1
|
Sargeant JM, Totton SC, Plishka M, Vriezen ER. Salmonella in Animal Feeds: A Scoping Review. Front Vet Sci 2021; 8:727495. [PMID: 34805332 PMCID: PMC8600132 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.727495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to describe the volume and nature of published literature on Salmonella in animal feeds using a formal scoping review methodology. A structured search followed by eligibility screening resulted in the identification of 547 relevant studies, encompassing studies conducted in the fields in which animal feeds are grown (15 studies), the manufacturing sector (106), during transportation (11), in the retail sector (15), and on-farm (226), with the sector not described for 204 studies. The most common study purposes were to estimate the prevalence of Salmonella in animal feeds (372 studies) and to identify serovars (195). The serovars that were found in animal feeds included serovars associated with human illness, with animal illness, and with serovars identified in food (livestock and poultry) intended for human consumption. There were 120 intervention studies and 83 studies conducted to evaluate potential risk factors. Within intervention and risk factor studies, there may be sufficient depth to warrant synthesis research in the areas of heat interventions, fermentation and ensiling, organic acids, season, and geographic region. Some deficiencies were identified in the completeness of reporting of key features in the relevant studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M. Sargeant
- Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nair S, Farzan A, Poljak Z, Friendship R. Identifying Active Salmonella Infections in Swine Nurseries Using Serology and Bacterial Culture and Evaluating Associated Risk Factors. Animals (Basel) 2020; 10:ani10091517. [PMID: 32867163 PMCID: PMC7552155 DOI: 10.3390/ani10091517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The objectives of this study were: to identify nursery cohorts with an active Salmonella infection using combined serological and bacteriological methods, and to try to identify risk factors associated with swine nurseries with active Salmonella spread. Twenty pigs from each of 50 cohorts of weaned pigs from 44 different nursery barns were sampled about the time of weaning and near the end of the nursery stage. Information regarding farm management and biosecurity practices were collected using a questionnaire. Blood samples were obtained at both visits, while rectal swabs were collected at the second visit. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to test sera for Salmonella antibodies and rectal samples were cultured for Salmonella. A nursery cohort was identified as having an active Salmonella infection if Salmonella was cultured from one or more of the 20 pigs or if serological evidence suggested exposure to Salmonella. The association between farm-level management covariates and active Salmonella infection was assessed in 46 cohorts using a logistic regression model. Nine of 46 (20%) cohorts produced Salmonella-free pigs. The remaining 37 (80%) cohorts were classified as having an active infection. Examination of risk factors failed to identify how negative and positive nurseries differed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Henry A, Letellier A, Côté JC, Desmarais G, Lachapelle V, Bergeron N, Lewandowsky S, Fravalo P. Salmonella contamination in a network of 10 pig farms interconnected within the same cooperative. Vet Rec Open 2019; 6:e000269. [PMID: 31673371 PMCID: PMC6803009 DOI: 10.1136/vetreco-2017-000269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate whether pig farms interconnected within the same cooperative share similar Salmonella contamination patterns. Setting Ten finishing pig farms within a 100 km radius of a common slaughterhouse were selected. Their inclusion was based on their association to the same cooperative and the sharing of common resources: piglets, feed, swine transporters, slaughterhouse, technicians and veterinarians. Procedure Each farm was visited three times over a 10-month period. Pig faeces, the barn front door handle, the feed pipeline, mobile objects (shovel, balance and pig board), the landing stage, the concrete slab of the feed bins, the tire tracks left on the pathways by the animal feed truck, the pig delivery truck and the carcase knacker truck and the mudguards and cabin carpets of the veterinarian and technician vehicles on their arrival at the farm were all analysed for the presence of Salmonella. Results All farms were not equally contaminated with Salmonella. Whereas some farms yielded up to 12 Salmonella isolates, other farms were Salmonella free. Some locations, most notably the landing stage, were more contaminated than others. Salmonella contamination was dynamic in time. Some contaminations seen on farms, on specific locations on the first visit, had disappeared on the second and third visits, but new contaminations were detected on different locations. Conclusions Contamination with Salmonella was not disseminated through the network of the 10 pig farms interconnected within the same cooperative but was rather most often restricted in time to specific locations on specific farms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Henry
- Pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ann Letellier
- Pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Charles Côté
- Pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gabriel Desmarais
- Pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
| | - Virginie Lachapelle
- Pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nadia Bergeron
- Pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sylvette Lewandowsky
- Pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
| | - Philippe Fravalo
- Pathologie et microbiologie, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Råsbäck T, Rosendal T, Stampe M, Sannö A, Aspán A, Järnevi K, Lahti ET. Prevalence of human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in Swedish pig farms. Acta Vet Scand 2018; 60:39. [PMID: 29940995 PMCID: PMC6020225 DOI: 10.1186/s13028-018-0393-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pigs are the most important reservoir for human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. We investigated the herd prevalence of human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in Swedish pig farms by analysing pen faecal samples using a cold enrichment of 1 week and thereafter subsequent plating onto chromogenic selective media (CAY agar). RESULTS Pathogenic Y. enterocolitica was found in 32 (30.5%) of the 105 sampled farms with finisher pigs. Bioserotype 4/O:3 was identified at all but one farm, where 2/O:9 was identified. Pen-prevalence within the positive herds varied from 1/4 to 4/4 pens. The calculated intra-class correlation coefficient ICC (0.89) from a model with a random effect for grouping within herd indicated a very high degree of clustering by herd. None of the explored risk factors, including herd size, herd type, pig flow, feed type, access to outdoors, evidence of birds and rodents in the herd, usage of straw, number of pigs in sampled pen and age of pigs in pen were significantly associated with Y. enterocolitica status of the pen. The use of high pressure washing with cold water was significantly associated with Y. enterocolitica in the pen (OR = 84.77, 4.05-1772). Two culture methods were assessed for detection of Y. enterocolitica, one of which included the use of a chromogenic agar (CAY agar) intended for detection of human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica. The chromogenic media was found equal or superior to traditional methods and was used in this study. The isolates obtained were characterised by biotyping, serotyping, mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) and PCR. Characterisation by MALDI-TOF gave identical results to that of conventional bioserotyping. All porcine isolates were positive for the ail and inv genes by PCR, indicating that the isolates were most likely pathogenic to humans. CONCLUSIONS Human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica was found in nearly one-third of the Swedish pig farms with finisher pigs. The use of high pressure washing with cold water was associated with the presence of Y. enterocolitica in the pen. A modified culturing method using a chromogenic agar was efficient for detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in pig faeces. The use of masspectrometry for identification and subtyping was in agreement with conventional biotyping and serotyping methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Therese Råsbäck
- Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Thomas Rosendal
- Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Michael Stampe
- Farm and Animal Health, Kungsängens Gård 6B, 753 23 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Axel Sannö
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7070, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Aspán
- Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89 Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7070, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Katarina Järnevi
- Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Elina Tast Lahti
- Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Callegari M, Dalto D, Silva CD. A Review of Prevention and Control Methods of Salmonella species in Swine Production and the Role of Dietary Non-Nutritional Additives. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2015.803.829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
6
|
Andres VM, Davies RH. Biosecurity Measures to Control Salmonella and Other Infectious Agents in Pig Farms: A Review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2015. [DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M. Andres
- Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency; New Haw Addlestone Surrey KT15 3NB UK
| | - Rob H. Davies
- Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency; New Haw Addlestone Surrey KT15 3NB UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vanantwerpen G, Berkvens D, Van Damme I, De Zutter L, Houf K. Assessment of Risk Factors for a High Within-Batch Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in Pigs Based on Microbiological Analysis at Slaughter. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2015; 12:571-5. [PMID: 25884541 DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2014.1897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of the current study was to find farm-level factors influencing the bacteriological prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in pigs at time of slaughter. On 100 farms, data concerning a broad range of farm aspects (e.g., management and housing system, biosecurity, and hygiene measurements) were collected using a face-to-face questionnaire. At the slaughterhouse, tonsils of on average 70 slaughter pigs per batch were sampled to determine the infection status of pigs. After univariable mixed-effect logistic regressions, variables that were related to the Yersinia prevalence (p<0.05) were included in a multivariable model. In this model, the factors remaining positively associated with a higher Y. enterocolitica carriage in the tonsils (p<0.1) were an increasing number of piglet suppliers, a high density of pig farms in the area, and the use of semislatted floors in the fattening pig unit. The proper use of a disinfection bath before entering the stables and a poor biosecurity level were protective factors, although a higher prevalence was associated with a significant positive interaction between the presence of pets in the stables and a poor biosecurity level. Reducing the number of piglet suppliers, using a disinfection bath properly, and prohibiting pets inside the stables could be easily implemented by pig farmers to lower the prevalence of Y. enterocolitica in pigs at slaughter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerty Vanantwerpen
- 1 Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University , Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Dirk Berkvens
- 2 Unit of Veterinary Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Animal Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine , Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Inge Van Damme
- 1 Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University , Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Lieven De Zutter
- 1 Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University , Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Kurt Houf
- 1 Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University , Merelbeke, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abattoir based survey of Salmonella in finishing pigs in the United Kingdom 2006–2007. Prev Vet Med 2014; 117:542-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2013] [Revised: 08/22/2014] [Accepted: 09/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
9
|
Larsen MH, Dalmasso M, Ingmer H, Langsrud S, Malakauskas M, Mader A, Møretrø T, Smole Možina S, Rychli K, Wagner M, John Wallace R, Zentek J, Jordan K. Persistence of foodborne pathogens and their control in primary and secondary food production chains. Food Control 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
10
|
Pires A, Funk J, Manuzon R, Darr M, Zhao L. Longitudinal study to evaluate the association between thermal environment and Salmonella shedding in a midwestern US swine farm. Prev Vet Med 2013; 112:128-37. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2013] [Revised: 06/28/2013] [Accepted: 07/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
11
|
De Ridder L, Maes D, Dewulf J, Pasmans F, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, Méroc E, Butaye P, Van der Stede Y. Evaluation of three intervention strategies to reduce the transmission of Salmonella Typhimurium in pigs. Vet J 2013; 197:613-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2012] [Revised: 02/08/2013] [Accepted: 03/21/2013] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
12
|
De Busser EV, De Zutter L, Dewulf J, Houf K, Maes D. Salmonella control in live pigs and at slaughter. Vet J 2013; 196:20-7. [PMID: 23414643 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2012] [Revised: 11/05/2012] [Accepted: 01/07/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
As European Union legislation sets reduction targets to lower the incidence of human salmonellosis, Member States are obliged to take effective measures to control Salmonella infection and contamination along the pig production chain. This review considers the most important control measures in the primary phase of pig production as well as during transport, lairage and along the slaughter line. Pig feed should be free of Salmonella, and contamination after feed processing must be prevented. Cleaning and disinfection procedures should be improved, although this can be complicated by the development of biofilms and the interaction between Salmonella and protozoa. Further research is required on the acid tolerance response of Salmonella strains regarding the use of organic acids in feed and/or drinking water. Vaccination of sows and piglets can be helpful but can interfere with current serosurveillance as no differentiation can yet be made between naturally infected and vaccinated animals. Fasting, transport and lairage conditions should be critically evaluated and improved. Slaughterhouses must avoid contamination and cross-contamination during all stages of the slaughter process. Scalding by steam and implementing a second singeing step after polishing are beneficial. Attention should be paid to the cleaning and disinfection procedures along the slaughter line. Carcass decontamination is a promising approach, but needs to be considered as a tool to add to good hygiene practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily V De Busser
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Correia-Gomes C, Mendonça D, Vieira-Pinto M, Niza-Ribeiro J. Risk factors for Salmonella spp in Portuguese breeding pigs using a multilevel analysis. Prev Vet Med 2013; 108:159-66. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2011] [Revised: 07/24/2012] [Accepted: 07/29/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
14
|
Correia-Gomes C, Economou T, Mendonça D, Vieira-Pinto M, Niza-Ribeiro J. Assessing risk profiles for Salmonella serotypes in breeding pig operations in Portugal using a Bayesian hierarchical model. BMC Vet Res 2012; 8:226. [PMID: 23171637 PMCID: PMC3514327 DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2012] [Accepted: 11/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The EU Regulation No 2160/2003 imposes a reduction in the prevalence of Salmonella in pigs. The efficiency of control programmes for Salmonella in pigs, reported among the EU Member States, varies and definitive eradication seems very difficult. Control measures currently recommended for Salmonella are not serotype-specific. Is it possible that the risk factors for different Salmonella serotypes are different? The aim of this study was to investigate potential risk factors for two groups of Salmonella sp serotypes using pen faecal samples from breeding pig holdings representative of the Portuguese pig sector. Methods The data used come from the Baseline Survey for the Prevalence of Salmonella in breeding pigs in Portugal. A total of 1670 pen faecal samples from 167 herds were tested, and 170 samples were positive for Salmonella. The presence of Salmonella in each sample (outcome variable) was classified in three categories: i) no Salmonella, ii) Salmonella Typhimurium or S. Typhimurium-like strains with the antigenic formula: 1,4,5,12:i:-, , and iii) other serotypes. Along with the sample collection, a questionnaire concerning herd management and potential risk factors was utilised. The data have a “natural” hierarchical structure so a categorical multilevel analysis of the dataset was carried out using a Bayesian hierarchical model. The model was estimated using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, implemented in the software WinBUGS. Results The significant associations found (when compared to category “no Salmonella”), for category “serotype Typhimurium or S. Typhimurium-like strains with the antigenic formula: 1,4,5,12:i:-” were: age of breeding sows, size of the herd, number of pigs/pen and source of semen. For the category “other serotypes” the significant associations found were: control of rodents, region of the country, source of semen, breeding sector room and source of feed. Conclusions The risk factors significantly associated with Salmonella shedding from the category “serotype Typhimurium or serotype 1,4,5,12:i:-“ were more related to animal factors, whereas those associated with “other serotypes” were more related to environmental factors. Our findings suggest that different control measures could be used to control different Salmonella serotypes in breeding pigs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Correia-Gomes
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar - Universidade do Porto (ICBAS-UP), Population Studies Department, Largo Prof, Abel Salazar, Porto, 2, 4099-003, PORTUGAL.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fermented liquid feed—Microbial and nutritional aspects and impact on enteric diseases in pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
16
|
|
17
|
Wales AD, Cook AJC, Davies RH. Producing Salmonella-free pigs: a review focusing on interventions at weaning. Vet Rec 2011; 168:267-76. [PMID: 21498180 DOI: 10.1136/vr.d1125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Salmonella infection in pig production is typically endemic and largely asymptomatic. It is a cause of substantial concern among food safety bodies, prompting voluntary and legislative responses aimed at monitoring and reducing the number of Salmonella-infected animals entering the human food chain. Elimination of the problem at an early stage of production is highly desirable, and to this end the present review examines published evidence on the carriage of Salmonella by piglets before and after weaning, as well as evidence on the dynamics of Salmonella infection in the weaner and grower stages of pig production, the effects of maternal immunity, and risk factors for Salmonella excretion after weaning. Various interventions to reduce or eliminate Salmonella infection in young pigs have been tried, such as vaccination, competitive exclusion, treatments in feed and water, antibiotic administration, disinfection of animals, and segregated weaning to clean accommodation. The evidence on the effectiveness of these is considered, and the last is examined in some detail, as it appears currently to offer the best chance of eliminating Salmonella from growing stock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Wales
- Department of Bacteriology, Veterinary Laboratories Agency - Weybridge, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wilkins W, Rajić A, Waldner C, McFall M, Chow E, Muckle A, Rosengren L. Distribution of Salmonella serovars in breeding, nursery, and grow-to-finish pigs, and risk factors for shedding in ten farrow-to-finish swine farms in Alberta and Saskatchewan. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH = REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE VETERINAIRE 2010; 74:81-90. [PMID: 20592836 PMCID: PMC2851729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2008] [Accepted: 02/24/2009] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The study objectives were to investigate Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution, and risk factors for shedding in 10 purposively selected farrow-to-finish farms in Saskatchewan and Alberta. Pooled fecal samples from the breeding and grow-finish phases and individual fecal samples from breeding, nursery, and grow-finish pigs were cultured for Salmonella; serotyping of isolates was performed. Pig and pen characteristics were recorded for each pig and pen sampled.Overall, 407/1143 (36%) of samples were Salmonella positive; within-farm prevalence ranged from 1% to 79%. Sows, nursery, and grow-finish pigs accounted for 43%, 29%, and 28% of positive samples, respectively. More Salmonella were detected in pooled pen than individual pig samples (P < 0.001). Among 418 Salmonella isolates, there were 19 distinct serovars; the most common were S. Derby (28.5%), S. Typhimurium, var. Copenhagen (19.1%), S. Putten (11.8%), S. Infantis (6.8%), and S. Mbandaka (6.1%). Sows were more likely to shed Salmonella than nursery or grow-finisher (OR 2.9, P < 0.001) pigs. Pelleted feed (OR 8.2, P < 0.001) and nose-to-nose pig contact through pens (OR 2.2, P = 0.005) were associated with increased Salmonella prevalence. Significant differences in serovar distribution were detected among production phases. The use of pooled pen samples is recommended as a more efficient means for accurate evaluation of Salmonella status in different phases of pig production. The breeding herd might be an important source of Salmonella persistence within farrow-to-finish farms and should be targeted in control efforts. The latter might also apply to the use of pelleted feed, which remains the most consistently reported significant risk factor for Salmonella shedding in pigs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Wilkins
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|