Different somatostatin and CXCR4 chemokine receptor expression in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms depending on their origin

CXCR4 expression in immunohistochemistry of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) is significantly associated with the development of various malignant tumors. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the expression of CXCR4 in the immunohistochemistry of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (GI-NENs).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search regarding gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms and CXCR4 was conducted using PubMed,Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with a cut off date of June 30, 2024.Two researchers independently screened the literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessed study quality using the Newcastle-OttawaScale. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata version 17.0. The pooled positive rate was employed to evaluate the expression of CXCR4 in the immunohistochemistry of GI-NENs.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies involving 501 patients were included in this research. The immunohistochemical analysis revealed positive CXCR4 expression in 174 patients. The meta-analysis calculated and summarized the combined positive rate (R: 0.41; 95% CI = 0.21-0.60, p = 0.00), indicating that the differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

CXCR4 is highly expressed in the immunohistochemistry of GI-NENs, which may provide some evidence for the therapeutic application of CXCR4 antagonists in treating neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Research process of PET tracers for neuroendocrine tumors diagnosis

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can affect several organ systems and present a variety of clinical symptoms, which are difficult to diagnose by conventional methods. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) is a group of specific receptors expressed on the well-differentiated NET cell membrane. [68Ga]-labeled somatostatin analogues (SSAs) PET/CT, endogenous ligands targeting SSTR, is widely used in currently clinical NETs diagnosis. The dual-tracer strategy ([68Ga]Ga-SSAs + [18F]FDG) allows for a more detailed evaluation of tumor metabolism and receptor expression. The NETPET score, integrating [68Ga]Ga-SSAs PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT results, enhances the accuracy of predicting treatment response and prognosis. In addition, novel isotopes ([18F]/[64Cu]) labeled SSAs and SSTR antagonists outperformed [68Ga]-SSAs in lesion detection, tumor uptake, and tumor-to-background ratio. Due to undifferentiated or dedifferentiated NETs, SSTR may not be expressed. [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [18F]-FDG PET/CT are applicable for SSTR-negative NET diagnosis. [18F]-MFBG and [18F]-DOPA have a higher sensitivity for identifying non-metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) than other radiotracers. This review addressed NET diagnosis with conventional imaging techniques, the clinical application of novel radiotracers, and the merits and limitations of the various radiotracers.

CXCR4: From Signaling to Clinical Applications in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

There are several well-described molecular mechanisms that influence cell growth and are related to the development of cancer. Chemokines constitute a fundamental element that is not only involved in local growth but also affects angiogenesis, tumor spread, and metastatic disease. Among them, the C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) and its specific receptor the chemokine C-X-C motif receptor 4 (CXCR4) have been widely studied. The overexpression in cell membranes of CXCR4 has been shown to be associated with the development of different kinds of histological malignancies, such as adenocarcinomas, epidermoid carcinomas, mesenchymal tumors, or neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The molecular synapsis between CXCL12 and CXCR4 leads to the interaction of G proteins and the activation of different intracellular signaling pathways in both gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and bronchopulmonary (BP) NENs, conferring greater capacity for locoregional aggressiveness, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and the appearance of metastases. Therefore, it has been hypothesized as to how to design tools that target this receptor. The aim of this review is to focus on current knowledge of the relationship between CXCR4 and NENs, with a special emphasis on diagnostic and therapeutic molecular targets.

Expression and clinical value of CXCR4 in high grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Background

CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is associated with the progression and metastasis of numerous malignant tumors. However, its relationship with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Grade 3 (GEP-NENs G3) is unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize the expression of CXCR4 in GEP-NENS and to explore the clinical and prognostic value of CXCR4.

Methods

This study retrospectively collected clinical and pathological data from patients with GEP-NENs who receiving surgery in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2013 to April 2021, and obtained the overall survival of the patients based on follow-up. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on pathological paraffin sections to observe CXCR4 staining. Groups were made according to pathological findings. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve was used to evaluate prognosis. SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis.

Results

100 GEP-NENs G3 patients were enrolled in this study. There was a significant difference in primary sites (P=0.002), Ki-67 index (P<0.001), and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) elevation (P=0.008) between neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G3 and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). CXCR4 was highly expressed only in tumors, low or no expressed in adjacent tissues (P<0.001). The expression level of CXCR4 in NEC was significantly higher than that in NET G3 (P=0.038). The K-M curves showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with high CXCR4 expression and patients with low CXCR4 expression, either in GEP-NEN G3 or NEC (P=0.920, P=0.842. respectively).

Conclusion

Differential expression of CXCR4 was found between tumor and adjacent tissues and between NET G3 and NEC. Our results demonstrated that CXCR4 can be served as a new IHC diagnostic indicator in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of GEP-NENs G3. Further studies with multi-center, large sample size and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the correlation between CXCR4 expression level and prognosis.

Impact of CXCR4-Directed PET/CT on Staging and Proposed Oncologic Management in Patients With Digestive System Tumors

PURPOSE

To elucidate the influence of CXC motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-directed imaging on staging and proposed oncologic management in patients with digestive system tumors compared with guideline-appropriate imaging (GAI).

METHODS

From our PET/CT database, we retrospectively identified 37 patients with advanced digestive system tumors, which had been scheduled for CXCR4-targeted [ 68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT for potential theranostic considerations. In all subjects, concurrent GAI was also available. Patients were afflicted with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (21/37 [56.8%]), pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (6/37 [16.2%]), cholangiocarcinoma (5/37 [13.5%]), hepatocellular carcinoma (4/37 [10.8%]), and colorectal carcinoma (1/37 [2.7%]). Staging results and impact on proposed oncologic management by a board-certified gastroenterologist were compared between GAI and [ 68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT.

RESULTS

Relative to GAI, CXCR4-directed PET/CT resulted in staging changes in 14 of 37 patients (37.8%). Upstaging was seen in 1 of 14 patients (7.1%), whereas downstaging was recorded in the remaining 13 of 14 patients (92.9%). Among those, staging changes would not have triggered any changes in oncological management in 4 of 14 (28.6%). For the remaining 10 of 14 patients (71.4%), however, findings on [ 68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT would have impacted subsequent clinical algorithm, including the necessity for further diagnostic steps or failure to initiate antitumor therapy.

CONCLUSION

[ 68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT missed tumor lesions in 13 patients with digestive system tumors, which would have led to inappropriate downstaging and clinical treatment of 10 patients. As such, our results do not support a more widespread use of [ 68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT for clinical staging in those tumor entities.

Evaluation of PD-L1 expression in a large set of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours and correlation with clinicopathological data

BACKGROUND

Targeting programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1 is a promising therapeutic approach for many types of cancer in which PD-L1 is overexpressed. However, data on PD-L1 expression levels in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are limited and contradictory.

METHODS

We evaluated PD-L1 expression in 457 archived, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded GEP-NEN samples from 175 patients by immunohistochemistry using the highly sensitive monoclonal anti-PD-L1 antibody 73-10. The immunostaining was semiquantitatively evaluated using a 12-point immunoreactivity score (IRS) taking both PD-L1-positive tumour cells and immune cells into account. Tumour samples with an IRS ≥ 3 were considered PD-L1-positive. Results were correlated with clinicopathological data and with the expression of several typical markers and receptors for neuroendocrine tumours.

RESULTS

Of the GEP-NEN samples, 73% were PD-L1-positive. The median IRS value across all samples was 4.0, corresponding to low expression. PD-L1 immunostaining was predominantly localised at the plasma membrane of the tumour cells. Positive correlations were observed between PD-L1 expression and tumour grading or Ki-67 index, between PD-L1 expression and the expression of chromogranin A, and between PD-L1 expression and the expression of each of the five somatostatin receptors. PD-L1 expression was lower in tumours with lymph node metastases at diagnosis than in those without regional metastasis and lower in high-stage than in earlier-stage tumours. No association was noted between PD-L1 expression and patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression is common in GEP-NENs and increases with malignancy. Therefore, especially in high-grade GEP-NENs, targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis could be a promising additional therapeutic strategy.

Reassessment of somatostatin receptor SST4 expression in bronchopulmonary and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms using the novel rabbit monoclonal anti-human SST4 antibody 7H49L61

Somatostatin receptors SST1, SST2, and SST5 are overexpressed in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), but little is known about SST4 expression in NENs because of a lack of specific monoclonal antibodies. We recently developed and thoroughly characterised a rabbit monoclonal anti-human SST4 antibody, 7H49L61, and showed that it is well suited for identifying SST4 expression in routine pathology samples. The present study aimed to re-evaluate SST4 expression in a large set of NEN samples using this antibody. For this purpose, we assessed SST4 expression in 722 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded NEN samples from 274 patients by immunohistochemistry using the novel antibody 7H49L61. The immunostaining was semiquantitatively evaluated using the 12-point immunoreactivity score (IRS), and the results were correlated with clinicopathological data. SST4 was detected in 39.3% of all NENs, but with a median IRS of 2.0, its expression intensity was negligible overall. In all cases, both cytoplasmic and membraneous staining was observed. SST4 expression was somewhat higher in bronchopulmonary NEN (BP-NEN) than in gastroenteropancreatic NEN (GEP-NEN) but still very low. SST4 expression positively correlated with favourable patient outcomes in BP-NEN but had a positive association with Ki-67 index or tumour grading and a negative interrelationship with overall survival in GEP-NEN. In conclusion, unlike that of other SST subtypes, SST4 expression in both BP-NEN and GEP-NEN is negligible and of no diagnostic or therapeutic relevance.

Comparative evaluation of somatostatin and CXCR4 receptor expression in different types of thyroid carcinoma using well-characterised monoclonal antibodies

Background

Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas can be treated surgically and with radioiodine therapy, whereas therapeutic options for advanced stage IV medullary and for anaplastic tumours are limited. Recently, somatostatin receptors (SSTs) and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 have been evaluated for the treatment of thyroid carcinomas, however, with contradictory results.

Methods

The expression of the five SSTs and of CXCR4 was assessed in 90 samples from 56 patients with follicular, papillary, medullary, or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma by means of immunohistochemistry using well-characterised monoclonal antibodies. The stainings were evaluated using the Immunoreactivity Score (IRS) and correlated to clinical data. In order to further substantiate the immunohistochemistry results, in serial sections of a subset of the samples receptor expression was additionally examined at the mRNA level using qRT-PCR.

Results

Overall, SST and CXCR4 protein expression was low in all four entities. In single cases, however, very high IRS values for SST2 and CXCR4 were observed. SST2 was the most frequently expressed receptor, found in 38% of cases, followed by SST5 and SST4, found in 14 and 9% of tumours, respectively. SST1 and SST3 could not be detected to any significant extent. CXCR4 was present in 12.5% of medullary and 25% of anaplastic carcinomas. Expression SST3, SST4, SST5 and CXCR4 was positively correlated with expression of the proliferation marker Ki-67. Additionally, a negative interrelationship between SST4 or SST5 expression and patient survival and a positive association between SST3 expression and tumour diameter were observed. qRT-PCR revealed a similar receptor expression pattern to that seen at the protein level. However, probably due to the low overall expression, no correlation was found for the SSTs or the CXCR4 between the IRS and the mRNA values.

Conclusions

SST- or CXCR4-based diagnostics or therapy in thyroid carcinomas should not be considered in general but may be feasible in single cases with high levels of expression of these receptors.

Assessment of G Protein-Coupled Oestrogen Receptor Expression in Normal and Neoplastic Human Tissues Using a Novel Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody

In addition to the classical oestrogen receptors, ERα and ERβ, a G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor (GPER) has been identified that primarily mediates the rapid, non-genomic signalling of oestrogens. Data on GPER expression at the protein level are contradictory; therefore, the present study was conducted to re-evaluate GPER expression by immunohistochemistry to obtain broad GPER expression profiles in human non-neoplastic and neoplastic tissues, especially those not investigated in this respect so far. We developed and thoroughly characterised a novel rabbit monoclonal anti-human GPER antibody, 20H15L21, using Western blot analyses and immunocytochemistry. The antibody was then applied to a large series of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human tissue samples. In normal tissue, GPER was identified in distinct cell populations of the cortex and the anterior pituitary; islets and pancreatic ducts; fundic glands of the stomach; the epithelium of the duodenum and gallbladder; hepatocytes; proximal tubules of the kidney; the adrenal medulla; and syncytiotrophoblasts and decidua cells of the placenta. GPER was also expressed in hepatocellular, pancreatic, renal, and endometrial cancers, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, and pheochromocytomas. The novel antibody 20H15L21 will serve as a valuable tool for basic research and the identification of GPER-expressing tumours during histopathological examinations.

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Adaptor Protein FAM159B Expression in Normal and Neoplastic Human Tissues

FAM159B is a so-called adaptor protein. These proteins are essential components in numerous cell signalling pathways. However, little is known regarding FAM159B expression in normal and neoplastic human tissues. The commercially available rabbit polyclonal anti-human FAM159B antibody HPA011778 was initially characterised for its specificity using Western blot analyses and immunocytochemistry and then applied to a large series of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded normal and neoplastic human tissue samples. Confirmation of FAM159B's predicted size and antibody specificity was achieved in BON-1 cells, a neuroendocrine tumour cell line endogenously expressing FAM159B, using targeted siRNA. Immunocytochemical experiments additionally revealed cytoplasmic expression of the adaptor protein. Immunohistochemical staining detected FAM159B expression in neuronal and neuroendocrine tissues such as the cortex, the trigeminal ganglia, dorsal root and intestinal ganglia, the pancreatic islets and the neuroendocrine cells of the bronchopulmonary and gastrointestinal tract, but also in the syncytiotrophoblasts of the placenta. FAM159B was also expressed in many of the 28 tumour entities investigated, with high levels in medullary and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas, parathyroid adenomas, lung and ovarian carcinomas, lymphomas and neuroendocrine tumours of different origins. The antibody HPA011778 can act as a useful tool for basic research and identifying FAM159B expression in tissue samples.

A panel of tumor biomarkers to predict complete pathological response to neo-adjuvant treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients is related to a favorable prognosis. The identification of early biomarkers predictive of pathological complete response would help optimize the multimodality management of the patients. A panel of 11 tumor-related proteins was investigated by immunohistochemistry in the pretreatment biopsy of a group of locally advanced rectal cancer patients to identify early biomarkers of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. A mono-institutional retrospective cohort of 95 stage II/III locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery was selected based on clinical–pathological characteristics and the availability of a pretreatment tumor biopsy. Eleven selected protein marker expression (MLH1, GLUT1, Ki67, CA-IX, CXCR4, COX2, CXCL12, HIF1α, VEGF, CD44, and RAD51) was investigated. The optimal cutoff values were calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Classification and regression tree analysis was performed to investigate the biomarker interaction. Patients presenting either Ki-67 or HIF1α or RAD51 below the cutoff value, or CXCR4 or COX2 above the cutoff value, were more likely to get a pathological complete response. Classification and regression tree analysis identified three groups of patients resulting from the combination of Ki-67 and CXCR4 expression. Patients with high expression of Ki-67 had the lowest chance to get a pathological complete response (18%), as compared to patients with low expression of both Ki-67 and CXCR4 (29%), and patients with low Ki-67 and high CXCR4 expression (70%). Pretreatment Ki-67, CXCR4, COX2, HIF1α, and RAD51 in tumor biopsies are associated with pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. A combined evaluation of Ki-67 and CXCR4 would increase their predictive potential. If validated, their optimal cutoff could be used to select patients for a tailored multimodality treatment.

Pathology Reporting in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Digestive System: Everything You Always Wanted to Know but Were Too Afraid to Ask

During the 5th NIKE (Neuroendocrine tumors Innovation in Knowledge and Education) meeting, held in Naples, Italy, in May 2019, discussions centered on the understanding of pathology reports of gastroenetropancreactic neuroendocrine neoplasms. In particular, the main problem concerned the difficulty that clinicians experience in extrapolating relevant information from neuroendocrine tumor pathology reports. During the meeting, participants were asked to identify and rate issues which they have encountered, for which the input of an expert pathologist would have been appreciated. This article is a collection of the most rated questions and relative answers, focusing on three main topics: 1) morphology and classification; 2) Ki67 and grading; 3) immunohistochemistry. Patient management should be based on multidisciplinary decisions, taking into account clinical and pathology-related features with clear comprehension between all health care professionals. Indeed, pathologists require clinical details and laboratory findings when relevant, while clinicians require concise and standardized reports. In keeping with this last statement, the minimum requirements in pathology datasets are provided in this paper and should be a baseline for all neuroendocrine tumor professionals.

Immunohistochemical expression of chemokine receptor in neuroendocrine neoplasms (CXCR4) of the gastrointestinal tract: a retrospective study of 71 cases

AIM

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is expressed in many tumor entities, including gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (GI-NENs). However, the role of CXCR4 expression in GI-NENs has been less studied. Our objective was to investigate the expression of CXCR4 in a series of GI-NENs with various clinical and pathological features.

METHODS

The immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of CXCR4 (clone UMB2) was examined in 71 GI-NENs and a semiquantitative immunoreactivity score (IRS) was calculated taking into consideration the intensity of the IHC reaction and the percentage of the tumor cells which showed positive expression. Results were compared with several clinical and pathological prognostic factors.

RESULTS

High CXCR4 expression was noted in 31 (43.7%) cases. Low IRS values were more frequent in NENs from the small intestine (66.7%) and stomach (60%). Also, all appendix tumors had IRS value of zero. High CXCR4 expression was noticed in 52.5% of liver metastases, compared to 40.4% primary tumors. A significant relationship was observed between the CXCR4 expression and the tumor grade (p=0.0216), and high IRS value was correlated with clinical stages III and IV (p=0.0142) and lympho-vascular invasion (p=0.0129). 74.1% of G1 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) had a low IRS, G3 NETs showed minor differences between low (42.9%) and high (57.1%) expression and 66.7% of neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) presented high expression of CXCR4.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study highlighted that high CXCR4 expression is associated with high grade and advanced stage GI-NENs, as well as with metastatic cases. In these cases, high CXCR4 expression could serve as an important target for CXCR4 antagonists.

Dual-Targeted Extracellular Vesicles to Facilitate Combined Therapies for Neuroendocrine Cancer Treatment

Neuroendocrine (NE) cancers arise from cells within the neuroendocrine system. Chemotherapies and endoradiotherapy have been developed, but their clinical efficacy is limited. The objective of this study was to develop a dual-targeted extracellular vesicles (EV)-delivered combined therapies to treat NE cancer. Specifically, we produced EV in stirred-tank bioreactors and surface tagged both anti-somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR 2) monoclonal antibody (mAb) and anti-C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) mAb to generate mAbs-EV. Both live-cell confocal microscopy imaging and In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) imaging confirmed that mAbs-EV specifically targeted and accumulated in NE cancer cells and NE tumor xenografts. Then the highly potent natural cytotoxic marine compound verrucarin A (Ver-A) with IC50 of 2.2-2.8 nM and microtubule polymerization inhibitor mertansine (DM1) with IC50 of 3.1-4.2 nM were packed into mAbs-EV. The in vivo maximum tolerated dose study performed in non-tumor-bearing mice indicated minimal systemic toxicity of mAbs-EV-Ver-A/DM1. Finally, the in vivo anticancer efficacy study demonstrated that the SSTR2/CXCR4 dual-targeted EV-Ver-A/DM1 is more effective to inhibit NE tumor growth than the single targeting and single drug. The results from this study could expand the application of EV to targeting deliver the combined potent chemotherapies for cancer treatment.

Evaluation of a New 177Lu-Labeled Somatostatin Analog for the Treatment of Tumors Expressing Somatostatin Receptor Subtypes 2 and 5

Targeted radionuclide therapy of somatostatin receptor (SST)-expressing tumors is only partially addressed by the established somatostatin analogs having an affinity for the SST subtype 2 (SST2). Aiming to target a broader spectrum of tumors, we evaluated the bis-iodo-substituted somatostatin analog ST8950 ((4-amino-3-iodo)-d-Phe-c[Cys-(3-iodo)-Tyr-d-Trp-Lys-Val-Cys]-Thr-NH2), having subnanomolar affinity for SST2 and SST5, labeled with [177Lu]Lu3+ via the chelator DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid). Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) cells stably transfected with the human SST2 (HEK-SST2) and SST5 (HEK-SST5) were used for in vitro and in vivo evaluation on a dual SST2- and SST5-expressing xenografted mouse model. natLu-DOTA-ST8950 showed nanomolar affinity for both subtypes (IC50 (95% confidence interval): 0.37 (0.22-0.65) nM for SST2 and 3.4 (2.3-5.2) for SST5). The biodistribution of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-ST8950 was influenced by the injected mass, with 100 pmol demonstrating lower background activity than 10 pmol. [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-ST8950 reached its maximal uptake on SST2- and SST5-tumors at 1 h p.i. (14.17 ± 1.78 and 1.78 ± 0.35%IA/g, respectively), remaining unchanged 4 h p.i., with a mean residence time of 8.6 and 0.79 h, respectively. Overall, [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-ST8950 targets SST2-, SST5-expressing tumors in vivo to a lower extent, and has an effective dose similar to clinically used radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Its main drawbacks are the low uptake in SST5-tumors and the persistent kidney uptake.

Immunohistochemical Profile and 47-Gene Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Solid Tumor Panel Analysis of a Series of 13 Strumal Carcinoids

Strumal carcinoid is an extraordinary rare tumor of the ovary consisting of thyroid tissue intermixed with neuroendocrine tumor component. The cellular origin of strumal carcinoids has been an area of debate. There is also little data on detailed immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics of these neoplasms. For this reason, this series investigated the characteristics of a series of 13 strumal carcinoids using immunohistochemical markers and a 47-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) solid tumor panel analysis. Both cellular components showed thyroglobulin expression in all tumors. TTF-1 expression was noted in both cellular components of 11 cases. Chromogranin A was positive in both components of most tumors (n = 12, 92.3% in the neuroendocrine component and n = 10, 76.9% in the thyroid follicular component). Synaptophysin stained the neuroendocrine component of all cases, and it was also identified in the follicular thyroid component of a single case. All tumors were negative for CDX2 and calcitonin. ISLET1 was positive in the neuroendocrine component of 8 cases (6.5%). With the exception of one case, all tumors were positive for SSTR2a. The tumors were associated with a low Ki67 labeling index. All cases were microsatellite stable and no pathogenic mutations were identified using a 47-gene NGS solid tumor analysis. This series underscored that strumal carcinoids are distinct neuroendocrine tumors. The synchronous expression for thyroid follicular epithelial and neuroendocrine differentiation biomarkers may suggest a precursor cell origin displaying mixed-amphicrine differentiation. While strumal carcinoids can be diagnosed by their typical morphology and immunohistochemical profile, frequent SSTR expression may serve as a potential theranostic biomarker in the management of affected patients. In addition, the absence of common driver mutations in the NGS solid tumor panel may suggest that these neoplasms seem to be genetically unrelated to follicular epithelial-derived thyroid tumors and potentially different than other commonly identified well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms. Therefore, further studies focusing on molecular characteristics of this entity are still needed.

Evaluation of Somatostatin and CXCR4 Receptor Expression in a Large Set of Prostate Cancer Samples Using Tissue Microarrays and Well-Characterized Monoclonal Antibodies

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common type of cancer among men in Western countries. Despite numerous therapeutic options, few treatments are available for patients with end-stage disease. In the present study, different somatostatin receptors (SSTs) and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 were evaluated for their suitability as novel therapeutic targets in PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression of SST subtypes 1, 2A, 3, and 5 and of CXCR4 was evaluated in 276 PCa tumor samples on a tissue microarray (TMA) in 23 whole-block tumor samples and in 3 PCa cell lines by immunohistochemistry using well-characterized monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: Overall, the frequency and intensity of expression of SSTs and CXCR4 were very low among the PCa samples investigated. Specifically, SST5, SST2A, and SST3 were expressed, albeit at low intensity, in 10.5%, 9.1%, and 0.7% of the TMA samples, respectively. None of the TMA samples showed SST1 or CXCR4 expression. Only a single small-cell-type neuroendocrine carcinoma that was coincidentally included among the whole-block samples exhibited strong SST2A, SST5, and CXCR4 and moderate SST3 expression. Independent of the tumor cells, the tumor capillaries in many of the PCa samples were strongly positive for SST2A, SST3, SST5, or CXCR4 expression. SST expression in the tumor cells was associated with advanced tumor grade and stage. CONCLUSION: Overall, SST and CXCR4 expression levels are clearly of no therapeutic relevance in PCa. SST- or CXCR4-based therapy might be feasible, however, in rare cases of small-cell-type neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate.

P53, Somatostatin receptor 2a and Chromogranin A immunostaining as prognostic markers in high grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Background

High grade gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) with a Ki67 proliferation index > 20%, include well-differentiated tumours grade 3 (NET G3) and poorly differentiated (PD) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). Abnormal p53-expression is a feature of PD tumours, while expression of chromogranin A (CgA) and somatostatin-receptor 2a (SSTR-2a) may be a feature of well-differentiated tumours. The aim of this study was to elucidate the expression and prognostic value of these three markers in 163 GEP-NEN patients with a Ki67-index > 20%.

Method

Clinical data, histopathology and overall survival were analysed according to Kaplan-Meier’s method and Cox regression. The expression of SSTR-2a, CgA and synaptophysin was analysed in tumour specimens by immunohistochemistry, and semi-quantitatively scored as negative (< 5%), heterogeneously positive (5–30%) or strongly positive (> 30%). P53 was defined as normal when scored as heterogeneously positive (1–30%), and abnormal when negative (0%) or strongly positive (> 30%).

Results

In multivariate analysis, better survival was observed among patients with heterogeneously positive p53 compared to strongly positive (p < 0.001). When dichotomised, tumours with a heterogeneously positive p53 vs. negative and strongly positive p53 also showed a significantly better survival (p = 0.002).

Survival was significantly worse for negative CgA compared to heterogeneously positive CgA (p = 0.02). Strongly positive SSTR-2a expression was found in 26% of the 163 included patients. Well-differentiated morphology correlated with strong expression of SSTR-2a and CgA, and heterogeneously positive p53-staining, and was more frequent in pancreatic primaries. In pancreatic primaries, strongly positive SSTR-2a was associated with longer survival (univariate analysis, p = 0.02). A significantly lower Ki67 proliferation index was found in patients with a heterogeneously positive p53, a positive SSTR-2a and CgA expression.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that abnormal p53-expression is an independent negative prognostic marker in GEP-NEN with a Ki67-index > 20%. Patients with heterogeneously positive p53 had the best prognosis. SSTR-2a was a positive prognostic marker in pancreatic NEN. Negative CgA was associated with a significantly worse OS compared to heterogeneously positive CgA-expression in a multivariate sub-analysis. Lower Ki67 index correlated significantly with heterogeneously positive p53, positive SSTR-2a and CgA expression.

Prognostic and predictive value of nuclear imaging in endocrine oncology

In the last few years, the role and use of medical technologies in (neuro)endocrine oncology has greatly evolved allowing not only important diagnostic information but also prognostic stratification in different clinical situations. The terms "prognostic" and "predictive" are commonly used to describe the relationships between biomarkers and patients' clinical outcomes but have quite different meaning. The present work discusses the prognostic and predictive value of nuclear medicine imaging. It critically reviews the clinical significance and potential impact of molecular examinations on follow-up and therapeutic strategies in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms, thyroid tumors, and adrenal malignancies.

Comprehensive Assessment of GPR68 Expression in Normal and Neoplastic Human Tissues Using a Novel Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody

GPR68 (OGR1) belongs to the proton-sensing G protein-coupled receptors that are involved in cellular adaptations to pH changes during tumour development. Although expression of GPR68 has been described in many tumour cell lines, little is known about its presence in human tumour entities. We characterised the novel rabbit monoclonal anti-human GPR68 antibody 16H23L16 using various cell lines and tissue specimens. The antibody was then applied to a large series of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded normal and neoplastic human tissue samples. Antibody specificity was demonstrated in a Western blot analysis of GPR68-expressing cells using specific siRNAs. Immunocytochemical experiments revealed pH-dependent changes in subcellular localisation of the receptor and internalisation after stimulation with lorazepam. In normal tissue, GPR68 was present in glucagon-producing islet cells, neuroendocrine cells of the intestinal tract, gastric glands, granulocytes, macrophages, muscle layers of arteries and arterioles, and capillaries. GPR68 was also expressed in neuroendocrine tumours, where it may be a positive prognostic factor, in pheochromocytomas, cervical adenocarcinomas, and endometrial cancer, as well as in paragangliomas, medullary thyroid carcinomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumours, and pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Often, tumour capillaries were also strongly GPR68-positive. The novel antibody 16H23L16 will be a valuable tool for basic research and for identifying GPR68-expressing tumours during histopathological examinations.

Somatostatin and chemokine CXCR4 receptor expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma relative to pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

PURPOSE

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) represents one of the most fatal types of cancer with an exceptionally poor prognosis, underscoring the need for improved diagnostic and treatment approaches. An over-expression of somatostatin receptors (SST) as well as of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 has been shown for many tumour entities. Respective expression data for PAC, however, are scarce and contradictory.

METHODS

Overall, 137 tumour samples from 70 patients, 26 of whom were diagnosed with PAC and 44 with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PanNET), were compared in terms of SST and CXCR4 expression by immunohistochemical analysis using well-characterized rabbit monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

Only SST1 and CXCR4 expression was detected in PAC tumours, with SST1 present in 42.3% and CXCR4 in 7.7% of cases. However, the overall staining intensity was very weak. In contrast to the tumour cells, in many PAC cases, tumour capillaries exhibited strong SST3, SST5, or CXCR4 expression. In PanNETs, SST2 was the most-prominently expressed receptor, observed in 75.0% of the tumours at medium-strong intensity. SST5, SST1, and CXCR4 expression was detected in 20.5%, 15.9%, and 11.4% of PanNET cases, respectively, but the staining intensity was only weak. SST2 positivity in PanNET, but not in PAC, was associated with favourable patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

SST or CXCR4 expression in PAC is clearly of no therapeutic relevance. However, indirect targeting of these tumours via SST3, SST5, or CXCR4 on tumour microvessels may represent a promising additional therapeutic strategy.

Biological and Biochemical Basis of the Differential Efficacy of First and Second Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Endogenous somatostatin shows anti-secretory effects in both physiological and pathological settings, as well as inhibitory activity on cell growth. Since somatostatin is not suitable for clinical practice, researchers developed synthetic somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) to overcome this limitation. Currently, SRLs represent pivotal tools in the treatment algorithm of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Octreotide and lanreotide are the first-generation SRLs developed and show a preferential binding affinity to somatostatin receptor (SST) subtype 2, while pasireotide, which is a second-generation SRL, has high affinity for multiple SSTs (SST₅ > SST₂ > SST₃ > SST₁). A number of studies demonstrated that first-generation and second-generation SRLs show distinct functional properties, besides the mere receptor affinity. Therefore, the aim of the present review is to critically review the current evidence on the biological effects of SRLs in pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors, by mainly focusing on the differences between first-generation and second-generation ligands.