1
|
Davies HG, Thorley EV, Al-Bahadili R, Sutton N, Burt J, Hookham L, Karampatsas K, Lambach P, Muñoz F, Cutland CL, Omer S, Le Doare K. Defining and reporting adverse events of special interest in comparative maternal vaccine studies: a systematic review. Vaccine X 2024; 18:100464. [PMID: 38495929 PMCID: PMC10943481 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The GAIA (Global Alignment on Immunisation Safety Assessment in Pregnancy) consortium was established in 2014 with the aim of creating a standardised, globally coordinated approach to monitoring the safety of vaccines administered in pregnancy. The consortium developed twenty-six standardised definitions for classifying obstetric and infant adverse events. This systematic review sought to evaluate the current state of adverse event reporting in maternal vaccine trials following the publication of the case definitions by GAIA, and the extent to which these case definitions have been adopted in maternal vaccine safety research. Methods A comprehensive search of published literature was undertaken to identify maternal vaccine research studies. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched using a combination of MeSH terms and keyword searches to identify observational or interventional studies that examined vaccine safety in pregnant women with a comparator group. A two-reviewer screening process was undertaken, and a narrative synthesis of the results presented. Results 14,737 titles were identified from database searches, 435 titles were selected as potentially relevant, 256 were excluded, the remaining 116 papers were included. Influenza vaccine was the most studied (25.0%), followed by TDaP (20.7%) and SARS-CoV-2 (12.9%).Ninety-one studies (78.4%) were conducted in high-income settings. Forty-eight (41.4%) utilised electronic health-records. The majority focused on reporting adverse events of special interest (AESI) in pregnancy (65.0%) alone or in addition to reactogenicity (27.6%). The most frequently reported AESI were preterm birth, small for gestational age and hypertensive disorders. Fewer than 10 studies reported use of GAIA definitions. Gestational age assessment was poorly described; of 39 studies reporting stillbirths 30.8% provided no description of the gestational age threshold. Conclusions Low-income settings remain under-represented in comparative maternal vaccine safety research. There has been poor uptake of GAIA case definitions. A lack of harmonisation and standardisation persists limiting comparability of the generated safety data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah G Davies
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
- MRC, UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Centre, Entebbe, Uganda
- Makerere University John Hopkins Research Unit, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Emma V Thorley
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rossul Al-Bahadili
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natalina Sutton
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Burt
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Hookham
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kostas Karampatsas
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Flor Muñoz
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Department, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clare L Cutland
- Wits African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (Wits-Alive), School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Saad Omer
- O’Donnell School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, USA
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, United Kingdom
- Makerere University John Hopkins Research Unit, Kampala, Uganda
- World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giles ML, Cole S, O’Bryan J, Krishnaswamy S, Ben-Othman R, Amenyogbe N, Davey MA, Kollmann T. The PRotective Effect of Maternal Immunisation on preTerm birth: characterising the Underlying mechanisms and Role in newborn immune function: the PREMITUR study protocol. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1212320. [PMID: 38187392 PMCID: PMC10771328 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1212320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Maternal immunisation, a low cost and high efficacy intervention is recommended for its pathogen specific protection. Evidence suggests that maternal immunisation has another significant impact: reduction of preterm birth (PTB), the single greatest cause of childhood morbidity and mortality globally. Our overarching question is: how does maternal immunisation modify the immune system in pregnant women and/or their newborn to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes and enhance the newborn infant's capacity to protect itself from infectious diseases during early childhood? To answer this question we are conducting a multi-site, prospective observational cohort study collecting maternal and infant biological samples at defined time points during pregnancy and post-partum from nulliparous women. We aim to enrol 400 women and determine the immune trajectory in pregnancy and the impact of maternal immunisation (including influenza, pertussis and/or COVID-19 vaccines) on this trajectory. The results are expected to identify areas that can be targeted for future intervention studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L. Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Obstetric Medicine and Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen Cole
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jessica O’Bryan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sushena Krishnaswamy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rym Ben-Othman
- Department of Paediatrics, Telethon Kids, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Nelly Amenyogbe
- Department of Paediatrics, Telethon Kids, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Mary-Ann Davey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tobias Kollmann
- Department of Paediatrics, Telethon Kids, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wolfe DM, Fell D, Garritty C, Hamel C, Butler C, Hersi M, Ahmadzai N, Rice DB, Esmaeilisaraji L, Michaud A, Soobiah C, Ghassemi M, Khan PA, Sinilaite A, Skidmore B, Tricco AC, Moher D, Hutton B. Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066182. [PMID: 37673449 PMCID: PMC10496691 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review to evaluate associations between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes and maternal non-obstetric serious adverse events (SAEs), taking into consideration confounding and temporal biases. METHODS Electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE ALL, Embase Classic+Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched to June 2021 for observational studies assessing associations between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and maternal non-obstetric SAEs and adverse birth outcomes, including preterm birth, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, small-for-gestational-age birth and congenital anomalies. Studies of live attenuated vaccines, single-arm cohort studies and abstract-only publications were excluded. Records were screened using a liberal accelerated approach initially, followed by a dual independent approach for full-text screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted, where two or more studies met methodological criteria for inclusion. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess evidence certainty. RESULTS Of 9443 records screened, 63 studies were included. Twenty-nine studies (24 cohort and 5 case-control) evaluated seasonal influenza vaccination (trivalent and/or quadrivalent) versus no vaccination and were the focus of our prioritised syntheses; 34 studies of pandemic vaccines (2009 A/H1N1 and others), combinations of pandemic and seasonal vaccines, and seasonal versus seasonal vaccines were also reviewed. Control for confounding and temporal biases was inconsistent across studies, limiting pooling of data. Meta-analyses for preterm birth, spontaneous abortion and small-for-gestational-age birth demonstrated no significant associations with seasonal influenza vaccination. Immortal time bias was observed in a sensitivity analysis of meta-analysing risk-based preterm birth data. In descriptive summaries for stillbirth, congenital anomalies and maternal non-obstetric SAEs, no significant association with increased risk was found in any studies. All evidence was of very low certainty. CONCLUSIONS Evidence of very low certainty suggests that seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy is not associated with adverse birth outcomes or maternal non-obstetric SAEs. Appropriate control of confounding and temporal biases in future studies would improve the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianna M Wolfe
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deshayne Fell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chantelle Garritty
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Candyce Hamel
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Butler
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mona Hersi
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nadera Ahmadzai
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle B Rice
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Psychiatry, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Leila Esmaeilisaraji
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Michaud
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlene Soobiah
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marco Ghassemi
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul A Khan
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Sinilaite
- Centre for Immunization Readiness, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Epidemiology Division & Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Moher
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie S, Monteiro K, Gjelsvik A. The association between maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in the United States: Pregnancy risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Vaccine 2023; 41:2300-2306. [PMID: 36870879 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Influenza vaccination during pregnancy is highly recommended. We examined the association between maternal influenza vaccination and adverse birth outcomes. METHODS This cross-sectional study used data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) during 2012-2017. The primary exposure was the receipt of influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth (PTB), and small for gestational age (SGA) were the primary outcomes. We conducted multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Covariates used to adjust confounding included maternal age, marital status, education, race and ethnicity, insurance status before pregnancy, and smoking status. For a subgroup in 2012-2015, we analyzed the association between influenza vaccination in each trimester and adverse birth outcomes. RESULTS During 2012-2017, compared with unvaccinated women, women vaccinated during pregnancy had a lower risk of LBW and PTB. During 2012-2015, maternal influenza vaccination in the 1st and 3rd trimesters was associated with a reduced risk of LBW and PTB, and vaccination in the 3rd trimester had a greater protective effect than in the 1st trimester. Influenza vaccination was not associated with SGA regardless of trimester. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that influenza vaccination during pregnancy is a safe and effective way to protect newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Xie
- Brown University, School of Public Health, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kubale JT, Frutos AM, Balmaseda A, Cerpas C, Saborio S, Ojeda S, Barilla C, Sanchez N, Vasquez G, Moreira H, Shotwell A, Meyers A, Lopez R, Plazaola M, Kuan G, Gordon A. High Co-circulation of Influenza and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac642. [PMID: 36519125 PMCID: PMC9745763 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
In the first 2 years of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, influenza transmission decreased substantially worldwide, meaning that health systems were not faced with simultaneous respiratory epidemics. In 2022, however, substantial influenza transmission returned to Nicaragua where it co-circulated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, causing substantial disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John T Kubale
- ICPSR, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Aaron M Frutos
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Angel Balmaseda
- Centro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua
- Sustainable Sciences Institute, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Cristhiam Cerpas
- Centro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua
- Sustainable Sciences Institute, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Saira Saborio
- Centro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua
- Sustainable Sciences Institute, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Sergio Ojeda
- Sustainable Sciences Institute, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Carlos Barilla
- Centro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Nery Sanchez
- Sustainable Sciences Institute, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Gerald Vasquez
- Centro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Hanny Moreira
- Centro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Abigail Shotwell
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Alyssa Meyers
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Roger Lopez
- Centro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia, Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua
- Sustainable Sciences Institute, Managua, Nicaragua
| | | | - Guillermina Kuan
- Sustainable Sciences Institute, Managua, Nicaragua
- Centro de Salud Sócrates Flores Vivas, Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Aubree Gordon
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giles ML, Davey MA, Wallace EM. Associations Between Maternal Immunisation and Reduced Rates of Preterm Birth and Stillbirth: A Population Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Immunol 2021; 12:704254. [PMID: 34557193 PMCID: PMC8454544 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.704254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Stillbirth and preterm birth (PTB) remain two of the most important, unresolved challenges in modern pregnancy care. Approximately 10% of all births are preterm with nearly one million children dying each year due to PTB. It remains the most common cause of death among children under five years of age. The numbers for stillbirth are no less shocking with 2.6 million babies stillborn each year. With minimal impact on the rate of these adverse birth outcomes over the past decade there is an urgent need to identify more effective interventions to tackle these problems. In this retrospective cohort study, we used whole-of-population data, to determine if maternal immunization during pregnancy against influenza and/or pertussis, is associated with a lower risk of PTB, delivering a small-for-gestational age (SGA) infant, developing preeclampsia or stillbirth. Women with a singleton pregnancy at 28 or more weeks' gestation delivering in Victoria, Australia from July 2015 to December 2018 were included in the analysis. Log-binomial regression was used to measure the relationship between vaccination during pregnancy against influenza and against pertussis, with preterm birth, SGA, preeclampsia and stillbirth. Variables included in the adjusted model were maternal age, body mass index, first or subsequent birth, maternal Indigenous status, socio-economic quintile, smoking, public or private maternity care and metropolitan or rural location of the hospital. Women who received influenza vaccine were 75% less likely to have a stillbirth (aRR 025; 95% CI 0.20, 0.31), and 31% less likely to birth <37 weeks (aRR 0.69; 95% CI 0.66, 0.72). Women who received pertussis vaccine were 77% less likely to have a stillbirth (aOR 0.23; 95% CI 0.18, 0.28) and 32% less likely to birth <37 weeks gestation (aRR 0.68; 95% CI 0.66, 0.71). Vaccination also reduced the odds of small for gestational age by 13% and reduced the odds of pre-eclampsia when restricted to primiparous women. This association was seen over four different influenza seasons and independent of the time of year suggesting that any protective effect on obstetric outcomes afforded by maternal vaccination may not be due to a pathogen-specific response but rather due to pathogen-agnostic immune-modulatory effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L. Giles
- The Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Speake HA, Pereira G, Regan AK. Risk of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes associated with inactivated influenza vaccination in first trimester of pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2021; 35:196-205. [PMID: 33155331 DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many countries, influenza vaccination is routinely recommended during any stage of pregnancy, yet uptake remains low, particularly in the first trimester. This is thought to be due to maternal concerns regarding vaccine safety. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety of influenza vaccination in the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS In a 4-year retrospective cohort study using probabilistic record linkage of administrative health data, we established a population-based cohort of 2391 women vaccinated in first trimester and 68 447 never vaccinated women with a date of conception between 2012 and 2015 in Western Australia. We estimated the relative risk (RR) of perinatal health outcomes among first trimester vaccinated women as compared to never vaccinated women using log-binomial logistic regression following a propensity score matched (PSM) analyses (2391 vaccinated women matched with 9564 never vaccinated women). RESULTS First trimester vaccination was not associated with increased risk of stillbirth (RR 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64, 2.19), small for gestational age (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83, 1.11) or preeclampsia (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.74, 1.28). The risk of spontaneous birth at 32-36 weeks was higher in first trimester vaccinated women compared with never vaccinated women (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.11, 1.77). Vaccination was associated with a 10-19% increase in the risk of gestational diabetes (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.94, 1.49), premature rupture of membranes (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.82, 1.48), and threatened preterm labour (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.90, 1.59). CONCLUSIONS With exception to spontaneous preterm birth, findings suggest that first trimester vaccination is not associated with adverse maternal and foetal outcomes. Results can be used to support patient and provider-level vaccine decision making during first trimester.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hollie A Speake
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, WA, Australia.,School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Gavin Pereira
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.,Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia.,Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Public Health Institute, Oslo, Norway
| | - Annette K Regan
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.,School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.,UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McMorrow ML, Rossi L, Meiring S, Bishop K, Itzikowitz R, Isaacs W, Stellenboom F, Walaza S, Hellferscee O, Treurnicht FK, Zar HJ, Tempia S, Cohen C. A Retrospective observational cohort study of the effect of antenatal influenza vaccination on birth outcomes in Cape Town, South Africa, 2015-2016. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2021; 15:446-456. [PMID: 33452708 PMCID: PMC8189187 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There are conflicting data concerning the impact of antenatal influenza vaccination on birth outcomes including low birthweight (LBW), preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), and stillbirth. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of infants born to women residing in Mitchells Plain, Cape Town. Infants were born at 4 health facilities during May 28 – December 31, 2015 and April 15 – December 31, 2016. We performed crude and multivariable logistic regression, propensity score (PS) matching logistic regression, and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) regression to assess vaccine effectiveness (VE) against LBW, preterm birth, SGA, and stillbirth adjusting for measured confounders. Results Maternal vaccination status, antenatal history, and ≥1 birth outcome(s) were available for 4084/5333 (76.6%) pregnancies, 2109 (51.6%) vaccinated, and 1975 (48.4%) unvaccinated. The proportion LBW was lower in vaccinated (6.9%) vs. unvaccinated (12.5%) in multivariable [VE 0.27 (95% CI 0.07‐0.42)], PS [VE 0.30 (95% CI 0.09‐0.51)], and IPTW [VE 0.24 (95% CI 0.04‐0.45)]. Preterm birth was less frequent in vaccinated (8.6%) than unvaccinated (16.4%) in multivariable [VE 0.26 (0.09‐0.40)], PS [VE 0.25 (95% CI 0.09‐0.41)], and IPTW [VE 0.34 (95% CI 0.18‐0.51)]. The proportion SGA was lower in vaccinated (6.0%) than unvaccinated (8.8%) but not in adjusted models. There were few stillbirths in our study population, 30/4084 (0.7%). Conclusions Using multiple analytic approaches, we found that influenza vaccination was associated with lower prevalence of LBW (24‐30%) and preterm birth (25‐34%) in Cape Town during 2015‐2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith L McMorrow
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Influenza Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, South Africa.,United States Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Liza Rossi
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Susan Meiring
- Division of Public Health Surveillance and Response, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Katherine Bishop
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Raphaela Itzikowitz
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Washiefa Isaacs
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Faakhiera Stellenboom
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Sibongile Walaza
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.,School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Orienka Hellferscee
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.,School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Florette K Treurnicht
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Heather J Zar
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.,Medical Research Council Unit on Child & Adolescent Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Stefano Tempia
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Influenza Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, South Africa.,Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.,MassGenics, Duluth, Georgia, USA
| | - Cheryl Cohen
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.,School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Omer SB, Clark DR, Madhi SA, Tapia MD, Nunes MC, Cutland CL, Simões EAF, Aqil AR, Katz J, Tielsch JM, Steinhoff MC, Wairagkar N. Efficacy, duration of protection, birth outcomes, and infant growth associated with influenza vaccination in pregnancy: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. THE LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2020; 8:597-608. [PMID: 32526188 PMCID: PMC7284303 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30479-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Maternal influenza immunisation can reduce morbidity and mortality associated with influenza infection in pregnant women and young infants. We aimed to determine the vaccine efficacy of maternal influenza immunisation against maternal and infant PCR-confirmed influenza, duration of protection, and the effect of gestational age at vaccination on vaccine efficacy, birth outcomes, and infant growth up to 6 months of age. Methods We did a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials done in Nepal (2011–2014), Mali (2011–2014), and South Africa (2011–2013). Pregnant women, gestational age 17–34 weeks in Nepal, 28 weeks or more in Mali, and 20–36 weeks in South Africa, were enrolled. Women were randomly assigned 1:1 to a study group, in which they received trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in all three trials, or a control group, in which they received saline placebo in Nepal and South Africa or quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine in Mali. Enrolment at all sites was complete by April 24, 2013. Infants and women were assessed for respiratory illness, and samples from those that met the case definition were tested for influenza by PCR testing. Growth measurements, including length and weight, were obtained at birth at all sites, at 24 weeks in South Africa, and at 6 months in Nepal and Mali. The three trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01430689, NCT01034254, and NCT02465190. Findings 10 002 women and 9800 liveborn infants were included. Pooled efficacy of maternal vaccination to prevent infant PCR-confirmed influenza up to 6 months of age was 35% (95% CI 19 to 47). The pooled estimate was 56% (28 to 73) within the first 2 months of life, 39% (11 to 58) between 2 and 4 months, and 19% (–9 to 40) between 4 and 6 months. In women, from enrolment during pregnancy to the end of follow-up at 6 months postpartum, the vaccine was 50% (95% CI 32–63) efficacious against PCR-confirmed influenza. Efficacy was 42% (12 to 61) during pregnancy and 60% (36 to 75) postpartum. In women vaccinated before 29 weeks gestational age, the estimated efficacy was 30% (–2 to 52), and in women vaccinated at or after 29 weeks, efficacy was 71% (50 to 83). Efficacy was similar in infants born to mothers vaccinated before or after 29 weeks gestation (34% [95% CI 12 to 51] vs 35% [11 to 52]). There was no overall association between maternal vaccination and low birthweight, stillbirth, preterm birth, and small for gestational age. At 6 months of age, the intervention and control groups were similar in terms of underweight (weight-for-age), stunted (length-for-age), and wasted (weight-for-length). Median centile change from birth to 6 months of age was similar between the intervention and the control groups for both weight and length. Interpretation The assessment of efficacy for women vaccinated before 29 weeks gestational age might have been underpowered, because the point estimate suggests that there might be efficacy despite wide CIs. Estimates of efficacy against PCR-confirmed influenza and safety in terms of adverse birth outcomes should be incorporated into any further consideration of maternal influenza immunisation recommendations. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad B Omer
- Yale Institute for Global Health, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale School of Nursing, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Dayna R Clark
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shabir A Madhi
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Milagritos D Tapia
- Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins, Bamako, Mali; Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marta C Nunes
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Clare L Cutland
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Eric A F Simões
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anushka R Aqil
- Department of Health, Behavior, Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joanne Katz
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James M Tielsch
- Department of Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mark C Steinhoff
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Global Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Niteen Wairagkar
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA; Vaccines For All, Pune, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rolfes MA, Vonglokham P, Khanthamaly V, Chitry B, Pholsena V, Chitranondh V, Mirza SA, Moen A, Bresee JS, Xeuatvongsa A, Olsen SJ. Measurement of birth outcomes in analyses of the impact of maternal influenza vaccination. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2019; 13:547-555. [PMID: 31424627 PMCID: PMC6800304 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The estimated association of maternal influenza vaccination and birth outcomes may be sensitive to methods used to define preterm birth or small‐for‐gestational age (SGA). Methods In a cohort of pregnant women in Lao People's Democratic Republic, we estimated gestational age from: (a) date of last menstrual period (LMP), (b) any prenatal ultrasound, (c) first trimester ultrasound, (d) Ballard Score at delivery, and (e) an algorithm combining LMP and ultrasound. Infants were classified as SGA at birth using a Canadian, global, and equation‐based growth reference. We estimated the association of maternal influenza vaccination and birth outcomes, by influenza activity, using multivariable log‐binomial regression and Cox proportional hazards regression with vaccination as a time‐varying exposure. Results The frequency of preterm birth in the cohort varied by method to estimate gestational age, from 5% using Ballard Score to 15% using any ultrasound. Using LMP, any ultrasound, or the algorithm, we found statistically significant reductions in preterm birth among vaccinated women during periods of high influenza activity and statistically significant increases in SGA, using a Canadian growth reference. We did not find statistically significant associations with SGA when using global or equation‐based growth references. Conclusions The association of maternal influenza vaccination and birth outcomes was most affected by the choice of a growth reference used to define SGA at birth. The association with pre‐term birth was present and consistent across multiple statistical approaches. Future studies of birth outcomes, specifically SGA, should carefully consider the potential for bias introduced by measurement choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A Rolfes
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Viengphone Khanthamaly
- Influenza Program, U.S. CDC-Lao PDR, American Embassy, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic
| | - Bounlap Chitry
- Mother and Child Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic
| | | | - Visith Chitranondh
- Luang Prabang Provincial Hospital, Luang Prabang, Lao People's Democratic Republic
| | - Sara A Mirza
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ann Moen
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Joseph S Bresee
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Sonja J Olsen
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bresee JS, Lafond KE, McCarron M, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Chu SY, Ebama M, Hinman AR, Xeuatvongsa A, Bino S, Richardson D, Porter RM, Moen A, McKinlay M. The partnership for influenza vaccine introduction (PIVI): Supporting influenza vaccine program development in low and middle-income countries through public-private partnerships. Vaccine 2019; 37:5089-5095. [PMID: 31288998 PMCID: PMC6685526 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Influenza vaccination remains the most effective tool for reducing seasonal influenza disease burden. Few Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) have robust, sustainable annual influenza national vaccination programs. The Partnership for Influenza Vaccine Introduction (PIVI) was developed as a public-private partnership to support LMICs to develop and sustain national vaccination programs through time-limited vaccine donations and technical support. We review the first 5 years of experience with PIVI, including the concept, country progress toward sustainability, and lesson learned. Between 2013 and 2018, PIVI worked with Ministries of Health in 17 countries. Eight countries have received donated vaccines and technical support; of these, two have transitioned to sustained national support of influenza vaccination and six are increasing national support of the vaccine programs towards full transition to local vaccine program support by 2023. Nine additional countries have received technical support for building the evidence base for national policy development and/or program evaluation. PIVI has resulted in increased use of vaccines in partner countries, and early countries have demonstrated progress towards sustainability, suggesting that a model of vaccine and technical support can work in LMICs. PIVI expects to add new country partners as current countries transition to self-reliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph S Bresee
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Center for Vaccine Equity, Task Force for Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Kathryn E Lafond
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Margaret McCarron
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Susan Y Chu
- Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Malembe Ebama
- Center for Vaccine Equity, Task Force for Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Alan R Hinman
- Center for Vaccine Equity, Task Force for Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Anonh Xeuatvongsa
- Ministry of Health, Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, Vientiane, Laos
| | | | - Dominique Richardson
- Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rachael M Porter
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ann Moen
- Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mark McKinlay
- Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Katz J, Englund JA, Steinhoff MC, Khatry SK, Shrestha L, Kuypers J, Mullany LC, Chu HY, LeClerq SC, Kozuki N, Tielsch JM. Impact of Timing of Influenza Vaccination in Pregnancy on Transplacental Antibody Transfer, Influenza Incidence, and Birth Outcomes: A Randomized Trial in Rural Nepal. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67:334-340. [PMID: 29452372 PMCID: PMC6051462 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Maternal influenza vaccination protects mothers and their infants in low resource settings, but little is known about whether the protection varies by gestational age at vaccination. Methods Women of childbearing age in rural southern Nepal were surveilled for pregnancy, consented and randomized to receive maternal influenza vaccination or placebo, with randomization stratified on gestational age (17-25 or 26-34 weeks). Enrollment occurred in 2 annual cohorts, and vaccinations occurred from April 2011 through September 2013. Results In sum, 3693 women consented and enrolled, resulting in 3646 live births. Although cord blood antibody titers and the rise in maternal titers were generally greater when women were vaccinated later in pregnancy, this was not statistically significant. The incidence risk ratio (IRR) for maternal influenza in pregnancy through 6 months postpartum was 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35, 1.10) for those vaccinated 17-25 weeks gestation and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.39, 2.00) for those 26-34 weeks. Infant influenza IRRs were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.51, 1.05) for those whose mothers were vaccinated earlier in gestation, and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.37, 1.08) for those later. Relative risks (RR) for low birthweight were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.98) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.72, 1.12) for 17-25 and 26-34 weeks gestation at vaccination, respectively. IRRs did not differ for small-for-gestational age or preterm. No RRs were statistically different by timing of vaccine receipt. Conclusions Vaccine efficacy did not vary by gestational age at vaccination, making maternal influenza immunization programs easier to implement where women present for care late in pregnancy. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01034254.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Katz
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Janet A Englund
- Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Foundation, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Mark C Steinhoff
- Global Health Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Ohio
| | | | - Laxman Shrestha
- Tribhuvan University, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Jane Kuypers
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Molecular Virology Laboratory, Seattle
| | - Luke C Mullany
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Helen Y Chu
- University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle
| | - Steven C LeClerq
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Baltimore, Maryland
- Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project – Sarlahi, Nepal
| | - Naoko Kozuki
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - James M Tielsch
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Department of Global Health, Washington, D.C
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Arriola CS, Vasconez N, Bresee J, Ropero AM. Knowledge, attitudes and practices about influenza vaccination among pregnant women and healthcare providers serving pregnant women in Managua, Nicaragua. Vaccine 2018; 36:3686-3693. [PMID: 29748029 PMCID: PMC6008783 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nicaragua implemented an influenza vaccination program for pregnant women with high-risk obstetric conditions in 2007. In 2014, the recommendation of influenza vaccination expanded to include all pregnant women. Given the expansion in the recommendation of vaccination, we evaluated knowledge, attitudes and practices of pregnant women and their healthcare providers towards influenza vaccination and its recommendation. METHODS We conducted surveys among pregnant women and their healthcare providers from June to August 2016 at two hospitals and 140 health facilities in Managua. The questions were adapted from the U.S. national CDC influenza survey and related to knowledge, attitudes and practices about influenza vaccination and barriers to vaccination. We analyzed reasons for not receiving vaccination among pregnant women as well as receipt of vaccination recommendation and offer by their healthcare providers. RESULTS Of 1,303 pregnant women enrolled, 42% (5 4 5) reported receiving influenza vaccination in the 2016 season. Of those who reported not receiving vaccination, 46% indicated barriers to vaccination. Pregnant women who were vaccinated were more likely to be aware of the recommendation for vaccination and the risks of influenza illness during pregnancy and to perceive the vaccine as safe and effective, compared to unvaccinated pregnant women (p-values < 0.001). Of the 619 health workers enrolled, over 89% recalled recommending influenza vaccination to all pregnant women, regardless of obstetric risk. Of the 1,223 women who had a prenatal visit between the start date of the influenza vaccination and the time of interview, 44% recalled receiving a recommendation for influenza vaccination and 43% were offered vaccination. Vaccination rates were higher for those receiving a recommendation and offer of vaccination compared with those who received neither (95% vs 5%, p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION Pregnant women in Managua had positive perceptions of influenza vaccine and were receptive to receiving influenza vaccination, especially after the offer and recommendation by their healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen S Arriola
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | | | - Joseph Bresee
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|