Avelumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum failure (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): pooled results from two expansion cohorts of an open-label, phase 1 trial

Early dynamics of clinical and laboratory parameters predict primary refractory disease in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving atezolizumab

BACKGROUND

In patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) receiving programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, it is critically important to identify primary refractory patients very early to enable modification of therapy before clinical progression and decline of performance status. We hypothesized that baseline and early-on-treatment (EOT) parameters may help identify patients likely to have primary refractory disease.

METHODS

We considered baseline and EOT variables measured up to 5 weeks after initiating therapy in the phase 3 clinical trial IMvigor211, which compared atezolizumab versus chemotherapy, in muC patients who had progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-regularized logistic regression models to predict the risk of primary refractory disease employing clinical and laboratory variables.

RESULTS

902 patients were evaluable for analysis. Our baseline model achieves an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.730, 0.717 for the atezolizumab group and 0.696 for the chemotherapy group. The AUC increases to 0.848 overall with EOT parameters, 0.871 for the atezolizumab group and 0.788 for the chemotherapy group. The EOT model suggests that 33.7% of patients receiving atezolizumab may benefit from switching to chemotherapy, reducing their risk of primary refractoriness from 67.1% to 51.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our prediction model employs readily available and routinely measured clinical and laboratory factors, such as urine-specific gravity, presence of liver metastases, and total protein and erythrocyte counts. It robustly identifies patients with early primary refractory disease to atezolizumab before clinical progression and may inform therapeutic decisions. Validation in larger independent cohorts and other treatments is required.

Clinical development of immuno-oncology therapeutics

Immuno-oncology (IO) is one of the fastest growing therapeutic areas within oncology. IO agents work indirectly via the host's adaptive and innate immune system to recognize and eradicate tumor cells. Despite checkpoint inhibitors being only introduced to the market since 2011, they have become the second most approved product category. Current Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved classes of IO agents include: immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), bi-specific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody therapy, T-cell receptor (TCR) engineered T cell therapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, cytokine therapy, cancer vaccine therapy, and oncolytic virus therapy. Cancer immunotherapy has made progress in multiple cancer types including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and urothelial carcinoma; however, several cancers remain refractory to immunotherapy. Future directions of IO include exploration in the neoadjuvant/perioperative setting, combination strategies, and optimizing patient selection through improved biomarkers.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy versus platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment of advanced urothelial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Recent clinical trials have shown that inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (programmed cell death-ligand 1 [PD-L1]) provide significant efficacy and clinical benefit in the treatment of advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy versus platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced UC.

Materials and methods

From the beginning of the database construction to February 4, 2024, a combination of medical subject headings and free-text words was searched using the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Study design framework. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched. Meta-analyses of progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), complete remission rate, duration of remission, and grade ≥3 adverse events were performed.

Results

Four studies were included in the meta-analysis. The PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy therapy is associated with significantly better ORR compared with chemotherapy. Unfortunately, there were no significant differences between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy and chemotherapy in terms of ORR, duration of remission, or overall survival.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy therapy provides more oncological advantages than standard chemotherapy and should be recommended as a first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic UC. Attention must also be paid to the adverse effects of the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy.

mRNA vaccines for prostate cancer: A novel promising immunotherapy

The treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PCa) primarily based on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); however, patients inevitably progress to the castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) stage. Despite the recent advancements in CRPC treatment with novel endocrine drugs that further inhibit androgen receptor signaling, resistance ultimately develops, underscoring the urgent need for new effective therapeutic strategies. Therapeutic cancer vaccines, a form of immunotherapy, exert anti-cancer effects by activating the host's immune system. Over the past few decades, various conventional therapeutic PCa vaccines based on cells, microbes, proteins, peptides, or DNA have been developed and tested in patients with advanced PCa. These attempts have largely failed to improve survival, with the sole exception of sipuleucel-T, which extended the median overall survival of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) patients by four months. The rapid development and high efficacy of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic have garnered worldwide attention. Compared to conventional vaccines, mRNA vaccines offer several unique advantages, including high production efficiency, low cost, high safety, strong immune response induction, and high adaptability and precision. These attributes make mRNA vaccines a promising frontier in the treatment of advanced PCa.

Asparagine drives immune evasion in bladder cancer via RIG-I stability and type I IFN signaling

Tumor cells often employ many ways to restrain type I IFN signaling to evade immune surveillance. However, whether cellular amino acid metabolism regulates this process remains unclear, and its effects on antitumor immunity are relatively unexplored. Here, we found that asparagine inhibited IFN-I signaling and promoted immune escape in bladder cancer. Depletion of asparagine synthetase (ASNS) strongly limited in vivo tumor growth in a CD8+ T cell-dependent manner and boosted immunotherapy efficacy. Moreover, clinically approved L-asparaginase (ASNase),synergized with anti-PD-1 therapy in suppressing tumor growth. Mechanistically, asparagine can directly bind to RIG-I and facilitate CBL-mediated RIG-I degradation, thereby suppressing IFN signaling and antitumor immune responses. Clinically, tumors with higher ASNS expression show decreased responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Together, our findings uncover asparagine as a natural metabolite to modulate RIG-I-mediated IFN-I signaling, providing the basis for developing the combinatorial use of ASNase and anti-PD-1 for bladder cancer.

Phase 2 trial of perioperative chemo-immunotherapy for gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma: The role of M2 macrophage landscape in predicting response

We present the clinical results of a phase 2 trial combining neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, 5 Flourouracil, and the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab in locally advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). Fifty-one patients receive neoadjuvant therapy with 50 proceeding to surgery. Grade 3-4 adverse events occur in 40%; complete/major pathological response is found in 7/50 (14%) and 9/50 (18%), with 2-year disease-free survival of 67.5%. There is no correlation between tumor regression and PD-L1 or mismatch repair (MMR) status. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and longitudinal single-cell transcriptomic profiling reveal alterations in certain innate immune cell populations, particularly noting an M2-tumor-associated macrophage (M2-TAM) proliferation in non-responding tumors. These findings describe the effective nature of this treatment regimen for GEA and reveal associated features of the inflammatory milieux associated with response to chemo-immunotherapy. The specific character of the inflammatory environment in non-responders may, in the future, help personalize treatment. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03288350).

A phase II study of lurbinectedin with or without avelumab in small cell carcinoma of the bladder (laser)-design and rationale

Small cell carcinoma of the bladder is a rare, aggressive malignancy accounting for less than 1% of all bladder malignancies. Treatment regimens are drawn from the small cell lung cancer (SCLC) literature, with platinum and etoposide commonly used in the first-line setting. Unfortunately, responses are generally short-lived, and most patients relapse. There is little evidence to guide selection of later lines of therapy. Lurbinectedin is an alkylating agent with accelerated US FDA approval for use in patients with SCLC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have also been approved for SCLC, improving survival when added to chemotherapy. This article describes the design and rationale behind LASER, an open-label phase II trial of lurbinectedin with or without avelumab.Clinical trial registration: NCT06228066 (ClinicalTrial.gov).

TBX3 shapes an immunosuppressive microenvironment and induces immunotherapy resistance

Background: Identifying biomarkers that predict immunotherapy efficacy and discovering new targets for combination therapies are critical elements for improving the prognosis of bladder cancer (BLCA) patients. Methods: Firstly, we explored the expression patterns of TBX3 in normal and pan-cancer tissues and the correlation between TBX3 and the immune microenvironment using data from multiple public databases. Then, we combined various techniques, including bulk RNA sequencing, single-cell RNA sequencing, high-throughput cytokine arrays, functional experiments, ProcartaPlex multiplex immunoassays and TissueFAXS panoramic tissue quantification assays, to demonstrate that TBX3 shapes an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in BLCA. Results: We identified TBX3 as a key factor associated with the immunosuppressive microenvironment in BLCA through a systematic multi-omics analysis. We found that TBX3 is primarily expressed in malignant cells, where TBX3high tumor cells increase the secretion of TGFβ1, which promotes the infiltration of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), thereby forming an immunosuppressive microenvironment. We further demonstrated that TBX3 enhances TGFβ1 expression by binding to the TGFβ1 promoter, and blocking TGFβ1 counteracts the immunosuppressive effects of TBX3. Moreover, TBX3 reduced the cancer-killing efficiency of CD8+ T cells by decreasing the proportion of GZMB+ CD8+ T cells, and knocking down TBX3 combined with anti-PD-1 treatment increased CD8+ T cell infiltration and reduced CAFs in vivo. We also validated the inverse relationship between TBX3+ malignant cells and CD8+ T cells and the positive relationship with CAFs in tissue microarrays. Lastly, we found that TBX3 predicted immunotherapy efficacy in our real-world immunotherapy cohort and multiple public cohorts. Conclusion: In summary, TBX3 promotes BLCA progression and immunotherapy resistance by inducing an immunosuppressive microenvironment, and targeting TBX3 could enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy for BLCA.

Unveiling FDA-approved Drugs and Formulations in the Management of Bladder Cancer: A Review

Urological cancers are one of the most prevalent malignancies around the globe. Specifically, bladder cancer severely threatens the health of humans because of its heterogeneous and aggressive nature. Extensive studies have been conducted for many years in order to address the limitations associated with the treatment of solid tumors with selective substances. This article aims to provide a summary of the therapeutic drugs that have received FDA approval or are presently in the testing phase for use in the prevention or treatment of bladder cancer. In this review, FDA-approved drugs for bladder cancer treatment have been listed along with their dose protocols, current status, pharmacokinetics, action mechanisms, and marketed products. The article also emphasizes the novel preparations of these drugs that are presently under clinical trials or are in the approval stage. Thus, this review will serve as a single point of reference for scientists involved in the formulation development of these drugs.

A comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment

Immunology-based therapies are emerging as an effective cancer treatment, using the body's immune system to target tumors. Immune checkpoints, which regulate immune responses to prevent tissue damage and autoimmunity, are often exploited by cancer cells to avoid destruction. The discovery of checkpoint proteins like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 was pivotal in developing cancer immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown great success, with FDA-approved drugs like PD-1 inhibitors (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab), PD-L1 inhibitors (Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Avelumab), and CTLA-4 inhibitors (Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab), alongside LAG-3 inhibitor Relatlimab. Research continues on new checkpoints like TIM-3, VISTA, B7-H3, BTLA, and TIGIT. Biomarkers like PDL-1 expression, tumor mutation burden, interferon-γ presence, microbiome composition, and extracellular matrix characteristics play a crucial role in predicting responses to immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Despite their effectiveness, not all patients experience the same level of benefit, and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as rash or itching, colitis, diarrhea, hyperthyroidism, and hypothyroidism may occur. Given the rapid advancements in this field and the variability in patient outcomes, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive review that consolidates the latest findings on immune checkpoint inhibitors, covering their clinical status, biomarkers, resistance mechanisms, strategies to overcome resistance, and associated adverse effects. This review aims to fill this gap by providing an analysis of the current clinical status of ICIs, emerging biomarkers, mechanisms of resistance, strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy, and assessment of adverse effects. This review is crucial to furthering our understanding of ICIs and optimizing their application in cancer therapy.

Liquid biopsy: paving a new avenue for cancer research

The current constraints associated with cancer diagnosis and molecular profiling, which rely on invasive tissue biopsies or clinical imaging, have spurred the emergence of the liquid biopsy field. Liquid biopsy involves the extraction of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating free or circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA or ctDNA), circulating cell-free RNA (cfRNA), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) from bodily fluid samples. Subsequently, these components undergo molecular characterization to identify biomarkers that are critical for early cancer detection, prognosis, therapeutic assessment, and post-treatment monitoring. These innovative biosources exhibit characteristics analogous to those of the primary tumor from which they originate or interact. This review comprehensively explores the diverse technologies and methodologies employed for processing these biosources, along with their principal clinical applications.

Targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

PURPOSE

The activity of targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced bladder cancer is reviewed.

SUMMARY

Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer. Pembrolizumab is approved alone as first-line therapy for patients who are ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy and with enfortumab for patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Avelumab is approved for maintenance therapy in patients who have not progressed with first-line platinum-containing therapy. Pembrolizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab are approved second-line therapy in patients who experience progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Erdafitinib is indicated for advanced disease that has susceptible FGFR2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and has progressed during or after treatment with at least one line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are antibody-drug conjugates. They are both approved for patients who have received anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 therapy and treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab is also indicated for patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin-based therapy and have received one or more prior lines of therapy.

CONCLUSION

Six targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have been approved for patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. They all have demonstrated activity in patients for whom disease has progressed during or after platinum-based therapy. Pembrolizumab, with and without enfortumab, has demonstrated first-line activity, and avelumab is a key maintenance therapy after first-line treatment. The results of additional clinical trials should provide evidence to establish the exact role in therapy of each agent in patients with advanced disease.

The roles of migrasomes in immunity, barriers, and diseases

Migrasomes are recently identified extracellular vesicles and organelles formed in conjunction with cell migration. They are situated at the rear of migrating cells, exhibit a circular or elliptical membrane-enclosed structure, and function as a new organelle. Migrasomes selectively sort intercellular components, mediating a cell migration-dependent release mechanism known as migracytosis and modulating cell-cell communication. Accumulated evidence clarifies migrasome formation processes and indicates their diverse functional roles. Migrasomes may also be potentially correlated with the occurrence, progression, and prognosis of certain diseases. Migrasomes' involvement in physiological and pathological processes highlights their potential for expanding our understanding of biological procedures and as a target in clinical therapy. However, the precise mechanisms and full extent of their involvement in immunity, barriers, and diseases remain unclear. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the roles of migrasomes in human immunity and barriers, in addition to providing insights into their impact on human diseases. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Migrasomes, newly identified extracellular vesicles and organelles, form during cell migration and are located at the rear of migrating cells. These circular or elliptical structures mediate migracytosis, selectively sorting intercellular components and modulating cell-cell communication. Evidence suggests diverse functional roles for migrasomes, including potential links to disease occurrence, progression, and prognosis. Their involvement in physiological and pathological processes highlights their significance in understanding biological procedures and potential clinical therapies. However, their exact mechanisms in immunity, barriers, and diseases remain unclear. This review provides an overview of migrasomes' roles in human immunity and barriers, and their impact on diseases.

Narrative review on efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenesis in combination with immunotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer

Background and Objective

Breast cancer was the second frequently diagnosed cancer in 2022 among all cancers. Besides classical chemotherapy and radiation, immunotherapy and targeted therapy are both identical treatment options for patients with advanced breast cancer. Immunotherapy is a therapeutic approach to control and eliminate tumors by restarting and maintaining the tumor-immunity cycle and restoring the body's normal anti-tumor immune response. Immunotherapy alone or in combination with other therapies has been shown to be clinically beneficial in a variety of solid tumors with a manageable safety profile. However, immunotherapy alone cannot fully satisfy the therapeutic needs for patients with breast cancer. Therefore, there is an urgent need for immunotherapy to be combined with other therapeutic approaches to increase treatment efficacy.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed database for relevant studies published over the past 5 years. Articles were screened for eligibility and key data extracted.

Key Content and Findings

We assess the current breast cancer treatment landscape, summarizing efficacy and safety of recent immunotherapy, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy. In the treatment of breast cancer, aiming to promote further research and applications of this novel treatment regimen in patients with breast cancer. Since anti-angiogenic therapy can reprogramme the tumor immune microenvironment, immunotherapy in combination with anti-angiogenic therapy might have a synergistic effect, igniting a new hope for immunotherapy for breast cancer patients. The review's conclusions offer insightful information on the state of breast cancer treatment today. In the end, improving clinical practice and pertinent research for immunotherapy combination therapy will contribute to bettering patient outcomes, raising quality of life, and creating more potent treatments.

Conclusions

This review emphasizes the potential of immunotherapy combinations, especially with anti-angiogenic therapeutic regimens, as a viable strategy for the treatment of breast cancer through a thorough study of the literature. To improve treatment approaches, lessen side effects for patients, and find trustworthy biomarkers to forecast response to immunotherapy combo medicines, further research is necessary.

Immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: an abridged Cochrane review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy as first- and second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

Based on a published protocol, we performed a systematic search of multiple databases. Two review authors independently performed the literature selection, identified relevant studies, assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, and extracted data. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the quality of the evidence on a per-outcome basis according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

We included five randomised controlled trials and also identified seven single-arm studies. When used as first-line therapy, immunotherapy probably has little to no effect on the risk of death from any cause compared to chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.07; moderate-certainty evidence). immunotherapy probably has little to no effect on health-related quality of life (mean difference [MD] 4.10, 95% CI 3.83-4.37; moderate). Immunotherapy probably reduces grade 3-5 adverse events (risk ratio [RR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.75; moderate). In the second-line setting immunotherapy may reduce the risk of death from any cause (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.81; low). Immunotherapy may have little to no effect on health-related quality of life when compared to chemotherapy (MD 4.82, 95% CI -3.11 to 12.75; low). Immunotherapy may reduce grade 3-5 adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97; low).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to chemotherapy, immunotherapy has little to no effect on the risk of death from any cause in a first-line setting. Nevertheless, it may reduce the risk of death from any cause when used as second-line therapy. The health-related quality of life of participants receiving first- and second-line therapy does not appear to be affected by immunotherapy. Immunotherapy probably reduces or may reduce grade 3-5 adverse events when used as first- and second-line therapy, respectively.

HLA-E and NKG2A Mediate Resistance to M. bovis BCG Immunotherapy in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the primary treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), known to stimulate inflammatory cytokines, notably interferon (IFN)-γ. We observed that prolonged IFN-γ exposure fosters adaptive resistance in recurrent tumors, aiding immune evasion and tumor proliferation. We identify HLA-E and NKG2A, part of a novel NK and T cell checkpoint pathway, as key mediators of resistance in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. IFN-γ enhances HLA-E and PD-L1 expression in recurrent tumors, with an enrichment of intra-tumoral NKG2A-expressing NK and CD8 T cells. CXCL9+ macrophages and dendritic cells and CXCL12-expressing stromal cells likely recruit CXCR3/CXCR4-expressing NK and T cells and CXCR7+ HLA-EHIGH tumor cells. NK and CD8 T cells remain functional within BCG-unresponsive tumors but are inhibited by HLA-E and PD-L1, providing a framework for combined NKG2A and PD-L1 blockade strategy for bladder-sparing treatment of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

Efficacy of trametinib in a metastatic urothelial carcinoma patient with a BRAF mutation

Introduction

BRAF mutations in bladder cancer are rare. MEK inhibitors have excellent clinical benefits in the treatment of melanoma.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old male was diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and underwent total cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. Despite 4 cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy and 3 courses of pembrolizumab, the left obturator lymph node enlarged. Cancer multi-gene panel testing confirmed the BRAF G469A mutation and trametinib was recommended. Three months after the initiation of trametinib (2 mg, qd), the left obturator lymph node shrank by more than 50%. The disease has remained stable for more than 18 months.

Conclusion

The present case indicates the potential of trametinib to treat mBUC patients with the BRAF G469A mutation in this setting.

Urine scRNAseq reveals new insights into the bladder tumor immune microenvironment

Due to bladder tumors' contact with urine, urine-derived cells (UDCs) may serve as a surrogate for monitoring the tumor microenvironment (TME) in bladder cancer (BC). However, the composition of UDCs and the extent to which they mirror the tumor remain poorly characterized. We generated the first single-cell RNA-sequencing of BC patient UDCs with matched tumor and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). BC urine was more cellular than healthy donor (HD) urine, containing multiple immune populations including myeloid cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, B cells, and dendritic cells (DCs) in addition to tumor and stromal cells. Immune UDCs were transcriptionally more similar to tumor than blood. UDCs encompassed cytotoxic and activated CD4+ T cells, exhausted and tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells, macrophages, germinal-center-like B cells, tissue-resident and adaptive NK cells, and regulatory DCs found in tumor but lacking or absent in blood. Our findings suggest BC UDCs may be surrogates for the TME and serve as therapeutic biomarkers.

Recent developments and future directions of first-line systemic therapy combined with immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a historical perspective on treatment evolution

Urothelial carcinoma presents significant treatment challenges, especially in advanced stages. Traditionally managed with platinum-based chemotherapy, the advent of immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized urothelial carcinoma treatment. This review explores the evolution of urothelial carcinoma management, focusing on the transition from immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy to innovative combination therapies. Pembrolizumab, following the KEYNOTE-045 trial, emerged as a pivotal ICI in pretreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma, outperforming traditional chemotherapy. However, limitations surfaced in untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients, particularly in those with low PD-L1 expression, as evidenced by trials like IMvigor130 and KEYNOTE-361. These challenges led to the exploration of combination therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors with platinum-based chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Notably, the CheckMate 901 trial demonstrated improved outcomes with a nivolumab-chemotherapy combination. A significant breakthrough was achieved with the combination of enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugates, and pembrolizumab, setting a new standard in first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Future directions involve further exploration of antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors, as seen in the TROPHY-U-01 and TROPiCS-4 trials. The review concludes that the locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treatment landscape is rapidly evolving, with combination therapies offering promising avenues for improved patient outcomes, signaling a new era in urothelial carcinoma management.

The rapidly changing treatment landscape of first-line advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)

The landscape of treatment for first-line therapy in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) and metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) has rapidly changed in the last year alone. Maintenance avelumab remains a viable treatment option for many patients across the globe for those who have responded or have achieved stable disease after platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the recent FDA approvals based on EV-302 for enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab, as well as CheckMate-904 with gemcitabine and cisplatin with nivolumab (GC+N) followed by maintenance nivolumab have left clinicians with the complicated decision of determining which regimen is most appropriate for their individual patients with untreated aUC. This commentary highlights the key trials that have set the standard-of-care for front-line aUC treatment and suggestions for choosing different regimens for the appropriate patient.

The Feasibility and Diagnostic Adequacy of PD-L1 Expression Analysis Using the Cytoinclusion Technique in Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Single-Center Study

Background: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been recognized as a potential biomarker for various cancers, yet its diagnostic and prognostic significance in urothelial bladder cancer (BCa) requires further investigation. Methods: In this prospective single-center study, we aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic adequacy of PD-L1 expression analysis using cytoinclusion in BCa patients. We enrolled consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), repeat TURBT, or robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Urinary and tissue specimens were collected from these patients for cytoinclusion and histopathological analysis to evaluate PD-L1 expression. Results: Out of 29 patients, PD-L1 expression was detected from cytoinclusion in 42.8% (3 out of 7), 10% (1 out of 10), and 66.8% (8 out of 12) of patients with negative/papilloma, low-grade, and high-grade tumors, respectively. Conversely, histopathological analysis identified PD-L1 expression in 57.2% (4 out of 7), 30% (3 out of 10), and 83.3% (10 out of 12) of patients with negative/papilloma, low-grade, and high-grade tumors, respectively. The diagnostic concordance between cytoinclusion and histopathology was 85.7%, 80%, and 83.3% in patients with negative/papilloma, low-grade, and high-grade tumors, respectively. Conclusions: Our study underscores the promise of cytoinclusion as a minimally invasive method for quantifying urinary PD-L1 percentages. This approach could serve as both a potential prognostic and diagnostic indicator, easily obtainable from urine samples. Standardizing this technique could facilitate its widespread use as a valuable tool.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Fundamental Mechanisms, Current Status and Future Directions

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a promising form of immunotherapy that have significantly changed the therapeutic landscape for many advanced cancers. They have shown unique clinical benefit against a broad range of tumour types and a strong overall impact on survival in studied patient populations. However, there are still many limitations holding back this immunotherapy from reaching its full potential as a possible curative option for advanced cancer patients. A great deal of research is being undertaken in the hope of driving advancements in this area, building a better understanding of the mechanisms behind immune checkpoint inhibition and ultimately developing more effective, safer, and wider-reaching agents. Taking into account the current literature on this topic, this review aims to explore in depth the basis of the use of ICIs in the treatment of advanced cancers, evaluate its efficacy and safety, consider its current limitations, and finally reflect on what the future holds for this very promising form of cancer immunotherapy.

A Podcast on Platinum Eligibility and Treatment Sequencing in Platinum-Eligible Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

The treatment landscape for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma continues to evolve. Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab has received Food and Drug Administration approval based on recent phase 3 trial data showing superior efficacy compared with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, its distinct toxicity profile may make it less suitable for some patients, and availability in some countries may be limited by cost considerations. Consequently, platinum-based chemotherapy is expected to remain an important first-line treatment option. Choice of platinum regimen (cisplatin- or carboplatin-based) is informed by assessment of clinical characteristics, including performance status, kidney function, and presence of peripheral neuropathy or heart failure. For patients without disease progression after completing platinum-based chemotherapy, avelumab first-line maintenance treatment is recommended by international guidelines. For patients who have disease progression, pembrolizumab is the preferred approach. Additionally, following results from a recent phase 3 trial, nivolumab plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy has also received Food and Drug Administration approval and is an additional first-line treatment option for cisplatin-eligible patients. Later-line options for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, depending on prior treatment, may include enfortumab vedotin, erdafitinib (for patients with FGFR2/3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements), sacituzumab govitecan, and platinum rechallenge. For the small proportion of patients ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy (i.e., unsuitable for cisplatin or carboplatin), immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab is a first-line treatment option, although approved agents vary between countries. In summary, this podcast discusses recent developments in the treatment landscape for advanced urothelial carcinoma, eligibility for platinum-based chemotherapy, potential first-line treatment options, and treatment sequencing. Supplementary file1 (MP4 246907 KB).

Navigating through novelties concerning mCRC treatment-the role of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy in mCRC

Over the course of nearly six decades since the inception of initial trials involving 5-FU in the treatment of mCRC (metastatic colorectal cancer), our progressive comprehension of the pathophysiology, genetics, and surgical techniques related to mCRC has paved the way for the introduction of novel therapeutic modalities. These advancements not only have augmented the overall survival but have also positively impacted the quality of life (QoL) for affected individuals. Despite the remarkable progress made in the last two decades in the development of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and target therapies, mCRC remains an incurable disease, with a 5-year survival rate of 14%. In this comprehensive review, our primary goal is to present an overview of mCRC treatment methods following the latest guidelines provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS). Emphasis has been placed on outlining treatment approaches encompassing chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and surgery's role in managing mCRC. Furthermore, our review delves into prospective avenues for developing new therapies, offering a glimpse into the future of alternative pathways that hold potential for advancing the field.

Investigating cellular similarities and differences between upper tract urothelial carcinoma and bladder urothelial carcinoma using single-cell sequencing

Background

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) both originate from uroepithelial tissue, sharing remarkably similar clinical manifestations and therapeutic modalities. However, emerging evidence suggests that identical treatment regimens may lead to less favorable outcomes in UTUC compared to BLCA. Therefore, it is imperative to explore molecular processes of UTUC and identify biological differences between UTUC and BLCA.

Methods

In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on three UTUC cases and four normal ureteral tissues. These data were combined with publicly available datasets from previous BLCA studies and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data for both cancer types. This pooled analysis allowed us to delineate the transcriptional differences among distinct cell subsets within the microenvironment, thus identifying critical factors contributing to UTUC progression and phenotypic differences between UTUC and BLCA.

Results

scRNA-seq analysis revealed seemingly similar but transcriptionally distinct cellular identities within the UTUC and BLCA ecosystems. Notably, we observed striking differences in acquired immunological landscapes and varied cellular functional phenotypes between these two cancers. In addition, we uncovered the immunomodulatory functions of vein endothelial cells (ECs) in UTUC, and intercellular network analysis demonstrated that fibroblasts play important roles in the microenvironment. Further intersection analysis showed that MARCKS promote UTUC progression, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining revealed that the diverse expression patterns of MARCKS in UTUC, BLCA and normal ureter tissues.

Conclusion

This study expands our multidimensional understanding of the similarities and distinctions between UTUC and BLCA. Our findings lay the foundation for further investigations to develop diagnostic and therapeutic targets for UTUC.

Frequency of next-generation sequencing, prevalence of targetable mutations and response to targeted therapies amongst patients with metastatic urothelial cancer in Ireland: a multi-centre retrospective study of real-world data

BACKGROUND

The genomic knowledge on urothelial carcinoma is expanding. It is recognised that urothelial carcinoma is a disease with a high somatic mutation rate and a high prevalence of genetic alterations, as discussed by Thomas and Sonpavde (2022). In the context of a disease rich with somatic alterations, continuing efforts to better identify which patients may benefit most from targeted therapy, immunotherapy and combination therapy may ultimately lead to improved outcomes for patients with this disease.

AIMS

We aimed to ascertain the frequency of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the prevalence of genomic alterations amongst patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) in Ireland. We studied patients who received a targeted therapy following the detection of an oncogenic alteration on NGS and assessed their outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of mUC between 2017 and 2022 were identified from Urology MDT databases as well as pharmacy databases across three Irish cancer centres. A retrospective review of patient notes including a comprehensive review of histopathology, radiology data, prior therapies and NGS reports was carried out for each patient.

RESULTS

111 patients diagnosed with mUC between 2017 and 2022 were identified for inclusion across three hospital sites. NGS was carried out on the tumour specimens of 66 patients (59%). Thirty-six potentially therapeutically targetable alterations were identified amongst thirty-five patients. The most frequent alterations identified were PIK3CA mutations, FGFR3 mutations or fusions and ERBB2 somatic mutations. Fifteen patients (13.5%) received therapy directed at a genetic alteration. The most common targeted therapy received was erdafitinib (60%) followed by trastuzumab (33%) with one patient receiving alpelisib monotherapy. The median duration of treatment with targeted therapy was 3 months (range 1-34 months). Two patients were observed to have durable responses to erdafitinib approaching 3 years duration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an understanding of the use of NGS and prevalence of genomic alterations in an Irish patient population.

RC48-Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study in China

OBJECTIVES

RC48 is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets HER2. In China, RC48 is approved for patients with HER-2-positive metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who have failed at least platinum-based chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate RC48 for mUC in a cohort of real-world patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 103 mUC patients from 12 centers between July 2021 and August 2023 in China. RC48 alone or with immunotherapy was administered until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, death, or other reasons. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 68 years, and 68.0% were men. Twenty-nine (28.2%) patients received RC48 alone; 73 (70.9%) received RC48 combination therapy. The response rates were as follows: complete response in 2 (1.9%) patients, partial response in 50 (48.5%) patients, stable disease in 30 (29.1%) patients. The ORR was 50.5%. In patients with ≥80 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2 and creatinine clearance rate (CCr) <30 mL/min, the ORR was 75%, 48.6%, and 40.0%, respectively. The median PFS was 6 (3.9-8.1) months, and the median OS was not reached. The most reported TRAEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy (53.4%), alopecia (42.7%), asthenia (38.8%), decreased appetite (35.9%) and weight loss (35.9%) and TRAE did not increase in patients with poor condition or impaired renal function.

CONCLUSION

Administration of RC48 for real-world patients is both effective and safe. mUC patients can benefit from RC48-based therapy, regardless of their poor condition or impaired renal function.

An updated review of immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: PD-L1 footprint

Esophageal cancer is considered one of the most significant challenges to public health worldwide. While various therapeutic options exist for esophageal cancer, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, several adverse effects of these medications have been reported. Therefore, a new generation of therapeutic lines should be applied to minimize complications. In this regard, immunotherapy is a novel approach that aims to kill tumor cells directly by targeting them. Specifically, monoclonal antibodies can target specific markers of esophageal cancer tumor cells, keeping other normal cells safe. Multiple monoclonal antibodies optimized for esophageal cancer, such as pembrolizumab, ramucirumab, trastuzumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab, are available. On the other hand, esophageal cancer tumor cells express a specific inhibitory ligand and its receptor called programmed cell death, which can suppress T cell immune responses. This receptor provides an inhibitory signal, causing the highest expression of the PD-L1 ligand on tumor cells. The outcomes of this interaction lead to the suppression of the activation and function of T lymphocytes. Therefore, immunotherapy for esophageal cancer targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has shown a remarkable correlation with cancer care. This study presents a comprehensive review of the latest findings related to immunotherapy in esophageal cancer.

How Immunotherapy Has Redefined the Treatment Paradigm of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma

In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for metastatic bladder cancer has expanded considerably, with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin, and anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor agents. Clinical trials evaluating ICIs as neoadjuvants, adjuvants, or first- or second-line treatments have produced conflicting results. However, first-line therapeutic strategies have been redefined by the recent publication of results from two clinical trials: CheckMate-901, which demonstrated the superiority of combined treatment with nivolumab and chemotherapy in extending overall survival, and EV-302, which demonstrated that combined treatment with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin reduced the risk of death by 53%. In this review, we discuss the role of ICIs, alone or in combination, in bladder cancer management in the metastatic and adjuvant settings in 2024, considering the latest published trials. The potential role of ICIs as neoadjuvants is also discussed.

Treatment Patterns and Attrition With Lines of Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in the US

Importance

The treatment paradigm for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has undergone substantial transformation due to the introduction of effective, novel therapeutic agents. However, outcomes remain poor, and little is known about current treatment approaches and attrition rates for patients with aUC.

Objectives

To delineate evolving treatment patterns and attrition rates in patients with aUC using a US-based patient-level sample.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study used patient-level data from the nationwide deidentified electronic health record database Flatiron Health, originating from approximately 280 oncology clinics across the US. Patients included in the analysis received treatment for metastatic or local aUC at a participating site from January 1, 2011, to January 31, 2023. Patients receiving treatment for 2 or more different types of cancer or participating in clinical trials were excluded from the analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize the (1) treatment received in each line (cisplatin-based regimens, carboplatin-based regimens, programmed cell death 1 and/or programmed cell death ligand 1 [PD-1/PD-L1] inhibitors, single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy, enfortumab vedotin, erdafitinib, sacituzumab govitecan, or others) and (2) attrition of patients with each line of therapy, defined as the percentage of patients not progressing to the next line.

Results

Of the 12 157 patients within the dataset, 7260 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis (5364 [73.9%] men; median age at the start of first-line treatment, 73 [IQR, 66-80] years). All patients commenced first-line treatment; of these, only 2714 (37.4%) progressed to receive second-line treatment, and 857 (11.8%) advanced to third-line treatment. The primary regimens used as first-line treatment contained carboplatin (2241 [30.9%]), followed by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (2174 [29.9%]). The PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors emerged as the predominant choice in the second- and third-line (1412 of 2714 [52.0%] and 258 of 857 [30.1%], respectively) treatments. From 2019 onward, novel therapeutic agents were increasingly used in second- and third-line treatments, including enfortumab vedotin (219 of 2714 [8.1%] and 159 of 857 [18.6%], respectively), erdafitinib (39 of 2714 [1.4%] and 28 of 857 [3.3%], respectively), and sacituzumab govitecan (14 of 2714 [0.5%] and 34 of 857 [4.0%], respectively).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that approximately two-thirds of patients with aUC did not receive second-line treatment. Most first-line treatments do not include cisplatin-based regimens and instead incorporate carboplatin- or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapies. These data warrant the provision of more effective and tolerable first-line treatments for patients with aUC.

Sacituzumab Govitecan in Combination With Pembrolizumab for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer That Progressed After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 3

PURPOSE

Pembrolizumab is standard therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progress after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, only approximately 21% of patients respond. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a trophoblast cell surface antigen-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate with US Food and Drug Administration-accelerated approval to treat patients with locally advanced or mUC who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). Here, we report the primary analysis of TROPHY-U-01 cohort 3.

METHODS

TROPHY-U-01 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label phase II study. Patients were CPI-naïve and had mUC progression after platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or ≤12 months in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Patients received 10 mg/kg of SG once on days 1 and 8 and 200 mg of pembrolizumab once on day 1 of 21-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per central review. Secondary end points included clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per central review, and safety.

RESULTS

Cohort 3 included 41 patients (median age 67 years; 83% male; 78% visceral metastases [29% liver]). With a median follow-up of 14.8 months, the ORR was 41% (95% CI, 26.3 to 57.9; 20% complete response rate), CBR was 46% (95% CI, 30.7 to 62.6), median DOR was 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.8 to not estimable [NE]), and median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.4 to 10.2). The median overall survival was 12.7 months (range, 10.7-NE). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61% of patients; most common were neutropenia (37%), leukopenia (20%), and diarrhea (20%).

CONCLUSION

SG plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a high response rate with an overall manageable toxicity profile in patients with mUC who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. No new safety signals were detected. These data support further evaluation of SG plus CPI in mUC.

TAS0313 plus Pembrolizumab for Post-Chemotherapy Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Naïve Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of TAS0313, a multi-epitope long peptide vaccine, plus pembrolizumab in post-chemotherapy immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). TAS0313 9 mg was administered subcutaneously followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg on Day 1, and as monotherapy on Day 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2, and Day 1 of subsequent cycles in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Biomarkers of response were assessed. In 36 patients enrolled, the ORR was 33.3% (complete response: 7 patients; partial response: 5 patients). Median PFS was 5.0 months; 6- and 12-month progression-free rates were 46.4% and 36.5%, respectively. Median OS was not reached; 6-, 12-, and 24-month OS rates were 83.3%, 72.2%, and 55.1%, respectively. In post hoc analysis, patients with a tumor infiltrating CD8+ lymphocyte (CD8+ TIL) count ≥99 and/or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥50 and lymphocyte count >1,380 cells/μL had higher ORRs and prolonged PFS versus patients with a CD8+ TIL count <99, PD-L1 CPS <50, and lymphocyte count ≤1,380 cells/μL. Thirty-four (94.4%) patients receiving combination therapy experienced treatment-related adverse events (AE), with pyrexia (n = 15, 41.7%), injection-site reactions (n = 15, 41.7%), injection-site induration (n = 6, 16.7%), and malaise (n = 6, 16.7%) the most common. No grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in ≥10% of patients. TAS0313 plus pembrolizumab combination therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in la/mUC. Clinical Trial Registration: JapicCTI-183824.

Safety and Efficacy Outcomes in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Treated Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Requiring Treatment Interruption or Discontinuation Due to Immune-Related Adverse Events

INTRODUCTION

As most patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) will be treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), familiarity with their associated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is critical. We describe the characteristics and outcomes of ICI-treated mUC patients who experienced irAEs requiring treatment interruption (TI) or permanent discontinuation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ICI-treated mUC patients who developed grade ≥2 irAEs were reviewed. Clinical-, treatment-, and toxicity-related data were evaluated. Toxicity was graded per common terminology for categorization of adverse events v5.0. Cohorts were divided into patients who underwent ICI rechallenge and those who required permanent ICI discontinuation. Time to treatment interruption (TTI), time to next treatment, and duration of clinical benefit were assessed descriptively. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

Of 200 ICI-treated mUC patients at Cleveland Clinic between October 2015 and October 2020, 16 (8%) experienced ≥ grade 2 irAEs necessitating TI. Median TTI among all patients was 6.5 months (range, 1-19). Eleven patients (69%) required corticosteroids. ICI were held and rechallenged in 10 patients (62%) and permanently discontinued in 6 patients (38%). Of the 10 ICI-rechallenged patients, 7 (70%) experienced another irAE upon rechallenge with median time to irAE recurrence of 2.9 months (range, 0.1-10.9); 3 (30%) eventually discontinued ICI due to recrudescent irAEs. Four (40%) of the 10 ICI-rechallenged patients received subsequent therapy. Five (83%) of the 6 patients who permanently discontinued ICI demonstrated durable clinical benefit off therapy with median duration of clinical benefit 17.7 months (range, 14.2-55.2). Two-year OS was 40% (95% CI: 19%-86%) in the ICI rechallenge cohort and 67% (95% CI: 38%-100%) in the permanent discontinuation cohort.

CONCLUSION

ICI-treated mUC patients who developed irAEs requiring TI had a high rate of subsequent irAEs upon ICI rechallenge. Importantly, patients who permanently discontinued ICI due to irAE demonstrated durable clinical benefit off treatment.

Cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating metastatic urothelial cancer

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is an important treatment option for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. A lot of clinical evidence proved the survival benefits of ICI, but cost-effectiveness of the treatment remains unclear. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the ICIs treatment in different sequences among mUC patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed mUC patients who had been treated at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020. These patients received chemotherapy with or without ICI treatment (Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Nivolumab, Durvalumab, or Avelumab). The patients were divided into three different groups: receiving chemotherapy alone, receiving a combination of first-line ICI and chemotherapy (ICI combination therapy), and receiving chemotherapy as the first-line treatment followed by second-line ICI therapy (Subsequent ICI therapy). The primary endpoint was cost per life day, while lifetime medical costs and overall survival were also evaluated. Results: The 74 enrolled patients had a median age of 67.0 years, with 62.2% being male. Of these patients, 23 had received chemotherapy only, while the remaining patients had received combined therapy with ICI in either first-line or as subsequent agents (37 patients had ever received atezolizumab, 18 pembrolizumab, 1 Durvalumab, 1 Nivolumab, and 1 Avelumab separately.). Fifty-five patients (74.3%, 55/74) received cisplatin amongst all the patients who underwent chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 27.5 months (95% CI, 5.2-49.9) in the first-line ICI combination therapy group, and 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.1-10.8) in the chemotherapy only. Median overall survival for the subsequent ICI therapy group was not reached. The median lifetime cost after metastatic UC diagnosis was USD 31,221. The subsequent ICI therapy group had significantly higher costs when compared with the ICI combination therapy group (155.8 USD per day, [IQR 99.0 to 220.5] v 97.8 USD per day, [IQR 60.8 to 159.19], p = 0.026). Higher insurance reimbursement expenses for the subsequent ICI therapy group were observed when compared with the ICI combination therapy group. Conclusion: Our real-world data suggests that first line use of ICI combined with chemotherapy demonstrates better cost-effectiveness and similar survival outcomes for mUC patients, when compared with subsequent ICI therapy after chemotherapy.

Significance of PD-L1 in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IMPORTANCE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have broadened the metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) therapeutic scenario. The association of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) with response and survival in patients treated with ICIs is still controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association of PD-L1 with response rate and overall survival among patients with mUC treated with ICIs.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology Meeting Libraries, and Web of Science were searched up to December 10, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Two authors independently screened the studies. Included studies were randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials enrolling patients with mUC receiving ICIs with available overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall response rate (ORR) data, separated between patients with PD-L1-positive and -negative tumors.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Fixed- or random-effects models were used depending on the heterogeneity among the studies.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were odds ratios (ORs) for ORR and hazard ratios (HRs) for OS, comparing patients with PD-L1-positive tumors and patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. Secondary outcomes were the PFS HR between patients with PD-L1-positive and -negative tumors and OS HR between ICI arms and non-ICI arms of only randomized clinical trials.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were selected, comprising 5271 patients treated with ICIs (2625 patients had PD-L1-positive tumors). The ORR was 13.8% to 78.6% in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors and 5.1% to 63.2% in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors, with an association between PD-L1 status and ORR favoring patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.47-2.56; P < .001). Median OS ranged from 8.4 to 24.1 months in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors and from 6.0 to 19.1 months in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. The pooled HR showed a significant reduction for patients with PD-L1-positive tumors compared with those with PD-L1-negative tumors in the risk of death (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.89; P = .003) and risk of progression (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69; P < .001) when ICIs were administered. PD-L1 is not likely to be a predictive biomarker of ICI response.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that PD-L1 expression is associated with improved ORR, OS, and PFS for patients with mUC who receive ICIs, but it is unlikely to be useful as a predictive biomarker. Developing predictive biomarkers is essential to select patients most likely to benefit from ICIs and avoid toxic effects and financial burden with these agents.

Immunogenicity of avelumab in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma or advanced urothelial carcinoma

Like other monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be immunogenic in some patients, potentially affecting pharmacokinetics (PKs) and clinical outcomes. In post hoc analyses, we characterized antidrug antibody (ADA) development with avelumab monotherapy in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (first-line [1L; N = 116] and second-line or later [≥2L; N = 88] cohorts) or with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 (1L maintenance [N = 350]) and JAVELIN Solid Tumor (≥2L [N = 249]) trials. Treatment-emergent ADAs developed in a numerically higher proportion of patients with aUC (1L maintenance, 19.1%; ≥2L, 18.1%) versus mMCC (1L, 8.2%; ≥2L, 8.9%); incidences within tumor types were similar by line of therapy. In PK analyses, numerically lower avelumab trough concentration and higher baseline clearance were observed in treatment-emergent ADA+ versus ADA- subgroups; however, differences were not clinically relevant. Numerical differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, or objective response rate by ADA status were observed; however, no clinically meaningful trends were identified. Proportions of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; any grade or grade 3/4), serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, or infusion-related reactions were similar, with overlapping 80% confidence intervals between ADA subgroups. Efficacy and safety observations were similar in subgroups defined by early development of ADA+ status during treatment. In conclusion, no meaningful differences in PKs, efficacy, and safety were observed between subgroups of avelumab-treated patients with different ADA status. Overall, these data suggest that ADAs are not relevant for treatment decisions with avelumab.

Extracellular Vesicles, Circulating Tumor Cells, and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Hints and Promises

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer, in particular lung cancer, while the introduction of predictive biomarkers from liquid biopsies has emerged as a promising tool to achieve an effective and personalized therapy response. Important progress has also been made in the molecular characterization of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs), highlighting their tremendous potential in modulating the tumor microenvironment, acting on immunomodulatory pathways, and setting up the pre-metastatic niche. Surface antigens on EVs and CTCs have proved to be particularly useful in the case of the characterization of potential immune escape mechanisms through the expression of immunosuppressive ligands or the transport of cargos that may mitigate the antitumor immune function. On the other hand, novel approaches, to increase the expression of immunostimulatory molecules or cargo contents that can enhance the immune response, offer premium options in combinatorial clinical strategies for precision immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the identification of immune checkpoints using EVs and CTCs, their potential applications as predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy, and their prospective use as innovative clinical tools, considering that CTCs have already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use, but providing good reasons to intensify the research on both.

Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes Before and After Access to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study From 2004 to 2021

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is a lethal disease with limited treatment options. We aimed to compare the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with mUC who were treated before and after the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) at a tertiary hospital in Barcelona.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study from 2004 to 2021. Access to ICIs began in December 2014. We analyzed differences in clinical characteristics and survival outcomes, such as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and restricted mean survival time (RMST).

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients were included. The median follow-up was 48.6 months. Ninety and 116 patients were treated during the pre-ICIs and the post-ICIs eras, respectively. We found high treatment attrition rates, with no differences in the number of patients who received second-line (48%) and third-line (26%) therapies between the two eras. In the second-line, ICIs became the predominant therapy (58%), leading to a 30% reduction in the utilisation of platinum-based ChT and non-platinum ChT. Innovative approaches including ICIs in the first-line treatment (18%) and targeted therapies in the third-line setting (34%) were observed. We found no differences in the median OS, 2-year OS, or 24-month RMST between the two periods.

CONCLUSION

ICIs have emerged as a transformative treatment option, reshaping the treatment landscape. Nevertheless, substantial attrition rates from first-line to subsequent lines of systemic therapies might impede the potential impact of ICIs on long-term survival outcomes across the entire population.

A Comprehensive Review of Immunotherapy Clinical Trials for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination, Novel Antibodies, Cellular Therapies, and Vaccines

Urothelial cancer is an immune-responsive cancer, but only a subset of patients benefits from immune checkpoint inhibition. Currently, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the combination of pembrolizumab with the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin are approved to treat patients with metastatic UC (mUC). Approval of first-line nivolumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin is expected imminently. Many treatment approaches are being investigated to better harness the immune system to fight mUC. In this review, we summarize the landmark clinical trials of ICIs that led to their incorporation into the current standard of care for mUC. We further discuss recent and ongoing clinical trials in mUC, which are investigating ICIs in combination with other agents, including chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel antibodies. Lastly, we review novel approaches utilizing bispecific antibodies, cellular therapies, and vaccines. The landscape of immunotherapy for mUC is rapidly evolving and will hopefully lead to better outcomes for patients.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy versus chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The application of platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents is the traditional treatment paradigm for advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma, which has changed with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ICI therapy versus chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed by two independent investigators. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

The patients treated with ICI monotherapy had no significant difference in OS than those treated with chemotherapy monotherapy (HR: 0.965, 95% CI 0.865-1.076, p = 0.518). However, the patients treated with ICI monotherapy had a higher ORR and lower incidence of high-grade (≥ grade 3) AEs than those treated with chemotherapy monotherapy (OR: 0.568, 95% CI 0.479-0.675, p < 0.001; OR: 0.614, 95% CI 0.446-0.845, p = 0.003). The patients treated with ICI in combination with chemotherapy had significantly better OS and PFS than those treated with chemotherapy alone (HR: 0.862, 95% CI 0.776-0.957, p = 0.006; HR: 0.788, 95% CI 0.707-0.879, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in ORR or the incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs (OR: 0.951, 95% CI 0.582-1.554, p = 0.841; OR: 0.942, 95% CI 0.836-1.062, p = 0.328).

CONCLUSION

ICI monotherapy did not show statistically significant difference in OS but demonstrated higher ORR and lower incidence of high-grade (≥ grade 3) AEs. And a statistically significant OS and PFS benefit was found in patients treated with first-line ICI in combination with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone.

Drug target therapy and emerging clinical relevance of exosomes in meningeal tumors

Meningioma is the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumor. In recent decades, several efforts have been made to eradicate this disease. Surgery and radiotherapy remain the standard treatment options for these tumors. Drug therapy comes to play its role when both surgery and radiotherapy fail to treat the tumor. This mostly happens when the tumors are close to vital brain structures and are nonbenign. Although a wide variety of chemotherapeutic drugs and molecular targeted drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, alkylating agents, endocrine drugs, interferon, and targeted molecular pathway inhibitors have been studied, the roles of numerous drugs remain unexplored. Recent interest is growing toward studying and engineering exosomes for the treatment of different types of cancer including meningioma. The latest studies have shown the involvement of exosomes in the theragnostic of various cancers such as the lung and pancreas in the form of biomarkers, drug delivery vehicles, and vaccines. Proper attention to this new emerging technology can be a boon in finding the consistent treatment of meningioma.

Progress in systemic therapy for advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma

Despite recent advances, advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma (aUC) remains incurable, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 10%. Platinum-based chemotherapy has a major role as first-line therapy for most patients with aUC. The approval of the anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab as maintenance therapy for patients without initial disease progression on platinum-based chemotherapy is an important development that has improved the survival outcomes of patients with this disease. Otherwise, the use of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 has been restricted to patients who are ineligible for platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. Other important developments include the FDA-accelerated approval of first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab for patients ineligible to receive cisplatin and the availability of FGFR inhibitors, enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan for subsequent lines of therapy. Several research questions remain unaddressed including the lack of adequate biomarkers, how to assign priority to the different treatment options for individual patients and which agents can be effective as monotherapies. The future is promising with the emergence of modalities such as antibody-drug conjugate-like drugs, next-generation ICIs, bispecific antibodies and cellular therapies. In this Review, we summarize the evolution of systemic therapy for patients with aUC and provide insights into the unmet needs.

Immuno-Oncology Advances in Genitourinary Cancers

Immuno-oncology (IO) has made monumental gains in the past decade in the genitourinary space. In this review, we highlight advances with IO in renal cell carcinoma where it now has become standard-of-care frontline therapy in the metastatic setting but also discuss challenges with the initial approach. In urothelial carcinoma, we discuss the growing use of IO including exciting recent updates with IO-based regimens that may soon become the new standard of care. We further discuss difficulties with IO in prostate cancer, germ cell tumors, and penile squamous cell carcinoma. Finally, we highlight advances in IO approaches beyond checkpoint inhibition including the role of the gut microbiome and T-cell redirecting therapies.

Targeted therapies in bladder cancer: signaling pathways, applications, and challenges

Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in men. Understanding molecular characteristics via studying signaling pathways has made tremendous breakthroughs in BC therapies. Thus, targeted therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) have markedly improved advanced BC outcomes over the last few years. However, the considerable patients still progress after a period of treatment with current therapeutic regimens. Therefore, it is crucial to guide future drug development to improve BC survival, based on the molecular characteristics of BC and clinical outcomes of existing drugs. In this perspective, we summarize the applications and benefits of these targeted drugs and highlight our understanding of mechanisms of low response rates and immune escape of ICIs, ADCs toxicity, and TKI resistance. We also discuss potential solutions to these problems. In addition, we underscore the future drug development of targeting metabolic reprogramming and cancer stem cells (CSCs) with a deep understanding of their signaling pathways features. We expect that finding biomarkers, developing novo drugs and designing clinical trials with precisely selected patients and rationalized drugs will dramatically improve the quality of life and survival of patients with advanced BC.

PD-1 and PD-L1: architects of immune symphony and immunotherapy breakthroughs in cancer treatment

PD-1 (Programmed Cell Death Protein-1) and PD-L1 (Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1) play a crucial role in regulating the immune system and preventing autoimmunity. Cancer cells can manipulate this system, allowing them to escape immune detection and promote tumor growth. Therapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have transformed cancer treatment and have demonstrated significant effectiveness against various cancer types. This study delves into the structure and signaling dynamics of PD-1 and its ligands PD-L1/PD-L2, the diverse PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and their efficacy, and the resistance observed in some patients. Furthermore, this study explored the challenges associated with the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment approach. Recent advancements in the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy, radiation, and surgical procedures to enhance patient outcomes have also been highlighted. Overall, this study offers an in-depth overview of the significance of PD-1/PD-L1 in cancer immunotherapy and its future implications in oncology.

The efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with or without anti-PD-1 for the first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of first-line anti-PD-1 combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC).

METHOD

Patients with advanced UC who received first-line treatment of chemotherapy (n = 51, gemcitabine/paclitaxel [albumin-bound] combined with platinum) or immunochemotherapy (n = 50, PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy) were enrolled. The efficacy and safety were analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

This study included data from 101 patients, including 51 patients in the chemotherapy group and 50 patients in the immunochemotherapy group. The median progression-free survival of the immunochemotherapy group was significantly longer than that of the chemotherapy group (11.5 vs. 7.17 m, HR = 0.56, p = 0.009). The two groups' overall survival showed no significant difference (20.3 vs. 17.8 m, p = 0.204). The objective response rates and the disease control rates of the two groups were 38.0% versus 49.0% (p = 0.26) and 88.0% versus 80.4% (p = 0.29). The incidence of adverse reactions (AEs) in the immunochemotherapy group and chemotherapy group were 90.0% and 84.3% (p = 0.394), respectively, and the incidence of Grade III-IV AEs were 32.0% and 35.3% (p = 0.726), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the first-line treatment of patients with advanced UC, anti-PD-1 therapy combined with chemotherapy might have better efficacy than chemotherapy alone, and AEs are similar between the two groups.

A phase 1a/1b first-in-human study (COMPASSION-01) evaluating cadonilimab in patients with advanced solid tumors

Simultaneous inhibition of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) with bispecific antibodies may improve efficacy over single-agent treatment while limiting toxicity. Cadonilimab is a humanized, bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4. This is a phase 1 study of cadonilimab including dose escalation (n = 39) and dose expansion (n = 80). One dose-limiting toxicity event is observed, with the maximum tolerated dose not reached. 6 mg/kg cadonilimab once every 2 weeks is established as the recommended dose for future studies. The most common treatment-related adverse event is infusion-related reaction (18.5%), mostly grade 1/2 in severity. The incidences of any grade and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events are 44.5% and 6.7%, respectively. The confirmed overall response rate is 13.4%, and the median duration of response is 12.9 months. Cadonilimab is well tolerated and showed promising efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03261011.

Use of concomitant proton pump inhibitors, statins or metformin in patients treated with pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: data from the ARON-2 retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Concomitant medications may potentially affect the outcome of cancer patients. In this sub-analysis of the ARON-2 real-world study (NCT05290038), we aimed to assess the impact of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), statins, or metformin on outcome of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) receiving second-line pembrolizumab.

METHODS

We collected data from the hospital medical records of patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab as second-line therapy at 87 institutions from 22 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate. We carried out a survival analysis by a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 802 patients were eligible for this retrospective study; the median follow-up time was 15.3 months. PPI users compared to non-users showed inferior PFS (4.5 vs. 7.2 months, p = 0.002) and OS (8.7 vs. 14.1 months, p < 0.001). Concomitant PPI use remained a significant predictor of PFS and OS after multivariate Cox analysis. The use of statins or metformin was not associated with response or survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results suggest a significant prognostic impact of concomitant PPI use in mUC patients receiving pembrolizumab in the real-world context. The mechanism of this interaction warrants further elucidation.

Bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is a global health issue with sex differences in incidence and prognosis. Bladder cancer has distinct molecular subtypes with multiple pathogenic pathways depending on whether the disease is non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive. The mutational burden is higher in muscle-invasive than in non-muscle-invasive disease. Commonly mutated genes include TERT, FGFR3, TP53, PIK3CA, STAG2 and genes involved in chromatin modification. Subtyping of both forms of bladder cancer is likely to change considerably with the advent of single-cell analysis methods. Early detection signifies a better disease prognosis; thus, minimally invasive diagnostic options are needed to improve patient outcomes. Urine-based tests are available for disease diagnosis and surveillance, and analysis of blood-based cell-free DNA is a promising tool for the detection of minimal residual disease and metastatic relapse. Transurethral resection is the cornerstone treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and intravesical therapy can further improve oncological outcomes. For muscle-invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care with evidence supporting trimodality therapy. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated benefit in non-muscle-invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Effective management requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers patient characteristics and molecular disease characteristics.