An unusual phenotype occurs in 15% of mismatch repair-deficient tumors and is associated with non-colorectal cancers and genetic syndromes

Epidemiology, pathogenesis, biology and evolving management of MSI-H/dMMR cancers

Deficiency in DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) is a common pathway of carcinogenesis across different tumour types and confers a characteristic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) molecular phenotype. The prevalence of the MSI-H/dMMR phenotype is highest in endometrial and colorectal cancers, and this phenotype is associated with a distinct tumour biology, prognosis and responsiveness to various anticancer treatments. In a minority of patients, MSI-H/dMMR cancers result from an inherited pathogenic variant in the context of Lynch syndrome, which has important implications for familial genetic screening. Whether these hereditary cancers have a different biology and clinical behaviour to their sporadic counterparts remains uncertain. Interest in this tumour molecular subtype has increased following the discovery of the high sensitivity of metastatic MSI-H/dMMR cancers to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in a histology-agnostic manner, which reflects the genomic hypermutation resulting from dMMR that renders these tumours highly immunogenic and immune infiltrated. This vulnerability is now also being exploited in early stage disease settings. Despite this common biological foundation, different MSI-H/dMMR cancers have histotype-specific features that correspond to their particular cell or tissue of origin, which might be associated with differences in prognosis and sensitivity to ICIs. In this Review, we provide an overview of the epidemiology, biology, pathogenesis, clinical diagnosis and treatment of MSI-H/dMMR tumours as a histology-agnostic cancer phenomenon. We also highlight peculiarities associated with specific pathogenetic alterations and histologies of MSI-H/dMMR tumours.

Genomic and transcriptomic landscapes of metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from distinct primary sites and their clinical implications

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) encompass a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms with varying prognoses and molecular alterations. Molecular profiling studies have furthered our understanding of NENs, but the majority of previous studies have focused on primary tumors and on mutational landscapes using DNA sequencing data. Here, we describe the genomic and transcriptomic landscapes of 28 metastatic NENs across different primary anatomical sites (PASs) and their potential clinical implications. Although our cohort is small, our analyses provide further insights on the molecular commonalities and distinctions between metastatic NENs of different PASs. Comparison to several reference transcriptome data sets revealed that despite considerable whole genome and transcriptome variability in NENs, the metastatic NENs are still more like each other than other cancer types. Our study also highlights the potential utility of NEN transcriptome data for molecular classification and clinical decision making.

Case Report: A case of synchronous multiple early gastric cancer with a microsatellite instability-high phenotype

Synchronous multiple early gastric cancer (SMEGC) is a relatively uncommon variant of early gastric cancer (EGC). In this report, we present a case of SMEGC accompanied by a microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype. The patient was a 69-year-old man who presented to our hospital with abdominal pain. The endoscopic examination revealed two lesions. Both lesions were pathologically confirmed as EGC, then the patient subsequently underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Nine months post-procedure, the patient returned with recurrent abdominal pain, leading to the diagnosis of a new EGC. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that all lesions exhibited an MSI-H phenotype and BRAF mutant expression, suggesting that these lesions are not associated with Lynch syndrome-related EGC. The case was ultimately diagnosed as SMEGC with an MSI-H phenotype. The current evidence and clinical experience suggest that patients with advanced MSI-H are likely to benefit from immunotherapy and should be considered for early systemic treatment with immunotherapy as a central component. At present, research studies on the molecular characteristics of SMEGC are limited, underscoring the importance of conducting comprehensive molecular diagnostics of each EGC patient, which could help clinicians thoroughly understand the lesion's characteristics.

Biomarkers in gastroesophageal cancer 2025: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)

Gastroesophageal carcinomas, including gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), pose a global health challenge due to their heterogeneity. The approach to diagnosis and treatment should first differentiate between GEA and ESCC. Over the past decade, therapies for metastatic or advanced GEA/ESCC have expanded, with several new therapeutic targets alongside trastuzumab for metastatic HER2-positive GEA. Four key biomarkers are essential for targeted therapy: HER2 overexpression/amplification, deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI), PD-L1, and Claudin18.2 expression. Immunohistochemistry is the recommended method for these biomarkers evaluation. In addition, the assessment of biomarkers like FGFR2b is likely to become routine in the near future. Experts from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) have formed a consensus to optimize biomarker detection and usage in clinical practice. Their recommendations aim to improve personalized treatment strategies for GEA and ESCC patients, integrating new diagnostic insights into routine care.

Mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotypes across solid tumors: A comprehensive cBioPortal study on prevalence and prognostic impact

Mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-d) and microsatellite instability (MSI) are prognostic and predictive biomarkers in oncology. Current testing for MMR/MSI relies on immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR proteins and molecular assays for MSI detection. This combined diagnostic strategy, however, lacks tumor specificity and does not account for gene variants. This study provides an in-depth analysis of MMR mutations frequency, spectrum, and distribution in solid tumors. Data from 23,893 patients across 11 tumor types, using 66 publicly available studies, were analyzed. MMR-mutated (MMR-m) status was defined by alterations in MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and/or MSH6; MSI was assessed by MSIsensor. Cases with indeterminate labelling were excluded. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Among 19,353 tumors, 949 MMR variants were identified, comprising 432 pathogenic and 517 variants of unknown significance (VUS), as defined by OncoKB. MSH6 mutations were the most frequent (n = 279, 29.4 %), followed by MSH2 (n = 198, 20.9 %), MLH1 (n = 187, 19.7 %), and PMS2 (n = 161, 16.9 %). MMR-m cases were more frequent in endometrial (EC, 20.5 %), colorectal (CRC, 8.2 %), bladder (BLCA, 8.7 %), and gastroesophageal cancers (GEC, 5.4 %). Pathogenic mutations were more common than non-pathogenic in EC, CRC, and GEC (p < 0.001, p = 0.01, p = 0.32, respectively). MMR-m status was not associated with MSI in 247 (48.9 %) cases, including 67 (13.2 %) with pathogenic mutations. The highest concordance between MMR-m and MSI was observed in CRC (65.7 %), EC (91.2 %), and GEC (69.6 %), while the lowest in pancreatic (0.2 %) and lung cancers (0.1 %). MMR-m GECs showed improved overall survival compared to MMR-wt (p = 0.009), a relationship not observed in other tumor types. This study demonstrates that the MMR spectrum is extremely hetoerogeneous in solid tumors, highliting the need for comprehensive and tumor-specific testing strategies.

Sarcomas developed in patients with Lynch Syndrome are enriched in pleomorphic soft-tissue sarcomas and are sensitive to immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas do not belong to the Lynch Syndrome (LS)-tumour spectrum. A growing body literature has reported sarcomas in patients with LS. Clinical and tumour characteristics of these patients remain unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We set up the first national retrospective study, SarcLynch, describing the pathological and clinical characteristics of sarcomas developed in patients with LS. Patients were identified from two national networks and included from 23 centres in France.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients participated in the SarcLynch study. Sixty-seven (83 %) tumours were soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) and 14 (17 %) bone sarcomas. Among STS, 59 (88 %) showed a pleomorphic component, with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) (36 %) and pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (pRMS) (21 %) being the most represented subtypes. Sarcoma was the first neoplastic event in 32 patients (40 %). Thirty-two patients (40 %) were carriers of MSH2 germline pathogenic variants. Among patients who underwent an assessment of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) by immunohistochemistry and/or molecular biology status, 75 % were dMMR by immunohistochemistry and 45 % were microsatellite instability high (MSI-H). Eight patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors and 4 (50 %) exhibited an objective response with 3 complete radiological response including 1 patient with pathological complete response. Duration of response ranged from 6 to 20 months.

CONCLUSIONS

SarcLynch, the largest multicentric series describing sarcomas developed in patients with LS, revealed an enrichment in patients with pleomorphic sarcomas - especially UPS and pRMS. This finding strongly supports screening for MMR status evaluation in these rare histotypes both for oncogenetic screening and therapeutic interest. Considering an objective response rate of 50 %, access to immunotherapy should be considered in these tumours.

Mismatch repair deficiency and its relationship with histopathological features in gastric cancer patients

Gastric cancer is a common malignancy disease with a poor prognosis. Deficient mismatch repair is a prognostic and predictive marker of response to systemic therapies. However, deficient mismatch repair frequency and the relationship between this status and microscopic characteristics are inconsistent across nations. We aimed to determine the rate of deficient mismatch repair and its association with histopathological features in gastric cancer patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 226 gastric cancer patients treated at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital and Hue Central Hospital from June 2020 to January 2024. Mismatch repair protein expression was evaluated using immunohistochemical staining, and any absence of mismatch repair proteins was regarded as deficient mismatch repair. The deficient mismatch repair rate was 12.8%. Deficient mismatch repair appeared to be more frequent in the intestinal subtype of Lauren classification odds ratio (OR) = 4.767 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.086-20.921; p = 0.039), tubular/papillary adenocarcinoma (OR = 5.25; 95% CI, 1.185-23.251; p = 0.029), mucinous adenocarcinoma (OR = 6.19; 95% CI, 1.113-34.445; p = 0.037), and differentiated type (OR = 3.24; 95% CI, 1.324-7.931; p = 0.01). No statistically significant association was detected with histopathological features according to the Tumor Location-Modified Lauren classification and mucinous secreting morphology. Deficient mismatch repair status was unusual in gastric cancer. The degree of cell differentiation and microscopic characteristics based on the World Health Organization and Lauren classification could all impact the predictive power for microsatellite-instable status.

Association between microsatellite instability status, clinicopathological features and mitochondrial DNA amplification in patients with colorectal cancer

The relationship between BRAF-V600E mutations, mitochondrial DNA amplification and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) in colorectal cancer (CRC) has yet to be fully elucidated. The aim of the present study was to assess the association between the MSI status and BRAF-V600E gene mutations/clinicopathological features/mitochondrial DNA amplification in CRC. A non-interventional study analysis was performed using the clinicopathological features of 455 patients with CRC. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate four mismatch repair proteins (MutS homolog 2, MutS homolog 6, MutL homolog 1 and postmeiotic segregation increased 2), Ki-67 index, and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Additionally, PCR coupled with capillary electrophoresis were used to ascertain the MSI status. Moreover, amplification refractory mutation system-PCR was used to detect BRAF-V600E gene mutation and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was used to assess mitochondrial DNA. A total of 455 patients were divided into the MSI high (MSI-H) group (n=52) and microsatellite stability (MSS) group (n=403) based on their MSI status. Compared with the results of immunohistochemistry of four mismatch repair proteins, the consistency rate between mismatch repair protein deficiency and MSI was 94.23%. There were significant differences in PD-L1, primary tumor site, clinical stage, degree of differentiation, tumor size, lymph node metastasis and the occurrence of multiple primary tumors between the MSI-H group and MSS group (P<0.05 or P<0.001). However, there were no significant differences for sex, age, PD-1, Ki-67 expression and BRAF-V600E. The 24-60-month survival rate of the patients in the MSI-H group was significantly higher than that of those in the MSS group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the number of mitochondrial DNA was significantly amplified in the MSI-H group. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the combined detection of PD-L1 and MSI in patients with CRC can provide more accurate and effective guidance for personalized treatment.

Morphomolecular Correlation and Clinicopathologic Analysis in Endometrial Carcinoma

Research groups have identified 4 groups [polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutant, mismatch repair-deficient, p53-abnormal, and no specific molecular profile)] reflecting the Tumor Cancer Genomic Atlas Research Network subgroups in endometrial carcinomas, improving the clinical applicability of molecular classification. We have analyzed the histopathologic and prognostic characteristics of our cases based on the ProMisE classification, supported by growing data on recommended treatment regimens. The study included 118 cases of endometrial carcinoma diagnosed between 2016 and 2020, which underwent mismatch repair and p53 immunohistochemistry. Next-generation sequencing was performed for POLE mutation analysis, dividing the cases into 4 subgroups. The histopathologic and clinical characteristics of these groups were then analyzed statistically. Four cases(3.4%) were classified as POLE mutant, 31 (26.3%) as mismatch repair-deficient, 22 (18.6%) as p53 mutant, and 61 (51.7%) as no specific molecular profile. We categorized 118 patients with endometrial carcinoma into low (n=43), intermediate (n=28), high-intermediate (n=21), high (n=22), and advanced metastatic (n=4) risk groups regardless of the molecular subtypes of their disease. When we reclassified all cases according to the molecular subtypes of endometrial carcinoma only the risk group of 3 (2.5%) cases changed. Using the new algorithm we designed, after narrowing down the number of patients, the microcystic, elongated, and fragmented pattern of invasion was revealed as an independent prognostic factor that reduces overall survival time (hazard ratio: 16.395, 95% CI: 2.140-125.606, P =0.007). In conclusion, using the new algorithm we have designed, and by identifying patients for whom molecular classification could alter risk groups, we observed that molecular tests can be utilized more efficiently in populations with limited economic resources and, in doing so, we discovered a new morphologic marker with prognostic significance.

A pilot study on the detection of microsatellite instability using long mononucleotide repeats in solid tumors

Microsatellite instability (MSI) status is a prognostic biomarker for immunotherapy in certain types of cancers, such as colorectal cancers (CRCs) and endometrial cancers (ECs). Tumors that are categorized as having high MSI (MSI-H) express high levels of neoantigens for immune recognition. The typical MSI test measures the length of short mononucleotide repeats (SMR) poly(A) 21-27; however, a limitation of this test is the difficulty in determining the shift size, particularly in endometrial cancer. To investigate an MSI detection assay with improved performance, the present study analyzed the use of poly(A) 40-44 mononucleotide repeats to detect the MSI status of 100 patients with either CRC (n=50) or EC (n=50). Capillary electrophoresis was used to evaluate five long mononucleotide repeat (LMR) markers, including poly(A) 40-A, 40-B, 40-C, 40-D and 44. The concordance rate of the LMR-MSI assay compared with an immunohistochemistry MSI detection assay was 96.0 and 95.1% for CRCs and ECs respectively, with the detection limit of the LMR-MSI assay demonstrated to be 2.5% MSI-H in HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cell lines. The LMR-MSI assay yielded a 95.1% concordance rate in ECs compared with that in the SMR-MSI test (87.8%). The LMR-MSI test identified a significantly higher mean shift size (13 bp) in MSI-H tumors compared with the SMR-MSI test (10 bp), in both EC and CRC tissue samples. Together, the present study suggested that the LMR-MSI test could potentially be a sensitive and practical technology for molecular laboratory testing, particularly in the use of immunotherapy for patients with CRCs and ECs.

[Endometrial carcinoma: molecular classification in routine pathology]

The molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma defines four main groups: polymerase‑ɛ(PolE) gene mutated, microsatellite unstable (MSI), p53 abnormal tumors and tumors with no specific molecular profile (NSMP). This classification provides significant insights into the prognosis and therapeutic decisions. Each group exhibits unique genetic profiles identified through immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics, enabling personalized treatment. The identification of these molecular signatures necessitates precise analytical methods, selected based on the local circumstances at each site. The approach to molecular classification highlights the critical role of pathology in the diagnosis and emphasizes the necessity of collaboration between the clinic and pathology.

Characterization of discordance between mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability testing may prevent inappropriate treatment with immunotherapy

In the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), patients with cancer are treated based on their tumor molecular profile with approved targeted and immunotherapies outside the labeled indication. Importantly, patients undergo a tumor biopsy for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) which allows for a WGS-based evaluation of routine diagnostics. Notably, we observed that not all biopsies of patients with dMMR/MSI-positive tumors as determined by routine diagnostics were classified as microsatellite-unstable by subsequent WGS. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the discordance rate between routine dMMR/MSI diagnostics and WGS and to further characterize discordant cases. We assessed patients enrolled in DRUP with dMMR/MSI-positive tumors identified by routine diagnostics, who were treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and for whom WGS data were available. Patient and tumor characteristics, study treatment outcomes, and material from routine care were retrieved from the patient medical records and via Palga (the Dutch Pathology Registry), and were compared with WGS results. Initially, discordance between routine dMMR/MSI diagnostics and WGS was observed in 13 patients (13/121; 11%). The majority of these patients did not benefit from ICB (11/13; 85%). After further characterization, we found that in six patients (5%) discordance was caused by dMMR tumors that did not harbor an MSI molecular phenotype by WGS. In six patients (5%), discordance was false due to the presence of multiple primary tumors (n = 3, 2%) and misdiagnosis of dMMR status by immunohistochemistry (n = 3, 2%). In one patient (1%), the exact underlying cause of discordance could not be identified. Thus, in this group of patients limited to those initially diagnosed with dMMR/MSI tumors by current routine diagnostics, the true assay-based discordance rate between routine dMMR/MSI-positive diagnostics and WGS was 5%. To prevent inappropriate ICB treatment, clinicians and pathologists should be aware of the risk of multiple primary tumors and the limitations of different tests. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair protein deficiency: equal predictive markers?

Current clinical guidelines recommend mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) or molecular microsatellite instability (MSI) tests as predictive markers of immunotherapies. Most of the pathological guidelines consider MMR protein IHC as the gold standard test to identify cancers with MMR deficiency and recommend molecular MSI tests only in special circumstances or to screen for Lynch syndrome. However, there are data in the literature which suggest that the two test types may not be equal. For example, molecular epidemiology studies reported different rates of deficient MMR (dMMR) and MSI in various cancer types. Additionally, direct comparisons of the two tests revealed relatively frequent discrepancies between MMR IHC and MSI tests, especially in non-colorectal and non-endometrial cancers and in cases with unusual dMMR phenotypes. There are also scattered clinical data showing that the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is different if the patient selection was based on dMMR versus MSI status of the cancers. All these observations question the current dogma that dMMR phenotype and genetic MSI status are equal predictive markers of the immunotherapies.

A Comprehensive Study of Heterogeneous Mismatch Repair Expression in Solid Tumors Reveals Different Immunohistochemical Patterns and Distinct Genetic Mechanisms

OBJECTIVE

Immunohistochemistry is routinely performed to detect mismatch repair deficiency in solid tumors. Heterogeneous MMR expression (MMR-het) has been reported occasionally but not systemically studied.

METHODS

In this study, we depicted MMR-het patterns of 40 tumors of different anatomical sites and analyzed MMR genetic alterations and tumor mutational burdens (TMB) through comprehensive genomic profiling.

RESULTS

The MMR-het patterns were classified into 4 subgroups: "single-loss" (3 cases), "MLH1/PMS2 double-loss" (16 cases), "MSH2/MSH6 double-loss" (8 cases), and "triple/tetra-loss" (13 cases). Seventeen MMR-het cases exhibited histological heterogeneity, in which MMR protein loss was generally confined to either poorly differentiated or well-differentiated tumor areas. All "single-loss" tumors had MMR somatic mutations and coexisting POLE exonuclease domain mutations. "MLH1/PMS2 double-loss" tumors unexceptionally harbored MLH1 hypermethylation without MMR germline mutations. In the "MSH2/MSH6 double-loss" subgroup, 4 cases had MSH2/MSH6 germline mutations, while another 4 cases had multiple MSH2/MSH6 somatic mutations. Additional POLE exonuclease domain mutations were identified in 2 cases. Tumors in the "triple/tetra-loss" subgroup generally had MLH1 abnormalities (8 MLH1 hypermethylation, 4 MLH1 germline mutation, 1 MLH1 double somatic mutations), and coexistent somatic mutations on MSH2/MSH6 . Thirty-one cases (83.8%) were TMB-H, and all POLE -mutated cases exhibited ultra-high TMB (111.4 to 524.2 mut/Mb).

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlighted the importance of accurately interpreting heterogeneous MMR protein staining patterns for developing a more efficient personalized genetic investigation strategy.

Molecular and Clinicopathologic Characterization of Mismatch Repair-Deficient Endometrial Carcinoma Not Related to MLH1 Promoter Hypermethylation

Universal tumor screening in endometrial carcinoma (EC) is increasingly adopted to identify individuals at risk of Lynch syndrome (LS). These cases involve mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) EC without MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (PHM). LS is confirmed through the identification of germline MMR pathogenic variants (PV). In cases where these are not detected, emerging evidence highlights the significance of double-somatic MMR gene alterations as a sporadic cause of MMRd, alongside POLE/POLD1 exonuclease domain (EDM) PV leading to secondary MMR PV. Our understanding of the incidence of different MMRd EC origins not related to MLH1-PHM, their associations with clinicopathologic characteristics, and the prognostic implications remains limited. In a combined analysis of the PORTEC-1, -2, and -3 trials (n = 1254), 84 MMRd EC not related to MLH1-PHM were identified that successfully underwent paired tumor-normal tissue next-generation sequencing of the MMR and POLE/POLD1 genes. Among these, 37% were LS associated (LS-MMRd EC), 38% were due to double-somatic hits (DS-MMRd EC), and 25% remained unexplained. LS-MMRd EC exhibited higher rates of MSH6 (52% vs 19%) or PMS2 loss (29% vs 3%) than DS-MMRd EC, and exclusively showed MMR-deficient gland foci. DS-MMRd EC had higher rates of combined MSH2/MSH6 loss (47% vs 16%), loss of >2 MMR proteins (16% vs 3%), and somatic POLE-EDM PV (25% vs 3%) than LS-MMRd EC. Clinicopathologic characteristics, including age at tumor onset and prognosis, did not differ among the various groups. Our study validates the use of paired tumor-normal next-generation sequencing to identify definitive sporadic causes in MMRd EC unrelated to MLH1-PHM. MMR immunohistochemistry and POLE-EDM mutation status can aid in the differentiation between LS-MMRd EC and DS-MMRd EC. These findings emphasize the need for integrating tumor sequencing into LS diagnostics, along with clear interpretation guidelines, to improve clinical management. Although not impacting prognosis, confirmation of DS-MMRd EC may release patients and relatives from burdensome LS surveillance.

Comparison of standard mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability tests in a large cancer series

BACKGROUND

The tumor-agnostic indication of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat cancers with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) increased the demand for such tests beyond Lynch syndrome. International guideline recommendations accept immunohistochemistry (IHC) for dMMR or molecular techniques (PCR or NGS) for MSI status determinations considering the two tests are equal, although there are scattered reports contradicting to this presumption.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Here we have directly compared four protein MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) to MSI Pentaplex PCR test in a large cancer patient cohort (n = 1306) of our diagnostic center where the two tests have been run parallel in 703 cases.

RESULTS

In this study we have found a high discrepancy rate (19.3%) of the two tests which was independent of the tumor types. The MSI PCR sensitivity for MMR IHC status was found to be very low resulting in a relatively low positive and negative predicting values. As a consequence, the correlation of the two tests was low (kappa < 0.7). During analysis of the possible contributing factors of this poor performance, we have excluded low tumor percentage of the samples, but identified dMMR phenotypes (classic versus non-classic or unusual) as possible contributors.

CONCLUSION

Although our cohort did not include samples with identified technical errors, our data strongly support previous reports that unidentified preanalytical factors might have the major influence on the poor performance of the MSI PCR and MMR IHC. Furthermore, the case is open whether the two test types are equally powerful predictive markers of immunotherapies.

Mismatch Repair Deficiency as a Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Endometrial Cancer: A Review on Immunohistochemistry Staining Patterns and Clinical Implications

Among the four endometrial cancer (EC) TCGA molecular groups, the MSI/hypermutated group represents an important percentage of tumors (30%), including different histotypes, and generally confers an intermediate prognosis for affected women, also providing new immunotherapeutic strategies. Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) has become the optimal diagnostic MSI surrogate worldwide. This review aims to provide state-of-the-art knowledge on MMR deficiency/MSI in EC and to clarify the pathological assessment, interpretation pitfalls and reporting of MMR status.

Pathologic Evaluation of Therapeutic Biomarkers in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Molecular testing is an essential component of the pathologic evaluation of colorectal carcinoma providing diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive therapeutic information. Mismatch repair status evaluation is required for all tumors. Advanced and metastatic tumors also require determination of tumor mutational burden, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutation status, ERBB2 amplification status, and NTRK and RET gene rearrangement status to guide therapy. Multiple assays, including immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability testing, MLH1 promoter methylation, and next-generation sequencing, are typically needed. Pathologists must be aware of these requirements to optimally triage tissue. Advances in colorectal cancer molecular diagnostics will continue to drive refinements in colorectal cancer personalized therapy.

Testing for deficient mismatch repair and microsatellite instability : A focused update

Testing to detect mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) has become an integral part of the routine diagnostic workup for colorectal cancer (CRC). While MSI was initially considered to be a possible indicator of a hereditary disposition to cancer (Lynch syndrome, LS), today the prediction of the therapy response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is in the foreground. Corresponding recommendations and testing algorithms are available for use in primary diagnosis (reviewed in: Rüschoff et al. 2021).Given the increasing importance for routine use and the expanding indication spectrum of ICI therapies for non-CRCs, such as endometrial, small intestinal, gastric, and biliary tract cancers, an updated review of dMMR/MSI testing is presented. The focus is on the challenges in the assessment of immunohistochemical stains and the value of PCR-based procedures, considering the expanded ICI indication spectrum. A practice-oriented flowchart for everyday diagnostic decision-making is provided that considers new data on the frequency and type of discordances between MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR findings, and the possible role of Next Generation Sequencing in clarifying them. Reference is made to the significance of systematic quality assurance measures (e.g., QuIP MSI portal and multicenter proficiency testing), including regular continued training and education.

[Testing deficient mismatch repair and microsatellite instability : A focused update. German version]

Testing to detect mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) has become an integral part of the routine diagnostic workup for colorectal cancer (CRC). While MSI was initially considered to be a possible indicator of a hereditary disposition to cancer (Lynch syndrome, LS), today the prediction of the therapy response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is in the foreground. Corresponding recommendations and testing algorithms are available for use in primary diagnosis (reviewed in: Rüschoff et al. 2021).Given the increasing importance for routine use and the expanding indication spectrum of ICI therapies for non-CRCs, such as endometrial, small intestinal, gastric, and biliary tract cancers, an updated review of dMMR/MSI testing is presented. The focus is on the challenges in the assessment of immunohistochemical stains and the value of PCR-based procedures, considering the expanded ICI indication spectrum. A practice-oriented flowchart for everyday diagnostic decision-making is provided that considers new data on the frequency and type of discordances between MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR findings, and the possible role of Next Generation Sequencing in clarifying them. Reference is made to the significance of systematic quality assurance measures (e.g., QuIP MSI portal and multicenter proficiency testing), including regular continued training and education.

The hereditary N363K POLE exonuclease mutant extends PPAP tumor spectrum to glioblastomas by causing DNA damage and aneuploidy in addition to increased mismatch mutagenicity

The exonuclease domain of DNA polymerases epsilon's catalytic subunit (POLE) removes misincorporated nucleotides, called proofreading. POLE-exonuclease mutations cause colorectal- and endometrial cancers with an extreme burden of single nucleotide substitutions. We recently reported that particularly the hereditary POLE exonuclease mutation N363K predisposes in addition to aggressive giant cell glioblastomas. We knocked-in this mutation homozygously into human cell lines and compared its properties to knock-ins of the likewise hereditary POLE L424V mutation and to a complete proofreading-inactivating mutation (exo-null). We found that N363K cells have higher mutation rates as both L424V- or exo-null mutant cells. In contrast to L424V cells, N363K cells expose a growth defect, replication stress and DNA damage. In non-transformed cells, these burdens lead to aneuploidy but macroscopically normal nuclei. In contrast, transformed N363K cells phenocopy the enlarged and disorganized nuclei of giant cell glioblastomas. Taken together, our data characterize a POLE exonuclease domain mutant that not only causes single nucleotide hypermutation, but in addition DNA damage and chromosome instability, leading to an extended tumor spectrum. Our results expand the understanding of the polymerase exonuclease domain and suggest that an assessment of both the mutational potential and the genetic instability might refine classification and treatment of POLE-mutated tumors.

Microsatellite Status Detection of Colorectal Cancer: Evaluation of Inconsistency between PCR and IHC

Objective: An essential component of precision medical treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) is the use of microsatellite state in combination with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as the primary clinical detection methods. Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch-repair deficiency (dMMR) accounts for about 15% of all CRC patients. Characterized by a high mutation burden, MSI-H is a predictive biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Misdiagnosis of microsatellite status has been shown to be an important cause of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therefore, a rapid and accurate assessment of microsatellite status can be beneficial for precision medicine in CRC. Methods: We evaluated the rate of discordance between PCR and IHC detection of microsatellite status from a cohort of patients that had 855 colorectal cancers. PCR-based microsatellite assay was performed using a set of five monomorphic mononucleotide makers (NR-24, BAT-25, CAT-25, BAT-26, MONO-27) and two polymorphic pentanucleotide (Penta D and Penta E). IHC was used to detect the absence of mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2). The inconsistency rates of the two assays were evaluated. Results: Among 855 patients,15.6% (134 to 855) cases were identified as MSI-H by PCR, whereas 16.9% (145 to 855) cases were identified as dMMR by IHC. There were 45 patients with discordant results between IHC and PCR. Of these, 17 patients were classified as MSI-H/pMMR and 28 patients as MSS/dMMR. When the clinicopathological characteristics of these 45 patients were compared to those of the 855 patients, it was found that more patients were younger than 65 years old (80% to 63%), more were male (73% to 62%), more were located in the right colon (49% to 32%), and more were poorly differentiated (20% to 15%). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated a high concordance between the PCR and IHC results. In order to reduce the ineffective treatment of ICIs due to MSI misdiagnosis, the patient's age, gender, tumor location and degree of differentiation should be included in the clinician's selection of MSI testing in colorectal cancer.

Mismatch repair deficiency, next-generation sequencing-based microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden as predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor effectiveness in frontline treatment of advanced stage endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Molecular profiling is developing to inform treatment in endometrial cancer. Using real world evidence, we sought to evaluate frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor vs chemotherapy effectiveness in advanced endometrial cancer, stratified by Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) ≥10 mut/MB and microsatellite instability (MSI).

METHODS

Patients with advanced endometrial cancer in the US-based de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine Clinico-Genomic Database were included. Data originated from patients treated between January 2011- March 2022 at 280 US clinics. Next-generation sequencing assays were performed via FoundationOne or FoundationOneCDx. Longitudinal clinical data were derived from electronic health records. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment included pembrolizumab, dostarlimab, and nivolumab monotherapies. Time to next treatment, time to treatment discontinuation, and overall survival were assessed with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for known prognostic factors. We used the Likelihood ratio test to compare biomarker performance.

RESULTS

A total of 343 patients received chemotherapy and 28 received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy as frontline treatment. Patients who received monotherapy were more likely to be stage III at diagnosis (immune checkpoint inhibitor: 54.6% vs chemotherapy: 15.0%; p<0.001) and more likely to test MSI-high via next-generation sequencing (immune checkpoint inhibitor: 53.6% vs chemotherapy: 19.2%; p<0.001). In MSI-high cancers, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor had a more favorable time to next treatment (aHR: 0.18, p=0.001) and overall survival (aHR 0.29, p=0.045). Additional analyses on 70 unique tumor specimens revealed mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) via immunohistochemistry and MSI-high via next-generation sequencing concordance (91%), with nominal improvement of MSI over dMMR to predict time to treatment discontinuation (p=0.030), time to next treatment (p=0.032), and overall survival (p=0.22). MSI status was concordant with tumor mutational burden ≥10 in 94.3% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors may have improved efficacy over chemotherapy in frontline treatment for advanced endometrial cancer defined by MSI-high using next-generation sequencing as a nominally better predictor of outcomes than dMMR with immunohistochemistry. This provides the biologic rationale of active phase III trials.

Real-world clinical outcomes of the combination of anti-PD-1 antibody, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy for HER2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous clinical trials indicated the addition of anti-PD-1 antibody remarkably improved the efficacy of trastuzumab and chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. However, no real-world experiences have been reported yet.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1212 patients with gastric/GEJ cancer treated at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between 2019 and 2022. Among 138 patients with HER2-positive gastric/GEJ cancer, 47 patients receiving at least two doses of the combination regimen with anti-PD-1 antibody, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy were recruited in the study population, and 38 out of 47 patients with measurable disease were included in the efficacy population. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity profiles were reported.

RESULTS

In the study population, 37 (78.7%) received the study therapy as a first-line treatment. In the efficacy population, the ORR and DCR were 76.3% and 94.7%, respectively. The overall median PFS was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.3-11.9 months). For the first-line treatment, the mPFS was 10 months, and 7 months for the second-line. Among 14 patients who failed the study treatment, three (21.4%) developed brain metastasis as the first failure site. No significant association was found between PFS and the expression of PD-L1. 22.2% of patients developed grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). No treatment-related grade ≥4 adverse events or deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study validated the combination regimen's high efficacy and good tolerance in patients with HER2-positive gastric/GEJ cancer. An increased incidence of brain metastasis was observed in patients who failed this regimen.

Unique Patterns of Heterogeneous Mismatch Repair Protein Expression in Colorectal Cancer Unveil Different Degrees of Tumor Mutational Burden and Distinct Tumor Microenvironment Features

Mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells is usually homogeneously retained or lost. Rare lesions may show a heterogeneous pattern of MMR protein expression. We evaluated MMR protein expression (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) in 200 CRCs, identifying 3 groups with proficient MMR protein expression (MMRp), deficient MMR protein expression (MMRd), and heterogeneous MMR protein expression (MMRh). MMRh tumors were microdissected on the basis of the expression of the heterogeneous marker. DNA was extracted and subjected to targeted sequencing. RNA was purified from bulk tumors of all MMRh cases and in a control series of 15 MMRp and 10 MMRd CRCs and analyzed using the PanCancer IO 360 Panel (NanoString Technologies). Twenty-nine of the 200 cases (14.5%) were MMRd. Nine cases (4.5%) showed a heterogeneous pattern of MMR expression, with 6 tumors harboring concomitant loss of one of the other MMR proteins, thus featuring areas with double loss at immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing (MMRh double-loss cases). Four of the 6 MMRh double-loss cases were suitable for a separate sequence variant analysis of IHC double-negative and IHC single-negative components of the tumor. In all lesions, both components exhibited a high tumor mutation burden (TMB). Nevertheless, a significant increase in TMB in the double-negative components was observed (mean TMB: negative, 70 mut/Mb vs positive, 59 mut/Mb) because of a higher number of subclonal variants compared with the other component. Comparative gene expression analyses among MMRd, MMRp, and MMRh CRCs highlighted differential gene expression patterns and an increased number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in MMRh lesions, which is also characterized by a substantial population of exhausted CD8⁺ lymphocytes. We describe a unique subgroup of CRCs showing heterogeneous expression of MMR proteins in a background of concomitant loss of one of the other markers.

Comprehensive Study of Microsatellite Instability Testing and Its Comparison With Immunohistochemistry in Gastric Cancers

PURPOSE

In this study, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was comprehensively analyzed and compared with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 5,676 GC cases, PCR-based MSI testing using five microsatellites (BAT-26, BAT-25, D5S346, D2S123, and D17S250) and IHC for MLH1 were performed. Re-evaluation of MSI testing/MLH1 IHC and additional IHC for MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were performed in discordant/indeterminate cases.

RESULTS

Of the 5,676 cases, microsatellite stable (MSS)/MSI-low and intact MLH1 were observed in 5,082 cases (89.5%), whereas MSI-high (MSI-H) and loss of MLH1 expression were observed in 502 cases (8.8%). We re-evaluated the remaining 92 cases (1.6%) with a discordant/indeterminate status. Re-evaluation showed 1) 37 concordant cases (0.7%) (18 and 19 cases of MSI-H/MMR-deficient (dMMR) and MSS/MMR-proficient (pMMR), respectively), 2) 6 discordant cases (0.1%) (3 cases each of MSI-H/pMMR and MSS/dMMR), 3) 14 MSI indeterminate cases (0.2%) (1 case of dMMR and 13 cases of pMMR), and 4) 35 IHC indeterminate cases (0.6%) (22 and 13 cases of MSI-H and MSS, respectively). Finally, MSI-H or dMMR was observed in 549 cases (9.7%), of which 47 (0.8%) were additionally confirmed as MSI-H or dMMR by re-evaluation. Sensitivity was 99.3% for MSI testing and 95.4% for MMR IHC.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the low incidence of MSI-H or dMMR, discordant/indeterminate results were occasionally identified in GCs, in which case complementary testing is required. These findings could help improve the accuracy of MSI/MMR testing in daily practice.

Non-classical phenotypes of mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability in primary and metastatic tumors at different sites in Lynch syndrome

Background

Lynch syndrome is a genetic disease characterized by abnormal DNA replication caused by germline variation in the mismatch repair (MMR) gene. There are rare non-classical phenotypes with loss of MMR protein expression and inconsistent microsatellite stability (MSS) in Lynch syndrome-related colorectal cancers. However, the difference between microsatellite instability (MSI) of extraintestinal tumors in a patient with Lynch syndrome has been closely studied. Herein, we reported the non-classical phenotypes of mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and MSI in four cases of Lynch syndrome in patients with colorectal cancer and other primary and metastatic tumors.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on four patients diagnosed with Lynch syndrome between 2018 and 2022 in the Department of Pathology of the Rocket Forces Specialized Medical Center. A one-step immunohistochemical (IHC) assay was employed to detect loss in the expression of Lynch syndrome-associated MMR proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6). MSI detection was performed in both primary and metastatic tumors at different sites in the four patients using NCI 2B3D (BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D17S250, and D5S346) and single nucleotide site (BAT25, BAT26, NR21, NR24, NR27, and MONO27) methods. In addition, related MMR gene germline variation, somatic mutations, and MLH1 gene promoter methylation were analyzed using next-generation sequencing and TaqMan probe-based methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MethyLight).

Results

Two of the four patients were heterozygous for MSH6 germline pathogenic variation, and the other two were heterozygous for MSH2 germline pathogenic variation. In all cases, IHC detection of protein expression of the MMR gene with germline variation was negative in all primary and metastatic tumors; non-classical phenotypes of dMMR and MSI were present between primary and metastatic tumors at different sites. dMMR in Lynch colorectal cancer demonstrated high MSI, whereas MSI in primary and metastatic tumors outside the intestine mostly exhibited MSS or low MSI.

Conclusions

The non-classical dMMR and MSI phenotype are mostly observed in Lynch syndrome, even in the context of MMR protein expression loss. Extraintestinal tumors infrequently present with a high degree of MSI and often exhibit a stable or low degree of MSI.

CINSARC signature outperforms gold-standard TNM staging and consensus molecular subtypes for clinical outcome in stage II-III colorectal carcinoma

The outcome of stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC) is highly variable and therapeutic choice is currently based on TNM staging with a few additional biomarkers. However, studies show that some stage III patients have a better prognosis than some stage II patients. A promising consensus molecular (CMS) classification with prognostic relevance has been developed, but it is not used in daily practice. Our team developed CINSARC, a 67-gene expression prognostic signature, whose prognostic value has been demonstrated in many cancer types. It is applicable to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks using NanoString® technology. We investigated whether it could predict outcome in stage II-III CRC. We established the CINSARC classification on the TCGA retrospective cohort comprising 297 stage II-III CRC patients using RNA sequencing and on a second independent cohort comprising 169 cases using NanoString® technology. We compared its recurrence-free and overall survival prognostic value with TNM staging and CMS classification. In the TCGA cohort, we showed that CINSARC significantly splits the population of stage II-III CRC into two groups with different progression-free interval (P = 1.68 × 10^-2; HR = 1.87 [1.11-3.16]) and overall survival (P = 3.73 × 10^-3; HR = 2.45 [1.31-4.59]) and is a strong prognostic factor in multivariate analysis, outperforming TNM staging and CMS classification. We validated these results in the second cohort by applying CINSARC on FFPE samples with Nanostring® technology. CINSARC is a ready-to-use tool with a robust independent prognostic value in stage II-III CRC.

Clinical prospects of WRN inhibition as a treatment for MSI tumours

The discovery of synthetic lethal interactions with genetic deficiencies in cancers has highlighted several candidate targets for drug development, with variable clinical success. Recent work has unveiled a promising synthetic lethal interaction between inactivation/inhibition of the WRN DNA helicase and tumours with microsatellite instability, a phenotype that arises from DNA mismatch repair deficiency. While these and further studies have highlighted the therapeutic potential of WRN inhibitors, compounds with properties suitable for clinical exploitation remain to be described. Furthermore, the complexities of MSI development and its relationship to cancer evolution pose challenges for clinical prospects. Here, we discuss possible paths of MSI tumour development, the viability of WRN inhibition as a strategy in different scenarios, and the necessary conditions to create a roadmap towards successful implementation of WRN inhibitors in the clinic.

Integrative Genomic Tests in Clinical Oncology

Many clinical decisions in oncology practice rely on the presence or absence of an alteration in a single genetic locus, be it a pathogenic variant in a hereditary cancer gene or activating mutation in a drug target. In addition, there are integrative tests that produce continuous variables and evaluate complex characteristics of the entire tumor genome. Microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis identifies tumors with the accumulation of mutations in short repetitive nucleotide sequences. This procedure is utilized in Lynch syndrome diagnostic pipelines and for the selection of patients for immunotherapy. MSI analysis is well-established for colorectal malignancies, but its applications in other cancer types lack standardization and require additional research. Homologous repair deficiency (HRD) indicates tumor sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and some cytotoxic drugs. HRD-related "genomic scars" are manifested by a characteristic pattern of allelic imbalances, accumulation of deletions with flanking homology, and specific mutation signatures. The detection of the genetic consequences of HRD is particularly sophisticated and expensive, as it involves either whole genome sequencing (WGS) or the utilization of large next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) can be determined by whole exome sequencing (WES) or middle-throughput NGS multigene testing. Although TMB is regarded as an agnostic indicator of tumor sensitivity to immunotherapy, the clinical utility of this test is proven only for a few cancer types.

Clinical Testing for Mismatch Repair in Neoplasms Using Multiple Laboratory Methods

Background: A deficiency in DNA mismatch repair function in neoplasms can be assessed by an immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the deficiency/loss of the mismatch repair proteins (dMMR) or by PCR-based methods to assess high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). In some cases, however, there is a discrepancy between the IHC and MSI analyses. Several studies have addressed the issue of discrepancy between IHC and MSI deficiency assessment, but there are limited studies that also incorporate genetic/epigenetic alterations. Methods: In this single-institution retrospective chart-review study, we reviewed 706 neoplasms assessed between 2015 and 2021. All eligible neoplasms were assessed by IHC testing, MSI analysis by PCR-based assay, and tumor-normal paired next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. Eighty percent of neoplasms with MLH1 protein loss had a concurrent MLH1 promoter methylation analysis. Mutation data for MMR genes, IHC, MSI analysis, and tumor histology were correlated with each other. Results: Fifty-eight (8.2%) of 706 neoplasms had MSI-H by PCR and/or dMMR by IHC. Of the 706 analyzed neoplasms, 688 neoplasms (98%) had concordant results: MSI-H/dMMR (n = 44), microsatellite-stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) (n = 625), and MSI-Low (L)/pMMR (n = 19). Of the remaining 18 neoplasms, 9 had a major discordance: MSS/loss of MSH2 and MSH6 (n = 3), MSS/loss of MSH6 (n = 2), MSS/Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 (n = 1), and MSI-High/pMMR (n = 3). In total, 57% of cases with dMMR and 61% of cases with MSI-H had a null mutation of an MMR gene mutation (or methylation of the MLH1 promoter), whereas this figure was 1% for neoplasms with a normal IHC or MSI pattern (p < 0.001). Among 9 cases with major discordance between MSI and IHC, only 3 cases (33%) had an underlying genetic/epigenetic etiology, whereas 37 (76%) of 49 cases with MSI-H and/or dMMR and without major discordance had an underlying genetic abnormality (p = 0.02). Discussion: For most neoplasms, IHC and PCR-based MSI testing results are concordant. In addition, an underlying genetic abnormality (a null mutation of an MMR gene or MLH1 promoter methylation) was attributable to dMMR and/or MSI-H findings. For neoplasms with major discordance in IHC and MSI testing, the addition and integration of NGS results and MLH1 promoter methylation analyses can be beneficial for resolving borderline cases, thereby facilitating patient management.