Requirement for DNA mismatch repair proteins in the transcription-coupled repair of thymine glycols in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Oxidative stress and the DNA mismatch repair pathway

SIGNIFICANCE

Living organisms are under constant assault by a combination of environmental and endogenous oxidative DNA damage, inducing the modification of proteins, lipids, and DNA. Failure to resolve these oxidative modifications is associated with genome instability and the development of many disease states. To maintain genomic integrity, oxidative lesions must be precisely targeted and efficiently resolved. For this, cells have evolved an intricate network of DNA repair mechanisms to detect and repair oxidative DNA damage.

RECENT ADVANCES

Emerging evidence suggests that in addition to the base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair pathways, the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway plays an important role in mediating oxidative DNA damage repair. Studies in lower organisms and mammalian cells have enabled us to further dissect this critical role and elucidate the precise mechanisms of repair.

CRITICAL ISSUES

Identification of synthetic lethal interactions between MMR deficiency and the accumulation of oxidative DNA damage raises the tantalizing prospect that oxidative DNA-damaging agents may be utilized to selectively target MMR-deficient cancers and potentially other tumor types deficient for oxidative DNA repair molecules.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

In this review, we emphasize the clinical relevance and potential translation of exploiting this oxidative DNA repair mechanism using synthetic lethality studies in MMR-deficient cells, to develop improved treatment strategies that will benefit cancer patients.

Mismatch repair and DNA damage signalling

Postreplicative mismatch repair (MMR) increases the fidelity of DNA replication by up to three orders of magnitude, through correcting DNA polymerase errors that escaped proofreading. MMR also controls homologous recombination (HR) by aborting strand exchange between divergent DNA sequences. In recent years, MMR has also been implicated in the response of mammalian cells to DNA damaging agents. Thus, MMR-deficient cells were shown to be around 100-fold more resistant to killing by methylating agents of the S(N)1type than cells with functional MMR. In the case of cisplatin, the sensitivity difference was lower, typically two- to three-fold, but was observed in all matched MMR-proficient and -deficient cell pairs. More controversial is the role of MMR in cellular response to other DNA damaging agents, such as ionizing radiation (IR), topoisomerase poisons, antimetabolites, UV radiation and DNA intercalators. The MMR-dependent DNA damage signalling pathways activated by the above agents are also ill-defined. To date, signalling cascades involving the Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR), as well as the stress-activated kinases JNK/SAPK and p38alpha have been linked with methylating agent and 6-thioguanine (TG) treatments, while cisplatin damage was reported to activate the c-Abl and JNK/SAPK kinases in MMR-dependent manner. MMR defects are found in several different cancer types, both familiar and sporadic, and it is possible that the involvement of the MMR system in DNA damage signalling play an important role in transformation. The scope of this article is to provide a brief overview of the recent literature on this subject and to raise questions that could be addressed in future studies.

Different effects of CSA and CSB deficiency on sensitivity to oxidative DNA damage

Mutations in the CSA and CSB genes cause Cockayne syndrome, a rare inherited disorder characterized by UV sensitivity, severe neurological abnormalities, and progeriod symptoms. Both gene products function in the transcription-coupled repair (TCR) subpathway of nucleotide excision repair (NER), providing the cell with a mechanism to remove transcription-blocking lesions from the transcribed strands of actively transcribed genes. Besides a function in TCR of NER lesions, a role of CSB in (transcription-coupled) repair of oxidative DNA damage has been suggested. In this study we used mouse models to compare the effect of a CSA or a CSB defect on oxidative DNA damage sensitivity at the levels of the cell and the intact organism. In contrast to CSB(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), CSA(-/-) MEFs are not hypersensitive to gamma-ray or paraquat treatment. Similar results were obtained for keratinocytes. In contrast, both CSB(-/-) and CSA(-/-) embryonic stem cells show slight gamma-ray sensitivity. Finally, CSB(-/-) but not CSA(-/-) mice fed with food containing di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (causing elevated levels of oxidative DNA damage in the liver) show weight reduction. These findings not only uncover a clear difference in oxidative DNA damage sensitivity between CSA- and CSB-deficient cell lines and mice but also show that sensitivity to oxidative DNA damage is not a uniform characteristic of Cockayne syndrome. This difference in the DNA damage response between CSA- and CSB-deficient cells is unexpected, since until now no consistent differences between CSA and CSB patients have been reported. We suggest that the CSA and CSB proteins in part perform separate roles in different DNA damage response pathways.

DNA mismatch repair proteins: potential guardians against genomic instability and tumorigenesis induced by ultraviolet photoproducts

In addition to their established role in repairing post-replicative DNA errors, DNA mismatch repair proteins contribute to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to a wide range of exogenous DNA damage (e.g., alkylation-induced lesions). The role of DNA mismatch repair in response to ultraviolet-induced DNA damage has been historically controversial. Recent data, however, suggest that DNA mismatch repair proteins probably do not contribute to the removal of ultraviolet-induced DNA damage, but may be important in suppressing mutagenesis, effecting apoptosis, and suppressing tumorigenesis following exposure to ultraviolet radiation.

Identification and characterization of BCL-3-binding protein: implications for transcription and DNA repair or recombination

A putative oncogene bcl-3 was originally identified and cloned at the breakpoint in the recurring chromosome translocation t(14;19) found in some cases of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Studies of bcl-3-deficient mice demonstrated a critical role for bcl-3 in the development of a normal immune response and the formation of germinal centers in secondary lymphoid organs. However, the molecular mechanism that underlies B cell leukemogenesis and the knockout mouse phenotype remains unclear. Here we have identified and characterized BCL-3-binding protein (B3BP) as a protein interacting specifically with the bcl-3 gene product (BCL-3) by a yeast two-hybrid screen. We found that B3BP associates with not only BCL-3 but also p300/CBP histone acetyltransferases. The N-terminal region of B3BP that contains the ATP-binding site is important for the interaction with BCL-3 and p300/CBP. Homology searches indicate that the ATP-binding region of B3BP, which contains a typical Walker-type ATP-binding P-loop, most resembles that of 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase of mammals and polynucleotide kinase of T4 bacteriophage. In fact B3BP shows intrinsic ATP binding and hydrolyzing activity. Furthermore, we demonstrated that B3BP is a 5'-polynucleotide kinase. We also found a small MutS-related domain, which is thought to be involved in the DNA repair or recombination reaction, in the C-terminal region of B3BP, and it shows nicking endonuclease activity. These observations might help to gain new insights into the function of BCL-3 and p300/CBP, especially the coupling of transcription with repair or recombination.

BRCA1 gene in breast cancer

The BRCA1 gene was identified and cloned in 1994 based its linkage to early onset breast cancer and breast-ovarian cancer syndromes in women. While inherited mutations of BRCA1 are responsible for about 40-45% of hereditary breast cancers, these mutations account for only 2-3% of all breast cancers, since the BRCA1 gene is rarely mutated in sporadic breast cancers. However, BRCA1 expression is frequently reduced or absent in sporadic cancers, suggesting a much wider role in mammary carcinogenesis. Since BRCA1 was cloned in 1994, its molecular function has been the subject of intense investigation. These studies have revealed multiple functions of the BRCA1 that may contribute to its tumor suppressor activity, including roles in: cell cycle progression, several highly specialized DNA repair processes, DNA damage-responsive cell cycle check-points, regulation of a set of specific transcriptional pathways, and apoptosis. Many of these functions are linked to protein:protein interactions involving different portions of the 1,863 amino acid (aa) BRCA1 protein. BRCA1 functions in cell cycle progression and the DNA damage response appear to be regulated by distinct and specific phosphorylation events, but the molecular pathways activated by these phosphorylations are only beginning to be unraveled. In addition, the reason that BRCA1 mutation carriers develop specific tumor types (breast and ovarian cancers in women and possibly prostate cancers in men) is not clearly understood. Elucidation of the precise molecular functions of the BRCA1 gene product will greatly enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of hereditary as well as sporadic mammary carcinogenesis.

Human cells bearing homozygous mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes hMLH1 or hMSH2 are fully proficient in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair

The transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair (TCNER) pathway maintains genomic stability by rapidly eliminating helix-distorting DNA adducts, such as UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), specifically from the transcribed strands of active genes. DNA mismatch repair (MMR) constitutes yet another critical antimutagenic pathway that removes mispaired bases generated during semiconservative replication. It was previously reported that the human colon adenocarcinoma strains HCT116 and LoVo (bearing homozygous mutations in the MMR genes hMLH1 and hMSH2, respectively), besides manifesting hallmark phenotypes associated with defective DNA mismatch correction, are also completely deficient in TCNER of UV-induced CPDs. This revealed a direct mechanistic link between MMR and TCNER in human cells, although subsequent studies have either supported, or argued against, the validity of this important notion. Here, the ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction was used to show at nucleotide resolution that MMR-deficient HCT116 and LoVo retain the ability to excise UV-induced CPDs much more rapidly from the transcribed vs the nontranscribed strands of active genes. Moreover, relative to DNA repair-proficient counterparts, MMR-deficient cells were not more sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of UV, and displayed equal ability to recover mRNA synthesis following UV challenge. These results conclusively demonstrate that hMLH1- and hMSH2-deficient human colon adenocarcinoma cells are fully proficient in TCNER.

Ultraviolet-sensitive syndrome cells are defective in transcription-coupled repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers

Patients with ultraviolet-sensitive syndrome (UV(S)S) are sensitive to sunlight, but present neither developmental nor neurological deficiencies. Complementation studies with hereditary DNA repair syndromes show that UV(S)S is distinct from all known xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) and Cockayne syndrome (CS) groups. UV(S)S cells exhibit some characteristics typical of CS, including normal global genomic (GGR) repair of UV-photoproducts, poor clonal survival and defective recovery of RNA synthesis after UV exposure. Those observations have led us to suggest that UV(S)S cells, like those from CS, are defective in transcription-coupled repair (TCR) of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD). We have now examined the repair of CPD in the transcribed and non-transcribed strands of the active dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and p53 genes, and of the silent alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and mid-size neurofilament (NF-M) genes in normal human cells and in cells belonging to UV(S)S and CS complementation group B. Our results provide compelling evidence that the UV(S)S gene is essential for TCR of CPD and probably other bulky DNA lesions. As a possible distinction between UV(S)S and CS patients, we postulate that the UV(S)S gene may not be required for TCR of oxidative lesions. We have also found that repair of CPD in either DNA strand of the genomic fragments examined, occurs at a slower rate in TCR-deficient cells than in the non-transcribed strands in normal cells; we suggest that in the absence of TCR, global repair complexes have hindered access to lesions in genomic regions that extend beyond individual transcription units.

Strand bias in targeted gene repair is influenced by transcriptional activity

Modified single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides can direct nucleotide exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Point and frameshift mutations are corrected in a reaction catalyzed by cellular enzymes involved in various DNA repair processes. The present model centers on the annealing of the vector to one strand of the helix, followed by the correction of the designated base. The choice of which strand to target is a reaction parameter that can be controlled, so here we investigate the properties of strand bias in targeted gene repair. An in vivo system has been established in which a plasmid containing an actively transcribed, but mutated, hygromycin-enhanced green fluorescent protein fusion gene is targeted for repair and upon conversion will confer hygromycin resistance on the cell. Overall transcriptional activity has a positive influence on the reaction, elevating the frequency. If the targeting vector is synthesized so that it directs nucleotide repair on the nontranscribed strand, the level of gene repair is higher than if the template strand is targeted. We provide data showing that the targeting vector can be displaced from the template strand by an active T7 phage RNA polymerase. The strand bias is not influenced by which strand serves as the leading or lagging strand during DNA synthesis. These results may provide an explanation for the enhancement of gene repair observed when the non-template strand is targeted.

Reduction of spontaneous mutagenesis in mismatch repair-deficient and proficient cells by dietary antioxidants

Cells lacking mismatch repair (MMR) exhibit elevated levels of spontaneous mutagenesis. Evidence exists that MMR is involved in repair of some DNA lesions besides mismatches. If some oxidative DNA lesions are substrates for MMR, then the excess mutagenesis in MMR(-) cells might be blocked by dietary antioxidants. Effects of the dietary antioxidants ascorbate, alpha-tocopherol, (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and lycopene on spontaneous mutagenesis were studied using mismatch repair-deficient (hMLH1(-)) human colon carcinoma HCT116 cells and HCT116/ch3 cells, in which normal human chromosome 3 has been added to restore mismatch repair. HCT116 cells have a 22-fold higher spontaneous mutation rate compared with HCT116/ch3 cells. HCT116 cells cultured in 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS) have twice the spontaneous mutation rate of those cultured in 10% FBS, most likely due to reduction in serum antioxidants in the low serum medium. As expected, alpha-tocopherol (50 microM) and ascorbate (284 microM) reduced spontaneous mutagenesis in HCT116 cells growing in 1% serum more dramatically than in cells cultured in 10% serum. The strongest antimutagenic compound was lycopene (5 microM), which reduced spontaneous mutagenesis equally (about 70%) in HCT116 cells growing in 10 and 1% FBS and in HCT116/ch3 cells. Since lycopene was equally antimutagenic in cells growing in low and high serum, it may have another antimutagenic mechanism in addition to its antioxidant effect. Surprisingly, EGCG (10 microM) was toxic to cells growing in low serum. It also reduced spontaneous mutagenesis equally (nearly 40%) in HCT116 and HCT116/ch3 cells. The large proportion of spontaneous mutagenesis that can be blocked by antioxidants in mismatch repair-deficient cells support the hypothesis that a major cause of their excess mutagenesis is endogenous oxidants. Blocking spontaneous mutagenesis, perhaps with a cocktail of antioxidants, should reduce the risk of cancer in people with a genetic defect in mismatch repair as well as other individuals.

Mismatch repair in correction of replication errors and processing of DNA damage

The primary role of mismatch repair (MMR) is to maintain genomic stability by removing replication errors from DNA. This repair pathway was originally implicated in human cancer through an association between microsatellite instability in colorectal tumors in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) kindreds. Microsatellites are short repetitive sequences which are often copied incorrectly by DNA polymerases because the template and daughter strands in these regions are particularly prone to misalignment. These replication-dependent events create loops of extrahelical bases which would produce frameshift mutations unless reversed by MMR. One consequence of MMR loss is a widespread expansion and contraction of these repeated sequences that affects the whole genome. Defective MMR is therefore associated with a mutator phenotype. Since the same pathway is also responsible for repairing base:base mismatches, defective cells also experience large increases in the frequency of spontaneous transition and transversion mutations. Three different approaches have been used to investigate the function of individual components of the MMR pathway. The first is based on the biochemical characterization of the purified protein complexes using synthetic DNA substrates containing loops or single mismatches. In the second, the biological consequences of MMR loss are inferred from the phenotype of cell lines established from repair-deficient human tumors, from tolerant cells or from mice defective in single MMR genes. In particular, molecular analysis of the mutations in endogenous or reporter genes helped to identify the DNA substrates for MMR. Finally, mice bearing single inactive MMR genes have helped to define the involvement of MMR in cancer prevention.

DNA mismatch repair and genetic instability

Mismatch repair (MMR) systems play a central role in promoting genetic stability by repairing DNA replication errors, inhibiting recombination between non-identical DNA sequences and participating in responses to DNA damage. The discovery of a link between human cancer and MMR defects has led to an explosion of research on eukaryotic MMR. The key proteins in MMR are highly conserved from bacteria to mammals, and this conservation has been critical for defining the components of eukaryotic MMR systems. In eukaryotes, there are multiple homologs of the key bacterial MutS and MutL MMR proteins, and these homologs form heterodimers that have discrete roles in MMR-related processes. This review describes the genetic and biochemical approaches used to study MMR, and summarizes the diverse roles that MMR proteins play in maintaining genetic stability.

Inactivation of DNA mismatch repair by increased expression of yeast MLH1

Inactivation of DNA mismatch repair by mutation or by transcriptional silencing of the MLH1 gene results in genome instability and cancer predisposition. We recently found (P. V. Shcherbakova and T. A. Kunkel, Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:3177-3183, 1999) that an elevated spontaneous mutation rate can also result from increased expression of yeast MLH1. Here we investigate the mechanism of this mutator effect. Hybridization of poly(A)(+) mRNA to DNA microarrays containing 96.4% of yeast open reading frames revealed that MLH1 overexpression did not induce changes in expression of other genes involved in DNA replication or repair. MLH1 overexpression strongly enhanced spontaneous mutagenesis in yeast strains with defects in the 3'-->5' exonuclease activity of replicative DNA polymerases delta and epsilon but did not enhance the mutation rate in strains with deletions of MSH2, MLH1, or PMS1. This suggests that overexpression of MLH1 inactivates mismatch repair of replication errors. Overexpression of the PMS1 gene alone caused a moderate increase in the mutation rate and strongly suppressed the mutator effect caused by MLH1 overexpression. The mutator effect was also reduced by a missense mutation in the MLH1 gene that disrupted Mlh1p-Pms1p interaction. Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments showed that purified Mlh1p forms a homodimer in solution, albeit with a K(d) of 3.14 microM, 36-fold higher than that for Mlh1p-Pms1p heterodimerization. These observations suggest that the mismatch repair defect in cells overexpressing MLH1 results from an imbalance in the levels of Mlh1p and Pms1p and that this imbalance might lead to formation of nonfunctional mismatch repair complexes containing Mlh1p homodimers.

Mouse mismatch repair gene Msh2 is not essential for transcription-coupled repair of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers

The human mutS homolog gene MSH2 is essential for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and defects in this gene can result in increased mutagenesis, genomic instability and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Besides correcting mismatch errors arising from DNA replication, it was shown that deficiencies in bacterial and human MMR genes including MSH2 resulted in defective transcription-coupled repair (TCR) of UV-induced photolesions. Here we show that MMR-deficient fibroblasts derived from two independent isogenic mouse strains with defined Msh2 deficiencies are as proficient in TCR of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) as wildtype fibroblasts. Our results indicate that in mouse cells Msh2 is not essential for TCR of UV-induced CPD in contrast to bacteria and human cells and suggest that the biological effects of UV in mouse Msh2(-/-) cells and mice are not due to defective TCR.

Transcriptional effects on double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts

Transcription stimulates spontaneous homologous recombination, but prior studies have not investigated the effects of transcription on double-strand break (DSB)-induced recombination in yeast. We examined products of five ura3 direct repeat substrates in yeast using alleles that were transcribed at low or high levels. In each strain, recombination was stimulated by DSBs created in vivo at an HO site in one copy of ura3. Increasing transcription levels in donor or recipient alleles did not further stimulate DSB-induced recombination, nor did it alter the relative frequencies of conversion and deletion (pop-out) events. This result is consistent with the idea that transcription enhances spontaneous recombination by increasing initiation. Gene conversion tracts were measured using silent restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) at approximately 100bp intervals. Transcription did not alter average tract lengths, but increased transcription in donor alleles increased both the frequency of promoter-proximal (5') unidirectional tracts and conversion of 5' markers. Increased transcription in recipient alleles increased the frequency of bidirectional tracts. We demonstrate that these effects are due to transcription per se, and not just transcription factor binding. These results suggest that transcription influences aspects of gene conversion after initiation, such as strand invasion and/or mismatch repair (MMR).

Measurement of oxidative DNA damage and repair in specific DNA sequences

We describe two methods that were developed in our laboratory to measure the production and repair of oxidative DNA damage in specific DNA sequences. Both of these methods rely on the use of monoclonal antibodies against modified nucleotides to separate DNA sequences that contain damage from those in which repair has occurred. In one case, the modified base is bromodeoxyuridine, which is inserted into the DNA during the repair synthesis step of excision repair. An antibody against this modified base is used to detect the production of the bromodeoxyuridine in the repair patch. This approach allows for the measurement of repair of any DNA lesion whose removal is accompanied by the production of a DNA repair patch. In the other case, the modified base is thymine glycol, an oxidized base that is produced by hydrogen peroxide and ionizing radiation. Using a monoclonal antibody that recognizes this altered base, detection of the production and repair of a specific base damage in a DNA sequence can be accomplished. These approaches are used in our laboratory to examine the transcription-coupled repair of oxidative DNA damage in both yeast and mammalian cells.

Initiation of base excision repair: glycosylase mechanisms and structures

The base excision repair pathway is an organism's primary defense against mutations induced by oxidative, alkylating, and other DNA-damaging agents. This pathway is initiated by DNA glycosylases that excise the damaged base by cleavage of the glycosidic bond between the base and the DNA sugar-phosphate backbone. A subset of glycosylases has an associated apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lyase activity that further processes the AP site to generate cleavage of the DNA phosphate backbone. Chemical mechanisms that are supported by biochemical and structural data have been proposed for several glycosylases and glycosylase/AP lyases. This review focuses on the chemical mechanisms of catalysis in the context of recent structural information, with emphasis on the catalytic residues and the active site conformations of several cocrystal structures of glycosylases with their substrate DNAs. Common structural motifs for DNA binding and damage specificity as well as conservation of acidic residues and amino groups for catalysis are discussed.

The many faces of mismatch repair in meiosis

Mismatches, and the proteins that repair them, play multiple roles during meiosis from generating the diversity upon which selection acts to preventing the intermingling of diverged populations and species. The mechanisms by which the mismatch repair proteins accomplish these many roles include gene conversion, reciprocal crossing over, mismatch repair-induced recombination and anti-recombination. This review focuses on recent studies, predominantly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, that have advanced our understanding of the details of mismatch repair complexes and how they apply to the diverse roles these proteins play in meiosis. These studies have also revealed unexpected and novel functions for some of the mismatch repair proteins.

Mismatch repair proteins and mitotic genome stability

Mismatch repair (MMR) proteins play a critical role in maintaining the mitotic stability of eukaryotic genomes. MMR proteins repair errors made during DNA replication and in their absence, mutations accumulate at elevated rates. In addition, MMR proteins inhibit recombination between non-identical DNA sequences, and hence prevent genome rearrangements resulting from interactions between repetitive elements. This review provides an overview of the anti-mutator and anti-recombination functions of MMR proteins in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Genomic heterogeneity of nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is one of the major cellular pathways that removes bulky DNA adducts and helix-distorting lesions. The biological consequences of defective NER in humans include UV-light-induced skin carcinogenesis and extensive neurodegeneration. Understanding the mechanism of the NER process is of great importance as the number of individuals diagnosed with skin cancer has increased considerably in recent years, particularly in the United States. Rapid progress made in the DNA repair field since the early 1980s has revealed the complexity of NER, which operates differently in different genomic regions. The genomic heterogeneity of repair seems to be governed by the functional compartmentalization of chromatin into transcriptionally active and inactive domains in the nucleus. Two sub-pathways of NER remove UV-induced photolesions: (I) Global Genome Repair (GGR) and (II) Transcription Coupled Repair (TCR). GGR is a random process that occurs slowly, while the TCR, which is tightly linked to RNA polymerase II transcription, is highly specific and efficient. The efficiency of these pathways is important in avoiding cancer and genomic instability. Studies with cell lines derived from Cockayne syndrome (CS) and Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) group C patients, that are defective in the NER sub-pathways, have yielded valuable information regarding the genomic heterogeneity of DNA repair. This review deals with the complexity of repair heterogeneity, its mechanism and interacting molecular pathways as well as its relevance in the maintenance of genomic integrity.

Mammalian DNA mismatch repair

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is one of multiple replication, repair, and recombination processes that are required to maintain genomic stability in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. In the wake of the discoveries that hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and other human cancers are associated with mutations in MMR genes, intensive efforts are under way to elucidate the biochemical functions of mammalian MutS and MutL homologs, and the consequences of defects in these genes. Genetic studies in cultured mammalian cells and mice are proving to be instrumental in defining the relationship between the functions of MMR in mutation and tumor avoidance. Furthermore, these approaches have raised awareness that MMR homologs contribute to DNA damage surveillance, transcription-coupled repair, and recombinogenic and meiotic processes.

Repair of oxidative DNA damage in vitro: a tool for screening antioxidative compounds

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) provoke the formation of base DNA alterations that are processed by an excision step of the lesion followed by a repair synthesis and ligation step to restore the strand continuity. We have reported previously the detection of DNA adducts by an in vitro chemiluminescence DNA repair synthesis assay (Salles et al., 1995) which allows the measurement of repair synthesis by cell-free extracts in damaged plasmid DNA adsorbed on sensitized microplate wells. The 3D (DNA damage detection) assay was performed in the presence of biotin-dUTP which was incorporated during the repair synthesis step. The extent of repair synthesis was measured in an ELISA reaction with ExtrAvidin-horse radish peroxidase and chemiluminescence detection. The 3D assay allows detection of any type of base alterations including base oxidation. Interestingly, under controlled production of ROS a screening procedure of antioxidants might be carried out with the 3D assay. By taking advantage of plasmid DNA adsorption, oxidative base damage can be recognized by the Escherichia coli Fpg protein which was detected in an ELISA reaction with specific antibody and chemiluminescence measurement (4D assay). With the sceening procedure of antioxidative compounds in mind, the development of such assays and their drawbacks are discussed.

Microsatellite instability in Drosophila spellchecker1 (MutS homolog) mutants

We have cloned a mutS homolog from Drosophila melanogaster called spellchecker1 (spel1) and have constructed spel1 mutant flies. MutS proteins promote the correction of DNA mismatches and serve important roles in DNA replication, recombination, and repair. The spel1 gene belongs to a subfamily of mutS first characterized by the MSH2 gene of yeast and which also includes hMSH2, one of the two major hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer loci of humans. Like msh2 mutants in other species, we find that flies lacking the spel1 gene suffer a highly increased rate of instability in long runs of dinucleotide repeats when analyzed after 10-12 fly generations. Using a new assay, we have also discovered that mutations in spel1 decrease the stability of a dinucleotide repeat when it is copied into the site of a double-strand break during gene conversion. Contrary to the case in mammalian cells, spel1 deficiency does not affect tolerance of flies to a methylating agent nor does it affect resistance to gamma-irradiation.

The role of mismatch repair in the prevention of base pair mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In most organisms, the mismatch repair (MMR) system plays an important role in substantially lowering mutation rates and blocking recombination between nonidentical sequences. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the products of three genes homologous to Escherichia coli mutS-MSH2, MSH3, and MSH6-function in MMR by recognizing mispaired bases. To determine the effect of MMR on single-base pair mismatches, we have measured reversion rates of specific point mutations in the CYC1 gene in both wild-type and MMR-deficient strains. The reversion rates of all of the point mutations are similar in wild-type cells. However, we find that in the absence of MSH2 or MSH6, but not MSH3, reversion rates of some mutations are increased by up to 60,000-fold, whereas reversion rates of other mutations are essentially unchanged. When cells are grown anaerobically, the reversion rates in MMR-deficient strains are decreased by as much as a factor of 60. We suggest that the high reversion rates observed in these MMR-deficient strains are caused by misincorporations opposite oxidatively damaged bases and that MMR normally prevents these mutations. We further suggest that recognition of mispairs opposite damaged bases may be a more important role for MMR in yeast than correction of errors opposite normal bases.

Eukaryotic mismatch repair: an update

The discovery that mutations in mismatch repair genes segregate with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer has awakened a great deal of interest in the study of the process of postreplicative mismatch repair. The characterisation of the principal players involved in this important metabolic pathway has been greatly facilitated by the amino acid sequence conservation among functional homologues of bacteria, yeast and mammals. The phenotypes of mismatch repair deficient mutants are also similar in many ways. In humans, mismatch repair malfunction demonstrates itself in the form of a mutator phenotype of the affected cells, an instability of microsatellite sequences and increased levels of somatic recombination. Moreover, mismatch repair deficient cells display also varying levels of tolerance to DNA damaging agents and are thought to be involved in the cell killing mediated by these agents. This article discusses some recent developments in this fast-moving field.

Physical interaction between components of DNA mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) and DNA mismatch repair are required for some common processes although the biochemical basis for this requirement is unknown. Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD14 was identified in a two-hybrid screen using MSH2 as "bait," and pairwise interactions between MSH2 and RAD1, RAD2, RAD3, RAD10, RAD14, and RAD25 subsequently were demonstrated by two-hybrid analysis. MSH2 coimmunoprecipitated specifically with epitope-tagged versions of RAD2, RAD10, RAD14, and RAD25. MSH2 and RAD10 were found to interact in msh3 msh6 and mlh1 pms1 double mutants, suggesting a direct interaction with MSH2. Mutations in MSH2 increased the UV sensitivity of NER-deficient yeast strains, and msh2 mutations were epistatic to the mutator phenotype observed in NER-deficient strains. These data suggest that MSH2 and possibly other components of DNA mismatch repair exist in a complex with NER proteins, providing a biochemical and genetical basis for these proteins to function in common processes.

Replication errors: cha(lle)nging the genome

Since the discovery of a link between the malfunction of post-replicative mismatch correction and hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer, the study of this complex repair pathway has received a great deal of attention. Our understanding of the mammalian system was facilitated by conservation of the main protagonists of this process from microbes to humans. Thus, biochemical experiments carried out with Escherichia coli extracts helped us to identify functional human homologues of the bacterial mismatch repair proteins, while the genetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae aided our understanding of the phenotypes of human cells deficient in mismatch correction. Today, mismatch repair is no longer thought of solely as the mechanism responsible for the correction of replication errors, whose failure demonstrates itself in the form of a mutator phenotype and microsatellite instability. Malfunction of this process has been implicated also in mitotic and meiotic recombination, drug and ionizing radiation resistance, transcription-coupled repair and apoptosis. Elucidation of the roles of mismatch repair proteins in these transduction pathways is key to our understanding of the role of mismatch correction in human cancer. However, in order to unravel all the complexities involved in post-replicative mismatch correction, we need to know the cast and the roles of the individual players. This brief treatise provides an overview of our current knowledge of the biochemistry of this process.