Analysis of donor factors affecting human islet isolation with current isolation protocol

Isolation and Purification of Human Pancreatic Islets

Successful islet isolation is the key to islet transplantation in diabetic patients. However, islet isolation is a technically complex and time-consuming manual process. Optimizing the islet isolation process can improve islet yield and quality, reduce operators, and thus reduce costs.The isolation and purification of human islets include pancreas acquisition and preservation, pancreas digestion, islet purification, islet culture, and islet quality identification. Briefly, after the duodenum was removed, the pancreas was trimmed, the main pancreatic duct was intubated at the distal end of the pancreatic head, collagenase was injected into the pancreatic duct, and the perfused pancreatic tissue was cut and then digested in a Ricordi chamber. A digestion temperature of 37 °C was continuously used to assess the number of samples and the integrity of the lysed and released islets. At the end of the digestion process, collect the digested tissue in a 500 mL centrifuge tube prefilled with 25 mL of cold (4 °C) human serum albumin and centrifuge twice at 150 g for 3 min. After mixing with UW solution as islet storage solution, put it on ice (shake occasionally to prevent clumping) after 30 min. Digested pancreatic tissue was centrifuged at 2200 rpm for 5 min in a COBE 2991 cell processor to isolate islets from exocrine tissue using a continuous density gradient. The purified islet fractions were washed twice in HBSS supplemented with 10% human serum albumin and finally collected in CMRL1066 medium supplemented with the corresponding liquid. The purity of purified islets was calculated by DTZ staining, the survival rate of islets was calculated by FDA/PI staining, and islet function was determined by in vitro glucose-stimulated insulin secretion test.

The Outcomes and Quality of Pancreatic Islet Cells Isolated from Surgical Specimens for Research on Diabetes Mellitus

Isolating a large quantity of high-quality human islets is a prerequisite for diabetes research. Human islets are typically isolated from the pancreases of brain-dead donors, making research difficult due to low availability. Pancreas tissue discarded after surgical resection may be a good alternative source of islet cells. To test this hypothesis, we isolated islets from discarded surgical specimens and evaluated the islet yield and quality as well as islet cell preparations. Eighty-two segmental pancreases were processed using the Ricordi automated method, and islet yield and quality were investigated. The mean age of patients was 54.6, and the cohort included 32 diabetes patients. After purification, partially resected pancreases yielded an average of 59,593 ± 56,651 islet equivalents (IEQs) and 2546 IEQ/g of digested pancreas, with 71.5 ± 21% purity. Multivariate analysis revealed that diabetes (p = 0.0046) and the lobe used (p = 0.0156) significantly altered islet yield. Islets transplanted into diabetic mice displayed good viability and in vitro glucose responses, DNA/RNA quality, mitochondrial function, and glucose control, even though these results were dependent on islet quality. Isolated cells also maintained high viability and function even after cryopreservation. Our findings indicate that pancreatic tissue discarded after surgery can be a valuable source of islets for diabetes research.

Failure mode and effect analysis in human islet isolation: from the theoretical to the practical risk

This study aimed to assess the global mapping risk of human islet isolation, using a failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), and highlight the impact of quality assurance procedures on the risk level of criticality. Risks were scored using the risk priority number (RPN) scoring method. The risk level of criticality was made based on RPN and led to risk classification (low to critical). A raw risk analysis and a risk control analysis (with control means and quality assurance performance) were undertaken. The process of human islet isolation was divided into 11 steps, and 230 risks were identified. Analysis of the highest RPN of each of the 11 steps showed that the 4 highest risks were related to the pancreas digestion and islet purification stages. After implementation of reduction measures and controls, critical and severe risks were reduced by 3-fold and by 2-fold, respectively, so that 90% of risks could be considered as low to moderate. FMEA has proven to be a powerful approach for the identification of weaknesses in the islet isolation processes. The results demonstrated the importance of staff qualification and continuous training and supported the contribution of the quality assurance system to risk reduction.

Using Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Islet Transplantation

Islet transplantation has the potential to cure type 1 diabetes, but current clinical transplantation protocols are inefficient because of the extensive loss of functional islets during the immediate post‐transplantation period. Studies in rodent models have demonstrated that co‐transplanting mesencyhmal stromal cells (MSCs) with islets improves graft functional survival and transplantation outcomes, and some of the beneficial effects of MSCs are attributable to bioactive molecules secreted by MSCs. Clinical islet transplantation is almost exclusively via the hepatic portal vein, which does not facilitate co‐engraftment of islets and MSCs, so attention is currently focused on using cell‐free cocktails of MSC‐derived products to treat islets prior to transplantation. This approach has the potential to overcome many of the technical and regulatory hurdles associated with using MSCs as an adjuvant therapy for human islet transplantation. Stem Cells Translational Medicine2018;7:559–563

The Effect of Donor Factors on Human Islet Yield and Their in Vivo Function

Background

A major problem in the islet field is the high selectivity exercised in accepting cadaveric pancreas for islet isolation. This practice is based on experience that indicates that islet yield and posttransplant function are related to donor demographics and injury mechanisms.

Objective

To examine factors influencing islets recovery and in vivo function with emphasis on donor-related factors.

Methods

Islets were isolated from 99 human donor pancreata, and islet yield was reported as islet equivalent per gram pancreatic tissue. Donor, procurement, and isolation factors were collected for each isolation and correlation statistics were performed between these variables and islet yield.

Results

Results indicated a differential effect of enzyme mixes on yield with 2 Collagenase P digestion most suitable for increased ischemic time ( R2 = 0.1; P < .08), Liberase with small donor pancreas size and elevated preprocurement glucose ( R2 = 0.15; P < .02), and Serva with female donors ( R2 = 0.17; P < .06). Islets from 29 isolations were further tested by transplantation under the kidney capsule of immune-deficient NOD-SCID mice. Although all 29 preparations had acceptable in vitro perfusion parameters indicating viability, only 19 functioned in vivo with serum levels of insulin >5 U/mL and C peptide >1.5 ng/mL. No significant differences in donor, procurement, and isolation factors were evident between the islet preparations that functioned in vivo and those that were nonfunctional.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that although yield is affected by a variety of donor factors and enzyme mixes, these factors do not affect islet in vivo function.

A Multicenter Study: North American Islet Donor Score in Donor Pancreas Selection for Human Islet Isolation for Transplantation

Selection of an optimal donor pancreas is the first key task for successful islet isolation. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in 11 centers in North America to develop an islet donor scoring system using donor variables. The data set consisting of 1,056 deceased donors was used for development of a scoring system to predict islet isolation success (defined as postpurification islet yield >400,000 islet equivalents). With the aid of univariate logistic regression analyses, we developed the North American Islet Donor Score (NAIDS) ranging from 0 to 100 points. The c index in the development cohort was 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.76). The success rate increased proportionally as the NAIDS increased, from 6.8% success in the NAIDS < 50 points to 53.7% success in the NAIDS ≥ 80 points. We further validated the NAIDS using a separate set of data consisting of 179 islet isolations. A comparable outcome of the NAIDS was observed in the validation cohort. The NAIDS may be a useful tool for donor pancreas selection in clinical practice. Apart from its utility in clinical decision making, the NAIDS may also be used in a research setting as a standardized measurement of pancreas quality.

Effects of Donor-, Pancreas-, and Isolation-Related Variables on Human Islet Isolation Outcome: A Systematic Review

Different factors have been reported to influence islet isolation outcome, but their importance varies between studies and are hampered by the small sample sizes in most studies. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to assess the impact of donor-, pancreas-, and isolation-related variables on successful human islet isolation outcome. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched electronically in April 2009. All studies reporting on donor-, pancreas-, and isolation-related factors relating to prepurification and postpurification islet isolation yield and proportion of successful islet isolations were selected. Seventy-four retrospective studies had sufficient data and were included in the analyses. Higher pre- and postpurification islet yields and a higher proportion of successful islet isolations were obtained when pancreata were preserved with the two-layer method rather than University of Wisconsin solution in donors with shorter cold ischemia times (CITs) [1 h longer CIT resulted in an average decline of prepurification and postpurification yields and proportion of successful isolations of 59 islet equivalents (IEQs)/g, 54 IEQs/g, and 21%, respectively]. Higher prepurification yields and higher percentage of successful islet isolations were found in younger donors with higher body mass index. Lower yields were found in donation after brain death donors compared to donation after cardiac death donors. Higher postpurification yields were found for isolation with Serva collagenase. This review identified donor-, pancreas-, and isolation-related factors that influence islet isolation yield. Standardized reports of these factors in all future studies may improve the power and identify additional factors and thereby contribute to improving islet isolation yield.

Systematic analysis of donor and isolation factor's impact on human islet yield and size distribution

Islet transplantation is a promising therapy for T1DM. Key factors influencing islet yield have been identified with conflicting results. In this study, we analyzed 276 isolations to identify variables for islet yield and, additionally, islet size and size distribution. Pearson correlation analyses demonstrated that BMI had a positive correlation with pancreas size, actual islet count (AIC), and islet equivalent (IEQ)/g (all p ≤ 0.009), while CIT had a negative correlation with AIC and IEQ/g (all p ≤ 0.003). In mixed linear regression, BMI also had a positive correlation with islet size but only for shorter digestion times (≤15 min); there was no association between BMI and islet size for longer digestion times (>15 min). CIT was not associated with islet size. Donor age, sex, and preservation solutions were shown to have no correlation with islet yields or size distribution. Pancreas size had a positive correlation with AIC and a negative association with IEQ/g; it also had positive association with islet size but only for females, not males. Overdigestion was positively associated with islet counts; however, there was also a greater proportion of smaller islets when digestion rate was >74% (p = 0.005). Of the three collagenases analyzed, Sigma V had the lowest digestion rate (mean = 65%), approximately 5% or 10% lower than Roche Liberase HI (p = 0.04) and Serva NB1 (p = 0.0003), respectively; however, the Sigma V group showed better islet size preservation. Yet, the enzymes resulted in similar IEQ/g digested tissue. Of the isolated islets, 70.2% were smaller than 150 µm and contributed only 20.4% to the total IEQ, while 7.4% of the islets were larger than 250 µm but contributed 42.4% to the total IEQ. In summary, BMI, pancreas size, and CIT are useful variables for predicting islet yield, but selection of enzyme and balancing digestion time and rate are also important.

Improvement of pancreatic islet cell isolation for transplantation

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a promising treatment for diabetes but still faces several challenges. Poor islet isolation efficiency and poor long-term insulin independence are currently two major issues, although donor shortage and the need for immunosuppressants also need to be addressed. We established the Kyoto islet isolation method (KIIM), which has enabled us to isolate and transplant islets even from non-heart-beating donors. KIIM involves 1) cooling the donor pancreas in situ, 2) preserving the ducts with modified Kyoto solution, 3) using a modified two-layer pancreas preservation method, and 4) adjusting the density of the density gradient centrifugation and using an iodixanol-based solution for purification. KIIM has enabled us to transplant 17 islet preparations out of 21 isolations (an 81% success rate). All transplanted islets functioned, and all transplanted patients had improved glycemic control without hypoglycemic unawareness. Recently, we used KIIM for islet isolation from a brain-dead donor at Baylor, which resulted in a very high islet yield (789,984 IE) with high viability (100% by fluorescein diacetate/propidium iodide staining and a stimulation index of 4.7). This preliminary evidence suggests that KIIM may also be promising for islet isolation from brain-dead donors. In addition, to assess engrafted islet mass, we developed a secretory unit of islet transplant objects (SUITO) index: fasting C-peptide (ng/dL) / [fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) - 63] x 1500. This simple index has enabled us to monitor the engrafted islet mass. This index should be useful when deciding whether to perform additional islet transplantations to maintain insulin independence. Poor islet isolation efficacy and poor long-term results could be resolved with ongoing research.

Body mass index reflects islet isolation outcome in islet autotransplantation for patients with chronic pancreatitis

Total pancreatectomy with autologous islet cell transplantation (TP with AIT) is an effective treatment for chronic pancreatitis patients with severe abdominal pain. Body mass index (BMI) of the pancreatic donor is proven to be a useful predictor for islet isolation and transplantation outcomes in allogenic islet transplantation. However, the association between BMI and islet isolation outcome and/or metabolism after AIT was previously unclear. Twelve patients who received TP with AIT at our hospital were included in this study. All pancreata were preserved with both pancreatic ductal injection and oxygen-charged static two-layer method using ET-Kyoto solution. The cohort was divided into two groups: low BMI group (BMI <23 kg/m(2), n=5) and high BMI group (BMI ≥23, n=7). The high BMI group had a significantly higher islet yield per gram than the low BMI group both in pancreas postdigestion and in final product (postdigestion: 7330 ± 539 vs. 3509 ± 563 IE/g; p<0.001; final product: 6555 ± 585 vs. 3476 ± 546 IE/g; p=0.004). For islet yield in final product per patient body weight, the high BMI group also had significantly higher islet yield than the low BMI group (7997 ± 779 vs. 4175 ± 750 IE/kg, p=0.007). Insulin independence rate in the high BMI group (71%) was also higher than that low BMI group (40%), but it did not reach statistical significance. Pancreata from patients with higher BMI could obtain higher islet yield in the setting of autologous islet cell transplantation for chronic pancreatitis.

{beta}-Cell mass dynamics and islet cell plasticity in human type 2 diabetes

Studies of long-standing type 2 diabetes (T2D) report a deficit in beta-cell mass due to increased apoptosis, whereas neogenesis and replication are unaffected. It is unclear whether these changes are a cause or a consequence of T2D. Moreover, whereas islet morphogenetic plasticity has been demonstrated in vitro, the in situ plasticity of islets, as well as the effect of T2D on endocrine differentiation, is unknown. We compared beta-cell volume, neogenesis, replication, and apoptosis in pancreata from lean and obese (body mass index > or = 27 kg/m(2)) diabetic (5 +/- 2 yr since diagnosis) and nondiabetic cadaveric donors. We also subjected isolated islets from diabetic (3 +/- 1 yr since diagnosis) and nondiabetic donors to an established in vitro model of islet plasticity. Differences in beta-cell volume between diabetic and nondiabetic donors were consistently less pronounced than those reported in long-standing T2D. A compensatory increase in beta-cell neogenesis appeared to mediate this effect. Studies of induced plasticity indicated that islets from diabetic donors were capable of epithelial dedifferentiation but did not demonstrate regenerative potential, as was seen in islets from nondiabetic donors. This deficiency was associated with the overexpression of Notch signaling molecules and a decreased neurogenin-3(+) cell frequency. One interpretation of these results would be that decreased beta-cell volume is a consequence, not a cause, of T2D, mediated by increased apoptosis and attenuated beta-cell (re)generation. However, other explanations are also possible. It remains to be seen whether the morphogenetic plasticity of human islets, deficient in vitro in islets from diabetic donors, is a component of normal beta-cell mass dynamics.

Estimation of donor usability for islet transplantation in the United States with the kyoto islet isolation method

The quality of donor pancreata is important for successful islet isolation. However, in some countries like Japan, the number of donor pancreata is very low; therefore, marginal donors have been used with less restrictive donor criteria. In order to use marginal donor pancreata, we established the Kyoto islet isolation method (KIIM). According to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in 2005, more than 6,000 pancreata were not clinically used in the US. In this study, we applied the KIIM for brain-dead donors and reevaluated donor usability based on the Japanese islet donor criteria. Islets were isolated with the Ricordi method using pancreata stored in University of Wisconsin (UW) solution (UW group) or by the two-layer method (TLM group) or the TLM combined with ductal injection (DI group). We implemented the KIIM (KIIM group) to confirm the effect of the KIIM on brain-dead donors. Donor charts in Texas from 2005 to 2006 were reviewed. If pancreata were not used clinically, the reason was reviewed and donors were reevaluated based on Japanese criteria. There were no significant differences of islet yield, viability, and purity between the UW and TLM groups. The DI group significantly improved islet yields and isolations were further improved in the KIIM group [UW: 251,663 +/- 60,217 islet equivalent (IE); TLM: 243,738 +/- 54,170 IE; DI: 498,639 +/- 28,853 IE; KIIM: 678,286 +/- 55,853]. The KIIM provided high-quality islets in high numbers from islet isolations from brain-dead donors. A total of 236 donor charts were reviewed and 194 pancreata (82%) were not used. Of these, 185 cases identified the reasons that the pancreata were not used. When we applied the Japanese criteria, an additional 82 cases out of 185 (44%) seem to be suitable for islet isolations. With the KIIM, more than 2,500 additional donor pancreata can be used for islet isolation in the US every year when the Japanese criteria are applied.

Pig pancreas anatomy: implications for pancreas procurement, preservation, and islet isolation

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation is emerging as a treatment option for selected patients with type 1 diabetes. The limited human islet supply from cadavers and poor islet yield and quality remain substantial impediments to progress in the field. Use of porcine islets holds great promise for large-scale application of islet transplantation. Consistent isolation of porcine islets is dependent on advances in pancreas procurement, pancreas preservation, and islet isolation, requiring detailed knowledge of the porcine pancreatic anatomy. The primary aim of this study was to describe the vascular and ductal anatomy of the porcine pancreas to guide and improve organ preservation and enzyme perfusion.

METHODS

Pancreata were removed by en bloc viscerectomy from 65 female Landrace pigs.

RESULTS

Fifteen percentage of organs exhibited inconsistent vascular branching from the celiac trunk. All organs showed uniform patterns of branching at the superior mesenteric artery. The superior and inferior mesenteric veins merged to become the portal vein in all but one case in which the inferior mesenteric vein drained into the splenic vein. Ninety-seven percent of pancreata had three lobes: duodenal lobe (DL), connecting lobe (CL), and splenic lobe (SL); 39% demonstrated ductal communication between the CL and the other two lobes; 50% had ductal communication only between the CL and duodenal lobe; and 11% presented other types of ductal delineation.

CONCLUSIONS

Accounting for the variations in vascular and ductal anatomy, as detailed in this study, will facilitate development of protocols for preservation, optimal enzyme administration, and pancreas distention and digestion, and will ultimately lead to substantial improvements in isolation outcomes.

Analysis of donor- and isolation-related variables from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) using the Kyoto islet isolation method

Recently, we demonstrated that islet transplantation from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) using the Kyoto islet isolation method (KIIM) successfully reversed patients' diabetes state. In this study, we evaluated the effects of donor- and isolation-related variables on islet isolation results from NHBDs by KIIM. Twenty-one islet preparations from the pancreata of NHBDs were isolated by KIIM. Islet preparations that met transplantation criteria and achieved improved patient diabetes control after transplantation were defined as successful isolations. Potential risk factors deemed to affect islet isolation results, such as age, gender, body mass index, hospital stay, donors' blood biochemical tests, a modified pancreata procurement method, and isolation and purification procedure-related variables, were analyzed. Seventeen out of 21 islet isolations (81%) were successful isolations. Postpurification islet yield was 447,639 +/- 39,902 islet equivalents (IE) in the successful isolation group and 108,007 +/- 31,532 IE in the failure group. Donor age was significantly younger in the success group (41.9 +/- 4.0 years old in the success group vs. 57.5 +/- 2.2 years old in the failure group, p = 0.003). Chronic pancreatitis significantly decreased islet yields (p = 0.006). Phase I time was significantly shorter (p = 0.010) and undigested tissue volume was significantly smaller (p = 0.020) in the success group. Purity was in positive correlation to postpurification islet yield, while donor age was in reverse correlation to postpurification islet yield. KIIM enables us to perform islet transplantation from NHBDs; however, the decision to use pancreata from older donors or those with chronic pancreatitis requires careful consideration.

Pancreatic islet isolation variables in non-human primates (rhesus macaques)

BACKGROUND

Non-human primates (NHPs) are important preclinical models for pancreatic islet transplantation (PIT) because of their close phylogenetic and immunological relationship with humans. However, low availability of NHP tissue, long learning curves and prohibitive expenses constrain the consistency of isolated NHP islets for PIT studies. To advance preclinical studies, we attempted to identify key variables that consistently influence the quantity and quality of NHP islets.

METHODS

Seventy-two consecutive pancreatic islet isolations from rhesus macaques were reviewed retrospectively. A scaled down, semi-automated islet isolation method was used, and monkeys with streptozotocin-induced diabetes, weighing 3-7 kg, served as recipients for allotransplantation. We analysed the effects of 22 independent variables grouped as donor factors, surgical factors and isolation technique factors. Islet yields, success of isolation and transplantation results were used as quantitative and qualitative outcomes.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis, variables that significantly affected islet yield were the type of monkey, pancreas preservation, enzyme lot and volume of enzyme delivered. The variables associated with successful isolation were the enzyme lot and volume delivered. The transplant result was correlated with pancreas preservation, enzyme lot, endotoxin levels and COBE collection method.

CONCLUSIONS

Islet quantity and quality are highly variable between isolations. The data reviewed suggest that future NHP isolations should use bilayer preservation, infuse more than 80 ml of Liberase into the pancreas, collect non-fractioned tissue from the COBE, and strictly monitor for infection.

Secretory unit of islet in transplantation (SUIT) and engrafted islet rate (EIR) indexes are useful for evaluating single islet transplantation

The evaluation of engraftment is important to assess the success of islet transplantation, but it is complex because islet transplantation usually requires two or more donors to achieve euglycemia. Islet transplantation from NHBDs was evaluated using new assessment forms for the secretory unit of islet in transplantation (SUIT) and engrafted islet rate (EIR) indexes. Insulin independence was obtained when the SUIT index was more than 28, which might indicate that 28% of the beta-cell mass of a normal subject is required for insulin independence. Because the average EIR for a single transplantation is about 30, the percentage of engrafted islets following one transplantation is about 30%, assuming that a normal subject has 1 million islet equivalents. Although few cultured islet transplants have been performed, the increase of the SUIT and EIR indexes in patients who received cultured islets was significantly lower than in patients who received fresh islets, suggesting that fresh islets may be more effective than cultured islets. The SUIT and EIR indexes are thus considered to be useful values for evaluating islet transplantation, especially for single islet transplantation.

Toward maximizing the success rates of human islet isolation: influence of donor and isolation factors

In order to make islet transplantation a therapeutic option for patients with diabetes there is an urgent need for more efficient islet cell processing to maximize islet recovery. Improved donor management, organ recovery techniques, implementation of more stringent donor criteria, and improved islet cell processing techniques may contribute to enhance organ utilization for transplantation. We have analyzed the effects of donor and islet processing factors on the success rate of human islet cell processing for transplantation performed at a single islet cell processing center. Islet isolation outcomes improved when vasopressors, and in particular pitressin, and steroids were used for the management of multiorgan donors. Higher islet yields were obtained from adult male donors, BMI >25 kg/m2, adequate glycemic control during hospital stay, and when the pancreas was retrieved by a local surgical team. Successful isolations were obtained in 58% of the cases when > or = 4 donor criteria were met, and even higher success rates (69%) were observed when considering > or = 5 criteria. Our data suggest that a sequential, integrated approach is highly desirable to improve the success rate of islet cell processing.

Evaluation of islet transplantation from non-heart beating donors

We evaluated islet transplantation from non-heart beating donors (NHBDs) with our Kyoto Islet Isolation Method. All patients had positive C-peptide after transplantation. The average HbA(1C) levels of the five recipients significantly improved from 7.8 +/- 0.4% at transplant to 5.2 +/- 0.2% currently (p < 0.01). Three patients with no or a single autoantibody became insulin independent while the other two patients with double autoantibodies reduced their insulin requirement but did not become insulin independent. C-peptide in patients who became insulin-independent gradually increased after each transplantation whereas C-peptide in patients who did not become insulin-independent from 3 months after the first transplantation to the next transplantation dramatically decreased. The beta-score of the three patients who became insulin independent was the best of eight. In conclusion, our method makes it feasible to use NHBDs for islet transplant into type 1 diabetic patients efficiently.

Successful islet transplantation from nonheartbeating donor pancreata using modified Ricordi islet isolation method

BACKGROUND

Current success of islet transplantation has led to donor shortage and the need for marginal donor utilization to alleviate this shortage. The goal of this study was to improve the efficacy of islet transplantation using nonheartbeating donors (NHBDs).

METHODS

First, we used porcine pancreata for the implementation of several strategies and applied to human pancreata. These strategies included ductal injection with trypsin inhibitor for protection of pancreatic ducts, ET-Kyoto solution for pancreas preservation, and Iodixanol for islet purification.

RESULTS

These strategies significantly improved both porcine and human islet isolation efficacy. Average 399,469+/-36,411 IE human islets were obtained from NHBDs (n=13). All islet preparations met transplantation criteria and 11 out of 13 cases (85%) were transplanted into six type 1 diabetic patients for the first time in Japan. All islets started to secrete insulin and all patients showed better blood glucose control without hypoglycemic loss of consciousness. The average HbA1c levels of the six recipients significantly improved from 7.5+/-0.4% at transplant to 5.1+/-0.2% currently (P<0.0003). The average insulin amounts of the six recipients significantly reduced from 49.2+/-3.3 units at transplant to 11+/-4.4 units (P<0.0005) and five out of six patients reduced to less than half dose. The first patient is now insulin free, the first such case in Japan.

CONCLUSION

This demonstrates that our current protocol makes it feasible to use NHBDs for islet transplant into type 1 diabetic patients efficiently.

Procurement of the Human Pancreas for Pancreatic Islet Transplantation from Marginal Cadaver Donors

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in pancreatic islet transplantation (PIT) have contributed significantly to the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes. The specific aim of this study was to develop an effective technique for the procurement of pancreas for PIT from nonheart-beating-donor (NHBDs).

METHODS

Between January 2004 and August 2004, eight human pancreata were procured and processed for isolation of islets at a cell processing center. After confirmation of brain death status, a double balloon catheter was inserted to prevent warm ischemic damage to the donor pancreas by using an in situ regional organ cooling system that was originally developed for procurement of kidneys. The catheter position of the cooling system was modified specifically for the pancreas and kidney. Furthermore, we worked in cooperation with a kidney procurement team to protect the pancreas during kidney procurement.

RESULTS

Warm ischemic time could be controlled with the modified in situ regional cooling system at 3.0 +/- 0.8 min (mean +/- SE). The operations for procurement of the kidneys and pancreata lasted 45.6 +/- 3.6 min and 10.6 +/- 1.8 min, respectively. Islet yield per isolation was 444,426 +/- 35,172 IE (islet equivalent). All eight cases met the criteria for PIT based on the Edmonton protocol.

CONCLUSION

We developed a novel procurement technique in cooperation with our kidney procurement team. This protocol for the procurement of pancreas and kidney from a NHBD enabled us to transplant islets into a type 1 diabetic patient and kidney into a renal failure patient.

Pancreatic islet transplantation for treating diabetes

Pancreatic islet transplantation is one of the options for treating diabetes and has been shown to improve the quality of life of severe diabetic patients. Since the Edmonton protocol was announced, islet transplantation have advanced considerably, including islet after kidney transplantation, utilisation of non-heart-beating donors, single-donor islet transplantation and living-donor islet transplantation. These advances were based on revised immunosuppression protocols, improved pancreas procurement and islet isolation methods, and enhanced islet engraftment. Further improvements are necessary to make islet transplantation a routine clinical treatment. To synergise efforts towards a cure for type 1 diabetes, a Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) Federation is currently being established to include leading diabetes research centres worldwide, including DRIs in Miami, Edmonton and Kyoto among others.

Internal assessment of a novel islet isolation facility in Spain

Islet transplantation is a promising therapy in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Herein we present the result from the first series of islet isolations carried out in our new islet isolation facility. The aims of study were to analyze the influence of various donor characteristics on the success of islet isolation and compare these outcomes with other European and American groups. Data from 22 completed islet isolation were used to compare donor and isolation variables among successful (>300,000 IEQs) versus unsuccessful isolations. The successful isolation rate from our laboratory was 31.8%. We did not see any significant differences between successful and unsuccessful groups according to donor characteristics, although age was close to significance (38.57 +/- 10.29 versus 48.33 +/- 12.39; P = .08). Donor age (1.12 [1.23; 0.99]) and body mass index (0.065 [1.32; 3.08]) were associated with isolation success in a logistic regression model. We did not find differences among intraprocedure variables with the exception of IEQ prepurification (409,073 +/- 115,041 versus 263,776 +/- 128,988; P < .05). IEQpre and IEQpost were positively correlated (P < .05). In comparison with other groups, we observed differences in some cases related to islet yield prepurification (P < .05) but not postpurification. Purity from our islet preparations was the highest from all considered groups (P < .05). Recovery was similar in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, donor characteristics have no influence on the success rate. The digestion step is a critical factor for success. Our results with respect to IE yield were close to that of experienced groups.

Effective islet isolation method with extremely high islet yields from adult pigs

Achieving good islet isolation is one of the most important factors for successful islet transplantation. Porcine pancreas is suitable for islet isolation research due to its anatomical and physiological similarities to human pancreas. In this study, we evaluated a new porcine islet isolation method designed to maximize islet yield and compared it with our previous open pan method and the standard method using a Ricordi chamber (Ricordi method). We performed 15 porcine islet isolations, five each with the new method, the open pan method, and the Ricordi method. The new method features several important improvements. Pancreata remain uncut and are kept intact during collagenase intraductal injection, a large filtration chamber to handle whole pancreata, low concentration of collagenase (Liberase HI) for digestion, and large plastic containers for large-scale islet purification. All isolated islets were assessed for yield, purity, viability and in vitro function. Islets isolated with this new method were transplanted under the kidney capsules of SCID mice with chemically induced diabetes for in vivo functional assessment (n = 8). With the new method, we obtained on average more than 1,000,000 islet equivalents (IE) (1,236,266 +/- 213,486 IE) (mean +/- SE) before purification and 800,000 IE (879,815 +/- 222,729 IE) after purification from one adult pig. Islet yield per pancreas was significantly higher compared with our previous open pan method (30,666 +/- 11,532 IE, p < 0.01) and the Ricordi method (317,073 +/- 86,093 IE, p < 0.05). All mice, transplanted with 1000 islets from the new method, returned to normoglycemia within 4 days after transplantation. Our new method makes it possible to obtain extremely high porcine islet yield with good function. It should produce useful information for human islet isolation and transplantation, and might be applied to single donor clinical xenogeneic transplantation.

Can the density of native pancreatic tissue slices predict human islet isolation and purification outcome?

INTRODUCTION

With currently available technology, the outcomes of human islet isolation and purification are still inconsistent, in part due to a lack of control of the pancreas donor and the procurement conditions. Using a single donor pancreas, the critical islet mass for establishing insulin independence of approximately 5000 engrafted islet equivalents (IEQ)/kg of recipient weight can only be retrieved from about one third of isolations. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether successful islet isolation and purification outcomes might be predicted from the density of native pancreatic tissue.

METHODS

Tissue slices (TS) were obtained from the neck of 9 nondistended human donor pancreata. The density of the TS was determined using gravity sedimentation in continuous density gradients under either iso-osmolar or hyperosmolar conditions. Correlation coefficients were calculated with regard to the density of isolated exocrine and endocrine tissue, donor age, body mass index (BMI), cold ischemia time (CIT), IEQ prepurification and postpurification, IEQ recovery, and purity.

RESULTS

(1) There was no change in density over time for TS in 300 mOsm/kg (mean, 1.079 +/- 0.0019 g/cm(3)) (2) In 500 mOsm/kg, there was a significant increase in density from 1.086 +/- 0.0021 g/cm(3) to 1.092 +/- 0.0021 g/cm(3) over time. (3) Density of isolated exocrine and endocrine became more distinct with lower density of TS (r = -0.776; P < .05). (4) Donor age, BMI, recovery of IEQ from gradients, and number of IEQ after purification did not correlate significantly with TS density. (5) In contrast, a significant inverse correlation existed betwen TS and CIT (r = -0.829; P < .05), and between TS versus IEQ number prior to purification (r = -0.867; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

No homogeneous distribution of pancreas tissue density was seen among 9 consecutive human organs. Taken together, the density of native pancreas TS is not a suitable sole predictor for successful islet isolation and purification.

Optimization in osmolality and range of density of a continuous ficoll-sodium-diatrizoate gradient for isopycnic purification of isolated human islets

INTRODUCTION

According to previous estimates from large animals and man, a minimum of approximately 5000 to 6000 engrafted islet equivalents (IEQ)/kg recipient weight is critical to establish insulin independence. Utilizing a single donor, this threshold yield of purified islets can be retrieved from approximately one third of all isolations. The aim of this study was to improve human islet purification by optimization of the osmolality and the density range of the continuous Ficoll-sodium-diatrizoate (FSD) gradient to facilitate consistent purities >80% of human islet preparations without considerable loss of islet yield.

METHODS

Aliquots of human pancreatic digests were placed on continuous density gradients. After centrifugation, sequential aliquots were extracted for amylase and insulin to determine the relative and cumulative density distribution of endocrine and exocrine tissue. We addressed the impact of two factors: (1) osmolalities (300 to 600 mosm/kg) in the gradient of FSD covering a density range of 1.070 to 1.100 g/cm(3); and (2) density (FSD 500/1.070 to 1.100) versus density-osmolarity gradient (DO-FSD 400-530/1.080 to 1.113).

RESULTS

The density of exocrine and endocrine tissue increased with rising osmolality. Differences in density of both tissues were highest at 450 and lowest at 300 and 600 mOsmol/kg. Purity and recovery were highest at 450 versus 400 or 500 mOsm/kg (NS). Exocrine but not endocrine tissue was more dense in DO-FSD than in FSD gradient (P < .05). The differences in density were 0.004 versus 0.013 g/cm(3) (P < .01), resulting in an increased islet purity and recovery.

CONCLUSION

The best osmolality for the FSD 1.070 to 1.100 g/cm(3) is at 450 mOsm/kg. Using the DO-FSD may improve human islet purification allowing successful clinical islet transplantation.