The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia

Cariprazine as a maintenance treatment in dual schizophrenia: a 6-month observational study in patients with schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder

Schizophrenia is often associated with substance use disorders, particularly cannabis use disorder (CUD). However, treatments frequently fail to address both conditions simultaneously. This study aimed to evaluate the antipsychotic effectiveness of cariprazine in patients with both schizophrenia and CUD in a real-world setting. A 6-month observational study was conducted on 58 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and CUD, treated with cariprazine. Antipsychotic effectiveness was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale, along with the Improvement and Severity scales. Cannabis consumption and addiction severity were assessed using the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test and the Severity of Dependence Scale, while functioning was evaluated with the Sheehan Disability Inventory. Cariprazine treatment resulted in significant improvements in schizophrenia symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale change: -47.88 points, P  < 0.0001; Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale change: -8.26 points, P  < 0.0001). Cannabis use and dependence also decreased (Cannabis Abuse Screening Test change: -7.0 points, P  < 0.0001; Severity of Dependence Scale change: -7.88 points, P  < 0.0001), alongside improvements in functioning (Sheehan Disability Inventory change: -9.48 points, P  < 0.0001). These results suggest that cariprazine is effective for both schizophrenia and CUD, though further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Is muscarinic receptor agonist effective and tolerant for schizophrenia?

BACKGROUND

Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have recently examined the efficacy and tolerability of muscarinic receptor agonists in schizophrenia. However, whether therapeutics targeting muscarinic receptors improve symptom management and reduce side effects remains systemically unexplored.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from inception until Jan 9, 2025. Altogether, the efficacy and safety outcomes of four RCTs (397 individuals in the muscarinic receptor agonists group, and 374 in the placebo control group) were meta-analyzed. To compare scores of positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), response rate, discontinuation rate, and adverse events with muscarinic receptor agonists vs. placebo in patients with schizophrenia, scale changes were pooled as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for categorical outcomes.

RESULTS

It revealed that muscarinic receptor agonists were superior to placebo in terms of decrease in the total PANSS score (MD, - 9.92; 95% CI, -12.46 to -7.37; I2 = 0%), PANSS positive symptom subscore (MD, - 3.21; 95% CI, -4.02 to -2.40; I2 = 0%), and PANSS negative symptom subscore (MD, -1.79; 95% CI, -2.47 to -1.11; I2 = 48%). According to the study-defined response rate, the pooled muscarinic receptor agonists vs. placebo RR was 2.08 (95% CI, 1.59 to 2.72; I2 = 0%). No significance was found in the discontinuation rate. Muscarinic receptor agonists were associated with a higher risk of nausea (RR = 4.61, 95% CI, 2.65 to 8.02; I2 = 3%), and in particular, xanomeline-trospium was associated with risks of dyspepsia, vomiting, and constipation.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlighted an efficacy advantage with tolerated adverse event profiles for muscarinic receptor agonists in schizophrenia.

Effect of bright light therapy on depression in patients with schizophrenia: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

In this pilot study, we investigated the effects of bright light therapy on depression in schizophrenia using a quasi-experimental design involving random assignment.

METHODS

We included patients with schizophrenia who had stable psychiatric symptoms. Experimental group (n = 16) received light therapy while control group (n = 12) received only regular indoor light. The intervention was administered in the morning once a day for 50 min for three weeks. Scores of the Chinese version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS-C), Chinese version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-C), Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale (CGI-SCH), and Stressful Life Event Scale (SLES) were measured at baseline (T0), immediately after 5th day of the intervention (T1), immediately after the 15th day of intervention (T2), and at the 14-day follow-up (T3). A generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis was performed to analyse group × time interaction effects and effect of bright light therapy on depression.

RESULTS

Results indicated that bright light therapy alleviated depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia after controlling for internal or surgical diseases and disease duration (in years). However, the effect was not maintained two weeks after the treatment.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that bright light therapy is a nonpharmacological adjunct treatment approach for patients with stable psychiatric symptoms.

Efficacy of clozapine versus second-generation antipsychotics in people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is recommended by national and international guidelines for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, available meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials have not shown superior efficacy of clozapine when compared with other second-generation antipsychotics, with heterogeneity identified between the original studies. We aimed to use individual patient data (IPD) to account for potential reasons of variability and to synthesise an adjusted estimate for the difference in efficacy between clozapine and other second-generation antipsychotics for treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

METHODS

In this systematic review and IPD meta-analysis, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register from inception to Jan 24, 2024, and previous reviews for blinded randomised controlled trials comparing clozapine with other second-generation antipsychotics in participants with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Trials were eligible if they included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and had a duration of at least 6 weeks. IPD were requested from trial investigators. The primary outcome was change in overall schizophrenia symptoms as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) between clozapine and other second-generation antipsychotics after 6-8 weeks of treatment. The effect size measure for the primary outcome was mean difference with 95% credible interval (CrI). We fitted a Bayesian random-effects IPD meta-regression model that included duration of illness, baseline severity, and sex as potential prognostic factors or treatment effect modifiers. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). People with lived experience of mental illness were involved in this study. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021254986.

FINDINGS

We screened 13 876 references and included 19 studies with data for 1599 participants; IPD were available for 12 of 19 trials (n=1052; mean age 37·67 years [SD 11·24; range 10-66]; 348 [33·08%] women and 704 [66·92%] men). Data on ethnicity were not available. The estimated mean difference in change from baseline PANSS total score was -0·64 points (95% CrI -3·97 to 2·63; τ=2·68) in favour of other second-generation antipsychotics. Shorter duration of illness and higher baseline severity were prognostic factors associated with a larger reduction in symptoms, but neither those factors nor sex were found to modify the relative effect between clozapine and other second-generation antipsychotics. The confidence in the evidence was graded as very low.

INTERPRETATION

This IPD meta-analysis found a small and uncertain advantage of other second-generation antipsychotics, mainly olanzapine and risperidone, and so did not provide evidence for superior efficacy of clozapine compared with other second-generation antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. It is limited by unavailability of IPD for some studies, uncaptured sources of variance, and uncertainty due to premature study discontinuation. Given the side-effects of clozapine, the observed uncertainty regarding clozapine's superiority warrants prudent use and further research.

FUNDING

German Ministry of Education and Research.

COSMIN systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

Background

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is the most widely used tool for assessing the symptoms of schizophrenia. Despite its widespread use, the psychometric properties of the PANSS have not been systematically reviewed. This study fills that gap in the scientific literature.

Methods

We utilized the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analytical procedures to assess the psychometric properties of the PANSS in its original three-subscale form as well as the quality level of the evidence available. On this basis we formulated recommendations for future research and use. A study protocol was registered under 10.17605/OSF.IO/5EGMD. The search period was until February 21, 2024.

Findings

We included 119 publications. According to COSMIN, the PANSS demonstrated sufficient reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness; but had significant shortcomings in content validity and structural validity. The original three-factor model showed poor structural validity, leading to its COSMIN classification as "not recommendable". The subscales showed overall acceptable measurement properties. However, the lack of structural validity of the three-subscale model renders its subscales less useful. Moreover, the PANSS negative subscale does not cover all domains of the National Institute of Mental Health consensus. Due to the length of the instrument (30-50 min), it is barely useable in clinical practice.

Interpretation

Although the PANSS is the standard scale for schizophrenia symptom severity, its shortcomings regarding fundamental psychometric domains and practical applicability warrant the development of new scales for which appropriate methods should be applied from the start.

Funding

There was no specific funding source for this research.

Usefulness in rehabilitation of the paper Multiple Errands Test to assess executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar or autism disorders. Results from the REHABase cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Neuropsychological tests measuring executive functions are useful for identifying specific cognitive disorders, but they have limits for characterizing executive dysfunction in everyday activities. This study aims to investigate the socio-demographic, clinical, and psychosocial features associated with executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar, and autism spectrum disorders using a Paper Multiple Errands Test.

PATIENTS OR MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1071 adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, 329 with bipolar spectrum disorder, and 254 with autism spectrum disorder were recruited from the French National Centers of Reference for Psychiatric Rehabilitation (REHABase) cohort between January 2016 and October 2022. Executive function severity was assessed by the multiple errands test. Socio-demographic and clinical data were extracted as well as results from standardized scales for self-stigma, quality of life, well-being, and self-esteem. Data were analyzed using bivariate and Quasi-Poisson regression model.

RESULTS

The mean number of errors measured by the paper multiple errands test was 3.1±1.9 in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (n=1071), 2.4±1.8 in bipolar disorder (n=329), and 2.6±1.9 in autism disorder (n=254). Factors significantly associated with the number of errors were (1) age, illness duration, number of hospitalizations, education level, working memory, and insight in patients with schizophrenia; (2) age, illness duration, number of hospitalizations, education level, and working memory in patients with bipolar disorder; and (3) education level and working memory in patients with autism disorder. The number of errors was associated with lower quality of life, well-being and self-esteem, but not self-stigma, in all three disorders.

CONCLUSION

The predictors of executive dysfunction observed with the paper multiple errands test were similar to those found with other tests of executive function. The paper multiple errands test is associated with essential psychosocial determinants in rehabilitation, particularly quality of life and well-being, and provides a wide range of information about functioning in community living.

Development and refinement of the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement for Non-seizure Symptoms measure in Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

BACKGROUND

Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) are rare, severe, childhood-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathies characterized by treatment-resistant epilepsy and varying intellectual disability levels. Clinical outcome assessments (COAs) describe how patients feel, function, or survive, thus providing valuable information on a therapy's efficacy and impact. Individuals with DS or LGS are heterogeneous, and many have limited verbal abilities and intellectual disability. Existing epilepsy-specific COA measures are unsuitable for DS and LGS clinical trials as many items demonstrate floor effects in these populations. As patients often cannot self-report symptoms, caregiver feedback on the measures' relevance and understandability is critical when developing COAs to ensure their suitability for the intended population, and that caregivers can help clinicians complete the measures when necessary.

METHODOLOGY

We aimed to develop a novel clinician-reported outcomes measure, to be completed in consultation with caregivers at clinic visits, to assess non-seizure symptoms in individuals with DS or LGS using a Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) approach: the CGI-I Non-seizure Symptoms measure. A 13-item initial draft measure was reviewed by experts in a three-round Delphi panel to confirm each item's relevance and refine descriptions, reduce overlap, and limit respondent burden.

RESULTS

Following panel review, three items reached consensus (≥70% agreement of no revision required) and were included in the final measure: communication, alertness, and disruptive behaviors. To ensure caregivers can help clinicians complete the measure, and to establish levels of change in each item domain considered meaningful from their perspective, the three-item measure was cognitively debriefed with caregivers of individuals with DS or LGS. Caregivers showed that each item was understandable by describing their child using the descriptions provided in the measure and reported that items were relevant or important to assess in DS or LGS. Most caregivers reported that even a minimal change to their child's condition in each domain would be meaningful to them and their child.

CONCLUSIONS

This CGI-I Non-seizure Symptoms measure represents relevant non-seizure outcomes considered important to individuals with DS or LGS and their families. The systematic development and refinement approach presented here supports its use in DS and LGS clinical trials.

Impact of Relapse in BDNF Receptors Expression in Patients With a First Episode of Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Relapsing after a first episode of schizophrenia (FES) is a main predictor of clinical and functional prognosis. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays a critical role in neuronal development and plasticity, and its signaling may be altered by successive relapses.

DESIGN

We assessed the impact of first relapse in the expression of the 2 isoforms of the BDNF tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB) receptor (active full-length TrkB-F and inactive truncated TrkB-T) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 53 FES patients in clinical remission followed up for 3 years.

RESULTS

The group of participants that relapsed (n = 24) during the follow-up presented a significant decrease in the expression of the active TrkB-F receptor compared to baseline (M = 100 ± 28.13 vs. M = 83.42 ± 33.84, t = 2.5, P = .02), with no changes in the inactive TrkB-T receptor expression nor in BDNF plasma levels. This decrease also led to a significant decline in the F/T ratio (M = 1.13 ± 0.38 vs. 0.94 ± 0.36, t = 2.17, P = .041). No significant differences were found in the receptors' expression nor in plasma levels in the group of cases that remained in remission (n = 29). These results were not associated with baseline differences between the groups in terms of the BDNF signaling pathway biomarkers, clinical or treatment variables.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the biological impact that a relapse produces over the systemic BDNF-TrkB signaling pathway, potentially undermining crucial neuronal functions. Identifying the actors involved can help design specific interventions for relapse prevention and improve the functional prognosis of people in the early stages of schizophrenia.

Predicting antipsychotic responsiveness using a machine learning classifier trained on plasma levels of inflammatory markers in schizophrenia

We apply machine learning techniques to navigate the multifaceted landscape of schizophrenia. Our method entails the development of predictive models, emphasizing peripheral inflammatory biomarkers, which are classified into treatment response subgroups: antipsychotic-responsive, clozapine-responsive, and clozapine-resistant. The cohort comprises 146 schizophrenia patients (49 antipsychotics-responsive, 68 clozapine-responsive, 29 clozapine-resistant) and 49 healthy controls. Protein levels of immune biomarkers were quantified using the Olink Target 96 Inflammation Panel (Olink®, Uppsala, Sweden). To predict labels, a support vector machine (SVM) classifier is trained on the Olink®data matrix and evaluated via leave-one-out cross-validation. Associated protein biomarkers are identified via recursive feature elimination. We constructed three separate predictive models for binary classification: one to discern healthy controls from individuals with schizophrenia (AUC = 0.74), another to differentiate individuals who were responsive to antipsychotics (AUC = 0.88), and a third to distinguish treatment-resistant individuals (AUC = 0.78). Employing machine learning techniques, we identified features capable of distinguishing between treatment response subgroups. In this study, SVM demonstrates the power of machine learning to uncover subtle signals often overlooked by traditional statistics. Unlike t-tests, it handles multiple features simultaneously, capturing complex data relationships. Chosen for simplicity, robustness, and reliance on strong feature sets, its integration with explainable AI techniques like SHapely Additive exPlanations enhances model interpretability, especially for biomarker screening. This study highlights the potential of integrating machine learning techniques in clinical practice. Not only does it deepen our understanding of schizophrenia's heterogeneity, but it also holds promise for enhancing predictive accuracy, thereby facilitating more targeted and effective interventions in the treatment of this complex mental health disorder.

Methods to address functional unblinding of raters in CNS trials

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) associated with the unique properties of a pharmaceutical product may functionally unblind clinician ratings, obscure true medication effects, and affect confidence about clinical trial results. Central nervous system studies are particularly susceptible to functional unblinding because they rely on relatively subjective symptom assessments. Two different methods were used to examine possible functional unblinding in pooled data from three recent five-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of xanomeline and trospium chloride (formerly known as KarXT) in participants with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis. Xanomeline/trospium is an M1/M4 muscarinic receptor agonist that may produce cholinergic side effects. First, we compared the scores of remote (site-independent) raters, blinded to TEAEs, who listened to audio recorded, site-based Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) interviews. Second, we conducted a post hoc analysis of participant subgroups with or without reported cholinergic-related TEAEs to ascertain whether cholinergic TEAEs influenced trial outcome. Remote ratings closely replicated 575 available "paired" site-based PANSS total scores at baseline and endpoint (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.88 and 0.93, respectively). Both site-based and remote PANSS scores yielded significant improvement favouring xanomeline/trospium over placebo (both p < 0.0001) and yielded significantly greater treatment response (≥30% improvement from baseline) than placebo (both p < 0.0001). The significant improvement of PANSS scores favouring xanomeline/trospium over placebo was comparable in magnitude for all subgroups regardless of whether participants reported cholinergic-related TEAEs, or any TEAEs at all (all p < 0.001). In sum, the two different methods used to assess functional unblinding in these studies found no impact of cholinergic TEAEs, or any TEAEs, on the trial results. These methods may have utility across all clinical trials.

Effectiveness of antipsychotic medication in patients with schizophrenia in a real world retrospective observational study in Ethiopia

Antipsychotic medications have become the cornerstone of treatment for schizophrenia. The antipsychotic drugs are high-affinity antagonists of dopamine D2 receptors that are most effective against psychotic symptoms, but antipsychotic drugs can have side effects that overshadow their advantages, like sedation, extrapyramidal symptoms, and weight gain, which are often experienced as adverse effects. In our country, the relative effectiveness of antipsychotic medication as well as their tolerance in schizophrenia patients is not fully addressed. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication and associated factors in schizophrenia patients at the psychiatry clinic. An institutional-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative data of patients with schizophrenia disorder based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) that initiated or changed to a new antipsychotic treatment by clinicians assessments from April 1, 2023, to March 1, 2024 at university of Gondar specialized hospital. The effectiveness of prescribed antipsychotic medication was evaluated using the Clinical Global Impressions-Schizophrenia scale (CGI-SCH), inclusive of subscales for positive, negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms. A total of 608 patients were receiving antipsychotic medications as follows: 118 patients (19.4%) were prescribed haloperidol, 88 patients (14.5%) were taking chlorpromazine, 48 patients (7.9%) received fluphenazine (decanoate), 126 patients (20.7%) were on risperidone, and 228 patients (37.5%) were treating with olanzapine. In total, 64.8% of patients show improvement in the prescribed medications within one year of treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate 35.2%) for haloperidol, 31 (26.3%) for chlorpromazine, 30 (34.1%) for Fluphenazine, 19 (39.6%) for risperidone, 51 (40.5%), and 83 (36.4%) for olanzapine. Effectiveness was assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I); the overall improvements like negative, positive, depressive, and cognitive symptoms were significantly higher for olanzapine, followed by haloperidol (p < .001). Good adherence (AHR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.5-0.78), history of relapse (AHR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.13-1.82), unemployment (AHR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.06-1.85), and history of suicidal ideation (AHR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.24-2.58) were significant predictors of symptoms improvement. The study found olanzapine is more effective in improving schizophrenia symptoms than other antipsychotic drugs. Medication adherence, symptom relapse, and suicidal thoughts significantly impacted antipsychotic effectiveness in individuals with schizophrenia disorder.

Capturing changes in social functioning and positive affect using ecological momentary assessment during a 12-month trial of xanomeline and trospium chloride in schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Experiential negative symptoms (NS) are determinants of disability in schizophrenia (SCZ). Xanomeline/Trospium Chloride (X/T), an M1/M4 muscarinic receptor agonist, is an approved monotherapy for treatment of schizophrenia, including NS. We used remote ecological momentary assessments (EMA) to track changes in indicators of NS during 12 months of outpatient treatment with X/T.

METHODS

After discontinuing previous medications, 566 outpatients with SCZ received open-label X/T monotherapy for up to 12 months. Participants completed 3 EMA surveys 7 days a week, one week a month. Surveys queried whether participants were home vs. away and alone vs with someone, as well as productive and unproductive activities, and moods. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) examined temporal changes and the relationships between the indicators of NS.

RESULTS

500 participants answered one or more EMA surveys and 350 met 33 % adherence criteria, answering a total of 40,464 surveys, with overall adherence among these participants at 66 %. During treatment with X/T, there were significant decreases in surveys at home (p < .001), alone (p < .001), and engaging in unproductive activities (p < .001). There were significant increases in productive activities both home (p < .001) and away (p < .001) and in positive affect (PA) (p < .001). Improvements in PA converged with reduced unproductive activities, particularly when others were present (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioral indicators of NS improved early and were sustained with X/T treatment. Improvements were multidimensional, shifting toward more time with others, away from home, and engaged in productive activities. These improvements were associated with increases in PA, consistent with previous EMA studies of NS.

Systematic Review of Self-Assessment Scales for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia

Background/Objectives: Negative symptoms (NSs) significantly impair the outcome of schizophrenia, primarily due to their effect on quality of life and their resistance to pharmacological treatments. Several scales have been developed to assess the various dimensions of NSs, including avolition, anhedonia, alogia, social withdrawal, and blunted affect. While observer-rated scales are the most commonly used, self-assessment tools remain underutilized. However, self-assessments offer a promising approach for gaining insights into the personal experiences of individuals. The objective of this review was to identify and report the psychometric properties of self-assessment scales for NSs that are relevant for both research and clinical practice, with a focus on tools that assess multiple domains of NSs in order to support comprehensive evaluations and tailored therapeutic strategies. Methods: We conducted an exhaustive literature review following PRISMA guidelines to identify self-evaluation scales that evaluate several domains of NSs in the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. The COSMIN checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of each tool. Results: Our review identified five self-assessment scales. Among these, two scales received a Grade A recommendation for use in clinical or research practice: the Self-evaluation Negative Symptom (SNS), which assesses the five domains of NSs, and the Motivation And Pleasure Scale Self-report (MAP-SR), which evaluates anhedonia, avolition, and social withdrawal. Conclusions: The SNS and the MAP-SR are the only tools with sufficient psychometric properties, making them reliable for use in both research and clinical practice. Despite the development of self-assessment tools for NSs, their integration into research and clinical settings remains limited, highlighting the need for increased utilization to enhance the understanding and management of these symptoms.

Obsessive-compulsive symptoms and disorder in clozapine-treated schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are commonly reported in patients with schizophrenia. Furthermore, the use of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia has been thought to induce or aggravate these disorders. To date, there is a paucity of research regarding the prevalence and associated factors. Hence, this study aims to report the prevalence of OCS and OCD, and examine potential risk factors, in clozapine-treated schizophrenia.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study conducted in the only tertiary hospital for psychiatric patients in Singapore. In total, 162 patients on a stable dose of clozapine were recruited for this study; 159 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included in the current analysis. Sociodemographic, clinical and treatment factors were analysed to identify factors associated with OCS and OCD.

RESULTS

The prevalence of OCS and OCD is 21.4% and 12.6% respectively. Factors associated with OCS include younger age (OR:0.96, p=0.033) and younger age of onset of psychosis (OR:0.92, p=0.017). There were no significant factors associated with OCD. However, in an analysis of both OCS and/or OCD, factors associated include younger age (OR:0.96, p=0.027) and younger age of onset of psychosis (OR:0.91, p=0.016). Severity of psychotic illness and Clozapine dose were not associated with OCS or OCD in clozapine-treated schizophrenia.

DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a high prevalence of OCS and OCD in clozapine-treated schizophrenia which clinicians should routinely screen for. Further research is warranted to establish the link between the factors identified in this study and OCS/OCD in clozapine-treated schizophrenia.

Machine learning prediction model of the treatment response in schizophrenia reveals the importance of metabolic and subjective characteristics

Predicting early treatment response in schizophrenia is pivotal for selecting the best therapeutic approach. Utilizing machine learning (ML) technique, we aimed to formulate a model predicting antipsychotic treatment outcomes. Data were obtained from 299 patients with schizophrenia from three multicenter, open-label, non-comparative clinical trials. For prediction of treatment response at weeks 4, 8, and 24, psychopathology (both objective and subjective symptoms), sociodemographic and clinical factors, functional outcomes, attitude toward medication, and metabolic characteristics were evaluated. Various ML techniques were applied. The highest area under the curve (AUC) at weeks 4, 8 and 24 was 0.711, 0.664 and 0.678 with extreme gradient boosting, respectively. Notably, our findings indicate that BMI and attitude toward medication play a pivotal role in predicting treatment responses at all-time points. Other salient features for weeks 4 and 8 included psychosocial functioning, negative symptoms, subjective symptoms like psychoticism and hostility, and the level of prolactin. For week 24, positive symptoms, depression, education level and duration of illness were also important. This study introduced a precise clinical model for predicting schizophrenia treatment outcomes using multiple readily accessible predictors. The findings underscore the significance of metabolic parameters and subjective traits.

Co-designing a low-intensity psychological therapy for fear of recurrence in psychosis using translational learning from fear of recurrence in oncology: protocol for intervention development for future testing in a feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Fear of recurrence is a transdiagnostic problem experienced by people with psychosis, which is associated with anxiety, depression and risk of future relapse events. Despite this, there is a lack of available psychological interventions for fear of recurrence, and psychological therapies for schizophrenia are often poorly implemented in general. However, low-intensity psychological therapy is available for people who experience fear of recurrence in the context of cancer, which means there is an opportunity to learn what has worked in a well-implemented psychological therapy to see if any learning can be adapted for schizophrenia care. This article describes the design, methods and expected data collection of development, acceptab i lity, feasibility, a n d preliminary outcome signals for a copro d uced low-intensity psycholo g ical intervention targeting fear o f relapse in people with schizophrenia (INDIGO), which aims to develop an acceptable psychological intervention for fear of recurrence.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

INDIGO will use a mixed-methods approach to co-design and deliver a model and treatment pathway for a psychological intervention for people diagnosed with schizophrenia who experience fear of recurrence. The study will consist of four stages. First, in-depth interviews with mental health staff and people diagnosed with schizophrenia (with a further social network mapping task for patient participants only) to develop the intervention. Second, in-depth interviews with people who have accessed the Glasgow Fear of Recurrence service and oncology staff will be conducted to inform further development of the intervention. Third, co-design workshops will be held with people diagnosed with schizophrenia and mental health staff to co-design intervention content and the treatment pathway. Finally, people diagnosed with schizophrenia will be presented with an intervention prototype and invited to complete 'think-aloud' interviews to gather further feedback so adaptations can be implemented.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The INDIGO study received ethical approval from East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (24/EM/0124). The study received independent peer review prior to funding. This co-design study is expected to lead to a future feasibility study and, if indicated, a randomised controlled trial.

Prevalence of treatment-resistant schizophrenia among people with early psychosis and its clinical and demographic correlates

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) among people with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) has been sub-optimally researched in Australia and internationally. We evaluated the prevalence of TRS among a cohort of FES patients and compared their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to those with FES who were treatment responsive.

METHODS

Over 2 years, we collated demographic, clinical and treatment-related data of all patients with ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth revision) diagnosis of schizophrenia who were active in October 2020 at four early psychosis intervention services (EPIS) in Western Australia. We used a modified version of Suzuki et al. criteria to diagnose TRS. The data were analysed utilising descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U test, Student's t-test and the False-Discovery Rate method.

RESULTS

The prevalence of TRS among the 167 patients diagnosed with FES was 41.3%, and the rates did not differ significantly between the services (p = 0.955). Those in the TRS group were less independent (p = 0.011), had more prolonged unemployment (p = 0.014) and were more likely to be on disability pension (p = 0.011) compared to the treatment responsive group. Furthermore, they had greater severity of symptoms (p = 0.002), longer duration of psychiatric symptoms (p = 0.019), more hospitalisations (p = 0.002) and longer cumulative admission durations (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that treatment resistance to antipsychotics is prevalent among people with FES managed at EPIS. Notably, it establishes an association between TRS and heightened clinical severity and psychosocial and treatment burden. These findings highlight the imperative for early detection of treatment resistance and timely and specialised interventions for this condition in mental health services.

Efficacy of xanomeline and trospium chloride in schizophrenia: pooled results from three 5-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, EMERGENT trials

In the 5-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EMERGENT-1 (NCT03697252), EMERGENT-2 (NCT04659161), and EMERGENT-3 (NCT04738123) trials, xanomeline and trospium chloride (formerly known as KarXT) significantly improved symptoms of schizophrenia and was generally well tolerated. We pooled data from the EMERGENT trials to further characterize the efficacy of xanomeline/trospium and provide sufficient statistical power to analyze responses in participant subgroups. In pooled analyses, xanomeline/trospium significantly improved Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at week 5 versus placebo (least squares mean difference, -9.9; 95% confidence interval, -12.4, -7.3; p < 0.0001; Cohen's d effect size, 0.65). PANSS subscale and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scores also improved significantly with xanomeline/trospium versus placebo. Subgroup analyses consistently favored xanomeline/trospium over placebo regardless of differences in participant age, sex, race, body mass index, and baseline PANSS total score. These results add to existing evidence demonstrating robust and reliable improvements in symptoms with xanomeline/trospium across a broad spectrum of people with schizophrenia.

RECAPACITA project: Comparing neuropsychological profiles in people with severe mental disorders, with and without capacity modification

Mental capacity assessment plays a crucial role in decision-making, especially in psychiatric contexts, where legal frameworks for determining capacity vary widely. This study explores the relationship between cognitive functioning and decision-making capacity modification (CM) in severe mental disorders (SMD), shedding light on the importance of neuropsychological evaluation in CM processes. Cross-sectional descriptive study, with 77 adult patients with SMD and CM, and 33 without CM from the mental health sector of Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (Spain). CM, sociodemographic and neuropsychological data were collected. An independent brief assessment of patients' mental capacity was also evaluated. There is an overrepresentation of males in CM processes. All three groups exhibit mild multidomain dysfunction, with impairments in executive functions, memory, and processing speed. Individuals with CM show poorer verbal learning capacity, with an impact on their occupational and family functioning. Mnemonic encoding positively correlates with mental capacity to decide, suggesting it could preliminarily be considered a potential predictive marker in CM processes. This study contributes insights into the cognitive aspects of CM in SMD, underscoring the need for a comprehensive approach integrating clinical, cognitive, and social factors in assessing decision-making capacity in this population.

Modeling the Determinants of Subjective Well-Being in Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

The ultimate goal of successful schizophrenia treatment is not just to alleviate psychotic symptoms, but also to reduce distress and achieve subjective well-being (SWB). We aimed to identify the determinants of SWB and their interrelationships in schizophrenia.

METHODS

Data were obtained from 637 patients with schizophrenia enrolled in multicenter, open-label, non-comparative clinical trials. The SWB under the Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN) was utilized; a cut-off score of 80 indicated a high level of SWB at baseline and 6 months. Various machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to identify the determinants of SWB. Furthermore, network analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) were conducted to explore detailed relationship patterns.

RESULTS

The random forest (RF) model had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.794 at baseline. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) had the most significant impact on high levels of SWB, followed by somatization, cognitive deficits, and depression. The network analysis demonstrated robust connections among the SWB, OCS, and somatization. SEM analysis revealed that OCS exerted the strongest direct effect on SWB, and also an indirect effect via the mediation of depression. Furthermore, the contribution of OCS at baseline to SWB was maintained 6 months later.

CONCLUSIONS

OCS, somatization, cognition, and depression, rather than psychotic symptoms, exerted significant impacts on SWB in schizophrenia. Notably, OCS exhibited the most significant contribution not only to the current state of well-being but also to follow-up SWB, implying that OCS was predictive of SWB. The findings demonstrated that OCS management is critical for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Anticholinergic load: A commonly neglected and preventable risk to cognition during schizophrenia treatment?

Background

Cognitive impairment is a widespread feature of schizophrenia, affecting nearly 80 % of patients. Prior research has linked the anticholinergic burden of psychiatric medications to these cognitive deficits. However, the impact of the anticholinergic burden from medications for physical morbidity remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the anticholinergic burden of psychiatric and physical medications in patients with schizophrenia and assess its impact on cognitive function.

Methods

A total of 178 patients with schizophrenia were recruited. The assessments included an ad hoc questionnaire for collecting demographic and clinical data. Anticholinergic burden was evaluated using the cumulative Drug Burden Index (cDBI) for each participant, and cognitive function was assessed using MATRICS. Psychopathology was measured using the PANSS, CDSS, CAINS, and the CGI-S. Statistical analysis included Student's t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regressions.

Results

The average cDBI was 1.3 (SD = 0.9). The model developed explained 40.80 % of the variance. The variable with the greatest weight was the cDBI (B = -11.148, p = 0.010). Negative-expression (B = -2.740, p = 0.011) and negative-experiential (B = -1.175, p = 0.030) symptoms were also associated with lower global cognitive score. However, more years of education (B = 5.140, p < 0.001) and cigarettes per day (B = 1.331, p < 0.001) predicted a better global cognitive score.

Conclusion

This study identified specific predictors of global cognition in schizophrenia, with anticholinergic burden emerging as the strongest factor. Our findings underscore the importance of considering the anticholinergic burden of treatments, in addition to negative symptoms, when designing interventions to optimize or maintain cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia.

Development of a Rasch-calibrated emotion recognition video test for patients with schizophrenia

Patients with schizophrenia tend to have deficits in emotion recognition (ER) that affect their social function. However, the commonly-used ER measures appear incomprehensive, unreliable and invalid, making it difficult to comprehensively evaluate ER. The purposes of this study were to develop the Computerized Emotion Recognition Video Test (CERVT) evaluating ER ability in patients with schizophrenia. This study was divided into two phases. First, we selected candidate CERVT items/videos of 8 basic emotion domains from a published database. Second, we validated the selected CERVT items using Rasch analysis. Finally, the 269 patients and 177 healthy adults were recruited to ensure the participants had diverse abilities. After the removal of 21 misfit (infit or outfit mean square > 1.4) items and adjustment of the item difficulties of the 26 items with severe differential item functioning, the remaining 217 items were finalized as the CERVT items. All the CERVT items showed good model fits with small eigenvalues (≤ 2) based on the residual-based principal components analysis for each domain, supporting the unidimensionality of these items. The 8 domains of the CERVT had good to excellent reliabilities (average Rasch reliabilities = 0.84-0.93). The CERVT contains items of the 8 basic emotions with individualized scores. Moreover, the CERVT showed acceptable reliability and validity, and the scores were not affected by examinees' gender. Thus, the CERVT has the potential to provide a comprehensive, reliable, valid, and gender-unbiased assessment of ER for patients with schizophrenia.

Efficacy and Safety of Xanomeline-Trospium Chloride in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

A significant need exists for new antipsychotic medications with different mechanisms of action, greater efficacy, and better tolerability than existing agents. Xanomeline is a dual M1/M4 preferring muscarinic receptor agonist with no direct D2 dopamine receptor blocking activity. KarXT combines xanomeline with the peripheral muscarinic receptor antagonist trospium chloride with the goal of reducing adverse events due to xanomeline-related peripheral muscarinic receptor activation. In prior trials, xanomeline-trospium chloride was effective in reducing symptoms of psychosis and generally well tolerated in people with schizophrenia.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of xanomeline-trospium vs placebo in adults with schizophrenia.

Design, Setting, and Participants

EMERGENT-3 (NCT04738123) was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-week trial of xanomeline-trospium in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis, conducted between April 1, 2021, and December 7, 2022, at 30 inpatient sites in the US and Ukraine. Data were analyzed from February to June 2023.

Interventions

Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive xanomeline-trospium chloride (maximum dose xanomeline 125 mg/trospium 30 mg) or placebo for 5 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The prespecified primary end point was change from baseline to week 5 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. Secondary outcome measures were change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS positive subscale score, PANSS negative subscale score, PANSS Marder negative factor score, Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, and proportion of participants with at least a 30% reduction in PANSS total score. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated.

Results

A total of 256 participants (mean [SD] age, 43.1 [11.8] years; 191 men [74.6%]; 156 of 256 participants [60.9%] were Black or African American, 98 [38.3%] were White, and 1 [0.4%] was Asian) were randomized (125 in xanomeline-trospium group and 131 in placebo group). At week 5, xanomeline-trospium significantly reduced PANSS total score compared with placebo (xanomeline-trospium , -20.6; placebo, -12.2; least squares mean difference, -8.4; 95% CI, -12.4 to -4.3; P < .001; Cohen d effect size, 0.60). Discontinuation rates due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between the xanomeline-trospium (8 participants [6.4%]) and placebo (7 participants [5.5%]) groups. The most common TEAEs in the xanomeline-trospium vs placebo group were nausea (24 participants [19.2%] vs 2 participants [1.6%]), dyspepsia (20 participants [16.0%] vs 2 participants [1.6%]), vomiting (20 participants [16.0%] vs 1 participant [0.8%]), and constipation (16 participants [12.8%] vs 5 participants [3.9%]). Measures of extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, and somnolence were similar between treatment groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

Xanomeline-trospium was efficacious and well tolerated in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis. These findings, together with the previously reported and consistent results from the EMERGENT-1 and EMERGENT-2 trials, support the potential of xanomeline-trospium to be the first in a putative new class of antipsychotic medications without D2 dopamine receptor blocking activity.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04738123.

A real-world data analysis of electronic health records to investigate the associations of predominant negative symptoms with healthcare resource utilisation, costs and treatment patterns among patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES

Negative symptoms in schizophrenia are associated with significant illness burden. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes for patients with schizophrenia who present with predominant negative symptoms (PNS) vs without PNS.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data.

SETTING

25 US providers of mental healthcare.

PARTICIPANTS

4444 adults with schizophrenia receiving care between 1999 and 2020.

EXPOSURE

PNS defined as ≥3 negative symptoms and ≤3 positive symptoms recorded in EHR data at the time of the first recorded schizophrenia diagnosis (index date). Symptom data were ascertained using natural language processing applied to semistructured free text records documenting the mental state examination. A matched sample (1:1) of patients without PNS was used to compare outcomes. Follow-up data were obtained up to 12 months following the index date.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Mean number of psychiatric hospital admissions.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean number of outpatient visits, estimated treatment costs, Clinical Global Impression - Severity score and antipsychotic treatments (12 months before and after index date).

RESULTS

360 (8%) patients had PNS and 4084 (92%) did not have PNS. Patients with PNS were younger (36.4 vs 39.7 years, p<0.001) with a greater prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities (schizoaffective disorders: 25.0 vs 18.4%, p=0.003; major depressive disorder: 17.8 vs 9.8%, p<0.001). During follow-up, patients with PNS had fewer days with an antipsychotic prescription (mean=111.8 vs 140.9 days, p<0.001). Compared with matched patients without PNS, patients with PNS were more likely to have a psychiatric inpatient hospitalisation (76.1% vs 59.7%, p<0.001) and had greater estimated inpatient costs ($16 893 vs $13 732, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PNS were younger and presented with greater illness severity and more psychiatric comorbidities compared with patients without PNS. Our findings highlight an unmet need for novel therapeutic approaches to address negative symptoms to improve clinical outcomes.

Overcoming the barriers to identifying and managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia and to improving access to clozapine: A narrative review and recommendation for clinical practice

Clozapine is the only approved antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Although a large body of evidence supports its efficacy and favorable risk-benefit ratio in individuals who have failed two or more antipsychotics, clozapine remains underused. However, variations in clozapine utilization across geographic and clinical settings suggest that it could be possible to improve its use. In this narrative review and expert opinion, we summarized information available in the literature on the mechanisms of action, effectiveness, and potential adverse events of clozapine. We identified barriers leading to discouragement in clozapine prescription internationally, and we proposed practical solutions to overcome each barrier. One of the main obstacles identified to the use of clozapine is the lack of appropriate training for physicians: we highlighted the need to develop specific professional programs to train clinicians, both practicing and in residency, on the relevance and efficacy of clozapine in TRS treatment, initiation, maintenance, and management of potential adverse events. This approach would facilitate physicians to identify eligible patients and offer clozapine as a treatment option in the early stage of the disease. We also noted that increasing awareness of the benefits of clozapine among healthcare professionals, people with TRS, and their caregivers can help promote the use of clozapine. Educational material, such as leaflets or videos, could be developed and distributed to achieve this goal. The information provided in this article may be useful to improve disease burden and support healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers navigating the complex pathways to TRS management.

Risk and protective factors for recovery at 3-year follow-up after first-episode psychosis onset: a multivariate outcome approach

PURPOSE

Recovery in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) remains a major issue. When risk factors are studied in relation to the disorder, potential protective factors should also be considered since they can modulate this relationship. This study is aimed at exploring which premorbid and baseline characteristics are associated with a good and poor global recovery in patients with FEP at 3-year follow-up.

METHODS

We categorized patients' outcome by using a Latent Class Analysis (LCA) considering a multimodal set of symptomatic and functional outcomes. A Mixed effects Models Repeated Measures analysis of variance (MMRM) was used to highlight group differences over time on symptomatic and functional outcomes assessed during the 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 325 patients with FEP aged between 18 and 35 years were included. Two groups were identified. A total of 187 patients (57.5%) did not achieve recovery, and 138 patients (42.5%) achieved recovery. Recovered patients had generally a better premorbid and baseline profile in comparison with non-recovered patients (as among which shorter duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), higher degree of insight, better functional level and lower illness severity at baseline). The trajectories for the psychopathological and functional outcomes over 36 months differed between the non-recovered and the recovered group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results pointed to some variables associated with recovery, acting as potential protective factors. These should be considered for early intervention programs to promote psychological resilience specifically in those with a worse prognosis in order to mitigate the effects of the variables that make them more vulnerable to poorer outcome.

Impact of gaming disorder on first episode psychosis patients' evolution: Protocol for a multicentered prospective study

AIMS

The objective of this study is to underline the impact of Gaming Disorder on the clinical evolution of patients with First Episode Psychosis. The specific aims of the study are to determine the prevalence of gaming disorder among those patients and assess the consequences of gaming on their clinical trajectory.

METHODS

This is a prospective multicenter cohort study that will enrol 800 patients diagnosed with a first episode psychosis, with a follow-up period of up to 3 years. Using a systematic screening procedure for gaming disorder, the clinical staff will assess patients gaming habits at admission and every 6 months thereafter. Information from patients' medical records will also be extracted using the same timeframe.

RESULTS

The patients' characteristics at admission and during follow-up will be presented in the form of descriptive statistics and compared between different subgroups of patients using uni- and multivariate logistic regression models. Repeated measures ANCOVA will also be performed to analyse the impact of gaming disorders on patients' clinical path as assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale, considering covariates such as psychiatric diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, age, sex/gender, and duration of untreated psychosis.

CONCLUSION

These findings will guide the development of prevention, detection, and treatment strategies for the comorbidity between gaming disorder and first episode psychosis, ultimately improving the patients' recovery.

Efficacy of clozapine versus standard treatment in adult individuals with intellectual disability and treatment-resistant psychosis (CLOZAID): study protocol of a multicenter randomized clinical trial

Background

Intellectual disability (ID) affects approximately 1% of the worldwide population and individuals with ID have a higher comorbidity with mental illness, and specifically psychotic disorders. Unfortunately, among individuals with ID, limited research has been conducted since ID individuals are usually excluded from mental illness epidemiological studies and clinical trials. Here we perform a clinical trial to investigate the effectiveness of clozapine in the treatment of resistant psychosis in individuals with ID. The article highlights the complexity of diagnosing and treating psychopathological alterations associated with ID and advocates for more rigorous research in this field.

Methods

A Phase IIB, open-label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial (NCT04529226) is currently ongoing to assess the efficacy of oral clozapine in individuals diagnosed with ID and suffering from treatment-resistant psychosis. We aim to recruit one-hundred and fourteen individuals (N=114) with ID and resistant psychosis, who will be randomized to TAU (treatment as usual) and treatment-with-clozapine conditions. As secondary outcomes, changes in other clinical scales (PANSS and SANS) and the improvement in functionality, assessed through changes in the Euro-QoL-5D-5L were assessed. The main outcome variables will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models (GLMM), assessing the effects of status variable (TAU vs. Clozapine), time, and the interaction between them.

Discussion

The treatment of resistant psychosis among ID individuals must be directed by empirically supported research. CLOZAID clinical trial may provide relevant information about clinical guidelines to optimally treat adults with ID and treatment-resistant psychosis and the benefits and risks of an early use of clozapine in this underrepresented population in clinical trials.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04529226. EudraCT: 2020-000091-37.

PsiOvi Staging Model for Schizophrenia (PsiOvi SMS): A New Internet Tool for Staging Patients with Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

One of the challenges of psychiatry is the staging of patients, especially those with severe mental disorders. Therefore, we aim to develop an empirical staging model for schizophrenia.

METHODS

Data were obtained from 212 stable outpatients with schizophrenia: demographic, clinical, psychometric (PANSS, CAINS, CDSS, OSQ, CGI-S, PSP, MATRICS), inflammatory peripheral blood markers (C-reactive protein, interleukins-1RA and 6, and platelet/lymphocyte [PLR], neutrophil/lymphocyte [NLR], and monocyte/lymphocyte [MLR] ratios). We used machine learning techniques to develop the model (genetic algorithms, support vector machines) and applied a fitness function to measure the model's accuracy (% agreement between patient classification of our model and the CGI-S).

RESULTS

Our model includes 12 variables from 5 dimensions: 1) psychopathology: positive, negative, depressive, general psychopathology symptoms; 2) clinical features: number of hospitalizations; 3) cognition: processing speed, visual learning, social cognition; 4) biomarkers: PLR, NLR, MLR; and 5) functioning: PSP total score. Accuracy was 62% (SD = 5.3), and sensitivity values were appropriate for mild, moderate, and marked severity (from 0.62106 to 0.6728).

DISCUSSION

We present a multidimensional, accessible, and easy-to-apply model that goes beyond simply categorizing patients according to CGI-S score. It provides clinicians with a multifaceted patient profile that facilitates the design of personalized intervention plans.

Developing a machine learning-based short form of the positive and negative syndrome scale

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) consists of 30 items and takes up to 50 minutes to administer and score. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based short form of the PANSS (PANSS-MLSF) that reproduces the PANSS scores. Moreover, the PANSS-MLSF estimated the removed-item scores.

STUDY DESIGN

The PANSS-MLSF was developed using an artificial neural network, and the removed-item scores were estimated using the eXtreme Gradient Boosting classifier algorithm. The reliability of the PANSS-MLSF was examined using Cronbach's alpha. The concurrent validity was examined by the association (Pearson's r) between the PANSS-MLSF and the PANSS. The convergent validity was examined by the association (Pearson's r) between the PANSS-MLSF and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale. The agreement of the estimated removed-item scores with their original scores was examined using Cohen's kappa.

STUDY RESULTS

Our analysis included data from 573 patients with moderate severity. The two versions of the PANSS-MLSF comprised 15 items and 9 items were proposed. The PANSS-MLSF scores were similar to the PANSS scores (mean squared error=2.6-24.4 points). The reliability, concurrent validity, and convergent validity of the PANSS-MLSF were good. Moderate to good agreement between the estimated removed-item scores and the original item scores was found in 60% of the removed items.

CONCLUSION

The PANSS-MLSF offers a viable way to reduce PANSS administration time, maintain score comparability, uphold reliability and validity, and even estimate scores for the removed items.

The effect of anticholinergic burden of psychiatric medications on major outcome domains of psychotic disorders: A 21-year prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Most medications used to treat psychotic disorders possess anticholinergic properties. This may result in a considerable anticholinergic burden (ACB), which may have deleterious effects on long-term outcomes. The extent to which cumulative ACB over years of treatment with psychotropic medications impacts different outcome domains remains unknown.

METHODS

This was a naturalistic study of 243 subjects with first-episode psychosis aimed at examining the cumulative effect of ACB of psychotropic medications administered over the illness course (ACB-years exposure) on several outcome domains assessed after a mean 21-year follow-up. Associations between ACB and the outcomes were modelled accounting for relevant confounding factors by using hierarchical linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 81.9 % of the participants were dispensed at least one drug with strong anticholinergic effects for at least 1 year; at the follow-up visit, 60.5 % of the participants continued to take medications with strong ACB. ACB-years exposure was uniquely related to severity of negative symptoms (β = 0.144, p = 0.004), poor psychosocial functioning (β = 0.186, p < 0.001) and poor cognitive performance (β = -0.273, p < 0.001). This association pattern was independent of a schizophrenia diagnosis. Most of the associations between ACB at the follow-up visit and the outcomes were accounted for ACB-years exposure.

CONCLUSION

Lifetime ACB of psychotropic medications has deleterious effects on the outcome of psychotic disorders. Clinicians should avoid prescribing medications with strong ACB, since there are numerous alternatives within each psychotropic drug group for prescribing medications with low ACB.

Development of an individualized risk calculator of treatment resistance in patients with first-episode psychosis (TRipCal) using automated machine learning: a 12-year follow-up study with clozapine prescription as a proxy indicator

About 15-40% of patients with schizophrenia are treatment resistance (TR) and require clozapine. Identifying individuals who have higher risk of development of TR early in the course of illness is important to provide personalized intervention. A total of 1400 patients with FEP enrolled in the early intervention for psychosis service or receiving the standard psychiatric service between July 1, 1998, and June 30, 2003, for the first time were included. Clozapine prescriptions until June 2015, as a proxy of TR, were obtained. Premorbid information, baseline characteristics, and monthly clinical information were retrieved systematically from the electronic clinical management system (CMS). Training and testing samples were established with random subsampling. An automated machine learning (autoML) approach was used to optimize the ML algorithm and hyperparameters selection to establish four probabilistic classification models (baseline, 12-month, 24-month, and 36-month information) of TR development. This study found 191 FEP patients (13.7%) who had ever been prescribed clozapine over the follow-up periods. The ML pipelines identified with autoML had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.676 (baseline information) to 0.774 (36-month information) in predicting future TR. Features of baseline information, including schizophrenia diagnosis and age of onset, and longitudinal clinical information including symptoms variability, relapse, and use of antipsychotics and anticholinergic medications were important predictors and were included in the risk calculator. The risk calculator for future TR development in FEP patients (TRipCal) developed in this study could support the continuous development of data-driven clinical tools to assist personalized interventions to prevent or postpone TR development in the early course of illness and reduce delay in clozapine initiation.

Efficacy and safety of the muscarinic receptor agonist KarXT (xanomeline-trospium) in schizophrenia (EMERGENT-2) in the USA: results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

New treatments with new mechanisms are urgently needed for people with schizophrenia. Xanomeline is a dual M1 and M4-preferring muscarinic receptor agonist that does not block D2 dopamine receptors, unlike all currently approved treatments for schizophrenia. Xanomeline-trospium (KarXT) combines xanomeline with the peripherally restricted muscarinic receptor antagonist trospium chloride with the goal of ameliorating xanomeline-related adverse events associated with peripheral muscarinic receptors. The EMERGENT-2 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of KarXT in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis.

METHODS

EMERGENT-2 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose, 5-week, inpatient, phase 3 trial in people with schizophrenia. Participants were adults aged 18-65 years with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who had a recent worsening of psychosis warranting hospital admission, a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score of 80 or higher, and a Clinical Global Impression-Severity score of 4 or higher. The participants were recruited from 22 inpatient sites in the USA, and were randomly assigned (1:1) to KarXT or placebo twice per day. Participants randomly assigned to KarXT received 50 mg xanomeline and 20 mg trospium twice per day for the first 2 days and then 100 mg xanomeline and 20 mg trospium twice per day for days 3-7. Beginning on day 8, KarXT dosing was flexible with an optional increase to 125 mg xanomeline and 30 mg trospium twice per day and the option to return to 100 mg xanomeline and 20 mg trospium based on tolerability. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS total score. Efficacy analyses used the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned participants who received at least one trial medication dose and had at least one post-baseline PANSS assessment). Least squares mean change from baseline, SE, and least squares mean difference between the KarXT and placebo groups at week 5, along with the 95% CI and two-sided p values were calculated for the primary and secondary continuous efficacy endpoints. Safety analyses included all participants receiving at least one trial medication dose and used descriptive statistics. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04659161).

FINDINGS

From Dec 16, 2020, to April 13, 2022, of 407 people who were screened, 252 participants meeting enrolment criteria were randomly assigned to the KarXT (n=126) or placebo (n=126). Baseline PANSS total scores were 98·3 (KarXT; n=126) and 97·9 (placebo; n=125). The trial met the primary endpoint with a mean change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS total score that favoured KarXT (-21·2 points, SE 1·7) versus placebo (-11·6 points, 1·6; least squares mean difference -9·6; 95% CI -13·9 to -5·2; p<0·0001, Cohen's d effect size=0·61). All secondary endpoints were also met, and favoured KarXT versus placebo (p<0·05). The most common adverse events with KarXT versus placebo were constipation (27 [21%] vs 13 [10%]), dyspepsia (24 [19%] vs 10 [8%]), headache (17 [14%] vs 15 [12%]), nausea (24 [19%] vs seven [6%]), vomiting (18 [14%] vs one [1%]), hypertension (12 [10%] vs one [1%]), dizziness (11 [9%] vs four [3%]), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (eight [6%] vs zero [0%]), and diarrhoea (seven [6%] vs four [3%]). Treatment-emergent adverse event rates of extrapyramidal motor symptoms (KarXT, zero [0%] vs placebo, zero [0%]), akathisia (one [1%] vs one [1%]), weight gain (zero [0%] vs one [1%]), and somnolence (six [5%] vs five [4%]) were similar between the KarXT and placebo groups, as were adverse event-related discontinuation rates (nine [7%] vs seven [6%]).

INTERPRETATION

In the EMERGENT-2 trial, KarXT was effective in reducing positive and negative symptoms and was generally well tolerated. These results support the potential for KarXT to represent a new class of effective and well tolerated antipsychotic medicines based on activating muscarinic receptors, not the D2 dopamine receptor-blocking mechanism of all current antipsychotic medications. Results from additional trials, including the identical EMERGENT-3 trial and the 52-week, open-label EMERGENT-4 and EMERGENT-5 trials, will provide additional information on the efficacy and safety of KarXT in people with schizophrenia.

FUNDING

Karuna Therapeutics.

Proxy measures for the assessment of psychotic and affective symptoms in studies using electronic health records

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of standardised psychometric data in electronic health record (EHR)-based research. Proxy measures of symptom severity based on patients' clinical records may be useful surrogates in mental health EHR research.

AIMS

This study aimed to validate proxy tools for the short versions of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS-6) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-6).

METHOD

A cross-sectional, multicentre study was conducted in a sample of 116 patients with first-episode psychosis from 12 public hospitals in Spain. Concordance between PANSS-6, YMRS-6 and MADRS-6 scores and their respective proxies was evaluated based on information from EHR clinical notes, using a variety of statistical procedures, including multivariate tests to adjust for potential confounders. Bootstrapping techniques were used for internal validation, and an independent cohort from the Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP-Lausanne, Switzerland) for external validation.

RESULTS

The proxy versions correlated strongly with their respective standardised scales (partial correlations ranged from 0.75 to 0.84) and had good accuracy and discriminatory power in distinguishing between patients in and not in remission (percentage of patients correctly classified ranged from 83.9 to 91.4% and bootstrapped optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.76 to 0.89), with high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.81). The findings remained robust in the external validation data-set.

CONCLUSIONS

The proxy instruments proposed for assessing psychotic and affective symptoms by reviewing EHR provide a feasible and reliable alternative to traditional structured psychometric procedures, and a promising methodology for real-world practice settings.

Relapse in clinically stable adult patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: evidence-based criteria derived by equipercentile linking and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on defining relapse in schizophrenia, and scale-derived criteria with unclear clinical relevance are widely used. We aimed to develop an evidence-based scale-derived set of criteria to define relapse in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

METHODS

We searched the Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, and obtained individual participant data on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). Our main outcomes were PANSS-derived criteria based on worsening in PANSS total score. We examined their relevance using equipercentile linking with CGI-S and functioning scales, and their test-performance in defining relapse with diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis against CGI-S worsening (≥1-point increase together with a score ≥4 points) and psychiatric hospitalisation.

FINDINGS

Based on data from seven RCTs (2354 participants; 1348 men [57·3%] and 1006 women [42·7%], mean age of 39·5 years [SD 12·0, range 17-89]; 303 Asian [12.9%], 255 Black [10.8%], 1665 White [70.7%], and other or unspecified 131 [5.6%]), an increase of 12 points or more in PANSS total (range 30-210 points) corresponded to clinically important deterioration in global severity of illness (≥1 point increase in CGI-S, range 1-7) and functioning (≥10 points decline in PSP or SOFAS, range 1-100). The interpretation of percentage changes varied importantly across different baseline scores. An increase of 12 points or more in PANSS total had good sensitivity and specificity using CGI-S as reference standard (sensitivity 82·1% [95% CI 77·1-86·4], specificity 86·9% [82·9-90·3]), as well as good sensitivity but lower specificity compared to hospitalisation (sensitivity 81·7% [74·1-87·7], specificity 69·2% [60·5-76·9]). Requiring either an increase in PANSS total or in specific items for positive and disorganization symptoms further improved test-performance. Cutoffs for situations where high sensitivity or specificity is needed are presented.

INTERPRETATION

An increase of either 12 points or more in the PANSS total score, or worsening of specific positive and disorganisation symptom items could be a reasonable evidence-based definition of relapse in schizophrenia, potentially linking symptoms used to define remission and relapse. Percentage changes should not be used to define relapse because their interpretation depends on baseline scores.

FUNDING

German Research Foundation (grant number: 428509362).

Remission with or without comorbid substance use disorders in early psychosis: long-term outcome in integrated care (ACCESS III study)

Introduction

Schizophrenia-Spectrum-Disorders are associated with poor long-term outcome as well as disability and often severely affect the lives of patients and their families often from symptom onset. Up to 70% of first episode psychosis (FEP) patients suffer from comorbid substance use disorders (SUD). We aimed at studying the course of illness in FEP patients within evidence-based care, with and without comorbid SUD, to examine how decreased, remitted or persistent substance use impacted rates of a combined symptomatic and functional long-term recovery compared with patients without SUD.

Methods

ACCESS III is an integrated care model for FEP or patients in the early phase of non-affective and affective psychotic disorders. Treatment trajectories of patients, who had been in ACCESS care for 1 year, with and without SUD were compared with regard to the course of illness and quality of life using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) and recovery rates were compared using binary logistic regression. Change in substance use was coded as either persistent, decreased/remitted or no use.

Results

ACCESS III was a prospective 1-year study (N = 120) in patients aged 12-29 years. Of these, 74 (61.6%) had a comorbid SUD at admission. There were no group differences regarding the course of illness between patients with or without comorbid SUD or between patients with a substance abuse or substance dependence. The only outcome parameter that was affected by SUD was quality of life, with larger improvement found in the group without substance use (p = 0.05) compared to persistent and remitted users. Using LOCF, 44 patients (48.9%) fulfilled recovery criteria at the endpoint; recovery did not differ based on substance use status.

Discussion

SUD and especially substance dependence are common in psychotic disorders even in FEP patients. Evidence-based integrated care led to long-term improvement in patients with comorbid SUD and rate of recovery did not differ for patients with substance use.

Service users' perceptions of relevant and helpful components of an integrated care concept (ACCESS) for psychosis

Introduction

Psychotic disorders have a significant impact on patients' lives and their families, and long-term treatment with individually tailored multimodal combinations of therapies is often required. Integrated care (IC) concepts such as the "Hamburg Model (ACCESS)" with a focus on psychotic disorders, includes different (therapeutic) components with pharmaco- and psychotherapy, family involvement, home treatment and the option of using a 24/7 crisis hotline. All components are offered by a therapeutically-oriented assertive community treatment (TACT) team in a need-adapted manner. So far, however, little is known about which specific components are regarded as especially relevant and helpful by the users of IC.

Methods

Patients currently participating in IC completed a questionnaire as part of the continuous quality assurance study (ACCESS II) in which they were asked to rate the different components of treatment according to their relevance and helpfulness, considering the individual's unique experiences with IC and needs in mental health care. Furthermore, they were asked to make suggestions regarding additional helpful components of treatment.

Results

Fifty patients participated in this survey (23% of the patients currently participating in the IC concept). For participants, the most helpful and important factors were having the same therapist in the long-term and the 24/7 crisis telephone. Additional components suggested by patients included more addiction-specific therapies and increased focus on vocational rehabilitation and integration.

Conclusion

From the perspective of the users of IC, long-term care from a trusted therapist with whom there is a therapeutic relationship and the possibility to reach someone they already know from the TACT team 24/7 serves as the best basis for effective care, fostering trust, understanding, and open communication. In contrast, home treatment remains a relevant aspect of evidence-based care for people with severe mental illness, but perhaps surprisingly, is not viewed as the most important issue.

Light-Dark and Activity Rhythm Therapy (L-DART) to Improve Sleep in People with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Single-Group Mixed Methods Study of Feasibility, Acceptability and Adherence

People with a diagnosis of schizophrenia often have poor sleep, even when their psychotic symptoms are relatively well managed. This includes insomnia, sleep apnoea, hypersomnia, and irregular or non-24 h sleep-wake timing. Improving sleep would better support recovery, yet few evidence-based sleep treatments are offered to this group. This paper presents a mixed methods feasibility and acceptability study of Light-Dark and Activity Rhythm Therapy (L-DART). L-DART is delivered by an occupational therapist over 12 weeks. It is highly personalisable to sleep phenotypes and circumstances. Ten participants with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses and sleep problems received L-DART; their sleep problems and therapy goals were diverse. We measured recruitment, attrition, session attendance, and adverse effects, and qualitatively explored acceptability, engagement, component delivery, adherence, activity patterns, dynamic light exposure, self-reported sleep, wellbeing, and functioning. Recruitment was ahead of target, there was no attrition, and all participants received the minimum 'dose' of sessions. Acceptability assessed via qualitative reports and satisfaction ratings was good. Adherence to individual intervention components varied, despite high participant motivation. All made some potentially helpful behaviour changes. Positive sleep and functioning outcomes were reported qualitatively as well as in outcome measures. The findings above support testing the intervention in a larger randomised trial ISRCTN11998005.

An adapted clinical global Impression of improvement for use in Angelman syndrome: Validation analyses utilizing data from the NEPTUNE study

PURPOSE

Angelman Syndrome (AS) is a rare, severe neurogenetic disorder that causes symptoms such as intellectual disability and motor impairments and is typically diagnosed in early childhood. The complexity and heterogeneity of AS confound characterization of disease severity and pose unique challenges when determining an individual's response to treatment. There is therefore a substantial unmet need for rating scales specifically designed for complex conditions such as AS. To address this, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale, which has components for both symptom severity (CGI-S) and improvement (CGI-I) was specifically adapted to measure severity (CGI-S-AS) and improvement (CGI-I-AS) in AS.

METHODS

The modified CGI-S/I-AS was used in the NEPTUNE trial of gaboxadol for the treatment of AS. Here we report on the validation of the CGI-I-AS using data from NEPTUNE and discuss insights for its potential use in future trials.

RESULTS

Improvements in the CGI-I-AS rating tended to be consistent with changes on other relevant rating scales. Sleep-related symptoms were particularly well represented, while communication-related symptoms were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Our validation analysis of the CGI-I-AS demonstrates its usefulness along with possible areas of improvement. The CGI-I-AS is a potential tool for use in other trials of AS drug candidates, and the process for its development can serve as a road map for the development of assessment tools for other neuropsychiatric disorders with similar complexities and heterogeneity.

The tertiary service for psychosis: Holistic recommendations for people with complex psychosis

OBJECTIVE

To describe (i) the clinical characteristics of individuals referred to the Tertiary Referral Service for Psychosis (TRSP) and (ii) the recommendations TRSP made for future treatment across psychopharmacological and other intervention domains.

METHOD

Retrospective audit of clinical data collected during the assessment process of individuals who accessed TRSP between 02/06/2020 and 31/12/2022. Categories of recommendations made following collaborative care planning comprised psychopharmacological, neuropsychological, psychological, psychosocial, physical health, substance misuse and other domains.

RESULTS

Eighty-two individuals were included, with diagnoses most commonly of schizophrenia (54.9%) and schizoaffective disorder (30.5%). The median PANSS score was 88.0 (73-100). Social occupational functioning was very poor (SOFAS M = 37.0, SD = 15.1). Cognitive functioning was poor (RBANS: M = 74.6; SD: 15.0). 67.1% had physical health comorbidities, with high prevalence of smoking (52.4%) and substance misuse (25.6%). Psychopharmacological recommendations (made for 81.7%) included clozapine trial (25.6%), clozapine dose change/augmentation (22.0%) and rationalisation of polypharmacy (12.2%). Neuropsychological (73.2%), psychological (39.0%) and psychosocial (85.4%) recommendations included access to cognitive remediation, psychological therapy and disability support. Physical health and substance misuse interventions were recommended for 91.5% and 20.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals referred to the TRSP had marked clinical and functional impairments. Holistic collaborative care planning complemented psychopharmacological interventions with psychological, psychosocial and physical healthcare recommendations.

Short communication: Prevalence of long-acting injectable antipsychotic use in Canadian early intervention services for psychosis

The use of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic drugs for psychotic disorders in Canada has been historically low compared to other jurisdictions despite advantages of LAIs in improving medication adherence and preventing relapse. In response, treatment recommendations were developed in 2013 by the Canadian Consortium for Early Intervention in Psychosis and other Canadian provincial expert groups. The impact of these guidelines needed to be assessed. To document practices in LAI use in early intervention services (EIS) for psychosis, Canadian EIS were surveyed in 2016 (n = 18) and 2020 (n = 12). Trends and descriptive information were examined using repeated cross-sectional survey data. Eight EIS responded to surveys at both time points allowing for longitudinal comparisons. Outcomes of interest included i) LAI use frequency, ii) timing of LAI starts, and iii) factors influencing LAI use. Cross-sectional analysis identified a significant increase in overall LAI usage (24.7% in 2016; 35.1% in 2020). Longitudinal analysis indicated that patients in the second program year saw the greatest increase in LAI use between 2016 and 2020 (25.6% vs. 36.1%), especially among patients under community treatment orders (65.5% vs. 81.5%). Results support increases in LAI use over time, accessibility, awareness, and increasing comfortability among Canadian clinicians.

Traditional healers working with primary care and mental health for early intervention in psychosis in young persons: protocol for the feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

In low/middle-income countries (LMICs), more than half of patients with first-episode psychosis initially seek treatment from traditional and religious healers as their first care. This contributes to an excessively long duration of untreated psychosis (DUP). There is a need for culturally appropriate interventions to involve traditional and spiritual healers to work collaboratively with primary care practitioners and psychiatrists through task-shifting for early detection, referral and treatment of first episode of psychosis.

METHODS

To prevent the consequences of long DUP in adolescents in LMICs, we aim to develop and pilot test a culturally appropriate and context-bespoke intervention. Traditional HEalers working with primary care and mental Health for early interventiOn in Psychosis in young pErsons (THE HOPE) will be developed using ethnographic and qualitative methods with traditional healers and caregivers. We will conduct a randomised controlled cluster feasibility trial with a nested qualitative study to assess study recruitment and acceptability of the intervention. Ninety-three union councils in district Peshawar, Pakistan will be randomised and allocated using a 1:1 ratio to either intervention arm (THE HOPE) or enhanced treatment as usual and stratified by urban/rural setting. Data on feasibility outcomes will be collected at baseline and follow-up. Patients, carers, clinicians and policymakers will be interviewed to ascertain their views about the intervention. The decision to proceed to the phase III trial will be based on prespecified stop-go criteria.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been obtained from Keele University Ethical Review Panel (ref: MH210177), Khyber Medical University Ethical Review Board (ref: DIR/KMU-EB/IG/001005) and National Bioethics Committee Pakistan (ref no. 4-87/NBC-840/22/621). The results of THE HOPE feasibility trial will be reported in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences and disseminated to local stakeholders and policymakers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN75347421.

Cutoff for Benchmark Disability Using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study from Rural South India

Background

India uses the Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS) for quantifying disability due to mental illness. The cutoff score for benchmark disability is 7. India has adopted International Classification of Functioning and Health (ICF) and thereby is a signatory to use World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). Cutoff for benchmark disability in WHODAS in a community-based sample is lacking.

Methods

The study was conducted in Jagaluru Taluk, Davanagere District, Karnataka. It is a part of an ongoing research funded by Indian Council of Medical Research. Frequency, percentages, mean, standard deviations, mode, median, Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve were used in analyzing the data.

Results

The study included 184 persons with severe mental illness with mean age of 47 and average duration of illness (DOI) of 11 years. They had mild disability (5.99) in IDEAS. The corresponding cutoff score in WHODAS, as compared to IDEAS, when the influence of DOI is removed was 24.

Conclusions

A shift from IDEAS to WHODAS is feasible. With the undue influence of DOI removed, both hospital and community-based samples show the score of 24 as cutoff.

Developing Angelman syndrome-specific clinician-reported and caregiver-reported measures to support holistic, patient-centered drug development

BACKGROUND

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare, heterogenous neurogenetic condition, which significantly impacts the lives of people with AS and their families. Valid and reliable measures reporting key symptoms and functional impairments of AS are required to support development of patient-centered therapies. We describe the development of clinician- and caregiver-reported, AS-specific Global Impression scales for incorporation into clinical trials. Best practice US Food and Drug Administration guidance for measure development was followed with input from expert clinicians, patient advocates, and caregivers during content generation and refinement.

RESULTS

Initial measurement domains for the Symptoms of AS-Clinician Global Impression (SAS-CGI) and the Caregiver-reported AS Scale (CASS) were identified from a conceptual disease model of AS symptoms and impacts, derived from interviews with caregivers and clinicians. Two rounds of cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews were performed; clinicians debriefed the SAS-CGI, with patient advocates and caregivers debriefing the CASS to ensure relevance and comprehension. Feedback was used to refine items and ensure wording was age-appropriate and captured AS-specific symptoms, as well as associated impacts and functional impairments. The SAS-CGI and CASS capture global assessments of seizures, sleep, maladaptive behaviors, expressive communication, fine and gross motor skills, cognition, and self-care, which were determined by clinicians, patient advocates, and caregivers to be the most challenging aspects of AS. Additionally, the measures include items for assessing overall AS symptoms and the meaningfulness of any change. In addition to ratings for severity, impact, and change, a notes field was included in the SAS-CGI to provide the rationale for the chosen rating. CD interviews confirmed the measures covered key concepts of AS from the perspective of clinicians and caregivers, and demonstrated that the measures' instructions, items, and response options were clear and appropriate. Interview feedback informed adjustments to the wording of the instructions and the items.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAS-CGI and CASS were designed to capture multiple AS symptoms, reflecting the heterogeneity and complexity of AS in children 1 to 12 years old. These clinical outcome assessments have been incorporated into AS clinical studies, which will allow for the evaluation of their psychometric properties and inform further refinements if needed.

Comprehensive rehabilitation and job reintegration of people with severe mental illness in a Latin American country: REINTEGRA study protocol

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing use of comprehensive rehabilitation models for people with severe mental illness (SMI), there are still limitations to their implementation and replicability in a consensual way, particularly in Latin American countries. The REINTEGRA program aims to be a standardized model of comprehensive rehabilitation focused on psychosocial and cognitive improvement through a set of interventions on different areas of people's functionality, with the goal of reintegrating people with SMI into the labour market. In this paper we summarize the protocol for its subsequent implementation in a mental health institution in Mexico.

METHOD

The protocol is based on a quasi-experimental, prospective longitudinal study, with a pragmatic or naturalistic control group. It will be carried out in three phases. Phase 1 consists of a series of interventions focused on psychosocial improvement; Phase 2 focuses on cognitive and behavioral improvement treatments; and Phase 3 targets psychosocial recovery through rehabilitation and reintegration into the labour market. The overall procedure will be monitored with standarized evaluations at different stages of the program.

DISCUSSION

This study presents a model of integral rehabilitation of people with SMI. At the moment, one of the obstacles to overcome is the organization and procedural control of the different actors needed for its implementation (nurses, psychologists, doctors, companies, institutions, etc.). REINTEGRA will be the first comprehensive rehabilitation model that includes systematized procedures for job reinsertion for people with SMI in Mexico, which aims to be a standardized tool of easy adaptation and the replicability for other mental health centers and institutions.

What factors should we modify to promote high functioning and prevent functional decline in people with schizophrenia?

Background

Since research in schizophrenia mainly focuses on deficits and risk factors, we need studies searching for high-functioning protective factors. Thus, our objective was to identify protective (PFs) and risk factors (RFs) separately associated with high (HF) and low functioning (LF) in patients with schizophrenia.

Methods

We collected information (sociodemographic, clinical, psychopathological, cognitive, and functional) from 212 outpatients with schizophrenia. Patients were classified according to their functional level (PSP) as HF (PSP > 70, n = 30) and LF (PSP ≤ 50, n = 95). Statistical analysis consisted of Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and logistic regression.

Results

HF model: variance explained: 38.4-68.8%; PF: years of education (OR = 1.227). RFs: receiving a mental disability benefit (OR = 0.062) and scores on positive (OR = 0.719), negative-expression (OR = 0.711), and negative-experiential symptoms (OR = 0.822), and verbal learning (OR = 0.866). LF model: variance explained: 42.0-56.2%; PF: none; RFs: not working (OR = 6.900), number of antipsychotics (OR = 1.910), and scores on depressive (OR = 1.212) and negative-experiential symptoms (OR = 1.167).

Conclusion

We identified specific protective and risk factors for high and low functioning in patients with schizophrenia and confirmed that high functioning factors are not necessarily the opposite of those associated with low functioning. Only negative experiential symptoms are a shared and inverse factor for high and low functioning. Mental health teams must be aware of protective and risk factors and try to enhance or reduce them, respectively, to help their patients improve or maintain their level of functioning.

Clozapine-related obsessive-compulsive symptoms and their impact on wellbeing: a naturalistic longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) are commonly associated with clozapine treatment but are frequently overlooked by clinicians despite their potential impact on patients' quality of life. In this study, we explored whether OCS severity impacted subjective wellbeing and general functioning, independently of depressive and psychotic symptoms.

METHODS

We used anonymised electronic healthcare records from a large cohort of patients who were treated with clozapine and assessed annually for OCS, wellbeing, general functioning, and psychopathology using standardised scales as part of routine clinical practice. We used statistical mixed linear model techniques to evaluate the longitudinal influence of OCS severity on wellbeing and general functioning.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were included, with 527 face-to-face assessments and 64.7% evaluated three or more times. Different linear mixed models demonstrated that OCS in patients treated with clozapine were associated with significantly worse wellbeing scores, independently of depression and psychotic symptoms, but OCS did not impair general functioning. Obsessional thinking and hoarding behaviour, but not compulsions, were significantly associated with the impact on wellbeing, which may be attributable to the ego-syntonic nature of the compulsions.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the frequent occurrence of OCS and their negative impact on wellbeing, we encourage clinicians to routinely assess and treat OCS in patients who are taking clozapine.

The RECAPACITA project: Description of the clinical, neuropsychological and functional profile of a sample of people with severe mental disorder and legal capacity modification in Spain

Severe mental disorder (SMD) includes people with long-term mental disorders, disability and social dysfunction. The mental capacity evaluation of the people has been a key aspect in legislative systems around the world and different proposals have been made. In countries like Spain, until 2021, the mental capacity of individuals was assessed by means of legal proceedings. In the last years, there has been a notable increase in the number of claims for legal incapacity, but no data are available on the total number of persons with CM, neither on the specific pathologies, or clinical and cognitive profiles. In view of the total absence of data on the profile of people with SMD and modification of capacity, the RECAPACITA study was born. This study includes patients with SMD and CM, as well as those without CM, with the aim to describe exhaustively their clinical, neuropsychological and functional profile of people with SMD and CM, as well as obtaining a basic description of the social environment.

OBJECTIVES

To describe CM in SMD, to identify clinical diagnoses, clinical severity and neuropsychological deterioration.

METHODS

Cross-sectional descriptive study. 77 adult patients with SMD and CM, inpatients from the mental health sector of the Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (Spain), outpatients linked to the community rehabilitation services (CRS), and penitentiary inmates. CM, sociodemographic, clinical, functional and neuropsychological data are collected.

RESULTS

In the sample, 59.5% present total CM. 74.7% are men (mean: 52.5 years). 87,0% have a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The estimated premorbid IQ is 91.4. The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) had a mean of 50.5, the "Clinical Global Impression Scale" (CGI) was 4.6 and Scale Unawareness of Mental Disorders (SUMD) was 9.28. The cognitive results shows a profile with slow proceeding speed (mean scale score: 6.6), good working memory (mean SC: 8.3) and adequate verbal comprehension (mean SC: 7.3). In memory, coding is altered (Pz: -1.9), and long-term spontaneous recall (Pz: -2.3). In abstract reasoning, a slight alteration is obtained (Mean SC: 6), as well as in semantic fluency (Mean SC: 6.3), phonological (Mean SC: 5.9), and inhibitory capacity (Mean SC: 5.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the sample are men with schizophrenia, with a total MC assumed by a tutelary foundation. They show a moderate alteration in global functioning and clinical global impression, with partial awareness of the disease. They present dysexecutive mild cognitive impairment, with poor memory coding and free retrieval capacity, and a normal IQ, adequate verbal comprehension and working memory. This study is the first to present objective data on the psychiatric, functional and cognitive status of a group of patients with CM. Such research could be a good starting point to address a topic of great interest from the health, social and legal point of view of the CM processes of people with SMD.

A consideration of the increased risk of schizophrenia due to prenatal maternal stress, and the possible role of microglia

Schizophrenia is caused by interaction of a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Of the latter, prenatal exposure to maternal stress is reportedly associated with elevated disease risk. The main orchestrators of inflammatory processes within the brain are microglia, and aberrant microglial activation/function has been proposed to contribute to the aetiology of schizophrenia. Here, we evaluate the epidemiological and preclinical evidence connecting prenatal stress to schizophrenia risk, and consider the possible mediating role of microglia in the prenatal stress-schizophrenia relationship. Epidemiological findings are rather consistent in supporting the association, albeit they are mitigated by effects of sex and gestational timing, while the evidence for microglial activation is more variable. Rodent models of prenatal stress generally report lasting effects on offspring neurobiology. However, many uncertainties remain as to the mechanisms underlying the influence of maternal stress on the developing foetal brain. Future studies should aim to characterise the exact processes mediating this aspect of schizophrenia risk, as well as focussing on how prenatal stress may interact with other risk factors.

Cross-diagnostic determinants of cognitive functioning: the muscarinic cholinergic receptor as a model system

Cognitive impairment is a predictor of disability across different neuropsychiatric conditions, and cognitive abilities are also strongly related to educational attainment and indices of life success in the general population. Previous attempts at drug development for cognitive enhancement have commonly attempted to remedy defects in transmitters systems putatively associated with the conditions of interest such as the glutamate system in schizophrenia. Recent studies of the genomics of cognitive performance have suggested influences that are common in the general population and in different neuropsychiatric conditions. Thus, it seems possible that transmitter systems that are implicated for cognition across neuropsychiatric conditions and the general population would be a viable treatment target. We review the scientific data on cognition and the muscarinic cholinergic receptor system (M1 and M4) across different diagnoses, in aging, and in the general population. We suggest that there is evidence suggesting potential beneficial impacts of stimulation of critical muscarinic receptors for the enhancement of cognition in a broad manner, as well as the treatment of psychotic symptoms. Recent developments make stimulation of the M1 receptor more tolerable, and we identify the potential benefits of M1 and M4 receptor stimulation as a trans-diagnostic treatment model.