1
|
Hartmann S, Dwyer D, Scott I, Wannan CMJ, Nguyen J, Lin A, Middeldorp CM, Wood SJ, Yung AR, McGorry PD, Nelson B, Clark SR. Dynamic updating of psychosis prediction models in individuals at ultra high-risk of psychosis. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2025:S2451-9022(25)00119-3. [PMID: 40158694 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2025] [Revised: 03/11/2025] [Accepted: 03/15/2025] [Indexed: 04/02/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The performance of psychiatric risk calculators can deteriorate over time due to changes in patient population, referral pathways, and medical advances. Such temporal biases in existing models may lead to suboptimal decisions when translated into clinical practice. Methods are available to correct this bias, yet no research has been conducted to investigate their utility in psychiatry. METHODS We aimed to analyse the performance of model updating methods for predicting psychosis onset by one year in 784 individuals at ultra high-risk (UHR) of psychosis from the UHR 1000+ cohort - a longitudinal cohort of UHR individuals recruited to research studies at Orygen, Melbourne, Australia, between 1995 and 2020. Model updating was performed using a yearly adjusted model (recalibration), a continuously updated model (refitting), and a continuous Bayesian updating model (dynamic updating) and compared to a static logistic regression prediction model (original) regarding calibration, discrimination, and clinical net benefit. RESULTS The original model was poorly calibrated over the entire validation period. All three updating methods improved the predictive performance compared to the original model (recalibration: P= 0.014, refitting: P= 0.028, dynamic updating: P= 0.002). The dynamic updating method demonstrated the best predictive performance (Harrel's C-index = 0.70, 95% CI: [0.58, 0.81]), calibration slope (slope = 1.03, 95% CI: [0.38, 1.74]) and clinical net benefit over the entire validation period. CONCLUSIONS Dynamic updating of psychosis prediction models may help to mitigate decreases in performance over time. Hence, existing psychosis prediction models need to be monitored for temporal biases to mitigate potentially harmful decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Hartmann
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Orygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Dominic Dwyer
- Orygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Isabelle Scott
- Orygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cassandra M J Wannan
- Orygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Josh Nguyen
- Orygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ashleigh Lin
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Christel M Middeldorp
- Child Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia; Child and Youth Mental Health Service, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Levvel, Academic Center for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stephen J Wood
- Orygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | - Alison R Yung
- Deakin University, Institute of Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), Geelong, Australia; School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Patrick D McGorry
- Orygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Barnaby Nelson
- Orygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Scott R Clark
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heda V, Dogra S, Kouznetsova VL, Kumar A, Kesari S, Tsigelny IF. miRNA-Based Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Using Machine Learning. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26:2280. [PMID: 40076899 PMCID: PMC11900116 DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2025] [Revised: 02/19/2025] [Accepted: 02/24/2025] [Indexed: 03/14/2025] Open
Abstract
Diagnostic practices for schizophrenia are unreliable due to the lack of a stable biomarker. However, machine learning holds promise in aiding in the diagnosis of schizophrenia and other neurological disorders. Dysregulated miRNAs were extracted from public sources. Datasets of miRNAs selected from the literature and random miRNAs with designated gene targets along with related pathways were assigned as descriptors of machine-learning models. These data were preprocessed and classified using WEKA and TensorFlow, and several classifiers were tested to train the model. The Sequential neural network developed by authors performed the best of the classifiers tested, achieving an accuracy of 94.32%. Naïve Bayes was the next best model, with an accuracy of 72.23%. MLP achieved an accuracy of 65.91%, followed by Hoeffding tree with an accuracy of 64.77%, Random tree with an accuracy of 63.64%, Random forest, which achieved an accuracy of 61.36%, and lastly ADABoostM1, which achieved an accuracy of 53.41%. The Sequential neural network and Naïve Bayes classifier were tested to validate the model as they achieved the highest accuracy. Naïve Bayes achieved a validation accuracy of 72.22%, whereas the sequential neural network achieved an accuracy of 88.88%. Our results demonstrate the practicality of machine learning in psychiatric diagnosis. Dysregulated miRNA combined with machine learning can serve as a diagnostic aid to physicians for schizophrenia and potentially other neurological disorders as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishrut Heda
- Scholars Program, CureScience Institute, San Diego, CA 92121, USA;
| | - Saanvi Dogra
- MAP Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA;
| | - Valentina L. Kouznetsova
- San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA;
- Department of Sciences, CureScience Institute, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Alex Kumar
- Computing and Mathematical Sciences Department, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA;
| | - Santosh Kesari
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA;
| | - Igor F. Tsigelny
- San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA;
- Department of Sciences, CureScience Institute, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quah SKL, Jo B, Geniesse C, Uddin LQ, Mumford JA, Barch DM, Fair DA, Gotlib IH, Poldrack RA, Saggar M. A data-driven latent variable approach to validating the research domain criteria framework. Nat Commun 2025; 16:830. [PMID: 39827137 PMCID: PMC11743195 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-55831-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 12/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework in psychiatry and neuroscience, recent studies suggest that the RDoC is insufficiently specific or excessively broad relative to the underlying brain circuitry it seeks to elucidate. To address these concerns, we employ a latent variable approach using bifactor analysis. We examine 84 whole-brain task-based fMRI (tfMRI) activation maps from 19 studies with 6192 participants. A curated subset of 37 maps with a balanced representation of RDoC domains constitute the training set, and the remaining held-out maps form the internal validation set. External validation is conducted using 36 peak coordinate activation maps from Neurosynth, using terms of RDoC constructs as seeds for topic meta-analysis. Here, we show that a bifactor model incorporating a task-general domain and splitting the cognitive systems domain better fits the examined corpus of tfMRI data than the current RDoC framework. We also identify the domain of arousal and regulatory systems as underrepresented. Our data-driven validation supports revising the RDoC framework to reflect underlying brain circuitry more accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K L Quah
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - B Jo
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - C Geniesse
- Machine Learning & Analytics Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - L Q Uddin
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - J A Mumford
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - D M Barch
- Departments of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
- Departments of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
- Departments of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - D A Fair
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - I H Gotlib
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - R A Poldrack
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - M Saggar
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dang G, Zhu L, Lian C, Zeng S, Shi X, Pei Z, Lan X, Shi JQ, Yan N, Guo Y, Su X. Are neurasthenia and depression the same disease entity? An electroencephalography study. BMC Psychiatry 2025; 25:44. [PMID: 39825342 PMCID: PMC11742223 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-06468-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2025] [Indexed: 01/20/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The neurasthenia-depression controversy has lasted for several decades. It is challenging to solve the argument by symptoms alone for syndrome-based disease classification. Our aim was to identify objective electroencephalography (EEG) measures that can differentiate neurasthenia from major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS Both electronic medical information records and EEG records from patients with neurasthenia and MDD were gathered. The demographic and clinical characteristics, EEG power spectral density, and functional connectivity were compared between the neurasthenia and MDD groups. Machine Learning methods such as random forest, logistic regression, support vector machines, and k nearest neighbors were also used for classification between groups to extend the identification that there is a significant different pattern between neurasthenia and MDD. RESULTS We analyzed 305 patients with neurasthenia and 45 patients with MDD. Compared with the MDD group, patients with neurasthenia reported more somatic symptoms and less emotional symptoms (p < 0.05). Moreover, lower theta connectivity was observed in patients with neurasthenia compared to those with MDD (p < 0.01). Among the classification models, random forest performed best with an accuracy of 0.93, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97, and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.96. The essential feature contributing to the model was the theta connectivity. LIMITATIONS This is a retrospective study, and medical records may not include all the details of a patient's syndrome. The sample size of the MDD group was smaller than that of the neurasthenia group. CONCLUSION Neurasthenia and MDD are different not only in symptoms but also in brain activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ge Dang
- Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Lin Zhu
- Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Chongyuan Lian
- Institute of Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Silin Zeng
- Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Xue Shi
- Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Zian Pei
- Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xiaoyong Lan
- Institute of Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Jian Qing Shi
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, College of Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Nan Yan
- CAS Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
- Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen University Town, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China.
| | - Yi Guo
- Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
- Institute of Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
- Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, 1017 Dongmen North Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China.
| | - Xiaolin Su
- Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
- Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, 1017 Dongmen North Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun S, Yan C, Qu S, Luo G, Liu X, Tian F, Dong Q, Li X, Hu B. Resting-state dynamic functional connectivity in major depressive disorder: A systematic review. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2024; 135:111076. [PMID: 38972502 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
As a novel measure, dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) provides insight into the dynamic nature of brain networks and their interactions in resting-state, surpassing traditional static functional connectivity in pathological conditions such as depression. Since a comprehensive review is still lacking, we then reviewed forty-five eligible papers to explore pathological mechanisms of major depressive disorder (MDD) from perspectives including abnormal brain regions and functional networks, brain state, topological properties, relevant recognition, along with longitudinal studies. Though inconsistencies could be found, common findings are: (1) From different perspectives based on dFC, default-mode network (DMN) with its subregions exhibited a close relation to the pathological mechanism of MDD. (2) With a corrupted integrity within large-scale functional networks and imbalance between them, longer fraction time in a relatively weakly-connected state may be a possible property of MDD concerning its relation with DMN. Abnormal transition frequencies between states were correlated to the severity of MDD. (3) Including dynamic properties in topological network metrics enhanced recognition effect. In all, this review summarized its use for clinical diagnosis and treatment, elucidating the non-stationary of MDD patients' aberrant brain activity in the absence of stimuli and bringing new views into its underlying neuro mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuting Sun
- Key Laboratory of Brain Health Intelligent Evaluation and Intervention, Beijing Institute of Technology, Ministry of Education, China; Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Wearable Computing, School of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, China
| | - Chang Yan
- Key Laboratory of Brain Health Intelligent Evaluation and Intervention, Beijing Institute of Technology, Ministry of Education, China
| | - Shanshan Qu
- Key Laboratory of Brain Health Intelligent Evaluation and Intervention, Beijing Institute of Technology, Ministry of Education, China
| | - Gang Luo
- Key Laboratory of Brain Health Intelligent Evaluation and Intervention, Beijing Institute of Technology, Ministry of Education, China
| | - Xuesong Liu
- Key Laboratory of Brain Health Intelligent Evaluation and Intervention, Beijing Institute of Technology, Ministry of Education, China
| | - Fuze Tian
- Key Laboratory of Brain Health Intelligent Evaluation and Intervention, Beijing Institute of Technology, Ministry of Education, China; Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Wearable Computing, School of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, China
| | - Qunxi Dong
- Key Laboratory of Brain Health Intelligent Evaluation and Intervention, Beijing Institute of Technology, Ministry of Education, China
| | - Xiaowei Li
- Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Wearable Computing, School of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, China
| | - Bin Hu
- Key Laboratory of Brain Health Intelligent Evaluation and Intervention, Beijing Institute of Technology, Ministry of Education, China; Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Wearable Computing, School of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Quah SKL, Jo B, Geniesse C, Uddin LQ, Mumford JA, Barch DM, Fair DA, Gotlib IH, Poldrack RA, Saggar M. A Data-Driven Latent Variable Approach to Validating the Research Domain Criteria Framework. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.01.31.577486. [PMID: 38559071 PMCID: PMC10979851 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.31.577486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework in psychiatry and neuroscience, recent studies suggest that the RDoC is insufficiently specific or excessively broad relative to the underlying brain circuitry it seeks to elucidate. To address these concerns, we employed a latent variable approach using bifactor analysis. We examined 84 whole-brain task-based fMRI (tfMRI) activation maps from 19 studies with 6,192 participants. A curated subset of 37 maps with a balanced representation of RDoC domains constituted the training set, and the remaining held-out maps formed the internal validation set. External validation was conducted using 36 peak coordinate activation maps from Neurosynth, using terms of RDoC constructs as seeds for topic meta-analysis. Here, we show that a bifactor model incorporating a task-general domain and splitting the cognitive systems domain better fits the examined corpus of tfMRI data than the current RDoC framework. We also identify the domain of arousal and regulatory systems as underrepresented. Our data-driven validation supports revising the RDoC framework to reflect underlying brain circuitry more accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K L Quah
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - B Jo
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - C Geniesse
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - L Q Uddin
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - J A Mumford
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - D M Barch
- Departments of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Psychiatry, and Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - D A Fair
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - I H Gotlib
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - R A Poldrack
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - M Saggar
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abalo-Rodríguez I, Blithikioti C. Let's fail better: Using philosophical tools to improve neuroscientific research in psychiatry. Eur J Neurosci 2024; 60:6375-6390. [PMID: 39400986 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/15/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
Despite predictions that neuroscientific discoveries would revolutionize psychiatry, decades of research have not yet led to clinically significant advances in psychiatric care. For this reason, an increasing number of researchers are recognizing the limitations of a purely biomedical approach in psychiatric research. These researchers call for reevaluating the conceptualization of mental disorders and argue for a non-reductionist approach to mental health. The aim of this paper is to discuss philosophical assumptions that underly neuroscientific research in psychiatry and offer practical tools to researchers for overcoming potential conceptual problems that are derived from those assumptions. Specifically, we will discuss: the analogy problem, questioning whether mental health problems are equivalent to brain disorders, the normativity problem, addressing the value-laden nature of psychiatric categories and the priority problem, which describes the level of analysis (e.g., biological, psychological, social, etc.) that should be prioritized when studying psychiatric conditions. In addition, we will explore potential strategies to mitigate practical problems that might arise due to these implicit assumptions. Overall, the aim of this paper is to suggest philosophical tools of practical use for neuroscientists, demonstrating the benefits of a closer collaboration between neuroscience and philosophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inés Abalo-Rodríguez
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Chrysanthi Blithikioti
- Department of General Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gordon JA, Dzirasa K, Petzschner FH. The neuroscience of mental illness: Building toward the future. Cell 2024; 187:5858-5870. [PMID: 39423804 PMCID: PMC11490687 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2024] [Revised: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/21/2024]
Abstract
Mental illnesses arise from dysfunction in the brain. Although numerous extraneural factors influence these illnesses, ultimately, it is the science of the brain that will lead to novel therapies. Meanwhile, our understanding of this complex organ is incomplete, leading to the oft-repeated trope that neuroscience has yet to make significant contributions to the care of individuals with mental illnesses. This review seeks to counter this narrative, using specific examples of how neuroscientific advances have contributed to progress in mental health care in the past and how current achievements set the stage for further progress in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A Gordon
- Department of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Kafui Dzirasa
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Neurology, and Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xing Y, Pearlson GD, Kochunov P, Calhoun VD, Du Y. Local-structure-preservation and redundancy-removal-based feature selection method and its application to the identification of biomarkers for schizophrenia. Neuroimage 2024; 299:120839. [PMID: 39251116 PMCID: PMC11491165 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Revised: 08/10/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of mental disorders is expected to be achieved through the identification of reliable neuroimaging biomarkers with the help of cutting-edge feature selection techniques. However, existing feature selection methods often fall short in capturing the local structural characteristics among samples and effectively eliminating redundant features, resulting in inadequate performance in disorder prediction. To address this gap, we propose a novel supervised method named local-structure-preservation and redundancy-removal-based feature selection (LRFS), and then apply it to the identification of meaningful biomarkers for schizophrenia (SZ). LRFS method leverages graph-based regularization to preserve original sample similarity relationships during data transformation, thus retaining crucial local structure information. Additionally, it introduces redundancy-removal regularization based on interrelationships among features to exclude similar and redundant features from high-dimensional data. Moreover, LRFS method incorporates l2,1 sparse regularization that enables selecting a sparse and noise-robust feature subset. Experimental evaluations on eight public datasets with diverse properties demonstrate the superior performance of our method over nine popular feature selection methods in identifying discriminative features, with average classification accuracy gains ranging from 1.30 % to 9.11 %. Furthermore, the LRFS method demonstrates superior discriminability in four functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) datasets from 708 healthy controls (HCs) and 537 SZ patients, with an average increase in classification accuracy ranging from 1.89 % to 9.24 % compared to other nine methods. Notably, our method reveals reproducible and significant changes in SZ patients relative to HCs across the four datasets, predominantly in the thalamus-related functional network connectivity, which exhibit a significant correlation with clinical symptoms. Convergence analysis, parameter sensitivity analysis, and ablation studies further demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our method. In short, our proposed feature selection method effectively identifies discriminative and reliable features that hold the potential to be biomarkers, paving the way for the elucidation of brain abnormalities and the advancement of precise diagnosis of mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Xing
- School of Computer and Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Godfrey D Pearlson
- Departments of Psychiatry and Neurobiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Peter Kochunov
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center and Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vince D Calhoun
- Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science, Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Yuhui Du
- School of Computer and Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang LL, Lui SS, Chan RC. Neuropsychology and Neurobiology of Negative Schizotypy: A Selective Review. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY GLOBAL OPEN SCIENCE 2024; 4:100317. [PMID: 38711865 PMCID: PMC11070600 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Schizotypy refers to a latent personality organization that reflects liability to schizophrenia. Because schizotypy is a multidimensional construct, people with schizotypy vary in behavioral and neurobiological features. In this article, we selectively review the neuropsychological and neurobiological profiles of people with schizotypy, with a focus on negative schizotypy. Empirical evidence is presented for alterations of neuropsychological performance in negative schizotypy. We also cover the Research Domain Criteria domains of positive valence, social process, and sensorimotor systems. Moreover, we systematically summarize the neurobiological correlates of negative schizotypy at the structural, resting-state, and task-based neural levels, as well as the neurochemical level. The convergence and inconsistency of the evidence are critically reviewed. Regarding theoretical and clinical implications, we argue that negative schizotypy represents a useful organizational framework for studying neuropsychology and neurobiology across different psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling-ling Wang
- School of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
| | - Simon S.Y. Lui
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Raymond C.K. Chan
- Neuropsychology and Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Monosov IE, Zimmermann J, Frank MJ, Mathis MW, Baker JT. Ethological computational psychiatry: Challenges and opportunities. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2024; 86:102881. [PMID: 38696972 PMCID: PMC11162904 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2024.102881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
Studying the intricacies of individual subjects' moods and cognitive processing over extended periods of time presents a formidable challenge in medicine. While much of systems neuroscience appropriately focuses on the link between neural circuit functions and well-constrained behaviors over short timescales (e.g., trials, hours), many mental health conditions involve complex interactions of mood and cognition that are non-stationary across behavioral contexts and evolve over extended timescales. Here, we discuss opportunities, challenges, and possible future directions in computational psychiatry to quantify non-stationary continuously monitored behaviors. We suggest that this exploratory effort may contribute to a more precision-based approach to treating mental disorders and facilitate a more robust reverse translation across animal species. We conclude with ethical considerations for any field that aims to bridge artificial intelligence and patient monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya E. Monosov
- Departments of Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, and Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jan Zimmermann
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Michael J. Frank
- Carney Center for Computational Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rubio JM, Lencz T, Cao H, Kraguljac N, Dhamala E, Homan P, Horga G, Sarpal DK, Argyelan M, Gallego J, Cholewa J, Barber A, Kane JM, Malhotra AK. Replication of a neuroimaging biomarker for striatal dysfunction in psychosis. Mol Psychiatry 2024; 29:929-938. [PMID: 38177349 PMCID: PMC11176002 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02381-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
To bring biomarkers closer to clinical application, they should be generalizable, reliable, and maintain performance within the constraints of routine clinical conditions. The functional striatal abnormalities (FSA), is among the most advanced neuroimaging biomarkers in schizophrenia, trained to discriminate diagnosis, with post-hoc analyses indicating prognostic properties. Here, we attempt to replicate its diagnostic capabilities measured by the area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operator characteristic curves discriminating individuals with psychosis (n = 101) from healthy controls (n = 51) in the Human Connectome Project for Early Psychosis. We also measured the test-retest (run 1 vs 2) and phase encoding direction (i.e., AP vs PA) reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Additionally, we measured effects of scan length on classification accuracy (i.e., AUCs) and reliability (i.e., ICCs). Finally, we tested the prognostic capability of the FSA by the correlation between baseline scores and symptom improvement over 12 weeks of antipsychotic treatment in a separate cohort (n = 97). Similar analyses were conducted for the Yeo networks intrinsic connectivity as a reference. The FSA had good/excellent diagnostic discrimination (AUC = 75.4%, 95% CI = 67.0-83.3%; in non-affective psychosis AUC = 80.5%, 95% CI = 72.1-88.0%, and in affective psychosis AUC = 58.7%, 95% CI = 44.2-72.0%). Test-retest reliability ranged between ICC = 0.48 (95% CI = 0.35-0.59) and ICC = 0.22 (95% CI = 0.06-0.36), which was comparable to that of networks intrinsic connectivity. Phase encoding direction reliability for the FSA was ICC = 0.51 (95% CI = 0.42-0.59), generally lower than for networks intrinsic connectivity. By increasing scan length from 2 to 10 min, diagnostic classification of the FSA increased from AUC = 71.7% (95% CI = 63.1-80.3%) to 75.4% (95% CI = 67.0-83.3%) and phase encoding direction reliability from ICC = 0.29 (95% CI = 0.14-0.43) to ICC = 0.51 (95% CI = 0.42-0.59). FSA scores did not correlate with symptom improvement. These results reassure that the FSA is a generalizable diagnostic - but not prognostic - biomarker. Given the replicable results of the FSA as a diagnostic biomarker trained on case-control datasets, next the development of prognostic biomarkers should be on treatment-response data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose M Rubio
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Todd Lencz
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hengyi Cao
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nina Kraguljac
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Elvisha Dhamala
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philipp Homan
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland
- Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guillermo Horga
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deepak K Sarpal
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Miklos Argyelan
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juan Gallego
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Cholewa
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anita Barber
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - John M Kane
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anil K Malhotra
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Neville V, Mendl M, Paul ES, Seriès P, Dayan P. A primer on the use of computational modelling to investigate affective states, affective disorders and animal welfare in non-human animals. COGNITIVE, AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE 2024; 24:370-383. [PMID: 38036937 PMCID: PMC11039423 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-023-01137-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Objective measures of animal emotion-like and mood-like states are essential for preclinical studies of affective disorders and for assessing the welfare of laboratory and other animals. However, the development and validation of measures of these affective states poses a challenge partly because the relationships between affect and its behavioural, physiological and cognitive signatures are complex. Here, we suggest that the crisp characterisations offered by computational modelling of the underlying, but unobservable, processes that mediate these signatures should provide better insights. Although this computational psychiatry approach has been widely used in human research in both health and disease, translational computational psychiatry studies remain few and far between. We explain how building computational models with data from animal studies could play a pivotal role in furthering our understanding of the aetiology of affective disorders, associated affective states and the likely underlying cognitive processes involved. We end by outlining the basic steps involved in a simple computational analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikki Neville
- Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
| | - Michael Mendl
- Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK
| | | | - Peggy Seriès
- Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Dayan
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics & University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pagnier GJ, Asaad WF, Frank MJ. Double dissociation of dopamine and subthalamic nucleus stimulation on effortful cost/benefit decision making. Curr Biol 2024; 34:655-660.e3. [PMID: 38183986 PMCID: PMC10872531 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and dopaminergic therapy (DA) are common interventions for Parkinson's disease (PD). Both treatments typically improve patient outcomes, and both can have adverse side effects on decision making (e.g., impulsivity).1,2 Nevertheless, they are thought to act via different mechanisms within basal ganglia circuits.3 Here, we developed and formally evaluated their dissociable predictions within a single cost/benefit effort-based decision-making task. In the same patients, we manipulated DA medication status and subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS status within and across sessions. Using a series of descriptive and computational modeling analyses of participant choices and their dynamics, we confirm a double dissociation: DA medication asymmetrically altered participants' sensitivities to benefits vs. effort costs of alternative choices (boosting the sensitivity to benefits while simultaneously lowering sensitivity to costs); whereas STN DBS lowered the decision threshold of such choices. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show, using a common modeling framework, a dissociation of DA and DBS within the same participants. As such, this work offers a comprehensive account for how different mechanisms impact decision making, and how impulsive behavior (present in DA-treated patients with PD and DBS patients) may emerge from separate physiological mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume J Pagnier
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Box GL-N, 185 Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA; Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, 164 Angell Street, 4(th) Floor, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
| | - Wael F Asaad
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Box GL-N, 185 Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA; Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, APC 633, Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903; Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, 164 Angell Street, 4(th) Floor, Providence, RI 02906, USA
| | - Michael J Frank
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Box GL-N, 185 Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA; Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Metcalf Research Building, 190 Thayer St, Providence, RI 02912, USA; Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, 164 Angell Street, 4(th) Floor, Providence, RI 02906, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The prediction of individual treatment responses with machine learning faces hurdles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederike H Petzschner
- Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Krainc D, Martin WJ, Casey B, Jensen FE, Tishkoff S, Potter WZ, Hyman SE. Shifting the trajectory of therapeutic development for neurological and psychiatric disorders. Sci Transl Med 2023; 15:eadg4775. [PMID: 38190501 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adg4775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Clinical trials for central nervous system disorders often enroll patients with unrecognized heterogeneous diseases, leading to costly trials that have high failure rates. Here, we discuss the potential of emerging technologies and datasets to elucidate disease mechanisms and identify biomarkers to improve patient stratification and monitoring of disease progression in clinical trials for neuropsychiatric disorders. Greater efforts must be centered on rigorously standardizing data collection and sharing of methods, datasets, and analytical tools across sectors. To address health care disparities in clinical trials, diversity of genetic ancestries and environmental exposures of research participants and associated biological samples must be prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitri Krainc
- Davee Department of Neurology, Simpson Querrey Center for Neurogenetics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Bradford Casey
- Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frances E Jensen
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah Tishkoff
- Departments of Genetics and Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Steven E Hyman
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Frohn OO, Martiny KM. The phenomenological model of depression: from methodological challenges to clinical advancements. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1215388. [PMID: 38023023 PMCID: PMC10658893 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In this article our overall aim is to illustrate how phenomenological psychopathology can advance the clinical work on depression. To do so, we start by unfolding the current phenomenological model of depression. We argue that this model faces a methodological challenge, which we define as 'the challenge of patho-description'. Mental disorders, such as depression, influence how people are able to access and describe their own experiences. This becomes a challenge for phenomenological psychopathology since its methodology is based on people's ability to describe their own experiences. To deal with this challenge, in the case of depression, we turn to the framework of phenomenological interview. We interview 12 participants (7 women, 5 men, age-range from 29 to 57 years) with moderate and severe depression. From the interview results, we show how phenomenological interview deals with the challenge of patho-description and how patho-description in depression conceals experiential nuances. We unfold these nuances and describe how people with depression pre-reflectively experience a variety of feelings, a type of agency, overly positive self-image, and relations in a hyper-social way. These descriptive nuances not only strengthen the phenomenological model of depression, but they also help advance the clinical work on depression. We firstly illustrate how the descriptive nuances can be added to current manuals and rating scales to advance diagnostic work. Secondly, we illustrate how phenomenological, 'bottom-up', and embodied approaches function at the pre-reflective level of experience, and that further effort at this level can help advance therapy for depression.
Collapse
|
18
|
Zanao TA, Luethi MS, Goerigk S, Suen P, Diaz AP, Soares JC, Brunoni AR. White matter predicts tDCS antidepressant effects in a sham-controlled clinical trial study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2023; 273:1421-1431. [PMID: 36336757 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-022-01504-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used as treatment for depression, but its effects are heterogeneous. We investigated, in a subsample of the clinical trial Escitalopram versus Electrical Direct Current Therapy for Depression Study (ELECTTDCS), whether white matter areas associated with depression disorder were associated with tDCS response. Baseline diffusion tensor imaging data were analyzed from 49 patients (34 females, mean age 41.9) randomized to escitalopram 20 mg/day, tDCS (2 mA, 30 min, 22 sessions), or placebo. Antidepressant outcomes were assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS) after 10-week treatment. We used whole-brain tractography for extracting white matter measures for anterior corpus callosum, and bilaterally for cingulum bundle, striato-frontal, inferior occipito-frontal fasciculus and uncinate. For the rostral body, tDCS group showed higher MD associated with antidepressant effects (estimate = -5.13 ± 1.64, p = 0.002), and tDCS significantly differed from the placebo and the escitalopram group. The left striato-frontal tract showed higher FA associated with antidepressant effects (estimate = -2.14 ± 0.72, p = 0.003), and tDCS differed only from the placebo group. For the right uncinate, the tDCS group lower AD values were associated with higher HDRS decrease (estimate = -1.45 ± 0.67, p = 0.031). Abnormalities in white matter MDD-related areas are associated with tDCS antidepressant effects. Suggested better white matter microstructure of the left prefrontal cortex was associated with tDCS antidepressant effects. Future studies should investigate whether these findings are driven by electric field diffusion and density in these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamires A Zanao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Matthias S Luethi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Stephan Goerigk
- Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Laboratory of Neurosciences LIM-27), São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Psychological Methodology and Assessment, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paulo Suen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexandre P Diaz
- Hochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany
| | - Jair C Soares
- Hochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany
| | - Andre R Brunoni
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
- Hospital Universitário, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Felsky D, Cannitelli A, Pipitone J. Whole Person Modeling: a transdisciplinary approach to mental health research. DISCOVER MENTAL HEALTH 2023; 3:16. [PMID: 37638348 PMCID: PMC10449734 DOI: 10.1007/s44192-023-00041-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
The growing global burden of mental illness has prompted calls for innovative research strategies. Theoretical models of mental health include complex contributions of biological, psychosocial, experiential, and other environmental influences. Accordingly, neuropsychiatric research has self-organized into largely isolated disciplines working to decode each individual contribution. However, research directly modeling objective biological measurements in combination with cognitive, psychological, demographic, or other environmental measurements is only now beginning to proliferate. This review aims to (1) to describe the landscape of modern mental health research and current movement towards integrative study, (2) to provide a concrete framework for quantitative integrative research, which we call Whole Person Modeling, (3) to explore existing and emerging techniques and methods used in Whole Person Modeling, and (4) to discuss our observations about the scarcity, potential value, and untested aspects of highly transdisciplinary research in general. Whole Person Modeling studies have the potential to provide a better understanding of multilevel phenomena, deliver more accurate diagnostic and prognostic tests to aid in clinical decision making, and test long standing theoretical models of mental illness. Some current barriers to progress include challenges with interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, systemic cultural barriers to transdisciplinary career paths, technical challenges in model specification, bias, and data harmonization, and gaps in transdisciplinary educational programs. We hope to ease anxiety in the field surrounding the often mysterious and intimidating world of transdisciplinary, data-driven mental health research and provide a useful orientation for students or highly specialized researchers who are new to this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Felsky
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8 Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
- Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Alyssa Cannitelli
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8 Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Jon Pipitone
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rubio J, Lencz T, Cao H, Kraguljac N, Dhamala E, Homan P, Horga G, Sarpal D, Argyelan M, Gallego J, Cholewa J, Barber A, Kane J, Maholtra A. Replication of a neuroimaging biomarker for striatal dysfunction in psychosis. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3185688. [PMID: 37609149 PMCID: PMC10441472 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3185688/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
To bring biomarkers closer to clinical application, they should be generalizable, reliable, and maintain performance within the constraints of routine clinical conditions. The functional striatal abnormalities (FSA), is among the most advanced neuroimaging biomarkers in schizophrenia, trained to discriminate diagnosis, with post-hoc analyses indicating prognostic properties. Here, we attempt to replicate its diagnostic capabilities measured by the area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operator characteristic curves discriminating individuals with psychosis (n=101) from healthy controls (n=51) in the Human Connectome Project for Early Psychosis. We also measured the test-retest (run 1 vs 2) and phase encoding direction (i.e., AP vs PA) reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Additionally, we measured effects of scan length on classification accuracy (i.e., AUCs) and reliability (i.e., ICCs). Finally, we tested the prognostic capability of the FSA by the correlation between baseline scores and symptom improvement over 12 weeks of antipsychotic treatment in a separate cohort (n=97). Similar analyses were conducted for the Yeo networks intrinsic connectivity as a reference. The FSA had good/excellent diagnostic discrimination (AUC=75.4%, 95%CI=67.0%-83.3%; in non-affective psychosis AUC=80.5%, 95%CI=72.1-88.0%, and in affective psychosis AUC=58.7%, 95%CI=44.2-72.0%). Test-retest reliability ranged between ICC=0.48 (95%CI=0.35-0.59) and ICC=0.22 (95%CI=0.06-0.36), which was comparable to that of networks intrinsic connectivity. Phase encoding direction reliability for the FSA was ICC=0.51 (95%CI=0.42-0.59), generally lower than for networks intrinsic connectivity. By increasing scan length from 2 to 10 minutes, diagnostic classification of the FSA increased from AUC=71.7% (95%CI=63.1%-80.3%) to 75.4% (95%CI=67.0%-83.3%) and phase encoding direction reliability from ICC=0.29 (95%CI=0.14-0.43) to ICC=0.51 (95%CI=0.42-0.59). FSA scores did not correlate with symptom improvement. These results reassure that the FSA is a generalizable diagnostic - but not prognostic - biomarker. Given the replicable results of the FSA as a diagnostic biomarker trained on case-control datasets, next the development of prognostic biomarkers should be on treatment-response data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Rubio
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes of Medical Research, Northwell Health
| | - Todd Lencz
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
| | - Hengyi Cao
- The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rubio JM, Lencz T, Cao H, Kraguljac N, Dhamala E, Homan P, Horga G, Sarpal DK, Argyelan M, Gallego J, Cholewa J, Barber A, Kane J, Malhotra A. Replication of a neuroimaging biomarker for striatal dysfunction in psychosis. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.07.17.23292779. [PMID: 37503088 PMCID: PMC10371185 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.17.23292779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
To bring biomarkers closer to clinical application, they should be generalizable, reliable, and maintain performance within the constraints of routine clinical conditions. The functional striatal abnormalities (FSA), is among the most advanced neuroimaging biomarkers in schizophrenia, trained to discriminate diagnosis, with post-hoc analyses indicating prognostic properties. Here, we attempt to replicate its diagnostic capabilities measured by the area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operator characteristic curves discriminating individuals with psychosis (n=101) from healthy controls (n=51) in the Human Connectome Project for Early Psychosis. We also measured the test-retest (run 1 vs 2) and phase encoding direction (i.e., AP vs PA) reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Additionally, we measured effects of scan length on classification accuracy (i.e., AUCs) and reliability (i.e., ICCs). Finally, we tested the prognostic capability of the FSA by the correlation between baseline scores and symptom improvement over 12 weeks of antipsychotic treatment in a separate cohort (n=97). Similar analyses were conducted for the Yeo networks intrinsic connectivity as a reference. The FSA had good/excellent diagnostic discrimination (AUC=75.4%, 95%CI=67.0%-83.3%; in non-affective psychosis AUC=80.5%, 95%CI=72.1-88.0%, and in affective psychosis AUC=58.7%, 95%CI=44.2-72.0%). Test-retest reliability ranged between ICC=0.48 (95%CI=0.35-0.59) and ICC=0.22 (95%CI=0.06-0.36), which was comparable to that of networks intrinsic connectivity. Phase encoding direction reliability for the FSA was ICC=0.51 (95%CI=0.42-0.59), generally lower than for networks intrinsic connectivity. By increasing scan length from 2 to 10 minutes, diagnostic classification of the FSA increased from AUC=71.7% (95%CI=63.1%-80.3%) to 75.4% (95%CI=67.0%-83.3%) and phase encoding direction reliability from ICC=0.29 (95%CI=0.14-0.43) to ICC=0.51 (95%CI=0.42-0.59). FSA scores did not correlate with symptom improvement. These results reassure that the FSA is a generalizable diagnostic - but not prognostic - biomarker. Given the replicable results of the FSA as a diagnostic biomarker trained on case-control datasets, next the development of prognostic biomarkers should be on treatment-response data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose M Rubio
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Todd Lencz
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Hengyi Cao
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Nina Kraguljac
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Elvisha Dhamala
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Philipp Homan
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland
- Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guillermo Horga
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
| | - Deepak K Sarpal
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Miklos Argyelan
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Juan Gallego
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - John Cholewa
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Anita Barber
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - John Kane
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Anil Malhotra
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University - Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Spriggs MJ, Murphy-Beiner A, Murphy R, Bornemann J, Thurgur H, Schlag AK. ARC: a framework for access, reciprocity and conduct in psychedelic therapies. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1119115. [PMID: 37251069 PMCID: PMC10211333 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1119115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The field of psychedelic assisted therapy (PAT) is growing at an unprecedented pace. The immense pressures this places on those working in this burgeoning field have already begun to raise important questions about risk and responsibility. It is imperative that the development of an ethical and equitable infrastructure for psychedelic care is prioritized to support this rapid expansion of PAT in research and clinical settings. Here we present Access, Reciprocity and Conduct (ARC); a framework for a culturally informed ethical infrastructure for ARC in psychedelic therapies. These three parallel yet interdependent pillars of ARC provide the bedrock for a sustainable psychedelic infrastructure which prioritized equal access to PAT for those in need of mental health treatment (Access), promotes the safety of those delivering and receiving PAT in clinical contexts (Conduct), and respects the traditional and spiritual uses of psychedelic medicines which often precede their clinical use (Reciprocity). In the development of ARC, we are taking a novel dual-phase co-design approach. The first phase involves co-development of an ethics statement for each arm with stakeholders from research, industry, therapy, community, and indigenous settings. A second phase will further disseminate the statements for collaborative review to a wider audience from these different stakeholder communities within the psychedelic therapy field to invite feedback and further refinement. By presenting ARC at this early stage, we hope to draw upon the collective wisdom of the wider psychedelic community and inspire the open dialogue and collaboration upon which the process of co-design depends. We aim to offer a framework through which psychedelic researchers, therapists and other stakeholders, may begin tackling the complex ethical questions arising within their own organizations and individual practice of PAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meg J. Spriggs
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Drug Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ashleigh Murphy-Beiner
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roberta Murphy
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Bornemann
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Drug Science, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anne K. Schlag
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Drug Science, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Krčmář L, Jäger I, Boudriot E, Hanken K, Gabriel V, Melcher J, Klimas N, Dengl F, Schmoelz S, Pingen P, Campana M, Moussiopoulou J, Yakimov V, Ioannou G, Wichert S, DeJonge S, Zill P, Papazov B, de Almeida V, Galinski S, Gabellini N, Hasanaj G, Mortazavi M, Karali T, Hisch A, Kallweit MS, Meisinger VJ, Löhrs L, Neumeier K, Behrens S, Karch S, Schworm B, Kern C, Priglinger S, Malchow B, Steiner J, Hasan A, Padberg F, Pogarell O, Falkai P, Schmitt A, Wagner E, Keeser D, Raabe FJ. The multimodal Munich Clinical Deep Phenotyping study to bridge the translational gap in severe mental illness treatment research. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1179811. [PMID: 37215661 PMCID: PMC10196006 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1179811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Treatment of severe mental illness (SMI) symptoms, especially negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia, remains a major unmet need. There is good evidence that SMIs have a strong genetic background and are characterized by multiple biological alterations, including disturbed brain circuits and connectivity, dysregulated neuronal excitation-inhibition, disturbed dopaminergic and glutamatergic pathways, and partially dysregulated inflammatory processes. The ways in which the dysregulated signaling pathways are interconnected remains largely unknown, in part because well-characterized clinical studies on comprehensive biomaterial are lacking. Furthermore, the development of drugs to treat SMIs such as schizophrenia is limited by the use of operationalized symptom-based clusters for diagnosis. Methods In line with the Research Domain Criteria initiative, the Clinical Deep Phenotyping (CDP) study is using a multimodal approach to reveal the neurobiological underpinnings of clinically relevant schizophrenia subgroups by performing broad transdiagnostic clinical characterization with standardized neurocognitive assessments, multimodal neuroimaging, electrophysiological assessments, retinal investigations, and omics-based analyzes of blood and cerebrospinal fluid. Moreover, to bridge the translational gap in biological psychiatry the study includes in vitro investigations on human-induced pluripotent stem cells, which are available from a subset of participants. Results Here, we report on the feasibility of this multimodal approach, which has been successfully initiated in the first participants in the CDP cohort; to date, the cohort comprises over 194 individuals with SMI and 187 age and gender matched healthy controls. In addition, we describe the applied research modalities and study objectives. Discussion The identification of cross-diagnostic and diagnosis-specific biotype-informed subgroups of patients and the translational dissection of those subgroups may help to pave the way toward precision medicine with artificial intelligence-supported tailored interventions and treatment. This aim is particularly important in psychiatry, a field where innovation is urgently needed because specific symptom domains, such as negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction, and treatment-resistant symptoms in general are still difficult to treat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lenka Krčmář
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- International Max Planck Research School for Translational Psychiatry (IMPRS-TP), Munich, Germany
| | - Iris Jäger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Emanuel Boudriot
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Hanken
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vanessa Gabriel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Melcher
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicole Klimas
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fanny Dengl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Schmoelz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Pauline Pingen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mattia Campana
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joanna Moussiopoulou
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vladislav Yakimov
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Georgios Ioannou
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Wichert
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Silvia DeJonge
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Zill
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Boris Papazov
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Valéria de Almeida
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabrina Galinski
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadja Gabellini
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Genc Hasanaj
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matin Mortazavi
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Temmuz Karali
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexandra Hisch
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcel S Kallweit
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Verena J. Meisinger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lisa Löhrs
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Karin Neumeier
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie Behrens
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Karch
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schworm
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Kern
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Berend Malchow
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Johann Steiner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Laboratory of Translational Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany
- Center for Health and Medical Prevention, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alkomiet Hasan
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Pogarell
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea Schmitt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Laboratory of Neurosciences (LIM-27), Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Elias Wagner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Keeser
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Center for Neurosciences, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian J. Raabe
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- International Max Planck Research School for Translational Psychiatry (IMPRS-TP), Munich, Germany
- Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lalousis PA, Schmaal L, Wood SJ, Reniers RLEP, Barnes NM, Chisholm K, Griffiths SL, Stainton A, Wen J, Hwang G, Davatzikos C, Wenzel J, Kambeitz-Ilankovic L, Andreou C, Bonivento C, Dannlowski U, Ferro A, Lichtenstein T, Riecher-Rössler A, Romer G, Rosen M, Bertolino A, Borgwardt S, Brambilla P, Kambeitz J, Lencer R, Pantelis C, Ruhrmann S, Salokangas RKR, Schultze-Lutter F, Schmidt A, Meisenzahl E, Koutsouleris N, Dwyer D, Upthegrove R. Neurobiologically Based Stratification of Recent-Onset Depression and Psychosis: Identification of Two Distinct Transdiagnostic Phenotypes. Biol Psychiatry 2022; 92:552-562. [PMID: 35717212 PMCID: PMC10128104 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying neurobiologically based transdiagnostic categories of depression and psychosis may elucidate heterogeneity and provide better candidates for predictive modeling. We aimed to identify clusters across patients with recent-onset depression (ROD) and recent-onset psychosis (ROP) based on structural neuroimaging data. We hypothesized that these transdiagnostic clusters would identify patients with poor outcome and allow more accurate prediction of symptomatic remission than traditional diagnostic structures. METHODS HYDRA (Heterogeneity through Discriminant Analysis) was trained on whole-brain volumetric measures from 577 participants from the discovery sample of the multisite PRONIA study to identify neurobiologically driven clusters, which were then externally validated in the PRONIA replication sample (n = 404) and three datasets of chronic samples (Centre for Biomedical Research Excellence, n = 146; Mind Clinical Imaging Consortium, n = 202; Munich, n = 470). RESULTS The optimal clustering solution was two transdiagnostic clusters (cluster 1: n = 153, 67 ROP, 86 ROD; cluster 2: n = 149, 88 ROP, 61 ROD; adjusted Rand index = 0.618). The two clusters contained both patients with ROP and patients with ROD. One cluster had widespread gray matter volume deficits and more positive, negative, and functional deficits (impaired cluster), and one cluster revealed a more preserved neuroanatomical signature and more core depressive symptomatology (preserved cluster). The clustering solution was internally and externally validated and assessed for clinical utility in predicting 9-month symptomatic remission, outperforming traditional diagnostic structures. CONCLUSIONS We identified two transdiagnostic neuroanatomically informed clusters that are clinically and biologically distinct, challenging current diagnostic boundaries in recent-onset mental health disorders. These results may aid understanding of the etiology of poor outcome patients transdiagnostically and improve development of stratified treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paris Alexandros Lalousis
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| | - Lianne Schmaal
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen J Wood
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Renate L E P Reniers
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas M Barnes
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Katharine Chisholm
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sian Lowri Griffiths
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Stainton
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Junhao Wen
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gyujoon Hwang
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Julian Wenzel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Carolina Bonivento
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Udo Dannlowski
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Adele Ferro
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Theresa Lichtenstein
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Georg Romer
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marlene Rosen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alessandro Bertolino
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Stefan Borgwardt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Paolo Brambilla
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Joseph Kambeitz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maxmilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Rebekka Lencer
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christos Pantelis
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephan Ruhrmann
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Frauke Schultze-Lutter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Psychology, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - André Schmidt
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Eva Meisenzahl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Koutsouleris
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maxmilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Dominic Dwyer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maxmilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Upthegrove
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Birmingham Early Interventions Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Geurts DEM, Van den Heuvel TJ, Huys QJM, Verkes RJ, Cools R. Amygdala response predicts clinical symptom reduction in patients with borderline personality disorder: A pilot fMRI study. Front Behav Neurosci 2022; 16:938403. [PMID: 36110290 PMCID: PMC9468714 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.938403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a prevalent, devastating, and heterogeneous psychiatric disorder. Treatment success is highly variable within this patient group. A cognitive neuroscientific approach to BPD might contribute to precision psychiatry by identifying neurocognitive factors that predict who will benefit from a specific treatment. Here, we build on observations that BPD is accompanied by the enhanced impact of the aversive effect on behavior and abnormal neural signaling in the amygdala. We assessed whether BPD is accompanied by abnormal aversive regulation of instrumental behavior and associated neural signaling, in a manner that is predictive of symptom reduction after therapy. We tested a clinical sample of 15 female patients with BPD, awaiting dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), and 16 matched healthy controls using fMRI and an aversive Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) task that assesses how instrumental behaviors are influenced by aversive Pavlovian stimuli. Patients were assessed 1 year after the start of DBT to quantify changes in BPD symptom severity. At baseline, behavioral aversive PIT and associated neural signaling did not differ between groups. However, the BOLD signal in the amygdala measured during aversive PIT was associated with symptom reduction at 1-year follow-up: higher PIT-related aversive amygdala signaling before treatment was associated with reduced clinical improvement at follow-up. Thus, within the evaluated group of BPD patients, the BOLD signal in the amygdala before treatment was related to clinical symptom reduction 1 year after the start of treatment. The results suggest that less PIT-related responsiveness of the amygdala increases the chances of treatment success. We note that the relatively small sample size is a limitation of this study and that replication is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk E. M. Geurts
- Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Thom J. Van den Heuvel
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Scelta, Expert Centre for Personality Disorders, GGNet, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Quentin J. M. Huys
- Mental Health Neuroscience Department, Division of Psychiatry and Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robbert J. Verkes
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Kairos Center for Forensic Psychiatry, Pro Persona Mental Health, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Roshan Cools
- Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
From broken models to treatment selection: Active inference as a tool to guide clinical research and practice. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN EUROPE 2022; 4:e9697. [DOI: 10.32872/cpe.9697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
27
|
Currie J, Waiter GD, Johnston B, Feltovich N, Douglas Steele J. Blunted Neuroeconomic Loss Aversion in Schizophrenia. Brain Res 2022; 1789:147957. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.147957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
28
|
Scholl J, Trier HA, Rushworth MFS, Kolling N. The effect of apathy and compulsivity on planning and stopping in sequential decision-making. PLoS Biol 2022; 20:e3001566. [PMID: 35358177 PMCID: PMC8970514 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Real-life decision-making often comprises sequences of successive decisions about whether to take opportunities as they are encountered or keep searching for better ones instead. We investigated individual differences related to such sequential decision-making and link them especially to apathy and compulsivity in a large online sample (discovery sample: n = 449 and confirmation sample: n = 756). Our cognitive model revealed distinct changes in the way participants evaluated their environments and planned their own future behaviour. Apathy was linked to decision inertia, i.e., automatically persisting with a sequence of searches for longer than appropriate given the value of searching. Thus, despite being less motivated, they did not avoid the effort associated with longer searches. In contrast, compulsivity was linked to self-reported insensitivity to the cost of continuing with a sequence of searches. The objective measures of behavioural cost insensitivity were clearly linked to compulsivity only in the discovery sample. While the confirmation sample showed a similar effect, it did not reach significance. Nevertheless, in both samples, participants reported awareness of such bias (experienced as "overchasing"). In addition, this awareness made them report preemptively avoiding situations related to the bias. However, we found no evidence of them actually preempting more in the task, which might mean a misalignment of their metacognitive beliefs or that our behavioural measures were incomplete. In summary, individual variation in distinct, fundamental aspects of sequential decision-making can be linked to variation in 2 measures of behavioural traits associated with psychological illness in the normal population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Scholl
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, PSYR2 Team, University Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Pôle EST, Bron, France
- Wellcome Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford Centre of Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hailey A. Trier
- Wellcome Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew F. S. Rushworth
- Wellcome Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nils Kolling
- Oxford Centre of Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Univ Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Inserm, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute U1208, Bron, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Khaleghi A, Mohammadi MR, Shahi K, Nasrabadi AM. Computational Neuroscience Approach to Psychiatry: A Review on Theory-driven Approaches. CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE 2022; 20:26-36. [PMID: 35078946 PMCID: PMC8813324 DOI: 10.9758/cpn.2022.20.1.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Translating progress in neuroscience into clinical benefits for patients with psychiatric disorders is challenging because it involves the brain as the most complex organ and its interaction with a complex environment and condition. Dealing with such complexity requires powerful techniques. Computational neuroscience approach to psychiatry integrates multiple levels and types of simulation, analysis and computation according to the different types of computational models to enhance comprehending, prediction and treatment of psychiatric disorder. This approach comprises two approaches: theory-driven and data-driven. In this review, we focus on recent advances in theory-driven approaches that mathematically and mechanistically examine the relationships between disorder-related changes and behavior at different level of brain organization. We discuss recent progresses in computational neuroscience models that relate to psychiatry and show how principles of neural computational modeling can be employed to explain psychopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Khaleghi
- Psychiatry and Psychology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Mohammadi
- Psychiatry and Psychology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kian Shahi
- Psychiatry and Psychology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Davidson B, Eapen-John D, Mithani K, Rabin JS, Meng Y, Cao X, Pople CB, Giacobbe P, Hamani C, Lipsman N. Lesional psychiatric neurosurgery: meta-analysis of clinical outcomes using a transdiagnostic approach. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93:207-215. [PMID: 34261748 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Four ablative neurosurgical procedures are used in the treatment of refractory psychiatric illness. The long-term effects of these procedures on psychiatric symptoms across disorders has never been synthesised and meta-analysed. METHODS A preregistered systematic review was performed on studies reporting clinical results following ablative psychiatric neurosurgery. Four possible outcome measures were extracted for each study: depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, anxiety and clinical global impression. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedge's g. Equipercentile linking was used to convert symptom scores to a common metric. The main outcome measures were the magnitude of improvement in depression, obsessive compulsive symptoms, anxiety and clinical global impression. The secondary outcome was a subgroup analysis comparing the magnitude of symptom changes between the four procedures. RESULTS Of 943 articles, 43 studies reporting data from 1414 unique patients, were included for pooled effects estimates with a random-effects meta-analysis. Results showed that there was a large effect size for improvements in depression (g=1.27; p<0.0001), obsessive-compulsive symptoms (g=2.25; p<0.0001) and anxiety (g=1.76; p<0.0001). The pooled clinical global impression improvement score was 2.36 (p<0.0001). On subgroup analysis, there was only a significant degree of heterogeneity in effect sizes between procedure types for anxiety symptoms, with capsulotomy resulting in a greater reduction in anxiety than cingulotomy. CONCLUSIONS Contemporary ablative neurosurgical procedures were significantly associated with improvements in depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, anxiety and clinical global impression. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020164784.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Davidson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Eapen-John
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karim Mithani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer S Rabin
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ying Meng
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xingshan Cao
- Research Design and Biostatistics, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher B Pople
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Giacobbe
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Clement Hamani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cohen BM, Öngür D, Babb SM. Alternative Diagnostic Models of the Psychotic Disorders: Evidence-Based Choices. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS 2022; 90:373-385. [PMID: 34233335 DOI: 10.1159/000517027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Standard diagnostic systems, the predominantly categorical DSM-5 and ICD-11, have limitations in validity, utility, and predictive and descriptive power. For psychotic disorders, these issues were partly addressed in current versions, but additional modifications are thought to be needed. Changes should be evidence based. We reviewed categorical, modified-categorical, and continuum-based models versus factor-based models of psychosis. Factors are clusters of symptoms or single prominent aspects of illness. Consistent evidence from studies of the genetics, pathobiology, and clinical presentation of psychotic disorders all support an underlying structure of factors, not categories, as best characterizing psychoses. Factors are not only the best fit but also comprehensive, as they can encompass any key feature of illness, including symptoms and course, as well as determinants of risk or response. Factors are inherently dimensional, even multidimensional, as are the psychoses themselves, and they provide the detail needed for either grouping or distinguishing patients for treatment decisions. The tools for making factor-based diagnoses are available, reliable, and concordant with actual practices used for clinical assessments. If needed, factors can be employed to create categories similar to those in current use. In addition, they can be used to define unique groupings of patients relevant to specific treatments or studies of the psychoses. Lastly, factor-based classifications are concordant with other comprehensive approaches to psychiatric nosology, including personalized (precision treatment) models and hierarchical models, both of which are currently being explored. Factors might be considered as the right primary structural choice for future versions of standard diagnostic systems, both DSM and ICD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce M Cohen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dost Öngür
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Suzann M Babb
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Richter D, Dixon J. Models of mental health problems: a quasi-systematic review of theoretical approaches. J Ment Health 2022; 32:396-406. [PMID: 35014924 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2021.2022638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health and mental illness have been contested concepts for decades, with a wide variety of models being proposed. To date, there has been no exhaustive review that provides an overview of existing models. AIM To conduct a quasi-systematic review of theoretical models of mental health problems. METHODS We searched academic databases, reference lists, and an electronic bookshop for literature that proposed, endorsed, reviewed, or critiqued such models. Papers, book chapters, and books were included with material by researchers, clinicians, non-medical professions, and service users writing between 2000 to June 2020 being considered. The study was registered with the Open Science Framework (No. osf.io/r3tjx). RESULTS Based on 110 publications, we identified 34 different models which were grouped into five broader categories. Many models bridged two or more categories. Biological and psychological approaches had the largest number of models while social, consumer and cultural models were less diversified. Due to the non-empirical nature of the publications, several limitations in terms of search and quality appraisal apply. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that mental health care needs to acknowledge the diversity of theoretical models on mental health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Richter
- Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.,Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Bern University Hospital for Mental Health, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jeremy Dixon
- Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cross-species anxiety tests in psychiatry: pitfalls and promises. Mol Psychiatry 2022; 27:154-163. [PMID: 34561614 PMCID: PMC8960405 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-021-01299-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Behavioural anxiety tests in non-human animals are used for anxiolytic drug discovery, and to investigate the neurobiology of threat avoidance. Over the past decade, several of them were translated to humans with three clinically relevant goals: to assess potential efficacy of candidate treatments in healthy humans; to develop diagnostic tests or biomarkers; and to elucidate the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders. In this review, we scrutinise these promises and compare seven anxiety tests that are validated across species: five approach-avoidance conflict tests, unpredictable shock anticipation, and the social intrusion test in children. Regarding the first goal, three tests appear suitable for anxiolytic drug screening in humans. However, they have not become part of the drug development pipeline and achieving this may require independent confirmation of predictive validity and cost-effectiveness. Secondly, two tests have shown potential to measure clinically relevant individual differences, but their psychometric properties, predictive value, and clinical applicability need to be clarified. Finally, cross-species research has not yet revealed new evidence that the physiology of healthy human behaviour in anxiety tests relates to the physiology of anxiety symptoms in patients. To summarise, cross-species anxiety tests could be rendered useful for drug screening and for development of diagnostic instruments. Using these tests for aetiology research in healthy humans or animals needs to be queried and may turn out to be unrealistic.
Collapse
|
34
|
GSK3β Activity in Reward Circuit Functioning and Addiction. NEUROSCI 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/neurosci2040033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β), primarily described as a regulator of glycogen metabolism, is a molecular hub linking numerous signaling pathways and regulates many cellular processes like cytoskeletal rearrangement, cell migration, apoptosis, and proliferation. In neurons, the kinase is engaged in molecular events related to the strengthening and weakening of synapses, which is a subcellular manifestation of neuroplasticity. Dysregulation of GSK3β activity has been reported in many neuropsychiatric conditions, like schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and Alzheimer’s disease. In this review, we describe the kinase action in reward circuit-related structures in health and disease. The effect of pharmaceuticals used in the treatment of addiction in the context of GSK3β activity is also discussed.
Collapse
|
35
|
Davidson B, Hamani C, Rabin JS, Meng Y, Richter MA, Giacobbe P, Lipsman N. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Capsulotomy for Musical Obsessions. Biol Psychiatry 2021; 90:e49-e50. [PMID: 32862969 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Davidson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Clement Hamani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer S Rabin
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ying Meng
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margaret Anne Richter
- Frederick W. Thompson Anxiety Disorders Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Giacobbe
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Beam E, Potts C, Poldrack RA, Etkin A. A data-driven framework for mapping domains of human neurobiology. Nat Neurosci 2021; 24:1733-1744. [PMID: 34764476 PMCID: PMC8761068 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-021-00948-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Functional neuroimaging has been a mainstay of human neuroscience for the past 25 years. Interpretation of fMRI data has often occurred within knowledge frameworks crafted by experts, which have the potential to amplify biases that limit the replicability of findings. Here, we employ a computational approach to derive a data-driven framework for neurobiological domains that synthesizes the texts and data of nearly 20,000 human neuroimaging articles. Across multiple levels of domain specificity, the structure-function links within domains better replicate in held-out articles than those mapped from dominant frameworks in neuroscience and psychiatry. We further show that the data-driven framework partitions the literature into modular subfields, for which domains serve as generalizable prototypes of structure-function patterns in single articles. The approach to computational ontology we present here is the most comprehensive characterization of human brain circuits quantifiable with fMRI and may be extended to synthesize other scientific literatures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Beam
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Russell A Poldrack
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Amit Etkin
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. .,Alto Neuroscience, Inc., Los Altos, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Geurts DEM, Haegens NM, Van Beek MHCT, Schroevers MJ, Compen FR, Speckens AEM. Putting mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to the test in routine clinical practice: A transdiagnostic panacea or a disorder specific intervention? J Psychiatr Res 2021; 142:144-152. [PMID: 34352560 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past two decades there has been a growing number of randomized clinical trials supporting the efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in the treatment of several psychiatric disorders. Since evidence for its effectiveness in routine clinical practice is lagging behind, we aimed to examine adherence, outcome and predictors of MBCT in a well-characterized, heterogeneous outpatient population in routine clinical practice. METHODS Data were collected from a naturalistic uncontrolled cohort of 998 patients formally diagnosed with mainly depression, anxiety disorders, personality disorders, somatoform disorders and/or ADHD. Patients received protocolized MBCT and completed self-report questionnaires pre- and post-treatment on overall functioning (Outcome Questionnaire, primary outcome), depressive symptoms, worry, mindfulness skills and self-compassion. Pre-to post-treatment changes were analysed for the overall sample and each diagnostic category separately with paired sample t-tests, reliable change indices (only overall sample) and repeated measures ANOVA for groups with and without comorbidity. Multiple linear regression was carried out to assess possible predictors of adherence and change in overall functioning. RESULTS Adherence was high (94%) but negatively affected by lower levels of education, more comorbidity and presence of ADHD. Outcome in terms of improvement in overall functioning was good in the overall sample (Cohen's d = 0.50, 30% showed reliable improvement vs. 3.5% reliable deterioration) and within each diagnostic category (Cohen's d range = 0.37-0.61). Worse overall functioning at baseline was the only predictor for a larger treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS After MBCT, overall functioning improved in a large heterogeneous psychiatric outpatient population independent of diagnosis or comorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk E M Geurts
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre for Mindfulness, Radboud University, P.O.Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, P.O.Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - N Marlou Haegens
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre for Mindfulness, Radboud University, P.O.Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, P.O.Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Marleen H C T Van Beek
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre for Mindfulness, Radboud University, P.O.Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, P.O.Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Maya J Schroevers
- Department of Health Sciences, Section Health Psychology, University of Groningen, P.O.Box FA12, 9713 AV, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Félix R Compen
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre for Mindfulness, Radboud University, P.O.Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, P.O.Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Anne E M Speckens
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre for Mindfulness, Radboud University, P.O.Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, P.O.Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Brown VM, Zhu L, Solway A, Wang JM, McCurry KL, King-Casas B, Chiu PH. Reinforcement Learning Disruptions in Individuals With Depression and Sensitivity to Symptom Change Following Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. JAMA Psychiatry 2021; 78:1113-1122. [PMID: 34319349 PMCID: PMC8319827 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Major depressive disorder is prevalent and impairing. Parsing neurocomputational substrates of reinforcement learning in individuals with depression may facilitate a mechanistic understanding of the disorder and suggest new cognitive therapeutic targets. OBJECTIVE To determine associations among computational model-derived reinforcement learning parameters, depression symptoms, and symptom changes after treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this mixed cross-sectional-cohort study, individuals performed reward and loss variants of a probabilistic learning task during functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and follow-up. A volunteer sample with and without a depression diagnosis was recruited from the community. Participants were assessed from July 2011 to February 2017, and data were analyzed from May 2017 to May 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Computational model-based analyses of participants' choices assessed a priori hypotheses about associations between components of reward-based and loss-based learning with depression symptoms. Changes in both learning parameters and symptoms were then assessed in a subset of participants who received cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). RESULTS Of 101 included adults, 69 (68.3%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 34.4 (11.2) years. A total of 69 participants with a depression diagnosis and 32 participants without a depression diagnosis were included at baseline; 48 participants (28 with depression who received CBT and 20 without depression) were included at follow-up (mean [SD] of 115.1 [15.6] days). Computational model-based analyses of behavioral choices and neural data identified associations of learning with symptoms during reward learning and loss learning, respectively. During reward learning only, anhedonia (and not negative affect or arousal) was associated with model-derived learning parameters (learning rate: posterior mean regression β = -0.14; 95% credible interval [CrI], -0.12 to -0.03; outcome sensitivity: posterior mean regression β = 0.18; 95% CrI, 0.02 to 0.37) and neural learning signals (moderation of association between striatal prediction error and expected value signals: t97 = -2.10; P = .04). During loss learning only, negative affect (and not anhedonia or arousal) was associated with learning parameters (outcome shift: posterior mean regression β = -0.11; 95% CrI, -0.20 to -0.01) and disrupted neural encoding of learning signals (association with subgenual anterior cingulate prediction error signals: r = -0.28; P = .005). Symptom improvement following CBT was associated with normalization of learning parameters that were disrupted at baseline (reward learning rate: posterior mean regression β = 0.15; 90% CrI, 0.001 to 0.41; loss outcome shift: posterior mean regression β = 0.42; 90% CrI, 0.09 to 0.77). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, the mapping of reinforcement learning components to symptoms of major depression revealed mechanistic features associated with these symptoms and points to possible learning-based therapeutic processes and targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa M. Brown
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg,Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke,Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Lusha Zhu
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke,School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Alec Solway
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke
| | - John M. Wang
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg,Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke
| | - Katherine L. McCurry
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg,Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke
| | - Brooks King-Casas
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg,Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke,Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Blacksburg
| | - Pearl H. Chiu
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg,Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gauld C, Giroux É, Micoulaud-Franchi JA. [Introduction to the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology]. Encephale 2021; 48:92-101. [PMID: 34544589 DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In clinical practice, the usefulness of diagnosis based on the Diagnostic or Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or the International Classification of Diseases, 11th edition, appears essential from a clinical, research, epidemiological, administrative, economic and political level. However, such diagnostic systems have shortcomings in terms of validity, little consideration of comorbidities and strong intra-class heterogeneity. On a structural level, the operationalization of its criteria is based on a reliability which has been defined a posteriori and which does not lead to improving the validity of the diagnosis but rather to the reification of the diagnostic categories. METHODS First published in its current form in 2017, the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) constitutes a nosological alternative based on statistics. It conceptualizes psychopathology as a set of hierarchical dimensions, i.e. in "transdiagnostic" continua. The HiTOP is structured according to super-spectra, spectra, sub-factors, syndromes, components and symptoms. This comes from the current dimensional psychology and quantitative nosology. This article describes the basic principles of the HiTOP project and its potential to integrate into clinical and psychiatric research based on its advantages and limitations. RESULTS Unlike the DSM, which is descriptive and categorical, the HiTOP is first a dimensional classification. This dimensionality describes psychiatric phenomena on continua, each dimension providing a diagnostic continuum to situate a clinical patient. This dimensionality avoids the reification of categories and it limits the dichotomy between normal and pathological. In addition, HiTOP shows a hierarchical structure: vertical refinement of dimensions allows to circumvent the problem of comorbidities, proposes a new conception of etiopathogenic mechanisms, and improves management of care. DISCUSSION Thus, we provide an illustration of the applications of a dimensional and hierarchical classification in current clinical practice and scientific research, compared to traditional nosology. The challenges of the HiTOP arise in terms of validity, i.e. in the relation of dimensions with physiopathological mechanisms, in clinical terms, i.e. in the potential contribution of dimensions in relation to categories. Moreover, methodological challenges will be important given the inherent limitations of the HiTOP. CONCLUSION The HiTOP allows to examine the conceptualization of psychiatric disorders, the search for explanatory mechanisms, and treatment from another perspective for psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gauld
- Service de Psychiatrie, Université Grenoble-Alpes, avenue du Maquis du Grésivaudan, 38000 Grenoble, France; UMR CNRS 8590 IHPST, Sorbonne University, Paris 1, 75231 Paris, France.
| | - É Giroux
- Institut de Recherches philosophiques de Lyon (EA 4187), Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - J-A Micoulaud-Franchi
- Service universitaire de médecine du sommeil, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France; USR CNRS 3413 SANPSY, université de Bordeaux, CHU Pellegrin, 33076 Bordeaux cédex, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Fritschi L, Lindmar JH, Scheidl F, Lenk K. Neuronal and Astrocytic Regulations in Schizophrenia: A Computational Modelling Study. Front Cell Neurosci 2021; 15:718459. [PMID: 34512269 PMCID: PMC8428975 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.718459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
According to the tripartite synapse model, astrocytes have a modulatory effect on neuronal signal transmission. More recently, astrocyte malfunction has been associated with psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia. Several hypotheses have been proposed on the pathological mechanisms of astrocytes in schizophrenia. For example, post-mortem examinations have revealed a reduced astrocytic density in patients with schizophrenia. Another hypothesis suggests that disease symptoms are linked to an abnormality of glutamate transmission, which is also regulated by astrocytes (glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia). Electrophysiological findings indicate a dispute over whether the disorder causes an increase or a decrease in neuronal and astrocytic activity. Moreover, there is no consensus as to which molecular pathways and network mechanisms are altered in schizophrenia. Computational models can aid the process in finding the underlying pathological malfunctions. The effect of astrocytes on the activity of neuron-astrocyte networks has been analysed with computational models. These can reproduce experimentally observed phenomena, such as astrocytic modulation of spike and burst signalling in neuron-astrocyte networks. Using an established computational neuron-astrocyte network model, we simulate experimental data of healthy and pathological networks by using different neuronal and astrocytic parameter configurations. In our simulations, the reduction of neuronal or astrocytic cell densities yields decreased glutamate levels and a statistically significant reduction in the network activity. Amplifications of the astrocytic ATP release toward postsynaptic terminals also reduced the network activity and resulted in temporarily increased glutamate levels. In contrast, reducing either the glutamate release or re-uptake in astrocytes resulted in higher network activities. Similarly, an increase in synaptic weights of excitatory or inhibitory neurons raises the excitability of individual cells and elevates the activation level of the network. To conclude, our simulations suggest that the impairment of both neurons and astrocytes disturbs the neuronal network activity in schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Fritschi
- Department of Mathematics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Florian Scheidl
- Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kerstin Lenk
- Computational Biophysics and Imaging Group (CBIG), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, BioMediTech, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Maintenance of bodily homeostasis relies on interoceptive mechanisms in the brain to predict and regulate bodily state. While altered neural activation during interoception in specific psychiatric disorders has been reported in many studies, it is unclear whether a common neural locus underpins transdiagnostic interoceptive differences. METHODS The authors conducted a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies comparing patients with psychiatric disorders with healthy control subjects to identify brain regions exhibiting convergent disrupted activation during interoception. Bibliographic, neuroimaging, and preprint databases through May 2020 were searched. A total of 306 foci from 33 studies were extracted, which included 610 control subjects and 626 patients with schizophrenia, bipolar or unipolar depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, eating disorders, or substance use disorders. Data were pooled using a random-effects model implemented by the activation likelihood estimation algorithm. The preregistered primary outcome was the neuroanatomical location of the convergence of peak voxel coordinates. RESULTS Convergent disrupted activation specific to the left dorsal mid-insula was found (Z=4.47, peak coordinates: -36, -2, 14; volume: 928 mm3). Studies directly contributing to the cluster included patients with bipolar disorder, anxiety, major depression, anorexia, and schizophrenia, assessed with task probes including pain, hunger, and interoceptive attention. A series of conjunction analyses against extant meta-analytic data sets revealed that this mid-insula cluster was anatomically distinct from brain regions involved in affective processing and from regions altered by psychological or pharmacological interventions for affective disorders. CONCLUSIONS These results reveal transdiagnostic, domain-general differences in interoceptive processing in the left dorsal mid-insula. Disrupted mid-insular activation may represent a neural marker of psychopathology and a putative target for novel interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla L Nord
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (Nord, Lawson, Dalgleish) and Department of Psychology (Lawson), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.; and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, U.K. (Dalgleish)
| | - Rebecca P Lawson
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (Nord, Lawson, Dalgleish) and Department of Psychology (Lawson), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.; and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, U.K. (Dalgleish)
| | - Tim Dalgleish
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (Nord, Lawson, Dalgleish) and Department of Psychology (Lawson), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.; and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, U.K. (Dalgleish)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ke PF, Xiong DS, Li JH, Pan ZL, Zhou J, Li SJ, Song J, Chen XY, Li GX, Chen J, Li XB, Ning YP, Wu FC, Wu K. An integrated machine learning framework for a discriminative analysis of schizophrenia using multi-biological data. Sci Rep 2021; 11:14636. [PMID: 34282208 PMCID: PMC8290033 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94007-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Finding effective and objective biomarkers to inform the diagnosis of schizophrenia is of great importance yet remains challenging. Relatively little work has been conducted on multi-biological data for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. In this cross-sectional study, we extracted multiple features from three types of biological data, including gut microbiota data, blood data, and electroencephalogram data. Then, an integrated framework of machine learning consisting of five classifiers, three feature selection algorithms, and four cross validation methods was used to discriminate patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls. Our results show that the support vector machine classifier without feature selection using the input features of multi-biological data achieved the best performance, with an accuracy of 91.7% and an AUC of 96.5% (p < 0.05). These results indicate that multi-biological data showed better discriminative capacity for patients with schizophrenia than single biological data. The top 5% discriminative features selected from the optimal model include the gut microbiota features (Lactobacillus, Haemophilus, and Prevotella), the blood features (superoxide dismutase level, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, and neutrophil count), and the electroencephalogram features (nodal local efficiency, nodal efficiency, and nodal shortest path length in the temporal and frontal-parietal brain areas). The proposed integrated framework may be helpful for understanding the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and developing biomarkers for schizophrenia using multi-biological data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng-Fei Ke
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.,National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Dong-Sheng Xiong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.,National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Jia-Hui Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.,National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Zhi-Lin Pan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.,National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Jing Zhou
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.,National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Shi-Jia Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.,National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Jie Song
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.,National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Xiao-Yi Chen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.,National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Gui-Xiang Li
- Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of Dementia, Guangzhou, 510500, China.,National Engineering Research Center for Healthcare Devices, Guangzhou, 510500, China
| | - Jun Chen
- Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of Dementia, Guangzhou, 510500, China.,National Engineering Research Center for Healthcare Devices, Guangzhou, 510500, China
| | - Xiao-Bo Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Yu-Ping Ning
- The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Huiai Hospital, Guangzhou, 510370, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China
| | - Feng-Chun Wu
- The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Huiai Hospital, Guangzhou, 510370, Guangdong, China. .,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
| | - Kai Wu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China. .,The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Huiai Hospital, Guangzhou, 510370, Guangdong, China. .,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China. .,Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of Dementia, Guangzhou, 510500, China. .,National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China. .,Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Guangdong Province, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China. .,National Engineering Research Center for Healthcare Devices, Guangzhou, 510500, China. .,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project constitutes a translational framework for
psychopathology research, initiated by the National Institute of Mental Health in an
attempt to provide new avenues for research to circumvent problems emerging from the
use of symptom-based diagnostic categories in diagnosing disorders. The RDoC
alternative is a focus on psychopathology based on dimensions simultaneously defined
by observable behavior (including quantitative measures of cognitive or affective
behavior) and neurobiological measures. Key features of the RDoC framework include an
emphasis on functional dimensions that range from normal to abnormal, integration of
multiple measures in study designs (which can foster computational approaches), and
high priority on studies of neurodevelopment and environmental influences (and their
interaction) that can contribute to advances in understanding the etiology of
disorders throughout the lifespan. The paper highlights key implications for ways in
which RDoC can contribute to future ideas about classification, as well as some of
the considerations involved in translating basic behavioral and neuroscience data to
psychopathology.
Collapse
|
44
|
Atiya NAA, Huys QJM, Dolan RJ, Fleming SM. Explaining distortions in metacognition with an attractor network model of decision uncertainty. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009201. [PMID: 34310613 PMCID: PMC8341696 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Metacognition is the ability to reflect on, and evaluate, our cognition and behaviour. Distortions in metacognition are common in mental health disorders, though the neural underpinnings of such dysfunction are unknown. One reason for this is that models of key components of metacognition, such as decision confidence, are generally specified at an algorithmic or process level. While such models can be used to relate brain function to psychopathology, they are difficult to map to a neurobiological mechanism. Here, we develop a biologically-plausible model of decision uncertainty in an attempt to bridge this gap. We first relate the model's uncertainty in perceptual decisions to standard metrics of metacognition, namely mean confidence level (bias) and the accuracy of metacognitive judgments (sensitivity). We show that dissociable shifts in metacognition are associated with isolated disturbances at higher-order levels of a circuit associated with self-monitoring, akin to neuropsychological findings that highlight the detrimental effect of prefrontal brain lesions on metacognitive performance. Notably, we are able to account for empirical confidence judgements by fitting the parameters of our biophysical model to first-order performance data, specifically choice and response times. Lastly, in a reanalysis of existing data we show that self-reported mental health symptoms relate to disturbances in an uncertainty-monitoring component of the network. By bridging a gap between a biologically-plausible model of confidence formation and observed disturbances of metacognition in mental health disorders we provide a first step towards mapping theoretical constructs of metacognition onto dynamical models of decision uncertainty. In doing so, we provide a computational framework for modelling metacognitive performance in settings where access to explicit confidence reports is not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadim A. A. Atiya
- Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Quentin J. M. Huys
- Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Raymond J. Dolan
- Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen M. Fleming
- Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Frässle S, Aponte EA, Bollmann S, Brodersen KH, Do CT, Harrison OK, Harrison SJ, Heinzle J, Iglesias S, Kasper L, Lomakina EI, Mathys C, Müller-Schrader M, Pereira I, Petzschner FH, Raman S, Schöbi D, Toussaint B, Weber LA, Yao Y, Stephan KE. TAPAS: An Open-Source Software Package for Translational Neuromodeling and Computational Psychiatry. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:680811. [PMID: 34149484 PMCID: PMC8206497 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.680811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Psychiatry faces fundamental challenges with regard to mechanistically guided differential diagnosis, as well as prediction of clinical trajectories and treatment response of individual patients. This has motivated the genesis of two closely intertwined fields: (i) Translational Neuromodeling (TN), which develops "computational assays" for inferring patient-specific disease processes from neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and behavioral data; and (ii) Computational Psychiatry (CP), with the goal of incorporating computational assays into clinical decision making in everyday practice. In order to serve as objective and reliable tools for clinical routine, computational assays require end-to-end pipelines from raw data (input) to clinically useful information (output). While these are yet to be established in clinical practice, individual components of this general end-to-end pipeline are being developed and made openly available for community use. In this paper, we present the Translational Algorithms for Psychiatry-Advancing Science (TAPAS) software package, an open-source collection of building blocks for computational assays in psychiatry. Collectively, the tools in TAPAS presently cover several important aspects of the desired end-to-end pipeline, including: (i) tailored experimental designs and optimization of measurement strategy prior to data acquisition, (ii) quality control during data acquisition, and (iii) artifact correction, statistical inference, and clinical application after data acquisition. Here, we review the different tools within TAPAS and illustrate how these may help provide a deeper understanding of neural and cognitive mechanisms of disease, with the ultimate goal of establishing automatized pipelines for predictions about individual patients. We hope that the openly available tools in TAPAS will contribute to the further development of TN/CP and facilitate the translation of advances in computational neuroscience into clinically relevant computational assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Frässle
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eduardo A. Aponte
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Saskia Bollmann
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Kay H. Brodersen
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cao T. Do
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivia K. Harrison
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Samuel J. Harrison
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Heinzle
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sandra Iglesias
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lars Kasper
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ekaterina I. Lomakina
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Mathys
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Interacting Minds Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Matthias Müller-Schrader
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Inês Pereira
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Frederike H. Petzschner
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sudhir Raman
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dario Schöbi
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Birte Toussaint
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lilian A. Weber
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Yu Yao
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Klaas E. Stephan
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kong Y, Gao S, Yue Y, Hou Z, Shu H, Xie C, Zhang Z, Yuan Y. Spatio-temporal graph convolutional network for diagnosis and treatment response prediction of major depressive disorder from functional connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42:3922-3933. [PMID: 33969930 PMCID: PMC8288094 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD) has been explored to be highly associated with the dysfunctional integration of brain networks. It is therefore imperative to explore neuroimaging biomarkers to aid diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we developed a spatiotemporal graph convolutional network (STGCN) framework to learn discriminative features from functional connectivity for automatic diagnosis and treatment response prediction of MDD. Briefly, dynamic functional networks were first obtained from the resting-state fMRI with the sliding temporal window method. Secondly, a novel STGCN approach was proposed by introducing the modules of spatial graph attention convolution (SGAC) and temporal fusion. A novel SGAC was proposed to improve the feature learning ability and special anatomy prior guided pooling was developed to enable the feature dimension reduction. A temporal fusion module was proposed to capture the dynamic features of functional connectivity between adjacent sliding windows. Finally, the STGCN proposed approach was utilized to the tasks of diagnosis and antidepressant treatment response prediction for MDD. Performances of the framework were comprehensively examined with large cohorts of clinical data, which demonstrated its effectiveness in classifying MDD patients and predicting the treatment response. The sound performance suggests the potential of the STGCN for the clinical use in diagnosis and treatment prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youyong Kong
- Lab of Image Science and Technology, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Key Laboratory of Computer Network and Information Integration, Southeast University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing, China
| | - Shuwen Gao
- Lab of Image Science and Technology, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yingying Yue
- Department of Psychosomatic and Psychiatry, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhenhua Hou
- Department of Psychosomatic and Psychiatry, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Huazhong Shu
- Lab of Image Science and Technology, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Key Laboratory of Computer Network and Information Integration, Southeast University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing, China
| | - Chunming Xie
- Department of Neurology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhijun Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yonggui Yuan
- Department of Psychosomatic and Psychiatry, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Schöbi D, Homberg F, Frässle S, Endepols H, Moran RJ, Friston KJ, Tittgemeyer M, Heinzle J, Stephan KE. Model-based prediction of muscarinic receptor function from auditory mismatch negativity responses. Neuroimage 2021; 237:118096. [PMID: 33940149 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Drugs affecting neuromodulation, for example by dopamine or acetylcholine, take centre stage among therapeutic strategies in psychiatry. These neuromodulators can change both neuronal gain and synaptic plasticity and therefore affect electrophysiological measures. An important goal for clinical diagnostics is to exploit this effect in the reverse direction, i.e., to infer the status of specific neuromodulatory systems from electrophysiological measures. In this study, we provide proof-of-concept that the functional status of cholinergic (specifically muscarinic) receptors can be inferred from electrophysiological data using generative (dynamic causal) models. To this end, we used epidural EEG recordings over two auditory cortical regions during a mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm in rats. All animals were treated, across sessions, with muscarinic receptor agonists and antagonists at different doses. Together with a placebo condition, this resulted in five levels of muscarinic receptor status. Using a dynamic causal model - embodying a small network of coupled cortical microcircuits - we estimated synaptic parameters and their change across pharmacological conditions. The ensuing parameter estimates associated with (the neuromodulation of) synaptic efficacy showed both graded muscarinic effects and predictive validity between agonistic and antagonistic pharmacological conditions. This finding illustrates the potential utility of generative models of electrophysiological data as computational assays of muscarinic function. In application to EEG data of patients from heterogeneous spectrum diseases, e.g. schizophrenia, such models might help identify subgroups of patients that respond differentially to cholinergic treatments. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In psychiatry, the vast majority of pharmacological treatments affect actions of neuromodulatory transmitters, e.g. dopamine or acetylcholine. As treatment is largely trial-and-error based, one of the goals for computational psychiatry is to construct mathematical models that can serve as "computational assays" and infer the status of specific neuromodulatory systems in individual patients. This translational neuromodeling strategy has great promise for electrophysiological data in particular but requires careful validation. The present study demonstrates that the functional status of cholinergic (muscarinic) receptors can be inferred from electrophysiological data using dynamic causal models of neural circuits. While accuracy needs to be enhanced and our results must be replicated in larger samples, our current results provide proof-of-concept for computational assays of muscarinic function using EEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Schöbi
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich & Swiss Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), Wilfriedstrasse 6, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabienne Homberg
- Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH, Daniel-Goldbach-Strasse 17-27, 40880 Ratingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Frässle
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich & Swiss Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), Wilfriedstrasse 6, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Heike Endepols
- Preclinical Imaging Group, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| | - Rosalyn J Moran
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute for Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London Se5 8AF, UK
| | - Karl J Friston
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N, 3AR, UK
| | - Marc Tittgemeyer
- Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Gleueler Strasse 50, 50931 Cologne, Germany; Cluster of Excellence in Cellular Stress and Aging associated Disease (CECAD), 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Jakob Heinzle
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich & Swiss Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), Wilfriedstrasse 6, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Klaas Enno Stephan
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich & Swiss Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), Wilfriedstrasse 6, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N, 3AR, UK; Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Gleueler Strasse 50, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yao Y, Stephan KE. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for hierarchical clustering of dynamic causal models. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42:2973-2989. [PMID: 33826194 PMCID: PMC8193526 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
In this article, we address technical difficulties that arise when applying Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to hierarchical models designed to perform clustering in the space of latent parameters of subject‐wise generative models. Specifically, we focus on the case where the subject‐wise generative model is a dynamic causal model (DCM) for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and clusters are defined in terms of effective brain connectivity. While an attractive approach for detecting mechanistically interpretable subgroups in heterogeneous populations, inverting such a hierarchical model represents a particularly challenging case, since DCM is often characterized by high posterior correlations between its parameters. In this context, standard MCMC schemes exhibit poor performance and extremely slow convergence. In this article, we investigate the properties of hierarchical clustering which lead to the observed failure of standard MCMC schemes and propose a solution designed to improve convergence but preserve computational complexity. Specifically, we introduce a class of proposal distributions which aims to capture the interdependencies between the parameters of the clustering and subject‐wise generative models and helps to reduce random walk behaviour of the MCMC scheme. Critically, these proposal distributions only introduce a single hyperparameter that needs to be tuned to achieve good performance. For validation, we apply our proposed solution to synthetic and real‐world datasets and also compare it, in terms of computational complexity and performance, to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), a state‐of‐the‐art Monte Carlo technique. Our results indicate that, for the specific application domain considered here, our proposed solution shows good convergence performance and superior runtime compared to HMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Yao
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Klaas E Stephan
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jancke D, Herlitze S, Kringelbach ML, Deco G. Bridging the gap between single receptor type activity and whole-brain dynamics. FEBS J 2021; 289:2067-2084. [PMID: 33797854 DOI: 10.1111/febs.15855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
What is the effect of activating a single modulatory neuronal receptor type on entire brain network dynamics? Can such effect be isolated at all? These are important questions because characterizing elementary neuronal processes that influence network activity across the given anatomical backbone is fundamental to guide theories of brain function. Here, we introduce the concept of the cortical 'receptome' taking into account the distribution and densities of expression of different modulatory receptor types across the brain's anatomical connectivity matrix. By modelling whole-brain dynamics in silico, we suggest a bidirectional coupling between modulatory neurotransmission and neuronal connectivity hardware exemplified by the impact of single serotonergic (5-HT) receptor types on cortical dynamics. As experimental support of this concept, we show how optogenetic tools enable specific activation of a single 5-HT receptor type across the cortex as well as in vivo measurement of its distinct effects on cortical processing. Altogether, we demonstrate how the structural neuronal connectivity backbone and its modulation by a single neurotransmitter system allow access to a rich repertoire of different brain states that are fundamental for flexible behaviour. We further propose that irregular receptor expression patterns-genetically predisposed or acquired during a lifetime-may predispose for neuropsychiatric disorders like addiction, depression and anxiety along with distinct changes in brain state. Our long-term vision is that such diseases could be treated through rationally targeted therapeutic interventions of high specificity to eventually recover natural transitions of brain states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Jancke
- Optical Imaging Group, Institut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.,International Graduate School of Neuroscience (IGSN), Ruhr University Bochum, Germany
| | - Stefan Herlitze
- Department of General Zoology and Neurobiology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Morten L Kringelbach
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.,Center for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.,Centre for Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Gustavo Deco
- Center for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,Institució Catalana de la Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.,School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rupprechter S, Stankevicius A, Huys QJM, Series P, Steele JD. Abnormal reward valuation and event-related connectivity in unmedicated major depressive disorder. Psychol Med 2021; 51:795-803. [PMID: 31907081 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291719003799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experience of emotion is closely linked to valuation. Mood can be viewed as a bias to experience positive or negative emotions and abnormally biased subjective reward valuation and cognitions are core characteristics of major depression. METHODS Thirty-four unmedicated subjects with major depressive disorder and controls estimated the probability that fractal stimuli were associated with reward, based on passive observations, so they could subsequently choose the higher of either their estimated fractal value or an explicitly presented reward probability. Using model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging, we estimated each subject's internal value estimation, with psychophysiological interaction analysis used to examine event-related connectivity, testing hypotheses of abnormal reward valuation and cingulate connectivity in depression. RESULTS Reward value encoding in the hippocampus and rostral anterior cingulate was abnormal in depression. In addition, abnormal decision-making in depression was associated with increased anterior mid-cingulate activity and a signal in this region encoded the difference between the values of the two options. This localised decision-making and its impairment to the anterior mid-cingulate cortex (aMCC) consistent with theories of cognitive control. Notably, subjects with depression had significantly decreased event-related connectivity between the aMCC and rostral cingulate regions during decision-making, implying impaired communication between the neural substrates of expected value estimation and decision-making in depression. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the theory that abnormal neural reward valuation plays a central role in major depressive disorder (MDD). To the extent that emotion reflects valuation, abnormal valuation could explain abnormal emotional experience in MDD, reflect a core pathophysiological process and be a target of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Rupprechter
- Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Stankevicius
- Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Q J M Huys
- Max Planck Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, UCL, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Series
- Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J D Steele
- Division of Imaging Science and Technology, Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Department of Neurology, Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|