Clinicopathologic features and prognostic value of claudin 18.2 overexpression in patients with resectable gastric cancer

Claudin 18.2 Expression in Gastric Tumors and Other Tumor Types With Gastric Epithelium-like Differentiation

BACKGROUND/AIM

Claudin 18.2 is an emerging biomarker for claudin 18.2-targeted therapy. We investigated claudin 18.2 expression in diverse tumor types.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 67 gastric tumors (61 surgically resected and six biopsy specimens) and 73 other tumor types (69 resected and four biopsy specimens), including those from the pancreas, hepatobiliary system, lung, ovary, uterine cervix, and others. Claudin 18.2 expression and positivity (≥75% of tumor cells showing moderate to strong membranous staining) were assessed using claudin 18 immunostaining (clone 43-14A).

RESULTS

Claudin 18.2 positivity was found in 47.8% (32/67) of gastric tumor samples. Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer showed a higher frequency of positivity (6/7, 85.7%), although not statistically significantly (p=0.216). Among gastric tumors from patients with lymph node or distant metastasis (n=20), four (20.0%) exhibited discrepancies in claudin 18.2 positivity between the primary and its metastasis. In other tumor types, claudin 18.2 positivity was more frequent in those with gastric epithelium-like differentiation, including pancreatic tumors (2/9, 22.2%), hepatobiliary carcinoma (2/8, 25.0%), invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinoma (4/5, 80.0%), and mucinous ovarian tumor (5/5, 100.0%) than in those with other histology (p<0.001). Interestingly, pancreatic tumors, potential candidates for claudin 18.2-targeted therapy, often exhibited reduced or lack of claudin 18.2 expression in the invasive component.

CONCLUSION

Overall, claudin 18.2 positivity occurred primarily in a significant proportion of gastric tumors and other tumors with gastric epithelium-like differentiation. Evaluating claudin 18.2 expression in all such tumors can benefit patients by guiding targeted therapy. Additionally, claudin 18.2 immunostaining serves as a lineage marker for gastric origin or gastric-like differentiation.

Predictive value of EBV-positivity in patients with gastric cancer treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity is a potential predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in gastric cancer patients, but its value in first-line ICI-based chemotherapy remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of EBV positivity in patients treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy.

METHODS

This single-center study included advanced gastric cancer patients treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy (n = 293). Patients with EBV positivity treated with chemotherapy alone (n = 12) served as the control group. EBV positivity was confirmed by in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

Among patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 18 (6.1%) had EBV-positive tumors, and these were associated with high PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) expression levels. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) tended to be more favorable in those with EBV-positive tumors. Multivariate analysis of patients treated with nivolumab-chemotherapy revealed that EBV positivity, combined with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5, was an independent factor for PFS. In patients with EBV-positive tumors, nivolumab-chemotherapy was associated with significantly favorable PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone. Similar results were observed in the subgroup with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5. However, survival outcomes did not differ between patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the subgroup with PD-L1 CPS < 5.

CONCLUSION

EBV positivity predicts favorable survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy. The benefit of nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone for patients with EBV positivity appears to be associated with high PD-L1 expression levels.

Claudin 18.2: a promising actionable target in biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Anti-claudin 18.2 (anti-CLDN18.2) therapy has been approved for patients with CLDN18-positive gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. The current study aims at evaluating the expression of CLDN18 in a large cohort of pathologically characterized biliary tract cancers (BTCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of 237 BTCs were collected and reviewed under the BITCOIN protocol. All samples were assessed for CLDN18 status using immunohistochemistry (clone 43-14A). Tumor positivity for CLDN18 was determined if ≥75% of tumor cells exhibited moderate-to-strong membranous staining.

RESULTS

CLDN18 expression was found in 29.5% of BTCs (70/237), with the highest rates in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC; 62.5%; 20/32) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA; 53.4%; 31/58), compared with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA; 12.9%; 19/147) (P < 0.0001). CLDN18 positivity was detected in 5.5% of cases (13/237), most common in GBC (15.6%; 5/32), followed by eCCAs (8.6%; 5/58) and iCCAs (2.0%; 3/147) (P = 0.0045). Most CLDN18-positive samples (10/13) exhibited a heterogenous staining pattern. In iCCAs, large duct subtypes had higher CLDN18 expression [33.3% (10/30) versus 7.7% (9/117), P = 0.0002] and positivity [6.7% (2/30) versus 0.9% (1/117), P = 0.106] than small duct iCCAs. No significant differences were observed across GBC and eCCA histotypes, and CLDN18 was not associated with IDH1 or FGFR2 status in iCCAs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that CLDN18 expression is present in a subset of BTCs, with significantly higher positivity rates in GBCs and eCCAs compared with iCCAs. In iCCAs, CLDN18 expression was more frequent in the large duct subtype but was not associated with IDH1 or FGFR2 status. These findings suggest that CLDN18 could be a potential therapeutic target in BTCs, warranting further prospective studies to evaluate its clinical significance and impact on patient outcomes.

Discordance in Claudin 18.2 Expression Between Primary and Metastatic Lesions in Patients With Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for CLDN18.2-expressing gastric cancer (GC). We sought to examine the heterogeneity of CLDN18.2 expression between primary GC (PGC) and metastatic GC (MGC) using various scoring methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 102 patients with pathologically confirmed paired primary and metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. CLDN18.2 expression was evaluated through immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. We assessed CLDN18.2 positivity using multiple scoring approaches, including the immunoreactivity score, H-score, and the percentage of tumor cells showing moderate-to-strong staining intensity. We analyzed the concordance rates between PGC and MGC and the association of CLDN18.2 positivity with clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

CLDN18.2 positivity varied from 25% to 65% depending on the scoring method, with PGC consistently showing higher expression levels than MGC. Intratumoral heterogeneity was noted in 25.5% of PGCs and 19.6% of MGCs. Intertumoral heterogeneity, manifesting as discordance in CLDN18.2 positivity between PGC and MGC, was observed in about 20% of cases, with moderate agreement across scoring methods (κ=0.47 to 0.60). In PGC, higher CLDN18.2 positivity correlated with synchronous metastasis, presence of peritoneal metastasis, poorly differentiated grade, and biopsy specimens. In MGC, positivity was associated with synchronous metastasis, presence of peritoneal metastasis, and metastatic peritoneal tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

CLDN18.2 expression demonstrates significant heterogeneity between PGC and MGC, with a 20% discordance rate. Comprehensive tissue sampling and reassessment of CLDN18.2 status are crucial, especially before initiating CLDN18.2-targeted therapies.

A CLDN18.2-Targeted Nanoplatform Manipulates Magnetic Hyperthermia Spatiotemporally for Synergistic Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer

Precision treatment of gastric cancer requires specific biomarkers, and CLDN18.2 emerges as a promising target for patients' stratification and therapeutic guidance. In 563 cases, 54.4% of patients are identified as CLDN18.2-positive, with CLDN18.2 expression negatively correlated with immune-related factors like PD-L1, indicating a "cold" tumor microenvironment. Here, a novel CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody 1D5 is created with superior high specificity and affinity, and the antibody-dependent fluorescence-magnetic nanoparticle is developed for specific detection and magnetic hyperthermia (MHT). Under the assistance of sensitive fluorescence and deep-penetrating magnetic particle imaging for tracing and timing the optimal nanoparticle dosage, MHT induces robust immunogenic response via DNA mismatch repair and tumor-associated antigen release. It recruits CD11c+ dendritic cells, compensates PD-1 in CD8+ T cells, and enhances CD86+ macrophage polarization. The combination of anti-PD-1 therapy increased TNF-α and IFN-γ secretion and further boosted the cytotoxic efficacy of CD8+ T cells. Excellent therapeutic efficacy is found simultaneously on cell-derived allografts and patient-derived xenografts based on this spatiotemporally manipulated strategy, presenting a therapeutic option for enhancing responsiveness to immunotherapy for CLDN18.2-positive individuals.

Claudin 18.2 expression profile in primary tumors and their ovarian metastases: implications for targeted therapy

BACKGROUND

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), a tight junction protein predominantly expressed in the normal gastric epithelium, has recently emerged as a potential therapeutic target in various solid tumors. Despite growing interest, comprehensive data on CLDN18.2 expression across primary tumors from different organs and their corresponding metastatic lesions remain limited.

METHODS

This study analyzed CLDN18.2 expression in 102 patients with primary adenocarcinomas from various organs and their corresponding ovarian metastatic carcinomas and in 81 cases of primary ovarian mucinous tumors using immunohistochemistry. We evaluated the association of CLDN18.2 expression with clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The highest CLDN18.2 positivity rate was observed in gastric adenocarcinomas (40%, 12/30), followed by cervical adenocarcinomas (20%, 1/5) and colorectal adenocarcinomas (4%, 2/50). Notably, primary ovarian mucinous tumors showed remarkably high expression rates, reaching 77% overall and 100% in mucinous borderline tumors. In contrast, adenocarcinomas of the appendix and breast lacked CLDN18 expression. While CLDN18.2 expression was generally maintained during metastasis, some variations in expression patterns were observed, particularly in gastric cancers (13%, 4/30). Our analysis found no significant correlation between CLDN18.2 expression and overall survival in the patient cohort.

CONCLUSION

The preserved expression of CLDN18.2 in metastatic tumors underscores its potential utility as a target for therapeutic approaches. Our findings emphasize the importance of evaluating CLDN18.2 status in both primary and metastatic tumors to refine therapeutic strategies.

Claudin 18.2 Immunohistochemistry Expression in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review

Claudin 18.2 is a transmembrane protein, part of the tight-junction complex, selectively expressed in gastric epithelium. It is showing promising results as a target in advanced gastric cancer in phase 3 clinical trials using a monoclonal antibody against claudin 18.2. A systematic review on expression of claudin 18.2 in gastric cancer was performed using the PubMed database. The following search expression was used: ("Stomach Neoplasms" [Mesh]) AND (("claudin-18[TIAB]") OR ("CLDN18[TIAB]")). A total of n=99 articles were retrieved. Of those, 17 preclinical studies about claudin 18.2 expression by immunohistochemistry were selected. The results of those studies showed great variability in the criteria used for defining the thresholds for positivity of the stain. The proportion of claudin 18.2 positive cases varied between 24% and 83%. In works using a positivity threshold set at >40% or >70% of cells with membranous/cytoplasmic staining at 2+/3+ intensity, the average rate of positive cases was 50% or 30%, respectively (similar with clones 43-14A and EPR19202). Positivity of claudin 18.2 was associated with advanced stage, diffuse phenotype and PD-L1 and EBV positivity in some of the studies. Variability in criteria used to define claudin 18.2 positivity, as well as methodological differences, could explain the variation in the proportion of positive cases described, as well as the inconsistency of the association with clinical, molecular, and survival variables. The upcoming anticlaudin 18.2 therapy in advanced gastric cancer should prompt pathology laboratories to adjust their staining protocols and evaluation criteria in their series of patients, to further establish the association of claudin expression with clinical and molecular variables.

Liquid biopsy in gastric cancer: A snapshot of the current state of the art

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is nowadays considered a robust source to search for druggable tumoral genetic alterations, and in some specific settings liquid biopsy (LB) is already part of the diagnostics scenario and it has successfully implemented in the everyday practice. Three strengths make LB an extraordinary tool: i) to represent the complex molecular mosaicism that characterizes spatially heterogeneous malignancies; ii) to monitor in real-time the tumoral molecular landscape (i.e. to depict the longitudinal/temporal tumor evolution); iii) to ensure molecular profiling even in those cases in which tissue sampling is not feasible or not adequate. This review provides a snapshot of the current state of the art concerning ctDNA assay utility in gastric cancer (GC), testing its robustness as marker and seeking to understand the reasons for the delay in its application in clinical practice.

Survival outcomes of patients with gastric cancer treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy based on claudin 18.2 expression

BACKGROUND

Claudin 18.2 has emerged as a viable therapeutic target in gastric cancer; however, its clinical relevance in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy is not known. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of nivolumab plus chemotherapy according to claudin 18.2 expression in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

This single-center study included patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy (n = 204) or chemotherapy alone (n = 183) whose claudin 18.2 immunohistochemistry results were available. Claudin 18.2 positivity (moderate-to-strong expression in ≥ 75% by the 43-14A clone) was analyzed in terms of efficacy outcomes.

RESULTS

Among patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 96 (47.1%) were assessed to have claudin 18.2-positive tumors. Between patients with claudin 18.2-positive and -negative tumors, objective response rate with nivolumab plus chemotherapy was comparable. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy were comparable between those with claudin 18.2-positive and -negative tumors. For both subgroups with PD-L1 combined positive score ≥ 5 and < 5, PFS and OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy were also comparable between patients with claudin 18.2-positive and -negative tumors. A consistent trend of favorable PFS and OS was observed with nivolumab plus chemotherapy compared to that of chemotherapy alone in both claudin 18.2-positive and -negative subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of nivolumab plus chemotherapy did not vary according to claudin 18.2 positivity. The clinical benefit of nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy was consistently observed in claudin 18.2-positive and -negative gastric cancer cases.

Spatial and Temporal Tumor Heterogeneity in Gastric Cancer: Discordance of Predictive Biomarkers

Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly heterogeneous disease that varies in both histological presentation and genetic characteristics. Recent advances in the treatment of metastatic and unresectable GC have made several biomarker tests essential for patient management. Predictive biomarkers such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), mismatch-repair (MMR) proteins, claudin 18.2, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b) are commonly evaluated using immunohistochemistry. However, the expression levels of these biomarkers may vary across different tumor areas, and the accuracy of biomarker diagnosis can be affected by sample quantity, sample location, and collection method. Therefore, tumor heterogeneity presents substantial challenges for accurate biomarker-based diagnosis and prediction of therapeutic responses. Tumor heterogeneity can be categorized into spatial heterogeneity, which refers to variations within the primary tumor (intra-tumoral) or between primary and metastatic sites, and temporal heterogeneity, which encompasses changes over time. This review addresses the tumor heterogeneity in predictive biomarker expression in GC, focusing on HER2, PD-L1, MMR, the Epstein-Barr virus, claudin 18.2, and FGFR2b.

The role of CLDN18.2 in gastric cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is a major global cause of cancer mortality, with a median overall survival of just 12 months. CLDN18.2, a specific isoform of Claudin18 normally expressed in the gastric mucosa, has emerged as a potential therapeutic target and prognostic biomarker due to its exposure on the surface of tumor cells following malignant transformation. This exposure allows CLDN18.2's extracellular loops to bind monoclonal antibodies, presenting new opportunities for targeted therapy and improved prognostic assessment.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted for studies that addressed the correlation of CLDN18.2 with: (1) Progression-free survival (PFS) and (2) Overall Survival (OS). Hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was examined with I2 statistics. P values of ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio, version 4.2.3.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies encompassing a total of 4,085 patients were included. There were 2,691 (65.8%) male and 1,394 (34.2%) female patients. In the histologic GC analysis, there were 1,582 (38.7%) patients that had intestinal type and 1,280 (31.3%) with diffuse type. Patients with CLDN18.2 negative status exhibited a non-significant trend towards prolonged PFS (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.98-1.61; p = 0.07; I2 = 18%) and a significant prolonged OS (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.07-1.34; p < 0.01; I2 = 37%) when compared to CLDN18.2-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings establish CLDN18.2 as a robust negative prognostic indicator for overall survival in GC patients. While its impact on PFS was not statistically significant, the association with OS suggests CLDN18.2 may serve as a marker for complex biological processes underlying tumor advancement.

Clinicopathological significance and prognostic values of claudin18.2 expression in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Claudin18.2 has been established as a putative therapeutic target in human solid malignancies. The aim of this study is to determine claudin18.2 expression as a clinicopathological and prognostic factor in human solid tumors through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles were systematically reviewed for studies that included the correlation between claudin18.2 expression and clinicopathological features and prognosis in solid tumors. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate either odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of clinicopathological factors or hazard ratio and 95% CIs of survival outcomes for claudin18.2 expression in all available solid tumors.

RESULTS

21 studies including 5,331 patients were identified. Overall proportion of claudin18.2 positivity was 29.7%. Analyses of clinicopathological features demonstrated that claudin18.2 positivity correlated with male predominance, lower T stage, more frequent MUC5AC positivity when all primary tumors included. In subgroup analysis, gastric cancer showed significant correlation between high claudin18.2 expression and frequent EBV infection, male predominance and lower T stage. In lung cancer, claudin18.2 expression was associated with favorable overall survival. However, analyses of survival outcomes in all solid tumors showed that claudin18.2 expression was not associated with overall survival and pooled disease-free survival, tumor-specific survival, progression-free survival and relapse-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study emphasizes evaluation of claudin18.2 expression as a potential prognostic factor in lung adenocarcinoma and further exploration in other solid tumors as well.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023468651.

Expression of claudin 18.2 in poorly cohesive carcinoma and its association with clinicopathologic parameters in East Asian patients

BACKGROUND

Poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) is a distinct subtype of gastric cancer with limited therapeutic options. This study investigated claudin (CLDN) 18.2 expression status in PCCs using a 43-13 A clone.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 178 consecutive surgically resected stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ gastric cancer samples. Tissue microarray blocks were constructed for CLDN18.2 immunohistochemical staining. We studied CLDN18.2 expression and its association with clinicopathologic parameters.

RESULTS

CLDN18.2 positivity (defined by ≥ 75 % of tumor cells showing moderate to strong membranous positivity) was found in 34.8 % of the PCC cases (62/178). Approximately half of the CLDN18.2 positive PCCs demonstrated heterogeneous expression (51.6 %, 32/62). CLDN18.2 positivity was not associated with any clinicopathologic parameters examined. However, CLDN18.2 positivity tended to be more frequent in E-cadherin-positive PCCs (no loss of expression) than in E-cadherin-negative PCCs (loss of expression) (50 % vs. 27.7 %). The CLDN18.2 expression level, represented by the H-score, gradually decreased as the paraffin block storage time increased (P = 0.046). Overall survival and disease-free survival analyses showed no significant difference between CLDN18.2-positive and negative PCCs.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant portion of surgically resected PCC specimens showed CLDN18.2 positivity. Additionally, since the expression level of CLDN18.2 gradually decreases with increased paraffin block storage time, reflex testing can be considered at the time of the cancer diagnosis.

The spatial and cellular portrait of transposable element expression during gastric cancer

Gastric Cancer (GC) is a lethal malignancy, with urgent need for the discovery of novel biomarkers for its early detection. I previously showed that Transposable Elements (TEs) become activated in early GC (EGC), suggesting a role in gene expression. Here, I follow-up on that evidence using single-cell data from gastritis to EGC, and show that TEs are expressed and follow the disease progression, with 2,430 of them being cell populations markers. Pseudotemporal trajectory modeling revealed 111 TEs associated with the origination of cancer cells. Analysis of spatial data from GC also confirms TE expression, with 204 TEs being spatially enriched in the tumor regions and the tumor microenvironment, hinting at a role of TEs in tumorigenesis. Finally, a network of TE-mediated gene regulation was modeled, indicating that ~ 2,000 genes could be modulated by TEs, with ~ 500 of them already implicated in cancer. These results suggest that TEs might play a functional role in GC progression, and highlights them as potential biomarker for its early detection.

Extent and clinical significance of the therapy-relevant tight junction protein Claudin 18.2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - real-world evidence

PURPOSE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with poor prognosis, wherefore targeted therapies have experienced increasing interest. Zolbetuximab is a novel targeted therapy under investigation in patients with PDAC and targets Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), which is a component of tight junctions and is of significance in various solid tumors. As its role in PDAC is not definitively elucidated, this study aims to clarify the significance of CLDN18.2 expression in PDAC in a real-world setting.

METHODS

All patients (n = 309) were recruited at one of the PANCALYZE study centers and received pancreatic resection with curative intention. Paraffin samples were analyzed using an antibody against CLDN18.2, which is known to be comparable to the antibody used by the SPOTLIGHT and GLOW studies.

RESULTS

94 PDACs are positive for CLDN18.2 (30.4 %). Positive CLDN 18.2 expression was associated with significantly better cancer differentiation (p < 0.001). Patients with positive CLDN18.2 expression showed significantly better overall survival when compared to patients with negative expression (median OS: 30 versus 18 months, p = 0.003). Additionally, in multivariable analyses, CLDN18.2 expression was identified as an independent factor for better survival in patients with PDAC (HR = 0.686, 95 %CI = 0.492-0.956, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Significant improvement in survival could be demonstrated by adding Zolbetuximab to known chemotherapy regimes in patients with gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma with at least 75 % CLDN18.2 positive cancer cells. Our findings demonstrate, that 30.4 % of the included patients with PDAC would potentially be eligible for therapy with Zolbetuximab in a real-world patient cohort. Results of trials targeting Claudin 18.2 are pending in patients with PDAC.

The preclinical discovery and development of zolbetuximab for the treatment of gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer remains a formidable challenge in oncology with high mortality rates and few advancements in treatment. Claudin-18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a tight junction protein primarily expressed in the stomach and is frequently overexpressed in certain subsets of gastric cancers. Targeting CLDN18.2 with monoclonal antibodies, such as zolbetuximab (IMAB362), has shown promising efficacy results in combination with chemotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

The molecular cell biology of CLDN18.2 is discussed along with studies demonstrating the utility of CLDN18.2 expression as a biomarker and therapeutic target. Important clinical studies are reviewed, including Phase III trials, SPOTLIGHT and GLOW, which demonstrate the efficacy of zolbetuximab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

CLDN18.2 is involved in gastric differentiation through maintenance of epithelial barrier function and coordination of signaling pathways, and its expression in gastric cancers reflects a 'gastric differentiation' program. Targeting Claudin-18.2 represents the first gastric cancer specific 'targeted' treatment. Further studies are needed to determine its role within current gastric cancer treatment sequencing, including HER2-targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Management strategies will also be needed to better mitigate zolbetuximab-related treatment side effects, including gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities.

Heterogeneity of claudin 18.2 expression in metastatic gastric cancer

Claudin 18.2 has emerged as a viable therapeutic target in gastric cancer (GC), but little is known about the heterogeneity of its expression in GC. This study investigated the heterogeneity of claudin 18.2 expression in 166 patients with metastatic GC whose surgical or paired primary-metastatic specimens were available. The prevalence of claudin 18.2 positivity (moderate-to-strong expression in ≥ 75% by the 43-14A clone) was 47.0%. Claudin 18.2-positive tumors exhibited more frequent peritoneal metastasis and a lower incidence of hepatic and distant lymph node involvement. Survival outcomes were comparable between patients with claudin 18.2-positive and -negative tumors. Intratumoral heterogeneity was noted in 38.5% of surgical specimens. Paired primary-metastatic site analysis revealed that 25.2% of patients had discordant results for claudin 18.2 positivity. Across different metastatic organ categories, peritoneal lesions showed the highest positivity rate (44.3%) and positive concordance rate (31.4%), whereas liver lesions had the lowest positivity rate (17.9%) and concordance rate (12.8%). In conclusion, claudin 18.2 expression exhibits intratumoral and intrapatient spatial heterogeneity in metastatic GC. Claudin 18.2 positivity is associated with more frequent peritoneal metastasis, and peritoneal lesions are more likely to have positively concordant claudin 18.2 results with the primary site than other metastatic sites.

Potential diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers of gastric cancer

Background

Gastric cancer (GC), a malignant epithelial tumor, is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Therapeutic strategies for GC, despite the biggest challenges, can significantly improve survival rates through early detection and effective screening methods.

Aim

To provide brief information on the necessity of multiple specific diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers for GC.

Methods

This review was conducted using a variety of search engines, including PubMed Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and others.

Results

Some potential biomarkers that provide essential information include circulating tumor cells (CTCs), DNA methylation, claudin 18.2, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), microRNAs, and serum pepsinogens.

Conclusion

Multiple tumor markers are essential for screening, tumor identification, staging, prognostic assessment, and monitoring recurrence after therapy due to the absence of a single tumor indicator for diagnosing, prognosticating, and predicting GC.

Progress and prospects of biomarker-based targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer represent the leading cause of tumor-related death worldwide. Although advances in immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy have expanded treatment options, they have not significantly altered the prognosis for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer. A minority of patients, particularly those with PD-L1-positive, HER-2-positive, or MSI-high tumors, may benefit more from immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or HER-2-directed therapies in advanced stages. However, for those lacking specific targets and unique molecular features, conventional chemotherapy remains the only recommended effective and durable regimen. In this review, we summarize the roles of various signaling pathways and further investigate the available targets. Then, the current results of phase II/III clinical trials in advanced gastric cancer, along with the superiorities and limitations of the existing biomarkers, are specifically discussed. Finally, we will offer our insights in precision treatment pattern when encountering the substantial challenges.

Claudins in Cancer: A Current and Future Therapeutic Target

Claudins are a family of 27 proteins that have an important role in the formation of tight junctions. They also have an important function in ion exchange, cell mobility, and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, the latter being very important in cancer invasion and metastasis. Therapeutic targeting of claudins has been investigated to improve cancer outcomes. Recent evidence shows improved outcomes when combining monoclonal antibodies against claudin 18.2 with chemotherapy for patients with gastroesophageal junction cancer. Currently, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells targeting claudin 18 are under investigation. In this review, we will discuss the major functions of claudins, their distribution in the normal as well as cancerous tissues, and their effect in cancer metastasis, with a special focus on the therapeutic targeting of claudins to improve cancer outcomes.

Evidence to Date on the Therapeutic Potential of Zolbetuximab in Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) continues to be a prevalent worldwide malignancy and a leading cause of cancer death, and it is frequently cited as incurable. Targeted therapy in GAC has lagged behind other solid tumors. The human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) represented the single target in GACs for many years, seen in approximately 20% of patients with advanced GAC. Recent advances in management now include the addition of immunotherapy checkpoint inhibition to select front-line advanced GACs. Unfortunately, outcomes remain poor for most patients. We anticipate finding a key to future discoveries in GACs in next-generation sequencing and more targeted approaches. Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as a therapeutic target in GACs. CLDN18.2 is reportedly expressed in 14-87% of GACs, and CLDN18.2 is available for monoclonal antibody (mAb) binding as it is expressed on the outer cell membrane. Here, we review the exploration of CLDN18.2 as a target in GACs via the use of zolbetuximab (IMAB362). Zolbetuximab is now under priority FDA review for GACs, and we eagerly await the review outcome.

[Claudin-18.2 and gastric cancer: from physiology to carcinogenesis]

Today a global problem for humanity is represented by cancer, in particular gastric cancer, which is characterized by high mortality and aggressive course. In this regard, there is a search for new approaches to the diagnosis and therapy of gastric cancer, one of these areas is the study of the expression level of the intercellular adhesion molecule claudin-18.2 in tumor tissue and its use as a target molecule. In the case of various pathological processes, including tumors, the expression profile of claudin-18.2 changes, which indicates its possible role in the initiation and progression of cancer. The aim of this review is to systematize the data on claudin-18.2, its role in normal cell physiology and embryology, as well as in the development of pathological processes in the stomach, its relation to the clinical and morphological characteristics of gastric cancer and importance in biological therapy.