Functional pharmacology of cloned heterodimeric GABAB receptors expressed in mammalian cells

Functional characterization of GABAA receptor-mediated modulation of cortical neuron network activity in microelectrode array recordings

The numerous γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA_AR) subtypes are differentially expressed and mediate distinct functions at neuronal level. In this study we have investigated GABA_AR-mediated modulation of the spontaneous activity patterns of primary neuronal networks from murine frontal cortex by characterizing the effects induced by a wide selection of pharmacological tools at a plethora of activity parameters in microelectrode array (MEA) recordings. The basic characteristics of the primary cortical neurons used in the recordings were studied in some detail, and the expression levels of various GABA_AR subunits were investigated by western blotting and RT-qPCR. In the MEA recordings, the pan-GABA_AR agonist muscimol and the GABA_BR agonist baclofen were observed to mediate phenotypically distinct changes in cortical network activity. Selective augmentation of αβγ GABA_AR signaling by diazepam and of δ-containing GABA_AR (δ-GABA_AR) signaling by DS1 produced pronounced changes in the majority of the activity parameters, both drugs mediating similar patterns of activity changes as muscimol. The apparent importance of δ-GABA_AR signaling for network activity was largely corroborated by the effects induced by the functionally selective δ-GABA_AR agonists THIP and Thio-THIP, whereas the δ-GABA_AR selective potentiator DS2 only mediated modest effects on network activity, even when co-applied with low THIP concentrations. Interestingly, diazepam exhibited dramatically right-shifted concentration-response relationships at many of the activity parameters when co-applied with a trace concentration of DS1 compared to when applied alone. In contrast, the potencies and efficacies displayed by DS1 at the networks were not substantially altered by the concomitant presence of diazepam. In conclusion, the holistic nature of the information extractable from the MEA recordings offers interesting insights into the contributions of various GABA_AR subtypes/subgroups to cortical network activity and the putative functional interplay between these receptors in these neurons.

KCTD12 modulation of GABA(B) receptor function

The molecular composition and functional diversity of native GABA_B receptors (GABA_BR) are still poorly understood, thus hindering development of selective GABA_BR ligands. Potassium channel tetramerization domain‐containing protein (KCTD) 12 is a GABA_BR auxiliary subunit and mouse KCTD12 can alter GABA_BR function. In this study, we sought to characterize the effects of human KCTD12 on GABA_BR kinetics and pharmacology, using an automated electrophysiological assay. Seizure susceptibility and ethanol consumption were also investigated in a KCTD12 knockout mouse model. Human KCTD12 co‐expression altered the kinetics of GABA_BR‐mediated GIRK channels, speeding rates of both activation and desensitization. Analysis of concentration‐response curves showed that KCTD12 coexpression did not alter effects of the agonists GABA or baclofen on GABA_BR. KCTD12 coexpression enhanced the potentiating effects of the positive allosteric modulator CGP7930, and its effects on GABA_BR activation and desensitization. The function of KCTD12 in vivo was examined, using the KCTD12 knockout mouse model. The knockout mice were more resistant to a pentylenetetrazole proconvulsant challenge suggesting reduced seizure susceptibility. In the two bottle preference test, KCTD12 knockout mice demonstrated a reduced consumption at high ethanol concentrations. In summary, human KCTD12 accelerated the kinetics of GABA_BR in vitro, in a manner possibly sensitive to allosteric pharmacological modulation. This study also provides novel in vivo evidence that the interaction between KCTD12 and GABA_BR is of physiological significance, and may be a mechanism to more selectively modulate GABA_BR.

Identifying the role of pre-and postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors in behavior

Although many reviews exist characterizing the molecular differences of GABAB receptor isoforms, there is no current review of the in vivo effects of these isoforms. The current review focuses on whether the GABAB1a and GABAB1b isoforms contribute differentially to behaviors in isoform knockout mice. The roles of these receptors have primarily been characterized in cognitive, anxiety, and depressive phenotypes. Currently, the field supports a role of GABAB1a in memory maintenance and protection against an anhedonic phenotype, whereas GABAB1b appears to be involved in memory formation and a susceptibility to developing an anhedonic phenotype. Although GABAB receptors have been strongly implicated in drug abuse phenotypes, no isoform-specific work has been done in this field. Future directions include developing site-specific isoform knockdown to identify the role of different brain regions in behavior, as well as identifying how these isoforms are involved in development of behavioral phenotypes.

Probing α4βδ GABAA receptor heterogeneity: differential regional effects of a functionally selective α4β1δ/α4β3δ receptor agonist on tonic and phasic inhibition in rat brain

In the present study, the orthosteric GABAA receptor (GABAAR) ligand 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisothiazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (Thio-THIP) was found to possess a highly interesting functional profile at recombinant human GABAARs and native rat GABAARs. Whereas Thio-THIP displayed weak antagonist activity at α1,2,5β2,3γ2S and ρ1 GABAARs and partial agonism at α6β2,3δ GABAARs expressed in Xenopus oocytes, the pronounced agonism exhibited by the compound at α4β1δ and α4β3δ GABAARs was contrasted by its negligible activity at the α4β2δ subtype. To elucidate to which extent this in vitro profile translated into functionality at native GABAARs, we assessed the effects of 100 μm Thio-THIP at synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors in principal cells of four different brain regions by slice electrophysiology. In concordance with its α6β2,3δ agonism, Thio-THIP evoked robust currents through extrasynaptic GABAARs in cerebellar granule cells. In contrast, the compound did not elicit significant currents in dentate gyrus granule cells or in striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs), indicating predominant expression of extrasynaptic α4β2δ receptors in these cells. Interestingly, Thio-THIP evoked differential degrees of currents in ventrobasal thalamus neurons, a diversity that could arise from differential expression of extrasynaptic α4βδ subtypes in the cells. Finally, whereas 100 μm Thio-THIP did not affect the synaptic currents in ventrobasal thalamus neurons or striatal MSNs, it reduced the current amplitudes recorded from dentate gyrus granule cells, most likely by targeting perisynaptic α4βδ receptors expressed at distal dendrites of these cells. Being the first published ligand capable of discriminating between β2- and β3-containing receptor subtypes, Thio-THIP could be a valuable tool in explorations of native α4βδ GABAARs.

GABA(B)-agonistic activity of certain baclofen homologues

Baclofen (1) is a potent and selective agonist for bicuculline-insensitive GABA(B) receptors and is used clinically as an antispastic and muscle relaxant agent. In the search for new bioactive chemical entities that bind specifically to GABA(B) receptors, we report here the synthesis of certain baclofen homologues, namely (R,S)-5-amino-3-arylpentanoic acid hydrochlorides (R,S)-1a-h as well as (R,S)-5-amino-3-methylpentanoic acid [(RS)-1i] to be evaluated as GABA(B)R agonists. Compound 1a is an agonist to GABA(B) receptors with an EC₅₀ value of 46 μM on tsA201 cells transfected with GABA(B1b)/GABA(B2)/Gqz5, being the most active congener among all the synthesized compounds.

Ligand-induced rearrangements of the GABA(B) receptor revealed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor (GABA(B)R), one of the family C G-protein-coupled receptor members, exists as a heterodimer comprised of subunits GB1 and GB2. To clarify the ligand-induced activation mechanism of the GABA(B)R, each subunit was fused with either Cerulean or enhanced yellow fluorescent protein at its intracellular loop, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) changes upon agonist application were monitored. As a result, FRET decreases were observed between GB1a loop 2 and GB2 loop 2 and between GB1a loop 2 and GB2 loop 1, suggesting the dissociation of intracellular domains during the receptor activation. Both intersubunit FRET pairs were expected to faithfully capture the activation of the original receptor as their pharmacological properties were highly similar to that of the wild-type receptor. However, the intrasubunit data suggest that the receptor activation does not involve major structural changes within the transmembrane domain of each subunit. By combining the results obtained from two different levels, it was concluded that the GABA(B)R activation by agonist is associated with an asymmetrical intersubunit rearrangement of GB1a and GB2 on the membrane. This type of activation mode, an intersubunit rearrangement without apparent intrahelical structural changes, appears commonly shared by the GABA(B)R and the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1alpha, another family C G-protein-coupled receptor previously studied by our group. Nevertheless, the directions of intracellular domain movements and its asymmetry observed here highlight the qualitative difference between the two receptors.

GABAB receptors: physiological functions and mechanisms of diversity

GABA(B) receptors are the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. GABA(B) receptors are implicated in the etiology of a variety of psychiatric disorders and are considered attractive drug targets. With the cloning of GABA(B) receptor subunits 13 years ago, substantial progress was made in the understanding of the molecular structure, physiology, and pharmacology of these receptors. However, it remained puzzling that native studies demonstrated a heterogeneity of GABA(B) responses that contrasted with a very limited diversity of cloned GABA(B) receptor subunits. Until recently, the only firmly established molecular diversity consisted of two GABA(B1) subunit isoforms, GABA(B1a) and GABA(B1b), which assemble with GABA(B2) subunits to generate heterodimeric GABA(B(1a,2)) and GABA(B(1b,2)) receptors. Using genetic, ultrastructural, biochemical, and electrophysiological approaches, it has been possible to identify functional properties that segregate with these two receptors. Moreover, receptor modifications and factors that can alter the receptor response have been identified. Most importantly, recent data reveal the existence of a family of auxiliary GABA(B) receptor subunits that assemble as tetramers with the C-terminal domain of GABA(B2) subunits and drastically alter pharmacology and kinetics of the receptor response. The data are most consistent with native GABA(B) receptors minimally forming dimeric assemblies of units composed of GABA(B1), GABA(B2), and a tetramer of auxiliary subunits. This represents a substantial departure from current structural concepts for GPCRs.

Molecular basis for amino acid sensing by family C G-protein-coupled receptors

Family C of human G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is constituted by eight metabotropic glutamate receptors, two gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B1-2)) subunits forming the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor, the calcium-sensing receptor, three taste1 receptors (T1R1-3), a promiscuous L-alpha;-amino acid receptor G-protein-coupled receptor family C, group 6, subtype A (GPRC6A) and seven orphan receptors. Aside from the orphan receptors, the family C GPCRs are dimeric receptors characterized by a large extracellular Venus flytrap domain which bind the endogenous agonists. Except from the GABA(B1-2) and T1R2-3 receptor, all receptors are either activated or positively modulated by amino acids. In this review, we outline mutational, biophysical and structural studies which have elucidated the interaction of the amino acids with the Venus flytrap domains, molecular mechanisms of receptor selectivity and the initial steps in receptor activation.

FLIPR assays of intracellular calcium in GPCR drug discovery

Fluorescent dyes sensitive to changes in intracellular calcium have become increasingly popular in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) drug discovery for several reasons. First of all, the assays using the dyes are easy to perform and are of low cost compared to other assays. Second, most non-Galpha(q)-coupled GPCRs can be tweaked to modulate intracellular calcium by co-transfection with promiscuous or chimeric/mutated G proteins making the calcium assays broadly applicable in GPCR research. Third, the price of instruments capable of measuring fluorescent-based calcium indicators has become significantly less making them obtainable even for academic groups. Here, we present a protocol for measuring changes in intracellular calcium levels in living mammalian cells based on the fluorescent calcium binding dye, fluo-4.

Influence of positive allosteric modulators on GABA(B) receptor coupling in rat brain: a scintillation proximity assay characterisation of G protein subtypes

Little is known concerning coupling of cerebral GABA(B) receptors to G protein subtypes, and the influence of positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) has not been evaluated. These questions were addressed by an antibody-capture/scintillation proximity assay strategy. GABA concentration-dependently enhanced the magnitude of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galphao and, less markedly, Galphai(1/3) in cortex, whereas Gq and Gs/olf were unaffected. (R)-baclofen and SKF97581 likewise activated Galphao and Galphai(1/3), expressing their actions more potently than GABA. Similar findings were acquired in hippocampus and cerebellum, and the GABA(B) antagonist, CGP55845A, abolished agonist-induced activation of Galphao and Galphai(1/3) in all structures. The PAMs, GS39783, CGP7930 and CGP13501, inactive alone, enhanced efficacy and potency of agonist-induced [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galphao in all regions, actions abolished by CGP55845A. In contrast, they did not modify efficacies at Galphai(1/3). Similarly, in human embryonic kidney cells expressing GABA(B(1a+2)) or GABA(B(1b+2)) receptors, allosteric modulators did not detectably enhance efficacy of GABA at Galphai(1/3), though they increased its potency. To summarise, GABA(B) receptors coupled both to Galphao and to Galphai, but not Gq and Gs/olf, in rat brain. PAMs more markedly enhanced efficacy of coupling to Go versus Gi(1/3). It will be of interest to confirm these observations employing complementary techniques and to evaluate their potential therapeutic significance.

Reduced GABAB receptor subunit expression and paired-pulse depression in a genetic model of absence seizures

Neocortical networks play a major role in the genesis of generalized spike-and-wave (SW) discharges associated with absence seizures in humans and in animal models, including genetically predisposed WAG/Rij rats. Here, we tested the hypothesis that alterations in GABA(B) receptors contribute to neocortical hyperexcitability in these animals. By using Real-Time PCR we found that mRNA levels for most GABA(B(1)) subunits are diminished in epileptic WAG/Rij neocortex as compared with age-matched non-epileptic controls (NEC), whereas GABA(B(2)) mRNA is unchanged. Next, we investigated the cellular distribution of GABA(B(1)) and GABA(B(2)) subunits by confocal microscopy and discovered that GABA(B(1)) subunits fail to localize in the distal dendrites of WAG/Rij neocortical pyramidal cells. Intracellular recordings from neocortical cells in an in vitro slice preparation demonstrated reduced paired-pulse depression of pharmacologically isolated excitatory and inhibitory responses in epileptic WAG/Rij rats as compared with NECs; moreover, paired-pulse depression in NEC slices was diminished by a GABA(B) receptor antagonist to a greater extent than in WAG/Rij rats further suggesting GABA(B) receptor dysfunction. In conclusion, our data identify changes in GABA(B) receptor subunit expression and distribution along with decreased paired-pulse depression in epileptic WAG/Rij rat neocortex. We propose that these alterations may contribute to neocortical hyperexcitability and thus to SW generation in absence epilepsy.

GABAB1 receptor subunit isoforms exert a differential influence on baseline but not GABAB receptor agonist-induced changes in mice

GABA(B) receptor agonists produce hypothermia and motor incoordination. Two GABA(B(1)) receptor subunit isoforms exist, but because of lack of specific molecular or pharmacological tools, the relevance of these isoforms in controlling basal body temperature, locomotor activity, or in vivo responses to GABA(B) receptor agonists has been unknown. Here, we used mice deficient in the GABA(B(1a)) and GABA(B(1b)) subunit isoforms to examine the influence of these isoforms on both baseline motor behavior and body temperature and on the motor-incoordinating and hypothermic responses to the GABA(B) receptor agonists l-baclofen and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB). GABA(B(1b))(-/-) mice were hyperactive in a novel environment and showed slower habituation than either GABA(B(1a))(-/-) or wild-type mice. GABA(B(1b))(-/-) mice were hyperactive throughout the circadian dark phase. Hypothermia in response to l-baclofen (6 and 12 mg/kg) or GHB (1 g/kg), baclofen-induced ataxia as determined on the fixed-speed Rotarod, and GHB-induced hypolocomotion were significantly, but for the most part similarly, attenuated in both GABA(B(1a))(-/-) and GABA(B(1b))(-/-) mice. We conclude that l-baclofen and GHB are nonselective for either GABA(B(1)) receptor isoform in terms of in vivo responses. However, GABA(B(1)) receptor isoforms have distinct and different roles in mediating locomotor behavioral responses to a novel environment. Therefore, GABA(B(1a)) and GABA(B(1b)) isoforms are functionally relevant molecular variants of the GABA(B(1)) receptor subunit, which are differentially involved in specific neurophysiological processes and behaviors.

GABAB receptor isoforms caught in action at the scene

The metabotropic GABAB receptors mediate slow synaptic inhibition and consist of heterodimers of GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits. The only known molecular diversity of the GABAB receptors arises from the two GABAB1 isoforms, but its functional significance has been unclear. Two studies in this issue of Neuron now demonstrate that GABAB1a and GABAB1b show strategically distinct subcellular localization and physiological action.

Characterization of the binding of [3H]CGP54626 to GABAB receptors in the male bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana)

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the vertebrate brain. GABA activates both ionotropic (GABA(A)) and metabotropic (GABA(B)) receptors in mammals. Whether non-mammalian vertebrates possess receptors with similar characteristics is not well understood. We used a mammalian GABA(B)-specific antagonist to determine the pharmacology of putative receptors in the brain of an anuran amphibian, the male bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). Receptor binding assays with the antagonist [(3)H]CGP54626 revealed a single class of high affinity binding sites (with a K(D) of 2.97 nM and a B(max) of 2619 fmol/mg protein). Binding was time- and temperature-dependent, saturable and specific. Specific binding of [(3)H]CGP54626 was inhibited by several mammalian GABA(B) receptor agonists and antagonists. The rank order potency of agonists was: GABA = SKF97541 > (R)-Baclofen > 3-APPA. The rank order for antagonists was: CGP54626 = CGP55845 > CGP52432 > CGP35348. The GABA(A) receptor ligands muscimol and SR95531 had very low affinity for [(3)H]CGP54626 binding sites, while bicuculline compounds had no affinity. Binding of GABA was positively modulated by CGP7930. Taurine did not allosterically modulate GABA binding but did inhibit [(3)H]CGP54626 binding in a linear fashion. Bullfrog brain thus possesses binding sites with significant similarity to mammalian GABA(B) receptors. These receptors differ from mammalian receptors, however, in dissociation kinetics, ligand specificity and allosteric modulation.

GABAB-receptor-mediated suppression of sympathetic outflow from the spinal cord of neonatal rats

Using a splanchnic nerve-spinal cord preparation in vitro that could spontaneously generate sympathetic nerve discharge (SND), we investigated the roles of intraspinal GABAB receptors in the regulation of SND. Despite an age-dependent difference in sensitivity, bath applications of baclofen (Bac; GABAB-receptor agonist) consistently reduced SND in a concentration-dependent manner. The drug specificity of Bac in activation of GABAB receptors was verified by application of its antagonist saclofen (Sac) or CGP-46381 (CGP). Sac or CGP alone did not change SND. However, in the presence of Sac or CGP, the effects of Bac on SND inhibition were reversibly attenuated. The splanchnic sympathetic preganglionic neuron (SPN) was recorded by blind whole cell, patch-clamp techniques. We examined Bac effects on electrical membrane properties of SPNs. Applications of Bac reduced excitatory synaptic events, induced membrane hyperpolarizations, and inhibited SPN firing. In the presence of 12 mM Mg2+ or 0.5 μM TTX to block Ca2+- or action potential-dependent synaptic transmissions, applications of Bac induced an outward baseline current that reversed at −29 ± 6 mV. Because the K+ equilibrium potential in our experimental conditions was −100 mV, the Bac-induced currents could not simply be attributed to an alteration of K+ conductance. On the other hand, applications of Bac to Cs+-loaded SPNs reduced Cd2+-sensitive and high-voltage-activated inward currents, indicating an inhibition of voltage-gated Ca2+ currents. Our results suggest that the activation of intraspinal GABAB receptors suppresses SND via a mixture of ion events that may link to a change in Ca2+ conductance.

Molecular structure and physiological functions of GABA(B) receptors

GABA(B) receptors are broadly expressed in the nervous system and have been implicated in a wide variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. The cloning of the first GABA(B) receptor cDNAs in 1997 revived interest in these receptors and their potential as therapeutic targets. With the availability of molecular tools, rapid progress was made in our understanding of the GABA(B) system. This led to the surprising discovery that GABA(B) receptors need to assemble from distinct subunits to function and provided exciting new insights into the structure of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in general. As a consequence of this discovery, it is now widely accepted that GPCRs can exist as heterodimers. The cloning of GABA(B) receptors allowed some important questions in the field to be answered. It is now clear that molecular studies do not support the existence of pharmacologically distinct GABA(B) receptors, as predicted by work on native receptors. Advances were also made in clarifying the relationship between GABA(B) receptors and the receptors for gamma-hydroxybutyrate, an emerging drug of abuse. There are now the first indications linking GABA(B) receptor polymorphisms to epilepsy. Significantly, the cloning of GABA(B) receptors enabled identification of the first allosteric GABA(B) receptor compounds, which is expected to broaden the spectrum of therapeutic applications. Here we review current concepts on the molecular composition and function of GABA(B) receptors and discuss ongoing drug-discovery efforts.

Bi-directional effects of GABA(B) receptor agonists on the mesolimbic dopamine system

The rewarding effect of drugs of abuse is mediated by activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system, which is inhibited by putative anti-craving compounds. Interestingly, different GABA(B) receptor agonists can exert similarly opposing effects on the reward pathway, but the cellular mechanisms involved are unknown. Here we found that the coupling efficacy (EC(50)) of G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK, Kir3) channels to GABA(B) receptor was much lower in dopamine neurons than in GABA neurons of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), depending on the differential expression of GIRK subunits. Consequently, in rodent VTA slices, a low concentration of the canonical agonist baclofen caused increased activity, whereas higher doses eventually inhibited dopamine neurons. At behaviorally relevant dosages, baclofen activated GIRK channels in both cell types, but the drug of abuse gamma-hydroxy-butyric acid (GHB) activated GIRK channels only in GABAergic neurons. Thus GABA(B) receptor agonists exert parallel cellular and behavioral effects due to the cell-specific expression of GIRK subunits.

Pharmacological characterisation of a cell line expressing GABA B1b and GABA B2 receptor subunits

The gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(B)) receptor has been shown to be a heterodimer consisting of two receptor subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). We have stably co-expressed these two subunits in a CHO cell line, characterised its pharmacology and compared it to the native receptor in rat brain membranes. Radioligand binding using [3H]CGP54626A demonstrated a similar rank order of potency between recombinant and native receptors: CGP62349>CGP54626A>SCH 50911>3-aminopropylphosphinicacid(3-APPA)>GABA>baclofen>saclofen>phaclofen. However, differences were observed in the affinity of agonists, which were higher at the native receptor, suggesting that in the recombinant system a large number of the receptors were in the low agonist affinity state. In contrast, [35S]GTPgammaS binding studies did not show any differences between recombinant and native receptors with the full agonists GABA and 3-APPA. Measurement of cAMP accumulation in the cells revealed a degree of endogenous coupling of the receptors to G-proteins. This is most likely to be due to the high expression levels of receptors (B(max)=22.5+/-2.5pmol/mg protein) in this experimental system. There was no evidence of GABA(B2) receptors, when expressed alone, binding [3H]CGP54626A, [3H]GABA, [3H]3-APPA nor of GABA having any effect on basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding or cAMP levels.

The anticonvulsant gabapentin (neurontin) does not act through gamma-aminobutyric acid-B receptors

The actions of the anticonvulsant gabapentin [1-(aminomethyl)cyclohexaneacetic acid, Neurontin] have been somewhat enigmatic until recently, when it was claimed to be a gamma-aminobutyric acid-B (GABA(B)) receptor agonist acting exclusively at a heterodimeric complex containing the GABA(B(1a)) splice variant (Mol Pharmacol 2001;59:144-152). In this study, we have investigated the effects of gabapentin on recombinant GABA(B(1a)) and GABA(B(1b)) receptors coexpressed with GABA(B(2)) in five different functional recombinant assays, its ability to inhibit [(3)H]GABA binding in a GABA(B) receptor-selective binding assay using rat synaptic membranes, and its ability to inhibit transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations in Labrador retriever dogs. Up to a concentration of 1 mM, gabapentin displayed no agonistic effects on either the GABA(B(1a,2)) or the GABA(B(1b,2)) heterodimer, when these were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes or mammalian cells and assayed by means of electrophysiology, calcium mobilization, inositol phosphate, and fluorometry assays. Gabapentin did not displace [(3)H]GABA from GABA(B) receptor sites in rat synaptic membranes. Finally, in contrast to the classic GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen, gabapentin was unable to inhibit transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations in dogs. Because of high levels of GABA(B(1a)) in the canine nodose ganglion, this finding indirectly supports the inactivity of gabapentin on the GABA(B(1a,2)) heterodimer demonstrated in various in vitro assays. In light of these results, we find it highly questionable that gabapentin is a GABA(B) receptor agonist. Hence, the anticonvulsive effects of the compound have to arise from GABA(B) receptor-independent mechanisms. This also implies that the first GABA(B) receptor splice variant-selective ligand remains to be discovered.

Effect of MPTP-induced denervation on basal ganglia GABA(B) receptors: correlation with dopamine concentrations and dopamine transporter

We investigated the effect of MPTP-induced lesion of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) dopaminergic neurons on GABA(B) receptors in the basal ganglia of mice and monkeys using receptor autoradiography and in situ hybridization. The extent of the lesion was measured with striatal catecholamine content, striatal binding of (125)I-RTI-121 to dopamine transporter (DAT), and DAT expression in the SNpc. GABA(B) receptors in mice brain were evaluated using (3)H-CGP54626 and its expression was measured with oligonucleotides probes targeting the mRNAs of GABA(B(1a+b)), GABA(B(1a)), GABA(B(1b)), GABA(B(2)) subunits. In monkeys, (125)I-CGP64213 and selective probes for GABA(B(1a+b)) and GABA(B(2)) mRNAs were used. In mice, dopamine content, (125)I-RTI-121 binding, and DAT expression were reduced by 44%, 40%, and 39% after a dose of 40 mg/kg of MPTP and 74%, 70%, and 34% after 120 mg/kg of MPTP, respectively. In monkeys, dopamine content and DAT expression were decreased by more than 90% and 80%, respectively. In the striatum and the subthalamic nucleus, GABA(B) receptors were unchanged following MPTP in both species. In the SNpc of mice, MPTP (120 mg/kg) induced a significant decrease of (3)H-CGP54626 binding (-10%) and of the expression of GABA(B(1a+b)) mRNA (-13%). The decrease of the expression of GABA(B(1a+b)) mRNA was correlated with dopamine content, (125)I-RTI-121 binding and DAT expression. In MPTP-treated monkeys, (125)I-CGP64213 binding (-40%), GABA(B(1a+b)) mRNA (-69%) and GABA(B(2)) mRNA (-66%) were also significantly decreased in the SNpc. Our results suggest that MPTP-induced denervation is associated with a decrease of GABA(B) receptors restricted to the SNpc. These observations may be relevant to the pathophysiology of motor disorders involving dysfunction of the basal ganglia such as Parkinson disease.

Advances in the molecular understanding of GABA(B) receptors

The molecular nature of the metabotropic GABA(B) receptor was for some time a mystery, however it was recently discovered that two related G-protein-coupled receptors have to heterodimerize to form the functional GABA(B) receptor at the cell surface. This review discusses the most recent findings in the rapidly expanding field of GABA(B) receptor research, and includes a summary of all splice variants of both receptor subunits identified to date. It also evaluates emerging evidence that certain splice variants might play a role in determining pharmacologically distinguishable receptors, and reviews receptor localization at the sub-cellular level and involvement in neuronal development.

Pharmacological characterization of homobaclofen on wild type and mutant GABA(B)1b receptors coexpressed with the GABA(B)2 receptor

Homobaclofen (5-amino-3-(4-chlorophenyl) pentanoic acid) is a homologue of the classical GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen. In a recent study, the two enantiomers of this compound were tested in a GABA(B) receptor selective [3H]gamma-aminobutyric acid ([3H]GABA) binding assay using rat brain homogenate and in an assay of electrically induced contractions of guinea pig ileum. The results from the two tissues did, however, not correlate very well, and in order to further investigate these discrepancies, we have pharmacologically characterized these enantiomers on recombinant wild type and mutant rat GABA(B)1b receptors coexpressed with rat GABA(B)2 receptors. The results from this study correlate nicely with the binding data from rat brain. (R)-Homobaclofen was shown to act like (R)-baclofen albeit with 20-fold less potency, and (S)-homobaclofen was inactive on the receptor. The discrepancies between the data obtained in this study and those from the guinea pig ileum model could be ascribed to differences in amino acid sequence or receptor splicing of GABA(B) receptors between the two species. Another explanation for the observation is the possible existence of a novel yet uncloned GABA(B) receptor in guinea pig ileum.

Cloning and functional expression of GABA(B) receptors from Drosophila

The neurotransmitter GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) functions as the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system of vertebrates and invertebrates. In vertebrates GABA signals both through ionotropic receptors (GABA(A), GABA(C)), which induce fast synaptic inhibitory responses, and through metabotropic receptors (GABA(B)), which play a fundamental role in the reduction of presynaptic transmitter release and postsynaptic inhibitory potentials. Whilst GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors have been cloned from vertebrates as well as invertebrates, GABA(B) receptors have only been identified in vertebrate species to date, although indirect evidence suggests their existence in arthropods, too. Here we report the cloning of three putative invertebrate GABA(B) receptor subtypes (D-GABA(B)R1, R2 and R3) isolated from Drosophila melanogaster. Whilst D-GABA(B)R1 and R2 show high sequence identity to mammalian GABA(B)R1 and R2, respectively, the receptor D-GABA(B)R3 seems to be an insect-specific subtype with no known mammalian counterpart so far. All three D-GABA(B)R subtypes are expressed in the embryonic central nervous system. In situ hybridization of Drosophila melanogaster embryos shows that two of the D-GABA(B)Rs (D-GABA(B)R1 and R2) are expressed in similar regions, suggesting a coexpression of the two receptors, whilst the third D-GABA(B)R (D-GABA(B)R3) displays a unique expression pattern. In agreement with these results we have only been able to functionally characterize D-GABA(B)R1 and R2 when the two subtypes are coexpressed either in Xenopus laevis oocytes or mammalian cell lines, whilst D-GABA(B)R3 was inactive in any combination. The pharmacology of the coexpressed D-GABA(B)R1/2 receptor was different from the mammalian GABA(B)Rs: e.g. baclofen, an agonist of mammalian GABA(B)Rs, showed no effect.

Characterization of [(3)H]-CGP54626A binding to heterodimeric GABA(B) receptors stably expressed in mammalian cells

Functional human GABA(B(1a,2)) and GABA(B(1b,2)) receptors have been stably expressed in mammalian CHO K1 cells. Detailed characterization of GABA(B) ligand binding at each of the receptors has been compared using [(3)H]-CGP54626A. In cell membranes fractions, [(3)H]-CGP54626A bound to a single site with a K(D) of 1. 51+/-1.12 nM, B(max) of 2.02+/-0.17 pmoles mg protein(-1) and 0. 86+/-0.20 nM, B(max) of 5.19+/-0.57 pmoles mg protein(-1) for GABA(B(1a,2)) and GABA(B(1b,2)) respectively. In competition binding assays the rank order was identical for both GABA(B) receptors. For known GABA(B) agonists the rank order was CGP27492>SKF97541=CGP46381>GABA>Baclofen and for GABA(B) antagonists the rank order was CGP54262A>CGP55845>CGP52432>SCH 50911>CGP51176>CGP36742=CGP35348 > or =2-OH Saclofen > or =ABPA. The allosteric effect of calcium cations was also investigated. The effect of removal of CaCl(2) from the binding assay conditions was ligand dependent to either cause a decrease in ligand affinity or to have no significant effect. However, these effects were similar for both GABA(B) receptors. A whole cell, scintillation proximity binding assay was used to determine agonist affinity at exclusively heterodimeric GABA(B) receptors. In competition assays, the rank order was the same for both GABA(B(1a,2)) and GABA(B(1b,2)) and consistent with that seen with cell membrane fractions. These data suggest that, in terms of ligand binding, the currently identified isoforms of the GABA(B) receptor are pharmacologically indistinguishable.