1
|
Wang M, Bi Y, Jin Y, Zheng ZJ. Global Incidence of Ovarian Cancer According to Histologic Subtype: A Population-Based Cancer Registry Study. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300393. [PMID: 38754054 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ovarian cancer can be categorized into distinct histologic subtypes with varying identifiable risk factors, molecular composition, clinical features, and treatment. The global incidence of ovarian cancer subtypes remains limited, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) without high-quality cancer registry systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used data from population-based cancer registries of the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents project to calculate the proportions of serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell, and other histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer. Proportions were applied to the estimated numbers of patients with ovarian cancer from Global Cancer Observatory 2020. Age-standardized incidence rates were calculated. RESULTS Globally, an estimated 133,818 new patients of serous cancer, 35,712 new patients of mucinous cancer, 29,319 new patients of endometrioid cancer, and 17,894 new patients of clear cell cancer were identified in 2020. The distribution of ovarian cancer histologic subtypes exhibited regional variation. Eastern Europe had the highest rate of serous and mucinous carcinomas, whereas Northern Africa and Eastern Asia had the highest burden of endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas, respectively. CONCLUSION This study provides a global incidence landscape of histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer, particularly in LMICs lacking comprehensive registry systems. Our analysis offers valuable insights into disease burden and guidance for tailored strategies for prevention of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minmin Wang
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yanxin Bi
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yinzi Jin
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Jie Zheng
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schlueter DJ, Sulieman L, Mo H, Keaton JM, Ferrara TM, Williams A, Qian J, Stubblefield O, Zeng C, Tran TC, Bastarache L, Dai J, Babbar A, Ramirez A, Goleva SB, Denny JC. Systematic replication of smoking disease associations using survey responses and EHR data in the All of Us Research Program. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 31:139-153. [PMID: 37885303 PMCID: PMC10746325 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The All of Us Research Program (All of Us) aims to recruit over a million participants to further precision medicine. Essential to the verification of biobanks is a replication of known associations to establish validity. Here, we evaluated how well All of Us data replicated known cigarette smoking associations. MATERIALS AND METHODS We defined smoking exposure as follows: (1) an EHR Smoking exposure that used International Classification of Disease codes; (2) participant provided information (PPI) Ever Smoking; and, (3) PPI Current Smoking, both from the lifestyle survey. We performed a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) for each smoking exposure measurement type. For each, we compared the effect sizes derived from the PheWAS to published meta-analyses that studied cigarette smoking from PubMed. We defined two levels of replication of meta-analyses: (1) nominally replicated: which required agreement of direction of effect size, and (2) fully replicated: which required overlap of confidence intervals. RESULTS PheWASes with EHR Smoking, PPI Ever Smoking, and PPI Current Smoking revealed 736, 492, and 639 phenome-wide significant associations, respectively. We identified 165 meta-analyses representing 99 distinct phenotypes that could be matched to EHR phenotypes. At P < .05, 74 were nominally replicated and 55 were fully replicated. At P < 2.68 × 10-5 (Bonferroni threshold), 58 were nominally replicated and 40 were fully replicated. DISCUSSION Most phenotypes found in published meta-analyses associated with smoking were nominally replicated in All of Us. Both survey and EHR definitions for smoking produced similar results. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the feasibility of studying common exposures using All of Us data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Schlueter
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
- Department of Health and Society, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lina Sulieman
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Huan Mo
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
- The Cohort Analytics Core (CAC), Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jacob M Keaton
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Tracey M Ferrara
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Ariel Williams
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Jun Qian
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Onajia Stubblefield
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Chenjie Zeng
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Tam C Tran
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
- The Cohort Analytics Core (CAC), Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lisa Bastarache
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Jian Dai
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Anav Babbar
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Andrea Ramirez
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Slavina B Goleva
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Joshua C Denny
- Precision Health Informatics Section, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He J, Hu Q. Ovarian cancer disease burden decreased in the United States from 1975 to 2018: A joinpoint and age-period-cohort analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e36029. [PMID: 38050303 PMCID: PMC10695534 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000036029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the leading cause of gynecological cancer-related deaths in the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term trends in OC incidence and incidence-based mortality rates (IBM) in the U.S. from 1975 to 2018 and to assess the effects of age, period, and cohort factors on OC incidence and mortality using an age-period-cohort model. We obtained data from the U.S. OC incidence/mortality data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1975 to 2018. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to determine long-term trends and transitions, and an age-period-cohort model was used to quantify the effects of age, period, and cohort parameters on incidence and mortality. In addition, 1990 to 2019 U.S. OC data obtained from the Global Burden of Disease study served as a potential validation set. Between 1975 and 2018, 80,622 new cases of OC and 60,218 deaths from OC were reported in the U.S. The average annual percent change for OC incidence was -1.33 (95% CI: -1.64 to -1.02, P < .001), with a significant decrease in incidence at a rate of 7.80% (95% CI: -11.52 to -3.92) per year from to 2015-2018. IBM reached its peak for the U.S. population in 1994, with an age-standardized mortality rate of 6.38 (per 100,000 people). IBM rose first, peaked in 1986, and then declined at a rate of 0.39% (95% CI: -0.66 to -0.12) and 2.48% (95% CI: -3.09 to -1.85) per year from to 1986-2007 and 2007-2018, respectively. In addition, age-period-cohort model analysis showed the highest risk of OC incidence in 1980 to 1984 and the highest risk of OC death in 1985-1989. This study reported a significant decline in OC morbidity and mortality in the U.S. since 1986. In addition, this study analyzed the changes in trends in OC incidence and mortality by race/ethnicity in the U.S. Monitoring trends in OC incidence and mortality by race/ethnicity can help in the development of targeted prevention and treatment measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahui He
- Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Qinyong Hu
- Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Horackova K, Janatova M, Kleiblova P, Kleibl Z, Soukupova J. Early-Onset Ovarian Cancer <30 Years: What Do We Know about Its Genetic Predisposition? Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:17020. [PMID: 38069345 PMCID: PMC10707471 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242317020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in women. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced epithelial OC in their late 60s, and early-onset adult OC diagnosed ≤30 years is rare, accounting for less than 5% of all OC cases. The most significant risk factor for OC development are germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (GPVs) in OC predisposition genes (including BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, Lynch syndrome genes, or BRIP1), which contribute to the development of over 20% of all OC cases. GPVs in BRCA1/BRCA2 are the most prevalent. The presence of a GPV directs tailored cancer risk-reducing strategies for OC patients and their relatives. Identification of OC patients with GPVs can also have therapeutic consequences. Despite the general assumption that early cancer onset indicates higher involvement of hereditary cancer predisposition, the presence of GPVs in early-onset OC is rare (<10% of patients), and their heritability is uncertain. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the genetic predisposition to early-onset OC, with a special focus on epithelial OC, and suggests other alternative genetic factors (digenic, oligogenic, polygenic heritability, genetic mosaicism, imprinting, etc.) that may influence the development of early-onset OC in adult women lacking GPVs in known OC predisposition genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klara Horackova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.H.); (M.J.); (P.K.); (Z.K.)
| | - Marketa Janatova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.H.); (M.J.); (P.K.); (Z.K.)
| | - Petra Kleiblova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.H.); (M.J.); (P.K.); (Z.K.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Zdenek Kleibl
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.H.); (M.J.); (P.K.); (Z.K.)
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Soukupova
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.H.); (M.J.); (P.K.); (Z.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Craig O, Nigam A, Dall GV, Gorringe K. Rare Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: Low Grade Serous and Mucinous Carcinomas. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2023; 13:a038190. [PMID: 37277207 PMCID: PMC10513165 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The ovarian epithelial cancer histotypes can be divided into common and rare types. Common types include high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas and the endometriosis-associated cancers, endometrioid and clear-cell carcinomas. The less common histotypes are mucinous and low-grade serous, each comprising less than 10% of all epithelial carcinomas. Although histologically and epidemiologically distinct from each other, these histotypes share some genetic and natural history features that distinguish them from the more common types. In this review, we will consider the similarities and differences of these rare histological types, and the clinical challenges they pose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Craig
- Department of Laboratory Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Abhimanyu Nigam
- Department of Laboratory Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | | | - Kylie Gorringe
- Department of Laboratory Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sellers TA, Peres LC, Hathaway CA, Tworoger SS. Prevention of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2023; 13:a038216. [PMID: 37137500 PMCID: PMC10411689 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Given the challenges with achieving effective and durable treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer, primary prevention is highly desirable. Fortunately, decades of research have provided evidence for several strategies that can be deployed to optimize risk reduction. These include surgery, chemoprevention, and lifestyle factor modifications. These broad categories vary in terms of the magnitude of risk reduction possible, the possible short-term and long-term side effects, the degree of difficulty, and acceptability. Thus, the concept of a risk-based model to personalize preventive interventions is advocated to guide discussion between care providers and women at risk. For women with inherited major gene mutations that greatly increase risk of ovarian cancer, surgical approaches have favorable risk to benefit ratios. Chemoprevention and lifestyle factor modifications portend a lower degree of risk reduction but confer lower risk of undesirable side effects. Since complete prevention is not currently possible, better methods for early detection remain a high priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Sellers
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA
| | - Lauren C Peres
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA
| | - Cassandra A Hathaway
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ali AT, Al-ani O, Al-ani F. Epidemiology and risk factors for ovarian cancer. PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY = MENOPAUSE REVIEW 2023; 22:93-104. [PMID: 37674925 PMCID: PMC10477765 DOI: 10.5114/pm.2023.128661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a complex disease, mostly observed in postmenopausal women, and is associated with poor survival rates. It is the sixth most common cancer and the fifth most common cause of death due to cancer among women in developed countries. Thus, despite representing less than one third of all gynaecologic cancers, deaths due to ovarian cancer account for more than two thirds of deaths due to gynaecologic cancers. Its prevalence is higher in Western Europe and Northern America than Asia and Africa. In sub-Saharan Africa, there is a considerably lower prevalence of ovarian cancer than other parts of Africa. Ovarian cancer is multifaceted, involving many factors, complex biological processes and unpredictable consequences. Unlike other female cancers that have early warning symptoms, ovarian cancer's symptoms are non-specific. As a result, ovarian cancers are normally undetected until advanced stages (III or IV). The major risk factors for ovarian cancer include older age, genetics, family history, hormone replacement therapy, nulliparity, and dietary fat. Controversial factors include obesity, infertility, talc powder, radiation exposure, fertility medications and in vitro fertilization. The current review discusses the aetiology, epidemiology and risk factors for ovarian cancer. Nevertheless, identification of the main risk factors for ovarian cancer may increase the awareness among women of the general population. This should help to decrease the incidence rate of ovarian cancer and increase the five-year survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aus Tariq Ali
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Osamah Al-ani
- Faculty of Medicine, Odessa National Medical University, Odessa, Ukraine
| | - Faisal Al-ani
- Faculty of Medicine, Odessa National Medical University, Odessa, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu S, Feng S, Du F, Zhang K, Shen Y. Association of smoking, alcohol, and coffee consumption with the risk of ovarian cancer and prognosis: a mendelian randomization study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:256. [PMID: 36941558 PMCID: PMC10026459 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10737-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Currently, the association between smoking, alcohol, and coffee intake and the risk of ovarian cancer (OC) remains conflicting. In this study, we used a two-sample mendelian randomization (MR) method to evaluate the association of smoking, drinking and coffee consumption with the risk of OC and prognosis. METHODS Five risk factors related to lifestyles (cigarettes per day, smoking initiation, smoking cessation, alcohol consumption and coffee consumption) were chosen from the Genome-Wide Association Study, and 28, 105, 10, 36 and 36 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were obtained as instrumental variables (IVs). Outcome variables were achieved from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Inverse-variance-weighted method was mainly used to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (Cl). RESULTS The two-sample MR analysis supported the causal association of genetically predicted smoking initiation (OR: 1.15 per SD, 95%CI: 1.02-1.29, P = 0.027) and coffee consumption (OR: 1.40 per 50% increase, 95%CI: 1.02-1.93, P = 0.040) with the risk of OC, but not cigarettes per day, smoking cessation, and alcohol consumption. Subgroup analysis based on histological subtypes revealed a positive genetical predictive association between coffee consumption and endometrioid OC (OR: 3.01, 95%CI: 1.50-6.04, P = 0.002). Several smoking initiation-related SNPs (rs7585579, rs7929518, rs2378662, rs10001365, rs11078713, rs7929518, and rs62098013), and coffee consumption-related SNPs (rs4410790, and rs1057868) were all associated with overall survival and cancer-specific survival in OC. CONCLUSION Our findings provide the evidence for a favorable causal association of genetically predicted smoking initiation and coffee consumption with OC risk, and coffee consumption is linked to a greater risk of endometrioid OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicong Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Songwei Feng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Furong Du
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210042, China
| | - Ke Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hosseini K, Ahangari H, Chapeland-leclerc F, Ruprich-Robert G, Tarhriz V, Dilmaghani A. Role of Fungal Infections in Carcinogenesis and Cancer Development: A Literature Review. Adv Pharm Bull 2022; 12:747-756. [PMID: 36415634 PMCID: PMC9675916 DOI: 10.34172/apb.2022.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a serious debilitating disease and one of the most common causes of death. In recent decades the high risk of various cancers enforced scientists to discover novel prevention and treatment methods to diminish the mortality of this terrifying disease. Accordingly, its prevention can be possible in near future. Based on epidemiological evidence, there is a clear link between pathogenic fungal infections and cancer development. This association is often seen in people with weakened immune systems such as the elderly and people with acquired immunodeficiency (AIDS). Carcinoma in these people is first seen chronically and then acutely. Although the different genetic and environmental risk factors are involved in carcinogenesis, one of the most important risk factors is fungal species and infections associating with cancers etiology. Now it is known that microbial infection is responsible for initiating 2.2 million new cancer cases. In this way, many recent studies have focused on investigating the role and mechanism of fungal infections in diverse cancers occurrence. This review provides a comprehensive framework of the latest clinical findings and the association of fungal infections with versatile cancers including esophageal, gastric, colorectal, lung, cervical, skin, and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamran Hosseini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Hossein Ahangari
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Science, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Florence Chapeland-leclerc
- Université de Paris, Faculté des Sciences, Laboratoire Interdiciplinaire des Energies de Demain (LIED), UMR 8236 CNRS, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Gwenael Ruprich-Robert
- Université de Paris, Faculté des Sciences, Laboratoire Interdiciplinaire des Energies de Demain (LIED), UMR 8236 CNRS, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Vahideh Tarhriz
- Molecular Medicine Research Center, Bio-Medicine Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Azita Dilmaghani
- Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gong TT, Liu FH, Liu YS, Yan S, Xu HL, He XH, Wei YF, Qin X, Gao S, Zhao YH, Wu QJ. A Follow-Up Study of Ovarian Cancer (OOPS): A Study Protocol. Front Nutr 2022; 9:872773. [PMID: 35782924 PMCID: PMC9248802 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.872773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The ovarian cancer (OC) follow-up study (OOPS) is an on-going hospital-based large prospective longitudinal cohort study aimed to explore the relationship between pre/post-diagnostic biological, clinical, environmental, and lifestyle factors with focus on the diet and OC prognosis (including drug resistance, relapse, and mortality). Patients recruited during the baseline survey were between 18 and 79 years old, with histologically confirmed OC diagnosis. Their follow-up and medical treatment were conducted at the gynecological oncology ward at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China after 2015. A total of 703 OC patients made up the final OOPS study population. The follow-up stage was conducted in both passive and active modes. In the passive mode, the follow-up was performed by linkage to the Liaoning Providence Center for Disease Control and Prevention every 6 months to obtain health outcome results. The status of lifestyle factors was re-estimated using the same measurements as those in the baseline survey. OC participants in the OOPS study completed a questionnaire and anthropometric examinations. In addition, biological specimens were collected during the baseline survey, which included blood, urine, and stool samples that were stored for further use. This article is intended to serve as an introduction to this project and to provide details for investigators who may be carry out related analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Ting Gong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Fang-Hua Liu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ya-Shu Liu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Shi Yan
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - He-Li Xu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xin-Hui He
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yi-Fan Wei
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xue Qin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Song Gao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yu-Hong Zhao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qi-Jun Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Medical Research on Major Chronic Disease, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Qi-Jun Wu
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Worldwide Burden, Risk Factors, and Temporal Trends of Ovarian Cancer: A Global Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092230. [PMID: 35565359 PMCID: PMC9102475 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Ovarian cancer was the third most common gynecological cancer globally in 2020. Ovarian carcinoma is the most common type of ovarian cancer, comprising over 90% of all ovarian cancer cases. The risk of ovarian cancer increases in females with age, along with having a family history, having a family cancer syndrome, and breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations. Investigation of the latest disease burden, risk factors, and temporal trends of ovarian cancer is important for the reduction of its associated mortality globally. The global incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer for 185 countries in 2020 were retrieved from the Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) database established by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, WHO, Lyon, France). The incidence of ovarian cancer has been increasing substantially among younger females, probably caused by the increasing prevalence of obesity, metabolic syndrome, estrogen exposure and nulliparity. Abstract This study aimed to investigate the most updated worldwide incidence and mortality, risk factors, and epidemiologic trend of ovarian cancer in different countries, regions, and age groups. The Global Cancer Observatory database was used for incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer in 2020. Data from Cancer Incidence in Five Continents and the WHO mortality database was accessed for trend analysis. Age-standardized rates (ASRs, per 100,000 persons) were calculated for incidence and mortality. The 10-year annual average percent change (AAPC) was estimated by Joinpoint regression analysis. There was an overall decreasing trend of ovarian cancer, yet its burden has been increasing in lower-income countries and among younger females in some countries. Intensive lifestyle modifications are warranted, especially for the populations at high risk for ovarian cancer, including smoking cessation, alcohol use reduction, physical activity, weight control, and treatment of metabolic diseases.
Collapse
|
12
|
Vidican P, Perol O, Fevotte J, Fort E, Treilleux I, Belladame E, Zavadil J, Fervers B, Charbotel B. Frequency of Asbestos Exposure and Histological Subtype of Ovarian Carcinoma. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:5383. [PMID: 35564776 PMCID: PMC9100164 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The International Agency for Research on Cancer established a causal link between asbestos exposure and ovarian cancer. However, the exposure frequency and histological characteristics of asbestos-associated ovarian cancers remain to be investigated in detail. This multicenter case-case study assessed the asbestos exposure in ovarian carcinoma (OC) patients, alongside its association with histological subtype. Women were recruited in four hospitals in Lyon, France. Histological reports were reviewed by a pathologist. Patient and family members' data were collected by phone-based questionnaires. Asbestos exposure was defined as direct (occupational and environmental) and indirect (via parents, partners, and children). An industrial hygienist assessed the probability and level of exposure. The 254 enrolled patients (mean age 60 years) reported having an average of 2.3 different jobs (mean working duration 29 years). The prevalence of direct and indirect asbestos exposure was 13% (mean exposure duration 11 years) and 46%, respectively. High-grade serous carcinoma accounted for 73% of all OCs and 82% of histological subtypes in women with direct exposure. After adjustment on a familial history of OC, no significant associations between asbestos exposure (direct and/or indirect) and high-grade serous carcinoma were found. Women with OC had a high prevalence of asbestos exposure. Establishing risk profiles, as reported here, is important in facilitating compensation for asbestos-related OCs and for the surveillance of women at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Vidican
- Département Prévention Cancer Environnement, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, CEDEX 08, 69373 Lyon, France; (O.P.); (E.B.); (B.F.)
| | - Olivia Perol
- Département Prévention Cancer Environnement, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, CEDEX 08, 69373 Lyon, France; (O.P.); (E.B.); (B.F.)
- Inserm UMR1296, “Radiations: Défense, Santé, Environnement”, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Joëlle Fevotte
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Université Gustave Eiffel—Ifsttar, Umrestte, UMR T 9405, Domaine Rockefeller, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008 Lyon, France; (J.F.); (E.F.)
| | - Emmanuel Fort
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Université Gustave Eiffel—Ifsttar, Umrestte, UMR T 9405, Domaine Rockefeller, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008 Lyon, France; (J.F.); (E.F.)
| | - Isabelle Treilleux
- Département D’anatomopathologie, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Elodie Belladame
- Département Prévention Cancer Environnement, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, CEDEX 08, 69373 Lyon, France; (O.P.); (E.B.); (B.F.)
| | - Jiri Zavadil
- Epigenomics and Mechanisms Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer WHO, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, CEDEX 08, 69372 Lyon, France;
| | - Béatrice Fervers
- Département Prévention Cancer Environnement, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, CEDEX 08, 69373 Lyon, France; (O.P.); (E.B.); (B.F.)
- Inserm UMR1296, “Radiations: Défense, Santé, Environnement”, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
- Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Barbara Charbotel
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Université Gustave Eiffel—Ifsttar, Umrestte, UMR T 9405, Domaine Rockefeller, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008 Lyon, France; (J.F.); (E.F.)
- CRPPE-Lyon, Centre Régional de Pathologies Professionnelles et Environnementales de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre Bénite, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gaitskell K, Hermon C, Barnes I, Pirie K, Floud S, Green J, Beral V, Reeves GK. Ovarian cancer survival by stage, histotype, and pre-diagnostic lifestyle factors, in the prospective UK Million Women Study. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 76:102074. [PMID: 34942490 PMCID: PMC8785125 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in UK women. Ovarian cancer survival varies by disease stage at diagnosis, but evidence is mixed on the effect of tumour histological type (histotype) and other factors. METHODS 1.3 million UK women completed a detailed health questionnaire in 1996-2001 and were followed for incident cancers and deaths via linkage to national databases. Using Cox regression models, we estimated adjusted relative risks (RRs) of death from ovarian cancer, by stage at diagnosis, tumour histotype, and 16 other personal characteristics of the women. RESULTS During 17.7 years' average follow-up, 13,222 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, and 8697 of them died from the disease. Stage at diagnosis was a major determinant of survival (stage IV vs I, RR=10.54, 95% CI: 9.16-12.13). Histotype remained a significant predictor after adjustment for stage and other factors, but associations varied over the follow-up period. Histotype-specific survival was worse for high-grade than low-grade tumours. Survival appeared worse with older age at diagnosis (per 5 years: RR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.15-1.22), higher BMI (per 5-unit increase: RR=1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11), and smoking (current vs never: RR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.27), but there was little association with 13 other pre-diagnostic reproductive, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors. CONCLUSION Stage at diagnosis is a strong predictor of ovarian cancer survival, but tumour histotype and grade remain predictors of survival even after adjustment for stage and other factors, contributing further evidence of biological dissimilarity between the ovarian cancer histotypes. Obesity and smoking represent potentially-modifiable determinants of survival, but the stronger association with stage suggests that improving earlier diagnosis would have a greater impact on increasing ovarian cancer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kezia Gaitskell
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Histopathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
| | - Carol Hermon
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Isobel Barnes
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Kirstin Pirie
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Sarah Floud
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Jane Green
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Valerie Beral
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Gillian K Reeves
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Guo JZ, Xiao Q, Gao S, Li XQ, Wu QJ, Gong TT. Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies on Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:681396. [PMID: 34458137 PMCID: PMC8385140 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.681396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the deadliest gynecological cancers worldwide. Previous observational epidemiological studies have revealed associations between modifiable environmental risk factors and OC risk. However, these studies are prone to confounding, measurement error, and reverse causation, undermining robust causal inference. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis has been established as a reliable method to investigate the causal relationship between risk factors and diseases using genetic variants to proxy modifiable exposures. Over recent years, MR analysis in OC research has received extensive attention, providing valuable insights into the etiology of OC as well as holding promise for identifying potential therapeutic interventions. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the key principles and assumptions of MR analysis. Published MR studies focusing on the causality between different risk factors and OC risk are summarized, along with comprehensive analysis of the method and its future applications. The results of MR studies on OC showed that higher BMI and height, earlier age at menarche, endometriosis, schizophrenia, and higher circulating β-carotene and circulating zinc levels are associated with an increased risk of OC. In contrast, polycystic ovary syndrome; vitiligo; higher circulating vitamin D, magnesium, and testosterone levels; and HMG-CoA reductase inhibition are associated with a reduced risk of OC. MR analysis presents a2 valuable approach to understanding the causality between different risk factors and OC after full consideration of its inherent assumptions and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Zeng Guo
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qian Xiao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Song Gao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiu-Qin Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qi-Jun Wu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Research Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ting-Ting Gong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Londoño C, Cayssials V, de Villasante I, Crous-Bou M, Scalbert A, Weiderpass E, Agudo A, Tjønneland A, Olsen A, Overvad K, Katzke V, Schulze M, Palli D, Krogh V, Santucci de Magistris M, Tumino R, Ricceri F, Gram IT, Rylander C, Skeie G, Sánchez MJ, Amiano P, Huerta JM, Barricarte A, Sartor H, Sonestedt E, Esberg A, Idahl A, Mahamat-Saleh Y, Laouali N, Kvaskoff M, Turzanski-Fortner R, Zamora-Ros R. Polyphenol Intake and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021; 10:1249. [PMID: 34439497 PMCID: PMC8389235 DOI: 10.3390/antiox10081249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite some epidemiological evidence on the protective effects of polyphenol intake on epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk from case-control studies, the evidence is scarce from prospective studies and non-existent for several polyphenol classes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the associations between the intake of total, classes and subclasses of polyphenols and EOC risk in a large prospective study. The study was conducted in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, which included 309,129 adult women recruited mostly from the general population. Polyphenol intake was assessed through validated country-specific dietary questionnaires and the Phenol-Explorer database. During a mean follow-up of 14 years, 1469 first incident EOC cases (including 806 serous, 129 endometrioid, 102 mucinous, and 67 clear cell tumours) were identified. In multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models, the hazard ratio in the highest quartile of total polyphenol intake compared with the lowest quartile (HRQ4vsQ1) was 1.14 (95% CI 0.94-1.39; p-trend = 0.11). Similarly, the intake of most classes and subclasses of polyphenols were not related to either overall EOC risk or any EOC subtype. A borderline statistically significant positive association was observed between phenolic acid intake (HRQ4vsQ1 = 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.43; p-trend = 0.02) and EOC risk, especially for the serous subtype and in women with obesity, although these associations did not exceed the Bonferroni correction threshold. The current results do not support any association between polyphenol intake and EOC in our large European prospective study. Results regarding phenolic acid intake need further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catalina Londoño
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08908 Barcelona, Spain; (C.L.); (V.C.); (I.d.V.); (M.C.-B.); (A.A.)
| | - Valerie Cayssials
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08908 Barcelona, Spain; (C.L.); (V.C.); (I.d.V.); (M.C.-B.); (A.A.)
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary, University of the Republic, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
- Department of Quantitative Methods, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Republic, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
| | - Izar de Villasante
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08908 Barcelona, Spain; (C.L.); (V.C.); (I.d.V.); (M.C.-B.); (A.A.)
| | - Marta Crous-Bou
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08908 Barcelona, Spain; (C.L.); (V.C.); (I.d.V.); (M.C.-B.); (A.A.)
| | - Augustin Scalbert
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 69372 Lyon, France; (A.S.); (E.W.)
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 69372 Lyon, France; (A.S.); (E.W.)
| | - Antonio Agudo
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08908 Barcelona, Spain; (C.L.); (V.C.); (I.d.V.); (M.C.-B.); (A.A.)
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Unit of Diet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (A.T.); (A.O.)
| | - Anja Olsen
- Unit of Diet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (A.T.); (A.O.)
| | - Kim Overvad
- Department of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark;
| | - Verena Katzke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (V.K.); (R.T.-F.)
| | - Matthias Schulze
- Department of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany;
- Institute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany
| | - Domenico Palli
- Cancer Risk Factors and Life-Style Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network-ISPRO, 50139 Florence, Italy;
| | - Vittorio Krogh
- Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | | | - Rosario Tumino
- Cancer Registry and Histopathology Unit, “Civic M.P. Arezzo” Hospital ASP, 97100 Ragusa, Italy;
| | - Fulvio Ricceri
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy;
- Unit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service ASL TO3, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy
| | - Inger T. Gram
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway; (I.T.G.); (C.R.); (G.S.)
| | - Charlotta Rylander
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway; (I.T.G.); (C.R.); (G.S.)
| | - Guri Skeie
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway; (I.T.G.); (C.R.); (G.S.)
| | - Maria-Jose Sánchez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), 18011 Granada, Spain;
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (P.A.); (J.M.H.); (A.B.)
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain
| | - Pilar Amiano
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (P.A.); (J.M.H.); (A.B.)
- Ministry of Health of the Basque Government, Sub-Directorate for Public Health and Addictions of Gipuzkoa, 20013 San Sebastian, Spain
- Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, BioDonostia Research Institute, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain
| | - José María Huerta
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (P.A.); (J.M.H.); (A.B.)
- Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, 30008 Murcia, Spain
| | - Aurelio Barricarte
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (P.A.); (J.M.H.); (A.B.)
- Navarra Public Health Institute, 31003 Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Hanna Sartor
- Diagnostic Radiology Unit, Lund University, 20502 Malmö, Sweden;
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, 21428 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Emily Sonestedt
- Nutritional Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 21428 Malmö, Sweden;
| | - Anders Esberg
- Department of Odontology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden;
| | - Annika Idahl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden;
| | - Yahya Mahamat-Saleh
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France; (Y.M.-S.); (N.L.); (M.K.)
- Exposome and Heredity Team, CESP, Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, INSERM, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Nasser Laouali
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France; (Y.M.-S.); (N.L.); (M.K.)
- Exposome and Heredity Team, CESP, Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, INSERM, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Marina Kvaskoff
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France; (Y.M.-S.); (N.L.); (M.K.)
- Exposome and Heredity Team, CESP, Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, INSERM, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Renée Turzanski-Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (V.K.); (R.T.-F.)
| | - Raul Zamora-Ros
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08908 Barcelona, Spain; (C.L.); (V.C.); (I.d.V.); (M.C.-B.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baron JA, Nichols HB, Anderson C, Safe S. Cigarette Smoking and Estrogen-Related Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1462-1471. [PMID: 33990391 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cigarette smoking is a known cause of many cancers, yet epidemiologic studies have found protective associations with the risk of four "estrogen-related" malignancies: endometrial cancer, endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancers, and thyroid cancer. This review considers epidemiologic and biological aspects of these associations, focusing particularly on estrogen signaling, and contrasts them with those for breast cancer, another estrogen-related malignancy. The observational findings regarding the inverse associations are consistent and remain after adjustment for possible confounding factors. In general, women who smoke do not have lower circulating estrogen levels than nonsmokers, eliminating one possible explanation for reduced risks of these malignancies. For endometrial and endometrioid ovarian cancer, the negative associations could plausibly be explained by interference with signaling through the estrogen receptor α. However, this is unlikely to explain the lower risks of thyroid and clear cell ovarian cancers. For thyroid cancer, an anti-inflammatory effect of nicotine and reduced TSH levels from smoking have been proposed explanations for the inverse association, but both lack convincing evidence. While the overall impact of cigarette smoking is overwhelmingly negative, protective associations such as those discussed here can provide potential clues to disease etiology, treatment, and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Baron
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. .,Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Hazel B Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Chelsea Anderson
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stephen Safe
- Department of Veterinary Physiology & Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Katuwal S, Jousilahti P, Pukkala E. Causes of death among women with breast cancer: A follow-up study of 50 481 women with breast cancer in Finland. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:839-845. [PMID: 33890290 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Our study aims to assess mortality from causes other than breast cancer among women with breast cancer with focus on indications of joint aetiology. Data on female breast cancer patients were obtained from the Finnish Cancer Registry and their underlying causes of death in 54 categories from the Statistics Finland. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for 50 481 patients diagnosed between 1971 and 2000 and followed until December 2012, stratified by histology, age at diagnosis and time since diagnosis. The expected numbers of deaths were based on respective mortality rates among the Finnish general population. Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated from Poisson regression model to compare risks of cause of death by histology. 41% of 30 841 deaths were due to causes other than breast cancer. Significant excess mortality was observed for stomach cancer (SMR 1.43, 95% CI 1.26-1.62), circulatory system diseases (SMR 1.17, 95% CI 1.14-1.20) and suicide (SMR 1.51, 95% CI 1.28-1.78). In an age-adjusted analysis, significantly higher relative risk of stomach cancer mortality was observed for lobular vs ductal subtype (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.32-3.02). Significantly increased SMRs were observed for cancers of respiratory organs among premenopausal women, and for other respiratory system diseases, dementia and Alzheimer disease among postmenopausal women. We conclude that female breast cancer patients are at increased risk of death from causes other than the breast cancer diagnosis including circulatory and respiratory system diseases and cancer of stomach, ovary and respiratory systems. The excess mortality because of different causes varies based on menopausal status and histology. There might be shared aetiological factors between the diagnosis of breast cancer and the causes of death among these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushmita Katuwal
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Pekka Jousilahti
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute of Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eero Pukkala
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Peres LC, Bethea TN, Camacho TF, Bandera EV, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Chyn DL, Harris HR, Joslin CE, Moorman PG, Myers E, Ochs-Balcom HM, Rosenow W, Setiawan VW, Wu AH, Rosenberg L, Schildkraut JM. Racial Differences in Population Attributable Risk for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in the OCWAA Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 113:710-718. [PMID: 33252629 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The causes of racial disparities in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) incidence remain unclear. Differences in the prevalence of ovarian cancer risk factors may explain disparities in EOC incidence among African American (AA) and White women. METHODS We used data from 4 case-control studies and 3 case-control studies nested within prospective cohorts in the Ovarian Cancer in Women of African Ancestry Consortium to estimate race-specific associations of 10 known or suspected EOC risk factors using logistic regression. Using the Bruzzi method, race-specific population attributable risks (PAR) were estimated for each risk factor individually and collectively, including groupings of exposures (reproductive factors and modifiable factors). All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Among 3244 White EOC cases and 9638 controls and 1052 AA EOC cases and 2410 controls, AA women had a statistically significantly higher PAR (false discovery rate [FDR] P < .001) for first-degree family history of breast cancer (PAR = 10.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.5% to 13.7%) compared with White women (PAR = 2.6%, 95% CI = 0.8% to 4.4%). After multiple test correction, AA women had a higher PAR than White women when evaluating all risk factors collectively (PAR = 61.6%, 95% CI = 48.6% to 71.3% vs PAR = 43.0%, 95% CI = 32.8% to 51.4%, respectively; FDR P = .06) and for modifiable exposures, including body mass index, oral contraceptives, aspirin, and body powder (PAR = 36.0%, 95% CI = 21.0% to 48.8% vs PAR = 13.8%, 95% CI = 4.5% to 21.8%, respectively; FDR P = .04). CONCLUSIONS Collectively, the selected risk factors accounted for slightly more of the risk among AA than White women, and interventions to reduce EOC incidence that are focused on multiple modifiable risk factors may be slightly more beneficial to AA women than White women at risk for EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Peres
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Traci N Bethea
- Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Campus, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tareq F Camacho
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Deanna L Chyn
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Charlotte E Joslin
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Medicine and Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Patricia G Moorman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Evan Myers
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Heather M Ochs-Balcom
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Will Rosenow
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - V Wendy Setiawan
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynn Rosenberg
- Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Harmych SJ, Kumar J, Bouni ME, Chadee DN. Nicotine inhibits MAPK signaling and spheroid invasion in ovarian cancer cells. Exp Cell Res 2020; 394:112167. [PMID: 32649943 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Nicotine is the major addictive component of cigarette smoke and although it is not considered carcinogenic, it can enhance or inhibit cancer cell proliferation depending on the type of cancer. Nicotine mediates its effects through nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), which are expressed in many different neuronal and non-neuronal cell types. We observed that the nAChR α4, α5, α7 subunits were expressed in ovarian cancer (OC) cells. Nicotine inhibited the proliferation of SKOV3 and TOV112D OC cells, which have TP53 mutation and wild-type KRAS, but did not inhibit the proliferation of TOV21G or HEY OC cells, which have KRAS mutation and wild-type TP53. Exposure to nicotine for 96 h led to a significant reduction in the amounts of activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and activated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in SKOV3 cells, and in activated ERK in TOV112D cells. In addition, SKOV3 and TOV112D invasion and spheroid formation were substantially inhibited by siRNA knockdown of mixed lineage kinase 3 (MLK3), or MEK inhibition. Nicotine treatment reduced SKOV3 and TOV112D spheroid invasion and compaction but did not significantly affect spheroid formation. Furthermore, SKOV3 spheroid invasion was blocked by p38 inhibition with SB202190, but not by MEK inhibition with U0126; whereas TOV112D spheroid invasion was reduced by MEK inhibition, but not by p38 inhibition. These results indicate that nicotine can suppress spheroid invasion and compaction as well as proliferation in SKOV3 and TOV112D OC cells; and p38 and ERK MAPK signaling pathways are important mediators of these responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Harmych
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, MS601, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
| | - Jay Kumar
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, MS601, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
| | - Mesa E Bouni
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, MS601, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA
| | - Deborah N Chadee
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, MS601, Toledo, OH, 43606, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
El-Sherif A, El-Sherif S, Taylor AH, Ayakannu T. Ovarian Cancer: Lifestyle, Diet and Nutrition. Nutr Cancer 2020; 73:1092-1107. [PMID: 32674720 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1792948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed El-Sherif
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Arrow Park Hospital, Upton, UK
| | - Sherif El-Sherif
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, West Cumberland Hospital, Whitehaven, UK
| | - Anthony Henry Taylor
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Thangesweran Ayakannu
- Gynaecology Oncology Cancer Centre, Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Women’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alexandrova E, Pecoraro G, Sellitto A, Melone V, Ferravante C, Rocco T, Guacci A, Giurato G, Nassa G, Rizzo F, Weisz A, Tarallo R. An Overview of Candidate Therapeutic Target Genes in Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061470. [PMID: 32512900 PMCID: PMC7352306 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) shows the highest mortality rate among gynecological malignancies and, because of the absence of specific symptoms, it is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage, mainly due to the lack of specific and early biomarkers, such as those based on cancer molecular signature identification. Indeed, although significant progress has been made toward improving the clinical outcome of other cancers, rates of mortality for OC are essentially unchanged since 1980, suggesting the need of new approaches to identify and characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying pathogenesis and progression of these malignancies. In addition, due to the low response rate and the high frequency of resistance to current treatments, emerging therapeutic strategies against OC focus on targeting single factors and pathways specifically involved in tumor growth and metastasis. To date, loss-of-function screenings are extensively applied to identify key drug targets in cancer, seeking for more effective, disease-tailored treatments to overcome lack of response or resistance to current therapies. We review here the information relative to essential genes and functional pathways recently discovered in OC, often strictly interconnected with each other and representing promising biomarkers and molecular targets to treat these malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Alexandrova
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
| | - Giovanni Pecoraro
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
| | - Assunta Sellitto
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
| | - Viola Melone
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
| | - Carlo Ferravante
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
- Genomix4Life, via S. Allende 43/L, 84081 Baronissi, Italy;
| | - Teresa Rocco
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
- Genomix4Life, via S. Allende 43/L, 84081 Baronissi, Italy;
| | - Anna Guacci
- Genomix4Life, via S. Allende 43/L, 84081 Baronissi, Italy;
| | - Giorgio Giurato
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
| | - Giovanni Nassa
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
| | - Francesca Rizzo
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
| | - Alessandro Weisz
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
- CRGS-Genome Research Center for Health, University of Salerno Campus of Medicine, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
- Correspondence: (A.W.); (R.T.); Tel.: +39-089-965043 (A.W.); +39-089-965067 (R.T.)
| | - Roberta Tarallo
- Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitan”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (E.A.); (G.P.); (A.S.); (V.M.); (C.F.); (T.R.); (G.G.); (G.N.); (F.R.)
- Correspondence: (A.W.); (R.T.); Tel.: +39-089-965043 (A.W.); +39-089-965067 (R.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Al-Zalabani AH. Cancer incidence attributable to tobacco smoking in GCC countries in 2018. Tob Induc Dis 2020; 18:18. [PMID: 32256282 PMCID: PMC7107909 DOI: 10.18332/tid/118722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member countries include Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates. The current study aims to provide an estimate of the population fractions of cancer cases attributable to tobacco smoking in the GCC countries. METHODS Population attributable fraction (PAF) was calculated for cancers that were listed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to have sufficient evidence of causal association. The estimated number of incident cancer cases in GCC countries were retrieved from the IARC GLOBOCAN database. The prevalence estimates of current tobacco smoking among persons aged ≥15 years were obtained from the World Health Organization report on prevalence of tobacco smoking. Relative risk estimates for various cancers were obtained from published meta-analyses. Summary PAFs and cancer cases attributable to tobacco smoking are reported by country, sex, and cancer type. RESULTS Tobacco smoking was responsible for 2536 (16.3%) of cancer cases in GCC countries in 2018. It accounted for 22.8% (n=2396) and 2.8% (n=140) of cancer cases among males and females, respectively. Among males, the highest number of cancer incident cases attributable to smoking was lung cancer (807) followed by urinary bladder (328), and colorectal cancer (305). Among females, the highest number of cancer cases attributable to smoking was lung cancer (62) followed by lip and oral cavity (13), and cervical cancer (13). CONCLUSIONS Tobacco smoking accounted for a large portion of cancer cases attributable to preventable risk factors in GCC countries. Preventive efforts focusing on reducing tobacco smoking should be a high priority in GCC countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulmohsen H Al-Zalabani
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen WC, Singh E, Muchengeti M, Bradshaw D, Mathew CG, Babb de Villiers C, Lewis CM, Waterboer T, Newton R, Sitas F. Johannesburg Cancer Study (JCS): contribution to knowledge and opportunities arising from 20 years of data collection in an African setting. Cancer Epidemiol 2020; 65:101701. [PMID: 32169796 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The Johannesburg Cancer Study (JCS) aims were to examine whether cancer risk factors identified in Western countries applied to black patients in Johannesburg, South Africa and to understand the impact of HIV on cancer risk, with a view to identifying previously unrecognised HIV associated cancers. A total of 24 971 black patients with an incident histologically proven (>95%) cancer of any type were enrolled between 1995-2016. Response rates were >90%. Patients provided informed consent, lifestyle and demographic information using a structured questionnaire; 19 351 provided a serum sample and 18 972 a whole blood sample for genomic analyses. This is currently the largest cancer epidemiological biobank in Africa. JCS uses a cancer case-control method; controls being cancer types unrelated to exposures of interest. Published results show the importance of HIV in several cancers known to be infection associated e.g. Kaposi sarcoma (OR = 1683; CI = 595-5194) in those with high Kaposi-sarcoma-associated-herpesvirus titres; no effect of HIV on lung or liver cancer-in the latter showing a strong association with HBVDNA, sAg and c positivity (OR = 47; CI = 21-104). Comparable data to higher-income country studies include lung cancer ORs in relation to smoking (15+g tobacco/day) (ORMales = 37; CI = 21-67, ORFemales = 18.5; CI = 8-45) and associations between alcohol and oesophageal cancer in smokers (ORM&F = 4.4; CI = 3-6). Relationship between hormonal contraception declined to null 10 or more years after stopping for breast (OR = 1.1; CI = 0.9-1.4) and cervical cancer (OR = 1.0;CI = 0.8-1.2), and protective effects shown, five or more years after stopping for ovarian (OR = 0.6; CI = 0.4-1) and endometrial cancer (OR = 0.4; CI = 0.2-0.9). Preferential access is based on data requests promoting data pooling, equal collaborative opportunities and enhancement of research capacity in South Africa. The JCS is a practical and valid design in otherwise logistically difficult settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenlong Carl Chen
- National Cancer Registry, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa; Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Elvira Singh
- National Cancer Registry, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Mazvita Muchengeti
- National Cancer Registry, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Debbie Bradshaw
- Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Christopher G Mathew
- Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Chantal Babb de Villiers
- Division of Human Genetics, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Cathryn M Lewis
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom; Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Waterboer
- Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robert Newton
- MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda; University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Freddy Sitas
- Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa; Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia; Menzies Centre of Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ouldamer L, Body G, Daraï E, Bendifallah S. [Borderline Ovarian Tumours: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Epidemiological Aspects and Risk Factors]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 48:239-247. [PMID: 32004787 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The incidence (rate/100,000) of BOT gradually increases with age from 15-19 years of age and peaks at nearly 4.5 cases/100,000 for the 55-59 year age group (NP3). In the presence of a benign ovarian mass, the standardized risk ratio of serous and mucinous BOT is 1.69, (95% CI 1.39-2.03) and 1.75, (95% CI 1.45-2.10), respectively (NP2). At diagnosis, a median age of diagnosis of OFA is 46 years, unilateral forms (79.7% of cases) are predominant compared to cancers (45.3%) (<0.001) and FIGO I stages represent nearly 63.7% of cases (NP3). The 5-year survival rates for FIGO I, II, III, IV stages are: 99.7% (95% CI: 96.2-100%), 99.6% (95% CI: 92.6-100%), 95.3% (95% CI: 91.8-97.4%), 77.1% (95% CI: 58.0-88.3%), respectively (NP3). Survivors at 5 years for serous and mucinous tumours are 99.7% (95% CI: 99.2-99.9%), 98.5% (95% CI: 96.9-99.3%), respectively (NP3). An epidemiological association exists between personal BOT risk and: (1) a familial history of BOT/certain cancers (pancreas, lung, bone, leukemia) (NP3), (2) a personal history of benign ovarian cyst (NP2), (3) a personal history of pelvic inflammatory disease (IGH), (4) the use of intrauterine device levonorgestrel (NP3), (5) the use of oral contraceptive pills (NP3), (6) multiparity (NP3), (7) hormone replacement therapy (NP3), (8) high consumption of coumestrol (NP4), (9) medical treatment of infertility with progesterone (NP3), (10) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). An epidemiological association exists between previous/actual tabacco consumption and the risk of mucinous ovarian BOT (NP2). Relative risk (RR) varies between 2.2 and 2.7, however the relationship is not necessarily a causal one. An epidemiological association exists between overweight/obesity and the risk of serous BOT (NP2). RR varies between 1.2 to 1.8. The high Vitamin D was inversely associated to the risk of serous BOT (NP4). The risk of mucinous BOT was lowered with paracetamol use (OR=0.77; 95% CI: 0.60-0.98) (NP3). However, the relationship between these factors and BOT is not necessarily a causal one and no screening modality can be proposed in the general population (gradeC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ouldamer
- Département de gynécologie, centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 37044 Tours, France; Unité Inserm 1069, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - G Body
- Département de gynécologie, centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, hôpital Bretonneau, 37044 Tours, France; Unité Inserm 1069, 10, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France
| | - E Daraï
- Département de gynécologie et d'obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Sorbonne université, hôpital universitaire Tenon, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France; UMR_S938, centre de recherche de Saint-Antoine, université Sorbonne, 75006 Paris, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Département de gynécologie et d'obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Sorbonne université, hôpital universitaire Tenon, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France; UMR_S938, centre de recherche de Saint-Antoine, université Sorbonne, 75006 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sapunova ID, Kontsevaya AV, Myrzamatova AO, Mukaneeva DK, Khudyakov MB, Ipatov PV, Drapkina OM. Economic damage from smoking associated with four groups of chronic non-communicable diseases in the Russian Federation in 2016. КАРДИОВАСКУЛЯРНАЯ ТЕРАПИЯ И ПРОФИЛАКТИКА 2019. [DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2019-6-6-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- I. D. Sapunova
- National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | - P. V. Ipatov
- National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
| | - O. M. Drapkina
- National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhang Y, Luo G, Li M, Guo P, Xiao Y, Ji H, Hao Y. Global patterns and trends in ovarian cancer incidence: age, period and birth cohort analysis. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:984. [PMID: 31640608 PMCID: PMC6806513 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6139-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer (OC) is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide and the most lethal gynaecological malignancy. We aimed to explore global geographical patterns and temporal trends from 1973 to 2015 for 41 countries in OC incidence and especially to analyse the birth cohort effect to gain further insight into the underlying causal factors of OC and identify countries with increasing risk of OC. METHODS OC data were drawn from the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents databases and online databases published by governments. The joinpoint regression model was applied to detect changes in OC trends. The age-period-cohort model was applied to explore age and birth cohort effects. RESULTS The age-standardized rate of OC incidence ranged from 3.0 to 11.4 per 100,000 women worldwide in 2012. The highest age-standardized rate was observed in Central and Eastern Europe, with 11.4 per 100,000 women in 2012. For the most recent 10-year period, the increasing trends were mainly observed in Central and South America, Asia and Central and Eastern Europe. The largest significant increase was observed in Brazil, with an average annual percentage change of 4.4%. For recent birth cohorts, cohort-specific increases in risk were pronounced in Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Lithuania, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Malta, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Russia, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, India, Japan, the Philippines and Thailand. CONCLUSIONS Disparities in the incidence and risk of OC persist worldwide. The increased risk of birth cohort in OC incidence was observed for most countries in Asia, Central and Eastern Europe, and Central and South America. The reason for the increasing OC risk for recent birth cohorts in these countries should be investigated with further epidemiology studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanting Zhang
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080 China
| | - Ganfeng Luo
- School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107 China
| | - Mengjie Li
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080 China
| | - Pi Guo
- Department of Public Health, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041 China
| | - Yuejiao Xiao
- Department of Public Health, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041 China
| | - Huanlin Ji
- Department of Public Health, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041 China
| | - Yuantao Hao
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080 China
- Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, No.74 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Guangzhou, 510000 China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bäumler M, Gallant D, Druckmann R, Kuhn W. Ultrasound screening of ovarian cancer. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2019; 41:hmbci-2019-0022. [PMID: 31661436 DOI: 10.1515/hmbci-2019-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer has a high mortality rate. The most common serous type spreads rapidly throughout the peritoneal cavity when 5-year survival is 10%. If diagnosed in earlier stages where the cancer is still confined to the ovary, this survival rate is about 90%. This is the reason to be interested in screening at earlier stages in the average-risk general population. Thus, annual transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) alone or as a multimodal screening test following serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) has been investigated. Ultrasound lacks sensitivity and specificity; new contrast-enhanced approaches might improve these. When the serum marker is combined with ultrasound and interpreted by a rise in the level rather than by a fixed cut-off, improved sensitivity and specificity and a late but not significant reduction in mortality are observed. Further investigations could highlight the interest of a shorter than annual screening, of a long-term follow-up and new contrast-enhanced ultrasound techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Delphine Gallant
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Edegem, Belgium
| | - René Druckmann
- Société européenne de langues française et allemande de Gynécologie Obstétrique (SELFAGO), Nice, France
| | - Walther Kuhn
- Donauisar Klinikum Deggendorf-Dingolfing-Landau, Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Deggendorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Qin Y, Li W, Long Y, Zhan Z. Relationship between p-cofilin and cisplatin resistance in patients with ovarian cancer and the role of p-cofilin in prognosis. Cancer Biomark 2019; 24:469-475. [PMID: 30932883 DOI: 10.3233/cbm-182209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to determine the correlation between p-cofilin expression and cisplatin resistance in patients with ovarian cancer, and also to investigate the role of p-cofilin in prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS The ovarian cancer cell line A2780/DDP resistant to cisplatin was prepared. The cell resistance to cisplatin was measured via MTT assay. The cell invasion capacity was identified via Transwell assay. The mRNA expression and protein level was evaluated via semi-quantitative PCR and Western blot, respectively. The tumor tissues of patients with cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer were collected. The relationship between prognosis and p-cofilin expression was analyzed. RESULTS The growth rate of A2780 was similar to that of A2780/DDP. The sensitivity of A2780 to cisplatin was significantly higher than that of A2780/DDP (p< 0.01). The migration capacity of A2780/DDP was significantly increased compared to that of A2780 (p< 0.01), indicating that the cisplatin-resistant cell lines were successfully constructed. Both CFL1 mRNA level and p-cofilin level in A2780/DDP was significantly higher than that in A2780 (p< 0.01). The p-cofilin level in cancer tissues in patients with cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer was significantly higher than that in patients with cisplatin-sensitive ovarian cancer (p< 0.01). The cisplatin resistance was positively correlated with the p-cofilin expression level (r= 0.802, p= 0.023). The survival time of patients with normal or low level of p-cofilin was significantly longer than that of patients with high expression. CONCLUSION The cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer is closely related to the expression level of p-cofilin, which affects the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
29
|
Yarmolinsky J, Relton CL, Lophatananon A, Muir K, Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Walther A, Zheng J, Fasching P, Zheng W, Yin Ling W, Park SK, Kim BG, Choi JY, Park B, Davey Smith G, Martin RM, Lewis SJ. Appraising the role of previously reported risk factors in epithelial ovarian cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization analysis. PLoS Med 2019; 16:e1002893. [PMID: 31390370 PMCID: PMC6685606 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various risk factors have been associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk in observational epidemiological studies. However, the causal nature of the risk factors reported, and thus their suitability as effective intervention targets, is unclear given the susceptibility of conventional observational designs to residual confounding and reverse causation. Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as proxies for risk factors to strengthen causal inference in observational studies. We used MR to evaluate the association of 12 previously reported risk factors (reproductive, anthropometric, clinical, lifestyle, and molecular factors) with risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, invasive epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes, and low malignant potential tumours. METHODS AND FINDINGS Genetic instruments to proxy 12 risk factors were constructed by identifying single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were robustly (P < 5 × 10-8) and independently associated with each respective risk factor in previously reported genome-wide association studies. These risk factors included genetic liability to 3 factors (endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, type 2 diabetes) scaled to reflect a 50% higher odds liability to disease. We obtained summary statistics for the association of these SNPs with risk of overall and histotype-specific invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (22,406 cases; 40,941 controls) and low malignant potential tumours (3,103 cases; 40,941 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). The OCAC dataset comprises 63 genotyping project/case-control sets with participants of European ancestry recruited from 14 countries (US, Australia, Belarus, Germany, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Canada, Poland, UK, Spain, Netherlands, and Sweden). SNPs were combined into multi-allelic inverse-variance-weighted fixed or random effects models to generate effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Three complementary sensitivity analyses were performed to examine violations of MR assumptions: MR-Egger regression and weighted median and mode estimators. A Bonferroni-corrected P value threshold was used to establish strong evidence (P < 0.0042) and suggestive evidence (0.0042 < P < 0.05) for associations. In MR analyses, there was strong or suggestive evidence that 2 of the 12 risk factors were associated with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and 8 of the 12 were associated with 1 or more invasive epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes. There was strong evidence that genetic liability to endometriosis was associated with an increased risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (odds ratio [OR] per 50% higher odds liability: 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.15; P = 6.94 × 10-7) and suggestive evidence that lifetime smoking exposure was associated with an increased risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (OR per unit increase in smoking score: 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.78; P = 0.02). In analyses examining histotypes and low malignant potential tumours, the strongest associations found were between height and clear cell carcinoma (OR per SD increase: 1.36, 95% CI 1.15-1.61; P = 0.0003); age at natural menopause and endometrioid carcinoma (OR per year later onset: 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16; P = 0.007); and genetic liability to polycystic ovary syndrome and endometrioid carcinoma (OR per 50% higher odds liability: 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96; P = 0.002). There was little evidence for an association of genetic liability to type 2 diabetes, parity, or circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and sex hormone binding globulin with ovarian cancer or its subtypes. The primary limitations of this analysis include the modest statistical power for analyses of risk factors in relation to some less common ovarian cancer histotypes (low grade serous, mucinous, and clear cell carcinomas), the inability to directly examine the association of some ovarian cancer risk factors that did not have robust genetic variants available to serve as proxies (e.g., oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy), and the assumption of linear relationships between risk factors and ovarian cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS Our comprehensive examination of possible aetiological drivers of ovarian carcinogenesis using germline genetic variants to proxy risk factors supports a role for few of these factors in invasive epithelial ovarian cancer overall and suggests distinct aetiologies across histotypes. The identification of novel risk factors remains an important priority for the prevention of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Yarmolinsky
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline L. Relton
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Artitaya Lophatananon
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Kenneth Muir
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Axel Walther
- Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jie Zheng
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Woo Yin Ling
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sue K. Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byoung-Gie Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji-Yeob Choi
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Boyoung Park
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - George Davey Smith
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Richard M. Martin
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah J. Lewis
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhou A, Minlikeeva AN, Khan S, Moysich KB. Association between Cigarette Smoking and Histotype-Specific Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Epidemiologic Studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28:1103-1116. [PMID: 31043418 PMCID: PMC6606332 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-1214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Many studies have demonstrated that smoking can influence ovarian cancer risk and survival; however, the number of studies investigating this relationship according to histologic subtypes is limited. We conducted a review of epidemiologic research that assessed the role of smoking on ovarian cancer risk and survival after diagnosis, specifically capturing studies that discerned between various histologic subtypes of this disease. In the majority of studies, current smoking was associated with increased risk of mucinous cancer. There was also evidence of a decreased risk of clear cell and endometrioid histotypes. No significant association was observed between cigarette smoking and serous cancer. In the studies investigating the relationship between smoking and survival, all the studies reported an increased risk of mortality associated with smoking. Smoking appeared to be a risk factor for both ovarian cancer risk and mortality. Future studies need to investigate further a potential link between smoking and ovarian cancer by having a better assessment of exposure to smoking and having a larger number of participants with the ability to detect associations within rare histotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aili Zhou
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Albina N Minlikeeva
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Sadat Khan
- State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
- Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fortner RT, Poole EM, Wentzensen NA, Trabert B, White E, Arslan AA, Patel AV, Setiawan VW, Visvanathan K, Weiderpass E, Adami HO, Black A, Bernstein L, Brinton LA, Buring J, Clendenen TV, Fournier A, Fraser G, Gapstur SM, Gaudet MM, Giles GG, Gram IT, Hartge P, Hoffman-Bolton J, Idahl A, Kaaks R, Kirsh VA, Knutsen S, Koh WP, Lacey JV, Lee IM, Lundin E, Merritt MA, Milne RL, Onland-Moret NC, Peters U, Poynter JN, Rinaldi S, Robien K, Rohan T, Sánchez MJ, Schairer C, Schouten LJ, Tjonneland A, Townsend MK, Travis RC, Trichopoulou A, van den Brandt PA, Vineis P, Wilkens L, Wolk A, Yang HP, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Tworoger SS. Ovarian cancer risk factors by tumor aggressiveness: An analysis from the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium. Int J Cancer 2019. [PMID: 30561796 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32075] [] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer risk factors differ by histotype; however, within subtype, there is substantial variability in outcomes. We hypothesized that risk factor profiles may influence tumor aggressiveness, defined by time between diagnosis and death, independent of histology. Among 1.3 million women from 21 prospective cohorts, 4,584 invasive epithelial ovarian cancers were identified and classified as highly aggressive (death in <1 year, n = 864), very aggressive (death in 1 to < 3 years, n = 1,390), moderately aggressive (death in 3 to < 5 years, n = 639), and less aggressive (lived 5+ years, n = 1,691). Using competing risks Cox proportional hazards regression, we assessed heterogeneity of associations by tumor aggressiveness for all cases and among serous and endometrioid/clear cell tumors. Associations between parity (phet = 0.01), family history of ovarian cancer (phet = 0.02), body mass index (BMI; phet ≤ 0.04) and smoking (phet < 0.01) and ovarian cancer risk differed by aggressiveness. A first/single pregnancy, relative to nulliparity, was inversely associated with highly aggressive disease (HR: 0.72; 95% CI [0.58-0.88]), no association was observed for subsequent pregnancies (per pregnancy, 0.97 [0.92-1.02]). In contrast, first and subsequent pregnancies were similarly associated with less aggressive disease (0.87 for both). Family history of ovarian cancer was only associated with risk of less aggressive disease (1.94 [1.47-2.55]). High BMI (≥35 vs. 20 to < 25 kg/m2 , 1.93 [1.46-2.56] and current smoking (vs. never, 1.30 [1.07-1.57]) were associated with increased risk of highly aggressive disease. Results were similar within histotypes. Ovarian cancer risk factors may be directly associated with subtypes defined by tumor aggressiveness, rather than through differential effects on histology. Studies to assess biological pathways are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elizabeth M Poole
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nicolas A Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | - Emily White
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Alan A Arslan
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Alpa V Patel
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Genetic Epidemiology Group, Folkhälsan Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Amanda Black
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | | | - Louise A Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | - Julie Buring
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.,Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Agnès Fournier
- CESP "Health across Generations," INSERM, Univ Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Univ Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Susan M Gapstur
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Mia M Gaudet
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Inger T Gram
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Patricia Hartge
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | | | - Annika Idahl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Victoria A Kirsh
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Woon-Puay Koh
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - I-Min Lee
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.,Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Eva Lundin
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Melissa A Merritt
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, United Kingdom
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jenny N Poynter
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Sabina Rinaldi
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Kim Robien
- Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C
| | - Thomas Rohan
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Maria-José Sánchez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA. Hospitales Universitarios de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.,CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Catherine Schairer
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | - Leo J Schouten
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mary K Townsend
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Ruth C Travis
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Antonia Trichopoulou
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.,WHO Collaborating Center for Nutrition and Health, Unit of Nutritional Epidemiology and Nutrition in Public Health, Dept. of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Piet A van den Brandt
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Vineis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, United Kingdom.,HuGeF Foundation, Torino, Italy
| | - Lynne Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hannah P Yang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | | | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.,Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fortner RT, Poole EM, Wentzensen NA, Trabert B, White E, Arslan AA, Patel AV, Setiawan VW, Visvanathan K, Weiderpass E, Adami HO, Black A, Bernstein L, Brinton LA, Buring J, Clendenen TV, Fournier A, Fraser G, Gapstur SM, Gaudet MM, Giles GG, Gram IT, Hartge P, Hoffman-Bolton J, Idahl A, Kaaks R, Kirsh VA, Knutsen S, Koh WP, Lacey JV, Lee IM, Lundin E, Merritt MA, Milne RL, Onland-Moret NC, Peters U, Poynter JN, Rinaldi S, Robien K, Rohan T, Sánchez MJ, Schairer C, Schouten LJ, Tjonneland A, Townsend MK, Travis RC, Trichopoulou A, van den Brandt PA, Vineis P, Wilkens L, Wolk A, Yang HP, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Tworoger SS. Ovarian cancer risk factors by tumor aggressiveness: An analysis from the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:58-69. [PMID: 30561796 PMCID: PMC6488363 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer risk factors differ by histotype; however, within subtype, there is substantial variability in outcomes. We hypothesized that risk factor profiles may influence tumor aggressiveness, defined by time between diagnosis and death, independent of histology. Among 1.3 million women from 21 prospective cohorts, 4,584 invasive epithelial ovarian cancers were identified and classified as highly aggressive (death in <1 year, n = 864), very aggressive (death in 1 to < 3 years, n = 1,390), moderately aggressive (death in 3 to < 5 years, n = 639), and less aggressive (lived 5+ years, n = 1,691). Using competing risks Cox proportional hazards regression, we assessed heterogeneity of associations by tumor aggressiveness for all cases and among serous and endometrioid/clear cell tumors. Associations between parity (phet = 0.01), family history of ovarian cancer (phet = 0.02), body mass index (BMI; phet ≤ 0.04) and smoking (phet < 0.01) and ovarian cancer risk differed by aggressiveness. A first/single pregnancy, relative to nulliparity, was inversely associated with highly aggressive disease (HR: 0.72; 95% CI [0.58-0.88]), no association was observed for subsequent pregnancies (per pregnancy, 0.97 [0.92-1.02]). In contrast, first and subsequent pregnancies were similarly associated with less aggressive disease (0.87 for both). Family history of ovarian cancer was only associated with risk of less aggressive disease (1.94 [1.47-2.55]). High BMI (≥35 vs. 20 to < 25 kg/m2 , 1.93 [1.46-2.56] and current smoking (vs. never, 1.30 [1.07-1.57]) were associated with increased risk of highly aggressive disease. Results were similar within histotypes. Ovarian cancer risk factors may be directly associated with subtypes defined by tumor aggressiveness, rather than through differential effects on histology. Studies to assess biological pathways are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée T. Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elizabeth M. Poole
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicolas A. Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington D.C., USA
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington D.C., USA
| | - Emily White
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alan A. Arslan
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alpa V. Patel
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Kala Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, Folkhälsan Research Center; Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda Black
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington D.C., USA
| | | | - Louise A. Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington D.C., USA
| | - Julie Buring
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Agnès Fournier
- CESP “Health across Generations”, INSERM, Univ Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Univ Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Susan M. Gapstur
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mia M. Gaudet
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Graham G. Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Inger T. Gram
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Patricia Hartge
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington D.C., USA
| | | | - Annika Idahl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Victoria A. Kirsh
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Woon-Puay Koh
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - I-Min Lee
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eva Lundin
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Melissa A. Merritt
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
| | - Roger L. Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N. Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ulrike Peters
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jenny N. Poynter
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sabina Rinaldi
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Kim Robien
- Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Thomas Rohan
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Maria-José Sánchez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA. Hospitales Universitarios de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Catherine Schairer
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington D.C., USA
| | - Leo J. Schouten
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mary K. Townsend
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ruth C. Travis
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Antonia Trichopoulou
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
- WHO Collaborating Center for Nutrition and Health, Unit of Nutritional Epidemiology and Nutrition in Public Health, Dept. of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Piet A. van den Brandt
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Paolo Vineis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
- HuGeF Foundation, Torino, Italy
| | - Lynne Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hannah P. Yang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington D.C., USA
| | | | - Shelley S. Tworoger
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Fortner RT, Poole EM, Wentzensen NA, Trabert B, White E, Arslan AA, Patel AV, Setiawan VW, Visvanathan K, Weiderpass E, Adami HO, Black A, Bernstein L, Brinton LA, Buring J, Clendenen TV, Fournier A, Fraser G, Gapstur SM, Gaudet MM, Giles GG, Gram IT, Hartge P, Hoffman-Bolton J, Idahl A, Kaaks R, Kirsh VA, Knutsen S, Koh WP, Lacey JV, Lee IM, Lundin E, Merritt MA, Milne RL, Onland-Moret NC, Peters U, Poynter JN, Rinaldi S, Robien K, Rohan T, Sánchez MJ, Schairer C, Schouten LJ, Tjonneland A, Townsend MK, Travis RC, Trichopoulou A, van den Brandt PA, Vineis P, Wilkens L, Wolk A, Yang HP, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Tworoger SS. Ovarian cancer risk factors by tumor aggressiveness: An analysis from the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium. Int J Cancer 2019. [PMID: 30561796 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32075]+[] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer risk factors differ by histotype; however, within subtype, there is substantial variability in outcomes. We hypothesized that risk factor profiles may influence tumor aggressiveness, defined by time between diagnosis and death, independent of histology. Among 1.3 million women from 21 prospective cohorts, 4,584 invasive epithelial ovarian cancers were identified and classified as highly aggressive (death in <1 year, n = 864), very aggressive (death in 1 to < 3 years, n = 1,390), moderately aggressive (death in 3 to < 5 years, n = 639), and less aggressive (lived 5+ years, n = 1,691). Using competing risks Cox proportional hazards regression, we assessed heterogeneity of associations by tumor aggressiveness for all cases and among serous and endometrioid/clear cell tumors. Associations between parity (phet = 0.01), family history of ovarian cancer (phet = 0.02), body mass index (BMI; phet ≤ 0.04) and smoking (phet < 0.01) and ovarian cancer risk differed by aggressiveness. A first/single pregnancy, relative to nulliparity, was inversely associated with highly aggressive disease (HR: 0.72; 95% CI [0.58-0.88]), no association was observed for subsequent pregnancies (per pregnancy, 0.97 [0.92-1.02]). In contrast, first and subsequent pregnancies were similarly associated with less aggressive disease (0.87 for both). Family history of ovarian cancer was only associated with risk of less aggressive disease (1.94 [1.47-2.55]). High BMI (≥35 vs. 20 to < 25 kg/m2 , 1.93 [1.46-2.56] and current smoking (vs. never, 1.30 [1.07-1.57]) were associated with increased risk of highly aggressive disease. Results were similar within histotypes. Ovarian cancer risk factors may be directly associated with subtypes defined by tumor aggressiveness, rather than through differential effects on histology. Studies to assess biological pathways are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elizabeth M Poole
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nicolas A Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | - Emily White
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Alan A Arslan
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Alpa V Patel
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Genetic Epidemiology Group, Folkhälsan Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Amanda Black
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | | | - Louise A Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | - Julie Buring
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.,Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Agnès Fournier
- CESP "Health across Generations," INSERM, Univ Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Univ Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Susan M Gapstur
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Mia M Gaudet
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Inger T Gram
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Patricia Hartge
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | | | - Annika Idahl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Victoria A Kirsh
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Woon-Puay Koh
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - I-Min Lee
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.,Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Eva Lundin
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Melissa A Merritt
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, United Kingdom
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jenny N Poynter
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Sabina Rinaldi
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Kim Robien
- Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C
| | - Thomas Rohan
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Maria-José Sánchez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA. Hospitales Universitarios de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.,CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Catherine Schairer
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | - Leo J Schouten
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mary K Townsend
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Ruth C Travis
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Antonia Trichopoulou
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.,WHO Collaborating Center for Nutrition and Health, Unit of Nutritional Epidemiology and Nutrition in Public Health, Dept. of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Piet A van den Brandt
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Vineis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, United Kingdom.,HuGeF Foundation, Torino, Italy
| | - Lynne Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hannah P Yang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C
| | | | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.,Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Santucci C, Bosetti C, Peveri G, Liu X, Bagnardi V, Specchia C, Gallus S, Lugo A. Dose-risk relationships between cigarette smoking and ovarian cancer histotypes: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control 2019; 30:1023-1032. [PMID: 31236793 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-019-01198-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although smoking has not been associated with overall ovarian cancer risk, a different impact on various histotypes has been reported. Our aim is to provide an accurate, up-to-date estimate of the dose-risk relationships between cigarette smoking and epithelial ovarian cancer, overall and by histotypes. METHODS Using an innovative approach for the identification of original study publications, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies published on the topic until September 2018. Summary relative risks (RR) for cigarette smoking were estimated using random-effects models; dose-risk relationships were evaluated using one-stage random-effects models with restricted cubic splines. RESULTS Thirty-seven studies were considered in the meta-analysis. The summary RRs for current versus never smokers were 1.05 (95% confidence interval CI 0.95-1.16) for overall ovarian cancer, 1.78 (95% CI 1.52-2.07) for mucinous, 0.77 (95% CI 0.65-0.93) for clear cell, 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.91) for endometrioid, and 1.05 (95% CI 0.94; 1.17) for serous cancer. The risk of borderline mucinous (RR 2.09) and serous (RR 1.16) tumors was higher than for invasive cancers (RR 1.44 and 0.95, respectively). For mucinous cancer, risk was noticeably higher with smoking intensity and duration (RR 2.35 for 20 cigarettes/day, and 2.11 for 20 years of smoking). A non-significant linear relation was found with smoking intensity, duration, and time since quitting for overall ovarian cancer and other histotypes. CONCLUSIONS This uniquely large and comprehensive meta-analysis confirms that although cigarette smoking does not appear to be a risk factor for ovarian cancer, and it is even slightly protective for some rare histotypes, there is a strong dose-risk relationship with mucinous ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Santucci
- Department of Oncology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Bosetti
- Department of Oncology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Peveri
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Xiaoqiu Liu
- Laboratory of Lifestyle Epidemiology, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Specchia
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Silvano Gallus
- Laboratory of Lifestyle Epidemiology, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandra Lugo
- Laboratory of Lifestyle Epidemiology, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Flaum N, Crosbie EJ, Edmondson RJ, Smith MJ, Evans DG. Epithelial ovarian cancer risk: A review of the current genetic landscape. Clin Genet 2019; 97:54-63. [PMID: 31099061 PMCID: PMC7017781 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death in women in the developed world, and one of the most heritable cancers. One of the most significant risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Combined risk factors can be used in models to stratify risk of EOC, and aid in decisions regarding risk-reduction strategies. Germline pathogenic variants in EOC susceptibility genes including those involved in homologous recombination and mismatch repair pathways are present in approximately 22% to 25% of EOC. These genes are associated with an estimated lifetime risk of EOC of 13% to 60% for BRCA1 variants and 10% to 25% for BRCA2 variants, with lower risks associated with remaining genes. Genome-wide association studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) thought to explain an additional 6.4% of the familial risk of ovarian cancer, with 34 susceptibility loci identified to date. However, an unknown proportion of the genetic component of EOC risk remains unexplained. This review comprises an overview of individual genes and SNPs suspected to contribute to risk of EOC, and discusses use of a polygenic risk score to predict individual cancer risk more accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Flaum
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Department of Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard J Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Department of Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Miriam J Smith
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Dafydd G Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Prevention Breast Cancer Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Cancer Genetics, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Giampaolino P, Della Corte L, Foreste V, Vitale SG, Chiofalo B, Cianci S, Zullo F, Bifulco G. Unraveling a difficult diagnosis: the tricks for early recognition of ovarian cancer. Minerva Med 2019; 110:279-291. [PMID: 31081307 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4806.19.06086-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the predominant type of ovarian cancer (OC). The 5-year survival of patients has improved over the last three decades, although the overall cure rate of OC if about 30%. Despite high response rates after initial chemotherapy, most patients with advanced ovarian cancer ultimately develop the recurrent disease because of resistance to chemotherapy. A proper early diagnosis and treatment of patients with ovarian cancer are urgently needed. Nowadays the diagnosis is performed by means of clinical symptoms and signs, often indicators of a disease already at an advanced stage, tumor markers (CA125 and HE4), transvaginal ultrasonography and imaging, very useful in distinguishing adnexal masses. Understand the nature of an adnexal mass is the primary point to begin the diagnosis of OC. Validated different model to approach and characterize adnexal pathology preoperatively are described, such as the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) and the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the AdneXa (ADNEX) model. New tumor markers, such as PRSS8, FOLR1, KLK6/7, GSTT1, and miRNAs, are getting ahead and are worth noting for early detection of ovarian cancer. Despite the development of numerous ultrasound models for the diagnosis of adnexal masses and the analysis of different tumor markers, the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer is still difficult to practice. Moreover, identifying genetic risk alleles, such as germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, for ovarian cancer has had a significant impact on disease prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierluigi Giampaolino
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Della Corte
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Virginia Foreste
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore G Vitale
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy -
| | - Benito Chiofalo
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Cianci
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Women and Children's Health, A. Gemelli University Hospital and Institute for Research and Care, Rome, Italy
| | - Fulvio Zullo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bifulco
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Poirier AE, Ruan Y, Grevers X, Walter SD, Villeneuve PJ, Friedenreich CM, Brenner DR. Estimates of the current and future burden of cancer attributable to active and passive tobacco smoking in Canada. Prev Med 2019; 122:9-19. [PMID: 31078177 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Although previous studies have examined the burden of cancer attributable to tobacco smoking, updated estimates are needed given the dramatic changes in smoking behaviours over the last 20 years. In this study, we estimate the proportion of cancer cases in 2015 attributable to past tobacco smoking and passive exposure in Canada and the proportion of cancers in the future that could be prevented through the implementation of interventions targeted at reducing tobacco use. Data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (2003) were used to estimate the prevalence of active tobacco smoking and passive exposure. Population attributable risk estimates were employed to estimate the proportion of cancers attributable to tobacco in 2015. The prevalence of active tobacco smoking and passive exposure was projected to 2032 and cancer incidence was projected from 2016 to 2042 to estimate the future burden of cancer attributable to tobacco. In 2003, 30% and 24% of Canadians were former and current smoker, respectively and 24% had been exposed to tobacco smoke in the past. We estimated that 17.5% (32,655 cases; 95% CI: 31,253-34,034) of cancers were attributable to active tobacco smoking and 0.8% (1408 cases; 95% CI: 1048-1781) to passive tobacco exposure in never smokers. Between 41,191 and 50,696 cases of cancer could be prevented by 2042 under various prevention scenarios. By decreasing passive tobacco exposure by 10-50%, between 730 and 3650 cancer cases could be prevented by 2042. Strategies focused on reducing the prevalence of tobacco smoking are crucial for cancer control in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbey E Poirier
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yibing Ruan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Xin Grevers
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stephen D Walter
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul J Villeneuve
- Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine M Friedenreich
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Oncology and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Darren R Brenner
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Oncology and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Arthur R, Brasky TM, Crane TE, Felix AS, Kaunitz AM, Shadyab AH, Qi L, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Rohan TE. Associations of a Healthy Lifestyle Index With the Risks of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer Among Women in the Women's Health Initiative Study. Am J Epidemiol 2019; 188:261-273. [PMID: 30407487 PMCID: PMC6357793 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Lifestyle-related factors influence risk of endometrial and ovarian cancers, but few studies have examined their joint associations with risk of these cancers. Using multivariable Cox regression models, we assessed the association of a healthy lifestyle index (HLI-a composite score (range, 0-20) involving diet, alcohol consumption, physical activity, body mass index, and smoking; higher scores represent healthier behavior) with risk of endometrial and ovarian cancers among 108,136 postmenopausal women who were recruited in the US Women's Health Initiative study between 1993 and 1998. After a median follow-up of 17.9 years, 1,435 endometrial cancer cases and 904 ovarian cancer cases had been ascertained. Women in the highest quintile of the HLI score had a lower risk of overall, type I, well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, poorly differentiated, and localized endometrial cancer than those in the lowest quintile (for quintile 5 vs. quintile 1, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.72), HR = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.72), HR = 0.66 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.96), HR = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.90), HR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.72), and HR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.74), respectively). The HLI score had a weak positive association with risk of serous ovarian cancer. Our findings underscore the potential importance of a healthy lifestyle in lowering endometrial cancer risk among postmenopausal women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhonda Arthur
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Theodore M Brasky
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Tracy E Crane
- College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Ashley S Felix
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Andrew M Kaunitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Aladdin H Shadyab
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Lihong Qi
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California
| | | | - Thomas E Rohan
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Otorhinolaryngological symptoms among smokeless tobacco (Maras powder) users. North Clin Istanb 2018; 6:284-292. [PMID: 31650117 PMCID: PMC6790918 DOI: 10.14744/nci.2018.50024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the relationship between smokeless tobacco (maras powder) consumption and otorhinolaryngological symptoms. METHODS: This descriptive study was carried out on 599 participants. The participants were divided into two groups. Of these, 299 (49.9%) patients aged over 18 years were the first group; they used smokeless tobacco for at least 5 years. The remaining patients comprised the second group, which included 300 (50.1%) healthy volunteers who did not use tobacco or its products and demonstrated some similarities with the first group. For the purpose of data collection, a questionnaire consisting of 45 questions was administered to the participants. RESULTS: Cough, sputum, shortness of breath, dysphagia, snoring, and apnea-hypopnea were found to be significantly increased in smokeless tobacco users. The highest odds ratio (OR) found was for sputum at 2.615. Similarly, other oral cavity symptoms such as mouth tickling, dryness of throat, mouth sores, halitosis, taste disorders, and toothache were found to be significantly increased in smokeless tobacco users. It is noteworthy that halitosis was 9.4 times more prevalent among smokeless tobacco users than in the non-tobacco users. Sinonasal symptoms such as sneezing, headache, facial fullness, and anorexia were found to be significantly increased in smokeless tobacco users. However, there were no differences between the groups in terms of ear symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the negative effects of smokeless tobacco consumption were particularly higher in the oral cavity, which in turn gave rise to a number of serious upper respiratory tract complaints.
Collapse
|
40
|
Zhang Y, Huang S, Guo Y, Li L. MiR-1294 confers cisplatin resistance in ovarian Cancer cells by targeting IGF1R. Biomed Pharmacother 2018; 106:1357-1363. [PMID: 30119207 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dysregulation of miRNAs is critical for chemosensitivity to platinum-based agents in ovarian cancer (OC) which is the most aggressive gynecological cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms of miRNA-regulated platinum resistance in ovarian cancer remain unclear. In this study, we intended to investigate the effect of miR-1294 on platinum-resistant OC. METHODS The expression of miR-1294 in OC tissues (n = 30) and cell lines was measured by qRT-PCR. Cell transfection was carried out to establish miR-1294 overexpression or knockdown. MTT and clone formation assays were performed to examine proliferation in OC cells. Additionally, wound healing and tumor invasion assays were used to investigate cell migration and invasion, respectively. Finally, the expression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated proteins was measured in OC cells by western blot. RESULTS Our results showed that miR-1294 dysregulation manipulated OC cisplatin resistance through regulating IGF1R. Knockdown of IGF1R decreased SKOVP/DDP cell proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT. Moreover, overexpression of miR-1294 prevented OC cisplatin resistance. CONCLUSION Our results indicated that epigenetic regulation of IGF1R via miR-1294 was essential for cisplatin resistance in OC and provide a new avenue for OC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanchuan city people's Hospital, 431600, China.
| | - Sanxiu Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanchuan city people's Hospital, 431600, China.
| | - Yu Guo
- Yangtze University, 434023, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Zheng G, Yu H, Kanerva A, Försti A, Sundquist K, Hemminki K. Borderline Ovarian Tumors Share Familial Risks with Themselves and Invasive Cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018; 27:1358-1363. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-0503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
42
|
Sköld C, Bjørge T, Ekbom A, Engeland A, Gissler M, Grotmol T, Madanat-Harjuoja L, Gulbech Ording A, Stephansson O, Trabert B, Tretli S, Troisi R, Sørensen HT, Glimelius I. Preterm delivery is associated with an increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer among parous women. Int J Cancer 2018; 143:1858-1867. [PMID: 29737528 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2018] [Revised: 03/31/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is a fatal disease of largely unknown etiology. Higher parity is associated with reduced risk of ovarian cancer. However, among parous women, the impact of pregnancy-related factors on risk is not well understood. This population-based case-control study included all parous women with epithelial ovarian cancer in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden during 1967-2013 (n = 10,957) and up to 10 matched controls (n = 107,864). We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for pregnancy-related factors and ovarian cancer risk by histological subtype. Preterm delivery was associated with an increased risk [pregnancy length (last pregnancy) ≤30 vs. 39-41 weeks, OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.06-1.67), adjusted for number of births]; the OR increased as pregnancy length decreased (p for trend < 0.001). Older age at first and last birth was associated with a decreased risk [first birth: 30-39 vs. <25 years: adjusted OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.83); last birth 30-39 vs. <25 years: adjusted OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.82)]. Increasing number of births was protective [≥4 births vs. 1; OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.59-0.68)] for all subtypes, most pronounced for clear-cell tumors [OR 0.30, (95% CI 0.21-0.44), pheterogeneity < 0.001]. No associations were observed for multiple pregnancies, preeclampsia or offspring size. In conclusion, in addition to high parity, full-term pregnancies and pregnancies at older ages were associated with decreased risk of ovarian cancer. Our findings favor the cell clearance hypothesis, i.e. a recent pregnancy provides protection by clearing of precancerous cells from the epithelium of the ovary/fallopian tubes, mediated by placental or ovarian hormones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Sköld
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tone Bjørge
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anders Ekbom
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Engeland
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway
| | - Mika Gissler
- Information Services Department, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Laura Madanat-Harjuoja
- Cancer Society of Finland, Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anne Gulbech Ording
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Olof Stephansson
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Rebecca Troisi
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Henrik Toft Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Cramer DW, Fichorova RN, Terry KL, Yamamoto H, Vitonis AF, Ardanaz E, Aune D, Boeing H, Brändstedt J, Boutron-Ruault MC, Chirlaque MD, Dorronsoro M, Dossus L, Duell EJ, Gram IT, Gunter M, Hansen L, Idahl A, Johnson T, Khaw KT, Krogh V, Kvaskoff M, Mattiello A, Matullo G, Merritt MA, Nodin B, Orfanos P, Onland-Moret NC, Palli D, Peppa E, Quirós JR, Sánchez-Perez MJ, Severi G, Tjønneland A, Travis RC, Trichopoulou A, Tumino R, Weiderpass E, Fortner RT, Kaaks R. Anti-CA15.3 and Anti-CA125 Antibodies and Ovarian Cancer Risk: Results from the EPIC Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018; 27:790-804. [PMID: 29661801 PMCID: PMC6309875 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Neoplastic and non-neoplastic events may raise levels of mucins, CA15.3, and CA125, and generate antibodies against them, but their impact on epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk has not been fully defined.Methods: CA15.3, CA125, and IgG1 antibodies against them were measured in 806 women who developed EOC and 1,927 matched controls from the European Prospective Investigation of Nutrition and Cancer. Associations between epidemiologic factors and anti-mucin antibodies were evaluated using generalized linear models; EOC risks associated with anti-mucin antibodies, by themselves or in combination with respective antigens, were evaluated using conditional logistic regression.Results: In controls, lower antibodies against both mucins were associated with current smoking; and, in postmenopausal women, higher levels with longer oral contraceptive use and later-age-at and shorter-interval-since last birth. Lower anti-CA15.3 antibodies were associated with higher body mass and, in premenopausal women, more ovulatory cycles. Higher anti-CA15.3 and anti-CA125 antibodies were associated with higher risk for mucinous EOC occurring ≥ 3 years from enrollment. Long-term risk for serous EOC was reduced in women with low CA125 and high anti-CA125 antibodies relative to women with low concentrations of both.Conclusions: We found general support for the hypothesis that anti-mucin antibody levels correlate with risk factors for EOC. Antibodies alone or in combinations with their antigen may predict longer term risk of specific EOC types.Impact: Anti-CA125 and anti-CA15.3 antibodies alone or in perspective of antigens may be informative in the pathogenesis of EOC subtypes, but less useful for informing risk for all EOC. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(7); 790-804. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel W Cramer
- Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raina N Fichorova
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Laboratory of Genital Tract Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hidemi Yamamoto
- Laboratory of Genital Tract Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Allison F Vitonis
- Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eva Ardanaz
- Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain
- IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dagfinn Aune
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heiner Boeing
- German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Jenny Brändstedt
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden
- Division of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Maria-Dolores Chirlaque
- Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- CIBER in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Health and Social Sciences, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Miren Dorronsoro
- Public Health Direction and Biodonostia Research Institute and Ciberesp, Basque Regional Health Department, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Laure Dossus
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Eric J Duell
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Inger T Gram
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Marc Gunter
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Louise Hansen
- Diet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Annika Idahl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Theron Johnson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kay-Tee Khaw
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vittorio Krogh
- Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Kvaskoff
- CESP, INSERM U1018, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Amalia Mattiello
- Diparmento di Medicina Clinica e Chirugria Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Matullo
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine -IIGM (FKA HuGeF), Torino, Italy
| | - Melissa A Merritt
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Björn Nodin
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Philippos Orfanos
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
- WHO Collaborating Center for Nutrition and Health, Unit of Nutritional Epidemiology and Nutrition in Public Health, Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julis Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Domenico Palli
- Cancer Risk Factors and Life-Style Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Research and Prevention Institute - ISPO, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Maria-Jose Sánchez-Perez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.Granada, Hospitales Universitarios de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Gianluca Severi
- CESP, INSERM U1018, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Diet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ruth C Travis
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Antonia Trichopoulou
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
- WHO Collaborating Center for Nutrition and Health, Unit of Nutritional Epidemiology and Nutrition in Public Health, Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Rosario Tumino
- Cancer Registry and Histopathology Department, "Civic - M.P. Arezzo" Hospital, ASP Ragusa, Italy
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Torre LA, Trabert B, DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Samimi G, Runowicz CD, Gaudet MM, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:284-296. [PMID: 29809280 PMCID: PMC6621554 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1974] [Impact Index Per Article: 329.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2018, there will be approximately 22,240 new cases of ovarian cancer diagnosed and 14,070 ovarian cancer deaths in the United States. Herein, the American Cancer Society provides an overview of ovarian cancer occurrence based on incidence data from nationwide population-based cancer registries and mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics. The status of early detection strategies is also reviewed. In the United States, the overall ovarian cancer incidence rate declined from 1985 (16.6 per 100,000) to 2014 (11.8 per 100,000) by 29% and the mortality rate declined between 1976 (10.0 per 100,000) and 2015 (6.7 per 100,000) by 33%. Ovarian cancer encompasses a heterogenous group of malignancies that vary in etiology, molecular biology, and numerous other characteristics. Ninety percent of ovarian cancers are epithelial, the most common being serous carcinoma, for which incidence is highest in non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) (5.2 per 100,000) and lowest in non-Hispanic blacks (NHBs) and Asians/Pacific Islanders (APIs) (3.4 per 100,000). Notably, however, APIs have the highest incidence of endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas, which occur at younger ages and help explain comparable epithelial cancer incidence for APIs and NHWs younger than 55 years. Most serous carcinomas are diagnosed at stage III (51%) or IV (29%), for which the 5-year cause-specific survival for patients diagnosed during 2007 through 2013 was 42% and 26%, respectively. For all stages of epithelial cancer combined, 5-year survival is highest in APIs (57%) and lowest in NHBs (35%), who have the lowest survival for almost every stage of diagnosis across cancer subtypes. Moreover, survival has plateaued in NHBs for decades despite increasing in NHWs, from 40% for cases diagnosed during 1992 through 1994 to 47% during 2007 through 2013. Progress in reducing ovarian cancer incidence and mortality can be accelerated by reducing racial disparities and furthering knowledge of etiology and tumorigenesis to facilitate strategies for prevention and early detection. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:284-296. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey A. Torre
- Senior Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Britton Trabert
- Earl Stadtman Investigator, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Carol E. DeSantis
- Director, Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Surveillance, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kimberly D. Miller
- Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Goli Samimi
- Program Director, Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Carolyn D. Runowicz
- Executive Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Mia M. Gaudet
- Strategic Director, Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research, Behavioral and Epidemiologic Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Vice President, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rebecca L. Siegel
- Strategic Director, Surveillance Information Services, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ko KP, Kim SJ, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, Lubinski J, Lynch HT, Armel S, Park SK, Karlan B, Singer CF, Neuhausen SL, Narod SA, Kotsopoulos J. The association between smoking and cancer incidence in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer 2018; 142:2263-2272. [PMID: 29330845 PMCID: PMC6020833 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Tobacco smoke is an established carcinogen, but the association between tobacco smoking and cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers is not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the association between tobacco smoking and cancer incidence in a cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The study population consisted of unaffected BRCA mutation carriers. Information on lifestyle including smoking histories, reproductive factors, and past medical histories was obtained through questionnaires. Incident cancers were updated biennially via follow-up questionnaires. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using time-dependent Cox regression models. There were 700 incident cancers diagnosed over 26,711 person-years of follow-up. The most frequent cancers seen in BRCA mutation carriers were breast (n = 428; 61%) and ovarian (n = 109; 15%) cancer. Compared to nonsmokers, (ever) smoking was associated with a modest increased risk of all cancers combined (HR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.01-1.37). Women in the highest group of total pack-years (4.3-9.8) had an increased risk of developing any cancer (HR = 1.27; 95%CI 1.04-1.56), breast cancer (HR = 1.33, 95%CI 1.02-1.75), and ovarian cancer (HR = 1.68; 95%CI 1.06-2.67) compared to never smokers. The associations between tobacco smoking and cancer did not differ by BRCA mutation type or by age at diagnosis. This prospective study suggests that tobacco smoking is associated with a modest increase in the risks of breast and ovarian cancer among women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwang-Pil Ko
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Shana J Kim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Henry T Lynch
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Susan Armel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sue K Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Beth Karlan
- Gynecology Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abdurrahman HA, Jawad AK, Alalalf SK. Preoperative assessment of ovarian tumors using a modified multivariate index assay. J Ovarian Res 2018; 11:41. [PMID: 29843758 PMCID: PMC5975415 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-018-0419-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Preoperative differentiation between benign and malignant masses can be challenging. The aim of this research was to evaluate the performance of a modified multivariate index assay (MIA) in detecting ovarian cancer and to compare the effectiveness of gynecologist assessment, cancer antigen (CA) 125, and MIA for identifying ovarian masses with high suspicion of malignancy. Results This prospective observational study included 150 women with ovarian masses who underwent surgery in the Maternity Teaching Hospital from December 2014 to May 2016. Preoperative estimation of modified MIA, assessment by a gynecologist, and CA 125 level correlated with the surgical histopathology. A modified MIA was implemented because of lack of access to the software typically used. Among 150 enrolled women there were 30 cases of malignancy, including 8 cases (26%) of early-stage ovarian cancer and 22 cases (74%) of late-stage cancer. MIA showed high specificity (96.7%) in detecting cancer and a sensitivity of 70%, with a positive predictive value of 84% and a negative predictive value of 92.8%. No significant differences were detected between the MIA results and the histopathology results (P = 0.267). For early-stage ovarian cancer, the sensitivity of MIA was 100% compared with 75% for CA 125 alone. Conclusion MIA seems to be effective for evaluation of ovarian tumors with higher specificity and positive predictive value than CA 125 while maintaining high negative predictive value and with only a slightly lower overall sensitivity. For evaluation of early-stage ovarian cancer, MIA showed a much higher sensitivity that markedly outperformed CA 125 alone. This modified MIA strategy may be particularly useful in low resource setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ariana Kh Jawad
- Kurdistan Board for Medical Specialists, Kurdistan, Erbil, Iraq.
| | - Shahla K Alalalf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hawler Medical University, College of Medicine, Kurdistan region, Erbil, Iraq
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Alton D, Eng L, Lu L, Song Y, Su J, Farzanfar D, Mohan R, Krys O, Mattina K, Harper C, Liu S, Yoannidis T, Milne R, Brown MC, Vennettilli A, Hope AJ, Howell D, Jones JM, Selby P, Xu W, Goldstein DP, Liu G, Giuliani ME. Perceptions of Continued Smoking and Smoking Cessation Among Patients With Cancer. J Oncol Pract 2018; 14:e269-e279. [PMID: 29676948 DOI: 10.1200/jop.17.00029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis leads to poorer treatment outcomes, survival, and quality of life. We evaluated the perceptions of the effects of continued smoking on quality of life, survival, and fatigue among patients with cancer after a cancer diagnosis and the effects of these perceptions on smoking cessation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with cancer from all disease subsites from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, Ontario) were surveyed between April 2014 and May 2016 for sociodemographic variables, smoking history, and perceptions of continued smoking on quality of life, survival, and fatigue. Multivariable regression models evaluated the association between patients' perceptions and smoking cessation and the factors influencing patients' perceptions of smoking. RESULTS Among 1,121 patients, 277 (23%) were smoking cigarettes up to 1 year before diagnosis, and 54% subsequently quit; 23% had lung cancer, and 27% had head and neck cancers. The majority felt that continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis negatively affected quality of life (83%), survival (86%), and fatigue (82%). Current smokers during the peridiagnosis period were less likely to perceive that continued smoking was harmful when compared with ex-smokers and never-smokers ( P < .01). Among current smokers, perceiving that smoking negatively affected quality of life (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.68 [95% CI, 1.26 to 5.72]; P = .011), survival (aOR, 5.00 [95% CI, 2.19 to 11.43]; P < .001), and fatigue (aOR, 3.57 [95% CI, 1.69 to 7.54]; P < .001) were each strongly associated with smoking cessation. Among all patients, those with a greater smoking history were less likely to believe that smoking was harmful in terms of quality of life (aOR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.98 to 0.99]; P < .001), survival (aOR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.98 to 0.99]; P < .001), and fatigue (aOR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98 to 0.99]; P < .001). CONCLUSION The perceptions of continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis among patients with cancer are strongly associated with smoking cessation. Counseling about the harms of continued smoking in patients with cancer, and in particular among those who have lower risk perceptions, should be considered when developing a smoking cessation program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon Alton
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawson Eng
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lin Lu
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yuyao Song
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Su
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Delaram Farzanfar
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rahul Mohan
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Olivia Krys
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katie Mattina
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Harper
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sophia Liu
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tom Yoannidis
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Milne
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Catherine Brown
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ashlee Vennettilli
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew J Hope
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doris Howell
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer M Jones
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Selby
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David P Goldstein
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meredith E Giuliani
- University of Toronto; Ontario Cancer Institute; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
The present overview of ovarian cancer epidemiology summarizes the main results for a network of case-control studies in Italy and from the Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer. There are consistent inverse relations between parity, oral contraceptive use and the risk of ovarian cancer. For other menstrual and hormonal factors (i.e. early age at menarche and late menopause), there are established associations, but of limited impact on ovarian cancer incidence on a population level. Serous and endometrioid ovarian cancers (but not mucinous or clear cell types) are related to current and recent use of hormone replacement therapy in menopause. There are no strong associations with alcohol and tobacco overall, but a direct link for tobacco with (borderline) mucinous cancers, of limited impact, however, on overall ovarian cancer mortality. There are direct associations of ovarian cancer risk with height and BMI, as well as possible relations with selected dietary factors - in the absence, however, of consistent findings - and a possible inverse association with physical activity. There is a strong association with a family history of ovarian cancer (and a few selected other neoplasms, including colorectum and endometrium). Recognized risk factors explain only a limited proportion of ovarian cancer cases on a population level. A key reason for the recent favourable trends of ovarian cancer incidence and mortality in several high-income countries is the widespread use of oral contraceptive in the generations born after 1930.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kortekaas KE, Pelikan HM. Hydrothorax, ascites and an abdominal mass: not always signs of a malignancy - Three cases of Meigs' syndrome. J Radiol Case Rep 2018; 12:17-26. [PMID: 29875983 DOI: 10.3941/jrcr.v12i1.3209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
This case report presents three cases of Meigs' syndrome: a benign ovarian tumor with ascites and a hydrothorax. After removal of the ovarian tumor, the symptoms resolved and the patients became asymptomatic. In daily practice, Meigs' syndrome is at first sight often mistaken for ovarian cancer. With this case report we would like to emphasize that the clinical presentation of an ovarian tumor might be ovarian cancer, but can masquerade as something uncommon like Meigs' syndrome. In a time span of two years we encountered three cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim E Kortekaas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Harold Mp Pelikan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gaitskell K, Green J, Pirie K, Barnes I, Hermon C, Reeves GK, Beral V. Histological subtypes of ovarian cancer associated with parity and breastfeeding in the prospective Million Women Study. Int J Cancer 2018; 142:281-289. [PMID: 28929490 PMCID: PMC5725697 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2017] [Revised: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer risk is known to be reduced amongst women who have had children, but reported associations with breastfeeding are varied. Few studies have had sufficient power to explore reliably these associations by tumour histotype. In a prospective study of 1.1 million UK women, 8719 developed ovarian cancer during follow-up. Cox regression yielded adjusted relative risks (RRs) overall and by tumour histotype amongst women with different childbearing patterns. Nulliparous women had a 24% greater ovarian cancer risk than women with one child, with significant heterogeneity by histotype (p = 0.01). There was no significant increase in serous tumours, a modest increase in mucinous tumours, but a substantial increase in endometrioid (RR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.18-1.89) and clear-cell tumours (RR = 1.68, 1.29-2.20). Among parous women, each additional birth was associated with an overall 6% reduction in ovarian cancer risk; this association also varied by histotype (p = 0.0006), with the largest reduction in risk for clear-cell tumours (RR per birth = 0.75, 0.65-0.85, p < 0.001) and weak, if any, effect for endometrioid, high-grade serous, or mucinous tumours. We found little association with age at first or last birth. There was about a 10% risk reduction per 12-months breastfeeding (RR = 0.89, 0.84-0.94, p < 0.001), with no significant heterogeneity by histotype, but statistical power was limited. In this large prospective study, ovarian cancer risk associated with parity varied substantially by tumour histotype. Nulliparity was associated with a substantially greater overall risk than expected from the effect of a single birth, especially for clear cell and endometrioid tumours, perhaps suggesting that infertility is associated with these histotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kezia Gaitskell
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt DriveOxfordOX3 7LFUnited Kingdom
| | - Jane Green
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt DriveOxfordOX3 7LFUnited Kingdom
| | - Kirstin Pirie
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt DriveOxfordOX3 7LFUnited Kingdom
| | - Isobel Barnes
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt DriveOxfordOX3 7LFUnited Kingdom
| | - Carol Hermon
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt DriveOxfordOX3 7LFUnited Kingdom
| | - Gillian K Reeves
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt DriveOxfordOX3 7LFUnited Kingdom
| | - Valerie Beral
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt DriveOxfordOX3 7LFUnited Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|