Prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in patients with clinical stage I seminoma undergoing surveillance—A systematic review

Factors impacting tumor displacement artifact and pseudo-lymphovascular invasion in testicular germ cell tumors

OBJECTIVES

Testicular germ cell tumors are susceptible to tumor displacement artifact (TDA), which produces pseudo-lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and confounds the identification of true LVI. Our study aimed to evaluate tumor displacement artifact and pseudo-LVI in testicular germ cell tumors and determine if prolonged fixation improves histological quality.

METHODS

A retrospective search identified 121 orchiectomies with slides that were reviewed to assess TDA and pseudo-LVI.

RESULTS

Seminoma had more TDA (68% vs 45%, P = .01) and pseudo-LVI (53% vs 19%, P < .001) than mixed germ cell tumor. Seminoma and mixed germ cell tumor with TDA and pseudo-LVI were larger than those without. Mixed germ cell tumor with ≥50% composition of seminoma had a higher rate of TDA (89% vs 38%, P = .008) and pseudo-LVI (44% vs 15%, P = .06) than those with less. TDA was reduced in seminoma with >1 night fixation compared to no fixation (50% vs 82%, P = .046), with a similar trend in mixed germ cell tumor (31% vs 60%, P = .15). A trend in reduction of pseudo-LVI was seen with >1 night fixation compared to no fixation in seminoma (64% vs 39%, P = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

Seminomas and larger germ cell tumors were more prone to TDA and pseudo-LVI. Prolonged formalin fixation improved histological quality in testicular germ cell tumors. Based on these data, we recommend fixation for at least 2 nights before sectioning orchiectomy specimens, particularly for larger tumors.

Follow-up of non-palpable testicular incidentalomas under 1 cm: does growth rate differentiate malignant and non-malignant lesions?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether small, incidentally detected testicular lesions can be safely followed up, by assessing growth rate and volume threshold for benign vs. malignant lesions.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study includes a consecutive series of 130 testicular incidentalomas < 1 cm and with negative tumour markers identified from October 2001 to November 2022, which were initially followed up with ultrasound. A total of 39 cases proceeded to surgery during the study period, either due to lesion growth (n = 28) or patient preference/recommendation by the referring urologist (n = 11). For the lesions that were growing, specific growth rate (SGR) and doubling time (DT) were calculated assuming an exponential growth pattern. In addition, the velocity of increase of the average diameter (∆Dav) and of the maximum diameter (∆Dmax) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 130 nodules that were initially followed up, six disappeared, eight were reduced in size, eighty-eight were stable, and twenty-eight increased in size. For operated nodules all 18 malignant tumours, 8/9 benign tumours, and 2/12 surgically proved non-neoplastic lesions were growing. The best cut-off values of the growth indicators to differentiate between malignant and non-malignant histology were 3.47 × 10-3%volume/day, ≤ 179 days, > 10 × 10-3 mm/day, and > 5 × 10-3 mm/day for SGR, DT, ∆Dmax, ∆Dav, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant and non-malignant small incidentalomas can be effectively differentiated based on growing parameters, even though overlap exists. An increase of the maximum diameter of about 1 mm and 2 mm in three months and in six months, respectively, suggests malignancy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Growing parameters allow an educated assessment of benign and malignant small testicular incidentalomas. Non-aggressive management is justified and safe when follow-up includes self-examination and tumour marker assessment to reduce the risk of interval tumour growth.

KEY POINTS

Small, non-palpable and asymptomatic testicular nodules < 1 cm are unexpectedly discovered during scrotal ultrasound. Growth indicators estimate the potential malignancy, even though overlap with non-malignant lesions exists. Non-growing incidentalomas can be safely followed up.

Current and Evolving Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Management of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors

Testicular cancer is the most common cancer among young adult men and has favorable outcomes, with survival rates approaching 99% and over 80% for those with early and advanced stage disease, respectively. Biomarkers play a critical role in the diagnosis, pre-treatment risk stratification, surveillance, and assessment of post-treatment disease response in these men. Traditional serum tumor markers (STMs), which include alpha fetoprotein (AFP), beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), are limited by low sensitivity (approximately 50%) during initial diagnosis; false-positive elevations as a result of other benign and malignant conditions; and negative levels in low-stage disease and in certain histologies such as teratoma and seminoma. As a result, novel biomarkers with potentially better performance characteristics, including microRNA (miRNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and circulating tumor cells (CTCs), are being investigated. MicroRNAs are small noncoding RNA involved in transcription and translation and regulate the expression of almost one-third of human genes that regulate the cell cycle, differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. In germ cell tumor (GCT) patients, miR371a-3p has been identified as a promising biomarker with sensitivity and specificity of approximately 90-92% and 84-86%, respectively. The use of this new biomarker could aid in several clinical scenarios, such as predicting the presence of micrometastases in chemotherapy-naïve patients with clinical stage I-II disease, thereby guiding decisions on treatment versus surveillance and predicting the presence of viable GCT in patients with residual disease post chemotherapy. Clinical trials are ongoing to validate the use of miRNA 371 as a biomarker and to define its performance characteristics. Though promising, miRNAs are limited by their inability to detect teratoma. ctDNA and CTCs are two other emerging biomarkers, though further studies are needed to clarify their role in managing patients with GCT.

Characteristics and prognosis of testicular mixed teratoma and seminoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the association of demographic and clinicopathological characteristics with the survival of patients with testicular mixed teratoma and seminoma (TMTS).

METHODS

The data of 3296 eligible patients with TMTS who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2015 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The association of demographic and clinicopathological characteristics with the OS and CSS of patients with TMTS was assessed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

The number of patients with TMTS increased annually. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, TMTS patients with advanced T stage (P < 0.001 for OS and P < 0.001 for CSS), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001 for OS and P < 0.001 for CSS), distant metastasis (P < 0.001 for OS and P < 0.001 for CSS), no regional lymph node resection (P = 0.003 for OS and P = 0.002 for CSS), large tumor size (P = 0.001 for OS and P = 0.001 for CSS), and LVI (P < 0.001 for OS and P < 0.001 for CSS) exhibited inferior OS and CSS. Moreover, distant metastasis (HR 11.224, P < 0.001; HR 15.817, P < 0.001) and regional lymph node resection (HR 0.425, P = 0.003; HR 0.366, P = 0.004) were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with TMTS through multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Distant metastasis and lymph node metastasis were deemed important prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with TMTS. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding and clinical assessments of these prognostic factors are necessary before tailoring clinical management and treatment plan specified for patients with TMTS.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Testicular germ cell cancer

OBJECTIVE

To update the recommendations for the management of germ cell tumours of the testis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comprehensive PubMed review from 2022 on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of testicular germ cell tumours (TGT), as well as safety of treatments. The level of evidence of the studies was assessed.

RESULTS

The initial assessment of a patient with a germ cell tumour of the testis is based on a clinical examination, biological evaluation (by measuring the serum markers AFP, total hCG, and LDH) and radiological evaluation (scrotal ultrasound and thoraco-abdomino-pelvic computed tomography [TAP]). Inguinal orchiectomy is the first therapeutic step, as it allows histological diagnosis and defines the local stage and risk factors for progression in stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs). For patients with pure stage I seminoma, the risk of progression is between 15 and 20%, so surveillance is preferred in compliant patients; adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin AUC 7 is an option; and the indications for lumbo-aortic radiotherapy are limited. For patients with stage I NSGCT, various options exist, namely, surveillance or a risk-adapted strategy (surveillance or 1 cycle of bleomycin etoposide cisplatin [BEP] depending on the presence or absence of vascular emboli within the tumour). Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for staging has a very limited role. Treatment of metastatic GCT consists of chemotherapy with BEP in the absence of contraindication to bleomycin, the number of cycles of which is defined according to the prognostic groups of the International Germ Cell Cancer Consortium Group (IGCCCG). Lumbo-aortic radiotherapy is still the standard treatment for stage IIA seminomatous germ cell tumours (SGCTs). At the end of chemotherapy, the size of any residual mass should be assessed via a TAP scan for SNGCTs, with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection recommended for any residual mass greater than 1cm, along with removal of all other metastatic sites. For SGCT, reassessment via 18FDG PET scans is necessary to determine the surgical indication for residual masses>3cm. Surgery remains rare in these situations.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to the recommendations for the management of GCT results in excellent specific survival rates of 99% for patients with stage I disease and over 85% for patients with metastatic disease.

Contemporary Role of Radiation Therapy in Testicular Cancer

Testicular cancer is a rare but curable male malignancy. Seminoma represents the majority of germ cell tumors and is considered radiation sensitive. Radiation treatment plays a role in adjuvant therapy after orchiectomy of stage I, IIA, and IIB seminomas. Radiation dose de-escalation has been effective in preventing tumor recurrences while also limiting acute and long-term toxicities. However, long-term risks, including the prevailing concern of secondary malignancy risk, between adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy play a role in recommendations. Ongoing work continues to be performed to reduce radiation field and dose in combination with chemotherapy while still maintaining excellent outcomes.

Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Clinical Stage I Seminoma: An Individual Patient Data Analysis by the European Association of Urology Testicular Cancer Guidelines Panel and Guidelines Office

BACKGROUND

The relapse rate in patients with clinical stage I (CSI) seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis (SGCTT) who were undergoing surveillance after radical orchidectomy is 4-30%, depending on tumor size and rete testis invasion (RTI). However, the level of evidence supporting the use of both risk factors in clinical decision-making is low.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the most important prognostic factors for relapse in CSI SGCTT patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Individual patient data for 1016 CSI SGCTT patients diagnosed between 1994 and 2019 with normal postorchidectomy serum tumor marker levels and undergoing surveillance were collected from nine institutions.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were fit to identify the most important prognostic factors. The primary endpoint was the time to first relapse by imaging and/or markers. Relapse probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

After a median follow-up of 7.7 yr, 149 (14.7%) patients had relapsed. Categorical tumor size (≤2, >2-5, and >5 cm), presence of RTI, and lymphovascular invasion were used to form three risk groups: low (56.4%), intermediate (41.3%), and high (2.3%) risks with 5-yr cumulative relapse probabilities of 8%, 20%, and 44%, respectively. The model outperformed the currently used model with tumor size ≤4 versus >4 cm and presence of RTI (Harrell's C index 0.65 vs 0.61). The low- and intermediate-risk groups were validated successfully in an independent cohort of 285 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of relapse after radical orchidectomy in CSI SGCTT patients under surveillance is low. We propose a new risk stratification model that outperformed the current model and identified a small subgroup with a high risk of relapse.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The risk of relapse after radical orchidectomy in patients with clinical stage I seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis is low. We propose a new risk stratification model that outperformed the current model and identified a small subgroup with a high risk of relapse.

Detection of Recurrence through microRNA-371a-3p Serum Levels in a Follow-up of Stage I Testicular Germ Cell Tumors in the DRKS-00019223 Study

PURPOSE

Surveillance of clinical stage I (CSI) testicular germ cell tumors (GCT) is hampered by low sensitivity and specificity of current biomarkers for detecting relapses. This study evaluated if serum levels of microRNA371a-3p (M371 test) can: (i) Accurately detect relapses, (ii) detect relapses earlier than conventional technology, and (iii) if elevated postoperative M371 levels may predict relapse.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a multicentric setting, 258 patients with testicular CSI GCT were prospectively followed by surveillance for a median time of 18 months with serial measurements of serum M371 levels, in addition to standard diagnostic techniques. Diagnostic characteristics of M371 for detecting relapses were calculated using ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients recurred (15.1%), all with elevated M371 levels; eight without relapse had elevations, too. The test revealed the following characteristics: area under the ROC curve of 0.993, sensitivity 100%, specificity 96.3%, positive predictive value 83%, negative predictive value 100%. Earlier relapse detection with the test was found in 28%, with non-significant median time gain to diagnosis. Postoperative M371 levels did not predict future relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity and specificity of the M371 test for detecting relapses in CSI GCTs are much superior to those of conventional diagnostics. However, post-orchiectomy M371 levels are not predictive of relapse, and there is no significant earlier relapse detection with the test. In all, there is clear evidence for the utility of the M371 test for relapse detection suggesting it may soon be ready for implementation into routine follow-up schedules for patients with testicular GCT.

Prognostic Factors for Relapse in Patients With Clinical Stage I Testicular Seminoma: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Approximately 20% of patients with clinical stage I seminoma relapse. Tumor size and rete testis invasion have been identified as risk factors for relapse. However, the level of evidence supporting the use of these risk factors in clinical decision making is low. Previous studies have been hampered by selection bias and variable pathology reporting that limit interpretation and generalization of results. We assessed prognostic factors for relapse in an unselected nationwide population-based setting with centralized pathology review.

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage I seminoma diagnosed from January 2013 to December 2018 were identified in the prospective Danish Testicular Cancer database. By linkage to the Danish National Pathology Registry, histologic slides from the orchiectomy specimens were retrieved and reviewed blinded to the clinical outcome. Clinical data were obtained from medical records with follow-up until July 2022. The association between prespecified potential clinical and histopathologic prognostic factors and relapse was assessed by the use of Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 924 patients included, 148 (16%) patients relapsed during a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Invasion of the testicular hilum (rete testis and hilar soft tissue), lymphovascular invasion, and elevated preorchiectomy levels of β-human chorionic gonadotropin and lactate dehydrogenase were independent predictors of relapse. The estimated 5-year risk of relapse ranged from 6% in patients with no risk factors to 62% in patients with all four risk factors with tumor extension into the hilar soft tissue of the testicular hilum. After internal model validation, the prognostic model had an overall concordance statistic of 0.70.

CONCLUSION

The provided prognostic factors could replace current risk factors in guidelines and be used in future studies investigating risk-adapted follow-up and treatment strategies.

Testicular Tumors

BACKGROUND

Germ-cell tumors of the testes are the most common type of malignant tumor in men aged 20 to 40. Their incidence in Germany is 10 per 100 000 men per year, with an estimated 4200 new cases annually.

METHODS

This selective review is based on the recommendations of the German clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care of testicular germ-cell tumors, as well as on pertinent original articles and reviews.

RESULTS

The treatment of germ-cell tumors requires an interdisciplinary approach comprising resection of the affected testis followed by further steps that depend on the histological type and stage of the tumor, which may include active surveillance, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, further surgery, or some combination of these measures. Two-thirds of germ-cell tumors are diagnosed in clinical stage I, when they are still confined to the testis; one-third are already metastatic when diagnosed, with organ metastases in 10-15%. Stage-based multimodal treatment approaches are associated with cure rates of more than 99% for stage I tumors and 67-95% for advanced metastatic disease, depending on the degree of progression.

CONCLUSION

For patients with early-stage tumors, overtreatment should be avoided in order to minimize long-term sequelae. For those whose tumors are in advanced stages, it must be decided which patients should receive intensified treatment to optimize the outcome. Multimodal treatment approaches are associated with high cure rates even for patients with metastatic disease.

SPTBN1 Mediates the Cytoplasmic Constraint of PTTG1, Impairing Its Oncogenic Activity in Human Seminoma

Seminoma is the most common testicular cancer. Pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 (PTTG1) is a securin showing oncogenic activity in several tumors. We previously demonstrated that nuclear PTTG1 promotes seminoma tumor invasion through its transcriptional activity on matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and E-cadherin (CDH1). We wondered if specific interactors could affect its subcellular distribution. To this aim, we investigated the PTTG1 interactome in seminoma cell lines showing different PTTG1 nuclear levels correlated with invasive properties. A proteomic approach upon PTTG1 immunoprecipitation uncovered new specific securin interactors. Western blot, confocal microscopy, cytoplasmic/nuclear fractionation, sphere-forming assay, and Atlas database interrogation were performed to validate the proteomic results and to investigate the interplay between PTTG1 and newly uncovered partners. We observed that spectrin beta-chain (SPTBN1) and PTTG1 were cofactors, with SPTBN1 anchoring the securin in the cytoplasm. SPTBN1 downregulation determined PTTG1 nuclear translocation, promoting its invasive capability. Moreover, a PTTG1 deletion mutant lacking SPTBN1 binding was strongly localized in the nucleus. The Atlas database revealed that seminomas that contained higher nuclear PTTG1 levels showed significantly lower SPTBN1 levels in comparison to non-seminomas. In human seminoma specimens, we found a strong PTTG1/SPTBN1 colocalization that decreases in areas with nuclear PTTG1 distribution. Overall, these results suggest that SPTBN1, along with PTTG1, is a potential prognostic factor useful in the clinical management of seminoma.

Surveillance as a safe and effective option for treatment of stage I seminoma

Introdubction: Stage I seminoma has a very good prognosis, yet approximately 15% have subclinical metastatic disease and will relapse after orchidectomy alone. Several management approaches have been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of real-world patients with stage I seminoma, analysing prognostic factors influencing treatment choice and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective, single institution study, with 55 patients diagnosed with clinical stage I seminoma between 2007 and 2020. Selected patients were analysed regarding three management approaches - surveillance, adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant carboplatin AUC7. Overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes were analysed. Predictors of treatment choice were determined, and predictors of recurrence were analysed in patients on active surveillance.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 91 months (13-165). Overall survival at 10 years was 98.2%. Stage I seminoma patients had a 1-, 3- and 10-year progression free survival of 98%, 94% and 89%, respectively. Three-year progression free survival was 92.0% for those on active surveillance (IC95%, 91.5-92.5%), 95.2% for carboplatin (IC95%, 94.8-95.6%) and 100% for those on adjuvant radiotherapy (p > 0.05). All relapses on active surveillance protocols occurred during the first 24 months. Overall, 43% of patients who underwent adjuvant treatment reported adverse effects of therapy, with higher incidence on radiotherapy group (63%).

CONCLUSIONS

Stage I seminoma have excellent prognosis, high cure rates, and low treatment-associated morbidity. Active surveillance is a safe modality when applied to selected patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin show similar results, with fewer adverse effects on chemotherapy arm.

Outcomes of surveillance versus adjuvant treatment for patients with stage-I seminoma: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

Testicular germ cell tumors (seminoma/non-seminoma) are the most common carcinomas in young males, comprising approximately 1% of all carcinomas. In stage-I disease, orchiectomy can cure approximately 85% of patients. Post-surgical options are adjuvant therapy and active surveillance. Our study examined the effects of management options on stage-I seminoma patients followed in our center.

METHODS

We evaluated the patients with stage-I testicular seminoma who underwent radical orchiectomy and followed up in the oncology center between 2001 and 2022. The outcomes of management options, survivals were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic significance of risk factors for relapse on survival was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 140 patients with stage-I seminoma, 49 (35%) were treated with adjuvant therapy, and 91 (65%) underwent surveillance. The median follow-up duration was 37 months. During the follow-up period, nine patients in the active surveillance group and four in the adjuvant therapy group had a recurrence. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.67). In the surveillance group, the univariate and multivariate analyzes identified the presence of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.005, HR: 0.13) as significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS). In the surveillance cohort, the 5-year DFS rate was 60% for patients with lymphovascular invasion and 93% for those without. There was statistical significance between the two groups (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that adjuvant therapy does not significantly improve DFS compared to surveillance in patients. In addition, it has been shown that lymphovascular invasion is an important prognostic indicator for DFS in determining the treatment strategy.

Stage I seminoma: Outcome of different treatment modalities and changes in patterns of care. A single institution experience

BACKGROUND

The mainstay for management of stage I seminoma is high inguinal orchiectomy with post-orchiectomy therapeutic options including active surveillance, chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze different post-orchiectomy treatment modalities outcomes of stage I seminoma patients presented to NCI, Cairo University in the period from 2005-2019.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients' records with clinical stage I seminoma who presented to our institute in the period from 2005-2019 was done. Adjuvant treatment details were extracted and we compared overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) for different modalities and changes in patterns of care over this period.

RESULTS

Thirty five patients were identified with thirty three patients eligible for analysis. Median age was 35 years (range, 19-52). Fourteen patients were kept under active surveillance, eleven patients received adjuvant carboplatin and eight patients received adjuvant radiation to para-aortic chain. Five-year OS was 100% for all patients regardless post-operative approach. Five-year DFS was 100% for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy versus 93% for patients who were kept under active surveillance (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Clinical stage I seminoma is a favorable disease entity with favorable disease related outcomes regardless post-operative approach. Active surveillance is reasonable and safe given equal survival to active treatment.

Testicular Neoplasms: Primary Tumour Size Is Closely Interrelated with Histology, Clinical Staging, and Tumour Marker Expression Rates-A Comprehensive Statistical Analysis

The role of primary tumour size (TS) in the clinical course of testicular tumours is incompletely understood. We retrospectively evaluated 641 consecutive patients with testicular neoplasms with regard to TS, histology, clinical stage (CS), serum tumour marker (STM) expression and patient age using descriptive statistical methods. TS ≤ 10 mm was encountered in 13.6% of cases. Median TS of 10 mm, 30 mm, 35 mm, and 53 mm were found in benign tumours, seminomas, nonseminomas, and other malignant tumours, respectively. In cases with TS ≤ 10 mm, 50.6% had benign tumours. Upon receiver operating characteristics analysis, TS of > 16 mm revealed 81.5% sensitivity and 81.0% specificity for detecting malignancy. In subcentimeter germ cell tumours (GCTs), 97.7% of cases had CS1, and CS1 frequency dropped with increasing TS. Expression rates of all STMs significantly increased with TS. MicroRNA-371a-3p (M371) serum levels had higher expression rates than classical STMs, with a rate of 44.1% in subcentimeter GCTs. In all, TS is a biologically relevant factor owing to its significant associations with CS, STM expression rates and histology. Importantly, 50% of subcentimeter testicular neoplasms are of benign nature, and M371 outperforms the classical markers even in subcentimeter tumours.

Biomarkers of disease recurrence in stage I testicular germ cell tumours

Stage I testicular cancer is a disease restricted to the testicle. After orchiectomy, patients are considered to be without disease; however, the tumour is prone to relapse in ~4-50% of patients. Current predictive markers of relapse, which are tumour size and invasion to rete testis (in seminoma) or lymphovascular invasion (in non-seminoma), have limited clinical utility and are unable to correctly predict relapse in a substantial proportion of patients. Adjuvant therapeutic strategies based on available biomarkers can lead to overtreatment of 50-85% of patients. Discovery and implementation of novel biomarkers into treatment decision making will help to reduce the burden of adjuvant treatments and improve patient selection for adjuvant therapy.

PTTG1/ZEB1 Axis Regulates E-Cadherin Expression in Human Seminoma

Simple Summary

Seminoma represents one of the most common neoplasms in Caucasian males between 15 and 40 years old. The molecular pathways underlying its clinical behavior are far from being understood yet. We previously demonstrated that nuclear Pituitary-tumor transforming-gene 1 (PTTG1), overexpressed in several neoplasms, promotes invasiveness through its transcriptional target matrix-metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2). PTTG1 sustains the migratory and invasive properties of cancer cells through the induction of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). E-Cadherin (E-CAD) repression is the first step of EMT. Therefore, we investigated the role of PTTG1 in EMT in human seminoma using an in vitro and in vivo model and through Atlas database interrogation. Our data showed a PTTG1-mediated E-CAD transcriptional repression through Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), a master regulator of the EMT process. Our data provide insights into the molecular characterization of seminoma, promoting PTTG1 as a prognostic marker useful in human seminoma clinical management.

Abstract

(1) Background: PTTG1 sustains the EMT process and the invasiveness of several neoplasms. We previously showed the role of nuclear PTTG1 in promoting invasiveness, through its transcriptional target MMP2, in seminoma in vitro models. Here, we investigated the key players involved in PTTG1-mediated EMT in human seminoma. (2) Methods: Two seminoma cell lines and four human seminoma tumor specimens were used. E-Cadherin gene regulation was investigated using Western blot, real-time PCR, and luciferase assay. Immunoprecipitation, ChIP, RE-ChIP, and confocal microscopy analysis were performed to evaluate the interplay between PTTG1 and ZEB1. Matrigel invasion and spheroid formation assays were applied to functionally investigate PTTG1 involvement in the EMT of seminoma cell lines. RNA depletion and overexpression experiments were performed to verify the role of PTTG1/ZEB1 in E-Cadherin repression and seminoma invasiveness. E-Cadherin and ZEB1 levels were analyzed in human testicular tumors from the Atlas database. (3) Results: PTTG1 transcriptionally represses E-Cadherin in seminoma cell lines through ZEB1. The cooperation of PTTG1 with ZEB1 has a significant impact on cell growth/invasion properties involving the EMT process. Analysis of the Atlas database of testicular tumors showed significantly lower E-Cadherin levels in seminoma, where PTTG1 showed nuclear staining. Finally, PTTG1 and ZEB1 strongly localize together in the periphery of the tumors. (4) Conclusions: These results strengthen the evidence for a role of PTTG1 in the EMT process in human seminomas through its cooperation with the transcriptional repressor ZEB1 on the E-Cadherin gene. Our data enrich the molecular characterization of seminoma, suggesting that PTTG1 is a prognostic factor in seminoma clinical management.

Hodentumoren aus klinischer Sicht

Hintergrund

Keimzelltumoren des Hodens sind die häufigste maligne Tumorerkrankung bei Männern im Alter von 15–40 Jahren. Die Unterscheidung von Seminomen und Nichtseminomen hat prognostische Bedeutung und ist für Therapieplanung und Nachsorge essenziell. Durch interdisziplinäre, stadiengerechte Therapie haben Keimzelltumoren generell eine sehr gute Prognose. Eine Übertherapie sollte wegen möglicher Langzeitfolgen vermieden werden. Hierbei hilft die Risikobeurteilung anhand klinischer und pathologischer Faktoren.

Ziel der Arbeit

Darstellung der (histo-)pathologischen Charakteristika, die die uroonkologische Therapieplanung maßgeblich beeinflussen.

Material und Methoden

Nichtsystematischer Übersichtsartikel über die relevanten (histo-)pathologischen Befunde für die klinische Therapieplanung im interdisziplinären Kontext.

Ergebnisse

Zentrale Pathologiebefunde für Kliniker:Innen sind: (i) Identifikation eines Keimzelltumors, ggf. durch Nachweis eines Chromosom-12p-Zugewinns, (ii) Subtypenspezifizierung und (iii) Angabe von Risikofaktoren (insbesondere Invasion von Lymphgefäßen und/oder Rete testis und Tumorgröße). Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen i. S. von Mutationsanalysen sind angesichts einer sehr geringen Mutationslast und bislang fehlender prädiktiver Marker und zielgerichteter Therapieoptionen nicht Teil der Routinediagnostik.

Diskussion

Ein detaillierter, idealerweise synoptischer histopathologischer Befundbericht ist Grundlage der Planung und Durchführung einer leitlinienkonformen, risikoadaptierten Therapie und neben der bildgebenden Diagnostik und der Bestimmung der Serumtumormarker AFP und β‑HCG (letztere insbesondere bei Nichtseminomen) mitentscheidend, um die guten Heilungsaussichten zu wahren und eine Übertherapie zu vermeiden.

[Follow-up of testicular germ cell tumors-historical aspects and current recommendations]

Systematic follow-up examinations of patients cured of testicular cancer first gained attention by caregivers in the 1980s only after the management of the disease had significantly been improved by the introduction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and almost synchronously, by the implementation of computerized tomography (CT) and serum tumor markers. Follow-up involves three aims: early diagnosis of recurrence, detection of treatment-related toxicity, and detection of secondary diseases. As the clinical presentation of testicular cancer is very heterogeneous, there is no uniform follow-up for the disease. Instead, risk-adapted follow-up schedules are required. Since the release of the German AWMF S3 guideline for the management of testicular cancer in 2019, high level evidence has accumulated for the noninferiority of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to CT with regard to abdominal imaging. Therefore, it is appropriate to modify the recommendations for follow-up given in the 2019 issue of the S3 guidelines. The modifications recommended herein relate to three issues: (1) Only three risk groups (instead of formerly four) are identified, i.e., seminoma (all stages); nonseminoma clinical stage 1b (i.e., pT2, with lymphovascular invasion) on surveillance; nonseminoma all other stages. All patients cured from poor risk disease or from relapses require individual follow-up schedules not included in the recommendations tabulated herein. (2) CT and abdominal sonography are replaced by MRI. (3) Chest X‑ray imaging during follow-up of seminoma patients is no longer recommended.

piRNAs and PIWI Proteins as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers of Genitourinary Cancers

piRNAs (PIWI-interacting RNAs) are small non-coding RNAs capable of regulation of transposon and gene expression. piRNAs utilise multiple mechanisms to affect gene expression, which makes them potentially more powerful regulators than microRNAs. The mechanisms by which piRNAs regulate transposon and gene expression include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and mRNA degradation. Genitourinary cancers (GC) are a large group of neoplasms that differ by their incidence, clinical course, biology, and prognosis for patients. Regardless of the GC type, metastatic disease remains a key therapeutic challenge, largely affecting patients’ survival rates. Recent studies indicate that piRNAs could serve as potentially useful biomarkers allowing for early cancer detection and therapeutic interventions at the stage of non-advanced tumour, improving patient’s outcomes. Furthermore, studies in prostate cancer show that piRNAs contribute to cancer progression by affecting key oncogenic pathways such as PI3K/AKT. Here, we discuss recent findings on biogenesis, mechanisms of action and the role of piRNAs and the associated PIWI proteins in GC. We also present tools that may be useful for studies on the functioning of piRNAs in cancers.

Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma-beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate evidence on prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in clinical stage I nonseminoma patients other than lymphovascular invasion (LVI).

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search in the biomedical databases Medline (via Ovid) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (search period January 2010 to February 2021) for full text publications in English and German language, reporting on retro- or prospectively assessed prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in patients with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.

RESULTS

Our literature search yielded eleven studies reporting on 20 potential prognostic factors. Results are based on cohort studies of mostly moderate to low quality. Five out of eight studies found a significant association of embryonal carcinoma (EC) in the primary tumor with relapse. Among the different risk definitions of embryonal carcinoma (presence, predominance, pure), presence of EC alone seems to be sufficient for prognostification. Interesting results were found for rete testis invasion, predominant yolk sac tumor, T-stage and history of cryptorchidism, but the sparse data situation does not justify their clinical use.

CONCLUSIONS

No additional factors that meet the prognostic value of LVI, especially when determined by immunohistochemistry, could be identified through our systematic search. The presence of EC might serve as a second, subordinate prognostic factor for clinical use as the data situation is less abundant than the one of LVI. Further efforts are necessary to optimize the use of these two prognostic factors and to evaluate and validate further potential factors with promising preliminary data.

Testicular germ cell tumours' clinical stage I: comparison of surveillance with adjuvant treatment strategies regarding recurrence rates and overall survival-a systematic review

PURPOSE

Testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs) represent the most common malignancy in young adult males with two thirds of all cases presenting with clinical stage I (CSI). Active surveillance is the management modality mostly favoured by current guidelines. This systematic review assesses the treatment results in CSI patients concerning recurrence rate and overall survival in non-seminoma (NS) and pure seminoma (SE) resulting from surveillance in comparison to adjuvant strategies.

METHODS/SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

We performed a systematic literature review confining the search to most recent studies published 2010-2021 that reported direct comparisons of surveillance to adjuvant management. We searched Medline and the Cochrane Library with additional hand-searching of reference lists to identify relevant studies. Data extraction and quality assessment of included studies were performed with stratification for histology (NS vs. SE) and treatment modalities. The results were tabulated and evaluated with descriptive statistical methods.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. In NS patients relapse rates were 12 to 37%, 0 to 10%, and 0 to 11.8% for surveillance, chemotherapy and for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) while overall survival rates were 90.7-100%, 91.7-100%, and 97-99.1%, respectively. In SE CSI, relapse rates were 0-22.3%, 0-5%, and 0-12.5% for surveillance, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, while overall survival rates were 84.1-98.7%, 83.5-100%, and 92.3-100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In both histologic subgroups, active surveillance offers almost identical overall survival as adjuvant management strategies, however, at the expense of higher relapse rates. Each of the management strategies in CSI GCT patients have specific merits and shared-decision-making is advised to tailor treatment.

Screening for the Key Proteins Associated with Rete Testis Invasion in Clinical Stage I Seminoma via Label-Free Quantitative Mass Spectrometry

Rete testis invasion (RTI) is an unfavourable prognostic factor for the risk of relapse in clinical stage I (CS I) seminoma patients. Notably, no evidence of difference in the proteome of RTI-positive vs. -negative CS I seminomas has been reported yet. Here, a quantitative proteomic approach was used to investigate RTI-associated proteins. 64 proteins were differentially expressed in RTI-positive compared to -negative CS I seminomas. Of them, 14-3-3γ, ezrin, filamin A, Parkinsonism-associated deglycase 7 (PARK7), vimentin and vinculin, were validated in CS I seminoma patient cohort. As shown by multivariate analysis controlling for clinical confounders, PARK7 and filamin A expression lowered the risk of RTI, while 14-3-3γ expression increased it. Therefore, we suggest that in real clinical biopsy specimens, the expression level of these proteins may reflect prognosis in CS I seminoma patients.

[Testicular and penile cancer-survival and quality of life : New guideline and network for second opinions]

Testicular cancer occupies a special position in several respects. Although it belongs to the group of rare tumors, which is why extensive experience in treating this tumor can not be guaranteed, interdisciplinary experts collaboration and the consequent implementation of clinical studies have resulted in standardized treatment recommendations. Because testicular cancer is one of the most curable cancers, long-term toxicity and treatment sequelae are of special importance. In the early stages, toxicity could be reduced by minimizing therapy to the extent possible, but without decreasing treatment success. Nevertheless, treatment is still controversially discussed, especially concerning treatment of stage I disease. Finally particular focus should be paid to non-germinal tumors which are even more rare, but partly also more dangerous. Therefore known facts should be made available for the broad medical community. In penile cancer, which is also a very rare tumor entity, organ-sparing surgery and consequent invasive lymph node staging are mandatory.

[non-metastasised clincial stage I testicular germ cell tumours : Patient information, suitability and limitations of surveillance]

BACKGROUND

Surveillance is the most frequently used treatment option in testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) patients in nonmetastasised clinical stage I (cSI).

OBJECTIVES

Presentation of indications for surveillance, the process of individual patient's advice and the limitations of surveillance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An overview of the current literature is given, including basic research, systemic reviews and expert recommendations. Basic principles are illustrated by case reports.

RESULTS

The risk of progression for cSI TGCT patients under surveillance is 5-30% for seminomas and 15-50% for nonseminomas. Surveillance is the preferred treatment option in seminoma and low-risk nonseminoma without lymphovascular invasion. Patients should be informed concerning the individual risk of progression, the possibilities of adjuvant therapy, side effects of adjuvant therapy, the kind of therapy in case of progression and the cure rate. A high risk of progression, psychological issues and malcompliance are important limitations of surveillance.

CONCLUSION

By thoroughly considering the limitations of surveillance, cSI TGCT patients can be safely treated with surveillance.

Contemporary trends in management of stage 1 seminoma

PURPOSE

Surveillance is now the preferred treatment strategy for patients with stage 1A/1B seminoma as reflected by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. In this study, we aimed to describe trends in adjuvant management strategy for stage 1A/B seminoma from 2004 to 2016 using the National Cancer Database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The database was queried for patients diagnosed with stage 1A/1B seminoma between 2004 and 2016. Staging was determined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines. Surveillance was defined as no treatment with chemotherapy or radiation within 60 days of diagnosis. Proportions of cancer patients utilizing surveillance, radiation, and single-agent chemotherapy were summarized annually. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare overall survival between groups.

RESULTS

8,686 patients with stage 1A/1B seminoma met inclusion criteria over the course of the study period. Overall, 3,004 (34.6%) patients began adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation within 60 days. Utilization of surveillance increased from 39.8% in 2004 to 86.8% in 2016 while utilization of radiation decreased from 59.7% to 4.6%. High-volume centers adopted surveillance earlier than low-volume centers.

CONCLUSION

This study describes trends in utilization of surveillance, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for stage 1A/1B seminoma over 12 years. A major shift from utilization of adjuvant treatment to surveillance in patients with stage 1A/B seminoma is observed in this large national cancer database; a minority of patients now receive adjuvant treatment and risk-related toxicities. Survival analysis reveals similar survival at a median 5-year follow-up. The results provide insight into the time needed for clinical practice to adopt the preferred approach of surveillance over the time period studied.

Clinical utility of the AJCC 8th edition pT1 subclassification and impact on practice patterns in stage I seminoma

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer 8^th edition staging guidelines for testicular cancer established a 3 cm cutoff to subclassify stage T1 seminomas (<3 cm = pT1a and ≥3 cm = pT1b). The efficacy of this cutoff in predicting metastatic disease and impact on treatment patterns have not been studied.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with pT1 testicular seminoma in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. Receiver operating curves were used to determine the efficacy of the 3 cm tumor cutoff in identifying metastatic disease, and multivariable regression was used to compute the effect of tumor size on the rate of adjuvant therapy among Stage I patients.

RESULTS

A total of 10,134 patients with pT1 seminoma were evaluated. The current size cutoff of 3 cm for subclassification did not exhibit high discrimination in identifying metastatic disease (area under receiver operating curve: 0.546). Surveillance has grown as the preferred treatment after orchiectomy -32.1% in 2004 to 81.2% in 2015. However, the rate of adjuvant therapy for pT1, Stage I seminomas associated positively with tumor size even with adjustment for year of diagnosis. For tumors above 3 cm, the odds ratio stabilized around 1.9. By using the 3 cm cutoff to guide adjuvant therapy, up to 85% of T1b patients may be overtreated.

CONCLUSION

The 3 cm cutoff for subclassification of Stage I seminoma does not predict metastatic recurrence but is associated with increased receipt of adjuvant therapy. A 3 cm cutoff and the pT1a/b classification may therefore contribute to overtreatment in many young patients with a long life expectancy for whom minimizing adverse effects should be prioritized.

Discrepancy in pathology reports upon second review of radical orchiectomy specimens for testicular germ cell tumors

INTRODUCTION

We sought to evaluate the discrepancies between primary pathology report and second pathology review of radical orchiectomy (RO) specimens.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of RO specimens from the Ontario Cancer Registry. All cases required both a primary pathology report and a second pathology review from another institution. Histopathological variables assessed included histological subtype and components of mixed germ cell tumor (GCT), pathological tumor (pT) stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), spermatic cord invasion, and surgical margin.

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 2015, 5048 ROs were performed with 2719 (53.9%) seminoma and 2029 (40.2%) non-seminoma. Of these, 519 (10.3%) received a second pathology review. There was concordance between primary pathology report and second pathology review in 326 (62.8%) cases. The most common discrepancies involved a change in pT stage (n=148, 28.5%), with upstaging in 83 (16%) and downstaging in 65 (12.5%) cases relative to the original pT stage. The second most common discrepancy regarded the reporting of LVI (n=121, 23.3%), with 62 (11.9%) reporting presence of LVI when the primary pathology report did not. Other discrepancies included a change in the histological subtype in 28 (5.4%) cases and spermatic cord margin status in five (9.6%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 10% of orchiectomy specimens underwent a second pathology review, with nearly 40% of reviews leading to a meaningful change in parameters. Such variation could lead to incorrect tumor staging, estimate of relapse risk, and inappropriate treatment decisions. Expert pathology review of RO specimens should be considered, as it has significant implications for decision-making.

Controversies in the management of clinical stage 1 testis cancer

In November 2018, The Canadian Testis Cancer Workshop was convened.  The two-day workshop involved urologists, medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, physician’s assistants, residents and fellows, nurses, patients and patient advocacy groups.   One of the goals of the workshop was to discuss the challenging areas of testis cancer care where guidelines may not be specific.  The objective was to distill through discussion around cases, expert approach to working through these challenges. Herein we present a summary of discussion from the workshop around controversies in the management of clinical stage 1 (CS1) disease. CS1 represents organ confined non-metastatic testis cancer that represents approximately 70-80% of men at presentation. Regardless of management, CS1 has an excellent prognosis. However, without adjuvant treatment, approximately 30% of CS1 nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) and 15% of CS1 seminoma relapse. The workshop reviewed that while surveillance has become the standard for the majority of patients with CS1 disease there remains debate in the management of patients at high-risk of relapse. The controversy in the management of CS1 testis cancer surrounds the optimal balance between the morbidity of overtreatment and the identification of patients who may derive most benefit from adjuvant treatment. The challenge lies in a shared decision process where discussion of options extends beyond the simple risk of relapse but to include the long-term toxicities of adjuvant treatments and the favorable cancer-specific survival.    

Two cycles of adjuvant carboplatin for clinical stage 1 testicular seminoma in New Zealand centres: A retrospective analysis of efficacy and long-term events

Background

Adjuvant carboplatin reduces relapse risk in clinical stage 1 (CS1) seminoma, though there is a paucity of long‐term safety data.

Aim

Our objective was to report long‐term outcomes of two cycles of adjuvant carboplatin dosed at area under the time–concentration curve (AUC) of 7.

Methods and results

We performed a retrospective analysis on treatment and outcomes of patients with CS1 seminoma who received adjuvant carboplatin from 2000 to 2016 at our centres in the Midland Region, New Zealand. Of 159 patients, median age 39 years, 153 received two cycles of carboplatin: 147 dosed at AUC7 and 6 at AUC6. Six patients had one cycle of carboplatin AUC7. One patient relapsed at 22 months and died of bleomycin pneumonitis 2 months after achieving a complete response with BEP chemotherapy. Neither RTI (present in 21.3%) nor tumor size >4 cm (in 43.3%) was predictive of relapse. Median follow‐up was 106 months. At 15 years, outcomes were: relapse‐free survival 99.4%, overall survival 91.4%, disease‐specific survival 100%, subsequent malignant neoplasm rate 7.6%, and second testicular germ cell tumor rate 3.85%. One patient had persistent grade 1 thrombocytopenia at 46 months.

Conclusions

These data add to the body of evidence that two cycles of carboplatin AUC7 is safe and effective adjuvant treatment for CS1 seminoma.

Active surveillance in stage 1 disease: standard of care independent of risk factors?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Approximately 30% of clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) and 15-20% of CS1 seminoma relapse without adjuvant treatment. Despite this, the 5-year survival for CS1 is 99%. The purpose of this review is to assess if active surveillance should be standard for all patients with CS1 testis cancer independent of risk factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre suggest a nonrisk-adapted surveillance approach avoids treatment in ∼70% of patients. Most relapse early at a median time of 7.4 months. The majority of relapses are confined to the retroperitoneum (66%) and only one modality of treatment is required: chemotherapy only in 61% and RPLND only in 73%.

SUMMARY

Surveillance is the preferred option and a safe proven strategy for the management of CS1 disease independent of risk factors. The prognosis for CS1 disease is excellent and the decision to offer surveillance or adjuvant treatment needs to highlight the treatment-related morbidity in an otherwise fit and healthy young man.

Prediction of relapse in stage I testicular germ cell tumor patients on surveillance: investigation of biomarkers

Background

Better biomarkers for assessing risk of relapse in stage I testicular germ cell tumor patients are needed, to complement classical histopathological variables. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of previously suggested biomarkers, related to proliferation (MIB-1 and TEX19) and to immune microenvironment (CXCL12, CXCR4, beta-catenin and MECA-79) in a surveillance cohort of stage I testicular germ cell tumor patients.

Methods

A total of 70 patients were included. Survival analyses were performed, including Cox regression models.

Results

Patients with vascular invasion and elevated human chorionic gonadotropin levels showed significantly poorer relapse-free survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio = 2.820, 95% confidence interval 1.257–6.328; hazard ratio = 3.025, 95% confidence interval 1.345–6.808). Patients with no vascular invasion but with MIB-1 staining in > 50% tumor cells showed significantly shorter relapse-free survival (p = 0.042). TEX19 nuclear immunoexpression was confirmed in spermatogonial cells, and weak cytoplasmic immunoexpression was depicted in 15/70 tumors, not significantly impacting survival. CXCL12 immunoexpression in tumor cells did not associate with relapse, but non-seminoma patients exhibiting vascular invasion and CXCL12-positive stromal/inflammatory cells showed significantly improved relapse-free survival (p = 0.015). Exclusively nuclear immunoexpression of CXCR4 associated with better relapse-free survival (p = 0.032), but not after adjusting for vascular invasion. Patients with higher beta-catenin scores showed a tendency for poorer relapse-free survival (p = 0.056). MECA-79 immunoexpression was absent.

Conclusions

The informative protein biomarkers (i.e., MIB-1, CXCL12, beta-catenin, and possibly CXCR4) may prove useful for risk-stratifying patients if validated in larger, multicentric and well-defined studies. Currently, classical histopathological features of testicular germ cell tumors remain key for relapse prediction.

The metastatic potential of seminomatous germ cell tumours is associated with a specific microRNA pattern

BACKGROUND

Seminomatous germ cell tumours (SGCT) are the most frequent malignancy in young men. Reliable prognostic biomarkers for the prediction of metastasis at diagnosis and the risk of relapse in clinical stage I (CSI) are lacking. Adjuvant therapies carry a risk of overtreatment, whereas salvage therapies have a risk of high toxicities. Thus, the identification of reliable prognostic biomarkers is highly desirable to identify patients who will benefit from early adjuvant treatment. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate tumour development and progression, and their potential as biomarkers has already been proven in a variety of malignancies.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to define a specific miRNA expression pattern that discriminates metastatic from non-metastatic primary SGCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total RNA was isolated from 24 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary SGCT tumours (10 non-metastatic, five metachronously and nine synchronously metastatic) and from 10 normal testicular tissue samples. Microarray analysis was performed for global miRNA expression profiling. The results were validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.

RESULTS

Microarray analyses revealed a specific miRNA pattern that distinguishes metastatic from non-metastatic SGCT. Sixty-three miRNAs were differentially expressed in metastatic compared to non-metastatic tumours (P < .01). Microarray results were confirmed by qRT-PCR for three out of five selected miRNAs (miR-29c-5p, miR-506-3p and miR-371a-5p; P < .05). All five miRNAs (miR-29c-5p, miR-506-3p, miR-1307-5p, miR-371a-5p and miR-371a-3p) showed differential expression between tumour and normal tissues (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Metastatic primary SGCTs are characterized by a specific miRNA expression pattern. Therefore, specific miRNAs could represent a new tool to predict the metastatic potential in SGCT patients.

Primary tumor size thresholds in stage IA testicular seminoma: Implications for adjuvant therapy after orchiectomy and survival

OBJECTIVES

Primary tumor size (PTS) is the main prognostic factor for relapse in clinical stage (CS) IA testicular seminoma (T1N0M0S0) and the 8th edition of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system now subcategorizes pT1 tumors into pT1a and pT1b based on PTS (<3 cm and ≥3 cm, respectively). We attempted to assess PTS as a prognosticator for overall survival (OS) in CS IA seminoma and to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of active surveillance (AS) versus adjuvant therapy (AT) in patients with large primary tumors (LPT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In the National Cancer Database (2004-2014), 2455 (47.7%) and 2685 (52.3%) patients with CS IA seminoma were treated with AS and AT, respectively. AT was defined as the receipt of chemotherapy or radiation within 3 months after orchiectomy. A cut-point analysis was performed to determine the optimal PTS threshold predicting OS at 5 years after orchiectomy. Inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were used to compare OS of patients with LPT (using the optimal PTS cut-point) treated with AS versus AT.

RESULTS

In adjusted analysis, pathologic T-stage (pT1a vs. pT1b) did not predict OS and no OS benefit was noted in pT1b patients treated with AT. The optimal PTS cut-point was 4.5 cm. In multivariable analysis, patients with LPT (≥4.5 cm) had an increased risk of overall mortality (HR = 1.87, P = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that OS was superior in patients with LPT treated with AT (IPTW-adjusted log-rank P = 0.029). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AT was associated with an OS benefit in patients with LPT (HR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.39-0.91, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In this National Cancer Database analysis, PTS was a predictor of OS in CS IA seminoma. An OS benefit was noted for individuals with LPT (defined as PTS ≥4.5 cm) managed with AT. These findings may warrant refinement of Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system.

Prognostic factors for relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular cancer: protocol for a Danish nationwide cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Approximately one-fourth of patients with clinical stage I testicular germ cell cancer will relapse within 5 years of follow-up. Certain histopathological features in the primary tumour have been associated with an increased risk of relapse. The available evidence on the prognostic value of the risk factors, however, is hampered by heterogeneity of the study populations included and variable reporting of the histopathological features. The aim of this study is to identify pathological risk factors for relapse in an unselected large nationwide cohort of patients with stage I disease.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

All incident cases of stage I testicular germ cell cancer diagnosed in Denmark between 2013 and 2018 will be identified using the nationwide prospective Danish Testicular Cancer (DaTeCa) database. Archived microscopic slides from the orchiectomy specimens will be retrieved through linkage to the Danish Pathology Data Bank and reviewed blinded to the clinical outcome. The DaTeCa database includes 960 stage I seminoma patients with expected 185 relapses and 480 patients with stage I non-seminoma with expected 150 relapses. A minimum follow-up period of 3 years of all patients will be ensured. Predefined prognostic variables will be investigated with regard to relapse in univariable and multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee (Region Zealand, Denmark) and the Danish Data Protection Agency. All data will be managed confidentially according to legislation. Study results will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-review journals.

Clinical characteristics of testicular seminoma in individuals in West China: a 10-year follow-up study

Objective

To assess the clinical characteristics of testicular seminoma (TS).

Patients and methods

A testicular cancer (TC) survey was conducted by the Department of Urology, West China Hospital, between 2008 and 2018. Tumors were classified according to the NCCN criteria such as age, tumor size, tumor marker levels, histopathology, clinical stage, initial treatment, follow-up, and clinical outcomes, were obtained from the database of our center.

Results

Among 155 registered cases of TC with seminomatous element, 127 cases of pure TS were analyzed. All 127 patients with a median age of 37 years were pathologically diagnosed with orchiectomy specimens. Orchiectomy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were the main treatments for these patients. Patients with clinical stages I, II, and III testicular cancer of accounted for 81.1% (n=103), 15.7% (n=20), and 3.2% (n=4) of all patients, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 50 months, five patients presented with relapse during follow-up, and one among them died. Of the patients with stage I TS (T1N0M0S0 CS IA), three patients who only underwent orchiectomy relapsed. Among patients with stage II TS (T1N1M0S1 CS IIA), one patient relapsed after orchiectomy, post-surgery chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In four patients with stage III disease (T2N1M1aS1 CS IIIA), one relapsed after orchiectomy and chemotherapy, and died shortly after salvage chemotherapy and radiotherapy due to recurrence. The median overall survival time was 50 months. In all patients, the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival probabilitis were 98.6% and 98.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

The present study shows that patients with TS have good prognosis even at an advanced stage. Surveillance after orchiectomy was important for patients with CSI seminoma, and we recommend cisplatin-based chemotherapy as salvage therapy for patients with CSI seminoma. In addition, patients with a maximal tumor diameter >4 cm should undergo post-surgery chemotherapy.

[Stage 1 germ-cell tumour]

Stage I germ-cell tumors are rare and highly curable diseases. As such, management of these tumours should carefully follow guidelines. Initial management is based on orchiectomy and several options as adjuvant therapy. Pro's and con's should be discussed with the patient for a personalized management. Patients with stage 1 germ-cell tumours should be addressed to expert centers.