Epidemiology and biomarker profile of pituitary adenohypophysial tumors

The periphery of pituitary macroadenoma expressed higher invasive capability: the importance of clinical implication

BACKGROUND

Partial resection of pituitary neuroendocrine tumor often results in residual tumor that increases the risk of recurrence. This pilot study aimed to determine whether the center and periphery of pituitary macroadenomas expressed different levels of biomarkers of invasiveness.

METHODS

This prospective pilot study included 30 patients with newly diagnosed pituitary macroadenomas (≥ 10 mm) who underwent transsphenoidal surgery (2012-2013). Patients were randomly assigned to the sorted group (n = 15), where central and peripheral tumor zones were separately resected, or the unsorted group (n = 15), where tumors were resected without zonal distinction. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) quantified Ki-67, HIF-1α, CD31, CD34, CD105, and VEGF expression. Differences in biomarker expression across tumor zones, Knosp grade, and functional status were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and other statistical methods.

RESULTS

In the sorted group, the peripheral zone exhibited significantly higher immunoreactivities of Ki-67, HIF-1α, CD34, and VEGF (all p < 0.01) compared to the central zone, while CD31 and CD105 showed no significant differences. Subgroup analysis showed that in Knosp grade 0-2 tumors, CD34 and VEGF were elevated in the peripheral zone, whereas in Knosp grade 3-4 tumors, Ki-67, HIF-1α, and CD34 were significantly higher (all p < 0.05). In functioning adenomas, HIF-1α and CD34 were increased in the peripheral zone, while in non-functioning adenomas, Ki-67, HIF-1α, CD34, and VEGF were significantly elevated.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study revealed that biomarkers of invasiveness are expressed at higher levels in the peripheral zone of pituitary macroadenomas. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate their clinical significance.

Natural history and predictors of growth in conservatively managed non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas: A volumetric study of 232 tumors

BACKGROUND

Although patients with clinically non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFPMAs) are typically monitored without immediate therapeutic intervention, their natural course remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize growth dynamics in conservatively managed NFPMAs and identify clinical predictors of tumor progression using volumetric MRI analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 232 patients with NFPMAs who underwent at least two high-resolution MRI scans over a minimum follow-up of 12 months without therapeutic intervention. Tumor volumes were assessed using semi-automated segmentation. Progression was defined as a ≥ 20 % increase in volume. Clinical and radiological variables were evaluated to identify predictors of growth.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 37 months, 110 tumors (47.4 %) demonstrated significant growth. The median initial tumor volume was 1.9 cm³ , with median absolute and relative annual growth rates of 0.13 cm³ /year and 5.47 %/year, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression identified larger initial tumor volume (HR 1.140, 95 % CI 1.005-1.081; p = 0.027) and female sex (HR 1.594, 95 % CI 1.076-2.361; p = 0.020) as independent predictors. A tumor volume threshold of 2.5 cm³ was associated with increased growth risk. Among age-matched groups, females exhibited greater volumetric growth than males.

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of NFPMAs exhibit slow but measurable growth over time. Tumor volume at diagnosis and female sex are significant predictors of progression. These findings underscore the importance of individualized surveillance strategies, particularly for female patients with larger baseline tumors, and provide clinically relevant data to inform long-term management of NFPMAs.

Epigenetic implications in the pathogenesis of corticotroph tumors

Non-mutational epigenetic reprogramming is considered an important enabling characteristic of neoplasia. Corticotroph tumors and other subtypes of pituitary tumors are characterized by distinct epigenetic profiles. The DNA methylation profile is consistent with disease-specific gene expression, which highlights the importance of epigenetic changes in tumor formation and progression. Elucidating the epigenetic changes underlying tumorigenesis plays an important role in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of corticotroph tumors and may ultimately contribute to improving tumor-specific treatment. Here, we provide an overview of the epigenetic landscape of corticotroph tumors. We also review the role of epigenetics in silencing the expression of tumor suppressor genes and promoting oncogenes expression, which could potentially be involved in the pathogenesis of corticotroph tumors. We briefly discuss microRNAs and epigenetic aspects of POMC regulation. Lastly, since the epigenetic changes are reversible, we discuss drugs that target epigenetic modifiers that could potentially be used in the arsenal of Cushing's disease treatment modalities.

Multiple microcysts and clivus invasion diagnose T-box pituitary transcription factor 19 lineage adenomas in non-functioning pituitary adenomas

BackgroundPreoperative identification of T-box pituitary transcription factor 19 (TPIT) lineage silent adenomas in non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) is important.PurposeTo compare the clinical, laboratory, and radiological features of the three cell lineages of adenomas in NFPAs and evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of multiple microcysts and clivus invasion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for TPIT lineage adenomas in NFPAs.Material and MethodsA total of 405 patients with NFPA were retrospectively enrolled, including steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) lineage adenomas (n = 204), TPIT lineage adenomas (n = 111), and pituitary transcription factor 1 (PIT-1) lineage adenomas (n = 90). The clinical, laboratory, and radiological features of the three lineages adenomas were compared. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of multiple microcysts, clivus invasion, and their combination were calculated to diagnose TPIT lineage adenomas in NFPAs.ResultsAmong the three lineages of NFPAs, patients with SF-1 lineage were older than those with TPIT and PIT-1 lineages (P < 0.001). TPIT lineage adenomas were most common in women (P < 0.001) and had the highest tumor volume (P < 0.001), and incidence of clivus invasion (P < 0.001). The multiple microcysts and clivus invasion in the diagnosis of TPIT lineage adenomas in NFPAs had high specificity (88.44% vs. 98.64%) and accuracy (77.28%).ConclusionThe MRI findings of multiple microcysts and clivus invasion can help diagnose TPIT lineage adenomas in NFPAs with high specificity.

Radiomics based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predict the cell lineages of nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVE

Accurate preoperative predict the cell lineages of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (NFPitNETs) can help neurosurgeons develop treatment strategies. This study aimed to predict the three cell lineages of NFPitNETs using radiomics based on MRI.

METHODS

NFPitNETs patients from January 2019 and January 2023 were retrospectively enrolled, with adenoma lineages including SF-1 (n = 239), TPIT (n = 204), and PIT-1 (n = 100). Sagittal T1-weighted images (T1WI), contrast-enhanced (CE) sagittal T1WI, CE-coronal T1WI, and axial T2WI were obtained for tumor segmentation on ITK-SNAP. Pyradiomics was used for features extracted. Variance threshold method, t-test, and LASSO were used for feature selection. Support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) were used to predict the three-lineages adenomas based on their radiomics and semantic features. Receiver operating characteristic curve-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) analysis was used to assess the model's performance.

RESULTS

A total of 543 patients with NFPitNETs (mean age, 49.46 ± 12.39) were included. Patients with SF-1 adenomas had a higher mean age than those with TPIT and PIT-1 adenomas (52.84 ± 11.56 vs 49.94 ± 10.54 vs 40.42 ± 13.41, p < 0.001). Female patients are more common in TPIT and PIT-1 adenomas than SF-1 ones (96.57% vs 69% vs 41%, p < 0.001). The SVM model incorporating semantic and radiomics features based on CE-coronal T1WI performed the best, with a macro-average AUC of 0.899. CE-coronal T1WI were the best among all the MR sequences for predicting the cell lineages of NFPitNETs.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics based on preoperative MRI can help predict the cell lineages of NFPitNETs, which prove useful to neurosurgeons to develop treatment strategies.

Immature PIT1-lineage Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors/Adenomas, a Morphologically Unique Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors/Adenomas Commonly With Cytologic Atypia Features and a Predilection for Aggressive Clinical Potential

Immature PIT1-lineage pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs)/adenomas (Immature PIT1-lineage tumors) are a rare and underrecognized subtype of PitNETs that exhibits distinct cytologic atypia features and aggressive clinical potential. This study characterizes the clinical, radiological, histologic, and immunohistochemical features of 15 immature PIT1-lineage tumors identified from 1084 PitNETs patients over 5 years. Our cohort of 6 males and 9 females had a median age of 37.00 years (range: 23 to 68 y). All patients presented with pituitary macrotumors with an average size of 27.13×22.60×22.13 mm (length×width×height). The invasive growth pattern was identifiable, with 40.00% of tumors presenting with advanced stage (Knosp type 3 and 4) disease, followed by 20.00% Knosp type 2, 26.67% type 1, and 13.33% type 0. Clinical follow-up in 11 patients (median duration: 10.91 mo) revealed local recurrence in 1 case (9.09%). Microscopically, immature PIT1-lineage tumors comprised epithelioid (n=14) or spindle-shaped (n=1) chromophobic or weak basophilic cells with marked cytologic atypia, macronucleoli, and nuclear pseudoinclusions. By immunohistochemistry, most cases showed a consistent stain for PIT1 but limited expression of PIT1 family hormones in conjunction with diffuse or focal expression of CK8/18 (Cam 5.2), whereas none of the mimics showed a similar stain pattern in such a distinct way. We corroborate that immature PIT1-lineage tumors are rare, aggressive, and morphologically unique PitNETs/adenomas with cytologic atypia features. Immunohistochemistry may facilitate diagnosis in the distinction from histologic mimics.

Association between transcription factors expression and growth patterns of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas

Transcription factors (TFs), including steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1), T-box transcription factor (TPIT) and pituitary transcription factor-1 (PIT-1), play a pivotal role in the cytodifferentiation of adenohypophysis. However, the impact of TFs on the growth patterns of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the correlation between the expression of TFs and NFPAs growth patterns. Preoperative MRI in 171 patients who underwent surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas were analyzed to determine tumor growth patterns. Immunohistochemical staining for transcription factors PIT-1, TPIT, and SF-1 was done on all samples. Extrasellar growth was divided into three principal directions: infrasellar, suprasellar and lateral cavernous sinus invasion (CSI). Suprasellar extension was defined as tumor extension superior to the tuberculum sellae-dorsum sellae line, inferior extension as invasion through the sellar floor into the sphenoid sinus or clivus and CSI as Knosp grading score of 3 ~ 4. Statistical analysis to compare the groups was conducted using the Fisher's exact test and t-test. TPIT-expressing tumors were more likely to exhibit combined infrasellar extension (55.17 vs 17.70%, p < 0.0001), as well as isolated infrasellar extension (18.97 vs 0%, p < 0.0001) compared to SF-1-expressing tumors. Conversely, SF-1-expressing tumors were more likely to exhibit combined suprasellar extension (92.92 vs 77.59%, p = 0.0061), as well as isolated suprasellar extension (75.22 vs 41.38%, p < 0.0001). TPIT-expressing tumors had a significantly higher CSI invasion (55.17 vs 35.40%, p = 0.0148). The mean maximal tumor diameter in TPIT and SF-1 macroadenomas was similar (28 vs 26 mm, p = 0.1213). The expression of TFs affects the extrasellar growth pattern of NFPAs. TPIT tumors exhibit a higher propensity for bone invasion and CSI, while SF-1 tumors tend to extend into the suprasellar region. Isolated infrasellar extension is specific to TPIT tumors and can serve as a radiologic sign to distinguish between TPIT tumors and SF-1 tumors.

Practical approaches to diagnosing PitNETs/adenomas based on cell lineage

The evolution of classification systems of pituitary adenomas (now PitNETs) has culminated in the use of transcription factor (TF) immunohistochemistry (IHC), forming a cell lineage-based system. However, several issues remain to be addressed, including the additional financial and logistic burden of undertaking the complete array of anterior pituitary hormones and TF IHC. To that end, several groups have suggested algorithms to minimise the number of tests performed, with varying levels of diagnostic accuracy. Although the proportion of null cell tumours has decreased following the use of TFs, "multilineage" tumours have been reported and characterised using transcriptomic signatures, most prominently the PIT1-SF1 co-expressing PitNETs, which do not bear a position in the present system of classification. In this review, we examine the proposed practical approaches to the diagnosis of PitNETs. We review the literature on reported PitNET types that challenge the existing classification system, such as those that express multiple TFs, with their potential clinical implications. Finally, we assess limitations in the present system, such as the lack of a standardised system for IHC interpretation, that need to be addressed in the future.

Clinicopathologic Correlates of PIT1 and SF1-Multilineage Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors and the Diagnostic Utility of NKX2.2 Immunohistochemistry in Pituitary Pathology

CONTEXT.—

PIT1 and SF1-multilineage pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) have been defined since the classification of adenohypophysial tumors based on the PIT1, SF1, and TPIT transcription factors.

OBJECTIVE.—

To describe the clinicopathologic features of PIT1 and SF1-multilineage PitNETs and to contribute to the pituitary pathology practice by questioning the expression of NKX2.2 in PitNETs.

DESIGN.—

We reviewed 345 PitNETs and described the clinicopathologic features of 8 PIT1 and SF1-multilineage tumors. NKX2.2 positivity and staining pattern were compared to those of 45 PitNETs from the control group.

RESULTS.—

PIT1 and SF1-multilineage PitNET patients had a mean age of 41.13 (range, 14-58 years) and a mean tumor diameter of 14.0 mm (range, 8-20 mm). The most common clinical presentation was acromegaly (6 of 8), and postoperative remission was achieved in all patients. On histomorphologic examination, a pseudopapillary pattern was seen in 5 of the tumors, either focally or diffusely. In addition to PIT1 and SF1, there was a diffuse staining with growth hormone and a predominantly perinuclear staining with cytokeratin 18. With NKX2.2, all multilineage tumors were positive, of which 5 were diffuse and 3 were focal. In the control group, 8 tumors (8 of 45) were positive, of which only 1 was diffuse and 7 were focal.

CONCLUSIONS.—

In conclusion, NKX2.2 is a transcription factor that can be used as an additional tool in pituitary pathology, and PIT1 and SF1-multilineage PitNETs are specific tumors that usually present with acromegaly, show signs of a nonaggressive clinical course, have a pseudopapillary histomorphology, and express NKX2.2.

Olfactory Neuroblastoma and Olfactory Carcinoma: A Practical Review

In the sinonasal tract, two tumor types are defined by neuroectodermal differentiation. Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), the traditional member of this category, is a keratin-negative neuroectodermal neoplasm that has lobulated architecture and variable neurofibrillary matrix. Olfactory carcinoma (OC), a newly-recognized diagnosis in the sinonasal tract, has keratin-positive neuroectodermal elements frequently intermixed with well-formed glands. These two neuroectodermal entities can show substantial overlap with other sinonasal small round blue cell tumors that express neuroendocrine markers. This review provides a practical overview of the key clinical and diagnostic features of ONB and OC and their differential diagnosis.

The current state of MRI-based radiomics in pituitary adenoma: promising but challenging

In the clinical diagnosis and treatment of pituitary adenomas, MRI plays a crucial role. However, traditional manual interpretations are plagued by inter-observer variability and limitations in recognizing details. Radiomics, based on MRI, facilitates quantitative analysis by extracting high-throughput data from images. This approach elucidates correlations between imaging features and pituitary tumor characteristics, thereby establishing imaging biomarkers. Recent studies have demonstrated the extensive application of radiomics in differential diagnosis, subtype identification, consistency evaluation, invasiveness assessment, and treatment response in pituitary adenomas. This review succinctly presents the general workflow of radiomics, reviews pertinent literature with a summary table, and provides a comparative analysis with traditional methods. We further elucidate the connections between radiological features and biological findings in the field of pituitary adenoma. While promising, the clinical application of radiomics still has a considerable distance to traverse, considering the issues with reproducibility of imaging features and the significant heterogeneity in pituitary adenoma patients.

How to standardize the diagnostic approach to pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Pituitary tumors present heterogeneous biochemical, clinico-radiological, and histological features. Although histologically benign, a non-negligible number of cases present an unpredictable aggressive behavior with local invasiveness, partial/complete resistance to treatment and/or recurrence after surgery, and, rarely, metastasize, overall leading to a significant increase of morbidity, and, thus, requiring skilled multidisciplinary management in referral Centers. Histopathological diagnosis is essential to stratify cancer patient risk and uniform follow-up among Centers. Classification of pituitary neoplasia is continuously evolving in relation to the increased knowledge of mechanisms underlying adenohypophyseal cell tumorigenesis, and the attempts of combining clinico-radiological, biochemical, intraoperative, histological, and molecular elements, with the aim of identifying aggressive forms through. An integrated standardized histopathological report has been proposed in 2019 by the European Pituitary Pathology Group, based on the indications of the 2017 WHO classification of pituitary tumors. The last edition of the WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors and of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors brought substantial novelties: 1) the replacement of the term "adenoma" with "Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor" (PitNET), and of "carcinoma" with "metastatic PitNET," and the consequent ICD-11 recoding from benign to malignant disease; and 2) the pivotal role of lineage restricted pituitary transcription factors for histological typing and subtyping. However, this approach does not reflect the spectrum of tumor phenotypes based on hormone secretion, nor include molecular features. Efforts of interdisciplinary groups of pituitary experts should be strongly encouraged to better understand factors involved in PitNETs evolution and, consequently, standardize diagnosis and reporting based on the most recent knowledges, essential to stratify cancer patient risk and uniform follow-up among centers.

Clinical implications of the 2022 WHO classification on the multidisciplinary management of PitNETS patients

The review explores the 2022 update to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of pituitary adenomas, now referred to as pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs), and his possible impact on the clinical management of PitNET patients. The review highlights the differences and the evolution from the 2017 to 2022 version, with the current classification considering the lineage of the tumor cells, cell type, hormones produced, and other auxiliary characteristics for a comprehensive histological classification. The revision in terminology reflects a broader perspective on neuroendocrine neoplasia. The new approach based on transcription factors, hormone expression and other biomarkers has allowed a major revision of the nomenclature and a more accurate classification of pituitary adenomas. Furthermore, in some cases this approach is also assuming a prognostic value, useful in clinical practice. However, despite this elaborate classification and stratification, the review points out the lack of a robust grading or staging system and suggests the need for further research and validation of diagnostic methods. Despite these limitations, the revised classification presents a significant step towards understanding and managing PitNETs patients.

Diagnosis and Management of Aggressive/Refractory Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

The majority of acromegaly and gigantism are caused by growth hormone-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). Most cases can be cured or controlled by surgery, medical therapy, and/or radiotherapy. However, a few of these tumors are resistant to traditional therapy and always have a poor prognosis. The title aggressive/refractory is used to differentiate them from pituitary carcinomas. To date, there is no definitive conclusion on how to diagnose aggressive/refractory growth hormone-secreting PitNETs, which may have slowed the process of exploring new therapeutical strategies. We summarized the literature described diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Potential disease markers and prospective therapies were also included.

Does New WHO 2022 Nomenclature of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors Offer an Extra Edge to the Neurosurgeons for Its Management? A Narrative Review

The new World Health Organization nomenclature of pituitary tumors was introduced in the year 2022 after much deliberation. This nomenclature clearly demarcates the anterior lobe (adenohypophyseal), posterior lobe (neurohypophyseal), and hypothalamic tumors. There is also focus on other tumors arising in the sellar region. The nomenclature has also advocated the routine use of immunohistochemistry in describing the pituitary transcription factors that plays a fundamental role in distinguishing the cell lineage of these tumors. However, the nomenclature is complex in understanding due to inclusion of pathological correlates like transcription factors, hormones, biomarkers, and various controversies that have emerged regarding the renaming of pituitary adenomas (PA) as PiTNETs ("Pituitary Neuroendocrine tumors") because majority of the adenomas are benign and have rare metastatic behavior while classifying them as PiTNETs will create unnecessary misinterpretation of these as aggressive tumors that will lead to apprehension among the patients. The new classification gives deeper insight into the histological picture of the various pituitary tumors but other than contributing to the follow-up strategy and postsurgery management, this classification does not add anything new that could be advantageous for the neurosurgeons in clinical practice and decision making, especially in deciding the plan of action for surgery. Hence, there is need of a more comprehensive, integrated, neuroradiological-based classification with more emphasis on the invasiveness of these tumors that would assist the neurosurgeons in planning the treatment strategy and managing patients of pituitary tumors.

Plurihormonal Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumours - A Single Centre Experience

Introduction. Plurihormonal pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNET)/adenomas are pituitary neuroendocrine tumours composed of monomorphous cell populations expressing anterior pituitary transcription factors and/or hormones belonging to more than one cell lineage. Studies dedicated to plurihormonal tumours are rare and quite heterogenous with their results, bearing in mind changes in diagnostic criteria and inconsistent use of antibodies for anterior pituitary transcription factors in the diagnostic immunohistochemical panel. Material and Methods. We retrospectively analysed all patients surgically treated for PitNETs from 2016 to July 2022 in a tertiary healthcare institution. All tumours previously diagnosed PitNETs with the word "plurihormonal" were re-examined and potentially re-classified, according to 2022 WHO classification of endocrine tumours. Results. Among 721 patients surgically treated for PitNET in 5.5 years period, the diagnosis of plurihormonal PitNET was established in 11 tumours (1.3%). All tumours showed diffuse and intensive positivity for anterior pituitary transcription factors PIT1 and SF1. Clinically, all patients presented with acromegaly. Conclusions. Retrospective studies related to newly defined plurihormonal PitNETs with a reassessment of diagnoses are necessary due to their rarity and ambition to investigate their origin and biological behaviour. The fact that the majority of plurihormonal PitNETs are clinically presented with acromegaly and show simultaneous positivity to PIT1 and SF1 transcription factors deserve special attention and need for further research in larger cohorts of these exceptional tumours.

Histopathology of growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumors: State of the art and new perspectives

Somatotroph (GH) adenomas/PitNETs typically arise from adenohypophysis and are biochemically active, leading to acromegaly and gigantism. More rarely, they present with ectopic origin and do not present overt biochemical or clinical features (silent variants). Histopathological examination should consider the clinical and radiological background, and include multiple steps assessing tumor morphology, pituitary transcription factors (PTFs), hormone secretion, proliferation markers, granulation, and somatostatin receptors (STRs), aimed at depicting as better as possible tumor origin (in case of non-functioning and/or metastatic tumor), and clinical behavior, including response to treatment. GH-secreting tumors are part of the Pit-1 family tumors and can secrete GH only (pure somatotrophs) or co-secrete prolactin (mixed tumors; in this case, various histological subtypes have been identified). Each subtype presents unique radiological, biochemical, and clinical characteristic. Therefore, the integration of biochemical, clinical, radiological, and histopathological elements is fundamental for proper diagnosis and management of pituitary adenomas/PitNETs, to be performed in referral Centers. In more recent times, the importance of genetic and epigenetic evaluation in the characterization of pituitary tumors (i.e., early identification of aggressive variants) has been outlined by some large studies, with the intention of improving targeted treatments.

Clinical and Molecular Characteristics of Gonadotroph Pituitary Tumors According to the WHO Classification

Since 2017, hormone-negative pituitary neuroendocrine tumors expressing the steroidogenic factor SF1 have been recognized as gonadotroph tumors (GnPT) but have been poorly studied. To further characterize their bio-clinical spectrum, 54 GnPT defined by immunostaining for FSH and/or LH (group 1, n = 41) or SF1 only (group 2, n = 13) were compared and studied for SF1, βFSH, βLH, CCNA2, CCNB1, CCND1, caspase 3, D2R, and AIP gene expression by qRT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry for AIP and/or D2R was performed in representative cases. Overall, patients were significantly younger in group 1 (P = 0.040 vs group 2), with a similar trend excluding recurrent cases (P = 0.078), and no significant difference in gender, tumor size, invasion or Ki67. SF1 expression was similar in both groups but negatively correlated with the patient's age (P = 0.013) and positively correlated with βLH (P < 0.001) expression. Beta-FSH and AIP were significantly higher in group 1 (P = 0.042 and P = 0.024, respectively). Ki67 was unrelated to gonadotroph markers but positively correlated with CCNB1 (P = 0.001) and negatively correlated with CCND1 (P = 0.008). D2R and AIP were strongly correlated with each other (P < 0.001), and both positively correlated with SF1, βFSH, βLH, and CCND1. AIP immunopositivity was frequently observed in both groups, with a similar median score, and unrelated to Ki67. D2R immunostaining was best detected with a polyclonal antibody and mostly cytoplasmic. This study indicates that hormone-negative GnPT tend to occur in older patients but do not significantly differ from other GnPT in terms of invasion or proliferation. It also points out the current limits of D2R immunostaining in such tumors.

Transcription Factor Immunohistochemistry in the Classification of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor/Adenoma: Proposal in a Limited-Resource Setting

CONTEXT.—

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenomas are common intracranial tumors that require accurate subtyping because each tumor differs in its biologic behavior and response to treatment. Pituitary-specific transcription factors allow for improved lineage identification and diagnosis of newly introduced variants.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess the usefulness of transcription factors and design a limited panel of immunostains for classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenoma.

DESIGN.—

A total of 356 tumors were classified as per expression of pituitary hormones and transcription factors T-box family member TBX19 (TPIT), pituitary-specific POU-class homeodomain (PIT1), and steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1). The resultant classification was correlated with patients' clinical and biochemical features. The performance and relevance of individual immunostains were analyzed.

RESULTS.—

Reclassification of 34.8% (124 of 356) of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenoma was done after application of transcription factors. The highest agreement with final diagnosis was seen using a combination of hormone and transcription factors. SF-1 had higher sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value compared with follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. On the other hand, TPIT and PIT1 had similar performance and Allred scores compared with their respective hormones.

CONCLUSIONS.—

SF-1 and PIT1 should be included in the routine panel for guiding the classification. PIT1 positivity needs to be followed by hormone immunohistochemistry, especially in nonfunctional cases. TPIT and adrenocorticotropin can be used interchangeably as per availability of the lab.

Pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment of plurihormonal pituitary adenoma

Plurihormonal pituitary adenoma (PPA) is a type of pituitary tumor capable of producing two or more hormones and usually presents as an aggressive, large adenoma. As yet, its pathogenesis remains unclear. This is the first study to systematically summarize the underlying pathogenesis of PPA. The pathogenesis is related to plurihormonal primordial stem cells, co-transcription factors, hormone co-expression, differential gene expression, and cell transdifferentiation. We conducted a literature review of PPA and analyzed its clinical characteristics. We found that the average age of patients with PPA was approximately 40 years, and most showed only one clinical symptom. The most common manifestation was acromegaly. Currently, PPA is treated with surgical resection. However, recent studies suggest that immunotherapy may be a potentially effective treatment.

Update on Current Evidence for the Diagnosis and Management of Nonfunctioning Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are the third most frequently diagnosed intracranial tumors, with nonfunctioning PitNETs (nfPitNETs) accounting for 30% of all pituitary tumors and representing the most common type of macroPitNETs. NfPitNETs are usually benign tumors with no evidence of hormone oversecretion except for hyperprolactinemia secondary to pituitary stalk compression. Due to this, they do not typically present with clinical syndromes like acromegaly, Cushing's disease or hyperthyroidism and instead are identified incidentally on imaging or from symptoms of mass effects (headache, vision changes, apoplexy). With the lack of effective medical interventions, first-line treatment is transsphenoidal surgical resection, however, nfPitNETs often have supra- or parasellar extension, and total resection of the tumor is often not possible, resulting in residual tumor regrowth or reoccurrence. While functional PitNETs can be easily followed for recurrence using hormonal biomarkers, there is no similar parameter to predict recurrence in nfPitNETs, hence delaying early recognition and timely management. Therefore, there is a need to identify prognostic biomarkers that can be used for patient surveillance and as therapeutic targets. This review focuses on summarizing the current evidence on nfPitNETs, with a special focus on potential new biomarkers and therapeutics.

[Unification of pathomorphological examination of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pituitary gland. Controversial issues of the new classification]

The progressive improvement of the classification using modern analytical methods is an essential tool for the development of precise and personalized approaches to the treatment of pituitary adenomas. In recent years, endocrinologists have witnessed evolutionary changes that have occurred in the histopathological identification of pituitary neoplasms, revealing new possibilities for studying tumorigenesis and predicting biological behavior.The paper considers the historical aspects of the gradual improvement of the classification of pituitary adenomas, as well as the new international 2022 WHO classification, according to which pituitary adenomas are included in the list of neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) to reflect the biological aggressiveness of some non-metastatic pituitary adenomas. The characteristics of pituitary adenoma are presented, as well as a list of histological subtypes of aggressive neuroendocrine tumors of the pituitary gland, marked by the main potentials for invasive growth, an increased risk of recurrence and a negative clinical prognosis.The expediency of changing the definition of «pituitary adenoma» to «neuroendocrine tumor» is discussed. It is emphasized that the introduction of a unified clinical, laboratory and morphological protocol into national clinical practice will help provide comparable comparative studies on the prognosis of the disease and the effectiveness of secondary therapy and also contribute to adequate management of potentially aggressive PitNETs.

Role of Tumor Microenvironment in Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: New Approaches in Classification, Diagnosis and Therapy

Adenohypophysal pituitary tumors account for 10-15% of all intracranial tumors, and 25-55% display signs of invasiveness. Nevertheless, oncology still relies on histopathological examination to establish the diagnosis. Considering that the classification of pituitary tumors has changed significantly in recent years, we discuss the definition of aggressive and invasive tumors and the latest molecular criteria used for classifying these entities. The pituitary tumor microenvironment (TME) is essential for neoplastic development and progression. This review aims to reveal the impact of TME characteristics on stratifying these tumors in view of finding appropriate therapeutic approaches. The role of the pituitary tumor microenvironment and its main components, non-tumoral cells and soluble factors, has been addressed. The variable display of different immune cell types, tumor-associated fibroblasts, and folliculostellate cells is discussed in relation to tumor development and aggressiveness. The molecules secreted by both tumoral and non-tumoral cells, such as VEGF, FGF, EGF, IL6, TNFα, and immune checkpoint molecules, contribute to the crosstalk between the tumor and its microenvironment. They could be considered potential biomarkers for diagnosis and the invasiveness of these tumors, together with emerging non-coding RNA molecules. Therefore, assessing this complex network associated with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors could bring a new era in diagnosing and treating this pathology.

Clinical presentation and recurrence of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: results from a single referral center in Colombia

INTRODUCTION

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) represent 15-18.2% of all intracranial tumors. Their clinical presentation can range from chronic headache, visual defects, hypopituitarism to hormone excess syndromes. PitNETS are commonly classified as functioning neuroendocrine tumors (F-PitNETs) and non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PitNETs). At the moment, new classification has emerged based on cell lineages. Almost 50% of all patients with PitNETs require surgical intervention, and about 25% of these have residual and persistent disease that may require additional management.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort of medical records of patients with PitNETs, aiming to describe the incidence of recurrence of patients who received surgical treatment over a 12 month follow up period at San Jose Hospital (SJH) in Bogotá, Colombia, over an observation period of 10 years. Furthermore, clinical presentation, biochemical characteristics and immunohistochemistry, postoperative complications are detailed.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and eighty-seven patients with pituitary tumors were included in the cohort; 83% (737/887) had a diagnosis of PitNET. Of these, 18.9% (140) received surgical management. The majority 58% (98/140) had nonfunctional-PitNETs (NF-PitNETs), followed by growth-hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma (22.1%; 33/140), adrenocorticotropic- hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma (9.3%; 13/140), and prolactinomas (9.3%; 13/140). A recurrence was found in 45.71% (64/140), subclassified as biochemical in 15.71% (22/140), controlled with medications in 20% (28/140), and remission occurred in 18.57% (26/140).

CONCLUSION

Clinical presentation and incidence of recurrence in patients with PitNETs in a referral center in Colombia are similar to other surgical cohorts with low cure rates and high recurrence.

Identification of cholesterol metabolism-related subtypes in nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors and analysis of immune infiltration

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the role of cholesterol metabolism-related genes in nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PitNETs) invading the cavernous sinus and analyze the differences in immune cell infiltration between invasive and noninvasive NF-PitNETs.

METHODS

First, a retrospective analysis of single-center clinical data was performed. Second, the immune cell infiltration between invasive and noninvasive NF-PitNETs in the GSE169498 dataset was further analyzed, and statistically different cholesterol metabolism-related gene expression matrices were obtained from the dataset. The hub cholesterol metabolism-related genes in NF-PitNETs were screened by constructing machine learning models. In accordance with the hub gene, 73 cases of NF-PitNETs were clustered into two subtypes, and the functional differences and immune cell infiltration between the two subtypes were further analyzed.

RESULTS

The clinical data of 146 NF-PitNETs were evaluated, and the results showed that the cholesterol (P = 0.034) between invasive and noninvasive NF-PitNETs significantly differed. After binary logistic analysis, cholesterol was found to be an independent risk factor for cavernous sinus invasion (CSI) in NF-PitNETs. Bioinformatics analysis found three immune cells between invasive and noninvasive NF-PitNETs were statistically significant in the GSE169498 dataset, and 34 cholesterol metabolism-related genes with differences between the two groups were obtained 12 hub genes were selected by crossing the two machine learning algorithm results. Subsequently, cholesterol metabolism-related subgroups, A and B, were obtained by unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis. The results showed that 12 immune cells infiltrated differentially between the two subgroups. The chi-square test revealed that the two subgroups had statistically significance in the invasive and noninvasive samples (P = 0.001). KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the differentially expressed genes were mainly enriched in the neural ligand-receptor pathway. GSVA analysis showed that the mTORC signaling pathway was upregulated and played an important role in the two-cluster comparison.

CONCLUSION

By clinical data and bioinformatics analysis, cholesterol metabolism-related genes may promote the infiltration abundance of immune cells in NF-PitNETs and the invasion of cavernous sinuses by NF-PitNETs through the mTOR signaling pathway. This study provides a new perspective to explore the pathogenesis of cavernous sinus invasion by NF-PitNETs and determine potential therapeutic targets for this disease.

Pathology of Crooke Cells in the Human Pituitaries: A Timely Review

Crooke cell change was first found in the regressed and suppressed corticotroph (adrenocorticotropic hormone-producing) cells, and now is known to occur in pituitary tumors. The tumor cells of this type can be recognized by morphology with immunohistochemistry, and are well known to predict aggressive behavior such as invasion and rare metastases. This is one of the representative neuroendocrine tumors in the pituitary which is now considered to have malignant potential as proposed in the pancreas and gastrointestinal tracts. It is important to emphasize the pituitary tumor pathology such as Crooke cell change for prognostication and appropriate therapies. This review article describes the evolution from the Crooke cells to Crooke cell tumors which is timely along with the Fifth WHO classification 2022 published online.

Identification of the enhancer RNAs related to tumorgenesis of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Background

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs), which originate from the pituitary gland, account for 10%-15% of all intracranial neoplasms. Recent studies have indicated that enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) exert regulatory effects on tumor growth. However, the mechanisms underlying the eRNA-mediated tumorigenesis of PitNETs have not been elucidated.

Methods

Normal pituitary and PitNETs tissues were used to identify the differentially expressed eRNAs (DEEs). Immune gene sets and hallmarks of cancer gene sets were quantified based on single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm using GSVA. The perspective of immune cells among all samples was calculated by the CIBERSORT algorithm. Moreover, the regulatory network composed of key DEEs, target genes of eRNAs, hallmarks of cancer gene sets, differentially expressed TF, immune cells and immune gene sets were constructed by Pearson correlation analysis. Small molecular anti-PitNETs drugs were explored by CMap analysis and the accuracy of the study was verified by in vitro and in vivo experiments, ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq.

Results

In this study, data of 134 PitNETs and 107 non-tumorous pituitary samples were retrieved from a public database to identify differentially expressed genes. In total, 1128 differentially expressed eRNAs (DEEs) (494 upregulated eRNAs and 634 downregulated eRNAs) were identified. Next, the correlation of DEEs with cancer-related and immune-related gene signatures was examined to establish a co-expression regulatory network comprising 18 DEEs, 50 potential target genes of DEEs, 5 cancer hallmark gene sets, 2 differentially expressed transcription factors, 4 immune cell types, and 4 immune gene sets. Based on this network, the following four therapeutics for PitNETs were identified using Connectivity Map analysis: ciclopirox, bepridil, clomipramine, and alexidine. The growth-inhibitory effects of these therapeutics were validated using in vitro experiments. Ciclopirox exerted potential growth-inhibitory effects on PitNETs. Among the DEEs, GNLY, HOXB7, MRPL33, PRDM16, TCF7, and ZNF26 were determined to be potential diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers for PitNETs.

Conclusion

This study illustrated the significant influence of eRNAs on the occurrence and development of PitNETs. By constructing the co-expression regulation network, GNLY, HOXB6, MRPL33, PRDM16, TCF7, and ZNF26 were identified as relatively significant DEEs which were considered as the novel biomarkers of diagnosis and treatment of PitNETs. This study demonstrated the roles of eRNAs in the occurrence and development of PitNETs and revealed that ciclopirox was a potential therapeutic for pituitary adenomas.

Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Role of Ki67 Proliferative Index in Neuroendocrine and Endocrine Neoplasms: Past, Present, and Future

The introduction of Ki67 immunohistochemistry in the work-up of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has opened a new approach for their diagnosis and prognostic evaluation. Since the first demonstration of the prognostic role of Ki67 proliferative index in pancreatic NENs in 1996, several studies have been performed to explore its prognostic, diagnostic, and predictive role in other neuroendocrine and endocrine neoplasms. A large amount of information is now available and published results globally indicate that Ki67 proliferative index is useful to this scope, although some differences exist in relation to tumor site and type. In gut and pancreatic NENs, the Ki67 proliferative index has a well-documented and accepted diagnostic and prognostic role and its evaluation is mandatory in their diagnostic work-up. In the lung, the Ki67 index is recommended for the diagnosis of NENs on biopsy specimens, but its diagnostic role in surgical specimens still remains to be officially accepted, although its prognostic role is now well documented. In other organs, such as the pituitary, parathyroid, thyroid (follicular cell-derived neoplasms), and adrenal medulla, the Ki67 index does not play a diagnostic role and its prognostic value still remains a controversial issue. In medullary thyroid carcinoma, the Ki67 labelling index is used to define the tumor grade together with other morphological parameters, while in the adrenal cortical carcinoma, it is useful to select patients to treated with mitotane therapy. In the present review, the most important information on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive role of Ki67 proliferative index is presented discussing the current knowledge. In addition, technical issues related to the evaluation of Ki67 proliferative index and the future perspectives of the application of Ki67 immunostaining in endocrine and neuroendocrine neoplasms is discussed.

Unveiling the identities of null cell tumours: Epigenomics corroborate subtle histological cues in pituitary neuroendocrine tumour/adenoma classification

AIMS

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumour (PitNET)/adenoma classification is based on cell lineage and requires immunopositivity for adenohypophysial hormones and/or transcription factors (TFs) steroidogenic factor 1 (SF1), T-box transcription factor TBX19 (TPIT) or pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1 (PIT1). PitNET/adenomas lacking lineage affiliation are termed 'null cell' tumours (NCTs). NCT diagnosis may be afflicted by methodological limitations and inconsistent diagnostic approaches. Previous studies have questioned the existence of true NCTs. In this study, we explore the epigenomic identities of PitNET/adenomas lacking clear TF immunopositivity.

METHODS

Seventy-four hormone-negative PitNET/adenomas were immunostained and scored for SF1, TPIT and PIT1 expression. All tumours were classified as gonadotroph, corticotroph, PIT1-positive or 'null cell'. NCTs were subjected to global DNA methylation analysis. Epigenomic profiles of NCTs were compared to reference tumours using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) plotting and methylation-based classification.

RESULTS

TF immunostaining revealed definite lineage identity in 59 of 74 (79.7%) hormone-negative PitNET/adenomas. Of the remaining 15 NCTs, 13 demonstrated minimal and inconclusive nuclear SF1 or TPIT expression (5 and 8, respectively). Two NCTs were entirely immunonegative. UMAP plotting and methylation-based classification demonstrated that the epigenomes of NCTs with minimal SF1 or TPIT expression were adequately affiliated with gonadotroph or corticotroph lineages, respectively. The two immunonegative NCTs were located near the corticotroph PitNET/adenomas via UMAP, whereas the methylation classifier could not match these two cases to predefined tumour classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Epigenomic analyses substantiate lineage identification based on minimal TF immunopositivity in PitNET/adenomas. This strategy dramatically decreases the incidence of NCTs and further challenges the legitimacy of NCTs as a distinct PitNET/adenoma subtype. Our study may be useful for guiding diagnostic efforts and future considerations of PitNET/adenoma classification.

An Overview of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNET) and Algorithmic Approach to Diagnosis

The diagnostic algorithm and nomenclature of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors have evolved over the past decade, beginning with simpler categorical schemes focused on histomorphologic features and moving to a more sophisticated lineage-specific categorization. This contemporary overview highlights a multimodal approach to pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with a focus on changes in nomenclature, classification, and subclassification; including, brief comments on treatment, and new guidelines for genetic screening, particularly for young patients with such neoplasms.

Postoperative complications after endoscope-assisted transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: a case series, systematic review, and meta-analysis of the literature

PURPOSE

Endoscope-assisted transsphenoidal surgery over the last few years has led to more radical excision of pituitary adenomas (PAs) with a low complication rate. Systematic registration of complications by experienced surgical teams could help to improve this technique while ameliorating the patients' quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred ten endoscopic procedures were performed in 94 patients with PAs (37 functional) by the same neurosurgical team of a tertiary center during the period 2014-2019. Post-surgical complications were analyzed and compared with data published during the last 5 years in the PubMed and Cochrane databases by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate in our series was 23.4%. Diabetes insipidus (DI) and intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage were the commonest complications (12.8%), followed by postoperative hypopituitarism (9.2%) and hematoma (8.5%) during the follow-up of 2.15 ± 1.4 years. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, meningitis, deep vein thrombosis, and hyposmia were rare (< 3%). Postoperative hypopituitarism was significantly associated with incidence of hematoma. No statistically significant association was found between PAs Hardy and Knosp scale grading or between patients' characteristics with the occurrence of postoperative complications. Our meta-analysis including nine studies found no significant differences comparing the complications of endoscopic versus microscopic surgery.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic approach is safe when performed by experienced surgical teams. CSF leakage and DI were the commonest complications in our series; however, confirmation by larger studies is required. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in complication rates comparing endoscopic versus microscopic surgery.

Incidence and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Benign Pituitary Tumors Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

OBJECTIVE

To study the incidence and prognostic factors of patients with benign pituitary tumors based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with benign pituitary tumors reported in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2016, who presented completed demographic and clinical data, were included in our study. The age-adjusted incidence rate was calculated and stratified by year at diagnosis, age, gender, and the pathological type of benign pituitary tumor. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regressions to determine the factors associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 29,967 patients were included in the study, of whom 26,691 (89.07%) survived and 3276 (10.93%) died. The age-adjusted incidence rate increased from 3.15 per 100,000 person-years in 2004 to 4.66 per 100,000 person-years in 2011 (annual percent change = 5.51, P < 0.001), and the subsequent growth trend from 2011 to 2016 was not statistically significant (annual percent change = 0.26, P = 0.711). Most patients were female, aged 60-79 years, and pituitary adenomas accounted for the main proportion of the incidence of benign pituitary tumors. Surgery was associated with the overall survival on the multivariable Cox regression model (hazard ratio = 0.677, 95% confidential interval: 0.629-0.727) and Kaplan-Meier curves, especially in pituitary adenoma. Radiation was not associated with the overall survival of benign pituitary tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of benign pituitary tumors was low but showed an increasing trend. Surgery may be beneficial to the prognosis. It should be noted that benign pituitary tumors may not require excessive treatment, such as radiation.

Updating the Landscape for Functioning Gonadotroph Tumors

Functioning gonadotroph adenomas (FGAs) are rare tumors, as the overwhelming majority of gonadotroph tumors are clinically silent. Literature is based on case reports and small case series. Gonadotroph tumors are poorly differentiated and produce and secrete hormones inefficiently, but in exceptional cases, they cause clinical syndromes due to hypersecretion of intact gonadotropins. The clinical spectrum of endocrine dysfunction includes an exaggerated response of ovaries characterized as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in premenopausal females and adolescent girls, testicular enlargement in males, and isosexual precocious puberty in children. Transsphenoidal surgery and removal of tumor reduces hormonal hypersecretion, improves endocrine dysfunction, and provides tissue for further analysis. Medical therapies (somatostatin analogues, dopamine agonists, GnRH agonists/antagonists) are partially or totally ineffective in many cases, especially with respect to antitumor effect. This review aims to update recent literature on these rare functioning tumors and highlight their therapeutic management.

CHST7 Methylation Status Related to the Proliferation and Differentiation of Pituitary Adenomas

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are the second most common primary brain tumor and may develop from any of the cell lineages responsible for producing the different pituitary hormones. DNA methylation is one of the essential epigenetic mechanisms in cancers, including PAs. In this study, we measured the expression profile and promoter methylation status of carbohydrate sulfotransferase 7 (CHST7) in patients with PA; then, we investigated the effect of the CHST7 methylation status on the proliferation and differentiation of PAs. The volcano map and Metascape results showed that the levels of CHST7 were related to the lineages’ differentiation and the cell adhesion of PAs, and patients with low CHST7 had greater chances of having an SF-1 lineage (p = 0.002) and optic chiasm compression (p = 0.007). Reactome pathway analysis revealed that most of the DEGs involved in the regulation of TP53 regulated the transcription of cell cycle genes (HSA-6791312 and HSA6804116) in patients with high CHST7. Correlation analysis showed that CHST7 was significantly correlated with the eIF2/ATF4 pathway and mitochondrion-related genes. The AUC of ROC showed that CHST7 (0.288; 95% CI: 0.187–0.388) was superior to SF-1 (0.555; 95% CI: 0.440–0.671) and inferior to FSHB (0.804; 95% CI: 0.704–0.903) in forecasting the SF-1 lineage (p < 0.001). The SF-1 lineage showed a higher methylation frequency for CHST7 than the Pit-1 and TBX19 lineages (p = 0.009). Furthermore, as the key molecule of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, inhibin βE (INHBE) was positively correlated with the levels of CHST7 (r = 0.685, p < 0.001). In summary, CHST7 is a novel pituitary gland specific protein in SF-1 lineage adenomas with a potential role in gonadotroph cell proliferation and lineage differentiation in PAs.

Sparsely Granulated Corticotroph Pituitary Macroadenoma Presenting with Pituitary Apoplexy Resulting in Remission of Hypercortisolism

Objective

Case Report

Discussion

Conclusion

Utility of a canine TSH assay for diagnosis and monitoring of feline hyperthyroidism

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study was initiated to evaluate the utility of TSH measurements using a common canine TSH assay to diagnose and monitor feline hyperthyroidism after radioiodine or thyreostatic drug treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The electronic database of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna was searched for combined TSH and T4 measurements. 217 pairs of TSH and T4 from 136 cats with possible hyperthyroidism were assigned to group A (untreated; n = 24) and B (treated; n = 193). Measurements in group B were then subcategorized according to T4 concentrations (reference range 15-50 nmol/L): group B1 = elevated T4 (n = 46), group B2 = normal T4 (n = 84) and group B3 = decreased T4 (n = 63). Group B2 was further divided into cats with low normal (group B2a; n = 35), medium normal (group B2b; n = 29) and high normal (group B2c; n = 20) T4 concentrations.

RESULTS

TSH was detectable in 4 (17 %) of the 24 untreated cats (group A) and did not return to normal despite seemingly successful therapy in two. Increased TSH concentrations were observed in 3.6 % of the treated cats in group B2 and 2.9 %, 6.9 %, and 0 % in subgroups B2a, B2b and B2c, respectively. Forty-four percent of the treated cats with a decreased T4 (group B3) had an increased TSH concentration. TSH correlated with treatment length (r = 0.358, p = 0.004) and was significantly higher in cats treated for more than 3 months (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

TSH was detectable in a significant number of untreated hyperthyroid cats and thus this parameter should not be used to definitively rule out feline hyperthyroidism. Furthermore, the very low prevalence of increased TSH concentrations in treated hyperthyroid cats with a normal T4 and cost benefit calculations do not support the routine measurement of TSH in these cats. The fact that TSH correlated with time since treatment start and 56 % of the cats with a decreased T4 had TSH concentrations within the reference limits, suggests delayed recovery of the pituitary thyrotrophs which might explain the low prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in the present study.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

TSH measurement in cats with suspected or treated hyperthyroidism using a canine assay lacks diagnostic sensitivity and can only complement therapeutic decision-making.

Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

This review article provides a brief overview of the new WHO classification by adopting a question-answer model to highlight the spectrum of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms which includes epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas) arising from upper aerodigestive tract and salivary glands, and special neuroendocrine neoplasms including middle ear neuroendocrine tumors (MeNET), ectopic or invasive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET; formerly known as pituitary adenoma) and Merkel cell carcinoma as well as non-epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (paragangliomas). The new WHO classification follows the IARC/WHO nomenclature framework and restricts the diagnostic term of neuroendocrine carcinoma to poorly differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms. In this classification, well-differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms are termed as neuroendocrine tumors (NET), and are graded as G1 NET (no necrosis and < 2 mitoses per 2 mm²; Ki67 < 20%), G2 NET (necrosis or 2-10 mitoses per 2 mm², and Ki67 < 20%) and G3 NET (> 10 mitoses per 2 mm² or Ki67 > 20%, and absence of poorly differentiated cytomorphology). Neuroendocrine carcinomas (> 10 mitoses per 2 mm², Ki67 > 20%, and often associated with a Ki67 > 55%) are further subtyped based on cytomorphological characteristics as small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Unlike neuroendocrine carcinomas, head and neck NETs typically show no aberrant p53 expression or loss of RB reactivity. Ectopic or invasive PitNETs are subtyped using pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, SF1, GATA3, ER-alpha), hormones and keratins (e.g., CAM5.2). The new classification emphasizes a strict correlation of morphology and immunohistochemical findings in the accurate diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms. A particular emphasis on the role of biomarkers in the confirmation of the neuroendocrine nature of a neoplasm and in the distinction of various neuroendocrine neoplasms is provided by reviewing ancillary tools that are available to pathologists in the diagnostic workup of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms. Furthermore, the role of molecular immunohistochemistry in the diagnostic workup of head and neck paragangliomas is discussed. The unmet needs in the field of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms are also discussed in this article. The new WHO classification is an important step forward to ensure accurate diagnosis that will also form the basis of ongoing research in this field.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

In this review, we detail the changes and the relevant features that are applied to neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in the 2022 WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. Using a question-and-answer approach, we discuss the consolidation of the nomenclature that distinguishes neuronal paragangliomas from epithelial neoplasms, which are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The criteria for these distinctions based on differentiation are outlined. NETs are generally (but not always) graded as G1, G2, and G3 based on proliferation, whereas NECs are by definition high grade; the importance of Ki67 as a tool for classification and grading is emphasized. The clinical relevance of proper classification is explained, and the importance of hormonal function is examined, including eutopic and ectopic hormone production. The tools available to pathologists for accurate classification include the conventional biomarkers of neuroendocrine lineage and differentiation, INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranins, and somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), but also include transcription factors that can identify the site of origin of a metastatic lesion of unknown primary site, as well as hormones, enzymes, and keratins that play a role in functional and structural correlation. The recognition of highly proliferative, well-differentiated NETs has resulted in the need for biomarkers that can distinguish these G3 NETs from NECs, including stains to determine expression of SSTRs and those that can indicate the unique molecular pathogenetic alterations that underlie the distinction, for example, global loss of RB and aberrant p53 in pancreatic NECs compared with loss of ATRX, DAXX, and menin in pancreatic NETs. Other differential diagnoses are discussed with recommendations for biomarkers that can assist in correct classification, including the distinctions between epithelial and non-epithelial NENs that have allowed reclassification of epithelial NETs in the spine, in the duodenum, and in the middle ear; the first two may be composite tumors with neuronal and glial elements, and as this feature is integral to the duodenal lesion, it is now classified as composite gangliocytoma/neuroma and neuroendocrine tumor (CoGNET). The many other aspects of differential diagnosis are detailed with recommendations for biomarkers that can distinguish NENs from non-neuroendocrine lesions that can mimic their morphology. The concepts of mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine (MiNEN) and amphicrine tumors are clarified with information about how to approach such lesions in routine practice. Theranostic biomarkers that assist patient management are reviewed. Given the significant proportion of NENs that are associated with germline mutations that predispose to this disease, we explain the role of the pathologist in identifying precursor lesions and applying molecular immunohistochemistry to guide genetic testing.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors

This review summarizes the changes in the 5th Edition of the WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors that relate to the pituitary gland. The new classification clearly distinguishes anterior lobe (adenohypophyseal) from posterior lobe (neurohypophyseal) and hypothalamic tumors. Other tumors arising in the sellar region are also discussed. Anterior lobe tumors include (i) well-differentiated adenohypophyseal tumors that are now classified as pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs; formerly known as pituitary adenomas), (ii) pituitary blastoma, and (iii) the two types of craniopharyngioma. The new WHO classification provides detailed histological subtyping of a PitNET based on the tumor cell lineage, cell type, and related characteristics. The routine use of immunohistochemistry for pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, SF1, GATA3, and ERα) is endorsed in this classification. The major PIT1, TPIT, and SF1 lineage-defined PitNET types and subtypes feature distinct morphologic, molecular, and clinical differences. The "null cell" tumor, which is a diagnosis of exclusion, is reserved for PitNETs with no evidence of adenohypophyseal lineage differentiation. Unlike the 2017 WHO classification, mammosomatotroph and acidophil stem cell tumors represent distinct PIT1-lineage PitNETs. The diagnostic category of PIT1-positive plurihormonal tumor that was introduced in the 2017 WHO classification is replaced by two clinicopathologically distinct PitNETs: the immature PIT1-lineage tumor (formerly known as silent subtype 3 tumor) and the mature plurihormonal PIT1-lineage tumor. Rare unusual plurihormonal tumors feature multi-lineage differentiation. The importance of recognizing multiple synchronous PitNETs is emphasized to avoid misclassification. The term "metastatic PitNET" is advocated to replace the previous terminology "pituitary carcinoma" in order to avoid confusion with neuroendocrine carcinoma (a poorly differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasm). Subtypes of PitNETs that are associated with a high risk of adverse biology are emphasized within their cell lineage and cell type as well as based on clinical variables. Posterior lobe tumors, the family of pituicyte tumors, include the traditional pituicytoma, the oncocytic form (spindle cell oncocytoma), the granular cell form (granular cell tumor), and the ependymal type (sellar ependymoma). Although these historical terms are entrenched in the literature, they are nonspecific and confusing, such that oncocytic pituicytoma, granular cell pituicytoma, and ependymal pituicytoma are now proposed as more accurate. Tumors with hypothalamic neuronal differentiation are classified as gangliocytomas or neurocytomas based on large and small cell size, respectively. This classification sets the standard for a high degree of sophistication to allow individualized patient management approaches.

Pituitary carcinoma: reclassification and implications in the NET schema

The entity known as pituitary carcinoma has been traditionally defined as a tumor of adenohypophysial cells that metastasizes systemically or craniospinally independent of the histological appearance of the lesion. Reported cases of pituitary carcinoma have clinically and histologically resembled their non-metastatic counterparts that were classified as adenomas; the majority of cases were initially diagnosed as adenomas, and with tumor progression and spread, the diagnosis was changed to carcinoma. This classification has been challenged since the definition of malignancy in most organs is not based only on metastatic spread. The extent of local invasion resulting in an inability to completely resect an adenohypophysial tumor can have serious consequences that can cause harm and are therefore not benign. To address this dilemma, it was proposed that pituitary tumors be classified as neuroendocrine tumors. This change in nomenclature is totally appropriate since these tumors are composed of classical neuroendocrine cells; as with other neuroendocrine tumors, they have variable behavior that can be indolent but can involve metastasis. With the new nomenclature, there is no requirement for a distinction between adenomas and carcinomas. Moreover, the WHO/IARC has provided an overarching classification for neuroendocrine neoplasms at all body sites; in this new classification, the term 'neuroendocrine carcinoma' is reserved for poorly differentiated high-grade malignancies that are clinically, morphologically and genetically distinct from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. It remains to be determined if there are true pituitary neuroendocrine carcinomas.

An Update on Silent Corticotroph Adenomas: Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Clinical Features, and Management

Simple Summary

The 2017 World Health Organization classification of endocrine tumors defines pituitary adenomas based on their cell lineages. T-PIT can serve as a complimentary tool for further identification of silent corticotroph adenomas (SCAs). Unlike functioning corticotroph adenomas in patients with Cushing’s disease, SCAs present no clinical and biochemical features of Cushing’s syndrome. SCAs have been shown to exhibit a more aggressive course characterized by a higher probability of recurrence and resistance to conventional treatment due to their intrinsic histological features. The aim of our review is to offer an update on the diagnosis, mechanisms, clinical features and management of SCAs. Studies of the molecular mechanisms of SCA pathogenesis will provide new directions for the diagnosis and management of SCAs.

Abstract

With the introduction of 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of endocrine tumors, T-PIT can serve as a complementary tool for identification of silent corticotroph adenomas (SCAs) in some cases if the tumor is not classifiable by pituitary hormone expression in pathological tissue samples. An increase of the proportion of SCAs among the non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) has been witnessed under the new rule with the detection of T-PIT-positive ACTH-negative SCAs. Studies of molecular mechanisms related to SCA pathogenesis will provide new directions for the diagnosis and management of SCAs. A precise pathological diagnosis can help clinicians better identify SCAs. Understanding clinical features in the context of the pathophysiology of SCAs is critical for optimal management. It could provide information on appropriate follow-up time and aid in early recognition and treatment of potentially aggressive forms. Management approaches include surgical, radiation, and/or medical therapies.

Double adenomas of the pituitary reveal distinct lineage markers, copy number alterations, and epigenetic profiles

PURPOSE

Pituitary adenoma (PA) constitutes the third most common intracranial neoplasm. The mostly benign endocrine lesions express no hormone (null cell PA) or the pituitary hormone(s) of the cell lineage of origin. In 0.5-1.5% of surgical specimens and in up to 10% of autopsy cases, two or three seemingly separate PA may coincide. These multiple adenomas may express different hormones, but whether or not expression of lineage-restricted transcription factors and molecular features are distinct within multiple lesions remains unknown.

METHODS

Searching the data bank of the German Pituitary Tumor Registry 12 double pituitary adenomas with diverse lineage were identified among 3654 adenomas and 6 hypophyseal carcinomas diagnosed between 2012 and 2020. The double adenomas were investigated immunohistochemically for expression of hormones and lineage markers. In addition, chromosomal gains and losses as well as global DNA methylation profiles were assessed, whenever sufficient material was available (n = 8 PA).

RESULTS

In accordance with the literature, combinations of GH/prolactin/TSH-FSH/LH adenoma (4/12), GH/prolactin/TSH-ACTH adenoma (3/12), and ACTH-FSH/LH adenoma (3/12) were observed. Further, two out of 12 cases showed a combination of a GH/prolactin/TSH adenoma with a null-cell adenoma. Different expression pattern of hormones were confirmed by different expression of transcription factors in 11/12 patients. Finally, multiple lesions that were molecularly analysed in 4 patients displayed distinct copy number changes and global methylation pattern.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm and extend the knowledge on multiple PA and suggest that such lesions may origin from distinct cell types.

Clinical Relevance of New World Health Organization Classification System for Pituitary Adenomas: A Validation Study With 2-Year Experience

Background

The new World Health Organization (WHO) classification system proposed a cell lineage-based classification scheme for pituitary adenomas in which transcription factors (TFs) play a major role as key classifiers. We aimed to evaluate clinical relevance of the new classification system in a clinical setting.

Methods

TF staining was retrospectively performed for 153 clinically and histologically well characterized pituitary adenomas. Then, 484 pituitary adenomas were prospectively stained for TFs and then for relevant pituitary hormones. TF and hormone stain-based diagnoses were compared, and differences in clinical manifestations were evaluated.

Results

The accuracies of antibodies for three TFs were successfully validated and had an overall matching rate was 89.6%. We identified 50 (10.4%) cases with discrepancies between TF and pituitary hormone stains. Gonadotroph adenomas lacking follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone stains account for most discrepancies. Null cell adenomas may be more prevalent than reported and may be clinically more aggressive than gonadotroph adenomas.

Conclusion

The new WHO classification is mostly well matched with the traditional classification. However, until the new classification is further validated and interpreted in the context of long-term clinical outcomes, routine histological examination should include full slate of immunostains for pituitary hormones as well as TFs.

[Recommendations on the pathological report of pituitary tumors. A consensus of experts of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition and the Spanish Society of Pathology]

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) constitute, together with other tumors of the sellar region, 15-25% of intracranial neoplasms. In 2017, the World Health Organization proposed a new classification of PitNETs. The main innovation with respect to the 2004 classification was the recommendation to include in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PitNETs the determination of the transcription factors of the 3 pituitary cell lineages: Pit-1, Tpit and SF-1. Additionally, other clinicopathological classifications with a predictive capacity of tumor behavior during follow-up were proposed. Given these changes, it is appropriate to adapt the knowledge generated during the last 15 years to the daily practice of the treatment and monitoring of PitNETs at the Centers of Excellence in Pituitary Pathology. This document includes the positioning of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) on the classification and denomination of the PitNETs and the information that the pathologist should provide to the clinician to facilitate the treatment and monitoring of these tumors.

Association of different pathologic subtypes of growth hormone producing pituitary adenoma and remission in acromegaly patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Regarding the inconclusive results of previous investigations, this study aimed to determine the association between pathology, as a possible predictor, with remission outcomes, to know the role of pathology in the personalized decision making in acromegaly patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on the consecutive surgeries for growth hormone (GH) producing pituitary adenomas from February 2015 to January 2021. Seventy-one patients were assessed for granulation patterns and prolactin co-expression as dual staining adenomas. The role of pathology and some other predictors on surgical remission was evaluated using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 71 included patients, 34 (47.9%) patients had densely granulated (DG), 14 (19.7%) had sparsely granulated (SG), 23 (32.4%) had dual staining pituitary adenomas. The remission rate was about 62.5% in the patients with SG and DG adenomas named single staining and 52.2% in dual staining groups. Postoperative remission was 1.53-folds higher in the single staining adenomas than dual staining-one (non-significant). The remission rate was doubled in DG group compared to two other groups (non-significant). By adjusting different predictors, cavernous sinus invasion and one-day postoperative GH levels decreased remission rate by 91% (95% CI: 0.01-0.67; p = 0.015) and 64% (95% CI: 0.19-0.69; p < 0.001), respectively. Responses to the medications were not significantly different among three groups.

CONCLUSION

Various pathological subtypes of pituitary adenomas do not appear to have a predictive role in estimating remission outcomes. Cavernous sinus invasion followed by one-day postoperative GH is the strongest parameter to predict biochemical remission.

Towards precision medicine for clinically non-functioning pituitary tumours

OBJECTIVE

Clinically non-functioning pituitary tumours (NFPT) are a heterogenous group of neoplasms with diverse outcomes. The purpose of this narrative review was to summarize available data on predictive factors, both in routine practice and research settings.

DESIGN

A literature review was conducted for papers published in peer-reviewed journals, investigating clinical, radiological, pathological and genetic predictive factors in NFPT.

RESULTS

Several clinical and radiological factors have been associated with NFPT recurrence and/or aggressiveness, including larger size and pre-/post-operative growth rates. Application of transcription factor immunohistochemistry has given rise to improved subtype identification, including 'higher-risk' subtypes, in routine clinical practice. Numerous other pathological and genetic biomarkers have demonstrated promise for prognostication in the research setting.

CONCLUSION

NFPT are a heterogenous group of tumours, characterized by diverse presentation, pathogenesis and outcomes. Ongoing refinements in understanding of tumour biology are likely to pave the way to improved integrative prognostication and precision medicine for NFPT.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a model for neuroendocrine tumor classification

The classification of adenohypophysial neoplasms as "pituitary neuroendocrine tumors" (PitNETs) was proposed in 2017 to reflect their characteristics as epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms with a spectrum of clinical behaviors ranging from small indolent lesions to large, locally invasive, unresectable tumors. Tumor growth and hormone hypersecretion cause significant morbidity and mortality in a subset of patients. The proposal was endorsed by a WHO working group that sought to provide a unified approach to neuroendocrine neoplasia in all body sites. We review the features that are characteristic of neuroendocrine cells, the epidemiology and prognosis of these tumors, as well as further refinements in terms used for other pituitary tumors to ensure consistency with the WHO framework. The intense study of PitNETs has provided information about the importance of cellular differentiation in tumor prognosis as a model for neuroendocrine tumors in different locations.