Molecular genetic heterogeneity in undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas

Prognostic values of molecular subtypes and SWI/SNF protein expression in de-differentiated/undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma

AIMS

Classification and risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) has transitioned from histopathological features to molecular classification, e.g. the ProMisE classifier, identifying four prognostic subtypes: POLE mutant (POLEmut) with almost no recurrence or disease-specific death events, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP), with intermediate outcome and p53 abnormal (p53abn) with poor outcomes. However, the applicability of molecular classification is unclear in rare but aggressive histotypes of EC, e.g. de-differentiated and undifferentiated endometrial cancers (DD/UDEC). Here, we aim to assembled a cohort of DD/UDEC from a single institution and analysed the prognostic significance of ProMisE molecular subtypes and the expression of SWItch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodelling complex members, previously implicated in the pathogenesis of DD/UDEC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We accrued 88 DD/UDEC cases, assessed POLE status by Sanger sequencing and performed immunohistochemistry for p53, mismatch repair and SWI/SNF proteins on the tissue microarrays assembled. Assignment of molecular subtypes was possible in 80 tumours; POLE sequencing failed in the remaining eight cases. There were 12 (15%) POLEmut, 44 (55%) MMRd, 14 (17.5%) p53abn and 10 (12.5%) NSMP DD/UDEC. POLEmut DD/UDECs had excellent outcomes, but the other three molecular subtypes all had poor outcomes, with no significant differences among them. The loss of one or more SWI/SNF proteins [AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A), ARID1B, SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4 (SMARCA4), SMARCA2], observed in 66% (55 of 83) cases, was not of prognostic significance.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that all molecular subtypes of DD/UDEC except POLEmut behave in an aggressive fashion. Further study is needed to determine whether these molecular alterations can be targeted with adjuvant therapy, in order to improve outcomes of patients with DD/UDEC.

Exploring the Genetic and Clinical Landscape of Dedifferentiated Endometrioid Carcinoma

Dedifferentiated endometrioid carcinoma (DDEC) is rare, has a poor prognosis, and the genes responsible for dedifferentiation remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of DDEC in Japanese patients and develop treatment strategies. Eighteen DDEC cases were included; their clinicopathological features and prognoses were analyzed and compared to those of other histological subtypes. The samples were divided into well-differentiated and undifferentiated components; immunostaining and whole-exome sequencing (n = 3 cases) were conducted. The incidence of DDEC was 2.0% among endometrial cancers. The 5-year progression-free survival and the 5-year overall survival for DDEC was approximately 40% and 30%, respectively. Immunohistochemistry showed that 66.7% of patients were mismatch repair deficient. The rate of p53 mutations was higher than that reported in previous studies, and patients with p53 mutations in the undifferentiated components had a poor prognosis. Whole-exome sequencing revealed different gene mutations and mutation signatures between well-differentiated and undifferentiated components. New genetic mutations in undifferentiated regions were uncommon in all three cases. One case (case 1) exhibited homologous recombination deficiency, whereas the other two showed microsatellite instability-high and hypermutator phenotypes. Genetic analysis suggests that immune checkpoint and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and drugs targeting the p53 pathway may be effective against DDEC.

Immune alterations and overexpression of CTCF in endometrial carcinoma: insights from molecular subtyping

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer (EC) is a prevalent epithelial malignancy originating in the female endometrium, and its global incidence has been on the rise over the past decade. Despite significant scientific progress has been achieved recently, the genetic factors underlying EC pathogenesis remain poorly understood, warranting further investigation.

METHODS

We employed transcriptomic datasets from the Genomic Data Commons database to extract variable and clinical data. Quantile normalization and log2 transformations were applied to obtain a gene expression matrix for the sample cohort. Various assays, such as quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), western blotting, immunohistochemistry (IHC), wound healing assay, transwell assay, and TUNEL assay, were employed in the study to examine the involvement of CTCF in EC cell biology. Additionally, in vivo experiments were conducted using a subcutaneous transplantation tumor model in athymic nude mice. The potential mechanism of action of CTCF was also illustrated by identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and functions after interfering with CTCF gene expression through the GSPAdb online database.

RESULTS

After categorizing 543 samples into cohorts with high and low ImmuneScores, we discovered 1025 genes that were differentially expressed, including 745 genes that were up-regulated and 280 genes that were down-regulated in the high scores group compared to the low scores group. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) analysis highlighted 11 genes with the highest mutation frequency. Furthermore, 16 immune checkpoints and 50 immune regulatory factors exhibited differential expression. Among these, CTCF was up-regulated in EC. We found that CTCF knockdown could diminish EC's invasive ability and metastatic potential while enhancing apoptosis. In vivo experiments corroborated that CTCF knockdown could reduce tumor growth. The GSPAdb online database identified differential expression pathways mainly enriched in cellular metabolism as well as some intracellular classical signaling pathways after interfering with CTCF gene expression. In addition, we identified potential downstream regulators of CTCF through protein interaction networks.

CONCLUSION

This study unveiled comprehensive molecular characteristics and DEGs in EC, emphasizing the up-regulation of CTCF in EC. Our findings collectively suggest that CTCF represents a promising therapeutic target, and our gene molecular typing model offers a novel approach for prognostic evaluation in EC.

p53 Immunohistochemistry staining patterns and prognosis significance in 212 cases of non-endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining pattern and prognostic significance of p53 in non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (non-EEC).

METHODS

This study retrospectively included 212 non-EEC patients, with histological types including serous carcinoma (SC), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), mixed carcinoma (MC), undifferentiated carcinoma (UC), and carcinosarcoma (CS). p53 IHC was interpreted as normal/wild-type and abnormal/mutant-type, the latter including overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic staining patterns. Moreover, uncommon p53 subclonal/heterogeneous staining patterns were described. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were employed as endpoints to evaluate the prognostic significance of p53.

RESULTS

In 212 non-EEC cases, 50 (23.6 %) were p53 wild-type, while 162 (76.4 %) displayed abnormal p53 staining. Overexpression was the predominant abnormal p53 staining pattern (122/162), complete absence followed (33/162). All SCs exhibited the mutant p53 staining pattern. The p53 abnormal expression rates in CCC, MC, UC, and CS were 37.5 %, 78.9 %, 35.7 %, and 75.7 %, respectively. Interestingly, of the 12 MC cases with SC components, barring one with p53 subclonal staining, all showed the mutant-type staining. The concordance rate for p53 expression between epithelial and mesenchymal components of CS was 94.3 % (66/70). Kaplan-Meier curves indicated patients with p53 abnormalities had worse DFS compared to those with wild-type p53 (P=0.025). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed that p53 (HR: 2.270, 95 % CI: 1.124-4.586, P=0.022) independently predicted DFS in non-EEC patients, though not for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-EEC patients with various histological types exhibit different p53 staining patterns. However, abnormal p53 expression, regardless of histological type, implies a poor DFS in non-EEC patients.

Histologic and Molecular Type Changes in Endometrial Cancer Recurrences in Comparison With Their Corresponding Primary Tumors

In this study, molecular alterations in endometrial carcinoma (EC) recurrences were analyzed. We aimed to identify genes implicated in tumor progression and to evaluate whether histologic and molecular type shifting occurs in recurrences. Thus, we analyzed 50 samples corresponding to 24 primary ECs (15 low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinomas [LG-EECs] and 9 high-grade endometrial carcinomas) and their corresponding 26 recurrences. These were studied by immunohistochemistry, next-generation sequencing, and MLH1 promoter methylation. We observed shared mutations in all primary tumors and their recurrences, indicating a clonal relationship between both lesions. Most morphologic and molecular changes associated with progression were found in LG-EEC. In this group, 6 patients (40%) presented additional mutations in the recurrence. These mutations more frequently affected genes of the PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway, implicating this pathway not only in tumor initiation but also in progression. In addition, 2 patients (13%) in which the primary tumor belonged to the nonspecific molecular profile subtype, shifted to the mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) subtype after the acquisition of MLH1 promoter methylation in the recurrence lesions. In 3 patients (20%) with MMRd, there was a change from LG-EEC to G3-EEC. One TP53-mutated LG-EEC transformed into an undifferentiated carcinoma in a mediastinal lymph node metastasis after losing the expression of SMARCA2 while preserving SMARCA4 and SMARCB1. Morphologic and molecular changes in EC recurrences, especially dedifferentiation and the acquisition of MMRd, should be considered for a correct diagnosis and treatment. MMRd should be tested in metastatic lesions, if available, in patients with primary tumors reported to be of a molecular subtype different from MMRd.

Moving into the modern era of molecular classification for endometrial cancer

The molecular subtypes of endometrial carcinoma (EC) were first described by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) a decade ago. Using surrogate approaches, the molecular classification has been demonstrated to be prognostic across EC patients and to have predictive implications. Starting in 2020, the molecular classification has been incorporated into multiple guidelines as part of the risk assessment and most recently into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging. This review article discusses the implementation of the EC molecular classification into clinical practice, the therapeutic implications, and the molecular and clinical heterogeneity of the EC molecular subtypes.

Dedifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma: A Rare Aggressive Neoplasm-Clinical, Morphological and Immunohistochemical Features

Dedifferentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma is characterised by the coexistence of an undifferentiated carcinoma and a low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The low-grade component in this subtype of endometrial carcinoma is Grade 1 or 2 according to the Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading system. The coexistence of low-grade endometrial carcinoma and solid undifferentiated carcinoma can cause diagnostic problems on histological examination. In fact, this combination can often be mistaken for a more common Grade 2 or Grade 3 endometrial carcinoma. Therefore, this subtype of uterine carcinoma can often go under-recognised. An accurate diagnosis of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is mandatory because of its poorer prognosis compared to Grade 3 endometrial carcinoma, with a solid undifferentiated component that can amount to as much as 20% of the entire tumour. The aim of this review is to provide clinical, immunohistochemical, and molecular data to aid with making an accurate histological diagnosis and to establish whether there are any findings which could have an impact on the prognosis or therapeutic implications of this rare and aggressive uterine neoplasm.

Genomic profiling of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas arising in the background of high-grade carcinoma: a targeted next-generation sequencing study

AIMS

Our understanding of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (DEC), a rare and aggressive malignancy, mainly reflects undifferentiated carcinomas (UC) arising in the setting of low-grade endometrial cancer (DEC-LG). However, cases of UC arising in the setting of high-grade EC (DEC-HG) have been noted in the literature. Our knowledge of the genomics of DEC-HG is limited. To characterise the molecular landscape of DEC-HC, targeted genomic sequencing and immunohistochemical analysis was carried out on seven DEC-HG and four DEC-LG.

METHODS AND RESULTS

DEC-HG and DEC-LG, including undifferentiated and differentiated components, both showed a similar frequency and spectrum of mutations. ARID1A mutations were identified in 6/7 (86%) DEC-HG and 4/4 (100%) DEC-LG, while SMARCA4 mutations were present in 4/7 (57%) DEC-HG and in 1/4 (25%) DEC-LG. Concurrent SMARCA4/BRG1 protein loss by immunohistochemistry was observed in 3/4 and 1/1 SMARCA4 mutated DEC-HG and DEC-LG, respectively. Neither genomic alterations nor protein loss in SMARCB1/INI1 were observed in any of our cases. TP53 mutations were detected in 4/7 (57%) DEC-HG and in 2/4 (50%) DEC-LG, while mutation-pattern p53 immunohistochemistry expression was observed in 2/7 (29%) DEC-HG and none of the DEC-LG. MLH1 mutations were observed in 1/7 (14%) DEC-HG and 1/4 (25%) DEC-LG. MSH2 and MSH6 mutations were each detected in 1/7 (14%) DEC-HG, but neither was associated with corresponding loss of protein expression.

CONCLUSION

The findings support expanding the definition of DEC to include DEC-HG, a previously under-recognised phenomenon with genomic similarities to DEC-LG.

The role of LncRNA MCM3AP-AS1 in human cancer

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNA) play pivotal roles in every level of gene and genome regulation. MCM3AP-AS1 is a lncRNA that has an oncogenic role in several kinds of cancers. Aberrant expression of MCM3AP-AS1 has been reported to be involved in the progression of diverse malignancies, including colorectal, cervical, prostate, lymphoma, lung, ovary, liver, bone, and breast cancers. It is generally believed that MCM3AP-AS1 expression is associated with cancer cell growth, proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis. MCM3AP-AS1 by targeting various signaling pathways and microRNAs (miRNAs) presents an important role in cancer pathogenesis. MCM3AP-AS1 as a competitive endogenous RNA has the ability to sponge miRNA, inhibit their expressions, and bind to different target mRNAs related to cancer development. Therefore, MCM3AP-AS1 by targeting several signaling pathways, including the FOX family, Wnt, EGF, and VEGF can be a potent target for cancer prediction and diagnosis. In this review, we will summarize the role of MCM3AP-AS1 in various human cancers.

ARID1A, BRG1, and INI1 deficiency in undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and next-generation sequencing analysis of a case series from a single institution

Undifferentiated/dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UDEC and DDEC) are rare, aggressive uterine neoplasms, with no specific line of differentiation. A significant proportion of these cases feature mutations of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex members, including ARID1A, SMARCA4, and SMARCB1 genes. To study these entities more comprehensively, we identified 10 UDECs and 10 DDECs from our pathology archives, obtained clinicopathologic findings and follow-up data, and performed immunohistochemical studies for ARID1A, BRG1 (SMARCA4), and INI1 (SMARCB1) proteins. In addition, we successfully conducted targeted next-generation sequencing for 23 samples, including 7 UDECs, and 7 undifferentiated and 9 well/moderately-differentiated components of DDECs. Cases consisted of 18 hysterectomies and 2 curettage/biopsy specimens. Patient age ranged from 47 to 77 years (median, 59 years), with a median tumor size of 8.0 cm (range, 2.5-13.0 cm). All cases demonstrated lymphovascular invasion and the majority (13/20) were FIGO stage III-IV. By immunohistochemistry, ARID1A loss was observed in 15 cases, BRG1 loss in 4, and all cases had intact INI1 expression. A trend for enrichment of the undifferentiated component of DDECs for ARID1A loss was seen, although not statistically significant. Sequencing revealed frequent pathogenic mutations in PTEN, PIK3CA, ARID1A, CTNNB1, and RNF43, a recurrent MAX pathogenic mutation, and MYC and 12p copy number gains. In DDECs, the undifferentiated component featured a higher tumor mutational burden compared to the well/moderately-differentiated component; however, the mutational landscape largely overlapped. Overall, our study provides deep insights into the mutational landscape of UDEC/DDEC, SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex member status, and their potential relationships with tumor features.

Generation and Integrated Analysis of Advanced Patient-Derived Orthoxenograft Models (PDOX) for the Rational Assessment of Targeted Therapies in Endometrial Cancer

Clinical management of endometrial cancer (EC) is handicapped by the limited availability of second line treatments and bona fide molecular biomarkers to predict recurrence. These limitations have hampered the treatment of these patients, whose survival rates have not improved over the last four decades. The advent of coordinated studies such as The Cancer Genome Atlas Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (TCGA_UCEC) has partially solved this issue, but the lack of proper experimental systems still represents a bottleneck that precludes translational studies from successful clinical testing in EC patients. Within this context, the first study reporting the generation of a collection of endometrioid-EC-patient-derived orthoxenograft (PDOX) mouse models is presented that is believed to overcome these experimental constraints and pave the way toward state-of-the-art precision medicine in EC. The collection of primary tumors and derived PDOXs is characterized through an integrative approach based on transcriptomics, mutational profiles, and morphological analysis; and it is demonstrated that EC tumors engrafted in the mouse uterus retain the main molecular and morphological features from analogous tumor donors. Finally, the molecular properties of these tumors are harnessed to assess the therapeutic potential of trastuzumab, a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) inhibitor with growing interest in EC, using patient-derived organotypic multicellular tumor spheroids and in vivo experiments.

Data Set for the Reporting of Endometrial Cancer: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) developed a standardized endometrial cancer data set in 2011, which provided detailed recommendations for the reporting of resection specimens of these neoplasms. A new data set has been developed, which incorporates the updated 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification of endometrial cancers, and other major advances in endometrial cancer reporting, all of which necessitated a major revision of the data set. This updated data set has been produced by a panel of expert pathologists and an expert clinician and has been subject to international open consultation. The data set includes core elements which are unanimously agreed upon as essential for cancer diagnosis, clinical management, staging, or prognosis and noncore elements which are clinically important, but not essential. Explanatory notes are provided for each element. Adoption of this updated data set will result in improvements in endometrial cancer patient care.

TCGA Molecular Prognostic Groups of Endometrial Carcinoma: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

The four TCGA-based molecular prognostic groups of endometrial carcinoma (EC), i.e., POLE-mutant, mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient, p53-abnormal, and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP), have recently been integrated into ESGO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines. The POLE-mutant and MMR-deficient groups are associated with high mutational load, morphological heterogeneity, and inflammatory infiltration. These groups are frequent in high-grade endometrioid, undifferentiated/dedifferentiated, and mixed histotypes. POLE-mutant ECs show good prognosis and do not require adjuvant treatment, although the management of cases at stage >II is still undefined. MMR-deficient ECs show intermediate prognosis and are currently substratified based on clinicopathological variables, some of which might not have prognostic value. These groups may benefit from immunotherapy. P53-mutant ECs are typically high-grade and often morphologically ambiguous, accounting for virtually all serous ECs, most carcinosarcomas and mixed ECs, and half of clear-cell ECs. They show poor prognosis and are treated with chemoradiotherapy; a subset may benefit from HER2 inhibitors or PARP inhibitors. The NSMP group is the most frequent TCGA group; its prognosis is highly variable and affected by clinicopathological/molecular factors, most of which are still under evaluation. In conclusion, the TCGA classification has improved diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of EC. Further studies are needed to resolve the points of uncertainty that still exist.

Endometrial Cancer: An Update on Prognostic Pathologic Features and Clinically Relevant Biomarkers

The prognosis of endometrial cancers has historically been determined by the evaluation of histologic typing, grading, and staging. Recently, molecular classification, pioneered by the 4 prognostic categories from The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, has been shown to independently predict the outcome, correlate with biomarker expression, and predict response to adjuvant chemotherapy. In modern-day pathology practice, it has become necessary to integrate the time-honored prognostic pathologic features with molecular classification to optimize patient management. In this review, the significance of the molecular classification of endometrioid carcinomas, the application of practical diagnostic surrogate algorithms, and interpretation of test results will be addressed. Histologic features and theragnostic biomarkers will also be discussed in relation to the molecular subtypes of endometrial cancers.

Uncommon and Difficult High-Grade Endometrial Carcinomas

This article presents features of uncommon high-grade endometrial carcinomas that often pose a significant diagnostic challenge. An update on undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma is first provided, followed by discussions on more recently defined entities such as mesonephric-like carcinoma of the endometrium and gastric-type endometrial carcinomas. Finally, endometrial carcinoma with germ cell or trophoblastic-like components is discussed.

ZEB1 expression is frequently detected in undifferentiated and dedifferentiated carcinomas, but is not specific among endometrial carcinomas

AIMS

The pathological diagnosis of undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UC/DCs) is prognostically important. However, undifferentiated components may be confused with other subtypes, particularly grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas (G3ECs). ZEB1 has recently been identified as a promising marker because it is frequently expressed in the undifferentiated components of UC/DCs, but not in other carcinomas. Therefore, we herein evaluated the diagnostic utility of ZEB1 with an emphasis on distinguishing between UC/DCs and G3ECs using an expanded cohort of endometrial carcinomas and carcinosarcomas.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immunostaining for ZEB1 was performed on whole-tissue sections of 19 UC/DCs, 194 non-UC/DC endometrial carcinomas, and 29 carcinosarcomas. Staining was defined as negative (<5%), focal (5-50%), and diffuse expression (>50%). ZEB1 was expressed in 84% of the undifferentiated components of UC/DCs (diffuse in 14, focal in two). Focal expression was observed in eight non-UC/DC endometrial carcinomas and diffuse expression in seven, with the latter comprising G3ECs (4/76), serous carcinoma (1/37), clear cell carcinoma (1/21), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (1/3). Epithelial differentiation was morphologically and immunohistochemically less evident in G3ECs and neuroendocrine carcinoma with diffuse ZEB1 expression. All carcinosarcomas showed diffuse ZEB1 expression in their sarcomatous components.

CONCLUSION

Immunostaining for ZEB1 was sufficiently sensitive to detect undifferentiated components. Diffuse ZEB1 expression showed high specificity for distinguishing between undifferentiated components and G3ECs; however, ZEB1 expression was not entirely specific to UC/DCs. The integration of ZEB1 into the diagnosis of UC/DCs requires careful examinations to exclude other tumours, such as less differentiated G3ECs, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and carcinosarcomas.

Rare Subtype of Endometrial Cancer: Undifferentiated/Dedifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma, from Genetic Aspects to Clinical Practice

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecologic cancers worldwide. There were 417,367 newly diagnosed cases and 97,370 deaths due to this disease worldwide in 2020. The incidence rates have increased over time, especially in countries with rapid socioeconomic transitions, and EC has been the most prevalent gynecologic malignancy in Taiwan since 2012. The new EC molecular classifications of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network include clear-cell carcinoma, serous carcinoma, and carcinosarcoma, while undifferentiated/dedifferentiated EC (UDEC) is not mentioned, and most previous clinical trials for EC have not included UDEC. UDEC is rare, has an aggressive growth pattern, tends to be diagnosed at an advanced stage, and is resistant to conventional chemotherapy. In this review, case series or case reports on the clinical features and genomic/epigenetic and expression profiles on UDEC data are summarized in order to identify potential molecular targets for current and future research.

Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel

It is often difficult to histologically differentiate among endometrial dedifferentiated carcinoma (DC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC), serous carcinoma (SC), and carcinosarcoma (CS) due to the presence of solid components. In this study, we aimed to categorize these carcinomas according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification using a small custom-made cancer genome panel (56 genes and 17 microsatellite regions) for integrated molecular diagnosis. A total of 36 endometrial cancer cases with solid components were assessed using IHC, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the custom-made panel. Among 19 EC cases, six were categorized as MMR-deficient (MMR-d) and eight were classified as having a nonspecific molecular profile. Three EC cases were classified as POLE mutation (POLEmut)-type, which had a very high tumor mutation burden (TMB) and low microsatellite instability (MSI). Increased TMB and MSI were observed in all three DC cases, classified as MMR-d with mutations in MLH1 and POLD1. Except for one case classified as MMR-d, all SC cases exhibited TP53 mutations and were classified as p53 mutation-type. SC cases also exhibited amplification of CCND1, CCNE1, and MYC. CS cases were classified as three TCGA types other than the POLEmut-type. The IHC results for p53 and ARID1A were almost consistent with their mutation status. NGS analysis using a small panel enables categorization of endometrial cancers with solid proliferation according to TCGA classification. As TCGA molecular classification does not consider histological findings, an integrated analytical procedure including IHC and NGS may be a practical diagnostic tool for endometrial cancers.

The Novel Phosphatase Domain Mutations Q171R and Y65S Switch PTEN from Tumor Suppressor to Oncogene

Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10, or PTEN, is a well-characterized tumor suppressor with both lipid and protein phosphatase activities. PTEN is often downregulated by epigenetic mechanisms such as hypermethylation, which leads to constitutive activation of the PI3K-Akt pathway. Large datasets from next-generation sequencing, however, revealed that mutations in PTEN may not only hamper protein function but may also affect interactions with downstream effectors, leading to variable oncogenic readouts. Here, two novel PTEN mutations, Q171R and Y65S, identified in Filipino colorectal cancer patients, were phenotypically characterized in NIH3T3 and HCT116 cells, alongside the C124S canonical mutant and wild-type controls. The novel mutants increased cellular proliferation, resistance to apoptosis and migratory capacity. They induced gross morphological changes including cytoplasmic shrinkage, increased cellular protrusions and extensive cytoskeletal reorganization. The mutants also induced a modest increase in Akt phosphorylation. Further mechanistic studies will help determine the differential oncogenic potencies of these mutants, and resolve whether the structural constraints imposed by the mutations may have altered associations with downstream effectors.

A Timely Update of Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Classification in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Endometrial Carcinomas

CONTEXT.—

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and has been traditionally classified based on histology. However, the distinction of certain histologic subtypes based on morphology is not uncommonly problematic, and as such, immunohistochemical study is often needed. Advances in comprehensive tumor sequencing have provided novel molecular profiles of endometrial carcinomas. Four distinct molecular subtypes with different prognostic values have been proposed by The Cancer Genome Atlas program: polymerase epsilon ultramutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated, copy number low (microsatellite stable or no specific molecular profile), and copy number high (serouslike, p53 mutant).

OBJECTIVE.—

To discuss the utilities of commonly used immunohistochemical markers for the classification of endometrial carcinomas and to review the recent advancements of The Cancer Genome Atlas molecular reclassification and their potential impact on treatment strategies.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and authors' personal practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The current practice of classifying endometrial cancers is predominantly based on morphology. The use of ancillary testing, including immunohistochemistry, is helpful in the identification, differential diagnosis, and classification of these cancers. New developments such as molecular subtyping have provided insightful prognostic values for endometrial carcinomas. The proposed The Cancer Genome Atlas classification is poised to gain further prominence in guiding the prognostic evaluation for tailored treatment strategies in the near future.

The MCM3AP-AS1/miR-126/VEGF axis regulates cancer cell invasion and migration in endometrioid carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) MCM3AP-AS1 plays an oncogenic role in several malignancies, but its role in endometrioid carcinoma (EC) is unclear. This study was carried out to explore the role of MCM3AP-AS1 in EC.

METHODS

A total of 60 EC patients were enrolled in this study. Expression levels of MCM3AP Antisense RNA 1 (MCM3AP-AS1), microRNA-126 (miR-126), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in tissues and transfetced cells were measured by RT-qPCR. Cell transfections were performed to explore the interaction among MCM3AP-AS1, miR-126 and VEGF. Transwell assays were perfromed to evaluate the invasion and migration abilities of HEC-1 cells after transfection.

RESULTS

MCM3AP-AS1 was upregulated in EC and predicted poor survival. MCM3AP-AS1 directly interacted with miR-126. In EC cells, overexpression of MCM3AP-AS1 and miR-126 did not significantly affect the expression of each other. In addition, overexpression of MCM3AP-AS1 increased the expression levels of VEGF, a target of miR-126. Moreover, overexpression of MCM3AP-AS1 and VEGF increased the migration and invasion rates of EC cells, while overexpression of miR-126 suppressed these cell behaviors. Overexpression of MCM3AP-AS1 attenuated the role of miR-126 in cell invasion and migration.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, MCM3AP-AS1 may serve as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) of miR-126 to upregulate VEGF, thereby regulating cancer cell behaviors in EC.

Cervical malignant mixed mesonephric tumour: A case report with local recurrence after six-years and next-generation sequencing analysis with particular reference to the ataxia telangiectasia mutated gene

Malignant mixed mesonephric tumours (MMMsT) of the female genital tract are extremely rare, and the majority are located in the wall of the cervix uteri. At present, there are no reports of the molecular characterisation of MMMsT of the female genital tract. Herein, we report the morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features of this rare malignancy using next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. A 58-year-old woman presented with vaginal bleeding. In 2013, she had been diagnosed with a cervical carcinosarcoma of probable mesonephric origin and International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB that had been treated by total hysterosalpingo-oopherectomy without adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Ultrasonography showed a vaginal mass measuring 25 mm in the maximum dimension. Biopsy was performed and showed a biphasic neoplasm composed of adenocarcinoma and sarcoma. Immunohistochemistry showed positive staining for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), pancytokeratin (MNF116), paired box 8 (PAX-8), β-catenin, cytokeratin 7, cyclin D1, GATA3 and CD10. Androgen receptor positivity was detected in very limited areas. Cytokeratin 20, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), transcription termination factor 1 (TTF1), Wilm's tumour antigen-1 (WT-1), calretinin and p16 were negative. The immunohistochemical profile was consistent with mesonephric origin. NGS analysis identified a variant of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene (p.Phe858Leu; c.2572 T>C; COSM21826). The number of detected allele frequency reads of ATM mutation following clinical relapse was higher, compared to its baseline: 65 vs. 96%. The differential diagnosis of MMMsT includes mesonephric hyperplasia, malignant mixed Mullerian tumour (carcinosarcoma), endometrioid adenocarcinoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma. The clinical significance of the observed ATM variant in the case reported herein is unknown. The present findings need further verification, as the mutation in ATM may result in chemotherapy resistance or conversely, may be exploited for targeted therapies.

Clinico-pathological significance of TCGA classification and SWI/SNF proteins expression in undifferentiated/dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: A possible prognostic risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Undifferentiated/dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UEC/DDEC) is a heterogeneous entity, which may show any of the TCGA molecular signatures and loss of the switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) proteins expression.

AIM

To assess the clinico-pathological significance of the TCGA molecular groups and SWI/SNF proteins expression in UEC/DDEC, through a quantitative systematic review.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for all studies assessing the TCGA molecular groups, i.e. POLE-mutant, mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), p53-abnormal (p53abn) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and/or the SWI/SNF proteins (SMARCA4/BRG1, SMARCB1/INI1, ARID1B) expression in UEC/DDEC. Student t-test, Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with long-rank test were used to assess differences among groups; a p-value<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the systematic review. Among the TCGA groups, the mean patient age was significantly higher in the p53abn group than in the NSMP group (p = 0.048). The POLE-mutant group showed advanced FIGO stage (III-IV) significantly less commonly than the NSMP (p = 0.003) and MMRd (p = 0.008) groups, and a significantly better prognosis than the NSMP (p = 0.007), MMRd (p = 0.011) and p53abn (p = 0.045) groups.The SWI/SNF-deficient cases showed a significantly worse prognosis than the SWI/SNF-intact cases (p = 0.010), while no significant differences were found regarding patient age and FIGO stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Among UEC/DDEC, POLE-mutant cases show good prognosis, while SWI/SNF-deficient cases show poor prognosis. The other TCGA molecular subtypes seem to be characterized by an intermediate biological behaviour. On this account, UEC/DDEC patients might be subdivided into three risk groups based on POLE and SWI/SNF status. Further studies are necessary in this field.

Endometrial carcinoma: molecular subtypes, precursors and the role of pathology in early diagnosis

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is classified into a wide range of morphological variants; this list has expanded over the past decade with the inclusion of mesonephric-like and dedifferentiated carcinoma as EC variants in the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours, and recognition that carcinosarcoma is a biphasic carcinoma rather than a sarcoma. Each EC variant has distinct molecular abnormalities, including TCGA-based molecular subtypes, allowing further subclassification and adding complexity. In contrast to this rapid progress in understanding EC, there are only two recognized EC precursor lesions: endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EAH/EIN) and serous intraepithelial carcinoma, a situation that has not changed for many years. Diagnosis of EC precursors is a cornerstone of surgical pathology practice, with early diagnosis contributing to the relatively favorable prognosis of EC. In this review we relate the precursor lesions to each of the EC morphological variants and molecular subtypes, discuss how successful early diagnosis is for each variant/molecular subtype and how it might be improved, and identify knowledge gaps where there is insufficient understanding of EC histogenesis. © 2020 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

BRG1, INI1, and ARID1B Deficiency in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis of a Large Series From a Single Institution

Switch/sucrose nonfermenting complex subunits, such as BRG1, INI1, and ARID1B, are inactivated in a subset of endometrial undifferentiated carcinoma and dedifferentiated carcinoma (DC). Limited information is currently available on their prevalence in other subtypes or the nosological status of endometrial carcinoma with their deficiencies. This study immunohistochemically examined the expression status of BRG1, INI1, and ARID1B using 570 archived cases of endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma resected at a single institution. We identified 1 BRG1-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma, 8 BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient DC, and 3 BRG1-deficient clear-cell carcinomas. None of the cases of endometrioid and serous carcinomas or carcinosarcoma showed deficiencies of these subunits. We then compared 8 BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient DC with 6 BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-intact DC and 28 carcinosarcomas, the latter of which was often confused with DC. Histologically, BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-intact and BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient DC shared a monotonous solid appearance with rhabdoid and epithelioid cells and a myxoid stroma; however, abrupt keratinization and cell spindling was absent in BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient tumors. The median overall survival of patients with BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient DC was 3.8 months, which was worse than those with BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-intact DC (P=0.008) and with carcinosarcoma (P=0.004). BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-deficient DC may be a separate entity with an aggressive behavior to be distinguished from BRG1/INI1/ARID1B-intact DC and carcinosarcoma. Regarding clear-cell carcinoma (n=12), BRG1 deficiency appeared to be mutually exclusive with abnormal ARID1A, BRM, and p53 expression. Further studies are needed to clarify whether BRG1 deficiency plays a role in the pathogenesis of clear-cell carcinoma.

Molecular Heterogeneity of High Grade Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Simple Summary

Due to its low frequency, high grade colorectal carcinomas (HG-CRCs) are underrepresented in molecular series. We intended to further characterize the pathological and molecular features of these tumors. In addition, morphologically different areas when present, were analyzed separately to study tumor heterogeneity. We found that most (72.5%) of HG-CRCs showed mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency. MMR status conditioned the frequency and the clonality of the molecular alterations found. Thus, whereas BRAF mutations and gene fusions were observed only in MMR deficient (MMRd) tumors, TP53, KRAS, and gene amplifications predominated in MMR proficient (MMRp) tumors. In MMRp tumors, gene amplification was a mechanism of progression, whereas the accumulation of mutations in genes of different pathways such as NOTCH, MMR or PIK3CA was involved in the clonal diversity of MMRd HG-CRC. In summary, intertumor and intratumor molecular heterogeneity in HG-CRCs is mainly due to MMR status.

Abstract

High grade colorectal carcinomas (HG-CRCs), which comprise 15% of colorectal carcinomas, are underrepresented in reported molecular studies. Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of 40 HG-CRCs are described. Moreover, glandular and solid areas of 25 tumors were separately analyzed. The expression of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6, p53, E-cadherin, CDX2, CK20, CD8, PDL1, PAN-TRK, c-MET, SMARCB1, ARID1A, SMARCA2, and SMARCA4 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Promoter MLH1 methylation was analyzed in tumors with MLH1/PMS2 loss. Next-generation sequencing was used to screen 161 genes for hotspot mutations, copy number variations and gene fusions. In this series, 72.5% of HG-CRCs showed mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). MMR deficient tumor and MMR proficient (MMRp) tumors showed striking molecular differences. Thus, whereas BRAF mutations were only observed in MMRd tumors, mutations in KRAS and TP53 were more frequent in MMR proficient tumors. Moreover, gene fusions (NTRK1 and MET) were detected only in MMRd tumors, whereas gene amplification (MYC, CCND1 and EGFR) predominated in MMRp/TP53-mutated tumors. Loss of expression of proteins involved in chromatin remodeling, such as ARID1A, was observed only in MMRd HG-CRCs, which also showed more frequently PD-L1 expression and a higher number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. The separate analysis of glandular and solid areas indicated that the clonal or subclonal nature of the molecular alterations also depended on MMR status. Mutations in genes such as TP53 and KRAS were always clonal in MMRp-CRCs but occurred as subclonal events in MMRd-CRCs. Gene amplification was implicated in the progression of MMRp tumors, but not in MMRd tumors, in which clonal diversity was due to accumulation of mutations in genes of different pathways such as NOTCH, MMR, or PIK3CA. In summary, intertumor and intratumor molecular heterogeneity in HG-CRCs is mainly due to MMR status.

Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated neoplasms of the female genital tract

Undifferentiated neoplasms in the female gynecologic tract comprise two main groups-undifferentiated carcinoma, most common in the endometrium and ovary, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, although tumors with an undifferentiated appearance may occur in all gynecologic organs. Their differential diagnosis is broad and generous sampling, careful morphological evaluation, judicious use of immunohistochemistry, and in many cases, molecular testing is often essential in the diagnostic work-up. As some of these neoplasms fail to respond to conventional chemotherapy regimens and/or radiation therapy, targeted therapy may be valuable in treating these highly aggressive tumors, thus the importance of precise diagnosis. In this review we discuss the clinicopathological features of undifferentiated carcinoma, dedifferentiated carcinoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, followed by a comprehensive analysis of morphological mimickers. Finally, we briefly review ovarian and lower genital tract tumors with an undifferentiated histological appearance.

Dedifferentiated Endometrioid Carcinomas with Neuroendocrine Differentiation: A Clinicopathological and Immunohistochemical Study of Three Cases

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between dedifferentiated endometrioid carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation and mismatch repair deficiency.

Patients and Methods

The clinicopathological records and samples of three patients were retrieved from the Pathology Department of Zhejiang University's School of Medicine Women's Hospital.

Results

The tumors comprised one dominant poorly differentiated component (60-90% of the neoplasm volume) and one well-differentiated glandular component. The poorly differentiated component showed solid sheets with organoid growth patterns and insular, trabecular and rosette/pseudorosette patterns. Large polygonal cells, vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm were observed in the poorly differentiated area. All three cases were diffusely positive for p16 and for at least two of three neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin, synaptophysin, neural cell adhesion molecule (CD56)) in >10% of cancer cells. Loss of MMR protein expression was found in two patients: MLH1 and PSM2 in patient 2 and MSH2 and MSH 6 in patient 3. Abnormal P53 and SMARCB1 (INI1) expression was noted in patient 3. All three patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and two received postoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. The patients survived disease-free for 60, 26 and 15 months, respectively.

Conclusion

Dedifferentiated endometrioid carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation may be associated with mismatch repair deficiency and have an improved prognosis.

Molecular Profiles of Mixed Endometrial Carcinoma

Mixed endometrial carcinomas are defined as a combination of 2 or more distinct histologic subtypes, one of which must be a type II tumor comprising at least 5% of the tumor volume. The oncogenesis of these tumors remains unclear, particularly in light of the increasingly appreciated morphologic overlap among subtypes, as well as evolving molecular data. We evaluated 8 cases of mixed endometrial carcinoma, including 4 endometrioid (EC)/serous (SC), 1 SC/clear cell (CC), and 3 EC/CC cases, to study the underlying molecular features and oncogenic mechanisms at play. Each component was analyzed by a targeted next-generation sequencing assay. All tumors shared mutations in both components. In 6 cases, one component showed additional mutations. Two EC/SC cases showed shared mutations and mutations unique to each component. When present, unique mutations were typically seen in the SC component, including variants in POLE and TP53, as well as potentially targetable genes DDR2, MAP2K1, and CCNE1. In EC/SC tumors, ERBB2 abnormalities were seen in 2 cases. EC/CC cases showed FGFR2 activating mutations in the EC component only. No fusion drivers were identified. Our data suggest that the majority of these tumors begin as a single clone and diverge along 2 pathways: (1) tumor progression, with one component showing additional mutations, and (2) tumor divergence, in which tumor components have both shared mutations and mutations unique to each component. In addition, the findings suggest a component of morphologic mimicry in these tumors. Our findings are clinically relevant since targetable mutations may be present in only one component of mixed tumors.

Clinicopathological significance of multiple molecular features in undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas

We investigated the clinicopathological significance of multiple molecular features in undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UDECs). Eighteen dedifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (DDECs) and three undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UECs) were collected. Polymerase-ε exonuclease domain mutations (POLE-EDM) were analysed by Sanger sequencing. SWI/SNF complex subunits, mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, p53, and PD-L1 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The SWI/SNF complex was inactivated in half of the UDECs; variably combined with deficient MMR (dMMR), POLE-EDM, or p53 aberrance. Deficiencies in BRG1 and ARID1A were mutually exclusive (p<0.05) in DDECs. ARID1A defects were mostly (8/9) associated with dMMR and typically occurred simultaneously in both endometrioid and dedifferentiated components, whereas BRG1 defects were less frequently (3/7) combined with dMMR and were only observed in dedifferentiated cells. Two-thirds of the UDECs displayed dMMR, mainly caused by the MLH1 promotor methylation. Mutant p53 immunostaining was detected in accordant or subclonal patterns. All three POLE-EDM UDEC patients had stage IA disease with either dMMR or p53 abnormality. Strong positive signals for PD-L1 were mainly detected in dMMR samples. BRG1 defects may likely trigger the progression of dedifferentiation in UDECs by superimposing the pre-existing driver events or by initiating UECs de novo, whereas ARID1A inactivation is subordinate and may likely be secondary to dMMR. The biological behaviours of BRG1-intact UDECs were evaluated according to The Cancer Genome Atlas molecular classification; their driver events require further analysis. Exact molecular subtypes can be helpful for clinical management and treatment decisions for patients with UDEC.

Establishment and characterization of VOA1066 cells: An undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma cell line

Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (DDEC) is a rare but highly aggressive type of endometrial cancer, in which an undifferentiated carcinoma arises from a low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. The low-grade component is often eclipsed, likely due to an outgrowth of the undifferentiated component, and the tumor may appear as a pure undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UEC). We and others have recently identified inactivating mutations of SMARCA4, SMARCB1 or ARID1B, subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex, that are unique to the undifferentiated component and are present in a large portion of DDEC and UEC. However, the understanding of whether and how these mutations drive cancer progression and histologic dedifferentiation is hindered by lack of cell line models of DDEC or UEC. Here, we established the first UEC cell line, VOA1066, which is highly tumorigenic in vivo. This cell line has a stable genome with very few somatic mutations, which do include inactivating mutations of ARID1A and ARID1B (2 mutations each), and a heterozygous hotspot DICER1 mutation in its RNase IIIb domain. Immunohistochemistry staining confirmed the loss of ARID1B, but ARID1A staining was retained due to the presence of a truncating non-functional ARID1A protein. The heterozygous DICER1 hotspot mutation has little effect on microRNA biogenesis. No additional DICER1 hotspot mutations have been identified in a cohort of 33 primary tumors. Therefore, we have established the first UEC cell line with dual inactivation of both ARID1A and ARID1B as the main genomic feature. This cell line will be useful for studying the roles of ARID1A and ARID1B mutations in the development of UEC.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma arising in the background of high-grade endometrial carcinoma - Expanding the definition of dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma

Dedifferentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma (DEC) is defined by the coexistence of undifferentiated carcinoma with low-grade (FIGO grade 1 or 2) endometrioid carcinoma. Few cases of DEC arising in the background of high-grade carcinoma (DEC-HG) have been reported, however, this phenomenon is poorly characterized. In this study we describe the morphologic, immunohistochemical and clinico-pathologic characteristics of DEC-HG. 18 DECs were diagnosed at our institution between 2008-2019, and in 11 (61%), the undifferentiated component was associated with high-grade carcinoma (8 endometrioid FIGO grade 3, 2 with ambiguous features, 1 serous). The remaining 7 (39%) represented DEC-LG (3 FIGO grade 1 and 4 FIGO grade 2). 7/11 (64%) patients with DEC-HG presented with advanced stage (FIGO stage III/IV), whereas most with DEC-LG (6/7, 86%) were stage I. On follow up, 2 patients in the DEC-HG group died of disease and 2 had progressive disease within 2 months of surgery. There was only one recurrence in the DEC-LG, 6 months post-surgery. The DEC component in both groups showed similar morphology and immunophenotype, with predominantly focal or complete loss of expression of pan-keratin, EMA, E-cadherin, CK8/18, PAX8 and ER. The DEC component in the DEC-HG group had wild-type p53 expression in 8/11 (73%) cases, loss of MLH1 and PMS2 in 6/11 (55%) and loss of SMARCA4 in 3/9 (33%). Although numbers are small, we show that DEC-HG is a previously under-recognized phenomenon, with morphologic and immunophenotypic similarities to DEC-LG, which supports expanding the definition of DEC to include DEC-HG. DEC-HG may be more aggressive than DEC-LG.

SWI/SNF-deficient malignancies of the female genital tract

Mutations and other molecular events involving subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex are common in a wide variety of malignancies, including those arising at various sites in the female genital tract. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas in the uterine corpus and ovary not uncommonly contain mutations in ARID1A and these also occur in other endometriosis-associated ovarian neoplasms such as seromucinous tumours. In these organs, mutations in SMARCA4, SMARCB1, ARID1A and ARID1B (with subsequent loss of corresponding protein expression as a reliable surrogate) are relatively common in undifferentiated carcinomas, including the undifferentiated component of dedifferentiated carcinoma. SMARCA4 mutations are extremely common (almost ubiquitous) in small cell carcinoma of the ovary of hypercalcaemic type (SCCOHT), occurring in about 98% of these neoplasms, often in association with epigenetic SMARCA2 loss. SMARCB1-deficient vulval neoplasms include epithelioid sarcoma and myoepithelial carcinoma, as well as related malignancies which defy easy classification. Recently the spectrum of SWI/SNF deficient female genital malignancies has been expanded to include SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and mural nodules of anaplastic carcinoma in ovarian mucinous neoplasms.

The frequency of POLE-mutation in endometrial carcinoma and prognostic implications: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is classified into four distinct molecular subgroups including ultramutated DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). POLE-mutated tumors have the best prognosis and are a promising target for immunotherapy. This meta-analysis consolidated the reported variation of POLE-mutant frequency and assessed prognostic value in EC.

Methods

Internet searches explored scientific data bases: EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Data was extracted from eligible studies including: sample size, number of positive POLE-mutant cases, sequencing information, clinicopathologic data, and survival data. Meta-analysis and a random-effects model produced pooled estimates of POLE frequency and prognostic parameters using 95% confidence intervals (CI), hazard ratios (HR), and odd ratios (OR).

Results

Six thousand three hundred and forty-six EC patient cases were pooled from 25 studies. The pooled proportion of POLE gene mutation in EC was 8.59% (95% CI, 7.01 to 10.32), of which 8.22% (95% CI, 6.27 to 10.42) were type I and 0.93% (95% CI, 0.34 to 1.81) type 2. Clinicopathologic data showed that POLE-mutated tumors are mostly endometrioid. They present at higher levels in earlier stages (I–II) of EC (89.51%; 95% CI, 81.11 to 95.66) at the highest grade III (51.53%; 95% CI, 36.08 to 66.84) with reduced myometrial invasion (OR, 1.48, 95% CI, 0.99 to 2.20). Survival analysis indicated favorable overall survival (HR, 0.90), disease-specific survival (HR, 0.41), and progression-free survival (HR, 0.23) for POLE mutant EC.

Conclusions

Almost one-tenth of EC patients have POLE-mutated tumors. Given their improved prognostic potential, identifying the POLE mutation status is key for the management of EC patients.

Endometrial Carcinomas with Intestinal-Type Metaplasia/Differentiation: Does Mismatch Repair System Defects Matter? Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Intestinal metaplasia/differentiation in primary endometrial carcinomas is an uncommon phenomenon, with only few cases described.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of endometrial carcinomas with intestinal metaplasia/differentiation interrogating the electronic databases Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus, and we reported an additional case arising in a 49-year-old woman.

RESULTS

We identified only eight patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinomas exhibiting intestinal metaplasia/differentiation, and additionally our case. Endometrial carcinomas with intestinal-type features can present in pure or mixed forms in association with usual-type endometrioid carcinomas; in mixed forms, the two neoplastic components may derive from a common neoplastic progenitor, as evidenced by the concomitant loss of MSH2 and MSH6 protein expression in our case. Disease recurrences occur in a significant fraction of the cases, including patients diagnosed in low-stage disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Endometrial carcinomas with intestinal metaplasia/differentiation are rare and they may represent a more aggressive tumor variant, thus requiring a proper treatment despite the low-tumor stage. The ProMise classification should be performed also in these unusual tumors, since they can be associated with mismatch repair system defects.

Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Ovarian Carcinoma: Frequency, Causes, and Consequences

Mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD) is involved in the initiation of both hereditary and sporadic tumors. MMRD has been extensively studied in colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer, but not so in other tumors, such as ovarian carcinoma. We have determined the expression of mismatch repair proteins in a large cohort of 502 early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma entailing all the 5 main subtypes: high-grade serous carcinoma, endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EOC), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), mucinous carcinoma, and low-grade serous carcinoma. We studied the association of MMRD with clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in EOC, the histologic type in which MMRD is most frequent. In addition, MLH1 promoter methylation status and massive parallel sequencing were used to evaluate the proportion of sporadic and Lynch syndrome-associated tumors, and the most frequently mutated genes in MMRD EOCs. MMRD occurred only in endometriosis-associated histologic types, and it was much more frequent in EOC (18%) than in CCC (2%). The most frequent immunohistochemical pattern was loss of MLH1/PMS2, and in this group, 80% of the cases were sporadic and secondary to MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. The presence of somatic mutations in mismatch repair genes was the other mechanism of MMRD in sporadic tumors. In this series, the minimum estimated frequency of Lynch syndrome was 35% and it was due to germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. ARID1A, PTEN, KTM2B, and PIK3CA were the most common mutated genes in this series. Interestingly, possible actionable mutations in ERRB2 were found in 5 tumors, but no TP53 mutations were detected. MMRD was associated with younger age and increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Universal screening in EOC and mixed EOC/CCC is recommended for the high frequency of MMRD detected; however, for CCC, additional clinical and pathologic criteria should be evaluated to help select cases for analysis.

TCGA Classification of Endometrial Cancer: the Place of Carcinosarcoma

In 2013, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network found four novel prognostic subgroups of endometrial carcinoma: POLE/ultramutated (POLE), microsatellite-instable/hypermutated (MSI), copy-number-low/TP53-wild-type (CNL), and copy-number-highTP53-mutant (CNH). However, poor is known regarding uncommon histotypes of endometrial cancer. We aimed to assess the genetic profile of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) on the light of these findings. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed through electronic databases searching (up to July 2019). All studies assessing UCS series for the TCGA classification were included. For each TCGA subgroup, pooled prevalence on the total UCS number was calculated. Four studies with 231 patients were included. Pooled prevalence of the TCGA subgroups were: 5.3% for the POLE subgroup, 7.3% for the MSI subgroup, 73.9% for the CNH subgroup, 13.5% for the CNL subgroup. The CNH subgroup predominates in UCS, while subgroups with high mutational load (POLE and MSI) are less common. UCS appears as a preferential evolution of CNH carcinomas.

Diagnostic accuracy of p53 immunohistochemistry as surrogate of TP53 sequencing in endometrial cancer

Aberrant p53 immunohistochemical expression is used to identify the copy-number-high/TP53-mutant subgroup of endometrial cancer (EC). We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of p53 immunohistochemistry as surrogate for TP53 sequencing through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched from their inception to June 2019. All studies assessing p53 expression and TP53 mutations in EC were included. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed based on area under the curve (AUC). Immunohistochemical criteria used to define aberrant p53 expression were "overexpression" and "overexpression or complete absence". Subgroup analysis was based on the sequencing technique adopted (Polymerase Chain Reaction + sequencing, or next generation sequencing, NGS). Thirteen observational studies with 727 endometrial cancers were included. Both "overexpression" and "overexpression or complete absence" showed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.9088 and 0.9030, respectively). The subgroup with "overexpression" and NGS showed the best results, with very high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.9927). In conclusion, immunohistochemistry for p53 is a highly accurate surrogate of TP53 sequencing. Overexpression of p53 in ≥70-80% showed the best accuracy in predicting TP53 mutations. Further studies in this field should adopt optimized immunohistochemical procedures and take into account less common p53 patterns (e.g. cytoplasmic expression).

Impact of endometrial carcinoma histotype on the prognostic value of the TCGA molecular subgroups

BACKGROUND

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) identified four prognostic subgroups of endometrial carcinoma: copy-number-low/p53-wild-type (p53wt), POLE-mutated/ultramutated (POLEmt), microsatellite-instability/hypermutated (MSI), and copy-number-high/p53-mutated (p53mt). However, it is still unclear if they may be integrated with the current histopathological prognostic factors, such as histotype.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of histotype on the prognostic value of the TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching 7 electronic databases from their inception to April 2019 for studies assessing prognosis in all TCGA subgroups of endometrial carcinoma. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was calculated in two different groups ("all-histotypes" and "endometrioid"), using p53wt subgroup as reference standard; HR for non-endometrioid histotypes was calculated indirectly. Disease-specific survival and progression-free survival were assessed as additional analyses.

RESULTS

Six studies with 2818 patients were included. In the p53mt subgroup, pooled HRs for OS were 4.322 (all-histotypes), 2.505 (endometrioid), and 4.937 (non-endometrioid). In the MSI subgroup, pooled HRs were 1.965 (all-histotypes), 1.287 (endometrioid), and 6.361 (non-endometrioid). In the POLEmt subgroup, pooled HRs were 0.763 (all-histotypes), 0.481 (endometrioid), and 2.634 (non-endometrioid). Results of additional analyses were consistent for all subgroups except for non-endometrioid POLEmt carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

Histotype of endometrial carcinoma shows a crucial prognostic value independently of the TCGA molecular subgroup, with non-endometrioid carcinomas having a worse prognosis in each TCGA subgroup. Histotype should be integrated with molecular characterization for the risk stratification of patients in the future.

TCGA Molecular Subgroups in Endometrial Undifferentiated/Dedifferentiated Carcinoma

We aimed to classify undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma (UDC/DDC) according to the four TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer: microsatellite-instable/hypermutated (MSI), POLE-mutant/ultramutated (POLE), copy-number-low/p53-wild-type (p53wt), and copy-number-high/p53-abnormal (p53abn), through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched from January 2013 to July 2019 for studies assessing the TCGA classification in endometrial UDC/DDC series. Pooled prevalence of each TCGA subgroup on the total UDC/DDCs was calculated. Three studies with 73 patients were included. Pooled prevalence of the TCGA subgroups were: 12.4% for the POLE subgroup, 44% for the MSI subgroup, 18.6% for the p53abn subgroup, 25% for the p53wt group. All TCGA groups are represented in UDC/DDC, with a predominance of the MSI group, indicating a biological heterogeneity. Hypermutated/ultramutated cancers constitute the majority of UDC/DDC, suggesting a crucial difference with other high-risk histologies of endometrial carcinoma.

High-Grade Endometrial Carcinomas: Classification with Molecular Insights

This article provides an overview of the current diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma subtypes and provides updates, including the most recent molecular findings from The Cancer Genome Atlas and others. Interpretation of relevant immunohistochemistry and critical diagnostic differential diagnosis with pitfalls are discussed.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: a National Cancer Database analysis of prognostic factors and treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND

Undifferentiated endometrioid endometrial carcinoma of the uterus is a rare, highly aggressive, and under-recognized subtype of endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates survival, prognostic factors for survival, and treatment outcomes associated with undifferentiated endometrial cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with undifferentiated endometrial cancer who underwent definitive primary surgical treatment. Patients with all other histologic subtypes or incomplete treatment data were excluded. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors for survival. Points for each prognostic factor were assigned from regression coefficients in the final multivariable model and summed for a total score. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to determine cut-offs in the score to identify unique prognostic groups.

RESULTS

Among 349 404 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 2004 to 2013, 3994 (1.1%) met the criteria for diagnosis of undifferentiated endometrial cancer and 3486 had survival data. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (interquartile range (IQR) 57-74) and 58% of patients had early stage disease. Median interval from diagnosis to surgery was 3.7 weeks (IQR 2.0-5.7). Five year overall survival was 57% (standard error (SE) 1%). Stage was the strongest predictor of survival, with a 15-20% decrement in 5 year survival for each advance in stage. Stage, age, race, and presence of comorbidities were independent predictors of survival and were used to categorize patients into five prognostic groups. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival across most disease stages and prognostic groups. Multimodal adjuvant therapy was superior to unimodal treatment particularly in advanced stage unfavorable and very unfavorable groups.

CONCLUSION

In women with undifferentiated endometrial cancer, survival is primarily driven by stage. Despite the poor overall prognosis of undifferentiated endometrial cancer, multimodal adjuvant therapy is a key component of treatment.

Molecular profiling and molecular classification of endometrioid ovarian carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

Endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (EOCs) comprise 5-10% of all ovarian cancers and commonly co-occur with synchronous endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). We sought to examine the molecular characteristics of pure EOCs in patients without concomitant EEC.

METHODS

EOCs and matched normal samples were subjected to massively parallel sequencing targeting 341-468 cancer-related genes (n = 8) or whole-genome sequencing (n = 28). Mutational frequencies of EOCs were compared to those of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs; n = 224) and EECs (n = 186) from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and synchronous EOCs (n = 23).

RESULTS

EOCs were heterogeneous, frequently harboring KRAS, PIK3CA, PTEN, CTNNB1, ARID1A and TP53 mutations. EOCs were distinct from HGSOCs at the mutational level, less frequently harboring TP53 but more frequently displaying KRAS, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN and CTNNB1 mutations. Compared to synchronous EOCs and pure EECs, pure EOCs less frequently harbored PTEN, PIK3R1 and ARID1A mutations. Akin to EECs, EOCs could be stratified into the four molecular subtypes: 3% POLE (ultramutated), 19% MSI (hypermutated), 17% copy-number high (serous-like) and 61% copy-number low (endometrioid). In addition to microsatellite instability, a subset of EOCs harbored potentially targetable mutations, including AKT1 and ERBB2 hotspot mutations. EOCs of MSI (hypermutated) subtype uniformly displayed a good outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

EOCs are heterogeneous at the genomic level and harbor targetable genetic alterations. Despite the similarities in the repertoire of somatic mutations between pure EOCs, synchronous EOCs and EECs, the frequencies of mutations affecting known driver genes differ. Further studies are required to define the impact of the molecular subtypes on the outcome and treatment of EOC patients.

Molecular Basis of Tumor Heterogeneity in Endometrial Carcinosarcoma

Endometrial carcinosarcoma (ECS) represents one of the most extreme examples of tumor heterogeneity among human cancers. ECS is a clinically aggressive, high-grade, metaplastic carcinoma. At the morphological level, intratumor heterogeneity in ECS is due to an admixture of epithelial (carcinoma) and mesenchymal (sarcoma) components that can include heterologous tissues, such as skeletal muscle, cartilage, or bone. Most ECSs belong to the copy-number high serous-like molecular subtype of endometrial carcinoma, characterized by the TP53 mutation and the frequently accompanied by a large number of gene copy-number alterations, including the amplification of important oncogenes, such as CCNE1 and c-MYC. However, a proportion of cases (20%) probably represent the progression of tumors initially belonging to the copy-number low endometrioid-like molecular subtype (characterized by mutations in genes such as PTEN, PI3KCA, or ARID1A), after the acquisition of the TP53 mutations. Only a few ECS belong to the microsatellite-unstable hypermutated molecular type and the POLE-mutated, ultramutated molecular type. A common characteristic of all ECSs is the modulation of genes involved in the epithelial to mesenchymal process. Thus, the acquisition of a mesenchymal phenotype is associated with a switch from E- to N-cadherin, the up-regulation of transcriptional repressors of E-cadherin, such as Snail Family Transcriptional Repressor 1 and 2 (SNAI1 and SNAI2), Zinc Finger E-Box Binding Homeobox 1 and 2 (ZEB1 and ZEB2), and the down-regulation, among others, of members of the miR-200 family involved in the maintenance of an epithelial phenotype. Subsequent differentiation to different types of mesenchymal tissues increases tumor heterogeneity and probably modulates clinical behavior and therapy response.