Direct Proximity Tagging of Small Molecule Protein Targets Using an Engineered NEDD8 Ligase

Leveraging a self-cleaving peptide for tailored control in proximity labeling proteomics

Protein-protein interactions play an important biological role in every aspect of cellular homeostasis and functioning. Proximity labeling mass spectrometry-based proteomics overcomes challenges typically associated with other methods and has quickly become the current state of the art in the field. Nevertheless, tight control of proximity-labeling enzymatic activity and expression levels is crucial to accurately identify protein interactors. Here, we leverage a T2A self-cleaving peptide and a non-cleaving mutant to accommodate the protein of interest in the experimental and control TurboID setup. To allow easy and streamlined plasmid assembly, we built a Golden Gate modular cloning system to generate plasmids for transient expression and stable integration. To highlight our T2A Split/link design, we applied it to identify protein interactions of the glucocorticoid receptor and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleocapsid and non-structural protein 7 (NSP7) proteins by TurboID proximity labeling. Our results demonstrate that our T2A split/link provides an opportune control that builds upon previously established control requirements in the field.

Targeting NEDD8-activating enzyme for cancer therapy: developments, clinical trials, challenges and future research directions

NEDDylation, a post-translational modification through three-step enzymatic cascades, plays crucial roles in the regulation of diverse biological processes. NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE) as the only activation enzyme in the NEDDylation modification has become an attractive target to develop anticancer drugs. To date, numerous inhibitors or agonists targeting NAE have been developed. Among them, covalent NAE inhibitors such as MLN4924 and TAS4464 currently entered into clinical trials for cancer therapy, particularly for hematological tumors. This review explains the relationships between NEDDylation and cancers, structural characteristics of NAE and multistep mechanisms of NEDD8 activation by NAE. In addition, the potential approaches to discover NAE inhibitors and detailed pharmacological mechanisms of NAE inhibitors in the clinical stage are explored in depth. Importantly, we reasonably investigate the challenges of NAE inhibitors for cancer therapy and possible development directions of NAE-targeting drugs in the future.

Chemical and Biological Strategies for Profiling Protein-Protein Interactions in Living Cells

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play critical roles in almost all cellular signal transduction events. Characterization of PPIs without interfering with the functions of intact cells is very important for basic biology study and drug developments. However, the ability to profile PPIs especially those weak/transient interactions in their native states remains quite challenging. To this end, many endeavors are being made in developing new methods with high efficiency and strong operability. By coupling with advanced fluorescent microscopy and mass spectroscopy techniques, these strategies not only allow us to visualize the subcellular locations and monitor the functions of protein of interest (POI) in real time, but also enable the profiling and identification of potential unknown interacting partners in high-throughput manner, which greatly facilitates the elucidation of molecular mechanisms underlying numerous pathophysiological processes. In this review, we will summarize the typical methods for PPIs identification in living cells and their principles, advantages and limitations will also be discussed in detail.

Spatial Chemoproteomics for Mapping the Active Proteome

Functional regulation of cell signaling through dynamic changes in protein activity state as well as spatial organization represent two dynamic, complex, and conserved phenomena in biology. Seemingly separate areas of -omics method development have focused on building tools that can detect and quantify protein activity states, as well as map sub-cellular and intercellular protein organization. Integration of these efforts, through the development of chemical tools and platforms that enable detection and quantification of protein functional states with spatial resolution provide opportunities to better understand heterogeneity in the proteome within cell organelles, multi-cellular tissues, and whole organisms. This review provides an overview of and considerations for major classes of chemical proteomic probes and technologies that enable protein activity mapping from sub-cellular compartments to live animals.

Proximity-Dependent In Vivo Biotin Labeling for Interactome Mapping in Marchantia polymorpha

Weak or transient protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are involved in a manifold of cellular processes in all living organisms, including plants. However, many of these interactions may remain undiscovered by co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) approaches due to their low binding affinities or transitory nature. Enzyme-mediated proximity-dependent in vivo biotin labeling can be a powerful strategy to efficiently capture weak and transient PPIs and has been successfully applied in different model angiosperm species. Here, we provide an optimized and robust protocol for biotin ligase-mediated proximity labeling for interactome mapping in the model liverwort Marchantia polymorpha.

Identification of proteomic landscape of drug-binding proteins in live cells by proximity-dependent target ID

Direct identification of the proteins targeted by small molecules can provide clues for disease diagnosis, prevention, and drug development. Despite concentrated attempts, there are still technical limitations associated with the elucidation of direct interactors. Herein, we report a target-ID system called proximity-based compound-binding protein identification (PROCID), which combines our direct analysis workflow of proximity-labeled proteins (Spot-ID) with the HaloTag system to efficiently identify the dynamic proteomic landscape of drug-binding proteins. We successfully identified well-known dasatinib-binding proteins (ABL1, ABL2) and confirmed the unapproved dasatinib-binding kinases (e.g., BTK and CSK) in a live chronic myeloid leukemia cell line. PROCID also identified the DNA helicase protein SMARCA2 as a dasatinib-binding protein, and the ATPase domain was confirmed to be the binding site of dasatinib using a proximity ligation assay (PLA) and in cellulo biotinylation assay. PROCID thus provides a robust method to identify unknown drug-interacting proteins in live cells that expedites the mode of action of the drug.

GPI-anchored ligand-BioID2-tagging system identifies Galectin-1 mediating Zika virus entry

Identification of host factors facilitating pathogen entry is critical for preventing infectious diseases. Here, we report a tagging system consisting of a viral receptor-binding protein (RBP) linked to BioID2, which is expressed on the cell surface via a GPI anchor. Using VSV or Zika virus (ZIKV) RBP, the system (BioID2- RBP(V)-GPI; BioID2-RBP(Z)-GPI) faithfully identifies LDLR and AXL, the receptors of VSV and ZIKV, respectively. Being GPI-anchored is essential for the probe to function properly. Furthermore, BioID2-RBP(Z)-GPI expressed in human neuronal progenitor cells identifies galectin-1 on cell surface pivotal for ZIKV entry. This conclusion is further supported by antibody blocking and galectin-1 silencing in A549 and mouse neural cells. Importantly, Lgals1^−/− mice are significantly more resistant to ZIKV infection than Lgals1^+/+ littermates are, having significantly lower virus titers and fewer pathologies in various organs. This tagging system may have broad applications for identifying protein-protein interactions on the cell surface.

•

A tagging system for identifying ligand-receptor interactions is developed

•

Receptor binding domain determines the specificity of the system

•

Being GPI-anchored is pivotal for the tagging system to function properly

•

Galectin-1 is identified as an entry factor essential for ZIKV infection

PUP-IT2 as an alternative strategy for PUP-IT proximity labeling

PUP-IT is a proximity labeling method based on the prokaryotic enzyme PafA. PafA mediates the ligation of Pup, a small peptide, to the proximal proteins. It is different from other proximity labeling methods, such as BioID and APEX, in that both the enzyme and the labeling tag are proteins, which allows for potential in vivo applications. All proximity labeling involves the genetic fusion of the proximity labeling enzyme with the bait protein. However, PafA is a 55 kDa enzyme which sometimes interferes with the bait function. In this study, we tested an alternative proximity labeling strategy, PUP-IT2, in which only a small 7 kDa protein is fused to the bait protein. We examined the activity of PUP-IT2 in vitro and in cells. We also compared it with the original PUP-IT. Finally, we applied PUP-IT2 coupled mass spectrometry to map protein-protein interactions. Overall, we established a new way to use PUP-IT2 for proximity labeling, and this method may have a broad application.

Molecular Spatiomics by Proximity Labeling

Proximity labeling can be defined as an enzymatic “in-cell” chemical reaction that catalyzes the proximity-dependent modification of biomolecules in live cells. Since the modified proteins can be isolated and identified via mass spectrometry, this method has been successfully utilized for the characterization of local proteomes such as the sub-mitochondrial proteome and the proteome at membrane contact sites, or spatiotemporal interactome information in live cells, which are not “accessible” via conventional methods. Currently, proximity labeling techniques can be applied not only for local proteome mapping but also for profiling local RNA and DNA, in addition to showing great potential for elucidating spatial cell–cell interaction networks in live animal models. We believe that proximity labeling has emerged as an essential tool in “spatiomics,” that is, for the extraction of spatially distributed biological information in a cell or organism.

Proximity labeling is a multidisciplinary chemical technique. For a decade, we and other groups have engineered it for multiple applications based on the modulation of enzyme chemistry, chemical probe design, and mass analysis techniques that enable superior mapping results. The technique has been adopted in biology and chemistry. This “in-cell” reaction has been widely adopted by biologists who modified it into an in vivo reaction in animal models. In our laboratory, we conducted in vivo proximity labeling reactions in mouse models and could successfully obtain the liver-specific secretome and muscle-specific mitochondrial matrix proteome. We expect that proximity reaction can further contribute to revealing tissue-specific localized molecular information in live animal models.

Simultaneously, chemists have also adopted the concept and employed chemical “photocatalysts” as artificial enzymes to develop new proximity labeling reactions. Under light activation, photocatalysts can convert the precursor molecules to the reactive species via electron transfer or energy transfer and the reactive molecules can react with proximal biomolecules within a definite lifetime in an aqueous solution. To identify the modified biomolecules by proximity labeling, the modified biomolecules should be enriched after lysis and sequenced using sequencing tools. In this analysis step, the direct detection of modified residue(s) on the modified proteins or nucleic acids can be the proof of their labeling event by proximal enzymes or catalysts in the cell. In this Account, we introduce the basic concept of proximity labeling and the multidirectional advances in the development of this method. We believe that this Account may facilitate further utilization and modification of the method in both biological and chemical research communities, thereby revealing unknown spatially distributed molecular or cellular information or spatiome.

Advances in enzyme-mediated proximity labeling and its potential for plant research

Cellular processes rely on the intimate interplay of different molecules, including DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites. Obtaining and integrating data on their abundance and dynamics at high temporal and spatial resolution are essential for our understanding of plant growth and development. In the past decade, enzymatic proximity labeling (PL) has emerged as a powerful tool to study local protein and nucleotide ensembles, discover protein-protein and protein-nucleotide interactions, and resolve questions about protein localization and membrane topology. An ever-growing number and continuous improvement of enzymes and methods keep broadening the spectrum of possible applications for PL and make it more accessible to different organisms, including plants. While initial PL experiments in plants required high expression levels and long labeling times, recently developed faster enzymes now enable PL of proteins on a cell type-specific level, even with low-abundant baits, and in different plant species. Moreover, expanding the use of PL for additional purposes, such as identification of locus-specific gene regulators or high-resolution electron microscopy may now be in reach. In this review, we give an overview of currently available PL enzymes and their applications in mammalian cell culture and plants. We discuss the challenges and limitations of PL methods and highlight open questions and possible future directions for PL in plants.

Proximity labeling for investigating protein-protein interactions

The study of protein complexes and protein-protein interactions is of great importance due to their fundamental roles in cellular function. Proximity labeling, often coupled with mass spectrometry, has become a powerful and versatile tool for studying protein-protein interactions by enriching and identifying proteins in the vicinity of a specified protein-of-interest. Here, we describe and compare traditional approaches to investigate protein-protein interactions to current day state-of-the-art proximity labeling methods. We focus on the wide array of proximity labeling strategies and underscore studies using diverse model systems to address numerous biological questions. In addition, we highlight current advances in mass spectrometry-based technology that exhibit promise in improving the depth and breadth of the data acquired in proximity labeling experiments. In all, we show the diversity of proximity labeling strategies and emphasize the broad range of applications and biological inquiries that can be addressed using this technology.

Proximity Labeling Techniques: A Multi-Omics Toolbox

Proximity labeling techniques are emerging high-throughput methods for studying protein-protein, protein-RNA, and protein-DNA interactions with temporal and spatial precision. Proximity labeling methods take advantage of enzymes that can covalently label biomolecules with reactive substrates. These labeled biomolecules can be identified using mass spectrometry or next-generation sequencing. The main advantage of these methods is their ability to capture weak or transient interactions between biomolecules. Proximity labeling is indispensable for studying organelle interactomes. Additionally, it can be used to resolve spatial composition of macromolecular complexes. Many of these methods have only recently been introduced; nonetheless, they have already provided new and deep insights into the biological processes at the cellular, organ, and organism levels. In this paper, we review a broad range of proximity labeling techniques, their development, drawbacks and advantages, and implementations in recent studies.

Proximity labeling: an enzymatic tool for spatial biology

In this Forum, we highlight how cutting-edge, proximity-dependent, enzymatic labeling tools, aided by sequencing technology developments, have enabled the extraction of spatial information of proteomes, transcriptomes, genome organization, and cellular networks. We also discuss the potential applications of proximity labeling in the unexplored field of spatial biology in live systems.

Protein complexes and neighborhoods driving autophagy

Autophagy summarizes evolutionarily conserved, intracellular degradation processes targeting cytoplasmic material for lysosomal degradation. These encompass constitutive processes as well as stress responses, which are often found dysregulated in diseases. Autophagy pathways help in the clearance of damaged organelles, protein aggregates and macromolecules, mediating their recycling and maintaining cellular homeostasis. Protein-protein interaction networks contribute to autophagosome biogenesis, substrate loading, vesicular trafficking and fusion, protein translocations across membranes and degradation in lysosomes. Hypothesis-free proteomic approaches tremendously helped in the functional characterization of protein-protein interactions to uncover molecular mechanisms regulating autophagy. In this review, we elaborate on the importance of understanding protein-protein-interactions of varying affinities and on the strengths of mass spectrometry-based proteomic approaches to study these, generating new mechanistic insights into autophagy regulation. We discuss in detail affinity purification approaches and recent developments in proximity labeling coupled to mass spectrometry, which uncovered molecular principles of autophagy mechanisms.Abbreviations: AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; AP-MS: affinity purification-mass spectrometry; APEX2: ascorbate peroxidase-2; ATG: autophagy related; BioID: proximity-dependent biotin identification; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; GFP: green fluorescent protein; iTRAQ: isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification; MS: mass spectrometry; PCA: protein-fragment complementation assay; PL-MS: proximity labeling-mass spectrometry; PtdIns3P: phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate; PTM: posttranslational modification; PUP-IT: pupylation-based interaction tagging; RFP: red fluorescent protein; SILAC: stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture; TAP: tandem affinity purification; TMT: tandem mass tag.

Recent progress in mass spectrometry-based strategies for elucidating protein-protein interactions

Protein-protein interactions are fundamental to various aspects of cell biology with many protein complexes participating in numerous fundamental biological processes such as transcription, translation and cell cycle. MS-based proteomics techniques are routinely applied for characterising the interactome, such as affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry that has been used to selectively enrich and identify interacting partners of a bait protein. In recent years, many orthogonal MS-based techniques and approaches have surfaced including proximity-dependent labelling of neighbouring proteins, chemical cross-linking of two interacting proteins, as well as inferring PPIs from the co-behaviour of proteins such as the co-fractionating profiles and the thermal solubility profiles of proteins. This review discusses the underlying principles, advantages, limitations and experimental considerations of these emerging techniques. In addition, a brief account on how MS-based techniques are used to investigate the structural and functional properties of protein complexes, including their topology, stoichiometry, copy number and dynamics, are discussed.

Proximity labeling: an emerging tool for probing in planta molecular interactions

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are key to nearly all aspects of cellular activity. Therefore, the identification of PPIs is important for understanding a specific biological process in an organism. Compared with conventional methods for probing PPIs, the recently described proximity labeling (PL) approach combined with mass spectrometry (MS)-based quantitative proteomics has emerged as a powerful approach for characterizing PPIs. However, the application of PL in planta remains in its infancy. Here, we summarize recent progress in PL and its potential utilization in plant biology. We specifically summarize advances in PL, including the development and comparison of different PL enzymes and the application of PL for deciphering various molecular interactions in different organisms with an emphasis on plant systems.

State-of-the-Art Technologies for Understanding Brassinosteroid Signaling Networks

Brassinosteroids, the steroid hormones of plants, control physiological and developmental processes through its signaling pathway. The major brassinosteroid signaling network components, from the receptor to transcription factors, have been identified in the past two decades. The development of biotechnologies has driven the identification of novel brassinosteroid signaling components, even revealing several crosstalks between brassinosteroid and other plant signaling pathways. Herein, we would like to summarize the identification and improvement of several representative brassinosteroid signaling components through the development of new technologies, including brassinosteroid-insensitive 1 (BRI1), BRI1-associated kinase 1 (BAK1), BR-insensitive 2 (BIN2), BRI1 kinase inhibitor 1 (BKI1), BRI1-suppressor 1 (BSU1), BR signaling kinases (BSKs), BRI1 ethyl methanesulfonate suppressor 1 (BES1), and brassinazole resistant 1 (BZR1). Furthermore, improvement of BR signaling knowledge, such as the function of BKI1, BES1 and its homologous through clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR), the regulation of BIN2 through single-molecule methods, and the new in vivo interactors of BIN2 identified by proximity labeling are described. Among these technologies, recent advanced methods proximity labeling and single-molecule methods will be reviewed in detail to provide insights to brassinosteroid and other phytohormone signaling pathway studies.

GABA signaling in plants: targeting the missing pieces of the puzzle

The adaptation of plants to unstable environments relies on their ability to sense their surroundings and to generate and transmit corresponding signals to different parts of the plant to evoke changes necessary for optimizing growth and defense. Plants, like animals, contain a huge repertoire of intra- and intercellular signals, including organic and inorganic molecules. The occurrence of neurotransmitter-like signaling molecules in plants has been an intriguing field of research. Among these, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) was discovered in plants over half a century ago, and studies of its roles as a primary metabolite have been well documented, particularly in the context of stress responses. In contrast, evidence of the potential mechanism by which GABA acts as a signaling molecule in plants has only recently been reported. In spite of this breakthrough, the roles of GABA as a signaling molecule in plants have yet to be established and several aspects of the complexity of the GABA signaling system remain obscure. This review summarizes the uncertainties in GABA signaling in plants and suggests research directions and technologies that would help in answering unsolved questions.

Protein engineering for selective proteomics

Post-translational modifications, complex formation, subcellular localization, and cell-type-specific expression create functionally distinct protein subpopulations that enable living systems to execute rapid and precise responses to changing conditions. Systems-level analysis of these subproteomes remains challenging, requiring preservation of spatial information or enrichment of species that are transient and present at low abundance. Engineered proteins have emerged as important tools for selective proteomics based on their capacity for highly specific molecular recognition and their genetic targetability. Here, we focus on new developments in protein engineering for selective proteomics of post-translational modifications, protein complexes, subcellular compartments, and cell types. We also address remaining challenges and future opportunities to integrate engineered protein tools across different subproteome scales to map the proteome with unprecedented depth and detail.

Recent Advances in Chemical Biology Using Benzophenones and Diazirines as Radical Precursors

The use of light-activated chemical probes to study biological interactions was first discovered in the 1960s, and has since found many applications in studying diseases and gaining deeper insight into various cellular mechanisms involving protein-protein, protein-nucleic acid, protein-ligand (drug, probe), and protein-co-factor interactions, among others. This technique, often referred to as photoaffinity labelling, uses radical precursors that react almost instantaneously to yield spatial and temporal information about the nature of the interaction and the interacting partner(s). This review focuses on the recent advances in chemical biology in the use of benzophenones and diazirines, two of the most commonly known light-activatable radical precursors, with a focus on the last three years, and is intended to provide a solid understanding of their chemical and biological principles and their applications.

Interaction profiling methods to map protein and pathway targets of bioactive ligands

Recent advances in -omic profiling technologies have ushered in an era where we no longer want to merely measure the presence or absence of a biomolecule of interest, but instead hope to understand its function and interactions within larger signaling networks. Here, we review several emerging proteomic technologies capable of detecting protein interaction networks in live cells and their integration to draft holistic maps of proteins that respond to diverse stimuli, including bioactive small molecules. Moreover, we provide a conceptual framework to combine so-called 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' interaction profiling methods and ensuing proteomic profiles to directly identify binding targets of small molecule ligands, as well as for unbiased discovery of proteins and pathways that may be directly bound or influenced by those first responders. The integrated, interaction-based profiling methods discussed here have the potential to provide a unique and dynamic view into cellular signaling networks for both basic and translational biological studies.

Photoproximity Profiling of Protein-Protein Interactions in Cells

We report a novel photoproximity protein interaction (PhotoPPI) profiling method to map protein-protein interactions in vitro and in live cells. This approach utilizes a bioorthogonal, multifunctional chemical probe that can be targeted to a genetically encoded protein of interest (POI) through a modular SNAP-Tag/benzylguanine covalent interaction. A first generation photoproximity probe, PP1, responds to 365 nm light to simultaneously cleave a central nitroveratryl linker and a peripheral diazirine group, resulting in diffusion of a highly reactive carbene nucleophile away from the POI. We demonstrate facile probe loading, and subsequent interaction- and light-dependent proximal labeling of a model protein-protein interaction (PPI) in vitro. Integration of the PhotoPPI workflow with quantitative LC-MS/MS enabled unbiased interaction mapping for the redox regulated sensor protein, KEAP1, for the first time in live cells. We validated known and novel interactions between KEAP1 and the proteins PGAM5 and HK2, among others, under basal cellular conditions. By contrast, comparison of PhotoPPI profiles in cells experiencing metabolic or redox stress confirmed that KEAP1 sheds many basal interactions and becomes associated with known lysosomal trafficking and proteolytic proteins like SQSTM1, CTSD, and LGMN. Together, these data establish PhotoPPI as a method capable of tracking the dynamic subcellular and protein interaction "social network" of a redox-sensitive protein in cells with high temporal resolution.

Chemical Biology Gateways to Mapping Location, Association, and Pathway Responsivity

Here we discuss, how by applying chemical concepts to biological problems, methods have been developed to map spatiotemporal regulation of proteins and small-molecule modulation of proteome signaling responses. We outline why chemical-biology platforms are ideal for such purposes. We further discuss strengths and weaknesses of chemical-biology protocols, contrasting them against classical genetic and biochemical approaches. We make these evaluations based on three parameters: occupancy; functional information; and spatial restriction. We demonstrate how the specific choice of chemical reagent and experimental set-up unite to resolve biological problems. Potential improvements/extensions as well as specific controls that in our opinion are often overlooked or employed incorrectly are also considered. Finally, we discuss some of the latest emerging methods to illuminate how chemical-biology innovations provide a gateway toward information hitherto inaccessible by conventional genetic/biochemical means. Finally, we also caution against solely relying on chemical-biology strategies and urge the field to undertake orthogonal validations to ensure robustness of results.

Recent advances in proximity-based labeling methods for interactome mapping

Proximity-based labeling has emerged as a powerful complementary approach to classic affinity purification of multiprotein complexes in the mapping of protein-protein interactions. Ongoing optimization of enzyme tags and delivery methods has improved both temporal and spatial resolution, and the technique has been successfully employed in numerous small-scale (single complex mapping) and large-scale (network mapping) initiatives. When paired with quantitative proteomic approaches, the ability of these assays to provide snapshots of stable and transient interactions over time greatly facilitates the mapping of dynamic interactomes. Furthermore, recent innovations have extended biotin-based proximity labeling techniques such as BioID and APEX beyond classic protein-centric assays (tag a protein to label neighboring proteins) to include RNA-centric (tag an RNA species to label RNA-binding proteins) and DNA-centric (tag a gene locus to label associated protein complexes) assays.

Down-regulating Proteolysis to Enhance Anticancer Activity of Peptide Nanofibers

Nanofibers of short peptides are emerging as a promising type of agents for inhibiting cancer cells. But the proteolysis of peptides decreases the anticancer efficacy of the peptide nanofibers. Here we show that decreasing the activity of proteasomes enhance the activity of peptide nanofibers for inhibiting cancer cells. Based on the structure of galactin-3, we designed a heptapeptide, which self-assembles to form nanofibers. The nanofibers of the heptapeptide exhibit moderate cytotoxicity to three representative cancer cell lines (HeLa, MCF-7, and HepG2), largely due to the proteolysis of the peptides. Using a clinically approved proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, to treat the cancer cells significantly decreases the proteolysis of the peptides and enhances the activity of the peptide nanofibers for inhibiting the cancer cells. This work illustrates a promising approach for enhancing the anticancer efficacy of peptide nanofibers by modulating intracellular protein degradation machinery, as well as provides insights for understanding the cytotoxicity of aberrant protein or peptide aggregates in complicated cellular environment.

A proximity-tagging system to identify membrane protein-protein interactions

The communication between cells and between cellular organelles is often controlled by the interaction of membrane proteins. Although many methods for the detection of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) exist, membrane PPIs remain difficult to detect. Here we developed a proximity-based tagging system, PUP-IT (pupylation-based interaction tagging), to identify membrane protein interactions. In this approach, a small protein tag, Pup, is applied to proteins that interact with a PafA-fused bait, enabling transient and weak interactions to be enriched and detected by mass spectrometry. Pup does not diffuse from the enzyme, which allows high-specificity labeling. We applied this approach to CD28, a critical costimulatory receptor for T lymphocyte activation, and identified known CD28 binding partners and multiple potential interacting proteins. In addition, we demonstrated that this method can identify the interaction between a cell surface receptor and its ligand.