Hyperpolarization-induced dilatation of submucosal arterioles in the guinea-pig ileum

Endothelium-dependent smooth muscle hyperpolarization: do gap junctions provide a unifying hypothesis?

An endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) that is distinct from nitric oxide (NO) and prostanoids has been widely hypothesized to hyperpolarize and relax vascular smooth muscle following stimulation of the endothelium by agonists. Candidates as diverse as K(+) ions, eicosanoids, hydrogen peroxide and C-type natriuretic peptide have been implicated as the putative mediator, but none has emerged as a 'universal EDHF'. An alternative explanation for the EDHF phenomenon is that direct intercellular communication via gap junctions allows passive spread of agonist-induced endothelial hyperpolarization through the vessel wall. In some arteries, eicosanoids and K(+) ions may themselves initiate a conducted endothelial hyperpolarization, thus suggesting that electrotonic signalling may represent a general mechanism through which the endothelium participates in the regulation of vascular tone.

Electrical coupling and release of K+ from endothelial cells co-mediate ACh-induced smooth muscle hyperpolarization in guinea-pig inner ear artery

The physiological basis of ACh-elicited hyperpolarization in guinea-pig in vitro cochlear spiral modiolar artery (SMA) was investigated by intracellular recording combined with dye labelling of recorded cells and immunocytochemistry. We found the following. (1) The ACh-hyperpolarization was prominent only in cells that had a low resting potential (less negative than -60 mV). ACh-hyperpolarization was reversibly blocked by 4-DAMP, charybdotoxin or BAPTA-AM, but not by N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, glipizide, indomethacin or 17-octadecynoic acid. (2) Ba(2)(+) (100 microm) and ouabain (1 microm) each attenuated ACh-hyperpolarization by approximately 30% in smooth muscle cells (SMCs) but had only slight or no inhibition in endothelial cells (ECs). A combination of Ba(2)(+) and 18beta-glycyrrhetinic acid near completely blocked the ACh-hyperpolarization in SMCs. (3) High K(+) (10 mm) induced a smaller hyperpolarization in ECs than in SMCs, with an amplitude ratio of 0.49 : 1. Ba(2)(+) blocked the K(+)-induced hyperpolarization by approximately 85% in both cell types, whereas ouabain inhibited K(+)-hyperpolarization differently in SMCs (19%) and ECs (35%) and increased input resistance. 18beta-Glycyrrhetinic acid blocked the high K(+)-hyperpolarization in ECs only. (4) Weak myoendothelial dye coupling was detected by confocal microscopy in cells recorded with a propidium iodide-containing electrode for longer than 30 min. A sparse plexus of choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive (ChAT) fibres was observed around the SMA and its up-stream arteries. (5) Evoked excitatory junction potentials (EJP) were partially blocked by 4-DAMP in half of the cells tested. We conclude that ACh-induced hyperpolarization originates from ECs via activation of Ca(2)(+)-activated potassium channels, and is independent of the release of NO, cyclo-oxygenase or cytochrome P450 products. ACh-induced hyperpolarization in smooth muscle cells involves two mechanisms: (a) electrical spread of the hyperpolarization from the endothelium, and (b) activation of inward rectifier K(+) channels (K(ir)) and Na(+)-K(+) pump current by elevated interstitial K(+) released from the endothelial cells, these being responsible for about 60% and 40% of the hyperpolarization, respectively. The role ratio of K(ir) and pump current activation is at 8 : 1 or less.

Spreading vasodilatation in resistance arteries

Focal application of vasodilators such as acetylcholine (ACh), which evoke arterial hyperpolarization, cause coordinated dilatation along the length of an artery with minimal decay with distance from the site of application. This phenomenon is called spreading vasodilatation. In an artery wall, the endothelium is separated from the surrounding smooth muscle cell layers by an internal elastic lamina (IEL). Adjacent endothelial cells are strongly connected via gap junctions, which can allow direct communication between the cells, including the passage of small molecules and electrical current. Direct communication between an endothelial cell and a smooth muscle cell, through a hole in the IEL, has recently been observed in arteries. Spreading vasodilatation is associated with a spread of hyperpolarization which may be a key mechanism responsible for this spreading arterial vasodilatation. Endothelial cells appear to play an important role in such spread, even though the facilitating mechanisms underlying this spread are as yet unclear. These spreading responses are likely to have an important physiological role in the coordination of blood flow within a vascular network.

Effects of insulin on the acetylcholine-induced hyperpolarization in the guinea pig mesenteric arterioles

BACKGROUND

Insulin induces endothelium-dependent vasodilatation, which may be casually related to the insulin resistance and hypertension. Endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) is the most important mechanism of insulin-induced vasodilatation, and a possible contribution of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) is also considered. Attempts were made to observe the effects of insulin on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced hyperpolarization in the submucosal arteriole of the guinea pig ileum, the objective being to investigate possible involvement of EDHF in the actions of insulin.

METHODS

Conventional microelectrode techniques were applied to measure the membrane potential of smooth muscle cells in the submucosal arteriole. EDHF-induced hyperpolarization was elicited by ACh in the presence of both N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) (100 microM) and diclofenac (1 microM).

RESULTS

The resting membrane potential was -70.9 mV, and Ba(2+) (0.5 mM) depolarized the membrane to -33.0 mV. Insulin (10 microU/ml to 100 mU/ml) did not change the membrane potential in the absence or presence of Ba(2+). In the presence of Ba(2+), ACh (3 microM) hyperpolarized the membrane with two components, an initial large hyperpolarization followed by a slow and small one. Low concentration of insulin (100 microU/ml) did not alter the ACh-induced hyperpolarization. High concentration of insulin (100 mU/ml) shortened the time required to reach the peak amplitude and tended to increase the peak amplitude of the ACh-induced hyperpolarization.

CONCLUSIONS

The data show that insulin enhances the ACh-induced hyperpolarization in the submucosal arterioles of the guinea pig ileum. The results suggested that EDHF also accounts for one of the endothelial factors involved in the insulin-induced vasodilatation.

Junctional and nonjunctional effects of heptanol and glycyrrhetinic acid derivates in rat mesenteric small arteries

1 Heptanol, 18alpha-glycyrrhetinic acid (18alphaGA) and 18beta-glycyrrhetinic acid (18betaGA) are known blockers of gap junctions, and are often used in vascular studies. However, actions unrelated to gap junction block have been repeatedly suggested in the literature for these compounds. We report here the findings from a comprehensive study of these compounds in the arterial wall. 2 Rat isolated mesenteric small arteries were studied with respect to isometric tension (myography), [Ca2+]i (Ca(2+)-sensitive dyes), membrane potential and--as a measure of intercellular coupling--input resistance (sharp intracellular glass electrodes). Also, membrane currents (patch-clamp) were measured in isolated smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Confocal imaging was used for visualisation of [Ca2+]i events in single SMCs in the arterial wall. 3 Heptanol (150 microm) activated potassium currents, hyperpolarised the membrane, inhibited the Ca2+ current, and reduced [Ca2+]i and tension, but had little effect on input resistance. Only at concentrations above 200 microm did heptanol elevate input resistance, desynchronise SMCs and abolish vasomotion. 4 18betaGA (30 microm) not only increased input resistance and desynchronised SMCs but also had nonjunctional effects on membrane currents. 18alphaGA (100 microm) had no significant effects on tension, [Ca2+]i, total membrane current and synchronisation in vascular smooth muscle. 5 We conclude that in mesenteric small arteries, heptanol and 18betaGA have important nonjunctional effects at concentrations where they have little or no effect on intercellular communication. Thus, the effects of heptanol and 18betaGA on vascular function cannot be interpreted as being caused only by effects on gap junctions. 18alphaGA apparently does not block communication between SMCs in these arteries, although an effect on myoendothelial gap junctions cannot be excluded.

2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB) is a reliable blocker of store-operated Ca2+ entry but an inconsistent inhibitor of InsP3-induced Ca2+ release

Since its introduction to Ca2+ signaling in 1997, 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB) has been used in many studies to probe for the involvement of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors in the generation of Ca2+ signals. Due to reports of some nonspecific actions of 2-APB, and the fact that its principal antagonistic effect is on Ca2+ entry rather than Ca2+ release, this compound may not have the utility first suggested. However, 2-APB has thrown up some interesting results, particularly with respect to store-operated Ca2+ entry in nonexcitable cells. These data indicate that although it must be used with caution, 2-APB can be useful in probing certain aspects of Ca2+ signaling.

Myoendothelial electrical coupling in arteries and arterioles and its implications for endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor

1. Considerable progress has been made over the past decade in evaluating the presence of electrical coupling between the endothelial and smooth muscle layers of blood vessels, prompted, in part, by ultrastructural evidence for the presence of myoendothelial junctions. 2. In a variety of vessels ranging in size from conduit arteries down to small arterioles, action potentials have been recorded from endothelial cells that were associated with constriction of the vessels and/or occurred in synchrony with and were indistinguishable from action potentials recorded from the smooth muscle. From these results, it is now firmly established that myoendothelial electrical coupling occurs in at least some blood vessels. 3. Spread of hyperpolarizing current from the endothelium to the smooth muscle is the most likely explanation of the smooth muscle hyperpolarization attributed to endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor. Because this hyperpolarization can evoke considerable relaxation of the smooth muscle, myoendothelial electrical coupling has important implications for endothelial regulation of the contractile activity of blood vessels.

Involvement of myoendothelial gap junctions in the actions of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor

The nature of the vasodilator endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) is controversial, putatively involving diffusible factors and/or electrotonic spread of hyperpolarization generated in the endothelium via myoendothelial gap junctions (MEGJs). In this study, we investigated the relationship between the existence of MEGJs, endothelial cell (EC) hyperpolarization, and EDHF-attributed smooth muscle cell (SMC) hyperpolarization in two different arteries: the rat mesenteric artery, where EDHF-mediated vasodilation is prominent, and the femoral artery, where there is no EDHF-dependent relaxation. In the rat mesenteric artery, stimulation of the endothelium with acetylcholine (ACh) evoked hyperpolarization of both ECs and SMCs, and characteristic pentalaminar MEGJs were found connecting the two cell layers. In contrast, in the femoral artery, ACh evoked hyperpolarization in only ECs but not in SMCs, and no MEGJs were present. Selective hyperpolarization of ECs or SMCs evoked hyperpolarization in the other cell type in the mesenteric artery but not in the femoral artery. Disruption of gap junctional coupling using the peptide Gap 27 markedly reduced the ACh-induced hyperpolarization in SMCs, but not in ECs, of the mesenteric artery. These results show that transfer of EC hyperpolarization or of a small molecule to SMCs through MEGJs is essential and sufficient to explain EDHF.

Glycyrrhetinic derivatives inhibit hyperpolarization in endothelial cells of guinea pig and rat arteries

Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) derivatives have been used to implicate gap junctions in vasorelaxation attributed to endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). The aim of this study was to assess whether GA compounds affect endothelial cell hyperpolarization. Membrane potentials were recorded from dye-identified endothelial and smooth muscle cells of guinea pig coronary and rat mesenteric arteries. GA derivatives had varied effects on the resting membrane potential: depolarization, hyperpolarization, or no effect, depending on the artery. 18alpha-GA (50 microM) had a small variable effect on ACh-induced hyperpolarizations in endothelial cells. 18beta-GA (30 microM) and carbenoxolone (100 microM) significantly reduced ACh-induced hyperpolarizations in both endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Smooth muscle action potentials in rat tail arteries were smaller and slower in the presence of 18beta-GA. Nerve-induced excitatory junction potentials were inhibited by 18beta-GA and carbenoxolone, whereas the time course of their decay initially increased and then decreased. In conclusion, the GA compounds had a range of effects. Their inhibition of the EDHF hyperpolarization and relaxation in the smooth muscle may stem from the inhibition of endothelial cell hyperpolarization.

Endothelial factors involved in the bradykinin-induced relaxation of the guinea-pig aorta

Endothelial factors involved in the bradykinin (BK)-induced relaxation of the guinea-pig aorta were investigated using isolated aortic rings. In intact aortic rings, higher concentrations of BK (> or = 10(-7) M) produced contraction, possibly as a direct action on smooth muscle. This BK-induced contraction was enhanced either by Nw-nitro-L-arginine (NOLA), an inhibitor of the production of nitric oxide or by indomethacin (IND), an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase, but not by carbenoxolone (CX), a known inhibitor of gap junctions. In aortic rings contracted with noradrenaline, BK elicited a relaxation with two components; an initial fast relaxation followed by a gradually diminishing slow relaxation, both in an endothelium-dependent manner. The BK-induced relaxation was inhibited in a drug specific manner by either NOLA, IND or CX. NOLA either abolished the fast relaxation, or sometimes converted it into a contractile response. IND reduced the amplitude and duration of the relaxation, by inhibiting the fast relaxation and abolishing the following slow relaxation. CX reduced both components of the relaxation. In the presence of both NOLA and CX, the BK-induced relaxation was converted to a contractile response followed by an IND-sensitive slow relaxation. In the presence of NOLA and IND together, BK stimulation caused a contraction with no following relaxation. These results indicate that in aortic rings of the guinea-pig, BK stimulates endothelial cells to release nitric oxide and prostanoids that produce the fast and slow components of the relaxation respectively. The effects of CX suggest that the contribution of EDHF to the BK-induced relaxation is weak.