Gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor (REGATTA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial

Educational Review: Updates on Therapeutic Strategies for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis

Gastric cancer (GC) commonly presents in advanced stages with metastatic spread to the peritoneal cavity, and outcomes associated with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) continue to carry a dismal prognosis. Persistent challenges in the detection of peritoneal metastasis (PM) have resulted in a relative paucity of high-quality data to inform management decisions. Several consensus groups have published recommendations to guide management, including most recently the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, which now include cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as a potential treatment modality in select patients with GCPM. Multiple clinical trials have investigated the use of CRS/HIPEC and other peritoneal-directed therapies, such as intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC). As high-volume centers work to incorporate such therapies into their practice, ongoing clinical trials are aimed at understanding their efficacy. Recent findings have improved understanding of the mechanisms and pathophysiology underlying GCPM while the discovery of novel targets offers potential for drug development and therapeutic strategies to overcome treatment resistance. This review highlights recent advancements and addresses the persistent challenges in managing GCPM while also offering a comprehensive summary of current guidelines and treatment strategies.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of applying reduced surgery for the treatment of asymptomatic unresectable advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES

Systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of reduction surgery in asymptomatic unresectable advanced gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched from database inception to 12 July 2024. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to evaluate the quality and analyze the bias of the randomized controlled and non-randomized controlled studies included in this study, and RevMan (Version 5.4) was used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies were finally included, including 1 randomized controlled study and 4 retrospective studies. The cumulative sample size was 1717 cases, including 701 cases in the reduced surgery group and 1016 cases in the non-surgical treatment group. The results of the Meta-analysis showed that the reduced surgery group did not offer a survival benefit compared with the non-surgical treatment group in terms of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates. The reduced surgery group had a longer median survival time than the non-surgical group by 11.58 months. The incidence rate, morbidity rate, and mortality rate of the reduced surgery group were 5.5% and 6.5% higher than those of the non-surgical group, respectively. The incidence of perioperative complications and death rate in the reduced surgery group were 15% and 4%, respectively; about 3% of patients might have complications of the primary foci during non-surgical treatment and need palliative surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that in asymptomatic patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer, reduced surgery with resection of the primary site does not result in a long-term survival benefit. We look forward to more high-quality randomized controlled trials to provide more substantial evidence to support clinical practice.

Single centre experience with conversion surgery for advanced and metastatic gastric cancer in Slovakia

Conversion surgery (CS) following systemic chemotherapy (SCT) has been suggested as a promising strategy for improving prognosis of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma (GC). The evidence, however, comes mostly from small-scale studies. Moreover, controversy exists over the criteria for selecting patients for SCT. We retrospectively analyzed 123 patients treated between 2007 and 2023. Thirty-one underwent CS, 44 received primary radical surgery (R0) with adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), and 48 received surgical or palliative treatment. Survival rates and predictors of successful conversion were assessed. Median survival for R0 + ACT (30.4 months, 95%CI: 20.9-45.0) was non-significantly higher than SCT + R0 (19.4 months, 95%CI: 10.3-40.1; P = 0.2353). Successful downstaging after SCT was observed in 54.8% of CS patients. This group of SCT responders had significantly lower laboratory markers CEA, NLR and PLR (P-value of 0.019; 0.036 and 0.029, respectively). Both successful and failed conversion groups had significantly longer survival than group with palliative treatment (16.0 months, 95%CI: 8.4-19.1 vs. 7.4 months, 95%CI: 5.3-9.9; P = 0.0003). Multivariable analysis confirmed significantly lowered hazard and prolonged overall survival in CS vs. palliative treatments after adjusting for age and stage differences (P = 0.0014). Conversion therapy improves short-term survival and offers potential for long-term survival in select stage IV GC patients.

MZT1 protects gastric cancer against glucose starvation through targeting NEDD1

A fasting mimic diet (FMD) has been proven to be a potential therapeutic regimen for gastric cancer (GC) patients. However, the intolerance of energy restriction and limited efficacies hinder wide application of FMD. To identify critical targets mediating resistance against glucose starvation and explore novel approaches to GC therapy, proteomics profiling was performed to depict the landscape of protein expression changes in cells under glucose deprivation. MZT1 was found to be greatly upregulated. We next investigated potential clinical value and regulatory functions of MZT1. Compared to adjacent normal tissues, MZT1 was upregulated in GC specimens and associated with unfavorable patient prognosis. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments indicated that downregulation of the MZT1 level inhibited GC proliferation, migration, invasion, glycolysis and sensitized cells to glucose starvation. Mechanistically, MZT1 functioned as an oncogenic factor by inhibiting NEDD1 ubiquitination and increasing its expression. In conclusion, during glucose starvation, MZT1 is upregulated in GC cells, which promotes resistance by directly suppression of NEDD1 ubiquitination. Our findings unveil the novel mechanisms by which MZT1 can promote GC malignancy. The potential clinical value of MZT1 as GC biomarkers has been first revealed. Suppression of MZT1 may become a promising approach to improve FMD efficacy, which require further validation by future investigations.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis - Joint analysis of European GASTRODATA and American national cancer database

INTRODUCTION

Palliative chemotherapy is the current standard among advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM), while the role of gastrectomy with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC remains unclear. The current study aimed to assess treatment outcomes among GC patients with PM undergoing gastrectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using multinational cancer registries.

METHODS

The analysis (2012-2022) included stage IV GC patients with PM undergoing gastrectomy and HIPEC from the European GASTRODATA Registry (EU cohort) and the American National Cancer Database (NCDB, U.S. cohort). The study outcomes were textbook oncological outcome (TOO) assessment and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 193 patients, 49.7 ​% were from the EU cohort and 50.3 ​% from the U.S.

COHORT

EU cohort had significantly higher rates of pT4 tumors (EU: 50 ​% vs U.S.: 40.2 ​%), metastatic lymph nodes (EU: 68.8 ​% vs U.S.: 54.6 ​%), and ≥16 lymph nodes evaluated (EU: 91.7 ​% vs U.S.: 68 ​%). Postoperatively, the EU cohort had longer hospital stay (EU: 53.1 ​% vs 22.2 ​%, p ​< ​0.001), with no significant differences in 30-day readmission (EU: 14.6 ​% vs U.S: 7.2 ​%, p ​= ​0.11) and 90-day mortality (EU: 4.2 ​% vs U.S.: 9.3 ​%, p ​= ​0.25). TOO rates were 30.2 ​% and 32 ​% for EU and U.S. cohorts, respectively. Within the U.S. cohort, TOO achievement was associated with improved 1- (86.7 ​% vs. 57.4 ​%), 3- (55.8 ​% vs. 29.7 ​%), and 5-year OS (50.2 ​% vs. 29.7 ​%) (p ​= ​0.0025) survival compared with non-TOO.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with GC and PM undergoing gastrectomy and HIPEC, achievement of TOO was associated with decreased risk of postoperative complications (EU cohort) and improved long-term survival (U.S. cohort).

PLAGL2-STAU1-NCOA4 axis enhances gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis by resisting ferroptosis via ferritinophagy

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the primary site of distant metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) and is associated with an advanced disease stage and poor prognosis. Due to its high resistance to chemotherapy, disseminated peritoneal lesions are often untreatable. A primary reason for therapy resistance in cancer cells is often their defective cell death execution mechanisms. Ferroptosis, a newly identified type of regulated cell death, is strongly linked to the emergence and formation of tumors. Earlier studies have demonstrated the significant role of RNA-binding proteins in ferroptosis. Nevertheless, the fundamental process linking Staufen Double-Stranded RNA Binding Protein 1 (STAU1) to ferroptosis in the peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer is yet to be clarified. This study shows that the RNA-binding protein STAU1 is crucial for regulating ferroptosis in gastric cancer cells. Elevated levels of STAU1 are linked to unfavorable outcomes in individuals diagnosed with gastric cancer. STAU1 was up-regulated by PLAGL2 and decreased the stability of NCOA4 mRNA by binding to the 3'-untranslated region. Decreased NCOA4 expression inhibits the accumulation of reactive iron, the occurrence of the Fenton reaction, and cellular ROS generation in the GC cells. Additionally, we showed that NCOA4 is crucial in the process of ferritinophagy triggered by the reduction of STAU1 in gastric cancer cells. Ultimately, the process safeguards GC cells from ferroptosis. These findings elucidate the function of PLAGL2/STAU1/NCOA4 in the ferroptosis of gastric cancer cells and provide theoretical backing for possible diagnostic markers and treatment targets for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases at an Australian centre

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is a major cause of cancer mortality, with poorer prognosis in the presence of peritoneal metastases as low as 2.8-9 months. Systemic therapy has a limited role. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been shown to improve survival. This study evaluates survival of patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases (GCPM) undergoing CRS and HIPEC at an Australian centre.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC for GCPM from January 2009 to December 2023. Data included demographics, perioperative factors, histopathology and survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were identified, with median postoperative overall survival of 11.7 months (95% CI 8.6-34.2 months). Most patients had poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (n = 23, 96%), with 14 (58%) exhibiting signet cell pathology. 62% (n = 15) received preoperative chemotherapy. Median PCI was 5, with a CC score of 0 in 96% of patients (n = 23). Clavien-Dindo III/IV morbidity was noted in 8 patients (33%) with no perioperative mortality. No survival differences were found between those with signet cell pathology and those without (10.6 vs. 11.7 months, p = 0.83), nor between those receiving preoperative chemotherapy and those who did not (11.7 vs. 10.6 months, p = 0.60). Age, sex, PCI, CC and tumour markers demonstrated correlations with survival in linear regression, but no individual factor significantly influenced outcomes.

CONCLUSION

CRS and HIPEC for low volume GCPM should be considered in select patients.

Analysis of the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric pyloric obstruction

Objective

To explore the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer and pyloric obstruction.

Methods

We included patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) or endoscopic stenting (ES) between May 2017 and October 2022. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was used to evaluate the patient nutritional status. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios were used to evaluate the inflammatory status of patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival conditions, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival differences. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors related that might affect the prognosis.

Results

During the study period, 41 patients received LGJ and 37 patients received endoscopic stenting (ES). Patients in the ES group had higher rates of postoperative complications, particularly bleeding (0 vs. 16.2%, P<0.05). After two cycles NACT, the proportion of PNI≥45 patients in LGJ group was significantly higher than that in ES group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the proportion of patients with PLR<162 in the ES group was significantly higher than that in the LGJ group (P<0.05), and compared to the ES group, patients in the LGJ group were able to tolerate more cycles of NACT (6 vs. 4 cycles). A higher median survival time was observed in the LGJ group, and the multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed treatment selection as an independent risk factor for overall survival (HR, 6.362; 95% CI:3.285-12.321, P<0.001).

Conclusion

NACT after LGJ shows potential for reducing tumor stage and improving patient prognosis.

CT-based scores for extramural vascular invasion and occult peritoneal metastasis correlate with gastric cancer survival

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of scoring extragastric vascular invasion and occult peritoneal metastasis using preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of gastric cancer (GC) and to explore the correlation between these scores and patient prognosis.

METHODS

587 GC patients with CT scans from two centers, all confirmed by pathology, were retrospectively evaluated. Scores for CT-detected blood vessel invasion (ctBVI), lymphatic invasion (ctLVI), and occult peritoneal metastasis (ctOPM) were assigned based on preoperative CT images. The patients' follow-up provided data on overall and disease-free survival. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The inter-group and intra-group consistency of ctBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores were all > 0.70. Log-rank analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival curves (p < 0.001). CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores were related to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified ctBVL, ctLVI, ctOPM scores as independent risk factors for GC prognosis. In multivariate analysis, the three sign scores were related to DFS (p < 0.05), with ctBVL (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.980, 95% CI: 1.336-2.933), ctLVI (HR = 1.502, 95% CI: 1.336-2.933), and ctOPM (HR = 1.182, 95% CI: 0.886-1.578). The three scores were also correlated with OS (p < 0.05), ctBVL (HR = 2.003, 95% CI: 1.278-3.139), ctLVI (HR = 1.523, 95% CI:1.055-2.200) and ctOPM (HR = 1.289, 95% CI: 1.013-1.770).

CONCLUSION

CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores are valuable prognostic indicators in gastric cancer, influencing both OS and DFS.

KEY POINTS

Question To study whether the ctBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores assessed by preoperative enhanced CT imaging can predict the survival outcomes of patients. Findings CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores, assessed via preoperative enhanced CT imaging, are associated with worse survival outcomes when elevated. Clinical relevance CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores may help guide personalized follow-up plans. Patients with higher scores might require closer monitoring and more aggressive treatment.

Gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis: a bibliometric study from 2000 to 2024 using VOSviewer software

Background

Gastric cancer remains a prevalent malignancy worldwide, with peritoneal metastasis being the predominant form of recurrence and metastasis, which are clear predictors of prognosis. The aim of this comprehensive bibliometric analysis was to assess the current status of the research landscape and to identify impending trends in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis (GCPM).

Methods

Relevant studies of GCPM were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Qualified articles were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria for further analysis. The selected publications were then subjected to bibliometric analysis utilizing VOSviewer software.

Results

In total, 1,100 publications were included for analysis. The results revealed a consistent upward trend in the number of publications annually from 2000 to 2024, with an anticipated continuation of this growth in future research. The National Cancer Center Japan, emerged as the institution with the most publications and Professor Kodera and Annals of Surgical Oncology were identified as the most influential author and journal, respectively, in the domain of GCPM. In terms of international collaborations, the USA, Japan, and France were the most engaged countries. Yonemura was recognized as the most frequently cited author. Gastrectomy, systemic chemotherapy, and intraperitoneal therapy are the current research hotspots within this domain.

Conclusion

Research related to GCPM had rapidly increased over the past two decades. These findings identify the most influential countries, institutions, authors, journals, and academic collaboration networks, while also clarifying hotspots and future trends in GCPM research.

Oligometastatic disease - a renaissance for surgery?

Half of the patients with esophageal cancer, cancer of the gastro-esophageal junction and gastric cancer present metastasis at the time of diagnosis. In addition, even patients originally thought to be free of metastasis will present metachronous metastasis in the course of the disease. These patients are considered incurable and current standard of care for metastatic esophageal, gastro-esophageal junction and gastric cancers is a systemic therapy without curative intention. However, patients presenting only a low metastatic load are now defined as oligometastatic disease and should benefit from an aggressive, multimodal therapy. We present here a review of recent publications investigating multimodal therapies for oligometastatic disease and showing that a systemic therapy combined with a resection of the primary tumor together with metastasis is associated with a better prognosis than a systemic therapy alone. We also give a precise focus on esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the gastro-esophageal junction and of the stomach. Interestingly, patients with oligometastatic cancer of the esophago-gastric junction can even be treated in curative intention with such a multimodal therapy as we present here in a short case report. In conclusion, new therapeutic strategies including multimodal approaches for oligometastatic disease have shown promising results in the last years and ongoing randomized prospective trials will provide us the evidence to include them in future European guidelines.

Primary tumour resection in non-small cell lung cancer patients with pleural dissemination unexpectedly detected during operation: a two-centre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus regarding whether primary tumour resection (PTR) should be performed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with unexpected pleural dissemination (PD) discovered at thoracotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive NSCLC patients with surgically confirmed PD were retrospectively enrolled from two high-volume centres between January 2016 and December 2023. Patients were divided into the primary tumour resection (PTR) and exploratory thoracotomy (ET) group. PTR included wedge resection, segmentectomy and lobectomy. Patients in the ET group received biopsy only. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias from confounding factors. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analysed using the Kaplan‒Meier method, and comparisons were made using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 223 patients were identified: 167 (74.9%) in the PTR group and 56 (25.1%) in the ET group. The median follow-up time and median survival time (MST) were 39.0 months and 49.0 months, respectively. The MST for the ET and PTR groups were 44.0 and 60.0 months, respectively (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51-1.24; p = 0.3097). After PSM, there were no significant differences in terms of median disease-specific survival (DSS: 60.0 vs. 61.0 months, p = 0.3419) or progression-free survival (PFS: 30.0 vs. 47.0 months, p = 0.5471) between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that smoking history and a tumour size ≥ 3 cm were independent risk factors for DSS and PFS, whereas targeted therapy was an independent protective factor.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that primary tumour resection does not improve long-term survival in NSCLC patients with unexpected PD discovered at thoracotomy. It is high time to re-evaluate the value of surgery for NSCLC patients with PD and avoid overtreatment, especially in the era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06232967 (approval date: January 31, 2024).

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction

BACKGROUND

Advanced gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) causes malnutrition and medication adherence issues, leading to a poor prognosis. We developed a novel multimodal, less invasive treatment approach for gastric cancer patients with symptomatic GOO: laparoscopic stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (LSPGJ) combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), followed by minimally invasive gastrectomy with reuse of gastrojejunostomy. This study is a retrospective analysis of the safety and feasibility of our treatment strategy.

METHODS

In this single-institution retrospective study, we enrolled 54 patients (NAC group, n = 26; upfront gastrectomy group, n = 28) who achieved R0 resection through a minimally invasive approach between 2007 and 2020 and evaluated their short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

After LSPGJ, the Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System score significantly improved (p < 0.001). The median relative dose intensity of NAC was 88.2%. Regarding short-term outcomes, there were no differences in postoperative complications, length of postsurgical hospital stay, and adjuvant chemotherapy administration. Although overall survival and relapse-free survival showed trends toward improvement in the NAC group, these differences were not statistically significant. The cumulative incidence curve for recurrence in the NAC group was significantly lower than that of the upfront gastrectomy group (p = 0.041). Recurrence and hematogenous metastasis were significantly lower in the NAC group (p = 0.031 and 0.041, respectively) than in the upfront gastrectomy group. A forest plot revealed that NAC yielded favorable outcomes, particularly for patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2, cT4, or cN1.

CONCLUSIONS

LSPGJ combined with NAC followed by minimally invasive gastrectomy was a safe and feasible treatment strategy for patients with advanced gastric cancer with symptomatic GOO. This procedure may contribute to the early recovery of oral intake and help maintain NAC dose intensity, potentially improving prognosis, particularly for patients with low BMI and advanced-stage disease.

Differences in efficacy of biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan alone in second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer with or without prior gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin combination therapy (BIRIP) and irinotecan monotherapy (IRI) are both expectable second-line chemotherapy (SLC) options for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Although many patients receiving SLC have undergone gastrectomy, the impact of gastrectomy on SLC remains unclear, and the impact of gastrectomy may vary from regimen to regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 290 eligible patients registered in two randomized phase III trials evaluating BIRIP (IRI, 60 mg/m2; CDDP, 30 mg/m2, q2w) or IRI (150 mg/m2, q2w) for patients with AGC was classified into the prior gastrectomy subgroup (PGG) or the no gastrectomy subgroup (NGG). We performed a subgroup analysis to evaluate the impact of gastrectomy on second-line BIRIP and IRI.

RESULTS

The BIRIP demonstrated significantly longer OS (11.1 vs. 6.8 months; HR 0.64; P = 0.026) and PFS (3.7 vs. 2.3 months; HR 0.54; P = 0.003) than the IRI, as well as better ORR (23.5% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.046) and DCR (74.5% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.010) in NGG. Although in PGG, the BIRIP failed to demonstrate differences in OS (13.8 vs. 13.8 months; HR 0.94; P = 0.722), PFS (4.9 vs. 4.5 months; HR 0.82; P = 0.194), ORR (18.3% vs. 20.5%) and DCR (70.4% vs. 65.1%). The incidence of grade 3 or worse adverse events did not differ except for a high incidence of anemia in the BIRIP group in PGG.

CONCLUSIONS

BIRIP was an effective treatment option that may improve survival outcomes among patients with AGC without previous gastrectomy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000025367.

Treatment of Gastric Cancer Carcinomatosis

Patients with gastric cancer peritoneal metastases (GCPM) have Stage IV disease. Systemic therapy is a crucial aspect of their care. Patients with GCPM should have their tumors tested for HER2 and PD-L1 expression and microsatellite instability for potential targeted therapies. If patients with synchronous GCPM have stable disease following neoadjuvant therapy, surgical intervention can be considered. Patients with positive cytology or low-volume peritoneal disease (peritoneal carcinomatosis index [PCI] < 7) may "convert" to negative cytology or resolution of peritoneal metastases following intraperitoneal therapy and may be candidates for subsequent gastrectomy.

Effectiveness of conversion surgery in stage IV gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

For patients with stage IV gastric cancer (GC), systemic therapy is often the standard treatment, but the prognosis remains poor. Conversion surgery (CS) has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for selected patients who had certain response to chemotherapy. This study aims to compare the survival outcomes of CS versus continued chemotherapy (CT) in stage IV GC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 52 patients with stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma, from January-2018 to June-2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent CS (CS group) after a response to chemotherapy and those who continued with systemic chemotherapy (CT group). Baseline characteristics, chemotherapy toxicity, surgical outcomes, and survival data were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Among 52 patients, 26 patients underwent CS, while other 26 continued with CT. The CS group showed a significantly higher 3-year overall survival (OS) rate and median survival time (MST) compared to the CT group (36 % vs. 15 %, HR = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.19-0.79, p = 0.009; 23.4 months vs. 14.7 months, p < 0.001, respectively). Subgroup analysis by Yoshida classification revealed superior survival outcomes for CS in category 3 (MST: 26.1 months vs. 12.6 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that CS were associated with a longer survival. No major postoperative complications were observed in the CS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion surgery improved survival outcomes in selected stage IV GC patients compared to systemic chemotherapy alone. CS should be considered as a treatment option for patients who responds to initial chemotherapy, particularly those in Yoshida category 3.

Artificial intelligence assisted real-time recognition of intra-abdominal metastasis during laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery

Laparoscopic exploration (LE) is crucial for diagnosing intra-abdominal metastasis (IAM) in advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, overlooking single, tiny, and occult IAM lesions during LE can severely affect the treatment and prognosis due to surgeons' visual misinterpretations. To address this, we developed the artificial intelligence laparoscopic exploration system (AiLES) to recognize IAM lesions with various metastatic extents and locations. The AiLES was developed based on a dataset consisting of 5111 frames from 100 videos, using 4130 frames for model development and 981 frames for evaluation. The AiLES achieved a Dice score of 0.76 and a recognition speed of 11 frames per second, demonstrating robust performance in different metastatic extents (0.74-0.76) and locations (0.63-0.90). Furthermore, AiLES performed comparably to novice surgeons in IAM recognition and excelled in recognizing tiny and occult lesions. Our results demonstrate that the implementation of AiLES could enhance accurate tumor staging and assist individualized treatment decisions.

Emerging Trends in the Management of Gastric Malignancy with Peritoneal Dissemination: Same Disease, Heterogeneous Prognosis

Gastric cancer is a significant global contributor to cancer-related mortality. Stage IV gastric cancer represents a significant percentage of patients in Western countries, with peritoneal dissemination being the most prevalent site. Peritoneal disease comprises two distinct entities, macroscopic (P1) and microscopic (P0CY1), which are associated with poor long-term survival rates. Although the present standard of treatment is palliative chemotherapy, a global controversy has arisen concerning specific patients with limited disease burden or conversion to negative lavage cytology following chemotherapy. Available approaches include systemic or intraperitoneal chemotherapy, upfront gastrectomy, and conversion surgery. This review consolidated the current evidence regarding multimodal management, indicating prolonged survival for this distinct subgroup of patients. Considering the complexity of peritoneal metastases, the potential of the multimodal approach unveils promising prospects for identifying the optimal treatment for this particular subset of stage IV patients and thus enhancing their survival outcomes.

A prognostic nomogram to predict the cancer-specific survival of patients with initially diagnosed metastatic gastric cancer: a validation study in a Chinese cohort

BACKGROUND

Few studies have been designed to predict the survival of Chinese patients initially diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). Therefore, the objective of this study was to construct and validate a new nomogram model to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) in Chinese patients.

METHODS

We collected 328 patients with mGC from Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital as the training cohort and 60 patients from Xinyuan County People's Hospital as the external validation cohort. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify risk factors, and a nomogram was created to predict CSS. The predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the consistency index (C-index), the calibration curve, and the decision curve analysis (DCA) in the training cohort and the validation cohort.

RESULTS

Multivariate Cox regression identified differentiation grade (P < 0.001), T-stage (P < 0.05), N-stage (P < 0.001), surgery (P < 0.05), and chemotherapy (P < 0.001) as independent predictors of CSS. Nomogram of chemotherapy regimens and cycles was also designed by us for the prediction of mGC. Thus, these factors are integrated into the nomogram model: the C-index value was 0.72 (95% CI 0.70-0.85) for the nomogram model and 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.89) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.86) for the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration curves and DCA also demonstrated adequate fit and ideal net benefit in prediction and clinical applications.

CONCLUSIONS

We established a practical nomogram to predict CSS in Chinese patients initially diagnosed with mGC. Nomograms can be used to individualize survival predictions and guide clinicians in making therapeutic decisions.

The Role of Metastasectomy in Patients with Liver-Only Metastases from Gastric Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role of metastasectomy in patients with liver-only metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma remains under investigation. Therefore, we performed a national registry analysis comparing surgical treatment options for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and liver-only metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective National Cancer Database (2010-2019) study, adults (≥ 18 years) with gastric adenocarcinoma and liver-only metastases (no brain, bone, or lung metastases) were included. Patients were stratified into four groups: no surgical treatment, primary tumor resection (PTR), liver metastasectomy, and PTR with liver metastasectomy. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of 10,977 included patients, 93.6% underwent no surgical treatment, 4.6% PTR alone, 0.8% liver metastasectomy alone, and 1.0% both PTR and liver metastasectomy. The median OS after no surgical treatment was 6.5 months, after PTR alone 10.9 months, after liver metastasectomy alone 9.9 months, and after PTR and liver metastasectomy 18.6 months. In multivariable analysis, when adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, Charlson-Deyo score, chemotherapy, and radiation, PTR and liver metastasectomy was associated with superior OS compared with no surgical treatment (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.76-2.69, p < 0.001), PTR alone (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.12-1.79, p = 0.003), and liver metastasectomy alone (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.45-2.64, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that, in highly selected patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and synchronous liver-only metastases and favorable biology, surgical resection might grant a survival advantage.

Machine learning-based CT radiomics approach for predicting occult peritoneal metastasis in advanced gastric cancer preoperatively

AIM

To develop a machine learning-based CT radiomics model to preoperatively diagnose occult peritoneal metastasis (OPM) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 177 AGC patients were retrospectively analyzed. Four regions of interest (ROIs) along the largest area of tumor (core ROI) and corresponding tumor mesenteric fat space (peri ROI) were manually delineated on the arterial (A-core and A-peri) and venous phase (V-core and V-peri) of CT images. A total of 1316 radiomics features were extracted from each ROI. Then, ten machine learning classification algorithms were used to develop the model. An integrated radiomics nomogram was established to predict OPM individually.

RESULTS

For the radiomics of tumor mesenteric fat space, the AUCs of A-peri in training and test sets were 0.881 and 0.800, respectively. And the AUCs of V-peri were 0.838 and 0.815, respectively. In terms of primary tumor' s radiomics signature, the AUCs of A-core in training and test sets were 0.862 and 0.691, respectively. The AUCs of V-core were 0.831 and 0.620. Integrated radiomics model showed the highest AUC value when it compared to each single radiomics score in the training (0.943 vs 0.831-0.881) and test set (0.835 vs 0.620-0.815). Radiomics nomogram demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy with a C-index of 0.948.

CONCLUSION

Both the radiomics of tumor mesenteric fat space and primary tumor were associated with OPM. A CT radiomics nomogram had a relatively good predictive performance for detecting OPM in patients with AGC.

PDLIM1 Inhibits Chemoresistance by Blocking DNA Damage Repair in Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Current cisplatin (CDDP) resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. To address the issue of drug resistance, we explored the regulatory functions of PDZ and LIM structural domain protein 1 (PDLIM1) in CDDP chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

In this study, we analyzed PDLIM1 expression and prognosis using bioinformatics on publicly available data. PDLIM1 expression in a gastric mucosal epithelial cell line (GSE-1), CDDP- sensitive (SGC7901, BGC823) and CDDP-resistant gastric cancer cells was detected by RTqPCR and Western blotting. Cell proliferative capacity was assessed by knockdown of PDLIM1 and overexpression of PDLIM1 in cells administered in combination with cisplatin, and apoptotic levels were measured by CCK-8 and colony formation assay and by flow cytometry. Expression of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) and γH2AX was determined by Western blotting or immunofluorescence staining.

RESULTS

Downregulation of PDLIM1 was found in tumor tissues and cells, which was associated with poor clinical outcomes. Knockdown of PDLIM1 enhanced proliferation and attenuated apoptosis in gastric cancer cells. In addition, the therapeutic effects of CDDP on proliferation, apoptosis, and DNA damage repair were attenuated by PDLIM1 deletion.PDLIM1 expression was downregulated in CDDP-resistant tumor cells. Overexpression of PDLIM1 overcomes CDDP resistance in tumor cells as BRCA1 expression decreases and γH2AX expression increases.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that PDLIM1 enables to alleviate gastric cancer progression and resistance to cisplatin via impeding DNA damage repair.

Conversion Therapy for Stage IV Gastric Cancer: Report From the Expert Consensus Meeting at KINGCA WEEK 2024

Conversion therapy is a treatment strategy that shifts from palliative systemic therapy to curative surgical treatment for primary and/or metastatic stage IV gastric cancer (GC). To address its clinical statements, the Korean Gastric Cancer Association aims to present a consensus on conversion therapy among experts attending KINGCA WEEK 2024. The KINGCA Scientific Committee and Development Working Group for Korean Practice Guidelines prepared preformulated topics and 9 clinical statements for conversion therapy. The Delphi method was applied to a panel of 17 experts for consensus and opinions. The final comments were announced after the statement presentation and discussed during the consensus meeting session of KINGCA WEEK 2024. Most experts agreed that conversion therapy provides a survival benefit for selected patients who respond to systemic therapy and undergo R0 resection (88.3%). Patients with limited metastases were considered good candidates (94.2%). The optimal timing was based on the response to systemic therapy (70.6%). The regimen was recommended to be individualized (100%) and the duration to be at least 6 months (88.3%). A minimally invasive approach (82.3%) and D2 lymph node dissection (82.4%) were considered for surgery. However, resection for metastases with a complete clinical response after systemic therapy was not advocated (41.2%). All experts agreed on the need for large-scale randomized-controlled trials for further evidence (100%). Recent advancements in treatment may facilitate radical surgery for patients with stage IV GC. Further evidence is warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of conversion therapy.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline)

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area. Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version. Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Evolution in the Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastases

Despite therapeutic treatments and the growing utilization of multimodal therapies, gastric cancer (GC) remains a highly aggressive malignancy with high mortality worldwide. Much of the complexity in treating GC is due to the high incidence of peritoneal metastasis (PM), with mean overall survival typically ranging from 4 to 10 months. With current systemic therapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies continuing to remain ineffective for GC/PM, there has been a significant growing interest in intraperitoneal (IP) therapies for the treatment of GC/PM. In this review, we summarize the development of PM and evolving treatment strategies for GC/PM. Furthermore, we explore the various advancements and outcomes of IP therapies, including heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), neoadjuvant HIPEC, and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC).

Transcriptional landscape and predictive potential of long noncoding RNAs in peritoneal recurrence of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play a critical role in gastric cancer (GC) progression and metastasis. However, research comprehensively exploring tissue-derived lncRNAs for predicting peritoneal recurrence in patients with GC remains limited. This study aims to investigate the transcriptional landscape of lncRNAs in GC with peritoneal metastasis (PM) and to develop an integrated lncRNA-based score to predict peritoneal recurrence in patients with GC after radical gastrectomy.

METHODS

We analyzed the transcriptome profile of lncRNAs in paired peritoneal, primary gastric tumor, and normal tissue specimens from 12 patients with GC in the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) discovery cohort. Key lncRNAs were identified via interactive analysis with the TCGA database and SYSUCC validation cohort. A score model was constructed using the LASSO regression model and nomogram COX regression and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The role of lncRNAs in the PM of GC was then examined through wound healing, Transwell, 3D multicellular tumor spheroid invasion, and peritoneal cavity xenograft tumorigenicity assays in mice.

RESULT

Five essential lncRNAs were screened and incorporated into the PM risk score to predict peritoneal recurrence-free survival (pRFS). We developed a comprehensive, integrated nomogram score, including the PM risk score, pT, pN, and tumor size, which could effectively predict the 5-year pRFS with an Area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.88). Subsequently, we demonstrated that one of these lncRNAs, CASC15, promoted the invasion and migration of GC cells in vitro and facilitated the PM of GC cells in vivo, initially verifying that lncRNAs contribute to the PM of GC. Mechanistic analysis demonstrated that CASC15 promoted EMT and metastasis by activating the JNK and p38 pathways.

CONCLUSION

A lncRNA-based integrated score was constructed in this study to predict peritoneal recurrence in patients clinically.

Impact of nutrition risk index, prognostic nutritional index and skeletal muscle index on early myelosuppression of first-line chemotherapy in stage IV gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

In gastric cancer (GC) patients, malnutrition is common and has a negative impact on treatment tolerance, survival, and prognosis. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between prechemotherapy nutritional state and early myelosuppression in stage IV GC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with stage IV GC who received first-line chemotherapy between July 2012 and December 2021. Clinical and laboratory data were collected within 1 week before chemotherapy to calculate nutrition risk index, prognostic nutritional index. Pretreatment abdominal computed tomography scans were used to quantify skeletal muscle index (SMI). The main measurable outcome was the incidence of grade ≥ 2 early myelosuppression after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among 102 patients eligible for analysis, 50% were malnourished, 50% were poor prognoses and 49% were sarcopenic at baseline.The side effects were generally well managed, with a 26.5% occurrence of grade 3/4 side effects. Pre-chemotherapy patients with low Nutrition Risk Index (NRI) (p = 0.002), low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (p = 0.001), and low SMI (p = 0.001) had significantly higher incidences of grade ≥ 2 myelosuppression occurred after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Moreover, the high level of PNI was associated with higher completion rate of chemotherapy (p = 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SMI at baseline (p = 0.006) and hemoglobin level (p = < 0.001) were prognostic factors for grade ≥ 2 early myelosuppression.

CONCLUSION

Stage IV GC patients with low NRI, low PNI and low SMI experienced significantly more grade ≥ 2 early myelosuppression during the first line of chemotherapy.

Curative treatment for oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer- results of a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

Oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer is a clinical entity with no standard treatment recommendation. Treatment with curative intent has recently emerged as an option for selected patients in contrast to the traditional palliative treatment strategy. This prospective study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combined systemic and local treatment with curative intent for patients with oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer.

METHODS

In a multicenter study, consecutive patients with gastroesophageal cancer and metastases in the liver and/or extra-regional lymph nodes were screened for inclusion. Eligible patients were offered curatively intended perioperative chemotherapy followed by surgical resection or liver ablation. Primary endpoints were treatment safety and feasibility. Secondary outcomes included postoperative mortality, treatment response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Subgroup analyses were stratified based on oligometastatic location.

RESULTS

A total of 29 (82.9%) patients completed treatment with surgical resection (93.1%), liver ablation (3.4%), or definitive chemoradiotherapy (3.4%). Postoperative complications were found in 19 (73.1%) patients, whereas postoperative mortality was 0%. The most common complications included infection (34.6%) and respiratory complications (34.6%). Median overall survival was 20.9 months (interquartile range 11.2-42.6) from diagnosis and 17.0 months (interquartile range 6.4-35.9) from surgery in patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (interquartile range 3.1-11.3).

CONCLUSION

This study found curative treatment to be a relatively safe option, with an overall survival of 20.8 months and no postoperative mortality.

Palliative surgery in metastatic gastric cancer: analysis (2007-2021)

OBJECTIVE

Patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) may require palliative surgery to manage complications such as obstruction or bleeding. While the role of stenting in MGC is clear, the role of palliative surgery in MGC shows conflicting results.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of patients with MGC treated at our institution between January 2007 and December 2021. The clinical outcomes of patients who underwent palliative surgery are analysed in this review.

RESULTS

Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and palliative gastrectomy were performed in 48 and 28 patients, respectively. The median overall survival in the GJ and palliative gastrectomy groups were 9.25 and 11.25 months, respectively (p=0.21). On subgroup analysis, we found that the patients who were diagnosed with MGC intraoperatively had better survival compared with preoperatively diagnosed patients even though it was statistically not significant. The complication rates following GJ and palliative gastrectomy were 6% and 7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both palliative gastrectomy and GJ offer similar results to endoscopic stenting, as reported in the literature. Surgical palliative options continue to be relevant in selected cases due to lower rates of repeat interventions and reduced hospital visits, making them a one-time solution for patients, especially in resource-constrained settings.

Survival Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery with HIPEC in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the impact of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on the survival outcomes for patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2020 identified patients with topography and histology codes consistent with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent CRS/HIPEC. The exclusion criteria ruled out known other distant metastasis and missing key data. The study compared the CRS/HIPEC group with patients who had stage IV disease (with the same exclusions for distant metastases) and received systemic chemotherapy but no surgery to the primary site.

RESULTS

The study included 148 patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC. Their median age was 57 years (interquartile range [IQR], 47-66 years), with 57.4% of the patients identifying as male and 73.6% identifying as white. Most of the CRS/HIPEC patients had locally advanced disease, with 33.8% having pT4 disease and 23% patients having pN3 status. The Charlson-Deyo scores were 0 for 77% and 1 for 16.9% of the patients. The overall survival (OS) among the stage IV patients managed with CRS/HIPEC was significantly longer than for the patients receiving only systemic chemotherapy (median survival, 18.1 vs 9.3 months; p < 0.001), and the 1-year OS was 72.6% versus 38.8% (p < 0.05)). Among the stage IV patients, CRS/HIPEC showed better survival than systemic chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.73; p < .001) when control was used for the Charlson Deyo score, histology, age, and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the association of CRS/HIPEC with improved survival for selected patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and peritoneal disease. Some of this difference may have been due to selection bias, but the differences in the survival curves are robust.

Surgical Resection Enhances Survival in Patients With Liver Metastases From Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based, Case-Control Study

Background and Aims

Gastric cancer with liver metastases (GCLM) is a challenging condition that significantly reduces long-term survival rates, but recent advancements in surgical techniques have shown promise. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the impact of surgical resection on survival rates in GCLM patients.

Methods

We conducted a population-based analysis utilizing the SEER database for patients diagnosed with GCLM between 2010 and 2015. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who underwent cancer-directed surgery (CDS) and those who did not. The overlap weighting method based on lasso regression with penalty factors was employed to minimize selection bias. Survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models, with subgroup analyses to further explore the effects of surgery among patients.

Results

A total of 3694 patients with GCLM were identified. Of those, 354 (9.58%) patients underwent CDS. After propensity score adjustment, The median OS was significantly higher in the surgical resection group (12 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11-16) compared to the nonresection group (6 months, 95% CI: 5-6). Cox regression analysis revealed a substantial improvement in OS for the surgical resection group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.562 (95% CI: 0.482-0.656), including patients with adverse conditions.

Conclusions

The analysis demonstrated a clear association between surgical resection and enhanced OS in GCLM patients. Nevertheless, further research endeavors should be undertaken to identify specific prognostic factors that aid in the selection of optimal candidates for surgical resection.

A comprehensive overview of gastric cancer management from a surgical point of view

Despite advancements in medical care, surgical technologies, and the development of novel treatments over the past decade, the prognosis for patients with gastric cancer (GC) has only modestly improved. This is primarily due to the fact that the majority of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages or present with metastatic disease. Radical resection remains the cornerstone of potentially curative treatment, yet the overall 5-year survival rate remains below 35%. The management of GC varies globally, influenced by factors such as geographical disparities, patient comorbidities and performance status, surgical approaches, and available medical resources. Multidisciplinary collaboration and a multimodal treatment approach are essential for optimizing patient outcomes. Surgeons must stay updated on emerging surgical concepts and make informed decisions regarding patient selection, timing of intervention, and the adoption of appropriate surgical techniques to improve both quality of life and prognosis. This review aims to provide a surgical perspective on the management of GC across all stages, highlighting the importance of a comprehensive treatment approach. Endoscopic resection may be a viable option for early GC in patients with minimal risk of lymph node metastasis, particularly in elderly patients with high surgical risk or severe comorbidities. For advanced GC, neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery could be a promising strategy to improve patient outcomes. Conversion surgery offers a potential survival benefit for patients who respond to treatment with tumor downstaging. The treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis remains challenging; however, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with complete cytoreductive surgery or pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy may prolong survival or improve quality of life in highly selected patients.

Survival and Treatment Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) from gastric cancer (GC) are rare but associated with poor prognosis, significantly impacting patient survival and quality of life. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to consolidate existing research on BM from GC, evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes, and explore the effectiveness of treatment options.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across the Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, following PRISMA guidelines. Eighteen high-quality studies, as per the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, were included, encompassing 70,237 GC patients, of whom 621 developed BM. Data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), neurological symptoms, and HER2 status were analyzed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The incidence of BM in GC patients was found to be 2.29% (95% CI: 1.06-3.53%), with the range extending from 0.47% to 7.79% across studies. HER2-positive status was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of developing BM, with an odds ratio of 43.24 (95% CI: 2.05-913.39; p = 0.02), although this finding was based on limited data. The surgical resection of BM was linked to significantly improved survival outcomes, with a mean difference in OS of 12.39 months (95% CI: 2.03-22.75; p = 0.02) compared to non-surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical resection of brain metastases in GC patients significantly enhances overall survival, while HER2-positive patients may show a higher risk for developing BM. These findings underscore the importance of tailored therapeutic approaches for GC patients with BM.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the survival and estimate surgical benefits for gastric cancer with liver metastasis receiving primary tumor resection

Background

Surgical treatment has been widely controversial for gastric cancer accompanied by liver metastasis (GCLM). This paper aims to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the survival and estimate surgical benefits for GCLM patients.

Methods

A total of 616 GCLM patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database and 74 GCLM patients receiving primary tumor resection (PTR) from the Chinese center were included in this study. Patients from the SEER database were divided into training set (with PTR) (n=493) and non-operative set (without PTR) (n=123). Patients undergoing PTR from China were included as external validation set. Independent risk factors associated with the overall survival of GCLM patients undergoing PTR were identified in the training set via log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. Afterwards, a comprehensive model and corresponding nomogram were constructed and validated by validation set.

Results

The survival of patients undergoing PTR (n=493) was longer than that without PTR (n=123) (log-rank test, p<0.0001) in SEER cohort. T stage (HR=1.40, 95% CI=1.14, 1.73), differentiation grade (HR=1.47, 95% CI=1.17, 1.85), non-hepatic metastases (HR=1.69, 95% CI=1.29, 2.21), and adjuvant therapy (HR=0.34, 95% CI= 0.28, 0.42) were closely related with the survival of GCLM with PTR, and thus, a four-factor nomogram was established. However, GCLM patients receiving PTR in the high-risk subgroup (n=255) screened out by the nomogram did not have better survival outcomes compared with patients without PTR (n=123) (log-rank test, p=0.25).

Conclusions

The nomogram could predict survival of GCLM patients receiving PTR with acceptable accuracy. In addition, although PTR did improve the survival of whole GCLM patients, patients in the high-risk subgroup were unable to benefit from PTR, which could assist clinicians to make decisions for the treatment of GCLM.

Conversion surgery for gastric cancer with PM

It remains unclear whether the application of surgery to gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis prolongs survival. Twenty studies on conversion surgery were reviewed. Key points were the response to chemotherapy, complete resection, and a low tumor burden at the time of surgery. A bidirectional approach has been developed to increase the response rate. There are two different strategies in surgery. The outcomes of ongoing trials may clarify controversial issues.

A quantitative model using multi-parameters in dual-energy CT to preoperatively predict serosal invasion in locally advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a quantitative model for predicting serosal invasion based on multi-parameters in preoperative dual-energy CT (DECT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 342 LAGC patients who underwent gastrectomy and DECT from six centers were divided into one training cohort (TC), and two validation cohorts (VCs). Dual-phase enhanced DECT-derived iodine concentration (IC), water concentration, and monochromatic attenuation of lesions, along with clinical information, were measured and collected. The independent predictors among these characteristics for serosal invasion were screened with Spearman correlation analysis and logistic regression (LR) analysis. A quantitative model was developed based on LR classifier with fivefold cross-validation for predicting the serosal invasion in LAGC. We comprehensively tested the model and investigated its value in survival analysis.

RESULTS

A quantitative model was established using IC, 70 keV, 100 keV monochromatic attenuations in the venous phase, and CT-reported T4a, which were independent predictors of serosal invasion. The proposed model had the area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of 0.889 for TC and 0.860 and 0.837 for VCs. Subgroup analysis showed that the model could well discriminate T3 from T4a groups, and T2 from T4a groups in all cohorts (all p < 0.001). Besides, disease-free survival (DFS) (TC, p = 0.015; and VC1, p = 0.043) could be stratified using this quantitative model.

CONCLUSION

The proposed quantitative model using multi-parameters in DECT accurately predicts serosal invasion for LAGC and showed a significant correlation with the DFS of patients.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This quantitative model from dual-energy CT is a useful tool for predicting the serosal invasion of locally advanced gastric cancer.

KEY POINTS

Serosal invasion is a poor prognostic factor in locally advanced gastric cancer that may be predicted by DECT. DECT quantitative model for predicting serosal invasion was significantly and positively correlated with pathologic T stages. This quantitative model was associated with patient postoperative disease-free survival.

Are Palliative Interventions Worth the Risk in Advanced Gastric Cancer? A Systematic Review

Background: Less than 25% of gastric cancers (GC) are discovered early, leading to limited treatment options and poor outcomes (27.8% mortality, 3.7% 5-year survival). Screening programs have improved cure rates, yet post-diagnosis treatment guidelines remain unclear (systemic chemotherapy versus surgery). The optimal type of palliative surgery (palliative gastrectomy (PG), surgical bypass (SB), endoscopic stenting (ES)) for long-term outcomes is also debated. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases along with Google Scholar with the search terms "gastric cancer" and "palliative surgery" for studies post-1985. From the initial 1018 articles, multiple screenings narrowed it to 92 articles meeting criteria such as "metastatic, stage IV GC", and intervention (surgery or chemotherapy). Data regarding survival and other long-term outcomes were recorded. Results: Overall, there was significant variation between studies but there were similarities of the conclusions reached. ES provided quick symptom relief, while PG showed improved overall survival (OS) only with adjuvant chemotherapy in a selective population. PG had higher mortality rates compared to SB, with ES having a reported 0% mortality, but OS improved with chemotherapy across both SB and PG. Conclusions: Less frail patients may experience an improvement in OS with palliative resection under limited circumstances. However, operative intervention without systemic chemotherapy is unlikely to demonstrate a survival benefit. Further research is needed to explore any correlations.

Intratumoral CXCL13+ CD160+ CD8+ T cells promote the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Stage IV gastric cancer is a highly heterogeneous and lethal tumor with few therapeutic strategies. The combination of programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors and chemotherapy is currently the standard frontline treatment regimen for advanced gastric cancer. Nevertheless, it remains a great challenge to screen the beneficiaries of immunochemotherapy and expand indications for this treatment regimen.

METHODS

We conducted a pathological assessment to ascertain the importance of tertiary lymphoid structures based on the tissue samples collected from patients with stage IV gastric cancer (n=15) both prior to and following immunochemotherapy treatment. Additionally, we used spatial (n=10) and single-cell transcriptional analysis (n=97) to investigate the key regulators of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs). Multiplex immunofluorescence and image analysis (n=34) were performed to explore the association between tumor-infiltrating CXCL13+ CD160+ CD8+ T cells and TLSs. The relationship between CXCL13+ CD160+ CD8+ T cells and the responsiveness to immunotherapy was also evaluated by multiplex immunofluorescence and image analysis approaches (n=15). Furthermore, we explored the intrinsic characteristics of CXCL13+ CD160+ CD8+ T cells through various experimental techniques, including quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, western blot, and flow cytometry.

RESULTS

We found that responders exhibited higher levels of TLSs and CXCL13+ CD160+ CD8+ T cells in biopsy tissues prior to immunochemotherapy compared with non-responders. Following conversion therapy, responders also had a higher percentage of mature TLSs and a higher number of CXCL13+ CD160+ CD8+ T cells in surgical resections. Moreover, we discovered that vitamin B6 in CD160+ CD8+ T cells could reduce the ubiquitination modification of HIF-1α by MDM2, thereby attenuating the degradation of HIF-1α. Consequently, this led to the transcriptional upregulation of CXCL13 expression, facilitating the recruitment of CXCR5+ B cells and the formation of TLSs.

CONCLUSION

The number and maturity of TLSs, along with the extent of CXCL13+ CD160+ CD8+ T-cell infiltration, might function as potential indicators for assessing the effectiveness of immunotherapy in treating gastric malignancies. Furthermore, our research suggests that vitamin B6 could enhance the secretion of CXCL13 by CD160+ CD8+ T cells by reducing the degradation of HIF-1α. Additionally, we demonstrate that vitamin B6 supplementation or targeting pyridoxal kinase could substantially improve the efficacy of immunotherapies for gastric cancer.

PIPAC in patients with peritoneal metastases from gastrointestinal tract (PIPOX01): An open label, non-comparative phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial

BACKGROUND

Despite modern systemic chemotherapy, survival remains poor for patients with advanced isolated peritoneal metastases from the gastrointestinal tract. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with oxaliplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a phase 1/2, open label, non-comparative, dose escalation and expansion trial of PIPAC with oxaliplatin in patients with a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of more than 5, 13 and 15 for respectively a gastric, small bowel and colorectal primary cancer, and who had received at least three months of systemic chemotherapy. PIPAC cycle lengths were 4-6 weeks with systemic chemotherapy allowed 15 days after each PIPAC. PCI and oxaliplatin tumor concentration were assessed every PIPAC cycle. The main endpoints were tolerability, tumor response, and survival.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2020, 34 patients were enrolled in three centers, in this phase 1/2 study, of whom 25 were evaluable at the recommended dose determined in the phase I trial (90 mg/m2 plus systemic 5-FU). Before inclusion, patients received a median of 2 [1-4] chemotherapy lines and had a median PCI of 22.5 [7-29]. At this dose, the safety profile showed acceptable tolerability. Eight patients (32 %) had grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events. Minor (grade 1/2) adverse events were mainly abdominal pain (n = 19, 76 %) and nausea (n = 16, 64 %). Median PFS was 6.1 months and median OS was 13 months.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced and refractory peritoneal metastasis, PFS of 6.1 months is encouraging. A prospective randomized phase II study is required.

Pathological Complete Response Achieved with XELOX Chemotherapy, HIPEC, and Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in Stage IV Gastric Adenocarcinoma with Peritoneal Metastasis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The detection rates of early gastric cancer (GC) in China are approximately 20%; upon diagnosis, the majority of patients with GC are identified as having advanced stage disease, and in some cases, even metastatic advanced GC. Currently, the optimal treatment strategy for peritoneal metastasis (PM) in GC remains uncertain, and pathological complete response (pCR) is rare following conversion therapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report details the management of a 66-year-old patient diagnosed with advanced stage IVB (T4N2M1c) adenocarcinomas of the gastric cardia with PM who received multimodal therapy comprised of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), XELOX chemotherapy, and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) therapy followed by radical gastrectomy. Through the multimodal management, the patient attained PCR and experienced long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

The conversion therapy protocol combined with HIPEC, XELOX chemotherapy, and anti-PD-1 therapy and our scientific, accurate, full-course management strategy may be propagable for potentially curing patients with advanced GC with PM.

Current status and future trends of real-time imaging in gastric cancer surgery: A literature review

Technological advances are crucial for the optimization of gastric cancer surgery, and the success of any gastric cancer surgery is based on the correct and precise anatomical determination of the primary tumour and tissue structures. Real-time imaging-guided surgery is showing increasing potential and utility, mainly because it helps to aid intraoperative decision-making. However, intraoperative imaging faces many challenges in the field of gastric cancer. This article summarizes and discusses the following clinical applications of real-time optical imaging and fluorescence-guided surgery for gastric cancer: (1) the potential of quantitative fluorescence imaging in assessing tissue perfusion, (2) vascular navigation and determination of tumour margins, (3) the advantages and limitations of lymph node drainage assessment, and (4) identification of peritoneal metastases. In addition, preclinical study of tumour-targeted fluorescence imaging are discussed.

Optimizing Timing of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Enhance Intravenous Carboplatin Concentration

Despite advances in systemic chemotherapy, patients with gastric cancer (GC) and peritoneal metastases (PMs) continue to have poor prognoses. Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of Paclitaxel (PTX) combined with systemic chemotherapy shows promise in treating PMs from GC. However, methods of drug administration need to be optimized to maximize efficacy. In this study, we utilized a mouse model with PMs derived from a human GC cell line, administering PTX either IP or intravenously (IV), and Carboplatin (CBDCA) IV 0, 1, and 4 days after PTX administration. The PMs were resected 30 min later, and concentrations of PTX and CBDCA in resected tumors were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results indicated that PTX concentrations were higher with IP administration than with IV administration, with significant differences observed on days 0 and 1. CBDCA concentrations 4 days post-IP PTX administration were higher than with simultaneous IV PTX administration. These findings suggest that IP PTX administration enhances CBDCA concentration in peritoneal tumors. Therefore, sequential IV administration of anti-cancer drugs appears more effective than simultaneous administration with IP PTX, a strategy that may improve prognoses for patients with PMs.

Perioperative intraperitoneal plus systemic chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer: phase Ib/II single-arm prospective study

BACKGROUND

In gastric cancer, peritoneal metastasis is the most common form of metastasis and leads to dismal prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining perioperative intraperitoneal (IP) plus systemic chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with gastric cancer with limited peritoneal metastasis or even after reducing peritoneal tumor burden by upfront IP chemotherapy.

METHOD

Patients were enrolled in phase Ib in a 3 + 3 dose escalation of IP paclitaxel plus a fixed dose of IP cisplatin and oral S-1. In phase II, patients were managed according to the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) by diagnostic laparoscopy. For patients with a PCI of >12, upfront IP and systemic chemotherapy were given. Patients with a PCI of ≤12 or reduced to ≤12 after upfront chemotherapy underwent CRS with HIPEC. The primary endpoints were safety and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) confirmation for phase Ib and the 1-year overall survival rate for phase II.

RESULTS

The RP2D was defined as IP 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 60 mg/m2 cisplatin and oral 70 mg/m2/day S-1 for 14 days. A total of 22 patients were included. After CRS with HIPEC, there were no grade 3 or higher complications. The median hospital stay was 7 days (range, 6-11). The median overall and progression-free survival were 27.3 months (95% CI, 14.4 to not estimable) and 12.6 months (95% CI, 7.7-14.5), respectively. One-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 81.0% (95% CI, 65.8-99.6) and 54.5% (95% CI, 37.2-79.9), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A combination of IP plus systemic chemotherapy, CRS, and HIPEC was safe and resulted in good survival outcomes.

Current trends in the management of Gastro-oEsophageal cancers: Updates to the ESSO core curriculum (ESSO-ETC-UGI-WG initiative)

Gastro-oEsophageal Cancers (GECs) are severe diseases whose management is rapidly evolving. The European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) is committed to the generation and spread of knowledge, and promotes the multidisciplinary management of cancer patients through its core curriculum. The present work discusses the approach to GECs, including the management of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancers (OMEC), the diagnosis and management of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer (GC), the management of Siewert Type II tumors, the importance of mesogastric excision, the role of robotic surgery, textbook outcomes, organ preserving options, the use of molecular markers and immune check-point inhibitors in the management of patients with GECs, as well as the improvement of current clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with GECs. The aim of the present review is to provide a concise overview of the state-of-the-art on the management of patients with GECs and, at the same time, to share the latest advancements in the field and to foster the debate between surgical oncologists treating GECs worldwide. We are sure that our work will, at the same time, give an update to the advanced surgical oncologists and help the training surgical oncologists to settle down the foundations for their future practice.

International consensus on the management of metastatic gastric cancer: step by step in the foggy landscape : Bertinoro Workshop, November 2022

BACKGROUND

Many gastric cancer patients in Western countries are diagnosed as metastatic with a median overall survival of less than twelve months using standard chemotherapy. Innovative treatments, like targeted therapy or immunotherapy, have recently proved to ameliorate prognosis, but a general agreement on managing oligometastatic disease has yet to be achieved. An international multi-disciplinary workshop was held in Bertinoro, Italy, in November 2022 to verify whether achieving a consensus on at least some topics was possible.

METHODS

A two-round Delphi process was carried out, where participants were asked to answer 32 multiple-choice questions about CT, laparoscopic staging and biomarkers, systemic treatment for different localization, role and indication of palliative care. Consensus was established with at least a 67% agreement.

RESULTS

The assembly agreed to define oligometastases as a "dynamic" disease which either regresses or remains stable in response to systemic treatment. In addition, the definition of oligometastases was restricted to the following sites: para-aortic nodal stations, liver, lung, and peritoneum, excluding bones. In detail, the following conditions should be considered as oligometastases: involvement of para-aortic stations, in particular 16a2 or 16b1; up to three technically resectable liver metastases; three unilateral or two bilateral lung metastases; peritoneal carcinomatosis with PCI ≤ 6. No consensus was achieved on how to classify positive cytology, which was considered as oligometastatic by 55% of participants only if converted to negative after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

As assessed at the time of diagnosis, surgical treatment of oligometastases should aim at R0 curativity on the entire disease volume, including both the primary tumor and its metastases. Conversion surgery was defined as surgery on the residual volume of disease, which was initially not resectable for technical and/or oncological reasons but nevertheless responded to first-line treatment.

Advanced Gastric Cancer: Single-Center Experience

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most diagnosed cancer, but it is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Despite the likelihood of gastric cancer metastasizing to the peritoneum, optimal management strategies for this population remain undefined. We carried out a retrospective analysis to present our findings on patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with peritoneal metastases (CP) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). To better understand the data, we compared these patients with AGC patients without CP who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, as well as with another group of patients who underwent upfront surgery. Patients who undergo surgery and HIPEC achieve a higher survival rate than patients in the literature who undergo only palliative chemotherapy with a median overall survival of 28 months with a low incidence of major complications.

Survival in esophageal cancer with nonregional lymphadenopathy: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Survival among patients with esophageal cancer with stage IV nonregional lymphadenopathy treated with neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is not well described. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of patients with nonregional lymphadenopathy with a propensity-matched cohort of patients with locoregional disease.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively maintained database from a regional upper gastrointestinal cancer network in Quebec, Canada. From January 2010 to December 2022, patients with radiologically suspicious nonregional retroperitoneal or supraclavicular lymphadenopathy were identified. Using 1:1 propensity score matching, a control group without nonregional disease was created.

RESULTS

Of the 1235 patients identified, 39 met the inclusion criteria and were allocated to the study group of whom 35 of 39 (89%) had adenocarcinoma. Retroperitoneal and supraclavicular lymphadenopathy occurred in 26 of 39 patients (67%) and 13 of 39 patients (33%). Of the 39 patients, 34 (87%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 5 (13%) received chemoradiotherapy. After resection, ypN0 of nonregional lymph node stations occurred in 21 of 39 patients (54%). When comparing the study group with a matched non-stage IV control group, the median overall survival was similar in patients with retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (21.0 months [95% CI, 8.0-21.0] vs 27.0 months [95% CI, 13.0-41.0]; P = .262) but not with supraclavicular disease (13.0 months; 95% CI, 8.0-18.0; P = .039). The median follow-up intervals were 40.1 months (95% CI, 1.0-83.0) for the study group and 70.0 (95% CI, 33.0-106.0) for the control groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with a matched cohort of patients with similar disease burden but not stage IV disease, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy did not negatively affect survival outcomes. Multimodal curative intent therapy may be appropriate in select cases.

Intraoperative assessment of the curative potential to predict survival after gastric cancer resection: A national cohort study

BACKGROUND

The surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of tumor resection following gastrectomy adds new information that could help clinicians and patients by predicting survival.

METHODS

All patients in Sweden undergoing gastric cancer resection between 2006 and 2018 were grouped according to a prospectively registered variable; the surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of surgery: curative, borderline curative, or palliative. Factors affecting group allocation were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression, while survival was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 2341 patients undergoing gastric cancer resection, 1547 (71%) were deemed curative, 340 (15%) borderline curative, and 314 (14%) palliative (140 missing assessments). Advanced stage increased the risk of borderline curative resection (Stage III, odds ratio (OR) = 6.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.92-9.31), as did emergency surgery OR = 3.31 (1.74-6.31) and blood loss >500 mL; OR = 1.63 (1.06-2.49). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion both decreased the risk of borderline curative resection, OR = 0.58 (0.39-0.87) and 0.57 (0.40-0.80), respectively. In multivariable Cox regression, the surgeon's assessment independently predicted worse survival for borderline curative (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.29-1.83) and palliative resections (HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.45-2.19), compared to curative resections. The sensitivity of the surgeon's assessment of long-term survival was 96.7%. The PPV was 50.7% and the NPV was 92.1%.

CONCLUSION

The surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of gastric cancer surgery may independently aid survival prediction and is analogous to prognostication by pathologic Staging. Advanced disease, emergency surgery, and a high intraoperative blood loss, increases the risk of a borderline curative or palliative resection. Conversely, neoadjuvant treatment and MDT discussion reduce the risk of borderline curative or palliative resection.

European clinical practice guidelines for the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer (OMEC-4)

INTRODUCTION

The OligoMetastatic Esophagogastric Cancer (OMEC) project aims to provide clinical practice guidelines for the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of esophagogastric oligometastatic disease (OMD).

METHODS

Guidelines were developed according to AGREE II and GRADE principles. Guidelines were based on a systematic review (OMEC-1), clinical case discussions (OMEC-2), and a Delphi consensus study (OMEC-3) by 49 European expert centers for esophagogastric cancer. OMEC identified patients for whom the term OMD is considered or could be considered. Disease-free interval (DFI) was defined as the time between primary tumor treatment and detection of OMD.

RESULTS

Moderate to high quality of evidence was found (i.e. 1 randomized and 4 non-randomized phase II trials) resulting in moderate recommendations. OMD is considered in esophagogastric cancer patients with 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases or 1 involved extra-regional lymph node station. In addition, OMD continues to be considered in patients with OMD without progression in number of metastases after systemic therapy. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is recommended for baseline staging and for restaging after systemic therapy when local treatment is considered. For patients with synchronous OMD or metachronous OMD and a DFI ≤ 2 years, recommended treatment consists of systemic therapy followed by restaging to assess suitability for local treatment. For patients with metachronous OMD and DFI > 2 years, upfront local treatment is additionally recommended.

DISCUSSION

These multidisciplinary European clinical practice guidelines for the uniform definition, diagnosis and treatment of esophagogastric OMD can be used to standardize inclusion criteria in future clinical trials and to reduce variation in treatment.