Factors that drive mental health disparities and promote well-being in transgender and nonbinary people

Intentions to Use PrEP Among a National Sample of Transgender and Gender-Expansive Youth and Emerging Adults: Examining Gender Minority Stress, Substance Use, and Gender Affirmation

Transgender and gender-expansive young people, ages 13-24 years, experience disproportionate HIV risk yet are among those with the lowest US PrEP uptake rates (< 10%). Factors influencing PrEP outcomes for this population are poorly understood. This study examines the effects of gender minority stressors, gender affirmation, and heavy substance use on their PrEP outcomes using data from the CDC's 2018 START study (N = 972). A conceptual model integrating the gender minority stress and gender affirmation models was developed, mapping relevant START items onto it. Structural equation modeling (Mplus-8.9) was used to examine factors related to their PrEP intentions. Most participants were 18-24 (68%), trans-female (46%), white (45%), and reported heavy substance use (40%). Medical discrimination increased internalized transphobia (b = 0.097, SE = 0.034, p = 0.005) and perceived stigma (b = 0.087, SE = 0.034, p = 0.010). Family rejection increased perceived stigma (b = 0.181, SE = 0.032, p < 0.001) and heavy substance use (b = 0.260, SE = 0.053, p < 0.001). Perceived stigma also increased heavy substance use (b = 0.106, SE = 0.037, p = 0.004). Perceived stigma (b=-0.085, SE = 0.027, p = 0.002) and heavy substance use (b=-0.161, SE = 0.031, p < 0.001) decreased PrEP intentions, while gender affirmation increased them (b = 0.045, SE = 0.019, p = 0.020). A 1-point increase in gender affirmation reduced heavy substance use risk by -0.179 (SE = 0.030, p < 0.001) in the presence of family rejection and by -0.074 (SE = 0.041, p = 0.074) when perceived stigma was present. This study underscores heavy substance use as a potential barrier to PrEP uptake for transgender/gender-expansive youth. Future research could explore how gender affirmation acts as a protective factor against the negative impact of family rejection and perceived stigma on heavy substance behaviors among these populations.

Psychosocial influences on pain in transgender individuals

Pain is an unpleasant and unavoidable part of the human experience, but the prevalence and impact of pain disproportionately impacts marginalized groups, including transgender and gender-diverse people. While there are many bases of pain, psychosocial variables, including cognitions (e.g., outcome and interpersonal expectations, social gender norms), affect (e.g., negative affectivity, emotional distress), and social factors (e.g., social exclusion) may be particularly relevant in the pain experiences of transgender individuals. The coalescence of these factors is discussed in this review, where authors specifically consider how these cognitive, affective, and social factors may contribute to pain disparities seen in transgender individuals. Patient-centered communication is presented as a potential avenue to directly mitigate the effect of these psychosocial variables on pain in transgender individuals by reducing feelings of social exclusion transgender patients may experience in the medical office, and the authors call for additional experimental research and the development of educational interventions for providers.

Examining gender-specific mental health risks after gender-affirming surgery: a national database study

BACKGROUND

Transgender individuals face heightened psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation, partly due to stigma and lack of gender affirmation.

AIM

To evaluate mental health outcomes in transgender individuals with gender dysphoria who have undergone gender-affirming surgery, stratified by gender and time since surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized the TriNetX database, analyzing U.S. patients aged ≥18 with gender dysphoria (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] F64) between June 2014 and June 2024. Six cohorts were created based on gender and surgery status: Cohorts A-D included patients with or without surgery, and Cohorts E-F allowed for gender comparison among those with surgery. Propensity score matching controlled for age, race, and ethnicity. Mental health outcomes included depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, substance use disorder, and body dysmorphic disorder, assessed over two years post-surgery using clinician-verified ICD-10 codes. Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) was analyzed separately and not conflated with gender dysphoria cohorts to ensure the distinction between these conditions. Statistical analysis employed risk ratios, with P < 0.05 deemed significant.

OUTCOMES

Primary outcomes were differences in mental health disorders, specifically depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, body-dysmorphic disorder, and substance use disorder, among transgender individuals' post-surgery.

RESULTS

From 107 583 patients, matched cohorts demonstrated that those undergoing surgery were at significantly higher risk for depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and substance use disorders than those without surgery. Males with surgery showed a higher prevalence of depression (25.4% vs. 11.5%, RR 2.203, P < 0.0001) and anxiety (12.8% vs. 2.6%, RR 4.882, P < 0.0001). Females exhibited similar trends, with elevated depression (22.9% vs. 14.6%, RR 1.563, P < 0.0001) and anxiety (10.5% vs. 7.1%, RR 1.478, P < 0.0001). Feminizing individuals demonstrated particularly high risk for depression (RR 1.783, P = 0.0298) and substance use disorders (RR 1.284, P < 0.0001).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Findings suggest the necessity for gender-sensitive mental health support following gender-affirming surgery to address post-surgical psychological risks.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

By leveraging ICD-10 codes, we provide a more accurate representation of patient demographics and clinical outcomes, minimizing recall and reporting biases that often limit survey-based research. Limitations include the inability to account for unmeasured confounders such as social support.

CONCLUSION

Gender-affirming surgery, while beneficial in affirming gender identity, is associated with increased risk of mental health issues, underscoring the need for ongoing, gender-sensitive mental health support for transgender individuals' post-surgery.

Experiences and narratives of mandatory psychological assessment in Trans and Nonbinary people: An Italian qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

This study adopts a qualitative methodological framework to investigate the overall experiences of institutional gender affirmation pathway (GAP) with a focus on the narratives of mandatory psychological assessment in Trans and Nonbinary (TNB) people in Italy, who face daily discrimination, social prejudice, episodes of violence, and victimization. In the Italian context, psychological assessment is a prerequisite to receive a diagnosis of gender dysphoria, which is essential to access hormone therapy, surgical interventions, and legal change of name and gender marker.

METHODS

The study employed a qualitative methodological design, since it allows a deep and flexible exploration of participants' experiences and perspectives. Specifically, the data collection technique consisted of semi-structured interviews with N = 21 participants. The corpus of data was analyzed consistently with thematic analysis and reflexive thematic analytic approach, for identifying, analysing and reporting patterns in data, allowing the corpus of data to be examined in terms of their principal themes, using both theory-driven (top-down) and bottom-up analytical strategies.

RESULTS

Through the reflexive thematic approach, we generated two themes, further divided into sub-themes. The first theme is "Being trans + in our society" and it is composed by the following sub-themes: "personal experiences of identity affirmation"; "minority stress and transphobia"; "supportive familiar and working contexts", "institutional gender affirmation process"; "resilience and self-determination". The second theme, "Experiences of mandatory psychological assessment" is divided in: "disrespectful experiences"; "affirming and supportive interactions"; "to take better care". The results highlight how TNB individuals often experience significant stress related to their minority status and face discrimination in healthcare settings. Furthermore, there is a lack of individualization in the approach by healthcare providers and a shortage of knowledge about gender sensible topics among them. This study therefore highlights an insufficient provision of effective psychological support and the need to adopt more inclusive approaches, dismantling the pathologizing dimension of the diagnostic process for TNB people.

CONCLUSIONS

It is therefore crucial to promote awareness programs on gender identity issues to foster a more welcoming and informed environment in healthcare settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Padua with unique number D120DC6FDC5DF2694CF281D76B2CDB41 and protocol number 5003.

The mental health age gradient by gender identity

Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2017-2022 we estimated adjusted and unadjusted differences in self-reported number of poor mental health days (past month) between gender minority (GM) and cisgender adults. We document that the disparity is largest among younger individuals. Among 18- to 23-year-olds, GM adults report on average 14.5 days of poor mental health, compared to 6.3 days for cisgender individuals, yielding an unadjusted disparity of 8.2 days [95% CI: 7.15, 9.24]. This disparity decreases with age - among people over the age of 73, the observed difference was 1.7 days [95% CI: 0.13, 3.27].

Perceptions of occupational physicians in supporting transgender and gender-diverse people (returning) at work - a focus group study: The uncharted territory of gender-diverse occupational healthcare

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the role of occupational physicians (OPs) in supporting transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) workers during gender transition and return to work (RTW) following gender-affirming (medical) interventions.

DESIGN

We conducted a qualitative study (ONZ-2023-0026) using focus groups.

SETTING

This study involved OPs in Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

Two semistructured focus group interviews were held with 19 OPs working in occupational health services in Belgium in May and November 2023. Purposeful sampling was used, which included OPs with at least 2 years of seniority and experience with TGD people or inclusive company culture. Participants were predominantly white and cisgender, with varying levels of seniority and sectoral coverage.

METHODS

Qualitative data was thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke to find patterned meaning.

RESULTS

The analysis created four themes: (1) 'What is the right professional attitude?: You never get a second chance to make a good first impression' discusses the aspects of professional attitude alongside ethical considerations; (2) 'Controlled open-mindedness' entails values and views of gender in light of medicine, the individual worker, organisations and society; (3) 'The balance game: "Fingerspitzengefühl" (intuitive flair or instinct) without treating' and (4) 'Being gender-bombarded: the need for OP-tailored training and best practices'. These themes highlighted the limited knowledge and experience of OPs regarding gender-affirming care (GAC) and their need for additional training. Participants struggled to find the best gender-inclusive professional approach to support TGD workers as well as employers and require 'best practices'. Implementing overarching legislative frameworks can help OPs and companies create an inclusive work environment considering the differences in occupational sectors and company culture. RTW policies should focus on abilities without medicalisation and stigmatisation and involve multiple stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

Occupational medicine can be crucial in improving the health and well-being of TGD workers. However, with the ageing workforce, gender diversity poses new 'hidden' challenges for sick leave management, RTW and sensitive health surveillance. Multidisciplinary training with stakeholders and GAC professionals can enhance occupational practice and equip future OPs with the necessary competencies and confidence.

An Integrative Model of Alcohol-Facilitated Intimate Partner Aggression Perpetration in Sexual and Gender Diverse Couples

OBJECTIVE

Sexual and gender diverse (SGD) individuals are at heightened risk for intimate partner aggression (IPA) perpetration relative to their heterosexual and cisgender peers. Alcohol is a well-established cause of IPA perpetration in cisgender, heterosexual couples; however, minimal research has investigated the alcohol-IPA perpetration link in SGD couples. The relative lack of work in this area is a major barrier to addressing this health disparity. SGD individuals experience unique stressors related to their and/or their partner's intersecting minoritized identities that are crucial to understanding alcohol-IPA etiology and informing culturally affirming intervention programming.

METHOD

We advance prior work by members of the authorship team to propose an integrative theoretical model that invokes (a) the I3 Model to organize risk and resilience factors at the individual and dyadic level and (b) alcohol myopia theory to explain the mechanism by which proximal alcohol use facilitates IPA as a function of individual differences in those factors.

RESULTS

This integrative model provides a framework to understand how the confluence of stigma, minority stressors, proximal alcohol use, and other factors contribute to IPA perpetration in SGD couples.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of this integrative model has the potential to facilitate more rigorous research (e.g., intensive longitudinal designs, dyadic analysis) focused on putative risk and resilience factors across the social ecology. Further, the model provides guidance for intervention development by identifying how individual (e.g., minority stress), relationship (e.g., relationship functioning), and structural factors (e.g., SGD stigma) interactively contribute to alcohol-facilitated IPA perpetration.

Stratified analysis of health and gender-affirming care among Italian transgender and gender diverse adults

PURPOSE

This study aimed to provide the first comprehensive analysis of the health status of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) adults in Italy, addressing disparities in physical and mental health and access to gender-affirming care. By combining self-reported health data with clinical evaluations and incorporating demographic and clinical variables, the research offers a robust and previously unavailable health profile of this population.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey targeting TGD adults across Italy was conducted from June 2020 to June 2021. The survey consisted of self-reported health assessments and clinician-conducted evaluations, collecting data on chronic physical conditions, mental health disorders, infectious diseases, and gender-affirming care. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, identified associations between demographics and health outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 959 participants, mental health disorders were prevalent, with over half experiencing depression and/or anxiety. Non-binary individuals reported poorer health compared to binary individuals. Chronic conditions such as thyroid disorders were more common in individuals assigned female at birth (AFAB), whereas those assigned male at birth (AMAB) had higher rates of osteoporosis and sexually transmitted infections. Key health predictors included age, education, employment, and engagement in gender-affirming hormone therapy.

CONCLUSION

The study reveals stark health disparities among TGD individuals in Italy, emphasizing the need for targeted health policies, expanded mental health services, and specialized healthcare provider training.

The AFFIRM Framework for gender-affirming care: qualitative findings from the Transgender and Gender Diverse Health Equity Study

BACKGROUND

Transgender, nonbinary, and gender diverse (TGD) people experience stigma in healthcare settings impacting healthcare utilization, including avoidance of care due to anticipated discrimination. Gender-affirming care refers to care for medical gender affirmation, such as gender-affirming hormones and surgery, as well as general care that affirms and respects TGD patients. This study sought to explore the experiences of TGD adults to inform gender-affirming care delivery and develop an actionable framework for practice.

METHODS

Between May-October 2021, one-time individual in-depth interviews were conducted with 27 TGD adults receiving any healthcare in the greater Boston Massachusetts area to gather data about gender-affirming care. Interviews were semi-structured, explored prior and current experiences in healthcare and ideal gender-affirming care models, and conducted virtually via a secure Zoom platform. Analyses were conducted using immersion crystallization and reflexive thematic analysis; interview transcripts were double coded by two coders.

RESULTS

Participants had a mean age of 28.5, ranging 18-45 years, and were: 7 transgender men, 6 transgender women, 8 nonbinary, 3 genderqueer, 1 agender, and 2 gender not specified. Themes about gender-affirming care coalesced into the acronym AFFIRM: (1) Affirms in individual interactions: Participants called for affirmation of TGD identity, lived expertise, and competent TGD providers and staff. (2) Flexible and accessible: Participants expressed the need for gender-affirming care to be available beyond urban population-specific clinics, in a timely fashion without long wait lists, and in a community-centered manner such as offering non-traditional times and settings. (3) Fights systemic oppression: Participants emphasized the need for providers and health systems to eliminate gatekeeping practices for gender-affirming care and create care models that resist intersecting oppressive systems such as racism and cisgenderism. (4) Interacts with community: Patients desired intentional interaction with TGD community to holistically address health and unmet gender affirmation needs. (5) Retains patients in care: Patients shared the need to collaboratively identify and problem-solve obstacles to gender-affirming care with providers and healthcare systems to optimize TGD-specific retention strategies. (6) Multidisciplinary: Patients called for interdisciplinary teams with co-located services such as primary care and mental healthcare with letter-writing for surgical care, and incorporation of peer navigators to meet the broader social, health, and well-being needs of TGD people.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study and the AFFIRM Framework which emerged from TGD patient narratives can be applied to improve current care and set benchmarks for high-quality gender-affirming care delivery and practice.

Transgender and Gender-Diverse Minority Stress and Substance Use Frequency and Problems: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The goal of this preregistered study was to systematically review and meta-analyze quantitative research examining relationships between minority stress (distal stress, expectations of gender-based rejection, concealment of gender identity, and internalized transphobia) and substance use (alcohol use frequency and problems, and drug use frequency and problems) in transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) samples. Searches of PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Gender Studies, and LGBTQ+ Source databases were conducted for quantitative articles that included effect sizes for cross-sectional associations between TGD-based minority stress and substance use outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to compute effect sizes for 16 minority stressor-substance use variable pairs. Moderator analyses were conducted for publication year and proportion of the sample assigned female sex at birth, identified as Black, Indigenous, or people of color (BIPOC), or identified as a sexual minority. Thirty-six studies with 76 effect sizes were included. Significant correlations were observed for relationships between distal stress and alcohol use frequency (r=0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.06 to 0.20) and problems (r=0.09; 95% CI=0.03 to 0.14), and drug use frequency (r=0.16; 95% CI=0.11 to 0.21) and problems (r=0.14; 95% CI=0.05 to 0.23). No associations for proximal minority stress-substance use variable pairs were significant. Effect sizes for associations between distal stress and alcohol use frequency were higher in samples with more BIPOC participants (z=4.27, p<0.001, R 2=0.740). Findings indicate that distal, but not proximal, minority stress was significantly associated with drug and alcohol use frequency and problems. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.

Sexual and gender minority youth in Canada: An investigation of disparities in positive mental health

OBJECTIVES

While studies indicate that 2SLGBTQ + youth are more likely to experience negative psychological outcomes compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers, less is known about the positive mental health (PMH) of 2SLGBTQ + youth in Canada. To fill this gap, we investigated disparities in PMH by self-reported sexual attraction among 15‒17-year-olds and gender modality among 12‒17-year-olds.

METHODS

We analyzed data from youth respondents in the 2019 Canadian Health Survey on Children and Youth. We obtained estimates of average life satisfaction and high self-rated mental health, happiness, autonomy, competence, and relatedness for youth with an exclusively heterosexual attraction and youth with a minority sexual attraction (those exclusively attracted to the same gender, and those attracted to both females and males), and for cisgender and gender minority youth. Regression analyses were conducted to test for disparities on each PMH outcome.

RESULTS

Compared with exclusively heterosexual youth, sexual minority youth reported lower life satisfaction and were less likely to report high self-rated mental health, happiness, autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Significant disparities were more consistently found for youth attracted to both females and males than youth exclusively attracted to the same gender. Gender minority (versus cisgender) youth also reported lower average life satisfaction and were less likely to report high self-rated mental health, happiness, autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

CONCLUSION

Although this study provides evidence for the presence of disparities in PMH, its strength-based focus on PMH also documents the presence of well-being among many sexual and gender minority youth in Canada.

Health Communication Preferences of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals - Development and First Psychometric Evaluation of the CommTrans Questionnaire

Patient-doctor communication is an important component of patient-centered care and should be adapted to the target group. Adapting communication to transgender and gender-diverse individuals is particularly difficult, as little is known about the preferences of this group. Thus, the aim of the study was to develop a questionnaire to assess the communication preferences of the target group. Based on a qualitative study, an item pool was created, which was tested in a survey in September 2022. An item analysis was conducted and items with unacceptable characteristics were removed. The remaining item pool was examined with an explorative factor analysis. The sample consisted of N = 264 individuals. Of the initial k = 43 items, k = 9 items remained in the final factor analysis. The final two factor solution explained 60.7% of the variance. The factors describe the emotional resonance in communication (Cronbach's α = .74; e.g. "My medical doctors should be happy for me when my treatment progresses positively.") as well as gender-related communication (Cronbach's α = .85; e.g. "My medical doctors should introduce themselves with pronouns."). Overall, the questionnaire captures the communication preferences of transgender and gender-diverse individuals in medical conversations. It covers two important topics for the target group, but further validation is necessary.

Disparities in depression and anxiety at the intersection of race and gender identity in a large community health sample

BACKGROUND

Persons of color experience are disproportionately impacted by poor mental health compared to White individuals, as are gender diverse populations relative to cisgender individuals. Yet, few studies have assessed differences in common mental health disorders at the intersection of race and gender identity.

METHODS

Using health record data from an urban US community health center in Massachusetts that primarily serves LGBTQIA + communities, we organized patients (N = 29,988) into 24 race and gender identity categories, pairing four race groups (White, Black, Asian, and another race, which was inclusive of Native American/Alaskan, Native Hawaiian, Multiracial, and other) with six gender identity groups (cisgender men and women, transgender men and women, nonbinary individuals assigned male and female at birth [AMAB/AFAB]). We compared the severity of self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety and the likelihood of meeting diagnostic thresholds across the four race categories within three gender groups (cisgender and transgender men, cisgender and transgender women, nonbinary individuals).

RESULTS

Depression and anxiety symptom severity differed within men and women; transgender men and women across races had higher severity than cisgender men and women. In nonbinary individuals, symptom severity was high and consistent across the race groups. Differences were observed in the likelihood of meeting clinical thresholds for depression and anxiety across races in men and women, reflecting the pattern described above. Nonbinary participants across races had high likelihood of meeting the thresholds for both diagnoses (29.2%-47.1%). The likelihood of meeting the depression and anxiety thresholds were highest among Black nonbinary AFAB adults (44.4%) and transgender women in the another race category (48.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this unique sample, differences in depression and anxiety symptom severity and likely diagnoses suggest disparities among nonbinary individuals across races, as well as among transgender men and women grouped into the another race category and women who identify as Black. Focused mental health strategies tailored to address race and gender identity may be critical to proactively address these disparities.

The experiences of transgender and nonbinary adults in primary care: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Transgender and nonbinary (TNB) people face barriers to primary care, which remains the main entry point for accessing gender-affirming healthcare in the UK.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to summarise the evidence regarding TNB people's experiences of primary care to inform improvements in service and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted across articles from 2005 to April 2023 across Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and PsychInfo using established keywords relating to gender identity, primary care and experiences. Qualitative data were thematically analysed and quantitative data were compiled using a descriptive narrative.

RESULTS

Following eligibility criteria, 16 articles were included in this review. This review identified both facilitators and limitations and barriers experienced by TNB people related to primary care provider knowledge; the patient-provider relationship, and healthcare settings. Quantitative findings reported up to 54.4% of participants were uncomfortable discussing TNB issues with their physician. Overall findings suggest TNB people face discrimination on a systemic level utilising primary care services, though positive healthcare encounters at a local level were reported. Participants expressed a desire for primary care-led gender-affirming healthcare services, with involvement from local TNB communities.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates TNB people's mixed experiences of primary care alongside their recommendations for service improvement. This is the first systematically reviewed evidence on the topic, emphasising the need for clinicians and policymakers to centre the voices of the TNB community in service design and improvement.

Heightened vigilance and its associations with suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among 285 Korean transgender and nonbinary adults: Effect modification by connectedness to the LGBTQ+ community

INTRODUCTION

Anti-transgender stigma presents threats of discrimination to transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals, prompting them to stay vigilant. Using a longitudinal data of 285 South Korean TGNB adults, we examined vigilance and its associations with suicidal ideation and suicide attempt and explored the protective role of connectedness to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) community.

METHODS

Data were collected in October 2021 (baseline) and October 2022 (follow-up). Vigilance was measured using the 4-item Heightened Vigilance Scale at baseline. At follow-up, 12-month suicidal ideation and suicide attempt, and connectedness to the LGBTQ+ community were measured.

RESULTS

Having heightened levels of vigilance was associated with increased prevalence of suicidal ideation (Prevalence Ratio [PR]: 1.33, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.09-1.62) and suicide attempt (PR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.23-3.86), after adjusting for covariates including anti-transgender discrimination experiences and lifetime suicidality at baseline. When stratified by connectedness to the LGBTQ+ community, the associations between vigilance and suicidality remained statistically significant among those with low connectedness whereas no statistically significant association was observed among those with high connectedness.

CONCLUSION

The study provides empirical evidence for policies and interventions that ensure safety of TGNB individuals from discrimination and promote connectedness to the LGBTQ+ community to reduce the suicide risk among TGNB individuals.

Influences of sex and gender on the associations between risk and protective factors, brain, and behavior

Risk and protective factors for psychiatric illnesses are linked to distinct structural and functional changes in the brain. Further, the prevalence of these factors varies across sexes and genders, yet the distinct and joint effects of sex and gender in this context have not been extensively characterized. This suggests that risk and protective factors may map onto the brain and uniquely influence individuals across sexes and genders. Here, we review how specific risk (childhood maltreatment, the COVID-19 pandemic, experiences of racism), and protective factors (social support and psychological resilience) distinctly influence the brain across sexes and genders. We also discuss the role of sex and gender in the compounding effects of risk factors and in the interdependent influences of risk and protective factors. As such, we call on researchers to consider sex and gender when researching risk and protective factors for psychiatric illnesses, and we provide concrete recommendations on how to account for them in future research. Considering protective factors alongside risk factors in research and acknowledging sex and gender differences will enable us to establish sex- and gender-specific brain-behavior relationships. This will subsequently inform the development of targeted prevention and intervention strategies for psychiatric illnesses, which have been lacking. To achieve sex and gender equality in mental health, acknowledging and researching potential differences will lead to a better understanding of men and women, males and females, and the factors that make them more vulnerable or resilient to psychopathology.

Trans and gender diverse identities in adolescent health research: making the most of imperfect data

Advancing adolescent health research necessitates deliberate design and analysis that accurately captures the rapidly evolving world in which adolescents live and the ways in which they understand and express themselves and their experiences. In this Perspective, we reflect on how researchers might approach existing, imperfect data in a way that is accurate and inclusive of trans and gender diverse (TGD) adolescents. Drawing on our experience of running a large school-based survey of health and well-being (the OxWell Student Survey) and extensive coproduction with three TGD adolescents ('youth advisors'), we present considerations for critically appraising, processing and analysing quantitative gender data to better reflect adolescents' lived experiences. Specific topics discussed include how to assess the strengths and limitations of existing gender data; how to generate meaningful research data from free-text gender descriptions (and the implications of not doing so); and how to analyse data from TGD adolescents, including for those who choose not to disclose their gender. We conclude with a set of 10 recommendations, coproduced with the three youth advisors, for those working with 'imperfect' gender data.

Enhancing brain health in the Global South through sex and gender lens

Gender inequality substantially impacts society, disproportionately disadvantaging women, especially in the Global South. This inequality correlates with brain health outcomes for women, including a higher risk of cognitive decline and dementia. This perspective highlights how sex-linked biology and gender disparities affect women's brain health in the Global South through various pathways, such as differential exposome, health behaviors, and gender biases in research and healthcare systems. Alzheimer's disease and other brain health conditions exemplify how sex-specific risk factors and gender-related health barriers interact to influence brain health. We advocate for incorporating sex/gender considerations in research, policy, and clinical practice to improve brain health interventions in the Global South. Additionally, we propose using the patient and public involvement framework to effectively tailor health strategies that address these factors.

Gender Minority Stressors and Psychological Distress Among Chinese Transgender and Gender Diverse People: Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Psychological Network Approaches

Mental health disparities in transgender and gender diverse (TGD) populations call for more research examining gender minority stressors (GMS) as antecedents to their psychological distress, especially for the long-underrepresented groups living in conservative societies towards gender minorities. Furthermore, some questions remain underexamined, including the relative, independent influences of various GMS on TGD people's mental well-being (i.e., uniqueness of each stressor); how these stressors would configurate with each other in distinctive patterns to characterize subgroups of TGD people (i.e., beyond-average heterogeneity); and how these stressors would constitute a psychological network and vary in their centrality in that network (i.e., holistic complexity). To narrow such gaps, we examined the links between GMS and TGD people's psychological distress, using survey data collected in 2023 from 410 Chinese TGD people (Meanage = 22.33 years, SD = 4.27; 306 transgender, 70 non-binary/gender-queer/gender-fluid, 26 agender/gender-neutral, 3 intersex, and 5 others). We approached such links from three perspectives. First, variable-centered analyses indicated that while different GMS were considered simultaneously, internalized transphobia, preoccupation with gender dysphoria, and gender-related victimization were uniquely associated with psychological distress. Second, person-centered analyses yielded a 3-profile solution. Psychological distress varied systematically across profiles. Last, network analyses revealed a 3-cluster structure: Distal, Proximal Internal, and TGD-Specific Stressors. Preoccupation with gender dysphoria was the most central node. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the implications of GMS for TGD people's mental well-being. GMS related to internal struggles with gender identity might be among the central intervention targets to prevent/reduce TGD people's psychological distress.

Young adults, particularly young women, account for an increasingly large share of Dutch mental healthcare expenditure over the period between 2015 and 2021

AIMS

There is increasing concern over the mental distress of youth in recent years, which may impact mental healthcare utilisation. Here we aim to examine temporal patterns of mental healthcare expenditures in the Netherlands by age and sex in the period between 2015 and 2021.

METHODS

Comprehensive data from health insurers in the Netherlands at the 3-number postal code level were used for cluster weighted linear regressions to examine temporal patterns of mental healthcare expenditure by age group (18-34 vs 35-65). The same was done for medical specialist and general practitioner costs. Additionally, we examined interactions with gender, by adding the interaction between age, year and sex to the model.

RESULTS

Mental healthcare costs for younger adults (18-34) were higher than those for older adults (35-65) at all time points (β = 0.22, 95%-CI = 0.19; 0.25). Furthermore there was an increase in the strength of the association between younger age and mental healthcare costs from β = 0.22 (95%-CI = 0.19; 0.25) in 2015 to β = 0.37 (95%-CI = 0.35; 0.40) in 2021 (p < 0.0001) and this was most evident in women (p < 0.0001). Younger age was associated with lower general practitioner costs at all time points, but this association weakened over time. Younger age was also associated with lower medical specialist costs, which did not weaken over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Young adults, particularly young women, account for an increasing share of mental healthcare expenditure in the Netherlands. This suggests that mental distress in young people is increasingly met by a response from the medical system. To mitigate this trend a public mental health approach is needed.

Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among Autistic Transgender or Gender-Nonconforming US College Students

Importance

Suicide risk is a global public health crisis, with suicide ranking as a consistent leading cause of death among adults in the US. Autistic individuals and transgender or gender-nonconforming (TGNC) individuals represent populations with notably elevated rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs).

Objective

To characterize suicidal thoughts and behaviors among TGNC and autistic individuals, using a large, nationally representative sample.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from students at colleges and universities throughout the US who participated in the American College Health Association National College Health Assessment from 2019 to 2023.

Exposures

Autistic and TGNC identities were self-reported by participants.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The frequency of intersectionality of autism and TGNC identities and whether those who had intersectional marginalized identities had increased likelihood of STBs were examined. STBs were self-reported by participants. A series of moderated regression analyses were performed to examine how the interaction between autism and possessing a marginalized gender identity (ie, TGNC status) was associated with STBs.

Results

The sample included 41 507 college students with a mean (SD) age of 23.35 (6.83) years. A total of 2410 participants (5.81%) identified as being TGNC. Overall, 326 TGNC participants (13.53%) also identified as autistic, whereas 625 of those who identified as cisgender (1.58%) also identified as autistic. Gender identity and autism were associated with greater odds of STBs. For suicidal ideation, gender identity had an odds ratio (OR) of 3.34 (95% CI, 2.99-3.73), and autism had an OR of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.76-2.42). For suicide attempts, gender identity had an OR of 2.74 (95% CI, 2.13-3.52), and autism had an OR of 2.39 (95% CI, 1.62-3.52). A significant interaction existed for attempts (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.97); nonautistic cisgender individuals had the lowest attempt rate.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cross-sectional study addresses the dearth of information on how intersectionality in gender and autism status impacts the risk of STBs, and the results confirm the elevated risk of STBs among TGNC and autistic populations. Interventions are needed to support college students with these identities.

Emotion regulation strategies and coping self-efficacy as moderators of daily associations between transgender and gender diverse (TGD) enacted stigma and affect among TGD young adults assigned female at birth

BACKGROUND

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies have begun to establish links between sexual minority enacted stigma and anxious/depressed affect at the daily level. However, few of these studies have examined the effects of the unique stigma experienced by transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people. Further, the potential moderating roles of emotion regulation strategies (i.e., strategies used to up- or down-regulate emotions) and coping self-efficacy (i.e., individuals' perceptions of their ability to cope effectively with stressors) have been neglected in EMA research on enacted stigma.

METHODS

The current study aimed to extend this literature by examining the moderating roles of six emotion regulation strategies (i.e., reflection, reappraisal, rumination, expressive suppression, distraction, social sharing) and coping self-efficacy on concurrent and prospective associations between TGD enacted stigma and affect using EMA data from 115 sexual minority gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth.

RESULTS

Results indicated that coping self-efficacy buffered prospective associations between TGD enacted stigma and anxious/depressed affect, while rumination exacerbated these effects. Some unexpected buffering effects were identified in concurrent associations between enacted stigma and negative affect, with suppression and distraction temporarily tempering this association. However, suppression also prospectively predicted increases in negative affect, suggesting that any benefit of this emotion regulation strategy is temporary.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight emotion regulation strategies that may be effective in reducing negative affect, identify coping self-efficacy as a promising buffer of effects of enacted stigma, and confirm emotion regulation strategies that may exacerbate effects of enacted stigma.

A Narrative Synthesis Review of Legislation Banning Gender-Affirming Care

Purpose of Review

In recent years, there has been a drastic increase in legislation across US states that aims to ban gender-affirming care (GAC) for transgender and nonbinary (trans) youth. We synthesized the literature on bans on GAC, its impacts on medical and mental health providers, trans communities, particularly trans youth and their caregivers (e.g., parents/families), and provided recommendations for future research and advocacy.

Recent Findings

We highlight several adverse impacts of legislation banning GAC, including: an increase in professional tensions for medical and mental health providers that work with trans youth and worse mental health outcomes for trans youth and their caregivers due to loss of autonomy in accessing evidence-based GAC.

Summary

Bans on GAC undermine evidenced-based practices and are resulting in negative health effects for trans communities and youth. Research evidence highlights the need to examine effects of bans at the intersections of gender identity, socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity.

Intimate partner violence is related to future alcohol use among a nationwide sample of LGBTQIA+ people: Results from The PRIDE Study

BACKGROUND

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, aromantic and asexual (LGBTQIA+) communities in the United States experience higher rates of alcohol use than the general population. While experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) is thought to lead to increased alcohol use in LGBTQIA+ people, little research has investigated the temporal relationship between IPV and alcohol use in this population.

METHODS

Data from two annual questionnaires of The Population Research in Identity and Disparities for Equality Study (The PRIDE Study) longitudinal cohort (n=3,783) were included. Overall IPV and three sub-types (physical, sexual, and emotional) - measured in 2021 using the extended Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream (E-HITS) screening tool - was examined as a predictor of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score in 2022 using multivariable linear regression to assess linear and quadratic associations. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and history of alcohol use.

RESULTS

One-quarter (24.7%) of respondents reported experiencing past-year IPV in 2021. The mean AUDIT score in 2022 was 3.52 (SD = 4.13). In adjusted models, both linear (B: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.38) and quadratic (B: -0.03, 95% CI: -0.04, -0.01) terms for overall IPV were significantly associated with next-year AUDIT score. These patterns were mirrored in each IPV sub-type, were not attenuated when accounting for relationship characteristics, and were heterogeneous across gender identity groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide evidence of a temporal relationship between IPV and alcohol use in LGBTQIA+ communities, suggesting that efforts to prevent and mitigate IPV may help reduce alcohol use disparities in this population.

Enhancing psychiatric rehabilitation outcomes through a multimodal multitask learning model based on BERT and TabNet: An approach for personalized treatment and improved decision-making

Evaluating the rehabilitation status of individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI) necessitates a comprehensive analysis of multimodal data, including unstructured text records and structured diagnostic data. However, progress in the effective assessment of rehabilitation status remains limited. Our study develops a deep learning model integrating Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and TabNet through a late fusion strategy to enhance rehabilitation prediction, including referral risk, dangerous behaviors, self-awareness, and medication adherence, in patients with SMI. BERT processes unstructured textual data, such as doctor's notes, whereas TabNet manages structured diagnostic information. The model's interpretability function serves to assist healthcare professionals in understanding the model's predictive decisions, improving patient care. Our model exhibited excellent predictive performance for all four tasks, with an accuracy exceeding 0.78 and an area under the curve of 0.70. In addition, a series of tests proved the model's robustness, fairness, and interpretability. This study combines multimodal and multitask learning strategies into a model and applies it to rehabilitation assessment tasks, offering a promising new tool that can be seamlessly integrated with the clinical workflow to support the provision of optimized patient care.

Public Restroom Access and Mental Health Among Gender-Minoritized Individuals in China

This cross-sectional study assesses the adequacy of gender-neutral public restrooms and examines the association of public restroom–related stress with mental health among gender-diverse individuals in China.

"I have to fight for them to investigate things": a qualitative exploration of physical and mental healthcare for women diagnosed with mental illness

Introduction

Women play a significant role in the management of their own healthcare and that of others, however women diagnosed with mental illness and physical health concerns experience significant health inequalities as compared to people living without mental health concerns.

Methods

In this paper, we reflect on the experiences of 20 cis women diagnosed with mental and physical health concerns who agreed to be a part of this research. This qualitative study is part of the larger Healthtalk Australia research project which was not gender specific. Female participants shared many experiences of mental and physical healthcare in interviews with researchers that pointed to the need for a gendered approach to addressing health inequalities. Consequently, we iteratively consolidated transcripts of interviews with participants into thematic categories facilitated by NVIVO 12.

Results

We identified two broad themes and a set of subthemes: in the doctor's office - experience of labelling; negotiating medications; and interactions with physical and mental health, and outside the doctor's office - responses to trauma, financial concerns, and reliance on participant's internal resources to get healthcare needs met.

Discussion

We conclude that participants in this study undertook significant work to manage their own healthcare needs, despite being challenged by clinicians and systems that failed to see them as whole people with expertise regarding their own health.

Intersectional Male-Centric and White-Centric Biases in Collective Concepts

In principle, the fundamental concepts person, woman, and man should apply equally to people of different genders and races/ethnicities. In reality, these concepts might prioritize certain groups over others. Based on interdisciplinary theories of androcentrism, we hypothesized that (a) person is more associated with men than women (person = man) and (b) woman is more associated with women than man is with men (i.e., women are more gendered: gender = woman). We applied natural language processing tools (specifically, word embeddings) to the linguistic output of millions of individuals (specifically, the Common Crawl corpus). We found the hypothesized person = man / gender = woman bias. This bias was stronger about Hispanic and White (vs. Asian) women and men. We also uncovered parallel biases favoring White individuals in the concepts person, woman, and man. Western society prioritizes men and White individuals as people and "others" women as people with gender, with implications for equity across policy- and decision-making contexts.

Research priorities in trans health: a Delphi-study

Purpose

Progress has been made in understanding trans health needs, but research priorities are often set by policy or healthcare professionals without trans input, which may not reflect public needs. Our study sought to identify trans health research priorities in France from both researchers and the trans community.

Methods

Expert stakeholders (health and social sciences professionals, trans individuals, and their families) answered a three-round Delphi survey on trans health research priorities. The first round involved an open-ended questionnaire, analyzed qualitatively. In the second round, participants ranked research propositions from round one using a Likert scale. The study's second phase involved a two-hour workshop with experts and trans individuals.

Results

53 participants (32% trans individuals/relatives, 60% health professionals) contributed 217 responses to open-ended questions, leading to 44 research priorities. After the two voting rounds, a total of five proposals reached a strong consensus cut-off and were considered as the main research priorities: evaluation of the effect of puberty blocker use in trans children and adolescents (95%), evaluation of the effect of supporting trans children and adolescents (92%), study of the support systems available for trans youth and their parents (86%), persistence of trans identity around puberty (prevalence, persistent persons characteristics) (86%), and needs assessment survey of the support for adolescents and their families (83%). Thirteen other proposals were considered moderate priorities.

Conclusion

The main consensus in our French study concerned research on trans-youth care and support needs. Our results may guide further trans-health research that meets the public's needs and desires.

Trans-Inclusive Communication and Self-Perceived Barriers to It, as Reported by Doctors-A Mixed-Methods Survey in Germany

The majority of transgender and gender-nonconforming people (TGNC) report negative experiences with doctors in the healthcare system. As there is little knowledge about the communication behaviour of doctors towards TGNC, this survey aimed to assess the self-reported trans-inclusive communication of doctors and their willingness to communicate trans-inclusively, as well as their self-perceived barriers to it. A mixed-methods survey was applied for this. Firstly, we measured self-reported trans-inclusive communication behaviour based on the CommTrans questionnaire. Based on this, the overall willingness, as well as self-perceived barriers (qualitative) to communication, were assessed. In total, N = 57 doctors took part in the survey. Most participants reported not introducing themselves using pronouns (79.4%). Of these, 61.4% said that they would not be able to do this in the future either. Perceived barriers were classified into the following eight categories: necessity, sample-dependency, habit, structural barriers in practice, uncertainties in dealing with the topic, limits of patient-centredness, gender as a binary concept, and transphobia. In summary, doctors in Germany show different degrees of trans-inclusive communication. It is likely that this has a negative effect on TGNC, their health and access to the healthcare system.

Health status of transgender people globally: A systematic review of research on disease burden and correlates

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Transgender and gender diverse (trans) health research has grown rapidly, highlighting the need to characterize the scientific evidence base. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed research on disease burden and correlates in trans adolescents and adults over a 20-month period to identify knowledge gaps and assess methodological characteristics including measurement of gender identity, community engagement, and study quality.

DATA SOURCES, ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

We searched seven databases using terms related to (a) transgender populations and (b) health or disease. Eligible studies were in English, French, or Spanish and reported original quantitative data on mental health or substance use conditions, infectious diseases, or non-communicable conditions in at least 25 trans individuals aged 15+. Quality assessment was performed in duplicate on a 10% sample of articles and findings were summarized using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

The 328 included studies were conducted in 45 countries, with most from North America (54%) and limited research from South Asia (3%), Sub-Saharan Africa (3%), and the Middle East and North Africa (2%). Most studies used cross-sectional designs (73%) and convenience sampling (65%). Only 30% of studies reported any form of community engagement. Mental health and substance use disorders were the most studied area (77% of studies) and non-communicable conditions the least (16%). Available data indicated that trans populations experience high disease burden with considerable heterogeneity within and across settings. Of 39 articles assessed for quality, 80% were rated as fair, 18% as poor, and 3% as good quality.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Geographic, gender-specific, and topical gaps remain in trans health, but we found more research from African countries, with transmasculine people, and on non-communicable conditions than previous syntheses. Areas for growth in trans health research include community engagement, non-binary health, chronic and age-related conditions, and health determinants.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021234043.

Analyzing body dissatisfaction and gender dysphoria in the context of minority stress among transgender adolescents

BACKGROUND

Gender dysphoria among transgender adolescents has predominantly been examined in relation to body dissatisfaction. While in adult transgender samples, body dissatisfaction is higher than in cisgender controls, this has so far rarely been investigated for adolescents. In the context of a cisnormative society, the impact of influences from the social environment on body dissatisfaction and gender dysphoria has been neglected in research. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) provide a detailed analysis of body dissatisfaction among young transgender people and (2) investigate whether body dissatisfaction and gender dysphoria are associated with experiences of minority stress such as trans hostility and poor peer relations (PPR).

METHODS

The paper presents a cross-sectional study among a sample of transgender adolescents, presenting at a specialized outpatient counseling clinic (N = 99; age M = 15.36, SD = 1.85). First, body dissatisfaction (assessed by the Body-Image-Scale; BIS), was explored and compared to data from a population-based control group of cisgender peers (N = 527; age M = 14.43, SD = 0.97). Second, within a clinic-referred transgender subsample (n = 74), associations between body dissatisfaction and gender dysphoria (measured by Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale; UGDS), PPR (measured by the Youth-Self-Report; YSR-R), and trans hostile experiences (assessed in clinical interview) were examined by correlations, t-tests and multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Transgender adolescents reported more body dissatisfaction than cisgender peers. The dissatisfaction with sex characteristics, non-hormonal reactive body regions and the total score for body dissatisfaction were positively related with gender dysphoria. The majority had experienced trans hostility in the present and/or past (54.1%) and PPR (63.5%). More body dissatisfaction was correlated with more PPR regarding visible body parts i.e., hair, overall appearance and muscles, whilst PPR and gender dysphoria were not associated. Transgender adolescents who experienced trans hostility showed higher gender dysphoria and PPR, but not more body dissatisfaction. In multiple regression, trans hostility predicted gender dysphoria, whilst age and PPR predicted body dissatisfaction.

DISCUSSION

Experiences of minority-stress differentially interact with body dissatisfaction and gender dysphoria among transgender adolescents. Social correlates of body dissatisfaction and gender dysphoria must be considered when working with young transgender people.

Gender-related self-reported mental health inequalities in primary care in England: a cross-sectional analysis using the GP Patient Survey

BACKGROUND

Transgender, non-binary, and gender diverse people face discrimination and barriers to accessing health care. Existing evidence suggests higher rates of mental health conditions among these groups compared with binary and cisgender groups. However, information is limited by poor gender recording in health records and surveys. We aimed to provide the first national estimates of gender-related inequalities in self-reported mental health conditions and mental health support across 15 gender groups in England.

METHODS

We used changes to the 2021 and 2022 nationally representative cross-sectional English General Pracitioner (GP) Patient Surveys and used age-adjusted logistic regression to predict probabilities of two outcomes: first, self-reporting a mental health condition and second, self-reporting unmet mental health needs. We report results for 15 exposure groups: five gender groups (female, male, non-binary, prefer to self-describe, and prefer not to say), within three cisgender or transgender identity groups (cisgender, transgender, or prefer not to say). We explored potential mediation by adding covariates.

FINDINGS

Of the 1 520 457 respondents in the estimation sample, 861 017 (51·4%) were female, 645 300 (47·4%) were male, 2600 (0·3%) were non-binary, 2277 (0·2%) self-described their gender, and 9263 (0·7%) preferred not to state their gender. 1 499 852 (98·3%) respondents were cisgender, 7994 (0·7%) were transgender, and 12 611 (1·0%) preferred not to say their cisgender or transgender identity. We found wide gender-related inequalities in the probability of self-reporting a mental health condition, with the highest probabilities among non-binary patients who were transgender (47·21% [95% CI 42·86-51·60]) or preferred not to say their cisgender or transgender identity (32·90% [26·50-40·00]), and among transgender patients who self-described their gender (35·03% [27·39-43·53]). With the exception of non-binary patients in each case, probabilities were lowest among cisgender patient groups (ranging from male at 8·80% [8·69-8·92] to female at 11·97% [11·86-12·07]) and patients who preferred not to say their cisgender or transgender identity (ranging from female 7·15% [6·06-8·42] to prefer to self-describe 10·37% [7·13-14·86]). Inequalities in other health conditions and socioeconomic factors might mediate some of these inequalities. Probabilities of self-reported unmet mental health needs were lowest among cisgender male (15·55% [15·33-15·76]) and female (15·93% [15·76-16·10]) patients with increased probabilities among all other groups, ranging from 19·95% (17·57-22·57) in transgender male patients to 28·64% (26·23-31·17) among patients who preferred not to say their gender or their cisgender or transgender identity. Inequalities in interactions with health-care professionals may mediate much of these inequalities.

INTERPRETATION

Together with existing evidence, our findings showed large gender-related inequalities in self-reported mental health outcomes in England. Given the existence of self-reported unmet mental health needs, we suggest that better health care system inclusivity and health-care professional training are needed, alongside broader improvements in the social and legal environment for transgender, non-binary, and gender diverse people.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Health literacy of trans and gender diverse individuals -a cross sectional survey in Germany

INTRODUCTION

To date, there has been little research on the general health literacy of trans and gender diverse individuals, even though previous research undermines the importance of good health literacy in this sample. The aim of the article is therefore to describe the general health literacy of trans and gender diverse individuals based on a German survey.

METHODS

In September 2022, a survey study was conducted in which health literacy was recorded using HLS-EU-16. Data will be presented descriptively; gender differences will be explored using a Χ2- test and a univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Out of N = 223 participants, n = 129 individuals (57.8%) identified as non-binary; n = 49 (22.0%) identified themselves as male, while n = 45 (20.2%) identified as female. Mean age was 28.03 years. Overall, 26.4% of all the participants showed an inadequate health literacy, as proposed by the HLS-EU-16. In trend, health-related task related to media use were more often perceived as easy compared to the German general population.

CONCLUSION

Individuals, who identify as trans and gender diverse may have a general health literacy below average compared to the German general population. However, tasks related to media use were perceived as easy, which might be a good starting point for health literacy related interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00026249, Date of registration: 15/03/2022.

Gender affirmation and mental health in prison: A critical review of current corrections policy for trans people in Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Trans people in prison experience disproportionate rates of harm, including negative mental health outcomes, and thus require special protections. Instead, corrections policies have historically further marginalised them. This critical policy review aimed to compare corrections policies for trans people in Australia and New Zealand with human rights standards and consider their mental health impact.

METHODS

Online searches were conducted on corrections websites for each state/territory in Australia and New Zealand. Drawing on the Nelson Mandela Rules and Yogyakarta Principles, 19 corrections policies relevant to placement, naming, appearance and gender-affirming healthcare for trans people were reviewed. The potential mental health impact of these policies on incarcerated trans people was discussed using the Gender Minority Stress and Resilience framework.

RESULTS

Australian and New Zealand corrections policies have become more concordant with human rights standards in the past 5 years. However, gender-related discrimination and human rights violations were present in corrections policies of all jurisdictions. New South Wales and Victorian policies had the highest concordance with human rights standards, while Queensland and South Australian policies had the lowest.

CONCLUSION

Policies that contribute to discrimination and minority stress may increase risk of mental health problems and suicide for incarcerated trans people. Mental health professionals working in prisons need to be aware of these risks to provide safe and accessible mental healthcare for trans people. Collaborative policy development with trans people is essential to protect the safety and rights of incarcerated trans people and consider models beyond the gender binary on which correctional systems have been founded.

Eating disorders among queer and trans individuals: Implications for conceptualization, assessment, and treatment

Eating disorders (EDs) have been traditionally viewed as a disorder affecting cisgender, heterosexual women. Yet, the prevalence of EDs among queer and trans (QnT) individuals, coupled with the lack of interventions that attend to contextual factors related to sexual orientation and gender identity, underscore a critical health disparity issue requiring urgent attention. Here, we first review factors pertaining to QnT individuals' minoritized sexual and gender identities that are important to consider in ED conceptualization for this population (e.g., minority stressors, identity-based body image standards). Next, we describe problematic assumptions present in existing ED assessment and propose more inclusive approaches. Lastly, we provide suggestions for practices that providers can implement within their treatment of EDs among QnT individuals.

"Ever since I knew I was trans I knew I wanted hormone therapy": a qualitative exploration into the journey of Australian trans individuals accessing feminizing gender-affirming hormone therapy

Background

For many trans folks, gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is a desired affirming procedure that has been linked with positive health outcomes, however literature has had little focus on the journeys of trans people as they access GAHT.

Aim

To understand trans people's journey of accessing GAHT to delineate supports necessary to better engage trans individuals into gender-affirming care.

Method

This study conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of 15 Australian trans adults who participated in a larger study investigating the effects of a cyproterone acetate titration protocol.

Findings

A four-factor thematic structure was created from the data. Theme one describes early cognizance of being trans and the pivotal moments in their trans realization. The second theme explores the rapid engagement with community to begin accessing information and affirming healthcare, including GAHT. The third theme explores barriers to engaging in GAHT and theme four reflects on advice participants have for other trans people who are considering GAHT.

Conclusion

Findings from this study emphasize the importance of providing support to young trans people to help reconcile their gender identity and assist them to engage into care as early as possible. It also highlights the key role that community plays in providing links to affirming information and providers of GAHT - but also emphasizes the importance of considering how to engage with community who may be missed. The experience of accessing GAHT is personal and contextual, but signaling of affirming safe spaces and access to salient information may be key strategies to better support trans people choosing to access GAHT.

Exploring communication preferences of trans and gender diverse individuals-A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Trans and gender-diverse individuals experience adverse health outcomes that might be due, in addition to other factors, to stigma and discrimination in the health care sector. At the same time, the concept of person-centred care acknowledges the role of patient-physician communication in health care outcomes. This study aims to explore patient-physician communication preferences in trans and gender-diverse individuals.

METHOD

A qualitative interview study was conducted, including N = 10 participants between February and March 2022. Participants were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guideline, based on previous knowledge in person-centred care and sample specific communication. Participants were asked about their experiences and wishes in patient-physician centeredness. Analyses were conducting using a qualitative content analysis strategy.

RESULTS

Mean age was 29.3 years; n = 6 participants identified themselves within the binary gender concept, while n = 4 identified themselves with a non-binary gender. Communication preferences for patient-physician communication were categorised into four themes: general communication aspects (e.g. active listening); the role of gender during appointments (e.g. appropriate/inappropriate addressing); gender-neutral language (e.g. experiences use of gender neutral language by physicians); own communication style (e.g. early outing and justification). Furthermore, possible contextual factors of patient-physician communication where found (e.g. trusting relationship).

CONCLUSION

Adding knowledge to communication preferences of trans and gender-diverse individuals, this study was able to identify preferences that are specific to the sample as well as preferences that differ from the cis-gendered population. However, it remains unclear how the patient-physician communication preferences affects health care utilization and outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00026249).

Identifying protective factors for gender diverse adolescents' mental health

Few studies have disentangled differences in victimization exposures and mental health symptoms among gender diverse subgroups, nor considered the role of potential protective factors in ameliorating the impact of victimization on gender diverse youths' mental health. Here we report findings from a secondary data analysis, in which we address this gap by analyzing cross-sectional survey data (N = 11,264 in the final analytic sample) from a population-based survey of youth in participating school districts in a large Midwestern U.S. county. Relative to cisgender youth with gender conforming expression, transgender youth and cisgender youth with nonconforming gender expression are more likely to experience victimization and severe mental health concerns. Additionally, school-connectedness moderates the association between bias-based harassment and depression for cisgender youth with gender nonconforming expression, and family support/monitoring buffers the association of peer victimization with suicide attempts among transgender youth. Findings highlight the need to better understand factors which may confer protection among gender diverse adolescents, so that in turn appropriate supports across key contexts can be implemented.