Prediction of recurrence in B-C stages of colorectal cancer by p53 nuclear overexpression in comparison with standard pathological features

Immunohistochemical investigation of prognostic biomarkers in resected colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Many studies have investigated the prognostic role of biomarkers in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, no biomarker has been established in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to scrutinize the current literature for biomarkers evaluated by immunohistochemistry as prognostic markers in patients with resected CRLM.

Methods

A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Articles were identified in the PubMed database with selected search terms and by cross-references search. The REMARK quality criteria were applied. Markers were included if they reported the prognostic impact of immunohistochemical markers in a multivariable setting in relation to overall survival (OS). A meta-analysis was conducted when more than one original article provided survival data of a marker.

Results

In total, 26 biomarkers were identified as independent significant markers for OS in resected CRLM. These biomarkers were found to be involved in multiple oncogenic signalling pathways that control cell growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis and evasion of immune detection. Among these biomarker candidates were Ki-67, EGFR, p53, hTERT, CD34, TSP-1, KISS1, Aurora kinase A and CDX2. CD34 and TSP-1 were reported as significantly associated with survival by more than one study and where therefore pooled in a meta-analysis.

Conclusion

A number of independent prognostic biomarkers for resected CRLM were identified. However, most markers were evaluated in a retrospective setting with small patient cohorts, without external validation. Large, prospective, multicentre studies with standardised methods are needed before biomarkers can translated into the clinic.

Expression of the p53 protein and clinical and pathologic correlation in adenocarcinoma of the rectum

BACKGROUND

p53 is a tumor suppressor gene that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a wide range of tumors, including colorectal cancer.

AIM

To evaluate the prognostic significance of p53 protein expression, and to correlate with clinical and pathologic variables as well as survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining for p53 protein was performed in a series of 83 patients with rectal cancer with a follow-up of at least 5 years.

RESULTS

Expression of nuclear protein was positive in 36 (43.4%) of the tumors. We found association between positive p53 and death, local recurrence, distant metastasis and overall recurrence and we also found association between p53 and death, local recurrence, metastasis and overall recurrence when analysis was adjusted to Astler-Coller stage and grade of differentiation.

CONCLUSION

p53 immunoexpression has shown to be an independent prognostic factor in these series.

Outcome after curative resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Few biologic markers have been studied as prognostic factors in recurrent rectal carcinoma patients. We sought to determine the influence of clinical, pathologic, and biologic (p53, bcl-2, and ki-67) variables on survival after curative resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer who received surgery with curative intent.

RESULTS

From 1988 to 1998, 134 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer underwent operative exploration. Curative resection was performed in 85 patients. Median follow-up was 43 (range, 1.3-149) months. On multivariate analysis, negative predictors of overall survival included an elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level (P=0.02; hazard ratio 2.41; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.19-4.89) and an R1 resection margin (P = 0.01; hazard ratio, 2.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.27-6.21). In 26 patients for whom biologic variables were available, p53, bcl-2, and ki-67 did not significantly impact disease-specific survival or overall survival. Five-year disease-specific survival, overall survival, and pelvic control rates were 46, 36, and 51 percent respectively. Of the 50 patients who relapsed, time to second local recurrence was longer than time to development of metastasis (median, 16.5 vs. 9 months). Median survival for patients with metastatic recurrence was 26.l vs. 41.5 months for those with a subsequent local recurrence alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately two-thirds of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer can be resected for cure. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and an R0 resection margin were the only significant predictors of overall survival. p53, bcl-2, and ki-67 did not impact survival outcomes.

Molecular lesions in colorectal cancer: impact on prognosis? Original data and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

In the Dukes' B and C stages of colorectal carcinoma there are considerable variations in the observed courses of the disease. Since post-operative chemotherapy in patients with Dukes' C (node-positive) colon carcinoma has been demonstrated to be effective in improving overall-survival, a more exact prognosis assessment gains additional significance and therapeutic relevance.

DISCUSSION

One also hopes to derive improved prognostic factors from the clarification of the molecular pathogenesis. Because of its frequency and the accessibility and recognizability of its developmental stages colorectal carcinoma is among the best investigated of all solid tumors. Despite a multitude of suggested molecular candidate markers none of these changes has yet been able enter the everyday life of the clinic. However, it is to be expected that some of the molecular alterations presently discussed will gain importance before long in the clinical treatment of patients with colorectal carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Considering also our own findings, this review presents the latest developments in the scientific discussion of the tumor suppressor/oncogenes p53, k-ras, and DCC, biochemical determinants of the 5-fluorouracil metabolism, and defects of the DNA repair system.

What we could do now: molecular pathology of colorectal cancer

The contribution of molecular genetics to colorectal cancer has been largely restricted to relatively rare inherited tumours and to the detection of germ line mutations predisposing to these cancers. However, much is now known about the somatic events leading to colorectal cancer in general. Several studies have examined the relation between genetic features and prognosis. The purpose of this article is to review these studies and summarise the current state of this subject. Although many of the published studies are small and inconclusive, it is clear that several different pathways exist for the development of this cancer, and some molecular characteristics seem to correlate with clinicopathological features. At present, studies are confined to evaluating a small number of molecular markers; however, with the advent of methods for the rapid genetic profiling of large numbers of colorectal cancers, it will be possible to evaluate fully the clinical usefulness of a range of colorectal cancer genotypes.

Diagnostic and prognostic tumor markers in the gastrointestinal tract

The gastrointestinal tract is the most common site of malignancies of any anatomic system in the body. An early detection of primary tumors of the bowel, pancreas, liver, stomach, and esophagus is often difficult in asymptomatic patients and for this reason these tumors are often detected at a relatively advanced stage, when symptoms lead to a diagnostic evaluation. Furthermore, gastrointestinal tract tumors have an extremely variable prognosis; thus, the identification of new prognostic parameters may be useful for selecting patients to more tailored therapies. In this work, the main molecular, genetic, tissular, and circulating tumor markers proposed for diagnosis and prognosis of gastrointestinal malignancies are reviewed and discussed.

The results of colorectal cancer treatment by p53 status: treatment-specific overview

PURPOSE

Both negative and positive influences of mutant p53 on treatment outcome have been reported, and we present here a meta-analysis of published studies where outcome was reported for defined treatment groups.

METHODS

We identified articles on the effect of p53 status by treatment modality, excluding those not stratified by method of treatment. A common hazard ratio was estimated from studies that reported a multivariate analysis. We also estimated the numbers of patients expressing the endpoint at the mean or median follow-up time and calculated a pooled odds ratio.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight articles were evaluable (23 using immunohistochemistry to detect overexpression of p53 and 8 using DNA sequencing), for a total of 4,416 patients. For patients treated with surgery only, the immunohistochemistry studies showed a significant influence of p53 status on disease-free survival and a marginally significant influence on overall survival. In the studies using DNA sequencing, by contrast, there was a significant influence of p53 mutations on overall survival, but not disease-free survival. For patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy, the influence of p53 status on disease-free survival was either insignificant or marginally significant, depending on test used; there was no influence on overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this pooled analysis of published studies where treatment was accounted for shows that there is a borderline significant hazard associated with p53 overexpression or mutation vs. p53 wild-type, it is unlikely that p53 can be applied in a routine clinical setting alongside factors such as T stage, nodal status, and residual tumor, whose prognostic value is much stronger.

Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999

BACKGROUND

Under the auspices of the College of American Pathologists, the current state of knowledge regarding pathologic prognostic factors (factors linked to outcome) and predictive factors (factors predicting response to therapy) in colorectal carcinoma was evaluated. A multidisciplinary group of clinical (including the disciplines of medical oncology, surgical oncology, and radiation oncology), pathologic, and statistical experts in colorectal cancer reviewed all relevant medical literature and stratified the reported prognostic factors into categories that reflected the strength of the published evidence demonstrating their prognostic value. Accordingly, the following categories of prognostic factors were defined. Category I includes factors definitively proven to be of prognostic import based on evidence from multiple statistically robust published trials and generally used in patient management. Category IIA includes factors extensively studied biologically and/or clinically and repeatedly shown to have prognostic value for outcome and/or predictive value for therapy that is of sufficient import to be included in the pathology report but that remains to be validated in statistically robust studies. Category IIB includes factors shown to be promising in multiple studies but lacking sufficient data for inclusion in category I or IIA. Category III includes factors not yet sufficiently studied to determine their prognostic value. Category IV includes factors well studied and shown to have no prognostic significance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical literature was critically reviewed, and the analysis revealed specific points of variability in approach that prevented direct comparisons among published studies and compromised the quality of the collective data. Categories of variability recognized included the following: (1) methods of analysis, (2) interpretation of findings, (3) reporting of data, and (4) statistical evaluation. Additional points of variability within these categories were defined from the collective experience of the group. Reasons for the assignment of an individual prognostic factor to category I, II, III, or IV (categories defined by the level of scientific validation) were outlined with reference to the specific types of variability associated with the supportive data. For each factor and category of variability related to that factor, detailed recommendations for improvement were made. The recommendations were based on the following aims: (1) to increase the uniformity and completeness of pathologic evaluation of tumor specimens, (2) to enhance the quality of the data needed for definitive evaluation of the prognostic value of individual prognostic factors, and (3) ultimately, to improve patient care.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Factors that were determined to merit inclusion in category I were as follows: the local extent of tumor assessed pathologically (the pT category of the TNM staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer [AJCC/UICC]); regional lymph node metastasis (the pN category of the TNM staging system); blood or lymphatic vessel invasion; residual tumor following surgery with curative intent (the R classification of the AJCC/UICC staging system), especially as it relates to positive surgical margins; and preoperative elevation of carcinoembryonic antigen elevation (a factor established by laboratory medicine methods rather than anatomic pathology). Factors in category IIA included the following: tumor grade, radial margin status (for resection specimens with nonperitonealized surfaces), and residual tumor in the resection specimen following neoadjuvant therapy (the ypTNM category of the TNM staging system of the AJCC/UICC). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), which regularly reviews TNM staging systems, established a working party to develop recommendations for colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary consensus conference using published literature developed an arbitrary classification system of prognostic marker value (Category I, IIA, IIB, III, and IV), which forms the framework for this report.

RESULTS

The working party concluded that several T categories should be subdivided: pTis into intraepithelial carcinoma (pTie) and intramucosal carcinoma (pTim); pT1 into pT1a and pT1b corresponding to the absence or presence of blood or lymphatic vessel invasion, respectively; and pT4 into pT4a and pT4b according to the absence or presence of tumor involving the surface of the specimen, respectively. The working party also recommended that TNM groups be stratified based on the presence or absence of elevated serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (>/= 5 ng/mL) on preoperative clinical examination. In addition, the working party also concluded that carcinoma of the appendix should be excluded from the colorectal carcinoma staging system because of fundamental differences in natural history.

CONCLUSIONS

The TNM categories and stage groupings for colorectal carcinoma published in the current AJCC manual have clinical and academic value. However, a few categories require subdivision to provide increasing discrimination for individual patients. The serum marker CEA should be added to the staging system, whereas multiple other factors should be recorded as part of good clinical practice. Although many molecular and oncogenic markers show promise to supplement or modify the current staging systems eventually, to the authors' knowledge none have yet been evaluated sufficiently to recommend their inclusion in the TNM system.

p27(kipl) protein expression: an independent prognostic factor in rectal carcinoma stages I-III

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of some molecular markers on lymph node metastases, overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated p27(kip1) , p53, nm23, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in 109 primary rectal cancer specimens (stage I, n=38; stage II, n=24; stage III, n=20; and stage IV, n=27) from patients operated on between 1990 and 1995 at Clinica Chirurgica II.

RESULTS

Tumour differentiation (P=0.0469), depth of rectal wall invasion (T status) (P=0.0000), distant metastases (P=0.0000), vascular invasion (P=0.0000), and p27(kip1) expression (P=0.0022) were associated with lymph node metastases (N status). During follow up (median duration 47 months), 48 patients died, and 25 patients (stages I-III) had recurrences. At multivariate analysis, T and N status, and intratumoural necrosis were independent risk factors for OS. The relative risk (RR) of death for patients with lymph node metastases, advanced T status and intratumoural necrosis was 3.3 (P=0.0002), 2.03 (P=0.0127), and 1.47 (P=0.1935), respectively. When analysis included only stage I-III patients, N status and p27(kip1) protein expression were found to be independent risk factors for OS. The RR of death for patients with lymph node metastases and those without p27(kip1) expression was 2.98 (P=0.0251), and 3.57 (P=0.0231), respectively. At multivariate analysis, N status, p27(kip1) expression, and intratumoural necrosis were independent risk factors for DFS. The RR of recurrence for patients with lymph node metastases, intratumoural necrosis and absence of p27(kip1) expression was 6.29 (P=0.0001), 3.04 (P=0.0168), and 3.25 (P=0.0387), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Absence of p27(kip1) expression is a useful marker of tumour aggressiveness in rectal carcinoma stages I-III, and an independent predictor for OS and DFS.

Nuclear p53 protein expression in resected hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: an independent prognostic factor of survival

An association has been reported between nuclear p53 protein expression in tumour cells and a poor outcome in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study we investigated the prognostic significance of nuclear p53 protein expression in CRC liver metastases after curative hepatic resection. The study population consisted of 69 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection for metastases from CRC at our Institution between February 1987 and October 1993. Immunohistochemical expression of p53 protein was evaluated in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of CRC liver metastases using the monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) D01 and Pab 1801. The Cox proportional hazards model was used in forward stepwise regression to assess the relative influence of different prognostic factors. Forty-four (63.8%) CRC liver metastases were p53-positive. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated that patients with p53-positive metastases had a median survival of 27 months versus 93 months for patients with p53-negative metastases (P < 0.01). The 3 and 5 years survival rates were 31.5 and 21.0% in patients with p53-positive metastases and 71.8 and 53.1% in patients with p53-negative metastases. At multivariate analysis p53 protein status was the single best predictor of survival (P = 0.0079); the odds ratio of death among patients with p53-positive tumours was 2.53. Nuclear p53 protein expression in hepatic metastases from CRC is an independent prognostic factor of survival following liver resection. These findings may be of clinical importance in the selection of patients more likely to benefit from liver resection and could be used as criteria for stratification in trials on adjuvant therapy.

p53 protein overexpression and response to induction chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The association between mutations in the p53 gene and prognosis in colorectal cancer remains controversial. This report evaluates the role of p53 protein to predict the response of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with primary locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Between January 1993 and December 1994, 26 patients were seen with locally advanced primary rectal adenocarcinoma, located between 0 and 10 cm from the anal verge, demonstrated clinically and by CT scan. Each received 45 Gy of preoperative radiation therapy (RT) concomitantly with bolus infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) (450/mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 and 28 to 33 of RT). Surgery was performed between 4 and 8 weeks later. All the primary tumors were mapped and sliced. The response rate was divided according to the percentage of malignant cells in the rectal wall and perirectal fat. Lymph nodes were studied with the manual or modified clearing technique. p53 mutant status was assessed immunohistochemically from sections of the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pretreatment biopsy and the resected specimen.

RESULTS

There were 14 females and 12 males, with a mean age of 54 years. All received the scheduled treatment. An abdominoperineal resection (n = 10), low anterior resection (n = 10), and pelvic exenteration (n = 6) were performed. The stages of tumors were as follows: no residual tumor (n = 4); T2 (n = 6); T3-4 (N = 9); and T3-4, N1,2 (n = 7). Fourteen specimens (54%) had mutated p53, and 10 (71%) had >50% of residual tumor, whereas only two (17%) of the specimens with normal p53 had >50% of residual tumor (P = .018). Eight of the 10 low anterior resections were performed in patients whose specimens expressed normal p53.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the determination of p53 is a factor in predicting tumor response in patients who undergo preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Genetic prognostic markers in colorectal cancer

The contribution of molecular genetics to colorectal cancer has been restricted largely to relatively rare inherited tumours and to the detection of germline mutations predisposing to these cancers. However, much is now also known about somatic events leading to colorectal cancer. A number of studies has been undertaken examining possible relations between genetic features and prognostic indices. While many of these studies are small and inconclusive, it is clear that a number of different pathways exist for the development of this cancer and some molecular characteristics correlate with clinicopathological features. With the advent of methods for the rapid genotyping of large numbers of colorectal cancers, it should be possible to evaluate fully the clinical usefulness of colorectal cancer genotypes through multivariate analyses.

Molecular biology of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Western populations. This cancer develops as a result of the pathologic transformation of normal colonic epithelium to an adenomatous polyp and ultimately an invasive cancer. The multistep progression requires years and possibly decades and is accompanied by a number of recently characterized genetic alterations. Mutations in two classes of genes, tumor-suppressor genes and proto-oncogenes, are thought to impart a proliferative advantage to cells and contribute to development of the malignant phenotype. Inactivating mutations of both copies (alleles) of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene--a tumor-suppressor gene on chromosome 5q--mark one of the earliest events in colorectal carcinogenesis. Germline mutation of the APC gene and subsequent somatic mutation of the second APC allele cause the inherited familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. This syndrome is characterized by the presence of hundreds to thousands of colonic adenomatous polyps. If these polyps are left untreated, colorectal cancer develops. Mutation leading to dysregulation of the K-ras protooncogene is also thought to be an early event in colon cancer formation. Conversely, loss of heterozygosity on the long arm of chromosome 18 (18q) occurs later in the sequence of development from adenoma to carcinoma, and this mutation may predict poor prognosis. Loss of the 18q region is thought to contribute to inactivation of the DCC tumor-suppressor gene. More recent evidence suggests that other tumor-suppressor genes--DPC4 and MADR2 of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) pathway--also may be inactivated by allelic loss on chromosome 18q. In addition, mutation of the tumor-suppressor gene p53 on chromosome 17p appears to be a late phenomenon in colorectal carcinogenesis. This mutation may allow the growing tumor with multiple genetic alterations to evade cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Neoplastic progression is probably accompanied by additional, undiscovered genetic events, which are indicated by allelic loss on chromosomes 1q, 4p, 6p, 8p, 9q, and 22q in 25% to 50% of colorectal cancers. Recently, a third class of genes, DNA repair genes, has been implicated in tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer. Study findings suggest that DNA mismatch repair deficiency, due to germline mutation of the hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, or hPMS2 genes, contributes to development of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The majority of tumors in patients with this disease and 10% to 15% of sporadic colon cancers display microsatellite instability, also know as the replication error positive (RER+) phenotype. This molecular marker of DNA mismatch repair deficiency may predict improved patient survival. Mismatch repair deficiency is thought to lead to mutation and inactivation of the genes for type II TGF-beta receptor and insulin-like growth-factor II receptor. Individuals from families at high risk for colorectal cancer (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer or familial adenomatous polyposis) should be offered genetic counseling, predictive molecular testing, and when indicated, endoscopic surveillance at appropriate intervals. Recent studies have examined colorectal carcinogenesis in the light of other genetic processes. Telomerase activity is present in almost all cancers, including colorectal cancer, but rarely in benign lesions such as adenomatous polyps or normal tissues. Furthermore, genetic alterations that allow transformed colorectal epithelial cells to escape cell cycle arrest or apoptosis also have been recognized. In addition, hypomethylation or hypermethylation of DNA sequences may alter gene expression without nucleic acid mutation.