Hypernegative supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription elongation in vitro

Update on R-loops in genomic integrity: Formation, functions, and implications for human diseases

R-loops, three-strand nucleic acid structures, have emerged as crucial players in various physiological processes, including the regulation of gene expression, DNA replication, and class switch recombination. However, their presence also poses a significant threat to genome stability. A particularly challenging aspect is understanding the dynamic balance between R-loops' "light" and "dark" sites, especially concerning maintaining genome integrity. The complex and multifaceted roles of R-loops in genome stability necessitate a deeper understanding. This review offers a comprehensive exploration of the formation, resolution, and implications of R-loops, particularly in the context of DNA damage and human disease. We delve into the dualistic nature of R-loops, highlighting their role in DNA damage response and repair, and discuss the therapeutic potential arising from our evolving understanding of these enigmatic entities. Emphasizing recent advancements and unresolved questions, this review aims to provide a cohesive overview of R-loops, inviting further inquiry and investigation into their complex biological significance.

Complex determinants of R-loop formation at transposable elements and major DNA satellites

Aberrant activation of transposable elements (TEs) has been a well-documented source of genomic instability and disease, stemming from their insertion into genes and their imposition of epigenetic effects on nearby loci. However, the extent to which their disruptive effects involve concomitant or subsequent formation of DNA:RNA hybrids (R-loops) remains unknown. Here, we used DNA:RNA immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (DRIP-seq) to map the R-loop profiles of TEs and satellites in Drosophila melanogaster ovaries in control and rhino knockout flies, where dozens of TE families are derepressed. We observe that R-loops form primarily in LTR retrotransposons that carry A/T-rich sequence motifs, which are known to favor R-loop formation at genes in Drosophila and other species. We also report evidence of R-loop formation at 11 of 14 highly abundant D. melanogaster DNA satellites. R-loop formation is positively correlated with expression level for both TEs and satellites; however, neither sequence content nor expression fully explain which repeat families form R-loops, suggesting other factors are at play. Finally, by analyzing population frequencies of R-loop-forming TEs, we present evidence that TE copies with high R-loop signal may be under stronger negative selection, which suggests that R-loop formation by TEs may be deleterious to their host. Collectively, these results provide insight into the determinants of R-loop formation at repetitive elements.

UV induces codirectional replication-transcription conflicts and an alternative DnaA-dependent replication origin in the rnhAB mutants of Escherichiacoli

The rnhAB mutants of Escherichia coli lacking both RNase H enzymes are unexpectedly UV-sensitive, being unable to restore normal levels of post-UV replication. Examining patterns of chromosomal replication in the rnhAB mutants after UV could identify the problem sites. We show that normal rnhA (B) mutant replication initiates at three distinct oriK areas in the origin macrodomain, none of them coinciding with oriC proper, the dominant origin being some 400 kb away. Interestingly, initiation after UV switches to the DnaA-dependent oriK closest to oriC and continues from there until the growth replication pattern is restored, like in the rnhA single mutants. However, in the rnhAB double mutant, post-UV forks initiated at the new origin have difficulty reaching the terminus, with the major stalling sites at the rrn operons. In the rnhAB recBC mutants, additionally deficient in linear DNA degradation/repair, post-UV replication forks cannot traverse the origin-distal ribosomal RNA operons, rrnG and rrnH, showing that restoration of disintegrated replication forks is essential for replication in the rnhAB mutant. In contrast, the rnhAB rpoB* mutant, in which transcription complexes are unstable, is UV-resistant and resumes normal replication even faster than WT cells, indicating that the rnhAB mutants suffer from UV-induced replication-transcription conflicts.

DNA supercoiling-mediated G4/R-loop formation tunes transcription by controlling the access of RNA polymerase

RNA polymerase (RNAP) is a processive motor that modulates DNA supercoiling and reshapes DNA structures. The feedback loop between the DNA topology and transcription remains elusive. Here, we investigate the impact of potential G-quadruplex forming sequences (PQS) on transcription in response to DNA supercoiling. We find that supercoiled DNA increases transcription frequency 10-fold higher than relaxed DNA, which lead to an abrupt formation of G-quadruplex (G4) and R-loop structures. Moreover, the stable R-loop relieves topological strain, facilitated by G4 formation. The cooperative formation of G4/R-loop effectively alters the DNA topology around the promoter and suppresses transcriptional activity by impeding RNAP loading. These findings highlight negative supercoiling as a built-in spring that triggers a transcriptional burst followed by a rapid suppression upon G4/R-loop formation. This study sheds light on the intricate interplay between DNA topology and structural change in transcriptional regulation, with implications for understanding gene expression dynamics.

Causes and consequences of DNA double-stranded breaks in cardiovascular disease

The genome, whose stability is essential for survival, is incessantly exposed to internal and external stressors, which introduce an estimated 104 to 105 lesions, such as oxidation, in the nuclear genome of each mammalian cell each day. A delicate homeostatic balance between the generation and repair of DNA lesions maintains genomic stability. To initiate transcription, DNA strands unwind to form a transcription bubble and provide a template for the RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) complex to synthesize nascent RNA. The process generates DNA supercoils and introduces torsional stress. To enable RNAPII processing, the supercoils are released by topoisomerases by introducing strand breaks, including double-stranded breaks (DSBs). Thus, DSBs are intrinsic genomic features of gene expression. The breaks are quickly repaired upon processing of the transcription. DNA lesions and damaged proteins involved in transcription could impede the integrity and efficiency of RNAPII processing. The impediment, which is referred to as transcription stress, not only could lead to the generation of aberrant RNA species but also the accumulation of DSBs. The latter is particularly the case when topoisomerase processing and/or the repair mechanisms are compromised. The DSBs activate the DNA damage response (DDR) pathways to repair the damaged DNA and/or impose cell cycle arrest and cell death. In addition, the release of DSBs into the cytosol activates the cytosolic DNA-sensing proteins (CDSPs), which along with the nuclear DDR pathways induce the expression of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), cell cycle arrest, senescence, cell death, inflammation, and aging. The primary stimulus in hereditary cardiomyopathies is a mutation(s) in genes encoding the protein constituents of cardiac myocytes; however, the phenotype is the consequence of intertwined complex interactions among numerous stressors and the causal mutation(s). Increased internal DNA stressors, such as oxidation, alkylation, and cross-linking, are expected to be common in pathological conditions, including in hereditary cardiomyopathies. In addition, dysregulation of gene expression also imposes transcriptional stress and collectively with other stressors provokes the generation of DSBs. In addition, the depletion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), which occurs in pathological conditions, impairs the repair mechanism and further facilitates the accumulation of DSBs. Because DSBs activate the DDR pathways, they are expected to contribute to the pathogenesis of cardiomyopathies. Thus, interventions to reduce the generation of DSBs, enhance their repair, and block the deleterious DDR pathways would be expected to impart salubrious effects not only in pathological states, as in hereditary cardiomyopathies but also aging.

Kinetic Features of Degradation of R-Loops by RNase H1 from Escherichia coli

R-loops can act as replication fork barriers, creating transcription-replication collisions and inducing replication stress by arresting DNA synthesis, thereby possibly causing aberrant processing and the formation of DNA strand breaks. RNase H1 (RH1) is one of the enzymes that participates in R-loop degradation by cleaving the RNA strand within a hybrid RNA-DNA duplex. In this study, the kinetic features of the interaction of RH1 from Escherichia coli with R-loops of various structures were investigated. It was found that the values of the dissociation constants Kd were minimal for complexes of RH1 with model R-loops containing a 10-11-nt RNA-DNA hybrid part, indicating effective binding. Analysis of the kinetics of RNA degradation in the R-loops by RH1 revealed that the rate-limiting step of the process was catalytic-complex formation. In the presence of RNA polymerase, the R-loops containing a ≤16-nt RNA-DNA hybrid part were efficiently protected from cleavage by RH1. In contrast, R-loops containing longer RNA-DNA hybrid parts, as a model of an abnormal transcription process, were not protected by RNA polymerase and were effectively digested by RH1.

The hidden architects of the genome: a comprehensive review of R-loops

Three-stranded DNA: RNA hybrids known as R-loops form when the non-template DNA strand is displaced and the mRNA transcript anneals to its template strand. Although R-loop formation controls DNA damage response, mitochondrial and genomic transcription, and physiological R-loop formation, imbalanced formation of R-loop can jeopardize a cell's genomic integrity. Transcription regulation and immunoglobulin class switch recombination are two further specialized functions of genomic R-loops. R-loop formation has a dual role in the development of cancer and disturbed R-loop homeostasis as observed in several malignancies. R-loops transcribe at the telomeric and pericentromeric regions, develop in the space between long non-coding RNAs and telomeric repeats, and shield telomeres. In bacteria and archaea, R-loop development is a natural defence mechanism against viruses which also causes DNA degradation. Their emergence in the mammalian genome is controlled, suggesting that they were formed as an inevitable byproduct of RNA transcription but also co-opted for regulatory functions. R-loops may be engaged in cell physiology by regulating gene expression. R-loop biology is probably going to remain a fascinating field of study for a very long time as it offers many avenues for R-loop research.

RNA Polymerase II is a Polar Roadblock to a Progressing DNA Fork

DNA replication and transcription occur simultaneously on the same DNA template, leading to inevitable conflicts between the replisome and RNA polymerase. These conflicts can stall the replication fork and threaten genome stability. Although numerous studies show that head-on conflicts are more detrimental and more prone to promoting R-loop formation than co-directional conflicts, the fundamental cause for the RNA polymerase roadblock polarity remains unclear, and the structure of these R-loops is speculative. In this work, we use a simple model system to address this complex question by examining the Pol II roadblock to a DNA fork advanced via mechanical unzipping to mimic the replisome progression. We found that the Pol II binds more stably to resist removal in the head-on configuration, even with minimal transcript size, demonstrating that the Pol II roadblock has an inherent polarity. However, an elongating Pol II with a long RNA transcript becomes an even more potent and persistent roadblock while retaining the polarity, and the formation of an RNA-DNA hybrid mediates this enhancement. Surprisingly, we discovered that when a Pol II collides with the DNA fork head-on and becomes backtracked, an RNA-DNA hybrid can form on the lagging strand in front of Pol II, creating a topological lock that traps Pol II at the fork. TFIIS facilitates RNA-DNA hybrid removal by severing the connection of Pol II with the hybrid. We further demonstrate that this RNA-DNA hybrid can prime lagging strand replication by T7 DNA polymerase while Pol II is still bound to DNA. Our findings capture basal properties of the interactions of Pol II with a DNA fork, revealing significant implications for transcription-replication conflicts.

Chromatin remodeling and spatial concerns in DNA double-strand break repair

The substrate for the repair of DNA damage in living cells is not DNA but chromatin. Chromatin bears a range of modifications, which in turn bind ligands that compact or open chromatin structure, and determine its spatial organization within the nucleus. In some cases, RNA in the form of RNA:DNA hybrids or R-loops modulates DNA accessibility. Each of these parameters can favor particular pathways of repair. Chromatin or nucleosome remodelers are key regulators of chromatin structure, and a number of remodeling complexes are implicated in DNA repair. We cover novel insights into the impact of chromatin structure, nuclear organization, R-loop formation, nuclear actin, and nucleosome remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair, focusing on factors that alter repair functional upon ablation.

Intertwining roles of R-loops and G-quadruplexes in DNA repair, transcription and genome organization

R-loops are three-stranded nucleic acid structures that are abundant and widespread across the genome and that have important physiological roles in many nuclear processes. Their accumulation is observed in cancers and neurodegenerative disorders. Recent studies have implicated a function for R-loops and G-quadruplex (G4) structures, which can form on the displaced single strand of R-loops, in three-dimensional genome organization in both physiological and pathological contexts. Here we discuss the interconnected functions of DNA:RNA hybrids and G4s within R-loops, their impact on DNA repair and gene regulatory networks, and their emerging roles in genome organization during development and disease.

Bridging the gap: R-loop mediated genomic instability and its implications in neurological diseases

R-loops, intricate three-stranded structures formed by RNA-DNA hybrids and an exposed non-template DNA strand, are fundamental to various biological phenomena. They carry out essential and contrasting functions within cellular mechanisms, underlining their critical role in maintaining cellular homeostasis. The specific cellular context that dictates R-loop formation determines their function, particularly emphasizing the necessity for their meticulous genomic regulation. Notably, the aberrant formation or misregulation of R-loops is implicated in numerous neurological disorders. This review focuses on the complex interactions between R-loops and double-strand DNA breaks, exploring how R-loop dysregulation potentially contributes to the pathogenesis of various brain disorders, which could provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underpinning neurological disease progression and identify potential therapeutic targets by highlighting these aspects.

Looping out of control: R-loops in transcription-replication conflict

Transcription-replication conflict is a major cause of replication stress that arises when replication forks collide with the transcription machinery. Replication fork stalling at sites of transcription compromises chromosome replication fidelity and can induce DNA damage with potentially deleterious consequences for genome stability and organismal health. The block to DNA replication by the transcription machinery is complex and can involve stalled or elongating RNA polymerases, promoter-bound transcription factor complexes, or DNA topology constraints. In addition, studies over the past two decades have identified co-transcriptional R-loops as a major source for impairment of DNA replication forks at active genes. However, how R-loops impede DNA replication at the molecular level is incompletely understood. Current evidence suggests that RNA:DNA hybrids, DNA secondary structures, stalled RNA polymerases, and condensed chromatin states associated with R-loops contribute to the of fork progression. Moreover, since both R-loops and replication forks are intrinsically asymmetric structures, the outcome of R-loop-replisome collisions is influenced by collision orientation. Collectively, the data suggest that the impact of R-loops on DNA replication is highly dependent on their specific structural composition. Here, we will summarize our current understanding of the molecular basis for R-loop-induced replication fork progression defects.

TATDN2 resolution of R-loops is required for survival of BRCA1-mutant cancer cells

BRCA1-deficient cells have increased IRE1 RNase, which degrades multiple microRNAs. Reconstituting expression of one of these, miR-4638-5p, resulted in synthetic lethality in BRCA1-deficient cancer cells. We found that miR-4638-5p represses expression of TATDN2, a poorly characterized member of the TATD nuclease family. We discovered that human TATDN2 has RNA 3' exonuclease and endonuclease activity on double-stranded hairpin RNA structures. Given the cleavage of hairpin RNA by TATDN2, and that BRCA1-deficient cells have difficulty resolving R-loops, we tested whether TATDN2 could resolve R-loops. Using in vitro biochemical reconstitution assays, we found TATDN2 bound to R-loops and degraded the RNA strand but not DNA of multiple forms of R-loops in vitro in a Mg2+-dependent manner. Mutations in amino acids E593 and E705 predicted by Alphafold-2 to chelate an essential Mg2+ cation completely abrogated this R-loop resolution activity. Depleting TATDN2 increased cellular R-loops, DNA damage and chromosomal instability. Loss of TATDN2 resulted in poor replication fork progression in the presence of increased R-loops. Significantly, we found that TATDN2 is essential for survival of BRCA1-deficient cancer cells, but much less so for cognate BRCA1-repleted cancer cells. Thus, we propose that TATDN2 is a novel target for therapy of BRCA1-deficient cancers.

Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress

Replicative DNA polymerases are blocked by nearly all types of DNA damage. The resulting DNA replication stress threatens genome stability. DNA replication stress is also caused by depletion of nucleotide pools, DNA polymerase inhibitors, and DNA sequences or structures that are difficult to replicate. Replication stress triggers complex cellular responses that include cell cycle arrest, replication fork collapse to one-ended DNA double-strand breaks, induction of DNA repair, and programmed cell death after excessive damage. Replication stress caused by specific structures (e.g., G-rich sequences that form G-quadruplexes) is localized but occurs during the S phase of every cell division. This review focuses on cellular responses to widespread stress such as that caused by random DNA damage, DNA polymerase inhibition/nucleotide pool depletion, and R-loops. Another form of global replication stress is seen in cancer cells and is termed oncogenic stress, reflecting dysregulated replication origin firing and/or replication fork progression. Replication stress responses are often dysregulated in cancer cells, and this too contributes to ongoing genome instability that can drive cancer progression. Nucleases play critical roles in replication stress responses, including MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase, CtIP, MRE11, EXO1, DNA2-BLM, SLX1-SLX4, XPF-ERCC1-SLX4, Artemis, XPG, FEN1, and TATDN2. Several of these nucleases cleave branched DNA structures at stressed replication forks to promote repair and restart of these forks. We recently defined roles for EEPD1 in restarting stressed replication forks after oxidative DNA damage, and for TATDN2 in mitigating replication stress caused by R-loop accumulation in BRCA1-defective cells. We also discuss how insights into biological responses to genome-wide replication stress can inform novel cancer treatment strategies that exploit synthetic lethal relationships among replication stress response factors.

Regulation and function of R-loops at repetitive elements

R-loops are atypical, three-stranded nucleic acid structures that contain a stretch of RNA:DNA hybrids and an unpaired, single stranded DNA loop. R-loops are physiological relevant and can act as regulators of gene expression, chromatin structure, DNA damage repair and DNA replication. However, unscheduled and persistent R-loops are mutagenic and can mediate replication-transcription conflicts, leading to DNA damage and genome instability if left unchecked. Detailed transcriptome analysis unveiled that 85% of the human genome, including repetitive regions, hold transcriptional activity. This anticipates that R-loops management plays a central role for the regulation and integrity of genomes. This function is expected to have a particular relevance for repetitive sequences that make up to 75% of the human genome. Here, we review the impact of R-loops on the function and stability of repetitive regions such as centromeres, telomeres, rDNA arrays, transposable elements and triplet repeat expansions and discuss their relevance for associated pathological conditions.

Physiologic and Transcriptomic Effects Triggered by Overexpression of Wild Type and Mutant DNA Topoisomerase I in Streptococcus pneumoniae

Topoisomerase I (TopoI) in Streptococcus pneumoniae, encoded by topA, is a suitable target for drug development. Seconeolitsine (SCN) is a new antibiotic that specifically blocks this enzyme. We obtained the topARA mutant, which encodes an enzyme less active than the wild type (topAWT) and more resistant to SCN inhibition. Likely due to the essentiality of TopoI, we were unable to replace the topAWT allele by the mutant topARA version. We compared the in vivo activity of TopoIRA and TopoIWT using regulated overexpression strains, whose genes were either under the control of a moderately (PZn) or a highly active promoter (PMal). Overproduction of TopoIRA impaired growth, increased SCN resistance and, in the presence of the gyrase inhibitor novobiocin (NOV), caused lower relaxation than TopoIWT. Differential transcriptomes were observed when the topAWT and topARA expression levels were increased about 5-fold. However, higher increases (10-15 times), produced a similar transcriptome, affecting about 52% of the genome, and correlating with a high DNA relaxation level with most responsive genes locating in topological domains. These results confirmed that TopoI is indeed the target of SCN in S. pneumoniae and show the important role of TopoI in global transcription, supporting its suitability as an antibiotic target.

Synthetic lethal mutants in Escherichia coli define pathways necessary for survival with RNase H deficiency

Ribonucleotides frequently contaminate DNA and, if not removed, cause genomic instability. Consequently, all organisms are equipped with RNase H enzymes to remove RNA-DNA hybrids (RDHs). Escherichia coli lacking RNase HI (rnhA) and RNase HII (rnhB) enzymes, the ∆rnhA ∆rnhB double mutant, accumulates RDHs in its DNA. These RDHs can convert into RNA-containing DNA lesions (R-lesions) of unclear nature that compromise genomic stability. The ∆rnhAB double mutant has severe phenotypes, like growth inhibition, replication stress, sensitivity to ultraviolet radiation, SOS induction, increased chromosomal fragmentation, and defects in nucleoid organization. In this study, we found that RNase HI deficiency also alters wild-type levels of DNA supercoiling. Despite these severe chromosomal complications, ∆rnhAB double mutant survives, suggesting that dedicated pathways operate to avoid or repair R-lesions. To identify these pathways, we systematically searched for mutants synthetic lethal (colethal) with the rnhAB defect using an unbiased color screen and a candidate gene approach. We identified both novel and previously reported rnhAB-colethal and -coinhibited mutants, characterized them, and sorted them into avoidance or repair pathways. These mutants operate in various parts of nucleic acid metabolism, including replication fork progression, R-loop prevention and removal, nucleoid organization, tRNA modification, recombinational repair, and chromosome-dimer resolution, demonstrating the pleiotropic nature of RNase H deficiency. IMPORTANCE Ribonucleotides (rNs) are structurally very similar to deoxyribonucleotides. Consequently, rN contamination of DNA is common and pervasive across all domains of life. Failure to remove rNs from DNA has severe consequences, and all organisms are equipped with RNase H enzymes to remove RNA-DNA hybrids. RNase H deficiency leads to complications in bacteria, yeast, and mouse, and diseases like progressive external ophthalmoplegia (mitochondrial defects in RNASEH1) and Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (defects in RNASEH2) in humans. Escherichia coli ∆rnhAB mutant, deficient in RNases H, has severe chromosomal complications. Despite substantial problems, nearly half of the mutant population survives. We have identified novel and previously confirmed pathways in various parts of nucleic acid metabolism that ensure survival with RNase H deficiency.

Translocating RNA polymerase generates R-loops at DNA double-strand breaks without any additional factors

The R-loops forming around DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) within actively transcribed genes play a critical role in the DSB repair process. However, the mechanisms underlying R-loop formation at DSBs remain poorly understood, with diverse proposed models involving protein factors associated with RNA polymerase (RNAP) loading, pausing/backtracking or preexisting transcript RNA invasion. In this single-molecule study using Escherichia coli RNAP, we discovered that transcribing RNAP alone acts as a highly effective DSB sensor, responsible for generation of R-loops upon encountering downstream DSBs, without requiring any additional factors. The R-loop formation efficiency is greatly influenced by DNA end structures, ranging here from 2.8% to 73%, and notably higher on sticky ends with 3' or 5' single-stranded overhangs compared to blunt ends without any overhangs. The R-loops extend unidirectionally upstream from the DSB sites and can reach the transcription start site, interfering with ongoing-round transcription. Furthermore, the extended R-loops can persist and maintain their structures, effectively preventing the efficient initiation of subsequent transcription rounds. Our results are consistent with the bubble extension model rather than the 5'-end invasion model or the middle insertion model. These discoveries provide valuable insights into the initiation of DSB repair on transcription templates across bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes.

Aclarubicin stimulates RNA polymerase II elongation at closely spaced divergent promoters

Anthracyclines are a class of widely prescribed anticancer drugs that disrupt chromatin by intercalating into DNA and enhancing nucleosome turnover. To understand the molecular consequences of anthracycline-mediated chromatin disruption, we used Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) to profile RNA polymerase II during anthracycline treatment in Drosophila cells. We observed that treatment with the anthracycline aclarubicin leads to elevated levels of RNA polymerase II and changes in chromatin accessibility. We found that promoter proximity and orientation affect chromatin changes during aclarubicin treatment, as closely spaced divergent promoter pairs show greater chromatin changes when compared to codirectionally oriented tandem promoters. We also found that aclarubicin treatment changes the distribution of noncanonical DNA G-quadruplex structures both at promoters and at G-rich pericentromeric repeats. Our work suggests that the cancer-killing activity of aclarubicin is driven by the disruption of nucleosomes and RNA polymerase II.

Characterization of a pathway of genomic instability induced by R-loops and its regulation by topoisomerases in E. coli

The prototype enzymes of the ubiquitous type IA topoisomerases (topos) family are Escherichia coli topo I (topA) and topo III (topB). Topo I shows preference for relaxation of negative supercoiling and topo III for decatenation. However, as they could act as backups for each other or even share functions, strains lacking both enzymes must be used to reveal the roles of type IA enzymes in genome maintenance. Recently, marker frequency analysis (MFA) of genomic DNA from topA topB null mutants revealed a major RNase HI-sensitive DNA peak bordered by Ter/Tus barriers, sites of replication fork fusion and termination in the chromosome terminus region (Ter). Here, flow cytometry for R-loop-dependent replication (RLDR), MFA, R-loop detection with S9.6 antibodies, and microscopy were used to further characterize the mechanism and consequences of over-replication in Ter. It is shown that the Ter peak is not due to the presence of a strong origin for RLDR in Ter region; instead RLDR, which is partly inhibited by the backtracking-resistant rpoB*35 mutation, appears to contribute indirectly to Ter over-replication. The data suggest that RLDR from multiple sites on the chromosome increases the number of replication forks trapped at Ter/Tus barriers which leads to RecA-dependent DNA amplification in Ter and to a chromosome segregation defect. Overproducing topo IV, the main cellular decatenase, does not inhibit RLDR or Ter over-replication but corrects the chromosome segregation defect. Furthermore, our data suggest that the inhibition of RLDR by topo I does not require its C-terminal-mediated interaction with RNA polymerase. Overall, our data reveal a pathway of genomic instability triggered by R-loops and its regulation by various topos activities at different steps.

R-loops, type I topoisomerases and cancer

R-loops are abundant and dynamic structures ubiquitously present in human cells both in the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. They form in cis in the wake of transcription complexes and in trans apart from transcription complexes. In this review, we focus on the relationship between R-loops and topoisomerases, and cancer genomics and therapies. We summarize the topological parameters associated with the formation and resolution of R-loops, which absorb and release high levels of genomic negative supercoiling (Sc-). We review the deleterious consequences of excessive R-loops and rationalize how human type IA (TOP3B) and type IB (TOP1) topoisomerases regulate and resolve R-loops in coordination with helicase and RNase H enzymes. We also review the drugs (topoisomerase inhibitors, splicing inhibitors, G4 stabilizing ligands) and cancer predisposing genes (BRCA1/2, transcription, and splicing genes) known to induce R-loops, and whether stabilizing R-loops and thereby inducing genomic damage can be viewed as a strategy for cancer treatment.

Detecting R-Loop Formation Using a Plasmid-Based In Vitro Transcription Assay

R-loops are three-stranded nucleic acid structures that consist of a DNA-RNA hybrid and a displaced single-stranded DNA. Since it was first reported by Ronald Davis and colleagues over 40 years ago, the study of R-loops has become an increasingly expanded area of research. Numerous factors have been identified to modulate the dynamic formation and resolution of R-loops, which are critical for proper controls of gene expression and genome stability. Along the lines of these discoveries, various biochemical and cellular assays have been developed to detect R-loop changes in vitro and in vivo. In this chapter, we describe a protocol for measuring R-loop formation using a plasmid-based in vitro transcription assay. The R-loop formed is then detected and quantified by using gel mobility, antibody staining, and DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP)-qPCR assays. Unlike the helicase assay that uses short R-loop substrates, this assay system introduces DNA topology and active transcription as additional variables that impact R-loop formation, thus, more closely recapitulating in vivo situations. Furthermore, this method can be adopted for investigation of cis-elements and trans-acting factors that influence R-loop formation.

Variable DNA topology is an epigenetic generator of physiological heterogeneity in bacterial populations

Transcription is a noisy and stochastic process that produces sibling-to-sibling variations in physiology across a population of genetically identical cells. This pattern of diversity reflects, in part, the burst-like nature of transcription. Transcription bursting has many causes and a failure to remove the supercoils that accumulate in DNA during transcription elongation is an important contributor. Positive supercoiling of the DNA ahead of the transcription elongation complex can result in RNA polymerase stalling if this DNA topological roadblock is not removed. The relaxation of these positive supercoils is performed by the ATP-dependent type II topoisomerases DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. Interference with the action of these topoisomerases involving, inter alia, topoisomerase poisons, fluctuations in the [ATP]/[ADP] ratio, and/or the intervention of nucleoid-associated proteins with GapR-like or YejK-like activities, may have consequences for the smooth operation of the transcriptional machinery. Antibiotic-tolerant (but not resistant) persister cells are among the phenotypic outliers that may emerge. However, interference with type II topoisomerase activity can have much broader consequences, making it an important epigenetic driver of physiological diversity in the bacterial population.

Manipulation of topoisomerase expression inhibits cell division but not growth and reveals a distinctive promoter structure in Synechocystis

In cyanobacteria DNA supercoiling varies over the diurnal cycle and is integrated with temporal programs of transcription and replication. We manipulated DNA supercoiling in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 by CRISPRi-based knockdown of gyrase subunits and overexpression of topoisomerase I (TopoI). Cell division was blocked but cell growth continued in all strains. The small endogenous plasmids were only transiently relaxed, then became strongly supercoiled in the TopoI overexpression strain. Transcript abundances showed a pronounced 5'/3' gradient along transcription units, incl. the rRNA genes, in the gyrase knockdown strains. These observations are consistent with the basic tenets of the homeostasis and twin-domain models of supercoiling in bacteria. TopoI induction initially led to downregulation of G+C-rich and upregulation of A+T-rich genes. The transcriptional response quickly bifurcated into six groups which overlap with diurnally co-expressed gene groups. Each group shows distinct deviations from a common core promoter structure, where helically phased A-tracts are in phase with the transcription start site. Together, our data show that major co-expression groups (regulons) in Synechocystis all respond differentially to DNA supercoiling, and suggest to re-evaluate the long-standing question of the role of A-tracts in bacterial promoters.

R-loop: The new genome regulatory element in plants

An R-loop is a three-stranded chromatin structure that consists of a displaced single strand of DNA and an RNA:DNA hybrid duplex, which was thought to be a rare by-product of transcription. However, recent genome-wide data have shown that R-loops are widespread and pervasive in a variety of genomes, and a growing body of experimental evidence indicates that R-loops have both beneficial and harmful effects on an organism. To maximize benefit and avoid harm, organisms have evolved several means by which they tightly regulate R-loop levels. Here, we summarize our current understanding of the biogenesis and effects of R-loops, the mechanisms that regulate them, and methods of R-loop profiling, reviewing recent research advances on R-loops in plants. Furthermore, we provide perspectives on future research directions for R-loop biology in plants, which might lead to a more comprehensive understanding of R-loop functions in plant genome regulation and contribute to future agricultural improvements.

Dynamic Change of R-Loop Implicates in the Regulation of Zygotic Genome Activation in Mouse

In mice, zygotic genome activation (ZGA) occurs in two steps: minor ZGA at the one-cell stage and major ZGA at the two-cell stage. Regarding the regulation of gene transcription, minor ZGA is known to have unique features, including a transcriptionally permissive state of chromatin and insufficient splicing processes. The molecular characteristics may originate from extremely open chromatin states in the one-cell stage zygotes, yet the precise underlying mechanism has not been well studied. Recently, the R-loop, a triple-stranded nucleic acid structure of the DNA/RNA hybrid, has been implicated in gene transcription and DNA replication. Therefore, in the present study, we examined the changes in R-loop dynamics during mouse zygotic development, and its roles in zygotic transcription or DNA replication. Our analysis revealed that R-loops persist in the genome of metaphase II oocytes and preimplantation embryos from the zygote to the blastocyst stage. In particular, zygotic R-loop levels dynamically change as development proceeds, showing that R-loop levels decrease as pronucleus maturation occurs. Mechanistically, R-loop dynamics are likely linked to ZGA, as inhibition of either DNA replication or transcription at the time of minor ZGA decreases R-loop levels in the pronuclei of zygotes. However, the induction of DNA damage by treatment with anticancer agents, including cisplatin or doxorubicin, does not elicit genome-wide changes in zygotic R-loop levels. Therefore, our study suggests that R-loop formation is mechanistically associated with the regulation of mouse ZGA, especially minor ZGA, by modulating gene transcription and DNA replication.

Sex-specific variation in R-loop formation in Drosophila melanogaster

R-loops are three-stranded nucleotide structures consisting of a DNA:RNA hybrid and a displaced ssDNA non-template strand. Previous work suggests that R-loop formation is primarily determined by the thermodynamics of DNA:RNA binding, which are governed by base composition (e.g., GC skew) and transcription-induced DNA superhelicity. However, R-loops have been described at genomic locations that lack these properties, suggesting that they may serve other context-specific roles. To better understand the genetic determinants of R-loop formation, we have characterized the Drosophila melanogaster R-loop landscape across strains and between sexes using DNA:RNA immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (DRIP-seq). We find that R-loops are associated with sequence motifs that are G-rich or exhibit G/C skew, as well as highly expressed genes, tRNAs, and small nuclear RNAs, consistent with a role for DNA sequence and torsion in R-loop specification. However, we also find motifs associated with R-loops that are A/T-rich and lack G/C skew as well as a subset of R-loops that are enriched in polycomb-repressed chromatin. Differential enrichment analysis reveals a small number of sex-biased R-loops: while non-differentially enriched and male-enriched R-loops form at similar genetic features and chromatin states and contain similar sequence motifs, female-enriched R-loops form at unique genetic features, chromatin states, and sequence motifs and are associated with genes that show ovary-biased expression. Male-enriched R-loops are most abundant on the dosage-compensated X chromosome, where R-loops appear stronger compared to autosomal R-loops. R-loop-containing genes on the X chromosome are dosage-compensated yet show lower MOF binding and reduced H4K16ac compared to R-loop-absent genes, suggesting that H4K16ac or MOF may attenuate R-loop formation. Collectively, these results suggest that R-loop formation in vivo is not fully explained by DNA sequence and topology and raise the possibility that a distinct subset of these hybrid structures plays an important role in the establishment and maintenance of epigenetic differences between sexes.

R-Loop Detection in Bacteria

Early evidence for R-loop formation in vivo came from the study of Escherichia coli topA (topoisomerase I; topo I) null mutants. Assays with plasmids to detect RNase HI-sensitive hypernegative supercoiling or R-looped DNA were used in vitro and in vivo to demonstrate R-loop formation. In addition, these R-loop-dependent topological modifications of plasmid DNA were shown to correlate with severe growth and gene expression inhibition in topA null mutants that could be corrected by RNase HI overproduction. However, direct evidence for R-loop formation on chromosomal DNA from E. coli cells was only obtained recently by using the S9.6 antibody to detect RNA-DNA hybrids in dot-blot experiments. Here, we present a protocol for such experiments with a special emphasis on the procedure used for bacterial genomic DNA extraction and preparation including treatment with appropriate ribonucleases to eliminate RNA-RNA hybrids (that are also recognized by S9.6) as well as single-stranded RNA (ssRNA), in order to obtain a signal that is specific to stable RNA-DNA hybrids generated. Furthermore, we recommend that the results of such experiments be correlated with RNase HI-sensitive phenotypes.

Programmed genomic instability regulates neural transdifferentiation of human brain microvascular pericytes

BACKGROUND

Transdifferentiation describes transformation in vivo of specialized cells from one lineage into another. While there is extensive literature on forced induction of lineage reprogramming in vitro, endogenous mechanisms that govern transdifferentiation remain largely unknown. The observation that human microvascular pericytes transdifferentiate into neurons provided an opportunity to explore the endogenous molecular basis for lineage reprogramming.

RESULTS

We show that abrupt destabilization of the higher-order chromatin topology that chaperones lineage memory of pericytes is driven by transient global transcriptional arrest. This leads within minutes to localized decompression of the repressed competing higher-order chromatin topology and expression of pro-neural genes. Transition to neural lineage is completed by probabilistic induction of R-loops in key myogenic loci upon re-initiation of RNA polymerase activity, leading to depletion of the myogenic transcriptome and emergence of the neurogenic transcriptome.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the global transcriptional landscape not only shapes the functional cellular identity of pericytes, but also stabilizes lineage memory by silencing the competing neural program within a repressed chromatin state.

MYC assembles and stimulates topoisomerases 1 and 2 in a "topoisome"

High-intensity transcription and replication supercoil DNA to levels that can impede or halt these processes. As a potent transcription amplifier and replication accelerator, the proto-oncogene MYC must manage this interfering torsional stress. By comparing gene expression with the recruitment of topoisomerases and MYC to promoters, we surmised a direct association of MYC with topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) and TOP2 that was confirmed in vitro and in cells. Beyond recruiting topoisomerases, MYC directly stimulates their activities. We identify a MYC-nucleated "topoisome" complex that unites TOP1 and TOP2 and increases their levels and activities at promoters, gene bodies, and enhancers. Whether TOP2A or TOP2B is included in the topoisome is dictated by the presence of MYC versus MYCN, respectively. Thus, in vitro and in cells, MYC assembles tools that simplify DNA topology and promote genome function under high output conditions.

Toward an understanding of the detection and function of R-loops in plants

Although lagging behind studies in humans and other mammals, studies of R-loops in plants have recently entered an exciting stage in which the roles of R-loops in gene expression, genome stability, epigenomic signatures, and plant development and stress responses are being elucidated. Here, we review the strengths and weaknesses of existing methodologies, which were largely developed for R-loop studies in mammals, and then discuss the potential challenges of applying these methodologies to R-loop studies in plants. We then focus on recent advances in the functional characterization of R-loops in Arabidopsis thaliana and rice. Recent studies in plants indicate that there are coordinated relationships between R-loops and gene expression, and between R-loops and epigenomic signatures that depend, in part, on the types of R-loops involved. Finally, we discuss the emerging roles of R-loops in plants and directions for future research.

The interplay of RNA:DNA hybrid structure and G-quadruplexes determines the outcome of R-loop-replisome collisions

R-loops are a major source of genome instability associated with transcription-induced replication stress. However, how R-loops inherently impact replication fork progression is not understood. Here, we characterize R-loop-replisome collisions using a fully reconstituted eukaryotic DNA replication system. We find that RNA:DNA hybrids and G-quadruplexes at both co-directional and head-on R-loops can impact fork progression by inducing fork stalling, uncoupling of leading strand synthesis from replisome progression, and nascent strand gaps. RNase H1 and Pif1 suppress replication defects by resolving RNA:DNA hybrids and G-quadruplexes, respectively. We also identify an intrinsic capacity of replisomes to maintain fork progression at certain R-loops by unwinding RNA:DNA hybrids, repriming leading strand synthesis downstream of G-quadruplexes, or utilizing R-loop transcripts to prime leading strand restart during co-directional R-loop-replisome collisions. Collectively, the data demonstrates that the outcome of R-loop-replisome collisions is modulated by R-loop structure, providing a mechanistic basis for the distinction of deleterious from non-deleterious R-loops.

Topoisomerase I Essentiality, DnaA-Independent Chromosomal Replication, and Transcription-Replication Conflict in Escherichia coli

Topoisomerase I (Topo I) of Escherichia coli, encoded by topA, acts to relax negative supercoils in DNA. Topo I deficiency results in hypernegative supercoiling, formation of transcription-associated RNA-DNA hybrids (R-loops), and DnaA- and oriC-independent constitutive stable DNA replication (cSDR), but some uncertainty persists as to whether topA is essential for viability in E. coli and related enterobacteria. Here, we show that several topA alleles, including ΔtopA, confer lethality in derivatives of wild-type E. coli strain MG1655. Viability in the absence of Topo I was restored with two perturbations, neither of which reversed the hypernegative supercoiling phenotype: (i) in a reduced-genome strain (MDS42) or (ii) by an RNA polymerase (RNAP) mutation, rpoB*35, that has been reported to alleviate the deleterious consequences of RNAP backtracking and transcription-replication conflicts. Four phenotypes related to cSDR were identified for topA mutants: (i) one of the topA alleles rescued ΔdnaA lethality; (ii) in dnaA⁺ derivatives, Topo I deficiency generated a characteristic copy number peak in the terminus region of the chromosome; (iii) topA was synthetically lethal with rnhA (encoding RNase HI, whose deficiency also confers cSDR); and (iv) topA rnhA synthetic lethality was itself rescued by ΔdnaA. We propose that the terminal lethal consequence of hypernegative DNA supercoiling in E. coli topA mutants is RNAP backtracking during transcription elongation and associated R-loop formation, which in turn leads to transcription-replication conflicts and to cSDR. IMPORTANCE In all life forms, double-helical DNA exists in a topologically supercoiled state. The enzymes DNA gyrase and topoisomerase I act, respectively, to introduce and to relax negative DNA supercoils in Escherichia coli. That gyrase deficiency leads to bacterial death is well established, but the essentiality of topoisomerase I for viability has been less certain. This study confirms that topoisomerase I is essential for E. coli viability and suggests that in its absence, aberrant chromosomal DNA replication and excessive transcription-replication conflicts occur that are responsible for lethality.

Transcription-associated DNA breaks and cancer: A matter of DNA topology

Transcription is an essential cellular process but also a major threat to genome integrity. Transcription-associated DNA breaks are particularly detrimental as their defective repair can induce gene mutations and oncogenic chromosomal translocations, which are hallmarks of cancer. The past few years have revealed that transcriptional breaks mainly originate from DNA topological problems generated by the transcribing RNA polymerases. Defective removal of transcription-induced DNA torsional stress impacts on transcription itself and promotes secondary DNA structures, such as R-loops, which can induce DNA breaks and genome instability. Paradoxically, as they relax DNA during transcription, topoisomerase enzymes introduce DNA breaks that can also endanger genome integrity. Stabilization of topoisomerases on chromatin by various anticancer drugs or by DNA alterations, can interfere with transcription machinery and cause permanent DNA breaks and R-loops. Here, we review the role of transcription in mediating DNA breaks, and discuss how deregulation of topoisomerase activity can impact on transcription and DNA break formation, and its connection with cancer.

Genome-wide proximity between RNA polymerase and DNA topoisomerase I supports transcription in Streptococcus pneumoniae

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major cause of disease and death that develops resistance to multiple antibiotics. DNA topoisomerase I (TopoI) is a novel pneumococcal drug target. TopoI is the sole type-I pneumococcal topoisomerase that regulates supercoiling homeostasis in this bacterium. In this study, a direct in vitro interaction between TopoI and RNA polymerase (RNAP) was detected by surface plasmon resonance. To understand the interplay between transcription and supercoiling regulation in vivo, genome-wide association of RNAP and TopoI was studied by ChIP-Seq. RNAP and TopoI were enriched at the promoters of 435 and 356 genes, respectively. Higher levels of expression were consistently measured in those genes whose promoters recruit both RNAP and TopoI, in contrast with those enriched in only one of them. Both enzymes occupied a narrow region close to the ATG codon. In addition, RNAP displayed a regular distribution throughout the coding regions. Likewise, the summits of peaks called with MACS tool, mapped around the ATG codon in both cases. However, RNAP showed a broader distribution towards ATG-downstream positions. Remarkably, inhibition of RNAP with rifampicin prevented the localization of TopoI at promoters and, vice versa, inhibition of TopoI with seconeolitsine prevented the binding of RNAP to promoters. This indicates a functional interplay between RNAP and TopoI. To determine the molecular factors responsible for RNAP and TopoI co-recruitment, we looked for DNA sequence motifs. We identified a motif corresponding to a -10-extended promoter for TopoI and for RNAP. Furthermore, RNAP was preferentially recruited to genes co-directionally oriented with replication, while TopoI was more abundant in head-on genes. TopoI was located in the intergenic regions of divergent genes pairs, near the promoter of the head-on gene of the pair. These results suggest a role for TopoI in the formation/stability of the RNAP-DNA complex at the promoter and during transcript elongation.

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a main cause of pneumonia, meningitis and sepsis. Antibiotic resistance in this bacterium has spread worldwide, compromising medical treatment. Therefore, the development of new drugs directed to novel targets is necessary. DNA topology is essential for the regulation of replication and gene expression. Topology is regulated and maintained by DNA topoisomerases, carrying out nicking-closing reactions. Type I and type II topoisomerases act on single-stranded and double-stranded DNA, respectively. Although type II topoisomerases are the target of clinically used antibiotics, there are no clinical antibiotics directed against type I topoisomerases. Seconeolitsine, a new drug targeting topoisomerase I, is effective against bacteria that have a single type I topoisomerase, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In this report, we studied the role of topoisomerase I in transcription. We found that topoisomerase I and RNA polymerase physically interact in vitro and co-localize at gene promoters in vivo. Binding of each of these enzymes to promoters was prevented by the specific inhibition of the other enzyme, supporting a role for topoisomerase I in RNA polymerase transcription.

Topological stress is responsible for the detrimental outcomes of head-on replication-transcription conflicts

Conflicts between the replication and transcription machineries have profound effects on chromosome duplication, genome organization, and evolution across species. Head-on conflicts (lagging-strand genes) are significantly more detrimental than codirectional conflicts (leading-strand genes). The fundamental reason for this difference is unknown. Here, we report that topological stress significantly contributes to this difference. We find that head-on, but not codirectional, conflict resolution requires the relaxation of positive supercoils by the type II topoisomerases DNA gyrase and Topo IV, at least in the Gram-positive model bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Interestingly, our data suggest that after positive supercoil resolution, gyrase introduces excessive negative supercoils at head-on conflict regions, driving pervasive R-loop formation. Altogether, our results reveal a fundamental mechanistic difference between the two types of encounters, addressing a long-standing question in the field of replication-transcription conflicts.

Lang and Merrikh show that resolution of head-on, but not codirectional, conflicts between replication and transcription machineries requires type II topoisomerases, suggesting that a fundamental difference between the two types of conflicts is supercoil buildup in DNA. Furthermore, they show that supercoil resolution at head-on conflict regions drives R-loop formation.

G-quadruplex-R-loop interactions and the mechanism of anticancer G-quadruplex binders

Genomic DNA and cellular RNAs can form a variety of non-B secondary structures, including G-quadruplex (G4) and R-loops. G4s are constituted by stacked guanine tetrads held together by Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds and can form at key regulatory sites of eukaryote genomes and transcripts, including gene promoters, untranslated exon regions and telomeres. R-loops are 3-stranded structures wherein the two strands of a DNA duplex are melted and one of them is annealed to an RNA. Specific G4 binders are intensively investigated to discover new effective anticancer drugs based on a common rationale, i.e.: the selective inhibition of oncogene expression or specific impairment of telomere maintenance. However, despite the high number of known G4 binders, such a selective molecular activity has not been fully established and several published data point to a different mode of action. We will review published data that address the close structural interplay between G4s and R-loops in vitro and in vivo, and how these interactions can have functional consequences in relation to G4 binder activity. We propose that R-loops can play a previously-underestimated role in G4 binder action, in relation to DNA damage induction, telomere maintenance, genome and epigenome instability and alterations of gene expression programs.

R-Loop Physiology and Pathology: A Brief Review

Physiological and pathological roles for R-loop structures continue to be discovered, and studies suggest that R-loops could contribute to human disease. R-loops are nucleic acid structures characterized by a DNA:RNA hybrid and displaced single-stranded DNA that occur in connection with transcription. R-loops form naturally and have been shown to be important for a number of physiological processes such as mitochondrial replication initiation, class switch recombination, DNA repair, modulating DNA topology, and regulation of gene expression. However, subsets of R-loops or persistent R-loops lead to DNA breaks, chromosome rearrangement, and genome instability. In addition, R-loops have been linked to human diseases, specifically neurological disorders and cancer. Of the large amount of research produced recently on R-loops, this review covers evidence for R-loop involvement in normal cellular physiology and pathophysiology, as well as describing factors that contribute to R-loop regulation.

The functional determinants in the organization of bacterial genomes

Bacterial genomes are now recognized as interacting intimately with cellular processes. Uncovering organizational mechanisms of bacterial genomes has been a primary focus of researchers to reveal the potential cellular activities. The advances in both experimental techniques and computational models provide a tremendous opportunity for understanding these mechanisms, and various studies have been proposed to explore the organization rules of bacterial genomes associated with functions recently. This review focuses mainly on the principles that shape the organization of bacterial genomes, both locally and globally. We first illustrate local structures as operons/transcription units for facilitating co-transcription and horizontal transfer of genes. We then clarify the constraints that globally shape bacterial genomes, such as metabolism, transcription and replication. Finally, we highlight challenges and opportunities to advance bacterial genomic studies and provide application perspectives of genome organization, including pathway hole assignment and genome assembly and understanding disease mechanisms.

Protective Mechanisms Against DNA Replication Stress in the Nervous System

The precise replication of DNA and the successful segregation of chromosomes are essential for the faithful transmission of genetic information during the cell cycle. Alterations in the dynamics of genome replication, also referred to as DNA replication stress, may lead to DNA damage and, consequently, mutations and chromosomal rearrangements. Extensive research has revealed that DNA replication stress drives genome instability during tumorigenesis. Over decades, genetic studies of inherited syndromes have established a connection between the mutations in genes required for proper DNA repair/DNA damage responses and neurological diseases. It is becoming clear that both the prevention and the responses to replication stress are particularly important for nervous system development and function. The accurate regulation of cell proliferation is key for the expansion of progenitor pools during central nervous system (CNS) development, adult neurogenesis, and regeneration. Moreover, DNA replication stress in glial cells regulates CNS tumorigenesis and plays a role in neurodegenerative diseases such as ataxia telangiectasia (A-T). Here, we review how replication stress generation and replication stress response (RSR) contribute to the CNS development, homeostasis, and disease. Both cell-autonomous mechanisms, as well as the evidence of RSR-mediated alterations of the cellular microenvironment in the nervous system, were discussed.

Supercoiling, R-loops, Replication and the Functions of Bacterial Type 1A Topoisomerases

Type 1A topoisomerases (topos) are the only topos that bind single-stranded DNA and the only ones found in all cells of the three domains of life. Two subfamilies, topo I and topo III, are present in bacteria. Topo I, found in all of them, relaxes negative supercoiling, while topo III acts as a decatenase in replication. However, recent results suggest that they can also act as back-up for each other. Because they are ubiquitous, type 1A enzymes are expected to be essential for cell viability. Single topA (topo I) and topB (topo III) null mutants of Escherichia coli are viable, but for topA only with compensatory mutations. Double topA topB null mutants were initially believed to be non-viable. However, in two independent studies, results of next generation sequencing (NGS) have recently shown that double topA topB null mutants of Bacillus subtilis and E. coli are viable when they carry parC parE gene amplifications. These genes encode the two subunits of topo IV, the main cellular decatenase. Here, we discuss the essential functions of bacterial type 1A topos in the context of this observation and new results showing their involvement in preventing unregulated replication from R-loops.

Emerging roles for R-loop structures in the management of topological stress

R-loop structures are a prevalent class of alternative non-B DNA structures that form during transcription upon invasion of the DNA template by the nascent RNA. R-loops form universally in the genomes of organisms ranging from bacteriophages, bacteria, and yeasts to plants and animals, including mammals. A growing body of work has linked these structures to both physiological and pathological processes, in particular to genome instability. The rising interest in R-loops is placing new emphasis on understanding the fundamental physicochemical forces driving their formation and stability. Pioneering work in Escherichia coli revealed that DNA topology, in particular negative DNA superhelicity, plays a key role in driving R-loops. A clear role for DNA sequence was later uncovered. Here, we review and synthesize available evidence on the roles of DNA sequence and DNA topology in controlling R-loop formation and stability. Factoring in recent developments in R-loop modeling and single-molecule profiling, we propose a coherent model accounting for the interplay between DNA sequence and DNA topology in driving R-loop structure formation. This model reveals R-loops in a new light as powerful and reversible topological stress relievers, an insight that significantly expands the repertoire of R-loops' potential biological roles under both normal and aberrant conditions.

Ultra-deep Coverage Single-molecule R-loop Footprinting Reveals Principles of R-loop Formation

R-loops are a prevalent class of non-B DNA structures that have been associated with both positive and negative cellular outcomes. DNA:RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) approaches based on the anti-DNA:RNA hybrid S9.6 antibody revealed that R-loops form dynamically over conserved genic hotspots. We have developed an orthogonal approach that queries R-loops via the presence of long stretches of single-stranded DNA on their looped-out strand. Nondenaturing sodium bisulfite treatment catalyzes the conversion of unpaired cytosines to uracils, creating permanent genetic tags for the position of an R-loop. Long-read, single-molecule PacBio sequencing allows the identification of R-loop 'footprints' at near nucleotide resolution in a strand-specific manner on long single DNA molecules and at ultra-deep coverage. Single-molecule R-loop footprinting coupled with PacBio sequencing (SMRF-seq) revealed a strong agreement between S9.6-based and bisulfite-based R-loop mapping and confirmed that R-loops form over genic hotspots, including gene bodies and terminal gene regions. Based on the largest single-molecule R-loop dataset to date, we show that individual R-loops form nonrandomly, defining discrete sets of overlapping molecular clusters that pileup through larger R-loop zones. R-loops most often map to intronic regions and their individual start and stop positions do not match with intron-exon boundaries, reinforcing the model that they form cotranscriptionally from unspliced transcripts. SMRF-seq further established that R-loop distribution patterns are not simply driven by intrinsic DNA sequence features but most likely also reflect DNA topological constraints. Overall, DRIP-based and SMRF-based approaches independently provide a complementary and congruent view of R-loop distribution, consolidating our understanding of the principles underlying R-loop formation.

Single-stranded DNA damage: Protecting the single-stranded DNA from chemical attack

Cellular processes, such as DNA replication, recombination and transcription, require DNA strands separation and single-stranded DNA is formation. The single-stranded DNA is promptly wrapped by human single-stranded DNA binding proteins, replication protein A (RPA) complex. RPA binding not only prevent nuclease degradation and annealing, but it also coordinates cell-cycle checkpoint activation and DNA repair. However, RPA binding offers little protection against the chemical modification of DNA bases. This review focuses on the type of DNA base damage that occurs in single-stranded DNA and how the damage is rectified in human cells. The discovery of DNA repair proteins, such as ALKBH3, AGT, UNG2, NEIL3, being able to repair the damaged base in the single-stranded DNA, renewed the interest to study single-stranded DNA repair. These mechanistically different proteins work independently from each other with the overarching goal of increasing fidelity of recombination and promoting error-free replication.

The balancing act of R-loop biology: The good, the bad, and the ugly

An R-loop is a three-stranded nucleic acid structure that consists of a DNA:RNA hybrid and a displaced strand of DNA. R-loops occur frequently in genomes and have significant physiological importance. They play vital roles in regulating gene expression, DNA replication, and DNA and histone modifications. Several studies have uncovered that R-loops contribute to fundamental biological processes in various organisms. Paradoxically, although they do play essential positive functions required for important biological processes, they can also contribute to DNA damage and genome instability. Recent evidence suggests that R-loops are involved in a number of human diseases, including neurological disorders, cancer, and autoimmune diseases. This review focuses on the molecular basis for R-loop-mediated gene regulation and genomic instability and briefly discusses methods for identifying R-loops in vivo It also highlights recent studies indicating the role of R-loops in DNA double-strand break repair with an updated view of much-needed future goals in R-loop biology.

DNA supercoiling and transcription in bacteria: a two-way street

BACKGROUND

The processes of DNA supercoiling and transcription are interdependent because the movement of a transcription elongation complex simultaneously induces under- and overwinding of the DNA duplex and because the initiation, elongation and termination steps of transcription are all sensitive to the topological state of the DNA.

RESULTS

Policing of the local and global supercoiling of DNA by topoisomerases helps to sustain the major DNA-based transactions by eliminating barriers to the movement of transcription complexes and replisomes. Recent data from whole-genome and single-molecule studies have provided new insights into how interactions between transcription and the supercoiling of DNA influence the architecture of the chromosome and how they create cell-to-cell diversity at the level of gene expression through transcription bursting.

CONCLUSIONS

These insights into fundamental molecular processes reveal mechanisms by which bacteria can prevail in unpredictable and often hostile environments by becoming unpredictable themselves.

High-resolution, strand-specific R-loop mapping via S9.6-based DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing

R-loops are prevalent three-stranded non-B DNA structures composed of an RNA-DNA hybrid and a single strand of DNA. R-loops are implicated in various basic nuclear processes, such as class-switch recombination, transcription termination and chromatin patterning. Perturbations in R-loop metabolism have been linked to genomic instability and have been implicated in human disorders, including cancer. As a consequence, the accurate mapping of these structures has been of increasing interest in recent years. Here, we describe two related immunoprecipitation-based methods for mapping R-loop structures: basic DRIP-seq (DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput DNA sequencing), an easy, robust, but resolution-limited technique; and DRIPc-seq (DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation followed by cDNA conversion coupled to high-throughput sequencing), a high-resolution and strand-specific iteration of the method that permits accurate R-loop mapping genome wide. Briefly, after gentle DNA extraction and restriction digestion with a cocktail of enzymes, R-loop structures are immunoprecipitated with the anti-RNA-DNA hybrid S9.6 antibody. Compared with DRIP-seq, in which the immunoprecipitated DNA is directly sequenced, DRIPc-seq permits the recovery of the RNA moiety of R-loops, and these RNA strands are subjected to strand-specific RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis. DRIPc-seq can be performed in 5 d and can be applied to any cell type, provided sufficient starting material can be collected. Accurately mapping R-loop distribution in various cell lines and under varied conditions is essential to understanding the formation, roles and dynamic resolution of these important structures.

Topoisomerase III Acts at the Replication Fork To Remove Precatenanes

The role of DNA topoisomerase III (Topo III) in bacterial cells has proven elusive. Whereas eukaryotic Top IIIα homologs are clearly involved with homologs of the bacterial DNA helicase RecQ in unraveling double Holliday junctions, preventing crossover exchange of genetic information at unscheduled recombination intermediates, and Top IIIβ homologs have been shown to be involved in regulation of various mRNAs involved in neuronal function, there is little evidence for similar reactions in bacteria. Instead, most data point to Topo III playing a role supplemental to that of topoisomerase IV in unlinking daughter chromosomes during DNA replication. In support of this model, we show that Escherichia coli Topo III associates with the replication fork in vivo (likely via interactions with the single-stranded DNA-binding protein and the β clamp-loading DnaX complex of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme), that the DnaX complex stimulates the ability of Topo III to unlink both catenated and precatenated DNA rings, and that ΔtopB cells show delayed and disorganized nucleoid segregation compared to that of wild-type cells. These data argue that Topo III normally assists topoisomerase IV in chromosome decatenation by removing excess positive topological linkages at or near the replication fork as they are converted into precatenanes.IMPORTANCE Topological entanglement between daughter chromosomes has to be reduced to exactly zero every time an E. coli cell divides. The enzymatic agents that accomplish this task are the topoisomerases. E. coli possesses four topoisomerases. It has been thought that topoisomerase IV is primarily responsible for unlinking the daughter chromosomes during DNA replication. We show here that topoisomerase III also plays a role in this process and is specifically localized to the replisome, the multiprotein machine that duplicates the cell's genome, in order to do so.