Risk of second cancers cancer after a first primary breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Socio-economic inequalities in second primary cancer incidence: A competing risks analysis of women with breast cancer in England between 2000 and 2018

We aimed to investigate socio-economic inequalities in second primary cancer (SPC) incidence among breast cancer survivors. Using Data from cancer registries in England, we included all women diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer (PBC) between 2000 and 2018 and aged between 18 and 99 years and followed them up from 6 months after the PBC diagnosis until a SPC event, death, or right censoring, whichever came first. We used flexible parametric survival models adjusting for age and year of PBC diagnosis, ethnicity, PBC tumour stage, comorbidity, and PBC treatments to model the cause-specific hazards of SPC incidence and death according to income deprivation, and then estimated standardised cumulative incidences of SPC by deprivation, taking death as the competing event. Multiple imputation was performed to account for missing data. Among 649,905 included women, 47,399 SPCs and 171,223 deaths occurred during 4,269,042 person-years of follow-up. Income deprivation was consistently associated with an increased rate of SPC incidence (cause-specific hazard ratio for the most vs. least deprived quintile: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.25, 1.33) and of death (1.36; 1.34, 1.38), translating into an absolute risk difference (the most vs. least deprived quintile) of 1.3% (95% CI: 1.0, 1.5) for SPC incidence and 4.9% (95% CI: 4.6, 5.1) for death at 10 years. Women with PBC from deprived areas in England faced a substantially higher risk of SPC than their counterparts. Future research is warranted to understand mechanisms for observed inequalities to inform strategies to monitor, prevent, and identify SPC in women with PBC.

Warning factors of metachronous uterine cancer in patients with breast cancer: a real-world nationwide cohort study

Objective

This study aimed to explore the risk factors for metachronous uterine cancer, including age at diagnosis, stage, body mass index (BMI), medical history and tamoxifen treatment in women with breast cancer to enable tailored risk-based gynecological surveillance.

Methods

A nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted. Data were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry from 2011 to 2019. The risk of metachronous uterine cancer was analyzed by Cox regression model.

Results

There were 307 patients identified with uterine cancer among 114,906 patients with breast cancer. The incidence was 37.46 cases per 100,000 person-years among tamoxifen non-users (69 cases per 184,207 person-years). Among tamoxifen users (n = 58,227), the incidence rates were 105.52 cases (79 cases per 74,869 person-years) for <1 year of use, 111.62 cases (111 cases per 99,444 person-years) for 1-3 years, 58.19 cases (31 cases per 53,276 person-years) for 3-5 years, and 62.12 cases (17 cases per 27,366 person-years) for ≥5 years. The hazard ratio (HR) for uterine cancer was 3.06 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.14-4.39), 3.03 (95 % CI 2.15-4.28), 1.61 (95 % CI 1.01-2.57), and 1.77 (95 % CI 1.00-3.13) for patients on tamoxifen for <1, 1-3, 3-5, and ≥5 years. High BMI (≥25 kg/m2) was associated with an increased risk (HR 2.46, 95 % CI 1.07-5.64). Abnormal uterine bleeding was a significant predictor regardless of the clinical or sonographic diagnosis of endometrial lesions.

Conclusion

Routine ultrasound is not recommended for the detection of metachronous uterine cancer, and gynecologic investigations should focus on breast cancer patients with high BMI, tamoxifen use, and abnormal uterine bleeding.

Molecule subtypes play important roles for second primary malignancies development based on 324,661 breast cancer survivors

The incidence trend of breast molecule subtypes was unclear. There was not quantified risk by subtype with the second primary malignancies (SPMs) and limited evidence about the risk factors for developing SPMs in first primary breast cancer(FPBC). Data from 18 SEER registries were used to identify FPBC, which were randomly selected for training and validation sets. The SPMs information of breast cancer survivors in Hebei were also collected to compare the distribution with SEER. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to explore the risk factors and integrated to the establishment of nomogram and risk stratification model. There was a decreased trend for TNBC, but an increased trend for Luminal A. The median survival months were 46, 46, 46 and 44 for Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2 enriched and TNBC, with the median latency time were 39, 39, 40 and 41.0 months, respecitvely, The cumulative incidence rates(CIR) of SPMs were 2.61%, 2.30%, 2.21% and 2.84%. Age at diagnosis, clinical lymph node status, radiotherapy and subtypes were independent risk factors for SPMs. A predict nomogram was established with the AUC of 0.682 and 0.679 for three- and five- year incidence risk in training set. Patients were divided into the low-risk (31.94%), intermediate-risk (51.83%) and high-risk (16.23%) groups by risk stratification model. The first common SPMs was second breast cancer in both SEER and Hebei cohort, the second and third rank SPMs were lung and gynecological cancer in SEER, but presented the opposite result in Hebei. The incidence rates and SPMs of subtypes were difference. The high risk individuals could be identified by risk stratification model, who need more closely followed up by Clinicians.

Risk of second primary cancer in young breast cancer survivors: an important yet overlooked issue

Currently, female breast cancer (BC) represents the highest incidence of cancer globally. This trend has raised significant attention regarding breast cancer young women (BCYW). With advancements in treatment technology, BCYW survivors are living longer; however, the risk of developing or succumbing to a second primary cancer (SPC) has greatly increased. In addition, several factors, including age, menstrual cycle, hormonal changes, obesity, pregnancy, and breastfeeding, interact to influence the development of SPC in BCYW and make its treatment more difficult. This study investigates the relationship between BCYW and SPC, focusing on morbidity trends, pathological genomics, recurrence rates, survival times, treatment modalities, and physiological fertility. Most BCYW involve BRCA pathogenic variants or fall under triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing subtypes, increasing the risk of SPC. While there are regional variations in survival time following the diagnosis of an SPC, the long-term survival outcomes remain unfavorable. In addition, the choice of treatment for BCYW survivors has a prolonged cumulative toxic effect. The combination of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy is effective in treating BC, but it simultaneously increases the risk of developing an SPC, specifically endometrial cancer. Furthermore, radiotherapy is associated with a heightened risk of contralateral BC and lung cancer. We aim to address existing gaps in the literature and to enhance awareness of the risks associated with SPC in BCYW, thereby offering valuable insights for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Patterns of Subsequent Cancer Incidence Over Time in Patients with Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer survivors face a higher risk of subsequent primary cancers. This study investigated the patterns of subsequent cancer risk according to time since breast cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (2000-2018), we identified a cohort of 771,681 breast cancer survivors. Standard incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated by comparing the observed with the expected number of subsequent cancers over different follow-up periods since breast cancer diagnosis. Analyses were conducted for multiple cancer types, stratified by hormone receptor status, treatment of the first breast cancer, age, and race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

Survivors experienced a 16% increased risk of subsequent cancer with the SIR continuing to increase with longer follow-up (SIR = 1.04, 1.22, and 1.31 for 12-59, 60-119, and ≥120 months). This trend was driven primarily by a subsequent breast cancer, particularly among women <50 years of age, those with initial hormone receptor-negative cancer, and racial/ethnic minorities. The patterns of subsequent non-breast cancer risk varied by type. An early-onset and sustained increased risk was observed for subsequent leukemia, thyroid cancer, soft-tissue sarcoma, melanoma, pancreatic cancer, and uterine cancer. A delayed increased risk was observed for subsequent esophageal, ovarian, oral cavity/pharyngeal, and lung cancers, whereas for small intestine, stomach, kidney, and colorectal cancers, there was a decrease after an initial increased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns in subsequent cancer risk since breast cancer diagnosis differ by cancer type and characteristics of the first breast cancer.

IMPACT

These findings can inform etiology and tailored approaches to screening and prevention of subsequent cancers.

Unexpected presentation: metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) of the breast masquerading as a large cystic-solid renal mass

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) of the breast is a rare histological subtype of breast cancer, which usually has a low propensity for metastasis and is associated with a good prognosis. AdCC metastasis to the kidney is rare, with only 29 cases reported in the literature. We report a case of a woman in her 60s with multiple right-sided large cystic-solid renal lesions after a recent diagnosis of marginal zone B-cell lymphoma. The patient previously had T1c N0 breast AdCC, treated with curative intent surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy 10 years prior. She underwent a radical nephrectomy, and histology was confirmed asmetastatic classic AdCC, consistent with the spread from previous AdCC breast cancer. Although she was in remission for 10 years, it is imperative to distinguish between breast AdCC metastasis and primary cystic renal cell carcinoma to be able to formulate an optimal management strategy for these tumours.

Prognostic Factors Affecting Survival of Patients With Single Primary Breast Cancer vs Patients With Multiple Primary Cancers in Lifetime, One of Which is Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the demographic and molecular characteristics, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients with single primary breast cancer (SPBC) and patients with multiple primary cancers in their life time in which one of them is breast cancer (MPC).

METHODS

Using data from SEER 17 Research Plus, patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 were included in this study. Race, marital status, laterality, tumor size, molecular subtype, grade, stage, radiotherapy-chemotherapy treatment, and surgery data were analyzed in the data obtained after excluding patients with missing values. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used for survival analysis, and Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

573175 patients were included in the study. The mean age of MPC patients was significantly higher than SPBC patients (65.99 ± 12.68, 60.33 ± 13.47, P < .001, respectively). Patients with SPBC had significantly more hormone receptor (HR)-positive/Her2 positive, HR-negative/Her2-negative, and HR-negative/Her2-positive molecular subtypes; patients with MPC had more HR-positive/Her2-negative subtypes (P < .001). Grade 3 tumor status, locoregional spread, and distant metastasis were significantly higher in SPBC patients (P < .001). Overall survival and CSS rates were significantly higher in SPBC patients (P < .001). In MPC patients, overall hazard ratio was 1.631 times higher than SPBC, and the cancer-specific hazard ratio was 1.096 times higher (95% CI [1.606-1.656], 95% CI [1.071-1.121], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although patients with SPBC have worse prognostic tumor characteristics, OS and CSS rates are better than patients with MPC.

Bedside implications of the use of surrogate endpoints in solid and haematological cancers: implications for our reliance on PFS, DFS, ORR, MRD and more

Clinical endpoints, such as overall survival, directly measure relevant outcomes. Surrogate endpoints, in contrast, are intermediate, stand-in measures of various tumour-related metrics and include tumour growth, tumour shrinkage, blood results, etc. Surrogates may be a time point measurement, that is, tumour shrinkage at some point (eg, response rate) or biomarker-assessed disease status, measured at given time points (eg, circulating tumour DNA, ctDNA). They can also be measured over time, as with progression-free survival, which is the time until a patient presents with either disease progression or death. Surrogates are increasingly used in trials supporting the marketing authorisation of novel oncology drugs. Yet, the trial-level correlation between surrogates and clinical endpoints-meaning to which extent an improvement in the surrogate predicts an improvement in the direct endpoint-is often moderate to low. Here, we provide a comprehensive classification of surrogate endpoints: time point measurements and time-to-event endpoints in solid and haematological malignancies. Also, we discuss an overlooked aspect of the use of surrogates: the limitations of surrogates outside trial settings, at the bedside. Surrogates can result in the inappropriate stopping or switching of therapy. Surrogates can be used to usher in new strategies (eg, ctDNA in adjuvant treatment of colon cancer), which may erode patient outcomes. In liquid malignancies, surrogates can mislead us to use novel drugs and replace proven standards of care with costly medications. Surrogates can lead one to intensify treatment without clear improvement and possibly worsening quality of life. Clinicians should be aware of the role of surrogates in the development and regulation of drugs and how their use can carry real-world, bedside implications.

Eating frequency, timing of meals, and sleep duration before and after a randomized controlled weight loss trial for breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

To examine eating frequency, timing of meals, and sleep duration before and after a weight loss intervention for breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

Female breast cancer survivors (n = 159; 55 ± 9 years; 31.4 ± 5.0 kg/m2; stage I-III, median [IQR] 9.5 [5.5] months post-diagnosis) participated in a randomized controlled trial of a 12-month weight loss intervention versus usual care. Eating frequency, proportion of daily calories consumed after 5 PM, eating after 8 PM, nightly fasting duration, and sleep duration were estimated and categorized based on existing associations with factors influencing breast cancer prognosis and breast cancer outcomes. These behaviors at baseline were compared to women from an Australian national survey with similar age and BMI range. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to examine the changes in health behaviors from baseline to 18 months between intervention and usual care groups.

RESULTS

Before the trial, eating after 8 PM (67%) was higher, and short nightly fasting duration (< 13 h, 83%) and long sleep duration (> 9 h/day, 26%) were marginally higher, in breast cancer survivors than women in the national survey (52%, 75%, and 17%, respectively). "Less optimal" eating behaviors and sleep duration tended to co-occur. Behaviors remained unchanged over the 18-month follow-up, irrespective of the study group (p > 0.05; Cohen's effect sizes < 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Later timing of eating and long sleep duration were prevalent in breast cancer survivors and continued following a weight loss intervention.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Future multi-behavior interventions in breast cancer survivors should consider specific messages to target eating timing behaviors and sleep.

Germline DNA Damage Repair Gene Alterations in Patients with Metachronous Breast and Colorectal Cancer

A hereditary component of breast (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) has been described in approximately one-third of these tumor types. BC patients have an increased risk of developing CRC as a second primary tumor and vice versa. Germline genomic variants (NextSeq550, Illumina) were investigated in 24 unrelated BC and/or CRC patients and 7 relatives from 3 index patients. Fifty-six pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 19 of 24 patients. We detected single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in CRC predisposition genes (MLH1 and MUTYH) and other promising candidates (CDK5RAP3, MAD1L1, NOS3, and POLM). Eighteen patients presented SNVs or copy number variants (CNVs) in DNA damage repair genes. We also identified SNVs recently associated with BC or CRC predisposition (PABPC1, TYRO3, MAP3K1, SLC15A4, and LAMA1). The PABPC1c.1255C>T variant was detected in nine unrelated patients. Each patient presented at least one SNV/CNV in a candidate gene, and most had alterations in more than one gene, reinforcing a polygenic model for BC/CRC predisposition. A significant fraction of BC/CRC patients with a family history of these tumors harbored deleterious germline variants in DNA repair genes. Our findings can lead to strategies to improve the diagnosis, genetic counseling, and treatment of patients and their relatives.

Survival prediction in second primary breast cancer patients with machine learning: An analysis of SEER database

BACKGROUND

Studies have found that first primary cancer (FPC) survivors are at high risk of developing second primary breast cancer (SPBC). However, there is a lack of prognostic studies specifically focusing on patients with SPBC.

METHODS

This retrospective study used data from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. We selected female FPC survivors diagnosed with SPBC from 12 registries (from January 1998 to December 2018) to construct prognostic models. Meanwhile, SPBC patients selected from another five registries (from January 2010 to December 2018) were used as the validation set to test the model's generalization ability. Four machine learning models and a Cox proportional hazards regression (CoxPH) were constructed to predict the overall survival of SPBC patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used for feature selection. Model performance was assessed using time-dependent area under the ROC curve (t-AUC) and integrated Brier score (iBrier).

RESULTS

A total of 10,321 female FPC survivors with SPBC (mean age [SD]: 66.03 [11.17]) were included for model construction. These patients were randomly split into a training set (mean age [SD]: 65.98 [11.15]) and a test set (mean age [SD]: 66.15 [11.23]) with a ratio of 7:3. In validation set, a total of 3,638 SPBC patients (mean age [SD]: 66.28 [10.68]) were finally enrolled. Sixteen features were selected for model construction through univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Among five models, random survival forest model showed excellent performance with a t-AUC of 0.805 (95 %CI: 0.803 - 0.807) and an iBrier of 0.123 (95 %CI: 0.122 - 0.124) on testing set, as well as a t-AUC of 0.803 (95 %CI: 0.801 - 0.807) and an iBrier of 0.098 (95 %CI: 0.096 - 0.103) on validation set. Through feature importance ranking, the top one and other top five key predictive features of the random survival forest model were identified, namely age, stage, regional nodes positive, latency, radiotherapy, and surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The random survival forest model outperformed CoxPH and other machine learning models in predicting the overall survival of patients with SPBC, which was helpful for the monitoring of high-risk populations.

Synchronous occurrence of primary breast cancer and renal cell carcinoma: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Multiple Primary Malignant Neoplasms (MPMNs) are rare and refer to the occurrence of two or more distinct primary cancers with unrelated histopathological features in one patient. MPMNs can be classified as synchronous when tumors appear simultaneously or within six months of each other, and as metachronous when identified six months or more after the initial cancer diagnosis. While breast cancer often co-occurs with other primary cancers such as colorectal, endometrial, and ovarian cancers, the simultaneous presence of invasive lobular breast carcinoma and clear cell renal cancer is rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we present the case of a 59-year-old postmenopausal woman who initially presented with breast carcinoma. Further investigation revealed a mass in the left kidney. The patient underwent a radical mastectomy and axillary dissection, followed by a left nephrectomy. After 8 months follow up, the patient is doing well and disease-free.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Based on our case and literature review, the co-occurrence of breast carcinoma with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is uncommon. Most reported cases involve metastatic tumors or metachronous breast malignancy with RCC. The etiology of synchronous malignancy is complex, and treatment options usually include a combination of surgery and/or adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

This case report contributes valuable insights to the limited literature on synchronous breast cancer with renal cell carcinoma. The rarity of this simultaneous occurrence underscores the importance of considering such cases. Documenting these cases is crucial for increasing awareness and reducing the resulting morbidity and mortality.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer with second primary malignancies

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in breast cancer (BC) with second primary malignancies (SPMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

149 BC patients (149/1419, 10.5 %) ultimately diagnosed with SPMs were included in the study. The following data were evaluated: age, location, the treatment of the first BC, the interval between the first BC and SPMs, the maximum diameter of SPMs, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of SPMs, and SPMs metastases. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of follow-up patients were analyzed. The diagnostic efficiency of 18F-FDG PET/CT for SPMs and consistency with the pathological findings were calculated.

RESULTS

The most common SPMs of BC was lung cancer (81/149, 54.4 %), particularly early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. There were the shorter maximum diameter of SPMs, the lower SUVmax of SPMs, and the fewer SPMs metastases in the lung cancer group than non-lung cancer group (P<0.001). The OS and PFS of the follow-up patients in the lung cancer group were longer than non-lung cancer group (P<0.001). The SPMs metastases was independent prognostic indicator of OS. The pathological grouping and the SPMs metastases were independent prognostic indicators of PFS. 18F-FDG PET/CT efficacy in diagnosing SPMs in BC patients was high. Compared with the pathological findings, the consistency was good (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Applying 18F-FDG PET/CT in BC patients might be helpful in detecting SPMs and partially predicting patient prognosis, in addition to its primary function in the diagnosis and staging of BC.

Colorectal cancer screening utilization among breast, cervical, prostate, skin, and lung cancer survivors

PURPOSE

To examine whether sociodemographic characteristics, access to care, risk behavior factors, and chronic health conditions were associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization among breast, cervical, prostate, skin, and lung cancer survivors.

METHODS

We analyzed the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data on 9780 eligible cancer survivors. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were applied to assess the association between guideline-concordant CRC screening and the mentioned characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 81.9%, 65%, 88%,78.1%, and 80.1% of breast, cervical, prostate, skin, and lung cancer survivors received CRC screening, respectively (p-value < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, breast, cervical, and skin cancer survivors aged 60 years or older were associated with higher odds of receiving CRC screening. Respondents that had their recency of routine checkup two or more years before had lower odds of having CRC screening among cervical (OR = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.22), prostate (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.49), and skin cancer (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36-0.70) survivors. The presence of chronic diseases was also associated with guideline-concordant CRC screening among breast, prostate, and skin cancer survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide important evidence on potential factors that are associated with guideline-concordant CRC screening utilization across different cancer survivors, which include older age, recency of routine checkup, and multiple chronic diseases. Moreover, variation in CRC screening utilization across cancer survivors may highlight missed opportunities for secondary cancer prevention.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Establishing clear CRC screening guidelines and including patient-provider communication on recommendation in cancer survivorship care may increase adherence to CRC screening.

Association of radiotherapy for stage I-III breast cancer survivors and second primary malignant cancers: a population-based study

PURPOSE

With life span extending, breast cancer survivors may face the possibility of developing second primary cancers (SPCs). The objective of this research is to investigate the risk factors, risk attribute to radiotherapy and the survivalship for SPCs.

METHODS

A total of 445 523 breast cancer patients were enrolled from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in 2000-2018. The risk factors for SPCs development were confirmed by competing risk model, and then were integrated to the nomogram establishment. The cumulative incidence of SPCs including SBC (second breast cancer), SGC (second gynecological cancer), and SLC (second lung cancer) were estimated. The radiotherapy-associated risk for SPCs were evaluated by Poisson regression in radiotherapy and no-radiotherapy. Propensity score matching was used to reduce possible bias for survival comparison.

RESULTS

There were 57.63% patients in radiotherapy. The risk factors for developing SPCs were age, year, race, tumor size, stage, radiotherapy, grade, surgery, and histology. The cumulative incidence of SPCs was 7.75% in no-radiotherapy and 10.33% in radiotherapy. SLC, SBC, and SGC also appeared the similar results. The increased risk of developing SPCs were associated with radiotherapy in majority subgroups. The dynamic radiotherapy-associated risk for SPCs by age slightly increased risk was observed. Regardless radiotherapy or no-radiotherapy, the 10-year overall survival for SBC (radiotherapy: 59.41%; no-radiotherapy: 55.53%) and SGC (radiotherapy: 48.61%; no-radiotherapy: 35.53%) were worse than that among matched patients with only primary cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer survivors remained a high radiotherapy-associated risk for developing SPCs. The prognosis in radiotherapy was better than in no-radiotherapy for some specific SPCs. Largely attention should be paid to these patients.

Causal relationship between prostate cancer and 12 types of cancers: multivariable and bidirectional Mendelian randomization analyses

BACKGROUND

Previous observational studies have shown an association between certain cancers and the subsequent risk of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the causal relationship between these cancers and PCa is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between 12 common cancers and the risk of PCa.

METHODS

We employed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to perform forward and reverse Mendelian randomization (MR) within two-sample frameworks. Furthermore, we conducted multivariable MR analyses to investigate the relationships between different types of cancer. In addition, multiple sensitivity analysis methods were employed to assess the robustness of our findings.

RESULTS

Our univariable MR analysis showed that genetically predicted hematological cancer was associated with a reduced risk of PCa (OR: 0.911, 95% CI 0.89-0.922, P = 0.03). Furthermore, MR analysis demonstrates that genetically predicted occurrence of thyroid gland and endocrine gland cancer also raised the risk of PCa (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis showed that thyroid gland cancer exhibited a higher incidence of PCa (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08-1.16, P = 0.008). In the reverse MR analysis, we found no significant inverse causal associations between PCa and 12 types of cancers.

CONCLUSION

In summary, this study provided insights into the causal relationships between various types of cancer and PCa. Hematological cancer was suggested to associate with a lower risk of PCa, while thyroid gland cancer and endocrine gland cancer might increase the risk. These findings contribute to the understanding of genetic factors related to PCa and its potential associations with other cancers.

Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors-Opportunity to Address Gaps in Cancer Prevention and Survivorship

The risks of secondary cancers associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are as much as three times higher for survivors of pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer (PYAC) compared to the general population. Despite this, HPV vaccination rates among PYAC survivors remain low. Whereas pediatric oncology providers endorse HPV vaccination of PYAC survivors, many lack the resources or opportunities to intervene. The responsibility of HPV vaccination, therefore, falls to primary care providers and practices. This article provides an overview of the challenges with HPV vaccination that are distinct to PYAC survivors and discusses potential strategies to increase HPV vaccine coverage in this population.

Synchronous Occurrence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Malignant Melanoma

In people with cancer, multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPMNs) are not unusual, and they may be caused by risk factors such as genetics, viral infection, smoking, environmental factors, or treatment-related variables. The frequency of MPMNs occurring in the same or separate organ systems is between 2% and 17%. The 5-year breast cancer survivors have been found to have around 3.6% chance of acquiring another neoplasm. In this case report, we present a very rare simultaneous occurrence of two highly malignant tumors - triple-negative breast cancer and cutaneous melanoma. We performed genetic tests for determining the link between both neoplasms. The patient was treated in an adjuvant setting with chemotherapy and immunotherapy with pembrolizumab. According to epidemiological studies, for primary cutaneous melanoma following breast cancer, the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) varied from 1.03 to 4.10, while for primary breast carcinoma following cutaneous melanoma, it varied from 1.16 to 5.13. A number of risk factors have been proven to increase the risk of a second primary malignancy. This case highlights the importance of risk factor assessment and thorough primary workup of each patient. It emphasizes the need for a personalized approach when treating synchronous neoplasms.

Characterization of patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer and melanoma: genetic susceptibility or increased surveillance?

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer diagnosis had been linked to an increased risk of melanoma in several reports. The aim of the current study was to assess the role of genetics, increased surveillance, and radiation treatment in patients with a dual diagnosis of breast cancer and melanoma (DBM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients treated at Sheba Medical Center between 2007 and 2021 with DBM were included in the cohort. Data on family history, genetic tests, characteristics, and treatment of both cancers were collected. The proportion of patients with a pathogenic variant (PV) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes was compared to a control group of patients with breast cancer. The proportion of patients presenting with in-situ disease was compared to the national registry data.

RESULTS

The cohort included 222 DBM patients of whom 114 had documentation of genetic testing. Twenty patients tested positive for PVs of which 13 (11%) were in BRCA genes. This was comparable to the proportion in patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer (736; 19%). The proportion of melanoma diagnosed at stage 0 was comparable to the national proportion ( N  = 40; 30% vs. 28%, respectively). In comparison to the national registry, a larger proportion of breast cancers were ductal carcinoma in situ or lobular carcinoma in situ [10% in the registry vs. 19% (22) in the cohort; P  < 0.003].

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DBM we did not find an increased proportion of PVs in BRCA genes. Our findings suggest that the increased standardized incidence ratio of the dual diagnosis may be partially explained by increased surveillance and detection of earlier-stage cancers.

Risk of second primary cancer among women in the Kaiser Permanente Breast Cancer Survivors Cohort

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer survivors are living longer due to early detection and advances in treatment and are at increased risk for second primary cancers. Comprehensive evaluation of second cancer risk among patients treated in recent decades is lacking.

METHODS

We identified 16,004 females diagnosed with a first primary stage I-III breast cancer between 1990 and 2016 (followed through 2017) and survived ≥ 1 year at Kaiser Permanente (KP) Colorado, Northwest, and Washington. Second cancer was defined as an invasive primary cancer diagnosed ≥ 12 months after the first primary breast cancer. Second cancer risk was evaluated for all cancers (excluding ipsilateral breast cancer) using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and a competing risk approach for cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for KP center, treatment, age, and year of first cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 6.2 years, 1,562 women developed second cancer. Breast cancer survivors had a 70% higher risk of any cancer (95%CI = 1.62-1.79) and 45% higher risk of non-breast cancer (95%CI = 1.37-1.54) compared with the general population. SIRs were highest for malignancies of the peritoneum (SIR = 3.44, 95%CI = 1.65-6.33), soft tissue (SIR = 3.32, 95%CI = 2.51-4.30), contralateral breast (SIR = 3.10, 95%CI = 2.82-3.40), and acute myeloid leukemia (SIR = 2.11, 95%CI = 1.18-3.48)/myelodysplastic syndrome (SIR = 3.25, 95%CI = 1.89-5.20). Women also had elevated risks for oral, colon, pancreas, lung, and uterine corpus cancer, melanoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR range = 1.31-1.97). Radiotherapy was associated with increased risk for all second cancers (HR = 1.13, 95%CI = 1.01-1.25) and soft tissue sarcoma (HR = 2.36, 95%CI = 1.17-4.78), chemotherapy with decreased risk for all second cancers (HR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.78-0.98) and increased myelodysplastic syndrome risk (HR = 3.01, 95%CI = 1.01-8.94), and endocrine therapy with lower contralateral breast cancer risk (HR = 0.48, 95%CI = 0.38-0.60). Approximately 1 in 9 women who survived ≥ 1 year developed second cancer, 1 in 13 developed second non-breast cancer, and 1 in 30 developed contralateral breast cancer by 10 years. Trends in cumulative incidence declined for contralateral breast cancer but not for second non-breast cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated risks of second cancer among breast cancer survivors treated in recent decades suggests that heightened surveillance is warranted and continued efforts to reduce second cancers are needed.

Racial and ethnic disparities in mortality among breast cancer survivors after a second malignancy

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic differences in survival after a first cancer are well established but have not been examined after a second primary cancer (SPC) despite the increasing incidence among survivors.

METHODS

We examined 39 029 female breast cancer survivors who developed an SPC between 2000 and 2014 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression for competing risks data was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality after SPCs comparing Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian, and Non-Hispanic Black survivors with Non-Hispanic White survivors. Models were adjusted for sociodemographics, tumor characteristics, and treatments of the first and second cancer. Analyses were stratified by SPC type.

RESULTS

During 17 years of follow-up, there were 15 117 deaths after SPCs. The risk of cancer death was 12% higher among Non-Hispanic Black survivors (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.19) and 8% higher among Hispanic survivors (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.16) compared with Non-Hispanic White survivors. In subgroup analyses, the strongest associations were observed among Non-Hispanic Black survivors with a second breast or uterine cancer and among Hispanic survivors with a second breast cancer. Non-Hispanic Black survivors also experienced a 44% higher risk of cardiovascular disease death after SPC diagnosis than Non-Hispanic White survivors (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher cancer mortality among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic survivors and higher cardiovascular mortality among Non-Hispanic Black survivors exist among women who survive a first breast cancer to develop an SPC. Studies focused on identifying the contributors to these disparities are needed to enable implementation of effective mitigation strategies.

Risks of second non-breast primaries following breast cancer in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Second primary cancer incidence is rising among breast cancer survivors. We examined the risks of non-breast second primaries, in combination and at specific cancer sites, through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, seeking studies published by March 2022. We included studies that reported standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), with associated standard errors, assessing the combined risk of second non-breast primaries following breast cancer. We performed meta-analyses of combined second primary risks, stratifying by age, follow-up duration, and geographic region. We also assessed second primary risks at several specific sites, stratifying by age. The inverse variance method with DerSimonian-Laird estimators was used in all meta-analyses, assuming a random-effects model. Associated biases and study quality were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

One prospective and twenty-seven retrospective cohort studies were identified. SIRs for second non-breast primaries combined ranged from 0.84 to 1.84. The summary SIR estimate was 1.24 (95% CI 1.14-1.36, I2: 99%). This varied by age: the estimate was 1.59 (95% CI 1.36-1.85) when breast cancer was diagnosed before age 50, which was significantly higher than in women first diagnosed at 50 or over (SIR: 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.36, p for difference: < 0.001). SPC risks were also significantly higher when based on Asian, rather than European, registries (Asia-SIR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.29-1.67. Europe-SIR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.28). There were significantly increased risks of second thyroid (SIR: 1.89, 95% CI 1.49-2.38), corpus uteri (SIR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.53-2.23), ovary (SIR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.35-1.73), kidney (SIR: 1.43, 95% CI 1.17-1.73), oesophagus (SIR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.26-1.55), skin (melanoma) (SIR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.52), blood (leukaemia) (SIR: 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.45), lung (SIR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.51), stomach (SIR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.12-1.36) and bladder (SIR: 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.26) primaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer survivors are at significantly increased risk of second primaries at many sites. Risks are higher for those diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 and in Asian breast cancer survivors compared to European breast cancer survivors. This study is limited by a lack of data on potentially confounding variables. The conclusions may inform clinical management decisions following breast cancer, although specific clinical recommendations lie outside the scope of this review.

Risk of primary haematologic cancers following incident non-metastatic breast cancer: A Danish population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer survivors may have increased risk of subsequent haematologic cancer. We compared their risk of haematologic cancers with the general population during 38 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Using population-based Danish medical registries, we assembled a nationwide cohort of women diagnosed with incident non-metastatic breast cancer during 1980-2017, with follow-up through 2018. We compared breast cancer survivors with the general population by computing standardised incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Among 101,117 breast cancer survivors, we observed 815 incident haematologic cancers (median follow-up: 7.9 years). We observed excess risk of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) (SIR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.33-2.01), particularly in women who received chemotherapy (SIR: 3.33, 95%CI: 2.24-4.75) and premenopausal women (SIR: 3.23, 95%CI: 2.41-4.25). The risk of acute lymphoid leukaemia (ALL) was increased (SIR: 2.25, 95%CI: 1.29-3.66), whereas the risk of chronic lymphoid leukaemia (CLL) was decreased (SIR: 0.66, 95%CI: 0.53-0.82). An additional analysis showed elevated risk of CLL 0-6 months after breast cancer diagnosis (SIR: 3.00 95%CI: 1.75-4.80).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the general population, breast cancer survivors had elevated risk of AML, particularly when treated with chemotherapy. The risk of ALL was elevated, whereas the risk of CLL was lower. The higher risk of CLL in the first six months after diagnosis likely reflects surveillance bias-due to intensified diagnostic efforts at breast cancer diagnosis and treatment-prompting earlier detection. This has likely reduced the long-term risk of CLL in breast cancer survivors.

Risk of second primary cancer among breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

The aim of this study was to estimate the extra risk of second primary cancer among breast cancer patients.

Methods and materials

This is a systematic review. A comprehensive search of literature was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Scopus. The search included all published studies up to October 2022. This systematic review included studies published in the English language that reported the risk of second primary non-breast cancer [i.e., standardized incidence ratio (SIR)] among breast cancer patients older than 15 years. After evaluating the methodological quality of the selected studies, SIRs were pooled with consideration of heterogeneity among studies. The estimates were pooled by age and time since the diagnosis of primary breast cancer for both sexes (male and female). Age was categorized based on before 50 years and after 50 years, and time was categorized as duration of less than and more than 10 years, respectively.

Results

From 2,484 articles, 30 articles were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies varied in terms of population, number of cases, study design, setting, and year of implementation of the research. The estimated SIR for men and women was 1.28 (95% CI: 1.18, 1.38) and 1.27 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.39), respectively. Women diagnosed with breast cancer before menopause [SIR: 1.52 (95% CI: 1.34, 1.71) vs. 1.21 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.34)] as well as women after 10 years since their breast cancer diagnosis [1.33 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.431) vs. 1.24 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.37)] were at a higher risk of developing second primary cancer. Among men, while there were no differences in risk based on age, with the increase of time, the risk of second primary cancer was reduced [SIR: 1.22 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.33) vs. 1.00 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.22)].

Conclusion

There is an extra risk of second primary cancer among breast cancer patients. The extra risk should be considered for further screening and preventive measures among this population.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=336062, identifier (CRD42022336062).

Development and validation of nomograms to predict the survival probability and occurrence of a second primary malignancy of male breast cancer patients: a population-based analysis

Background

Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, which has restricted prospective research among MBC patients. With effective treatments, the prognosis of MBC patients has improved and developing a second primary malignancy (SPM) has become a life-threatening event for MBC survivors. However, few studies have focused on the prognosis of MBC patients and looked into the SPM issue in MBC survivors.

Method

We reviewed MBC patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2016 from the latest Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Plus database. Competing risk models and nomograms were conducted for predicting the risk of cancer-specific death and SPM occurrence. C-indexes, calibration curves, ROC curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves were applied for validation.

Result

A total of 1,843 MBC patients with complete information were finally enrolled and 60 (3.26%) had developed an SPM. Prostate cancer (40%) was the most common SPM. The median OS of all the enrolled patients was 102.41 months, while the median latency from the initial MBC diagnosis to the subsequent diagnosis of SPM was 67.2 months. The patients who suffered from an SPM shared a longer OS than those patients with only one MBC (p = 0.027). The patients were randomly divided into the development cohort and the validation cohort (at a ratio of 7:3). The Fine and Gray competing risk model was used to identify the risk factors. Two nomograms were constructed and validated to predict the 5-year, 8-year, and 10-year survival probability of MBC patients, both of which had good performance in the C-index, ROC curves, calibration plots, and DCA curves, showing the ideal discrimination capability and predictive value clinically. Furthermore, we, for the first time, constructed a nomogram based on the competing risk model to predict the 5-year, 8-year, and 10-year probability of developing an SPM in MBC survivors, which also showed good discrimination, calibration, and clinical effectiveness.

Conclusion

We, for the first time, included treatment information and clinical parameters to construct a nomogram to predict not only the survival probability of MBC patients but also the probability of developing an SPM in MBC survivors, which were helpful in individual risk estimation, patient follow-up, and counseling in MBC patients.

Risk of developing a second primary cancer in male breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With increasing survival after cancer diagnoses, second primary cancers (SPCs) are becoming more prevalent. We investigated the incidence and site of non-breast SPC risks following male breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies reporting standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) for SPCs published by March 2022. Meta-analyses used the generic inverse-variance method, assuming a random-effects model. We evaluated SIRs for overall SPCs, site-specific risks, by age at BC onset, time since BC onset and geographic region. We assessed study quality using routine techniques.

RESULTS

Eight population-based retrospective cohort studies were identified. SIRs ranged from 1.05 to 2.17. The summary SIR estimate was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.03-1.56, I2: 86%), and there were increased colorectal (SIR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03-1.61), pancreatic (SIR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.05-2.55) and thyroid (SIR: 5.58, 95% CI: 1.04-30.05) SPC risks. When an outlying study was excluded, the summary SIR for men diagnosed with BC before age 50 was 1.50 (95% CI: 1.21-1.85), significantly higher than men diagnosed at older ages (SIR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.98-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Male BC survivors are at elevated risks of developing second primary colorectal, pancreatic and thyroid cancers. The estimates may assist their clinical management and guide decisions on genetic testing.

High rate of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated primary lung cancer in patients with primary breast cancer

Background

With increased survival in breast cancer, resulting from advances in treatment, patients incur the possibility of subsequent primary malignancies, especially lung cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of CT-detected pulmonary ground-glass nodules and lung cancer following breast cancer diagnosis, the associations between breast cancer and lung cancer, the pathological features of double primary cancer, and the status of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in second primary lung cancer.

Methods

Clinical data from more than 9000 individuals who were diagnosed with primary breast cancer at Jiangsu Province Hospital (Jiangsu, China) between January 2008 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Of the 9179 patients, 6512 underwent diagnostic CT, 55 (0.8%) were diagnosed with a second primary lung cancer, which accounted for approximately 18.4% of the pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) detected. The incidence was higher than in the general female population (standardized incidence ratio 1.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-1.55]). Patients who experienced a second primary lung cancer exhibited a significantly higher rate of EGFR mutation (78.5%) than those with lung adenocarcinoma alone, with most exhibiting low-grade malignancy, older age, estrogen receptor negativity, low Ki67, and no lymph node metastasis.

Conclusions

Breast cancer patients, especially those with low-grade malignancy, were at high risk for developing primary lung cancer. For isolated GGN in patients with high-risk factors, clinicians should insist on close follow-up. Furthermore, EGFR may play an important role in primary lung adenocarcinomas and breast cancer.

Diagnostic diversity and heterogeneity of tumors: a real-world study of metastasis re-biopsy in advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Re-biopsy of metastasis in advanced breast cancer (ABC) has become an international convention to assist the diagnosis and evaluation of tumor heterogeneity. This study aimed to detect diagnostic diversity and inconsistencies among estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression levels between primary and metastatic lesions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1670 cases of ABC patients who had undergone at least one lesion re-biopsy from January 2010 to December 2018. The pathological diagnosis of biopsies, distribution of biopsy sites, and severe puncture complications at each site were collected. In addition, the inconsistency rates and related factors of ER, PR, and HER2 expression between primary and metastatic lesions were analyzed fully considering patients' demographic profiles and disease characteristics.

RESULTS

In total, 1670 cases of breast cancer (BC) patients diagnosed by pathology underwent one to four biopsies of recurrences or metastases in different sites or at different stages during the rescue treatment, producing 2019 histopathological specimens which were analyzed in the study. Pathological diagnosis showed that eight patients had benign pathological diagnoses, 11 patients had second primary malignant tumors but without recurrences of breast cancer, and 17 patients had pathologically confirmed breast cancer recurrences combined with second primary cancer. In 1173 patients who presented ER, PR, and HER2 expressions in primary and metastatic lesions, the inconsistency rates of ER, PR, and HER2 were 17.5% (205/1173), 31.3% (367/1173), and 13.9% (163/1173), respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that the age at the onset of breast cancer or adjuvant endocrine therapy was an independent factor affecting changes in PR expression level. Except one liver puncture with local hemorrhage and two lung punctures with hemopneumothorax, no other severe puncture complications occurred in 1950 non-surgical rebiopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathological diagnosis of metastasis re-biopsy of ABC was diverse, and the ER, PR, and HER2 expression levels were inconsistent between primary and metastatic lesions. Therefore, more attention should be paid to perform biopsies of relapsed and metastatic breast cancers routinely in clinical practice.

Population incidence and characteristics of secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer: a competing risk analysis

PURPOSE

To examine incidence and characteristics of women who developed secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer.

METHODS

This is a population-based retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program from 1973 to 2013. Women with uterine cancer who did not have synchronous or a history of breast cancer were followed after their uterine cancer diagnosis (N = 236,561). A time-dependent competing risk analysis was performed to examine cumulative incidences and clinico-pathological characteristics of those who subsequently developed breast cancer.

RESULTS

There were 7110 (3.0%) women who developed secondary breast cancers after uterine cancer with 5-, 10-, and 20-year cumulative incidence rates of 1.5, 2.8, and 4.7%, respectively. The increase in the rate of secondary breast cancer was particularly high in the first 3 years after a uterine cancer diagnosis (annual percent change [APC] 4.9), followed by 3-7 years (APC 1.6) after diagnosis (P < 0.001). The median time to develop secondary breast cancer was 6.4 years. Older women had significantly shorter time intervals between uterine and breast cancer diagnoses (3.7 years for aged > 71, 5.9 for aged 64-71, 7.6 for aged 56-63, and 9.4 for aged < 56, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, older age, White race, married status, endometrioid, serous, and mixed histology types, and early-stage tumors remained as independent factors of developing secondary breast cancer (all, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tumor factors with endometrioid and serous histology types and early-stage disease were the factors associated with secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer diagnosis. Older women had shorter time to develop secondary breast cancer.

Risk of colon cancer-related death in people who had cancer in the past

BACKGROUND

The rate of second primary malignancies (SPM) is gradually increasing. Yet, the risk of death from primary cancer vs. SPM is still not well understood. In this study, we investigated the survival of patients with colorectal cancer (as SPM) who had cancer in the past (prior cancer) and the risk factors of SPM death in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 1866 colon cancer patients with prior cancer in our main cohort and 43,959 colon cancer patients, including 37,440 patients with colon cancer as only malignancy and 6519 patients with colon cancer as subsequent colon cancer (SCC), in a second cohort and 3429 colon cancer patients, including 2371 patients with prior colon cancer (PCC) and 1058 patients with colon cancer as SPM, in a third cohort. After propensity score matching, 6519 pairs of subjects were identified in second cohort.

RESULTS

Patients with prior prostate and breast cancer had a higher risk of developing colon cancer compared to those with gastrointestinal cancer. Also, colon cancer patients with different prior cancer had different survival rates. Furthermore, except for prior lung cancer (52.78 vs. 25.93%), most subjects died due to colon cancer complications. The ratio of colon cancer deaths to prior cancer deaths in patients with a low stage and high stage was 1.51 and 6.64, respectively. In addition, colon cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS rates were significantly lower in subjects with colon cancer as the SPM than in those with PCC. Also, compared with PCC, SPM was associated with OS and CSS with HR 1.59 (95 CI 1.43-1.78) and HR 2.00 (95% CI 1.70-2.36). Furthermore, compared with only colon cancer, SCC was associated with OS and CSS with HR 1.23 (95 CI 1.17-1.29) and HR 1.13 (95% CI 1.06-1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior cancer was found to have an adverse impact on OS in patients with colon cancer (secondary cancer), most of whom died due to colon cancer as secondary cancer itself rather than prior cancer. Early detection and treatment strategies should be investigated in this population.

Mortality after second malignancy in breast cancer survivors compared to a first primary cancer: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study

Limited information exists about survival outcomes after second primary cancers (SPCs) among breast cancer survivors. Studies suggest that mortality after certain SPCs may be higher than mortality after first primary cancers (FPCs) of the same type. A cohort study was conducted among 63,424 US women using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database (2000–2016) to compare mortality after a SPC among breast cancer survivors to mortality among women after a FPC using Cox proportional hazard regression. Propensity scores were used to match survivors with SPCs to women with FPCs 1:1 based on cancer type and prognostic factors. During a median follow-up of 42 months, 11,532 cancer deaths occurred after SPCs among survivors compared to 9305 deaths after FPCs. Cumulative cancer mortality was 44.7% for survivors with SPCs and 35.2% for women with FPCs. Survivors with SPCs had higher risk of cancer death (hazard ratio (HR): 1.27, 95% CI: 1.23–1.30) and death overall (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.15–1.21) than women with FPCs. Increased risk of cancer death after SPCs compared to FPCs was observed for cancer in breast, lung, colon and/or rectum, uterus, lymphoma, melanoma, thyroid, and leukemia. Estrogen receptor status and treatment of the prior breast cancer as well as time between prior breast cancer and SPC significantly modified the mortality difference between women with SPC and FPC. A more tailored approach to early detection and treatment could improve outcomes from second cancer in breast cancer survivors.

Common Multiple Primary Cancers Associated With Breast and Gynecologic Cancers and Their Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prognosis: A Review

The mammary gland is closely related to the female reproductive system in many aspects, affecting the whole gynecological system. Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women and associated with considerable negative effects. Due to various factors including co-pathogenic genetic mutations, environment factors, lifestyle, behavioral factors, treatment regimens and in-creased survival of patients with BC, there is an increased probability of developing additional primary gynecologic cancers such as ovarian cancer (OC), endometrial cancer (EC), and cervical cancer (CC). More and more studies have been conducted in recent years. Multiple primary cancers (MPCs), also known as multiple primary malignancies, refers to two or more different primary cancers in the same patient occurring in the same or different organs or tissues. The pathogenesis of multiple primary cancers is complex and has a negative effect on the prognosis and survival of patients. This review discusses the common types of BC-associated MPCs, namely, BC associated with OC, BC associated with EC and BC associated with CC, as well as risk factors, pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis of MPCs associated with breast and gynecologic cancers. It provides new intervention and treatment ideas for patients with BC-associated MPCs to improve quality of life and prognosis.

Synchronous Malignancies Identified by PET-CT Scan in Breast Cancer Patients

Breast cancer is a common malignancy and a common cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Pre-treatment workup of breast cancer does not routinely include positron emission tomography scans. We aimed to review cases of women with breast cancer and a synchronous second primary malignancy. We present three cases of women with non-metastatic cancer in whom a synchronous second primary malignancy was found. Synchronous, second primary malignancies which were identified included rectal cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and non-small cell lung cancer. All second primary malignancies were identified by a PET-CT scan. In conclusion, PET-CT may be used for detection of secondary primary malignancies in select breast cancer patients.

Incidence and Survival of Multiple Primary Cancers in US Women With a Gynecologic Cancer

Objectives

To evaluate risk of a second cancer and associated survival times in United States women with diagnosis of cancer.

Methods

The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried for 2 cohorts of women aged 18 - 89 with either an index gynecologic or non-gynecologic cancer diagnosed between 1992 - 2017. Index cases were followed to determine if a second primary cancer was subsequently diagnosed; defined according to SEER multiple primary and histology coding rules. Standard Incident Ratios (SIR) and latency intervals between index diagnosis and second primary diagnosis were evaluated. Among those who developed a second primary cancer, median survival times from diagnosis of second primary cancer were also calculated.

Results

Between 1992 - 2017, 227,313 US women were diagnosed with an index gynecological cancer and 1,483,016 were diagnosed with an index non-gynecologic cancer. Among patients with index gynecologic cancer, 7.78% developed a non-gynecologic subsequent primary cancer. The risk of developing any non-gynecologic cancer following an index gynecologic cancer was higher than the risk in the general population (SIR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04 - 1.07). Organs especially at risk were Thyroid (SIR 1.45), Colon and Rectum (SIR 1.23), and Urinary System (SIR 1.33). Among women diagnosed with an index non-gynecologic cancer, 0.99% were diagnosed with a subsequent gynecologic cancer. The risk of developing a gynecologic cancer following a non-gynecologic cancer was also elevated compared to the average risk of the general population (SIR 1.05, 1.03 - 1.07), with uterine cancer having the highest SIR of 1.13.

Conclusion

The risk of a developing a second primary cancer and the corresponding survival time is based on the order and site of the index and subsequent cancer. Surveillance guidelines should be examined further to optimize survivorship programs.

Dietary and physical activity changes and adherence to WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations following a remotely delivered weight loss intervention for female breast cancer survivors: The Living Well after Breast Cancer randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Diet, exercise, and weight management are key in improving outcomes for breast cancer survivors, with international recommendations for cancer survivors relating to these behaviors. However, few behavioral interventions have reported outcomes aligned specifically with these recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a remotely delivered weight loss intervention versus usual care for female breast cancer survivors, on changes in multiple diet and physical activity behaviors.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial with assessments at study baseline, 6-, 12- and 18 months (i.e., mid-intervention, post-intervention, and non-contact follow-up).

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Participants were recruited between October 2012 and December 2014 through hospitals in Brisbane (Australia) and the state-based cancer registry. Eligible participants (female, 18-75 years, BMI 25-45 kg/m², diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer in previous two years) were randomly allocated to intervention (n=79) or usual care (n=80).

INTERVENTION

Participants randomized to the intervention group received 22 counseling telephone calls targeting diet and physical activity aimed at achieving 5-10% weight loss, and optional text messages, over 12 months. Usual care participants received their standard medical care and brief feedback following each assessment, which was similar to that provided to intervention participants with the exception that usual care participants' results were not compared to national and study recommendations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Dietary intake (24-hour recalls); physical activity (hip-worn Actigraph); sitting time (thigh-worn activPAL3); and, adherence to World Cancer Research Fund/American Cancer Research Institute (WCRF/AICR) recommendations for cancer survivors (0-7 score) were measured at each assessment, with data collected between November 2012 and October 2016.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Intervention effects were assessed by linear mixed models, accounting for repeated measures and baseline values. Significance was set at P<0.05.

RESULTS

At baseline, participants were (mean±SD) aged 55±9 years, with a BMI of 31.4±5.0 kg/m², 10.7±5.0 months post-diagnosis, and primarily non-minority. At baseline, only 8% (n=12) of participants met ≥5/7 WCRF/AICR recommendations (mean±SD WCRF/AICR adherence score: 3.8±1.0). At 12 months, significant intervention effects were observed in walking/running ( +21 mins/week; 95%CI: 4, 38) and WCRF/AICR adherence scores (+0.3 points; 95%CI: 0.0, 0.6) only. At 18 months, significant intervention effects were observed for energy intake (-229 kcal/day energy; 95%CI: -373, -84), total fat (-10 g/day; 95%CI: -18, -2), and saturated fat (-5 g/day; 95%CI: -9, -1), and were sustained for WCRF/AICR adherence scores (+0.5 points; 95%CI: 0.2, 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

This remotely delivered weight loss intervention led to sustained improvements in WCRF/AICR adherence scores, and some improvements in diet and physical activity. These findings provide support for the health benefit of programs targeting lifestyle behaviors in line with cancer survivor recommendations, and the potential for dissemination of such programs following treatment for early-stage female breast cancer.

Risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in breast cancer survivors: a nationwide cohort study

Several studies have suggested that estrogens have a protective function against lymphomagenesis. The treatment of breast cancer is driven by subtype classification, and the assessment of hormone receptor status is important for treatment selection. Thus, we evaluated the association between breast cancer and the incidence of NHL. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a population-based nationwide registry in South Korea. We selected all women with newly diagnosed breast cancer between January 1st, 2002 and December 31st, 2016 who received curative treatment (N = 84,969) and a 1:10 sample of age-matched non-breast cancer controls (N = 1,057,674). Incident breast cancer (time-varying exposure) was the exposure and development of any type of NHL, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mature T/NK-cell lymphomas, anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), and unspecified types of NHL, was the outcome. During follow-up, 1564 incident cases of NHL occurred. The fully adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) for NHL associated with the development of breast cancer was 1.64 (95% CI = 1.34–2.00) after adjusting for body mass index, alcohol intake, physical activity, smoking, income, and comorbidity. The adjusted HR for NHL was much higher in participants who were aged <50 years and who received hormone therapy (either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors) than in those ≥50 years or who did not receive hormone therapy, respectively. The development of breast cancer was associated with a significantly increased risk of NHL, particularly follicular lymphoma and mature T/NK-cell lymphoma. In particular, the risk of NHL was higher in patients receiving hormone therapy and in younger patients.

Primary synchronous malignancies of the breast and the kidney

Synchronous primary malignancies are most frequently seen with cancers of the stomach and oesophagus, mainly attributed to the similar genetic mutations. Most of these multiple malignancies turn out to be metastatic or metachronous lesions. Multiple synchronous malignancies are rarer than metachronous ones. Primary synchronous breast and renal cancer is even rare. These patients require extensive workup to exclude all possible metastases. The nature of the primary tumours must also be confirmed, prior to any treatment strategy. We report the case of a healthy, middle-aged woman who initially presented with a lesion suspicious for breast carcinoma, and further workup revealed the presence of an asymptomatic, synchronous primary renal cell cancer, which is a very rare presentation.

Colorectal Cancer Risk in Women with Gynecologic Cancers-A Population Retrospective Cohort Study

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) risk for women with gynecologic malignancy using insurance claims data of Taiwan. We identified patients who survived cervical cancer (N = 25,370), endometrial cancer (N = 8149) and ovarian cancer (N = 7933) newly diagnosed from 1998 to 2010, and randomly selected comparisons (N = 165,808) without cancer, matched by age and diagnosis date. By the end of 2011, the incidence and hazard ratio (HR) of CRC were estimated. We found that CRC incidence rates were 1.26-, 2.20-, and 1.61-fold higher in women with cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancers, respectively, than in comparisons (1.09/1000 person-years). The CRC incidence increased with age. Higher adjusted HRs of CRC appeared within 3 years for women with endometrial and ovarian cancers, but not until the 4th to 7th years of follow up for cervical cancer survivals. Cancer treatments could reduce CRC risks, but not significantly. However, ovarian cancer patients receiving surgery alone had an incidence of 3.33/1000 person-years for CRC with an adjusted HR of 3.79 (95% CI 1.11-12.9) compared to patients without any treatment. In conclusion, gynecologic cancer patients are at an increased risk of developing CRC, sooner for those with endometrial or ovarian cancer than those with cervical cancer.

Dietary Pattern at 18-Month Post-Diagnosis and Outcomes of Breast Cancer Among Chinese Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Evidence of the association between dietary pattern and outcomes of breast cancer was limited in Asian women, including Chinese.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study was initiated among Chinese breast cancer patients to investigate lifestyle habits and outcomes of breast cancer. At each follow-up, validated food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) were used to assess patients' dietary intake. This study included 1226 patients with invasive early-stage breast cancer with detailed data at 18-month follow-up after cancer diagnosis. Factor analysis was used to derive dietary patterns, whereby two dietary patterns were identified. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate associations between dietary patterns and time to outcome, including breast cancer recurrence, overall mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 54.1 months, 165 patients had breast cancer recurrence and 98 deaths occurred. Two dietary patterns were identified: "Western dietary pattern" characterized by high intake of refined grains and cakes, red and processed meat and oil; "healthy dietary pattern" characterized by high consumption of vegetables and fruits. Participants in the highest tertile of "Western dietary pattern" did not have a higher risk of breast cancer recurrence (P trend = 0.89), overall mortality (P trend = 0.48) and breast cancer-specific mortality (P trend = 0.75). Similarly, a null association existed between "healthy dietary pattern" and outcomes of breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Neither dietary pattern was associated with risk of breast cancer recurrence, all-causes death or death from breast cancer. Prospective follow-up is still needed to further confirm the association between specific dietary pattern and outcomes of breast cancer.

Risks of subsequent primary cancers among breast cancer survivors according to hormone receptor status

BACKGROUND

This study was aimed at examining the risks of subsequent primary cancers (SPCs) among breast cancer survivors by hormone receptor (HR) status and age at diagnosis.

METHODS

Data from 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries were used to identify 431,222 breast cancer survivors (at least 1 year) diagnosed between the ages of 20 and 84 years from 1992 to 2015. Risks of SPCs were measured as the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and the excess absolute risk (EAR) per 10,000 person-years. Poisson regression was used to test the difference in SIRs by HR status.

RESULTS

In comparison with the general population, the risk of new cancer diagnoses among survivors was 20% higher for those with HR-positive cancers (SIR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.21; EAR, 23.3/10,000 person-years) and 44% higher for those with HR-negative cancers (SIR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.41-1.47; EAR, 45.2/10,000 person-years), with the risk difference between HR statuses statistically significant. The higher risk after HR-negative cancer was driven by acute nonlymphocytic leukemia and breast, ovarian, peritoneal, and lung cancers. By age at diagnosis, the total EAR per 10,000 person-years ranged from 15.8 (95% CI, 14.1-17.5; SIR, 1.11) among late-onset (age, 50-84 years) HR-positive survivors to 69.4 (95% CI, 65.1-73.7; SIR, 2.24) among early-onset (age, 20-49 years) HR-negative survivors, with subsequent breast cancer representing 73% to 80% of the total EAR. After breast cancer, the greatest EARs were for ovarian cancer among early-onset HR-negative survivors, lung cancer among early- and late-onset HR-negative survivors, and uterine corpus cancer among late-onset HR-positive survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Risks of SPCs after breast cancer differ substantially by subtype and age. This suggests that more targeted approaches for cancer prevention and early-detection strategies are needed in survivorship care planning.

Patient and GP experiences of pathways to diagnosis of a second primary cancer: a qualitative study

Background

More people are surviving a first primary cancer and experiencing a second, different cancer. However, little is known about the diagnostic journeys of patients with second primary cancer (SPC). This study explores the views of patients and general practitioners (GPs) on their experiences of pathways to diagnosis of SPC, including the influence of a previous diagnosis of cancer on symptom appraisal, help-seeking and referral decisions.

Methods

Qualitative interviews with patients with a SPC diagnosis and case-linked GP interviews in a Scottish primary care setting. In-depth face to face or telephone interviews were conducted, underpinned by a social constructionist approach. Interviews were transcribed and Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis undertaken. Three analysts from the research team read transcripts and developed the coding framework using QSR NVivo version 10, with input from a fourth researcher. Themes were developed from refined codes and interpreted in the context of existing literature and theory.

Results

Interviews were conducted with 23 patients (aged 43–84 years) with a SPC diagnosis, and 7 GPs. Five patient themes were identified: Awareness of SPC, symptom appraisal and help-seeking, pathways to diagnosis, navigating the healthcare system, and impact of SPC. GPs interviews identified: experience and knowledge of SPC and referrals and decision-making.

Conclusions

Insights into the pathway to diagnosis of SPC highlights the need for increased awareness of and vigilance for SPC among patients and healthcare providers (HCPs), and emotional support to manage the psychosocial burden.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08238-0.

Body Mass Index and Risk of Second Cancer Among Women With Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer survivors are at increased risk for developing second primary cancers compared with the general population. Little is known about whether body mass index (BMI) increases this risk. We examined the association between BMI and second cancers among women with incident invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort included 6481 patients from Kaiser Permanente Colorado and Washington of whom 822 (12.7%) developed a second cancer (mean follow-up was 88.0 months). BMI at the first cancer was extracted from the medical record. Outcomes included: 1) all second cancers, 2) obesity-related second cancers, 3) any second breast cancer, and 4) estrogen receptor-positive second breast cancers. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for second cancers associated with BMI adjusted for site, diagnosis year, treatment, demographic, and tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

The mean age at initial breast cancer diagnosis was 61.2 (SD = 11.8) years. Most cases were overweight (33.4%) or obese (33.8%) and diagnosed at stage I (62.0%). In multivariable models, for every 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI, the risk of any second cancer diagnosis increased by 7% (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.14); 13% (RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.21) for obesity-related cancers, 11% (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.21) for a second breast cancer, and 15% (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.27) for a second estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a statistically significant increased risk of second cancers associated with increasing BMI. These findings have important public health implications given the prevalence of overweight and obesity in breast cancer survivors and underscore the need for effective prevention strategies.

Disparities in colorectal cancer screening among breast and prostate cancer survivors

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended as an integral part of cancer survivorship care. We compared the rates of CRC screening among breast and prostate cancer survivors by primary cancer type, patient, and geographic characteristics in a community‐based health‐care system with a mix of large and small metro urban areas.

Materials and Methods

Data for this retrospective study were abstracted from medical records of a multi‐specialty practice serving about 250,000 individuals in southern Maryland. Breast (N = 1056) and prostate (N = 891) cancer patients diagnosed prior to 2015 were followed up till June 2018. Screening colonoscopy within the last 10 years was considered to be guideline concordant. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the prevalence odds ratios of being concordant on CRC screening by age, gender, race, metro area type, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension.

Results

Overall 51% of survivors had undergone a screening colonoscopy. However, there was a difference in CRC screening rate between prostate (54%) and breast (44%) cancer survivors. Older age (≥65 years), being a breast cancer survivor compared to prostate cancer, and living in a large compared to small metropolitan area were associated with a lower probability of receiving CRC screening. Having hypertension was associated with higher likelihood of being current on colonoscopy screening guidelines among survivors; but diabetes and obesity were not associated with CRC screening.

Conclusions

Low levels of CRC screening utilization were found among breast and prostate cancer survivors in a single center in Southern Maryland. Gender, comorbidities, and residential factors were associated with receipt of CRC screening.

Differential Second Primary Malignancy Occurrence After Breast Cancer According to HER2 Status: A Population-Based Study

PURPOSE

Our study aims to analyze the association between HER2 status of breast cancer (BC) and second primary malignancy (SPM) occurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on BC patients registered between 2010 and 2018 in the NCI SEER database, we utilized standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and Poisson regression to quantify SPM occurrence compared with the general population. Then, adjusted for competing death risk, cumulative incidence function and Gray's test were adopted to estimate the probability of SPM. Subsequent proportional subdistribution hazards regression was executed to identify the HER2 status impact on SPM risk. Finally, survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 409,796 first BC patients were included and 18,283 were identified with at least one SPM. The SIR of SPM after HER2+ BC was significantly lower than HER2- BC (1.03 vs 1.13; RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96; p<0.001). The predominantly declining SPM risk was only observed for second BC (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96; p=0.003) and lung cancer (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95; p=0.007). Furthermore, competing risk analysis verified the protective effect of HER2 positivity status on SPM occurrence. The 5-year cumulative incidence of SPM following HER2+ and HER2- BC were 4.09% and 5.16%, respectively (p<0.001). In addition, among patients suffering from SPM, HER2 positivity status contributed to better overall survival.

CONCLUSION

It is demonstrated that HER2+ BC patients had lower SPM incidence, which was remarkable for second BC and lung cancer.

Care for Breast Cancer Survivors

The number of cancer survivors is increasing globally. More than 15.5 million Americans in 2016 and 1.3 million Koreans in 2013 were living with cancer history. This growing population is expected to increase due to marked development of cancer treatment and early detection. Especially, breast cancer is the second most common cancer in Korean women with relatively favorable 5-year survival rate. Cancer survivors generally face various physical, psychological, and social problems including late-effect or long-term effect after cancer treatment and high risk for second primary cancer and comorbid chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and bone health. Breast cancer survivors also encounter wide range of health problems. To satisfy their complex needs, comprehensive supports are required. We categorized the strategy of comprehensive care for breast cancer survivors into (1) Surveillance for primary cancer, (2) Screening of second primary cancer, (3) Management of comorbid health condition, (4) Promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors, and (5) Preventive care. In the future, studies for providing best comprehensive care for breast cancer survivors are needed according to the individuals' demand.

Longitudinal changes in sports activity from pre-diagnosis to first five years post-diagnosis: a prospective Chinese breast cancer cohort study

BACKGROUND

To compare change in level of physical activity between pre-and post- diagnosis of breast cancer in Chinese women.

METHODS

Based on an on-going prospective study consisting of a sample of Chinese women with breast cancer, a validated modified Chinese Baecke questionnaire was used to measure physical activity at baseline (12 months before cancer diagnosis), 18-, 36- and 60-months after diagnosis (over the previous 12 months before each interview).

RESULTS

In our cohort of 1462 Chinese women with a mean age of 52 years, the mean level of physical activity at post-diagnosis was 9.6 metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-hours/week, which was significantly higher than that at pre-diagnosis with mean level of 5.9 MET-hours/week (P < 0.001). The mean levels of physical activity at 18-, 36- and 60-months follow-up were 9.9, 9.8 and 9.3 MET-hours/week, respectively. There was no significant difference between any two of the three follow-ups at post-diagnosis. The proportions of participant who met World Cancer Research Fund/ American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) recommendation before and after cancer diagnosis were both low, being 20.7 and 35.1%, respectively. Compared to pre-diagnosis, most of the patients improved or had no change on level of physical activity at post-diagnosis, with the respective proportion being 48.2 and 43.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to current lifestyle recommendation for cancer survivors, Chinese women with breast cancer significantly increased level of physical activity level after cancer diagnosis, and such improvement was sustained to 5 years post-diagnosis. The proportion of patients who met the exercise recommendation for cancer survivors was still low. Encouraging patients on the importance of durable high level of physical activity in breast cancer survivorship is warranted.

Association between statin use and second cancer risk in breast cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

Many studies have revealed that statin therapy reduced mortality in cancer patients, especially in breast cancer, but the effect for second cancer was unclear. We, therefore, performed a comparable cohort study to determine the risk of second cancer in breast cancer patients with statin therapy.

METHODS

Using claims data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Program, this study enrolled newly diagnosed breast cancer patients from 2000 to 2007 with and without statin therapy as the statin (n = 1222) and nonstatin (n = 4888) cohorts, respectively. The nonstatin cohort was propensity score matched by cohort entry year, age, and randomly selected comorbidities. These two cohorts were followed up until the diagnosis of second cancer, death, or the end of 2011. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios.

RESULTS

The statin cohort had a lower incidence rate than the nonstatin cohort for second cancer (7.37 vs. 8.36 per 1000 person-years), although the difference was not significant (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.26). Compared with the nonstatin cohort, the second cancer risk was significantly higher for patients taking pravastatin (aHR 2.71, 95% CI 1.19-6.19) but lower for those receiving multiple statin treatment (aHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.81) and combined lipophilic and hydrophilic type of statin (aHR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.89). The risk was lower for patients receiving a cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) of > 430 (aHR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.86).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that there is little association between statin use and second cancer risk in breast cancer patients.

Risk factors and prediction of second primary cancer in primary female non-metastatic breast cancer survivors

This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of second primary cancer among female breast cancer (BC) survivors, with emphasis on the prediction of the individual risk conditioned on the patient's characteristics. We identified 208,474 BC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2010 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Subdistribution proportional hazard model and competing-risk nomogram were used to explore the risk factors of second primary BC and non-BC, and to predict the 5- and 10-year probabilities of second primary BC. Model performance was evaluated via calibration curves and decision curve analysis. The overall 3-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative incidences for second primary BC were 0.9%, 1.6% and 4.4%, and for second primary non-BC were 2.3%, 3.9%, and 7.8%, respectively. Age over 70 years at diagnosis, black race, tumor size over 2 cm, negative hormone receptor, mixed histology, localized tumor, lumpectomy alone, and surgeries plus radiotherapy were significantly associated with increased risk of second BC. The risk of second non-BC was only related to age, race and tumor size. The proposed risk model as well as its nomogram was clinically beneficial to identify patients at high risk of developing second primary breast cancer.

Demographic factors associated with missed follow-up among solid tumor patients treated at a large multi-site academic institution

Aim: To identify demographic predictors of patients who miss oncology follow-up, considering that missed follow-up has not been well studies in cancer patients. Methods: Patients with solid tumors diagnosed from 2007 to 2016 were analyzed (n = 16,080). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to examine predictors of missed follow-up. Results: Our study revealed that 21.2% of patients missed ≥1 follow-up appointment. African-American race (odds ratio [OR] 1.33; 95% CI: 1.17-1.51), Medicaid insurance (OR 1.59; 1.36-1.87), no insurance (OR 1.66; 1.32-2.10) and rural residence (OR 1.78; 1.49-2.13) were associated with missed follow-up. Conclusion: Many cancer patients miss follow-up, and inadequate follow-up may influence cancer outcomes. Further research is needed on how to address disparities in follow-up care in high-risk patients.

The Melanoma and Breast Cancer Association: An Overview of their 'Second Primary Cancers' and the Epidemiological, Genetic and Biological correlations

This study reviews the relevant epidemiological studies associating cutaneous melanoma and breast carcinomas and provides an overview of the possible genetic, biological and bias factors that underpin this relationship. Standardised incidence ratio (SIR) for primary cutaneous melanoma after breast carcinoma ranged from 1.16 to 5.13 and ranged from 1.03 to 4.10 for primary breast carcinoma after cutaneous melanoma. Epidemiological studies highlight age, gender and use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy as potential risk factors for second primary cancers (SPCs). Mutations in BRCA2, CDKN2A, CDK4 and BAP1 may partly underlie any SPC association. The impact of socio-cultural factors and surveillance bias may be attributed to the findings of SPC partially or entirely. In conclusion, this study has highlighted the association between breast carcinoma and melanoma and identified various factors for further research and the optimised management of patients with both cancers.