The fifth transmembrane segment of the neuromedin B receptor is critical for high affinity neuromedin B binding

A possible new target in lung-cancer cells: The orphan receptor, bombesin receptor subtype-3

Human bombesin receptors, GRPR and NMBR, are two of the most frequently overexpressed G-protein-coupled-receptors by lung-cancers. Recently, GRPR/NMBR are receiving considerable attention because they act as growth factor receptors often in an autocrine manner in different lung-cancers, affect tumor angiogenesis, their inhibition increases the cytotoxic potency of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors reducing lung-cancer cellular resistance/survival and their overexpression can be used for sensitive tumor localization as well as to target cytotoxic agents to the cancer. The orphan BRS-3-receptor, because of homology is classified as a bombesin receptor but has received little attention, despite the fact that it is also reported in a number of studies in lung-cancer cells and has growth effects in these cells. To address its potential importance, in this study, we examined the frequency/relative quantitative expression of human BRS-3 compared to GRPR/NMBR and the effects of its activation on cell-signaling/growth in 13 different human lung-cancer cell-lines. Our results showed that BRS-3 receptor is expressed in 92% of the cell-lines and that it is functional in these cells, because its activation stimulates phospholipase-C with breakdown of phosphoinositides and changes in cytosolic calcium, stimulates ERK/MAPK and stimulates cell growth by EGFR transactivation in some, but not all, the lung-cancer cell-lines. These results suggest that human BRS-3, similar to GRPR/NMBR, is frequently ectopically-expressed by lung-cancer cells in which, it is functional, affecting cell signaling/growth. These results suggest that similar to GRPR/NMBR, BRS-3 should receive increased attention as possible approach for the development of novel treatments and/or diagnosis in lung-cancer.

Molecular basis for high affinity and selectivity of peptide antagonist, Bantag-1, for the orphan BB3 receptor

Bombesin-receptor-subtype-3 (BB3 receptor) is a G-protein-coupled-orphan-receptor classified in the mammalian Bombesin-family because of high homology to gastrin-releasing peptide (BB2 receptor)/neuromedin-B receptors (BB1 receptor). There is increased interest in BB3 receptor because studies primarily from knockout-mice suggest it plays roles in energy/glucose metabolism, insulin-secretion, as well as motility and tumor-growth. Investigations into its roles in physiological/pathophysiological processes are limited because of lack of selective ligands. Recently, a selective, peptide-antagonist, Bantag-1, was described. However, because BB3 receptor has low-affinity for all natural, Bn-related peptides, little is known of the molecular basis of its high-affinity/selectivity. This was systematically investigated in this study for Bantag-1 using a chimeric-approach making both Bantag-1 loss-/gain-of-affinity-chimeras, by exchanging extracellular (EC) domains of BB3/BB2 receptor, and using site-directed-mutagenesis. Receptors were transiently expressed and affinities determined by binding studies. Bantag-1 had >5000-fold selectivity for BB3 receptor over BB2/BB1 receptors and substitution of the first EC-domain (EC1) in loss-/gain-of affinity-chimeras greatly affected affinity. Mutagenesis of each amino acid difference in EC1 between BB3 receptor/BB2 receptor showed replacement of His(107) in BB3 receptor by Lys(107) (H107K-BB3 receptor-mutant) from BB2 receptor, decreased affinity 60-fold, and three replacements [H107K, E11D, G112R] decreased affinity 500-fold. Mutagenesis in EC1's surrounding transmembrane-regions (TMs) demonstrated TM2 differences were not important, but R127Q in TM3 alone decreased affinity 400-fold. Additional mutants in EC1/TM3 explored the molecular basis for these changes demonstrated in EC1, particularly important is the presence of aromatic-interactions by His(107), rather than hydrogen-bonding or charge-charge interactions, for determining Bantag-1 high affinity/selectivity. In regard to Arg(127) in TM3, both hydrogen-bonding and charge-charge interactions contribute to the high-affinity/selectivity for Bantag-1.

The molecular basis for high affinity of a universal ligand for human bombesin receptor (BnR) family members

There is increased interest in the Bn-receptor family because they are frequently over/ectopically expressed by tumors and thus useful as targets for imaging or receptor-targeted-cytotoxicity. The synthetic Bn-analog, [D-Tyr(6), β-Ala(11), Phe(13), Nle(14)]Bn(6-14) [Univ.Lig] has the unique property of having high affinity for all three human BNRs (GRPR, NMBR, BRS-3), and thus could be especially useful for this approach. However, the molecular basis of this property is unclear and is the subject of this study. To accomplish this, site-directed mutagenesis was used after identifying potentially important amino acids using sequence homology analysis of all BnRs with high affinity for Univ.Lig compared to the Cholecystokinin-receptor (CCK(A)R), which has low affinity. Using various criteria 74 amino acids were identified and 101 mutations made in GRPR by changing each to those of CCK(A)R or to alanine. 22 GRPR mutations showed a significant decrease in affinity for Univ.Lig (>2-fold) with 2 in EC2[D97N, G112V], 1 in UTM6[Y284A], 2 in EC4[R287N, H300S] showing >10-fold decrease in Univ.Lig affinity. Additional mutations were made to explore the molecular basis for these changes. Our results show that high affinity for Univ.Lig by human Bn-receptors requires positively charged amino acids in extracellular (EC)-domain 4 and to a lesser extent EC2 and EC3 suggesting charge-charge interactions may be particularly important for determining the general high affinity of this ligand. Furthermore, transmembrane amino acids particularly in UTM6 are important contributing both charge-charge interactions as well as interaction with a tyrosine residue in close proximity suggesting possible receptor-peptide cation-π or H-bonding interactions are also important for determining its high affinity.

Molecular basis for the selectivity of the mammalian bombesin peptide, neuromedin B, for its receptor

The mammalian bombesin (Bn) peptides, neuromedin B (NMB) and gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), have widespread actions in many tissues, and their effects are mediated by two closely related G-protein-coupled receptors, the NMBR and GRPR. Little is known about the structural determinants of NMBR selectivity for NMB, in contrast to GRP selectivity for the GRPR, which has been extensively studied. To provide insight, chimeric NMBR-GRPR loss-of-affinity and gain-of-affinity mutants were made, as well as NH(2)-terminally truncated NMBR and point mutants using site-directed mutagenesis. Receptors were expressed in Balb-3T3-cells or CHOP cells, and affinities were determined. NMB had 115-fold greater affinity for NMBR than GRPR. Receptor-chimeric studies showed that NMBR selectivity for NMB was primarily determined by differences in the third extracellular (EC3) regions of GRPR-NMBR and adjacent upper-transmembrane-5 (TM5) region. In this region, 24 NMB gain-of-affinity GRPR mutants or NMBR loss-of-affinity point/combination mutants were made. Three gain-of-affinity mutant GRPRs [[A198I] (EC3), [H202Q] (EC3), [S215I] (upper TM5)] had increased NMB affinity (2.4-21-fold), and these results were confirmed with NMBR loss-of-affinity mutants [I199A,Q203H,I215S-NMBR]. The combination mutant [A198I,S215]GRPR had the greatest effect causing a complete NMB gain-of-affinity. The importance of differences at position 199NMBR or 203NMBR was studied by substituting amino acids with various properties. Our results show that NMBR selectivity for NMB is due to differences in the EC3 of NMBR-GRPR and the adjacent upper-TM5 region. Within these regions, isoleucines in NMBR [position 199 (EC3)] (instead of A198GRPR) and in 215NMBR (TM5) (instead of S214GRPR), as well as Q203NMBR (instead of H202GRPR) are responsible for high NMB-affinity/selectivity of NMBR. The effect at position 199 is primarily due to differences in hydrophobicity of the substitution, whereas steric factors and charge of the substitution at position 203 were important determinants of NMB selectivity.

International Union of Pharmacology. LXVIII. Mammalian bombesin receptors: nomenclature, distribution, pharmacology, signaling, and functions in normal and disease states

The mammalian bombesin receptor family comprises three G protein-coupled heptahelical receptors: the neuromedin B (NMB) receptor (BB(1)), the gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptor (BB(2)), and the orphan receptor bombesin receptor subtype 3 (BRS-3) (BB(3)). Each receptor is widely distributed, especially in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and central nervous system (CNS), and the receptors have a large range of effects in both normal physiology and pathophysiological conditions. The mammalian bombesin peptides, GRP and NMB, demonstrate a broad spectrum of pharmacological/biological responses. GRP stimulates smooth muscle contraction and GI motility, release of numerous GI hormones/neurotransmitters, and secretion and/or hormone release from the pancreas, stomach, colon, and numerous endocrine organs and has potent effects on immune cells, potent growth effects on both normal tissues and tumors, potent CNS effects, including regulation of circadian rhythm, thermoregulation; anxiety/fear responses, food intake, and numerous CNS effects on the GI tract as well as the spinal transmission of chronic pruritus. NMB causes contraction of smooth muscle, has growth effects in various tissues, has CNS effects, including effects on feeding and thermoregulation, regulates thyroid-stimulating hormone release, stimulates various CNS neurons, has behavioral effects, and has effects on spinal sensory transmission. GRP, and to a lesser extent NMB, affects growth and/or differentiation of various human tumors, including colon, prostate, lung, and some gynecologic cancers. Knockout studies show that BB(3) has important effects in energy balance, glucose homeostasis, control of body weight, lung development and response to injury, tumor growth, and perhaps GI motility. This review summarizes advances in our understanding of the biology/pharmacology of these receptors, including their classification, structure, pharmacology, physiology, and role in pathophysiological conditions.

Molecular basis for agonist selectivity and activation of the orphan bombesin receptor subtype 3 receptor

Bombesin receptor subtype (BRS)-3, a G-protein-coupled orphan receptor, shares 51% identity with the mammalian bombesin (Bn) receptor for gastrin-releasing peptide. There is increasing interest in BRS-3 because it is important in energy metabolism, glucose control, motility, and tumor growth. BRS-3 has low affinity for all Bn-related peptides; however, recently synthetic high-affinity agonists, [d-Tyr(6)/d-Phe(6),betaAla(11),Phe(13),Nle(14)]Bn-(6-14), were described, but they are nonselective for BRS-3 over other Bn receptors. Based on these peptides, three BRS-3-selective ligands were developed: peptide 2, [d-Tyr(6)(R)-3-amino-propionic acid(11),Phe(13),Nle(14)]Bn(6-14); peptide 3, [d-Tyr(6),(R)-Apa(11),4Cl-Phe(13),Nle(14)]Bn(6-14); and peptide 4, acetyl-Phe-Trp-Ala-His-(tBzl)-piperidine-3 carboxylic acid-Gly-Arg-NH(2). Their molecular determinants of selectivity/high affinity for BRS-3 are unknown. To address this, we used a chimeric/site mutagenesis approach. Substitution of extracellular domain 2 (EC2) of BRS-3 by the comparable gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) domain decreased 26-, 4-, and 0-fold affinity for peptides 4, 3, and 2. Substitution of EC3 decreased affinity 4-, 11-, and 0-fold affinity for peptides 2 to 4. Ten-point mutations in the EC2 and adjacent transmembrane regions (TM2) 2 and 3 of BRS-3 were made. His107 (EC2-BRS-3) for lysine (H107K) (EC2-GRPR) decreased affinity (25- and 0-fold) for peptides 4 and 1; however, it could not be activated by either peptide. Its combination with Val101 (TM2), Gly112 (EC2), and Arg127 (TM3) resulted in complete loss-of-affinity of peptide 4. Receptor-modeling showed that each of these residues face inward and are within 4 A of the binding pocket. These results demonstrate that Val101, His107, Gly112, and Arg127 in the EC2/adjacent upper TMs of BRS-3 are critical for the high BRS3 selectivity of peptide 4. His107 in EC2 is essential for BRS-3 activation, suggesting amino-aromatic ligand/receptor interactions with peptide 4 are critical for both binding and activation. Furthermore, these result demonstrate that even though these three BRS-3-selective agonists were developed from the same template peptide, [d-Phe(6),betaAla(11),Phe(13),Nle(14)]Bn-(6-14), their molecular determinants of selectivity/high affinity varied considerably.

Bombesin inhibits alveolarization and promotes pulmonary fibrosis in newborn mice

RATIONALE

Bombesin-like peptides promote fetal lung development. Normally, levels of mammalian bombesin (gastrin-releasing peptide [GRP]) drop postnatally, but these levels are elevated in newborns that develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung disease characterized by arrested alveolarization. In premature baboons with BPD, antibombesin antibodies reduce lung injury and promote alveolarization.

OBJECTIVES

The present study tests whether exogenous bombesin or GRP given perinatally alters alveolar development in newborn mice.

METHODS

Mice were given peptides intraperitoneally twice daily on Postnatal Days 1-3. On Day 14 lungs were inflation-fixed for histopathologic analyses of alveolarization.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Bombesin had multiple effects on Day 14 lung, when alveolarization was about half complete. First, bombesin induced alveolar myofibroblast proliferation and increased alveolar wall thickness compared with saline-treated control animals. Second, bombesin diminished alveolarization in C57BL/6 (but not Swiss-Webster) mice. We used receptor-null mice to explore which receptors might mediate these effects. Compared with wild-type littermates, bombesin-treated GRP receptor (GRPR)-null mice had increased interstitial fibrosis but reduced defects in alveolarization. Neuromedin B (NMB) receptor-null and bombesin receptor subtype 3-null mice had the same responses as their wild-type littermates. GRP had the same effects as bombesin, whereas neither NMB nor a synthetic bombesin receptor type 3 ligand had any effect. All effects of GRP were abrogated in GRPR-null mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Bombesin/GRP can induce features of BPD, including interstitial fibrosis and diminished alveolarization. GRPR appears to mediate all effects of GRP, but only part of the bombesin effect on alveolarization, suggesting that novel receptors may mediate some effects of bombesin in newborn lung.

New targets in the treatment of anorexia nervosa

The pathophysiology of anorexia nervosa (AN) is complex and involves alterations of serotonin, dopamine and histamine neurotransmitters. In addition, receptor activity is disturbed, presumably in response to the neurotransmitter changes. These alterations are reviewed in relation to symptomatology and outcome of AN. Neuropeptide and peripheral orexigenic and satiety peptide research is in its infancy but holds much promise to shed light on the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in this illness. Current drug therapies have not demonstrated the efficacy desired in the treatment of AN. Current therapies are reviewed and new drug targets are explored. Compounds that interact with serotonin, histamine and dopamine receptors may offer unique treatment opportunities. In the future, the manipulation of peptides may add to the therapeutic potential of pharmacotherapy.

Identification of key amino acids in the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) responsible for high affinity binding of gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP)

The bombesin (Bn) receptor family includes the gastrin-releasing peptide (GRPR) and neuromedin B (NMBR) receptors, Bn receptor subtype 3 (BRS-3) and Bn receptor subtype 4 (BB(4)). They share 50% homology, yet their affinities for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) differ. The determinants of GRP high affinity for GRPR and BB(4), and low affinity for BRS-3 are largely unknown. To address this question we made an analysis of structural homologies in Bn receptor members correlated with their affinities for GRP to develop criteria to identify amino acids important for GRP selectivity. Fourteen differences were identified and each was mutated singly in GRPR to that found in hBRS-3. Eleven mutants had a loss of GRP affinity. Furthermore, three of four amino acids in the GRPR selected used a similar approach and previously reported to be important for high affinity Bn binding, were important for GRP affinity. Some GRPR mutants containing combinations of these mutations had greater decreases in GRP affinity than any single mutation. Particularly important for GRP selectivity were K101, Q121, A198, P199, S293, R288, T297 in GRPR. These results were confirmed by making the reverse mutations in BRS-3 to make GRP gain of affinity mutants. Modeling studies demonstrated a number of the important amino acids had side-chains oriented inward and within 6A of the binding pocket. These results demonstrated this approach could identify amino acids needed for GRP affinity and complemented results from chimera/mutagenesis studies by identifying which differences in the extracellular domains of Bn receptors were important for GRP affinity.

Molecular basis of the selectivity of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor for gastrin-releasing peptide

The mammalian bombesin peptides [gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) and neuromedin B (NMB)] are important in numerous biological and pathological processes. These effects are mediated by the heptahelical GRP receptor (GRPR) and NMB receptor (NMBR). GRP has high affinity for GRPR and lower affinity for NMBR. Almost nothing is known about the molecular basis for the selectivity of GRP. To address this question, we first studied four loss-of-affinity GRPR chimeric receptors formed by exchanging the four extracellular (EC) domains of GRPR with the corresponding NMBR EC domains. Receptors were transiently expressed, and affinities were determined by binding studies. Only substitution of the third EC domain (EC3) of GRPR markedly decreased GRP affinity. In the reverse study using gain-of-affinity NMBR chimeras, only replacement of EC3 of NMBR markedly increased GRP affinity. Replacing each of the 20 comparable EC3 amino acids that differed in the NMBR in GRPR showed that two separate NMBR substitutions in the GRPR, Ile for Phe(185) or Ile for Ala(198), markedly decreased GRP affinity. Additional point mutants demonstrated that an amino acid with an aromatic ring in position 185 of GRPR and the size of the backbone substitution in position 198 of GRPR were important for GRP selectivity. These results demonstrate that selectivity of GRP for GRPR over NMBR is primarily determined by two amino acid differences in the EC3 domains of the receptor. Our results suggest that an interaction between the aromatic ring of Phe(185) of the GRPR with GRP is the most important for GRP selectivity.

Molecular basis for selectivity of high affinity peptide antagonists for the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor

Few gastrointestinal hormones/neurotransmitters have high affinity peptide receptor antagonists, and little is known about the molecular basis of their selectivity or affinity. The receptor mediating the action of the mammalian bombesin (Bn) peptide, gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), is an exception, because numerous classes of peptide antagonists are described. To investigate the molecular basis for their high affinity for the GRPR, two classes of peptide antagonists, a statine analogue, JMV594 ([d-Phe(6),Stat(13)]Bn(6-14)), and a pseudopeptide analogue, JMV641 (d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leupsi(CHOH-CH(2))-(CH(2))(2)-CH(3)), were studied. Each had high affinity for the GRPR and >3,000-fold selectivity for GRPR over the closely related neuromedin B receptor (NMBR). To investigate the basis for this, we used a chimeric receptor approach to make both GRPR loss of affinity and NMBR gain of affinity chimeras and a site-directed mutagenesis approach. Chimeric or mutated receptors were transiently expressed in Balb/c 3T3. Only substitution of the fourth extracellular (EC) domain of the GRPR by the comparable NMBR domain markedly decreased the affinity for both antagonists. Substituting the fourth EC domain of NMBR into the GRPR resulted in a 300-fold gain in affinity for JMV594 and an 11-fold gain for JMV641. Each of the 11 amino acid differences between the GRPR and NMBR in this domain were exchanged. The substitutions of Thr(297) in GRPR by Pro from the comparable position in NMBR, Phe(302) by Met, and Ser(305) by Thr decreased the affinity of each antagonist. Simultaneous replacement of Thr(297), Phe(302), and Ser(305) in GRPR by the three comparable NMBR amino acids caused a 500-fold decrease in affinity for both antagonists. Replacing the comparable three amino acids in NMBR by those from GRPR caused a gain in affinity for each antagonist. Receptor modeling showed that each of these three amino acids faced inward and was within 5 A of the putative binding pocket. These results demonstrate that differences in the fourth EC domain of the mammalian Bn receptors are responsible for the selectivity of these two peptide antagonists. They demonstrate that Thr(297), Phe(302), and Ser(305) of the fourth EC domain of GRPR are the critical residues for determining GRPR selectivity and suggest that both receptor-ligand cation-pi interactions and hydrogen bonding are important for their high affinity interaction.

Tyrosine 220 in the 5th transmembrane domain of the neuromedin B receptor is critical for the high selectivity of the peptoid antagonist PD168368

Peptoid antagonists are increasingly being described for G protein-coupled receptors; however, little is known about the molecular basis of their binding. Recently, the peptoid PD168368 was found to be a potent selective neuromedin B receptor (NMBR) antagonist. To investigate the molecular basis for its selectivity for the NMBR over the closely related receptor for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRPR), we used a chimeric receptor approach and a site-directed mutagenesis approach. Mutated receptors were transiently expressed in Balb 3T3. The extracellular domains of the NMBR were not important for the selectivity of PD168368. However, substitution of the 5th upper transmembrane domain (uTM5) of the NMBR by the comparable GRPR domains decreased the affinity 16-fold. When the reverse study was performed by substituting the uTM5 of NMBR into the GRPR, a 9-fold increase in affinity occurred. Each of the 4 amino acids that differed between NMBR and GRPR in the uTM5 region were exchanged, but only the substitution of Phe(220) for Tyr in the NMBR caused a decrease in affinity. When the reverse study was performed to attempt to demonstrate a gain of affinity in the GRPR, the substitution of Tyr(219) for Phe caused an increase in affinity. These results suggest that the hydroxyl group of Tyr(220) in uTM5 of NMBR plays a critical role for high selectivity of PD168368 for NMBR over GRPR. Receptor and ligand modeling suggests that the hydroxyl of the Tyr(220) interacts with nitrophenyl group of PD168368 likely primarily by hydrogen bonding. This result shows the selectivity of the peptoid PD168368, similar to that reported for numerous non-peptide analogues with other G protein-coupled receptors, is primarily dependent on interaction with transmembrane amino acids.

Nonpeptide neuromedin B receptor antagonists inhibit the proliferation of C6 cells

The ability of nonpeptide antagonists to interact with neuromedin B receptors on C6 cells was investigated. 2-[3-(2, 6-Diisopropyl-phenyl)-ureido]3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-methyl-N-(1-pyridin- 2-yl-cyclohexylmethyl)-proprionate (PD165929), 3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-methyl-2-[3(4-nitro-phenyl)-ureido]-N-(1-pyridin- 2-yl-cyclohexylmethyl)-propionamide (PD168368) and 3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-N-[1-(5-methoxy-pyridin-2-yl)-cyclohexylmethyl]- 2-m ethyl-2-[3-(4-nitro-phenyl)-ureido]-propionamide (PD176252) inhibited (125I-Tyr0)neuromedin B binding with IC50 values of 2000, 40 and 50 nM, respectively. Because neuromedin B is a G-protein coupled serpentine receptor, the effects of neuromedin B antagonists on second messenger production and proliferation were investigated. PD168368 inhibited the ability of 10 nM neuromedin B to cause elevation of cytosolic Ca2+, whereas it had no effect on basal cytosolic Ca2+. PD168368 inhibited the ability of 100 nM neuromedin B to cause elevation of c-fos mRNA. Also, PD168368 in a dose-dependent manner inhibited the ability of 100 nM neuromedin B to cause phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase. Using a [3-(4,5 dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide] assay, the order of antagonist potency to inhibit C6 proliferation was PD168368=PD176252>PD165929. Also, 1 microM PD168368 and PD176252 significantly inhibited colony number using a proliferation assay in vitro. PD168368 significantly inhibited C6 xenograft growth in nude mice in vivo. These results indicate that PD168368 is a C6 cell neuromedin B receptor antagonist, which inhibits proliferation.

Neuromedin B

Neuromedin B (NMB) is one of the bombesin (BN)-related peptides in mammals. It was originally purified from pig spinal cords, and it has been shown to be present in central nervous system as well as in gastrointestinal tract. BN and its related peptides have various physiological effects. These include regulation of exocrine and endocrine secretions, smooth muscle contraction, feeding, blood pressure, blood glucose, body temperature and cell growth. NMB exerts its effect by binding to the cell surface receptor. A high affinity receptor, NMB receptor (NMB-R) has been identified. This is a G-protein coupled receptor with seven membrane-spanning regions. Upon agonist binding, several intracellular signaling cascades including phospholipase activation, calcium mobilization and protein kinase C (PKC) activation lead to expression of several genes, DNA synthesis or cellular effects such as secretion. Existence of NMB-R has been demonstrated in several brain regions, notably in olfactory and thalamic regions, and in gastrointestinal tracts. Recent analysis using NMB-R-deficient mice, generated by gene-targeting technique, enables to distinguish functional properties of NMB-R from GRP-R. In this review, molecular characterization, anatomical distribution and pharmacological properties of NMB and NMB-R will be presented. Moreover, physiological roles of NMB and its receptor demonstrated by the analysis of NMB-R-deficient mice will be reported. Comparison with GRP/GRP-R system will provide important information about BN-like peptide systems in mammals.

Ligand binding sites on guinea pig C3aR: point and deletion mutations in the large extracellular loop and vicinity

Human C3a receptor (huC3aR) belongs to the G-protein coupled receptor family chacterized by having seven transmembrane domains. The huC3aR is a unique member of this family having a large extracellular (EC) loop of 175 amino acids between the 4th and 5th transmembrane domains. Based on a comparison of C3aR sequences from several species, a number of charged and conserved amino acids (Asp182, Asp309, Asp310, and Arg331) in and near the large EC loop of guinea pig C3aR were replaced using site-directed mutagenesis. Competitive binding assays showed that changing Arg331 in guinea pig C3aR to Ala (or Gln), but not changing Asp182, Asp309, or Asp310 to Ala, resulted in complete loss of ligand binding activity. These results and major EC loop deletions demonstrated that an essential C3a binding site is present in the transmembrane portion of C3aR, but not in the large EC loop. Replacement of Arg331 by a noncharged residue was sufficient to eliminate ligand-receptor interactions.

Conformational changes of neuromedin B and delta sleep-inducing peptide induced by their interaction with lipid membranes as revealed by spectroscopic techniques and molecular dynamics simulation

Static and dynamic spectroscopic properties of the tryptophanil emission in conjunction with circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and molecular dynamics are used to investigate the interactions of the neuropeptide neuromedin B (NMB) and the membrane-permeable delta sleep-inducing peptide (DSIP) with the membrane lipid phase. Our data indicate that in solution both peptides exist in energetically equivalent conformations, whereas in the presence of the membrane specific conformational states are stabilized. By changing from the aqueous to the lipid phase, the static and the dynamic fluorescence properties of the NMB's tryptophan residue are clearly affected: the fluorescence steady-state spectrum as well as the resolved fluorescence decay-associated spectra (DAS) are shifted to the blue with a significant increase of the fluorescence intensity of the second lifetime component (tau 2-DAS). On the other hand, in the lipid environment the same parameters of DSIP are negligibly affected as compared to the aqueous buffer. The CD and molecular dynamics analyses are consistent with these results and indicate that, while NMB assumes a helix-like conformation with the tryptophan residue in the apolar surface, DSIP adopts a globule-like structure with the indole ring that is surface-exposed. As previously found for neuromedin C (Polverini, E., Neyroz, P., Fariselli, P., Casadio, R., and Masotti, L., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 214, 663-668, 1995), for NMB the stabilized "lipophilic" structure also may favor the correct peptide-receptor contact and recognition. For DSIP, the lipid-stabilized conformation does not support an amphiphilic structure-driven peptide-membrane interaction and suggests a hydrophobicity-driven diffusion across the bilayer.

Mutagenesis and ligand modification studies on galanin binding to its GTP-binding-protein-coupled receptor GalR1

In this study, a large number of receptor mutants were generated and several N-terminally modified galanin analogues synthesized to refine the previously proposed binding site model for galanin to its GTP-binding-protein-coupled receptor GalR1. In addition to ligand-binding studies, the functionality of mutant receptors was evaluated by assessing their ability to mediate galaninergic inhibition of isoproterenol-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity. The His264Ala and Phe282Ala receptor mutants, although deficient in binding in the concentration range of galanin used, remain functional albeit 20-fold less efficient than the wild-type receptor in mediating inhibition of stimulated cAMP production by galanin. The His267Ala mutant is, apart from being deficient in galanin binding, also severely impaired in functional coupling. While His264 and Phe282 seem to be important in forming the binding pocket for galanin, His267 might play a role in forming or stabilizing the active conformation of the GalR1 receptor rather than directly participating in the formation of the binding pocket for galanin. N-terminal carboxylic acid analogues of galanin have low affinity to wild-type GalR1, but substantially increased affinity to the Glu271Lys receptor mutant. This, together with the finding that an alanine substitution of Phe115 in TM III results in a tenfold decrease in affinity for galanin, suggests that the N-terminus of galanin interacts with Phe115. In contrast to the Phe282Ala mutation in TM VII, a conservative mutation of Phe282 to tyrosine did not alter the affinity for galanin. Thus, the interaction between Tyr9 of galanin and Phe282 is likely to be of an aromatic-aromatic nature.

Identification of four amino acids in the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor that are required for high affinity agonist binding

The bombesin family of G-protein-coupled receptors includes the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R), the neuromedin B receptor (NMB-R), bombesin receptor subtype 3 (BRS-3), and bombesin receptor subtype 4 (bb4). All species homologues of GRP-R, NMB-R, and bb4 bind bombesin with dissociation constants in the nanomolar range; by comparison, human BRS-3 binds bombesin at much lower affinity (Kd >> 1 microM). We used this difference to help identify candidate residues that were potentially critical for forming the bombesin binding pocket. We reasoned that amino acids essential for bombesin binding would be conserved among all homologues of bb4, NMB-R, and GRP-R; conversely, at least one of these amino acids would not be conserved among homologues of BRS-3. Amino acid sequence alignment revealed nine residues that fit this model. We replaced each of these amino acids in mouse GRP-R with the homologous amino acid in human BRS-3. Four substitutions resulted in a significant decrease in bombesin affinity (R288H, Q121R, P199S, and A308S). The analogous mutations in BRS-3 (R127Q, H294R, S205P, and S315A) together resulted in a receptor with a 100-fold increase in bombesin and GRP affinities relative to wild-type BRS-3. From this, we propose a preliminary map of some of the amino acids comprising the agonist binding pocket.

A segment of five amino acids in the second extracellular loop of the cholecystokinin-B receptor is essential for selectivity of the peptide agonist gastrin

The two known receptors mediating the actions of cholecystokinin (CCK) and gastrin, CCK type A (CCKAR) and CCK type B (CCKBR) receptors, are G protein-coupled receptors having approximately 50% amino acid homology. Both the CCKAR and CCKBR have high affinity for sulfated CCK peptides, while only the CCKBR has high affinity for gastrin peptides. To determine the structural basis for the selectivity of the CCKBR for gastrin, we first constructed a series of CCKB/AR chimeras in which restriction endonuclease-defined segments of the CCKBR were replaced with the corresponding segments of the CCKAR. Chimeras transiently expressed in COS-1 cells were screened for the selective loss of gastrin affinity according to the displacement of 125I-labeled Bolton-Hunter-CCK-8 binding by gastrin-17-I and CCK-8. The sequence spanning from transmembrane domain III (TM III) to TM V was the only segment that resulted in the selective loss of gastrin affinity. This segment could account for 100 of the expected 300-fold lower affinity of gastrin-17-I observed for the control CCKAR compared to the control CCKBR. Using site-directed mutagenesis in this segment of the CCKBR, we identified a sequence of 5 amino acids in the second extracellular loop responsible for this 100-fold selective loss in gastrin affinity. 125I-labeled Bolton-Hunter-CCK-8 binding displacement by L365,260 (a CCKBR selective antagonist) was unaffected by the changes in these 5 amino acids. These results present for the first time the identification of the amino acid sequence of the CCKBR conferring the majority of the selectivity for gastrin.

A putative selectivity filter in the G-protein-coupled receptors for parathyroid hormone and secretion

The seven transmembrane segments (TMs) of many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are thought to form a cavity into which cognate ligands insert, leading to receptor activation. Residues lining the cavity are often essential for optimal ligand binding and/or signal transduction. The present studies evaluated whether residues lining the cavity also contribute to specificity, using GPCRs for the polypeptides parathyroid hormone (PTH) and secretin as models. These ligands display no sequence homology with one another, and neither ligand cross-reacts with the other's receptor. However, mutation of a single amino acid in the second TM of the secretin receptor to the corresponding residue in the PTH receptor (N192I) resulted in a receptor that binds and signals in response to PTH. The reciprocal mutation in the PTH receptor (I234N) likewise unmasked responsiveness to secretin. Neither mutation significantly altered the response of the receptors to their own ligands. The results suggest a model of specificity wherein TM residues near the extracellular surface of the receptor function as a selectivity filter that restricts access of inappropriate ligands to an activation site in the transmembrane cavity.

Bombesin receptors in the brain

We have shown that in the central nervous system BN receptors are closely associated with 5-HT systems. On a subpopulation of dorsal raphe neurons, NMB receptors are able to depolarize cells by reducing gK+. In one of the target regions of the dorsal raphe 5-HT neurons, the SCN, we have also shown that neurons are excited by BN-related peptides. In the SCN, the GRP receptors excite neurons by two different mechanisms: closure of gK+ and opening of an unidentified cation conductance. Expression of human BN receptors from the brain in CHO cells or Xenopus oocytes shows a very similar pharmacological profile to that seen in the rat brain slice preparations. In the CHO cell line, following BN receptor activation, a major second-messenger path involves hydrolysis of PIP2 by phospholipases to yield IP3, which releases Ca2+ from intracellular stores. In the oocyte expression system, a similar second messenger pathway is clearly apparent, and Ca2+-sensitive gCl- represents the last phase in a cascade of events. The final phase of the mechanism of action in the artificial systems does not involve gK+, suggesting a different second messenger cascade to that in neurons. However, the involvement of phospholipases and their phospholipid products have not been excluded in neurons.

Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved charged residues in the helical region of the human C5a receptor. Arg2O6 determines high-affinity binding sites of C5a receptor

The human C5a receptor (C5aR) belongs to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors with seven transmembrane helices. This part of the molecule is thought to contain part of the ligand-binding pocket, specifically to bind the C-terminal Arg of human C5a. Guided by sequence similarity and molecular modelling studies, several residues including polar (Asn119, Thr168, Gln259) as well as all conserved charged amino acids in the upper transmembrane region of the C5aR (Asp37, Asp82, Arg175, Arg2O6, Asp282) were exchanged by site-directed mutagenesis. Receptor mutants were transiently expressed in COS cells and analyzed for altered binding behaviour and/or localization at the cell surface by immunofluorescence. For all residues, suitable mutants could be found that exhibited wild-type affinity towards the ligand, providing evidence against a major contribution of these residues to high-affinity ligand binding. Some mutants, however, exhibited a complete (Asp282-->Ala) or partial loss of ligand-binding capacity (Arg175-->Ala, Arg2O6-->Gln) despite adequate expression levels on the cell surface. This phenotype was further analyzed in the [Gln2O6]C5aR mutant: quantitative flow cytometric analysis of epitope-tagged receptor derivatives in 293 cells confirmed an equal level of wild-type and mutant C5aR on the cell surface. Competitive binding curves revealed the presence of only a small population (<10%) of high-affinity sites (Kd approximately 2 nM), which was functionally active at 20 nM in the heterologous Xenopus oocyte expression system after coexpression of G alpha-16. The number of high-affinity sites of wild-type and [Gln2O6]C5aR in 293 cells could be up-regulated by coexpression of Gi alpha-2 and down-regulated by GTP[gamma S]-mediated uncoupling of the G-protein receptor interaction in membrane preparations. These findings are compatible with a model in which the Arg2O6 residue located in the upper third of transmembrane helix V determines high-affinity binding in the human C5aR by affecting the intracellular G-protein coupling.

The binding site of neuropeptide vasopressin V1a receptor. Evidence for a major localization within transmembrane regions

To identify receptor functional domains underlying binding of the neurohypophysial hormones vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OT), we have constructed a three-dimensional (3D) model of the V1a vasopressin receptor subtype and docked the endogenous ligand AVP. To verify and to refine the 3D model, residues likely to be involved in agonist binding were selected for site-directed mutagenesis. Our experimental results suggest that AVP, which is characterized by a cyclic structure, could be completely buried into a 15-20-A deep cleft defined by the transmembrane helices of the receptor and interact with amino acids located within this region. Moreover, the AVP-binding site is situated in a position equivalent to that described for the cationic neurotransmitters. Since all mutated residues are highly conserved in AVP and OT receptors, we propose that the same agonist-binding site is shared by all members of this receptor family. In contrast, the affinity for the antagonists tested, including those with a structure closely related to AVP, is not affected by mutations. This indicates a different binding mode for agonists and antagonists in the vasopressin receptor.

Mechanisms of thrombin receptor agonist specificity. Chimeric receptors and complementary mutations identify an agonist recognition site

Identification of the docking interactions by which peptide agonists activate their receptors is critical for understanding signal transduction at the molecular level. The human and Xenopus thrombin receptors respond selectively to their respective hexapeptide agonists, SFLLRN and TFRIFD. A systematic analysis of human/Xenopus thrombin receptor chimeras revealed that just two human-for-Xenopus amino acid substitutions, Phe for Asn87 in the Xenopus receptor's amino-terminal exodomain and Glu for Leu260 in the second extracellular loop, conferred human receptor-like specificity to the Xenopus receptor. This observation prompted complementation studies to test the possibility that Arg5a in the human agonist peptide might normally interact with Glu260 in the human receptor. The mutant agonist peptide SFLLEN was a poor agonist at the wild type human receptor but an effective agonist at a mutant human receptor in which Glu260 was converted to Arg. An "arginine scan" of the receptor's extracellular surface revealed additional complementary mutations in the vicinity of position 260 and weak complementation at position 87 but not elsewhere in the receptor. Strikingly, a double alanine substitution that removed negative charge from the Glu260 region of the human receptor also effectively complemented the SFLLEN agonist. The functional complementation achieved with single Arg substitutions was thus due at least in part to neutralization of a negatively charged surface on the receptor and not necessarily to introduction of a new salt bridge. By contrast, charge neutralization did not account for the gain of responsiveness to SFLLRN seen in the human/Xenopus receptor chimeras. Thus two independent approaches, chimeric receptors and arginine scanning for complementary mutations, identified the Glu260 region and to a lesser degree Phe87 as important determinants of agonist specificity. These extracellular sites promote receptor responsiveness to the "correct" agonist and inhibit responsiveness to an "incorrect" agonist. They may participate directly in agonist binding or regulate agonist access to a nearby docking site.

Lysine 182 of endothelin B receptor modulates agonist selectivity and antagonist affinity: evidence for the overlap of peptide and non-peptide ligand binding sites

The potent vasoactive peptide hormone endothelin (ET) binds to receptors which belong to the G-protein coupled receptor family. The availability of non-peptide antagonists for ET receptors allows investigation of the relationship among the binding sites for peptide and non-peptide ligands. In this study, a lysine residue, conserved within transmembrane domain 3 (TM3) of the ETA and ETB receptor subtypes, is implicated in agonist and antagonist binding by its analogous position within TM3 to a binding site aspartate residue conserved within bioactive amine receptors. Replacement of this lysine within hETB by arginine, alanine, methionine, aspartate, or glutamate results in hETB variants with unaltered affinities for agonist peptide ET-1 but which have affinities for peptide agonists ET-2, ET-3, sarafotoxin 6C, and TRL 1736 which are between 1-3 orders of magnitude lower than their corresponding wild-type hETB values. Significantly, the affinities of non-peptide antagonists, (+/-)-SB 209670 and its analogs as well as Ro 46-2005, are abrogated. The results suggest that an interaction of K182 of hETB with the indan 2-carboxyl of (+/-)-SB 209670 may contribute to the high-affinity binding of the diarylindan antagonists. The results indicate that TM3 of hETB is a region of overlap among the binding sites of non-peptide antagonists and the affected peptide agonists.

Locating ligand-binding sites in 7TM receptors by protein engineering

Over the past year, mutational analysis of peptide receptors has started to change our understanding of the interaction between G protein coupled receptors and their ligands, an area previously almost totally dominated by results from studies of monoamine receptors. A picture is currently emerging, in which small ligands appear to bind in three (more or less) overlapping ligand-binding pockets in between the transmembrane segments. In contrast, contact residues for peptide and protein ligands have mainly been found in exterior regions of peptide and protein receptors. It is also becoming increasingly clear that agonists and antagonists may interact in vastly different manners, even though they are competitive ligands for a common receptor.

Specificity of the thrombin receptor for agonist peptide is defined by its extracellular surface

G-protein-coupled receptors for catecholamines and some other small ligands are activated when agonists bind to the transmembrane region of the receptor. The docking interactions through which peptide agonists activate their receptors are less well characterized. The thrombin receptor is a specialized peptide receptor. It is activated by binding its tethered ligand domain, which is unmasked upon receptor cleavage by thrombin. Human and Xenopus thrombin receptor homologues are each selectively activated by the agonist peptide representing their respective tethered ligand domains. Here we identify receptor domains that confer this agonist specificity by replacing the Xenopus receptor's aminoterminal exodomain and three extracellular loops with the corresponding human structures. This switches receptor specificity from Xenopus to human. The specificity of these thrombin receptors for their respective peptide agonists is thus determined by their extracellular surfaces. Our results indicate that agonist interaction with extracellular domains is important for thrombin receptor activation.

Structure and function of receptors coupled to G proteins

Direct structural data on receptors coupled to G proteins were obtained last year in the form of a low resolution projection map of rhodopsin. A large number of receptor sequences have now been determined and detailed analysis of these has provided structural information about the receptors. New results from site-directed mutagenesis experiments can be examined in conjunction with the structural information from sequence analysis and the rhodopsin map. The identification of constitutively active mutated receptors has influenced our understanding of normal receptor equilibria.

Conserved HisVI-17 of the NK-1 receptor is involved in binding of non-peptide antagonists but not substance P

Residue number 17 in transmembrane segment VI has been shown to be crucial for the binding of agonists in G-protein-coupled receptors for the monoamines. In many peptide receptors a histidyl residue has been conserved at this position. We find that replacement of HisVI-17 in the NK-1 receptor with either glutamine, phenylalanine, or alanine has no apparent effect on the binding of the natural peptide ligand substance P or on the agonist induced increase in inositolphosphate turnover. However, the binding of certain non-peptide antagonists was impaired; for example, replacement of HisVI-17 with alanine decreased the affinity for FK888 and RP67,580 5- to 12-fold, respectively. A glutamine side chain was a good substitute for the imidazole in the binding of all non-peptide antagonists. It is concluded that the conserved HisVI-17 in the NK-1 receptor is involved in the binding of certain non-peptide antagonists, but is not important for the action of the natural peptide agonist, substance P.