1
|
Hammer PM, Momeni-Boroujeni A, Kolin DL, Kingsley L, Folkins A, Geisick RLP, Ho C, Suarez CJ, Howitt BE. POLE-Mutated Uterine Carcinosarcomas: A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Study of 11 Cases. Mod Pathol 2025; 38:100676. [PMID: 39615841 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2024] [Revised: 10/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/22/2024]
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCS) are high-grade biphasic neoplasms with generally poor outcomes. Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas molecular classification of endometrial carcinomas, the majority of UCS are classified as copy-number high/serous-like (p53-abnormal); however, a small subset represent other molecular subtypes, including those that harbor POLE mutations. We identified 11 POLE-mutated (POLEmut) UCS across 3 institutions and assessed the clinical, histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of these tumors. POLEmut UCS occurred in adult women (median age, 64 years; range, 48-79 years) and usually presented as The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 clinical stage IA (n = 4) or IB (n = 3). Almost all tumors were predominantly carcinomatous (n = 10), with most showing endometrioid morphology (n = 7), followed by ambiguous (n = 4) and serous (n = 3) histotypes. By immunohistochemistry, 7 tumors showed aberrant or subclonally aberrant expression of p53, 6 of which harbored pathogenic mutations in TP53 by sequencing. Other frequent mutations included PIK3CA (10/11), PTEN (8/11), RB1 (7/11), ARID1A (7/11), ATM (6/11), PIK3RA (5/11), and FBXW7 (4/11). Two tumors demonstrated loss of mismatch repair protein expression, and 1 had subclonal loss. Heterologous differentiation was uncommon, and only chondrosarcomatous type (n = 2) was observed. Mean and median follow-ups were 24.3 and 14.1 months, respectively (range, 1.4-61.1 months). Ten patients (91%) had no recurrences or death from disease, although 3 of these had follow-up periods <1 year. One patient, with the subclonal POLE variant, presented with stage IV disease and died 1.4 months after surgery. In conclusion, POLEmut UCS demonstrate unique morphologic and immunohistochemical features compared with their p53-abnormal counterparts and may have significant prognostic differences. Our study supports full molecular classification of UCS. We also raise awareness for potentially assessing POLE mutation allele frequency and clonality in consideration of classifying a tumor as POLEmut.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoebe M Hammer
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | - David L Kolin
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leandra Kingsley
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Ann Folkins
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Rachel L P Geisick
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Chandler Ho
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Carlos J Suarez
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Brooke E Howitt
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al Dallal HA, Jacobs TH, Bergman CL, Narayanan S, Kaur A, Al-Quran SZ, Chopra HK. Uterine carcinosarcoma with heterologous osseous elements: a case report of an extremely rare clinical occurrence with literature review. Front Oncol 2025; 15:1505504. [PMID: 40027125 PMCID: PMC11867948 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1505504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Carcinosarcoma is a rare and aggressive malignant neoplasm that predominantly affects elderly postmenopausal women and can involve various gynecologic organs. It is characterized by the presence of both malignant epithelial and sarcomatous components. While most uterine carcinosarcomas (UCS) are homologous (sarcomatous component consisting of elements native to the uterus), heterologous components are less common and may vary in composition. Rare heterologous elements can include lipomatous (liposarcoma) or osseous elements (osteosarcoma). We present an unusual case of a 31-year-old female with UCS exhibiting osseous heterologous elements. The patient underwent successful surgical resection and remains in remission during follow-up. This case is notable for its rarity, as highlighted by the uncommon age of the patient and the presence of rare heterologous elements in the UCS. Furthermore, it provides new insights into the diverse presentations of UCS and underscores the importance of comprehensive evaluation in understanding its clinical manifestations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba A. Al Dallal
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Taylor H. Jacobs
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Common Wealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Cody L. Bergman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
| | | | - Arshi Kaur
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Samer Z. Al-Quran
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Harpreet Kaur Chopra
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Can B, Karataşli V, Çakir İ, Sayhan S, Hansu K, Kuru O. The prognostic significance of the heterologous component in uterine carcinosarcomas. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA (1992) 2023; 69:e20230517. [PMID: 37729375 PMCID: PMC10508891 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uterine carcinosarcomas are aggressive, rare biphasic tumors with malignant epithelial and malignant sarcomatous components. The prognostic significance of the presence of extrauterine sarcoma (heterologous component) is controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of heterologous components in uterine carcinosarcomas on disease-free survival, overall survival, and other prognostic factors. METHODS Clinical and histopathological data from patients treated for uterine carcinosarcoma in a tertiary cancer center in Turkey between July 2000 and January 2020 were collected. Independent risk factors affecting overall survival and disease-free survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS A total of 98 patients were identified. The median follow-up was 21.8 (1.2-233.1) months. In the multivariate analysis, the median overall survival and disease-free survival were 23.8 and 20.7 months in those with homologous mesenchymal components and 17.6 and 9.7 months in those with heterologous mesenchymal components, respectively. It was found that the presence of heterologous mesenchymal components significantly reduced both overall survival and disease-free survival (odds ratio [OR], 2.861; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.196-6.841; p=0.018 and OR, 3.697; 95%CI 1.572-8.695; p=0.003, respectively). In addition, both lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy were found to significantly increase overall survival and disease-free survival. Age was found to increase only disease-free survival. CONCLUSION The results obtained in this study showed that the presence of heterologous components in uterine carcinosarcoma is a prognostic factor that adversely affects both overall survival and disease-free survival. Lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy have beneficial effects on both overall survival and disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behzat Can
- Necip Fazil City Hospital, Department of Gynecological Oncology – Kahramanmaraş, Turkey
| | - Volkan Karataşli
- Şanlıurfa State Hospital, Department of Gynecological Oncology – Sanlıurfa, Turkey
| | - İlker Çakir
- Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research Hospital, Department of Gynecological Oncology – İzmir, Turkey
| | - Sevil Sayhan
- İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pathology – İzmir, Turkey
| | - Kemal Hansu
- Necip Fazil City Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology – Kahramanmaraş, Turkey
| | - Oğuzhan Kuru
- Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gynecological Oncology – Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goyal A, Rajshekar SK, Krishnappa S, Rathod PS, Reddihalli PV, Bafna UD, Kansal Y, Nuthalapati S, Singh A. Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, Management, and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Uterine Carcinosarcoma: a Retrospective Analysis. Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:466-472. [PMID: 37324314 PMCID: PMC10267038 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01563-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma is a rare, highly aggressive, rapidly progressing neoplasm associated with a poor prognosis. It comprises 1-5% of all uterine malignancies but accounts for 16.4% of all deaths caused by uterine malignancies. There is a definite paucity of data available from the Indian subcontinent. Hence, we retrospectively conducted this study to analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics and outcomes of women with uterine carcinosarcoma in the past 10 years managed at the tertiary care center. This is a retrospective study of women with histologically proven uterine carcinosarcoma treated at a tertiary cancer center in South India between August 2009 and April 2019. Inpatient and outpatient records were reviewed; clinicopathological data were collected; and follow-up and survival data were ascertained. Over a period of 10 years, 20 patients were diagnosed with uterine carcinosarcoma. The majority of patients were postmenopausal (80%). Post-menopausal bleeding was the main presenting complaint in about 80% of patients. More than two-thirds of patients presented in the early stage (stage I, 55%; stage II, 20%). All patients underwent staging laparotomy. Patients with good performance status (85%) received adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 40 months, 7 (35%) patients were alive, out of which 6 are disease-free and 1 had a recurrence. The event-free survival at a median follow-up of 40 months was 40% and the overall survival was 48.5%. The outcome did not significantly differ based on the age, tumor histology (heterologous versus homologous), stage, and depth of myometrial invasion. Uterine carcinosarcoma, though rare, needs to be recognized as a distinct entity, and treated aggressively. Surgery is the cornerstone of therapy. Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation and chemotherapy improve local control and may delay recurrence, but have shown little survival advantage. The optimal adjuvant treatment for this uncommon disease is yet to be established, highlighting the need for larger multicentric studies on this tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S. K. Rajshekar
- Department of Gynaec-Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute Bengaluru, Bengaluru, India
| | - Shobha Krishnappa
- Department of Gynaec-Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute Bengaluru, Bengaluru, India
| | - Praveen S. Rathod
- Department of Gynaec-Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute Bengaluru, Bengaluru, India
| | | | - U. D. Bafna
- Department of Gynaec-Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute Bengaluru, Bengaluru, India
| | - Yamini Kansal
- Department of Gynaec-Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute Bengaluru, Bengaluru, India
| | | | - Amarinder Singh
- Department of Gynaec-Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute Bengaluru, Bengaluru, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Talwar A, Patel E, Tam M, Zhou F, Hu K, Persky M, Vaezi A, Jacobson A, Givi B. Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Carcinosarcoma of the Major Salivary Glands. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:775-781. [PMID: 35998038 DOI: 10.1177/01945998221120646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Carcinosarcoma of the salivary gland is a rare malignant biphasic tumor. The present study investigates the epidemiology and clinical behavior of carcinosarcoma of the major salivary glands using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). STUDY DESIGN Historical cohort study. SETTING NCDB. METHODS All tumors were selected between 2004 and 2018. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments, and survival were analyzed. Cox regression analysis was performed in surgically treated patients. RESULTS We identified 154 patients in the NCDB with carcinosarcoma of the salivary gland. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years (interquartile range, 55-76). Most patients were male (n = 92, 60%). The majority of tumors were in the parotid (n = 122, 79%), followed by submandibular gland (n = 21, 14%). The majority were high grade (n = 93, 95%), and a significant portion had locally advanced disease (pT3-4; n = 65, 62%). Nodal disease was present in more than one-third (n = 35, 36%). The most common treatment was surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 75, 49%). With a median follow-up of 36 months, the 3-year overall survival was 57.6% (95% CI, 48.7%-68.0%). In univariable analysis, advanced pT stage, pN+ disease, and positive margins were associated with worse survival. In multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P = .03) and pT stage (hazard ratio, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.27-4.95; P = .008) remained significant. CONCLUSION Carcinosarcoma is a rare salivary gland tumor that frequently presents at a locally advanced stage. Despite multimodality treatments, the outcomes are poor. In the absence of clinical trial data, these data from the NCDB could guide clinicians in the management of this rare disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhinav Talwar
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Evan Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Moses Tam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Fang Zhou
- Department of Pathology, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Michael Persky
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Alec Vaezi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Adam Jacobson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Babak Givi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bogani G, Ray-Coquard I, Concin N, Ngoi NYL, Morice P, Caruso G, Enomoto T, Takehara K, Denys H, Lorusso D, Coleman R, Vaughan MM, Takano M, Provencher DM, Sagae S, Wimberger P, Póka R, Segev Y, Kim SI, Kim JW, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Ramirez PT, Mariani A, Leitao M, Makker V, Abu-Rustum NR, Vergote I, Zannoni G, Tan D, McCormack M, Paolini B, Bini M, Raspagliesi F, Benedetti Panici P, Di Donato V, Muzii L, Colombo N, Pignata S, Scambia G, Monk BJ. Endometrial carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:147-174. [PMID: 36585027 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial carcinosarcoma is a rare and aggressive high-grade endometrial carcinoma with secondary sarcomatous trans-differentiation (conversion theory). The clinical presentation and diagnostic work-up roughly align with those of the more common endometrioid counterpart, although endometrial carcinosarcoma is more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Endometrial carcinosarcoma is not a single entity but encompasses different histological subtypes, depending on the type of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. The majority of endometrial carcinosarcomas are characterized by p53 abnormalities. The proportion of POLE and microsatellite instablity-high (MSI-H) is directly related to the epithelial component, being approximately 25% and 3% in endometrioid and non-endometrioid components.The management of non-metastatic disease is based on a multimodal approach with optimal surgery followed by (concomitant or sequential) chemotherapy and radiotherapy, even for early stages. Palliative chemotherapy is recommended in the metastatic or recurrent setting, with carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet being the first-line regimen. Although the introduction of immunotherapy plus/minus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor shifted the paradigm of treatment of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma were excluded from most studies evaluating single-agent immunotherapy or the combination. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the use of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in endometrial cancer (all histotypes) after progression on chemotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy in MSI-H cancers. In the era of precision medicine, emerging knowledge on molecular endometrial carcinosarcoma is opening new promising therapeutic options for more personalized treatment. The present review outlines state-of-the-art knowledge and future directions for patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave RoussT, Villejuif, France
| | - Giuseppe Caruso
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Belgium
| | - Kazuhiro Takehara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | | | - Robert Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michelle M Vaughan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Masashi Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Medical, Japan
| | | | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Yakir Segev
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Hospital, Haifa, Israel
| | - Se Ik Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mario Leitao
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gianfranco Zannoni
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - David Tan
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Mary McCormack
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Biagio Paolini
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Bini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | | | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Sapienza of Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal, Infantile, and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Medical Gynecologic Oncology Unit; University of Milan Bicocca; Milan; Italy, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, National Cancer Institute Napels, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Bradley J Monk
- HonorHealth, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beyond Serous: Treatment Options for Rare Endometrial Cancers. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2022; 23:1590-1600. [PMID: 36205807 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-01014-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Rare endometrial cancers are high-grade, aggressive malignancies which are often diagnosed at an advanced stage, and account for disproportionately more deaths than their more common low-grade counterparts. Standard of care includes a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Surgery consists of complete hysterectomy, and more recent evidence supports replacing a full lymphadenectomy with sentinel node mapping. Paclitaxel and carboplatin remain the mainstays of chemotherapy, while current studies incorporating immunotherapy will inform future practice. Whether and how to incorporate radiation remains controversial, and certain histologic subtypes, such as carcinosarcomas, may benefit from radiation more than others. Owing to their relative rarity, it is difficult to conduct clinical trials in this patient population, which has hindered the development of effective therapies for rare malignancies. Molecular profiling has offered insight into the pathogenesis of rare endometrial cancers, providing actionable targets for personalized therapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Horst RL, van der Hel O, Lutgens L, van der Aa M, Slangen B, Kruitwagen R, Lalisang RI. The role of multimodal adjuvant therapy for FIGO I-II carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 175:103701. [PMID: 35533817 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare entity with poor prognosis. Treatment of FIGO I-II UCS usually consists of surgery with or without adjuvant treatment. Due to the high metastatic potential, aggressive combined modality adjuvant treatment approaches, consisting of chemo- and radiotherapy, have been of interest. Our systematic review aims to compare survival, disease control and toxicity profiles in patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiation to other adjuvant strategies (e.g.observation, chemotherapy or radiotherapy). A total of ten studies were included for a combined cohort size of 6,520 patients. Generally, the studies showed a trend towards improved disease control and survival in patients undergoing adjuvant multimodal treatment, although statistical significance was often not reached. Selection bias and non-randomized treatment allocation pose serious challenges to extrapolate these outcomes to clinical practice. We recommend additional prospective research on the role of adjuvant chemoradiation in FIGO I-II UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L van der Horst
- Division Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - O van der Hel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - L Lutgens
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M van der Aa
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - B Slangen
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R Kruitwagen
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R I Lalisang
- Division Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ogasawara A, Shintatni D, Sato S, Hasegawa K. Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a review of clinical outcomes and considerations. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/21678707.2021.2049755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aiko Ogasawara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan
| | - Daisuke Shintatni
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan
| | - Sho Sato
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cory L, Brensinger C, Burger RA, Giuntoli RL, Morgan MA, Latif N, Lin LL, Ko EM. Patterns of adjuvant treatment and survival outcomes in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 39:100930. [PMID: 35111895 PMCID: PMC8790468 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
5-year survival for stage I uterine carcinosarcoma without adjuvant therapy is 43%. Nationally 40% of stage I uterine carcinosarcoma do not receive adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy alone improved OS and CSS in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma.
Objective To determine patterns in type and sequence of adjuvant treatment and associated differences in overall survival among women with Stage I uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). Methods Women with stage I UCS from 2000 to 2015 were identified through the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database linked to Medicare-based claims follow-up data through 2016. Data including demographics, co-morbidities, surgical procedure, surgical pathology and type and sequence of adjuvant treatment were collected. The primary study outcome was overall survival (OS) by type and sequence of adjuvant therapy. Cancer specific survival was also analyzed. Results A total of 755 women with Stage I UCS were identified. Of these, 56.3% (n = 445) received adjuvant therapy, whereas 43.7% (n = 330) did not. In comparison to no adjuvant treatment, an overall survival benefit was noted with receipt of chemotherapy alone for women with Stage I disease (log rank p < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons did not show a benefit in OS of concurrent RT-chemo, sequential RT-chemo, or sequential chemo-RT, over chemotherapy alone (p > 0.05 for all). Likewise, radiation alone and no treatment were associated with worse OS compared to chemotherapy alone (p < 0.001 for both). Adjusted Cox regression models demonstrated an OS benefit only in the chemotherapy alone cohort for Stage I disease (HR 0.43 95% CI 0.32, 0.60, p < 0.0001), as well as for CSS (HR 0.41, 95 %CI 0.26, 0.62, p < 0.0001), compared to no treatment. Conclusions In comparison to no adjuvant therapy, an overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was noted with receipt of chemotherapy alone in Stage I UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Cory
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
- Corresponding author at: 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Colleen Brensinger
- University of Pennsylvania, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Robert A. Burger
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Robert L. Giuntoli
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Mark A. Morgan
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Nawar Latif
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
- University of Pennsylvania, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, United States
| | - Lilie L. Lin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology. Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Emily M. Ko
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
- University of Pennsylvania, Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, United States
- University of Pennsylvania, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
da Silva JL, de Albuquerque LZ, Rodrigues FR, de Mesquita GG, Chaves CBP, Bonamino MH, de Melo AC. The prevalence and prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in uterine carcinosarcoma. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1306. [PMID: 34876047 PMCID: PMC8650400 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-09026-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the prevalence and prognostic role of tumor microenvironment (TME) markers in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) through immunohistochemical characterization. METHODS The internal database of our institution was queried out for women with UCS who underwent surgery and thereafter postoperative chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel between January 2012 and December 2017. Tissue microarrays containing surgical samples of UCS from 57 women were assessed by immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2. RESULTS The mean age was 65.3 years (range, 49 to 79 years). For the epithelial component (E), CD3_E and CD4_E were highly expressed in 38 (66.7%) and in 40 (70.1%) patients, respectively, and were significantly associated with more advanced stages (p = 0.038 and p = 0.025, respectively). CD8_E was highly expressed in 42 (73.7%) patients, FOXP3_E 16 (28.1%), PD-1_E 35 (61.4%), PD-L1_E 27 (47.4%) and PD-L2_E 39 (68.4%). For the sarcomatous component (S), the prevalence of high expression was: CD3_S 6 (10.5%), CD4_S 20 (35.1%), CD8_S 44 (77.2%), FOXP3_S 8 (14%), PD-1_S 14 (24.6%), PD-L1_S 14 (24.6%) and PD-L2_S 8 (14%). By multivariate analysis, the CD8/FOXP3_S ratio (p = 0.026), CD4_E (p = 0.010), PD-L1_E (p = 0.013) and PD-L1_S (p = 0.008) markers significantly influenced progression-free survival. CD4/FOXP3_S ratio (p = 0.043), PD-1_E (p = 0.011), PD-L1_E (p = 0.036) and PD-L1_S (p = 0.028) had a significant association with overall survival. CONCLUSION Some differences in UCS clinical outcomes may be due to the subtype of TILs and PD-1/PD-L1 axis immune checkpoint signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Lopes da Silva
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - Lucas Zanetti de Albuquerque
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Guilherme Gomes de Mesquita
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Division of Pathology, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Cláudia Bessa Pereira Chaves
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Martín Hernán Bonamino
- Immunology and Tumor Biology Program, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Vice-Presidency of Research and Biological Collections (VPPCB), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Andreia Cristina de Melo
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Uterine carcinosarcoma: An overview. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 163:103369. [PMID: 34051304 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), also known as malignant mixed Müllerian tumor, is a rare gynecological malignancy characterized by poor prognosis. This "biphasic" neoplasm presents an admixture of epithelial and mesenchymal/sarcomatoid tumor cells which partially share their molecular signature and exhibit a typical epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition gene expression profile. Due to the rarity of this cancer, at present there is a scarcity of specific treatment guidelines. Surgical resection remains the best curative option for localized disease, whereas the addition of peri-operative radiotherapy, chemotherapy and chemoradiation has been shown to further improve disease outcomes. In the metastatic setting, palliative chemotherapy is currently the treatment of choice, although no consensus exists about the best regimen to be delivered. Besides standard treatment options for the advanced disease, mechanistic insights into UCS pathogenesis and identification of its histopathological and molecular features boosted the development of novel, and potentially more effective, therapeutic agents, that will be here discussed.
Collapse
|
13
|
The Effect of Adjuvant Pelvic Radiotherapy on Distant Metastasis for Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:169-173. [PMID: 33481373 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCS) are rare tumors that carry a poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. Standard treatment consists of surgical resection and chemotherapy, though the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has yet to be determined. This study assessed survival rates between patients with UCS who underwent surgical resection alone and patients who underwent combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical resection for UCS between 1993 and 2011 at a single institution. We assessed 3-year disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival rates and utilized Kaplan-Meier modeling to analyze differences between UCS treatment modalities. RESULTS Twenty-four patients underwent UCS surgical resection between 1993 and 2011. The mean age was 61 (range: 39 to 75 y). Of these patients, 100% (n=24) underwent surgical resection, 25% (n=6) underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, 29% (n=7) underwent surgery and adjuvant RT, and 33% (n=8) underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and RT. At 3 years median follow, there was no significant difference in overall survival between treatment modalities. The addition of radiation therapy conferred increased DMFS in patients undergoing surgery irrespective of adjuvant chemotherapy (44% vs. 83%, P=0.0211).In patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, the significant increase in DMFS persisted with the addition of RT (P=0.0310). Lymph node involvement (n=8) was associated with a lower locoregional recurrence-free survival (38% vs. 92%, P=0.0029). CONCLUSIONS RT may offer a potential benefit in reducing the rate of distant metastases, though there were no statistically significant improvements in survival metrics.
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhao F, Tan P, Wang C, Ji X, Chen A. Effect of adjuvant therapy on the prognosis in stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma: A meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47:2473-2480. [PMID: 33913222 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both following the primary surgery on the progression-free survival and 5-year overall survival in patients with stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma. METHODS A preliminary investigation was conducted using PubMed and Embase databases to identify relevant studies published up to March, 2020. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by Revman 5.3 software to analysis outcomes. RESULTS Six retrospective cohort studies were involved in the analysis, including 1516 patients in observation group, 956 patients in chemotherapy group, 750 patients in radiotherapy group, and 1082 patients in raidochemotherapy group. The results indicated that chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.38-0.91, p < 0.05) and radiochemotherapy (HR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.24-0.53, p < 0.001) were associated with improved progression-free survival in patients. Similarly, pooled results suggested chemotherapy (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.34-0.71, p < 0.001) and radiochemotherapy (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.29-0.72, p < 0.001) promoted the 5-year overall survival compared with observation. However, radiotherapy alone had no statistical significance in improving progression-free survival (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.49-1.29, p = 0.36) and 5-year overall survival (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.38-1.12, p = 0.12). DISCUSSION Chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy appeared to be prognostic beneficial to early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Zhao
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Ping Tan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Chang Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Xuechao Ji
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Aiping Chen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Matsuzaki S, Klar M, Matsuzaki S, Roman LD, Sood AK, Matsuo K. Uterine carcinosarcoma: Contemporary clinical summary, molecular updates, and future research opportunity. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 160:586-601. [PMID: 33183764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a biphasic aggressive high-grade endometrial cancer in which the sarcoma element has de-differentiated from the carcinoma element. UCS is considered a rare tumor, but its incidence has gradually increased in recent years (annual percent change from 2000 to 2016 1.7%, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.2) as has the proportion of UCS among endometrial cancer, exceeding 5% in recent years. UCS typically affects the elderly, but in recent decades patients became younger. Notably, a stage-shift has occurred in recent years with increasing nodal metastasis and decreasing distant metastasis. The concept of sarcoma dominance may be new in UCS, and a sarcomatous element >50% of the uterine tumor is associated with decreased survival. Multimodal treatment is the mainstay of UCS. Lymphadenectomy, chemotherapy, and brachytherapy have increased in the past few decades, but survival outcomes remain dismal: the median survival is less than two years, and the 5-year overall survival rate has not changed in decades (31.9% in 1975 to 33.8% in 2012). Carboplatin/paclitaxel adjuvant chemotherapy improves progression-free survival compared with ifosfamide/paclitaxel, particularly in stages III-IV disease (GOG-261 trial). Twenty-six clinical trials previously examined therapeutic effectiveness in recurrent/metastatic UCS. The median response rate and progression-free survival were 37.5% and 5.9 months, respectively, after first-line therapy, but after later therapies, the outcomes were far worse (5.5% and 1.8 months, respectively). One significant discovery was that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of sarcomatous dedifferentiation in UCS and that heterologous sarcoma is associated with a higher EMT signature compared with homologous sarcoma. Furthermore, next-generation sequencing has revealed that UCS tumors are serous-like and that common somatic mutations include those in TP53, PIK3CA, FBXW7, PTEN, and ARID1A. This contemporary review highlights recent clinical and molecular updates in UCS. A possible therapeutic target of EMT in UCS is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Matsuzaki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Satoko Matsuzaki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, MD-Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
[Non endometroid endometrial cancer guidelines evaluation: A multicentric retrospective study]. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:1221-1232. [PMID: 33036741 PMCID: PMC7537627 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Les carcinomes de l’endomètre de type 2 sont des cancers peu fréquents et de mauvais pronostique. Il existe très peu d’étude analysant leur prise en charge. L’objectif de l’étude était d’étudier la prise en charge des carcinomes de type 2 dans nos centres en évaluant l’application des recommandations. Matériel et méthode Il s’agit d’une étude multicentrique rétrospective enregistrant les cancers de l’endomètre de type 2 pris en charge de janvier 2009 à décembre 2019. Les analyses ont été adaptées aux dernières recommandations françaises appliquées par rapport à l’année de prise en charge. Résultats Soixante-quatorze carcinomes de type 2 ont été analysés dans dix centres: 34 carcinosarcomes (45,9 %), 29 carcinomes séreux (39,2 %), neuf carcinomes à cellules claires (12,2 %) et deux carcinomes indifférenciés (2,7 %). Lors de la prise en charge initiale, les recommandations étaient appliquées dans 45,9 % des cas. Le principal motif de non-application des recommandations était la non-réalisation d’une stadification ganglionnaire chirurgicale pour 20 patientes (57,1 %). Lors de la prise en charge adjuvante, les recommandations étaient appliquées dans 37,8 % des cas. Le principal motif de non-application des recommandations était la non-réalisation d’une restadification ganglionnaire chirurgicale ou radiologique pour 25 patientes (67,6 %). Discussion L’applicabilité des recommandations pour la prise en charge des carcinomes de type 2 reste difficile en raison de l’âge élevé et des comorbidités des patientes notamment pour la réalisation d’une stadification chirurgicale ganglionnaire pelvienne et lombo-aortique. L’utilisation de nouvelles techniques de stadification permettrait de mieux sélectionner les indications de curages ganglionnaires.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kahramanoglu I, Demirkiran F, Turan H, Bese T, Cebi S, Ilvan S, Arvas M. Adjuvant Treatment Modalities, Prognostic Factors, and Outcome of the Uterine Carcinosarcoma. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2020; 43:34-42. [PMID: 33041218 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of adjuvant therapy and other factors associated with the recurrence and survival of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS A total of 102 patients who underwhent surgery for UCS from 1998 to 2017 were included in the analysis. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS At 240 months, the actuarial recurrence rate was 34.3%. Distant recurrence was the most common recurrence pattern. Patients with higher CA 125 levels, sarcoma dominance, cervical involvement, advanced stage, no lymphadenectomy, and residual tumour had a significiantly higher risk of recurrence. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 67% and 77%, respectively. FIGO stage was found to be an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS. Sarcoma dominance was independently associated with decreased OS. CONCLUSION Sarcoma dominance is associated with poor survival in UCS. Adjuvant treatment was not found to affect recurrence or survival. Given this finding, more effective postoperative strategies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilker Kahramanoglu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Fuat Demirkiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hasan Turan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tugan Bese
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sukru Cebi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sennur Ilvan
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Macit Arvas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Setia A, Kumar D, Bains L, Sharma P, Tempe A, Mallya V. Renal Hemangioblastoma with Mixed Mullerian tumour of endometrium: A tale of two rare primary tumours. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:154. [PMID: 32631354 PMCID: PMC7339407 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01929-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Renal hemangioblastoma (RH) is a very rare benign tumour. Hemangioblastoma most commonly occurs in the central nervous system (CNS), and only few cases of RH have been reported as they occur most commonly as asymptomatic masses found incidentally. Mixed Mullerian tumour (MMT) of the uterus is a rarer and aggressive form of uterine malignancy. The detection of two primary rare tumours incidentally is a rare entity. CASE PRESENTATION A 50-year-old female presented with abnormal uterine bleeding which on endometrial sampling was diagnosed as a rare variety of endometrial cancer, i.e. MMT or uterine carcinosarcoma. On preoperative imaging, a renal mass was also detected which was highly vascular and was mimicking renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was done from the renal mass to differentiate between RCC and metastasis, but it showed only blood cells. Patient underwent staging laparotomy for endometrial cancer and frozen section examination of the renal mass which was inconclusive with few atypical cells, and thus, patient underwent radical nephrectomy too. Histopathological examination revealed it to be a RH which is a very rare benign tumour. DISCUSSION RH is a rare benign tumour which does not require any treatment in majority of the patients. Only 26 cases of RH outside the CNS have been reported till date. MMT is a rare aggressive uterine tumour with an incidence of 1-2 % of all uterine neoplasms, which metastasizes early, and thus, early identification and treatment is the key. RH needs to be differentiated from RCC to avoid over treatment. Morphological findings are similar in RCC and RH; preoperative FNAC, PET scan, and intraoperative frozen section can be utilized to differentiate the two, in well-circumcised tumours and high index of suspicion. Occurrence of renal mass as an incidental finding in the preoperative work up of uterine malignancy directed us to the differentials of metastasis or another histologically distinct primary tumour. The presence of two rare primary tumours, i.e. RH and MMT in the same patient which are unrelated, is a rare entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aparna Setia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Devender Kumar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Lovenish Bains
- Department of Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Pallavi Sharma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Anjali Tempe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Varuna Mallya
- Department of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rottmann D, Snir OL, Wu X, Wong S, Hui P, Santin AD, Buza N. HER2 testing of gynecologic carcinosarcomas: tumor stratification for potential targeted therapy. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:118-127. [PMID: 31477811 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0358-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
A recent phase II clinical trial showed increased progression-free survival in patients with HER2-positive endometrial serous carcinoma receiving trastuzumab in addition to carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy. Similar to endometrial serous carcinomas, carcinosarcomas of the female genital tract have a dismal prognosis and could potentially benefit from new targeted therapeutic approaches. We aimed to systematically evaluate the characteristics of HER2 expression/amplification in gynecologic carcinosarcomas using standardized staining methods and scoring criteria. Tumors from 80 patients (65 uterine, 15 tubo-ovarian) were included, containing a serous (60%), endometrioid (10%), clear cell (3%), undifferentiated (3%), neuroendocrine (1%), or mixed (24%) carcinoma, and either a homologous (46%), or a heterologous (54%) sarcoma component. HER2 scores were assigned to both components per the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP breast scoring criteria. A total of 13 cases (12 uterine, 1 ovarian, 16%) were HER2 positive (either by immunohistochemistry or FISH) using the 2013 criteria, while only 10 cases (9 uterine, 1 ovarian, 13%) were HER2 positive per the 2007 criteria. Nine cases showed a change in their HER2 immunohistochemical score between the two scoring systems, including two cases with a change in the overall HER2 status from negative (2007) to positive (2013). Heterogeneity of HER2 protein expression was observed in 38% of HER2-positive tumors, and a lateral/basolateral membranous staining pattern was common. The sarcoma component showed 2+, equivocal HER2 expression in five cases, one of which also demonstrated HER2 amplification by FISH. All HER2-positive carcinosarcomas had either a serous or a mixed carcinoma component, and all but one HER2-positive tumors were of uterine primaries. Our study demonstrates that gynecologic carcinosarcomas share similarities in their HER2 expression/amplification profiles to endometrial serous carcinomas, which should be taken into account when assessing their HER2 status to ensure appropriate patient selection for potential targeted HER2-based therapies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Rottmann
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Olivia L Snir
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Xinyu Wu
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Serena Wong
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Pei Hui
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Alessandro D Santin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Natalia Buza
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li Y, Ren H, Wang J. Outcome of adjuvant radiotherapy after total hysterectomy in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma or carcinosarcoma: a SEER-based study. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:697. [PMID: 31307426 PMCID: PMC6631553 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5879-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on uterine sarcoma is unclear, and may depend on the histological type. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy after total hysterectomy in patients with leiomyosarcoma or carcinosarcoma. METHODS Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality. In addition, a 1:1 propensity score matching approach was performed, in which age group, disease stage, tumor grade, tumor size, and lymphadenectomy status were matched. RESULTS A total of 566 leiomyosarcoma and 1069 carcinosarcoma patients with stage I-III disease were included. Both regular Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching analysis revealed that utilization of adjuvant radiotherapy did not affect overall and cancer-specific mortality in patients with leiomyosarcoma. In contrast, for patients with carcinosarcoma, total mortality risk was significantly decreased with EBRT, brachytherapy, and combination radiotherapy compared with no radiotherapy. Cancer-specific mortality risk was significantly decreased with brachytherapy and combination radiotherapy as compared with no radiotherapy. Propensity score matching analyses revealed similar results in overall mortality, but not cancer-specific mortality, in patients with carcinosarcoma. Furthermore, the frequency of patients who did not receive any form of adjuvant radiotherapy was four times higher than those underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant radiotherapy may provide a survival benefit for uterine carcinosarcoma, but not leiomyosarcoma. In addition, adjuvant radiotherapy is underutilized, and increased utilization of adjuvant radiotherapy may improve the survival rate of patients with carcinosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China
| | - Haitao Ren
- Department of Burns and Wound Care Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
| | - Junmei Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Matsuo K, Ross MS, Yunokawa M, Johnson MS, Machida H, Omatsu K, Klobocista MM, Im DD, Satoh S, Baba T, Ikeda Y, Bush SH, Hasegawa K, Blake EA, Takekuma M, Shida M, Nishimura M, Adachi S, Pejovic T, Takeuchi S, Yokoyama T, Ueda Y, Iwasaki K, Miyake TM, Yanai S, Nagano T, Takano T, Shahzad MM, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Roman LD. Tumor characteristics and outcome of uterine carcinosarcoma in women aged ≥80 years. Surg Oncol 2019; 29:25-32. [PMID: 31196490 PMCID: PMC7523232 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine clinico-pathological characteristics and outcomes of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) in women aged ≥80 years. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of a previous multicenter retrospective study examining 906 women with stage I-IV UCS who underwent primary hysterectomy. Patient demographics, treatment types, tumor characteristics, and survival were examined across aged ≥80 (n = 82 [9.1%]), aged 60-79, (n = 526 [58.1%]), and aged <60 (n = 298 [32.9%]). RESULTS Women in the aged ≥80 group were more likely to be Caucasian, undergo simple hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy, and receive no postoperative therapy (all, P < 0.05). Tumors in the aged ≥80 group were more likely to have high-grade carcinoma, heterologous sarcoma, and sarcoma dominance but less likely to have lympho-vascular space invasion (all, P < 0.05). Lymphadenectomy did not improve survival in the aged ≥80 group (P > 0.05), whereas lymphadenectomy was protective for survival in the younger groups (both, P < 0.05). Postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) in the aged ≥80 group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.89, P = 0.021). With chemotherapy treatment, women in the aged ≥80 group had PFS similar to those in the aged 60-79 group (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.51-1.83, P = 0.92). In contrast, without chemotherapy treatment, women in the aged ≥80 group had significantly decreased PFS compared to the aged 60-79 group (HR 1.62, 95%CI 1.09-2.40, P = 0.016). Similar associations were observed for postoperative radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Nearly 10% of women with UCS are aged ≥80 that are characterized by aggressive tumor factors. Postoperative therapy but not extensive surgery may improve survival in this age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA.
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, KY, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- The Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, CO, USA
| | | | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, OR, USA
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Mian Mk Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kimyon Cömert G, Türkmen O, Boyraz G, Yalçın İ, Altın D, Karalök A, Şahin H, Taşkın S, Başaran D, Fırat Cuylan Z, Koyuncu K, Salman MC, Özgül N, Meydanlı MM, Turan T, Ortaç F, Yüce K. Effect of Adjuvant Therapy on Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Confirmed Stage I Uterine Carcinosarcoma: a Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Study. Balkan Med J 2019; 36:229-234. [PMID: 30873825 PMCID: PMC6636652 DOI: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2019.2018.12.75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Uterine carcinosarcoma is rare neoplasm that mostly presents as metastatic disease. Stage is one of the most important prognostic factor, however, the management of the early stage uterine carcinosarcoma is still controversial. Aims: To evaluate prognostic factors, treatment options, and survival outcomes in patients with surgically approved stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Data of 278 patients with uterine carcinosarcoma obtained from four gynecologic oncology centers were reviewed, and 70 patients with approved stage I uterine carcinosarcoma after comprehensive staging surgery were studied. Results: The median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (range; 39-82). All patients underwent both pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Forty-one patients received adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 24 months (range; 1-129). Nineteen (27.1%) patients had disease failure. The 3-year disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival of the entire cohort was 67% and 86%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, only age was significantly associated with disease-free survival (p=0.022). There was no statistical significance for disease-free survival between observation and receiving any type of adjuvant therapy following staging surgery. Advanced age (<75 vs ≥75 years) was the only independent prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio: 3.8, 95% CI=1.10-13.14, p=0.035) in multivariate analysis. None of the factors were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. Conclusion: Advanced age was the only independent factor for disease-free survival in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Performing any adjuvant therapy following comprehensive lymphadenectomy was not related to the improved survival of the stage I disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Günsu Kimyon Cömert
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Osman Türkmen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gökhan Boyraz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İbrahim Yalçın
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Duygu Altın
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Alper Karalök
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hanifi Şahin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Salih Taşkın
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Derman Başaran
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Zeliha Fırat Cuylan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kazibe Koyuncu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Coşkun Salman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nejat Özgül
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanlı
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Taner Turan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fırat Ortaç
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kunter Yüce
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Matsuo K, Ross MS, Yunokawa M, Johnson MS, Machida H, Omatsu K, Klobocista MM, Im DD, Satoh S, Baba T, Ikeda Y, Bush SH, Hasegawa K, Blake EA, Takekuma M, Shida M, Nishimura M, Adachi S, Pejovic T, Takeuchi S, Yokoyama T, Ueda Y, Iwasaki K, Miyake TM, Yanai S, Nagano T, Takano T, Shahzad MM, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Roman LD. Clinical utility of CA-125 in the management of uterine carcinosarcoma. J Gynecol Oncol 2019; 29:e88. [PMID: 30207096 PMCID: PMC6189428 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- The Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Mian Mk Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shen L, Hong L, Zhou S, Zhang G, Mai R. Mutational landscape implicates epithelial-mesenchymal transition gene TGF-β2 mutations for uterine carcinosarcoma after adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for breast carcinoma. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY 2019; 12:996-1002. [PMID: 31933910 PMCID: PMC6945146 DOI: pmid/31933910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare aggressive malignancy. Several reports previously described UCS occurring after tamoxifen therapy for breast carcinoma. However, the genetic landscape of tamoxifen-related UCS remains unclear. We performed whole-exome sequencing of two UCSs after tamoxifen therapy for breast carcinoma to determine mutational profile of UCSs and those corresponding breast carcinomas. Our results demonstrated that 374 somatic variants in 141 genes were shared across the two UCSs, whereas no shared somatic variations across the breast carcinomas were found. Pathway analysis indicated the MAPK pathway, including the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) inducer gene TGF-β2 mutations (c. 1039G > A and c. 1040C > T, both p.A347T), recurrently occurred in UCS, while ER-related gene EP300 (p.P16L) and ESR1 (p.V355I) mutations were identified independently in breast carcinomas. These findings highlight the EMT-related gene TGF-β2 variants in the tumorigenesis of tamoxifen-related UCS, support the possibility that tamoxifen mediates its effect on UCS by enhancing mutations of driver genes, and also provides the rationale for clinical investigation in ER-related gene mutation in breast carcinoma to predict the risk for UCS after tamoxifen treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical CollegeShantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Liangli Hong
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical CollegeShantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Songxia Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Shantou University Medical CollegeShantou 515031, Guangdong, China
| | - Guohong Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Shantou University Medical CollegeShantou 515031, Guangdong, China
| | - Ruiqin Mai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shantou University Medical CollegeShantou 515031, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Enomoto T, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Proposal for a Risk-Based Categorization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3676-3684. [PMID: 30105438 PMCID: PMC7521084 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6695-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To propose a categorization model of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) based on tumor cell types (carcinoma and sarcoma) and sarcoma dominance. METHODS This secondary analysis of a prior multicenter retrospective study examined 889 cases of UCS with available histologic evaluation. Based on survival outcome, cases were clustered into three groups: low-grade carcinoma with nondominant homologous sarcoma [type A, n = 96 (10.8%)], (1) low-grade carcinoma with heterologous sarcoma or any sarcoma dominance and (2) high-grade carcinoma with nondominant homologous sarcoma [type B, n = 412 (46.3%)], and high-grade carcinoma with heterologous sarcoma or any sarcoma dominance [type C, n = 381 (42.9%)]. Tumor characteristics and outcome were examined based on the categorization. RESULTS Women in type C category were more likely to be older, obese, and Caucasian, whereas those in type A category were younger, less obese, Asian, and nulligravid (all P < 0.01). Type C tumors were more likely to have metastatic implants, large tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion with sarcoma cells, and higher lymph node ratio, whereas type A tumors were more likely to be early-stage disease and small (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, tumor categorization was independently associated with progression-free survival (5-year rates: 70.1% for type A, 48.3% for type B, and 35.9% for type C, adjusted P < 0.01) and cause-specific survival (5-year rates: 82.8% for type A, 63.0% for type B, and 47.1% for type C, adjusted P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Characteristic differences in clinicopathological factors and outcomes in UCS imply that different underlying etiologies and biological behaviors may be present, supporting a new classification system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Abby M Richmond
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Characterizing sarcoma dominance pattern in uterine carcinosarcoma: Homologous versus heterologous element. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:433-440. [PMID: 30217299 PMCID: PMC7526039 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine significance of sarcoma dominance (SD) patterns in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS This is a secondary analysis of multicenter retrospective study examining women with stages I-IV UCS who underwent primary surgery. SD was defined as >50% of sarcoma component in uterine tumor. SD patterns were grouped as homologous sarcoma without SD (homo/non-dominance, n = 351), heterologous sarcoma without SD (hetero/non-dominance, n = 174), homologous sarcoma with SD (homo/dominance, n = 175), and heterologous sarcoma with SD (hetero/dominance, n = 189), and correlated to tumor characteristics and survival. RESULTS SD patterns were significantly associated with age, body habitus, carcinoma type, tumor size, depth of myometrial invasion, and nodal metastasis (all, P < 0.05). On univariate analysis, SD was associated with decreased progression-free survival (PFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) in homologous cases (both, P < 0.05) but not in heterologous cases. On multivariate models, both homologous and heterologous SD patterns remained independent prognostic factors for decreased PFS (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] ranges: homo/dominance 1.35-1.69, and hetero/dominance 1.47-1.64) and CSS (adjusted-HR ranges: 1.52-1.84 and 1.66-1.81, respectively) compared to homo/non-dominance (all, P < 0.05). Among stage I-III disease, when tumors had SD, adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved PFS (adjusted-HR: homo/dominance 0.49, and hetero/dominance 0.45) and CSS (0.36 and 0.31, respectively) compared to chemotherapy alone (all, P < 0.05); contrary, this association was not observed with absence of SD (all, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION In UCS, SD impacts survival in homologous but not in heterologous type. Regardless of sarcoma types, SD was associated with decreased survival in UCS; adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy may be an effective postoperative strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, USA; Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Enomoto T, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Significance of Lymphovascular Space Invasion by the Sarcomatous Component in Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2756-2766. [PMID: 29971677 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6547-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the significance of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) with a sarcomatous component on the tumor characteristics and clinical outcomes of women with uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS This was a secondary analysis of a prior multicenter retrospective study that examined women with stage I-IV UCS who underwent primary hysterectomy. Archived histopathology slides were reviewed and LVSI was scored as follows: LVSI with a carcinomatous component alone (LVSI-carcinoma; n = 375, 76.8%) or LVSI containing a sarcomatous component with or without a carcinomatous component (LVSI-sarcoma; n = 113, 23.2%). Qualitative metrics of LVSI were correlated to clinicopathological factors and survival outcome. RESULTS Tumors in the LVSI-sarcoma group were more likely to have sarcoma dominance (82.1 vs. 26.4%) heterologous sarcomatous component (51.3 vs. 37.9%), low-grade carcinoma (42.5 vs. 22.4%), and large tumor size (81.0 vs. 70.2%) in the primary tumor site compared with tumors in the LVSI-carcinoma group (all p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, LVSI-sarcoma was independently associated with decreased progression-free survival (5-year rates: 34.9 vs. 40.8%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-2.50, p < 0.001), and cause-specific survival (5-year rates: 41.8 vs. 55.9%, adjusted HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.39-2.75, p < 0.001) compared with LVSI-carcinoma. Postoperative radiotherapy for women with LVSI-sarcoma had a higher reduction rate of recurrence/progression of disease (54% reduction, p = 0.04) compared with postoperative radiotherapy for women with LVSI-carcinoma (26% reduction, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION In UCS, the presence of a sarcomatous component in LVSI is particularly prevalent when a tumor has sarcoma dominance. Our study suggests that LVSI containing a sarcomatous component may be a predictor of decreased survival for women with UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Abby M Richmond
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Matsuo K, Ross MS, Machida H, Blake EA, Roman LD. Trends of uterine carcinosarcoma in the United States. J Gynecol Oncol 2018; 29:e22. [PMID: 29400015 PMCID: PMC5823983 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare type of high-grade endometrial cancer (EC) that has been understudied with population-based statistics due to its rarity. This study examined temporal trends in the proportion of UCS among women with EC. METHODS This is a retrospective observational study examining The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program between 1973-2013. Primary EC cases were eligible for analysis, and a time-specific proportion of UCS was examined during the study period. RESULTS UCS was seen in 11,000 (4.7%) women among 235,849 primary EC cases. Mean age at UCS diagnosis increased from 65.9 to 71.7 years between 1973-1989 and then decreased from 71.7 to 67.0 years between 1989-2013 (both, p<0.001). Proportion of Black women significantly increased during the study period (11.9%-20.0%, p<0.001), whereas the proportion of White women decreased from 86.0% to 60.5% between 1987-2013 (p<0.001). There was a significant increase in the proportion of UCS among primary EC from 1.7% to 5.6% between 1973-2013 (p<0.001). Among type II ECs (n=76,118), the proportion of UCS also increased significantly from 6.0% to 17.5% between 1973-2013 (p<0.001). An increasing proportion of UCS was seen in both young and older women but the magnitude of interval increase was larger in the older age group between 1973-2013 (<60 years, from 1.3% to 3.3%. p<0.001; and ≥60 years, from 2.6% to 7.0%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that the proportion of UCS has significantly increased among EC, accounting for more than 5% in recent years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Matsuo K, Ross MS, Im DD, Klobocista MM, Bush SH, Johnson MS, Takano T, Blake EA, Ikeda Y, Nishimura M, Ueda Y, Shida M, Hasegawa K, Baba T, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Satoh S, Machida H, Yanai S, Iwasaki K, Miyake TM, Takeuchi S, Takekuma M, Nagano T, Yunokawa M, Pejovic T, Omatsu K, Shahzad MMK, Kelley JL, Ueland FR, Roman LD. Significance of venous thromboembolism in women with uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 148:267-274. [PMID: 29248197 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 11/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and to examine the association of VTE and survival in women with uterine carcinosarcoma. METHODS This multicenter retrospective study examined 906 women who underwent primary surgical treatment for stage I-IV uterine carcinosarcoma. Time-dependent analyses were performed for cumulative incidence of VTE after surgery on multivariate models. RESULTS There were 72 (7.9%) women who developed VTE after surgery with 1-, 2-, and 5-year cumulative incidences being 5.1%, 7.3%, and 10.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] per year 1.03, P=0.012), non-Asian race (HR 6.28, P<0.001), large body habitus (HR per kg/m2 1.04, P=0.014), residual disease at surgery (HR 3.04, P=0.003), tumor size ≥5cm (HR 2.73, P=0.003), and stage IV disease (HR 2.12, P=0.025) were independently associated with increased risk of developing VTE. A risk pattern analysis identified that obese Non-Asian women with large tumors (13.7% of population) had the highest incidence of VTE (2-year cumulative rate, 26.1%) whereas Asian women with no residual disease (47.1% of population) had the lowest (2-year cumulative rate, 1.6%) (P<0.001). Presence of carcinoma/sarcoma in metastatic sites was significantly associated with increased risk of VTE compared to carcinoma alone (2-year rates, 31.2% versus 8.4%, P=0.049). VTE was independently associated with decreased progression-free survival on multivariate models (5-year rates, 24.9% versus 47.2%, HR 1.46, 95%CI 1.05-2.04, P=0.026). CONCLUSION Our study suggests that VTE represents a surrogate marker of aggressive tumor behavior and diminished patient condition in uterine carcinosarcoma; obese Non-Asian women with large tumors carry a disproportionally high risk of VTE, suggesting that long-term prophylaxis may benefit this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA.
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- The Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, KY, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, CO, USA
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | | | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, OR, USA
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, KY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Querleu D, Darai E, Lecuru F, Rafii A, Chereau E, Collinet P, Crochet P, Marret H, Mery E, Thomas L, Villefranque V, Floquet A, Planchamp F. [Primary management of endometrial carcinoma. Joint recommendations of the French society of gynecologic oncology (SFOG) and of the French college of obstetricians and gynecologists (CNGOF)]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 45:715-725. [PMID: 29132772 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The management of endometrial carcinoma is constantly evolving. The SFOG and the CNGOF decided to jointly update the previous French recommendations (Institut national du cancer 2011) and to adapt to the French practice the 2015 recommendations elaborated at the time of joint European consensus conference with the participation of the three concerned European societies (ESGO, ESTRO, ESMO). MATERIAL AND METHODS A strict methodology was used. A steering committee was put together. A systematic review of the literature since 2011 has been carried out. A first draft of the recommendations has been elaborated, with emphasis on high level of evidence. An external review by users representing all the concerned discipines and all kinds of practice was completed. Three hundred and four comments were sent by 54 reviewers. RESULTS The management of endometrial carcinoma requires a precise preoperative workup. A provisional estimate of the final stage is provided. This estimation impact the level of surgical staging. Surgery should use a minimal invasive approach. The final pathology is the key of the decision concerning adjuvant therapy, which involves surveillance, radiation therapy, brachytherapy, or chemotherapy. CONCLUSION The management algorithms allow a fast, state of the art based, answer to the clinical questions raised by the management of endometrial cancer. They must be used only in the setting of a multidisciplinary team at all stages of the management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Querleu
- Institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - E Darai
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Lecuru
- Service de cancérologie gynécologique et du sein, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - A Rafii
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Education City, Al Lugta St, Ar-Rayyan, Qatar; Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Foch, 40, rue Worth, 92151 Suresnes, France
| | - E Chereau
- Hôpital privé Beauregard, 23, rue des Linots, 13001 Marseille, France
| | - P Collinet
- Clinique de gynécologie, hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, centre hospitalier régional universitaire, 59037 Lille cedex, France
| | - P Crochet
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital de la Conception, AP-HM, 147, boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - H Marret
- Pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique, service de chirurgie pelvienne gynécologique et oncologique, centre hospitalier universitaire Bretonneau, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours cedex 1, France
| | - E Mery
- Institut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - L Thomas
- Institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - V Villefranque
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier René-Dubos, 6, avenue de l'Île-de-France, 95300 Pontoise, France
| | - A Floquet
- Institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - F Planchamp
- Institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Matsuo K, Ross MS, Yunokawa M, Johnson MS, Machida H, Omatsu K, Klobocista MM, Im DD, Satoh S, Baba T, Ikeda Y, Bush SH, Hasegawa K, Blake EA, Takekuma M, Shida M, Nishimura M, Adachi S, Pejovic T, Takeuchi S, Yokoyama T, Ueda Y, Iwasaki K, Miyake TM, Yanai S, Nagano T, Takano T, Shahzad MMK, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Roman LD. Salvage chemotherapy with taxane and platinum for women with recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 147:565-571. [PMID: 29056442 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine survival after recurrence (SAR) among women with recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma who received a taxane/platinum doublet as the first-line salvage chemotherapy. METHODS We retrospectively examined 148 women with recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma who received salvage chemotherapy within a cohort of 906 uterine carcinosarcomas. An independent association of salvage chemotherapy type and SAR was examined with multivariate analysis. RESULTS There were 71 (48.0%) women who received a taxane/platinum regimen. On univariate analysis, women who received a taxane/platinum doublet had a higher 2-year SAR rate compared to women who received non-taxane/platinum regimens (55.5% versus 34.8%, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, use of taxane/platinum regimen was independently associated with improved SAR compared to the non-taxane/platinum regimens (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35 to 0.91, P=0.02). When stratified by disease-free interval, women with a disease-free interval ≥6months who received a taxane/platinum doublet had a higher 2-year SAR rate compared to those who received non-taxane/platinum regimens (61.9% versus 40.0%, HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.75, P=0.002); conversely, in women with a disease-free interval <6months, 2-year SAR rates were similar between the two groups (20.5% versus 18.4%, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.90, P=0.61). Among women who received a taxane/platinum doublet as adjuvant chemotherapy, re-treatment with taxane/platinum doublet as salvage chemotherapy remained beneficial (2-year SAR rate, 62.1% versus 39.7%, HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86, P=0.019). CONCLUSION Our study suggests that taxane/platinum doublet may be a more effective chemotherapy regimen compared to other regimens among women with recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma, especially for those who had a disease-free interval of ≥6months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA.
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, KY, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- The Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, CO, USA
| | - Munetaka Takekuma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, OR, USA
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Matsuo K, Johnson MS, Im DD, Ross MS, Bush SH, Yunokawa M, Blake EA, Takano T, Klobocista MM, Hasegawa K, Ueda Y, Shida M, Baba T, Satoh S, Yokoyama T, Machida H, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Miyake TM, Iwasaki K, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Nagano T, Takekuma M, Shahzad MMK, Pejovic T, Omatsu K, Kelley JL, Ueland FR, Roman LD. Survival outcome of women with stage IV uterine carcinosarcoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:488-496. [PMID: 29044542 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To examine survival of women with stage IV uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hysterectomy. METHODS This is a nested case-control study within a retrospective cohort of 1192 UCS cases. Women who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hysterectomy based-surgery for stage IV UCS (n = 26) were compared to those who had primary hysterectomy-based surgery without neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IV UCS (n = 120). Progression-free survival (PFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were examined. RESULTS The most common regimen for neoadjuvant chemotherapy was carboplatin/paclitaxel (53.8%). Median number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles was 4. PFS was similar between the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and the primary surgery group (unadjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.89, P = 0.45). Similarly, CSS was comparable between the two groups (unadjusted-HR 1.13, 95%CI 0.68-1.90, P = 0.64). When the types of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens were compared, women who received a carboplatin/paclitaxel regimen had better survival outcomes compared to those who received other regimens: PFS, unadjusted-HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.15-0.93, P = 0.027; and CSS, unadjusted-HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.07-0.61, P = 0.002. CONCLUSION Our study found that there is no statistically significant difference in survival between women with stage IV UCS who are tolerated neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those who undergo primary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Dwight D Im
- The Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- The Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Şükür YE, Taşkın S, Varlı B, Ateş C, Güngör M, Ortaç F. Prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma. Int J Clin Oncol 2017; 23:114-120. [DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1181-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 08/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|