Clinical risk associated with contrast angiography in metformin treated patients: a clinical review

Drug stewardship in chronic kidney disease to achieve effective and safe medication use

People living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) often experience multimorbidity and require polypharmacy. Kidney dysfunction can also alter the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications, which can modify their risks and benefits; the extent of these changes is not well understood for all situations or medications. The principle of drug stewardship is aimed at maximizing medication safety and effectiveness in a population of patients through a variety of processes including medication reconciliation, medication selection, dose adjustment, monitoring for effectiveness and safety, and discontinuation (deprescribing) when no longer necessary. This Review is aimed at serving as a resource for achieving optimal drug stewardship for patients with CKD. We describe special considerations for medication use during pregnancy and lactation, during acute illness and in patients with cancer, as well as guidance for the responsible use of over-the-counter drugs, herbal remedies, supplements and sick-day rules. We also highlight inequities in medication access worldwide and suggest policies to improve access to quality and essential medications for all persons with CKD. Further strategies to promote drug stewardship include patient education and engagement, the use of digital health tools, shared decision-making and collaboration within interdisciplinary teams. Throughout, we position the person with CKD at the centre of all drug stewardship efforts.

Analysis of Missingness Scenarios for Observational Health Data

Despite the extensive literature on missing data theory and cautionary articles emphasizing the importance of realistic analysis for healthcare data, a critical gap persists in incorporating domain knowledge into the missing data methods. In this paper, we argue that the remedy is to identify the key scenarios that lead to data missingness and investigate their theoretical implications. Based on this proposal, we first introduce an analysis framework where we investigate how different observation agents, such as physicians, influence the data availability and then scrutinize each scenario with respect to the steps in the missing data analysis. We apply this framework to the case study of observational data in healthcare facilities. We identify ten fundamental missingness scenarios and show how they influence the identification step for missing data graphical models, inverse probability weighting estimation, and exponential tilting sensitivity analysis. To emphasize how domain-informed analysis can improve method reliability, we conduct simulation studies under the influence of various missingness scenarios. We compare the results of three common methods in medical data analysis: complete-case analysis, Missforest imputation, and inverse probability weighting estimation. The experiments are conducted for two objectives: variable mean estimation and classification accuracy. We advocate for our analysis approach as a reference for the observational health data analysis. Beyond that, we also posit that the proposed analysis framework is applicable to other medical domains.

The Association between Metformin Therapy and Lactic Acidosis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There is increasing evidence to suggest that therapeutic doses of metformin are unlikely to cause lactic acidosis. The aims of this research were (1) to formally evaluate the association between metformin therapy and lactic acidosis in published case reports using two causality scoring systems, (2) to determine the frequency of pre-existing independent risk factors in published metformin-associated lactic acidosis cases, (3) to investigate the association between risk factors and mortality in metformin-associated lactic acidosis cases, and (4) to explore the relationship between prescribed metformin doses, elevated metformin plasma concentrations and the development of lactic acidosis in cases with chronic renal impairment.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify metformin-associated lactic acidosis cases. Causality was assessed using the World Health Organisation-Uppsala Monitoring Centre system and the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale. Compliance to dosing guidelines was investigated for cases with chronic renal impairment as well as the association between steady-state plasma metformin concentrations prior to admission.

RESULTS

We identified 559 metformin-associated lactic acidosis cases. Almost all cases reviewed (97%) presented with independent risk factors for lactic acidosis. The prescribed metformin dose exceeded published guidelines in 60% of cases in patients with impaired kidney function. Metformin steady-state plasma concentrations prior to admission were predicted to be below the proposed upper limit of the therapeutic range of 5 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost all cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis reviewed presented with independent risk factors for lactic acidosis, supporting the suggestion that metformin plays a contributory role. The prescribed metformin dose, on average, exceeded the dosing recommendations by 1000 mg/day in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment but the predicted pre-admission plasma concentrations did not exceed the therapeutic range.

[Contrast media - Guidelines for practical use]

Contrast agents have become an indispensable part of everyday life in diagnostic radiology. In multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), they provide essential diagnostic information, especially for vascular, inflammatory or oncologic diseases, which otherwise could not be answered. The two most important groups are iodine- and gadolinium-containing contrast agents. Rare side effects include PC-AKI (post-contrast acute kidney injury); more common are allergic and chemotoxic reactions. Since the introduction of guidelines, nephrogenic fibrosis has not been reported anymore, whereas gadolinium deposition in the central nervous system (CNS) has become a new topic. Concerning contrast media use in patients with reduced renal function, at a eGFR threshold of <45 ml/min or <30 ml/min, hydration and a review of indication for enhanced MDCT, depending on the application, is recommended. Low kV and DE-scan protocols with MDCT can help to reduce the amount of iodinated contrast agents. In MRI examinations, only macrocyclic contrast agents should be used for enhanced MRI exams. There has to be a careful risk-benefit analysis with enhanced studies in pregnancy, during lactation and in the pediatric population. Patient information and legal aspects with nonapproved indications are indispensable parts of daily clinical routine. The continuous updating and broadening of knowledge regarding the appropriate use of the various contrast agents has to be an integral part of clinical diagnostic radiology.

Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

GUIDELINE SUMMARY

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with mortality, amputation, and impaired quality of life. These Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) are focused on definition, evaluation, and management of CLTI with the goals of improving evidence-based care and highlighting critical research needs. The term CLTI is preferred over critical limb ischemia, as the latter implies threshold values of impaired perfusion rather than a continuum. CLTI is a clinical syndrome defined by the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in combination with rest pain, gangrene, or a lower limb ulceration >2 weeks duration. Venous, traumatic, embolic, and nonatherosclerotic etiologies are excluded. All patients with suspected CLTI should be referred urgently to a vascular specialist. Accurately staging the severity of limb threat is fundamental, and the Society for Vascular Surgery Threatened Limb Classification system, based on grading of Wounds, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) is endorsed. Objective hemodynamic testing, including toe pressures as the preferred measure, is required to assess CLTI. Evidence-based revascularization (EBR) hinges on three independent axes: Patient risk, Limb severity, and ANatomic complexity (PLAN). Average-risk and high-risk patients are defined by estimated procedural and 2-year all-cause mortality. The GVG proposes a new Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), which involves defining a preferred target artery path (TAP) and then estimating limb-based patency (LBP), resulting in three stages of complexity for intervention. The optimal revascularization strategy is also influenced by the availability of autogenous vein for open bypass surgery. Recommendations for EBR are based on best available data, pending level 1 evidence from ongoing trials. Vein bypass may be preferred for average-risk patients with advanced limb threat and high complexity disease, while those with less complex anatomy, intermediate severity limb threat, or high patient risk may be favored for endovascular intervention. All patients with CLTI should be afforded best medical therapy including the use of antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and glycemic control agents, as well as counseling on smoking cessation, diet, exercise, and preventive foot care. Following EBR, long-term limb surveillance is advised. The effectiveness of nonrevascularization therapies (eg, spinal stimulation, pneumatic compression, prostanoids, and hyperbaric oxygen) has not been established. Regenerative medicine approaches (eg, cell, gene therapies) for CLTI should be restricted to rigorously conducted randomizsed clinical trials. The GVG promotes standardization of study designs and end points for clinical trials in CLTI. The importance of multidisciplinary teams and centers of excellence for amputation prevention is stressed as a key health system initiative.

Are patients with mild to moderate renal impairment on metformin or other oral anti-hyperglycaemic agents at increased risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and metabolic acidosis after radiocontrast exposure?

AIM

To investigate whether the use of metformin during computed tomography (CT) with radiocontrast agents increases the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and metabolic acidosis after CT in type 2 diabetes patients with mild to moderate renal failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient records from January 2015 to December 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 374 patients were included in the final analysis. Of them, 157 patients received metformin, and 217 patients were taking other oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) during radiocontrast administration.

RESULTS

No significant difference in CIN incidence was observed between the metformin use group and the other OHAs group (p=0.085). Metabolic acidosis after CT was seen in 91 (58%) patients who used metformin and 141 (65%) patients who were taking other OHAs. There was no relationship between metabolic acidosis after CT and the use of metformin (p=0.195). Metabolic acidosis after radiocontrast agent exposure was associated with malignant disease, low serum albumin level, and low serum total CO₂ level at baseline.

CONCLUSION

These data show that other factors, but not metformin use, are associated with metabolic acidosis after radiocontrast agent exposure in patients with reduced renal function. These data support current recommendations that there is no need to discontinue metformin before CT using radiocontrast agents in patients with mild to moderate renal failure.

Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with mortality, amputation, and impaired quality of life. These Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) are focused on definition, evaluation, and management of CLTI with the goals of improving evidence-based care and highlighting critical research needs. The term CLTI is preferred over critical limb ischemia, as the latter implies threshold values of impaired perfusion rather than a continuum. CLTI is a clinical syndrome defined by the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in combination with rest pain, gangrene, or a lower limb ulceration >2 weeks duration. Venous, traumatic, embolic, and nonatherosclerotic etiologies are excluded. All patients with suspected CLTI should be referred urgently to a vascular specialist. Accurately staging the severity of limb threat is fundamental, and the Society for Vascular Surgery Threatened Limb Classification system, based on grading of Wounds, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) is endorsed. Objective hemodynamic testing, including toe pressures as the preferred measure, is required to assess CLTI. Evidence-based revascularization (EBR) hinges on three independent axes: Patient risk, Limb severity, and ANatomic complexity (PLAN). Average-risk and high-risk patients are defined by estimated procedural and 2-year all-cause mortality. The GVG proposes a new Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), which involves defining a preferred target artery path (TAP) and then estimating limb-based patency (LBP), resulting in three stages of complexity for intervention. The optimal revascularization strategy is also influenced by the availability of autogenous vein for open bypass surgery. Recommendations for EBR are based on best available data, pending level 1 evidence from ongoing trials. Vein bypass may be preferred for average-risk patients with advanced limb threat and high complexity disease, while those with less complex anatomy, intermediate severity limb threat, or high patient risk may be favored for endovascular intervention. All patients with CLTI should be afforded best medical therapy including the use of antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and glycemic control agents, as well as counseling on smoking cessation, diet, exercise, and preventive foot care. Following EBR, long-term limb surveillance is advised. The effectiveness of nonrevascularization therapies (eg, spinal stimulation, pneumatic compression, prostanoids, and hyperbaric oxygen) has not been established. Regenerative medicine approaches (eg, cell, gene therapies) for CLTI should be restricted to rigorously conducted randomizsed clinical trials. The GVG promotes standardization of study designs and end points for clinical trials in CLTI. The importance of multidisciplinary teams and centers of excellence for amputation prevention is stressed as a key health system initiative.

Metformin Use and Metformin-associated Lactic Acidosis in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Diabetes

Metformin is a very potent anti-diabetic drug that has become the drug of choice for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In addition to its glucose-lowering properties, it also reduces all-cause mortality through its anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects. Although metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is a very rare event, the mortality associated with it is close to 50%. As it is excreted through the kidney, MALA is frequently seen in patients on metformin with risk factors for developing acute kidney injury. Metformin increases the plasma lactate level in a concentration-dependent manner by inhibiting mitochondrial respiration, usually in the presence of a secondary event that disrupts lactate production or clearance. The incidence of acute kidney injury is very high in critically ill patients contributed by circulatory defects as well as contrast-induced nephropathy, the incidence of which is also high in this subset of the population. Because of this potential risk, metformin is frequently discontinued in diabetic patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Blood glucose variability and hypoglycemia, however, are both related to poor intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes and in order to prevent this in diabetic patients admitted to ICU, oral hypoglycemic agents are frequently switched to intravenous or subcutaneous insulin regimens, which allows for closer monitoring and better blood glucose control.

Is it necessary to discontinue metformin in diabetic patients with GFR > 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 undergoing coronary angiography: A controversy still exists?

BACKGROUND

Although metformin is not directly nephrotoxic, it has been postulated that it can impair gluconeogenesis from lactate, which may lead lactate to be accumulated under circumstances such as contrast-induced nephropathy. The present study aims to assess the role of metformin in lactate production in a group of diabetic patients with GFR > 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2undergoing coronary angiography.

METHODS

In the present randomized clinical trial, 162 metformin-treated diabetic patients were enrolled. The enlisted patients were scheduled to undergo coronary angiography at Modarres Hospital from Feb 2012 to Nov 2012. Patients were randomly allocated to continue metformin during peri-angiography period (M (+) group) or to stop the medication 24 hours prior the procedure (M (-) group). All the patients had glomerular filtration rate of >60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Iodixanol was the only contrast media which in all patients. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) was defined as an arterial pH <7.35 and plasma lactate concentration >5 mmol⁄L.

RESULTS

162 patients, including79 (48.7%) male and 83 (51.3%) female patients were enrolled in the study. The average of GFR was comparable in both groups (76 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the M (+) group versus 79 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the M (-) group, p=0.53). No significant difference was observed in the mean dose of metformin before the study between the 2 groups (2.18 tablets per day in M (+) group vs. 2.21 tablets per day in M(-) group, p=0.62).No lactic acidosis was observed in the studied groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that metformin continuation in diabetic patients with a GFR of more than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 undergoing coronary angiography does not enhance the risk of MALA development.

Patient Evaluation and Preparation in Vascular and Interventional Radiology: What Every Interventional Radiologist Should Know (Part 2: Patient Preparation and Medications)

Performing an interventional procedure imposes a commitment on interventional radiologists to conduct the initial patient assessment, determine the best course of therapy, and provide long-term care. Patient care before and after an interventional procedure, identification, and management of early and delayed complications of various procedures are equal in importance to the procedure itself. In this second part, we complete the comprehensive, methodical review of pre-procedural care and patient preparation before vascular and interventional radiology procedures.

Nonpharmacological strategies to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury

Contrast-induced AKI (CI-AKI) has been one of the leading causes for hospital-acquired AKI and is associated with independent risk for adverse clinical outcomes including morbidity and mortality. The aim of this review is to provide a brief summary of the studies that focus on nonpharmacological strategies to prevent CI-AKI, including routine identification of at-risk patients, use of appropriate hydration regimens, withdrawal of nephrotoxic drugs, selection of low-osmolar contrast media or isoosmolar contrast media, and using the minimum volume of contrast media as possible. There is no need to schedule dialysis in relation to injection of contrast media or injection of contrast agent in relation to dialysis program. Hemodialysis cannot protect the poorly functioning kidney against CI-AKI.

Discontinuation of metformin in the setting of coronary angiography: clinical uncertainty amongst physicians reflecting a poor evidence base

AIMS

Metformin is widely prescribed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is associated with a reduction in diabetes-induced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Concerns about metformin-associated lactic acidosis (M-ALA) in patients undergoing contrast-based angiographic procedures have led to the development and publication of a number of guidelines to improve the management of this patient cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This review focuses on the evidence behind these guidelines and, in particular, that concerning metformin discontinuation in diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention. This review addresses and compares guideline-directed management of such patients and includes the results of a UK physician survey to highlight variations in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that evidence for M-ALA in diabetics on metformin undergoing coronary intervention is lacking and existing guidance on the management of such patients is inconsistent. More robust evidence is needed in the form of a large, adequately-sized randomised trial or extensive registry so that we can optimally manage those patients requiring contrast-based coronary interventions who are also taking metformin.

How to reduce nephropathy following contrast-enhanced CT: a lesson in policy implementation

In excess of 50 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examinations are typically undertaken in our tertiary hospital NHS Trust each weekday, approximately 13,000 each year. In the Department of Radiology alone, we inject more than 1300 l of iodinated contrast medium per annum. There is a real need to devise a policy to anticipate contrast medium-induced nephropathy (CIN) and minimize its effects, without disrupting the high-intensity CT service. Having written a comprehensive yet pragmatic policy to reduce the incidence of this iatrogenic condition, it seemed sensible to share it with the wider radiology community and share the experience and lessons learnt in engaging all the stakeholders, ushering in the change with as little fuss as possible. The ramifications on primary and secondary care had to be anticipated, resource implications managed, and staff trained. This review is therefore presented in four sections: framing the problem, assessing its size and nature; a succeeding section on the available guidelines and their uptake; the policy itself to reduce CIN in CT is presented in the third section; and crucially, a description of the policy introduction process in the last section.

[Therapeutic approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions]

While the performance of percutaneous coronary interventions remains the domain of interventional cardiologists, the management of these patients before, during, and after the procedure is in the domain of general cardiologists, internists and primary care physicians. Therefore, for optimal patient care it is crucial that all engaged physicians should understand the procedural risks, complications and optimal treatment strategy before, during and after the procedure. Before a percutanous coronary intervention, patients with known allergies to iodinated contrast dye should be pretreated with oral corticosteroids and H1-receptor blockers. Diabetic patients as well as patients with renal failure need special care. Hydration is crucial for patients with renal insufficiency in order to minimise the risk of contrast nephropathy. Metformin therapy should be discontinued before the procedure in patients with renal failure in order to avoid lactic acidosis, and it should be reinstituted after the procedure only when normal serum creatine level is confirmed. Double antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) should be initiated at least six hours before the procedure. While aspirin therapy after the procedure is life long, the duration of clopidogrel therapy depends on the type of implanted stent (in patients with bare stents implanted clopidogrel should be taken at least 3 - 4 weeks post procedural, and in patients with drug-eluting stents implanted clopidogrel should be taken at least 6 - 12 months after the procedure due to in-stent restenosis prevention). Patients who experience typical anginal pain in a period of one to eight month after percutaneous coronary revascularization are likely to have restenosis, and they should be reevaluated with stress echocardiography and/or repeated coronary angiography.

Risk Factors and Therapy Strategies for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as increased costs for medical care, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic renal failure. A key step to safer CIN is to identify patients at risk and applying proven preventive interventions. Extracellular volume expansion, minimizing the dose of contrast media, using low-osmolar non-ionic contrast media, stopping the intake of nephrotoxic drugs, and avoiding short intervals between procedures have all been shown to be effective in reducing CIN. The aim of the present review is to summarize the knowledge about the risk factors and prophylactic treatments of CIN.

Risk factors for contrast-induced nephropathy

An increasing number of diagnostic imaging and interventional procedures require the use of radiographic contrast agents which has led to a parallel increase in the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). CIN is a serious clinical problem associated with increased morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with chronic renal failure (see the Case Report). A key step to minimize CIN is to identify patients at risk of CIN. The aim of the present review was to summarize the knowledge about the risk factors of CIN, including the review of ultimate clinical research and developments.

Does diabetes mellitus abolish the beneficial effect of primary coronary angioplasty on long-term risk of reinfarction after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with fibrinolysis? (A DANAMI-2 substudy)

Little is known about the effect of diabetes mellitus on long-term clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) compared with fibrinolysis in patients who have acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We analyzed 3-year clinical outcome in diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients who had been randomized to fibrinolysis or pPCI in the DANAMI-2 trial to compare long-term clinical outcome. The primary end point was a composite of death, clinical reinfarction, or disabling stroke. Median follow-up was 3.8 years. Among 1,572 consecutive patients who had ST-elevation myocardial infarction and were randomized to pPCI or fibrinolysis, 173 (11.0%) had diabetes mellitus; 60 of these patients received metformin treatment and were excluded. After 3 years no difference was found between diabetic patients who underwent pPCI versus fibrinolysis (combined event p=0.37, reinfarction p=0.06 in favor of fibrinolysis), whereas pPCI was superior to fibrinolysis in nondiabetic patients (combined event p=0.002, clinical reinfarction p<0.001). Three-year incidence of clinical reinfarction analyzed with Cox's regression showed that pPCI compared with fibrinolysis increased the relative risk of clinical reinfarction in diabetic patients (relative risk 2.57, 95% confidence interval 1.48 to 4.46, p <0.001) but decreased the risk in nondiabetic patients (relative risk 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.74, p<0.001). In conclusion, from the DANAMI-2 trial we hypothesize that diabetes may abolish the beneficial effect of pPCI on long-term risk of clinical reinfarction.

Contrast nephropathy, pathophysiology and prevention

Contrast nephropathy is a common cause of iatrogenic acute renal failure. Its incidence rises with the growing use of intra-arterial contrast in diagnostic and interventional procedures. Aim of the present review is to summarize the knowledge about pathophysiology and prevention. Nephrotoxicity is related to osmolality, dose and route of the contrast and only occurs in synergy with other factors, such as previous renal impairment and cardiovascular disease. With an interplay of these factors, contrast nephropathy has an impact on morbidity and mortality. Pathophysiological mechanisms are intrarenal vasoconstriction, leading to medullary ischemia, direct cytotoxicity, oxidative tissue damage and apoptosis. Several measures are of proven benefit in patients at risk. Among them are discontinuation of potentially nephrotoxic drugs, hydration, preferably with isotonic sodium bicarbonate, use of low osmolal contrast, oral or intravenous N-acetylcysteine and intravenous theophylline. In patients with severe cardiac and renal dysfunction undergoing cardiac interventions, periprocedural hemofiltration may be considered.

Radiocontrast-induced nephropathy

Radiocontrast administration remains the third leading cause of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. Clinically, radiocontrast-induced nephropathy (RIN) is defined as a sudden decline in renal function after radiocontrast administration. Typically, the serum creatinine level begins to increase at 24 to 72 hours after the administration of contrast, peaks at 3 to 5 days, and requires another 3 to 5 days to return to baseline. RIN increases the incidence of life-threatening complications such as sepsis, bleeding, and respiratory failure and increases the cost of medical care by extending the hospital stay. The increased mortality associated with acute renal failure encountered in this scenario calls for a heightened awareness of the diagnosis and prevention of RIN. Whereas individuals with healthy renal function are not generally considered to be at particular risk for RIN, patients with preexisting renal insufficiency and diabetes mellitus are much more likely to experience acute renal failure after contrast administration. In the past, a variety of therapeutic interventions have been used to prevent or attenuate RIN, including saline hydration, diuretics, mannitol, calcium channel antagonists, theophylline, endothelin receptor antagonists, hemodialysis, and dopamine. More recently, studies demonstrate a positive impact of fenoldopam (dopamine-1 receptor, dopamine-1 agonist) and the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine in ameliorating RIN. This article discusses the pathophysiology, risk factors, and prevention of RIN.

Oral agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: pharmacology, toxicity, and treatment

Currently available oral agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus include a variety of compounds from 5 different pharmacologic classes with differing mechanisms of action, adverse effect profiles, and toxicities. The oral antidiabetic drugs can be classified as either hypoglycemic agents (sulfonylureas and benzoic acid derivatives) or antihyperglycemic agents (biguanides, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones). In this review, a brief discussion of the pharmacology of these agents is followed by an examination of the adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, and toxicities. Finally, treatment of sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia is described, including general supportive care and the management of pediatric sulfonylurea ingestions. The adjunctive roles of glucagon, diazoxide, and octreotide for refractory hypoglycemia are also discussed.

Vascular imaging and intervention in peripheral arteries in the diabetic patient

Diabetic patients are four times more likely to develop peripheral vascular disease than the general population. This disease is likely to be more aggressive, with five times more patients developing critical limb ischaemia. Early diagnosis and treatment allows up to 80% of these patients to have some form of surgical or endovascular re-vascularisation. The primary imaging modalities to be used should be duplex ultrasound followed by angiography. Magnetic resonance angiography, however, holds out promise for the future as being a good method of non-invasive imaging. Endovascular (interventional radiological) procedures have a major role to play in treatment of vascular stenoses and occlusions. Thrombolytic agents can be used to dissolve thrombus within occluded vessels and so restore patency. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is of value in dilating the stenotic lesions within the vessels and so restoring normal blood flow. Endovascular stents may be inserted to ensure longer term patency. There is indirect evidence to suggest that the outcomes of endovascular procedures in the diabetic patient are less good than those in the general population, but nevertheless such procedures may save the diabetic patient from primary amputation and allow healing of ischaemic ulcers.

Changes in renal function with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

There is concern about adverse effects on renal function in patients with prolonged cardiac intervention procedures, when contrast media is used. To investigate this further we studied changes in renal function in 104 patients (79 male, 25 female; mean age 59.2, SD 9.8) undergoing routine elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), where 28 (27%) patients had concomitant stent implantation. There was associated diabetes in 15 patients (14%) and previous hypertension in 44 (blood pressure >160/90 mmHg, 44%). None of the patients were known to have congestive heart failure at the time of procedure or chronic renal failure (defined as serum creatinine >200 pmol/l). There was no significant change in mean serum urea pre- and post-PTCA (mean change -0.04 mmol/l, paired t-test P=0.90). However, there was a small rise in serum creatinine pre- and post-PTCA of borderline significance (mean change +5.8 micromol/l, P=0.051). Of the whole cohort, 65 patients (63%) had a rise in mean serum creatinine, whilst 45 (43%) showed a rise in serum urea levels. This deterioration in renal function was related to a difference in the procedure duration, but there were no statistically significant differences in mean age or volume of contrast media (Iopamide 340) between patients with or without deterioration in renal function. Patients with a rise in serum creatinine had lower baseline (pre-PTCA) serum urea and serum creatinine levels. In patients undergoing stent implantation, there was a higher quantity of contrast media, screening time and procedure duration. There were no significant differences in age, pre-PTCA serum urea and creatinine levels, and mean change in serum urea or creatinine levels in patients with and without stent usage. Whilst severe renal dysfunction following PTCA is uncommon, we suggest that some caution is necessary during PTCA or other cardiac interventions where more complex or prolonged procedures necessitating large volumes of contrast media use.

Metformin and contrast media--a dangerous combination?

Metformin is a biguanide used to treat type II diabetes mellitus. Since the recent introduction of this drug into the United States there has been considerable interest in metformin associated lactic acidosis (MALA) following intravenous contrast media. The Royal College of Radiologists published advice in November, 1996 (Advice to Members and Fellows with regard to metformin-induced lactic acidosis and X-ray contrast medium agents, RCR Publication) supporting the manufacturers' advice that metformin should not be used in the 48 h before or after intravenous (i.v.) contrast medium. We performed a systematic review of the literature and this has shown that almost all reported cases of MALA following i.v. contrast medium occurred where there was either pre-existing poor renal function or another contraindication to metformin usage. There has been only one reported case of lactic acidosis following the use of intravenous contrast medium in a patient with normal renal function. We suggest that the Royal College of Radiologists' advice should be modified and that it is safe to give i.v. contrast medium to patients on metformin with normal renal function.