Predicting the maximum-tolerated dose of PNU-159548 (4-demethoxy-3'-deamino-3'-aziridinyl-4'-methylsulphonyl-daunorubicin) in humans using CFU-GM clonogenic assays and prospective validation

Biodynamic signatures from ex vivo bone marrow aspirates are associated with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in cancer-bearing dogs

Background

Neutropenia is the most common dose‐limiting side effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy in cancer‐bearing dogs. Biodynamic imaging (BDI) is a functional imaging technology that measures dynamic light scattering from living, three‐dimensional tissues to characterize intracellular motion within those tissues. Previous studies have associated BDI biomarkers with tumour sensitivity to chemotherapy agents in dogs with naturally occurring cancer. We hypothesized that BDI, performed ex vivo on bone marrow aspirate samples, would identify dynamic biomarkers associated with the occurrence of specific degrees of neutropenia in tumour‐bearing dogs receiving doxorubicin chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Bone marrow aspirates were collected from 10 dogs with naturally occurring cancers prior to initiation of doxorubicin treatment. BDI was performed on bone marrow samples treated ex vivo with doxorubicin at 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μM along with 0.1% DMSO as a control. Dogs then were treated with doxorubicin (30 mg/m², intravenously). Peripheral blood neutrophil counts were obtained on the day of treatment and again 7 days later. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified provisional breakpoints for BDI biomarkers that correlated with specific changes in neutrophil counts between the two time points.

Results

Provisional breakpoints for several BDI biomarkers were identified, specifying dogs with the largest proportionate change in neutrophils and with neutropenia that was grade 2 or higher following doxorubicin treatment.

Conclusions

Biodynamic imaging of bone marrow aspirates may identify those dogs at greater risk for neutropenia following doxorubicin chemotherapy. This approach may be useful for pre‐emptively modifying chemotherapy dosing in dogs to avoid unacceptable side effects.

Understanding the correlation between in vitro and in vivo immunotoxicity tests for nanomedicines

Preclinical characterization of novel nanotechnology-based formulations is often challenged by physicochemical characteristics, sterility/sterilization issues, safety and efficacy. Such challenges are not unique to nanomedicine, as they are common in the development of small and macromolecular drugs. However, due to the lack of a general consensus on critical characterization parameters, a shortage of harmonized protocols to support testing, and the vast variety of engineered nanomaterials, the translation of nanomedicines into clinic is particularly complex. Understanding the immune compatibility of nanoformulations has been identified as one of the important factors in (pre)clinical development and requires reliable in vitro and in vivo immunotoxicity tests. The generally low sensitivity of standard in vivo toxicity tests to immunotoxicities, inter-species variability in the structure and function of the immune system, high costs and relatively low throughput of in vivo tests, and ethical concerns about animal use underscore the need for trustworthy in vitro assays. Here, we consider the correlation (or lack thereof) between in vitro and in vivo immunotoxicity tests as a mean to identify useful in vitro assays. We review literature examples and case studies from the experience of the NCI Nanotechnology Characterization Lab, and highlight assays where predictability has been demonstrated for a variety of nanomaterials and assays with high potential for predictability in vivo.

Two-stage model-based design of cancer phase I dose escalation trials: evaluation using the phase I program of barasertib (AZD1152)

Introduction Modeling and simulation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics has previously been shown to be potentially useful in designing Phase I programs of novel anti-cancer agents that show hematological toxicity. In this analysis, a two-stage model-based trial design was evaluated retrospectively using data from the Phase I program with the aurora kinase inhibitor barasertib. Methods Data from two Phase I trials and four regimens were used (n = 79). Using barasertib-hydroxy QPA plasma concentrations and neutrophil count data from only study 1A, a PKPD model was developed and subsequently used to predict the MTD and a safe starting dose for the other trials. Results The PKPD model based on data from the first study adequately described the time course of neutrophil count fluctuation. The two-stage model-based design provided safe starting doses for subsequent phase I trials for barasertib. Predicted safe starting dose levels were higher than those used in two subsequent trials, but lower than used in the other trial. Discussion The two-stage approach could have been applied safely to define starting doses for alternative dosing strategies with barasertib. The limited improvement in efficiency for the phase I program of barasertib may have been due to the fact that starting doses for the studied phase I trials were already nearly optimal. Conclusion Application of the two-stage model-based trial design in Phase I programs with novel anti-cancer drugs that cause haematological toxicity is feasible, safe, and may lead to a reduction in the number of patient treated at sub-therapeutic dose-levels.

Two-stage model-based clinical trial design to optimize phase I development of novel anticancer agents

Background The phase I program of anticancer agents usually consists of multiple dose escalation studies to select a safe dose for various administration schedules. We hypothesized that pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) modeling of an initial phase I study (stage 1) can be used for selection of an optimal starting dose for subsequent studies (stage 2) and that a post-hoc PK–PD analysis enhances the selection of a recommended dose for phase II evaluation. The aim of this analysis was to demonstrate that this two-stage model-based design, which does not interfere in the conduct of trials, is safe, efficient and effective. Methods PK and PD data of dose escalation studies were simulated for nine compounds and for five administration regimens (stage 1) for drugs with neutropenia as dose-limiting toxicity. PK–PD models were developed for each simulated study and were used to determine a starting dose for additional phase I studies (stage 2). The model-based design was compared to a conventional study design regarding safety (number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)), efficiency (number of patients treated with a dose below the recommended dose) and effectiveness (precision of dose selection). Retrospective data of the investigational anticancer drug indisulam were used to show the applicability of the model-based design. Results The model-based design was as safe as the conventional design (median number of DLTs = 3) and resulted in a reduction of the number of patients who were treated with a dose below the recommended dose (−27%, power 89%). A post-hoc model-based determination of the recommended dose for future phase II studies was more precise than the conventional selection of the recommended dose (root mean squared error 8.3% versus 30%). Conclusions A two-stage model-based phase I design is safe for anticancer agents with dose-limiting myelosuppression and may enhance the efficiency of dose escalation studies by reducing the number of patients treated with a dose below the recommended dose and by increasing the precision of dose selection for phase II evaluation.

Primary lymphocytes as predictors for species differences in cytotoxic drug sensitivity

Several in vitro methods have been suggested to predict drug-induced haematotoxicity and species differences; the most commonly used being the clonogenic CFU-GM assay. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether primary lymphocytes from peripheral blood, assayed with a short-term non-clonogenic assay, could be used to detect species differences in drug sensitivity, and offer an alternative to the CFU-GM assay. The effect of 17 different cytotoxic drugs on lymphocytes from human, dog, rat and mouse was evaluated. A higher sensitivity of human than mouse lymphocytes was seen for topotecan and for 3 of 5 antimetabolites tested. Clear species specificity was also seen for the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib where rodent cells were 50-300 times less sensitive than human cells. Good agreement between our data and published CFU-GM data was observed, suggesting that primary lymphocytes may be a useful model for species difference screening in drug development.

Hematopoietic colony-forming cell assays

Hematopoiesis is the process by which stem cells divide and differentiate to produce the multiple types of mature cells found in blood. The process begins in early embryonic development and continues throughout adult life, primarily in the bone marrow. Various in vivo and in vitro assays have been developed to detect and assess stem cells and early multi-potential progenitors. While highly informative about primitive hematopoietic cells these assays are long and labour intensive. Alternatively, colony-forming cell (CFC) assays may be used to quantify more lineage-restricted progenitors in a simple in vitro assay. When cultured in a semi-solid medium containing the appropriate cytokines, CFCs are able to divide and differentiate into a colony of more mature cells that can be detected by light microscopy. This allows for the quantification of erythroid, myeloid, lymphoid, megakaryocytic, and multi-potential cell lineages from various cell sources. This chapter outlines the materials and methods used for the culture and assessment of CFC from humans, mice, and other species.

4-Demethoxy-3′-deamino-3′-aziridinyl-4′-methylsulphonyl-daunorubicin (PNU-159548): A promising new candidate for chemotherapeutic treatment of osteosarcoma patients

The effectiveness of the alkycycline 4-demethoxy-3'-deamino-3'-aziridinyl-4'-methylsulphonyl-daunorubicin (PNU-159548, ladirubicin), a new drug with high antitumour activity against a broad range of neoplasms, was evaluated by using a panel of 32 human osteosarcoma cell lines, including cell lines resistant to doxorubicin, methotrexate, or cisplatin. PNU-159548 resulted to be highly active in all cell lines. No cross-resistance was found with conventional drugs, being PNU-159548 active also in cells resistant to doxorubicin and with a multidrug resistance phenotype (associated with MDR1 gene/P-glycoprotein overexpression), as well as in cells resistant to methotrexate or to cisplatin. Analysis of drug-drug interactions showed that PNU-159548 could be successfully used in combination with all the most important drugs currently used in OS chemotherapy. In fact, the simultaneous administration of PNU-159548 and doxorubicin, methotrexate, or cisplatin produced mostly additive or synergistic effects. Sequential exposure to PNU-159548 followed immediately by doxorubicin, methotrexate, or cisplatin was the most effective sequence of administration, invariably resulting in additive or synergistic effects in both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant osteosarcoma cell lines. In conclusion, the high in vitro effectiveness, the absence of cross-resistance with doxorubicin, methotrexate, or cisplatin and the possibility to be successfully used in combination with these drugs indicate PNU-159548 as a promising candidate to be considered for planning new therapeutic regimens for osteosarcoma patients, who show a decreased response to conventional chemotherapy.