Bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in Japanese patients with advanced, metastatic, EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ026): overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial

Comparison of first-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with low-dose bevacizumab versus osimertinib in untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with low-dose bevacizumab(7.5 mg/kg) versus osimertinib as first-line treatment in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 161 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, who received first-line treatment at Shanghai Chest Hospital between July 2017 and July 2023, were enrolled in this study. Among them, 78 patients were treated with a combination of first-generation EGFR-TKIs and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), constituting the bevacizumab plus TKI (A + T) group. The remaining 83 patients received osimertinib monotherapy (80 mg daily), forming the osimertinib group.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) was 65.4% (51/78) in the A + T group and 68.7% (57/83) in the osimertinib group (p = 0.657). Despite the potentially poorer baseline conditions of patients in the osimertinib group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.59 months (95% CI: 14.39-18.80) in the A + T group compared to 16.82 months (95% CI: 13.76-19.89) in the osimertinib group (p = 0.792). Preliminary overall survival (OS) analysis indicated a median OS of 51.75 months (95% CI: 41.63-61.86) in the A + T group versus 35.55 months (95% CI: 22.32-48.77) in the osimertinib group (p = 0.010), however, the OS data are not yet mature.

CONCLUSION

Although osimertinib remains the preferred first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations, combining first-generation EGFR-TKIs with low-dose bevacizumab may be a viable alternative for certain patients.

Transformation from acquired EGFR 19del/C797S to EGFR 19del/T790M in an advanced non-small cell lung cancer patient: a case report and literature review

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the first-line treatment of choice for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients treated with these inhibitors eventually develop resistance. One of the most common mechanisms is the emergence of the EGFR C797S mutation. Whether first-generation EGFR inhibitors (e.g. icotinib or gefitinib) can sustainably control EGFR-sensitive mutations/C797S NSCLC following third-generation EGFR inhibitor treatment remains insufficiently reported. Our case report discusses a female patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma carrying an EGFR exon 19 E746_A750delELREA mutation who received almonertinib as first-line treatment and developed C797S resistance during therapy. The patient was subsequently treated with a double dose of icotinib for 8 months until disease progression occurred, along with the development of an EGFR exon 20 T790M point mutation and TP53 mutation. This case provides clinical evidence suggesting that first-generation EGFR-TKIs may be an effective treatment strategy for patients with acquired EGFR 19del/C797S resistance following EGFR TKI therapy.

Evolving treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer harbouring common EGFR activating mutations

A clinically important subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is driven by common mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Over the past decade, first-, second-, and third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have substantially improved clinical outcomes, although acquired resistance inevitably emerges. In particular, the third-generation TKI osimertinib has demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to earlier-generation TKIs in the frontline setting, yet median OS remains approximately three years in pivotal trials. Efforts to extend disease control have led to various upfront intensification strategies, including combining EGFR TKIs with antiangiogenics or chemotherapy (e.g., the FLAURA-2 trial), and pairing novel bispecific antibodies such as amivantamab with third-generation TKIs. Upon progression on third-generation EGFR TKIs, platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard second-line treatment, albeit with modest response rates. Emerging therapies targeting MET amplification (e.g., savolitinib plus osimertinib), leveraging antibody-drug conjugates (e.g., patritumab deruxtecan), or adding immunotherapy and antiangiogenics have shown preliminary promise in overcoming resistance. Ongoing trials are assessing optimal treatment sequencing and the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to guide therapy escalation or de-escalation. Ultimately, the evolving landscape of EGFR-mutant NSCLC underscores the need for refined biomarker-driven approaches and personalized regimens to achieve further gains in survival. In this review, we discuss these strategies in detail, highlighting current evidence and future directions for EGFR-mutant NSCLC treatment.

Aumolertinib in combination with Lastet in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (EVOLUTION): protocol for a single-arm, phase II clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Targeted therapy is now the standard treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, yet resistance continues to be a significant challenge. Enhancing the efficacy of targeted therapies and prolonging patient survival remain critical clinical priorities. Although combining third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with intravenous chemotherapy has demonstrated promising results, it is unclear if oral chemotherapy regimens combined with EGFR TKIs could also improve survival outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

EVOLUTION is a multicentre, phase II clinical trial conducted across three tertiary hospitals in China: Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (lead centre), Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University and Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University. The study will enrol 60 patients with locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer harbouring EGFR-sensitive mutations who have not previously undergone systemic therapy. Participants will be administered a combination regimen of aumolertinib (110 mg orally, once a day in a 28-day cycle, continuously) and Lastet (25 mg orally, administered in a 28-day cycle, with 2 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate and duration of response. Tumour response will be assessed by the investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Patient enrolment is currently underway.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital in April 2024 (approval number: L23-334). Patients will participate after providing informed consent. The results of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at academic conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06463171.

RELAY: Final Overall Survival for Erlotinib Plus Ramucirumab or Placebo in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Metastatic NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

RELAY, a global double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (NCT02411448) found statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (primary end point) for ramucirumab (RAM) plus erlotinib (ERL) (RAM + ERL) in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-0.76, p < 0.0001; median progression-free survival: 19.4 versus 12.4 mo). Here, we report the final overall survival (OS; secondary end point) outcomes for the intention-to-treat population.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and February 2018, 449 eligible patients with an EGFR exon 19del or L858R mutation and no central nervous system metastases were randomized (1:1) to ERL (150 mg/day) with RAM (10 mg/kg every two weeks, N = 224) or placebo (N = 225).

RESULTS

At data cutoff, 297 deaths were reported (overall event rate = 66%), with a median follow-up of 45.1 months (interquartile range: 26.7-71.2), an OS HR of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.78-1.24, p = 0.864), and median OS of 51.1 months (RAM + ERL) and 46.0 months (placebo + ERL). Outcomes in subsets of patients with poor prognosis (L858R or TP53 co-mutation) suggest a directional improvement in OS (L858R: HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.62-1.22; exon 19del: HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.83-1.55; TP53 co-mutation: HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58-1.19; TP53-wild-type: HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.87-1.72). Treatment-emergent T790M rates were similar between arms. Over 80% of patients received post-study discontinuation therapy (>50% received osimertinib in comparable numbers between arms). The safety profile for RAM + ERL was consistent with previous reports with no increased toxicity over time or new safety signals observed.

CONCLUSION

In RELAY, OS was not significantly improved with similar long OS durations in both treatment arms.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02411448.

Pyrimidine-based dual-target inhibitors targeting epidermal growth factor receptor for overcoming drug resistance in cancer therapy(2006-present)

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a pivotal member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family, exerting crucial regulatory influence on cellular physiological processes, particularly in relation to cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation. In recent years, numerous EGFR inhibitors have been introduced to the market; unfortunately, the effectiveness of single-target EGFR inhibitors has been compromised due to the development of drug resistance caused by EGFR mutations. Despite attempts by some researchers to address this issue through combination therapy with two or more drugs, instances of dose-limiting toxicities have been observed. Consequently, EGFR dual-target inhibitors have emerged as a burgeoning field in cancer treatment, offering a novel therapeutic option for solid tumors with the added benefits of reduced risk of resistance, lower dosage requirements, diminished toxicity profiles, and enhanced efficacy. At present, a series of EGFR dual-target inhibitors with diverse structures have been developed successively. In this study, we initially investigated the pyrimidine-based EGFR dual-target inhibitors that have been reported in the past two decades and categorized them into aminopyrimidine derivatives and heterocyclic pyrimidine derivatives with increased molecular complexity. Subsequently, we comprehensively summarized the biological activity and structure-activity relationship of this class of inhibitors in the context of cancer therapy, while also exploring potential opportunities and challenges associated with their application in this field. The present study provides a partial framework to guide future endeavors in drug development.

[Standard of care of EGFR mutated metastatic NSCLC in first treatment and beyond progression]

Among the oncogenic alterations of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the EGFR gene mutation is observed in 15% of patients in France, particularly among non-smokers and women. Treatment mainly relies on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR. In first-line metastatic treatment, osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, has become the standard, improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to first- or second-generation TKIs. The combination of TKI/chemotherapy (osimertinib/carboplatine-pemetrexed) and TKI/bispecific antibodies (e.g., amivantamab/lazertinib) are alternatives under evaluation, with benefits in PFS but increased toxicity. In case of progression under first- or second-generation TKIs, the most common resistance is the T790M mutation, which can be targeted by osimertinib. For other resistances, platinum-based chemotherapy remains an option. Amivantamab combined with chemotherapy has shown an improvement in PFS in the second line and has early access in France. Other emerging approaches include conjugated antibodies (patritumab deruxtecan, datopotamab deruxtecan) and next-generation TKIs. In the future, personalized treatment based on the molecular profile and early response to TKIs could optimize management, particularly by integrating predictive markers such as EGFR clearance under treatment.

The changing treatment landscape of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

The discovery of the association between EGFR mutations and the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, third-generation EGFR TKIs, which are often characterized by potent central nervous system penetrance, are the standard-of-care first-line treatment for advanced-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Rational combinations of third-generation EGFR TKIs with anti-angiogenic drugs, chemotherapy, the EGFR-MET bispecific antibody amivantamab or local tumour ablation are being investigated as strategies to delay drug resistance and increase clinical benefit. Furthermore, EGFR TKIs are being evaluated in patients with early stage or locally advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC, with the ambitious aim of achieving cancer cure. Despite the inevitable challenge of acquired resistance, emerging treatments such as new TKIs, antibody-drug conjugates, new immunotherapeutic approaches and targeted protein degraders have shown considerable promise in patients with progression of EGFR-mutant NSCLC on or after treatment with EGFR TKIs. In this Review, we describe the current first-line treatment options for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, provide an overview of the mechanisms of acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR TKIs and explore novel promising treatment strategies. We also highlight potential avenues for future research that are aimed at improving the survival outcomes of patients with this disease.

Unveiling the immunomodulatory dance: endothelial cells' function and their role in non-small cell lung cancer

The dynamic interactions between tumor endothelial cells (TECs) and the immune microenvironment play a critical role in the progression of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In general, endothelial cells exhibit diverse immunomodulatory properties, influencing immune cell recruitment, antigen presentation, and regulation of immune checkpoint expression. Understanding the multifaceted roles of TECs as well as assigning specific functional hallmarks to various TEC phenotypes offer new avenues for targeted development of therapeutic interventions, particularly in the context of advanced immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic treatments. This review provides insights into the complex interplay between TECs and the immune system in NSCLC including discussion of potential optimized therapeutic opportunities.

What is the optimal first-line regimen for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

There are currently various tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based regimens available, and it can be challenging for clinicians to determine the most effective and safe option due to the lack of direct comparisons between these regimens. In this study, we conducted a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of distinct regimens to determine the optimal regimen for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer, thereby facilitating clinical decision-making.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and international conference databases were comprehensively searched from their inception to 02 April 2024 for collecting data regarding efficacy and safety from eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Following literature screening and data extraction, a NMA was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety among 21 regimens with a random-effects consistency model in a Bayesian framework using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation technique within the GEMTC package.

RESULTS

A total of 35 RCTs were included, involving 9718 individuals and 21 regimens. Compared with other interventions, combination therapies based on third-generation TKIs, especially osimertinib plus ramucirumab, showed the most favorable PFS prolongation in overall patients. Consistently, subgroup analyses showed that third-generation TKIs-based combination regimens were superior to other regimens in most prespecified subgroups with distinct clinicopathological characteristics. In terms of overall survival, despite the combination regimens based on third-generation TKIs also showing relatively superior outcomes, erlotinib plus chemotherapy and gefitinib plus chemotherapy were ranked more favorably. In terms of safety profile, combination therapies based on third-generation TKIs did not significantly increase the incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events compared with other regimens.

CONCLUSION

Our study concluded that combination regimens based on third-generation TKIs (osimertinib plus ramucirumab, osimertinib plus chemotherapy, osimertinib plus bevacizumab, amivantamab plus lazertinib and aumolertinib plus apatinib) could be the new and clinically preferable first-line, standard of care for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023480596).

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with oncogene-addicted metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with oncogene-addicted metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), published in January 2023, was modified according to previously established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with oncogene-addicted mNSCLC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with oncogene-addicted mNSCLC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and the Korean Society for Medical Oncology (KSMO). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different regions of Asia. The latter are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with oncogene-addicted mNSCLC across the different regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, while respecting the differences in screening practices, molecular profiling and age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies between the different regions of Asia.

Discovery of novel Macrocyclic small molecules Based on 2-Amino-4-thiazolylpyridineas selective EGFR inhibitors with high Blood-Brain barrier penetration for the treatment of glioblastoma

Because epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most commonly mutated oncogene in glioblastoma (GBM), the development of EGFR inhibitors has become a promising direction for the treatment of GBM. However, due to factors such as limited blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and pathway compensation mechanisms, current EGFR inhibitors targeting GBM are not satisfactory. In the previous study, we obtained compound 10c with strong anti-cell proliferation activity. Since macrocyclization can effectively change the physical and chemical properties of molecules, and optimize their selectivity. Therefore, a series of 2-amino-4-thiazolyl pyridine scaffold macrocyclic derivatives were designed and synthesized using compound 10c as the lead compound in this study. Compound 3a, which inhibited the growth of glioblastoma cell lines U87MG and U87-EGFRVIII, had average IC50 values of 4.69 µM and 4.98 µM, respectively. Compound 3a was highly selective to 9 kinases in the ErbB family, including ErbB2 and ErbB4. In addition, compound 3a demonstrated good blood-brain barrier permeability in mice, the blood-brain concentration of the drug remained above 20 % within 5-60 min following intravenous administration in mice. In conclusion, compound 3a is a promising candidate for novel EGFR inhibitors targeting GBM.

EGFR-TKIs or EGFR-TKIs combination treatments for untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and EGFR-TKI combination treatments have become the standard first-line treatments for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the best option has yet to be determined. This study compares the efficacy and safety of various first-line EGFR-TKI monotherapies and combination treatments for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials databases, and several international conferences to identify randomized controlled trials reporting on first-line EGFR-TKI treatments for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The study quality was assessed using the revised tool for risk of bias in randomized trials. The efficacy and safety outcomes of the included treatments were compared by network meta-analysis based on a frequentist approach.

RESULTS

We identified 26 trials (8,359 patients) investigating 14 treatment groups, including first, second, and third-generation EGFR-TKIs and their combination treatments. Osimertinib plus chemotherapy and lazertinib plus amivantamab showed the highest efficacy in improving progression-free survival. New third-generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated comparable efficacy to osimertinib alone but did not surpass it. Subgroup analyses revealed slight variation in treatment efficacy based on mutation types and patient demographics. Combination treatments were associated with a higher incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

These results reveal that osimertinib plus chemotherapy and lazertinib plus amivantamab are superior first-line options for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, these combinations are associated with higher adverse event rates.

Final Analysis Data and Exploratory Biomarker Analysis of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of Osimertinib Plus Bevacizumab Versus Osimertinib Monotherapy for Untreated Patients With Nonsquamous NSCLC Harboring EGFR Mutations: The WJOG9717L Study

Introduction

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been the standard treatment for patients with NSCLC who have sensitive EGFR mutations. This study revealed final analysis survival data, biomarkers, and resistance mechanisms of osimertinib plus bevacizumab or osimertinib monotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced EGFR-positive nonsquamous NSCLC.

Methods

We previously reported the primary results of a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study comparing osimertinib plus bevacizumab with osimertinib monotherapy for this population. In this exploratory analysis using tissue and plasma samples, we evaluated gene profiles at baseline and disease progression or the last dose using targeted deep sequencing.

Results

The median progression-free survival (PFS) by the blinded independent central reviewer was 22.1 months for the osimertinib plus bevacizumab arm and 20.2 months for the osimertinib arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.864, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.549-1.359). The 3-year overall survival was not different between the two arms (osimertinib plus bevacizumab: 57.1%; osimertinib monotherapy: 65.0%; HR 1.271, 95% CI: 0.727-2.223). A total of 94 patients had assessable plasma samples at baseline, and 40 had assessable pretreatment tissue samples. EGFR mutations (76.6%) and TP53 mutations (44.7%) were detected in plasma samples at baseline. In patients with plasma TP53 mutations (n = 42), the median PFS by blinded independent central reviewer was 19.8 months for the osimertinib plus bevacizumab arm and 20.2 months for the osimertinib arm (HR = 1.107, 95% CI: 0.534-2.297).

Conclusions

There was also no significant difference in the PFS between the two arms, even in patients with TP53 mutations.

Strategies for enhancing non-small cell lung cancer treatment: Integrating Chinese herbal medicines with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) poses a global health threat, and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) such as gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib have achieved significant success in clinical treatment. However, the emergence of resistance limits the long-term efficacy of these treatments, necessitating urgent exploration of novel EGFR-TKIs. This review provides an in-depth summary and exploration of the resistance mechanisms associated with EGFR-TKIs, with a specific focus on representative drugs like gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib. Additionally, the review introduces a therapeutic strategy involving the combination of Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) and chemotherapy drugs, highlighting the potential role of CHMs in overcoming NSCLC resistance. Through systematic analysis, we elucidate the primary resistance mechanisms of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC treatment, emphasizing CHMs as potential treatment medicines and providing a fresh perspective for the development of next-generation EGFR-TKIs. This comprehensive review aims to guide the application of CHMs in combination therapy for NSCLC management, fostering the development of more effective and comprehensive treatment modalities to ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates first-line treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. We analyzed 24 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,682 patients, comparing various EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and combination therapies. Direct comparisons showed that the addition of bevacizumab or chemotherapy to first-generation (1G) EGFR-TKIs improved overall survival (OS) compared to 1G TKIs alone, with HRs of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.433-0.973) and 0.682 (95% CI: 0.464-0.899), respectively. However, third-generation (3G) TKI monotherapy did not significantly improve OS compared with 1G TKIs, with an HR of 0.855 (95% CI: 0.511-1.198). Indirect comparisons suggested that the combination of 3G TKIs with chemotherapy provided the most significant improvements in OS and progression-free survival (PFS), significantly outperforming 3G TKIs, with HRs of OS 1.69 (95% CI: 1.14-3.4) and PFS 2.13 (95% CI: 1.28-3.54). Intracranial PFS was best with 1G TKIs plus bevacizumab. Our findings suggest that 3G EGFR-TKIs in combination with chemotherapy may be the most effective strategy for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and brain metastases, though further head-to-head trials are needed for validation.

Clinical Management in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutation After Osimertinib Progression With Unknown Resistance Mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is approved as a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation by FDA. However, the mechanisms of resistance for nearly half of patients after osimertinib progression are still unknown, and the optimal therapies for these patients are still controversial. In this retrospective study, we compared efficacy and safety between immunotherapy + chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and osimertinib + bevacizumab in NSCLC patients after osimertinib progression with unknown resistance mechanisms.

METHODS

Advanced NSCLC patients with unknown resistance mechanisms after osimertinib progression were retrospectively reviewed and divided into immunotherapy + chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and osimertinib + bevacizumab treatment groups according to the treatment they received after osimertinib progression. Clinicopathological features, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients were enrolled in this study, 22 in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group, 72 in the chemotherapy group, and 27 in the osimertinib + bevacizumab group. The ORR was much higher in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group compared with chemotherapy or osimertinib + bevacizumab group (55.56% vs. 14.81% vs. 0% in patients after progression on 1st line osimertinib treatment; 30.77% vs. 6.67% vs. 13.33% in patients after progression on 2nd/3rd line osimertinib treatment). Median PFS was also significantly longer in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group compared with other groups (8.2 months vs. 4.0 months vs. 6.0 months in all patients, p = 0.0066). The median OS did not reach remarkable difference among groups, although osimertinib + bevacizumab group had a numerically longer median OS (37.0 months vs. 37.0 months vs. 47.6 months in all patients, p = 0.6357). Compared with immunotherapy + chemotherapy and chemotherapy, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of osimertinib + bevacizumab were milder, especially in AEs related to gastrointestinal and bone marrow suppression.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides clinical evidence that NSCLC patients after osimertinib progression with unknown resistance mechanisms may benefit from immunotherapy + chemotherapy, with higher ORR and longer PFS compared with osimertinib + bevacizumab or chemotherapy groups. Osimertinib + bevacizumab treatment was also an optional option for patients because OS was numerically longer and safer in this group.

Gefitinib (an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus anlotinib (an multikinase inhibitor) for untreated, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (FL-ALTER): a multicenter phase III trial

Dual inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathways offers the prospect of improving the effectiveness of EFGR-targeted therapy. In this phase 3 study (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04028778), 315 patients with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomized (1:1) to receive anlotinib or placebo plus gefitinib once daily on days 1-14 per a 3-week cycle. At the prespecified final analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), a significant improvement in PFS was observed for the anlotinib arm over the placebo arm (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.48-0.80, P = 0.003). Particularly, patients with brain metastasis and those harboring EGFR amplification or high tumor mutation load gained significant more benefits in PFS from gefitinib plus anlotinib. The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events was 49.7% of the patients receiving gefitinib plus anlotinib versus 31.0% of the patients receiving gefitinib plus placebo. Anlotinib plus gefitinib significantly improves PFS in patients with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.

The role of vasculature and angiogenesis in respiratory diseases

In European countries, nearly 10% of all hospital admissions are related to respiratory diseases, mainly chronic life-threatening diseases such as COPD, pulmonary hypertension, IPF or lung cancer. The contribution of blood vessels and angiogenesis to lung regeneration, remodeling and disease progression has been increasingly appreciated. The vascular supply of the lung shows the peculiarity of dual perfusion of the pulmonary circulation (vasa publica), which maintains a functional blood-gas barrier, and the bronchial circulation (vasa privata), which reveals a profiled capacity for angiogenesis (namely intussusceptive and sprouting angiogenesis) and alveolar-vascular remodeling by the recruitment of endothelial precursor cells. The aim of this review is to outline the importance of vascular remodeling and angiogenesis in a variety of non-neoplastic and neoplastic acute and chronic respiratory diseases such as lung infection, COPD, lung fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension and lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer: an update on emerging EGFR-targeted therapies

INTRODUCTION

Current research in EGFR-mutated NSCLC focuses on the management of drug resistance and uncommon mutations, as well as on the opportunity to extend targeted therapies' field of action to earlier stages of disease.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a review analyzing literature from the PubMed database with the aim to describe the current state of art in the management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, but also to explore new strategies under investigation. To this purpose, we collected recruiting phase II-III trials registered on Clinicaltrials.govand conducted on EGFR-mutated NSCLC both in early and advanced stage.

EXPERT OPINION

With this review, we want to provide an exhaustive overview of current and new potential treatments in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with emphasis on the most promising newly investigated strategies, such as association therapies in the first-line setting involving EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy (FLAURA2) or drugs targeting different driver pathways (MARIPOSA). We also aimed at unearthing challenges to achieve in this field, specifically the need to fully exploit already available compounds while developing new ones, the management of new emerging toxicities and the necessity to improve our biological understanding of the disease to design trials with a solid scientific rationale and to allow treatment personalization such in case of uncommon mutations.

The efficacy and safety of adding anlotinib in gradual progression on third-generation EGFR-TKIs for EGFR-mutant advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

Acquired resistance is unavoidable with the approval of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for first-line therapy of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some studies have found that combining antiangiogenesis medicines with EGFR-TKI may benefit clinical outcomes in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, it is unclear whether EGFR-TKI paired with antiangiogenesis therapy could further improve survival for patients with gradual progression. Thus, we comprised the clinical effectiveness and safety of continuous EGFR-TKI in combination with anlotinib and EGFR-TKI alone in patients who had gradual progression on third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment. The comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival(OS) between two groups used the Kaplan-Meier method. Our study comprised 121 eligible patients in total. The objective response rates were 25.0% and 0%, and the disease response rate was 91.7% and 86.9% in the combination group and EGFR-TKIs monotherapy group. The median PFS of combined anlotinib and EGFR-TKI treatment was 6.7 months and the median PFS was 3.6 months in the EGFR-TKI monotherapy group ( P  < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in OS. The common adverse reactions were diarrhea (21.7%), hypertension (21.6%) and proteinuria (20.0%) in the combination group. Seven patients experienced a grade 3 or higher adverse event, no patients discounted the treatment or died due to the toxicity. Our study indicated that, when combined with anlotinib following gradual progression on EGFR-TKIs, it was more efficacious for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients than EGFR-TKI monotherapy. And the toxicity was clinically manageable.

Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes in pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer leptomeningeal metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysiss

Purpose

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a severe complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In patients with NSCLC LM harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, osimertinib is favored over alternative EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the efficacy of osimertinib relative to other EGFR-TKIs is not well established for patients with LM. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC LM.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis performed according to PRISMA guidelines included studies of adult patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and a diagnosis of LM who received an EGFR-TKI for the treatment of LM. We searched Medline ALL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. The evaluation of biases was done by using the Ottawa-Newscastle scale. The hazard ratio was used as the parameter of interest for overall survival (OS) and central nervous system-specific progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

128 publications were included with 243 patients and 282 lines of EGFR-TKI for NSCLC LM that met inclusion criteria. The median PFS in patients receiving any EGFR-TKI was 9.1 months, and the median OS was 14.5 months. In univariate analyses of the entire cohort, osimertinib treatment demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS, but not OS, compared to other EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinib demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS and OS in the subset of patients who were previously treated with EGFR-TKIs, but not in EGFR-TKI naïve patients.

Conclusion

Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes compared to other EGFR-TKIs, particularly in patients previously treated with EGFR-TKIs. An important limitation is that most patients were derived from retrospective reports. These results highlight the need for prospective studies for this difficult-to-treat patient population.

Identification of Prognostic and Immune Characteristics of Two Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtypes Based on TRPV Channel Family Genes

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the deadliest malignant tumors worldwide. Transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) channels take pivotal parts in many cancers, but their impact on LUAD remains unexplored. In this study, LUAD samples were classified into two subtypes according to the expression characteristics of TRPV1-6 genes, with LUAD subtype cluster2 exhibiting significantly higher survival rates than cluster1. Subsequently, analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was performed between cluster1 and cluster2, revealing enrichment of DEGs in channel activity and Ca2+ signaling pathways. We established a protein-protein interaction network based on DEGs and constructed a LUAD prognostic model by using Cox regression analysis based on genes corresponding to 170 protein nodes. The prognostic model demonstrated good predictive ability for patient prognosis, with higher survival rates observed in the low-risk (LR) group. The risk score was validated as an independent prognostic indicator, according to Cox regression analysis. A clinically applicable nomogram was plotted. Immunological analysis indicated that the LR and high-risk (HR) groups had varied proportions of immune cell infiltration. The immunotherapy prediction indicated that LUAD patients in LR group had a greater likelihood to benefit from immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the expression patterns of feature genes in the LUAD model were related to the sensitivity to lung cancer therapeutic drugs TAS-6417 and Erlotinib. To sum up, our LUAD prognostic model possessed clinical applicability for prognosis and immunotherapy response prediction.

Factors associated with prolonged progression-free survival of patients treated with first-line afatinib for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (>36 months) of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations treated with first-line afatinib.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC receiving first-line afatinib at two tertiary care referral centers, Linkou and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, in Taiwan between June 2014 and April 2022.

RESULTS

The data of 546 treatment-naïve EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients were analyzed. Median PFS and overall survival were 14.5 months and 27.2 months, respectively. The PFS of 462 patients (84.6%) was less than 36 months and of 84 patients (15.4%) was more than 36 months. The PFS > 36 months group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with uncommon mutations (p = 0.002). The PFS ≤36 months group had significantly higher incidences of bone, liver, and adrenal metastases (all p < 0.05) and a higher rate of multiple distant metastases. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that liver metastasis was negatively and independently associated with prolonged PFS (adjusted odds ratio = 0.246 [95% CI: 0.067-0.908], p = 0.035). The median overall survival of the PFS >36 months group was 46.0 months and that of the PFS ≤36 months group was 22.9 months (log-rank test, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving first-line afatinib were prone to shorter PFS if they had distant organ metastasis, especially liver metastasis.

Efficacy of bevacizumab through an indwelling pleural catheter in non-small cell lung cancer patients with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

Several studies have indicated that intrapleural infusion of bevacizumab is an effective treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with malignant pleural effusion (MPE). However, the impact of bevacizumab administered through an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) on the prognosis of these patients is unknown.

METHODS

Consecutive advanced NSCLC patients with symptomatic MPE receiving an IPC alone or bevacizumab through an IPC were identified in a tertiary hospital. The patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were included, and the median age was 60.3 years. Males and nonsmokers accounted for 48.3% and 65.8%, respectively. A total of 69.8% (104/149) of patients harbored actionable mutations, including 92 EGFR-activating mutations, 11 ALK fusions, and 1 ROS1 fusion. A total of 81.9% (122/149) of patients received IPC alone, and 18.1% (27/149) received bevacizumab through an IPC. The incidence of spontaneous pleurodesis during the first 6 months was greater in the bevacizumab-treated group than in the IPC-treated group in the subgroup with actionable mutations (64.3% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.28). The median overall survival (OS) in patients with actionable mutations treated with bevacizumab through an IPC was 42.2 months, which was significantly longer than the 26.7 months in patients who received an IPC alone (P = 0.045). However, the median OS did not differ between the two arms in the subgroup without actionable mutations (10.8 vs. 41.0 months, P = 0.24). No significant difference between the bevacizumab through an IPC group and the IPC group was detected in the number of participants who had adverse events, either in patients with actionable mutations (14.3% vs. 8.4%; P = 0.42) or in patients without actionable mutations (16.7% vs. 12.8%; P = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab through an IPC resulted in a significantly improved prognosis for NSCLC patients with MPE and actionable mutations. However, patients without actionable mutations do not benefit from bevacizumab through IPC.

Use of conditional estimates of effect in cancer epidemiology: An application to lung cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

In oncology clinical trials, there is the assumption that randomization sufficiently balances confounding covariates and therefore average treatment effects are usually reported. This paper explores the wider benefits provided by conditioning on covariates for reasons other than mitigation of confounding.

METHODS

We reanalyzed the data from primary randomized controlled trials listed in two meta-analyses to explore the significance of conditioning on smoking status in terms of the effect magnitude of treatment on progression free survival in non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS

The reanalysis revealed that conditioning on smoking status using sub-group analyses provided the closest empiric estimate of individual treatment effect based on smoking status and significantly reduced the heterogeneity of treatment effect observed across studies. In addition, smoking status was determined to be a modifier of the effect of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Conditioning on prognostic covariates in randomized trials in oncology helps generate the closest empiric estimates of individual treatment benefit, addresses heterogeneity due to varying covariate distributions across trials and facilitates future decision making as well as evidence synthesis. Conditioning using sub-group analyses also allows examination for effect modification in meta-analysis.

Addition of bevacizumab to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The synergistic effects of antiangiogenic inhibitor bevacizumab and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) therapy were encouraging in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, though some controversy remains. The specific subgroup of patients who might benefit most from the EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab combination therapy is yet to be determined. Methods: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that had compared the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab combination therapy with EGFR-TKI monotherapy in treating EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients published before 23 December 2022 were searched in the Cochrane, PubMed and Embase. We performed a meta-analysis for the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events with a grade equal or more than 3 (grade≥3 TRAEs). Subgroup analyses of PFS and OS stratified by clinical characteristics and treatment were conducted. Results: We included 10 RCTs involving 1520 patients. Compared with EGFR-TKI monotherapy, addition of bevacizumab to EGFR-TKI resulted in a significantly higher PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.62-0.87)) and ORR (risk ratio (RR) = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13). However, no significant difference in OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.83-1.12) was noticed. Patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC receiving combination therapy showed PFS improvement regardless of gender (male or female), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 or 1), baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (presence or absence) and EGFR mutation type (19del or 21L858R). Subgroup analyses showed that, with the treatment of bevacizumab and EGFR-TKI, patients who ever smoked achieved significantly better OS and PFS benefits (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.95; HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46-0.74, respectively), and those aged <75 years and the Asian population had significantly prolonged PFS (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.91; HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.58-0.87; respectively). The superiority of EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab combination therapy against EGFR-TKI monotherapy in improving PFS was more significant in the erlotinib regimen subgroup. The risk of grade≥3 TRAEs was remarkably higher in the combination therapy group (HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.39-2.16). Conclusion: Addition of bevacizumab to EGFR-TKI therapy provided significantly better PFS and ORR for EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients, though with higher risk of grade≥3 TRAEs. Patients who ever smoked, aged <75 years, and Asian population might benefit more from the combination regimen. Systematic Review Registration: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023401926).

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related fatalities, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85% of all lung cancers. Over the past forty years, patients with NSCLC have had a 5-year survival rate of only 16%, despite improvements in chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood can be used to identify minimal residual disease (MRD), and ctDNA-based MRD has been shown to be of significance in prognostic assessment, recurrence monitoring, risk of recurrence assessment, efficacy monitoring, and therapeutic intervention decisions in NSCLC. The level of MRD can be obtained by monitoring ctDNA to provide guidance for more precise and personalized treatment, the scientific feasibility of which could dramatically modify lung cancer treatment paradigm. In this review, we present a comprehensive review of MRD studies in NSCLC and focus on the application of ctDNA-based MRD in different stages of NSCLC in current clinical practice.

Recruitment of hexahydroquinoline as anticancer scaffold targeting inhibition of wild and mutants EGFR (EGFRWT, EGFRT790M, and EGFRL858R)

Hexahydroquinoline (HHQ) scaffold was constructed and recruited for development of new series of anticancer agents. Thirty-two new compounds were synthesised where x-ray crystallography was performed to confirm enantiomerism. Thirteen compounds showed moderate to good activity against NCI 60 cancer cell lines, with GI % mean up to 74% for 10c. Expending erlotinib as a reference drug, target compounds were verified for their inhibiting activities against EGFRWT, EGFRT790M, and EGFRL858R where compound 10d was the best inhibitor with IC50 = 0.097, 0.280, and 0.051 µM, respectively, compared to erlotinib (IC50 = 0.082 µM, 0.342 µM, and 0.055 µM, respectively). Safety profile was validated using normal human lung (IMR-90) cells. 10c and 10d disrupted cell cycle at pre-G1 and G2/M phases in lung cancer, HOP-92, and cell line. Molecular docking study was achieved to understand the potential binding interactions and affinities in the active sites of three versions of EGFRs.

Improving the efficacy of anti-EGFR drugs in GBM: Where we are going?

The therapies targeting mutations of driver genes in cancer have advanced into clinical trials for a variety of tumors. In glioblastoma (GBM), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most commonly mutated oncogene, and targeting EGFR has been widely investigated as a promising direction. However, the results of EGFR pathway inhibitors have not been satisfactory. Limited blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, drug resistance, and pathway compensation mechanisms contribute to the failure of anti-EGFR therapies. This review summarizes recent research advances in EGFR-targeted therapy for GBM and provides insight into the reasons for the unsatisfactory results of EGFR-targeted therapy. By combining the results of preclinical studies with those of clinical trials, we discuss that improved drug penetration across the BBB, the use of multi-target combinations, and the development of peptidomimetic drugs under the premise of precision medicine may be promising strategies to overcome drug resistance in GBM.

C-IGF1R encoded by cIGF1R acts as a molecular switch to restrict mitophagy of drug-tolerant persister tumour cells in non-small cell lung cancer

The clinical efficacy of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is limited by the emergence of drug resistance. We hypothesise that restoring dysregulated circular RNAs under initial treatment with EGFR-TKIs may enhance their effectiveness. Through high-throughput screening, we identify that combining circular RNA IGF1R (cIGF1R) with EGFR-TKIs significantly synergises to suppress tumour regrowth following drug withdrawal. Mechanistically, cIGF1R interacts with RNA helicase A (RHA) to depress insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) mRNA splicing, negatively regulating the parent IGF1R signalling pathway. This regulation is similar to that of IGF1R inhibitor, which induces drug-tolerant persister (DTP) state with activated mitophagy. The cIGF1R also encodes a peptide C-IGF1R that reduces Parkin-mediated ubiquitination of voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) to restrict mitophagy, acting as a molecular switch that promotes the transition of DTP to apoptosis. Our study shows that combining cIGF1R with EGFR-TKIs efficiently reduces the emergence of DTP.

Comparing Efficacy of Erlotinib and Bevacizumab Combination with Erlotinib Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess and contrast the efficacy and safety of combining erlotinib and bevacizumab with erlotinib alone in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors searched databases such as PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing erlotinib plus bevacizumab with erlotinib in NSCLC patients. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) were the outcomes of interest. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and relative risk (RR) were estimated utilizing both fixed- and random-effect models. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Nine studies comprising 1698 patients with NSCLC were included in this meta-analysis, of whom 850 were treated with erlotinib plus bevacizumab, and 848 with erlotinib. The erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination significantly prolonged PFS (HR, 0.62, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.70, p < 0.00001) but did not show any significant improvement in OS (HR, 0.95; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.07, p = 0.39) and ORR (HR, 1.10; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.24, p = 0.09). Increased risks of hypertension (RR, 5.15; 95% CI: 3.59, 7.39; p < 0.00001), proteinuria (RR, 10.54; 95% CI: 3.80, 29.20; p < 0.00001) and grade 3 and higher AEs (RR, 2.09; 95% CI: 1.47, 2.97; p < 0.00001) were observed with the erlotinib-plus-bevacizumab combination compared to erlotinib monotherapy. On subgroup analyses, the erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination improved PFS only. Combining erlotinib and bevacizumab has been shown to improve PFS in advanced NSCLC patients but did not show any significant OS and ORR benefits. Furthermore, risks of hypertension, proteinuria, and grade 3 or higher AEs were greater with the erlotinib-and-bevacizumab combination.

Sequential treatment in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving first-line bevacizumab combined with 1st/2nd-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Introduction

The clinical outcomes of sequential treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with first-line bevacizumab combined with 1st/2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs are unclear. Thus, we aimed to analyze the outcomes of these patients.

Methods

Between January 2015 and December 2020, data for 102 advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving first-line bevacizumab combined with erlotinib or afatinib followed by treatments at multiple institutions were retrospectively analyzed. All patients with progressive disease (PD) after first-line therapy underwent secondary T790M mutation detection.

Results

The secondary T790M mutation positive rate of all study patients was 57.9%. First-line erlotinib use and progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line therapy > 12 months were positively associated with the T790M mutation (P <0.05). The response rates (RRs) to second-line treatments were 51.7% and 22.7% for the osimertinib and nonosimertinib groups, respectively (P = 0.001). The median PFS associated with second-line osimertinib and nonosimertinib therapy was 13.7 and 7.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23-0.63; P< 0.001). Patients with a secondary T790M mutation receiving second-line osimertinib treatment had a median overall survival (OS) of 54.3 months, and the median OS was 31.9 months for non-T790M-mutated patients receiving second-line nonosimertinib treatments (HR = 0.36; CI: 0.21-0.62, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The majority of acquired resistance to first-line bevacizumab combined with 1st/2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs is associated with the T790M mutation. Sequential osimertinib treatment in patients with positive secondary T790M mutation is associated with better outcomes among these patients.

Novel systemic therapies in the management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-pretreated patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the standard first-line option for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring active EGFR mutations. The overall survival of patients with advanced NSCLC has improved dramatically with the development of comprehensive genetic profiles and targeted therapies. However, resistance inevitably occurs, leading to disease progression after approximately 10-18 months of EGFR-TKI treatment. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients who have experienced disease progression while undergoing EGFR-TKI treatment, but its efficacy is limited. The management of extensively pretreated patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC is becoming increasingly concerning. New agents have shown encouraging efficacy in clinical trials for this patient population, including fourth-generation EGFR-TKIs, EGFR-TKIs combined with counterpart targeted drugs, and novel agents such as antibody-drug conjugates. We review current efforts to manage extensively pretreated patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies showed that the combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib (combination therapy) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) but no overall survival (OS) compared to erlotinib alone (monotherapy) for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) had reported the OS results in 2021. This meta-analysis aimed to include the results of the two RCTs to make a decision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched relevant databases for RCTs on the use of bevacizumab plus erlotinib in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. The main outcomes of interest were PFS, OS, and the reported hazard ratio (HR). Fixed-effect model was used to estimate pooled HR.

RESULTS

Total 5 RCTs with 935 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. All studies reached their primary study endpoints including PFS and OS. Compared to monotherapy, combination therapy remarkably prolonged PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% confidence interval CI 0.51-0.70; p < 0.00001); however, OS was similar between the two groups (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.76-1.08; p = 0.26). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that in deletion within exon 19 (19del) mutation subgroup, the combination therapy could only prolong PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.76; p < 0.0001) but not OS (HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.37; p = 1.00), and also in leucine-to-arginine substitution in exon 21 (L858R) mutation subgroup (HR = 0.59, p < 0.0001 and HR = 0.80, p = 0.18, respectively). For patients with brain metastasis at baseline, the combination therapy achieved a significant better PFS than the monotherapy (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.90; p = 0.01), and a better OS with the difference marginally significant (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.02; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib can prolong progression-free survival but not overall survival compared to erlotinib alone in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients. The combination therapy not only can prolong progression-free survival but also has a tendency to prolong overall survival for patients with brain metastasis at baseline.

The combination of osimertinib with Raf inhibitor overcomes osimertinib resistance induced by KRAS amplification in EGFR-mutated lung cancer cells

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)¹ tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for the treatment of EGFR-positive patients exhibiting a T790 M resistance mutation after treatment with an earlier generation of EGFR TKIs. However, resistance to osimertinib inevitably develops despite its efficacy, and the resistance mechanisms are complex and not fully understood. We established cell lines with acquired resistance to osimertinib from gefitinib- or erlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells using a dose-escalation method, and found that they had upregulated levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2. Targeted next-generation sequencing of 143 genes was performed, and interestingly, amplification of KRAS was observed in osimertinib-resistant cells. Transfection of siRNA against the KRAS gene notably reduced the activation of ERK1/2 and AKT and significantly enhanced the induction of apoptosis by osimertinib treatment in osimertinib-resistant cells. LY3009120, a RAF inhibitor, showed a significant synergistic effect with osimertinib on apoptotic cell death in osimertinib-resistant cells. Combined treatment with osimertinib and LY3009120 also demonstrated remarkable synergistic anti-tumor activity in mouse xenografts of these cells. This could be a potential new treatment option for KRAS amplification-induced osimertinib failure.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for of advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in Asian populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: According to the 2023 guidelines for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line treatment and recently developed agents for the treatment of epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were compared in this meta-analysis. Treatment regimens involved in the included studies included first, second, and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), TKIs plus chemotherapy, TKIs plus angiogenesis inhibitors, and platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Considering the varying efficacy and safety of drugs in people of different ethnic origins, the optimal regimen should be determined, and the safety of first-line treatments should be assessed in the Asian population specifically. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched to retrieve reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with research data published from inception to 1 February 2023. Adopting Asian patient populations as the target (including studies in which Asian patients accounted for more than 50% of the sample), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted for comparison of treatment regimens and treatments were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: A total of 19 RCTs involving 5,824 patients and covering 14 treatment regimens were included. The primary outcome measure examined in this study was progression-free survival (PFS); other outcome measures examined were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), occurrence of any adverse events (AE), occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or above (≥3AE), and occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE). In terms of PFS, all regimens including TKIs (as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies), as well as bevacizumab (Bev) plus chemotherapy (Ch) were found to be significantly superior to basic chemotherapy (HRs: 0.09-0.61, p < 0.05 in all cases compared with Ch alone). The highest-ranking therapies were erlotinib (Erl) plus Bev (SUCRA: 0.94) and Erl plus ramucirumab (Ram) (SUCRA: 0.93). Regarding OS, no significant differences was observed between first-line treatment strategies; the top four treatments based on SUCRA, in rank order, were Bev + Ch (0.87), gefitinib (Gef) plus Ch (0.81), dacomitinib (Dac) (0.79), and osimertinib (Osi) (0.69). Additionally, there were no significant differences between first-line treatment strategies in terms of DCR. Regarding ORR, the top three treatments based on SUCRA were Erl + Bev (0.85), Erl + Ram (0.76), and Gef + Ch (0.74). No significant difference between first-line treatment strategies was observed in terms of the risk of AE. However, based on SUCRA, Erl ranked highest on avoidance of ≥ 3AE (0.97), and Osi ranked highest on avoidance of SAE (0.91). Conclusion: Based on these analyses of survival benefits, tumor burden response, and safety, furmonertinib (Fur), Osi, and aumolertinib (Aum) may represent the best treatment regimen options for Asian patients, significantly prolonging survival (as measured by median PFS/OS), eliciting a greater tumor burden response, and exposing patients to a lower risk of adverse events. Although Erl + Bev and Erl + Ram are associated with the best survival benefits in terms of PFS, further clinical studies are still needed to identify ways to reduce the risk of adverse events. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ID=CRD42023407994, identifier CRD42023407994.

First-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Plus Antiangiogenic Drugs Versus Third-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, despite significant survival improvement, the emergence of resistance mechanisms represents a common event. In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of third-generation EGFR-TKIs, the current standard of care, to first-generation EGFR-TKIs with antiangiogenic drugs for the first-line treatment of NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) reporting survival data published before September 1, 2022, were searched through the MEDLINE databases (PubMed), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (≥3 TRAEs) data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, with a total of 3,565 patients. We observed that third-generation EGFR-TKIs and first-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with antiangiogenic drugs provided a similar OS benefit over first-generation EGFR-TKIs in any of the subgroups. However, we indirectly observed a greater PFS benefit of third-generation EGFR-TKIs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs in females, never-smokers, in patients harboring exon 19 deletions, and in those with brain metastasis, as compared with using first-generation EGFR-TKIs plus antiangiogenic drugs. The ORR did not differ between the combination strategy and third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Finally, the risk of developing grade ≥3 TRAEs was higher using the combination of first-generation EGFR-TKIs and antiangiogenic drugs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs than third-generation EGFR-TKIs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that the combination strategy may provide an alternative to third-generation EGFR-TKIs, but more data are needed to determine the predictive clinicopathologic characteristics that can influence the treatment choice. Until then, third-generation EGFR-TKIs still represent the first choice in advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

EGFR inhibitor erlotinib plus monoclonal antibody versus erlotinib alone for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Immuno-combination therapy is emerging as an effective treatment for advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, compared to monotherapy, such as monoclonal antibodies or kinase inhibitors, whether combination therapy can enhance antitumor efficacy or alleviate side effects remains unclear.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was undertaken using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify eligible studies concentrating on treatment with erlotinib or erlotinib plus monoclonal antibodies in NSCLC patients published between January 2017 and June 2022. The primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Seven independent randomized, controlled clinical trials including 1513 patients were obtained for the final analysis. Erlotinib plus monoclonal antibodies was significantly associated with the improvement of PFS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI 0.53-0.69; z = 7.59, P < 0.01) and with moderate performance regarding OS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.58-1.13; z = 1.23, P = 0.22) and RR (odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% CI 0.98-1.59; z = 1.80, P = 0.07), irrespective of EGFR mutation status. In the safety evaluation, erlotinib plus monoclonal antibodies had a markedly higher occurrence of adverse events (AEs) of Clavien grade 3 or higher (OR, 3.32; 95% CI 2.66-4.15; z = 10.64, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared with erlotinib alone, combination therapy (erlotinib plus monoclonal antibodies) was associated with significantly improved PFS in NSCLC therapy, accompanied by increased treatment-related AEs.

REGISTRATION

Our systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews (CRD42022347667).

Challenges of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC and the potential role of herbs and active compounds: From mechanism to clinical practice

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are the most common oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are widely used in the treatment of lung cancer, especially in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, and EGFR-TKIs monotherapy has achieved better efficacy and tolerability compared with standard chemotherapy. However, acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs and associated adverse events pose a significant obstacle to targeted lung cancer therapy. Therefore, there is an urgent need to seek effective interventions to overcome these limitations. Natural medicines have shown potential therapeutic advantages in reversing acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs and reducing adverse events, bringing new options and directions for EGFR-TKIs combination therapy. In this paper, we systematically demonstrated the resistance mechanism of EGFR-TKIs, the clinical strategy of each generation of EGFR-TKIs in the synergistic treatment of NSCLC, the treatment-related adverse events of EGFR-TKIs, and the potential role of traditional Chinese medicine in overcoming the resistance and adverse reactions of EGFR-TKIs. Herbs and active compounds have the potential to act synergistically through multiple pathways and multiple mechanisms of overall regulation, combined with targeted therapy, and are expected to be an innovative model for NSCLC treatment.

Phase 2 Study of Osimertinib in Combination with Platinum and Pemetrexed in Patients with Previously Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The OPAL Study

BACKGROUND

This multicenter phase 2 trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy (OPP) in patients with previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received osimertinib 80 mg once daily (QD), with either cisplatin 75 mg/m² (arm A) or carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 5; arm B), plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m² for four cycles and maintenance therapy of osimertinib 80 mg QD with pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 3 weeks. The primary end-points were safety and objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary end-points were complete response rate (CRR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

In total, 67 patients (34 in arm A and 33 in arm B) were enrolled between July 2019 and February 2020. At the data cutoff (28th February 2022), 35 (52.2%) patients had discontinued the protocol treatment, including 10 (14.9%) due to adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. In the full analysis set, the ORR, CRR, and DCR were 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.0-97.8), 3.0% (0.0-7.2), and 97.0% (92.8-100.0), respectively. Based on updated survival data (data cutoff on August 31, 2022, median follow-up time: 33.4 months), the median PFS was 31.0 months (95% CI, 26.8 months-not reached) and median overall survival was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to show that OPP has excellent efficacy with acceptable toxicity in previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients.

Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy vs Gefitinib Alone in Untreated EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients With Brain Metastases: The GAP BRAIN Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study

IMPORTANCE

Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the standard therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases. Several studies have shown that adding chemotherapy to EGFR-TKIs could improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC; however, the efficacy of these agents in patients with brain metastases remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed with platinum) compared with gefitinib alone in patients with untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This open-label prospective, multicenter, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted in 6 centers in China from January 13, 2016, to August 27, 2021. The median follow-up time was 21.1 months (IQR, 13.5-31.8 months). Patients with untreated confirmed brain metastases and EGFR-sensitive mutated NSCLC were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

The eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gefitinib plus chemotherapy or gefitinib alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was intracranial PFS; secondary end points included PFS, overall survival (OS), intracranial objective response rate, overall objective response rate, and safety. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients (87 [54.0%] women; mean [SD] age, 55 [9.8] years; range, 26-80 years) were enrolled and randomized to receive gefitinib (n = 81) or gefitinib plus chemotherapy (n = 80). The median intracranial PFS was 15.6 months (95% CI, 14.3-16.9 months) in the gefitinib plus chemotherapy group vs 9.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-10.2 months) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.53; P < .001). Similarly, the median PFS was significantly longer with gefitinib plus chemotherapy than gefitinib alone (16.3; 95% CI, 14.4-18.2 months vs 9.5; 95% CI, 8.3-10.8 months; P < .001). Gefitinib plus chemotherapy had a better intracranial objective response rate (85.0%; 95% CI, 77.0%-93.0% vs 63.0%; 95% CI, 52.2%-73.7%; P = .002) and overall objective response rate (80.0%; 95% CI, 71.0%-89.0% vs 64.2%; 95% CI, 53.5%-74.9%; P = .03) than gefitinib alone. At data cutoff, the median OS was also significantly longer in the gefitinib plus chemotherapy group vs the gefitinib group (35.0 vs 28.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.99; P = .04). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were more common with gefitinib plus chemotherapy, most of which were manageable.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved intracranial PFS, PFS, and OS compared with gefitinib alone in patients with untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases and could be an optional first-line treatment for these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01951469.

Advances in the Management of Central Nervous System Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are common among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the presence of brain metastases has historically portended poor prognosis, recent advances in local and systemic therapies have greatly improved outcomes for NSCLC patients with CNS involvement. Stereotactic radiology surgery (SRS) has emerged as an effective radiotherapy technique with fewer toxicities compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Furthermore, multi-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with CNS overall response rates (ORR) of up to 70-80% are now an accepted first-line approach for a subset of advanced NSCLC patients with targetable molecular alterations. In addition, while the CNS was once considered an immunologic sanctuary site, growing evidence shows that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce durable responses in brain metastases as well. Ongoing efforts to optimize CNS metastases management are necessary to refine multimodal treatment approaches and develop new therapeutics with better CNS penetrance.

Bevacizumab versus Ramucirumab in EGFR-Mutated Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Real-World Observational Study

The combination of bevacizumab or ramucirumab with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations could have survival benefits. However, no study, to date, has been conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of these two antiangiogenic therapies (AATs). Stage IIIB to IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who received first-line EGFR-TKIs between January 2014 and May 2022 were enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups: those receiving bevacizumab and those receiving ramucirumab as a combination therapy in any line of treatment. Ninety-six patients were enrolled in this study's final analysis. The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who received front-line AATs combined with EGFR-TKI therapy was longer than that of patients receiving later-line AATs combined with other therapies (19.6 vs. 10.0 months, p < 0.001). No difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between front-line and later-line therapy (non-reach vs. 44.0 months, p = 0.261). Patients who received these two different AATs did not differ in PFS (24.1 vs. 15.7 months, p = 0.454) and OS (48.6 vs. 43.0 months, p = 0.924). In addition, these two AATs showed similar frequencies of the T790M mutation (43.6% vs. 38.2%; p = 0.645). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated several AAT cycles as an independent good prognostic factor in OS. The incidence of some adverse events such as bleeding and hepatitis was higher for bevacizumab than for ramucirumab but it was not significant. Front-line AAT and EGFR-TKI combination therapy improved the PFS of stage IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. The effectiveness and safety of the two AATs were similar.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for acquired resistance to EGFR therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

The advent of targeted therapy has transformed the treatment paradigm and survival of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver mutations. The development of acquired resistances during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) impedes a prolonged survival in many patients. This fact is leading to the use of locally ablative therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to counter these resistances. SABR is a non-invasive treatment that can be delivered in multiple locations and has already proven effective in oligometastatic disease. Clinical evidence suggests that the combination of SABR with TKIs prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic NSCLC patients with mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with international guidelines recommending their use in unfavorable scenarios such as oligoprogressive disease. In this publication, we have reviewed the available evidence on EGFR-TKIs resistance mechanisms and the combination of SABR with TKI in metastatic NSCLC with EGFR mutations. We also describe the utility and clinical recommendations of this combination in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease.

LAPS score for individualized treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer receiving EGFR-TKIs with or without bevacizumab

BACKGROUND

To establish a risk stratification score to facilitate individualized treatment for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We enrolled 160 advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with or without bevacizumab. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

There were 107 patients in EGFR-TKI monotherapy (T group) and 53 patients in EGFR-TKI with bevacizumab (A + T group). The median PFS in the A + T group was significantly longer than that in the T group (p = 0.002). No difference in the median OS between the A + T and T groups (p = 0.721). The multivariate analyses showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and the pre-treatment lactate dehydrogenase-albumin ratio (LAR) were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. The LAR-ECOG PS (LAPS) score was constructed by combining the pre-treatment LAR and ECOG PS. We defined ECOG PS 2 and high pre-treatment LAR as a score of 1. Then, patients with a total LAPS score of 0 were categorized as low-risk and those with 1-2 scores were classified as high-risk. For patients in low-risk group, there was no significant difference in PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) among those who received EGFR-TKI with or without bevacizumab. However, patients in high-risk group had a significant benefit in PFS and DCR when treated with EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab compared to those who received EGFR-TKI alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel LAPS score may help to facilitate individualized treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI with or without bevacizumab.

First-generation EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy for advanced EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment modalities for previously untreated advanced EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 196 advanced EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC. 107 received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy (T), 53 received EGFR-TKI + bevacizumab (T + A), and 36 received EGFR-TKI + bevacizumab + chemotherapy (T + A + C). The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

The median PFS was 27 months in the T + A + C group, 17 months in the T + A group, and 10 months in the T group. The multivariate analysis showed lower disease progression in the T + A + C group (HR, 0.377; 95% CI, 0.224-0.634; p < .001). Subgroup analysis showed that the T + A + C group did significantly improve PFS in patients with metastatic organs ≥2, brain metastases, liver metastases, and EGFR 19del compared to T + A group. No significant improvement in OS in the T + A + C group versus the T + A group, but a significant benefit in the subgroup of patients with metastatic organs ≥2. We also performed a subgroup analysis of the T + A + C group versus the T group, which similarly showed that the T + A + C group had better PFS than the T group in most subgroups, and the T + A + C group significantly improved OS in patients with metastatic organ ≥2 and liver metastases compared with the T group. The ORR was significantly higher in the T + A + C group than A + T and T groups (83.3% vs 71.7% vs 60.7%, p = .033). In safety, the T + A + C group had a higher incidence of AEs, but the majority was grade 1-2. The most frequent AEs of grade ≥ 3 were leukopenia (8.3%) and increased aminotransferase (8.3%) in the T + A + C group.

CONCLUSIONS

First-generation EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy was a promising strategy for advanced EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC.

Chronic Disease Self-Management of Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 Among Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Analysis

Introduction

Approximately 20-30% of individuals who contract acute coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection develop longer term complications of their initial infection, referred to as Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). PASC is characterized by chronic, varying symptomatology.

Methods

Using a mixed methods study design, we aimed to gain insight into individuals' experience with PASC, including cognitive issues, fatigue, and sleep disturbances. We explored whether our previously developed application (app), aimed at improving self-management skills among individuals with chronic diseases, is relevant for individuals with PASC and gained information to adapt the app for individuals with PASC. The study included 19 individuals, aged 40 years and older, recruited from our research participant database, Nova Southeastern University clinics, and community locations. We included this age range because older adults are more likely to have comorbid conditions, allowing us to better understand the impact of COVID-19 infection in these individuals. Participants completed seven standardized self-report questionnaires online, and an individual semi-structured interview via videoconferencing. Quantitative data were assessed using descriptive statistics and calculating individuals' scores in relation to norms. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Triangulation of the data was accomplished by calculating correlations between participants' responses on self-report scales and themes found in semi-structured interviews.

Results

Themes included disruption of everyday life, diverse physical symptoms, and cognitive problems including brain fog, fatigue, coping, and emotional upset. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that participants experienced high levels of fatigue, negative mood, cognitive problems, and overall reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Correlation analyses revealed that individual interview responses were related to participants' self-report of symptoms on standard questionnaires.

Discussion

Findings indicate that self-report questionnaires may reflect the experience of individuals with PASC and its impact. Additionally, further efforts to expand our prior mobile app are warranted among individuals with PASC.