Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil and mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a secondary analysis of the results from the randomised, controlled AMBITION study

Oral Treprostinil is Associated with Improved Survival in FREEDOM-EV and its Open-Label Extension

INTRODUCTION

In the event-driven FREEDOM-EV trial, oral treprostinil delayed clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Open-label extension studies offer additional data about tolerability, efficacy, and survival, especially for those initially assigned placebo. The aim of the current study was to determine if oral treprostinil changed survival when considering the parent and extension study, if treprostinil provides functional benefits for participants initially assigned to placebo, and if the benefits observed for those treated with treprostinil were durable.

METHODS

Both active and placebo participants from FREEDOM-EV could enroll in the FREEDOM-EV open-label extension (OLE) study after experiencing an investigator-assessed clinical worsening event or after parent study closure. All participants in the OLE were offered open-label oral treprostinil. Previously assigned placebo participants titrated to maximally tolerated doses; previously assigned treprostinil participants continued dose titration. We repeated assessments including functional class and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at 12-week intervals and measured N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at week 48. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and we estimated hazard ratio (HR) using Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

Of 690 FREEDOM-EV participants, 470 enrolled in the OLE; vital status was available for 89% of initial Freedom-EV participants. When considering the combined parent and open-label data, initial assignment to oral treprostinil reduced mortality (HR 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.91, p = 0.013); absolute risk reduction was 9%. Participants randomized to placebo who initiated oral treprostinil after clinical worsening and tolerated treatment through week 48 demonstrated favorable shifts in functional class (p < 0.0001), 6MWD improvements of + 84 m (p < 0.0001), and a reduction in NT-proBNP of - 778 pg/mL (p = 0.02), compared to OLE baseline. Modest trends toward benefit were measured for those initially assigned placebo who did not have clinical worsening, and 132/144 (92%) of treprostinil assigned participants without clinical worsening remained on drug at week 48 in the OLE study. Adverse events were consistent with FREEDOM-EV.

CONCLUSION

Initial treprostinil assignment improved survival in the entire data set; those who began treprostinil after a clinical worsening in the placebo arm and tolerated drug to week 48 enjoyed substantial functional gains.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01560637.

Do Patients With Low-Risk Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Really Benefit From Upfront Combination Therapy?: Insight From the AMBITION Trial

BACKGROUND

Based on results of the Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (AMBITION) trial, upfront combination therapy is recommended for treatment-naive patients with low-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, conflicting data exist whether adopting this treatment strategy in this risk group is beneficial or well tolerated.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do patients with low-risk PAH really benefit from upfront combination therapy?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Using the data from the original AMBITION trial, patients with PAH were classified as low, intermediate, or high risk using the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term PAH Disease Management 2.0 (REVEAL 2.0) score and the Pulmonary Hypertension Outcomes and Risk Assessment (PHORA) tool. The primary end point was time to clinical worsening (including death, hospitalization for PAH worsening, and disease progression) censored at 1- and 3-year post-enrollment. Side effects that led to withdrawal of treatment were also considered.

RESULTS

Patients with low-risk PAH categorized by REVEAL 2.0 and PHORA did not see a statistically significant benefit of upfront combination therapy vs monotherapy for time to clinical worsening at 1 and 3 years' post-enrollment using Cox proportional analysis (3-year hazard ratio of 0.40 [95% CI, 0.15-1.06; P = .07] and 0.55 [95% CI, 0.26-1.18; P = .12] for REVEAL 2.0 and PHORA, respectively) or considering time to clinical worsening or side effects (3-year hazard ratio of 0.75 [95% CI, 0.39-1.47; P = .4] and 0.87 [95% CI, 0.49-1.54; P = .63] for REVEAL 2.0 and PHORA). Patients with low-risk PAH on upfront combination therapy experienced a higher but not significant incidence of side effects using REVEAL 2.0 and PHORA. In contrast, patients at intermediate or high risk saw a statistically significant benefit of upfront combination therapy considering each of the end points regardless of side effects.

INTERPRETATION

This analysis suggests that perhaps some patients with low-risk PAH should be further stratified using other modalities prior to committing to upfront combination therapy, especially when the occurrence of side effects is considered. Further prospective data are needed to validate this hypothesis prior to changes in current guideline directed therapy are contemplated.

The tissue-specific transcriptional landscape underlines the involvement of endothelial cells in health and disease

Endothelial cells (ECs) that line vascular and lymphatic vessels are being increasingly recognized as important to organ function in health and disease. ECs participate not only in the trafficking of gases, metabolites, and cells between the bloodstream and tissues but also in the angiocrine-based induction of heterogeneous parenchymal cells, which are unique to their specific tissue functions. The molecular mechanisms regulating EC heterogeneity between and within different tissues are modeled during embryogenesis and become fully established in adults. Any changes in adult tissue homeostasis induced by aging, stress conditions, and various noxae may reshape EC heterogeneity and induce specific transcriptional features that condition a functional phenotype. Heterogeneity is sustained via specific genetic programs organized through the combinatory effects of a discrete number of transcription factors (TFs) that, at the single tissue-level, constitute dynamic networks that are post-transcriptionally and epigenetically regulated. This review is focused on outlining the TF-based networks involved in EC specialization and physiological and pathological stressors thought to modify their architecture.

Pathophysiology and new advances in pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is a progressive and often fatal cardiopulmonary condition characterised by increased pulmonary arterial pressure, structural changes in the pulmonary circulation, and the formation of vaso-occlusive lesions. These changes lead to increased right ventricular afterload, which often progresses to maladaptive right ventricular remodelling and eventually death. Pulmonary arterial hypertension represents one of the most severe and best studied types of pulmonary hypertension and is consistently targeted by drug treatments. The underlying molecular pathogenesis of pulmonary hypertension is a complex and multifactorial process, but can be characterised by several hallmarks: inflammation, impaired angiogenesis, metabolic alterations, genetic or epigenetic abnormalities, influence of sex and sex hormones, and abnormalities in the right ventricle. Current treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension and some other types of pulmonary hypertension target pathways involved in the control of pulmonary vascular tone and proliferation; however, these treatments have limited efficacy on patient outcomes. This review describes key features of pulmonary hypertension, discusses current and emerging therapeutic interventions, and points to future directions for research and patient care. Because most progress in the specialty has been made in pulmonary arterial hypertension, this review focuses on this type of pulmonary hypertension. The review highlights key pathophysiological concepts and emerging therapeutic directions, targeting inflammation, cellular metabolism, genetics and epigenetics, sex hormone signalling, bone morphogenetic protein signalling, and inhibition of tyrosine kinase receptors.

Initial Triple Combination Therapy Including Intravenous Prostaglandin I2 for the Treatment of Patients with Severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Upfront combination therapy including intravenous prostaglandin I₂ (PGI₂-IV) is recognized as the most appropriate treatment for patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This retrospective study aimed to determine reasons why this therapy is not used for some patients with severe PAH and describe the hemodynamic and clinical prognoses of patients receiving initial combination treatment with (PGI₂-IV+) or without (PGI₂-IV-) PGI₂-IV.Data for patients with severe PAH (World Health Organization Functional Class III/IV and mean pulmonary arterial pressure [mPAP] ≥ 40 mmHg) were extracted from the Japan Pulmonary Hypertension Registry. Overall, 73 patients were included (PGI₂-IV + n = 17; PGI₂-IV- n = 56). The PGI₂-IV+ cohort was younger than the PGI₂-IV- cohort (33.8 ± 10.6 versus 52.6 ± 18.2 years) and had higher mPAP (58.1 ± 12.9 versus 51.8 ± 9.0 mmHg), greater prevalence of idiopathic PAH (88% versus 32%), and less prevalence of connective tissue disease-associated PAH (0% versus 29%). Hemodynamic measures, including mPAP, showed improvement in both cohorts (post-treatment median [interquartile range] 38.5 [17.0-40.0] for the PGI₂-IV + cohort and 33.0 [25.0-43.0] mmHg for the PGI₂-IV - cohort). Deaths (8/56) and lung transplantation (1/56) occurred only in the PGI₂-IV - cohort.These Japanese registry data indicate that older age, lower mPAP, and non-idiopathic PAH may influence clinicians against using upfront combination therapy including PGI₂-IV for patients with severe PAH. Early combination therapy including PGI₂-IV was associated with improved hemodynamics from baseline, but interpretation is limited by the small sample size.

Efficacy and safety of switching from bosentan or ambrisentan to macitentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

There is little evidence of the effectiveness of switching from the endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) bosentan and ambrisentan to a novel ERA, macitentan, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of patients with PAH switching from other ERAs to macitentan.

Methods

We retrieved the relevant literature published before January 2022 for the meta-analysis from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Efficacy included changes in the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, hemodynamics, echocardiography and survival.

Results

Nine studies, consisting of 408 PAH patients, that met the inclusion criteria were included. The switch from bosentan or ambrisentan to macitentan effectively increased the 6MWD by 20.71 m (95% CI: 10.35-31.07, P < 0.00001, I ² = 0%). Six months after conversion, the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was found to improve from 19.0 ± 4.0 to 21.0 ± 5.0 mm in adults and from 16.00 ± 5.0 to 18.25 ± 4.8 mm in children. Ordinal logistic regression showed that the WHO-FC significantly improved by 0.412 (95% CI: 0.187-0.908, P = 0.028). The switch did not show significant improvement in NT-proBNP levels. In addition, the switch was well tolerated.

Conclusion

The switch from bosentan or ambrisentan to macitentan significantly increased the 6MWD in PAH patients, improved the WHO-FC, and exerted safety benefits. The effects of the switch on NT-proBNP levels, hemodynamics, and echocardiography still need to be further confirmed.

Systematic review registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021292554].

Selexipag-based triple combination therapy improves prognosis in Chinese pulmonary arterial hypertension patients

Aim

Selexipag is an oral selective prostacyclin receptor agonist approved for treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In the present study, we aim to assess the safety and efficacy of selexipag in triple combination therapy with endothelial receptor antagonists (ERAs) and PDE5is for Chinese PAH patients.

Methods and results

A single center retrospective study was performed on group 1 PAH patients (n = 68) initiating triple combination therapy with selexipag from 1 February 2020 to 31 August 2021 in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Shandong, China). Adolescents, children, and PAH patients with unrepaired congenital heart disease were excluded. The French pulmonary hypertension network (FPHN) non-invasive risk assessment, echocardiogram parameters, and clinical data, including tolerability, safety, and death/hospitalization events associated with PAH, were collected. Of the 68 patients, 31 (45.6%) patients had tolerable side effects while only a single patient discontinued selexipag due to severe diarrhea. In the analysis of the efficacy set of 62 patients, the median selexipag treatment time from selexipag initiation to last risk assessment was 27 (21, 33) weeks. Compared to baseline parameters, the percentage of WHO FC III/IV decreased from 77.4% (48) to 24.2% (15) (p = 0.000), median 6-min walk distance (6MWD) increased 82 m [from 398 (318, 450) to 480 (420, 506) m; p = 0.000], and NT-proBNP levels decreased from 1,216 (329, 2,159) to 455 (134, 1,678) pg/mL (p = 0.007). Patients who improved to three low-risk criteria increased from 9.7 to 38.7%. Right ventricular diameter (RV) diameter also decreased and was accompanied by an improved tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Patients transitioning from subcutaneous treprostinil to selexipag continued to show improvements in WHO FC, 6MWD (404 ± 94 vs. 383 ± 127 m) and NT-proBNP levels (2,319 ± 2,448 vs. 2,987 ± 3,770 pg/mL). Finally, the 1-year event free survival rate was 96.7% for patients initiating the triple combination therapy within 3 years of PAH diagnosis.

Conclusion

Triple combination therapy with selexipag was safe and effective in Chinese PAH patients, which was confirmed by acceptable tolerability, and improved exercise capacity, right heart function, risk assessment, and prognosis.

Assessment of Clinical Worsening End Points as a Surrogate for Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Clinical worsening (CW) is a composite end point commonly used in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) trials. We aimed to assess the trial-level surrogacy of CW for mortality in PAH trials, and whether the various CW components were similar in terms of frequency of occurrence, treatment-related relative risk (RR) reduction, and importance to patients.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (January 1990 to December 2020) for trials evaluating the effects of PAH therapies on CW. The coefficient of determination between the RR for CW and mortality was assessed by regression analysis. The frequency of occurrence, RR reduction, and importance to patients of the CW components were assessed.

RESULTS

We included 35 independent cohorts (9450 patients). PAH therapies significantly reduced CW events (RR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.55-0.73]), including PAH-related hospitalizations (RR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.79]), treatment escalation (RR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.38-0.84]) and symptomatic progression (RR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.48-0.69]), and modestly reduced all-cause mortality when incorporating deaths occurring after a primary CW-defining event (RR, 0.860 [95% CI, 0.742-0.997]). However, the effects of PAH-specific therapies on CW only modestly correlated with their effects on mortality (R²_trial, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.10-0.59]; P<0.0001), and the gradient in the treatment effect across component end points was large in the majority of trials. The weighted proportions of CW-defining events were hospitalization (33.5%) and symptomatic progression (32.3%), whereas death (6.7%), treatment escalation (5.6%), and transplantation/atrioseptostomy (0.2%) were infrequent. CW events were driven by the occurrence of events of major (49%) and mild-to-moderate (37%) importance to patients, with 14% of the events valued as critical.

CONCLUSIONS

PAH therapies significantly reduced CW events, but study-level CW is not a surrogate for mortality in PAH trials. Moreover, components of CW largely vary in frequency, response to therapy, and importance to patients and are thus not interchangeable.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; Unique identifier: CRD42020178949.

Profiles and treatment patterns of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension on monotherapy at experienced centres

AIMS

Guideline recommendations highlight the critical role of combination therapy for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Conversely, registry data demonstrate that a considerable number of PAH patients remain on monotherapy. The reasons for this discrepancy remain elusive. The aim of this study was to assess the patient profiles, treatment patterns, and disease characteristics of patients diagnosed with PAH who were kept on monotherapy at experienced pulmonary hypertension (PH) centres and to capture potential reasons for monotherapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the patient profiles of 182 patients on monotherapy with PAH-targeted drugs, managed at experienced PH expert centres (Cologne, Giessen, Heidelberg, and Dresden). Patients were identified based on their latest follow-up visit and analysed retrospectively from the time of PAH diagnosis to last follow-up. Patients were dichotomized by age, and patient characteristics, treatment patterns, response to therapy, change in risk status, and drug tolerability were recorded during the course of their disease. Patients' mean age was 69.1 ± 13.1 years at the most recent follow-up (Key Time Point 1) and 64.5 ± 14.9 years at the time of diagnosis (Key Time Point 2). The mean time on monotherapy was 60.7 ± 53.8 months; 35.7/64.3% of patients were male/female. The majority (66.5%) had idiopathic PAH, followed by PAH associated with connective tissue disease (17.0%) and portopulmonary PH (8.2%). Among patients on monotherapy, there were five main clusters: (i) patients with failed escalation attempts mostly because of intolerability (26.9%); (ii) low risk on monotherapy, favourable response, and no reason for escalation (24.2%); (iii) patients with mild PAH (36.3%); (iv) elderly patients with PAH and multiple co-morbidities (38.5%); and (v) patients with associated forms of PAH where the level of evidence for combination therapies is considered low (16.5%). There were substantial differences between patients above or below the median age (68 years). The most frequently used monotherapy for PAH was phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (75.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable number of PAH patients are on monotherapy at large PH expert centres, characterized by specific reasons that justify this kind of treatment. Nevertheless, as comprehensive treatment strategies have shown improved long-term outcomes even in mildly symptomatic patients, each case of monotherapy should be justified.

Prognostic impact of follow-up pulmonary vascular resistance in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Objective

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), caused by pulmonary artery remodelling and increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) due to an unknown mechanism, is an intractable disease with a poor prognosis. The recent development of PAH-specific treatment medications may allow for higher PVR reduction than previously achieved. This study aimed to identify the prognostic significance of follow-up PVR levels achieved shortly after the initiation of targeted treatment in patients with idiopathic/heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (I/H-PAH).

Methods

We analysed the data of all patients with I/H-PAH admitted to our hospital between 1998 and 2019. We collected data at baseline and during the first invasive haemodynamic evaluation. The primary outcome was death or lung transplantation.

Results

Of the 133 treatment-naïve patients enrolled in this study, 47 experienced adverse events during a median follow-up period of 6.4 (IQR 3.5–11.5) years. The median time interval to first follow-up from diagnosis was 162 (IQR 117–253) days. Incidence of the primary outcome was significantly lower in patients who achieved low PVR at follow-up. Of risk factors evaluated at follow-up, the multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed PVR as an independent predictor of the primary outcome (HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.029 to 1.183; p=0.006). The results were consistent across risk profiles according to the simplified risk stratification recommended by the European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society guidelines.

Conclusion

Follow-up PVR was an independent predictor of transplant-free survival in patients with I/H-PAH. Evaluation of haemodynamic status shortly after initiating treatment may help predict long-term prognosis.

Temporal trends in pulmonary arterial hypertension: results from the COMPERA registry

BACKGROUND

Since 2015, the European pulmonary hypertension guidelines recommend the use of combination therapy in most patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, it is unclear to what extent this treatment strategy is adopted in clinical practice and if it is associated with improved long-term survival.

METHODS

We analysed data from COMPERA, a large European pulmonary hypertension registry, to assess temporal trends in the use of combination therapy and survival of patients with newly diagnosed PAH between 2010 and 2019. For survival analyses, we looked at annualised data and at cumulated data comparing the periods 2010-2014 and 2015-2019.

RESULTS

A total of 2531 patients were included. The use of early combination therapy (within 3 months after diagnosis) increased from 10.0% in patients diagnosed with PAH in 2010 to 25.0% in patients diagnosed with PAH in 2019. The proportion of patients receiving combination therapy 1 year after diagnosis increased from 27.7% to 46.3%. When comparing the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 periods, 1-year survival estimates were similar (89.0% (95% CI 87.2-90.9%) and 90.8% (95% CI 89.3-92.4%), respectively), whereas there was a slight but nonsignificant improvement in 3-year survival estimates (67.8% (95% CI 65.0-70.8%) and 70.5% (95% CI 67.8-73.4%), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of combination therapy increased from 2010 to 2019, but most patients still received monotherapy. Survival rates at 1 year after diagnosis did not change over time. Future studies need to determine if the observed trend suggesting improved 3-year survival rates can be confirmed.

Dan-Shen-Yin Granules Prevent Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension via STAT3/HIF-1α/VEGF and FAK/AKT Signaling Pathways

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) plays an important role in the treatment of complex diseases, especially cardiovascular diseases. However, it is hard to identify their modes of action on account of their multiple components. The present study aims to evaluate the effects of Dan-Shen-Yin (DSY) granules on hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension (HPH), and then to decipher the molecular mechanisms of DSY. Systematic pharmacology was employed to identify the targets of DSY on HPH. Furthermore, core genes were identified by constructing a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and analyzed by Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes (KEGG) analysis. Related genes and pathways were verified using a hypoxia-induced mouse model and hypoxia-treated pulmonary artery cells. Based on network pharmacology, 147 potential targets of DSY on HPH were found, constructing a PPI network, and 13 hub genes were predicted. The results showed that the effect of DSY may be closely associated with AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 (AKT1), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and HIF-1 signaling pathways, as well as biological processes such as cell proliferation. Consistent with network pharmacology analysis, experiments in vivo demonstrated that DSY could prevent the development of HPH in a hypoxia-induced mouse model and alleviate pulmonary vascular remodeling. In addition, inhibition of STAT3/HIF-1α/VEGF and FAK/AKT signaling pathways might serve as mechanisms. Taken together, the network pharmacology analysis suggested that DSY exhibited therapeutic effects through multiple targets in the treatment of HPH. The inferences were initially confirmed by subsequent in vivo and in vitro studies. This study provides a novel perspective for studying the relevance of TCM and disease processes and illustrates the advantage of this approach and the multitargeted anti-HPH effect of DSY.

The Transition From Ambrisentan to Macitentan in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Real-word Prospective Study

Background: In a long-term event-driven trial, macitentan has demonstrated beneficial time to clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and reduced PAH-related hospitalization rates compared with placebo. Macitentan is the most recently approved endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and is the first ERA that has shown efficacy for morbidity and mortality in PAH patients; therefore, patients and physicians may consider converting treatment from ambrisentan to macitentan. Our study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and quality of life in PAH patients transitioning from ambrisentan to macitentan. Methods: This was a real-world, prospective study with a 12-month follow-up. PAH patients who had received stable doses of ambrisentan for over 3 months, were within the World Health Organization Functional Class II/III, and 6-min walk distance ≥ of 250 m were enrolled. The study included a screening period, followed by a transition phase, after which patients entered the long-term follow-up. Clinical data and treatment satisfaction outcomes were collected to assess and monitor the safety and efficacy of the transition. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn; No. ChiCTR2000034898). Results: One hundred and fifty-seven enrolled PAH patients completed the transition. All criteria for continuous treatment transition were met by 145 patients (92.4%). Results showed improvements in exercise capacity, cardiac function, and hemodynamics compared with baseline. During the process, 4 patients discontinued macitentan due to adverse events. There was no statistical difference in the overall incidence of adverse events before and after the transition. Conclusion: Transition to macitentan from ambrisentan was successful and well-tolerated by PAH patients, and was associated with greater efficacy and satisfaction.

The Transition From Ambrisentan to Macitentan in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Real-word Prospective Study

Background: In a long-term event-driven trial, macitentan has demonstrated beneficial time to clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and reduced PAH-related hospitalization rates compared with placebo. Macitentan is the most recently approved endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and is the first ERA that has shown efficacy for morbidity and mortality in PAH patients; therefore, patients and physicians may consider converting treatment from ambrisentan to macitentan. Our study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and quality of life in PAH patients transitioning from ambrisentan to macitentan.

Methods: This was a real-world, prospective study with a 12-month follow-up. PAH patients who had received stable doses of ambrisentan for over 3 months, were within the World Health Organization Functional Class II/III, and 6-min walk distance ≥ of 250 m were enrolled. The study included a screening period, followed by a transition phase, after which patients entered the long-term follow-up. Clinical data and treatment satisfaction outcomes were collected to assess and monitor the safety and efficacy of the transition. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn; No. ChiCTR2000034898).

Results: One hundred and fifty-seven enrolled PAH patients completed the transition. All criteria for continuous treatment transition were met by 145 patients (92.4%). Results showed improvements in exercise capacity, cardiac function, and hemodynamics compared with baseline. During the process, 4 patients discontinued macitentan due to adverse events. There was no statistical difference in the overall incidence of adverse events before and after the transition.

Conclusion: Transition to macitentan from ambrisentan was successful and well-tolerated by PAH patients, and was associated with greater efficacy and satisfaction.

Mortality trends in pulmonary arterial hypertension in canada: a temporal analysis of survival per ESC/ERS Guideline Era

INTRODUCTION

The evolution in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) management has been summarized in three iterations of the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines. No study has assessed whether changes in management, as reflected in the changing guidelines, has translated to improved long-term survival in PAH.

METHODS

Mixed retrospective/prospective analysis of treatment naïve, incident PAH patients (n=392) diagnosed at three major centers in Canada from 2009-2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on their diagnosis date and in accordance with three ESC/ERS guideline iterations: 2009 and 2015. Overall survival was assessed based on date of diagnosis and initial treatment strategy (i.e. mono versus combination).

RESULTS

In Canada, there was a shift towards more aggressive upfront management with combination therapy after the publication of the 2015 guidelines (10.4% and 30.8% in 2009-2015 patients, and 36.0% and 57.4% in 2016-2021 patients, for baseline and 2-year follow-up respectively). A key factor associated with combination therapy after 2015 was higher pulmonary vascular resistance (p=0.009). The 1, 3 and 5 year survival rates in Canada were 89.2%, 75.6%. and 56.0%, respectively. Despite changes in management, there was no improvement in long-term survival before and after publication of the 2015 ESC/ERS guideline (p=0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

There was an increase in the use of initial and sequential combination therapy in Canada after publication of the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines, which was not associated with improved long-term survival. These data highlight the continued difficulties of managing this aggressive pulmonary disease in an era without a cure.

Advances in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

The management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has significantly evolved over the last decades in the wake of more sensitive diagnostics and specialized clinical programs that can provide focused medical care. In the current era of PAH care, 1-year survival rates have increased to 86%–90% from 65% in the 1980s, and average long-term survival has increased to 6 years from 2.8 years. The heterogeneity in the etiology and disease course has opened doors to focusing research in phenotyping the disease and understanding the pathophysiology at a cellular and genetic level. This may eventually lead to precision medicine and the development of medications that may prevent or reverse pulmonary vascular remodeling. With more insight, clinical trial designs and primary end-points may change to identify the true survival benefit of pharmacotherapy. Identifying responders from non-responders to therapy may help provide individualized patient-centered care rather than an algorithm-based approach. The purpose of this review is to highlight the latest advances in screening, diagnosis, and management of PAH.

How We Would Treat Our Own Pulmonary Hypertension if We Needed to Undergo Cardiac Surgery

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a disease that has many etiologies and is particularly prevalent in patients presenting for cardiac surgery, with which it is linked to poor outcomes. This manuscript is intended to provide a comprehensive review of the impact of PH on the perioperative management of patients who are undergoing cardiac surgery. The diagnosis of PH often involves a combination of noninvasive and invasive testing, whereas preoperative optimization frequently necessitates the use of specific medications that affect anesthetic management of these patients. The authors postulate that a thoughtful, multidisciplinary approach is required to deliver excellent perioperative care. Furthermore, they use an index case to illustrate the implications of managing a patient with pulmonary hypertension who presents for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Endothelin-1 axes in the framework of predictive, preventive and personalised (3P) medicine

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is involved in the regulation of a myriad of processes highly relevant for physical and mental well-being; female and male health; in the modulation of senses, pain, stress reactions and drug sensitivity as well as healing processes, amongst others. Shifted ET-1 homeostasis may influence and predict the development and progression of suboptimal health conditions, metabolic impairments with cascading complications, ageing and related pathologies, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative pathologies, aggressive malignancies, modulating, therefore, individual outcomes of both non-communicable and infectious diseases such as COVID-19. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the involvement of ET-1 and related regulatory pathways in physiological and pathophysiological processes and estimates its capacity as a predictor of ageing and related pathologies,a sensor of lifestyle quality and progression of suboptimal health conditions to diseases for their targeted preventionand as a potent target for cost-effective treatments tailored to the person.

Comparative assessment of efficacy and safety of ambrisentan and bosentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: A meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Two endothelin receptor antagonists, ambrisentan and bosentan, have been demonstrated to be effective individually compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of ambrisentan and bosentan in patients with PAH.

METHODS

Clinical trials were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL/CCTR), EMBASE and PubMed databases. Weighted mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous outcomes (6-min walk distance [6MWD] and Borg dyspnoea index [BDI]). Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated for binary outcomes, including clinical worsening, discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and liver dysfunction. Surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank the treatments in each index.

RESULTS

Five clinical trials from four published studies (total patients: n = 920) were included. Ambrisentan and bosentan showed no significant difference in 6MWD (MD: -1.32; 95% CI: -27.87, 25.31, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.73, bosentan 0.77), BDI (MD: -0.16; 95% CI: -0.98, 0.65, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.83, bosentan 0.66), clinical worsening (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.33, 2.94, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.75, bosentan 0.74) and discontinuation due to AEs (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.11, 5.86, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.47, bosentan 0.57). However, ambrisentan was significantly better than bosentan with respect to abnormal liver function (HR: 23.18; 95% CI: 2.24, 377.20, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.99, bosentan 0.02).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that ambrisentan was similar to bosentan in efficacy, while it exhibited better tolerability with respect to abnormal liver function in comparison with bosentan, in patients with PAH.

Oxidized DNA Precursors Cleanup by NUDT1 Contributes to Vascular Remodeling in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Rationale: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening condition characterized by abnormally elevated pulmonary pressures and right ventricular failure. Excessive proliferation and resistance to apoptosis of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) is one of the most important drivers of vascular remodeling in PAH, for which available treatments have limited effectiveness.Objectives: To gain insights into the mechanisms leading to the development of the disease and identify new actionable targets.Methods: Protein expression profiling was conducted by two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry in isolated PASMCs from controls and patients with PAH. Multiple molecular, biochemical, and pharmacologic approaches were used to decipher the role of NUDT1 (nudrix hyrolase 1) in PAH.Measurements and Main Results: Increased expression of the detoxifying DNA enzyme NUDT1 was detected in cells and tissues from patients with PAH and animal models. In vitro, molecular or pharmacological inhibition of NUDT1 in PAH-PASMCs induced accumulation of oxidized nucleotides in the DNA, irresolvable DNA damage (comet assay), disruption of cellular bioenergetics (Seahorse), and cell death (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay). In two animal models with established PAH (i.e., monocrotaline and Sugen/hypoxia-treated rats), pharmacological inhibition of NUDT1 using (S)-Crizotinib significantly decreased pulmonary vascular remodeling and improved hemodynamics and cardiac function.Conclusions: Our results indicate that, by overexpressing NUDT1, PAH-PASMCs hijack persistent oxidative stress in preventing incorporation of oxidized nucleotides into DNA, thus allowing the cell to escape apoptosis and proliferate. Given that NUDT1 inhibitors are under clinical investigation for cancer, they may represent a new therapeutic option for PAH.

Recent advances in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: lessons from the upfront combination of ambrisentan and tadalafil

INTRODUCTION

The sixth World Symposium of Pulmonary Hypertension (sixth WSPH) brought to the forefront for the first time the value of earlier, aggressive management with an upfront oral combination in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) of low or intermediate risk. This was prompted by results from the AMBITION study (ambrisentan + tadalafil). A literature search was conducted to collect all evidence provided by upfront treatment with this combination, as well as other combinations under investigation at the time the manuscript was prepared.

AREAS COVERED

The value of an upfront oral combination with ambrisentan and tadalafil is reviewed on the basis of topics discussed at the sixth WSPH, such as evidence in different PAH etiologies, according to risk stratification and in so-called 'atypical' patients where monotherapy is still recommended. Evidence in clinical practice is also reviewed. New evidence about the value of the upfront oral combination is also commented. Finally, tendencies in primary endpoints to assess the effect of PAH-targeted therapies (time to clinical worsening and hemodynamics) and their value are also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

All above-mentioned aspects are put into perspective with regard to the impact of new advances on improving PAH management in clinical practice.

Pathological Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Targets of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Review

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive cardiovascular disease characterized by pulmonary vasculature reconstruction and right ventricular dysfunction. The mortality rate of PAH remains high, although multiple therapeutic strategies have been implemented in clinical practice. These drugs mainly target the endothelin-1, prostacyclin and nitric oxide pathways. Management for PAH treatment includes improving symptoms, enhancing quality of life, and extending survival rate. Existing drugs developed to treat the disease have resulted in enormous economic and healthcare liabilities. The estimated cost for advanced PAH has exceeded $200,000 per year. The pathogenesis of PAH is associated with numerous molecular processes. It mainly includes germline mutation, inflammation, dysfunction of pulmonary arterial endothelial cells, epigenetic modifications, DNA damage, metabolic dysfunction, sex hormone imbalance, and oxidative stress, among others. Findings based on the pathobiology of PAH may have promising therapeutic outcomes. Hence, faced with the challenges of increasing healthcare demands, in this review, we attempted to explore the pathological mechanisms and alternative therapeutic targets, including other auxiliary devices or interventional therapies, in PAH. The article will discuss the potential therapies of PAH in detail, which may require further investigation before implementation.

Combination Therapy with Oral Treprostinil for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. A Double-Blind Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

Rationale: Oral treprostinil improves exercise capacity in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), but the effect on clinical outcomes was unknown.

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of oral treprostinil compared with placebo on time to first adjudicated clinical worsening event in participants with PAH who recently began approved oral monotherapy.

Methods: In this event-driven, double-blind study, we randomly allocated 690 participants (1:1 ratio) with PAH to receive placebo or oral treprostinil extended-release tablets three times daily. Eligible participants were using approved oral monotherapy for over 30 days before randomization and had a 6-minute-walk distance 150 m or greater. The primary endpoint was the time to first adjudicated clinical worsening event: death; hospitalization due to worsening PAH; initiation of inhaled or parenteral prostacyclin therapy; disease progression; or unsatisfactory long-term clinical response.

Measurements and Main Results: Clinical worsening occurred in 26% of the oral treprostinil group compared with 36% of placebo participants (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.97; P = 0.028). Key measures of disease status, including functional class, Borg dyspnea score, and N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide, all favored oral treprostinil treatment at Week 24 and beyond. A noninvasive risk stratification analysis demonstrated that oral treprostinil–assigned participants had a substantially higher mortality risk at baseline but achieved a lower risk profile from Study Weeks 12–60. The most common adverse events in the oral treprostinil group were headache, diarrhea, flushing, nausea, and vomiting.

Conclusions: In participants with PAH, addition of oral treprostinil to approved oral monotherapy reduced the risk of clinical worsening.

Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01560624).

Initial combination therapy of ambrisentan and tadalafil in connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CTD-PAH) in the modified intention-to-treat population of the AMBITION study: post hoc analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate initial combination therapy with ambrisentan plus tadalafil (COMB) compared with monotherapy of either agent (MONO), and the utility of baseline characteristics and risk stratification in predicting outcomes, in patients with connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (CTD-PAH) and the systemic sclerosis (SSc)-pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) subpopulation.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of the Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (AMBITION) study included patients with CTD-PAH from the modified intention-to-treat population. Time to clinical failure (TtCF) was assessed by baseline characteristics, treatment assignment and risk group (low, intermediate and high) at baseline and week 16. TtCF was compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression modelling.

RESULTS

The analysis included 216 patients (COMB, n=117; MONO, n=99). The risk of clinical failure was lower with COMB versus MONO (risk reduction: CTD-PAH 51.7%, SSc-PAH 53.7%), particularly in patients with haemodynamic parameters characteristic of typical PAH without features of left heart disease and/or restrictive lung disease at baseline. The risk of clinical failure was lower with COMB versus MONO in the baseline low-risk group (HR not calculated due to no events in COMB), baseline intermediate-risk group (HR 0.519, 95% CI 0.297 to 0.905) and in the week 16 low-risk group (HR 0.069, 95% CI 0.009 to 0.548).

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit of COMB over MONO was demonstrated in patients with CTD-PAH, particularly in those with typical PAH haemodynamic characteristics at baseline. COMB is appropriate for patients categorised as low risk and intermediate risk at baseline and low risk at follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01178073.

Survival Improved in Patients Aged ≤ 70 Years With Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension During the Period 2006 to 2017 in France

BACKGROUND

To date, nothing is known about the evolution of survival in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) over the last decade.

METHODS

This study used a multivariate Cox regression model adjusted for clinically relevant baseline confounders to assess the association between the occurrence of death and date of PAH diagnosis comparing two periods of the same duration (2006-2011 vs 2012-2017). Interactions between the two diagnosis periods and baseline variables were tested.

RESULTS

A total of 306 incident patients were included, 167 (54.6%) with a PAH diagnosis occurring in 2006 to 2011 and 139 (45.4%) in 2012 to 2017. No significant difference in survival was observed between patients diagnosed with PAH in 2012 to 2017 compared with those diagnosed in 2006 to 2011 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [0.46-1.26]; P = .29). A significant interaction was observed between PAH diagnosis periods and age (P = .05). When stratifying according to age (based on the median age of 70 years), a significant increase was observed in survival in patients aged ≤ 70 years between the 2006 to 2011 period and the 2012 to 2017 period (HR, 0.40 [0.17-0.99]; P = .046) but not in older patients (HR, 1.29 [0.67-2.51]; P = .44). A significantly higher proportion of initial (ie, within the first 4 months) endothelin receptor antagonist/phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor combination therapy was observed in younger patients diagnosed from 2012 to 2017 vs those diagnosed from 2006 to 2011 (42.9% vs 19.5%; P = .002) but not in older patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the period 2006 to 2017, survival in systemic sclerosis-associated PAH improved over time in patients aged ≤ 70 years but not in older patients. Further investigations are needed to confirm this relation, as general improvement in medical care and management may also be a possible explanation.

Treatment of pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A focus on the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway

OBJECTIVE

While pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is rare in infants and children, it results in substantial morbidity and mortality. In recent years, prognosis has improved, coinciding with the introduction of new PAH-targeted therapies, although much of their use in children is off-label. Evidence to guide the treatment of children with PAH is less extensive than for adults. The goal of this review is to discuss the treatment recommendations for children with PAH, as well as the evidence supporting the use of prostanoids, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) in this setting.

DATA SOURCES

Nonsystematic PubMed literature search and authors' expertise.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were selected concentrating on the nitric oxide (NO)-soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway in PAH. The methodology of an ongoing study evaluating the sGC stimulator riociguat in children with PAH is also described.

RESULTS

Despite recent medical advances, improved therapeutic strategies for pediatric PAH are needed. The efficacy and tolerability of riociguat in adults with PAH have been well trialed.

CONCLUSION

The pooling of data across trials, supplemented by registry data, will help to confirm the safety and tolerability of prostanoids, ERAs, and PDE5i in children. Ongoing studies will clarify the place of sGC stimulators in the treatment strategy for pediatric PAH.

Selexipag in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: an update

Selexipag is a compound that was designed to overcome the issues associated with oral administration of prostanoid compounds, beraprost and treprostinil in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PAH). As a selective IP agonist, it was designed to avoid the off-target prostanoid effects especially in the gastrointestinal system. To place this compound in context, this paper briefly reviews the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of subcutaneous, inhaled, and oral prostanoid preparations and comparesthemto selexipag. Selexipag is the first agent targeting a prostanoid receptor where a reduction in the primary efficacy morbidity/mortality composite end-point has been demonstrated. While safety outcomes favor selexipag over placebo, tolerability issues remain. Efficacy in terms of improvement in effort tolerance, hemodynamic and mortality benefit is less than seen with IV therapy. This is the first prostanoid demonstrated in a clinical trial to have added benefit in those on background double combination therapy and the first non IV prostanoid to demonstrate outcome benefit in the connective tissue disease (CTD) population in a randomized controlled trial.

Safety and Efficacy of Ambrisentan-Phosphodiesterase Type 5 (PDE5) Inhibitor Combination Therapy for Japanese Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients in Real-World Clinical Practice

Background: This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ambrisentan combination therapy with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors in Japanese patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Methods and Results: PAH patients who received ambrisentan for the first time in combination with a PDE5 inhibitor between January 2013 and the end of August 2015 were included in this study. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) safety analysis, as well as the efficacy analysis focusing on changes in clinical parameters, were investigated for overall cases and cases stratified by patient background. Forty-eight consecutive patients (n=21, 43.8% with idiopathic PAH; male/female, 18/30; average age, 43.3±17.4 years; World Health Organization functional class III/IV, n=22, 45.8%) who were treated with ambrisentan and a PDE5 inhibitor in Japan underwent the safety analysis. A total of 14 ADR occurred in 10 patients (20.8%). ADR included headache (8.3%), face edema (4.2%), angina pectoris (2.1%), hyperemia (2.1%), dyspnea (2.1%), pulmonary hypertension (i.e., worsening of PAH, 2.1%), nausea (2.1%), hepatic function abnormal (2.1%), edema (2.1%), and sudden death (2.1%). On analysis of hemodynamics parameters, there was a significant improvement in the mean pulmonary arterial pressure (−13.5 mmHg, P=0.0001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (−563.53 dyn·s·cm⁻⁵, P=0.0033).

Conclusions: Ambrisentan combination therapy is safe and effective in hemodynamics improvement.

A Phase I Study to Show the Relative Bioavailability and Bioequivalence of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in Healthy Subjects

PURPOSE

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening disease that typically causes shortness of breath and exercise intolerance. Combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil has proven to be more effective at preventing clinical failure events in patients with PAH than either drug alone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of an ambrisentan/tadalafil fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with co-administration of the 2 monotherapies.

METHODS

This 3-part, randomized, single-dose, open-label crossover study was conducted in healthy volunteers. The first part of the study consisted of a 5-way crossover that compared the relative bioavailability of 4 FDC formulations (10-mg ambrisentan + 40-mg tadalafil) with co-administered reference monotherapies. One formulation was selected and its relative bioavailability was assessed when produced in 3 different granulation sizes during the second part of the study. In the third part of the study, the bioequivalence of the candidate FDC with the reference monotherapies was evaluated for the 10-mg/40-mg dose strength, in addition to 2 other dose strengths (5 mg/20 mg and 5 mg/40 mg). For all parts of the study, blood samples were taken at regular intervals after each dose, ambrisentan and tadalafil concentrations determined, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (C_max, AUC_0-∞, and AUC_0-t) obtained. Test/reference ratios of the geometric means of PK parameters were used to evaluate bioequivalence. Safety and tolerability were assessed by recording adverse events and monitoring vital signs, ECGs, and clinical laboratory data.

FINDINGS

Of the 174 subjects screened for eligibility, 112 were allocated to a randomized treatment sequence across all study parts, and 100 completed their full assigned treatments. All 4 FDC formulations tested during part 1 of the study yielded PK parameters similar those of the reference treatments. In part 2, granulation size was found to not affect the relative bioavailability of the selected formulation. In part 3, the selected FDC was found to be bioequivalent to co-administration of the monotherapies in both the fasted and fed states. The FDC was also found to be bioequivalent to the reference treatments at the 2 additional dose strengths. All but one of the adverse events was mild to moderate in intensity, and no serious adverse events were reported.

IMPLICATIONS

An ambrisentan/tadalafil FDC was bioequivalent to concurrently administered monotherapies and therefore represents a viable alternative treatment to co-administration. Use of an FDC is likely to be associated with reduced costs and improved patient compliance. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02688387.

Improving Survival in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Focus on Intravenous Epoprostenol

Pulmonary arterial hypertension represents a devastating disease, causing progressive increase of pulmonary vascular resistance leading to right ventricular dysfunction and death. Therapeutic management has rapidly advanced in recent years due to improved understanding of pathophysiology and new drugs have been developed; however, survival remains poor. Oral agents as phosphodiesterase type V inhibitors, the soluble guanylyl cyclase stimulator riociguat, the prostacyclin receptor agonist selexipag and the endothelin receptor antagonists have each achieved evidence-based validation and are recommended for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Initial oral monotherapy or combination therapy is recommended for patients with low or intermediate risk according to each patient's risk stratification. Intravenous epoprostenol is a synthetic prostacyclin and the first drug approved for the disease. Although it represents the only treatment shown to reduce mortality, it is underused. Survival rates for patients treated with oral combination drug therapies are lower than those for patients treated with initial combination therapies including intravenous epoprostenol. This raises the interesting question of whether intermediate risk pulmonary arterial hypertension patients should be routinely introduced to therapies including intravenous epoprostenol rather than combination oral therapies.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: Diagnosis and treatment according to the European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society 2015 guidelines

Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis) is an autoimmune connective tissue disease which presents endothelial dysfunction and fibroblast dysregulation, resulting in vascular and fibrotic disorders. Pulmonary hypertension is frequent in patients with systemic sclerosis: the natural evolution of the disease can induce the development of different forms of pulmonary hypertension, representing one of the main causes of death. Among the different forms of pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension is the most frequent one (rate of occurrence is estimated between 7% and 12%). This pulmonary vascular complication should be treated with a combination of drugs that is able to counteract endothelial dysfunction, antagonizing the endothelin-1 system and replacing prostaglandin I2 and nitric oxide activity. A correct diagnosis is mandatory, because it is possible only for pulmonary arterial hypertension to use specific drugs that are able to control the symptomatic condition and the evolution of the disease. According to the most recent guidelines, for the patients with systemic sclerosis, also without pulmonary hypertension symptoms, echocardiography screening for the detection of pulmonary hypertension is recommended. Pulmonary arterial hypertension screening programs in systemic sclerosis patients is able to identify milder forms of the disease, allowing earlier management and better long-term outcome.

New drugs and emerging therapeutic targets in the endothelin signaling pathway and prospects for personalized precision medicine

During the last thirty years since the discovery of endothelin-1, the therapeutic strategy that has evolved in the clinic, mainly in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, is to block the action of the peptide either at the ET(A) subtype or both receptors using orally active small molecule antagonists. Recently, there has been a rapid expansion in research targeting ET receptors using chemical entities other than small molecules, particularly monoclonal antibody antagonists and selective peptide agonists and antagonists. While usually sacrificing oral bio-availability, these compounds have other therapeutic advantages with the potential to considerably expand drug targets in the endothelin pathway and extend treatment to other pathophysiological conditions. Where the small molecule approach has been retained, a novel strategy to combine two vasoconstrictor targets, the angiotensin AT(1) receptor as well as the ET(A) receptor in the dual antagonist sparsentan has been developed. A second emerging strategy is to combine drugs that have two different targets, the ET(A) antagonist ambrisentan with the phosphodiesterase inhibitor tadalafil, to improve the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The solving of the crystal structure of the ET(B) receptor has the potential to identify allosteric binding sites for novel ligands. A further key advance is the experimental validation of a single nucleotide polymorphism that has genome wide significance in five vascular diseases and that significantly increases the amount of big endothelin-1 precursor in the plasma. This observation provides a rationale for testing this single nucleotide polymorphism to stratify patients for allocation to treatment with endothelin agents and highlights the potential to use personalized precision medicine in the endothelin field.

Endothelin-receptor antagonists in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: where do we stand?

Pulmonary arterial hypertension, a disease largely neglected until a few decades ago, is presently the object of intense studies by several research teams. Despite considerable progress, pulmonary arterial hypertension remains a major clinical problem, because it is not always easy to diagnose, treat, and prevent. The disease was considered incurable until the late 1990s, when Epoprostenol was introduced as the first tool against this illness. More recently, therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension gained momentum after publication of the SERAPHIN and AMBITION trials, which also highlighted the importance of upfront therapy. This review also focuses on recent substudies from these trials and progress in drugs targeting the endothelin pathway. Future perspectives with regard to endothelin-receptor antagonists are also discussed.

Targeted therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension: Updated recommendations from the Cologne Consensus Conference 2018

In the summer of 2016, delegates from the German Respiratory Society, the German Society of Cardiology and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology met in Cologne, Germany, to define consensus-based practice recommendations for the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). These recommendations were built on the 2015 European Pulmonary Hypertension guidelines and included new evidence, where available. The treatment algorithm for PAH was modified based on the observation that there are now many patients diagnosed with IPAH who are at an advanced age and have significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities. For patients newly diagnosed with classic forms of PAH, i.e. younger patients without significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities, the consensus-based recommendation was to use initial combination therapy as the standard approach. The use of monotherapies was no longer considered appropriate in such patients. The choice of treatment strategies should be based on the risk assessment as proposed in the European guidelines. In patients presenting with a low or intermediate risk, oral combination therapy with endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors or soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, respectively, should be used. In high-risk patients, triple combination therapy including a subcutaneous or intravenous prostacyclin analogue should be considered. For patients who suffer from PAH and significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities, initial monotherapy is recommended and the use of combination therapies should be considered on an individual basis. The latter recommendations are based on the scarcity of evidence supporting the use of combination therapy and the higher risk of drug-related adverse events in such patients.

Update on pulmonary arterial hypertension research: proceedings from a meeting of experts

BACKGROUND

While pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a progressive, symptomatic condition characterized by increased pulmonary vascular resistance, ultimately leading to right heart failure, great strides have been made in its understanding and treatment over the past two decades.

REVIEW

Continued research in pre-clinical, clinical, and health economic areas of research, in addition to registry analyses and technology advances, is critical for understanding the pathophysiology of the disease and devising the best ways to monitor and manage patients. On December 3, 2016, the latest pre-clinical, clinical, health economic outcome, and registry data on PAH was presented in a symposium sponsored by Actelion. This paper reviews the published research and insight into upcoming research that was presented at this interactive meeting.

Early intervention in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: clinical and economic outcomes

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has a high morbidity rate and is fatal if left untreated. Increasing evidence supports early intervention, possibly with initial combination therapy. PAH-specific pharmaceuticals, however, are expensive and may have serious adverse effects, particularly when used in combination. The currently dynamic health care economy reinforces the need for a review of early intervention from both outcomes and economic perspectives. We aimed to review the clinical and economic impact of PAH therapy, particularly examining drug cost, hospitalization burden, and health care economics impact, and the effect of early intervention on clinical outcomes. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and MEDLINE databases from 2005 to 2017 for studies comparing drug cost, clinical outcomes, and hospitalization burden associated with therapy for PAH. Emerging data indicate that early therapy is effective, but drug therapy is expensive, particularly with combination therapy. Efficacy studies also generally show benefit of combination therapy for patients in World Health Organization functional class II, with a consistent decrease in hospitalization. Pharmacoeconomic studies are limited but indicate that increased pharmacy costs are at least partially offset by decreased health care utilization, particularly inpatient care. Modeling also shows a cost benefit with combination therapy at 2 years. Nonetheless, more rigorously collected health care economic data should be incorporated into future drug efficacy trials to provide a clearer understanding of the impact and the associated cost benefit of early PAH therapy. Increasing evidence in support of early intervention and combination therapy for PAH is associated with rising medication costs that are largely offset by reduced hospitalization, on the basis of the currently available literature. Nonetheless, the studies performed to date have methodologic limitations that highlight the need for prospective studies using more robust economic modeling.