Hypertension management before and under the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons and future directions

Association between equivalized annual household income and regular medical visits for hypertensive patients since the COVID-19 outbreak

Previous studies have shown an increase in blood pressure during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic even among patients receiving antihypertensive treatment. This study aims to evaluate the association between equivalized annual household income and refraining from regular medical visits for hypertensive patients since the COVID-19 outbreak. We analyzed data from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS), including 2832 hypertensive patients aged 20-79 years from the 2020 survey and at least one survey between 2021 and 2023. They were categorized into lower-income ( Collapse

Key Words

• COVID-19
• Epidemiology
• Health inequities
• Hypertension
• Socioeconomic factors

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Hypertension/epidemiology
• Hypertension/therapy
• Hypertension/economics
• COVID-19/epidemiology
• Middle Aged
• Male
• Female
• Aged
• Income/statistics & numerical data
• Adult
• Japan/epidemiology
• SARS-CoV-2
• Young Adult

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Maya Toyama Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan Department of Nephrology, Self-Defense Forces Sendai Hospital, Sendai, Japan
Michihiro Satoh Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan. Department of Pharmacy, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Hideaki Hashimoto Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
Yutaro Iwabe Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan Center for Clinical Research Promotion and Development, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
Takahito Yagihashi Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine, Konan Hospital, Sendai, Japan
Shingo Nakayama Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
Takahisa Murakami Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan Division of Aging and Geriatric Dentistry, Department of Rehabilitation Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan
Naoki Nakaya Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Hirohito Metoki Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan Tohoku Institute for Management of Blood Pressure, Sendai, Japan
Atsushi Hozawa Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
Takahiro Tabuchi Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Behavioral Factors Related to Participation in Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Adults With Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Remote blood pressure (BP) monitoring (RBPM) or BP telemonitoring is beneficial in hypertension management. People with hypertension involved in telemonitoring of BP often have better BP control than those in usual care. However, most reports on RBPM are from intervention studies.

Objective

This study aimed to assess participant characteristics and technology health behaviors associated with RBPM participation in a wider population with hypertension. This study will help us understand the predictors of RBPM participation and consider how to increase it.

Methods

This was a quantitative, cross-sectional survey study of people with hypertension in the United States. The inclusion criteria included people aged ≥18 years with a hypertension diagnosis or who self-reported they have hypertension, had a prescription of at least one hypertension medication, understood the English language, and were willing to participate. The survey included demographics, technology health behaviors, and RBPM participation questions. The survey was self-administered on the Qualtrics platform and followed the CHERRIES (Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys) checklist. The primary dependent variable was participation in RBPM.

Results

In total, 507 people with hypertension participated in the survey. The mean age for all respondents was 60 (SD 14.7) years. The respondents were mostly female (306/507, 60.4%), non-Hispanic (483/507, 95.3%), and White (429/507, 84.6%). A little over half of the respondents reported having had hypertension for 5 years or more (287/507, 56.6%). About one-third of participants were aware of RBPM (165/507, 32.5%), and 11.8% (60/507) were enrolled in RBPM. The mean age of those engaging in RBPM and non-RBPM was 46.2 (SD 14.7) and 62 (SD 13.7) years, respectively. The most common reasons for not participating in RBPM were because their health provider did not ask the participant to participate (247/447, 55.3%) and their lack of awareness of RBPM (190/447, 42.5%). Most respondents in the RBPM group measure their BP at home (55/60, 91.7%), and 61.7% (37/60) engage in daily BP measurement, compared with 62.6% (280/447) and 25.1% (112/447), respectively, among the non-RBPM group. A greater number of those in the RBPM group reported tracking their BP measurements with mobile health (mHealth; 37/60, 61.7%) than those in the non-RBPM group (70/447, 15.6%). The electronic health records or patient portal was the most common channel of RBPM communication between the respondents and their health care providers. The significant predictors of participation in RBPM were RBPM awareness (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 34.65, 95% CI 11.35-150.31; P<.001) and sharing health information electronically with a health provider (AOR 4.90, 95% CI 1.39-21.64; P=.01) among all participants. However, the significant predictor of participation in RBPM among participants who were aware of RBPM was sharing health information electronically with a health provider (AOR 6.99, 95% CI 1.62-47.44; P=.007).

Conclusions

Participation in RBPM is likely to increase with increased awareness, health providers' recommendations, and tailoring RBPM services to patients' preferred electronic communication channels.

Increased prevalence of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome during COVID-19: A propensity score-matched study

A recent presidential advisory from the American Heart Association (AHA) has introduced the term cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome to describe the complex interplay among health conditions linking heart, kidney, and metabolism. The aim of our study was to compare the prevalence of concurrent CKM syndrome components before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify associated risk factors. We conducted a study utilizing data from a real-world population obtained from a primary care database. The study cohort comprised a closed group followed over a 6-year period (2017-2022). A total of 81,051 individuals were included: 32,650 in the pre-pandemic period and 48,401 in the 2020-2022 triennium. After propensity-score matching for sex, age, and BMI, the study included 30,511 participants for each period. 3554 individuals were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in the pre-pandemic period, compared to 7430 during the pandemic. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity displayed significant increases in prevalence during the pandemic, and prediabetes had a particularly sharp rise of 170%. Age-stratified analyses revealed a higher burden of CKM conditions with advancing age. Our findings indicate a substantial increase in the prevalence of CKM syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic, with nearly half of the patients exhibiting one or more CKM syndrome components.

A six-year study in a real-world population reveals an increased incidence of dyslipidemia during COVID-19

BACKGROUNDRecent studies conducted in individuals who survived COVID-19 suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk of dyslipidemia. However, it remains unclear whether this augmented risk is confirmed in the general population and how this phenomenon is affecting the overall burden of cardiometabolic diseases.METHODSTo address these aspects, we conducted a 6-year longitudinal study to examine the broader effects of COVID-19 on dyslipidemia incidence in a real-world population (228,266 individuals) residing in Naples in southern Italy. The pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups were balanced for demographic and clinical factors using propensity score matching.RESULTSOur analysis spans a period of 3 years during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022), comparing dyslipidemia incidence with pre-pandemic data (2017-2019), with a follow-up of at least 1,095 days corresponding to 21,349,215 person-years. During the COVID-19 period, we detected an increased risk of developing any dyslipidemia when compared with the pre-COVID-19 triennium (OR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.39). Importantly, these estimates were adjusted for comorbidities by a multivariate analysis.CONCLUSIONSTaken together, our data reveal a notable rise in dyslipidemia incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the utility of establishing specialized clinical monitoring protocols for patients who survive COVID-19 to mitigate the risk of developing dyslipidemia.

National and Regional Trends in the Prevalence of Hypertension in South Korea Amid the Pandemic, 2009-2022: Nationwide Study of Over 3 Million Individuals

BACKGROUND

Understanding the association between hypertension prevalence and socioeconomic and behavioral variables during a pandemic is essential, and this analysis should extend beyond short-term trends.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine long-term trends in the prevalence of participants diagnosed with and receiving treatment for hypertension, using data collected by a nationally representative survey from 2009 to 2022, which includes the COVID-19 pandemic era.

METHODS

A nationwide, population-based, cross-sectional study used data collected from the South Korea Community Health Survey between 2009 and 2022. The study sample comprised 3,208,710 Korean adults over a period of 14 years. We aimed to assess trends in the prevalence of participants diagnosed with and receiving treatment for hypertension in the national population from 2009 to 2022, with a specific focus on the COVID-19 pandemic, using weighted linear regression models.

RESULTS

Among the included 3,072,546 Korean adults, 794,239 (25.85%) were aged 19-39 years, 1,179,388 (38.38%) were aged 40-59 years; 948,097 (30.86%) were aged 60-79 years, and 150,822 (4.91%) were aged 80 years or older. A total of 1,426,379 (46.42%) were men; 761,896 (24.80%) and 712,264 (23.18%) were diagnosed with and received treatment for hypertension, respectively. Although the overall prevalence over the 14-year period increased, the upward trends of patients diagnosed with and receiving treatment for hypertension decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic era compared with the prepandemic era (β difference for trend during vs before the pandemic -.101, 95% CI -0.107 to -0.094 vs -.133, 95% CI -0.140 to -0.127). Notably, the trends in prevalence during the pandemic were less pronounced in subgroups of older adults (≥60 years old) and individuals with higher alcohol consumption (≥5 days/month).

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide representative study found that the national prevalence of participants diagnosed with and receiving treatment for hypertension increased during the prepandemic era. However, there was a marked decrease in these trends during the prepandemic era, compared with the pandemic era, particularly among specific subgroups at increased risk of negative outcomes. Future studies are needed to evaluate the factors associated with changes in the prevalence of hypertension during the COVID-19 pandemic.

An Examination of Complication Rates and Surgery Durations in Elective Hand Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic presented unique challenges to hand surgeons as hospitals worked to adapt to unprecedented demands on resources and personnel. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on outcomes in elective hand surgery using a large national database. Methods: This is a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset for patients undergoing elective hand procedures in 2019 and 2020. Demographics, comorbidities, procedural factors, and outcomes were compared between cases occurring in 2019 and 2020. Multivariable regressions were performed to evaluate the association between operative year and 30-day outcomes. Results: A total of 8971 patients were included with a mean age of 52.2 ± 16.7 and 52.8 ± 16.4 years for the 2019 and 2020 cohorts, respectively. Compared to the 2019 cohort, the 2020 cohort demonstrated higher prevalence of obesity (43.3% vs 40.8%, P = 0.019), hypertension requiring medication (32.9% vs 35.0%; P = 0.046), and American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥ 3 (30.4% vs 27.0%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in outcomes including 30-day readmissions, reoperation, or complications between cohorts on unadjusted or multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Elective hand cases performed during the pandemic were associated with longer operating times and more frequently involved patients with greater comorbidities. Despite these differences, patients undergoing surgery during the pandemic demonstrated similar outcomes including complications, readmissions, and reoperations compared to those undergoing surgery the year prior, suggesting that even in the setting of a pandemic, performing elective surgery is safe without an increased risk to the patient.

The Prevalence of Internet Use as a Source of Information Among Patients With Hypertension

Background and objective The incidence of hypertension is growing at an alarming rate globally. In the United States, nearly half of the adult population suffers from hypertension, a disease potentially associated with long-term dire consequences and comorbidities. While Internet access has proliferated, and free Internet-based education resources for healthy lifestyles have exponentially increased over the past two decades, little is known about whether Internet-based information can be or is used as a self-learning tool for hypertension management in a community setting. With almost no published data, if and to what degree Internet-based, self-directed learning tools are used for hypertension management needs to be assessed. In light of this, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of Internet use as a source of information in patients with known diagnoses of hypertension who presented to our Internal Medicine clinic at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso. Materials and methods We conducted a single-center, cohort-based observational study at our teaching hospital's internal medicine clinic. A survey questionnaire was distributed to all adults aged more than 18 years with a known diagnosis of hypertension. Consent for participation was obtained from all participants. Of the total studied population, 93.6% (190/203) were of Hispanic descent. Moreover, 67.5% (137/203) identified as female. Of note, 22.7% (46/203) reported using the Internet to learn about hypertension. Internet users were younger, with a mean age of 61.4 years compared to 68.7 (p=0.02) years for non-Internet users, attended institutions of a higher grade of education, and mostly received information regarding hypertension from their families (91.3% vs 2.5%, p<0.001). While most patients used the Internet for making treatment decisions and were satisfied with their choices, more than a quarter felt confused and anxious after using Internet-based resources. Results Most patients in the study were found to not use the Internet as a resource tool for hypertension management (157/203; 77.3%). Among the 22.7% of patients who used the Internet for hypertension management, the most commonly utilized resource was Google.com, as an initial step to hypertension research (26/46, 58.6%, p<0.001), followed by multiple resources within a predetermined list on the provided survey (14/46, 30.4%). The survey also assessed the reasons for using Internet-based resources, with the primary reason being evaluating treatment options (19/46, 41.5%), followed by developing coping skills (13/46, 28.2%), and lastly aiding in decision-making (10/46, 21.5%). Conclusions Internet-based educational tools are mushrooming as the Internet is becoming more pervasive. This study shows that within this predominant Hispanic population, nearly one-quarter of patients with hypertension are using Internet-based, self-learning tools. This highlights a slow shift in medical education which providers have to be prepared for as patients will be using these tools as secondary information sources for medical decision-making more frequently going forward. Further studies need to be conducted to evaluate the current and longitudinal impact of these new information sources.

Incidence of new-onset hypertension before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a 7-year longitudinal cohort study in a large population

BACKGROUND

While the augmented incidence of diabetes after COVID-19 has been widely confirmed, controversial results are available on the risk of developing hypertension during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We designed a longitudinal cohort study to analyze a closed cohort followed up over a 7-year period, i.e., 3 years before and 3 years during the COVID-19 pandemic, and during 2023, when the pandemic was declared to be over. We analyzed medical records of more than 200,000 adults obtained from a cooperative of primary physicians from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2023. The main outcome was the new diagnosis of hypertension.

RESULTS

We evaluated 202,163 individuals in the pre-pandemic years and 190,743 in the pandemic years, totaling 206,857 when including 2023 data. The incidence rate of new hypertension was 2.11 (95% C.I. 2.08-2.15) per 100 person-years in the years 2017-2019, increasing to 5.20 (95% C.I. 5.14-5.26) in the period 2020-2022 (RR = 2.46), and to 6.76 (95% C.I. 6.64-6.88) in 2023. The marked difference in trends between the first and the two successive observation periods was substantiated by the fitted regression lines of two Poisson models conducted on the monthly log-incidence of hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected a significant increase in new-onset hypertension during the COVID-19 pandemic, which at the end of the observation period affected ~ 20% of the studied cohort, a percentage higher than the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection within the same time frame. This observation suggests that increased attention to hypertension screening should not be limited to individuals who are aware of having contracted the infection but should be extended to the entire population.

Assessing the Risk of Hypertension in Chronic, Elderly Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

This study considers care management for older chronic patients during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIMS

To identify groups of variables at previous time points as a basis for deriving efficient classification models during and after a pandemic situation and to quantify the effect of each variable within the model to predict levels of worsening risk in diastolic and systolic arterial hypertension (AHT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective longitudinal study, data were collected at three time points: before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic period.

RESULTS

The study included 148 patients with an average age of 81.6 years. During the study period, mean systolic blood pressure among this population rose by 5 mmHg to 128.8 mmHg; the number of patients with systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg rose by 45.3%; among those with diastolic blood pressure > 90, the number rose by 41.2%; mean triglycerides levels rose to 152.6 mg/dL; cholesterol levels rose to 147 mg/dL; and LDL cholesterol rose to 112.2 mg/dL. Meanwhile, mean levels of HDL cholesterol decreased to 46.5 mg/dL. Binary-response logistic regression models were constructed to identify the most relevant variables for predicting AHT risk during and after the pandemic. The heart rate (OR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.22-2.72) and body mass index (OR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.08-2.94) variables were significant at the population level (p < 0.05) for diastolic and systolic AHT in the pandemic period risk models. The body mass index variable was also significant for diastolic AHT in the post-pandemic period risk model (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.32-2.94), whilst the triglycerides variable was significant in the systolic AHT post-pandemic period risk model (OR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.01-1.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Bad control of arterial hypertension in older patients with chronic disease is associated with elevated levels of LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, heart rate and triglycerides, and lower levels of HDL cholesterol.