochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sali A. From integrative structural biology to cell biology. J Biol Chem 2021; 296:100743. [PMID: 33957123 PMCID: PMC8203844 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Integrative modeling is an increasingly important tool in structural biology, providing structures by combining data from varied experimental methods and prior information. As a result, molecular architectures of large, heterogeneous, and dynamic systems, such as the ∼52-MDa Nuclear Pore Complex, can be mapped with useful accuracy, precision, and completeness. Key challenges in improving integrative modeling include expanding model representations, increasing the variety of input data and prior information, quantifying a match between input information and a model in a Bayesian fashion, inventing more efficient structural sampling, as well as developing better model validation, analysis, and visualization. In addition, two community-level challenges in integrative modeling are being addressed under the auspices of the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB). First, the impact of integrative structures is maximized by PDB-Development, a prototype wwPDB repository for archiving, validating, visualizing, and disseminating integrative structures. Second, the scope of structural biology is expanded by linking the wwPDB resource for integrative structures with archives of data that have not been generally used for structure determination but are increasingly important for computing integrative structures, such as data from various types of mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, optical microscopy, proteomics, and genetics. To address the largest of modeling problems, a type of integrative modeling called metamodeling is being developed; metamodeling combines different types of input models as opposed to different types of data to compute an output model. Collectively, these developments will facilitate the structural biology mindset in cell biology and underpin spatiotemporal mapping of the entire cell.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrej Sali
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, the Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, the Quantitative Biosciences Institute (QBI), and the Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Toward Increased Reliability, Transparency, and Accessibility in Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry. Structure 2020; 28:1259-1268. [PMID: 33065067 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2020.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Cross-linking mass spectrometry (MS) has substantially matured as a method over the past 2 decades through parallel development in multiple labs, demonstrating its applicability to protein structure determination, conformation analysis, and mapping protein interactions in complex mixtures. Cross-linking MS has become a much-appreciated and routinely applied tool, especially in structural biology. Therefore, it is timely that the community commits to the development of methodological and reporting standards. This white paper builds on an open process comprising a number of events at community conferences since 2015 and identifies aspects of Cross-linking MS for which guidelines should be developed as part of a Cross-linking MS standards initiative.
Collapse
|
30
|
Berman HM, Vallat B, Lawson CL. The data universe of structural biology. IUCRJ 2020; 7:630-638. [PMID: 32695409 PMCID: PMC7340255 DOI: 10.1107/s205225252000562x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
The Protein Data Bank (PDB) has grown from a small data resource for crystallographers to a worldwide resource serving structural biology. The history of the growth of the PDB and the role that the community has played in developing standards and policies are described. This article also illustrates how other biophysics communities are collaborating with the worldwide PDB to create a network of interoperating data resources. This network will expand the capabilities of structural biology and enable the determination and archiving of increasingly complex structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M. Berman
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bridge Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Brinda Vallat
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Catherine L. Lawson
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Roel-Touris J, Bonvin AM. Coarse-grained (hybrid) integrative modeling of biomolecular interactions. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2020; 18:1182-1190. [PMID: 32514329 PMCID: PMC7264466 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The computational modeling field has vastly evolved over the past decades. The early developments of simplified protein systems represented a stepping stone towards establishing more efficient approaches to sample intricated conformational landscapes. Downscaling the level of resolution of biomolecules to coarser representations allows for studying protein structure, dynamics and interactions that are not accessible by classical atomistic approaches. The combination of different resolutions, namely hybrid modeling, has also been proved as an alternative when mixed levels of details are required. In this review, we provide an overview of coarse-grained/hybrid models focusing on their applicability in the modeling of biomolecular interactions. We give a detailed list of ready-to-use modeling software for studying biomolecular interactions allowing various levels of coarse-graining and provide examples of complexes determined by integrative coarse-grained/hybrid approaches in combination with experimental information.
Collapse
|
32
|
Ganesan SJ, Feyder MJ, Chemmama IE, Fang F, Rout MP, Chait BT, Shi Y, Munson M, Sali A. Integrative structure and function of the yeast exocyst complex. Protein Sci 2020; 29:1486-1501. [PMID: 32239688 DOI: 10.1002/pro.3863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Exocyst is an evolutionarily conserved hetero-octameric tethering complex that plays a variety of roles in membrane trafficking, including exocytosis, endocytosis, autophagy, cell polarization, cytokinesis, pathogen invasion, and metastasis. Exocyst serves as a platform for interactions between the Rab, Rho, and Ral small GTPases, SNARE proteins, and Sec1/Munc18 regulators that coordinate spatial and temporal fidelity of membrane fusion. However, its mechanism is poorly described at the molecular level. Here, we determine the molecular architecture of the yeast exocyst complex by an integrative approach, based on a 3D density map from negative-stain electron microscopy (EM) at ~16 Å resolution, 434 disuccinimidyl suberate and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride cross-links from chemical-crosslinking mass spectrometry, and partial atomic models of the eight subunits. The integrative structure is validated by a previously determined cryo-EM structure, cross-links, and distances from in vivo fluorescence microscopy. Our subunit configuration is consistent with the cryo-EM structure, except for Sec5. While not observed in the cryo-EM map, the integrative model localizes the N-terminal half of Sec3 near the Sec6 subunit. Limited proteolysis experiments suggest that the conformation of Exo70 is dynamic, which may have functional implications for SNARE and membrane interactions. This study illustrates how integrative modeling based on varied low-resolution structural data can inform biologically relevant hypotheses, even in the absence of high-resolution data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai J Ganesan
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Michael J Feyder
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ilan E Chemmama
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Fei Fang
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael P Rout
- Laboratory of Cellular and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brian T Chait
- Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yi Shi
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mary Munson
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrej Sali
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sichun Yang
- Center for Proteomics and Department of Nutrition, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | - Pau Bernadó
- Centre de Biochimie Structurale (CBS), INSERM, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 29, rue de Navacelles, 34090 Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abriata LA, Lepore R, Dal Peraro M. About the need to make computational models of biological macromolecules available and discoverable. Bioinformatics 2020; 36:2952-2954. [DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano A Abriata
- Laboratory for Biomolecular Modeling
- Protein Production and Structure Core Facility, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
| | - Rosalba Lepore
- BSC-CNS Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|