Hepatitis C virus infection in haemodialysis patients: a clinical and virological study

Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dialysis is a replacement therapy for patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Patients on dialysis are at high risk of acquiring hepatitis C virus (HCV), which has become a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. There is a wide range of prevalence of HCV in dialysis populations around the world. It is still unknown how prevalent HCV infection is among worldwide dialysis patients (including those undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis). A review was conducted to estimate the global epidemiology of hepatitis C in dialysis patients. We searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Global Index Medicus and Web of Science until October 2022. A manual search of references from relevant articles was also conducted. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the χ2 test on Cochrane's Q statistic, and the sources of heterogeneity were investigated using subgroup analysis. In order to assess publication bias, funnel plots and Egger tests were conducted, and pooled HCV prevalence estimates were generated using a DerSimonian and Laird meta-analysis model. The study is registered with PROSPERO under CRD42022237789. We included 634 papers involving 392160 participants. The overall HCV case fatality rate was 38.7% (95% CI = 28.9-49). The global prevalence of HCV infection in dialysis population group were 24.3% [95% CI = 22.6-25.9]. As indicated by UNSD region, country, dialysis type, and HCV diagnostic targeted; Eastern Europe had the highest prevalence of 48.6% [95% CI = 35.2-62], Indonesia had 63.6% [95% CI = 42.9-82], hemodialysis patients had 25.5% [95% CI = 23.8-27.3], and anti-HCV were detected in 24.5% [95% CI = 22.8-26.2]. Dialysis patients, particularly those on hemodialysis, have a high prevalence and case fatality rate of HCV infection. Hemodialysis units need to implement strict infection control measures.

The association of hepatitis C infection with the onset of CKD and progression into ESRD

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not only an important cause of chronic liver disease, but extrahepatic manifestations are common and include chronic kidney disease (CKD). HCV is classically associated with cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis in the context of mixed cryoglobulinemia syndrome, but other glomerular diseases also occur and may be significantly under-recognized. HCV may cause glomerular disease by immune complex deposition; however, other potential mechanisms by which HCV promotes CKD include a direct cytopathic effect of the virus on renal tissue, and by its association with accelerated atherosclerosis, insulin resistance, and chronic inflammation. Epidemiologic studies show HCV infection confers an increased risk of incident CKD and accelerates progression of CKD to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the general population, as well as subpopulations including diabetic patients, those coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and kidney transplant recipients. Patients with CKD and HCV infection experience inferior clinical outcomes, including poorer quality of life and an increased risk of mortality. Treatment with interferon-based regimens is associated with decreased risk of incident CKD and ESRD, though prior studies are limited by the small number of patients with HCV and CKD who underwent treatment. With the advent of new, well-tolerated direct-acting antiviral combinations that are not cleared by the kidneys, it is possible to treat all genotypes of HCV infection in patients with CKD and ESRD. More data on the effect of direct-acting antivirals on CKD incidence and progression are necessary. However, there is every expectation that with improved access to HCV treatment, the burden of CKD in patients with HCV could significantly decline.

Infecção pelo vírus da hepatite c em pacientes em hemodiálise: prevalência e fatores de risco

CONTEXTO: Doentes com doença renal crônica em tratamento hemodialítico apresentam risco aumentado de aquisição do vírus da hepatite C (VHC). Elevadas taxas de prevalência têm sido detectadas em unidades de diálise do mundo inteiro. Estudos recentes têm demonstrado que a infecção pelo VHC interfere de forma negativa na sobrevida dos pacientes em hemodiálise e naqueles submetidos ao transplante renal. OBJETIVOS: Determinar a prevalência e os fatores de risco da infecção pelo VHC em pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise. MÉTODOS: Realizou-se estudo transversal entre janeiro e dezembro de 2007. Neste período, 236 pacientes em hemodiálise foram testados pelo ELISA de terceira geração. Os casos positivos foram submetidos a pesquisa qualitativa do HCV-RNA pelo método de PCR. Consideraram-se como portadores de infecção pelo VHC aqueles pacientes com anti-VHC e HCV-RNA positivos. Dosagens mensais de ALT e a média do valor de 12 meses foram obtidas em 195 pacientes. Do total de pacientes, 208 (88,1%) responderam ao questionário padronizado visando a identificação de fatores de risco associados à infecção pelo VHC. RESULTADOS: A prevalência de pacientes anti-VHC positivos encontrada entre os 236 testados foi de 14,8% (35/236); destes, a pesquisa do HCV-RNA foi positiva em 71,6% (25/35). Portanto, a prevalência da infecção crônica pelo VHC foi de 10,6% (25/236) dos pacientes. Pela análise bivariada, os principais fatores de risco associados à infecção pelo VHC foram o tempo de hemodiálise, o número de transfusões de sangue, a realização prévia de diálise peritonial e história de doença sexualmente transmissível. Contudo, após análise multivariada, somente o tempo de hemodiálise e história de doença sexualmente transmissível foram significativamente associados à infecção pelo VHC. Pacientes com mais de 10 anos de hemodiálise apresentaram risco de aquisição do VHC 73,9 (IC de 17,5 a 311,8) vezes maior quando comparados a pacientes com até 5 anos de tratamento. Indivíduos com doença sexualmente transmissível prévia apresentaram risco 4,8 (IC de 1,1 a 19,9) vezes superior de contaminação pelo VHC quando comparados àqueles sem doença sexualmente transmissível. O valor médio da ALT foi significantemente maior nos pacientes infectados pelo VHC (44,0 ± 13,5 U/L versus 33,5 ± 8,0 U/L, P<0,001). CONCLUSÃO: A infecção pelo VHC apresentou elevada prevalência na unidade de diálise analisada. O tempo de tratamento dialítico e história prévia de doença sexualmente transmissível foram os principais fatores de risco associados à infecção pelo VHC. Indivíduos em hemodiálise com infecção crônica pelo VHC apresentaram maior atividade de ALT que pacientes sem hepatite C crônica.

Chronic viral hepatitis in hemodialysis patients

Ever since the first outbreaks of hepatitis in hemodialysis units in the late 1960s, a number of hepatotropic viruses transmitted by blood and other body fluids have been identified. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding these blood-borne agents from an epidemiologic and preventive perspective. Data source and study selection were obtained from research and review articles related to the epidemiology of viral hepatitis in hemodialysis and indexed on Medline and Embase from 1965 to 2004. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the first significant hepatotropic virus to be identified in hemodialysis centers. HBV infection has been effectively controlled by active vaccination, screening of blood donors, the use of erythropoietin, and segregation of HBV carriers. To date, HBV remains an important cause of morbidity in endemic areas. Hepatitis delta virus is a defective virus that can only infect HBV-positive individuals. Hepatitis C virus is the most significant cause of non-A, non-B hepatitis and is mainly transmitted by blood transfusion. The introduction in 1990 of routine screening of blood donors for HCV contributed significantly to the control of HCV transmission. An effective HCV vaccine remains an unsolved challenge, however. Pegylation of interferon-alpha has made it possible to treat HCV-positive dialysis patients. Unexplained sporadic outbreaks of hepatitis by the mid-1990s prompted the discovery of hepatitis G virus and hepatitis GB virus C in 1995 and the TT virus in 1997. Although epidemiologic analyses revealed high prevalence rates of both viruses in the hemodialysis population, their exact role in liver disease has yet to be determined. The vigilant observation of guidelines on universal precaution and regular virologic testing are the cornerstones of the effective control of chronic hepatitis in the setting of hemodialysis.

[Prevalence and associated factors to hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients in Brazil]

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is higher in patients on hemodialysis than in the general population, probably due to greater exposure to risk situations. The purposes of the study were to determine anti-HCV antibodies prevalence among hemodialysis patients and dialysis clinics and patients factors associated with HCV transmission.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 752 hemodialysis patients in all 12 dialysis clinics of Fortaleza, Brazil, and were screened using third generation ELISA. Sociodemographic, clinical, and epidemiological data of 663 patients were collected through interviews. Nosocomial factors were assessed using a specific questionnaire tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student's t test, odds ratio and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of anti-HCV was 52% (390/746; ranged from 6% to 72%). The anti-HCV positivity was higher in patients who had previous peritoneal dialysis (OR=1.76; 95% CI 1.12-2.76) and blood transfusion (OR=2.75; 95% CI 1.25-6.03). Dialysis age has been associated with anti-HCV positivity (OR=1.47; 95% CI 1.35-1.61). Clinics practices associated with anti-HCV positivity were: previous preparing of heparin (OR=2.92; 95% CI 1.23-6.92), failure in gloves use or change (OR=5.73; 95% CI 1.75-18.72), unsatisfactory dialysis machine disinfection (OR=2.79; 95% CI 1.57-4.96), and patient isolation in dialysis room (OR=0.18; 95% CI 0.05-0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show high anti-HCV prevalence among hemodialysis patients and the association of nosocomial factors with new HCV infection cases.

Surveillance and control of blood-borne virus infections in haemodialysis units

The risk of transmission of blood-borne viruses in renal dialysis units was reduced following the Rosenheim report recommendations issued in 1972. This document focused on the prevention and control of hepatitis B virus infections in renal dialysis and transplantation units. Good practice guidelines were produced, some of which may have been relaxed in conjunction with technological advances which included the use of disposable cartridges for haemodialysis. However, new viruses transmitted by blood and other body fluids have been identified over the years. A review of current practice for both patients and staff, together with updated good practice guidance, is necessary.

Blood-borne virus infections in dialysis units--a review

Hepatitis outbreaks in haemodialysis unit patients and staff were reported in the late 1960s. In 1972, the Rosenheim report in the UK established guidelines which included routine tests for hepatitis B surface antigen and isolation facilities for dialysing patients with hepatitis B virus which resulted in a dramatic fall in cases of hepatitis. However, since these guidelines were introduced, other blood-borne viruses, notably HCV and HIV have been discovered, and failures of infection control practices still lead to outbreaks of HBV in haemodialysis units. The prevalence of HCV in dialysis patients varies considerably throughout the world, with reported prevalence ranging from 3.9% to 71%. The number of blood transfusions and the length of time on dialysis have consistently been associated with HCV prevalence. Several reports provide evidence of patient-to-patient HCV transmission with environmental blood contamination the most significant factor in intra-unit transmission. There is no evidence that HCV has been transmitted by re-use of dialysis machines but being dialysed next to an HCV positive patient is associated with a significant risk of HCV acquisition. Several studies have shown that dialysing HCV positive patients in a separate unit or in a defined sector of a dialysis unit significantly reduces nosocomial HCV infection. HGV is prevalent in dialysis units where there is evidence of transmission to patients but no evidence of associated symptoms. HIV is infrequently transmitted in dialysis units and several units treating many HIV-positive patients have shown no evidence of transmission. Careful attention needs to be paid to infection control procedures and regular virological testing.

Hepatitis C virus infection in dialysis: a continuing problem

Patients on chronic dialysis are at increased risk of acquiring parenterally transmitted hepatitis viruses from blood product transfusions or nosocomial transmission in hemodialysis units, and biochemical abnormalities in liver function are seen in 10-44% of patients on chronic hemodialysis. In the past, hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the major cause of parenterally transmitted viral hepatitis in dialysis patients, and the remaining cases were attributed to non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH). The discovery of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has shed light on the cause and clinical course of NANBH in patients on dialysis. The current debate is focused on strategies to reduce the transmission of HCV among dialysis patients and to lessen the consequences of liver disease among patients already infected.

Hepatitis C virus seroconversion and genotype prevalence in patients and staff on chronic hemodialysis

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA positivity among hemodialysis patients varies between 10 and 70%. Few previous surveys revealed high frequency of seroconversion of HCV-RNA-negative patients over the years of hemodialysis. Only few studies reported HCV genotype variability. We evaluated all 65 patients on chronic hemodialysis in our dialysis unit. All sera positive to anti-HCV on ELISA were retested by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction to HCV-RNA. Sixteen patients were found anti-HCV positive on ELISA, and 8 of them were also PCR positive. Three of these eight patients seroconverted during the year 1995. Four patients had both 1a and 1b genotypes of HCV, coexistence of genotypes 1b and 4a in one patient and genotypes 1a, 1b and 2a in the remaining three patients. Mean serum aminotransferase, duration of dialysis, and number of blood units transfused were significantly higher in the HCV-PCR-positive patients compared with the HCV-PCR-negative patients. Because strict isolation methods were initiated at the end of 1995, not one new case of HCV among dialysis patients was found in 1998, although new hemodialysis patients were diagnosed as having HCV. In conclusion, genotypes 1a and 1b, as is true for the general population in Israel, were also the predominant genotypes among hemodialysis patients; the coexistence of more than one genotype is common among hemodialysis patients; seroconversion is common among these patients and strict isolation methods are efficient and should be recommended.

Hepatitis B virus infection profile in central Brazilian hemodialysis population

Hepatitis B has proved to be a major health hazard in hemodialysis patients. In order to investigate the hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection profile in the hemodialysis population of Goiânia city--Central Brazil, all dialysis patients (N = 282) were studied. The prevalence of any HBV marker (HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc) was 56.7% (95% CI: 51.1-62.7), ranging from 33.3% to 77.7% depending on dialysis unit. HBV-DNA was detected in 67.6% and 88.2% of the HBsAg-positive serum samples, in 91.3% and 100% of the HBsAg/HBeAg-positive samples, and in 18.2% and 63.6% of the HBsAg/anti-HBe-reactive sera by hybridization and PCR, respectively. The length of time on hemodialysis was significantly associated with HBV seropositivity. Only 10% of the patients reported received hepatitis B vaccination. The findings of a high HBV infection prevalence in this population and the increased risk for HBV infection on long-term hemodialysis suggest the environmental transmission, emphasizing the urgent need to evaluate strategies of control and prevention followed in these units.

Hepatitis C virus infections in dialysis centers in The Netherlands: a national survey by serological and molecular methods

A national survey of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections among dialysis patients in The Netherlands was performed. The study involved 2,653 patients (2,108 hemodialysis patients and 545 chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [CAPD] patients) from 39 of the 49 dialysis centers in the country. Patient sera were analyzed by both serological and molecular methods. Screening by a third-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA) yielded 79 reactive sera. The presence of anti-HCV antibodies was confirmed in 70 patients by a line immunoassay. All seropositive samples were tested by reverse transcriptase PCR, and 57 samples were found to contain HCV RNA. Of the nine EIA-positive and line immunoassay-negative or indeterminate samples, four were HCV RNA positive. All seronegative samples were screened for the presence of HCV RNA in pools of five sera. Of 2,576 antibody-negative samples, 6 contained HCV RNA. All antibody-positive and RNA-positive samples were also tested by a second serological assay. The prevalence of HCV infections among Dutch dialysis patients as determined by serology or the presence of HCV RNA was 3% (80 of 2,653), i.e., 3.5% (73 of 2,108) in patients treated on hemodialysis and 1.3% (7 of 545) in patients on CAPD. Of these 80 HCV-infected dialysis patients, 67 (84%) were HCV RNA positive. Serological screening alone would have diagnosed only 70 infected patients. Therefore, antibody screening combined with detection of HCV RNA should be considered as the "gold standard" for diagnosing HCV infection in dialysis patients. The prevalence of HCV-infected patients in Dutch dialysis centers ranged from 0 to 8%, suggesting the existence of local risk factors for acquiring HCV infection. Genotyping analysis by reverse hybridization line probe assay revealed the presence of genotypes la (23%), 1b (46%), 2 (3%), 2a (13%), 2b (1%), 3a (7%), and 4a (4%). In four (6%) samples multiple genotypes were detected. The genotype distribution of HCV isolates among Dutch dialysis patients was similar to the distribution among nondialysis patients from the Benelux, except for subtype 1a, which was significantly more prevalent among dialysis patients. In only one center, a high prevalence of an uncommon genotype was suggestive of infection from a common source.

Hepatitis G virus RNA and hepatitis G virus antibodies in renal transplant recipients: prevalence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis G virus (HGV/GBV-C) RNA indicating current infection has been frequently isolated from the sera of transplant recipients and other multitransfused individuals. Lifetime exposure to the virus, however, is unknown. We carried out a study to determine the prevalence and risk factors of HGV antibodies and of HGV RNA among renal transplant recipients, and to investigate possible associations between HGV RNA and immunosuppressive treatment.

METHODS

HGV RNA was detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, and HGV antibodies (anti-E2) by a newly developed immunoassay. To assess risk factors for HGV exposure, univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 221 patients, 14% were HGV RNA positive and 40% had HGV antibodies. Both HGV RNA and anti-HGV were present in only two individuals. Thus, the overall HGV exposure prevalence was 53%. It increased significantly with the number of blood transfusions. In logistic regression, the adjusted HGV exposure prevalence odds ratio was 5.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-15) among patients with > or =10 transfusions (baseline: no transfusions). Other independent risk factors were a longer duration of hemodialysis and a longer time interval since transplantation. HGV viremia was not associated with the type of immunosuppressive treatment. Alanine aminotransferase levels were not significantly increased among HGV RNA-positive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Much higher proportions of renal transplant recipients were exposed to HGV than is suggested by HGV RNA detection alone. The majority of infected individuals apparently eliminate the virus over time. Contaminated blood transfusions have to be regarded as a main risk factor for HGV infection.

Hepatitis C in dialysis patients

Patients on hemodialysis have a higher prevalence of hepatitis C (HCV) infection compared with the general population. Several factors have been associated with an increased risk of HCV infection in hemodialysis patients, including number of blood transfusions, duration of hemodialysis, previous transplantation, intravenous drug abuse, male gender, and in-center hemodialysis. In addition, there is mounting evidence to suggest nosocomial transmission within hemodialysis units. Although the precise modes of transmission have not been identified, breakdown in standard infection control practices, physical proximity to an infected patient, and sharing of dialysis machines are possible causes. Nonetheless, at the present time, the Centers for disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not recommend dedicated machines, patient isolation, or a ban on re-use in hemodialysis patients with HCV infection. Consequently, strict adherence to universal precautions and careful attention to hygiene are recommended to reduce the transmission of HCV in dialysis units.

Methods of transmission of hepatitis C

The route of transmission of hepatitis C virus is still controversial. Parenteral exposure via blood or blood products leads to infection in the majority of cases, and the majority of intravenous drug users become infected by repetitive exposure to contaminated injection equipment. The risk of infection from a single needlestick injury is 5-15% and may depend on the size of the innoculum. Other parenteral routes of transmission may include traditional healing practices and the use of contaminated medical equipment. Transmission is less common within a family but the prevalence of hepatitis C viral antibodies is higher in family members and sexual partners of carriers than in the general population. There are some well-documented instances of acute hepatitis C occurring after a defined sexual exposure. Vertical transmission is rare unless the mother has high levels of circulating HCV RNA as may occur in those also infected with HIV. The detection of hepatitis C in saliva and the higher than expected prevalence of infection in dentists may point to the possibility of transmission by salivary contamination. There remain large numbers of hepatitis C carriers in whom no route of infection can be identified.