Bevacizumab and paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy and secondary cytoreduction in recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study GOG-0213): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

Optimal bevacizumab treatment strategy in advanced ovarian cancer: A review

Bevacizumab was the first targeted therapy developed for newly diagnosed and recurrent advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). Although bevacizumab has been approved for the treatment of AOC for several years, identifying patients who may benefit most from this treatment is still debated. Bevacizumab has been associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) regardless of clinical risk, but in some countries the use of bevacizumab in the treatment of newly diagnosed AOC has been restricted to higher-risk patients (stage III inoperable or suboptimally debulked disease, or stage IV disease); this is primarily due to the findings of exploratory subgroup analyses from phase III trials that suggest only higher-risk patients derive an overall survival (OS) advantage with bevacizumab. Recently reported post hoc analyses from the PAOLA-1 trial of maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone for patients with newly diagnosed AOC and homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumors suggested PFS and OS benefit was achieved in both lower-risk (with stage III disease who had undergone upfront surgery and had complete resection) and higher-risk (with stage III disease who had undergone upfront surgery and had residual disease or who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or with stage IV disease) patients, prompting reassessment of the role of bevacizumab in lower-risk patients. This review examines the role of bevacizumab in the AOC treatment pathway by discussing its efficacy and safety in the first-line, maintenance and recurrent settings, and evaluates the clinical implications of bevacizumab use across risk groups and lines of therapy.

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy could be superior to chemotherapy alone in relapsed ovarian cancer after PARPi: evidence from a multi-center propensity score-matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective, multi-center propensity score-matched (PMS) analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of the treatment strategy that combines bevacizumab and chemotherapy for patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who previously received poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis).

METHODS

A total of 250 ovarian cancer (OC) patients relapsed after PARPi received chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab at 4 medical centers were enrolled in the study. For both treatments, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to compare PFS.

RESULTS

In the multivariable analysis of 250 patients, the incorporation of bevacizumab into chemotherapy demonstrated a significant enhancement in PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.34-0.72; p<0.001). Fifty-five patients were enrolled in Group A (bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy) and 55 were enrolled in Group B (chemotherapy alone regime) after PSM analysis. A statistically significant difference in PFS was observed between the 2 regimens (HR=0.62; 95% CI=0.40-0.97; p=0.036), suggesting that the bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy regimen confers superior clinical benefits. The median PFS was 11 months in Group A and 9 months in Group B. A significant variation was noted in PFS between patients without RCRS (HR=0.50; 95% CI=0.30-0.82) and the platinum-resistant subgroup (HR=0.31; 95% CI=0.14-0.68). Adverse effects of Grade 3-4 were more prevalent in Group A than in Group B. Additionally, instances of severe hypertension and bowel perforation were reported solely within Group A.

CONCLUSION

In patients diagnosed with EOC relapsed after PARPi, the regime of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab is associated with better PFS.

The antibody-drug conjugate targeting ROR1, NBE-002, is active in high-grade serous ovarian cancer preclinical models

Background

Novel therapeutics are urgently needed for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). We identified the receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1) as a therapeutic target. NBE-002, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanised anti-ROR1 antibody, huXBR1-402, linked to a highly potent anthracycline-derivative (PNU), has activity in ROR1-positive haematologic malignancies.

Objectives

This study explored the anti-cancer effects of NBE-002 alone and in combination with standard HGSOC therapies, carboplatin, paclitaxel and olaparib.

Design

A ROR1-ADC was tested in cell lines and in vivo models of HGSOC.

Methods

Different ROR1-targeting antibodies and payload compositions were constructed and tested in vitro. The dose effect of NBE-002 alone and in combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel or olaparib was analysed in ROR1+ HGSOC cell lines. Growth inhibition and apoptosis were monitored by live cell imaging and combination effects determined. Ten HGSOC PDX models were treated with NBE-002 alone, or in combination with carboplatin or olaparib, over 4 weeks and tumour volume and overall survival evaluated.

Results

Synergistic interaction was observed in two out of five HGSOC cell lines treated with NBE-002 and carboplatin (PEO4 and OC023, chemo-resistant), in one out of five treated with NBE-002 and olaparib (PEO1, BRCA2 mutated, HR deficient) and none of five treated with NBE-002 and paclitaxel. In vivo, NBE-002 exhibited activity in PA-1 xenografts and three HGSOC PDX models with high ROR1 expression, platinum sensitivity and homologous recombination DNA repair deficient (HRD). When NBE-002 was combined with carboplatin, activity was observed in 7 of 10 ROR1-expressing PDX models, regardless of platinum or HRD status. The activity was demonstrated in combination with olaparib in both PDX tested, one HRD and one HRD reverted.

Conclusion

The ROR1-targeting ADC, NBE-002, has therapeutic potential in HGSOC, with single agent activity observed both in vitro and in vivo. Broader clinical applications were evident when NBE-002 was combined with carboplatin or olaparib.

Failure of early interval debulking surgery after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy: May bevacizumab add something? A large retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Data are limited on the use of bevacizumab in neoadjuvant setting for High-Grade Serous ovarian Cancer (HGSC) patients. This study explores the effect of adding bevacizumab to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) following the failure of early Interval Debulking Surgery (eIDS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This monocentric study retrospectively enrolled FIGO stage IIIC-IV HGSC patients (2017-2021), persisting unresectable after three NACT cycles. Eligible patients had an ECOG performance status ≤2, were aged 40-75 years, and had no contraindications to bevacizumab administration. Patients were stratified whether they added bevacizumab from cycles 4 to 6 (CPB group) or not (CP group). The primary endpoint was the cytoreduction rate after six cycles (delayed IDS, dIDS).

RESULTS

Overall, 58(23 %) patients received neoadjuvant bevacizumab(CPB), and 190 (77 %) did not (CP). Delayed IDS was performed in 117(47.6 %) patients (CPB:31-53.4 %; CP:86-45.8 %; p = 0.38), with complete gross resection rates of 83.9 % and 88.5 %, respectively (p = 0.72). Severe postoperative complications were comparable (CP: 8 %, CPB: 9.7 %, p = 0.069). Median overall survival (OS) for dIDS patients showed no significant difference (CPB: not reached, CP:38 months, p = 0.55), nor did progression-free survival (PFS; CPB:14 months, CP:12 months, p = 0.830). Conversely, among 130(52 %) patients persisting unresectable, bevacizumab significantly improved OS in the CPB group (not reached vs.18 months, p = 0.015), although PFS remained similar (CPB: 6 months, CP: 7 months, p = 0.741).

CONCLUSION

While adding bevacizumab to NACT does not seem to increase the dIDS rate, it significantly extends OS in unresectable patients. Its use may be a valuable option in selected cases after eIDS' failure.

CD105 blockade restores osimertinib sensitivity in drug-resistant EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

AIM

To investigate the role of CD105 in mediating drug resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Imaging mass cytometry was conducted on 66 NSCLC tumors, 44 of which had EGFR mutations. We correlated clinical variables, including overall survival, with CD105 (endoglin) expression, a co-receptor for bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling. Two osimertinib-resistant EGFR-mutant cell lines were developed to study the effects of EGFR and CD105 disruption. Single cell RNA sequencing of the isogenic parental and osimertinib resistant lines was performed. Additionally, ATAC sequencing and Single Cell ENergetIc metabolism by profiling Translation inHibition analysis (SCENITH) was used to assess promoter chromatin status and glycolytic state.

RESULTS

We found a negative correlation between CD105 expression and overall survival in patients. Treatment with osimertinib or EGFR knockdown significantly elevated CD105 expression in EGFR-mutant cell lines. Single-cell RNA sequencing identified a subset of cells with heightened endothelial characteristics and altered pyrimidine metabolism, associated with osimertinib resistance. These cells exhibited a slow-cycling behavior, characterized by elevated chromatin condensation and reduced glycolysis. Combining osimertinib with carotuximab, a CD105 neutralizing antibody, significantly reduced the slow-cycling transcriptomic signature, increased chromatin accessibility, and restored glycolysis compared to osimertinib treatment alone. Mass spectrometry confirmed that carotuximab re-engaged EGFR signaling by coupling it with CD105. Consequently, carotuximab re-sensitized resistant tumors to osimertinib by increasing their mitotic index and ERK signaling in mouse models.

CONCLUSION

Carotuximab effectively reduced the slow-cycling cell population and restored osimertinib sensitivity, offering a promising strategy for managing refractory NSCLC.

Bevacizumab beyond progression: Impact of subsequent bevacizumab re-treatment in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer after progression

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated whether patients with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma (OC) who are immediately re-treated with bevacizumab derive benefit after disease progression on a bevacizumab-containing regimen.

METHODS

This multi-institutional, retrospective study compared patients with high grade non-mucinous epithelial OC who received bevacizumab followed directly by another bevacizumab-containing treatment regimen to patients who received bevacizumab followed by a regimen that did not contain bevacizumab (or received no further treatment). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan Meier product-limit estimator and modeled via Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Among 226 patients with OC who received bevacizumab as part of a treatment regimen,103 received sequential treatment with bevacizumab and 123 received a bevacizumab-containing regimen followed by a non-bevacizumab-containing regimen at the time of progression. Median follow-up for all subjects was 17.3 months (range, 1.2-138.2 months). Median PFS was 17.2 months (95 % CI, 14.3-21.2) for patients who received sequential bevacizumab re-treatment and 5.1 months (95 % CI, 4.3-6.3) for patients who received bevacizumab without bevacizumab-containing re-treatment (p < 0.001). Median OS was 29.9 months (95 % CI, 26.1-35.4) for patients who received sequential bevacizumab re-treatment (p < 0.001) and 12.4 months (95 % CI, 9.2-16.7) for patients who did not receive bevacizumab-containing re-treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients with OC treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens sequentially at the time of progression have prolonged survival compared to patients who received no re-treatment with bevacizumab.

The effect of Bevacizumab treatment on the incidence of hypertension in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionThis study aims to evaluate the effect of bevacizumab treatment on the incidence of hypertension in patients with ovarian cancer.MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases was conducted until August 2024. We included only randomized clinical trials that compared ovarian cancer patients treated with Bevacizumab to those treated with other therapies. The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of developing hypertension, stratified by grade. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity between studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on hypertension severity (grade ≥2 and grade ≥3) and disease stage. Sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessments were also performed.ResultsA total of 11 randomized trials were included, comprising 5212 patients. The meta-analysis revealed that patients receiving Bevacizumab had a significantly higher risk of hypertension compared to controls (RR = 2.91, 95% CI: 1.65-5.16, P = 0.0002). Subgroup analysis showed that the risk of grade ≥2 hypertension was 1.68 times higher (95% CI: 0.92-3.07), and grade ≥3 hypertension was 5.10 times higher (95% CI: 2.46-10.55) in the Bevacizumab group. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings, and no significant publication bias was detected.ConclusionBevacizumab treatment in ovarian cancer significantly increases the risk of hypertension, particularly severe hypertension (grade ≥3). These findings underscore the need for vigilant blood pressure monitoring and management in patients receiving Bevacizumab to mitigate cardiovascular complications and optimize treatment outcomes.

Co-Expression of Dominant-Negative TGF-β Receptor 2 Enhances the Therapeutic Efficacy of Novel TREM1/DAP12-BB-Based CAR-T Cells in Solid Tumours

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has exhibited remarkable efficacy in the treatment of haematological malignancies, yet its application in solid tumours is hindered by the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME). In this study, a novel SS1-TREM1/DAP12-BB CAR-T cell was devised to target ovarian cancer and further engineered to co-express the dominant-negative TGF-β receptor 2 (DNR) to combat CAR-T cell exhaustion in TME. The incorporation of DNR effectively blocked TGF-β signalling, thereby enhancing CAR-T cell survival and antitumor activity in a TGF-β1-rich environment. In vivo evaluations demonstrated that DNR co-expression potentiated the antitumor efficacy of TREM1/DAP12-BB CAR-T cells and conferred resilience against tumour rechallenge. These findings underscore the broad potential of DNR co-expression in CAR design, presenting a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

X-Ray Irradiation Induces Oxidative Stress and Upregulates Intestinal Nrf2-Mrp2 Pathway, Leading to Decreased Intestinal Absorption of Valsartan

Background: It has been documented that radiation can influence the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy drugs, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In clinical practice, a considerable number of cancer patients undergo radiotherapy, and those with comorbid hypertension required antihypertensive drugs, including valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker. However, there is no research investigating whether radiotherapy poses a risk of altering the pharmacokinetics. Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of X-ray abdominal irradiation on the pharmacokinetics of valsartan and to preliminarily elucidate the underlying mechanism. Methods: The pharmacokinetics of valsartan after X-ray irradiation was investigated in rats and in vitro by detecting the concentration of valsartan in biological samples by LC-MS/MS. The oxidative stress in the intestine and the mRNA expression of partial transporters and Nrf2 in the liver and small intestine were detected by biochemical reagent kit or RT-qPCR. Results: In vivo studies showed that X-ray irradiation resulted in a significant decrease in the AUC and Cmax of valsartan, and the cumulative fractional excretion of valsartan in bile and urine, although there was no significant change in fecal excretion. In vitro studies showed that the uptake of valsartan by both intestine and Caco-2 cells decreased after irradiation, and the cellular uptake could be restored by Mrp2 inhibitor MK571. The levels of GSH, SOD, and CAT in the intestine decreased after irradiation. The mRNA expressions of Mrp2 and P-gp in the intestine or Caco-2 cells were significantly upregulated after irradiation while there was a downregulation of Mrp2 and oatp1b2 in liver. Nrf2 and HO-1 in the intestine were also significantly upregulated, which clarified the involvement of Mrp2 and the possible molecular mechanism. Conclusions: Abdominal X-ray irradiation can cause oxidative stress and upregulate intestinal Mrp2, which may be related to oxidative stress and upregulation of Nrf2, reducing intestinal absorption of valsartan and leading to a significant decrease in the blood concentration of valsartan.

Management of Recurrence in Ovarian Cancer-The Role of Surgery and HIPEC with Relevance to BRCA Testing in a PARPi Landscape

Background: The surgical and medical management of recurrent ovarian cancer is complex and requires a personalized approach based on several factors, including the timing of recurrence, the patient's performance status, previous treatment regimens, and the tumor's histology and molecular characteristics. Objectives: Five randomized trials-GOG-0213, DESKTOP III, SOC 1, HORSE, and CHIPOR-have been conducted and shed light on our practice. Results: Both the DESKTOP III and the SOC 1 trials support the benefit of secondary surgery. The GOG-0213 trial, however, did not show an overall survival benefit, confirming that surgery should not be offered to all patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer and highlighting the importance of strict patient selection using evidence-based selection criteria including the AGO or iMODEL scores. In patients with a negative score, there may be a place for cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC in BRCA-negative cases following a course of chemotherapy, although current evidence shows no additional benefit for HIPEC when cytoreductive surgery is performed as an adjuvant procedure. Conclusions: Secondary surgery is recommended for platinum-sensitive patients when respecting AGO or iModel criteria. In addition, surgery plus HIPEC can be considered in BRCA-negative patients with an initial negative AGO or iMODEL score who show sufficient response following a course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to then be considered operable.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of secondary cytoreduction in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare secondary cytoreduction plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer were selected. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the surgery group and no surgery group (HR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.77, 1.04; p = 0.14), but secondary cytoreduction showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.54, 0.76; p < 0.00001). A subgroup analysis comparing the complete gross resection subpopulation with the no surgery group achieved a significant longer OS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.85; p = 0.0003) and a greater PFS benefit (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.48-0.66; p < 0.00001). In addition, as compared with incomplete resection, the OS benefit of complete gross resection was more evident (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.37-0.69; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, although secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy resulted in longer PFS than chemotherapy alone, it did not lead to significant benefit in OS. However, when complete gross resection was achieved, it significantly prolonged OS and provided a greater PFS benefit.

Racial and ethnic enrollment disparities in clinical trials leading to Food and Drug Administration approvals for gynecologic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Compared to White women, Black women and other minority groups have a higher age-adjusted incidence risk of cervical and endometrial cancer. However, the extent of racial and ethnic disparities in clinical trial enrollment among studies performed mainly in North America and Europe for gynecologic malignancy is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed enrollment rates by race/ethnicity in trials that led to Food and Drug Administration approvals for gynecological cancers from 2010 to 2024.

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional study examined clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov that resulted in new Food and Drug Administration approvals for gynecologic malignancies between 2010 and 2024. Exclusion criteria were studies not conducted in North America or Europe. Enrollment fractions were obtained by dividing the number of trial participants segregated by the racial/ethnic group by the corresponding U.S. cancer prevalence (uterine, ovarian, and cervical cancer) for 2016 to 2020 for each racial/ethnic group. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare enrollment fractions of minority groups to non-Hispanic Whites.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 21 reporting race/ethnicity data. Three (3/21) studies dichotomized race as non-Hispanic White and non-White and 7 (7/21) reported ethnicity. The median number of participants was 494 [interquartile range 150-674]. Fifteen studies were phase III, and 6 were phase IB/II trials. Treatments included immune checkpoint inhibitors (7 studies), poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (5), vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (4), antibody-drug conjugates (4), and an imaging marker (1). Across all studies, 11,258 patients were included, 5563 (49.4%) in ovarian cancer studies, 2963 (26.3%) in endometrial cancer studies, and 2732 (24.3%) in cervical cancer studies. Three studies (n=1734) dichotomized participants into non-Hispanic White and non-White; non-Hispanic White 1291 [74.4%] and non-White 443 [25.6%], and enrollment fractions were 0.51% for non-Hispanic White and 0.43% for no-White, with non-White being underrepresented odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval [0.76-0.95], P=.004. In an Analysis of 18 studies reporting race categories, non-Hispanic Black patients were significantly underrepresented (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval [0.45-0.54], P<.001), while Asian patients were overrepresented (odds ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval [2.64-2.99], P<.001). In the 4 studies reporting ethnicity, Hispanic patients were also significantly underrepresented (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval [0.61-0.78], P<.001).

CONCLUSION

In clinical trials, performed in North America and Europe mainly, leading to Food and Drug Administration approvals for gynecologic malignancies, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients are significantly underrepresented compared to non-Hispanic White participants when enrollment is benchmarked to the U.S. female population with gynecological cancer. These trials do not adequately reflect the U.S. populations diagnosed with these malignancies. Enrollment strategies to increase diversity are urgently needed to ensure clinical trial results are equitable and applicable across all populations. Efforts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the Association of Community Cancer Centers, and the Gynecologic Oncologic Group/Society of Gynecologic Oncology Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access initiative provide a comprehensive framework for achieving this goal.

Revolutionizing ovarian cancer therapy by drug repositioning for accelerated and cost-effective treatments

Drug repositioning, the practice of identifying novel applications for existing drugs beyond their originally intended medical indications, stands as a transformative strategy revolutionizing pharmaceutical productivity. In contrast to conventional drug development approaches, this innovative method has proven to be exceptionally effective. This is particularly relevant for cancer therapy, where the demand for groundbreaking treatments continues to grow. This review focuses on drug repositioning for ovarian cancer treatment, showcasing a comprehensive exploration grounded in thorough in vitro experiments across diverse cancer cell lines, which are validated through preclinical in vivo models. These insights not only shed light on the efficacy of these drugs but also expand in potential synergies with other pharmaceutical agents, favoring the development of cost-effective treatments for cancer patients.

ScDrugAct: a comprehensive database to dissect tumor microenvironment cell heterogeneity contributing to drug action and resistance across human cancers

The transcriptional heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment (TME) cells is a crucial factor driving the diversity of cellular response to drug treatment and resistance. Therefore, characterizing the cells associated with drug treatment and resistance will help us understand therapeutic mechanisms, discover new therapeutic targets and facilitate precision medicine. Here, we describe a database, scDrugAct (http://bio-bigdata.hrbmu.edu.cn/scDrugAct/), which aims to establish connections among drugs, genes and cells and dissect the impact of TME cellular heterogeneity on drug action and resistance at single-cell resolution. ScDrugAct is curated with drug-cell connections between 3838 223 cells across 34 cancer types and 13 857 drugs and identifies 17 274 drug perturbation/resistance-related genes and 276 559 associations between >10 000 drugs and 53 cell types. ScDrugAct also provides multiple flexible tools to retrieve and analyze connections among drugs, genes and cells; the distribution and developmental trajectories of drug-associated cells within the TME; functional features affecting the heterogeneity of cellular responses to drug perturbation and drug resistance; the cell-specific drug-related gene network; and drug-drug similarities. ScDrugAct serves as an important resource for investigating the impact of the cellular heterogeneity of the TME on drug therapies and can help researchers understand the mechanisms of action and resistance of drugs, as well as discover therapeutic targets.

Feasibility and safety of hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer and chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and progression-free and overall survival in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) versus those without after hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-institution cohort study of patients with ovarian cancer treated with HIPEC at the Cleveland Clinic from January 2009 to December 2022. All patients received HIPEC with cisplatin and renal protection with mannitol and furosemide. Patients with a documented pre-operative eGFR were included. CKD was defined as a pre-operative eGFR of <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Demographics, clinicopathological data, perioperative creatinine levels, surgical complexity, post-operative complications, and treatment characteristics were analyzed. Progression-free and overall survival were assessed using Cox right-censored univariate models.

RESULTS

Of 171 patients, 16.4% (n = 28) had CKD. No significant differences were found in post-operative acute kidney injury (21.4% with CKD vs 13.3% in those without; p = .15), readmission rates (10.7% CKD vs 11.9% in those without; p = .99), or major complications such as death, venous thromboembolism, myocardial injury, and sepsis (10.7% with CKD vs 11.9% in those without; p = .95). Both groups had a median hospital stay of 5 days (p = .65). There was also no significant difference in survival, with median progression-free survival of 15.5 months in the group with CKD versus 16.8 months in those without (p = .79) and overall survival of 58.4 months in those with CKD versus 39.3 months in those without (p = .33).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in complication rates, progression-free survival, or overall survival between patients with CKD and those with normal kidney function receiving HIPEC for ovarian cancer.

Efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic drugs combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of platinum-sensitive/resistant ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

With the emergence of new anti-angiogenic treatments and the ongoing updates to clinical guidelines, the effectiveness and safety of these agents in treating platinum-sensitive/resistant ovarian cancer (OC) are yet to be fully determined. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic drugs combined with chemotherapy (CT) for platinum-sensitive OC (PSOC) or platinum-resistant OC (PROC).

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, encompassing all pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 31 May 2024. The primary outcomes for the meta-analysis were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while the objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs) of any grade, and grade ≥3 AEs were considered secondary endpoints. Data synthesis involved the computation of hazard ratio (HR), relative risk (RR), along with their 95% confidence interval (CI) and prediction interval (PI). Trial sequential analysis was carried out using STATA 12.0, R software 4.3.1, and TSA v0.9.5.10 Beta software.

Results

This meta-analysis encompassed 15 RCTs. The overall analysis revealed that compared to CT alone (or plus placebo), anti-angiogenic drugs combined with CT significantly improved PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.573 [0.518-0.633], 95% PI: 0.383-0.876) and ORR (RR [95% CI] = 1.362 [1.260-1.472], 95% PI: 0.824-2.251), but also increased the incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.115 [1.070-1.162], 95% PI: 0.870-1.422) in PSOC patients. For PROC patients, this combination therapy notably improved PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.542 [0.475-0.619], 95% PI: 0.322-0.930), OS (HR [95% CI] = 0.752 [0.646-0.875], 95% PI: 0.554-0.997), and ORR (RR [95% CI] = 2.141 [1.702-2.694], 95% PI: 0.839-5.307), whilst simultaneously elevating the risk of grade ≥3 AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.487 [1.216-1.819], 95% PI: 0.755-2.828).

Conclusion

Our research verified the advantages of combining anti-angiogenic agents with CT in enhancing PFS and ORR for patients with PSOC, and also confirmed improvements in PFS, OS, and ORR for those with PROC. It is crucial for medical practitioners to remain alert to the potential occurrence of AEs when implementing this combined therapeutic approach in a clinical milieu.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024552010.

Development of an FRα Companion Diagnostic Immunohistochemical Assay for Mirvetuximab Soravtansine

CONTEXT.—

Folate receptor-α (FRα, encoded by the FOLR1 gene) is overexpressed in several solid tumor types, including epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), making it an attractive biomarker and target for FRα-based therapy in ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE.—

To describe the development, analytic verification, and clinical performance of the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay (Ventana Medical Systems Inc) in EOC.

DESIGN.—

We used industry standard studies to establish the analytic verification of the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay. Furthermore, the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay was used in the ImmunoGen Inc-sponsored SORAYA study to select patients for treatment with mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) in platinum-resistant EOC.

RESULTS.—

The VENTANA FOLR1 Assay is highly reproducible, demonstrated by a greater than 98% overall percent agreement (OPA) for repeatability and intermediate precision studies, greater than 93% OPA for interreader and greater than 96% for intrareader studies, and greater than 90% OPA across all observations in the interlaboratory reproducibility study. The performance of the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay in the SORAYA study was evaluated by the overall staining acceptability rate, which was calculated using the number of patient specimens that were tested with the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay that had an evaluable result. In the SORAYA trial, data in patients who received MIRV demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy, and the overall staining acceptability rate of the assay was 98.4%, demonstrating that the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay is safe and effective for selecting patients who may benefit from MIRV. Together, these data showed that the assay is highly reliable, consistently producing evaluable results in the clinical setting.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The VENTANA FOLR1 Assay is a robust and reproducible assay for detecting FRα expression and identifying a patient population that derived clinically meaningful benefit from MIRV in the SORAYA study.

SEOM-GEICO clinical guideline on epithelial ovarian cancer (2023)

In recent years, the incorporation of new strategies to the therapeutic armamentarium has completely changed the outcomes of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The identification of new predictive and prognostic biomarkers has also enabled the selection of those patients more likely to respond to targeted agents. Nevertheless, EOC is still a highly lethal disease and resistance to many of these new agents is common. The objective of this guideline is to summarize the most relevant strategies to manage EOC, to help the clinician throughout the challenging diagnostic and therapeutic processes and to provide evidence-based recommendations.

Low serum concentrations of bevacizumab and nivolumab owing to excessive urinary loss in patients with proteinuria: a case series

PURPOSE

Proteinuria can cause interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic antibodies and may affect therapeutic efficacy. Here, we measured the serum and urinary concentrations of bevacizumab (BV) and nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with proteinuria and reported a case series of these patients.

METHODS

Thirty-two cancer patients who received BV every 3 weeks or NIVO every 2 weeks between November 2020 and September 2021 at Kyoto University Hospital were enrolled in this study. The serum and urinary concentrations of BV and NIVO were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

We divided the BV-treated patients and the NIVO-treated patients into two groups based on the urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR): UPCR 1 g/g or higher (BV, n = 9; NIVO, n = 3) and UPCR less than 1 g/g (BV, n = 14; NIVO, n = 6). Serum concentrations of the therapeutic antibodies adjusted by their doses were significantly lower in both BV- and NIVO-treated patients with UPCR 1 g/g or higher compared to those with less than 1 g/g. In patients with UPCR 1 g/g or higher, urinary concentrations of the therapeutic antibodies adjusted by their serum concentrations and urinary creatinine concentrations tended to increase.

CONCLUSION

This case-series study suggests a possibility of reduction in serum concentrations of BV and NIVO in patients with proteinuria by urinary excretion of these drugs.

Predicting prognosis for epithelial ovarian cancer patients receiving bevacizumab treatment with CT-based deep learning

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) presents considerable difficulties in prognostication and treatment strategy development. Bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic medication, has demonstrated potential in enhancing progression-free survival (PFS) in EOC patients. Nevertheless, the identification of individuals at elevated risk of disease progression following treatment remains a challenging task. This study was to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model using retrospectively collected computed tomography (CT) plain scans of inoperable and recurrent EOC patients receiving bevacizumab treatment diagnosed between January 2013 and January 2024. A total of 525 patients from three different institutions were retrospectively included in the study and divided into training set (N = 400), internal test set (N = 97) and external test set (N = 28). The model's performance was evaluated using Harrell's C-index. Patients were categorized into high-risk and low-risk group based on a predetermined cutoff in the training set. Additionally, a multimodal model was evaluated, incorporating the risk score generated by the DL model and the pretreatment level of carbohydrate antigen 125 as input variables. The Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) metric quantified the reclassification performance of our optimal model in comparison to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging model. The results indicated that DL model achieved a PFS predictive C-index of 0.73 in the internal test set and a C-index of 0.61 in the external test set, along with hazard ratios of 34.24 in the training set (95% CI: 21.7, 54.1; P < 0.001) and 8.16 in the internal test set (95% CI: 2.5, 26.8; P < 0.001). The multimodal model demonstrated a C-index of 0.76 in the internal test set and a C-index of 0.64 in the external test set. Comparative analysis against FIGO staging revealed an NRI of 0.06 (P < 0.001) for the multimodal model. The model presents opportunities for prognostic assessment, treatment strategizing, and ongoing patient monitoring.

Neoadjuvant PARPi or chemotherapy in ovarian cancer informs targeting effector Treg cells for homologous-recombination-deficient tumors

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is prevalent in cancer, sensitizing tumor cells to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. However, the impact of HRD and related therapies on the tumor microenvironment (TME) remains elusive. Our study generates single-cell gene expression and T cell receptor profiles, along with validatory multimodal datasets from >100 high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) samples, primarily from a phase II clinical trial (NCT04507841). Neoadjuvant monotherapy with the PARP inhibitor (PARPi) niraparib achieves impressive 62.5% and 73.6% response rates per RECIST v.1.1 and GCIG CA125, respectively. We identify effector regulatory T cells (eTregs) as key responders to HRD and neoadjuvant therapies, co-occurring with other tumor-reactive T cells, particularly terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells (Tex). TME-wide interferon signaling correlates with cancer cells upregulating MHC class II and co-inhibitory ligands, potentially driving Treg and Tex fates. Depleting eTregs in HRD mouse models, with or without PARP inhibition, significantly suppresses tumor growth without observable toxicities, underscoring the potential of eTreg-focused therapeutics for HGSOC and other HRD-related tumors.

First-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer or primary peritoneal cancer: a phase III randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

First-line bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) is approved for stage III/IV ovarian cancer treatment following initial surgical resection, based on global phase III GOG-0218 and ICON7 trials. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab + CP as first-line ovarian cancer therapy in Chinese patients.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer post-primary surgery were randomized 1:1 to receive 6 cycles of CP with bevacizumab/placebo, followed by bevacizumab/placebo maintenance until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Stratification factors were FIGO stage and debulking status (stage III optimally debulked vs stage III suboptimally debulked vs stage IV) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1 or 2).

RESULTS

Of randomized patients, 51 received bevacizumab + CP and 49 received placebo + CP. Median PFS was 22.6 months with bevacizumab + CP (95% confidence interval [CI]=18.6, not estimable) and 12.3 months (95% CI=9.5, 15.0) with placebo + CP (stratified hazard ratio=0.30; 95% CI=0.17, 0.53). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 46 of 49 (94%) patients receiving bevacizumab + CP, and 34 of 50 (68%) receiving placebo + CP.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab + CP showed clinically meaningful improvement in PFS vs placebo + CP, consistent with GOG-0218 results. Safety data were aligned with the known bevacizumab safety profile. These results support first-line bevacizumab + CP therapy in Chinese patients with ovarian cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635489.

Assessment of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The current research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, an orally administered small-molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Patients with recurrent EOC subjected to treatment with anlotinib in Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2020 to 2022 were included. The evaluation involved a thorough review of medical records, focusing on parameters such as the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), survival outcomes, and safety profile.

RESULTS

This study recorded 51 patients, with 26 patients undergoing anlotinib monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months, whereas the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Seven cases underwent a combined treatment of anlotinib with chemotherapy. Among them, two patients achieved partial response (PR), two were categorized as stable disease (SD), and three were identified as having progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 28.5% (2/7) and 57.1% (4/7), respectively. Additionally, 18 cases received anlotinib maintenance therapy, and the median PFS and the median OS were 7.0 months and 25.5 months, respectively. The most prevalent adverse effects included fatigue (38.6%), hypertension (27.3%), nausea and vomiting (25.0%) and hand-foot syndrome (25.0%).

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib demonstrated mild efficacy in the treatment of recurrent EOC, whether employed as monotherapy, chemotherapy-combined therapy, or maintenance therapy. The safety profile was proven manageable and well-tolerated, suggesting that anlotinib may emerge as a viable and novel treatment option for recurrent EOC.

Molecular biology as a driver in therapeutic choices for ovarian cancer

The majority of patients with ovarian cancer relapse within 3 years of first line chemotherapy. Therefore, choosing the most appropriate treatment in the recurrence setting has a fundamental role in defining a patient's prognosis. Treatment options include systemic and intra-peritoneal chemotherapy, secondary cytoreductive surgery, and stereotactic body radiotherapy. The best therapeutic choice depends on multiple factors and not only on treatment-free interval. For systemic therapy, prior lines therapy, residual toxicities, comorbidities, performance status, and patient preferences should be taken into account. Secondary cytoreductive surgery can be proposed in patients in which complete tumor resectability can be predicted and in those with oligometastatic disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy represents a valid alternative to surgery for oligometastatic disease with high local control and minimal toxicity. Current evidence has demonstrated an emerging role of BRCA mutational status and molecular profiling in the impacting response to systemic and local treatments. Therefore, these could provide guidance in the treatment decision process and help identify patients who respond better to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors or immunotherapy or to a combined approach with surgery rather than to platinum-based chemotherapy. Current knowledge in this field could help widen therapeutic options, especially for platinum-resistant patients. In this review, we offer an overview of the state of the art regarding the role of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in this setting and their implications in clinical practice and in the treatment decision process, so as to provide the best tailored therapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio for the Assessment of Bevacizumab-Associated Proteinuria in Patients with Gynecologic Cancers: A Diagnostic and Quality Improvement Study

Proteinuria is a common adverse event arising from treatment with bevacizumab, requiring diagnostic testing via 24-h urine collection. However, this method is cumbersome. We assessed urine screenings in gynecologic cancer patients from February 2021 to May 2022. Along with a simple urine dipstick (UD), the urine microalbumin, total protein, and creatinine were measured and calculated as the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) and the urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR), which were further adjusted through the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations to be estimated and correlated with 24-h urine total protein content. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was used for cost analysis. There were 129 urine samples from 36 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for the UACR were 0.56 and 0.97, and for the UPCR, 0.71 and 0.88, respectively. The 24-h TP correlated strongly with the UACR (r = 0.75; p < 0.001) and UPCR (r = 0.79; p < 0.001) and fair for the simple UD (r = 0.35; p < 0.001). The UPCR saves one unnecessary 24-h urine test for less than a dollar compared to a simple UD. The results indicate that using the UPCR could enhance diagnostic accuracy, lower costs, and reduce unnecessary 24-h urine sampling.

Optimizing Outcomes: Bevacizumab with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in 5110 Ovarian Cancer Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of incorporating bevacizumab into the combination therapy of carboplatin and paclitaxel for epithelial ovarian cancer and other clinical applications.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using keyword searches in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP until February 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing carboplatin and paclitaxel with and without bevacizumab in ovarian cancer patients were included. Efficacy outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as described by hazard ratios (HRs). Safety outcomes were analyzed with risk ratios (RRs) for 16 adverse events.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs (n = 5110) were included. The combination with bevacizumab significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.58, 0.92; p = 0.008). The chemotherapy group receiving bevacizumab with carboplatin and paclitaxel showed a significantly higher incidence of hypertension, non-CNS bleeding, thromboembolic events, GI perforation, pain, and proteinuria.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab improves PFS compared to the regimen without bevacizumab, but it raises significant safety concerns. Clinical management should consider adverse event prevention by vigilantly monitoring blood pressure, signs and symptoms of bleeding, thromboembolism, GI perforation, and pain to balance the therapeutic benefits with the potential risks of this combination therapy.

Bevacizumab Combination Therapy Versus Standard Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer in Shorter and Longer Follow-Up Duration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with ovarian cancer over a shorter and longer follow-up period.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Google Scholar for all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that administered bevacizumab to women with ovarian cancer. Review Manager 5.4 was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs. We assessed the quality of the included studies using version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2).

RESULTS

After screening the titles, abstracts, and full texts, we included nine RCTs in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Four RCTs had a low risk of bias, while 5 had some concerns. Bevacizumab was associated with a progression free survival benefit for <36 months (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45-0.76, P <0.0001, I2 =90%) and >36 months (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.80, P <0.0001, I2 =80%), and an overall survival benefit for <36 months (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, P =0.02, I2 =0%) but not for >36 months (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.09, P =0.77, I2 =30%). There was no difference in deaths between intervention and control groups <36 months (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.04, P =0.26, I2 =10%) or >36 months (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97-1.06, P =0.50, I2 =0%). Bevacizumab reduced disease progression <36 months (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.92, P =0.0008, I2 =82%) but not at >36 months (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58-1.19, P =0.30, I2 =94%). The adverse events reported with Bevacizumab use included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukocytopenia, anemia, hypertension, bleeding or hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal, cardiac, and dermatological adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab may improve progression-free survival within and after 36 months, overall survival within 36 months, and reduce disease progression within 36 months.

Targeted therapy in high grade serous ovarian Cancer: A literature review

Ovarian cancer continues to have a high mortality rate despite therapeutic advances. Traditionally, treatment has focused on surgery followed by systemic platinum- based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, most patients develop resistance to platinum agents, highlighting the need for targeted therapies. PARP inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents, such as bevacizumab, have more recently changed upfront therapy. Unfortunately, other targeted therapies including immunotherapy have not seen the same success. Emerging therapeutic targets and modalities such as small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, lipid metabolism targeting agents, gene therapy, ribosome targeted drugs as well as several other therapeutic classes have been and are currently under investigation. In this review, we discuss targeted therapies in high grade serous ovarian cancer from preclinical studies to phase III clinical trials.

Surgery versus no surgery in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: final overall survival analysis of the SOC-1 randomized phase 3 trial

Surgery for platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) is widely practiced but had contradictory survival outcomes in previous studies. In this multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial, women with PSROC, and having had one previous therapy and no platinum-based chemotherapy (platinum-free interval) of 6 months or more, were randomly assigned to either the surgery group (182 patients) or the no-surgery group (control) (175 patients). Patients with resectable diseases were eligible according to the international model (iMODEL), combined with a positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were coprimary endpoints in hierarchical testing, and a significantly longer progression-free survival with surgery was previously reported. Final analysis of OS was planned at data maturity of 59%. Between 19 July 2012 and 3 June 2019, 357 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 82.5 months. Median OS was 58.1 months with surgery and 52.1 months for control (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.05, P = 0.11). The predefined threshold for statistical significance was not met, but prespecified sensitivity analysis was performed. Overall, 61 of 175 (35%) patients in control had crossed over to surgery following subsequent relapse, and adjusted HR for death in the surgery group compared with control was 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.99. In subgroup analysis of relapse sites by imaging, median survival was not estimable in the surgery group and was 69.5 months in control in patients with <20 sites (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.03). Patients with a complete resection had the most favorable outcome, with a median OS of 73.0 months. Twenty-four of 182 (13.2%) patients remained relapse free and alive >60 months in the surgery group as compared with five of 175 (2.9%) patients in the control group. In patients with PSROC, surgery did not increase OS in the intention-to-treat population but resulted in a prolongation of survival following adjustment of crossover.ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01611766 .

Maintenance with mirvetuximab soravtansine plus bevacizumab vs bevacizumab in FRα-high platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

At first recurrence, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC) is frequently treated with platinum-based chemotherapy doublets plus bevacizumab, then single-agent bevacizumab. Most patients' disease progresses within a year after chemotherapy, emphasizing the need for novel strategies. Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV), an antibody-drug conjugate, comprises a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody and tubulin-targeting payload (maytansinoid DM4). In FRα-high PSOC, MIRV plus bevacizumab previously showed promising efficacy (objective response rate, 69% [95% CI: 41-89]; median progression-free survival, 13.3 months [95% CI: 8.3-18.3]; median duration of response, 12.9 months [95% CI: 6.5-15.7]) and safety. The Phase III randomized GLORIOSA trial will evaluate MIRV plus bevacizumab vs. bevacizumab alone as maintenance therapy in patients with FRα-high PSOC who did not have disease progression following second-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05445778; GOG.org ID: GOG-3078; ENGOT.ESGO.org ID: ENGOT-ov76.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy and mechanisms of resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is the commonest cause of gynaecological cancer deaths. First-line treatment for advanced disease includes a combination of platinum-taxane chemotherapy (post-operatively or peri-operatively) and maximal debulking surgery whenever feasible. Initial response rate to chemotherapy is high (up to 80%) but most patients will develop recurrence (approximately 70-90%) and succumb to the disease. Recently, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition (by drugs such as Olaparib, Niraparib or Rucaparib) directed synthetic lethality approach in BRCA germline mutant or platinum sensitive disease has generated real hope for patients. PARP inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy can prolong survival but therapeutic response is not sustained due to intrinsic or acquired secondary resistance to PARPi therapy. Reversion of BRCA1/2 mutation can lead to clinical PARPi resistance in BRCA-germline mutated ovarian cancer. However, in the more common platinum sensitive sporadic HGSOC, the clinical mechanisms of development of PARPi resistance remains to be defined. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the current status of PARPi and the mechanisms of resistance to therapy.

Effects of PARP Inhibitors on Subsequent Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

The clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer have been significantly improved by Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARP-is). However, the best therapeutic strategy for recurrence during PARP-i maintenance therapy remains unknown. Herein, we elucidated the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy after PARP-i treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer. Eligible patients had experienced relapses during PARP-i maintenance therapy lasting at least 6 months and had received subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy at our institution between January 2019 and March 2024. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and risk factors for PFS were evaluated. Sixty-six patients were assessed for eligibility and eighteen were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 14.5 months. The PFS and OS of all patients were 6.5 and 17.6 months, respectively. The evaluation of the risk factors for PFS revealed that age, pathological type, duration of PARP-i maintenance therapy, prior lines of chemotherapy, and PARP-i dose reduction were not significant prognostic markers. However, bevacizumab use in subsequent therapies significantly extended the PFS. The median PFS was 3.1 months in the chemotherapy-alone group and 8.9 months in the chemotherapy with bevacizumab group (log-rank p = 0.022). Platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab in subsequent therapies would provide substantial benefits in the PFS of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates: The New Treatment Approaches for Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC), accounting for approximately 200,000 deaths worldwide annually, is a heterogeneous disease showing major differences in terms of its incidence, tumor behavior, and outcomes across histological subtypes. In OC, primary chemotherapy, paclitaxel carboplatin, bevacizumab, and PARP inhibitors have shown prolonged progression-free survival and a favorable overall response rate compared to conventional treatments. However, treatment options for platinum-resistant recurrence cases are limited, with no effective therapies that significantly prolong the prognosis. Recently, mirvetuximab soravtansine, an alpha-folate receptor (FRα)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with FRα-positive recurrent epithelial OC (EOC). This approval was based on a Phase II study, which demonstrated its efficacy in such patients. ADCs comprise an antibody, a linker, and a payload, representing new concept agents without precedence. Advanced clinical studies are developing ADCs for patients with OC, targeting solid tumors such as gynecologic cancer. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating ADCs targeting FRα and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, trophoblast cell surface antigen-2, sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 2B, and cadherin-6 in Phase II/III studies. In this review, we summarize the existing evidence supporting the use of ADCs in OC, discuss ongoing clinical trials and preclinical studies, and explore the potential of these innovative agents to address the challenges in OC treatment.

Global publication productivity and research trends on recurrent ovarian cancer: a bibliometric study

Introduction

Recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) presents a dismal prognosis, persistently devoid of efficacious therapeutic strategies. Over the past decade, significant shifts have transpired in ROC management, marked by the identification of novel therapeutic targets and advancements in biomarker research and innovation. Since bibliometrics is an effective method for revealing scientific literature, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of literature pertaining to ROC. Our exploration encompassed identifying emerging research trends and common patterns, analyzing collaborative networks, and anticipating future directions within this clinical context.

Methods

We conducted a search in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) to acquire relevant articles as our dataset, which were then exported using R-Studio-2023.12.0-369 software. The Bibliometrix R package was utilized to perform visual analyses on countries, institutions, journals, authors, landmark articles, and keywords within this research field.

Results

A total of 1538 articles and 173 reviews published between 2014 and 2023 were eventually retrieved. The annual growth rate of scientific production was 4.27%. The USA led the way in the number of published works, total citations, and collaboration. Gynecologic Oncology was the most favoured journal in this research field. Vergote I from the University Hospital Leuven, was the most influential author. At last, the most prominent keywords were "chemotherapy" (n = 124), "bevacizumab" (n = 87), and "survival" (n = 65). Clinical outcomes (prognosis, survival), chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib) represented the basic and transversal themes, while antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and drug resistance were emerging themes. Cytoreduction surgical procedures and tamoxifen were niche themes, while immunotherapy and biomarkers were motor themes and had high centrality.

Conclusion

The trends in the ROC research field over the past decade were revealed through bibliometric analysis. Platinum resistance, ADC, and immunotherapy have emerged as the current prominent research topics.

Xenohormetic Phytochemicals Inhibit Neovascularization in Microphysiological Models of Vasculogenesis and Tumor Angiogenesis

Xenohormesis proposes that phytochemicals produced to combat stressors in the host plant exert biochemical effects in animal cells lacking cognate receptors. Xenohormetic phytochemicals such as flavonoids and phytoalexins modulate a range of human cell signaling mechanisms but functional correlations with human pathophysiology are lacking. Here, potent inhibitory effects of grapefruit-derived Naringenin (Nar) and soybean-derived Glyceollins (Gly) in human microphysiological models of bulk tissue vasculogenesis and tumor angiogenesis are reported. Despite this interference of vascular morphogenesis, Nar and Gly are not cytotoxic to endothelial cells and do not prevent cell cycle entry. The anti-vasculogenic effects of Glyceollin are significantly more potent in sex-matched female (XX) models. Nar and Gly do not decrease viability or expression of proangiogenic genes in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell spheroids, suggesting that inhibition of sprouting angiogenesis by Nar and Gly in a MPS model of the (TNBC) microenvironment are mediated via direct effects in endothelial cells. The study supports further research of Naringenin and Glyceollin as health-promoting agents with special attention to mechanisms of action in vascular endothelial cells and the role of biological sex, which can improve the understanding of dietary nutrition and the pharmacology of phytochemical preparations.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery and oncologic outcomes in the era of targeted maintenance therapy for recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To compare oncologic outcomes of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) before and after FDA approval of Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and bevacizumab maintenance therapies for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PS-ROC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent SCS for first recurrence of PS-ROC from 1/1/2013-1/1/2020 were identified. Exclusion criteria included prior chemotherapy for recurrence, bowel obstruction procedures, and palliative surgery. Data were dichotomized pre/post 1/2017, relative to FDA approval of PARPi and bevacizumab maintenance for ROC. Second progression-free survival (PFS2), the primary endpoint, was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Overall, 245 patients underwent SCS-131 (53%) pre- and 114 (47%) post-approval. Most patients had high-grade serous tumors (83% and 90%, respectively; p = 0.13). Deleterious BRCA1/2 alterations were identified in 27% (32/120) and 28% (32/113) of tested patients, respectively (p = 0.88). Disease-free intervals pre- and post-approval were: 6-12 months, 16% and 18%; 12-30 months, 56% and 59%; and >30 months, 28% and 24%, respectively (p = 0.73). Overall, 85% and 86% of patients, respectively, achieved complete gross resection (CGR; p > 0.99). PARPi maintenance use increased from 3.8% to 27% (p < 0.001) following approval, and bevacizumab from 1.5% to 12% (p < 0.001). Median PFS2 was 19 and 20.1 months, respectively. In the post group, 1-year PFS2 rate was 84.5% (95% CI, 75.7-90.4%) for patients with CGR vs 56.2% (95% CI, 29.5-76.2%) for those with residual disease; 3-year PFS2 rates were 31.3% (95% CI, 21.6-41.4%) and 12.5% (95% CI, 2.1-32.8%), respectively (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CGR during SCS is associated with improved PFS2 compared to suboptimal resection. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to elucidate the role of SCS as more therapeutics become available.

Tailored Treatment Strategies in First Line Therapy for Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Critical Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a significant cause of cancer-related mortality in women globally, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 49%. Standard therapy involves cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy. Its poor prognosis has driven interest in alternative therapies such as targeted molecular agents like bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review systematically searched PubMed from January 2018 to December 2023 for studies on PARPi in OC. Emphasis was on identifying relevant Phase III trials, extracting data on study design, patient demographics, and outcomes. Special focus was on assessing PARPi efficacy, safety, impact on quality of life, and ongoing trials, including those on Clinicaltrials.gov.

RESULTS

The efficacy of PARPi in first-line therapy for OC has been extensively studied. Trials like SOLO-1, PRIMA, and ATHENA-MONO have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), particularly in patients with BRCA mutations. Additionally, the combination of PARPi with other agents like bevacizumab has shown promising results in extending PFS. However, PARPi treatment is associated with various adverse effects, including hematologic toxicities like anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. While most adverse events are manageable, some patients may require dose adjustments or discontinuation of treatment. Importantly, PARPi maintenance therapy has not adversely affected health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with studies reporting similar HRQoL scores between PARPi-treated and placebo-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PARPi offer effective treatment with manageable side effects, suitable even for medically fragile patients. Individualized dosing can optimize benefits while minimizing adverse events. Exploring diverse treatment approaches, particularly in patients with limited life expectancy or high disease burden, could improve outcomes. Ongoing research is investigating alternative therapies and combinations to broaden treatment options. Combining bevacizumab with PARPi may be justified for first-line and recurrent maintenance therapy. Regardless of mutational status, PARPi should be considered for maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed advanced OC. Platinum sensitivity remains crucial for treatment decisions and predicting survival outcomes.

New hopes and promises in the treatment of ovarian cancer focusing on targeted treatment-a narrative review

Unfortunately, ovarian cancer is still diagnosed most often only in an advanced stage and is also the most lethal gynecological cancer. Another problem is the fact that treated patients have a high risk of disease recurrence. Moreover, ovarian cancer is very diverse in terms of molecular, histological features and mutations. Many patients may also develop platinum resistance, resulting in poor response to subsequent lines of treatment. To improve the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer, it is expected to make better existing and implement new, promising treatment methods. Targeted therapies seem very promising. Currently, bevacizumab - a VEGF inhibitor and therapy with olaparib - a polyADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor are approved. Other methods worth considering in the future include: folate receptor α, immune checkpoints or other immunotherapy methods. To improve the treatment of ovarian cancer, it is also important to ameliorate the determination of molecular features to describe and understand which group of patients will benefit most from a given treatment method. This is important because a larger group of patients treated for ovarian cancer can have a greater chance of surviving longer without recurrence.

Phase 1b study of mirvetuximab soravtansine, a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, in combination with carboplatin and bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the antitumor activity and safety profile of the triplet combination of mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), carboplatin, and bevacizumab in recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Participants with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (1-2 prior lines of therapy) received MIRV (6 mg/kg adjusted ideal body weight), carboplatin (AUC5), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) once every 3 weeks. Carboplatin could be discontinued after 6 cycles per investigator discretion; continuation of MIRV+bevacizumab as maintenance therapy was permitted. Eligibility included folate receptor alpha (FRα) expression by immunohistochemistry (≥50% of cells with ≥2+ intensity; PS2+ scoring); prior bevacizumab was allowed. Tumor response, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-one participants received triplet therapy, with a median of 6, 12, and 13 cycles of carboplatin, MIRV, and bevacizumab, respectively. The confirmed objective response rate was 83% (9 complete and 25 partial responses). The median DOR was 10.9 months; median PFS was 13.5 months. AEs (any grade) occurred as expected, based on each agent's safety profile; most common were diarrhea (83%), nausea (76%), fatigue (73%), thrombocytopenia (71%), and blurred vision (68%). Most cases were mild to moderate (grade ≤2), except for thrombocytopenia, for which most drug-related discontinuations occurred, and neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

This triplet regimen (MIRV+carboplatin+bevacizumab) was highly active, with a tolerable AE profile in participants with recurrent, platinum-sensitive, FRα-expressing ovarian cancer. Thrombocytopenia was the primary cause of dose modifications. These outcomes compare favorably to historical data reported for platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab regimens in similar patient populations.

Strategies to reprogram anti-inflammatory macrophages towards pro-inflammatory macrophages to support cancer immunotherapies

Tumor-associated myeloid cells, including macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, can be highly prevalent in solid tumors and play a significant role in the development of the tumor. Therefore, myeloid cells are being considered potential targets for cancer immunotherapies. In this review, we focused on strategies aimed at targeting tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Most strategies were studied preclinically but we also included a limited number of clinical studies based on these strategies. We describe possible underlying mechanisms and discuss future challenges and prospects.

Prospects and challenges of CAR-T in the treatment of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer ranks as the seventh most prevalent cancer among women and is considered the most lethal gynecological malignancy on a global scale. The absence of reliable screening techniques, coupled with the insidious onset of nonspecific symptoms, often results in a delayed diagnosis, typically at an advanced stage characterized by peritoneal involvement. Management of advanced tumors typically involves a combination of chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery. However, the therapeutic arsenal for ovarian cancer patients remains limited, highlighting the unmet need for precise, targeted, and sustained-release pharmacological agents. Genetically engineered T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) represent a promising novel therapeutic modality that selectively targets specific antigens, demonstrating robust and enduring antitumor responses in numerous patients. CAR T cell therapy has exhibited notable efficacy in hematological malignancies and is currently under investigation for its potential in treating various solid tumors, including ovarian cancer. Currently, numerous researchers are engaged in the development of novel CAR-T cells designed to target ovarian cancer, with subsequent evaluation of these candidate cells in preclinical studies. Given the ability of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) expressing T cells to elicit potent and long-lasting anti-tumor effects, this therapeutic approach holds significant promise for the treatment of ovarian cancer. This review article examines the utilization of CAR-T cells in the context of ovarian cancer therapy.

Efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic drug monotherapy and combination therapy for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

As the development of novel anti-angiogenic drugs and the continuous evolution of guideline recommendations, the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic agents in ovarian cancer (OC) remains unclear. Consequently, a meta-analysis was carried out to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic drug monotherapy and combination therapy for OC.

Methods

An exhaustive literature review was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane, encompassing all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up until 6 April 2024. The evaluation of efficacy outcomes incorporated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). Safety was assessed through the occurrence of any grade adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs. Synthesis of the data involved the calculation of hazard ratios (HRs), relative risks (RRs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and prediction intervals (PIs). Trial sequential analysis was executed employing TSA v0.9.5.10 Beta software, STATA 12.0, and R software 4.3.1.

Results

In this meta-analysis, 35 RCTs were included, encompassing 16,199 subjects in total. The overall analysis indicated that anti-angiogenic drug combination therapy significantly improved PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.678 [0.606-0.759], 95% PI: 0.415-1.108), OS (HR [95% CI] = 0.917 [0.870-0.966], 95% PI: 0.851-0.984), and ORR (RR [95% CI] = 1.441 [1.287-1.614], 95% PI: 1.032-2.014), but also increased the incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.137 [1.099-1.177], 95% PI: 1.011-1.252). The analysis did not corroborate any benefit of anti-angiogenic monotherapy over placebo concerning PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.956 [0.709-1.288], 95% PI: 0.345-2.645) and OS (HR [95% CI] = 1.039 [0.921-1.173], 95% PI: 0.824-1.331). However, it was observed that monotherapy with anti-angiogenic drugs did increase the incidence of any grade AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.072 [1.036-1.109], 95% PI: 0.709-1.592).

Conclusion

Our study confirmed the PFS, OS, and ORR benefits of anti-angiogenic drug combination therapy for OC patients. The efficacy results of anti-angiogenic monotherapy necessitates further evaluation as more RCTs become available. Clinicians should be vigilant of AEs when administering anti-angiogenic agents in a clinical setting.

Oncogenic Pathways and Targeted Therapies in Ovarian Cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the most aggressive forms of gynaecological malignancies. Survival rates for women diagnosed with OC remain poor as most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Debulking surgery and platinum-based therapies are the current mainstay for OC treatment. However, and despite achieving initial remission, a significant portion of patients will relapse because of innate and acquired resistance, at which point the disease is considered incurable. In view of this, novel detection strategies and therapeutic approaches are needed to improve outcomes and survival of OC patients. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of the genetic landscape and molecular pathways underpinning OC and its many subtypes. By examining therapeutic strategies explored in preclinical and clinical settings, we highlight the importance of decoding how single and convergent genetic alterations co-exist and drive OC progression and resistance to current treatments. We also propose that core signalling pathways such as the PI3K and MAPK pathways play critical roles in the origin of diverse OC subtypes and can become new targets in combination with known DNA damage repair pathways for the development of tailored and more effective anti-cancer treatments.

Germline predictors for bevacizumab induced hypertensive crisis in ECOG-ACRIN 5103 and BEATRICE

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab is a beneficial therapy in several advanced cancer types. Predictive biomarkers to better understand which patients are destined to benefit or experience toxicity are needed. Associations between bevacizumab induced hypertension and survival have been reported but with conflicting conclusions.

METHODS

We performed post-hoc analyses to evaluate the association in 3124 patients from two phase III adjuvant breast cancer trials, E5103 and BEATRICE. Differences in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with hypertension and those without were compared. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 mmHg (n = 346) and SBP ≥ 180 mmHg (hypertensive crisis) (n = 69). Genomic analyses were performed to evaluate germline genetic predictors for the hypertensive crisis.

RESULTS

Hypertensive crisis was significantly associated with superior IDFS (p = 0.015) and OS (p = 0.042), but only IDFS (p = 0.029; HR = 0.28) remained significant after correction for prognostic factors. SBP ≥ 160 mmHg was not associated with either IDFS or OS. A common single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs6486785, was significantly associated with hypertensive crisis (p = 8.4 × 10-9; OR = 5.2).

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab-induced hypertensive crisis is associated with superior outcomes and rs6486785 predicted an increased risk of this key toxicity.

A systematic review of ethnic minority participation in randomised controlled trials of systemic therapies for gynecological cancers

OBJECTIVE

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) must include ethnic minority patients to produce generalisable findings and ensure health equity as cancer incidence rises globally. This systematic review examines participation of ethnic minorities in RCTs of licensed systemic anti-cancer therapies (SACT) for gynecological cancers, defining the research population and distribution of research sites to identify disparities in participation on the global scale.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Phase II and III RCTs of licensed therapies for gynecological cancers published 01/11/2012-01/11/2022 that reported patient race/ethnicity were included. Extracted data included race/ethnicity and research site location. RCT populations were aggregated and participation of groups compared. Global distribution of research sites was described.

RESULTS

26 RCTs met inclusion criteria of 351 publications included in full-text screening, representing 17,041 patients. 79.8% were "Caucasian", 9.1% "East Asian", 3.7% "Black/African American" and 6.1% "Other, Unknown, Not Reported". "Caucasian" patients participated at higher rates than all other groups. Of 5,478 research sites, 80.1% were located in North America, 13.0% in Europe, 3.4% in East Asia, 1.3% in the Middle East, 1.3% in South America and 0.8% in Australasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnic minorities formed smaller proportions of RCT cohorts compared to the general population. The majority of sites were located in North America and Europe, with few in other regions, limiting enrollment of South Asian, South-East Asian and African patients in particular. Efforts to recruit more ethnic minority patients should be made in North America and Europe. More sites in underserved regions would promote equitable access to RCTs and ensure findings are generalisable to diverse groups. This review assessed the global population enrolled in contemporary RCTs for novel therapies now routinely given for gynecological cancers, adding novel understanding of the global distribution of research sites.

Current treatment strategies for ovarian cancer in the East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT)

Ovarian cancer, notable for its severe prognosis among gynecologic cancers, has seen substantial progress in treatment approaches recently. Enhanced protocols in chemotherapy and the introduction of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for maintenance therapy have markedly improved outcomes for patients with specific genetic profiles, such as those positive for BRCA mutations or exhibiting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Additionally, the method of intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration has emerged as a valuable alternative to traditional transvenous routes, showing promise for wider clinical adoption. The field of surgery has also evolved, with increasing exploration into the benefits and feasibility of laparoscopic methods over more invasive traditional surgeries, aiming for complete tumor removal but with reduced patient impact. The hereditary nature of ovarian cancer underscores the importance of genetic testing, which has become integral in tailoring treatment strategies, particularly in determining suitability for PARP inhibitors. The formation of the East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT) aims to optimize treatment across Japan, Korea, China, and Taiwan. The ovarian cancer committee of EAGOT shared the current policies, focusing on 5 topics: 1) strategies for maintenance therapy after initial surgery and chemotherapy, 2) drug regimens for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrence, 3) intraperitoneal chemotherapy, 4) laparoscopic surgery as an alternative to laparotomy, and 5) current status of genetic testing (BRCA, HRD, and panel tests) for ovarian cancer and its prospects. EAGOT's multi-national trials aim to harmonize these evolving treatment strategies, ensuring that the latest and most effective protocols are accessible across the region, thereby significantly impacting patient outcomes in East Asia.

Effect of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer on wound healing in patients: A meta-analysis

In this meta-analysis, we reviewed the findings and definitive findings of a new study that assessed the impact of bevacizumab on wound healing following combined chemotherapy for ovarian cancer (OC). The results of a controlled study that assessed the efficacy of bevacizumab in the treatment of ovarian cancer were retrieved from 4 databases, such as the Web of Science and EMBASE. The results of the adverse event associated with wound healing were determined by comparison of the controlled studies of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer. A meta-analysis was conducted with either a randomized or a fixed-effect model in order to establish an odds ratio for time to event variables and for a binary outcome. In the research literature, 830 trials have been identified and seven have been chosen to be included in a definitive analysis of the trial. Among the 4134 cases who received chemotherapy after operation, 2098 received standard chemotherapy and 2036 received the addition of bevacizumab. A total of 7 trials have shown that the use of bevacizumab in the treatment of ovarian cancer patients has reduced wound healing (OR, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.80, p = 0.002). Four trials demonstrated that there was no change in the incidence of haemorrhage in patients with ovarian cancer when administered with or without bevacizumab (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.10, 2.34, p = 0.37). The combined use of bevacizumab and chemotherapy may have a negative effect on the healing of wound.

Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors combined with antiangiogenic agents in the maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor and antiangiogenic agent monotherapy have shown to be effective as maintenance treatment in patients with ovarian cancer (OC). However, there is currently a lack of evidence-based study to directly compare the effects of combination therapy with these two drugs. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents in women with OC using a meta-analysis. Methods: An exhaustive search of literature was undertaken using multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up until 17 December 2023. The data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were pooled. We computed the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS and OS, along with the relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for AEs. Trial sequential analysis, heterogeneity test, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed. Stata 12.0 and Software R 4.3.1 were utilized for all analyses. Results: This meta-analysis included 7 RCTs with a total of 3,388 participants. The overall analysis revealed that combination therapy of PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.615, 95% CI = 0.517-0.731; 95% PI = 0.379-0.999), but also increased the risk of AEs, including urinary tract infection (RR = 1.500, 95% CI = 1.114-2.021; 95% PI = 0.218-10.346), fatigue (RR = 1.264, 95% CI = 1.141-1.400; 95% PI = 1.012-1.552), headache (RR = 1.868, 95% CI = 1.036-3.369; 95% PI = 0.154-22.642), anorexia (RR = 1.718, 95% CI = 1.320-2.235; 95% PI = 0.050-65.480), and hypertension (RR = 5.009, 95% CI = 1.103-22.744; 95% PI = 0.016-1580.021) compared with PARP inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent monotherapy. Our study has not yet confirmed the benefit of combination therapy on OS in OC patients (HR = 0.885, 95% CI = 0.737-1.063). Additionally, subgroup analyses further showed that combination therapy resulted in an increased risk of AEs, encompassing thrombocytopenia, vomiting, abdominal pain, proteinuria, fatigue, headache, anorexia, and hypertension (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the PFS benefit of combination therapy with PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents in patients with OC. The OS result need to be updated after the original trial data is mature. Clinicians should be vigilant of AEs when administering the combination therapy in clinical practice. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023494482.