Is hepatitis B virus subtype testing useful in predicting virological response and resistance to lamivudine?

Evaluation of genotype characteristics and drug resistance mutations in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is one of the public health priorities worldwide, especially in the Southwest China. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between genotypes and drug resistance mutations among HBV patients in Southwest China, with the objective of providing guidance for clinical antiviral treatment. A total of 4266 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients treated in the Qianjiang Hospital of Chongqing University were included in our study from 2014 to 2020. Both genotypes and drug-resistant mutations of CHB patients were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Genotype B and genotype C were the main HBV genotypes in our study. We found 54 mutation patterns, including 9 single-site mutations and 45 multiple-site mutations, accounting for 57.64% and 42.36%, respectively. rtM204I/V/S (485/1936) was the most common single-site mutation type, and rtL180M + rtM204I/V (482/1936) was the most common multiple-site mutation type. 1372 CHB patients were resistant to LAM + LDT, and 342 CHB patients were resistant to ADV. There was only 1 CHB patient who exhibited resistance to LAM + LDT + ADV + ETV, with a specific mutation pattern of rtA181T + rtT184L + rtM204V. Our study demonstrated trends in genetic mutations and drug resistance in CHB patients to enable timely adjustment of antiviral treatment strategies.

Hepatitis B Virus Genotype Influence on Virological and Enzymatic Measures over Time-A Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

HBV is a hepatotropic virus with multiple genotypes. It is uncertain if specific genotype(s) influence virological measures and/or liver markers over time. It is unclear whether nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy response is influenced by genotype. In this retrospective longitudinal study, we utilized data from The Ottawa Hospital Viral Hepatitis Program (TOHVHP) to evaluate the role of HBV genotype on viral load, liver enzymatic levels, fibrosis progression, and parenchymal inflammation and steatosis over time. HBV DNA, ALT, and AST levels, as well as transient elastography scores for fibrosis (E) and inflammation/steatosis (CAP), were modeled using mixed-effects linear regression. Interaction terms between HBV genotype and time were included to investigate if there was a difference in trends between genotypes. A total of 393 HBV patients infected with genotypes A-E were included. The mean age was 44.4 years, and 56% were male. Asian (50.5%), Black (29.1%), and White (6.4%) patients were well-represented. By multivariate analysis, we found no evidence that the trajectories of these commonly measured viral or liver measures varied over time by HBV genotype in those receiving HBV nucleos(t)ides and in those not on antiviral therapy.

Hepatitis B virus genotypes influence clinical outcomes: A review

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a hepatotropic virus that affects approximately 296 million people worldwide. A crucial step to HBV replication is the transcription of its infectious DNA from its viral RNA intermediate. The production of the RNA intermediate hinges on reverse transcription, and therefore the lack of proofreading in that process commonly yields mutants and has led to nine well-described genotypes (A-I) and over 30 known sub-genotypes of the virus. The influence of genotype on HBV infection outcomes, which include fibrosis progression, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), remain uncertain. This review aims to analyze the influence of HBV genotype on the risk of development of these outcomes. The response to current and future HBV therapies is considered. Further study of larger and more diverse samples will hopefully resolve outstanding uncertainties.

Molecular Epidemiological Characteristics and Risk Factors for Acquiring HBV Among Li Ethnic in Baisha County, Hainan Island-Subgenotype D3 Was First Discovered in China

The residents of Baisha, a county of Hainan Island, mainly composed of Li ethnic population and relatively closed living environment with its unique geographical location. Our previous study showed that Li ethnic population of Baisha is an endemic center for hepatitis C virus, with significantly higher rates than in other parts of China. However, the epidemiology of HBV in this region remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive epidemiological survey of HBV in Baisha County, including 1,682 Li ethnic residents. The total seropositive rate for HBsAg was 10.2% and was higher than other parts of China. HBV-positive status was associated with the 20–40-year-old group (OR = 1.27, 95%CI 1.04–1.39, P < 0.01) and alcohol consumption (OR = 2.17, 95%CI 1.58–2.99, P < 0.01). Phylogenetic analysis showed that HBV subgenotype D3 was predominant in Baisha County which was first discovered in China, followed by C5, C1, B2, and undetermined subgenotypes which were significantly different from other geographical distribution of main genotypes in China. The most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) of the HBV genotype C in the Li ethnic of Baisha County was 1846 (95%CI: 1739–1932), and Baisha-C5 was earlier than Baisha-C1 and Baisha-C2. Most Baisha-D3 sequences were concentrated in one bundle and unrelated to those D3 genome sequences elsewhere in the world. According to the phylogenetic tree, D3 was introduced into Baisha County in 1884 (95%CI: 1816–1993) and became a local endemic virus. In conclusion, HBV infection in the Li ethnic group is characterized by a high prevalence rate in 20–40-year-old individuals and a unique genotype distribution which were significantly different from other geographical distribution of main genotypes in China, and subgenotype D3 was first discovered in China.

Virological and Clinical Characteristics of Hepatitis B Virus Genotype A

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the most prevalent chronic viral infections in humans. The overall prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is reported to be 3.6%; however, it varies depending upon the geographic area. HBV is classified into ten genotypes (A through J) on the basis of an intergroup genomic divergence of > 8%. Specifically, HBV genotype A exhibits several unique virological and clinical characteristics and can be further classified into seven subtypes. Among them, subtype A2 or Ae (A2/[e]) is occasionally responsible for nosocomial infection and among homosexual males. Regarding virological factors, the G1896A precore mutation is rarely observed in genotype A as it would disrupt an essential stem-loop structure in the ε signal essential for pregenomic RNA packaging. HBV genotype A also harbors a 6-nucleotide C-terminal insertion in the hepatitis B-e antigen (HBeAg) precursor, resulting in a variable-length HBeAg protein product observed in serum of positive patients. These molecular traits likely contribute to the specific clinical presentation of genotype A-infected patients, such as mild acute hepatitis B (AHB), longer persistence of HBsAg positivity in AHB, and increased chronicity after AHB in adults. However, genotype A shows a better response to interferon than other genotypes in chronic hepatitis B patients. Here, we review the virological and clinical characteristics of HBV genotype A that will be useful in elucidating the association among persistent viral infection, host genetic factors, and treatment in future studies.

How viral genetic variants and genotypes influence disease and treatment outcome of chronic hepatitis B. Time for an individualised approach?

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global problem. Several HBV genotypes exist with different biology and geographical prevalence. Whilst the future aim of HBV treatment remains viral eradication, current treatment strategies aim to suppress the virus and prevent the progression of liver disease. Current strategies also involve identification of patients for treatment, namely those at risk of progressive liver disease. Identification of HBV genotype, HBV mutants and other predictive factors allow for tailoured treatments, and risk-surveillance pathways, such as hepatocellular cancer screening. In the future, these factors may enable stratification not only of treatment decisions, but also of patients at risk of higher relapse rates when current therapies are discontinued. Newer technologies, such as next-generation sequencing, to assess drug-resistant or immune escape variants and quasi-species heterogeneity in patients, may allow for more information-based treatment decisions between the clinician and the patient. This article serves to discuss how HBV genotypes and genetic variants impact not only upon the disease course and outcomes, but also current treatment strategies. Adopting a personalised genotypic approach may play a role in future strategies to combat the disease. Herein, we discuss new technologies that may allow more informed decision-making for response guided therapy in the battle against HBV.

Evolution of drug-resistant mutations in HBV genomes in patients with treatment failure during the past seven years (2010-2016)

The objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence of drug-resistant HBV mutants in patients with treatment failure during the past seven years (2010-2016). 4055 HBV-infected patients who underwent HBV polymerase gene mutation test from 2010 to 2016 were enrolled. The nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) resistance mutation positions, including rtL180, rtA181, rtT184, rtS202, rtM204, rtI233, rtN236, rtI169, rtV173, and rtM250 were analyzed. Genotypic resistance mutations were detected in 30.8% (1248/4055) of the patients with treatment failure. Rates of drug-resistant mutations associated with LAM, ADV, ETV, and multidrug were 27.23% (1104/4055), 9.67% (392/4055), 3.69% (150/4055), and 0.79% (32/4055). Among the primary NA-resistant mutations, rtM204I (13.44%, 545/4055) occurred more frequently, followed by rtM204V, rtN236T, rtA181T, and rtA181V. For single-base mutations, rtL180M and rtA181V increased gradually during the past seven years, while rtM204I/V and rtN236T decreased after 2015. The development of drug-resistant mutations positively correlated with the consumption of ETV (r = 0.964, P = 0.002), and weakly correlated with that of LAM (r = 0.679, P = 0.109) and ADV (r = 0.429, P = 0.354). Moreover, single-base mutation rtA181V and multi-base mutations (rtL180M + M204I and rtL180M + M204V + M204I) were more common in HBV genotype C than those in genotype B (1.94% vs. 0.66%, 1.84% vs. 0.16%, 1.02% vs. 0.16%, respectively). NA-related mutations in HBV RT region increased in the past seven years, especially for LAM. Frequencies of rtL180M and rtA181T/V increased gradually in the past seven years, to which we should pay more attention.

Analysis of the prevalence of drug-resistant hepatitis B virus in patients with antiviral therapy failure in a Chinese tertiary referral liver centre (2010-2014)

OBJECTIVES

To study the prevalence of drug-resistant HBV in patients with therapy failure in a Chinese tertiary referral liver centre.

METHODS

1223 HBV-infected patients who underwent genotypic resistance testing between 2010-2014 were studied.

RESULTS

3TC genotypic resistance was the most common (46.5%), followed by LdT resistant (46.2%), ETV intermediate (37.9%), ADV resistant (11.4%), TDF intermediate (11.4%) and ETV resistant (1.7%). The 3TC resistance rate increased from 39.8% in 2010 to 56.6% in 2013, before decreasing to 49.5% in 2014, evidence of a lagging effect of l-nucleoside consumption. M204I, N236T and L180M+M204V+V173L/S202G were the most common substitutions for l-nucleoside (3TC and LdT), ADV and ETV genotypic resistant phenotypes, respectively. 3TC-exposed patients showed a high multiple genetic resistance rate (3TC-resistant+LdT-resistant+ETV intermediate; 58.8%). Resistance rates to 3TC, LdT and ETV in HCC patients were significantly higher than in cirrhosis and CHB patients. Resistance rates to different drugs showed no statistical difference between genotype B and C patients, whilst some amino acid substitution showed genotype bias, e.g. N236T incidence in genotype B was significantly higher than in genotype C (43.2% vs. 5.9%; P<0.0001), and genotype C isolates had a significantly higher A181V/T incidence than genotype B (54.9% vs. 19.3%; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

3TC genotypic resistance was most common in this centre, whilst ETV had the lowest resistance rate. HBV genotypes had no impact on antiviral drug resistance, except for some drug resistance substitutions bias. Optional initial therapy and subsequent rescue treatment should be based on knowledge of nucleos(t)ide analogue resistance.

Epidemiology study of HBV genotypes and antiviral drug resistance in multi-ethnic regions from Western China

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a critical global health issue and moderately epidemic in Western China, but HBV molecular epidemiology characteristics are still limited. We conducted this study to investigate HBV genotypes and antiviral resistant mutations in this multi-ethnic area. A total of 1316 HBV patients were recruited from four ethnic groups from 2011 to 2013. Genotypes and resistant mutations were determined by Sanger sequencing. Four genotypes (B, C, D and C/D) were identified. Genotype B and C were common in Han population, while genotype D was predominant in Uygurs. Genotype C was the major genotype in both Tibetans and Yis, and recombinant C/D was found in Tibetans only. Lamivudine resistance was common in all populations, especially in Hans with prevalence of 42.8%. Entecavir resistance was barely observed regardless of ethnicity. Genotype C isolates had higher rates of rtA181T/V than genotype B (13.5% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001), in accordance with higher prevalence of resistance to adefovir (20.0% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001). While incidence of resistant mutations to other drugs and clinical factors showed no difference among different genotypes. HBV genotypes and resistance-conferring mutations had different geographic and demographic distributions in Western China, which provided molecular epidemiology data for clinical management.

Clinical significance of periodic detection of hepatitis B virus YVDD mutation by ultrasensitive real-time amplification refractory mutation system quantitative PCR during lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Monitoring hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutants periodically during nucleoside analogue treatment is of great clinical significance, particularly in persistently HBV DNA-positive patients. However, few studies have investigated the dynamic changes of HBV YMDD (Tyr-Met-Asp-Asp) and YVDD (Tyr-Val-Asp-Asp) populations in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients whilst undergoing lamivudine (LMV) treatment. In this study, we sought to investigate the dynamic changes of HBV YMDD and YVDD variants by ultrasensitive real-time amplification refractory mutation system quantitative PCR (RT-ARMS-qPCR) and evaluate its significance for changes in the treatment of CHB patients. RT-ARMS-qPCR was established and evaluated with standard recombinant plasmids. Fifteen CHB patients receiving LMV (100 mg daily) were consecutively recruited and followed up for 60 weeks. Serum samples were obtained from each patient at baseline and every 12 weeks. The total HBV DNA, HBV YMDD DNA and YVDD DNA levels were measured using RT-ARMS-qPCR at all given time points after treatment. Routine liver biochemistry parameters, including aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, were also measured every 12 weeks. The linear range of the assay was between 1×10(12) and 1×10(5) copies ml(-1). The low detection limit was 1×10(4) copies ml(-1). After 60 weeks of LMV treatment, nine patients experienced virological breakthrough. The YVDD variant could be detected 12-48 weeks before virological breakthrough. The YVDD variant was detected as the predominant population (range 69.4-100 %) in patients by the time virological breakthrough appeared. We concluded that RT-ARMS-qPCR was sensitive for the detection and quantification of low levels of HBV mutation. Periodic detection of HBV YM(V)DD every 12 weeks during LMV treatment is helpful for therapeutic decision making.

Molecular epidemiology and genetic characterization of hepatitis B virus in the Indian subcontinent

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a gradually evolving virus. The aim of this study was to characterize the distribution pattern of HBV genotypes and subgenotypes and HBsAg subtypes in chronic hepatitis B subjects from the Indian subcontinent. We also sought to investigate the genetic diversity of HBV genotypes and its influence on the therapeutic response.

METHODS

A total of 295 chronic hepatitis B subjects were studied. HBV genotypes and subgenotypes were determined using the generated HBV reverse transcriptase (rt) sequences. HBsAg subtypes were predicted using a newly developed automated program in Microsoft Visual Basic (VB6). Genetic diversity was characterized by calculating the mean genetic distance (d), the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (dS), and the number of non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site (dN). The virological response was measured by HBV DNA levels.

RESULTS

In southern India, the predominant HBV subgenotype/subtype was D2/ayw3 (79.1%). In eastern India, C1/adr (28.2%) was found to be the predominant subgenotype/subtype, followed by A1/adw2 (25.4%). In the north-eastern region, C2/adr, D2/ayw3, and D5/ayw3 were predominant and were each identified in 20.8% of subjects. In treatment-naïve subjects, the d, dS, and dN of genotype D sequences were higher compared to genotypes C and A. Additionally, the d, dS, and dN of HBV rt sequence were higher in subjects who subsequently showed a virological response to nucleos(t)ide analogues as compared to non-responders, irrespective of the genotypes tested (p=0.014 to p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We have described the distribution of HBV genotypes and subgenotypes and HBsAg subtypes in three major regions of the Indian subcontinent. HBV genetic diversity may play a pivotal role in the clinical outcome of chronic hepatitis B.

Prevalence, clinical and virologic outcomes of hepatitis B virus co-infection in HIV-1 positive Kenyan women on antiretroviral therapy

Background

Sub-Saharan Africa carries a high burden of co-infection with HIV-1 and hepatitis B virus (HBV). In this region, individuals with HIV-1/HBV co-infection on antiretroviral therapy (ART) frequently receive lamivudine as the only agent active against HBV, raising concerns for development of HBV resistance to lamivudine. We aimed to determine the prevalence, clinical, and virologic outcomes of chronic HBV infection, including HBV resistance to lamivudine, in a cohort of HIV-1 seropositive Kenyan women on long-term ART.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, HIV-1 seropositive women initiated three-drug ART regimens that included lamivudine as the single drug active against HBV. Archived samples were tested for HBsAg, with further testing to determine HBeAg seroprevalence, HBV DNA suppression, and lamivudine resistance. We estimated the prevalence of chronic HBV and examined associations between HBV co-infection and clinical and virologic outcomes with chi-square tests, logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.

Results

In a cohort of 159 women followed for a median of 3.4 years (interquartile range 1.4–4.5), 11 (6.9%; 95% CI 3.1–10.7) had chronic HBV infection. Of these, 9 (82%) achieved undetectable plasma HBV DNA levels. One woman developed lamivudine resistance, for an incidence of 3 per 100 person-years. The HBV co-infected women were at greater risk for abnormal ALT elevations compared to HIV-1 mono-infected women (HR 2.37; 95% CI 1.1–5.3). There were no differences between HBV-infected and uninfected women in mortality, CD4 count, or HIV-1 RNA suppression.

Conclusion

The prevalence of chronic HBV in this cohort was similar to recent studies from other African populations. Given our long-term follow-up, lamivudine resistance was lower than expected for HIV-1/HBV co-infected patients. Improved screening for HBV and extended follow-up of HIV-1/HBV co-infected individuals are needed to better understand the impact of different ART regimens on clinical outcomes in this population.

Hepatitis B viral factors and treatment responses in chronic hepatitis B

Baseline and on-treatment hepatitis B viral factors are reported to affect treatment responses. A lower baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level is a strong predictor of the response to antiviral therapy. HBV genotype A/B patients have better responses to interferon-based therapy than those with genotypes C/D. Regarding the association of HBV mutants with responses to antiviral therapy, current evidence is limited. On-treatment viral suppression is the most important predictor of response to nucleoside analogs. On-treatment hepatitis B surface antigen decline is significantly associated with response to pegylated interferon. In the future, individualized therapy should be based on treatment efficacy, adverse effects, baseline and on-treatment predictors of antiviral therapy.

Correlation of the occurrence of YMDD mutations with HBV genotypes, HBV-DNA levels, and HBeAg status in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B during lamivudine treatment

BACKGROUND

Continuous lamivudine therapy is associated with high rates of YMDD mutations, which are the main causes of drug resistance. The current study explores the association of the emergence of YMDD mutations with pretherapy HBV genotype, HBV-DNA levels, HBeAg status, and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in Chinese patients receiving lamivudine therapy for chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

A total of 319 chronic hepatitis B patients who received lamivudine therapy for more than a year were enrolled in this study. YMDD mutations, HBV genotype, HBV-DNA levels, HBeAg status, and ALT levels were determined prior to their lamivudine treatment and every three months for a year of this therapy.

RESULTS

Among the 319 patients, 137 (42.95%) were infected with genotype B and 182 (57.05%) with genotype C. Up to 94 patients (29.47%) developed YMDD mutations within one year of lamivudine therapy. Furthermore, 50 patients with HBV genotype B and 44 patients with genotype C developed YMDD mutations (36.50% vs 24.18%, P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that pretherapy HBV genotype, HBV-DNA levels, and HBeAg status are independent factors for the emergence of YMDD mutations (HBV genotype: OR=2.159, 95% CI 1.291-3.609, P=0.003; HBV-DNA: OR=1.653, 95% CI 1.231-2.218, P=0.001; HBeAg: OR=2.021, 95% CI 1.201-3.399, P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

HBV genotype, HBV-DNA levels, and HBeAg status at baseline are the independent factors associated with the emergence of YMDD mutations among Chinese patients receiving lamivudine therapy for chronic hepatitis B. These findings are helpful to the development of therapeutic strategies for these patients.

A comprehensive HBV array for the detection of HBV mutants and genotype

OBJECTIVE

To develop a comprehensive hepatitis B virus (HBV) array providing simultaneous analysis of 8 genotypes, 47 mutations of reverse-transcriptase polymerase gene and 18 mutations of S gene.

METHOD

Oligonucleotides corresponding to various HBV-normal and -mutant sequences were spotted onto pre-treated glass slides. Single-stranded templates of the HBV gene fragment were prepared from serum-DNA of HBV-infected patients by 2-staged PCR and subjected to allele-specific arrayed-primer extension with Cy5-dCTP. Fluorescein-labelled products were scanned at 670nm.

RESULTS

Comparative analysis of 100 unrelated samples using the array and a commercial kit, revealed 44 with additional mutations from the array, these were confirmed by sequencing. Analysis of 381 samples from 45 patients during 1-3 years of anti-viral therapy showed improved sensitivity with detection of drug-resistant mutations months before clinical relapse. The lower detection limit was 28 copies/mL.

CONCLUSION

The array is better than many existing methods as it provides both mutations and genotype data in a single analysis.

Genotyping the hepatitis B virus with a fragment of the HBV DNA polymerase gene in Shenyang, China

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been classified into eight genotypes (A-H) based on intergenotypic divergence of at least 8% in the complete nucleotide sequence or more than 4% in the S gene. To facilitate the investigation of the relationship between the efficacy of drug treatment and the mutation with specific genotype of HBV, we have established a new genotyping strategy based on a fragment of the HBV DNA polymerase gene. Pairwise sequence and phylogenetic analyses were performed using CLUSTAL V (DNASTAR) on the eight (A-H) standard full-length nucleotide sequences of HBV DNA from GenBank (NCBI) and the corresponding semi-nested PCR products from the HBV DNA polymerase gene. The differences in the semi-nested PCR fragments of the polymerase genes among genotypes A through F were greater than 4%, which is consistent with the intergenotypic divergence of at least 4% in HBV DNA S gene sequences. Genotyping using the semi-nested PCR products of the DNA polymerase genes revealed that only genotypes B, C, and D were present in the 50 cases, from Shenyang, China, with a distribution of 11 cases (22%), 25 cases (50%), and 14 cases (28%) respectively. These results demonstrate that our new genotyping method utilizing a fragment of the HBV DNA polymerase gene is valid and can be employed as a general genotyping strategy in areas with prevalent HBV genotypes A through F. In Shenyang, China, genotypes C, B, and D were identified with this new genotyping method, and genotype C was demonstrated to be the dominant genotype.

Recent advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

INTRODUCTION

At present, two strategies exist for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB): i) standard or pegylated interferon alpha (IFN) with mainly immune modulatory effects; and ii) nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) with direct antiviral effects. The optimal treatment for an individual patient remains controversial.

AREAS COVERED

The treatment efficacy and prediction of response to antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis B are reviewed and discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The rates of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss or seroconversion are continuously increasing in CHB patients after stopping a finite course of IFN, whereas long-term NA therapy is usually required to improve the adverse outcomes of CHB. Lower baseline HBV DNA level is a strong predictor for both sustained viral suppression and HBeAg seroconversion in patients receiving IFN-based as well as NAs therapy. In addition, HBeAg-positive patients with genotype A or B infection have better responses to IFN-based therapy than those with genotypes C or D infection. Furthermore, on-treatment predictors such as declines of serum HBV DNA, HBsAg and HBeAg levels may be helpful in making decisions of subsequent therapy. Regarding the association of host genetic factors with responses to antiviral therapy, current evidence is limited.

The clinical implications of hepatitis B virus genotype: Recent advances

Outcomes of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are heterogeneous. Estimates of annual incidence of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are 2-10% and 1-3%, respectively. Several viral factors, including HBV genotype, viral load and specific viral mutations, have been associated with disease progression. Among these, HBV genotype is not only predictive of clinical outcomes but has also been associated with response to interferon treatment. Currently, at least 10 HBV genotypes and several subtypes have been identified; they have distinct geographic distribution. Acute infection with genotypes A and D results in higher rates of chronicity than genotypes B and C. Compared to genotype A and B cases, patients with genotypes C and D have lower rates of spontaneous hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion; when this occurs, it tends to be delayed. HBV genotype C has a higher frequency of basal core promoter (BCP) A1762T/G1764A mutation, pre-S deletion and is associated with higher viral load than genotype B. Similarly, genotype D has a higher prevalence of BCP A1762T/G1764A mutation than genotype A. These observations suggest important pathogenic differences between HBV genotypes. These may contribute to more severe liver disease, including cirrhosis and HCC with genotypes C and D HBV infection. In addition, genotype A and B patients have better responses to interferon-based therapy than genotypes C and D, but there are few consistent differences for direct HBV antivirals. In conclusion, genotyping of chronic HBV infections can help practicing physicians identify those at risk of disease progression and determine optimal anti-viral therapy.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) subgenotypes C2 and B2 differ in lamivudine- and adefovir-resistance-associated mutational patterns in HBV-infected Chinese patients

We aimed to study the prevalence and clinical implications of hepatitis B virus (HBV) subgenotypes in Chinese patients. A total of 4,300 patients, mainly from northern China, were enrolled, including 182 patients with acute hepatitis B and 4,118 patients with chronic HBV infection who had been exposed to nucleoside or nucleotide analogs. HBV genotypes/subgenotypes were determined by direct sequencing of the HBV S/Pol region. The prevalence rates were 0.40% for HBV/B1, 14.30% for HBV/B2, 0.25% for HBV/B3, 0.35% for HBV/B4, 1.05% for HBV/C1, 81.72% for HBV/C2, 0.93% for HBV/C3, 0.16% for HBV/C4, and 0.84% for HBV/D. In chronic HBV infection, patients with HBV/B2 were younger and had lower ΗBeAg positive rates than patients with HBV/C2. The incidence of lamivudine-resistant mutations was significantly higher in HBV/C2 compared to HBV/B2 (27.9% versus 19.8%; P<0.01), and the significant difference was observed only for rtM204I and not rtM204V. In addition, compensatory mutations were more frequently detected in HBV/C2. The incidence of adefovir-resistant mutations was similar between the two subsets, but HBV/C2 inclined to show rtA181V (3.6% for C2 versus 0.9% for B2; P<0.01), while HBV/B2 inclined to show rtN236T (4.5% for versus 2.5% for C2; P<0.01). The ratios of HBV/B2 to HBV/C2 infection were 1.7 (110/65), 5.7 (2,653/463), 7.5 (520/69), 8.0 (48/6), and 15.3 (183/12) for acute hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis B, liver cirrhosis, acute-on-chronic liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively. In conclusion, HBV/C2 and HBV/B2, two prevalent subgenotypes, differ in lamivudine- and adefovir-resistance-associated mutational patterns. HBV/C2-infected patients are more likely to have disease progression than HBV/B2-infected ones.

Characterization of potential antiviral resistance mutations in hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase sequences in treatment-naïve Chinese patients

Full-length hepatitis B virus (HBV) reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences were amplified and sequenced among 192 nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B. Deduced amino acids (AAs) at 42 previously reported potential NA resistance (NAr) mutation positions in RT region were analyzed. Patients were found with either B-genotype (28.65%) or C-genotype (71.35%) infections. Rt53, rt91, rt124, rt134, rt221, rt224, rt238 and rt256 were identified as B- and C-genotype-dependent polymorphic AA positions. AA substitutions at 11 classical NAr mutation positions, i.e. rt80, rt169, rt173, rt180, rt181, rt184, rt194, rt202, rt204, rt236 and rt250, were not detected. However, potential NAr mutations were found in 30.73% (59/192) isolates, which involved 18 positions including rt53, rt207, rt229, rt238 and rt256, etc. The concomitant AA changes of HBsAg occurred in 16.67% (32/192) isolates including sG145R mutation. One-third of mutation positions were located in functional RT domains (e.g. rt207 and rt233), A-B interdomains (overlapping HBsAg 'a' determinant and showing most concomitant immune-associated mutations) and non-A-B interdomains (e.g. rt191 and rt213), respectively. Genotypes B and C each showed several preferred positions to mutate. These results might provide insights into understanding the evolution and selection basis of NAr HBV strains under antiviral therapy.

The profile of mutational clusters associated with lamivudine resistance can be constrained by HBV genotypes

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate the different clusters of mutations associated with lamivudine resistance in HBV genotypes D and A.

METHODS

HBV reverse transcriptase sequences of 89 HBV-infected patients failing lamivudine treatment were analyzed. The association of mutations with HBV genotypes was assessed by Chi-Squared test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Covariate analysis was based on hierarchical clustering.

RESULTS

In genotype A, the rtM204V (prevalence: 68.2%) was the main sign of lamivudine failure. Multivariate analysis confirmed that genotype A is the only predictor for rtM204V emergence (OR: 14.5 [95% CI: 1.3-158], P=0.02). Covariate analysis showed that rtM204V clusters with rtL180M, rtL229V (corresponding to sF220L in the HBsAg), and, interestingly, with HBsAg mutation sS207N (bootstrap=0.95). Both sF220L and sS207N co-localized in the fourth transmembrane HBsAg domain. In contrast, in genotype D the primary mutations rtM204V and rtM204I occurred with similar prevalence (39.1% versus 45.3%, P=0.47), and showed a distinct pattern of compensatory mutations. rtM204V clusters with mutations localized in the RT-B domain (rtV173L, rtL180M, and rtT184A/S) (bootstrap=0.94), while rtM204I clusters with mutations localized in the RT-A domain (rtS53N, rtT54Y, and rtL80I/V) (bootstrap=0.96) (without associations with HBsAg specific mutations).

CONCLUSIONS

HBV genotype plays an important role in driving RT evolution under lamivudine treatment, and thus can be relevant for therapeutic sequencing, immunological response and disease progression.

Peginterferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the era of nucleos(t)ide analogues

The practising clinician is currently faced with a number of effective treatment options for chronic hepatitis B, including two formulations of interferon (standard IFN and pegylated IFN) and five nucleos(t)ide analogues (lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir). Treatment strategies can be divided into those aiming for sustained response after discontinuation of therapy and those that need to be maintained by prolonged antiviral therapy. Sustained response is particularly achieved with interferon-based therapy, while treatment-maintained response can be achieved with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in the majority of patients. Of currently available drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, PEG-IFN seems to result in the highest rate of off-treatment sustained response after a 1-year course of therapy. Sustained transition to the immune-control phase (inactive HBsAg carrier state) can be achieved in 30-35% of HBeAg-positive patients and 20-25% of HBeAg-negative patients. Loss of HBsAg has been observed in 11% of both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients after 3-4 years. Since hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype is an important predictor of response to PEG-IFN, determination of HBV genotype is essential in patients in whom sustained off-treatment response is pursued. Aiming for sustained response is of particular interest because many HBV-infected patients are in need of antiviral therapy at a young age and may otherwise require indefinite antiviral therapy.

Treatment predictors of a sustained virologic response in hepatitis B and C

Treatment predictors are important tools for the management of therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) infection. In chronic hepatitis B, several pretreatment parameters have been identified for prediction of virologic response to interferon alfa-based antiviral therapies or treatment with polymerase inhibitors. In interferon alfa and pegylated interferon alfa-treated patients, low baseline HBV DNA concentrations, HBV genotype A (B), and high baseline ALT levels are significantly associated with treatment response. In patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues, low baseline HBV DNA but not viral genotype is positively associated with virologic response. During treatment the best predictor of response is HBV DNA kinetics. Early viral suppression is associated with favourable virologic response and reduced risk for subsequent resistance mutations. For the current standard treatment with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C, infection with HCV genotypes 2 and 3, baseline viral load below 400,000-800,000 IU/ml, Asian and Caucasian ethnicity, younger age, low GGT levels, absence of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, and absence of steatosis in the liver have been identified as independent pretreatment predictors of a sustained virologic response. After initiation of treatment, initial viral decline with undetectable HCV-RNA at week 4 of therapy (RVR) is the best predictor of sustained virologic response independent of HCV genotype.

Comparison of reverse hybridization, microarray, and sequence analysis for genotyping hepatitis B virus

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotyping has become important in epidemiological and clinical diagnoses, given the relationship between the viral genotype and the progression of disease or the appearance of antiviral resistance. Since genotyping by sequence and phylogenetic analyses is not convenient in the clinical setting, we evaluated InnoLipa HBV genotyping (Innogenetics, Belgium) and an HBV DNA-Chip (bioMerieux, France) prototype assay and compared their sequencing of the gold standard S gene, using a cohort of 275 individual patient samples. All but two samples, belonging to distant and individual subgroups within a single genotype, were detected by InnoLipa HBV assay. Four samples with dual infections belonging to genotypes A and G were identified only by InnoLipa HBV assay. Using an HBV DNA-Chip assay, one sample could not be amplified due to a low viral load. Four samples were identified as genotype C and two as genotype D by sequencing but were classified as genotype A (two samples) and D (two samples) and as A (one sample) and G (one sample) by the DNA-Chip assay. In conclusion, the InnoLipa HBV genotyping strip assay detected dual infections and was an easy and quick tool for genotyping, with a sensitivity of 99.3% and a specificity of 100% compared to sequence analysis. HBV DNA-Chip assay showed a sensitivity and specificity of 97.5 and 97.8%, respectively.

Genetic variability of hepatitis B virus and response to antiviral therapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global health issue. Effective and individualized treatment of chronic hepatitis B to prevent progression to end-stage liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma is needed. HBV can be classified into eight genotypes (A-H) on the basis of genome sequence divergence. In addition, several naturally occurring HBV mutants have also been identified. The epidemiology of HBV genotypes and their implications for response to antiviral therapy have become increasingly recognized. Recent studies suggested that responses to standard interferon treatment in patients with genotype A or B are better than those with genotype C or D; however, conflicting results exist regarding the response to pegylated interferon. The influence of dose and duration on interferon-based therapy remains to be clarified. In addition to genotype, naturally occurring mutations such as precore and core promoter mutations have also attracted much attention, because they have been shown to affect the disease progression of HBV-related chronic liver disease and possibly the response to antiviral therapy. Here, we review the differences in antiviral theraputic response among HBV genotypes and discuss the role of precore or core promoter mutations in response to antiviral therapy.

Hepatitis B virus genotypes: natural history and implications for treatment

There are eight different genotypes named A-H. Genotypes have distinct geographic distribution in different regions of the world. There exists a difference in the disease profile between different genotypes. Genotype A compared with D, and B compared with C have earlier hepatitis B e-antigen seroconversion and less severe liver disease. However, genotypes are closely linked with core promoter and precore mutations. This may have a confounding effect on the association of genotypes with disease progression. Patients with genotype A compared with D and B compared with C have a better treatment response to IFN-alpha. However, there are no differences in the treatment response and rate of emergence of drug-resistant hepatitis B virus between different genotypes to nucleoside/nucleotide analog therapy.

Role of viral factors in the natural course and therapy of chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global health problem that causes a wide spectrum of liver disease, including acute or fulminant hepatitis, inactive carrier state, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The pathogenesis of hepatocyte damage associated with HBV is mainly through immune-mediated mechanisms. On the basis of the virus and host interactions, the natural history of HBV carriers who are infected in early life can be divided into four dynamic phases. The frequency, extent, and severity of hepatitis flares or acute exacerbation in the second immune clearance and/or fourth reactivation phase predict liver disease progression in HBV carriers. In the past decade, hepatitis B viral factors including serum HBV DNA level, genotype, and naturally occurring mutants predictive of clinical outcomes have been identified. The higher the serum HBV DNA level after the immune clearance phase, the higher the incidence of adverse outcomes over time. In addition, high viral load, genotype C, basal core promoter mutation, and pre-S deletion correlate with increased risk of cirrhosis and HCC development. As to the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, patients with high HBV DNA level and genotype C or D infection are shown to have a worse response to interferon therapy. In conclusion, serum HBV DNA level, genotype, and naturally occurring mutants are identified to influence liver disease progression and therapy of chronic hepatitis B. More investigations are needed to clarify the molecular mechanisms of the viral factors involved in the pathogenesis of each stage of liver disease and the response to antiviral treatments.

Viral genotype and baseline load predict the response to adefovir treatment in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To determine the factors associated with virological response (VR), HBeAg loss or the emergence of adefovir (ADV)-related mutations in ADV-treated chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine (LAM) resistance.

METHODS

Fifty-four LAM-resistant CHB patients (46% HBeAg-positive) were treated with ADV monotherapy (n=28) or ADV plus LAM (n=26) for a mean of 30.4 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (70.4%) achieved VR defined as HBV-DNA levels <10(4)copies/ml within the first 12 months of treatment. Six (24%) of 25 HBeAg-positive patients exhibited HBeAg loss and 20% seroconverted to anti-HBe. Eight patients (14.8%) developed ADV-related mutations. In the multivariate analysis, female gender (HR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.76, p=0.018), HBeAg-negative (HR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.96, p=0.040) and low baseline HBV-DNA levels (HR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.95, p=0.027) were independent predictors of VR, whereas low HBV-DNA levels (HR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.11-1.20, p=0.095) and HBV-genotype D (HR=0.06, 95% CI: 0.004-0.84, p=0.037) independently predicted HBeAg loss.

CONCLUSIONS

ADV therapy suppresses viral replication in more than 70% of LAM-R patients. Factors associated with virologic response are female gender, HBeAg-negative status and low baseline serum HBV-DNA levels. Genotype D HBV infection and low baseline HBV-DNA levels independently predict HBeAg loss.

Lipids changes in liver cancer

Liver is one of the most important organs in energy metabolism. Most plasma apolipoproteins and endogenous lipids and lipoproteins are synthesized in the liver. It depends on the integrity of liver cellular function, which ensures homeostasis of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. When liver cancer occurs, these processes are impaired and the plasma lipid and lipoprotein patterns may be changed. Liver cancer is the fifth common malignant tumor worldwide, and is closely related to the infections of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). HBV and HCV infections are quite common in China and other Southeast Asian countries. In addition, liver cancer is often followed by a procession of chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, so that hepatic function is damaged obviously on these bases, which may significantly influence lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in vivo. In this review we summarize the clinical significance of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism under liver cancer.

Hepatitis B virus genotypes in Europe

There are eight genotypes of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Most genotypes can be further divided into subgenotypes. HBV genotypes influence the course of disease and treatment, and show geographic preferences. In Europe, A and D are the main genotypes found. Genotype A is more prevalent in northern Europe, where genotype D is mainly found in countries surrounding the Mediterranean Sea and in Eastern Europe. Subgenotype A2 is the dominant subgenotype in Europe, but the geographic prevalence of the four subgenotypes found in genotype D is not yet clear. On treatment with interferon HBV, genotype A, compared to genotype D, showsbetter virological response and in a large proportion of patients, even development of anti-HBs. However, in the first year of treatment with lamivudine, higher rates of emergence of YMDD variants are observed in genotype A. This work summarizes the current knowledge on HBV genotypes in countries with low and intermediate HBV carriership from Europe.

High level of genetic heterogeneity in S and P genes of genotype D hepatitis B virus

The genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes and subgenotypes was investigated by directly sequencing amplified PreS, S and P genes of HBV isolates obtained from the plasma of 99 subjects with chronic HBV infection. Genotype D showed the greatest intragenotypic and intrasubgenotypic divergence: in particular, the a determinant was mutated in 58.2% of the genotype D patients, two of whom showed prototypic vaccine-induced escape mutants at codon 145. Moreover, five sites under significant positive selection were found in the S protein of the D isolates: one in the a determinant and four in the highly hydrophobic C terminal. Our results suggest that careful surveillance of vaccine-induced escape mutants should be considered in populations with highly frequent genotype D infections, and raise questions concerning the possible relationship between the genetic heterogeneity, host immunity and pathogenicity of this HBV genotype.

Hepatitis B virus genotype distribution and its lamivudine-resistant mutants in HIV-coinfected patients with chronic and occult hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes were examined in HIV-infected patients with chronic and occult HBV infection. From a total population of 593 HIV-infected patients, 22 individuals (prevalence 3.7%) were found to be HBsAg while 72 (12.1%) were found to be anti-HBc alone. From them, 20 and 4 were HBV DNA positive, respectively. These last four patients are therefore considered to be HBV infected in an occult form. The genotypes could be determined in all 24 HBV-infected patients. HBV-A was the most common (20/24; 83.3%), followed by HBV-D (2/24; 8.3%) and HBV-F (1/24; 4.2%). The remaining sample exhibited mixed infection involving genotypes A and D as pure ones, thus also forming part of three intergenotypic recombinant forms exhibiting different mosaic S gene patterns. The sexual route of transmission was predominant among HBV genotype A-infected patients. Among the 24 HBV DNA-positive patients, point mutations related to lamivudine resistance were found in four strains. These viral strains showed a methionine-to-valine substitution at codon 204 (rtM204V) in association with an upstream B-domain change at rtL180M. Additionally, two of them exhibited the additional rtV173L mutation. The value of HBV molecular monitoring including both HBV viral genomic characterization and genotypic resistance profile in HIV-HBV-coinfected individuals is discussed.

[Hepatitis B and C virus antiviral resistance]

Infection by the hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) viruses is a major cause of morbidity and mortality world-wide. The clinical outcomes of infection by these viruses (e.g., chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma) depend on several factors related to the host and the viral agent. Among the latter, factors associated with the response to current antiviral therapies, such as the emergence of resistance mutants and the genotype responsible for the infection, are gaining increasing importance. As has been established for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the presence of resistance mutations in the viral polymerase constitutes the main problem for treating HBV infection with approved drugs and those recently applied. Methods have been developed to detect these mutations, as well as algorithms to predict the response to treatment. The outcome of treatment for HCV infection is highly influenced by the viral genotype, however, and our understanding of the molecular basis for the response to interferon in these patients has grown considerably in recent years.

Simultaneous quantification and genotyping of hepatitis B virus for genotypes A to G by real-time PCR and two-step melting curve analysis

Both the viral titer and the genotype significantly determine clinical outcomes and responses to antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. A method was developed for large-scale A-to-G genotyping with simultaneous viral quantification. The assay was run on a LightCycler instrument using hybridization probes. The genotype was determined from the melting points of the probes in a two-step manner. Set 1 amplicons differentiated genotypes B, E, and F from A, C, D, and G and simultaneously quantified viremia by real-time PCR. Melting curve analysis using the set 2-1 amplicon or the set 2-2 amplicon reaction mixture was then used to differentiate these genotype groups into single genotypes. HBV DNA quantification was consistent with that of the Amplicor assay and linear in a range from 10(2) to 10(13) copies/ml. By comparison with the restriction fragment length polymorphism method, 92.3% of 441 samples were accurately genotyped by the current assay. The method should be useful for genotyping and quantification of HBV DNA in areas where all genotypes exist.

Detection of hepatitis B virus genotypes and mutants: current status

Characterization results of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome before, during and after antiviral treatment have changed in the last year for a number of reasons. First of all, with the introduction of more nucleoside and nucleotide antiviral therapies, it has become clear that variants or mutants do emerge in time. Viral genomic changes in the HBV polymerase gene can result in a direct antiviral effect, but compensatory mutations can also be identified during prolonged treatment periods. Furthermore, there is an increasing number of reports suggesting that HBV genotypes can be related to, for example, disease progression or the effect of antiviral treatment itself (alpha-interferon or lamivudine). Combined with HBV DNA viral load monitoring, an increase in viral load or a limited reduction during treatment is indicative of genomic changes related to resistance. However, these genomic changes can also be present in the absence of an increase in HBV DNA. Methodologies for the detection of these variants, as well as the determination of genotypes, are rather straightforward. Sequence analysis is time-consuming and expensive, but provides the most information, particularly if not all information on mutations related to antiviral resistance is known. However, the sensitivity of direct sequencing for the presence of minor variant populations is poor, and no mixtures of variant populations are, in general, detected. The ability to detect minor populations and, if possible, even quantify them, gives more insightful information on the dynamic evolution of the virus itself. Antiviral treatment can result in the appearance of more than one population of variants, which can be present for a prolonged period of time, and even remain undetected with current technologies. However, screening specifically for these variant populations before starting treatment for so-called untreated patients (who have received no antiviral treatment for, e.g., 6 months) has already shown that the effects of treatment can be biased. Furthermore, the detection of more dynamic viral populations - including both wild-type and resistant variants - during, but also after therapy, does provide helpful information in the analysis of virological data. Technologies enabling the detection and quantification of these variant populations are presented and discussed.

Comparison of sequence analysis and INNO-LiPA HBV DR line probe assay in patients with chronic hepatitis B

The aim of this study was to compare direct sequence analysis of partial HBV pol gene and Inno-LiPA HBV DR in serum samples of 120 chronic hepatitis B patients sent to the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of Ege University Hospital because of lamivudine resistance. Sequence analysis was performed on ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer. Comparison of Inno-LiPA and sequence results obtained by double-blind evaluation showed full agreement (both at rt180 and rt204) in 58.8% of samples. Visually rechecking of the electropherograms increased this rate to 68.3% Codon based rates are 81.7% and 75.8% at rt180 and rt204 respectively. LiPA detected variants in additional 12 (10%) samples, but missed one variant sample (both rt180 and rt204) and one sample was indeterminate due to poor probe binding. LiPA allows determination of mixed variants and seems to be more sensitive and simple for routine testing even though sequence analysis is still the gold standard for detecting new variants.

Complications in treating chronic hepatitis B in patients with HIV

The management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) poses specific problems in the presence of HIV infection, as therapeutic approaches have to consider both HBV and HIV. There are currently four drugs approved for the treatment of chronic HBV: IFN-alpha, lamivudine, adefovir and entecavir. Furthermore, the dual antiviral activity against HIV and HBV of antiretrovirals such as tenofovir and emtricitabine broadens the armamentarium against HBV in the HIV-coinfected population. Nucleotide analogues adefovir and tenofovir have the advantage of a higher genetic barrier for resistance when compared with the nucleoside analogues lamivudine and emtricitabine. Fortunately, the two families do not share resistance mutations, allowing salvage therapy and the consideration of combination therapy for drug-naive individuals. Although response to IFN-alpha is poorer in HBV/HIV-coinfected patients compared with HBV-monoinfected individuals, the more potent pegylated forms of IFN-alpha have brought new hopes.

Therapeutic implications of hepatitis B virus genotypes

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a global health problem. In addition to the implementation of universal hepatitis B vaccination, effective and individualized treatment of chronic hepatitis B to prevent progression into end-stage liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma is still needed. HBV has been designated eight genotypes (A-H) based on genome sequence divergence. The epidemiology of HBV genotypes and their implications on the responses to antiviral therapy have become increasingly recognized in both Asian and Western countries.

METHODS

Published data are thus reviewed.

RESULTS

Each genotype has its distinct geographical and ethnic distribution. Genotypes A and D occur frequently in Africa, Europe, and India, while genotypes B and C are prevalent in Asia. Genotype E is restricted to West Africa, and genotype F is found in Central and South America. The distribution of genotypes G and H is less clear. Accumulating evidence indicates a better sustained response to conventional interferon in patients with genotype B than those with C, and in patients with genotype A than those with D. In contrast, conflicting results exist regarding the response to pegylated interferon. On the other hand, the therapeutic responses to nucleoside/nucleotide analogues are comparable among patients with different HBV genotypes. The impact of HBV subgenotypes, mixed genotype infections, and recombinants of different genotypes on the response to antiviral treatments awaits further examinations.

CONCLUSION

Remarkable clinical and pathogenic differences do exist among HBV genotypes; however, researches on molecular and virologic mechanisms underlying the clinical phenotypes of different HBV genotypes are urgently needed.

Relationship of genotypes of hepatitis B virus to mutations, disease progression and response to antiviral therapy

Phylogenetic analysis has led to the classification of hepatitis B virus into eight genotypes, designated A to H. The genotypes have differences in biological properties and show heterogeneity in their global distribution. These attributes of the genotypes may account not only for differences in the prevalence of hepatitis B virus mutants in various geographic regions, but also be responsible for differences in the clinical outcome and response to antiviral treatment in different population groups.

Virus and transaminase levels determine the emergence of drug resistance during long-term lamivudine therapy in chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The results of earlier studies on determinants for the emergence of tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutants (rtM204 I/V) were controversial. The aim was to evaluate the impact of viral factors, host factors, host-viral interaction and drug factor on the emergence of rtM204 I/V.

METHODS

56 non-cirrhotic and 58 cirrhotic patients received lamivudine therapy for a median of 34 (12-60) months.

RESULTS

rtM204 I/V emerged in 37 noncirrhotic and 36 cirrhotic patients. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that baseline hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status [odds ratio (OR), 7.728; 95% confidental interval (CI), 2.886-12.957; P=0.0026], HBV-DNA level (OR, 3.756; 95% CI, 1.058-5.089; P=0.0202), alanine transaminase (ALT) level (OR, 6.285; 95% CI, 1.057-11.990; P=0.00246) and treatment duration (OR, 19.88; 95% CI, 8.652-31.762; P<0.0004) were independent determinants for the emergence of rtM204 I/V. Further categorical analysis and correlation test disclosed that patients with HBeAg positivity, HBV-DNA>500 pg/ml and ALT <5x upper limit of normal had significantly higher mutation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

HBeAg status, HBV-DNA, ALT levels and treatment duration are the major determinants for the YMDD mutation during lamivudine therapy, and should be considered in designing the therapeutic strategy.

Management of patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus and HIV

The management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection poses specific problems in the presence of HIV co-infection, since therapeutic approaches have to consider both HBV and HIV infections. There are currently four drugs approved for the treatment of chronic HBV infection (interferon alpha, lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir); the dual antiviral activity of tenofovir and emtricitabine broadens the armamentarium against HBV in HBV/HIV co-infected patients. Nucleotide analogues--eg, adefovir and tenofovir--have the advantage of a higher genetic barrier to the development of resistance compared with nucleoside analogues--eg, lamivudine and emtricitabine. Fortunately, the two families do not share resistance mutations, allowing salvage therapy and the possibility of combination therapy for drug-naive individuals. Although response to interferon alpha is poorer in HBV/HIV co-infected patients compared with HIV-negative individuals, especially in hepatitis B e antigen-negative HBV infection, the more potent pegylated forms of interferon alpha have brought new hope.

Hepatitis B virus: significance of genotypes

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) genotypes have come of age. The concept that HBV genotypes may influence the course of disease and relevant biological differences has now been recognised. However, there are still major gaps in our knowledge. Most clinical data come from Asia and describe findings in patients infected with genotypes B and C. Large scale studies with genotypes A and D as found in Europe or A, D and E from Africa are urgently needed to broaden our understanding. Experimental data which explain in vivo findings in terms of differences in molecular biology in vitro are still in the beginning. The succeeding years will see many interesting studies which will aid our understanding of how variants and genotypes of HBV influence the spectrum of disease in people infected with HBV.

Chronic hepatitis B and viral genotype: the clinical significance of determining HBV genotypes

The global health challenge posed by the hepatitis B virus (HBV) centres around the widespread distribution and the serious complications as a result of persistent infection with the virus. As with other chronic diseases mediated by pathogens such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), clinicians are searching for epidemiological, pathological and viral characteristics of HBV infection that may lead to more effective management of patients with chronic infection. Unlike HCV, the role of HBV genotype in disease progression, severity, response to therapy and drug resistance is still under investigation and just beginning to be clarified. This review examines the potential role of HBV genotype determination in the clinic with emphasis on how this genetic information may used to provide effective management for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Molecular virology in chronic hepatitis B: genotypes

Different hepatitis B virus genotypes have different geographical distributions, natural disease progression, risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and treatment responses. This article summarizes the recent literature in this area.

Detection of hepatitis B virus variants resistant to lamivudine and famciclovir among randomly selected chronic carriers from Spain

BACKGROUND

Treatment for chronic hepatitis B with lamivudine is often hampered by the emergence of point mutations in the YMDD motif of the HBV DNA polymerase gene that confer drug resistance. This usually occurs after several months of therapy, but early detection of lamivudine-resistant mutants has been reported among patients in South Korea. Data from Japan and France suggest that naturally occurring, lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) variants can be found among chronic carriers who have never received lamivudine treatment. Famciclovir can be used as an alternative when lamivudine-resistant variants emerge, though the substitute treatment may also give rise to the emergence and selection of drug-resistant variants.

METHODS

The presence of mutations related with lamivudine and famciclovir resistance was studied in serum samples from 79 randomly selected Spanish HBV carriers, using a line probe assay (LiPA) on HBV genome fragments amplified by polymerase chain reaction. Data concerning antiviral therapy prior to sampling were available for these patients.

RESULTS

Mutations related with resistance to either drug were detected in ten patients. Three of them (3.8% of the 79 carriers studied) had no record of prior lamivudine or famciclovir treatment at the time of sampling. Wild-type strains together with either the rtM204I (M552I) or rtV207I (V555I) point mutation were found in two of these cases, and the rtV207I mutation alone was detected in the third.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings seem to indicate that lamivudine and famciclovir-resistant variants circulate among Spanish HBV carriers. Since it is expected that antiviral therapy will be ineffective when drug-resistant variants are present before the beginning of treatment, it could be beneficial to test for these variants as an additional routine procedure when designing antiviral therapy on an individual basis.