Administration of budesonide once daily by means of turbuhaler to subjects with stable asthma

Effect of common comparators in indirect comparison analysis of the effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma

Purpose

Indirect comparison (IC) and direct comparison (DC) of four inhaled corticosteroid (CS) treatments for asthma were conducted, and the factors that may influence the results of IC were investigated. Among those factors, we focused on the effect of common comparator selection in the treatment of asthma, where little control group bias or placebo effect is expected.

Method

IC and DC were conducted using the change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1(L)) as an outcome parameter. Differences between inhaled CS were evaluated to compare the results of IC and DC. As a common comparator for IC, placebo (PLB) or mometasone (MOM) was selected. Whether the results of IC are affected by the selection of a common comparator and whether the results of IC and DC are consistent were examined.

Results

23 articles were identified by a literature search. Our results showed that ICs yielded results similar to DCs in the change from baseline of FEV1(L). No statistically significant difference was observed in inconsistency analysis between ICs and DCs. It was clinically and statistically confirmed that ICs with PLB and those with MOM did not differ in terms of the results of FEV1(L) analysis in this dataset.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that ICs among inhaled CS can deliver results consistent with those of DCs when using the change from baseline in FEV1(L) as an outcome parameter in asthma patients. It was also shown that using an active comparator has similar results if there is no effect of control group bias. It should be emphasized that the investigation of control group bias is a key factor in conducting relevant ICs so that an appropriate common comparator can be selected.

Placebo effect model in asthma clinical studies: longitudinal meta-analysis of forced expiratory volume in 1 second

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to describe the time course of the placebo effect in asthma and quantitatively investigate the affective factors of the placebo effect for the placebo response simulation during the asthma clinical study design.

METHODS

We conducted a systemic search of public data sources for the study-level forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) to build the placebo effect model for studies by oral or inhaled administrations simultaneously. The administration routes, types of inhalation device, mean patient age, mean male proportion, baseline FEV(1), disease severity, year of publication, inhaled corticosteroid status during the treatment, and dropout rate were tested as covariates.

RESULTS

There are 34 literature sources containing 178 mean values for FEV(1) presenting the individual observations from about 3,703 patients. The exponential models adequately described the time course of placebo effect with the typical value of the maximum placebo effect (P(max)) of 0.060 L. Dropout rate incorporated in the residual error model and the disease severity (mild to moderate and moderate to severe) at baseline were covariates that remained in the final model.

CONCLUSIONS

The placebo effect is adequately described by an exponential model over time. By incorporating the dropout rate in the residual error model, the estimation precision was improved. The model could predict the placebo response profile in mild to severe asthmatic patients for the asthma clinical study design and could also be a structure model of the placebo effect for the pure drug effect evaluation in the asthma clinical trials.

Increasing adherence to inhaled steroid therapy among schoolchildren: randomized, controlled trial of school-based supervised asthma therapy

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the effectiveness of school-based supervised asthma therapy in improving asthma control. The primary hypothesis was that the supervised-therapy group would have a smaller proportion of children experiencing an episode of poor asthma control each month, compared with those in the usual-care group.

METHODS

Children were eligible if they had physician-diagnosed persistent asthma, the need for daily controller medication, and the ability to use a dry-powder inhaler and a peak flowmeter. The trial used a 2-group, randomized, longitudinal design with a 15-month follow-up period. A total of 290 children from 36 schools were assigned randomly to either school-based, supervised therapy or usual care. Ninety-one percent of the children were black, and 57% were male. The mean age was 11 years (SD: 2.1 years). An episode of poor asthma control was defined as > or =1 of the following each month: (1) an absence from school attributable to respiratory illness/asthma; (2) average use of rescue medication >2 times per week (not including preexercise treatment); or (3) > or =1 red or yellow peak flowmeter reading.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty children completed the study. There were no differences in the likelihood of an episode of poor asthma control between the baseline period and the follow-up period for the usual-care group. For the supervised-therapy group, however, the odds of experiencing an episode of poor asthma control during the baseline period were 1.57 times the odds of experiencing an episode of poor asthma control during the follow-up period. Generalized estimating equation modeling revealed a marginally significant intervention-time period interaction, indicating that children in the supervised-therapy group showed greater improvement in asthma control.

CONCLUSIONS

Supervised asthma therapy improves asthma control. Clinicians who have pediatric patients with asthma with poor outcomes that may be attributable to nonadherence should consider supervised therapy.

Relative systemic availability of budesonide in patients with asthma after inhalation from two dry powder inhalers

BACKGROUND

To improve dosing consistency and product features, budesonide inhalation powder delivered via a dry powder inhaler (DPI) (DPI-A 200 microg) was redesigned to include lactose, a newly shaped mouthpiece, and a new dose indicator (DPI-B). Budesonide DPI-B is available in two strengths (90 microg, 180 microg).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the relative rate and extent of the systemic availability of budesonide inhaled via DPI-A and DPI-B and test for systemic absorption bioequivalence.

METHODS

Adults (n = 37) with asthma as defined by the American Thoracic Society were randomized in an open-label, crossover, single-center, single-dose study to budesonide DPI-A 200 microg x 4 inhalations, budesonide DPI-B 180 microg x 4 inhalations, or budesonide DPI-B 90 microg x 8 inhalations, on 3 days, each separated by a washout period of >or= 5 days. Plasma samples were collected immediately before and up to 12 h after dosing. Primary pharmacokinetic variables were area under the drug plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)); plasma concentration at 12 h (C(12h)) and time to maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) were secondary variables. Treatments were considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for their AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) ratios fell between 80 and 125%. Adverse events were collected.

RESULTS

The 90% CIs for the ratios of AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) for budesonide DPI-A 200 microg and DPI-B 180 microg and for both budesonide DPI-B strengths fell between 80% and 125% (AUC(0-infinity): budesonide DPI-B 180 microg x 4/DPI-A 200 microg x 4: 96.3% [90% CI: 90.9, 102.1]; budesonide DPI-B 180 microg x 4/DPI-B 90 microg x 8: 92.2% [90% CI: 87.0, 97.7]; C(max): (budesonide DPI-B 180 microg x 4/DPI-A 200 microg x 4: 100.4% [95% CI: 92.1, 109.4]; budesonide DPI-B 180 microg x 4/DPI-B 90 microg x 8: 94.4% [90% CI: 86.6, 102.9]). No differences in C(12h) and T(max) were found between treatments. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide DPI-A 200 mug and DPI-B 180 mug have systemic absorption bioequivalence, and DPI-B 90 microg and 180 microg are dose-strength equivalent when administered at the same dose. These results may not be generalized to all patients with asthma, as this analysis included only patients with mild-to-moderate asthma aged >or= 19 years.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of budesonide delivered via two dry powder inhalers

BACKGROUND

The dry powder inhaler (DPI) device for budesonide inhalation powder 200 microg (DPI-A) was redesigned to improve dosing consistency and provide new features (budesonide inhalation powder 90 microg and 180 microg; DPI-B).

OBJECTIVE

Two multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, 12-week studies compared the efficacy and safety of budesonide delivered via each DPI versus placebo, and the systemic exposure of budesonide from each device.

METHODS

Asthmatic adults with mild-to-moderate asthma (N = 621) and patients 6-17 years with mild asthma (N = 516) received budesonide DPI-B 360 microg or DPI-A 400 microg twice-daily (total daily dose 720 microg or 800 microg), budesonide DPI-B 180 microg or DPI-A 200 microg once daily (total daily dose 180 microg or 200 microg), or matching placebo. Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and secondary variables (asthma symptoms, beta(2)-adrenergic agonist use, peak expiratory flow [PEF], and withdrawals due to worsening asthma) versus placebo were measured.

RESULTS

In both studies, FEV(1) significantly (p < 0.05) improved for all active treatments versus placebo except once-daily budesonide DPI-B 180 mug in adults. In the adult study, significantly (p < 0.05) greater improvements in all secondary variables occurred with all active treatments versus placebo. In the pediatric/adolescent study, improvements in AM/PM PEF were significantly (p <or= 0.011) greater with twice-daily budesonide DPI-B 360 microg versus placebo. Numerically fewer patients in all active-treatment groups withdrew due to worsening asthma versus placebo. Adverse event profiles were similar among groups. In the pediatric/adolescent study, no significant differences in mean 24-h urine cortisol or cortisol: creatinine ratio assessments were observed between the active treatment groups and the placebo group. Although pharmacokinetic variables were generally similar across subgroups in the adult (n = 77) and pediatric/adolescent (n = 32) studies, pairwise treatment comparisons of twice-daily budesonide DPI-B 360 microg versus DPI-A 400 microg and once-daily budesonide DPI-B 180 microg versus DPI-A 200 microg showed large variability for the area under the drug plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval and the maximum detected drug plasma concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of budesonide DPI-A and DPI-B versus placebo were demonstrated across the low to medium inhaled corticosteroid dose range in children >or= 6 years with very mild asthma and adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. The study is limited by the evaluation of only two doses for each product in both studies. Additionally, the studies were not designed to test equivalence or noninferiority between the active products. Pharmacokinetic characterization was limited because of the small sample sizes.

Once-daily inhaled glucocorticosteroid administration in controlled asthma patients

BACKGROUND

Inhaled glucocorticosteroids are usually administered in two equal daily doses. To simplify the method of treatment, once-daily administration has been used. However, little information regarding whether once-daily treatment can sufficiently control airway inflammation is available. We aimed to investigate whether once-daily administration of inhaled glucocorticosteroids can control airway inflammation.

METHODS

Twenty-four well-controlled asthma patients were enrolled in a randomized crossover trial to compare the efficacies of once-daily and twice-daily administration of inhaled glucocorticosteroids. Initially, the patients were randomly assigned to receive either once-daily or twice-daily administration for 16 weeks. After an 8-week washout period, patients who originally received twice-daily administration were assigned to once-daily administration for 16 weeks and vice versa. We assessed the changes in the forced expiratory volume in 1s, morning and evening peak expiratory flows, asthma symptoms, health-related quality of life and fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels.

RESULTS

Patients with once-daily administration showed the same level of clinical control and lung functions as patients receiving twice-daily administration. There was no difference in the fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels between the beginning and end of the twice-daily treatment (35.69 and 33.23ppb, respectively). In contrast, the fractional exhaled nitric oxide level was significantly higher at the end of the once-daily treatment (33.87 and 39.38ppb, respectively, p< 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although once-daily administration is sufficient for clinical control of asthma, it might not control airway inflammation sufficiently.

Design of the supervised asthma therapy study: implementing an adherence intervention in urban elementary schools

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids, when properly used, can offer considerable protection against asthma-related morbidity. However, adherence to prescribed inhaled steroids among children is low and rates differ markedly by population. The lowest rates of adherence and highest rates of morbidity are among inner-city and low income populations.

PURPOSE

To describe the design of a school-based clinical trial in a largely minority population that is examining the efficacy of a school-based intervention intended to increase adherence to daily inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

The supervised asthma therapy study is a two-group randomized longitudinal trial. Children were randomly assigned to either school-based supervised asthma therapy or parent supervised asthma therapy. Children were followed longitudinally for 15 months. The primary outcome of the study is the time-averaged difference between the two groups in the percentage of children experiencing at least one asthma exacerbation each month.

RESULTS

A web-based data collection system was designed to capture data at school. A total of 295 students, recruited from community and school sites, who attended one of 36 urban elementary schools enrolled in the study and 290 were randomized. The average age of the students was 10.0 years (sd=2.1), 91% were African American, 8% were white, and 1% were of other racial groups. 57% of students were male. The study has been recently completed and results are being analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention studies requiring daily medication supervision and daily data collection can be successfully conducted within the elementary school environment.

Once-daily dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol and once-daily budesonide in adults with mild to moderate asthma

Adherence to maintenance therapy is often poor in patients with asthma. Simplifying dosing regimens has the potential to improve both adherence and asthma-related morbidity. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 617 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1] 78.5% predicted) who were not optimally controlled on inhaled corticosteroids (200-500 microg/day) were randomized to once-daily budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, 2 inhalations in the evening), twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, 1 inhalation), or a corresponding dose of budesonide once-daily (200 microg, 1 inhalation in the evening). All patients received budesonide (100 microg twice daily) during a 2-week run-in. Changes in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) were similar for od budesonide/formoterol (23.4 l/min) and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (24.1 l/min), and both were greater than with budesonide (5.5 l/min; both P<0.001). Evening PEF, symptom-free days, reliever-free days, and asthma control days were improved with budesonide/formoterol therapy vs. budesonide (P<0.05 vs. budesonide for all variables). All treatments were well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol administered once daily in the evening is a convenient treatment regimen that is as effective in improving asthma control as twice-daily dosing in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma.

Combination inhalers containing inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists: improved clinical efficacy and dosing options in patients with asthma

Combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) is a recognized treatment for adults with moderate to severe asthma. The introduction of inhalers containing both an ICS and a LABA simplifies treatment and improves asthma control. This review discusses clinical evidence that budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone are effective and well tolerated in asthma treatment. Moreover, the rapid onset of effect and long duration of action of budesonide and formoterol make once-daily dosing, adjustable maintenance dosing, and the novel treatment strategy of using budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and as needed for symptom relief, valuable treatment options for patients with asthma.

Comparative efficacy of once-daily ciclesonide and budesonide in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily ciclesonide, a new-generation, on-site-activated, inhaled corticosteroid, with once-daily budesonide in persistent asthma.

METHODS

Eligible patients requiring budesonide or equivalent 320-640 microg (ex-mouthpiece, equivalent to 400-800 microg; Turbohalertrade mark) daily entered a 2-week baseline, and then a 2- to 4-week pretreatment period (budesonide 1280 microg/day; ex-mouthpiece, equivalent to 1600 microg/day). Patients with an increase in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) of 7% or 0.15 L were randomised to ciclesonide 320 microg (ex-actuator, equivalent to 400 microg ex-valve) via a hydrofluoroalkane-metered dose inhaler (HFA-MDI) without a spacer or budesonide 320 microg once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. Change in FEV1 was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

In all, 359 patients were randomised. The FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) decreased by 0.18 and 0.12L, respectively, in the ciclesonide group, and by 0.23 and 0.21L in the budesonide group. For FEV1, ciclesonide was noninferior and numerically superior to budesonide. For FVC, ciclesonide was statistically superior to budesonide (P=0.010). Asthma symptom scores were comparable; the median percentage of symptom-free days was significantly higher for ciclesonide (43.6%) versus budesonide (25.8%) (P=0.017). Rescue medication use decreased significantly only for ciclesonide patients (P=0.009). Frequency of adverse events was low in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Ciclesonide 320 microg once daily by HFA-MDI without a spacer was at least as effective as budesonide 320 microg once daily in persistent asthma.

Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate administered once-daily in the evening in patients with persistent asthma dependent on inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Once-daily dosing with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) may simplify asthma management and improve patient compliance. Since asthma is frequently worse at night, evening dosing appears to be a more obvious choice to accommodate the chronobiology of asthma than morning dosing.

OBJECTIVE

The primary study objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate (MF) dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) 400 microg qd PM (one 400 microg inhalation) with placebo for the treatment of asthma in patients previously dependent on twice a day (bid, bis in die) ICS therapy. We also compared different regimens of MF-DPI with each other and with placebo.

METHODS

This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated lung function and asthma symptoms in 400 subjects with persistent asthma randomized to MF-DPI 200 microg qd (once a day, quaque die) PM, 400 microg qd PM as one inhalation from a 400 microg device, 400 microg qd PM as two inhalations from a 200 microg device, 200 microg twice daily (bid), or placebo. Evening doses were to be taken in the late afternoon or early evening, preferably before dinner time.

RESULTS

Mean changes from baseline at endpoint in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s) were similar for MF-DPI 400 microg qd PM (one inhalation; 0.41 L), MF-DPI 400 microg qd PM (2 inhalations; 0.49 L), MF-DPI 200 microg qd PM (0.41 L), and MF-DPI 200 microg bid (0.51 L); and all were significantly improved compared with placebo (0.16 L; p < 0.001). Secondary efficacy variables, including nocturnal awakenings and use of rescue albuterol, were also significantly improved with MF-DPI treatment compared with placebo. All treatments were generally safe and well tolerated, with adverse events of mild to moderate severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily evening dosing of MF-DPI at doses of 400 and 200 microg restored lung function and improved nocturnal and daytime symptom control in subjects with asthma previously dependent on bid ICS therapy. Comparable effectiveness of a total daily dose of 400 microg was demonstrated between once daily in the evening and twice-daily administration. The results also confirm the effectiveness of MF-DPI 200 microg qd PM, the lowest dose studied.

Combination therapy of long-acting beta agonists and inhaled corticosteroids in the management of chronic asthma

Both the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Expert Panel guidelines recommend combination treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and inhaled long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) for patients whose asthma is not adequately controlled by low doses of ICSs alone. Not only is this combination more effective than the combination of either theophylline or leukotriene modifiers with ICSs, there is suggestive evidence that the results with LABAs and ICSs may be more than additive. Through the effect of each one on the receptor for the other, they may have a synergistic action. This marked effectiveness of the combination, particularly when combined in the same device, has led to new objectives and novel applications. Therefore, for the first time, it appears that the Goals of Asthma Therapy, as outlined in the guidelines, are achievable for many patients with asthma. Also, at least for combination therapies including formoterol, adjustable dosing and perhaps even use as a rescue as well as a maintenance therapy may be possible.

Budesonide once versus twice-daily administration: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of budesonide administered once daily compared to twice daily in asthma.

METHODOLOGY

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing budesonide administered once versus twice a day that presented data on at least one clinical outcome measure was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies, with 1922 children and adults with asthma, met the inclusion criteria. These studies were performed predominantly with mild to moderate asthmatic patients, using doses of budesonide ranging from 200 to 800 microg per day. There was no significant difference between daily dosing once or twice for all the clinical outcome variables, including withdrawals due to asthma, for which the odds ratio was 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.52).

CONCLUSIONS

In mild to moderate asthma a once-daily budesonide regimen has a similar efficacy to a twice-daily regimen in doses up to 800 microg per day. A once-daily regimen has potential advantages in terms of patient compliance and satisfaction, when used in clinical practice.

Once-daily inhaled budesonide for the treatment of asthma: clinical evidence and pharmacokinetic explanation

BACKGROUND

Budesonide, a widely used inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with a favorable therapeutic ratio, is available via a dry powder inhaler (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) and as a suspension for nebulization (Pulmicort Respules).

METHODS

MEDLINE and an AstraZeneca database were searched to identify relevant controlled clinical trials published between 1986 and 2002 using the key words budesonide OR inhaled corticosteroid, AND once daily.

RESULTS

Thirty-four controlled clinical studies involving once-daily administration of budesonide to asthmatic patients were identified. Excluding long-term studies, this review presents data from 23 controlled studies for 4466 adults or adolescents and 1532 children with asthma and demonstrates efficacy of budesonide in both corticosteroid-naïve patients and patients previously treated with ICS. Once-daily administration of budesonide achieves clinical efficacy comparable with that of twice-daily regimens in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma and is equally effective when given in the morning or evening. Once-daily administration simplifies treatment regimens and may improve patient compliance. The tolerability profiles of budesonide once-daily via Turbuhaler or as budesonide inhalation suspension are good and comparable with those for twice-daily dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily budesonide is effective and well tolerated as initial treatment for adults and children with mild asthma and as maintenance therapy in patients with more severe asthma once asthma control has been achieved.

The role of budesonide in adults and children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

Asthma, a chronic and potentially life-threatening disease of the airways, affects patients of all ages. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the recommended first-line therapy for patients with persistent asthma. To review the clinical efficacy and tolerability data available on budesonide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma, a MEDLINE database search was performed for 1996-2003 using the following key words: budesonide, inhaled corticosteroid, efficacy, safety, systemic. When administered once or twice daily, budesonide effectively controls asthma in children, adolescents, and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. Budesonide can be delivered effectively via a dry powder inhaler (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) in patients aged > or = 6 years or as an inhalation suspension (Pulmicort Respules) in children as young as 12 months. With over 20 years' clinical exposure, budesonide has been demonstrated to be well tolerated in the treatment of chronic asthma in patients as young as 12 months. Specifically, at doses required to treat mild or moderate persistent asthma, budesonide does not affect hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, bone mineral density, cataract formation, or final adult height. As Pulmicort Turbuhaler, budesonide is the only ICS to achieve a Food and Drug Administration pregnancy category B rating. Early intervention with budesonide is recommended in asthma management: maximum benefit from therapy is reported in patients treated within 2 years of disease recognition. Budesonide is effective and well tolerated in the control of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in patients aged 12 months and older. There is no evidence for variation in efficacy in population subgroups.

Once-daily inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the mainstay of asthma therapy. Although compliance to this type of medication is often suboptimal and once-daily dosing can help to improve adherence to the treatment, the clinical implications of such a mode of administration should be determined.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review summarizes the recent studies on comparative efficacy of once-versus twice-daily administration of ICS, in light of previous reports.

SUMMARY

Although twice-daily administration of ICS is often better to optimize asthma parameters, in many patients, asthma can be sufficiently controlled by a once-daily regimen of most ICS. An increased frequency of dosing seems preferable if asthma becomes uncontrolled or is severe, although this requires further study. A therapeutic trial should, however, be done to ensure that asthma control is adequate. Comparative long-term effects of such a strategy on inflammatory and remodeling parameters remain to be determined, as does the proportion of patients who can adequately control their asthma with once-daily administration of the various ICS available.

The role of intracellular esterification in budesonide once-daily dosing and airway selectivity

BACKGROUND

Since their introduction in the 1970s, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) have been used to control airway inflammation associated with asthma. Budesonide is one of the ICSs recommended as first-line therapy for mild to moderate persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the esterification of budesonide and how it results in prolonged, location-specific retention of drug in the airways, allowing once-daily dosing.

RESULTS

Studies conducted over the past decade have shown that budesonide forms reversible fatty acid esters within the cells of airway tissue, resulting in the formation of an intracellular depot pool of inactive drug. As the intracellular concentration of free budesonide decreases, these budesonide esters are hydrolyzed back to their active state. This process increases budesonide's retention in the airways, prolongs its duration of action, and lowers the risk of systemic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

By extending budesonide's local anti-inflammatory effect and increasing its airway selectivity, the esterification process appears to contribute to the drug's efficacy, particularly during once-daily administration. Reducing the number of required daily inhalations may increase patient compliance with asthma therapy, although this remains to be evaluated.

Preclinical properties of budesonide: translation to the clinical setting

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) nearly 30 years ago, the management of asthma has been transformed. It is now understood that asthma is primarily a disease of chronic inflammation, even in its milder forms, and that to delay treatment may lead to deterioration in lung function. International treatment guidelines for asthma recommend early intervention with a potent ICS, with the greatest benefit observed when treatment is started within 2 years of the onset of symptoms. Each of the currently available ICSs has distinct physical and pharmacokinetic properties and is delivered via different devices.

OBJECTIVE

This article brings together the findings and concepts presented in this supplement. It provides an overview of budesonide's predicted clinical efficacy and tolerability in patients with asthma based on its physical properties and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide's physical properties and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles help predict its clinical efficacy and tolerability when used as early intervention in asthma. Study results indicate that lung deposition of budesonide is increased by delivery via dry-powder inhaler, enhancing the drug's efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed mild persistent asthma. The preclinical, clinical, and safety data support budesonide's predicted performance in the clinical setting.

Expected characteristics of an ideal, all-purpose inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are well established as the mainstay of asthma therapy. A number of ICSs are now available, each with unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles and physical characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the key characteristics of an ideal ICS and uses examples of existing agents to indicate the extent to which therapies reach these goals.

RESULTS

Improved therapeutic efficacy in an ICS may be offset by an increase in systemic effects. The ideal characteristics of an ICS include optimal clinical efficacy and no toxicity in combination with a convenient and easy-to-use inhaler device. To achieve this optimal profile, an ICS should have the following: a high affinity for and potency at the glucocorticoid receptor; prolonged retention in the lung; minimal or no oral bioavailability (ie, high first-pass inactivation); and rapid, complete systemic inactivation. The formulation and type of inhaler device are also important considerations: they should provide deposition in the lung in both large and small airways with no absorption effects outside the lung. ICSs should be evaluated for administration with several different delivery devices to ensure ease of use by patients of all ages with different asthma severities. An ICS that can be administered QD is also likely to improve patient adherence by simplifying the treatment regimen.

CONCLUSION

An ideal ICS should have a large therapeutic margin, be used safely and effectively for long periods, be administered QD, be suitable for use in patients of all ages and asthma severities, and offer both control and prevention of asthma symptoms and exacerbations.

Review of the unique properties of budesonide

BACKGROUND

The aim of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy for asthma is to attain high therapeutic activity in the airways while keeping the risk of systemic adverse effects relatively low. However, the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of various ICSs affect this ratio, thereby influencing their ability to fulfill the requirements of an ideal agent.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the physical and pharmacokinetic properties of budesonide, outlining how they, safety data, and use of different inhalation devices enable budesonide to meet many of the clinical requirements of an ideal ICS for the treatment of asthma.

RESULTS

ICS efficacy is influenced by lipophilicity, lung deposition, and retention in airway tissue, whereas the rate of elimination determines systemic activity. Budesonide is retained in the airways to a greater extent than other ICSs because of an esterification process that increases its lipophilicity. The prolonged retention of budesonide in the airways may contribute to its efficacy when administered QD. In addition to a pressurized metered-dose inhaler, budesonide is available as a dry-powder inhaler and in nebulized form, which can be used by asthma patients aged > or =6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

When combined with delivery devices suitable for a spectrum of patient groups, the physical and pharmacokinetic properties of budesonide lend it many of the characteristics of an ideal ICS, including favorable efficacy and tolerability profiles.

Once-daily budesonide inhalation powder (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) improves health-related quality of life in adults previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids

In the treatment of asthma, the conventional measures used to monitor a patient's progress and health status do not address the impact of functional impairments associated with the disease that may affect the patient's daily life. Unlike those measures, health-related quality of life (HRQL) reflects the physical, psychological, and social difficulties a patient perceives on a day-to-day basis. This study was conducted to determine the effects of once-daily budesonide inhalation powder via the Pulmicort Turbuhaler on the HRQL in adult patients with asthma previously treated with other inhaled corticosteroids. A total of 184 patients 18 to 70 years of age who previously received inhaled corticosteroids were enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients were randomly assigned to budesonide 400 microg once daily or to placebo for 12 weeks. Each patient's HRQL was assessed at randomization and at weeks 4 and 12 with the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). More patients receiving budesonide than those receiving placebo reported statistically significant (P < or = .05) improvements in HRQL at weeks 4 and 12. With the exception of the domain pertaining to exposure to environmental stimuli, differences from placebo in overall AQLQ scores and individual domain scores were clinically important (> or = 0.5 units). In addition, 2.4 patients needed to be treated with once-daily budesonide for 1 patient to demonstrate clinically important improvement. Budesonide 400 microg administered once daily via the Pulmicort Turbuhaler provides statistically significant and clinically important HRQL benefit in adult patients with asthma previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

Budesonide/formoterol for the treatment of asthma

Budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort), AstraZeneca plc) is a novel treatment for asthma, combining an inhaled corticosteroid - budesonide, and a long-acting beta(2)-agonist - formoterol, in a single inhaler, the Turbuhaler. Randomised, clinical studies in patients with asthma have demonstrated that budesonide/formoterol is more effective than the inhaled corticosteroids, budesonide and fluticasone alone, and at least as effective as both monocomponents in separate inhalers. Results from clinical studies suggest a synergistic effect when both drugs are administered via one inhaler, although the mechanisms for this are not fully understood. Budesonide/formoterol has a rapid onset of effect, apparent within 1 min of treatment, which is largely because of the properties of formoterol. Once- and twice-daily dosing with budesonide/formoterol are effective treatment options for patients with mild or moderate asthma. Studies have also shown that the beneficial safety profiles and dose relationships of both budesonide and formoterol allow dose adjustments of budesonide/formoterol in response to variations in the patient's asthma. Findings from the budesonide/formoterol adjustable maintenance dosing programme, comparing fixed and adjustable, symptom-guided dosing regimens, demonstrate that patients achieve equally good asthma control with adjustable dosing (from one inhalation twice-daily to more than four inhalations twice-daily), but at a significantly lower overall drug load. Adverse events, mainly expected inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)agonist class effects, have been few in number and mild in nature. In addition, there is growing evidence that budesonide/formoterol is also effective in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The future for treatment with budesonide/formoterol may include as-needed administration in addition to maintenance therapy.

Role of budesonide as maintenance therapy for children with asthma

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways. Inhaled corticosteroids are recognized as the preferred long-term control medication for persistent asthma based on their anti-inflammatory properties and significant evidence of efficacy. Inhaled budesonide is the most carefully characterized inhaled corticosteroid for childhood asthma. It is available for administration in children down to six months of age and to date has an excellent safety profile.

Fifty microg b.i.d. of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) are effective in stable asthmatics previously treated with a higher dose of FP

Twenty-seven subjects with moderate asthma at the time of diagnosis, well controlled under regular fluticasone propionate (FP) (250 microg b.i.d.) for 6 months at least, were randomized to receive in double-blind fashion: FP 125 microg b.i.d. (Group 1) or FP 50 microg b.i.d. (Group 2) or placebo (Group 3) for 3 months or until symptom recurrence. Daily symptom score and peak expiratory flow were monitored. At the beginning and at the end of the study subjects underwent methacholine challenge and sputum induction. Recurrence of symptoms occurred shortly after randomization in all subjects receiving placebo. None from Group 1 or 2 experienced symptom recurrence during the study. No significant difference in clinical and functional data, and in sputum eosinophil percentages was observed between the beginning and the end of the study in both Groups 1 and 2. Subjects from Group 3 showed a significant increase of sputum eosinophils (P<0.05) and a significant decrease in provocative dose of methacholine (P<0.05) when asthma symptoms recurred. Therefore, very low doses of FP (50 microg b.i.d.) are effective in maintaining for 3 months a good control of the disease in asthmatics already stable under high-dose fluticasone, considering both clinical and functional outcomes and markers of airway inflammation.

Inhaled corticosteroids (budesonide): the cornerstone of asthma therapy--what are the options?

The clinical value of corticosteroids in treating asthma has long been recognised. Major advances in the use of these drugs came with the introduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and the recognition that even mild asthma has an inflammatory component. ICS are now considered as first-line therapy in all asthma treatment guidelines. Over the past decade there has been clarification of the dose-response relationship with ICS and confirmation of the general long-term efficacy and safety of these drugs in both adults and children. Recent work has focused on simplifying dosing regimens and investigating flexibility of dosing. Moreover, ICS can be used in combination with other agents such as long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonists to provide effective asthma control in patients with persistent asthma not adequately controlled on ICS alone. Thus, ICS remain the cornerstone of modern asthma therapy.

Managing a variable disease

Asthma varies in severity over time; consequently, treatment regimens must be sufficiently flexible to be adjusted when necessary. At present, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the cornerstone of asthma therapy and optimal treatment strategies must consider total daily dose and dosing frequency. The dose responsiveness to ICS varies for different indices of asthma. Symptoms and lung function respond readily to low-dose ICS and the dose-response curve is relatively flat. In contrast, the prevention of asthma exacerbations displays a more pronounced dose-response relationship. In mild asthma, once-daily dosing with budesonide is as effective as twice-daily dosing. However, in moderate-to-severe asthma, four-times daily dosing is better than twice-daily dosing for obtaining maximal benefit with minimal side effects. A flexible treatment regimen, consisting of low-dose maintenance treatment combined with high dose and frequently dosed ICS at the earliest sign of an exacerbation, has been shown to be effective. This could be achieved using a single inhaler combination product if the beta(2)-agonist moiety allows for the same flexibility in dosing. Formoterol, with its wide dose range, rapid onset and long duration of effect, has the pharmacological features that permit this versatile, flexible dosing. As a result, Symbicort would seem to offer the flexibility required in a single inhaler for maintenance and reliever purposes in the management of this variable disease.

Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a routine hospital setting: feasibility and perceived value

BACKGROUND

Assessment of health-related quality of life is so far mainly used in specific research settings and not widely accepted in the routine care of patients. Lack of trust in accuracy and reliability and lack of knowledge concerning the questionnaires used, methods, terminology, are just some of the perceived barriers for a more widespread dissemination of these instruments into routine health care. The present study was undertaken in order to test the feasibility of a computerised system for collecting and analysing health-related quality of life in a routine clinical setting and to examine the thoughts and attitudes among physicians concerning the value of these measurements.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with chronic pulmonary lung disease were asked to assess their health-related quality of life with a computerised version of the SF-36 questionnaire before a regular the visit to a physician. The results were immediately available for the physician during the consultation for comparison of information given by the patients and the physician's evaluation of the patients overall health status. A focus group interview with the physicians was performed before and after the implementation of routine measurements of health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

The systematic assessment concept worked satisfactorily. All patients approached agreed to participate and completed the assessment on the touch screen computer. A weak correlation was found between patients' self-rated health and pulmonary function and between physicians' evaluation and pulmonary function. The physicians appreciated the SF-36 assessments and the value of the patients' perspective although only a few could pinpoint new clinical decisions based upon this new information.

CONCLUSION

Physicians' clinical evaluation and patients' self-rating of health status offer unique and important information that are complementary.

Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: common clinical quandaries

This narrative review provides evidence-based explanations to some of the common clinical concerns regarding inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids are the treatment of choice for a newly diagnosed asthmatic patient. Better results are obtained when treatment is initiated as soon as the diagnosis is made. Asthma control can be achieved and maintained in most patients with a low or moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroid administered in two daily doses. Longer duration of treatment provides more sustained benefits than treatment that is intermittent and for short periods of time. The clinical benefits can be observed within 24 hours of commencing treatment and may be more pronounced in patients with an eosinophilic bronchitis. Inhaled corticosteroids provide additional benefit when used in conjunction with prednisone in acute severe asthma. Low doses do not have clinically deleterious side effects on the bones, growth, eye, or hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal-axis. However, they do not normalize lung function and prevent structural changes in the airway wall in all asthmatic patients.

Once-daily budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler in adults with moderate persistent asthma

Patients with moderate persistent asthma (n = 523; mean FEV1 77.4%) not fully controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS; 400-1000 microg/day) were randomized to receive either once-daily budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, two inhalations); or twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, one inhalation); or budesonide (400 microg) once-daily for 12 weeks. Once-daily dosing was administered in the evening and twice-daily dosing was administered in the morning and evening. All patients received twice-daily budesonide (200 microg) during a 2-week run-in. Compared with budesonide alone, change in mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow was greater in the once-daily budesonide/formoterol group (27 and 171 min(-1), respectively; P < 0.001) and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol group (23 and 24 l min(-1), respectively; P < 0.001). Night awakenings, symptom-free days, reliever-use-free days and asthma-control days were all improved during once-daily budesonide/formoterol therapy vs. budesonide (P < or = 0.05). Similar improvements were also seen with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (P < or = 0.05). The risk of a mild exacerbation was reduced after once- and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol vs. budesonide (38% and 35%, respectively; P < 0.002). All treatments were well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol, once- or twice-daily, in a single inhaler improved asthma symptoms and exacerbations compared with budesonide. In the majority of patients with moderate persistent asthma requiring ICS and long-acting beta-agonists, once-daily formoterol/budesonide provided sustained efficacy over 24 h, similar to twice-daily dosing.

Budesonide Turbuhaler delivered once daily improves health-related quality of life and maintains improvements with a stepped-down dose in adults with mild to moderate asthma

BACKGROUND

Budesonide inhalation powder administered via Turbuhaler (budesonide Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE) is proven efficacious and safe in the treatment of mild to severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in adults with mild to moderate asthma.

METHODS

In this double-blind, parallel-group study, 309 asthmatic patients between 18 and 70 years of age were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with budesonide 200 or 400 microg or placebo for 6 weeks. Patients initially receiving 400 microg budesonide had their dose reduced to 200 microg (400/200-microg group), and patients receiving 200 microg (200/200-microg group) or placebo continued to receive their assigned doses for a 12-week maintenance phase. HRQL was evaluated using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire at randomization, week 6, and week 18.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, patients initially receiving 400 and 200 microg budesonide Turbuhaler demonstrated significantly greater HRQL scores at week 6 (P < or = 0.001 and P < or = 0.010, respectively) that were maintained at week 18 (P < or = 0.001). Clinically important (> or = 0.5 unit) improvement in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire overall at week 18 was demonstrated by 55% and 43% of patients in the 400/200-microg and 200/200-microg budesonide Turbuhaler groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild to moderate asthma, once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler 200 and 400 microg demonstrates statistically significant and clinically important improvements in HRQL that can be maintained with a low dose of 200 microg.

Efficacy of budesonide in inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients and patients with mild persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients with mild intermittent or mild persistent asthma represent 70% of asthma sufferers. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the mainstay of treatment for persistent asthma, although many of the early clinical studies of these drugs included only patients with moderate to severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the literature on the efficacy of budesonide in the treatment of mild persistent asthma, including newly diagnosed ICS-naive patients.

METHODS

Published data were identified by a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature from 1992 to 2002 using the terms budesonide plus efficacy or safety, both with and without the termsfluticasone or beclomethasone. An AstraZeneca reference database was also used to identify publications from the same period. Controlled, randomized studies that included patients with mild persistent asthma and early-treatment intervention were selected for inclusion.

RESULTS

Inhaled budesonide has been used for almost 20 years in the treatment and control of moderate to severe asthma. Studies involving patients with mild persistent asthma have demonstrated significant improvements in peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates (P < 0.01) and forced expiratory volume in I second (P < 0.016) values for adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients treated with budesonide compared with placebo. Budesonide therapy is effective when given once or twice daily via dry powder inhaler or nebulizer, even at a low starting dose (200 microg/d). No significant adverse events have been reported with budesonide within the dose range used to treat mild persistent asthma (200 to 400 microg/d). Significant improvements in PEF rates (P < 0.01) and significant reductions in the risk of exacerbations and the number of days with poorly controlled asthma have been reported for ICS-naive patients treated with budesonide compared with placebo (both P < 0.001). In the primary care setting, mild persistent asthma may be undertreated. Patients with mild persistent asthma benefit significantly from early treatment with budesonide (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of mild persistent asthma in adults and children, including many patients whose primary care physicians do not think they require daily ICS treatment.

Once-daily administration of budesonide Turbuhaler was as effective as twice-daily treatment in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 288 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma currently on inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCSs) were treated with budesonide Turbuhaler, 200 microg once every night (q.n.), 100 microg twice-daily (b.i.d.), or placebo b.i.d. After 12 weeks, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased in both groups treated with budesonide but decreased in placebo-treated patients. Symptom scores and bronchodilator use were significantly reduced in both groups receiving active treatment (p = 0.023-0.0001) compared with patients treated with placebo. There was no significant difference in outcome measurements between the two budesonide regimens. Thus, patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma receiving b.i.d. treatment with inhaled GCSs can usually be switched to budesonide Turbuhaler, 200 microg, q.n. without loss of asthma control.

A meta-analysis of the dose-response relationship of inhaled corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with mild to moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are commonly used in the treatment of persistent asthma, the relationship between dose and clinical response remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether ICS exhibit a dose-response relationship in the treatment of mild to moderate persistent asthma.

METHODS

This was a meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials concerning the relationship between ICS dose and response in asthma. Relevant studies were identified through a search of PubMed and MEDLINE for articles on asthma and ICS published between January 1996 and January 2001. The search was limited to publications classified as clinical trials that included the text words asthma and corticosteroids, glucocorticoids, beclomethasone, budesonide, fluticasone, flunisolide, mometasone, or triamcinolone acetonide. Five clinical measures were considered: morning peak expiratory flow rate (AM PEFR), evening PEFR (PM PEFR), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), beta-agonist use, and asthma symptom score (severity of symptoms on a given day, as evaluated by patients).

RESULTS

Forty-three studies were identified, of which 16 met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. These studies involved 4 agents: fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, budesonide, and mometasone furoate. A statistically significant dose response in AM PEFR was observed with fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and budesonide (respective 95% CIs, 4.9 to 11.5, 4.7 to 18.0, and 5.8 to 24.9). A statistically significant dose response to fluticasone propionate and triamcinolone acetonide was also observed in PM PEFR (95% CIs, 2.0 to 8.7 and 2.4 to 13.7) and asthma symptom score (95% CI, -0.069 to -0.002 and -0.60 to -0.10). In terms of FEV(1), the dose response was statistically significant only with budesonide (95% CI, 0.025 to 0.17). Dose-response relationships were not disproportionately driven by the highest doses, and the greatest effects on response were seen at doses below or at the low end of the recommended range, suggesting that use of high doses of ICS may contribute only marginally to efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-response relationships were not uniformly observed with all drugs or for all measures of response. Use of higher doses of ICS in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma does not appear to increase the efficacy of these drugs.

A novel approach to defining the relationship between lung function and symptom status in asthma

We present a novel approach to estimating functional relationships between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and asthma-related symptoms on a population-wide basis. We used asthma-related clinical trials that reported estimates of mean lung function (measured as FEV(1) percent predicted) and symptoms (symptom score or percentage of symptom days or nighttime awakenings). Using average baseline values from each study in weighted linear regression analyses, we found a negative association between lung function and symptom score (P < 0.001) and the percentage of nighttime awakenings (P = 0.18), but no association between lung function and symptom days. We also found consistent relationships between the mean changes in lung function and symptoms at follow-up within the studies. Functional relationships between FEV(1) percent predicted and asthma-related symptoms can be useful for inferring the effect on the symptoms of a population associated with overall improvements in lung function.

The inhaled Steroid Treatment as Regular Therapy in early asthma (START) study: rationale and design

Although the beneficial effects of treatment with inhaled steroids in asthma are widely accepted, the role of early intervention in patients with mild asthma remains unsettled. Conventional efficacy trials are often of short duration and involve highly selected patient populations that exclude many patients typical of those encountered in routine clinical practice. Hence, a large "real-world" effectiveness study is needed to evaluate the benefits of early intervention with inhaled steroids in patients with mild, persistent asthma. In the START (inhaled Steroid Treatment As Regular Therapy in early asthma) study, patients ages 6-60 years, from 31 countries and districts worldwide with mild persistent asthma, have been randomized to once-daily treatment with budesonide, 200 microg (for patients < 11 years) or 400 microg (for patients > or = 11 years), or placebo via Turbuhaler for 3 years. The double-blind treatment period will be followed by a 2-year period of open budesonide treatment. Throughout the study, other asthma medication including glucocorticosteroids can be given as judged appropriate by the investigator. Lung function will be measured by spirometry using standardized techniques at 3-month intervals throughout the study, and bronchodilator reversibility will be measured annually. The primary outcome measures are the time to the first severe asthma-related event during the first 3 years of the study and the change in postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) from baseline during the entire 5-year study period. These measures have been chosen to reflect the progression of mild asthma toward more severe asthma and the extent of irreversible airflow limitation, which should reflect the degree of airway remodeling.

Treatment of asthma by the inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide given either in the morning or evening

The study addressed the question whether the novel inhaled prodrug corticosteroid ciclesonide is equally effective when inhaled in the morning compared to the evening. For this purpose a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study was initiated in which 209 asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in one second = 50-90% predicted) inhaled either 200 microg ciclesonide in the morning or in the evening, for 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by means of spirometry as well as daily recordings of morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptoms and use of rescue medication. The 24-h urinary cortisol excretion was measured to evaluate any effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenol axis. Ciclesonide significantly improved asthma control. Morning and evening administration was shown to be equally effective for the different spirometry variables, evening PEF, symptoms, use of rescue medication and number of asthma exacerbations. Regarding morning PEF, the improvements after evening dosing were more prominent and equivalence of morning and evening administration could not be demonstrated. No relevant influence on cortisol excretion was found. Overall, the study indicates that ciclesonide can be given either in the morning or in the evening to meet the patients' preference and individual medical needs, although evening administration may lead to a more pronounced improvement in morning peak expiratory flow.

Once-daily budesonide via Turbuhaler improves symptoms in adults with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of twice-daily budesonide Turbuhaler (Pulmicort Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) for the treatment of mild to severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide Turbuhaler administered once daily each morning with placebo in inhaled corticosteroid-naive adults with persistent asthma.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 177 adults (aged 18 to 70 years) received placebo or once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler (400 microg) for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and AM/PM peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and nighttime/daytime asthma symptom scores, patient discontinuations, use of breakthrough medication (albuterol), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25%-75%), and quality of life assessments. Safety was evaluated based on adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between study groups. The mean percentages of predicted FEV1 at baseline were 71.9 +/- 9.8 in patients receiving budesonide Turbuhaler and 70.6 +/- 11.0 in patients receiving placebo. Mean changes from baseline over the 12-week treatment period in FEV1 were significantly (P = 0.007) improved in patients receiving once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler compared with placebo (0.31 L and 0.17 L, respectively). Significant (P < or = 0.037) improvements over placebo also were observed in AM PEFR, nighttime/daytime asthma symptoms, and albuterol use with budesonide Turbuhaler treatment. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity and similar between study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide Turbuhaler 400 microg administered once daily in the AM is efficacious and safe for inhaled corticosteroid-naive asthmatic adults.

Budesonide at different doses for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled budesonide (BUD) is available in a range of doses for treating chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To quantitatively assess the efficacy and safety of budesonide at different doses in order to establish whether a clinically significant dose response profile exists.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was carried out for Controlled and Randomised Clinical Trials (RCTs) using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, correspondence with trial authors and the manufacturer.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing one dose of budesonide to a second dose in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer extracted data; authors were contacted to clarify missing information. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using Review Manager.

MAIN RESULTS

24 studies were selected for inclusion in the review (3907 subjects). In non-oral steroid treated, mild to moderately severe asthma no clinically worthwhile differences in FEV1, morning PEFR, symptom scores or rescue beta2 agonist use were apparent across a dose range of 200-1600 mcg/d. However, in moderate to severe asthma there was a significant reduction in the likelihood of trial withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation with BUD 800 mcg/d compared to 200 mcg/d: RR 3.93 (95% CI, 1.4 to 10.9). This result was largely weighted by a single large high quality RCT. In a single study in patients receiving oral corticosteroids, clinically significant improvements favouring high dose BUD (1600 mcg/d) over low dose (200 mcg/d) were apparent for FEV1 and morning PEFR. In two studies there was no dose dependent oral steroid sparing effect for BUD 1600 mcg/d v 800 or 400 mcg/d. Statistically significant, dose dependent suppression of 24 hour urinary free cortisol excretion and serum cortisol post synthetic ACTH infusion over the dose range 800-3200 mcg/d were apparent but the clinical significance of these findings is unclear.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide exhibits a clinically significant dose response effect for improvement in FEV1 in severe asthma and reduction of exacerbations in moderate to severe asthma. No significant dose dependent improvements in FEV1, PEFR or symptoms are evident in non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild to moderate disease. Dose dependent alterations in sensitive measures of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function were evident but the clinical significance of these changes is unclear.

Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Flovent Diskus is a powder formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) delivered via a breath-actuated, multidose inhaler.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of dry powder FP administered once or twice daily (200 microg per day) to children with persistent asthma.

METHODS

Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a 52-week, open-label extension. Children aged 4 to 11 were required to have pulmonary function 50% to 85% of predicted values. The population was stratified for baseline therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/cromolyn or bronchodilators only). After a 2-week placebo run-in, 242 patients received dry powder FP 200 microg each morning, dry powder FP 100 microg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks; 192 were rerandomized to the QD or BID regimen for an additional 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Primary endpoints were mean changes in FEV1 and morning PEF recorded at clinic visits.

RESULTS

Both dry powder FP regimens significantly improved FEV1, evening PEF, and asthma symptoms at the double-blind phase endpoint (P < or = .017 compared with placebo). The BID regimen also significantly improved morning PEF and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (P < or = .005). Among patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids/cromolyn, improvements observed with the QD and BID regimens were similar. Patients switched from BID to open-label QD treatment showed additional improvements at week 52 generally comparable to patients who received the BID regimen during both phases. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated for up to 64 weeks with few reports of drug-related adverse events or morning plasma cortisol abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Once daily dosing of dry powder FP 200 microg is an effective and convenient alternative for children whose asthma is controlled with a more frequent dosing regimen of inhaled corticosteroids.

Budesonide inhalation suspension: a review of its use in infants, children and adults with inflammatory respiratory disorders

Budesonide, a topically active corticosteroid, has a broad spectrum of clinically significant local anti-inflammatory effects in patients with inflammatory lung diseases including persistent asthma. In infants and young children with persistent asthma, day- and night-time symptom scores, and the number of days in which beta2-agonist bronchodilators were required, were significantly lower during randomised, double-blind treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 to 2 mg/day than placebo in 3 multicentre trials. Significantly fewer children discontinued therapy with budesonide inhalation suspension than with placebo because of worsening asthma symptoms in a study that included children who were receiving inhaled corticosteroids at baseline. Recent evidence indicates that budesonide inhalation suspension is significantly more effective than nebulised sodium cromoglycate in improving control of asthma in young children with persistent asthma. At a dosage of 2 mg/day, budesonide inhalation suspension significantly reduced the number of asthma exacerbations and requirements for systemic corticosteroids in preschool children with severe persistent asthma. In children with acute asthma or wheezing, the preparation was as effective as, or more effective than oral prednisolone in improving symptoms. In children with croup, single 2 or 4mg dosages of budesonide inhalation suspension were significantly more effective than placebo and as effective as oral dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg or nebulised L-epinephrine (adrenaline) 4mg in alleviating croup symptoms and preventing or reducing the duration of hospitalisation. Early initiation of therapy with budesonide inhalation suspension 1 mg/day appears to reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and decrease overall corticosteroid usage in preterm very low birthweight infants at risk for chronic lung disease. In adults with persistent asthma, budesonide inhalation suspension < or =8 mg/day has been compared with inhaled budesonide 1.6 mg/day and fluticasone propionate 2 mg/day administered by metered dose inhaler. Greater improvements in asthma control occurred in patients during treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension than with budesonide via metered dose inhaler, whereas fluticasone propionate produced greater increases in morning peak expiratory flow rates than nebulised budesonide. Several small studies suggest that the preparation has an oral corticosteroid-sparing effect in adults with persistent asthma and that it may be as effective as oral corticosteroids during acute exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The frequency of adverse events was similar in children receiving budesonide inhalation suspension 0.25 to 2 mg/day or placebo in 12-week studies. During treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 to 1 mg/day in 3 nonblind 52-week studies, growth velocity in children was generally unaffected; however, a small but statistically significant decrease in growth velocity was detected in children who were not using inhaled corticosteroids prior to the introduction of budesonide inhalation suspension. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function was not affected by short (12 weeks) or long (52 weeks) term treatment with nebulised budesonide. In conclusion, budesonide inhalation suspension is the most widely available nebulised corticosteroid, and in the US is the only inhaled corticosteroid indicated in children aged > or =1 year with persistent asthma. The preparation is suitable for use in infants, children and adults with persistent asthma and in infants and children with croup.

Antiasthmatic effects of mediator blockade versus topical corticosteroids in allergic rhinitis and asthma

To compare the antiasthmatic efficacy of inflammatory mediator blockade versus topical corticosteroid therapy in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and asthma, 14 patients were enrolled into a single-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled crossover study comparing 2 wk therapy of (1) 400 microgram orally inhaled budesonide plus 200 microgram intranasal budesonide (BUD) or (2) 10 mg oral montelukast plus 10 mg oral cetirizine (ML + CZ). Before each treatment period, patients received 7 to 10 d placebo washout. All treatments were given once daily in the morning. Throughout the study, patients recorded the following domiciliary measures: peak expiratory flow (PEF), rescue inhaler requirement, asthma symptoms, and daily activity score. Laboratory measurements were made at trough of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge and exhaled nitric oxide (NO). Compared with pooled placebo (PL), there were significant (p < 0.05) improvements in all domiciliary measures with both treatments (mean PEF [L/min] PL: 463; BUD: 478; ML + CZ: 483). For geometric mean AMP PC(20) (mg/ml), there was an improvement (p < 0.05), compared with PL (47), for ML + CZ (133) but not for BUD (51); whereas for NO (ppb) there was significant suppression with BUD (7.6) but not ML + CZ (11.5) compared with PL (13.6). In conclusion, both combined mediator blockade and combined topical corticosteroids are equally effective antiasthma therapy in patients with asthma and SAR.

Mometasone furoate administered once daily is as effective as twice-daily administration for treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Despite current recommendations, many patients with persistent asthma are still treated with bronchodilators alone.

OBJECTIVE

The safety and efficacy of two once daily dosing regimens (200 microg and 400 microg) of mometasone furoate (MF) administered in the morning by using a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with those of a twice daily dosing regimen (200 microg administered twice daily) in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists.

METHODS

All patients (306 patients; age range, 12-70 years) were given a diagnosis of asthma for at least 6 months before enrollment in this 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study. The primary efficacy variable was change in FEV(1) from baseline to endpoint (last evaluable visit).

RESULTS

At endpoint, FEV(1) was significantly improved (P < or =.02) after MF-DPI 400 microg once daily morning treatment and MF-DPI 200 microg twice daily treatment (16.0% and 16.1%, respectively) compared with placebo (5.5%). The improvement seen with MF-DPI 200 microg once daily morning treatment (10.4%) was not significantly different from that with placebo. Secondary efficacy variables also showed significant improvement for the MF-DPI 400 microg once daily morning treatment group and the MF-DPI 200 microg twice daily treatment group compared with the placebo group. All doses of MF administered by means of a DPI were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to demonstrate that a total daily dose of 400 microg of MF administered by means of a DPI is an effective treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. This treatment was equally effective when administered either as a once daily or twice daily regimen.