Inotuzumab ozogamicin as single agent in pediatric patients with relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from a phase II trial

Safety evaluation of inotuzumab ozogamicin: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database

OBJECTIVE

Given inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) relatively recent market introduction and ongoing new drug surveillance period, further research is needed on its adverse drug events (ADEs) in the real world.

METHODS

Retrieve and analyze ADE reports associated with InO from the FAERS database, covering the period from 2004Q1 to 2024Q3, and employ the reporting odds ratio (ROR) methodology to conduct signal detection for InO-related ADEs.

RESULTS

This study analyzed 1007 (2725 ADEs) patients, focusing on critical issues like veno-occlusive liver disease (VOD) ( n = 97, ROR = 486.02), infections ( n = 20, ROR = 3.27), and febrile neutropenia ( n = 57, ROR = 20.43). Additionally, it also revealed some new ADEs, including sepsis ( n = 35, ROR = 7.14), cytokine release syndrome ( n = 22, ROR = 36.78), graft-versus-host disease ( n = 20, ROR = 62.21), enterocolitis infectious ( n = 3, ROR = 69.07), pneumonia fungal ( n = 6, ROR = 30.76), and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome ( n = 21, ROR = 10.65), among others. Consequently, it is imperative to exercise increased vigilance regarding these potential ADEs in the clinical administration of InO.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the potential ADEs and associated risks with the clinical application of InO, with particular emphasis on the risks of VOD, infections, and febrile neutropenia. The implementation of a vigilant monitoring strategy is crucial for the early detection and timely management of these potential complications.

Overcoming the novel glycan-lectin checkpoints in tumor microenvironments for the success of the cross-presentation-based immunotherapy

In pursuit of meeting the ever-rising demand for cancer therapies, cross-presentation-based glyconanovaccines (GNVs) targeting C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) on DCs have shown significant potential as cutting-edge cancer immunotherapy. GNVs are an attractive approach to induce anti-cancer cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. Despite immune checkpoints (ICs) being well established and an obstacle to the success of GNVs, glycan-lectin circuits are emerging as unique checkpoints due to their immunomodulatory functions. Given the role of aberrant tumor glycosylation in promoting immune evasion, mitigating these effects is crucial for the efficacy of GNVs. Lectins, such as siglecs and galectins, are detrimental to the tumor immune landscape as they promote an immunosuppressive TME. From this perspective, this review aims to explore glycan-lectin ICs and their influence on the efficacy of GNVs. We aim to discuss various ICs in the TME followed by drawbacks of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We will also emphasize the altered glycosylation profile of tumors, addressing their immunosuppressive nature along with ways in which CLRs, siglecs, and galectins contribute to immune evasion and cancer progression. Considering the resistance towards ICIs, current and prospective approaches for targeting glycan-lectin circuits and future prospects of these endeavors in harnessing the full potential of GNVs will also be highlighted.

Clinical outcomes and relapse patterns in pediatric acute leukemia patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation: a multicenter Brazilian experience

Background

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) represents a well-established therapeutic strategy for high-risk leukemia, though post-transplant relapse remains a significant challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Procedure

In this retrospective study, we analyzed medical records of 310 pediatric patients (age < 18 years) who underwent HCT for acute leukemias at four Brazilian institutions between 2010 and 2019.

Results

The cohort included patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; 74.2%) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML; 25.8%). The median age was 9.52 years (range: 0.25-17.97), with male predominance (68.3%). Total body irradiation (TBI)-based conditioning was utilized in 72.6% of cases, and bone marrow served as the predominant graft source (74.5%). Prior to transplantation, 46.5% of patients were in first complete remission. Post-transplant relapse occurred in 36.7% of patients at a median of 245 days (range: 38-2,505). With a median follow-up of 2,019 days (5.5 years), overall survival was 69.3% at one year, declining to 62.4% at two years. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 12.6%, 28.8%, and 33.4% at 100 days, one year, and two years post-HCT, respectively. Adjusted analysis revealed increased relapse risk in patients with mixed donor chimerism, positive minimal residual disease (MRD) status before HCT, and disease status beyond first complete remission (including CR2, advanced disease, and refractory disease).

Conclusions

These findings underscore the elevated relapse risk associated with advanced disease status, positive pre-HCT MRD, and mixed donor chimerism post-transplant. Future interventions should prioritize improving diagnostic capabilities, expanding access to modern treatment protocols, and facilitating early referral to transplant centers, particularly for aggressive disease presentations.

DNTT-mediated DNA damage response drives inotuzumab ozogamicin resistance in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

ABSTRACT

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-calicheamicin conjugate with striking efficacy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, there is wide interpatient variability in treatment response, and the genetic basis of this variation remains largely unknown. Using a genome-wide CRISPR screen, we discovered that the loss of DNA nucleotidylexotransferase (DNTT) is a primary driver of InO resistance. Mechanistically, the downregulation of DNTT attenuated InO-induced DNA damage response, cell cycle arrest, and mitochondrial apoptotic priming, thereby ultimately leading to leukemia resistance to InO. Ex vivo leukemia InO sensitivity was highly associated with DNTT expression in ALL blasts with substantial intraleukemia heterogeneity as revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Among patients with B-ALL enrolled in the Children's Oncology Group trial AALL1621, we observed consistent DNTT downregulation in residual blasts following InO treatment. The selection of DNTT-low blasts by InO therapy was also recapitulated in vivo using patient-derived xenograft models. Collectively, our data indicate that DNTT is a key regulator of calicheamicin response in leukemia and thus a potential biomarker for individualizing InO therapy in B-ALL.

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as a Bridge to Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed Pediatric BCP-ALL After Tisagenlecleucel: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy tisagenlecleucel has shown promising results in the treatment of pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). However, around 50% of patients relapse after tisagenlecleucel. Following multiple relapses, limited treatment options are left, and the prognosis is dismal. We report on four pediatric patients who relapsed after tisagenlecleucel and were treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO).

CASE

Four patients with BCP-ALL received tisagenlecleucel after second relapse (3/4) or refractory disease at first relapse (1/4). Three patients relapsed with CD19NEG/CD22POS BCP-ALL, one with CD19POS/CD22POS BCP-ALL. Following relapse, they received treatment with InO. After the first InO cycle, all achieved complete remission (CR), three without measurable residual disease. After two or three InO cycles, they underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). One patient developed an isolated extramedullary relapse (IEM) in both anterior eye chambers six and nine months after allo-HSCT and received palliative radiotherapy. This patient was in CR at the last follow-up 25 months later. The other patients were also in CR at the last follow-up (mean 31.3 months).

CONCLUSION

InO can be used successfully and safely for the treatment of CD22POS BCP-ALL relapse after tisagenlecleucel as a bridge to allo-HSCT in heavily pretreated pediatric patients.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia-a deep dive into pharmacokinetics, -dynamics, and -genetics of antileukemic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is important to optimize drug exposure and minimize toxicity for the individual patient.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review covers the pharmacokinetics (PK), -dynamics (PD) and -genetics of classic chemotherapeutic drugs used in frontline therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), including anthracyclines, asparaginase, busulfan, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, glucocorticoids, methotrexate, nelarabine, thiopurines, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and vincristine. Furthermore, novel immunotherapies including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells that are rapidly moving into frontline therapy are addressed. This review focuses on TDM already used in clinical practice as well as the unused potential and feasibility of TDM. Finally, important factors affecting PK/PD such as obesity and transition to adolescence and young adulthood are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Investigation of TDM as standard of care for antileukemic agents is highly warranted to personalize curative yet toxic anticancer regimens within frontline ALL treatment. Some of the drugs have been used in ALL treatment regimens for decades, but a wide range of new compounds are being introduced, some like blinatumomab reaching standard-of-care designation. Not least, optimized drug efficacy and reduction of the risk of serious toxicities may render TDM implementation cost-effective.

Contributions of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology to the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Cure of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Part 2b (Numbers 16 to 20)

This offering represents part 2b of a second set of 5 additional contributions of pediatric hematology/oncology to the diagnosis, treatment, and potential cure of precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. It contains numbers 16 to 20 and includes (16) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, newer immunotherapies including (17) blinatumomab, and (18) inotuzumab ozogamicin, (19) ploidy, and (20) creation of the "day hospital" to administer outpatient care to children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and other cancers. These and the other reviewed contributions have had a significant role in improving the quality and duration of the lives of children, most of whom faced tragic and painful death back in the 1950s and 1960s. Most of our early optimistic goals were achieved and have benefitted substantially our patients, providing those of us who participated in many of these key clinical trials, a profound sense of accomplishment.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapse prevention in a boy with Down syndrome and relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a CD22-directed antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, has demonstrated excellent efficacy in B-cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). It has been used for patients with relapsed or refractory BCP-ALL as a bridge to allo-HCT. Children with Down syndrome (DS) have an increased risk of BCP-ALL and higher rates of relapse and toxicity, including treatment-related mortality. Although allo-HCT is potentially curative for relapsed or refractory ALL, post-transplant leukemic relapse rates and transplant-related mortality are dismal in patients with DS-ALL, which results in less frequent use of allo-HCT in this group than in the non-DS population. Therefore, novel and less toxic therapeutic strategies are required to improve outcomes. Here we report the case of a child with DS who was diagnosed with a second relapse of BCP-ALL and has maintained complete remission through regular single-agent InO therapy. Single-agent maintenance using InO can be a good option to avoid subsequent relapse in patients with relapsed or refractory BCP-ALL who cannot proceed to allo-HCT and require less-toxic treatments.

Polymeric Drug Delivery Systems in Biomedicine

Our review examines the key aspects of using polymeric carriers in biomedicine. The section "Polymers for Biomedicine" provides an overview of different types of polymers, their structural features and properties that determine their use as drug delivery vehicles. The section "Polymeric Carriers" characterizes the role of polymeric delivery systems in modern medicine. The main forms of polymeric carriers are described, as well as their key advantages for drug delivery. The section "Preclinical and Clinical Trials of Polymeric Drug Carriers" reviews the examples of clinical and preclinical studies of polymeric forms used for antitumor therapy, therapy for bacterial and infectious diseases. The final section "Targeted Drug Delivery Systems" is devoted to the discussion of approaches, as well as ligands that provide targeted drug delivery using polymeric carriers. We have paid special attention to modern approaches for increasing the efficacy of antibacterial therapy using vector molecules.

Characterizing the ideal patient for treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is indicated for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This systematic literature review (CRD42022330496) assessed outcomes by baseline characteristics for patients with R/R ALL treated with InO to identify which patients may benefit most.

METHODS

In adherence with PRISMA guidelines, searches were run in Embase and MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria were real-world evidence, observational studies, and phase 2-4 trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa instrument assessed quality.

RESULTS

34 publications were included; 11 described the phase 3 INO-VATE trial. Patients treated with InO who were CD22-positive, in first salvage, and eligible for subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) had improved outcomes. Reduced incidence of veno-occlusive disease was observed in patients with normal transaminase levels and bilirubin, no prior liver disease, and who did not receive dual alkylators.

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal patient for InO treatment has CD22-positive disease (≥20% leukemic blasts), normal liver function, no history of liver disease, is in first salvage, has not previously received HSCT, prefers outpatient treatment, or has high disease burden. Limitations included potentially missing publications that were non-English, not identified in the searches, or available after the date the searches were conducted.

REGISTRATION

This systematic review was registered on the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), registration number: CRD42022330496.

Lessons learned from 20 years of preclinical testing in pediatric cancers

Programs for preclinical testing of targeted cancer agents in murine models of childhood cancers have been supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) since 2004. These programs were established to work collaboratively with industry partners to address the paucity of targeted agents for pediatric cancers compared with the large number of agents developed and approved for malignancies primarily affecting adults. The distinctive biology of pediatric cancers and the relatively small numbers of pediatric cancer patients are major challenges for pediatric oncology drug development. These factors are exacerbated by the division of cancers into multiple subtypes that are further sub-classified by their genomic properties. The imbalance between the large number of candidate agents and small patient populations requires careful prioritization of agents developed for adult cancers for clinical evaluation in children with cancer. The NCI-supported preclinical pediatric programs have published positive and negative results of efficacy testing for over 100 agents to aid the pediatric research community in identifying the most promising candidates to move forward for clinical testing in pediatric oncology. Here, we review and summarize lessons learned from two decades of experience with the design and execution of preclinical trials of antineoplastic agents in murine models of childhood cancers.

Outcomes in children with first-relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Japan: Results from JCCG Study JPLSG-ALL-R08

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM)-S classification is a crucial prognostic indicator in children experiencing first-relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Early molecular response to therapy, evaluated by measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD), has a significant impact on the survival of patients with childhood ALL. Applying risk stratification based on the BFM-S classification and MRD response after induction, the first nationwide prospective multicenter study, ALL-R08, was conducted in children with first-relapsed ALL in Japan.

METHODS

The ALL-R08 study comprised two parts: ALL-R08-I, an observational study aimed at obtaining an overall picture of outcomes in first-relapsed childhood ALL, and ALL-R08-II, a clinical trial for the non-T-ALL S2 risk group. In ALL-R08-II, patients with an MRD level of ≥10-3 at the end of induction therapy were assigned to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), whereas those with an MRD level less than 10-3 and isolated extramedullary relapse continued to receive chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In total, 163 patients were enrolled in the ALL-R08 study, and 82 and 81 patients were enrolled in the ALL-R08-I and the ALL-R08-II, respectively. In ALL-R08-I, the probability of 3-year event-free survival (EFS) for patients with S1, S2, S3, S4, and post-HCT groups was 83% ± 15%, 37% ± 11%, 28% ± 8%, 14% ± 7%, and 0%, respectively. In the ALL-R08-II trial, 3-year EFS in patients with post-induction MRD less than 10-3 and ≥10-3 was 70% ± 9% (n = 27) and 68% ± 8% (n = 31) (p = .591), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ALL-REZ BFM-type treatment is equally effective for children with first-relapsed ALL treated according to the Japanese frontline protocols and for children with first-relapsed ALL treated according to the BFM-type frontline protocols.

Daratumumab in pediatric relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma: the DELPHINUS study

ABSTRACT

Patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL) have poor outcomes compared with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients. The phase 2, open-label DELPHINUS study evaluated daratumumab (16 mg/kg IV) plus backbone chemotherapy in children with relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL (n = 7) after ≥2 relapses, and children and young adults with T-cell ALL (children, n = 24; young adults, n = 5) or LL (n = 10) after first relapse. The primary end point was complete response (CR) in the B-cell ALL (end of cycle 2) and T-cell ALL (end of cycle 1) cohorts, after which patients could proceed off study to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Seven patients with advanced B-cell ALL received daratumumab with no CRs achieved; this cohort was closed because of futility. For the childhood T-cell ALL, young adult T-cell ALL, and T-cell LL cohorts, the CR (end of cycle 1) rates were 41.7%, 60.0%, and 30.0%, respectively; overall response rates (any time point) were 83.3% (CR + CR with incomplete count recovery [CRi]), 80.0% (CR + CRi), and 50.0% (CR + partial response), respectively; minimal residual disease negativity (<0.01%) rates were 45.8%, 20.0%, and 50.0%, respectively; observed 24-month event-free survival rates were 36.1%, 20.0%, and 20.0%, respectively; observed 24-month overall survival rates were 41.3%, 25.0%, and 20.0%, respectively; and allogeneic HSCT rates were 75.0%, 60.0%, and 30.0%, respectively. No new safety concerns with daratumumab were observed. In conclusion, daratumumab was safely combined with backbone chemotherapy in children and young adults with T-cell ALL/LL and contributed to successful bridging to HSCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03384654.

Precision Medicine for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children: A Review

The clinical outcome for children diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a testimony to the success of modern medicine. Over the past few decades, survival has climbed from ∼10% to >90% for certain subgroups. Yet, the outcome for those with relapsed disease is often poor, and survivors struggle with a multitude of healthcare issues, some of which are lifelong. In recent years, the advent of the widespread sequencing of tumors has made available patients with previously unrecognized subtypes of leukemia, who have the potential to benefit from the addition of targeted therapies. Indeed, the promise of precision medicine, encompassing a person's environment, genetics and lifestyle, is likely to have profound impact on further tailoring therapies that are likely to improve outcomes, diminish toxicity and ultimately pave the pathway for a healthier population.

Impact of Age on Pharmacogenomics and Treatment Outcomes of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

PURPOSE

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can occur across all age groups, with a strikingly higher cure rate in children compared with adults. However, the pharmacological basis of age-related differences in ALL treatment response remains unclear.

METHODS

Studying 767 children and 309 adults with newly diagnosed B-cell ALL enrolled on frontline trials at St Jude Children's Research Hospital, MD Anderson Cancer Center, the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, and the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, we determined the ex vivo sensitivity of leukemia cells to 21 drugs. Twenty-three ALL molecular subtypes were identified using RNA sequencing. We systematically characterized the associations between drug response and ALL genomics in children, adolescents and young adults, and elderly adults. We evaluated the effect of age-related gene expression signature on ALL treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven ALL drugs (asparaginase, prednisolone, mercaptopurine, dasatinib, nelarabine, daunorubicin, and inotuzumab ozogamicin) showed differential activity between children and adults, of which six were explained by age-related differences in leukemia molecular subtypes. Adolescents and young adults showed similar patterns of drug resistance as older adults, relative to young children. Mercaptopurine exhibited subtype-independent greater sensitivity in children. Transcriptomic profiling uncovered subclusters within CRLF2-, DUX4-, and KMT2A-rearranged ALL that were linked to age and cytotoxic drug resistance. In particular, a subset of children had adult-like ALL on the basis of leukemia gene expression patterns across subtypes, despite their chronological age. Resistant to cytotoxic drugs, children with adult-like ALL exhibited poor prognosis in pediatric ALL trials, even after adjusting for age and minimal residual diseases.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide pharmacogenomic insights into age-related disparities in ALL cure rates and identify leukemia prognostic features for treatment individualization across age groups.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with chemotherapy in pediatric B-cell precursor CD22+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the phase IB ITCC-059 trial

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a CD22-directed antibody conjugated with calicheamicin. The phase IB of the ITCC-059 trial tested InO combined with chemotherapy in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Relapsed /refractory CD22+ BCP-ALL pediatric patients were enrolled. The primary objective was to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included preliminary efficacy and tolerability. InO was combined with 1.5 mg/m2 of vincristine (days 3, 10, 17, 24), 20 mg/m2 of dexamethasone (2 5-day blocks, then amended), and intrathecal therapy. A rolling-6 design was used testing InO from 0.8 to 1.8 mg/m2/cycle. Between May 2020 and April 2022, 30 patients were treated, and 29 were evaluable for dose limiting toxicities (DLT). At 1.1 mg/m2/cycle, two of four patients had DLT (liver toxicity). InO was de-escalated to 0.8 mg/m2/cycle (N=6) without DLT while awaiting a protocol amendment to reduce dexamethasone dose to 10 mg/m2. Post amendment, InO was re-escalated to 1.1 mg/m2/cycle (N=6, 1 DLT), then to 1.4 mg/m2/ cycle (N=3, no DLT), and finally to 1.8 mg/m2/cycle (N=7, 1 DLT). Three additional patients were treated in an expansion cohort. The pooled response rate was 80% (24/30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 61.4-92.3) and, among responders, 66.7% achieved minimal residual disease negativity. The RP2D of InO combined with vincristine, dexamethasone and intrathecal therapy was declared at 1.8 mg/m2/cycle (1.5 mg/m2/cycle after remission) in a fractioned schedule. This combination showed a response rate similar to the single agent cohorts of this trial, with liver toxicity issues at the initial higher dexamethasone dose (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NTR5736).

Complete Remission with Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as Fourth-Line Salvage Therapy in a Child with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background: Despite the progress achieved regarding survival rates in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapsed or refractory disease still poses a therapeutic challenge. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a CD22-directed monoclonal antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, which has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for adults and pediatric patients 1 year and older with relapsed or refractory CD22-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Case presentation: Herein, we present the case of a 23-month-old girl with high-risk B-ALL who experienced very early isolated medullary relapse; following the failure of conventional chemotherapy according to the ALL-IC REL 2016 protocol, she went on to receive the bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) blinatumomab and subsequently, due to refractory disease, the combination of fludarabine, cytarabine, and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib without achieving remission. Given the high CD22 expression by the lymphoblasts, off-label use of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) was chosen and administrated in a 28-day cycle as a salvage treatment. The minimal residual disease (MRD) was 0.08% on day 28, and InO was continued, thus achieving MRD negativity; the patient successfully underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a matched family donor. Conclusions: Our case highlights the efficacy and safety of InO as a salvage treatment in the setting of relapsed B-ALL refractory not only to conventional chemotherapy but also to novel treatments, such as blinatumomab and bortezomib.

Genomic determinants of response and resistance to inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell ALL

ABSTRACT

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-drug conjugate that delivers calicheamicin to CD22-expressing cells. In a retrospective cohort of InO-treated patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, we sought to understand the genomic determinants of the response and resistance to InO. Pre- and post-InO-treated patient samples were analyzed by whole genome, exome, and/or transcriptome sequencing. Acquired CD22 mutations were observed in 11% (3/27) of post-InO-relapsed tumor samples, but not in refractory samples (0/16). There were multiple CD22 mutations per sample and the mechanisms of CD22 escape included epitope loss (protein truncation and destabilization) and epitope alteration. Two CD22 mutant cases were post-InO hyper-mutators resulting from error-prone DNA damage repair (nonhomologous/alternative end-joining repair, or mismatch repair deficiency), suggesting that hypermutation drove escape from CD22-directed therapy. CD22-mutant relapses occurred after InO and subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), suggesting that InO eliminated the predominant clones, leaving subclones with acquired CD22 mutations that conferred resistance to InO and subsequently expanded. Acquired loss-of-function mutations in TP53, ATM, and CDKN2A were observed, consistent with a compromise of the G1/S DNA damage checkpoint as a mechanism for evading InO-induced apoptosis. Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screening of cell lines identified DNTT (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase) loss as a marker of InO resistance. In conclusion, genetic alterations modulating CD22 expression and DNA damage response influence InO efficacy. Our findings highlight the importance of defining the basis of CD22 escape and eradication of residual disease before HSCT. The identified mechanisms of escape from CD22-targeted therapy extend beyond antigen loss and provide opportunities to improve therapeutic approaches and overcome resistance. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01134575, NCT01371630, and NCT03441061.

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: First Pediatric Approval

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (BESPONSA™) is a CD22-targeted monoclonal antibody drug conjugate (ADC) developed by Pfizer for the treatment of CD22-postive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Inotuzumab ozogamicin comprises a humanized IgG4 anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to the potent DNA-binding cytotoxic agent N-acetyl-gamma-calicheamicin dimethylhydrazide (CalichDMH) via a linker. Inotuzumab ozogamicin binds to CD22-expressing tumour cells, facilitating the delivery of conjugated CalichDMH, which after intracellular activation induces double strand DNA breaks, ultimately leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is approved in the USA, Europe and several countries worldwide for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD22-positive B-cell precursor ALL in adults. On 6 March 2024, inotuzumab ozogamicin received its first pediatric approval in the USA for this indication in patients aged ≥ 1 years. Inotuzumab ozogamicin has since been approved in Japan in March 2024 for the same indication in pediatric patients. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of inotuzumab ozogamicin leading to this first approval for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD22-positive B-cell precursor ALL in pediatric patients.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Pediatric Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of Study ITCC-059

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for treating relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) in adults. Pediatric pharmacokinetic data of inotuzumab ozogamicin are lacking. This study is the first to examine the population pharmacokinetics of inotuzumab ozogamicin in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL.

METHODS

From 531 adult patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 234 adult patients with BCP-ALL, and 53 pediatric patients with BCP-ALL, 8924 inotuzumab ozogamicin serum concentrations were analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. A published adult inotuzumab ozogamicin population-pharmacokinetic model, a two-compartment model with linear and time-dependent clearance, was adapted to describe the pediatric data.

RESULTS

Modifications in this analysis, compared to the published adult model, included: (i) re-estimating pharmacokinetic parameters and covariate effects; (ii) modifying covariate representation; and (iii) introducing relevant pediatric covariate effects (age on the decay coefficient of time-dependent clearance and ALL effect (disease type and/or different bioanalytical analysis methods) on initial values of time-dependent clearance). For patients with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL, increasing age was associated with a decreasing decay coefficient of time-dependent clearance, reflecting that the target-mediated drug clearance declines more rapidly in children. In pediatric BCP-ALL, the median [interquartile range] cumulative area under the concentration-time curve was significantly higher among responders (n = 42) versus non-responders (n = 10) at the end of the first cycle (26.1 [18.9-35.0] vs 10.1 [9.19-16.1], × 103 ng*h/mL, p < 0.001). From simulations performed at the recommended pediatric phase II dose, inotuzumab ozogamicin exposure reached a similar level as observed in responding pediatric trial participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic profile of inotuzumab ozogamicin in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL was well described in this study. No dose adjustment is required clinically for pediatric patients with BCP-ALL based on the simulated inotuzumab ozogamicin exposure at the recommended pediatric phase II dose, promising efficacy and acceptable tolerability.

Naked antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates: targeted therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has reached overall survival rates exceeding 90%. The present and future challenges are to cure the remainder of patients still dying from disease, and to reduce morbidity and mortality in those who can be cured with standard-of-care chemotherapy by replacing toxic chemotherapy elements while retaining cure rates. With the novel therapeutic options introduced in the last years, including immunotherapies and targeted antibodies, the treatment of ALL is undergoing major changes. For B-cell precursor ALL, blinatumomab, an anti-CD19 bispecific antibody, has established its role in the consolidation treatment for both high- and standard-risk first relapse of ALL, in the presence of bone marrow involvement, and may also have an impact on the outcome of high-risk subsets such as infant ALL and Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL. Inotuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD22 drug conjugated antibody, has demonstrated high efficacy in inducing complete remission in relapsed ALL, even in the presence of high tumor burden, but randomized phase III trials are still ongoing. For T-ALL the role of CD38-directed treatment, such as daratumumab, is gaining interest, but randomized data are needed to assess its specific benefit. These antibodies are currently being tested in patients with newly diagnosed ALL and may lead to major changes in the present paradigm of treatment of pediatric ALL. Unlike the past, lessons may be learned from innovations in adult ALL, in which more drastic changes are piloted that may need to be translated to pediatrics.

The Evolving Landscape of Flowcytometric Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is a major independent prognostic marker in the clinical management of pediatric and adult B-cell precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (BCP-ALL), and risk stratification nowadays heavily relies on MRD diagnostics. MRD can be detected using flow cytometry based on aberrant expression of markers (antigens) during malignant B-cell maturation. Recent advances highlight the significance of novel markers (e.g., CD58, CD81, CD304, CD73, CD66c, and CD123), improving MRD identification. Second and next-generation flow cytometry, such as the EuroFlow consortium's eight-color protocol, can achieve sensitivities down to 10-5 (comparable with the PCR-based method) if sufficient cells are acquired. The introduction of targeted therapies (especially those targeting CD19, such as blinatumomab or CAR-T19) introduces several challenges for flow cytometric MRD analysis, such as the occurrence of CD19-negative relapses. Therefore, innovative flow cytometry panels, including alternative B-cell markers (e.g., CD22 and CD24), have been designed. (Semi-)automated MRD assessment, employing machine learning algorithms and clustering tools, shows promise but does not yet allow robust and sensitive automated analysis of MRD. Future directions involve integrating artificial intelligence, further automation, and exploring multicolor spectral flow cytometry to standardize MRD assessment and enhance diagnostic and prognostic robustness of MRD diagnostics in BCP-ALL.

A review of the clinical efficacy of FDA-approved antibody‒drug conjugates in human cancers

While strategies such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy have become the first-line standard therapies for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer, acquired resistance is still inevitable in most cases. The introduction of antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) provides a novel alternative. ADCs are a new class of anticancer drugs comprising the coupling of antitumor mAbs with cytotoxic drugs. Compared with chemotherapeutic drugs, ADCs have the advantages of good tolerance, accurate target recognition, and small effects on noncancerous cells. ADCs occupy an increasingly important position in the therapeutic field. Currently, there are 13 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‒approved ADCs and more than 100 ADC drugs at different stages of clinical trials. This review briefly describes the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved ADCs, and discusses the related problems and challenges to provide a reference for clinical work.

Case report: Two pediatric cases of long-term leukemia-free survival with relapsed acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia treated with donor CD7 CAR-T cells bridging to haploidentical stem cell transplantation

Introduction

Patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) have a poor prognosis. We developed donor CD7 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells to salvage r/r T-ALL patients and obtained encouraging results. Patients who had not received allogeneic (allo-) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) before CAR-T therapy would develop pancytopenia and immunodeficiency for a long period after CD7 CAR-T therapy; therefore, allo-HSCT is needed in these patients. Here, we report two pediatric r/r T-ALL patients who received donor CD7 CAR-T bridging to allo-HSCT with leukemia-free survival (LFS) and sustained negative minimal residual disease for >2 years.

Case presentation

Patient 1 was a 10-year-old boy who visited our hospital because of a T-ALL relapse with multiple lymphadenopathies without discomfort. The patient did not achieve remission after one course of induction chemotherapy. The patient then received donor (his father) CD7 CAR-T cells and achieved complete remission (CR). Thirty days after the first CAR-T cell infusion, he received allo-HSCT, and his father was also the donor. His LFS was >3 years. Patient 2 was an 8-year-old boy who was admitted to our hospital with relapsed T-ALL with fever, cough, and mild dyspnea. He did not achieve remission after one course of induction chemotherapy; therefore, he received donor (his father) CD7 CAR-T cells and achieved CR. Twenty-six days after CAR-T cell infusion, the patient received allo-HSCT, with his father as the donor. He has survived for >2 years free of leukemia. At the last follow up, both patients were alive and presented a good quality of life.

Conclusion

The long-term survival of these two patients supports the use of CD7 CAR-T therapy bridging to allo-HSCT as an effective and safe treatment with the capacity to make r/r T-ALL a curable disease, similar to r/r acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia.

Novel therapies for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current novel therapy landscape in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), with a focus on key clinical trials which will shape the future direction of care for these children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent landmark immunotherapy trials in B-ALL have demonstrated significant benefit for children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed/refractory high-risk leukemia. Due to these successes, current trials are asking the question as to whether immunotherapy can be successfully incorporated upfront. Additionally, therapies targeting novel antigens or molecular pathways are being developed, providing new options for children previously thought to have incurable leukemia.

SUMMARY

As survival for ALL has relatively plateaued with maximizing intensity through conventional chemotherapy, continued preclinical and clinical study of novel immunotherapeutic and targeted agents is crucial to further improve outcomes in childhood leukemia.

Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy

The CRISPR system is a revolutionary genome editing tool that has the potential to revolutionize the field of cancer research and therapy. The ability to precisely target and edit specific genetic mutations that drive the growth and spread of tumors has opened up new possibilities for the development of more effective and personalized cancer treatments. In this review, we will discuss the different CRISPR-based strategies that have been proposed for cancer therapy, including inactivating genes that drive tumor growth, enhancing the immune response to cancer cells, repairing genetic mutations that cause cancer, and delivering cancer-killing molecules directly to tumor cells. We will also summarize the current state of preclinical studies and clinical trials of CRISPR-based cancer therapy, highlighting the most promising results and the challenges that still need to be overcome. Safety and delivery are also important challenges for CRISPR-based cancer therapy to become a viable clinical option. We will discuss the challenges and limitations that need to be overcome, such as off-target effects, safety, and delivery to the tumor site. Finally, we will provide an overview of the current challenges and opportunities in the field of CRISPR-based cancer therapy and discuss future directions for research and development. The CRISPR system has the potential to change the landscape of cancer research, and this review aims to provide an overview of the current state of the field and the challenges that need to be overcome to realize this potential.

[A 2023 inventory in oncology news]

In 2023, the improvement of our therapeutic management has largely taken shape. The aim of our article is to highlight the major advances that will change our practices. These are not only in the field of treatment, but also in the improvement of supportive care. Here, we present these new developments organ by organ, cancer by cancer. You can read everything or concentrate on the cancers that are your areas of expertise. But this exhaustiveness should be representative of our current state of progress.

Advancing Diagnostics and Therapy to Reach Universal Cure in Childhood ALL

Systemic combination chemotherapy and intrathecal chemotherapy markedly increased the survival rate of children with ALL. In the past two decades, the use of minimal (measurable) residual disease (MRD) measurements early in therapy improved risk group stratification with subsequent treatment intensifications for patients at high risk of relapse, and enabled a reduction of treatment for low-risk patients. The recent development of more sensitive MRD technologies may further affect risk stratification. Molecular genetic profiling has led to the discovery of many new subtypes and their driver genetic alterations. This increased our understanding of the biological basis of ALL, improved risk classification, and enabled implementation of precision medicine. In the past decade, immunotherapies, including bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and cellular therapies directed against surface proteins, led to more effective and less toxic therapies, replacing intensive chemotherapy courses and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed and refractory ALL, and are now being tested in newly diagnosed patients. It has taken 50-60 years to increase the cure rate in childhood ALL from 0% to 90% by stepwise improvements in chemotherapy. This review provides an overview of how the developments over the past 10-15 years mentioned above have significantly changed the diagnostic and treatment approach in ALL, and discusses how the integrated use of molecular and immunotherapeutic insights will very likely direct efforts to cure those children with ALL who are not cured today, and improve the quality of life for survivors who should have decades of life ahead. Future efforts must focus on making effective, yet very expensive, new technologies and therapies available to children with ALL worldwide.

Targeting CD22 for B-cell hematologic malignancies

CD19-targeted chimeric receptor antigen (CAR)-T cell therapy has shown remarkable clinical efficacy in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies. However, 30%-60% of patients eventually relapsed, with the CD19-negative relapse being an important hurdle to sustained remission. CD22 expression is independent of CD19 expression in malignant B cells. Consequently, CD22 is a potential alternative target for CD19 CAR-T cell-resistant patients. CD22-targeted therapies, mainly including the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and CAR-T cells, have come into wide clinical use with acceptable toxicities and promising efficacy. In this review, we explore the molecular and physiological characteristics of CD22, development of CD22 ADCs and CAR-T cells, and the available clinical data on CD22 ADCs and CAR-T cell therapies. Furthermore, we propose some perspectives for overcoming tumor escape and enhancing the efficacy of CD22-targeted therapies.

Treatment-related adverse events of antibody-drug conjugates in clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The wide use of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) is transforming the cancer-treatment landscape. Understanding the treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of ADCs is crucial for their clinical application. We conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the profile and incidence of AEs related to ADC use in the treatment of solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published from January 2001 to October 2022. The overall profile and incidence of all-grade and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs were the primary outcomes of the analysis.

Results

A total of 138 trials involving 15,473 patients were included in this study. The overall incidence of any-grade treatment-related AEs was 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 99.9%-100.0%; I 2 = 89%) and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs was 6.2% (95% CI: 3.0%-12.4%; I² = 99%).

Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive overview of AEs related to ADCs used for cancer treatment. ADC use resulted in a high incidence of any-grade AEs but a low incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs. The AE profiles and incidence differed according to cancer type, ADC type, and ADC components.

Outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia not in remission enrolled in JACLS ALL-02

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is only indicated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients for whom other treatments are unlikely to be curative. However, outcomes of patients not in complete remission (CR) at HSCT remain very poor. To improve the outcomes of patients receiving HSCT, it is important to obtain detailed clinical information about patients with ALL receiving HSCT in CR and not in CR. Patients enrolled in the Japan Association of Childhood Leukemia Study ALL-02 who underwent HSCT and were not in CR (non-CR patients, n = 55) were examined. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of non-CR patients was 27.3%. Compared with CR patients, non-CR patients experienced very early and early relapse significantly more frequently and had poorer prognostic factors. Most interestingly, high hyperdiploid (HHD) patients showed an excellent 1-year OS of 80%. In addition, long-term survival among surviving HHD patients was longer than 5 years. All eight patients who survived after undergoing HSCT while not in CR were younger than 10 years at initial diagnosis and were negative for central nervous system involvement. While limited, these results suggest that a subset of patients may benefit from HSCT while not in CR.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: efficacy, toxicity, and practical considerations

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the cell surface receptor CD22 coupled to a cytotoxic calicheamicin payload via an acid labile linker. InO has shown significant activity in relapsed and refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) in both single agent and combination chemotherapy regimens in adult and pediatric trials. Its use in newly diagnosed elderly patients has also been established while clinical trials investigating its use in newly diagnosed pediatric patients and fit adults are ongoing. Notable toxicities include sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), particularly in patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after InO as well as myelosuppression and B-cell aplasia which confer increased infection risk, particularly in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting, the planned subsequent curative therapy modality must be considered when using InO to mitigate SOS risk if proceeding to HSCT and account for potential B-cell aplasia if proceeding to chimeric antigen receptor CAR-T therapy. Studies exploring mechanisms of resistance or failure of InO are ongoing but modulation or loss CD22 expression, alternative CD22 splicing, and high Bcl-2 expression have been implicated. In this review, we will summarize the currently available data on InO, with an emphasis on pediatric trials, and explore future directions including combinatorial therapy.

Harnessing the Immune System: Current and Emerging Immunotherapy Strategies for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Treatment for relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children and young adults continues to evolve. Despite optimization of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic approaches and risk-adapted therapy, about 12% of pediatric patients still relapse, and survival rates in this population remain poor. Salvage therapy for relapsed patients continues to be challenging as attempts to further intensify chemotherapy have resulted in excessive toxicity without improving outcomes. Immunotherapy has profoundly impacted the landscape of relapsed ALL by harnessing the patient's immune system to target and eliminate leukemia cells. In this review, we provide an overview and summary of immunotherapy agents that have been approved and remain under investigation for children, including blinatumomab, inotuzumab, daratumomab, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. We discuss the landmark clinical trials that have revolutionized the field and provide an update on ongoing clinical trials involving these agents for children in the relapsed and upfront setting. The incorporation of these novel immunotherapies into ALL treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, has demonstrated promising potential to augment outcomes while decreasing toxicity. However, we also highlight the many challenges we still face and the research critically needed to achieve our goals for cure in children.

How I use risk factors for success or failure of CD19 CAR T cells to guide management of children and AYA with B-cell ALL

By overcoming chemotherapeutic resistance, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells facilitate deep, complete remissions and offer the potential for long-term cure in a substantial fraction of patients with chemotherapy refractory disease. However, that success is tempered with 10% to 30% of patients not achieving remission and over half of patients treated eventually experiencing relapse. With over a decade of experience using CAR T cells in children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) to treat relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and 5 years since the first US Food and Drug Administration approval, data defining the nuances of patient-specific risk factors are emerging. With the commercial availability of 2 unique CD19 CAR T-cell constructs for B-ALL, in this article, we review the current literature, outline our approach to patients, and discuss how individual factors inform strategies to optimize outcomes in children and AYA receiving CD19 CAR T cells. We include data from both prospective and recent large retrospective studies that offer insight into understanding when the risks of CAR T-cell therapy failure are high and offer perspectives suggesting when consolidative hematopoietic cell transplantation or experimental CAR T-cell and/or alternative immunotherapy should be considered. We also propose areas where prospective trials addressing the optimal use of CAR T-cell therapy are needed.

Current Status of Novel Agents for the Treatment of B Cell Malignancies: What's Coming Next?

Resistance to death is one of the hallmarks of human B cell malignancies and often contributes to the lack of a lasting response to today's commonly used treatments. Drug discovery approaches designed to activate the death machinery have generated a large number of inhibitors of anti-apoptotic proteins from the B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 2 family and the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway. Orally administered small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 protein and BCR partners (e.g., Bruton's tyrosine kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase) have already been included (as monotherapies or combination therapies) in the standard of care for selected B cell malignancies. Agonistic monoclonal antibodies and their derivatives (antibody-drug conjugates, antibody-radioisotope conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells) targeting tumor-associated antigens (TAAs, such as CD19, CD20, CD22, and CD38) are indicated for treatment (as monotherapies or combination therapies) of patients with B cell tumors. However, given that some patients are either refractory to current therapies or relapse after treatment, novel therapeutic strategies are needed. Here, we review current strategies for managing B cell malignancies, with a focus on the ongoing clinical development of more effective, selective drugs targeting these molecules, as well as other TAAs and signaling proteins. The observed impact of metabolic reprogramming on B cell pathophysiology highlights the promise of targeting metabolic checkpoints in the treatment of these disorders.

Polyphenols: Chemoprevention and therapeutic potentials in hematological malignancies

Polyphenols are one of the largest plant-derived natural product and they play an important role in plants' defense as well as in human health and disease. A number of them are pleiotropic molecules and have been shown to regulate signaling pathways, immune response and cell growth and proliferation which all play a role in cancer development. Hematological malignancies on the other hand, are cancers of the blood. While current therapies are efficacious, they are usually expensive and with unwanted side effects. Thus, the search for newer less toxic agents. Polyphenols have been reported to possess antineoplastic properties which include cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis via multiple mechanisms. They also have immunomodulatory activities where they enhance T cell activation and suppress regulatory T cells. They carry out these actions through such pathways as PI3K/Akt/mTOR and the kynurenine. They can also reverse cancer resistance to chemotherapy agents. In this review, i look at some of the molecular mechanism of action of polyphenols and their potential roles as therapeutic agents in hematological malignancies. Here i discuss their anti-proliferative and anti-neoplastic activities especially their abilities modulate signaling pathways as well as immune response in hematological malignancies. I also looked at clinical studies done mainly in the last 10-15 years on various polyphenol combination and how they enhance synergism. I recommend that further preclinical and clinical studies be carried out to ensure safety and efficacy before polyphenol therapies be officially moved to the clinics.

Infectious Complications of Targeted Therapies in Children with Leukemias and Lymphomas

Simple Summary

Targeted therapies in children with hematological malignancies moderate the effects of cytotoxic therapy, thus improving survival rates. They have emerged over the last decade and are used in combination with or after the failure of conventional chemotherapy and as bridging therapy prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Nowadays, there is a growing interest in their efficacy and safety in pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed disease. The compromised immune system, even prior to therapy, requires prompt monitoring and treatment. In children with hematological malignancies, targeted therapies are associated with a comparable incidence of infectious complications to adults. The exact impact of these agents that have different mechanisms of action and are used after conventional chemotherapy or HSCT is difficult to ascertain. Clinicians should be cautious of severe infections after the use of targeted therapies, especially when used in combination with chemotherapy.

Abstract

The aim of this review is to highlight mechanisms of immunosuppression for each agent, along with pooled analyses of infectious complications from the available medical literature. Rituximab confers no increase in grade ≥3 infectious risks, except in the case of patients with advanced-stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin links with high rates of grade ≥3 infections which, however, are comparable with historical cohorts. Pembrolizumab exhibits a favorable safety profile in terms of severe infections. Despite high rates of hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) with blinatumomab, low-grade ≥3 infection rates were observed, especially in the post-reinduction therapy of relapsed B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Imatinib and nilotinib are generally devoid of severe infectious complications, but dasatinib may slightly increase the risk of opportunistic infections. Data on crizotinib and pan-Trk inhibitors entrectinib and larotrectinib are limited. CAR T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel is associated with grade ≥3 infections in children and is linked with HGG and the emergence of immune-related adverse events. Off-label therapies inotuzumab ozogamicin, brentuximab vedotin, and venetoclax demonstrate low rates of treatment-related grade ≥3 infections, while the addition of bortezomib to standard chemotherapy in T-cell malignancies seems to decrease the infection risk during induction. Prophylaxis, immune reconstitution, and vaccinations for each targeted agent are discussed, along with comparisons to adult studies.

Management of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas in the Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Population: An Adult vs. Pediatric Perspective

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a broad entity which comprises a number of different types of lymphomatous malignancies. In the pediatric and adolescent population, the type and prognosis of NHL varies by age and gender. In comparison to adults, pediatric and adolescent patients generally have better outcomes following treatment for primary NHL. However, relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease is associated with poorer outcomes in many types of NHL such as diffuse large B cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma. Newer therapies have been approved in the use of primary NHL in the pediatric and adolescent population such as Rituximab and other therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy are under investigation for the treatment of R/R NHL. In this review, we feature the characteristics, diagnosis, and treatments of the most common NHLs in the pediatric and adolescent population and also highlight the differences that exist between pediatric and adult disease. We then detail the areas of treatment advances such as immunotherapy with CAR T-cells, brentuximab vedotin, and blinatumomab as well as cell cycle inhibitors and describe areas where further research is needed. The aim of this review is to juxtapose established research regarding pediatric and adolescent NHL with recent advancements as well as highlight treatment gaps where more investigation is needed.