Multiple domains of G protein beta confer subunit specificity in beta gamma interaction

Comprehensive analysis of heterotrimeric G-protein complex diversity and their interactions with GPCRs in solution

Agonist binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) triggers signal transduction cascades involving heterotrimeric G proteins as key players. A major obstacle for drug design is the limited knowledge of conformational changes upon agonist binding, the details of interaction with the different G proteins, and the transmission to movements within the G protein. Although a variety of different GPCR/G protein complex structures would be needed, the transient nature of this complex and the intrinsic instability against dissociation make this endeavor very challenging. We have previously evolved GPCR mutants that display higher stability and retain their interaction with G proteins. We aimed at finding all G-protein combinations that preferentially interact with neurotensin receptor 1 (NTR1) and our stabilized mutants. We first systematically analyzed by coimmunoprecipitation the capability of 120 different G-protein combinations consisting of αi1 or αsL and all possible βγ-dimers to form a heterotrimeric complex. This analysis revealed a surprisingly unrestricted ability of the G-protein subunits to form heterotrimeric complexes, including βγ-dimers previously thought to be nonexistent, except for combinations containing β5. A second screen on coupling preference of all G-protein heterotrimers to NTR1 wild type and a stabilized mutant indicated a preference for those Gαi1βγ combinations containing γ1 and γ11. Heterotrimeric G proteins, including combinations believed to be nonexistent, were purified, and complexes with the GPCR were prepared. Our results shed new light on the combinatorial diversity of G proteins and their coupling to GPCRs and open new approaches to improve the stability of GPCR/G-protein complexes.

The expanding roles of Gβγ subunits in G protein-coupled receptor signaling and drug action

Gβγ subunits from heterotrimeric G proteins perform a vast array of functions in cells with respect to signaling, often independently as well as in concert with Gα subunits. However, the eponymous term "Gβγ" does not do justice to the fact that 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ isoforms have evolved in mammals to serve much broader roles beyond their canonical roles in cellular signaling. We explore the phylogenetic diversity of Gβγ subunits with a view toward understanding these expanded roles in different cellular organelles. We suggest that the particular content of distinct Gβγ subunits regulates cellular activity, and that the granularity of individual Gβ and Gγ action is only beginning to be understood. Given the therapeutic potential of targeting Gβγ action, this larger view serves as a prelude to more specific development of drugs aimed at individual isoforms.

Synthesis and assembly of G protein βγ dimers: comparison of in vitro and in vivo studies

The heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) are the canonical cellular machinery used with the approximately 700 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the human genome to transduce extracellular signals across the plasma membrane. The synthesis of the constituent G protein subunits, and their assembly into Gβγ dimers and G protein heterotrimers, determines the signaling repertoire for G-protein/GPCR signaling in cells. These synthesis/assembly -processes are intimately related to two other overlapping events in the intricate pathway leading to formation of G protein signaling complexes, posttranslational modification and intracellular trafficking of G proteins. The assembly of the Gβγ dimer is a complex process involving multiple accessory proteins and organelles. The mechanisms involved are becoming increasingly appreciated, but are still incompletely understood. In vitro and in vivo (cellular) studies provide different perspectives of these processes, and a comparison of them can provide insight into both our current level of understanding and directions to be taken in future investigations.

Prenylation-deficient G protein gamma subunits disrupt GPCR signaling in the zebrafish

Prenylation of G protein gamma (gamma) subunits is necessary for the membrane localization of heterotrimeric G proteins and for functional heterotrimeric G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. To evaluate GPCR signaling pathways during development, we injected zebrafish embryos with mRNAs encoding Ggamma subunits mutated so that they can no longer be prenylated. Low-level expression of these prenylation-deficient Ggamma subunits driven either ubiquitously or specifically in the primordial germ cells (PGCs) disrupts GPCR signaling and manifests as a PGC migration defect. This disruption results in a reduction of calcium accumulation in the protrusions of migrating PGCs and a failure of PGCs to directionally migrate. When co-expressed with a prenylation-deficient Ggamma, 8 of the 17 wildtype Ggamma isoforms individually confer the ability to restore calcium accumulation and directional migration. These results suggest that while the Ggamma subunits possess the ability to interact with G Beta (beta) proteins, only a subset of wildtype Ggamma proteins are stable within PGCs and can interact with key signaling components necessary for PGC migration. This in vivo study highlights the functional redundancy of these signaling components and demonstrates that prenylation-deficient Ggamma subunits are an effective tool to investigate the roles of GPCR signaling events during vertebrate development.

G Protein βγ Dimer Formation: Gβ and Gγ Differentially Determine Efficiency of in Vitro Dimer Formation

The Gbeta and Ggamma subunit of the heterotrimeric G proteins form a functional dimer that is stable once assembled in vivo or in vitro. The requirements, mechanism, and specificity of dimer formation are still incompletely understood, but represent important biochemical processes involved in the specificity of cellular signaling through G proteins. Here, seven Gbeta and 12 FLAG-epitope-tagged Ggamma subunits were separately synthesized in vitro using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate expression system. The translation products were combined and dimers isolated by immunoprecipitation. Gbeta1 and Gbeta4 formed dimers with all Ggamma subunit isoforms, generally with Gbeta/Ggamma stoichiometries between 0.2:1 and 0.5:1. Gbeta5, Gbeta5L, and Gbeta3s did not form significant amounts of dimer with any of the gamma subunit isoforms. Gbeta2 and Gbeta3 formed dimers with selected Ggamma isoforms to levels intermediate between that of Gbeta1/Gbeta4 and Gbeta3s/Gbeta5/Gbeta5L. We also expressed selected Gbetagamma in HEK293 cells and measured PLCbeta2 activity. Gbetagamma dimer-dependent increases in IP3 production were seen with most Gbeta1, Gbeta2, and Gbeta5 combinations, indicating functional dimer expression in intact cells. These results define the complete set of G protein betagamma dimers that are formed using a single biochemical assay method and suggest that there are Gbeta isoform-specific factors in rabbit reticulocyte lysates that determine the efficacy of Gbetagamma dimer formation.

Adenylyl cyclase type-VIII activity is regulated by G(betagamma) subunits

The Ca2+-activated adenylyl cyclase type VIII (AC-VIII) has been implicated in several forms of neural plasticity, including drug addiction and learning and memory. It has not been clear whether Gi/o proteins and G-protein coupled receptors regulate the activity of AC-VIII. Here we show in intact mammalian cell system that AC-VIII is inhibited by mu-opioid receptor activation and that this inhibition is pertussis toxin sensitive. Moreover, we show that G(betagamma) subunits inhibit AC-VIII activity, while constitutively active alphai/o subunits do not. Different Gbeta isoforms varied in their efficacies, with Gbeta1gamma2 or Gbeta2gamma2 being more efficient than Gbeta3gamma2 and Gbeta4gamma2, while Gbeta5 (transfected with gamma2) had no effect. As for the Ggamma subunits, Gbeta1 inhibited AC-VIII activity in the presence of all gamma subunits tested except for gamma5 that had only a marginal activity. Moreover, cotransfection with proteins known to serve as scavengers of Gbetagamma dimers, or to reduce Gbetagamma plasma membrane anchorage, markedly attenuated the mu-opioid receptor-induced inhibition of AC-VIII. These results demonstrate that Gbetagamma (originating from agonist activation of these receptors) and probably not Galphai/o subunits are involved in the agonist inhibition of AC-VIII.

The WD-repeats of Net2p interact with Dnm1p and Fis1p to regulate division of mitochondria

The Net2, Fis1, and Dnm1 proteins are required for the division of mitochondria in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Net2p has an amino-terminal region that contains predicted coiled-coil motifs and a carboxyl-terminal domain composed of WD-40 repeats. We found that the amino-terminal part of Net2p interacts with Fis1p, whereas the carboxyl-terminal region interacts with both Dnm1p and Fis1p. Overproduction of either domain of Net2p in yeast cells poisons mitochondrial fission, and the dominant-negative effect caused by the WD-repeats of Net2p is suppressed by increased levels of Dnm1p. Point mutations in the WD-region of Net2p or in the GTPase region of Dnm1p disrupt the normal Net2p-Dnm1p interaction, causing Net2p to lose its normal punctate distribution. Our results suggest that Dnm1p interacts with the WD-repeats of Net2p and in a GTP-dependent manner recruits Net2p to sites of mitochondrial division. Furthermore, our results indicate that Net2p is required for proper assembly of the mitochondrial fission components to regulate organelle division.

Specific combinations of G-protein subunits discriminate hormonal signalling in rat pituitary (GH(3)) cells in culture

It was previously shown that hormone receptor coupling to voltage-dependent calcium channels in prolactin and growth hormone-producing GH(3) cells was heavily dependent on the specific heterotrimeric combinations of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits of the guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding protein family. Consequently, we assessed whether this was also the case for hormonal modulation of the adenylate cyclase (AC) and phospholipase C (PL-C) effector enzymes in GH(3) cells in culture. By employing polyclonal antibodies directed towards C-terminal decapeptides of various alpha subunits in membrane assays, as well as antisense oligonucleotides towards certain beta- and gamma-subunit genes in whole-cell incubations, it was possible to unravel a tentative profile of heterotrimers preferred by some of the seven-transmembrane-stretch receptors in their modulation of AC and PL-C activities. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and thyroliberin (TRH) activate membrane-bound AC through alpha(s)beta(2)gamma(2), while somatostatin (SRIH) and dopamine (DA) inhibited the AC through alpha(i2)beta(1)gamma(3). TRH activated membrane-bound PL-C through alpha(q/11)beta(4)gamma(2), while DA inhibition of the PL-C was accomplished via alpha(o)beta(3)gamma(4). Hence, it seems that not only the specificity of alpha subunits determines the coupling between G protein-associated receptors in GH cells, the receptor binding to G proteins also requires certain combinations of beta and gamma subunits.

Dual regulation of Akt/protein kinase B by heterotrimeric G protein subunits

While positive regulation of c-Akt (also known as protein kinase B) by receptor tyrosine kinases is well documented, compounds acting through G protein-coupled receptors can also activate Akt and its downstream targets. We therefore explored the role of G protein subunits in the regulation of Akt in cultured mammalian cells. In HEK-293 and COS-7 cells transiently transfected with beta(2)-adrenergic or m2 muscarinic receptors, respectively, treatment with agonist-induced phosphorylation of Akt at serine 473 as evidenced by phosphoserine-specific immunoblots. This effect was blocked by the phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase inhibitor LY294002 and wild-type Galpha(i1), and was not duplicated by co-transfection of the constitutively active Galpha(s)-Q227L or Galpha(i)-Q204L mutant. Co-transfection of Gbeta(1), Gbeta(2) but not Gbeta(5) together with Ggamma(2) activated the kinase when assayed in vitro following immunoprecipitation of the epitope-tagged enzyme. In contrast, constitutively activated G protein subunits representing the four Galpha subfamilies were found unable to activate Akt in either cell line. The latter results are in disagreement with a report by Murga et al. (Murga, C., Laguinge, L., Wetzker, R., Cuadrado, A., and Gutkind, J. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 19080-19085) that described activation of Akt in response to mutationally activated Galpha(q) and Galpha(i) transfection in COS cells. To the contrary, in our experiments Galpha(q)-Q209L inhibited Akt activation resulting from betagamma or mutationally activated H-Ras co-transfection in these cells. In HEK-293 cells Galpha(q)-Q209L transfection inhibited insulin-like growth factor-1 activation of epitope-tagged Akt. In m1 muscarinic receptor transfected HEK-293 cells, carbachol inhibited insulin-like growth factor-1 stimulated phosphorylation at Ser(473) of endogenous Akt in an atropine-reversible fashion. We conclude that G proteins can regulate Akt by two distinct and potentially opposing mechanisms: activation by Gbetagamma heterodimers in a phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-dependent fashion, and inhibition mediated by Galpha(q). This work identifies Akt as a novel point of convergence between disparate signaling pathways.

Reconstitution of the vertebrate visual cascade using recombinant heterotrimeric transducin purified from Sf9 cells

For reconstitution studies with rhodopsin and cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE), all three subunits of heterotrimeric transducin (T alpha beta gamma) were simultaneously expressed in Sf9 cells at high levels using a baculovirus expression system and purified to homogeneity. Light-activated rhodopsin catalyzed the loading of purified recombinant T alpha with GTP gamma S. In vitro reconstitution of rhodopsin, recombinant transducin, and PDE in detergent solution resulted in cGMP hydrolysis upon illumination, demonstrating that recombinant transducin was able to activate PDE. The rate of cGMP hydrolysis by PDE as a function of GTP gamma S-loaded recombinant transducin (T(*)) concentration gave a Hill coefficient of approximately 2, suggesting that the activation of PDE by T(*) was cooperatively regulated. Furthermore, the kinetic rate constants for the activation of PDE by T(*) suggested that only the complex of PDE with two T(*) molecules, PDE. T(2)(*), was significantly catalytically active under the conditions of the assay. We conclude that the model of essential coactivation best describes the activation of PDE by T(*) in a reconstituted vertebrate visual cascade using recombinant heterotrimeric transducin.

A neurally enriched coronin-like protein, ClipinC, is a novel candidate for an actin cytoskeleton-cortical membrane-linking protein

Brain-enriched human FC96 protein shows a close sequence similarity to the Dictyostelium actin-binding protein coronin, which has been implicated in cell motility, cytokinesis, and phagocytosis. A phylogenetic tree analysis revealed that FC96 and two other mammalian molecules (p57 and IR10) form a new protein family, the coronin-like protein (Clipin) family; thus hereafter we refer to FC96 as ClipinC. A WD domain and a succeeding alpha-helical region are conserved among coronin and Clipin family members. ClipinC is predominantly expressed in the brain, and discrete areas in the mouse brain were intensely labeled with anti-ClipinC antibodies. ClipinC was also shown to bind directly to F-actin in vitro. Immunocytochemical analysis revealed that ClipinC accumulated at focal adhesions as well as at neurite tips and stress fibers. Furthermore, ClipinC was associated with vinculin, which is a major component of focal contacts. These results indicate that ClipinC is also a component part of the cross-bridge between the actin cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane. These findings and the previously reported function of coronin suggest that ClipinC may play specific roles in the reorganization of neuronal actin structure, a change that has been implicated in both cell motility and growth cone advance.

Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase isoforms V and VI by various Gbetagamma subunits

An intriguing development in the G-protein signaling field has been the finding that not only the Galpha subunit, but also Gbetagamma subunits, affect a number of downstream target molecules. One of the downstream targets of Gbetagamma is adenylyl cyclase, and it has been demonstrated that a number of isoforms of adenylyl cyclase can be either inhibited or stimulated by Gbetagamma subunits. Until now, adenylyl cyclase type I has been the only isoform reported to be inhibited by free Gbetagamma. Here we show by transient cotransfection into COS-7 cells of either adenylyl cyclase V or VI, together with Ggamma2 and various Gbeta subunits, that these two adenylyl cyclase isozymes are markedly inhibited by Gbetagamma. In addition, we show that Gbeta1 and Gbeta5 subunits differ in their activity. Gbeta1 transfected alone markedly inhibited adenylyl cylcase V and VI (probably by recruiting endogenous Ggamma subunits). On the other hand, Gbeta5 produced less inhibition of these isozymes, and its activity was enhanced by the addition of Ggamma2. These results demonstrate that adenylyl cyclase types V and VI are inhibited by Gbetagamma dimers and that Gbeta1 and Gbeta5 subunits differ in their capacity to regulate these adenylyl cyclase isozymes.

The G-protein betagamma complex

The vast majority of signalling pathways in mammalian cells are mediated by heterotrimeric (alpha betagamma) G proteins. Reviewed here is regulation of signal transduction by the betagamma complex at different protein interfaces: subunit-subunit, receptor-G protein and G protein-effector. The role of diverse beta and gamma subunit types in achieving specificity in signalling and potentially unidentified functions for these subunits also are discussed.

Differential modulation of adenylyl cyclases I and II by various G beta subunits

The accepted dogma concerning the regulation of adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity by G beta gamma dimers states that the various isoforms of AC respond differently to the presence of free G beta gamma. It has been demonstrated that AC I activity is inhibited and AC II activity is stimulated by G beta gamma subunits. This result does not address the possible differences in modulation that may exist among the different G beta gamma heterodimers. Six isoforms of G beta and 12 isoforms of G gamma have been cloned to date. We have established a cell transfection system in which G beta and G gamma cDNAs were cotransfected with either AC isoform I or II and the activity of these isoforms was determined. We found that while AC I activity was inhibited by both G beta 1/gamma 2 and G beta 5/gamma 2 combinations, AC II responded differentially and was stimulated by G beta 1/gamma 2 and inhibited by G beta 5/gamma 2. This finding demonstrates differential modulatory activity by different combinations of G beta gamma on the same AC isoform and demonstrates another level of complexity within the AC signaling system.

The coiled-coil region of the G protein beta subunit. Mutational analysis of Ggamma and effector interactions

The beta and gamma subunits of the heterotrimeric G proteins remain tightly associated throughout the signaling cycle as the betagamma dimer interacts with Galpha, receptors, and effectors. A coiled-coil structure involving alpha-helical segments at the N termini of the beta and gamma subunits contributes to the dimerization interface and has been implicated in effector signaling in yeast. Scanning mutagenesis of the coiled-coil region of the mammalian beta1 subunit was performed to examine the effect of point mutations on betagamma assembly and effector signaling in COS cell cotransfection assays. In addition to the E10K mutation described previously, mutations A11E, L14E, and I18E in beta1 were found to block betagamma association, as evidenced by the failure of the Gbeta mutants to undergo cytosolic translocation with cotransfected nonisoprenylated Ggamma. Although none of 14 beta1 point mutations prevented the betagamma-dependent activation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) effector pathway, the D20K point mutation enhanced JNK but not phospholipase C-beta2 activation. These findings implicate the coiled-coil region of Gbeta in JNK signaling, provide further evidence that the structural features of the betagamma complex mediating effector regulation may differ among effectors, and identify single codons in the mammalian beta subunit where mutation might yield a phenotype of defective signal transduction.

G protein mechanisms: insights from structural analysis

This review is concerned with the structures and mechanisms of a superfamily of regulatory GTP hydrolases (G proteins). G proteins include Ras and its close homologs, translation elongation factors, and heterotrimeric G proteins. These proteins share a common structural core, exemplified by that of p21ras (Ras), and significant sequence identity, suggesting a common evolutionary origin. Three-dimensional structures of members of the G protein superfamily are considered in light of other biochemical findings about the function of these proteins. Relationships among G protein structures are discussed, and factors contributing to their low intrinsic rate of GTP hydrolysis are considered. Comparison of GTP- and GDP-bound conformations of G proteins reveals how specific contacts between the gamma-phosphate of GTP and the switch II region stabilize potential effector-binding sites and how GTP hydrolysis results in collapse (or reordering) of these surfaces. A GTPase-activating protein probably binds to and stabilizes the conformation of its cognate G protein that recognizes the transition state for hydrolysis, and may insert a catalytic residue into the G protein active site. Inhibitors of nucleotide release, such as the beta gamma subunit of a heterotrimeric G protein, bind selectively to and stabilize the GDP-bound state. Release factors, such as the translation elongation factor, Ts, also recognize the switch regions and destabilize the Mg(2+)-binding site, thereby promoting GDP release. G protein-coupled receptors are expected to operate by a somewhat different mechanism, given that the GDP-bound form of many G protein alpha subunits does not contain bound Mg2+.

Functional and structural complexity of signal transduction via G-protein-coupled receptors

A prerequisite for the maintenance of homeostasis in a living organism is fine-tuned communication between different cells. The majority of extracellular signaling molecules, such as hormones and neurotransmitters, interact with a three-protein transmembrane signaling system consisting of a receptor, a G protein, and an effector. These single components interact sequentially and reversibly. Considering that hundreds of G-protein-coupled receptors interact with a limited repertoire of G proteins, the question of coupling specificity is worth considering. G-protein-mediated signal transduction is a complex signaling network with diverging and converging transduction steps at each coupling interface. The recent realization that classical signaling pathways are intimately intertwined with growth-factor-signaling cascades adds another level of complexity. Elaborate studies have significantly enhanced our knowledge of the functional anatomy of G-protein-coupled receptors, and the concept has emerged that receptor function can be modulated with high specificity by coexpressed receptor fragments. These results may have significant clinical impact in the future.

Selective activation of effector pathways by brain-specific G protein beta5

While multiple G protein beta and gamma subunit isoforms have been identified, the implications of this potential diversity of betagamma heterodimers for signaling through betagamma-regulated effector pathways remains unclear. Furthermore the molecular mechanism(s) by which the betagamma complex modulates diverse mammalian effector molecules is unknown. Effector signaling by the structurally distinct brain-specific beta5 subunit was assessed by transient cotransfection with gamma2 in COS cells and compared with beta1. Transfection of either beta1 or beta5 with gamma2 stimulated the activity of cotransfected phospholipase C-beta2 (PLC-beta2), as previously reported. In contrast, cotransfection of beta1 but not beta5 with gamma2 stimulated the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathways even though the expression of beta5 in COS cells was evident by immunoblotting. The G protein beta5 expressed in transfected COS cells was properly folded as its pattern of stable C-terminal proteolytic fragments was identical to that of native brain beta5. The inability of beta5 to activate the MAPK and JNK pathways was not overcome by cotransfection with three additional Ggamma isoforms. These results suggest it is the Gbeta subunit which determines the pattern of downstream signaling by the betagamma complex and imply that the structural features of the betagamma complex mediating effector regulation may differ among effectors.

A C-terminal mutant of the G protein beta subunit deficient in the activation of phospholipase C-beta

The molecular mechanism by which the G protein betagamma complex modulates multiple mammalian effector pathways is unknown. Homolog-scanning mutagenesis of the G protein beta subunit was employed to identify residues critical for the activation of phospholipase C-beta2 (PLC-beta2). A series of chimeras was made by introducing small segments of the Dictyostelium beta subunit into a background of mammalian beta1 and tested in COS cell cotransfection assays for their ability to activate PLC-beta2 and assemble with mammalian gamma2. A chimera that contained four Dictyostelium beta substitutions within the C-terminal 14 residues was unable to activate PLC-beta2 when cotransfected with gamma, despite its demonstrable expression in a gamma-dependent manner. Cotransfection of the mutant blocked m2 muscarinic receptor activation of PLC by a pertussis toxin-sensitive pathway. This C-terminal mutant retained the ability, however, to stimulate the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. These results imply that activation of different betagamma-responsive effectors is mediated by distinct domains.

Heterotrimeric G proteins

Over the past year, the thrust of work in the field of heterotrimeric G proteins has been primarily in the following areas: first, resolution of their three-dimensional structures by X-ray crystallography; second, elucidation of the effect of lipid modifications on the Galpha and Ggamma subunits; third, understanding the role of the Gbetagamma dimer in stimulation of a variety of effectors following receptor activation; and fourth, identification of the points of contact among the Galpha, Gbeta, and Ggamma subunits, and between these subunits and their cognate receptor or effector molecules.

Differential ability to form the G protein betagamma complex among members of the beta and gamma subunit families

We have determined the relative abilities of several members of the G protein beta and gamma subunit families to associate with each other using the yeast two-hybrid system. We show first that the mammalian beta1 and gamma3 fusion proteins form a complex in yeast and that formation of the complex activates the reporter gene for beta-galactosidase. Second, the magnitude of reporter activity stimulated by various combinations of beta and gamma subunit types varies widely. Third, the reporter activity evoked by a particular combination of beta and gamma subunit types is not correlated with the expression levels of these subunit types in the yeast cells. Finally, the reporter activity shows a direct relationship with the amount of hybrid betagamma complex formed in the cell as determined by immunoprecipitation. These results suggest that different beta and gamma subunit types interact with each other with widely varying abilities, and this in combination with the level of expression of a subunit type in a mammalian cell determines which G protein will be active in that cell. The strong preference of all gamma subunit types for the beta1 subunit type explains the preponderence of this subunit type in most G proteins.

Receptor and membrane interaction sites on Gbeta. A receptor-derived peptide binds to the carboxyl terminus

The functional organization of Gbetagamma is poorly understood. Regions of bovine brain Gbetagamma that interact with a photoaffinity derivative of an alpha2-adrenergic receptor-derived peptide from the third intracellular loop (diazopyruvoyl-modified peptide Q (DAP-Q)) and a hydrophobic membrane probe (3-trifluoromethyl-3-(m-iodophenyl)diazirine (TID)) were examined. We previously showed that DAP-Q cross-links to specific, competable sites on both the alpha and beta subunits of Go/Gi but not on the gamma subunit and that betagamma subunit was required for stimulation of Go/Gi GTPase activity (Taylor, J. M., Jacob Mosier, G. G., Lawton, R. G., Remmers, A. E., and Neubig, R. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27618-27624). Similarly, we show here that the membrane-associated photoprobe [125I]TID labels alpha and beta but not gamma. We have now mapped the sites of incorporation of DAP-Q and TID into the beta subunit. TID labels both the 14-kDa amino-terminal and the 23-kDa carboxyl-terminal fragments from a partial tryptic digest of beta while DAP-Q labels only the carboxyl-terminal fragment. Further mapping with endopeptidase Lys C reveals substantial labeling of multiple fragments by TID while DAP-Q labels predominantly a approximately 6-kDa fragment within the carboxyl-terminal 60 amino acids of beta1. Thus, regions within the 7th (or possibly 6th) WD-40 repeat of the beta subunit of G protein interact with the receptor-derived peptide while membrane interaction involves multiple sites throughout the beta subunit.

An intact N terminus of the gamma subunit is required for the Gbetagamma stimulation of rhodopsin phosphorylation by human beta-adrenergic receptor kinase-1 but not for kinase binding

Cleavage after lysine 32 in the Ggamma2 subtype and after lysine 36 in the Ggamma3 subtype of purified mixed brain Gbetagamma by endoproteinase Lys-C blocks Gbetagamma-mediated stimulation of phosphorylation of rhodopsin in urea-extracted rod outer segments by recombinant human beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (hbetaARK1) holoenzyme while hbetaARK1 binding to rod outer segments is partially affected. This treatment does not attenuate the binding of the treated Gbetagamma to C-terminal fragments of hbetaARK1 containing the pleckstrin homology domain. Lys-C proteolysis also does not alter the association of the Gbetagamma with phospholipids, its ability to support pertussis toxin-catalyzed Galphao/Galphai ADP-ribosylation, or its ability to inhibit forskolin-stimulated platelet adenylate cyclase. The Gbeta subunit remains noncovalently associated with the cleaved Ggamma fragments. Thus, in addition to recruiting hbetaARK1 to its receptor substrate, Ggamma contributes secondary and/or tertiary structural features to activate the kinase.

Multiple domains contribute to the distinct inactivation properties of human heart and skeletal muscle Na+ channels

Voltage-gated Na+ channels are essential for the normal electrical excitability of neuronal and striated muscle membranes. Distinct isoforms of the Na+ channel alpha-subunit have been identified by molecular cloning, and their functional attributes have been defined by heterologous expression coupled with electrophysiological recording. Two closely related Na+ channel alpha-subunit isoforms, hH1 (human heart) and hSkM1 (human skeletal muscle), exhibit differences in their inactivation properties and in their response to the coexpressed beta 1-subunit. To localize regions that contribute to inactivation and to beta 1-subunit response, we have exploited these functional differences by studying chimeric channels composed of segments from both hH1 and hSkM1. Chimeras in which one or more of the cytoplasmic interdomain regions (ID1-2, ID2-3, and ID3-4) were exchanged between hH1 and hSkM1 exhibit inactivation properties identical with the background channel isoform, suggesting that these regions are not sufficient to cause gating differences. In contrast, inactivation properties of chimeras composed of approximately equal halves of the two channel isoforms were intermediate between hH1 and hSkM1. Furthermore, the response to the coexpressed beta 1-subunit was dependent on structures located in the carboxy-terminal half of the alpha-subunit, although domains D3, D4, and the carboxy terminal are not singularly responsible for this effect. These data indicate that inactivation differences between hH1 and hSkM1 are determined by multiple alpha-subunit domains.

Crystal structure of a G-protein beta gamma dimer at 2.1A resolution

Many signalling cascades use seven-helical transmembrane receptors coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins (G alpha beta gamma) to convert extracellular signals into intracellular responses. Upon nucleotide exchange catalysed by activated receptors, heterotrimers dissociate into GTP-bound G alpha subunits and G beta gamma dimers, either of which can modulate many downstream effectors. Here we use multiwavelength anomalous diffraction data to solve the crystal structure of the beta gamma dimer of the G protein transducin. The beta-subunit is primarily a seven-bladed beta-propeller that is partially encircled by an extended gamma-subunit. The beta-propeller, which contains seven structurally similar WD repeats, defines the stereochemistry of the WD repeat and the probable architecture of all WD-repeat-containing domains. The structure details interactions between G protein beta- and gamma-subunits and highlights regions implicated in effector modulation for the conserved family of G protein beta gamma dimers.

Intersubunit surfaces in G protein alpha beta gamma heterotrimers. Analysis by cross-linking and mutagenesis of beta gamma

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide binding proteins (G proteins) are made up of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits, the last two forming a very tight complex. Stimulation of cell surface receptors promotes dissociation of alpha from the beta gamma dimer, which, in turn, allows both components to interact with intracellular enzymes or ion channels and modulate their activity. At present, little is known about the conformation of the beta gamma dimer or about the areas of beta gamma that interact with alpha. Direct information on the orientation of protein surfaces can be obtained from the analysis of chemically cross-linked products. Previous work in this laboratory showed that 1,6-bismaleimidohexane, which reacts with cysteine residues, specifically cross-links alpha to beta and beta to gamma (Yi, F., Denker, B. M., and Neer, E. J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 3900-3906). To identify the residues in beta and gamma involved in cross-linking to each other or to alpha, we have mutated the cysteines in beta 1, gamma 2, and gamma 3 and analyzed the mutated proteins by in vitro translation in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate. All the mutants were able to form beta gamma dimers that could interact with the alpha subunit. We found that 1,6-bismaleimidohexane can cross-link beta 1 to gamma 3 but not to gamma 2. The cross-link goes from Cys25 in beta 1 to Cys30 in gamma 3. This cysteine is absent from any of the other known gamma isoforms and therefore confers a distinctive property to gamma 3. The beta subunit in the beta 1 gamma 2 dimer can be cross-linked to an unidentified protein in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate, generating a product slightly larger than cross-linked beta 1 gamma 3. The beta subunit can also be cross-linked to alpha, giving rise to two products on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, both of which were previously shown to be formed by cross-linking beta to Cys215 in alpha o (Thomas, T. C., Schmidt, C. J., and Neer, E. J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 10295-10299). Mutation of Cys204 in beta 1 abolished one of these two products, whereas mutation of Cys271 abolished the other. Because both alpha-beta cross-linked products are formed in approximately equal amounts, Cys204 and Cys271 in beta are equally accessible from Cys215 in alpha o. Our findings begin to define intersubunit surfaces, and they pose structural constraints upon any model of the beta gamma dimer.

The structure of the G protein heterotrimer Gi alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2

The crystallographic structure of the G protein heterotrimer Gi alpha 1(GDP)beta 1 gamma 2 (at 2.3 A) reveals two nonoverlapping regions of contact between alpha and beta, an extended interface between beta and nearly all of gamma, and limited interaction of alpha with gamma. The major alpha/beta interface covers switch II of alpha, and GTP-induced rearrangement of switch II causes subunit dissociation during signaling. Alterations in GDP binding in the heterotrimer (compared with alpha-GDP) explain stabilization of the inactive conformation of alpha by beta gamma. Repeated WD motifs in beta form a circularized sevenfold beta propeller. The conserved cores of these motifs are a scaffold for display of their more variable linkers on the exterior face of each propeller blade.

Identification of a three-amino-acid region in G protein gamma 1 as a determinant of selective beta gamma heterodimerization

Guanine-nucleotide-binding protein beta and gamma subunits belong to large protein families encompassing at least five and ten members, respectively, from mammalian cells. The formation of stable beta gamma heterodimers is a selective process determined by the primary sequences of both the beta and gamma subunit. For example, gamma 2 dimerizes with both beta 1 and beta 2, gamma 1 with beta 1, but not with beta 2. To identify the structural elements of gamma subunits relevant to the selectivity of beta gamma dimerization, we have used the baculovirus-insect cell-expression system to produce chimeric beta and gamma subunits and have studied their dimerization using an assay based on the ability of isoprenylation-resistant gamma subunit mutants to draw beta subunits into the cytosol and including sucrose density gradient analysis of soluble recombinant beta gamma dimers. The results show that replacement of three consecutive residues of gamma 1, Cys36-Cys37-Glu38, by the corresponding residues of gamma 2, Ala33-Ala34-Ala35, suffices to render the mutant gamma 1 subunit capable of forming heterodimers with beta 2. The ability of mutant gamma 1 subunits to dimerize with beta 2 does not correlate with the probability of the mutated region to participate in coiled-coil structures. The tripeptide region identified here as a critical determinant of the selectivity of beta gamma dimer formation is distinct from, but partially overlaps with, the region reported by Lee et al. [Lee, C., Murakami, T. & Simonds, W. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 8779-8784]. The results of this study, therefore, not only extend the region of gamma 1 selecting between beta 1 and beta 2 to the five-residue sequence between Cys36 and Phe40, but also argue against the notion that the hydrophobic terminal residue of this motif represents the key determinant of selective beta gamma interaction.

Isolation of cDNA clones encoding eight different human G protein gamma subunits, including three novel forms designated the gamma 4, gamma 10, and gamma 11 subunits

With the growing awareness that the G protein beta and gamma subunits directly regulate the activities of various enzymes and ion channels, the importance of identifying and characterizing these subunits is underscored. In this paper, we report the isolation of cDNA clones encoding eight different human gamma subunits, including three novel forms designated gamma 4, gamma 10, and gamma 11. The predicted protein sequence of gamma 4 shares the most identity (60-77%) with gamma 2, gamma 3, and gamma 7 and the least identity (38%) with gamma 1. The gamma 4 is modified by a geranylgeranyl group and is capable of interacting with both beta 1 and beta 2 but not with beta 3. The predicted protein sequence of gamma 10 shows only modest to low identity (35-53%) with the other known gamma subunits, with most of the differences concentrated in the N-terminal region, suggesting gamma 10 may interact with a unique subclass of alpha. The gamma 10 is modified by a geranylgeranyl group and is capable of interacting with beta 1 and beta 2 but not with beta 3. Finally, the predicted protein sequence of gamma 11 shows the most identity to gamma 1 (76% identity) and the least identity to the other known gamma (33-44%). Unlike most of the other known gamma subunits, gamma 11 is modified by a farnesyl group and is not capable of interacting with beta 2. The close resemblance of gamma 11 to gamma 1 raises intriguing questions regarding its function since the mRNA for gamma 11 is abundantly expressed in all tissues tested except for brain, whereas the mRNA for gamma 1 is expressed only in the retina where the protein functions in phototransduction.

The G protein gamma subunit. Requirements for dimerization with beta subunits

Guanine nucleotide-binding protein beta and gamma subunits form a tightly bound complex that can only be separated by denaturation. Assembly of beta and gamma subunits is a complicated process. The beta 1 and gamma 2 subunits can be synthesized in vitro in rabbit reticulocyte lysate and then assembled into dimers, but beta 1 cannot form beta gamma dimers when synthesized in a wheat germ extract. In contrast, gamma 2 translated in either system can dimerize with beta 1, suggesting that dimerization-competent gamma 2 can be synthesized without the aid of specific chaperonins or other cofactors. Dimerization-competent gamma 2 in solution forms an asymmetric particle with a Stokes radius of about 21 +/- 0.4 A (n = 4), s20,w of 0.9 S (range 0.8-1.0 S, n = 2), and frictional ratio of 1.57 (assuming no hydration). To define the part of gamma 2 that is needed for native beta gamma dimer formation, a series of N- and C-terminal truncations were generated, synthesized in vitro, and incubated with beta 1. Dimerization was assessed by stabilization of beta 1 to tryptic proteolysis. Truncation of up to 13 amino acids at the C terminus did not affect dimerization with beta 1, whereas removal of 27 amino acids prevented it. Therefore, a region between residues 45 and 59 of gamma 2 is important for dimerization. Truncation of 15 amino acids from the N terminus greatly diminished the formation of beta gamma dimers, while removal of 25 amino acids entirely blocked it. Thus, another region important for forming native beta gamma is near the N terminus. Extension of the N terminus by 12 amino acids that include the influenza virus hemagglutinin epitope did not prevent beta gamma dimerization. Furthermore, in intact 35S-labeled COS cells, epitope-tagged gamma 2 coimmunoprecipitates with beta and alpha subunits. The N-terminal epitope tag must lie at the surface of the heterotrimer since it prevents neither heterotrimer formation nor access of the antibody.

Identification of a discrete region of the G protein gamma subunit conferring selectivity in beta gamma complex formation

The identification of multiple G protein beta and gamma subunit subtypes suggests a potential diversity of beta gamma heterodimers, which may contribute to the specificity of signal transduction between receptors and effectors. The assembly of beta and gamma subtypes is selective. For example, gamma 1 can assemble with beta 1 but not with beta 2, whereas gamma 2 assembles with both beta isoforms. To identify the structural features of the beta and gamma subunits governing selectivity in heterodimer assembly, a series of nonisoprenylated chimeras of gamma 1 and gamma 2 was constructed, and their interaction with beta 1 and beta 2 was assessed by their ability to direct beta expression to the cytosol in cotransfected COS cells. All of the gamma 1/gamma 2 chimeras were capable of interacting with beta 1 as judged by the cotransfection assay. Chimeras containing gamma 2 sequence near the middle of the molecule between two conserved sequence motifs were capable of interacting as well with beta 2. Among 12 divergent residues in this region, it was found that replacement of three consecutive amino acids in gamma 1, Glu-Glu-Phe (residues 38-40), with the three corresponding amino acids of gamma 2, Ala-Asp-Leu (residues 35-37), conferred the ability to assemble with beta 2. The reciprocal chimera containing Glu-Glu-Phe in the context of gamma 2 failed to assemble with beta 2. The last residue of this triplet is occupied by a leucine in all known mammalian gamma subunits except gamma 1 and appears to be a key determinant of the ability of a gamma subunit to assemble with beta 2. This locus maps to a region of predicted alpha-helical structure in the gamma subunit, likely to represent a point of physical contact with the beta subunit.