Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-OES18 in patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The EORTC QLQ-OES18 has previously demonstrated clinical validity; however, there are limited published psychometric data for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We evaluated the measurement properties of the QLQ-OES18 in a clinical trial population of patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC.

METHODOLOGY

Analyses used data from RATIONALE 302 (NCT03430843), a randomized phase 3 study of tislelizumab versus investigator-chosen chemotherapy as second-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC. Psychometric validation of the QLQ-OES18 included tests of reliability, construct validity, ability to detect change, and estimation of anchor-based meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds-the latter two being exploratory given that the trial was not powered to detect efficacy in patient-reported outcome endpoints.

RESULTS

In total, 512 patients were randomized to either tislelizumab or chemotherapy; the average age was 61.5 years, and 84.4% were male. Three of the 4 QLQ-OES18 multi-item scales (dysphagia, eating, and pain) and the index scale met the prespecified criterion for acceptable internal consistency as well as acceptable test-retest reliability. Associations between baseline QLQ-OES18 scores and convergent/discriminant validators were generally as expected (i.e., the QLQ-OES18 pain score had a strong positive correlation with the QLQ-C30 pain score). For known-groups validity, 88.6% of analyses demonstrated the hypothesized direction of effect, suggesting that the expected differences in baseline QLQ-OES18 scores between prespecified groups were observed. Ability to detect change analyses indicated that several QLQ-OES18 domain scores demonstrated sensitivity in detecting possible treatment effects, although many patients reported minimal symptoms at baseline, which limited the ability to detect significant improvement.

CONCLUSION

Overall, a collection of psychometric evidence indicated that the EORTC QLQ-OES18 reliably and validly measured symptom severity in the RATIONALE 302 population. Specifically, the dysphagia domain consistently demonstrated robust psychometric properties. Limitations in data reduced the interpretability of MWPC thresholds and are discussed in detail.

Perioperative nivolumab and chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: a randomized multicentre phase 2 study with circulating tumor DNA dynamics monitoring

BACKGROUND

Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy show promise in treating oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), long-term survival data are limited. This randomized, multicenter phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy of perioperative Nivolumab with chemotherapy, followed by surgery and adjuvant immunotherapy, in patients with locally advanced resectable OSCC, and explored the prognostic role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status.

METHODS

In this trial, participants recruited from five centers were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either perioperative Nivolumab or a placebo in addition to chemotherapy (cisplatin and paclitaxel), followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy. For those who did not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR), adjuvant treatment with Nivolumab was administered. The main measure of success was the pCR rate, with secondary endpoints including the R0 resection rate, event-free survival, and overall survival. All outcomes and safety measures were assessed based on the intention-to-treat population. ctDNA levels were monitored as exploratory endpoints.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were enrolled and randomized to Nivolumab or placebo plus chemotherapy. The pCR rate was slightly higher in the Nivolumab group (15%) compared to the control group (13.3%) (relative risk, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.38 to 3.36). No significant differences were observed in R0 resection rates (96.4% vs. 96.6%; P > 0.05). The median follow-up duration was 24.9 months (interquartile range: 22.8 to 26.7 months). Two-year event-free survival rates were 63.11% in the Nivolumab group versus 60.47% in the chemo group (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.92). Two-year overall survival rates were 83.32% and 79.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.29 to 2.31). All participants were ctDNA positive at baseline, but post-treatment, 89% of the Nivolumab group and 62.5% of the placebo group turned ctDNA negative (P = 0.01). Those negative for ctDNA at all testing points showed significantly better disease-free survival (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative Nivolumab plus chemotherapy is a viable and safe option for systemically treating locally advanced resectable OSCC. Monitoring minimal residual disease through ctDNA could be potentially valuable for assessing the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy and for prognostic evaluation in a systemic manner.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT05213312.

Haematological toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors in digestive system tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the hematologic toxicity profiles, toxicity spectrum, and safety rankings of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used for digestive system tumors. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was anemia, while secondary outcomes included neutropenia, neutrophil count decreased, thrombocytopenia, platelet count decreased, leukopenia, white blood cell (WBC) count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and febrile neutropenia (FN). Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor type, country category, study phase, ICI regimen, control group, chemotherapy regimen, ICI plus different chemotherapy regimens. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data according to pre-specified criteria, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RevMan 5.4 software was utilized to visualize the risk of bias assessments. Stata 16.0 was used to conduct network meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression. 25 phase II and III RCTs (n = 15216) were included. The general safety of ICIs ranked from high to low for grade 1-5 anemia were as follows: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, and tislelizumab. For grade 3-5 anemia, the general safety profile of the ICIs were as follows, from highest to lowest: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, and camrelizumab. Compared to chemotherapy, treatment-related hematologic toxicities with ICIs occurred primarily in grade 1-5 anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and WBC count decreased. Taking ICI monotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab were generally safer than taking chemotherapy, one ICI drug with chemotherapy, or two ICI drugs with chemotherapy. In terms of grade 1-5 hematologic toxicities, tislelizumab had the highest risk of neutropenia and leukopenia; the primary treatment-adverse events (AEs) for sintilimab was neutrophil count decreased and WBC count decreased; the primary treatment-related AE associated with nivolumab was platelet count decreased; camrelizumab posed the highest risk for lymphocyte count decreased. In terms of grade 3-5 hematologic toxicities, pembrolizumab was predominantly linked to neutropenia; sintilimab showed the greatest risk for neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and lymphocyte count decreased; avelumab was most associated with WBC count decreased. FN primarily manifested as grade 3-5, with camrelizumab having the highest risk. Among agents used in gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, avelumab demonstrated the most favorable safety profile for anemia. Each treatment regimen has its unique safety profile. Early identification and management of ICI-related hematologic toxicities are essential in clinical practice.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024571508.

Camrelizumab combined with apatinib plus irinotecan as a second-line treatment in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Camrelizumab (CAM) combined with apatinib plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment shows good efficacy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. This study aimed to explore the potential of CAM combined with apatinib plus irinotecan (IRT) as a second-line treatment in advanced or metastatic ESCC patients.

METHODS

A total of 59 advanced or metastatic ESCC patients receiving CAM combined with apatinib plus IRT as second-line treatment were enrolled in this study between January 2020 and March 2024. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and the assessment of toxicity. Concurrently, a model was constructed utilizing patients' clinical characteristics and radiomic features to predict the patients' prognoses.

RESULTS

At the time of analysis, 58 patients were withdrawn due to disease progression (n = 9), death (n = 43), or lost to follow-up (n = 6), and 1 patient was ongoing. The ORR and DCR were 37.7% and 84.9%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 6.3 (95% CI: 4.8-7.8) and 16.7 (95% CI: 13.5-19.9) months, respectively. The most common adverse events of any grade were leukopenia (52.5%), fatigue (25.4%), anemia (23.7%), thrombocytopenia (23.7%), neutropenia (22.0%), and hypoalbuminemia (22.0%). Most of the adverse events were grade I-II. The incidence of grade III-IV adverse events was 20.3%. Predictive models were established based on the outcomes of multivariate Cox analyses. The combined model had an excellent ability to predict the 1-year OS [AUC (95% CI): 0.979 (0.930-1.000)].

CONCLUSION

CAM combined with apatinib plus IRT as a second-line treatment exhibits acceptable efficacy and safety in advanced or metastatic ESCC patients. The model that combines clinical and radiomic features has the greatest ability to predict the survival of advanced or metastatic ESCC patients.

The Evolving Role of Immunotherapy for Gastroesophageal Malignancies

The incorporation of immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape for advanced, unresectable, or metastatic gastroesophageal cancers (GECs), with improved survival outcomes. These improvements in outcomes for advanced GECs have led to clinical trials evaluating the role of immunotherapy in patients with resectable early-stage GECs. However, there remains a high burden of morbidity and mortality, and ongoing trials utilizing novel immunotherapy agents and combinations are underway. This review summarizes the findings of previous and ongoing clinical trials related to immunotherapy for patients with early- and late-stage GECs.

Tumor molecular signatures: bridging the bench and the operating room

Contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for many solid tumors rely on understanding the Mismatch Repair (MMR) system, a fundamental DNA repair mechanism responsible for correcting errors introduced during DNA replication. Pathology reports written for tumors excised in surgery, often indicate the expression status of MMR proteins. This is of significant clinical value, as loss of MMR protein expression is associated with the accumulation of DNA replication errors. The MMR system recognizes and replaces mismatched nucleotides, particularly in microsatellite regions. These are short, repetitive non-coding DNA sequences prone to replication errors. When MMR proteins are inactivated by genetic or epigenetic alterations, MMR deficiency (dMMR) occurs, preventing repair and leading to microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome, which is commonly associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. This work highlights the clinical utility of MMR protein and MSI status as molecular signatures and discusses diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Understanding these molecular changes supports clinicians in making informed therapeutic decisions and may improve patient outcomes by providing personalized treatments to fit individual tumor profiles.

Survival Impact of Adjuvant Nivolumab Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in managing locally advanced esophageal cancer remains unclear. This study evaluated the survival benefits of adjuvant nivolumab after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin (DCF) regimen in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included 439 consecutive patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent radical esophagectomy following neoadjuvant DCF chemotherapy. The approval of adjuvant nivolumab has led to patients with pathological lymph node metastasis following preoperative treatment becoming eligible for treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 439 patients included, 379 and 60 received neoadjuvant DCF (neoDCF group) and adjuvant nivolumab after neoadjuvant DCF (neoDCF+AdNivo group), respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) remained comparable despite differences in pathological lymph node metastasis (53% vs. 100%). After propensity score matching, adjuvant nivolumab yielded a significant improvement in DFS and overall survival (OS) (2-year DFS: 60.2% vs. 44.9%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.83, p = 0.009; 2-year OS: 94.1% vs. 64.0%, HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06-0.50, p = 0.001). The 1-year postoperative recurrence rate in the neoDCF+AdNivo group was lower (23% vs. 47%, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis revealed a marked improvement in DFS in patients with ypT3 or ypN2 disease, particularly in those with ypStage III disease. Adjuvant nivolumab and ypN stage were identified as independent prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant nivolumab therapy following neoadjuvant DCF chemotherapy may improve survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced ESCC, with particularly strong benefits being observed in ypStage III.

Clinical development of immuno-oncology therapeutics

Immuno-oncology (IO) is one of the fastest growing therapeutic areas within oncology. IO agents work indirectly via the host's adaptive and innate immune system to recognize and eradicate tumor cells. Despite checkpoint inhibitors being only introduced to the market since 2011, they have become the second most approved product category. Current Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved classes of IO agents include: immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), bi-specific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody therapy, T-cell receptor (TCR) engineered T cell therapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, cytokine therapy, cancer vaccine therapy, and oncolytic virus therapy. Cancer immunotherapy has made progress in multiple cancer types including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and urothelial carcinoma; however, several cancers remain refractory to immunotherapy. Future directions of IO include exploration in the neoadjuvant/perioperative setting, combination strategies, and optimizing patient selection through improved biomarkers.

Exploring predictive biomarkers of efficacy and survival with nivolumab treatment for unresectable/recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blockade has improved survival for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but response rates are low. Biomarkers to predict who will benefit from PD-1 blockade are urgently needed.

METHODS

This multicenter study involved 250 patients with recurrent/unresectable advanced ESCC receiving nivolumab as second- or later-line therapy. We assessed tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) and tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) density using immunohistochemistry and hematoxylin/eosin staining in surgical specimens and pre-nivolumab endoscopic biopsies.

RESULTS

In surgical specimens, clinical response (vs. non-response) to nivolumab correlated significantly with CD8+ lymphocyte count (160 vs. 95.2 cells/field, P = 0.0494), CD8/Foxp3 ratio (6.52 vs. 2.72, P = 0.0053), and TLS density (0.21/mm2 vs. 0.10/mm2, P = 0.0005). In terms of overall survival, multivariate analysis identified CD8/Foxp3 ratio (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.83, P = 0.0050) and TLS density (HR = 1.67, P = 0.0171 as independent prognostic parameters in surgical specimens. Similarly, in endoscopic biopsies, clinical response (vs. non-response) to nivolumab correlated significantly with CD8+ counts (254 cells/mm2 vs. 124 cells/mm2, P = 0.0344), CCR8+ lymphocyte count (62.6 cells/mm2 vs. 140 cells/mm2, P = 0.0355), CD8/Foxp3 ratio (2.09 vs. 0.89, P = 0.040), and CD8/CCR8 ratio (2.34 vs. 0.89, P = 0.0020). Multivariate analysis also identified CD8/CCR8 ratio in endoscopic biopsies (HR = 1.66, P = 0.0313) as an independent prognostic parameter.

CONCLUSIONS

CD8+ and CCR8+ cell counts, CD8/Foxp3 and CD8/CCR8 ratios, and TLS density may be predictive biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy and survival with PD-1 blockade for ESCC.

Identification and validation of poor prognosis immunoevasive subtype of esophageal cancer with tumor-infiltrating SAMD3 + NK cell abundance

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) remains highly lethal due to tumor microenvironment (TME)-mediated immune evasion. While natural killer (NK) cells are central to antitumor immunity, their functional states in EC are poorly characterized.

METHODS

We integrated bulk RNA-seq (TCGA/GEO) and single-cell data to construct an NK cell-derived prognostic signature (NK score) via LASSO-Cox regression. Immunofluorescence was applied to assess the clinical relevance of SAMD3 + NK cells in EC. Using both xenograft mouse models and in vitro co-culture procedures, the impact of SAMD3 on NK cell function was confirmed.

RESULTS

In EC patients, the prognostic NK score-which is generated from important NK cell markers including SAMD3-was substantially correlated with a worse chance of survival. NK cells within the TME had significant levels of SAMD3 expression, as seen by immunofluorescence labeling. Moreover, NK cells with SAMD3 knockdown exhibited enhanced antitumor activity, leading to decreased tumor development in the xenograft model.

DISCUSSION

Our results demonstrate the predictive significance of NK cell markers in EC and pinpoint SAMD3 as a critical modulator of NK cell activity. We pioneer SAMD3 + NK cells as architects of TME immunosuppression in EC. Our findings nominate SAMD3 inhibition as a combinatorial strategy to overcome immune checkpoint blockade resistance.

Efficacy and safety of concurrent programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor and definitive radiotherapy with immunonutrition support in esophageal squamous cell cancer: a phase II multicenter clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors, with China accounting for 50% of the world's total incidence. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) with platin-based dual-drug regimen is the standard treatment for inoperable, locally advanced esophageal cancer in patients with a good performance status. However, certain patients possess risk factors that heighten toxicity and reduce their tolerance to cCRT, thereby challenging the feasibility of standard treatment. This study evaluates an alternative therapeutic approach combining programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor (PD-1 inhibitor), definitive radiotherapy, and immunonutrition support for patients with unresectable non-metastatic esophageal cancer expressing PD-L1 who are intolerant to cCRT.

METHODS

This is a phase II, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial involving patients with histologically confirmed unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), who exhibit positive PD-L1 and are unsuitable for cCRT. Participants will receive a total radiotherapy dose of 50-60 Gy in 25-30 fractions, sintilimab (200 mg every three weeks), alongside, supplemented by enteral nutritional emulsion (600-1600 ml/day). The primary endpoint is the 1-year progression-free survival rate, with secondary endpoints including objective response rate, overall survival and incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This research has the potential to redefine treatment for inoperable ESCC patients who cannot tolerate conventional therapies. By evaluating a less toxic regimen that combines immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and nutritional support, we aim to determine if this approach can improve both survival rates and quality of life. The synergistic effects of immunonutrition support and PD-1 inhibitor will also be explored.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06342167.

Oridonin combined with cisplatin synergistically induces apoptosis by activating the NOXA-BCL2 axis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal cancer, a malignant neoplasm originating from the epithelial cells of the esophagus, predominantly manifests as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in approximately 90% of cases in China. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens remain the first-line therapeutic option for ESCC, however, the five-year overall survival rate of patients is disappointingly low. Oridonin, a bioactive diterpenoid extracted from the traditional Chinese medicine herb Donglingcao, has demonstrated inhibitory effects against various malignancies. Currently, research on the combination of oridonin and cisplatin for the treatment of ESCC is limited. This study aims to elucidate the potential synergistic anti-cancer effects of oridonin in combination with cisplatin on ESCC, along with the underlying synergistic molecular mechanisms. In vitro experiments revealed that the combination of oridonin and cisplatin could synergistically inhibit ESCC cell proliferation, migration, invasion. The synergistic effect also induced cell cycle arrest and promoted apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway by augmenting NOXA transcriptional activity and activating the NOXA-BCL2 axis. In vivo experiments corroborated these findings, showing a marked reduction in the growth of subcutaneous xenograft tumors in mice treated with the combination, without exacerbating the cisplatin-associated side effects such as weight loss or hepatic and renal toxicity. In conclusion, the combination of oridonin and cisplatin can synergistically inhibit the development of ESCC through the activation of the NOXA-BCL2 axis signaling pathway. This treatment is both safe and effective,presenting a promising prospect for combined therapeutic application in ESCC management.

The paths toward immunotherapy of esophageal cancer: An overview of clinical trials

As the seventh-leading contributor to global cancer-related deaths, esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most challenging types of cancer. Despite advancements in conventional therapies, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, the five-year survival rate remains low, underscoring the need for the development of more efficacious treatment approaches. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment approach, offering new hope for EC patients. This review provides an in-depth examination of the latest immunotherapeutic strategies for EC, focusing on immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapy, cancer vaccines, and oncolytic virotherapy. We critically analyze the current clinical data to highlight the progress and pitfalls of each immunotherapeutic approach for EC. Additionally, we explore the potential for combination therapies, which could overcome the resistance often seen with monotherapies. Finally, we discuss the limitations of current treatments and outline key areas for future research to improve patient outcomes and survival.

NOTCH1 Mutation and Survival Analysis of Tislelizumab in Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Biomarker Analysis From the Randomized, Phase III, RATIONALE-302 Trial

PURPOSE

Although multiple agents targeting PD-1 have been approved as second-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), only a fraction of patients derive long-term survival. Hence, reliable predictive biomarkers are urgently needed.

METHODS

Comprehensive tumor genomic profiling and transcriptome sequencing were performed on samples from the RATIONALE-302 study. We also conducted single-cell RNA sequencing analysis on Notch1 knockdown ESCC murine models to further explore the potential molecular mechanisms underlying anti-PD-1 benefit.

RESULTS

We identified NOTCH1 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker for longer overall survival (OS) with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy (18.4 months v 5.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.71]). At the transcriptional level, type I IFN (IFN-I)/toll-like receptor expression signatures were positively associated with OS benefit of tislelizumab, whereas B-cell and neutrophil signatures predicted unfavorable OS. Exploratory analyses showed that the presence of NOTCH1 mutation correlated with enrichment of IFN-I signatures and reduced infiltration of B cells and neutrophils. In murine models, comparative single-cell transcriptome analyses further revealed that Notch1 deficiency facilitated a more immunologically activated tumor microenvironment which potentiated anti-PD-1 treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our data provide novel insights for anti-PD-1 treatment selection using NOTCH1 mutations and may provide a rationale for combination therapy in ESCC.

Liquid biopsy for guiding breast cancer immunotherapy

Liquid biopsy is a laboratory test used to detect and analyze circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and other tumor-derived components, in a blood sample. In the context of breast cancer (BC), liquid biopsies hold significant promise for guiding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-based combinations, offering real-time insights into tumor dynamics, treatment response, and resistance mechanisms. This review explores the role of liquid biopsy in BC immunotherapy, focusing on its applications, benefits, issues, and current and future research directions.

Successful triple therapy for advanced synchronous multiple primary esophageal carcinoma with metal stenting, photodynamic and comprehensive systemic therapies-shining light on hope: a case report and literature review

Synchronous multiple primary esophageal cancer (SMPEC) is a rare and aggressive condition often accompanied by obstructive dysphagia, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Current treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy, are limited in providing immediate symptom relief. This case report describes a 64-year-old female with SMPEC and metastases to thoracic lymph nodes, the lesser curvature of the stomach, and the right adrenal gland, presenting with severe dysphagia (score 4 on the Japanese Dysphagia Severity Scale). To rapidly alleviate symptoms, she underwent simultaneous metal stent implantation and photodynamic therapy (PDT). She started a liquid diet on the second day after treatment and resumed a normal diet one week later. Subsequently, she underwent systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. By the third treatment cycle, primary and metastatic lesions significantly decreased, achieving a partial response (PR) with stable disease and progression-free survival (PFS) exceeded 12 months. This triple therapy approach-combining stent implantation, PDT, and systemic treatments-proved effective and safe for advanced SMPEC, not only providing immediate dysphagia relief and selective tumor destruction but also delaying disease progression and improving patient outcomes.

Clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly cancer patients: Current evidence from immunosenescence pathophysiology to clinical trial results

The age-related decline in immunity appears to be associated not only with cancer development but also with differential responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Despite their increasing utility across various malignancies and therapeutic settings, limited data -derived primarily from subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pooled meta-analyses, and retrospective studies- are available on the effects of aging on their efficacy and toxicity. Immunosenescence, characterized by the progressive decline of the function of the immune system, and inflammaging, a state of persistent low-grade sterile inflammation, may influence ICI outcomes. Additionally, the incidence, severity, and subtypes of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may differ between older and younger individuals due to loss of immunotolerance. In the current review, starting from a a comprehensive discussion of the pathophysiology of immunosenescence, we proceed to critically review age-related retrospective and randomized evidence supporting FDA-approved ICIs. We highlight similarities or differences across age groups and the clinical benefit of ICIs in elderly versus younger cancer patients. The optimal integration of ICIs in geriatric oncology necessitates greater inclusion of this patient demographic in RCTs along with real-world data in order to acquire robust data which will guide evidence-based treatment decisions for this population.

Arthralgia in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used for patients with cancer, evidence of the impact of ICIs on the incidence of arthralgia remains limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of ICIs on arthralgia incidences in patients with cancer.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to identify phase 3 randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs in patients with cancer and reporting the incidence of arthralgia. We performed a meta-analysis to pool odds ratios (ORs) of any grade and grade 3-5 arthralgia.

RESULTS

Forty RCTs (n = 26,610) were included. The incidence of any-grade and grade 3-5 treatment-related arthralgia was 12.0% (n = 1,125/9,395) and 0.54% (n = 47/8,723). The addition of an ICI to systemic therapy, such as chemotherapy, significantly increased any-grade (OR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.13-1.54, p = 0.001) and grade 3-5 arthralgia (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.08-2.94, p = 0.02) with low heterogeneity among ICI subtype subgroups (I2 = 0%). ICI monotherapy was associated with higher incidences of arthralgia than non-taxane (OR 6.83, 95% CI: 3.05-15.30, p < 0.001) but not than taxane chemotherapy (OR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.44-1.24, p = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

These results could guide oncologists to assess arthralgia in patients receiving ICIs.

Investigating the synergistic effects of immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although combinations of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with chemotherapy have been approved for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), it remains unclear whether immunochemotherapy (ICT) offers advantages over the simple addition of individual monotherapies. This study aimed to investigate whether ICT exhibits a synergistic effect in patients with advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Reconstructed individual patient data of 3330 patients were electronically extracted from the Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves of eight randomized-controlled trials (ATTRACTION-3, CheckMate648, KEYNOTE-181, KEYNOTE-590, RATIONALE-302, RATIONALE-306, ESCORT, and ESCORT-1st). The observed progression-free survival (PFS) curve of each constituent monotherapies was used to estimate simulated PFS curves expected under a model of independent drug action. If the observed curve demonstrated significantly better PFS than the simulated curve, the combination of ICI and chemotherapy may have a synergistic effect, implying a superior outcome compared to simply adding the component monotherapy.

RESULTS

The 1-year, 2-year, and median PFS of the observed and simulated KM curves were 26.3% vs. 24.8%, 14.6% vs. 12.0%, and 6.9 vs. 6.4 months, respectively. The one-sample log-rank test showed no significant differences between the observed and simulated KM curves (p = 0.073).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed PFS with ICT was comparable to the simulated PFS estimated from the data for each monotherapy. Although it is unclear whether potential synergies exist for ICT, these findings suggest that the benefits of ICI and chemotherapy do not interfere with each other, thereby providing theoretical support for the efficacy of ICT.

Factors affecting prognosis in patients with locally advanced and advanced esophageal cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy in plateau regions

Esophageal cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies. This study aimed to examine the impact of factors such as immunotherapy, altitude, radiotherapy target volume, and radiotherapy dose on the prognosis of patients with locally advanced and advanced esophageal cancer who are receiving definitive radiotherapy and living in high-altitude regions. We retrospectively collected data from all patients with locally advanced and advanced esophageal cancer who completed definitive radiotherapy at Yunnan Cancer Hospital between January 2017 and January 2023. A total of 274 patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 24.5 months. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 15.0 months and 11.0 months, respectively. Adjuvant therapy (including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and antiangiogenic targeted therapy, P = 0.004) and gross target volume (GTV, P = 0.015) were independent predictors of overall survival, whereas body mass index (BMI, P = 0.037) was an independent predictor of progression-free survival. Patients with a smaller planning target volume (PTV), clinical target volume (CTV), GTV, and gross tumor volume of metastatic regional lymph nodes (GTVnd), as well as those with a smaller New target volume, had a better prognosis. Treatment efficacy affects patient prognosis, with those showing early therapeutic effectiveness having a better prognosis than those for whom the treatment is ineffective. Patients who experienced disease progression within three months after the end of radiotherapy had a poorer prognosis. The altitude and radiotherapy dose had no significant impact on the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients. The location of the lesion, GTV, and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiotherapy were factors influencing the occurrence of esophageal fistulas.

Case Report: Esophageal cancer under comprehensive treatment strategy-application and clinical outcome analysis of combined immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and low-dose radiotherapy

Current evidence for the combined use of immunotherapy, low-dose chemoradiotherapy, and epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy for the treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is lacking. We report the case of a 73-year-old woman with squamous cell carcinoma of upper middle thoracic esophagus. After undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic targeted therapy, the patient achieved a progression-free survival of 17 months. To date, the patient has achieved 35 months of overall survival, which continues to extend, with a good quality of life. Immunotherapy combined with low-dose concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a promising option for elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer who are intolerant to standard treatments. The addition of an epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody as a radiosensitizer improves therapeutic efficacy. The combination of sintilimab and anlotinib has the potential to treat recurrent and metastatic esophageal cancer. Tailoring treatment strategies for specific patient groups is essential in personalized medicine.

Patients with Upper Third of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Have Better Tumor Regression After Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Several high-quality clinical trials have shown promising results compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) or chemoradiotherapy, further supporting the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (AEC). This study evaluated the efficacy of NICT in different segments of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and aimed to identify potential prognostic factors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study analyzed 248 patients. Before undergoing radical surgery, the patients received two to four cycles of NICT. The relationship between different segments of ESCC and both clinical and pathologic characteristics were evaluated.

RESULTS

The patients with tumors in the upper thoracic esophagus had a higher proportion of lower tumor regression grade (TRG) scores. A significantly higher proportion of patients with TRG 0-1 was observed in the upper and middle thoracic tumor groups than in the lower thoracic group (P = 0.001). In esophageal cancer, TRG 2-3 was significantly associated with lower thoracic tumor location (odds ratio [OR], 3.298; P = 0.003), clinical T3 stage (OR, 2.834; P < 0.001), and clinical N2 stage (OR, 2.557; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with upper-third ESCC appeared to derive greater clinical benefits from NICT than those with tumors located in the lower third of the esophagus in this post hoc analysis. This could potentially serve as a predictor of NICT efficacy.

Mismatch between evidence and related clinical recommendations about the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer patients with anticancer drugs: A critical historical review

PURPOSE

to analyze the most robust research and recommendations that have informed the potential superiority of treatments with anticancer drugs over any type of supportive care for advanced esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

We conducted a critical historical review. First, we identified randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from a previous scoping review conducted by our research group, ASTAC, updating the search strategy. Second, we searched for the most important and recognized international clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in advanced EC. Finally, we performed a systematic document analysis to compare whether the recommendations proposed in the CPGs were supported by the previously identified relevant evidence.

RESULTS

We identified and assessed 15 RCTs and 11 CPGs from ESMO (eight), ASCO (two), and NICE (one) published over the last 40 years. There is a clear mismatch between these guidelines' recommendations and the available RCTs regarding the efficacy of anticancer drugs compared to best supportive care (BSC).

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of consistent evidence to support the treatment of advanced EC patients with anticancer drugs, and a notable mismatch exists between the available evidence and the recommendations made by relevant CPGs. As a result, these guidelines may be biased in favoring the use of anticancer drugs over supportive care and in consequence it is advisable to be very prudent when proposing systemic treatments to patients with advanced EC. Further rigorous and independent research is needed to better evaluate the true benefits of anticancer treatments in advanced EC and to update the CPGs accordingly.

Radiotherapy modulates autophagy to reshape the tumor immune microenvironment to enhance anti-tumor immunity in esophageal cancer

The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy exerts synergistic antitumor in a range of human cancers, and also in esophageal cancer. Radiotherapy-induced tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) reprogramming is an essential basis for the synergistic antitumor between radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Radiotherapy can induce autophagy in tumor cells and immune cells of TIME, and autophagy activation is involved in the modification of immunological characteristics of TIME. The TIME landscape of esophageal cancer, especially ESCC, can be affected by radiotherapy or autophagy regulation. In this review, we depicted that local radiotherapy-induced autophagy could promote the maturation, migration, infiltration, and function of immune cells by complicated mechanisms to make TIME from immune "cold" to "hot", resulting in the synergistic antitumor of RT and IO. We argue that unraveling the relevance of radiotherapy-initiated autophagy to driving radiotherapy reprogramming TIME will open new ideas to explore new targets or more efficiently multimodal therapeutic interventions in ESCC.

Biomarkers in gastroesophageal cancer 2025: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)

Gastroesophageal carcinomas, including gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), pose a global health challenge due to their heterogeneity. The approach to diagnosis and treatment should first differentiate between GEA and ESCC. Over the past decade, therapies for metastatic or advanced GEA/ESCC have expanded, with several new therapeutic targets alongside trastuzumab for metastatic HER2-positive GEA. Four key biomarkers are essential for targeted therapy: HER2 overexpression/amplification, deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI), PD-L1, and Claudin18.2 expression. Immunohistochemistry is the recommended method for these biomarkers evaluation. In addition, the assessment of biomarkers like FGFR2b is likely to become routine in the near future. Experts from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) have formed a consensus to optimize biomarker detection and usage in clinical practice. Their recommendations aim to improve personalized treatment strategies for GEA and ESCC patients, integrating new diagnostic insights into routine care.

Feasibility and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades as rechallenge immunotherapy in previously treated advanced ESCC: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) seemed favorable in several tumors, but clinical experience on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was scanty. This real-world study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of anlotinib plus ICI for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified advanced ESCC patients who received anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting for evaluation of clinical outcomes and safety. Totally 110 ICI-pretreated patients, of which 89 (80.9%) received prior first- or second-line treatment, were included from September 9, 2019, to November 30, 2022. Most patients (63.6%) discontinued initial ICI due to disease progression.

RESULTS

After rechallenge, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.1 (95% CI, 8.6-13.7) and 5.6 (95% CI, 4.4-6.8) months, respectively; estimated OS and PFS rates at 12 months were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.8%-57.7%) and 21.4% (95% CI, 10.9%-34.2%), respectively. No complete response was reported and 21 (19.1%) patients attained partial response; the objective response rate was 19.1%. Fifty-five (50.0%) had stable disease for a disease control rate of 69.1%. Of the 21 responders, median duration of response was 6.4 months. Tendencies for longer OS were observed in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance of 0 (P = .056). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 10.0%.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting was promising and resulted in encouraging benefits for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC. Our findings provided preliminary but unique evidence to help select ESCC patients benefiting from this strategy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org.cn; number ChiCTR2300070777.

Effectiveness, safety, and patterns of use of camrelizumab in advanced esophageal cancer: an individual patient data pooled analysis of 987 patients from three prospective cohort studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This individual patient data pooled analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and patterns of use of camrelizumab in a large cohort of advanced esophageal cancer (AEC) patients.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Adult patients (≥ 18 years) who had received camrelizumab as part of AEC treatment were pooled from three independent, prospective observational cohort studies (NCT04616040, ChiCTR1900027275, and ChiCTR2000039499). The main outcomes were patterns of camrelizumab use, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety in the overall population and specific subgroups of underrepresented patients. Among 987 patients, 450 (45.6%) received camrelizumab in the first line, 398 (40.3%) in the second line, and 139 (14.1%) in the third line or later. Most (69.7%) patients received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy regardless of treatment lines. The median PFS was 9.9 (95% CI 7.4, 14.4), 6.6 (95% CI 5.1, 8.8), and 5.7 (95% CI 3.1, 9.6) months in the first line, second line, and third line or later, respectively. The corresponding median OS was 15.5 (95% CI 12.6, 18.4), 12.1 (95% CI 10.0, 14.7), and 10.9 (95% CI 8.1, 14.5) months. Patients with poor performance status (ECOG PS ≥ 2) and with camrelizumab in the second line or later, but not patients with older age (≥ 75 years), were associated with poor survival. Adverse events occurred in 721 (73.0%) patients, with no new safety signals.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an overview of camrelizumab use in unselected AEC patients. The real-world effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab are generally consistent with those observed in pivotal trials.

Complete response of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy: a Case report

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a prevalent and aggressive malignancy, often diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor prognosis. This case report highlights the successful treatment of a patient with advanced ESCC, who presented with bilateral lung and adrenal gland metastases. Despite the aggressive nature of the disease, the patient underwent a regimen of first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, followed by immune maintenance therapy. Remarkably, the patient achieved complete remission after the completion of treatment, demonstrating the potential efficacy of this combined therapeutic approach in managing advanced ESCC with multiple metastatic sites.

Revolutionary Cancer Therapy for Personalization and Improved Efficacy: Strategies to Overcome Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Cancer remains a significant public health issue worldwide, standing as a primary contributor to global mortality, accounting for approximately 10 million fatalities in 2020 [...].

Immunotherapy as a new perspective for the therapy of esophageal cancer

The therapeutic landscape in nearly every therapeutic line in advanced/metastatic patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGC) is enriched by recent approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In curative intended therapy, patients without pathological residual disease of SCC or GEJ (esophagogastric junction) cancer after preoperative chemoradiation and complete resection have access to adjuvant immunotherapy (independent of PD-L1 (programmed cell death protein 1) status, nivolumab, CHECKMATE 577). For metastatic SCC in the first-line, nivolumab combined with chemotherapy or with ipilimumab (TPS (tumor proportion score) ≥1 %, SCC, CHECKMATE 648) are approved, as well as second-line nivolumab alone regardless of PD-L1 status (ATTRACTION 03). For both, locally advanced or metastatic SCC and EGC, chemotherapy with pembrolizumab is available for patients with CPS (combined positive score) ≥10 (KEYNOTE 590) and for adenocarcinoma with nivolumab (CPS ≥5, CHECKMATE 649). Recent added approvals are chemotherapy with pembrolizumab in CPS ≥1 patients (KEYNOTE 859) and the addition of trastuzumab for personalized therapy in HER-2 positive/CPS ≥1 gastric and GEJ patients (KEYNOTE 811).

CD45RO-Positive Memory T-Cell Density in the Tumoral Core and Invasive Margin Predict Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The association between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor immunity has long been recognized. Among T-cell types, CD45RO-positive memory T cells (CD45RO+) are reported to correlate with survival in several cancer types, but clinical evidence is lacking in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

In surgical specimens from 162 preoperatively untreated patients, immunohistochemistry for CD45RO was performed to evaluate the density of CD45RO+ in the tumor core (CT) and invasive margin (IM) using an auto-count method. Patients were classified into high- versus low-CD45RO+ groups based on CD45RO+ density in CT and IM separately and combined. The relationship between CD45RO+ density and clinicopathological factors, including prognosis, was evaluated.

RESULTS

Average CD45RO+ density was 133/mm2 in CT and 372/mm2 in IM. No significant differences in clinicopathological factors according to high- versus low-CD45RO+ scores were identified. Using CT scores, the CD45RO+-high group had a better 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (77.2% vs. 54.7% CD45RO+-low, P = 0.0433), but OS rates did not differ statistically between the two groups by IM scores (75.7% vs. 50.3%, P = 0.0576). Using immunohistochemical scores for CT+IM, the survival difference was significant, with a 5-year OS rate of 73.7% for the CD45RO+-high group versus 46.3% for the CD45RO+-low group (P = 0.0141). Multivariate analysis identified CD45RO+ CT+IM density as an independent prognostic variable in OS (hazard ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.43-3.62, P = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

Density of CD45RO+ expression in the CT and IM might be a predictor of long-term survival in ESCC.

Recent Noteworthy Studies in Thoracic Oncology

BACKGROUND

In this paper, we review recent prospective surgical studies on resectable esophageal and lung cancer.

METHODS

A narrative literature review was performed using the terms 'resectable esophageal cancer' and 'multimodal therapy' and 'resectable non-small cell lung cancer'. Prospective surgical trials performed from 2010 to 2023 were identified and analyzed.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov was queried for ongoing studies.

RESULTS

The studies on esophageal cancer demonstrate the benefits of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, compared with surgery alone, and the emerging role of immunotherapy as part of induction and adjuvant treatment protocols. The selected studies on lung cancer demonstrate the evolving role of sublobar resection for patients with peripheral node-negative clinical stage IA1 disease and the developing role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy for patients with stage II-IIIA disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The methods of treating patients with resectable esophageal or lung cancer are changing. Efforts to limit patient morbidity and optimize tumor treatment before surgery are increasingly being pursued and these approaches will likely continue to evolve as tumor biology and long-term pharmacologic mechanisms of action become clearer. Personalized medicine strategies that are based on tumor characteristics and the host genetic profile remain on the horizon, not yet ready for adoption in routine clinical practice.

Current status and perspectives of esophageal cancer: a comprehensive review

Esophageal cancer (EC) continues to be a significant global health concern, with two main subtypes: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Prevention and changes in etiology, improvements in early detection, and refinements in the treatment have led to remarkable progress in the outcomes of EC patients in the past two decades. This seminar provides an in-depth analysis of advances in the epidemiology, disease biology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment landscape of esophageal cancer, focusing on the ongoing debate surrounding multimodality therapy. Despite significant advancements, EC remains a deadly disease, underscoring the need for continued research into early detection methods, understanding the molecular mechanisms, and developing effective treatments.

Prognostic value of liver metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab

Nivolumab has been approved for unresectable recurrent advanced esophageal cancer. The present study aimed to provide real-world data on diverse patient profiles, including the elderly and those with poor performance status, while exploring therapeutic efficacy biomarkers. This retrospective study included 42 patients with esophageal cancer who received nivolumab after second- or later-line treatment at Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (Kyoto, Japan) from February 2020 to December 2021. The study evaluated real-world patient data for the outcomes, safety and clinical characteristics impacting efficacy. The median patient age was 70 years (range, 52-80), and 36 patients (85%) were male. A total of 22 patients (52%) were ≥70 years of age, and three (7%) had an Eastern Clinical Oncology Group Performance Status of 2, which was not included in the clinical trial. The response and disease control rates were 26 and 78%, respectively. With a median follow-up period of 7.9 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.5 (95% CI, 2.0-6.0) and 19 (95% CI, 6.4-not reached) months, respectively. Patients with liver metastases had significantly worse progression-free survival and overall survival, while lung and lymph node metastases did not clearly impact nivolumab efficacy. Multivariate analysis revealed that liver metastases may predict both worse progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.37; 95% CI, 1.07-5.24; P=0.03) and overall survival (HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.00-7.53; P=0.04). This study provided real-world evidence of nivolumab's favorable efficacy across diverse profiles, including the elderly and those with impaired performance status. No serious immune-related adverse events occurred and liver metastasis emerged as a predictive biomarker for nivolumab efficacy in esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Survival Impacts of Mitochondrial Status in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the survival impacts of mitochondrial status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery.

METHODS

In total, 260 pre-NAC samples from ESCC patients were analyzed. Mitochondrial status was estimated employing an objective, immunohistochemistry-based system (Mito-score). Mito-scores were dichotomized according to the median value of our cohort. We also evaluated the immune microenvironment (CD4, CD8, Foxp3, HLA class-1, Ki-67 and programmed death ligand-1) on pre-NAC specimens. Multivariate Cox hazards models were applied to determine independent predictors of poor overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients with cT3-4 tumors had higher Mito-scores than those with cT1-2 tumors (p = 0.06), and good responders to NAC had significantly higher Mito-scores than poor responders to NAC (p = 0.04). CD8 cells and Ki-67 expression were significantly higher in Mito-high than Mito-low tumors (p = 0.017 and p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with low Mito-scores had significantly poorer OS than those with high Mito-scores (3-year OS: 57.6% vs. 68.2%; p = 0.03). A survival difference by Mito-score was evident in cStage III-IV patients (3-year OS: low 50.6% vs. high 66.1%; p = 0.006). Multivariable analysis revealed that a low Mito-score (hazard ratio 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.12-2.24; p = 0.009) as well as pT3-4 disease (p < 0.001) and pN2-3 disease (p < 0.001) were independently associated with poor OS outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

A low Mito-score before NAC had a significant survival impact in ESCC patients, especially in those with advanced disease. Mitochondrial status might be associated with tumor aggressiveness and responsiveness to NAC, thereby possibly affecting the survival outcomes of ESCC patients.

Optimal early endpoint for second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated advanced solid cancers: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials.

METHODS

Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8.

RESULTS

A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2-57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy as second-line treatment for locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center observational study, we collected medical records of patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC who received either camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment between July 1, 2019, and May 31, 2023. We evaluated short-term efficacy, including overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), as well as survival outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety was also assessed. Additionally, factors influencing OS in ESCC patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC were included, with 30 receiving camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy and 30 receiving chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in ORR (33.33% vs. 13.33%) and DCR (73.33% vs. 56.67%) between the combination therapy and chemotherapy-alone groups (P > 0.05). However, the median PFS was significantly longer in the combination therapy group compared to the chemotherapy group (4.7 months vs. 3.4 months, P = 0.048). Additionally, the median OS was significantly improved in the combination therapy group compared to the chemotherapy group (11.7 months vs. 6.5 months, P = 0.003). Age and history of radical surgery were significantly associated with OS in patients receiving camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy as second-line treatment (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Second-line treatment with camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy is well-tolerated and associated with favorable oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC. Furthermore, younger patients and those who have undergone radical surgery may derive greater benefit from camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy as a second-line treatment.

ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline interim update on the treatment of locally advanced oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma

•This update provides recommendations for perioperative treatment of locally advanced oesophageal and OGJ adenocarcinoma. •Recent phase III data have demonstrated that perioperative ChT should be the preferred approach for most patients. •Updated recommendations are also provided for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma. •Algorithms for the management of locoregional oesophageal cancer and advanced squamous-cell carcinoma are provided. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.

Unraveling the tumor microenvironment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through single-cell sequencing: A comprehensive review

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly heterogeneous and aggressive malignancy. The progression, invasiveness, and metastatic potential of ESCC are shaped by a multitude of cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME), including tumor cells, immune cells, endothelial cells, as well as fibroblasts and other cell types. Recent advancements in single-cell sequencing technologies have significantly enhanced our comprehension of the diverse landscape of ESCC. Single-cell multi-omics technology, particularly single-cell transcriptome sequencing, have shed light on the expression profiles of individual cells and the molecular characteristics of distinct tumor cell populations. This review summarizes the latest literature on single-cell research in the field of ESCC, aiming to elucidate the heterogeneity of tumor cells, immune cells, and stromal cells at the single-cell level. Furthermore, it explores the impact of cellular interactions within the TME on the progression of ESCC. By compiling a comprehensive overview of single-cell omics research on ESCC, this article aims to enhance our understanding of ESCC diagnosis and treatment by elucidating the intricate interplay within the TME. It explores the cellular composition, spatial arrangement, and functional attributes of the ESCC TME, offering potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers for personalized treatment strategies.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors as second-line treatment for advanced squamous esophageal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with a focus on PD-L1 expression levels

Background

PD-1 inhibitors have shown promising efficacy in enhancing OS and AEs as second-line therapies for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, there remains no clear consensus on which PD-1 inhibitor provides the best balance between efficacy and safety. To address this key issue in the second-line treatment of ESCC, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) with a focus on OS benefits, particularly in patients with different levels of PD-L1 expression.

Methods

A systematic search of relevant literature was conducted in Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, covering publications from the inception of these database to June 2024. The evaluated endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), AEs, and Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (Grade ≥ 3 AEs). A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to assess the efficacy and safety of various immunotherapy regimens in patients with advanced ESCC. To ensure transparency, novelty, and reliability, this study was prospectively registered in the systematic review registry (CRD42024540581).

Results

Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs), encompassing 2,078 patients and six treatment regimens, were included in this study. Among advanced ESCC patients not selected based on PD-L1 expression, Sintilimab demonstrated the greatest OS benefit (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.98). Camrelizumab showed the most favorable improvement in PFS compared to chemotherapy (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47-0.87) and also achieved the best ORR benefit (OR = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.98-6.99). In terms of safety, Nivolumab (OR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.05-0.19) and Tislelizumab (OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.33) exhibited significant safety advantages over chemotherapy concerning AEs. Moreover, Nivolumab (OR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.08-0.20) was associated with a markedly lower risk of Grade ≥ 3 AEs compared to chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis based on PD-L1 expression revealed that Tislelizumab (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.37-0.76) offered the greatest OS benefit for patients with PD-L1 ≥ 10%, while Camrelizumab (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.89) was the most likely regimen to provide an OS advantage for patients with PD-L1 < 10%.

Conclusion

Compared to chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors may provide improved survival outcomes for patients with advanced ESCC. Among patients not selected based on PD-L1 expression, Sintilimab is most likely to deliver the best survival benefit. For patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 10%, Tislelizumab is expected to offer the greatest efficacy, while Camrelizumab appears to be the most effective for those with PD-L1 < 10%.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024540581.

Digestive cancers: mechanisms, therapeutics and management

Cancers of the digestive system are major contributors to global cancer-associated morbidity and mortality, accounting for 35% of annual cases of cancer deaths. The etiologies, molecular features, and therapeutic management of these cancer entities are highly heterogeneous and complex. Over the last decade, genomic and functional studies have provided unprecedented insights into the biology of digestive cancers, identifying genetic drivers of tumor progression and key interaction points of tumor cells with the immune system. This knowledge is continuously translated into novel treatment concepts and targets, which are dynamically reshaping the therapeutic landscape of these tumors. In this review, we provide a concise overview of the etiology and molecular pathology of the six most common cancers of the digestive system, including esophageal, gastric, biliary tract, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and colorectal cancers. We comprehensively describe the current stage-dependent pharmacological management of these malignancies, including chemo-, targeted, and immunotherapy. For each cancer entity, we provide an overview of recent therapeutic advancements and research progress. Finally, we describe how novel insights into tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion deepen our understanding of therapy resistance and provide an outlook on innovative therapeutic strategies that will shape the future management of digestive cancers, including CAR-T cell therapy, novel antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapies.

Cost-effectiveness of the addition of sintilimab as a first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Chinese healthcare system perspective

BACKGROUND

The ORIENT-15 double-blind randomized controlled trial demonstrated that the addition of sintilimab to chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) resulted in better clinical outcomes. In this analysis, we sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic OSCC from a healthcare system perspective in China.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was constructed to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing chemotherapy alone with sintilimab for locally advanced or metastatic OSCC patients. Clinical data were obtained from the ORIENT-15 trial and extrapolated to 10 years. Health state utilities and costs were sourced from the literature and from public healthcare institutions. The primary outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Two different sensitivity analyses, one-way and probabilistic, were performed to assess model uncertainty.

RESULTS

Sintilimab-based chemotherapy was more costly ($31699.21 vs. $20687.42) and more effective (0.74 vs. 0.53) than placebo-based chemotherapy, resulting in an ICER of $51908.19 /QALY, which is greater than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of China ($38223/QALY). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the PFS and cost of sintilimab were the major influencing factors affecting the results.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with locally advanced or metastatic OSCC, sintilimab chemotherapy could improve survival time and health benefits compared with traditional chemotherapy, but the present analysis suggests that sintilimab is not a cost-effective treatment option in China.

Is prophylactic lymph node dissection efficacious in salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy?

BACKGROUND

Salvage esophagectomy for esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is a high-risk surgery, and radical lymph node dissection (RLND) can cause severe complications. However, the significance of RLND in salvage surgery remains unclear.

METHODS

This study included 55 patients who underwent curative-intent salvage esophagectomy after dCRT for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We evaluated the prognostic impact of lymph node dissection of each station using efficacy indexes (EIs) and compared the outcomes between RLND and limited lymph node dissection (LLND).

RESULTS

Nine (16.4%) patients underwent RLND and 46 (83.6%) underwent LLND. Patients who underwent RLND had greater operative blood loss and a greater number of resected lymph nodes compared to patients who underwent LLND (P = 0.053 and 0.002, respectively). However, the incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different between the groups. The EIs of the cervical and mediastinal lymph nodes were zero because no patients with involved nodes at these stations remained alive at 5 years. In contrast, perigastric lymph nodes had relatively high EIs. Overall and cancer-specific survival did not differ significantly between patients who underwent RLND and those who underwent LLND (P = 0.475 and 0.808, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The EIs of the cervical and mediastinal lymph nodes were zero, and RLND did not improve survival. Depending on tumor status, LLND may be sufficient for salvage esophagectomy.

Multimodal Treatment of Resectable Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The current guidelines for the treatment of esophageal cancer recommend a multimodal approach that includes chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Despite advances in treatment, rates of treatment failure, pathologic incomplete response, tumor metastasis, and death remain unacceptably high.

METHODS

This study was a narrative literature review using the terms "resectable esophageal cancer" and "multimodal therapy" to identify prospective trials of neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy, individually or combined with surgery, for esophageal cancer. Trials performed between 1984 and 2022 were identified and analyzed.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov was queried to identify ongoing studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-one clinical studies were identified: 15 randomized controlled trials and 6 prospective nonrandomized trials. The results of the randomized trials suggest that multimodal therapy-in the form of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with radiation or chemotherapy alone, followed by surgery-is associated with better rates of local disease control and partial clinical response and, potentially, longer survival than is surgery alone. Immunotherapy is an emerging option for the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of patients with resectable esophageal cancer is rapidly evolving. Although previous treatment options have had only limited benefits for patients, significant progress has been made during last 3 decades. The results of the available studies suggest that advances in the treatment of esophageal cancer have the potential to improve survival in these patients; however, questions remain regarding mechanisms of action, patient selection, and the use of personalized approaches that are based on genetics.

Immune Stress-induced Tumor Mutation Burden and Neoantigen Expression in 4T1 Mammary Cancer Cells: A Potential Mechanism for Long-term Survival in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND/AIM

The Kaplan-Meier curves for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) display a small group of potentially-cured patients with long-term survival, creating a 'kangaroo-tail' shape of the survival curve. However, the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon and what occurs in patients whose cancer is resistant to ICIs remain unclear. The present study aimed to answer these questions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed mutations in mouse 4T1 mammary-gland-derived cancer cells expressing the hemagglutinin antigen (4T1-HA), which were grown in either wild-type mice or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL)-loaded immunocompromised mice (RAG-/- + ACT) under immune stress. These mutations were compared to those in 4T1-HA cells grown in RAG-/- mice without immune stress as a control.

RESULTS

The number of gene mutations, the tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) scores were increased in the cancer cells under immune stress. The mutations in the antigen protein were such that the protein retained its immunogenicity and could still function as a neoantigen. Repeated immune recognition of additional neoantigens may lead to the kangaroo-tail survival phenomenon. The common genetic mutations of the analyzed 4T1-HA cells under immune stress included genes related to immune response. Analysis of alternative splicing of genes showed that are accumulated gene alterations under immune stress related to cancer-cell proliferation. Copy-number variation (CNV) analysis indicated that normal-antigen presentation and immune responses may be impaired under immune stress.

CONCLUSION

Cancer cells, under immune stress, may acquire both immune escape capabilities and increased immunogenicity. This dual effect could lead to either resistance or response to ICIs, respectively.

S-1-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus nimotuzumab in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who failed neoadjuvant therapy: a real-world prospective study

PURPOSE

This prospective study in a real-world setting investigated the feasibility and safety of S-1 plus nimotuzumab (S-1-Nimo) based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) patients who failed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy.

METHODS

LA-ESCC patients who failed to converse to resectable disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy were enrolled to receive the 4-week S-1-Nimo regimen of radiotherapy (40 Gy in 20 fractions, 5 days per week), S-1 chemotherapy, and nimotuzumab. Then, after surgical assessments, patients evaluated as resectable disease received surgery; patients with unresectable disease continued to receive definitive radiotherapy (50-60 Gy in 25-30 fractions, 5 days per week) concurrently with S-1-Nimo. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS).

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were enrolled and evaluated. The median follow-up time was 23.2 months. Median EFS was 9.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-14.0) months, with an estimated 2-year EFS rate of 24.2%. The median overall survival (OS) and the estimated OS rate at 2 years were 13.4 (95% CI, 10.3-17.5) months and 31.2%, respectively. Twelve underwent surgery, with a surgical conversion rate of 18.8% and an R0 resection rate of 100.0%. Subgroup analysis identified the significantly prolonged EFS and OS in patients who experienced radical surgery (median EFS, not reached vs. 8.7 months; p = .0117. median OS, 24.9 vs. 10.6 months; p = .0205) as compared to those treated with CCRT. Of 64 patients, grade 3 adverse events mainly included radiation esophagitis (4.7%), anemia (1.6%), and thrombocytopenia (1.6%).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated the reasonable efficacy and promising safety of the S-1-Nimo-based CCRT in LA-ESCC patients with failure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy.

Adjuvant immunotherapy after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study

Background

The role of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting seems promising in recent years. As per the findings of the CheckMate 577 trial, patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who had neoadjuvant chemoradiation with residual pathologic disease should be considered adjuvant immunotherapy (AIT). However, it is unknown if individuals with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who have received neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) followed by radical surgery also require AIT.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the data from patients who underwent NICT and radical surgery for ESCC between 2019 and 2020. To compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), Kaplan-Meier survival curves were produced. To determine the parameters linked to DFS and OS, a Cox model using hazard ratios (HRs) was completed.

Results

Among the 292 eligible patients, 215 cases with a mean age of 63.3 ± 6.8 years, including 190 (88.4%) men and 25 (11.6%) women, were finally recruited. The percentage of R0 resection was 98.3%. After NICT, 65 (30.2%) patients achieved pathological complete response. AIT was given to 78 (36.3%) patients following radical resection. For all patients, the 3-year DFS and OS were 62.3% and 74.0%, respectively. In terms of 3-year DFS (61.5% vs. 62.8%, P=0.984) or OS (76.9% vs. 72.3%, P=0.384), no statistically significant difference was found between patients with and without AIT. AIT significantly improved survival in patients with ypT+N+ (DFS: 23.9% vs. 38.5%, P=0.036; OS: 37.0% vs. 61.5%, P=0.010), but not in those with ypT0N0 or ypT+N0. It was found that AIT was related to both DFS (HR: 0.297; P<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.321; P=0.001) in patients with ypT+N+.

Conclusion

In ypT+N+ ESCC patients, AIT after NICT followed by radical surgery reduces the recurrence and death, thereby improving the DFS and OS. Randomized controlled trials ought to be conducted to further assess the results of this retrospective investigation.

Mid-term follow-up results of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The study was conducted in order to investigate whether neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can bring survival benefits to patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the real world.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC who underwent surgery at the Jining First People's Hospital from April 2020 to April 2022. Based on their medical history, the enrolled patients were divided into a neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy plus surgery group (nICT group) and a surgery-only group (S group). Primary endpoints were the two-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Secondary endpoints were the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, and compared the surgery and postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

Results

A total of 47 patients in the nICT group and 73 patients in the S group were included for further analysis, the stage of the nICT group was more advanced than that of the S group. In the group nICT, 8 patients (17%) achieved the complete pathological response (pCR), 29 patients (61.7%) achieved major pathological response (MPR), including 6 patients (12.8%) with a primary tumor achieving pCR but had residual tumor cells in the lymph nodes (pT0N+), and the treatment-related AES was manageable. The surgery and postoperative outcomes were comparable in both groups. The two-year OS and DFS rates for the nICT group were 91.5% and 85.5% respectively, while those for the S group were 71.2% and 68.5%, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test revealed significant differences in DFS and OS between the two groups. Patients who achieved MPR in the nICT group showed better DFS and OS, while the Three-cycle subgroup did not exhibit any survival benefit compared to the Two-cycle subgroup.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy has promising efficacy and safety in the treatment of locally advanced resectable ESCC. The treatment modality has the potential to become a standard therapy for locally advanced resectable ESCC.

Tislelizumab for consolidation therapy in patients with pathologically residual Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after definitive concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II trial

Although concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) is presently the standard intervention for patients with inoperable, locally advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC), it has been associated with poor long-term survival outcomes. Notably, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) improve the long-term survival of Esophageal Cancer (EC) patients, with manageable Adverse Effects (AEs). Herein, 90 patients with residual pathology after radical simultaneous Radiotherapy (RT) for inoperable/refused-to-operate ESCC were enrolled and randomized into two treatment groups (Chemotherapy+immunotherapy and chemotherapy alone) in a 2:1 ratio. This study will also discuss the value of immunotherapy in improving long-term survival outcomes in patients with pathological residuals after concurrent RT for locally advanced, inoperable ESCC.Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/identifier is ChiCTR2200063345.

Biomarker Testing and Role of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Immunotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) constitutes an aggressive subset of esophageal cancers that portends a poor prognosis. Management of ESCC has been historically challenging due to the limited effective therapeutic options. Broadening our understanding of the molecular landscape and identifying reliable biomarkers are essential in early detection, monitoring disease response and advancing treatment strategies. Recently, immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have changed the treatment algorithm of ESCC. In this review, we explore the molecular landscape and biomarkers that can aid in the management of ESCC and discuss the role of immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of ESCC.