Models for early chemoprevention trials in breast cancer

Use of Biomarker Modulation in Normal Mammary Epithelium as a Correlate for Efficacy of Chemopreventive Agents Against Chemically Induced Cancers

In both estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive (ER+/PR+) human breast cancer and in ER+/PR+ cancers in the methylnitrosourea (MNU)-induced rat model, short-term modulation of proliferation in early cancers predicts preventive/therapeutic efficacy. We determined the effects of known effective/ineffective chemopreventive agents on proliferative index (PI) in both rat mammary epithelium and small cancers. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with MNU at 50 days of age. Five days later, the rats were treated with the individual compounds for a period of 14 days. At that time, normal mammary tissue from the inguinal gland area was surgically removed. After removal, the rats remained on the agents for an additional 5 months. This cancer prevention study confirmed our prior results of striking efficacy with tamoxifen, vorozole, Targretin, and gefitinib, and no efficacy with metformin, naproxen, and Lipitor. Employing a separate group of rats, the effects of short-term (7 days) drug exposure on small palpable cancers were examined. The PI in both small mammary cancers and in normal epithelium from control rats was >12%. In agreement with the cancer multiplicity data, tamoxifen, vorozole, gefitinib, and Targretin all strongly inhibited proliferation (>65%; P < 0.025) in the normal mammary epithelium. The ineffective agents metformin, naproxen, and Lipitor minimally affected PI. In the small cancers, tamoxifen, vorozole, and Targretin all reduced the PI, while metformin and Lipitor failed to do so. Thus, short-term changes in the PI in either normal mammary epithelium or small cancers correlated with long-term preventive efficacy in the MNU-induced rat model.

The expression of prostate-specific antigen in invasive breast carcinoma and its relationship with routine clinicopathologic parameters

Background:

Invasive breast carcinoma is one of the most common cancers of women. Parameters such as lymph node status, tumor grade, and the status of hormone receptors are among the main prognostic determinants of this cancer. Immunohistochemical detection of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is widely used to identify metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma. However, its immunoreactivity has been found in some non-prostatic tissues. This study was conducted to assess PSA expression in invasive breast carcinoma and its relationship with routine clinicopathologic parameters.

Materials and Methods:

100 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded invasive breast carcinoma tissue specimens from the pathology archive of Alzahra hospital (Isfahan, Iran) were studied for the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2/neu, and PSA by immunohistochemistry. Stained sections were classified according to the intensity of staining and the percentage of cells showing PSA staining. The relationship between PSA expression and other markers, age, lymph node status, tumor subtype, and tumor grade was then studied.

Results:

No association was found between PSA expression on one hand and PR, Her2/neu, age, lymph node status, tumor grade, and tumor subtype on the other. PSA score was reversely correlated with ER expression (P = 0.015).

Conclusion:

Despite the reverse relationship between PSA expression and the immunoreactivity of ER, PSA expression was not correlated with other prognostic factors. Therefore, the detection of PSA by immunohistochemistry does not seem to be a significant prognostic parameter in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.

Conducting chemoprevention clinical trials: challenges and solutions

The clinical trials investigative team faces a number of challenges during the execution of a chemoprevention protocol that often depend on the phase of the trial. Phase II chemoprevention trials test promising agents for biomarker modulation in cohorts of 30 to 200 participants at greater than average risk of the cancer being studied who meet strict eligibility criteria. By contrast, phase III trials test agents for their efficacy in cancer prevention in thousands of participants who are generally healthy or may be at slightly elevated risk. Consideration must be given to accruing a very large cohort or a smaller but relatively rare group of participants, and to maintaining vigilance over the toxicity profile of the agent, which may be taken for a lengthy period of time. Additional considerations include clear communication to the participants of the risks and benefits associated with participating on the trial, as well as the need for their long-term commitment. In light of the layer of complexities that chemoprevention research adds to clinical trials, one or more team members need a unique set of skills and knowledge, beyond understanding the scientific aspects of the trial.

Distribution of molecular breast cancer subtypes among Tunisian women and correlation with histopathological parameters: a study of 194 patients

According to the immunohistochemical test of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her-2), breast cancer can be divided into 4 molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, Her-2, and basal-like. The purpose of this study is to correlate these subtypes with clinicopathological features. We have selected from the files of our Pathology Department 194 breast carcinomas which had already been studied for ER, PR, and Her-2, diagnosed between January 2008 and October 2009. The cases were classified into 4 molecular subtypes. The clinicopathological characteristics of each subtype were compared. The luminal A subtype was the most prevalent (51.5%). The basal-like and Her-2 subtypes were significantly correlated to a large tumor size, a high tumor grade, and a high-volume nodal involvement (≥4). On multivariate analysis, patients with the Her-2 and basal-like subtypes were 4.2 (95% CI, 1.3-13.5) times more likely to have developed metastases in four or more lymph nodes than those with luminal tumors. Our analysis revealed that the Her-2 and basal-like subtypes are correlated with factors associated with a poor prognosis. The luminal A subtype is the commonest subtype, showing that breast cancer in Tunisia has no aggressive phenotype.

Translational pathology of neoplasia

With the increasing use of individualized medical care (personalized medicine) in treating and managing patients with cancer, the utilization of biomarkers in selecting and tailoring such medical approaches also is increasing and becoming more important. Specifically, many therapies are effective against only a subgroup of a specific type of tumors and exposing patients with different non-responsive subgroups of the same tumor to ineffective therapies, not only exposes these patients needlessly to acute and chronic side effects of the therapy, but also adds to the costs of medical care. For example, the Oncotype Dx test for estrogen receptor positive tumors that are node negative has been used to identify low risk tumors for which surgery alone is an adequate therapy. Biomarkers may be used to aid in multiple aspects of medical care related to cancer, including early detection, diagnosis, risk assessment, as well as in predicting the aggressiveness of cancers (i.e., prognosis) and predicting the therapeutic efficacy of treatments (i.e., prediction). Biomarkers may be also used as surrogate endpoints to aid in evaluating therapies and preventive approaches. Types of biomarkers vary greatly and include histopathologic appearance, stage of the lesion, quantitative morphologic features, size of the lesion, metastatic pattern and extent of metastasis, as well as imaging and molecular features. The types of measurements of biomarkers also vary; for example, molecular features can be measured at the DNA, mRNA or protein levels as well as at regulatory levels (e.g., microRNA). The usefulness of each biomarker is limited by its sensitivity and specificity in fulfilling its role (e.g., in early detection) and the requirements of sensitivity and specificity to accomplish specific tasks are affected by multiple variables. For example, both very high specificity and sensitivity of a test are required to screen a population with a low prevalence of a specific tumor. The goal of this manuscript is to introduce the reader to how biomarkers may be used and the limitations on the uses of biomarkers in translational research.

Assessing intraepithelial neoplasia and drug safety in cancer-preventive drug development

Despite significant interest from the research community and the population in general, drug approvals for cancer prevention and/or cancer risk reduction are few. This is due, in part, to the requirement that new cancer-preventive drugs must first be shown to be efficacious in reducing cancer incidence or mortality. Moreover, such drugs need to have proven safety for long-term administration. This process can be improved by focusing on precancer (intraepithelial neoplasia) to identify subjects at risk and prove efficacy in shorter, smaller trials as well as on detecting early markers of potential toxicities of chronic exposure to cancer-preventive drug regimens.

Progress in chemoprevention drug development: the promise of molecular biomarkers for prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer--a plan to move forward

This article reviews progress in chemopreventive drug development, especially data and concepts that are new since the 2002 AACR report on treatment and prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia. Molecular biomarker expressions involved in mechanisms of carcinogenesis and genetic progression models of intraepithelial neoplasia are discussed and analyzed for how they can inform mechanism-based, molecularly targeted drug development as well as risk stratification, cohort selection, and end-point selection for clinical trials. We outline the concept of augmenting the risk, mechanistic, and disease data from histopathologic intraepithelial neoplasia assessments with molecular biomarker data. Updates of work in 10 clinical target organ sites include new data on molecular progression, significant completed trials, new agents of interest, and promising directions for future clinical studies. This overview concludes with strategies for accelerating chemopreventive drug development, such as integrating the best science into chemopreventive strategies and regulatory policy, providing incentives for industry to accelerate preventive drugs, fostering multisector cooperation in sharing clinical samples and data, and creating public-private partnerships to foster new regulatory policies and public education.

Comparison of cytomorphology in specimens obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration and ductal lavage from women at high risk for development of breast cancer

Ductal lavage (DL) and random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) are both being used to harvest epithelial cells for risk assessment as well as response evaluation in chemoprevention trials. The magnitude of increase in relative risk has been defined in a prospective study for RPFNA but not for DL atypia. We attempted both procedures in 26 women at high risk for development of breast cancer. Median age was 43 (range 32-57); 15 women were premenopausal, with 6 of the postmenopausal women on HRT. Collection of nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) was attempted and, if successful, was followed by DL; RPFNA was then performed on all women. Both procedures were attempted the same day (follicular phase of menstrual cycle if premenopausal) in 24 subjects and within three months for two subjects. Twenty-three subjects produced NAF, 17 of the 23 (74%) had a successful duct cannulation as part of the DL procedure, with 16 yielding sufficient (10) ductal cells for morphologic assessment. Twenty-five of 26 (96%) subjects had a successful RPFNA procedure with adequate cellularity for morphology. There was concordance between DL and RPFNA specimens for traditional cytologic category assessment in 10/16 (63%), Masood index score in 13/16 (82%), and Consensus Panel assessment in 12/16 (75%) of specimens. We conclude that same day DL and RPFNA is feasible, with 62% and 96% of high-risk women having a successful procedure with evaluable cytomorphology. RPFNA was more likely to yield an evaluable specimen, but if a cellular DL specimen was obtained, morphology was generally similar.

Ki-67 Expression in Benign Breast Ductal Cells Obtained by Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspiration

Ki-67 expression in ductal cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) is currently being used as a response biomarker in phase II breast cancer chemoprevention trials; however, Ki-67 in RPFNA has not been well studied as a risk predictor for cancer, which would support its use as a response indicator. We examined the expression of Ki-67 in RPFNA specimens with hyperplasia +/- atypia obtained from 147 women at high risk for development of breast cancer. Median Ki-67 was 1.4% (range 0-24%). Ki-67 was higher in specimens from women < 50 versus those > or = 50 (median 2% versus 0.6%; P = 0.006) and from premenopausal women versus postmenopausal women (P = 0.037); however, hormone replacement therapy (predominately low-dose estrogen without progestins) had no effect. By univariate analysis, Ki-67 was positively correlated with ductal cell number (P = 0.001) and hyperplasia with atypia (P = 0.007). By multivariable analysis, the proportion of ductal cells expressing Ki-67 was again predicted by cell number, which, in turn, was predicted by cytologic atypia. The association of Ki-67 expression with cytologic atypia, a known risk factor for development of breast cancer, provides preliminary justification for its use as a response biomarker in phase II chemoprevention trials.

Failure of high risk women to produce nipple aspirate fluid does not exclude detection of cytologic atypia in random periareolar fine needle aspiration specimens

INTRODUCTION

Evidence of hyperplasia with atypia found both on random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) and in nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) fluid are associated with an increased risk for breast cancer.

AIM

In this study, we report the correlation of NAF production with cytological assessment of ductal cells obtained by RPFNA.

METHODS

113 women at high risk for development of breast cancer attending the Breast Cancer Prevention Clinic at the University of Kansas Medical Center underwent a single NAF collection attempt and RPFNA.

RESULTS

NAF was successfully collected in 51% of women. There was no significant difference in age, 5-year Gail risk assessment, menopausal status, hormone use, family history of breast cancer, history of prior atypical hyperplasia/LCIS or history of contralateral DCIS/invasive breast cancer between women who produced NAF and those that did not. The only significant difference between the two groups was in history of prior lactation (p = 0.018). Twenty-seven of the 113 subjects were found to have hyperplasia with atypia by RPFNA was 31% in women who produced NAF versus 16% in those who did not (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Although prevalence of RPFNA atypia was numerically higher in NAF producers than non-producers the difference did not reach statistical significance. Failure to produce NAF does not exclude the presence of hyperplasia with atypia by random periareolar fine needle aspiration.

Protein biomarkers for breast cancer prevention

Protein biomarkers suitable for the prevention of breast cancer must be extremely sensitive, easily detectable and highly correlated with the disease. They should be expressed in the reversible phase of carcinogenesis. Among the large number of candidate tumour-associated proteins, those related to the oestrogen/chorionic gonadotropin/insulin pathway seem to be of most interest because these can be causally implicated. They presumably are the first to express differently and are open to hormonal treatments. The biomarkers that give information on membrane receptor-modulated signal transduction should be considered as well. Up to now, only tamoxifen has shown some preventive activity, suggesting that the oestrogen pathway is useful indeed. Fenretinide and recombinant human chorionic gonatotropin (hCG) are also promising. But the financial requirements and the very long assessment periods largely prevent current research. This is precisely why we badly need to give priority to molecular biology research, in particular in the protein compartment There is widespread belief that advanced proteomics together with increased informatics can provide specific combinations of disease-related expression profiles that could identify high-risk groups with much more reliability and allow us to monitor preventive strategies.

Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Phase I Evaluation of Biomarker Modulation by Arzoxifene, a Third Generation Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator

PURPOSE

Arzoxifene, a new selective estrogen receptor modulator with strong breast antiestrogen activity and absence of uterine agonist activity, was explored as a potential chemoprevention agent. We performed a multi-institutional evaluation of arzoxifene in women with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ or T1/T2 invasive cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a Phase IA trial, 50 pre- or postmenopausal women were randomized to 10, 20, or 50 mg of arzoxifene daily in the interval between biopsy and re-excision or were enrolled as no-treatment controls. In a Phase IB trial, 76 postmenopausal women were randomized to 20 mg of arzoxifene versus matched placebo. Serum specimens collected at entry and at re-excision were assayed for various hormones and growth factors. Tissue from biopsies (estrogen receptor + and/or progesterone receptor +) and re-excision specimens was evaluated immunohistochemically for proliferation (Ki-67 by MIB-1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen) and other biomarkers.

RESULTS

In both trials, increases in serum sex hormone binding globulin were noted, as were decreases in insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and the IGF-I:IGF binding protein-3 ratio (P < 0.007 versus control/placebo). For 45 evaluable women in Phase IA, decreases in proliferation indices were more prevalent for arzoxifene (particularly 20 mg) than for controls. For 58 evaluable women in Phase IB, a decrease in estrogen receptor expression for arzoxifene was observed compared with no change with placebo (P = 0.0068). However, decreases in proliferation indices for arzoxifene were not statistically different from placebo, perhaps due to a confounding effect of stopping hormone replacement therapy before entry.

CONCLUSION

Given the favorable side effect profile and the biomarker modulations reported here, arzoxifene remains a reasonable candidate for additional study as a breast cancer chemoprevention agent.

Chemoprevention for pancreatic cancer

For a number of solid tumors, including pancreatic cancer, efforts aimed at disease prevention may be more successful than currently available anticancer treatments. While specific interventions are emerging to prevent breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer, no trials of chemoprevention are being conducted in pancreatic cancer. Importantly, there are significant obstacles to the conduct of such research. However, preclinical and epidemiologic studies suggest that several drugs may have chemopreventive potential in pancreatic cancer. These include aspirin and other non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors, somatostatin analogs, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and anti-androgenic agents. As the oncology community evaluates some of these agents in large chemoprevention trials for breast, colon, and prostate cancer, it may be found that pancreatic cancer prevention occurs as an unintended, but desirable consequence. Moreover, other general societal trends, such as smoking cessation and the widespread use of cholesterol-lowering agents and aspirin, could have a role in reducing the risk of pancreatic cancer, and in the future, may lead to a decrease in its incidence.

Chemoprevention of breast cancer: implications for postmenopausal women

Estrogen administration is associated with reduction in perimenopausal symptoms and the risk for several conditions affecting postmenopausal women. As estrogen administration also increases the risk for breast cancer, a common dilemma facing many women and their physicians is whether to use estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that antagonises estrogenic effects in breast tissue but retains some estrogen agonist properties in other organs, or neither. For women with average to moderate risk of breast cancer and with perimenopausal symptoms, ERT may be the best short-term choice. For very high-risk women (>1% per year) with menopausal symptoms, alternatives to ERT might be offered and tried first. A diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer within the last 2 to 5 years should be considered a relative contraindication for ERT unless the tumour was estrogen receptor negative. High-risk women without menopausal symptoms are the best candidates for the only currently approved drug for breast cancer risk reduction, tamoxifen. Although the drug is approved for women with a 5-year risk of breast cancer > or = 1.7% (0.34% per year), postmenopausal women most likely to experience a favourable benefit/risk ratio are those with a Gail estimated risk of >0.5% per year without a uterus or >1% per year if they retain their uterus. Tamoxifen should not be used in women with prior history of thromboembolic or precancerous uterine conditions. Tamoxifen is often used in Europe in conjunction with transdermal ERT in hysterectomised women without obvious loss of efficacy or increased risk of thromboembolism. Raloxifene is a second generation SERM with estrogen-like agonist effects on bone but with less uterine estrogen agonist activity than tamoxifen. Raloxifene may have less potent breast antiestrogenic effects than tamoxifen, particularly in a moderate- to high-estrogen environment. Raloxifene is approved for use in reducing risk of osteoporosis, but not breast cancer. Whether it is as effective as tamoxifen in reducing breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women is the subject of a current trial. All women regardless of breast cancer risk are advised to employ nonpharmacological risk reduction measures, including normalisation of bodyweight, exercise, adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, and avoidance of smoking and alcohol. The preventive options are best weighed during an individualised consultation where a woman's menopausal symptoms and risk for breast cancer and other diseases can be examined, and the options for improving postmenopausal health can be discussed.

Breast cancer chemoprevention: current challenges and a look toward the future

There is a need to develop new prevention agents for breast cancer risk reduction that would have fewer side effects than the approved agent, tamoxifen, and/or would be effective in preventing estrogen receptor-negative or tamoxifen-resistant, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. There also is a need to improve the accuracy of present risk assessment models and to incorporate tissue-based biomarkers to supplement risk prediction tools. Candidate risk biomarkers include the serum hormones insulin-like growth factor-1 and its binding protein-3, mammographic breast density, nipple aspirate fluid production, and breast tissue evidence of proliferative breast disease (intraepithelial neoplasia). A variety of techniques have been developed to randomly sample breast tissue to detect precancerous changes and/or detect modulation of proliferation in response to a prevention agent. Based on molecular abnormalities observed in breast intraepithelial neoplasia, a number of drug classes and combinations are suggested as potential chemoprevention approaches. Clinical trial models have been developed to select the appropriate drug dose for subsequent biomarker modulation chemoprevention trials in which the use of surrogate endpoint biomarkers as indicators of efficacy is being explored. If these biomarkers can be validated and shown to reliably predict and monitor response in phase I/II prevention trials, and if favorable modulation is correlated with subsequent decreased cancer incidence, biomarkers may replace cancer incidence as the endpoint in future phase III trials, dramatically reducing the time and expense associated with new prevention drug development.

Breast cancer risk in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid

BACKGROUND

We previously showed that women with abnormal cytology in breast fluid obtained by nipple aspiration had an increased relative risk (RR) of breast cancer compared with women from whom fluid was not obtained and with women whose fluid had normal cytology. This study extends the follow-up in the original study group (n = 4046) and presents the first follow-up for a second group of women (n = 3627).

METHODS

We collected nipple aspirate fluid from women in the San Francisco Bay Area during the period from 1972 through 1991, classified the women according to the most severe epithelial cytology observed in fluid specimens, and determined breast cancer incidence through March 1999. We estimated RRs for breast cancer using Cox regressions, adjusting for age and year of study entry. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

For women in the first and second study groups, the median years of follow-up were 21 years and 9 years, respectively, and breast cancer incidences were 7.8% (285 cases in the 3633 women for whom breast cancer status could be determined) and 3.5% (115 of 3271), respectively. Compared with women from whom no fluid was obtained, whose incidences of breast cancer were 4.7% (39 of 825) and 3.3% (65 of 1950) for those in group 1 and group 2, respectively, incidences and adjusted RRs were 8.1% (34 of 422), with RR = 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9 to 2.3), and 0% (0 of 31), respectively, for those with unsatisfactory aspirate specimens and 8.2% (148 of 1816), with RR = 1.6 (95% CI = 1.1 to 2.3), and 3.1% (25 of 811), with RR = 1.2 (95% CI = 0.8 to 2.0), respectively, for those with normal cytology in aspirates. Compared with women from whom no fluid was obtained, incidences and adjusted RRs for women in group 1 with epithelial hyperplasia and atypical hyperplasia in aspirates were 10.8% (52 of 483), with RR = 2.4 (95% CI = 1.6 to 3.7), and 13.8% (12 of 87), with RR = 2.8 (95% CI = 1.5 to 5.5), respectively, while those for women in group 2 were 5.5% (25 of 457) and 0% (0 of 22), respectively, with a combined RR = 2.0 (95% CI = 1.3 to 3.3).

CONCLUSION

The results obtained with the newly followed women independently confirmed previous findings that women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid have an increased risk of breast cancer.

Beyond tamoxifen new endpoints for breast cancer chemoprevention, new drugs for breast cancer prevention

Although tamoxifen appears to markedly reduce breast cancer risk in women with a prior diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia or in situ carcinoma, it is not clear what other groups of women receive substantial benefit. Major breast chemoprevention priorities are to (1) develop new agents that (a) have fewer side effects, (b) are effective in ER--as well as tamoxifen-resistant precancerous tissue, and (c) are compatible with hormone therapy; and (2) develop efficient clinical strategies including prognostic and predictive morphologic and molecular biomarkers. Breast tissue may be repeatedly sampled for evidence of intraepithelial neoplasia by fine needle aspiration, ductal lavage, or needle biopsy to select candidates at highest short-term risk as well as to monitor response in small proof of principle studies prior to a large cancer incidence trial. Molecular marker expression may also be used to select a cohort most likely to respond to a particular agent. A large number of new agents are attractive as potential prevention agents and some are already in clinical prevention testing. Compounds which should be effective in ER + precancerous tissue but may have a better side-effect profile include new selective estrogen receptor modulators which lack uterine estrogen agonist activity, isoflavones, aromatase inactivators/inhibitors for postmenopausal women, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone regimens for premenopausal women. Retinoids, rexinoids, and deltanoids may be efficacious in ER+ tissue resistant to tamoxifen. Agents which should theoretically have activity in ER- or ER+ precancerous tissue include polyamine synthesis inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, combined demethylating agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors, as well as metalloprotease and angiogenesis inhibitors. Sample Phase I and Phase II clinical trial designs are reviewed using modulation of molecular markers and breast intraepithelial neoplasia as the major endpoints.

Biomarker assays in nipple aspirate fluid

The noninvasive technique of nipple aspiration as a potential source of biomarkers of breast cancer risk was evaluated. The feasibility of performing mutagenesis assays, amplifying DNA, and performing protein electrophoresis on nipple aspirate fluid was explored. A tool was developed to measure the level of discomfort, if any, from this procedure. Twenty-five healthy women (20 premenopausal and 5 postmenopausal) were enrolled. Fluid was obtained using a modified breast pump. Premenopausal women were scheduled for four to six weekly aspirations, and postmenopausal women were scheduled for one to two weekly aspirations. Mutagenesis assays were performed using the Salmonella (Ames) assay. DNA amplification of several microsatellite regions was carried out using polymerase chain reaction. Protein was quantified, and two-dimensional protein electrophoresis was performed. Overall, fluid was obtained from 80% of the women, and the level of discomfort was minimal. Acid hydrolysis of one sample resulted in mutagenicity; all six nonhydrolyzed samples were not mutagenic. The ability to amplify DNA ranged from 34% to 96%, depending on length of the microsatellite region examined. The average protein concentration was 71 microg/mL. Two-dimensional protein electrophoresis was successfully performed on samples from two subjects. Nipple aspiration is a simple technique and is easily learned and well tolerated, which yields a reagent useful for a variety of investigations. This technique may facilitate the identification and application of biomarkers for future breast cancer risk assessment and chemopreventive protocols.

Chemoprevention for high-risk women: tamoxifen and beyond

The demonstration by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) that 5 years of tamoxifen therapy is associated with an approximate 50% reduction in breast cancer incidence in high-risk women was a milestone in breast cancer prevention. Because tamoxifen is associated with increased risk of side-effects such as hot flashes, menstrual abnormalities, uterine cancer, and thromboembolic phenomena, its use will not be advisable or acceptable for all high-risk women. Women over 50 years of age appear to be at highest risk for serious adverse events, such as uterine cancer and thromboembolic phenomena. Individuals in whom tamoxifen-associated breast cancer risk reduction appears to outweigh risk of serious side-effects include women with prior in situ or estrogen receptor (ER)-positive invasive cancer, atypical hyperplasia, and/or women ages 35-49 with a calculated Gail 5-year risk of > or =1.7%, hysterectomized women aged 50 and older with a 5-year Gail risk of > or =2.5%, and nonhysterectomized women aged 50 and older with a 5-year Gail risk of >5.0%. It is not yet clear whether tamoxifen can reduce breast cancer incidence in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, although preliminary evidence favors benefit for at least those with a BRCA2 mutation. Raloxifene is a selective ER modulator with less uterine estrogen agonist activity than tamoxifen, and it is hoped that it will result in fewer uterine cancers but will be equally efficacious in reducing the risk of breast cancer. The NSABP is currently conducting a randomized study of tamoxifen versus raloxifene in high-risk postmenopausal women. Approximately one third of invasive cancers are ER negative. Tamoxifen does not reduce the incidence of ER-negative cancers, nor does it appear to be effective in preventing the appearance of one third of ER-positive cancers. Priorities in prevention research are to develop (a) biomarkers to refine short-term risk assessments based on epidemiologic models, (b) biomarkers predictive of response to specific classes of preventive agents, (c) drugs with fewer side-effects and/or effective in ER-negative or ER-positive tamoxifen-resistant precancerous disease, and (d) efficient clinical trial models to assess new agent efficacy. Breast intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN) may be sampled by minimally invasive techniques and is an attractive short-term risk biomarker. Molecular abnormalities observed in IEN may be used to select potential agents for testing/therapy, and modulation of these abnormalities may be used in phase I trials to select appropriate doses and in phase II trials to assess response. Breast density volume and certain serum markers such as insulin-like growth factor-1 are also being studied as potential risk and response biomarkers. Reversal or prevention of advanced IEN as well as modulation of other risk biomarkers in randomized phase II and phase III trials is being evaluated as a means of more efficiently evaluating prevention drugs in the future. A number of agents are being developed that target molecular abnormalities in IEN, have fewer or different side effects than tamoxifen, and may be effective in ER-negative or tamoxifen-resistant disease.

Molecular biomarkers for breast cancer prognosis: coexpression of c-erbB-2 and p53

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic significance of molecular biomarkers, particularly c-erbB-2 and p53, through study of prospective clinical data and archival breast cancer tissues for women accrued to the Alabama Breast Cancer Project.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Defining molecular abnormalities in breast cancer is an important strategy for early detection, assessment of prognosis, and treatment selection. Evidence is strong that selective biomarkers, including c-erbB-2 and p53, have prognostic significance in breast cancer. Few studies have analyzed the prognostic significance of coexpression of biomarkers.

METHODS

Study patients were those accrued to the Alabama Breast Cancer Project (1975-1978) who had archival breast cancer tissues available for analysis. Criteria for entrance into the Alabama Breast Cancer Project were T1-3 breast cancer with M0 status. Age, nodal status, and histologic grade were also documented. Patients were randomized to radical versus modified radical mastectomy, and node-positive patients were also randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil [CMF]) versus melphalan. Archival breast cancer tissues were studied for c-erbB-2, TGF-alpha, p53, cathepsin D, bcl-2, and estrogen and progesterone receptor expression using immunohistochemistry. Survival curves were developed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed using the log-rank test, multivariate analysis using a rank regression model.

RESULTS

Three hundred eleven patients were accrued to the Alabama Breast Cancer Project, and paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues for 90 patients were available for immunohistochemical analysis of molecular biomarkers. Univariate analysis showed nodal status, c-erbB-2 expression, and p53 expression to have prognostic significance. Coexpression of c-erbB-2 and p53 was also found to have prognostic significance by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis showed T stage, nodal status, c-erbB-2 expression, and p53 expression to have independent prognostic significance.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that c-erbB-2 and p53 expression in breast cancer have prognostic significance. After median follow-up of 16 years, coexpression of c-erbB-2 and p53 may have more prognostic significance than traditional prognostic factors such as T stage and nodal status. Prospective study of large numbers of patients with breast cancer is encouraged to validate these findings.

From adjuvant therapy to breast cancer prevention: BCPT and STAR

The continued widespread prevalence of breast cancer supports placing a high priority on research aimed at its primary prevention, particularly among women who are at increased risk for developing this disease. The suggestion of potential agents for the primary chemoprevention of breast cancer evolved out of the treatment setting. Extensive experience with tamoxifen, a first-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) showing efficacy, first, in the treatment of advanced breast cancer and, subsequently, as adjuvant therapy for early stage disease established the safety of this agent. Cumulative data from multiple adjuvant studies documented the efficacy of tamoxifen in reducing second primary breast cancers in the contralateral breast, supporting its potential as a chemopreventive agent for breast cancer. The safety and second primary data on tamoxifen, together with extensive information on its pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and antitumor effects, as well as its potentially beneficial effects on lipid metabolism and osteoporosis, led the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) to select tamoxifen for testing in the first prospective randomized phase III trial of the efficacy of a chemopreventive agent for preventing breast cancer in women at increased risk of the disease. Accordingly, in 1992 the NSABP started the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1) in which 13,388 women > or = 35 years of age who were at increased risk of breast cancer according to Gail model risk factors [family history, age, and personal history (i.e., age at first birth, age at menarche, previous breast biopsies)] were randomized to tamoxifen 20 mg/day or placebo for 5 years. Through 69 months of follow-up tamoxifen reduced the risk of invasive breast cancer, primarily estrogen receptor-positive tumors, by 49% (two-sided p < 0.00001). Tamoxifen reduced the risk of noninvasive breast cancer by 50% (two-sided p < 0.002). In addition, tamoxifen reduced fractures of the hip, radius, and spine, but it had no effect on the rate of ischemic heart disease. As previously shown, the rates of endometrial cancer and vascular events increased with tamoxifen. With the P-1 results establishing tamoxifen as the standard of care for the primary chemoprevention of breast cancer in high-risk women, concern over the side effects of tamoxifen has prompted a continuing search for an agent that displays a more desirable efficacy/toxicity profile. Raloxifene, a second-generation SERM approved for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, displays antiestrogenic properties in the breast and possibly the endometrium, and estrogenic effects in the bone and on the lipid profile, suggesting it as a candidate for comparison with the chemopreventive standard, tamoxifen. Raloxifene will be compared to tamoxifen in an equivalency trial, the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) NSABP P-2, which began in July 1999 at almost 500 centers in North America. The plan is to randomize 22,000 postmenopausal women > or = 35 years of age at increased risk of breast cancer by Gail criteria to tamoxifen 20 mg/day or raloxifene 60 mg/day for 5 years. Study endpoints include invasive and noninvasive breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, endometrial cancer, bone fractures, and vascular events.

Recommendations for cancer prevention trials using potentially ototoxic test agents

PURPOSE

Preventive oncology applies pharmacologic agents to reverse, retard, or halt progression of neoplastic cells to invasive malignancy, a process that may require administration of agents over long periods of time. Although ototoxicity may be a tolerable side effect of anticancer or antimicrobial therapy, even modest ototoxicity may not be acceptable in agents developed for preventive oncology that are routinely administered to subjects who neither are, nor necessarily will become, clinically ill.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Age-related shifts in hearing may occur over the course of longterm or open-ended therapy; consequently, age-adjusted norms enable researchers to better distinguish hearing loss caused by drugs from that caused by aging. Norms for hearing sensitivity are derived from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging and are the basis for the proposed audiologic monitoring recommendations.

RESULTS

Audiologic monitoring recommendations are presented that standardize patient selection, adverse event reporting, posttreatment follow-up, and audiologic testing for potentially ototoxic investigational agents.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations are applicable to trials of investigational agents as well as various classes of drugs used in routine clinical care.

Breast cancer chemoprevention: beyond tamoxifen

A large number of new potential chemoprevention agents are available that target molecular abnormalities found in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and/or ER-positive precancerous breast tissue and have side effect profiles that differ from tamoxifen. Classes of agents currently undergoing evaluation in clinical prevention trials or those for which testing is planned in the near future include new selective ER modulators, aromatase inactivators/inhibitors, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists, monoterpenes, isoflavones, retinoids, rexinoids, vitamin D derivatives, and inhibitors of tyrosine kinase, cyclooxygenase-2, and polyamine synthesis. New clinical testing models will use morphological and molecular biomarkers to select candidates at highest short-term risk, to predict the response to a particular class of agent, and to assess the response in phase II prevention trials. If validated, morphological and molecular markers could eventually replace cancer incidence as an indicator of efficacy in future phase III trials.

Short-term breast cancer prediction by random periareolar fine-needle aspiration cytology and the Gail risk model

BACKGROUND

: Biomarkers are needed to refine short-term breast cancer risk estimates from epidemiologic models and to measure response to prevention interventions. The purpose of our study was to determine whether the cytologic appearance of epithelial cells obtained from breast random periareolar fine-needle aspirates or molecular marker expression in these cells was associated with later breast cancer development.

METHODS

: Four hundred eighty women who were eligible on the basis of a family history of breast cancer, prior precancerous biopsy, and/or prior invasive cancer were enrolled in a single-institution, prospective trial. Their risk of breast cancer according to the Gail model was calculated, and random periareolar fine-needle aspiration was performed at study entry. Cells were characterized morphologically and analyzed for DNA aneuploidy by image analysis and for the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, estrogen receptor, p53 protein, and HER2/NEU protein by immunocytochemistry. All statistical tests are two-sided.

RESULTS

: At a median follow-up time of 45 months after initial aspiration, 20 women have developed breast cancer (invasive disease in 13 and ductal carcinoma in situ in seven). With the use of multiple logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis, subsequent cancer was predicted by evidence of hyperplasia with atypia in the initial fine-needle aspirate and a 10-year Gail projected probability of developing breast cancer. Although expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, estrogen receptor, p53, and HER2/NEU was statistically significantly associated with hyperplasia with atypia, it did not predict the development of breast cancer in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

: Cytomorphology from breast random periareolar fine-needle aspirates can be used with the Gail risk model to identify a cohort of women at very high short-term risk for developing breast cancer. We recommend that cytomorphology be studied for use as a potential surrogate end point in prevention trials.

Yield of Terminal Duct Lobule Units in Normal Breast Stereotactic Core Biopsy Specimens: Implications for Biomarker Studies

The purpose of this study was to assess the potential value of large-needle core biopsies of normal breast tissue for immunohistochemical studies of epithelial risk assessment. A retrospective analysis was performed to determine the yield of nonatrophic terminal duct lobule units (TDLUs) in 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsies of normal adjacent breast tissue which were included in routine stereotactic core biopsies of benign lesions. Fifty-one patients had a median of two normal tissue cores (range 1-7); 82% of the patients had two or more normal tissue cores; 47% had three or more normal tissue cores. Nonatrophic TDLUs were present in only 47% of patients and in 31% (42 of 137) of all cores. Patients with heterogeneous or dense normal mammographic parenchyma at the site of the biopsy were more likely to have nonatrophic TDLUs, 45% (20 of 44), than patients with fatty normal mammographic parenchyma at the biopsy site, 0% (0 of 7), p = 0.007. Seventy percent (7 of 10) of postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy had nonatrophic TDLUs as compared to 41% (11 of 27) of premenopausal and postmenopausal women not on hormones (p = not significant). Eleven-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsies of normal breast tissue have a low yield of nonatrophic TDLUs suitable for histochemical studies of epithelial risk assessment.

Incidence of BRCA1/2 germ line alterations in a high risk cohort participating in a phase II chemoprevention trial

It is unknown what proportion of women at high risk for breast cancer, entering phase II chemoprevention trials, have BRCA1/2 alterations, and whether their initial biomarker patterns or response to preventive interventions will differ between carriers and non-carriers. As part of a 6-month phase II chemoprevention trial of diflouromethlyornithine (DFMO), high-risk subjects (family history, prior precancerous breast disease or prior breast cancer), who had random peri-areolar fine needle evidence of epithelial hyperplasia with or without atypia, were offered genetic counselling and testing at the completion of their study participation. 97% of the 119 women eligible for testing underwent BRCA1/2 gene sequencing, 3 declined. 26 (22%) of the 116 women had an alteration in BRCA1/2. Known deleterious mutations were present in 3 (3%), uncertain significance mutations in 19 (16%), and probable polymorphisms in 6 (5%). There does not appear to be a difference in initial biomarker distribution between participants with and without germ line alterations.

Chemoprevention: general perspective

Chemoprevention is the use of natural or synthetic compounds to block, reverse, or prevent the development of invasive cancers. Cellular carcinogenesis forms the biologic basis for the identification of chemopreventives, assessment of their activity, and ultimately the success or failure of a chemopreventive. Chemopreventive agents undergo multistep evaluations to assess efficacy that are similar in concept but vastly different in practice to standard ablative oncologic therapeutics. In vitro assessments of potential anticarcinogenesis efficacy include measurements of an agent's antioxidant activity, induction of phase II metabolizing enzymes and effects upon cellular proliferation and apoptotic control pathways. In vivo efficacy is assessed primarily in rodent models of carcinogenesis that are specific for a given organ target. The role of genetically modified animal models in the in vivo assessment of chemoprevention agents remains unclear. Clinical assessment of chemopreventive agent efficacy consists of a multistep process of identification of an optimal chemopreventive agent (phase 1), demonstration of efficacy in humans through the modulation of reversal of a tissue, biochemical, and molecular surrogates for neoplastic transformation and invasion (phase 2) and cancer risk reduction in large cohort trials (phase 3). Opportunities and future needs include the development of reliable, predictive in vivo models of carcinogenesis, careful exploration of the preventive pharmacology of therapeutic agents being used for non-cancer prevention indications, and the incorporation of genetic risk cohorts to define cancer chemopreventive efficacy.

Pilot trial of the safety, tolerability, and retinoid levels of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide in combination with tamoxifen in patients at high risk for developing invasive breast cancer

PURPOSE

N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide (¿4-HPR, Fenretinide; R.W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Springhouse, PA) and tamoxifen (TAM) have synergistic antitumor and chemopreventive activity against mammary cancer in preclinical studies. We performed a pilot study of this combination in women at high risk for developing breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two women were treated with four cycles of 4-HPR, 200 mg orally (PO) for 25 days of each 28-day cycle, and TAM, 20 mg PO once daily for 23 months beginning after 1 month of 4-HPR alone. Tolerability, dark adaptometry, tissue biopsies, and retinoid plasma concentrations (Cp) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Symptomatic reversible nyctalopia developed in two patients (6%) on 4-HPR, but 16 (73%) of 22 patients had reversible changes in dark adaptation, which correlated with relative decrease in Cp retinol (P </=.01). Four patients stopped treatment for side effects, and 84% of patients had hot flashes. Other commonly reported (grade </= 2) reversible toxicities included skin and ocular dryness, fatigue, and mood changes. Serum high-density lipoprotein increased and cholesterol decreased from baseline to month 4. Baseline mean +/- SD Cp retinol was 708 +/- 280 ng/mL. Mean +/- SD Cp of 4-HPR, N-(4-methoxyphenyl) retinamide (4-MPR), and retinol after 1 month of 4-HPR were 0.34 +/- 0.21 micromol/L, 0.28 +/- 0.21 micromol/L, and 282 +/- 127 ng/mL, respectively. Mean retinoid Cps did not change after 3 months of 4-HPR + TAM.

CONCLUSIONS

TAM administration did not affect Cp 4-HPR or 4-MPR. Reversible nyctalopia correlated with relative decrease in Cp retinol but was not symptomatic for most patients. TAM + 4-HPR has acceptable tolerability for this high-risk cohort.