1
|
Zhang S, Ma M, Zhang Y, Luo J, Ouyang F, Tian Y, Gao Y. Maternal psychological distress modifies the association between prenatal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and infants' neurodevelopment. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2025; 977:179351. [PMID: 40215636 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2025] [Accepted: 04/03/2025] [Indexed: 04/25/2025]
Abstract
Prenatal PFAS exposure and maternal psychological distress may adversely affect child neurodevelopment through shared biological pathways, such as hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis disruption and pro-inflammatory responses. However, whether psychological distress modifies PFAS-related neurodevelopmental risks remains unclear. Using data from the Shanghai Birth Cohort including 1779 mother-child pairs, we measured maternal PFAS levels during the first trimester and assessed maternal psychological distress (perceived stress, depression, and anxiety) during the second trimester. Child neurodevelopment was evaluated at 6 months of age using the Ages & Stages Questionnaires-Third Edition (ASQ-3). Multivariable regression models and quantile g-computation were conducted to evaluate the associations of ASQ-3 scores with individual and mixture PFAS. Stratified analyses were conducted between the psychological distress positive group (experienced any one type of stressor) and negative group (experienced no stressors). We found that 41 % of pregnant women experienced at least one type of psychological distress. Among the overall participants, maternal PFAS exposure was associated with reduced gross motor scores in children. Maternal psychological distress status modified the association between PFAS and gross motor scores. Specifically, the adverse associations of PFAS with gross motor development were only observed in the psychological distress positive group, while no association was found in the negative group. Significant interaction effects were observed between maternal psychological distress and most PFAS compounds (all P for interaction <0.1). Furthermore, the adverse associations of prenatal PFAS exposure with gross motor development intensified in women experiencing multiple types of psychological stressors. This study indicates that maternal psychological distress may increase the risk of PFAS-related adverse gross motor development in six-month-old children. Investigating maternal psychological distress could be crucial for identifying vulnerable populations and guiding intervention measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanyu Zhang
- MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200092 Shanghai, China; Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 230601 Hefei, China
| | - Mingyue Ma
- Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Shenyang Medical College, 110034 Shenyang, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200025, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiajun Luo
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, the University of Chicago, 60637, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Fengxiu Ouyang
- MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200092 Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Tian
- MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200092 Shanghai, China.
| | - Yu Gao
- MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200092 Shanghai, China; Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200025, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rinne GR, Podosin M, Mahrer NE, Shalowitz MU, Ramey SL, Dunkel Schetter C. Prospective associations of prenatal stress with child behavior: Moderation by the early childhood caregiving environment. Dev Psychopathol 2025; 37:1083-1094. [PMID: 38738363 PMCID: PMC11557737 DOI: 10.1017/s0954579424000920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Fetal exposure to prenatal stress can increase risk for psychopathology but postnatal caregiving may offset risk. This study tests whether maternal sensitivity and the home environment during early childhood modify associations of prenatal stress with offspring behavior in a sample of 127 mother-child pairs (n = 127). Mothers reported on perceived stress during pregnancy. Maternal sensitivity was rated by coders during a parent-child free play task when children were 4 years old. One year later, mothers reported on the home environment, child internalizing and externalizing behaviors, and children completed an assessment of inhibitory control. As hypothesized, the early childhood caregiving environment modified associations of prenatal stress with child behavior. Specifically, prenatal stress was associated with more internalizing behaviors at lower levels of maternal sensitivity and in home environments that were lower in emotional support and cognitive stimulation, but not at mean or higher levels. Furthermore, prenatal stress was associated with lower inhibitory control only at lower levels of maternal sensitivity, but not at higher levels. Maternal sensitivity and an emotionally supportive and cognitively stimulating home environment in early childhood may be important factors that mitigate risk for mental health problems among children exposed to prenatal stress.
Collapse
|
3
|
Khoury JE, Giles L, Atkinson L, Gonzalez A. The role of prenatal perceived stress and hair cortisol as they relate to toddler socioemotional outcomes over the first three years. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2025; 172:107251. [PMID: 39631237 DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2024] [Revised: 11/24/2024] [Accepted: 11/24/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
Prenatal maternal psychological distress and physiological stress (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal [HPA] activity) can negative impact early child development. Research rarely examines the combined or interactive role of prenatal perceived stress and HPA activity on child outcomes. The current longitudinal study examined how prenatal distress and HPA activity impacted child socioemotional functioning from age 1-3. This sample (n=148) was followed from pregnancy, 15-, 24- and 35-months postpartum. During pregnancy, mothers reported their levels of perceived stress and hair samples were collected, reflecting cortisol secretion in the past 3 months. At each postpartum timepoint, mothers reported toddler socioemotional functioning using the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment. Multivariate regression results indicated that higher maternal perceived stress interacted with higher hair cortisol levels in association with greater socioemotional problems at 15 and 24 months. In addition, there was a main effect of higher prenatal perceived stress in relation to greater socioemotional problems at 36 months. Exploratory sex-specific moderation analyses indicated that sex interacted with hair cortisol, such that higher levels of prenatal cortisol were associated greater behaviour problems and lower socioemotional competence for females compared to males at 24-months. Findings indicated the importance of examining both physiological stress and psychological stress in pregnancy, as they interact to impact child socioemotional development. Findings also highlight sex-specific prenatal effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer E Khoury
- Department of Psychology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
| | - Lauren Giles
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Leslie Atkinson
- Department of Psychology, Metropolitan Toronto University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Gonzalez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University; Hamilton, ON, Canada; Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University; Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lund IO, Hannigan LJ, Ask H, Askelund AD, Hegemann L, Corfield EC, Wootton RE, Ahmadzadeh YI, Davey Smith G, McAdams TA, Ystrom E, Havdahl A. Prenatal maternal stress: triangulating evidence for intrauterine exposure effects on birth and early childhood outcomes across multiple approaches. BMC Med 2025; 23:18. [PMID: 39838367 PMCID: PMC11753172 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03834-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 12/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal stress during pregnancy may impact offspring development via changes in the intrauterine environment. However, genetic and environmental factors shared between mothers and children might skew our understanding of this pathway. This study assesses whether prenatal maternal stress has causal links to offspring outcomes: birthweight, gestational age, or emotional and behavioral difficulties, triangulating across methods that account for various measured and unmeasured confounders. METHODS We used data from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), including maternal reports on prenatal stress at work, at home, and via stressful life events as exposures. Outcomes were children's birthweight and gestational age, from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, and maternal reports on early offspring emotional and behavioral difficulties. We assessed associations using four approaches: sibling control analyses, gene-environment interaction analyses, intergenerational Mendelian randomization (MR), and negative control (i.e., postnatal stress) analyses. RESULTS Maternal prenatal stress was observationally associated with offspring lower birthweight (e.g., βwork = - 0.01 [95%CI: - 0.02, - 0.01]), earlier birth (e.g., βwork = - 0.04 [95%CI: - 0.04, - 0.03])), and more emotional (e.g., βevents = 0.08 [95%CI: 0.07, 0.09]) and behavioral difficulties (e.g., βrelationship = 0.08 [95%CI: 0.07, 0.09]) in the full sample (N = 112,784). However, sibling control analyses (N = 36,511) revealed substantial attenuation of all associations after accounting for familial factors. Gene-environment interaction models (N = 76,288) showed no clear evidence of moderation of associations by mothers' polygenic scores for traits linked to stress sensitivity. Intergenerational MR analyses (N = 29,288) showed no clear evidence of causal effects of maternal plasma cortisol on any offspring outcomes. Negative control exposure analyses revealed similar effect sizes whether exposures were measured prenatally or postnatally. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that links between prenatal maternal stress and variation in early offspring outcomes are more likely to be confounded than causal. While no observational study can rule out causality, the consistency of our findings across different approaches is striking. Other sources of prenatal stress or more extreme levels may represent intrauterine causal risk factors for offspring development. Nonetheless, our research contributes to identifying boundary conditions of the fetal programming and developmental origins of health and disease hypotheses, which may not be as universal as sometimes assumed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingunn Olea Lund
- PsychGen Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Child Health and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Laurie J Hannigan
- PsychGen Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Nic Waals Institute, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- MRC (Medical Research Council) Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Helga Ask
- PsychGen Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Child Health and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- PROMENTA, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Adrian D Askelund
- PsychGen Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Nic Waals Institute, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Laura Hegemann
- PsychGen Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Nic Waals Institute, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elizabeth C Corfield
- PsychGen Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Nic Waals Institute, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Robyn E Wootton
- PsychGen Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Nic Waals Institute, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- MRC (Medical Research Council) Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yasmin I Ahmadzadeh
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - George Davey Smith
- MRC (Medical Research Council) Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tom A McAdams
- PROMENTA, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eivind Ystrom
- PsychGen Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Child Health and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- PROMENTA, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alexandra Havdahl
- PsychGen Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Nic Waals Institute, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- PROMENTA, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tung I, Keenan K, Hipwell AE. Resilience to stress during pregnancy: Biopsychosocial mechanisms and implications for offspring emotional and behavioral outcomes in toddlerhood. Dev Psychol 2024; 60:1733-1745. [PMID: 38358671 PMCID: PMC11697983 DOI: 10.1037/dev0001695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Exposure to high levels of stress during pregnancy is a known risk factor for a wide range of offspring outcomes, but little is known about the biopsychosocial factors underlying resilience and recovery from stress during pregnancy. The current study investigated associations between emotional and instrumental support during pregnancy and resilience to stress during pregnancy, including perceived resilience (belief in ability to "bounce back" from adversity) and physiological resilience (ability to physiologically recover quickly after an acute stressor). We further tested whether support and resilience during pregnancy predicted offspring internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Participants included 130 pregnant women (ages 26-28 years; 58% Black, 27% White, 15% Multiracial; 28% receiving public assistance) from a population-based longitudinal study. During pregnancy, participants reported on emotional and instrumental support, current life stressors, and perceived resilience to stress. In addition, heart rate variability was recorded continuously before, during, and after a controlled stress test to measure physiological recovery from stressors. When offspring were 2-3 years of age, mothers reported on children's internalizing and externalizing problems. Results from moderated mediation analyses indicated that emotional, but not instrumental, support was associated with perceived resilience during pregnancy, which predicted lower internalizing and externalizing problems in offspring. Emotional support also predicted greater physiological recovery during pregnancy, but only for individuals reporting multiple life stressors. Findings suggest that emotional support may influence psychological and physiological responses to stress during pregnancy, with implications for offspring emotional and behavioral health. Clinical implications of these results and directions for future research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Tung
- Department of Psychology, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA, USA
| | - Kate Keenan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alison E. Hipwell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tung I, Balaji U, Hipwell AE, Low CA, Smyth JM. Feasibility and acceptability of measuring prenatal stress in daily life using smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and wearable physiological monitors. J Behav Med 2024; 47:635-646. [PMID: 38581594 PMCID: PMC11697973 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-024-00484-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
High levels of stress during pregnancy can have lasting effects on maternal and offspring health, which disproportionately impacts families facing financial strain, systemic racism, and other forms of social oppression. Developing ways to monitor daily life stress during pregnancy is important for reducing stress-related health disparities. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of using mobile health (mHealth) technology (i.e., wearable biosensors, smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment) to measure prenatal stress in daily life. Fifty pregnant women (67% receiving public assistance; 70% Black, 6% Multiracial, 24% White) completed 10 days of ambulatory assessment, in which they answered smartphone-based surveys six times a day and wore a chest-band device (movisens EcgMove4) to monitor their heart rate, heart rate variability, and activity level. Feasibility and acceptability were evaluated using behavioral meta-data and participant feedback. Findings supported the feasibility and acceptability of mHealth methods: Participants answered approximately 75% of the surveys per day and wore the device for approximately 10 hours per day. Perceived burden was low. Notably, participants with higher reported stressors and financial strain reported lower burden associated with the protocol than participants with fewer life stressors, highlighting the feasibility of mHealth technology for monitoring prenatal stress among pregnant populations living with higher levels of contextual stressors. Findings support the use of mHealth technology to measure prenatal stress in real-world, daily life settings, which shows promise for informing scalable, technology-assisted interventions that may help to reduce health disparities by enabling more accessible and comprehensive care during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Tung
- Department of Psychology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, 1000 E. Victoria Street, Carson, CA, 90747, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Uma Balaji
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alison E Hipwell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carissa A Low
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joshua M Smyth
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ptaschinski C, Gibbs BF. Early-life risk factors which govern pro-allergic immunity. Semin Immunopathol 2024; 46:9. [PMID: 39066790 PMCID: PMC11283399 DOI: 10.1007/s00281-024-01020-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Allergic diseases affect up to 40% of the global population with a substantial rise in food allergies, in particular, over the past decades. For the majority of individuals with allergy fundamental programming of a pro-allergic immune system largely occurs in early childhood where it is crucially governed by prenatal genetic and environmental factors, including their interactions. These factors include several genetic aberrations, such as filaggrin loss-of-function mutations, early exposure to respiratory syncytial virus, and various chemicals such as plasticizers, as well as the influence of the gut microbiome and numerous lifestyle circumstances. The effects of such a wide range of factors on allergic responses to an array of potential allergens is complex and the severity of these responses in a clinical setting are subsequently not easy to predict at the present time. However, some parameters which condition a pro-allergic immune response, including severe anaphylaxis, are becoming clearer. This review summarises what we currently know, and don't know, about the factors which influence developing pro-allergic immunity particularly during the early-life perinatal period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Ptaschinski
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
- Mary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Bernhard F Gibbs
- School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, North Holmes Road, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 1QU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|