pH-Dependent Drug–Drug Interactions for Weak Base Drugs: Potential Implications for New Drug Development

Effects of Food, Gastric Acid Reduction, and Strong CYP3A Induction on the Pharmacokinetics of Tasurgratinib, a Novel Selective Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor

We conducted this three-part study in healthy subjects to investigate the pharmacokinetics of tasurgratinib (orally available selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3) and M2 (its major metabolite) under different conditions. In Part A, subjects received tasurgratinib 35 mg either fed with a high-fat meal or fasted. In Parts B and C, subjects received tasurgratinib 35 mg alone or with either rabeprazole (acid-reducing agent) 20 mg (Part B) or rifampin (strong CYP3A inducer) 600 mg (Part C). Primary endpoints were maximum concentration (Cmax), and areas under the plasma concentration-time curve to time of last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-t)) and extrapolated to infinite time (AUC(0-inf)). Forty-two subjects were enrolled, 14 each into Parts A, B, and C. In Part A, administration of tasurgratinib with a high-fat meal resulted in 33% reduction in Cmax and ∼23% reduction in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) of tasurgratinib, and 47% reduction in Cmax with ∼30% reduction in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) of M2. In Part B, co-administration of rabeprazole at steady state resulted in no/weak interaction with tasurgratinib (∼8% increase in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) without an effect on Cmax) and M2 (∼18% increase in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) without an effect on Cmax). In Part C, co-administration of rifampin at steady state resulted in a weak interaction with tasurgratinib (∼16% reduction in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf)) and M2 (∼12% reduction in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf)). Administration of tasurgratinib with a high-fat meal appeared to reduce systemic exposure of tasurgratinib, however co-administration with an acid-reducing agent or a CYP3A inducer had a minimal impact on pharmacokinetics.

Playing Hide-and-Seek with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Can We Overcome Administration Challenges?

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated significant efficacy against various types of cancers through molecular targeting mechanisms. Over the past 22 years, more than 100 TKIs have been approved for the treatment of various types of cancer indicating the significant progress achieved in this research area. Despite having significant efficacy and ability to target multiple pathways, TKIs administration is associated with challenges. There are reported inconsistencies between observed food effect and labeling administration, challenges of concomitant administration with acid-reducing agents (ARA), pill burden and dosing frequency. In this context, the objective of present review is to visit administration challenges of TKIs and effective ways to tackle them. We have gathered data of 94 TKIs approved in between 2000 and 2022 with respect to food effect, ARA impact, administration schemes (food and PPI restrictions), number of pills per day and administration frequency. Further, trend analysis has been performed to identify inconsistencies in the labeling with respect to observed food effect, molecules exhibiting ARA impact, in order to identify solutions to remove these restrictions through novel formulation approaches. Additionally, opportunities to reduce number of pills per day and dosing frequency for better patient compliance were suggested using innovative formulation interventions. Finally, utility of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK) for rationale formulation development was discussed with literature reported examples. Overall, this review can act as a ready-to-use-guide for the formulation, biopharmaceutics scientists and medical oncologists to identify opportunities for innovation for TKIs.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Do Not Affect the Bioavailability of a Novel Liquid Formulation of Levothyroxine

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the impact of a representative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (omeprazole), administered simultaneously or staggered, on the pharmacokinetics of levothyroxine (LT4) solution (Tirosint-SOL).

METHODS

This was a randomized, 3-way crossover, comparative bioavailability study in 36 healthy adults under fasting conditions. Omeprazole 40 mg delayed-release capsule was administered once daily from Day 1 to 6 (mornings, Treatment-A; evenings, Treatment-B; none, Treatment-C) to increase and stabilize gastric pH. In the morning of Day 5, a single dose of LT4 solution 600 mcg was administered. Blood samples were collected 0 to 48 hours post-LT4 administration. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for total serum thyroxine using baseline-corrected data. Maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-48) were included in an analysis of variance to obtain geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

For both comparisons (A/C and B/C), geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for all parameters were within the equivalence boundaries (80%-125%), indicating bioequivalence: for A/C, AUC0-48 98.98% [94%-104%], and Cmax 91.68% [87%-97%]; for B/C, AUC0-48 98.94% [95%-103%], and Cmax 94.90% [90%-100%]. Median Tmax (time associated with Cmax) was similar across treatments.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that Tirosint-SOL bioavailability is unaffected by coadministration of a representative PPI, given simultaneously or staggered by about 12 hours, compared to administration of LT4 solution alone. For hypothyroid patients on PPI therapy, administration of LT4 solution may reduce variations in thyroid stimulating hormone levels related to intermittent use of acid-reducing drugs and consequently the need for dose adjustments.

Assessing and mitigating pH-mediated DDI risks in drug development - formulation approaches and clinical considerations

pH-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDI) is a prevalent DDI in drug development, especially for weak base compounds with highly pH-dependent solubility. FDA has released a guidance on the evaluation of pH-mediated DDI assessments using in vitro testing and clinical studies. Currently, there is no common practice of ways of testing across the academia and industry. The development of biopredictive method and physiologically-based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) approaches to assess acid-reducing agent (ARA)-DDI have been proven with accurate prediction and could decrease drug development burden, inform clinical design and potentially waive clinical studies. Formulation strategies and careful clinical design could help mitigate the pH-mediated DDI to avoid more clinical studies and label restrictions, ultimately benefiting the patient. In this review paper, a detailed introduction on biorelevant dissolution testing, preclinical and clinical study requirement and PBPK modeling approaches to assess ARA-DDI are described. An improved decision tree for pH-mediated DDI is proposed. Potential mitigations including clinical or formulation strategies are discussed.

Prodrugs as empowering tools in drug discovery and development: recent strategic applications of drug delivery solutions to mitigate challenges associated with lead compounds and drug candidates

The delivery of a drug to a specific organ or tissue at an efficacious concentration is the pharmacokinetic (PK) hallmark of promoting effective pharmacological action at a target site with an acceptable safety profile. Sub-optimal pharmaceutical or ADME profiles of drug candidates, which can often be a function of inherently poor physicochemical properties, pose significant challenges to drug discovery and development teams and may contribute to high compound attrition rates. Medicinal chemists have exploited prodrugs as an informed strategy to productively enhance the profiles of new chemical entities by optimizing the physicochemical, biopharmaceutical, and pharmacokinetic properties as well as selectively delivering a molecule to the site of action as a means of addressing a range of limitations. While discovery scientists have traditionally employed prodrugs to improve solubility and membrane permeability, the growing sophistication of prodrug technologies has enabled a significant expansion of their scope and applications as an empowering tool to mitigate a broad range of drug delivery challenges. Prodrugs have emerged as successful solutions to resolve non-linear exposure, inadequate exposure to support toxicological studies, pH-dependent absorption, high pill burden, formulation challenges, lack of feasibility of developing solid and liquid dosage forms, first-pass metabolism, high dosing frequency translating to reduced patient compliance and poor site-specific drug delivery. During the period 2012-2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 50 prodrugs, which amounts to 13% of approved small molecule drugs, reflecting both the importance and success of implementing prodrug approaches in the pursuit of developing safe and effective drugs to address unmet medical needs.

Should the Use of Acid Reducing Agents in Conjunction with Ribociclib be Avoided? An Integrated QbD Approach for Assessment of pH-Mediated Interaction

The objective of the study was to evaluate the possible pH-dependent interaction of ribociclib succinate with acid-reducing agents, which are concomitantly administered as supportive care medicines in cancer. Quality by Design-based analytical method development for a weakly basic drug ribociclib succinate supposedly having the characteristic ability of pH-dependent solubility was carried out for analyzing micro-dissolution experiment samples in biorelevant media to study pH-dependent interaction. An accurate and robust analytical method was developed using a three-level three-factorial box-behnken design for quantification of ribociclib succinate in micro-dissolution samples by the implementation of the Analytical Quality by Design approach. Here, pH of aqueous mobile phase and flow rate proved to be critical process parameters. The gastric compartment solubility was found to be 814.05 μg/mL, which dropped down to 494.71 μg/mL after a pH shift from pH 1.2-6.5. In the intestinal compartment, initial solubility was 717.58 μg/mL, which reduced to 463.20 μg/mL after a pH shift from 6.5 to 6.8. Concluded results state that pH shift does not impact the solubility or the absorption of the drug to a significant extent in the presence of acid-reducing agents. However, the study would prove to be a practical approach for examination of the behavior of the drugs at the initial stages.

Dasatinib anhydrate containing oral formulation improves variability and bioavailability in humans

Dasatinib monohydrate indicated for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia displays pH-dependent solubility. The aim of reported development program of novel dasatinib anhydrate containing formulation was to demonstrate improved absorption and lower pharmacokinetic variability compared to dasatinib monohydrate. In a bioavailability study comparing formulations containing 110.6 mg and 140 mg of dasatinib as anhydrate and monohydrate, respectively, both Cmax and AUC of dasatinib were within standard 80.00-125.00% range, while the intra- and inter-subject variability for AUC0-inf after the test product was approximately 3-fold and 1.5-fold less than after the reference, respectively.In a drug-drug interaction study, omeprazole 40 mg reduced the mean AUC0-inf of dasatinib by 19%, when the test was ingested 2 h before the 5th omeprazole dose. This decrease of exposure is clinically irrelevant and substantially less than after the reference. Co-prescription analysis supports the importance of pH-dependent solubility of dasatinib, as >21% of patients were treated concomitantly with a PPI and dasatinib despite warnings against this co-medication in the SmPC.The novel dasatinib anhydrate containing formulation demonstrated improved absorption and less pharmacokinetic variability compared to dasatinib monohydrate product, which may translate into improved clinical outcomes, although this needs to be proven by an appropriate trial.

Model based assessment of food and acid reducing agent effects on oral absorption of mezigdomide (CC-92480), a novel cereblon E3 ligase modulator

Mezigdomide is a novel cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD) agent with enhanced autonomous cell-killing activity in multiple myeloma (MM) cells, and promising immunomodulatory and antitumor activity in patients with MM. We developed a population pharmacokinetics (PKs) model for mezigdomide in healthy subjects (HSs), and quantified effects of high-fat meal and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) on human disposition parameters. Plasma concentrations from 64 HS in two phase I clinical studies (NCT03803644 and NCT04211545) were used to develop a population PK model. The HSs received single oral doses of 0.4-3.2 mg mezigdomide with full PK profiles collected. A two-compartment linear PK model with first-order absorption and lag time best described mezigdomide PK profiles in HSs. The population PK parameters of absorption rate constant, lag time, central volume of distribution, clearance, peripheral volume of distribution, and intercompartmental clearance were estimated to be 1.18 h-1 (interoccasion variability [IOV]: 65%), 0.423 h (IOV: 31%), 440 L (interindividual variability [IIV]: 63%), 35.1 L/h (IIV: 40%), 243 L (IIV: 26%), and 36.8 L/h (IIV: 26%), respectively. High-fat meal increased oral bioavailability by ~30% and PPI co-administration decreased oral bioavailability by ~64%. Mezigdomide demonstrated a linear dose-exposure relationship in HSs. The PK model suggests a modest effect of high-fat meal, and a substantial effect of PPIs on mezigdomide oral bioavailability. This population PK model enables data integration across studies to identify important covariate effects and is being used to guide dose selection in clinical study designs for mezigdomide in patients with MM.

Modelling Based Approaches to Support Generic Drug Regulatory Submissions-Practical Considerations and Case Studies

Model informed drug development (MiDD) is useful to predict in vivo exposure of drugs during various stages of the drug development process. This approach employs a variety of quantitative tools to assess the risks during the drug development process. One important tool in the MiDD tool kit is the Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling (PBPK). This tool is extensively used to reduce the development cost and to accelerate the access of medicines to the patients. In this work, we provide an overview of PBPK modelling approaches in the generic drug development process, with a special emphasis on the bio-waiver applications. We describe herein approaches and common pitfalls while submitting model based justifications as a response to the regulatory deficiencies during the generic drug development process. With some in-house case studies, we have attempted to provide a clear path for PBPK model based justifications for bio-waivers. With this review, the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application of modelling and simulation tools for generic drug product development could be potentially reduced.

Physiologically Based Absorption Modelling to Explore the Formulation and Gastric pH Changes on the Pharmacokinetics of Acalabrutinib

Acalabrutinib, a selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a biopharmaceutics classification system class II drug. The aim of this study was to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to mechanistically describe absorption of immediate release capsule formulation of acalabrutinib in humans. Integration of in vitro biorelevant measurements, dissolution studies and in silico modelling provided clinically relevant inputs for the mechanistic absorption PBPK model. The batch specific dissolution data were integrated in two ways, by fitting a diffusion layer model scalar to the drug product dissolution with integration of drug substance laser diffraction particle size data, or by fitting a product particle size distribution to the dissolution data. The latter method proved more robust and biopredictive. In both cases, the drug surface solubility was well predicted by the Simcyp simulator. The model using the product particle size distribution (P-PSD) for each clinical batch adequately captured the PK profiles of acalabrutinib and its active metabolite. Average fold errors were 0.89 for both Cmax and AUC, suggesting good agreement between predicted and observed PK values. The model also accurately predicted pH-dependent drug-drug interactions between omeprazole and acalabrutinib, which was similar across all clinical formulations. The model predicted acalabrutinib geometric mean AUC ratios (with omeprazole vs acalabrutinib alone) were 0.51 and 0.68 for 2 batches of formulations, which are close to observed values of 0.43 and 0.51~0.63, respectively. The mechanistic absorption PBPK model could be potentially used for future applications such as optimizing formulations or predicting the PK for different batches of the drug product.

Drug-drug interactions associated with FLT3 inhibitors for acute myeloblastic leukemia: current landscape

INTRODUCTION

FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) are drugs in which there is limited experience and not yet enough information on the mechanisms of absorption, transport, and elimination; but especially on the potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). There are therefore risks in the management of FLT3i DDIs (i.e. sorafenib, ponatinib, crenolanib, midostaurin, quizartinib, and gilteritinib) and ignoring them can compromise therapeutic success in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment, in complex patients and secondary pathologies.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the DDIs of FLT3i with P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting (OAT), organic cationic transporting (OCT), cytochrome P450 (CYP) subunits, and other minor metabolic/transport pathways. EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register and the Web of Science were searched. The last literature search was performed on the 14 February 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

FLT3i will be combined with other therapeutic agents (supportive care, doublet, or triplet therapy) and in different clinical settings, which means a greater chance of controlling and even eradicating the disease effectively, but also an increased risk to patients due to potential DDIs. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential interactions that may occur and be vigilant in monitoring those patients who are receiving any potentially interacting drug.

Evaluation of US Food and Drug Administration Drug Label Recommendations for Coadministration of Antivirals and Acid-Reducing Agents

Coadministration with acid-reducing agents (ARAs), including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine H2 -receptor antagonists (H2 blockers), and antacids has been demonstrated to reduce antiviral exposure and efficacy. Therefore, it is essential that US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels include recommendations to manage these drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This investigation analyzed information in FDA drug labels to manage DDIs between ARAs and antivirals approved from 1998 to 2019. To ascertain clinical adoption, we assessed whether FDA label recommendations were incorporated into current antiviral clinical practice guidelines. We identified 82 label recommendations for 43 antiviral approvals. Overall, 56.1% of recommendations were deemed clinically actionable, with the most common actionable management strategies being dose adjustment during coadministration (40.2%) and coadministration not recommended (9.8%). The sources informing DDI recommendations were clinical DDI studies (59.8%) and predictions of altered exposure (40.2%). Antivirals with low aqueous solubility were more likely to have label recommendations and were more commonly investigated using clinical DDI studies (P < 0.01). For recommendations informed by clinical DDI studies, changes in drug exposure were associated with actionable label recommendations (P < 0.01). The frequency of exposure changes in clinical DDI studies was similar across antiviral indications, but exposure changes were numerically higher for antacids (71.4%) relative to PPIs (42.9%) and H2 blockers (28.6%). Of DDI pairs identified within drug labels, 76.8% were included in guidelines, and recommended management strategies were concordant in 90.5% of cases. Our findings demonstrate that current regulatory oversight mostly (but not completely) results in actionable label recommendations to manage DDIs for high-risk antivirals.

Effects of CYP3A Inhibition, CYP3A Induction, and Gastric Acid Reduction on the Pharmacokinetics of Ripretinib, a Switch Control KIT Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

Ripretinib is a switch control KIT kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of adults with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors who received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Ripretinib and its active metabolite (DP-5439) are cleared mainly via cytochrome P450 enzyme 3A4/5 (CYP3A4/5), and ripretinib solubility is pH-dependent, thus the drug-drug interaction potentials of ripretinib with itraconazole (strong CYP3A inhibitor), rifampin (strong CYP3A inducer), and pantoprazole (proton pump inhibitor) were each evaluated in open-label, fixed-sequence study designs. Overall, 20 participants received ripretinib 50 mg alone and with itraconazole 200 mg once daily, 24 participants received ripretinib 100 mg alone and with rifampin 600 mg once daily, and 25 participants received ripretinib 50 mg alone and with pantoprazole 40 mg once daily. Ripretinib exposure increased with concomitant itraconazole, with geometric least-squares (LS) mean ratios of ripretinib area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to ∞ (AUC_0-∞ ) and maximum observed concentration (C_max ) of 199% and 136%. Ripretinib exposure decreased with concomitant rifampin: geometric LS mean ratios for ripretinib AUC_0-∞ and C_max were 39% and 82%. Pantoprazole coadministration had no effect on ripretinib pharmacokinetics. No unexpected safety signals occurred. No dose adjustment is required for ripretinib coadministered with gastric acid reducers and strong CYP3A inhibitors; patients also receiving strong CYP3A inhibitors should be monitored more frequently for adverse reactions. Concomitant ripretinib use with strong CYP3A inducers should be avoided. Prescribers should refer to approved labeling for specific dose recommendations with concomitant use of strong and moderate CYP3A inducers.

Phase I study to evaluate of the gastric pH-dependent drug interaction between famitinib and the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole in healthy subjects

To evaluate the potential gastric pH-dependent drug-drug interaction (DDI), safety and tolerability of famitinib co-administered with omeprazole in healthy subjects. Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled in a single-center, single-arm, open-label, fixed-sequence study. Famitinib was administered as a single oral 25 mg under a fasting condition on day 1, omeprazole (40 mg once daily) was given on days 10-14, concomitantly with famitinib on day 15, and for the follow-up 7 additional days (days 16-22). Blood samples were collected for the pharmacokinetic analysis of famitinib and its metabolite SHR116637 following each famitinib dose. Safety and tolerability were assessed during the whole progress via clinical laboratory tests. The least-squares geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% CI) of C_max, AUC_0-t and AUC_0-∞ for famitinib combined with omeprazole to famitinib alone were 0.989 (0.953, 1.027), 0.956 (0.907, 1.007) and 0.953(0.905, 1.005) respectively. For the metabolite SHR116637, their GMRs (90% CI) of the above parameters were 0.851 (0.786, 0.920), 0.890 (0.838, 0.946)and 0.887 (0.835, 0.943), indicating the absence of significant differences in the parameters. During the treatment period, 9(45%) subjects reported 16 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE), among which 6 subjects (30%) reported 9 TEAEs and 1 subject (5%) reported 1 TEAE during famitinib or omeprazole administered alone respectively, 5 subjects (25.0%) reported 6 TEAEs during in the combined administration phase. Omeprazole did not have a significant influence on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of famitinib and SHR116637, and the safety profile was good upon co-administration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT 05,041,920.

Improving Drug Delivery While Tailoring Prodrug Activation to Modulate Cmax and Cmin by Optimization of (Carbonyl)oxyalkyl Linker-Based Prodrugs of Atazanavir

Structure-property relationships associated with a series of (carbonyl)oxyalkyl amino acid ester prodrugs of the marketed HIV-1 protease inhibitor atazanavir (1), designed to enhance the systemic drug delivery, were examined. Compared to previously reported prodrugs, optimized candidates delivered significantly enhanced plasma exposure and trough concentration (C_min at 24 h) of 1 in rats while revealing differentiated PK paradigms based on the kinetics of prodrug activation and drug release. Prodrugs incorporating primary amine-containing amino acid promoieties offered the benefit of rapid bioactivation that translated into low circulating levels of the prodrug while delivering a high C_max value of 1. Interestingly, the kinetic profile of prodrug cleavage could be tailored for slower activation by structural modification of the amino terminus to either a tertiary amine or a dipeptide motif, which conferred a circulating depot of the prodrug that orchestrated a sustained release of 1 along with substantially reduced C_max and a further enhanced C_min.

Dose Individualization of Oral Multi-Kinase Inhibitors for the Implementation of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Oral multi-kinase inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape for various cancer types and provided significant improvements in clinical outcomes. These agents are mainly approved at fixed doses, but the large inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (efficacy and safety) has been an unsolved clinical issue. For example, certain patients treated with oral multi-kinase inhibitors at standard doses have severe adverse effects and require dose reduction and discontinuation, yet other patients have a suboptimal response to these drugs. Consequently, optimizing the dosing of oral multi-kinase inhibitors is important to prevent over-dosing or under-dosing. To date, multiple studies on the exposure-efficacy/toxicity relationship of molecular targeted therapy have been attempted for the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) strategies. In this milieu, we recently conducted research on several multi-kinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, and lenvatinib, with the aim to optimize their treatment efficacy using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach. Among them, sunitinib use is an example of successful TDM implementation. Sunitinib demonstrated a significant correlation between drug exposure and treatment efficacy or toxicities. As a result, TDM services for sunitinib has been covered by the National Health Insurance program in Japan since April 2018. Additionally, other multi-kinase targeted anticancer drugs have promising data regarding the exposure-efficacy/toxicity relationship, suggesting the possibility of personalization of drug dosage. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the clinical evidence for dose individualization of multi-kinase inhibitors and discuss the utility of TDM of multi-kinase inhibitors, especially sunitinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, and lenvatinib.

Vitamin C Improves Dasatinib Concentrations Under Hypochlorhydric Conditions of the Simulated Stomach Duodenum Model

PURPOSE

pH-dependent drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with poorly soluble, weakly basic drugs may lead to clinical implications. Dasatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with reduced absorption in patients on acid-reducing agents (ARAs). The objective of this study is to investigate the influence of gastric pH on dasatinib supersaturation and determine if vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid) can improve dasatinib concentrations under simulated hypochlorhydric gastric conditions.

METHODS

A dynamic, in vitro, multi-compartment, simulated stomach duodenum (SSD) model mimicking fluid volumes and transfer rates was used to investigate the concentration of BCS class IIb drugs versus time curves. Dasatinib and lamotrigine were explored under normal, fasted, simulated gastric fluids (pH 2) (FaSGF), hypochlorhydric simulated gastric fluids (pH 4.5) (FaSGF_hypo) and FaSGF_hypo with 1000 mg of vitamin C.

RESULTS

Significant supersaturation of dasatinib was observed in the duodenum compartment of the SSD model in FaSGF. A 90% reduction in dasatinib AUC_∞ was observed in FaSGF_hypo. Upon addition of vitamin C to FaSGF_hypo, drug concentrations were restored to those observed in FaSGF. Lamotrigine AUC_∞ in the duodenal compartment were similar in both FaSGF and FaSGF_hypo. The in vitro trends observed for dasatinib and lamotrigine are reflective of the trends observed in vivo in subjects receiving treatment with ARAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSD model serves as a good in vitro tool for assessing the effect of pH-dependent DDIs on bioavailability of weakly basic drugs with solubility/ dissolution limited absorption. Vitamin C provides a promising approach for improving bioavailability of poorly soluble, weakly basic drugs in hypochlorhydric patients.

Recent advances in the translation of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics science for drug discovery and development

Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK) is an important branch of pharmaceutical sciences. The nature of ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) and PK (pharmacokinetics) inquiries during drug discovery and development has evolved in recent years from being largely descriptive to seeking a more quantitative and mechanistic understanding of the fate of drug candidates in biological systems. Tremendous progress has been made in the past decade, not only in the characterization of physiochemical properties of drugs that influence their ADME, target organ exposure, and toxicity, but also in the identification of design principles that can minimize drug-drug interaction (DDI) potentials and reduce the attritions. The importance of membrane transporters in drug disposition, efficacy, and safety, as well as the interplay with metabolic processes, has been increasingly recognized. Dramatic increases in investments on new modalities beyond traditional small and large molecule drugs, such as peptides, oligonucleotides, and antibody-drug conjugates, necessitated further innovations in bioanalytical and experimental tools for the characterization of their ADME properties. In this review, we highlight some of the most notable advances in the last decade, and provide future perspectives on potential major breakthroughs and innovations in the translation of DMPK science in various stages of drug discovery and development.

The effect of esomeprazole on the upper GI tract release and systemic absorption of mesalazine from colon targeted formulations

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of coadministration of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) esomeprazole on the upper GI tract behavior and systemic exposure of mesalazine from two mechanistically different colon targeted delivery systems: Claversal (pH-dependent release) and Pentasa (prolonged release). To this end, gastric, jejunal and systemic concentrations of mesalazine and its metabolite N-acetyl mesalazine were monitored in 5 healthy volunteers following oral intake of Pentasa or Claversal with or without PPI pre-treatment (cross-over study). Our exploratory study demonstrated that pre-treatment with a PPI may affect the release and absorption of mesalazine from formulations with different modified release mechanisms. Upon intake of Claversal, the onset of mesalazine absorption was accelerated substantially by PPI pre-treatment. While the PPI-induced increase in pH initiated the disintegration process already in the upper GI tract, the release of mesalazine started beyond the proximal jejunum. Upon intake of Pentasa, PPI pre-treatment seemed to increase the systemic exposure, even though the underlying mechanism could not be revealed yet. The faster release of mesalazine in the GI tract and/or the increased systemic absorption following PPI pre-treatment may reduce the ability of mesalazine to reach the colon. Future research assessing mesalazine disposition in the lower GI tract is warranted.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of trazpiroben (TAK-906) in the presence and absence of the proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole

Trazpiroben, a dopamine D2 /D3 receptor antagonist under development to treat gastroparesis, displays decreasing solubility with increasing pH. This single-sequence, open-label, two-period, crossover study evaluated the effect of esomeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor that raises gastric pH, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of trazpiroben in healthy adults (NCT03849690). In total, 12 participants were enrolled and entered period 1 (days 1-3), receiving a single oral dose of trazpiroben 25 mg on day 1. After a 4-day washout, participants then entered period 2 (days 8-13) and received esomeprazole 40 mg once daily on days 8-12, with a single oral dose of trazpiroben 25 mg co-administered 1 h post esomeprazole dosing on day 11. Geometric mean area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞ ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) values were generally similar when trazpiroben was administered alone versus alongside esomeprazole (AUC∞ , 44.03 vs. 38.85 ng h/ml; Cmax , 19.76 vs. 17.24 ng/ml). Additionally, the associated geometric mean ratio (GMR; co-administration: administration alone) 90% confidence intervals (CIs) suggested no clinically meaningful difference between treatment groups (AUC∞ , GMR 0.88, 90% CI 0.78-1.00; Cmax , 0.87, 90% CI 0.70-1.09). Mean apparent first-order terminal elimination half-life values were similar between treatments, illustrating co-administration with esomeprazole had minimal effect on trazpiroben elimination. Trazpiroben was well-tolerated in healthy adults following administration alone and alongside esomeprazole, with no clinically relevant adverse events reported. The lack of evidence of any clinically meaningful drug-drug interaction supports the co-administration of esomeprazole with trazpiroben.

Characterizing the Physicochemical Properties of Two Weakly Basic Drugs and the Precipitates Obtained from Biorelevant Media

Generally, some weakly basic insoluble drugs will undergo precipitate and redissolution after emptying from the stomach to the small intestinal, resulting in the limited ability to predict the absorption characteristics of compounds in advance. Absorption is determined by the solubility and permeability of compounds, which are related to physicochemical properties, while knowledge about the absorption of redissolved precipitate is poorly documented. Considering that biorelevant media have been widely used to simulate gastrointestinal fluids, sufficient precipitates can be obtained in biorelevant media in vitro. Herein, the purpose of this manuscript is to evaluate the physicochemical properties of precipitates obtained from biorelevant media and active pharmaceutical ingredients (API), and then to explore the potential absorption difference between API and precipitates. Precipitates can be formed by the interaction between compounds and intestinal fluid contents, leading to changes in the crystal structure, melting point, and melting process. However, the newly formed crystals have some advantageous properties compared with the API, such as the improved dissolved rate and the increased intrinsic dissolution rate. Additionally, the permeability of some precipitates obtained from biorelevant media was different from API. Meanwhile, the permeability of rivaroxaban and Drug-A was decreased by 1.92-fold and 3.53-fold, respectively, when the experiments were performed in a biorelevant medium instead of a traditional medium. Therefore, the absorption of precipitate may differ from that of API, and the permeability assay in traditional medium may be overestimated. Based on the research results, it is crucial to understand the physicochemical properties of precipitates and API, which can be used as the departure point to improve the prediction performance of absorption.

[Drug-drug interactions of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma]

The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment strategy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with activating EGFR mutations, ALK or ROS-1 gene rearrangements. The Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency have approved several inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer : five tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, osimertinib and dacomitinib) and six tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting ALK (crizotinib, céritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib and entrectinib). Interestingly, these tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments are administered orally. While this route of administration improves the treatment flexibility and provides a comfortable and preferable option for patients, it also increases the risk of drug-drug interactions. The latter may result in changes in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors or their concomitant treatments, with subsequent risks of increasing their toxicity and/or reducing their effectiveness. This review provides an overview of drug-drug interactions with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR and ALK, as well as practical recommendations to guide oncologists and clinical pharmacists in the process of managing drug-drug interactions during the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Concomitant Gastric Acid Suppressants on the Survival of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The influence of concomitant use of gastric acid suppressants (AS) on survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is inconsistent according to previous studies. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of additional AS in patients with NSCLC taking TKIs.

METHODS

Relevant observational studies were identified by a search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Only studies with multivariate analyses were included. A random-effect model was used to combine the results.

RESULTS

Thirteen retrospective studies with 12259 patients were included. Pooled results showed that concomitant use of AS was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 1.89, P < 0.001; I ² = 65%) and overall survival (OS, adjusted HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.61, P < 0.001; I ² = 70%) in NSCLC patients taking TKIs. Sensitivity analysis limited to studies including NSCLC with EGFR mutation showed consistent results (HR for PFS: 1.53, P=0.003; HR for OS: 1.43, P=0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that the association between concomitant use of AS and poor survival was not significantly affected by the category of AS used (proton pump inhibitors or histamine type-2 receptor antagonists) or the country of the study (Asian or non-Asian, P for subgroup analysis all >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of AS in patients with NSCLC taking TKIs may be associated with poor survival outcomes.

Exploring the Relationship of Drug BCS Classification, Food Effect, and Gastric pH-Dependent Drug Interactions

Food effect (FE) and gastric pH-dependent drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are both absorption-related. Here, we evaluated if Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classes may be correlated with FE or pH-dependent DDIs. Trends in FE data were investigated for 170 drugs with clinical FE studies from the literature and new drugs approved from 2013 to 2019 by US Food and Drug Administration. A subset of 38 drugs was also evaluated to determine whether FE results can inform the need for a gastric pH-dependent DDI study. The results of FE studies were defined as no effect (AUC ratio 0.80-1.25), increased exposure (AUC ratio ≥1.25), or decreased exposure (AUC ratio ≤0.8). Drugs with significantly increased exposure FE (AUC ratio ≥2.0; N=14) were BCS Class 2 or 4, while drugs with significantly decreased exposure FE (AUC ratio ≤0.5; N=2) were BCS Class 1/3 or 3. The lack of FE was aligned with the lack of a pH-dependent DDI for all 7 BCS Class 1 or 3 drugs as expected. For the 13 BCS Class 2 or 4 weak base drugs with an increased exposure FE, 6 had a pH-dependent DDI (AUC ratio ≤0.8). Among the 16 BCS Class 2 or 4 weak base drugs with no FE, 6 had a pH-dependent DDI (AUC ratio ≤0.8). FE appears to have limited correlation with BCS classes except for BCS Class 1 drugs, confirming that multiple physiological mechanisms can impact FE. Lack of FE does not indicate absence of pH-dependent DDI for BCS Class 2 or 4 drugs. Graphical Abstract.

Clinical study of drug-drug interaction between omeprazole and pyrotinib after meal

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pyrotinib and determine the safety of this combination in healthy Chinese volunteers.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers were enrolled in this single-dose and self-controlled study. Pyrotinib (400 mg per oral) was administered 30 minutes after the standard meal. Omeprazole was administered from day 6 (D6) to D10 (40 mg, per oral). On D10, the subjects took omeprazole under fasting conditions, followed by pyrotinib 30 minutes after the standard meal. Blood samples for PK analyses in each phase were collected for analysing the drug concentration. Safety was assessed via clinical laboratory tests and physical examinations.

RESULTS

Compared with a single dose of pyrotinib, pyrotinib coadministered with omeprazole showed no significant difference in exposure, elimination, half-life and apparent clearance rate. The mixed-effects model revealed that the least-squares geometric mean ratios of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)_0-t , AUC_0-∞ and maximum plasma concentration (C_max, 90% confidence intervals) of pyrotinib alone and pyrotinib coadministered with omeprazole were 0.94 (0.82, 1.08), 0.94 (0.83, 1.08) and 0.91 (0.806, 1.038), respectively, indicating the absence of significant differences in AUC_0-t , AUC_0-∞ and C_max . During the treatment period, 6 subjects (33.3%) reported 8 adverse events during pyrotinib monotherapy and omeprazole administration, respectively; 10 subjects (55.6%) reported 34 adverse events in the combined administration phase.

CONCLUSION

Omeprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, did not significantly impact the PK properties of pyrotinib, and a good safety profile was observed on coadministration.

In Vitro-In Silico Tools for Streamlined Development of Acalabrutinib Amorphous Solid Dispersion Tablets

Amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) dosage forms can improve the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs, enabling the commercialization of new chemical entities and improving the efficacy and patient compliance of existing drugs. However, the development of robust, high-performing ASD dosage forms can be challenging, often requiring multiple formulation iterations, long timelines, and high cost. In a previous study, acalabrutinib/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS)-H grade ASD tablets were shown to overcome the pH effect of commercially marketed Calquence in beagle dogs. This study describes the streamlined in vitro and in silico approach used to develop those ASD tablets. HPMCAS-H and -M grade polymers provided the longest acalabrutinib supersaturation sustainment in an initial screening study, and HPMCAS-H grade ASDs provided the highest in vitro area under the curve (AUC) in gastric to intestinal transfer dissolution tests at elevated gastric pH. In silico simulations of the HPMCAS-H ASD tablet and Calquence capsule provided good in vivo study prediction accuracy using a bottom–up approach (absolute average fold error of AUC_0-inf < 2). This streamlined approach combined an understanding of key drug, polymer, and gastrointestinal properties with in vitro and in silico tools to overcome the acalabrutinib pH effect without the need for reformulation or multiple studies, showing promise for reducing time and costs to develop ASD drug products.

Clinical evaluation of the potential drug-drug interactions of savolitinib: Interaction with rifampicin, itraconazole, famotidine or midazolam

Aims

We investigated savolitinib pharmacokinetics (PK) when administered alone or in combination with rifampicin, itraconazole or famotidine, and investigated midazolam PK when administered with or without savolitinib in healthy males.

Methods

Savolitinib PK was evaluated before/after: rifampicin (600 mg once daily [QD] for 5 days); itraconazole (200 mg QD for 5 days); a single dose of famotidine (40 mg QD) 2 hours before savolitinib. Midazolam PK was evaluated before/after midazolam (1 mg QD) with or without savolitinib (600 mg QD). Each study enrolled 20, 16, 16 and 14 volunteers, respectively. Plasma samples were collected to determine the effect on PK.

Results

The geometric mean ratios (GMR, %) (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for savolitinib alone and in combination for C_max, AUC respectively, were 45.4 (41.4–49.9), 38.5 (34.2–43.3) in the rifampicin study (n = 18); 105.2 (87.7–126.3), 108.4 (96.3–122.1) in the itraconazole study (n = 16); and 78.8 (67.7–91.7), 87.4 (81.2–94.2) in the famotidine study (n = 16). The GMRs (90% CIs) for midazolam alone and in combination with savolitinib for C_max, AUC respectively, were 84.1 (70.0–101.0), 96.7 (92.4–101.1) (n = 14). Savolitinib alone or in combination was well tolerated.

Conclusions

Co‐dosing of rifampicin significantly reduced exposure to savolitinib vs savolitinib alone; co‐dosing of itraconazole or midazolam with savolitinib had no clinically significant effect on savolitinib or midazolam PK, respectively. Co‐dosing of famotidine with savolitinib reduced exposure to savolitinib, although this was not considered clinically meaningful. No new savolitinib‐related safety findings were observed.

Assessment of the Potential for Veverimer Drug-Drug Interactions

Veverimer is a polymer being developed as a potential treatment of metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Veverimer selectively binds and removes hydrochloric acid from the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in an increase in serum bicarbonate. Veverimer is not systemically absorbed, so potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are limited to effects on the absorption of other oral drugs through binding to veverimer in the gastrointestinal tract or increases in gastric pH caused by veverimer binding to hydrochloric acid. In in vitro binding experiments using a panel of 16 test drugs, no positively charged, neutral, or zwitterionic drugs bound to veverimer. Three negatively charged drugs (furosemide, aspirin, ethacrynic acid) bound to veverimer; however, this binding was reduced or eliminated in the presence of normal physiologic concentrations (100-170 mM) of chloride. Veverimer increased gastric pH in vivo by 1.5-3 pH units. This pH elevation peaked within 1 hour and had returned to baseline after 1.5-3 hours. Omeprazole did not alter the effect of veverimer on gastric pH. The clinical relevance of in vitro binding and the transient increase in gastric pH was evaluated in human DDI studies using two drugs with the most binding to veverimer (furosemide, aspirin) and two additional drugs with pH-dependent solubility effecting absorption (dabigatran, warfarin). None of the four drugs showed clinically meaningful DDI with veverimer in human studies. Based on the physicochemical characteristics of veverimer and results from in vitro and human studies, veverimer is unlikely to have significant DDIs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Patients with chronic kidney disease, who are usually on many drugs, are vulnerable to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The potential for DDIs with veverimer was evaluated based on the known site of action and physicochemical structure of the polymer, which restricts the compound to the gastrointestinal tract. Based on the findings from in vitro and human studies, we conclude that veverimer is unlikely to have clinically significant DDIs.

Potential Applications of Chitosan-Based Nanomaterials to Surpass the Gastrointestinal Physiological Obstacles and Enhance the Intestinal Drug Absorption

The small intestine provides the major site for the absorption of numerous orally administered drugs. However, before reaching to the systemic circulation to exert beneficial pharmacological activities, the oral drug delivery is hindered by poor absorption/metabolic instability of the drugs in gastrointestinal (GI) tract and the presence of the mucus layer overlying intestinal epithelium. Therefore, a polymeric drug delivery system has emerged as a robust approach to enhance oral drug bioavailability and intestinal drug absorption. Chitosan, a cationic polymer derived from chitin, and its derivatives have received remarkable attention to serve as a promising drug carrier, chiefly owing to their versatile, biocompatible, biodegradable, and non-toxic properties. Several types of chitosan-based drug delivery systems have been developed, including chemical modification, conjugates, capsules, and hybrids. They have been shown to be effective in improving intestinal assimilation of several types of drugs, e.g., antidiabetic, anticancer, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory drugs. In this review, the physiological challenges affecting intestinal drug absorption and the effects of chitosan on those parameters impacting on oral bioavailability are summarized. More appreciably, types of chitosan-based nanomaterials enhancing intestinal drug absorption and their mechanisms, as well as potential applications in diabetes, cancers, infections, and inflammation, are highlighted. The future perspective of chitosan applications is also discussed.

Evaluation of the Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors on the Efficacy of Dacomitinib and Gefitinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR-Activating Mutations

Introduction

Dacomitinib and gefitinib are irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR-activating mutations. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in healthy volunteers suggested that acid-reducing drugs such as proton pump inhibitors (PPI) decreased dacomitinib and gefitinib exposure by limiting the pH-dependent absorption. This analysis retrospectively evaluates the effect of concomitant PPI use on dacomitinib exposure and on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with dacomitinib 45 mg QD or gefitinib 250 mg QD in a 1:1 randomized phase 3 study (ARCHER 1050).

Methods

The analysis grouped all patients (n = 452) treated in each arm of the study as non-PPI users, PPI users, or extensive PPI users. PFS and OS data were presented by Kaplan–Meier plots and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Dacomitinib exposure was compared using a linear mixed-effects model.

Results

Results showed that dacomitinib PFS and OS did not differ significantly when comparing PPI users (N = 59) to non-PPI users (N = 152), while extensive PPI users (N = 24) had shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.94, p = 0.011] and OS (HR: 1.77, p = 0.027) when compared to non-PPI users. For patients treated with gefitinib, PFS did not differ significantly when comparing PPI users (N = 51) and extensive PPI users (N = 19) to non-PPI users (N = 159); however, both PPI users (HR: 1.65, p = 0.007) and extensive PPI users (HR: 1.70, p = 0.050) had shorter OS when compared to non-PPI users. Further analysis by adjusting potential confounders indicated no statistically significant differences in PFS or OS between any PPI user vs. non-PPI user groups in the dacomitinib and gefitinib arms. PPI use did not appear to affect dacomitinib exposure.

Conclusion

In conclusion, PPI use in patients with NSCLC likely has minimal impact on dacomitinib or gefitinib efficacy despite decreased absorption of these drugs observed in PK studies.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01774721

Pharmacokinetic effects of proton pump inhibitors on the novel PARP inhibitor fluzoparib: a single-arm, fixed-sequence trial in male healthy volunteers

Purpose To assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) effect of proton pump inhibitors on the novel poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor fluzoparib, and observe the safety of its co-administration with omeprazole. Patients and methods Sixteen male healthy volunteers (HVs) were enrolled in a single-center, single-arm, open-label, fixed-sequence study. HVs took fluzoparib (100 mg, p.o.) after meal consumption on day-1, took omeprazole 40 mg (p.o.) under a fasting condition from day-5 to day-9, and took fluzoparib (100 mg, p.o.) after meal consumption on day-9. Blood samples were collected at predetermined timepoints for PK analyses. Safety was assessed via clinical laboratory tests. The study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry on 30 September 2019 (NCT04108676). Results The peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) after fluzoparib administration was 2395.17 ± 418.27 ng/mL, the area under the curve (AUC) within 72 h (AUC0 - 72 h) was 26669.09 ± 7320.12 h·ng/mL, and AUC0-∞ was 26897.44 ± 7573.61 h·ng/mL. The Cmax after co-administration of fluzoparib and omeprazole was 2489.43 ± 423.72 ng·mL, AUC0 - 72 h was 30300.49 ± 8350.08 h·ng/mL, and AUC0-∞ was 30678.74 ± 8595.55 h·ng/mL. The geometric mean ratio of Cmax, AUC0 - 72 h and AUC0-∞ was 104.0% (90%CI: 94.8-114.0%), 113.6% (104.2-123.9%) and 104.1% (104.5-124.6%). The number of HVs with adverse reactions was identical (eight) for administration of fluzoparib and co-administration of fluzoparib and omeprazole. Conclusions The proton pump inhibitor omeprazole did not have a significant influence on the PK behavior of fluzoparib, and its safety profile was good upon co-administration with omeprazole. (NCT04108676, 30 September 2019).

A Systematic Review of Gastric Acid-Reducing Agent-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions with Orally Administered Medications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Several review articles have been published discussing gastric acid-related drug-drug interactions (DDIs) mediated by coadministration of antacids, histamine H₂ receptor antagonists, or proton pump inhibitors, but are not sufficiently comprehensive in capturing all documented DDIs with acid-reducing agents (ARAs) and tend to focus on gastric pH-dependent DDIs and/or basic drugs. Subsequently, several new drugs have been approved, and new information is available in the literature. The objective of this systematic review is to comprehensively identify oral medications that have clinically meaningful DDIs, including loss of efficacy or adverse effects, with gastric ARAs, and categorize these medications according to mechanism of interaction.

METHODS

An indepth search of clinical data in the PDR3D: Reed Tech Navigator™ for Drug Labels, University of Washington Drug-Drug Interaction Database, DailyMed, Drugs@FDA.gov, and UpToDate^®/Lexicomp^® Drug and Drug Interaction screening tool was conducted from 1 June to 1 August 2018. The PDR3D, University of Washington Drug-Drug Interaction Database, and DailyMed were searched with terms associated with gastric acid and ARAs. Conflicting findings were further investigated using the UpToDate^®/Lexicomp^® screening tool. Clinical relevance was assessed on whether an intervention was needed, and prescribing information and/or literature supporting the DDI.

RESULTS

Through the search strategy, 121 medications were found to clinically meaningfully interact with ARAs. For 38 medications the mechanism of interaction with ARAs was identified as gastric pH dependent, and for 83 medications the interaction was found to be not gastric pH mediated, with mechanisms involving metabolic enzymes, transporters, chelation, and urine alkalization. Additionally, 109 medications were studied and did not have a clinically meaningful interaction with ARAs.

CONCLUSION

This review may provide a resource to healthcare professionals in aiding the care of patients by increasing awareness of interactions with ARAs and may also identify and potentially aid in avoiding clinically relevant DDIs and preventing risk of treatment failure and/or adverse effects. Advances in non-clinical predictions of gastric pH-mediated DDIs may guide the need for a future clinical evaluation.

Amorphous Solid Dispersion Tablets Overcome Acalabrutinib pH Effect in Dogs

Calquence^® (crystalline acalabrutinib), a commercially marketed tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), exhibits significantly reduced oral exposure when taken with acid-reducing agents (ARAs) due to the low solubility of the weakly basic drug at elevated gastric pH. These drug-drug interactions (DDIs) negatively impact patient treatment and quality of life due to the strict dosing regimens required. In this study, reduced plasma drug exposure at high gastric pH was overcome using a spray-dried amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) comprising 50% acalabrutinib and 50% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS, H grade) formulated as an immediate-release (IR) tablet. ASD tablets achieved similar area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) at low and high gastric pH and outperformed Calquence capsules 2.4-fold at high gastric pH in beagle dogs. In vitro multicompartment dissolution testing conducted a priori to the in vivo study successfully predicted the improved formulation performance. In addition, ASD tablets were 60% smaller than Calquence capsules and demonstrated good laboratory-scale manufacturability, physical stability, and chemical stability. ASD dosage forms are attractive for improving patient compliance and the efficacy of acalabrutinib and other weakly basic drugs that have pH-dependent absorption.

Impact of histamine type-2 receptor antagonists on the anticancer efficacy of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Gefitinib is one of the standard treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. It has been reported that acid suppressants (AS) decrease the anti-tumor effect of gefitinib by reducing its solubility. AS is sometimes necessary in cancer patients; however, previous reports have not shown the most compatible AS with gefitinib administration in cancer patients. This study was conducted to determine if histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) can affect the anti-tumor efficacy of gefitinib.

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with NSCLC who were administered gefitinib were retrospectively investigated. Patients who were co-administered H2RA were compared with non-AS control patients. H2RA was administered once a day at about 3-5 or 8-12 h after gefitinib intake. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Median PFS in H2RA group and control group was 8.0 months and 9.0 months, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.82). The incidence of liver dysfunction was significantly less in patients administered H2RA, whereas there were no differences between the two groups with regard to skin toxicity and diarrhea. Multivariate analysis suggested that H2RA co-administration is not a risk factor for worse PFS and OS (hazard ratio of 0.95, 0.86; 95% confidence interval of 0.60-1.48, 0.52-1.43; p = 0.82 and 0.60, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that concomitant administration of H2RA with gefitinib does not affect the efficacy of gefitinib.

(Carbonyl)oxyalkyl linker-based amino acid prodrugs of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor atazanavir that enhance oral bioavailability and plasma trough concentration

We describe the design, synthesis and pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation of a series of amino acid-based prodrugs of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor atazanavir (1) derivatized on the pharmacophoric secondary alcohol using a (carbonyl)oxyalkyl linker. Prodrugs of 1 incorporating simple (carbonyl)oxyalkyl-based linkers and a primary amine in the promoiety were found to exhibit low chemical stability. However, chemical stability was improved by modifying the primary amine moiety to a tertiary amine, resulting in a 2-fold enhancement of exposure in rats following oral dosing compared to dosing of the parent drug 1. Further refinement of the linker resulted in the discovery of 22 as a prodrug that delivered the parent 1 to rat plasma with a 5-fold higher AUC and 67-fold higher C₂₄ when compared to oral administration of the parent drug. The PK profile of 22 indicated that plasma levels of this prodrug were higher than that of the parent, providing a more sustained release of 1 in vivo.

Application of Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict Gastric pH-Dependent Drug-Drug Interactions for Weak Base Drugs

Weak‐base drugs are susceptible to drug–drug interactions (DDIs) when coadministered with gastric acid–reducing agents (ARAs). We developed PBPK models to evaluate the potential of such pH‐dependent DDIs for four weak‐base drugs, i.e., tapentadol, darunavir, erlotinib, and saxagliptin. The physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of these drugs were first optimized using pharmacokinetic (PK) data following oral administration without ARAs, which were then verified with data from additional PK studies in the presence and absence of food. The models were subsequently used to predict the extent of DDIs with ARA coadministration. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the impact of gastric pH on quantitative prediction of drug exposure in the presence of ARA. The results suggested that the PBPK models developed could adequately describe the lack of the effect of ARA on the PK of tapentadol, darunavir, and saxagliptin and could qualitatively predict the effect of ARA in reducing the absorption of erlotinib. Further studies involving more drugs with positive pH‐dependent DDIs are needed to confirm the findings and broaden our knowledge base to further improve the utilization of PBPK modeling to evaluate pH‐dependent DDI potential.

Physiologically Based Absorption Modelling to Explore the Impact of Food and Gastric pH Changes on the Pharmacokinetics of Entrectinib

Entrectinib is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of TRKA/B/C, ROS1, and ALK with both systemic and CNS activities, which has recently received FDA approval for ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer and NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. This paper describes the application of a physiologically based biophamaceutics modeling (PBBM) during clinical development to understand the impact of food and gastric pH changes on absorption of this lipophilic, basic, molecule with reasonable permeability but strongly pH-dependent solubility. GastroPlus™ was used to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) model integrating in vitro and in silico data and dissolution studies and in silico modelling in DDDPlus™ were used to understand the role of self-buffering and acidulant on formulation performance. Models were verified by comparison of simulated pharmacokinetics for acidulant and non-acidulant containing formulations to clinical data from a food effect study and relative bioavailability studies with and without the gastric acid-reducing agent lansoprazole. A negligible food effect and minor pH-dependent drug-drug interaction for the market formulation were predicted based on biorelevant in vitro measurements, dissolution studies, and in silico modelling and were confirmed in clinical studies. These outcomes were explained as due to the acidulant counteracting entrectinib self-buffering and greatly reducing the effect of gastric pH changes. Finally, sensitivity analyses with the verified model were applied to support drug product quality. PBBM has great potential to streamline late-stage drug development and may have impact on regulatory questions.

Localized Metabolomic Gradients in Patient-Derived Xenograft Models of Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly recognized as a disease involving dysfunctional cellular metabolism. GBMs are known to be complex heterogeneous systems containing multiple distinct cell populations and are supported by an aberrant network of blood vessels. A better understanding of GBM metabolism, its variation with respect to the tumor microenvironment, and resulting regional changes in chemical composition is required. This may shed light on the observed heterogeneous drug distribution, which cannot be fully described by limited or uneven disruption of the blood-brain barrier. In this work, we used mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) to map metabolites and lipids in patient-derived xenograft models of GBM. A data analysis workflow revealed that distinctive spectral signatures were detected from different regions of the intracranial tumor model. A series of long-chain acylcarnitines were identified and detected with increased intensity at the tumor edge. A 3D MSI dataset demonstrated that these molecules were observed throughout the entire tumor/normal interface and were not confined to a single plane. mRNA sequencing demonstrated that hallmark genes related to fatty acid metabolism were highly expressed in samples with higher acylcarnitine content. These data suggest that cells in the core and the edge of the tumor undergo different fatty acid metabolism, resulting in different chemical environments within the tumor. This may influence drug distribution through changes in tissue drug affinity or transport and constitute an important consideration for therapeutic strategies in the treatment of GBM. SIGNIFICANCE: GBM tumors exhibit a metabolic gradient that should be taken into consideration when designing therapeutic strategies for treatment.See related commentary by Tan and Weljie, p. 1231.

Limited drug-drug interaction of elbasvir/grazoprevir for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The assessment of drug-drug interaction (DDI) is important not only for safety but also for maintaining the efficacy of direct acting antivirals in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). This study aims to evaluate DDI before and during elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) treatment.

METHODS

CHC patients who treated with EBR/GZR in five hospitals were enrolled. The patients' demographic data, comorbidities, concomitant medications taken before and during EBR/GZR were recorded. DDI was evaluated using a tool from the HEP Drug Interactions (www.hep-druginteractions.org) website. In addition to the evaluation of DDI for EBR/GZR, the virtual DDI of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) were evaluated. Degrees of DDI were classified as "do not co-administer", "potential interaction", and "potentially weak interaction".

RESULTS

A total of 460 patients were enrolled. At baseline, 80.1% of patients had one or more comorbidities and 72.8% took one or more medications. Cardiovascular diseases (43.9%), gastrointestinal diseases (37.4%), and metabolic diseases (36.7%) were the three most common comorbidities. The prevalence of DDI before EBR/GZR treatment was 12.8% (59 patients). Among the same population, the prevalence of virtual DDI of SOF/VEL, GLE/PIB, and LDV/SOF were 38.5% (179 patients), 48.8% (220 patients), and 57.0% (262 patients), respectively. During EBR/GZR treatment, 167 patients (36.3%) took newly prescribed medications. One patient (0.2%) and seven patients (1/5%) exhibited do-not-co-administer and potential interaction with EBR/GZR, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DDI was limited in treatment with EBR/GZR. DDI can occur upon the administering of a new medication during antiviral treatment and attention should be paid to it.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03706222.

Food, Acid Supplementation and Drug Absorption - a Complicated Gastric Mix: a Randomized Control Trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of food on gastric pH and the ability of over the counter betaine hydrochloride (BHCl) acid to reacidify gastric pH after food-induced elevations in gastric pH.

METHODS

This open-label cross over clinical study (NCT02758015) included 9 subjects who were randomly assigned to one of 16 possible, 4-period cross-over sequences to determine the impact and relationship of food and gastric pH with acid supplementation. Subjects were administered various doses (1500 mg, 3000 mg and 4500 mg) of betaine hydrochloride (BHCl) to determine the ability of acid supplementation to reacidify gastric pH after the elevation of gastric pH caused by the ingestion of food.

RESULTS

Following the administration of food and the resulting elevation in gastric pH, time to return to baseline gastric pH levels without acid supplementation was 49.7 ± 14.0 min. Administering 4500 mg of BHCl acid in capsules was able to reacidify gastric pH levels back to baseline following the administration of food in approximately 17.3 ± 5.9 min. AUC_pH of each treatment were similar and not statistically different. Mean max pH following the administration of food was 3.20 ± 0.55.

CONCLUSION

The ability of food to elevate and maintain gastric pH levels in the presence of acid supplementation was made evident throughout the study. A 4500 mg dose of BHCl was required to reacidify gastric pH after the administration of food. This study details the difficulty faced by clinicians in dosing a poorly soluble, weakly basic drug to patients receiving acid reducing agents where administration with food is recommended to avoid gastric side effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02758015.

Effect of concomitant dosing with acid-reducing agents and vemurafenib dose on survival in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma treated with vemurafenib ± cobimetinib

BACKGROUND

We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of concomitant acid-reducing agents (ARAs) and vemurafenib dose on the efficacy of vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma treated with vemurafenib or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib.

METHODS

Data were pooled for patients treated with vemurafenib or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib in the BRIM-2, BRIM-3, BRIM-7, and coBRIM studies. The primary end-points were progression-free survival and overall survival across patient subgroups defined by vemurafenib dose (full vs reduced) and concomitant ARA use (yes vs no). Objective response rate (ORR) was also analysed. Steady-state vemurafenib concentrations were evaluated according to vemurafenib dosing and concomitant ARA use across treatment cohorts in a subset of patients from BRIM-7 and coBRIM with available concentration data.

RESULTS

Efficacy analyses included 920 patients: 641 in the vemurafenib cohort and 279 in the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib cohort. Overall, no significant differences in survival outcomes were observed across subgroups according to vemurafenib dose and ARA use, with or without adjustment for known prognostic covariates, in both treatment cohorts. ORR was also similar across subgroups in both treatment cohorts. Steady-state vemurafenib concentrations were analysed in 389 patients (193 in the vemurafenib cohort and 196 in the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib cohort) and were generally similar across vemurafenib dose subgroups, regardless of ARA use in both treatment cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this retrospective pooled analysis suggest that ARAs can be used concomitantly with vemurafenib, alone or in combination with cobimetinib, without compromising the efficacy of vemurafenib.

Safety and Tolerability of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Oncology

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have dramatically improved progression-free survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who carry sensitizing EGFR-activating mutations and in patients with breast and pancreatic cancers. However, EGFR-TKIs are associated with significant and disabling undesirable effects that adversely impact on quality of life and compliance. These effects include dermatological reactions, diarrhoea, hepatotoxicity, stomatitis, interstitial lung disease and ocular toxicity. Each individual EGFR-TKI is also associated with additional adverse effect(s) that are not shared widely by the other members of its class. Often, these effects call for dose reduction, treatment discontinuation or pharmacotherapeutic intervention. Since dermatological effects result from on-target effects on wild-type EGFR, rash is often considered to be a biomarker of efficacy. A number of studies have reported better outcomes in patients with skin reactions compared with those without. This has led to a 'dosing-to-rash' strategy to optimize therapeutic outcomes. Although conceptually attractive, there is currently insufficient evidence-based support for this strategy. While skin reactions following EGFR-TKIs are believed to result from an effect on wild-type EGFR, their efficacy is related to effects on mutant variants of EGFR. It is noteworthy that newer EGFR-TKIs that spare wild-type EGFR are associated with fewer dermatological reactions. Furthermore, secondary mutations such as T790M in exon 20 often lead to development of resistance to the clinical activity and efficacy of first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. This has stimulated the search for later-generations of EGFR-TKIs with the ability to overcome this resistance and with greater target selectivity to spare wild-type EGFR in expectations of an improved safety profile. However, available data reviewed herein indicate that not only are these newer agents associated with the aforementioned adverse effects typical of earlier agents, but they are also susceptible to resistance due to tertiary mutations, most frequently C797S. At least three later-generation EGFR-TKIs, canertinib, naquotinib and rociletinib, have been discontinued from further development in NSCLC following concerns about their safety and risk/benefit.

A Proposal of Conducting Bioequivalence Trials with Gastric pH Modulators for Two Oral Formulations Demonstrating Different Dissolution Profiles at Elevated pH

In this paper, a special case for bioequivalence evaluation of oral formulations is discussed. Drug formulations with different forms of active moieties (e.g., free base and salt) may yield different dissolution characteristics and, thus, differ in absorption at elevated gastric pH. However, routine bioequivalence trials using subjects with normal gastric pH (i.e., ~ 1) may fail to identify these differences because dissolution/absorption profiles of the two formulations at normal gastric pH are similar. In the case of palbociclib, it is confirmedthat the free base and salt formulations showed different absorption in patients with different gastric pH. Significant reduction in drug absorption was observed only in patients with elevated gastric pH using free base formulation. The discovery that the free base had significantly reduced absorption hinged on the inclusion of enough patients with elevated gastric pH to detect a difference in a bioequivalence trial. This raises a concern, as demonstrated through simulation, that dissolution/absorption differences in other formulations could be missed in routine bioequivalence trials. Aside from differences in active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), other factors, such as changes in excipients or manufacturing methods, may also lead to exposure differences between formulations at elevated gastric pH. For formulations containing different forms of the same active moiety or the same API and showing different dissolution profiles at elevated pH (i.e., pH ~ 4–6.8), evaluation of bioequivalence with gastric pH modulators (e.g., a H₂ blocker) in addition to routine bioequivalence assessments may help to ensure therapeutic equivalence in patients with elevated gastric pH.