Efficacy of donor vaccination before hematopoietic cell transplantation and recipient vaccination both before and early after transplantation

Adoptive transfer of donor B lymphocytes: a phase 1/2a study for patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

ABSTRACT

Immune reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is slow and patients carry a high and prolonged risk of opportunistic infections. We hypothesized that the adoptive transfer of donor B cells can foster after HSCT immuno-reconstitution. Here, we report, to our knowledge, the results of a first-in-human phase 1/2a study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of adoptively transferred donor B cells and to test their activity upon recall vaccination. Good manufactoring practice (GMP) B-cell products were generated from donor apheresis products using 2-step magnetic cell separation. Fifteen patients who had undergone allo-HSCT were enrolled and treated after taper of immunosuppression (median, day +148; range, 130-160). Patients received 4 different doses of B cells (0.5 × 106 to 4.0 × 106 B cells per kg body weight). To test the activity of infused donor memory B cells in vivo, patients were vaccinated with a pentavalent vaccine 7 days after B-cell transfer. We observed the mobilization of plasmablasts and an increase in serum titers against vaccine antigens, with a stronger response in patients receiving higher B-cell numbers. Analysis of immunoglobulin VH-sequences by next-generation sequencing revealed that plasmablasts responding to vaccination originated from memory B-cell clones from the donor. Donor B-cell transfer was safe, as no Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation was observed, and only low-grade graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 4 out of 15 patients. This pilot trial may pave the way for further studies exploring the adoptive transfer of memory B cells to reduce the frequency of infections after allo-HSCT. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov as #NCT02007811.

COVID-19 after hematopoietic cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy

More than 3 years have passed since Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a global pandemic, yet COVID-19 still severely impacts immunocompromised individuals including those treated with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapies who remain at high risk for severe COVID-19 and mortality. Despite vaccination efforts, these patients have inadequate responses due to immunosuppression, which underscores the need for additional preventive approaches. The optimal timing, schedule of vaccination, and immunological correlates for protective immunity remain unknown. Antiviral therapies used early during disease can reduce mortality and severity due to COVID-19. The combination or sequential use of antivirals could be beneficial to control replication and prevent the development of treatment-related mutations in protracted COVID-19. Despite conflicting data, COVID-19 convalescent plasma remains an option in immunocompromised patients with mild-to-moderate disease to prevent progression. Protracted COVID-19 has been increasingly recognized among these patients and has been implicated in intra-host emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Finally, novel SARS-CoV2-specific T-cells and natural killer cell-boosting (or -containing) products may be active against multiple variants and are promising therapies in immunocompromised patients.

Impact of Donor and Recipient SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination or Infection on Immunity after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The role of donor and recipient Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunologic status pre-transplantation has not been fully investigated in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Given the poor immunogenicity to vaccines in this population and the serious outcomes of COVID-19, adoptive transfer of immunity may offer important insight into improving protection for this vulnerable population. In this study, we evaluated the role of adoptive transfer of immunity at 1 month post-transplantation and 6 months post-transplantation after vaccination of recipients, based on pre-transplantation severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination and infection exposures of both recipient and donor. Using banked specimens from related donor allogeneic HSCT recipients and clinical data from both donors and recipients, anti-Spike (S) IgG titers were analyzed at 1, 3, and 6 months post-transplantation according to prior SARS-CoV-2 immunologic exposures. Recipients were excluded if they had received SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies or had infection in the first 6 months post-transplantation. Of the 53 recipient-donor pairs, 29 donors and 24 recipients had prior SARS-CoV-2 immunologic exposure. Recipient-donor pairs with no prior SARS-CoV-2 exposure (D0R0) had significantly lower anti-S IgG titers at 1 month compared to those with prior exposures (D1R1) (D0R0: median, 2.43 [interquartile range (IQR), .41 to 3.77]; D1R1: median, 8.42; IQR, 5.58 to 12.20]; P = .008). At 6 months, anti-S IgG titers were higher in recipients who were vaccinated at 3 months post-transplantation in the D1R1 cohort (median IgG, 148.34; IQR, 92.36 to 204.33) compared with the D0R0 cohort (median IgG, 38.74; IQR, 8.93 to 119.71). Current strategies should be optimized to enhance SARS-CoV-2 protection for HSCT recipients, including augmentation of the immune response for both donors and recipients prior to transplantation.

Long-Term Immunity Against Tetanus and Diphtheria after Vaccination of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients

Revaccination against tetanus and diphtheria after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is usually effective, but the duration of the immunity is unknown. We conducted this study to evaluate humoral immunity to tetanus and diphtheria in long-term survivors and to provide knowledge regarding the need for boosters. The median time from HCT to blood sampling was 14 years (range, 8 to 40 years). All patients had received at least 3 doses of vaccines against both tetanus and diphtheria, either monovalent or combination vaccines containing a full dose of the diphtheria toxoid component. In addition, 1 or more booster doses were administered to 21 of the 146 patients (14%). On enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, levels <.1 IU/mL for diphtheria and <.01 IU/mL for tetanus were considered low or seronegative. Values between .01 and .5 IU/mL for tetanus and between .1 and 1.0 IU/mL for diphtheria were considered to represent partial protection, and levels >.5 and >1.0 IU/mL were considered high and protective, respectively. In all, 39% of patients were seronegative against diphtheria, 52% had some protection, and 9% had a high titer. In contrast, no patient had become seronegative to tetanus, 32% had "partial protection" against tetanus and 68% had a high titer. In multivariate analysis, active graft-versus-host-disease, sex, or time from sampling did not affect the probability of becoming seronegative or seropositive. Younger age was associated with lower antibody levels to tetanus toxoid, but age was not correlated with antibody levels against diphtheria toxoid. Tetanus immunity was maintained after vaccination in most long-term survivors, but immunity against diphtheria was poor, and boosters should be considered.

Hematopoietic stem cell donor vaccination with cytomegalovirus triplex augments frequencies of functional and durable cytomegalovirus-specific T cells in the recipient: A novel strategy to limit antiviral prophylaxis

To enhance protective cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells in immunosuppressed recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), we evaluated post-HCT impact of vaccinating healthy HCT donors with Triplex. Triplex is a viral vectored recombinant vaccine expressing three immunodominant CMV antigens. The vector is modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA), an attenuated, non-replicating poxvirus derived from the vaccinia virus strain Ankara. It demonstrated tolerability and immunogenicity in healthy adults and HCT recipients, in whom it also reduced CMV reactivation. Here, we report feasibility, safety, and immunological outcomes of a pilot phase 1 trial (NCT03560752 at ClinicalTrials.gov) including 17 CMV-seropositive recipients who received an HCT from a matched related donor (MRD) vaccinated with 5.1 × 108 pfu/ml of Triplex before cell harvest (median 15, range 11-28 days). Donor and recipient pairs who committed to participation in the trial resulted in exceptional adherence to the protocol. Triplex was well-tolerated with limited adverse events in donors and recipients, who all engrafted with full donor chimerism. On day 28 post-HCT, levels of functional vaccinia- and CMV-specific CD137+ CD8+ T cells were significantly higher (p < .0001 and p = .0174, respectively) in recipients of Triplex vaccinated MRD than unvaccinated MRD (control cohort). Predominantly, central and effector memory CMV-specific T-cell responses continued to steadily expand through 1-year follow-up. CMV viremia requiring antivirals developed in three recipients (18%). In summary, this novel approach represents a promising strategy applicable to different HCT settings for limiting the use of antiviral prophylaxis, which can impair and delay CMV-specific immunity, leading to CMV reactivation requiring treatment.

Influence of Acute and Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease on Persistence of Antibodies against Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella in the First Year after Autologous or Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are vulnerable to infections due to severe immunosuppression. Live-attenuated vaccines are contraindicated for two years after HSCT. The aim of this study was to assess the persistence of antibodies against measles, mumps, rubella and varicella in the first year after HSCT. Forty patients undergoing autologous (n = 12) or allogeneic (n = 28) HSCT were included in this study. Specific IgG antibodies to measles, mumps, rubella and varicella virus in serum samples were assessed by the LIAISON XL, a fully automated chemiluminescence analyzer, at seven different time points starting one week before HSCT and up to 12 months after HSCT. At baseline, before HSCT, most patients showed antibodies against measles (100%), mumps (80%), rubella (97.5%) and varicella (92.5%). Although titers declined over time, most patients retained antibodies against measles (92.5%), mumps (62.5%), rubella (87.5%) and varicella (85%) up to 12 months after HSCT. There was no significant difference between patients with and without GvHD concerning persistence of antibody titers. Significantly higher varicella titers were detected in autologous patients compared to patients with chronic GvHD. Considering that live-attenuated vaccines should not be administered during the first year after HSCT, the persistence of antibodies against these diseases is relevant.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the COVID-19 era

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients are especially vulnerable to coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), because of their profound immunodeficiency. Indeed, the first pandemic wave was marked by a high mortality rate in this population. Factors increasing immunodepression such as older age, immunosuppressive treatments or a short delay between transplant and infection appear to worsen the prognosis. Many changes in clinical practice had to be implemented in order to limit this risk, including postponing of transplant for non-malignant diseases, preference for local rather than international donations and for peripheral blood as stem cell source, and the widespread use of cryopreservation. The great revolution in the COVID-19 pandemic came from the development of mRNA vaccines that have shown to be able to prevent severe forms of the disease. More than 75% of allo-HSCT recipients develop seroconversion after 2 doses of vaccine. Multiple studies have identified lymphopenia, exposure to immunosuppressive or anti-CD20 therapies, and a short post-transplant period as factors associated with a poor response to vaccination. The use of repeated injections of the vaccine, including a third dose, not only improves the seroconversion rate but also intensifies the immune response, both in B cells and T cells. Vaccines are an effective and well-tolerated method in this high-risk population. Some studies investigated the possibility of immune protection being transferred from a vaccinated donor to a recipient, with encouraging initial results. However, dynamic mutations and immune escape of the virus can lead to breakthrough infections with new variants in vaccinated individuals and still represent a threat of severe disease in allo-HSCT recipients. New challenges include the need to adapt vaccine protection to emerging variants.

Successful outcome of pre-engraftment COVID-19 in an HCT patient: impact of targeted therapies and cellular immunity

We describe the clinical strategy implemented for successful treatment and outcome of pre-engraftment SARS-CoV2 infection in HCT recipient.

Robust levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific and functional T cells rapidly expanded early post-HCT and may have contributed to viral clearance.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has emerged as a global pandemic that upended existing protocols and practices, including those for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Here, we describe the successful clinical course and multiple key interventions administered to an acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient, who tested SARS-CoV-2 positive by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction on day −1 of matched unrelated donor (SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G negative) T-cell-replete HCT. This experience allowed for implementing a virologic and immunomonitoring panel to characterize the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the recipient’s nascent humoral and cellular immune response. The finding of robust, functional, and persistent levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells, starting early after transplant was unexpected, and in combination with the clinical strategy, may have contributed to the favorable outcome. Additionally, it is plausible that preexisting cross-reactive endemic coronavirus immunity in the allogeneic graft reduced recipient susceptibility to COVID-19 disease. This case supports the critical role that T-cell responses may play in mitigating SARS-CoV-2 infection, even in the context of transplant immunosuppression, in which reconstitution of humoral response is commonly delayed. Interventional approaches to transfer SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular immunity such as HCT donor vaccination and adaptive cellular therapy could be of benefit.

Tick-Borne Encephalitis Specific Lymphocyte Response after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Predicts Humoral Immunity after Vaccination

The aim of this prospective study was to assess lymphocyte proliferative and cytokine response prior to and following tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) immunization among patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Seventeen adult patients 11–13 months after HSCT and eight unvaccinated healthy adults received up to three TBE vaccinations. Following in vitro stimulation with TBE-antigen, lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine secretion (IL-2, IL-10, IL-13, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, GM-CSF) were analyzed by thymidine incorporation assay and the Luminex system. Ten patients (59%) showed significant baseline TBE-specific lymphocyte proliferation (stimulation index (SI) > 3) prior to vaccination, but none of the unvaccinated controls (p = 0.002). All patients with a TBE-specific antibody response after two vaccinations (at least 2-fold increase of neutralization test titers) exhibited a strong TBE-specific lymphocyte proliferative response at baseline (SI > 10). Patients with sibling donors had a significantly stronger baseline TBE-specific lymphocyte proliferative and IL-13 cytokine response than patients with unrelated donors (p < 0.05). In conclusion, a relevant proportion of patients showed TBE-specific lymphocyte proliferative and cytokine responses prior to vaccination after HSCT, which predicted the humoral response to the vaccine. Patients with vaccinated sibling donors were more likely to elicit a cellular immune response than patients with unrelated donors of unknown vaccination status.

Revisiting Role of Vaccinations in Donors, Transplant Recipients, Immunocompromised Hosts, Travelers, and Household Contacts of Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Vaccination is an effective strategy to prevent infections in immunocompromised hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Pretransplant vaccination of influenza, pneumococcus, Haemophilus influenza type b, diphtheria, tetanus, and hepatitis B, both in donors and transplant recipients, produces high antibody titers in patients compared with recipient vaccination only. Because transplant recipients are immunocompromised, live vaccines should be avoided with few exceptions. Transplant recipients should get inactive vaccinations when possible to prevent infection. This includes vaccination against influenza, pneumococcus, H. influenza type b, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, meningococcus, measles, mumps, rubella, polio, hepatitis A, human papillomavirus, and hepatitis B. Close contacts of transplant recipients can safely get vaccinations (inactive and few live vaccines) as per their need and schedule. Transplant recipients who wish to travel may need to get vaccinated against endemic diseases that are prevalent in such areas. There is paucity of data on the role of vaccinations for patients receiving novel immunotherapy such as bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells despite data on prolonged B cell depletion and higher risk of opportunistic infections.

Vaccination of haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: guidelines of the 2017 European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL 7)

Infection is a main concern after haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and a major cause of transplant-related mortality. Some of these infections are preventable by vaccination. Most HSCT recipients lose their immunity to various pathogens as soon as the first months after transplant, irrespective of the pre-transplant donor or recipient vaccinations. Vaccination with inactivated vaccines is safe after transplantation and is an effective way to reinstate protection from various pathogens (eg, influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae), especially for pathogens whose risk of infection is increased by the transplant procedure. The response to vaccines in patients with transplants is usually lower than that in healthy individuals of the same age during the first months or years after transplant, but it improves over time to become close to normal 2-3 years after the procedure. However, because immunogenic vaccines have been found to induce a response in a substantial proportion of the patients as early as 3 months after transplant, we recommend to start crucial vaccinations with inactivated vaccines from 3 months after transplant, irrespectively of whether the patient has or has not developed graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) or received immunosuppressants. Patients with GvHD have higher risk of infection and are likely to benefit from vaccination. Another challenge is to provide HSCT recipients the same level of vaccine protection as healthy individuals of the same age in a given country. The use of live attenuated vaccines should be limited to specific situations because of the risk of vaccine-induced disease.

Contemporary analysis of functional immune recovery to opportunistic and vaccine-preventable infections after allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation

Objectives

Infections are a major cause of mortality after allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), and immune recovery is necessary for prevention. Novel transplant procedures have changed the epidemiology of infections but contemporary data on functional immune recovery are limited. In this pilot study, we aimed to measure immune recovery in the current era of alloHSCT.

Methods

Twenty, 13, 11, 9 and 9 alloHSCT recipients had blood collected at baseline (time of conditioning) and 3‐, 6‐, 9‐, and 12‐months post‐alloHSCT, respectively. Clinical data were collected, and immune recovery was measured using immunophenotyping, lymphocyte proliferation, cytokine analysis and antibody isotyping.

Results

Median absolute T‐ and B‐cell counts were below normal from baseline until 9‐ to 12‐months post‐alloHSCT. Median absolute CD4⁺ T‐cell counts recovered at 12‐months post‐alloHSCT. Positive proliferative responses to Aspergillus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV), influenza and tetanus antigens were detected from 9 months. IL‐6 was the most abundant cytokine in cell cultures. In cultures stimulated with CMV, EBV, influenza and tetanus peptides, the CD4⁺ T‐cell count correlated with IL‐1β (P = 0.045) and CD8⁺ T‐cell count with IFNγ (P = 0.013) and IL‐1β (P = 0.012). The NK‐cell count correlated with IL‐1β (P = 0.02) and IL‐17a (P = 0.03). Median serum levels of IgG1, IgG2 and IgG3 were normal while IgG4 and IgA were below normal range throughout follow‐up.

Conclusions

This pilot study demonstrates that immune recovery can be measured using CD4⁺ T‐cell counts, in vitro antigen stimulation and selected cytokines (IFNγ, IL‐1β, IL‐4, IL‐6, IL‐17, IL‐21, IL‐31) in alloHSCT recipients. While larger studies are required, monitoring immune recovery may have utility in predicting infection risk post‐alloHSCT.

A fifty-year odyssey: prospects for a cytomegalovirus vaccine in transplant and congenital infection

INTRODUCTION

It has been almost fifty years since the Towne strain was used by Plotkin and collaborators as the first vaccine candidate for cytomegalovirus (CMV). While that approach showed partial efficacy, there have been a multitude of challenges to improve on the promise of a CMV vaccine. Efforts have been dichotomized into a therapeutic vaccine for patients with CMV-infected allografts, either stem cells or solid organ, and a prophylactic vaccine for congenital infection.

AREAS COVERED

This review will evaluate research prospects for a therapeutic vaccine for transplant recipients that recognizes CMV utilizing primarily T cell responses. Similarly, we will provide an extensive discussion on attempts to develop a vaccine to prevent the manifestations of congenital infection, based on eliciting a humoral anti-CMV protective response. The review will also describe newer developments that have upended the efforts toward such a vaccine through the discovery of a second pathway of CMV infection that utilizes an alternative receptor for entry using a series of antigens that have been determined to be important for prevention of infection.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

There is a concerted effort to unify separate therapeutic and prophylactic vaccine strategies into a single delivery agent that would be effective for both transplant-related and congenital infection.

Vaccinating donors for hematopoietic cell transplantation: A systematic review and future perspectives

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT) recipients are at an increased risk of infectious complications, which is a major cause of morbidity and mortality post-transplant. Vaccination of donors is one of the strategies that has been studied to improve immune reconstitution post-transplant, however the efficacy and safety of this strategy is not well reviewed in the literature. In this systematic review we sought to evaluate the current strategies of donor vaccination along with their immunogenicity, effectiveness and safety. Utilizing strict selection criteria with defined MeSH terminology, an electronic search was conducted from the following databases: Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scopus. Abstracts of various professional society meetings were also screened and hand searching of various reviews and guideline articles was carried out. The full text of 52 articles were reviewed, from which 5 articles satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria for effectiveness and immunogenicity trials and 1 article was included for safety data. Jadad score was used to assess the quality of included studies. The results of the included studies were inconsistent, and the studies were generally of suboptimal methodological quality. Most of the included studies (n = 3) investigated the use of more than one vaccine, however not all commonly used vaccines in HCT were investigated. None of the studies reported any long-term benefits for HCT recipients of vaccinated donors. Only one study reported safety data of using vaccination in donors. Given the suboptimal quality of the studies, and questionable effectiveness, donor vaccination cannot be recommended for all. Prospective high-quality vaccine trials in HCT donors are needed.

Vaccinations in patients with hematological malignancies

Patients with hematological malignancies are at risk for a number of infections that are potentially preventable by vaccinations such as pneumococcal infections and influenza. Treatment, especially with anti-B-cell antibodies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), negatively impacts the response to vaccination for several months. It is therefore recommended that patients be vaccinated before initiating immunosuppressive therapy if possible. The risk of side-effects with inactivated vaccines is low, but care has to be taken with live vaccines, such as varicella-zoster virus vaccine, since severe and fatal complications have been reported. HSCT patients require repeated doses of most vaccines to achieve long-lasting immune responses. New therapeutic options for patients with hematological malignancies that are rapidly being introduced into clinical practice will require additional research regarding the efficacy of vaccinations. New vaccines are also in development that will require well-designed studies to ascertain efficacy and safety.

Trypanosoma-Cruzi Cross-Reactive Antibodies Longitudinal Follow-Up: A Prospective Observational Study in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Antibodies named TcCRA "Trypanosoma cruzi Cross Reactive Antibodies" were detected in 47% of blood donors from French population unexposed to the parasite. In order to evaluate the passive or active transmissibility of TcCRA and further characterize its role and etiology, we have conducted a study in a cohort of 47 patients who underwent allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations (allo-HSCT). Donors and recipients were tested for TcCRA prior to transplantation. Recipients were further tested during follow-up after transplantation. Demographical, clinical and biological data were collected. Our primary end-point was to assess the risk of TcCRA acquisition after transplantation. During this initial analysis, we observed no seroconversion in patients receiving cells from TcCRA negative donors (n = 23) but detected seroconversion in 4 out of 24 patients who received hematopoietic stem cells from positive donors. Here, we are discussing possible scenarios to explain TcCRA-immune status in recipient after transplantation.

Pretransplant vaccinations in allogeneic stem cell transplantation donors and recipients: an often-missed opportunity for immunoprotection?

Immune deficiency following hematopoietic cell transplantation predisposes the patient to potentially deadly infections. Vaccinations can improve immunity and thus reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with these infections. Over the years different sets of guidelines have been published the most recent by the Infectious Diseases Society of American (IDSA). There is limited evidence that vaccination of donors and/or recipients before transplantation may improve immunity. However, despite the possibility of augmented immunity, there remain logistical, ethical and medical concerns about such a vaccination strategy.

Interleukin 12 (IL-12) family cytokines: Role in immune pathogenesis and treatment of CNS autoimmune disease

Cytokines play crucial roles in coordinating the activities of innate and adaptive immune systems. In response to pathogen recognition, innate immune cells secrete cytokines that inform the adaptive immune system about the nature of the pathogen and instruct naïve T cells to differentiate into the appropriate T cell subtypes required to clear the infection. These include Interleukins, Interferons and other immune-regulatory cytokines that exhibit remarkable functional redundancy and pleiotropic effects. The focus of this review, however, is on the enigmatic Interleukin 12 (IL-12) family of cytokines. This family of cytokines plays crucial roles in shaping immune responses during antigen presentation and influence cell-fate decisions of differentiating naïve T cells. They also play essential roles in regulating functions of a variety of effector cells, making IL-12 family cytokines important therapeutic targets or agents in a number of inflammatory diseases, such as the CNS autoimmune diseases, uveitis and multiple sclerosis.

Vaccine therapy for cytomegalovirus in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Passive immunization against CMV is desirable to minimize or perhaps eliminate complications related to CMV disease. In allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), the major challenge facing a successful anti-CMV vaccine is inducing immunity in an immunocompromised host. To date, only one CMV vaccine, ASP0113, has been evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase II study. ASP0113 is a bivalent product containing two plasmids that encode CMV glycoprotein B and tegument phosphoprotein 65, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in rate of initiation of anti-CMV therapy, rates of CMV viremia were lower in the ASP0113 group when measured by a central laboratory. Also, time-to-first episode of viremia was longer in subjects receiving ASP0113. These findings paved the way for an ongoing placebo-controlled Phase III study aiming at enrolling 500 subjects. Results of this Phase III trial, especially if it meets clinically meaningful endpoints, will ultimately determine the role of anti-CMV vaccine strategies in allo-HCT.

Immunization in cancer patients: where we stand

An increasing proportion of cancer patients benefit from new treatment strategies. However, infection remains a main cause of morbidity and mortality, either due to the underlying diseases, to treatment, or both. Although most opportunistic infections are sofar not routinely preventable by vaccines, community infections such as invasive pneumococcal disease and influenza may be avoided by vaccines in many instances. The immune response of cancer patients to vaccines is almost constantly depressed when compared to the one of healthy individuals of the same age range. However, they may, in many cases, reach seroprotection. This article addresses the rationale to develop and implement immunization programs in cancer patients, including patients with hematologic malignancies and recipients of stem cell transplantation, and the main specificities of this patient population regarding vaccines, and the potential approaches to improve the immune response. The Infectious Diseases Society of America has recently published guidelines for vaccination of the immunocompromised hosts. Although many questions remain to be clarified, oncologists and hematologists should be encouraged to implement these guidelines in their therapeutic programs and to develop prospective studies covering unsolved issues.

Pneumococcal immunization in immunocompromised hosts: where do we stand?

Immunocompromised patients are all at risk of invasive pneumococcal disease, of different degrees and timings. However, considerable progress in pneumococcal immunization over the last 30 years should benefit these patients. The 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine has been widely evaluated in these populations, but due to its low immunogenicity, its efficacy is sub-optimal, or even low. The principle of the conjugate vaccine is that, through the protein conjugation with the polysaccharide, the vaccine becomes more immunogenic, T-cell dependent, and thus providing a better early response and a boost effect. The 7-valent conjugate vaccine has been the first one to be evaluated in different immunocompromised populations. We review here the efficacy and safety of the different antipneumococcal vaccines in cancer, transplant and HIV-positive patients and propose a critical appraisal of the current guidelines.

Vaccination of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: perspective in Korea

Antibody titers to vaccine-preventable diseases such as tetanus, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella decline within 1-10 years after allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) if the recipient is not vaccinated. Vaccine-preventable diseases such as pneumococcal diseases, Haemophilus influenzae type b infections, influenza, measles, and varicella can pose an increased risk for SCT recipients. Therefore, after SCT, the recipients should be routinely revaccinated. Vaccination recommendations have previously been developed and published by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the Centers for Disease Control, by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and by the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation in 2009. Different epidemiologies and strategies have existed in Korea. In 2012, the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases published "Vaccination for Adult" describing the guidelines for vaccination, one of the chapters assigned for vaccination of SCT recipients. The present article reviews the current available vaccination strategies for SCT recipients, their family members, and healthcare workers, with the focus on recent Korean perspectives.

Vaccination of immunocompromised patients

Vaccination of immunocompromised patients is challenging both regarding efficacy and safety. True efficacy data are lacking so existing recommendations are based on immune responses and safety data. Inactivated vaccines can generally be used without risk but the patients who are most at risk for infectious morbidity and mortality as a result of their severely immunosuppressed state are also those least likely to respond to vaccination. However, vaccination against pneumococci, Haemophilus influenzae and influenza are generally recommended. Live vaccines must be used with care because the risk for vaccine-associated disease exists.

Neoantigen and tumor antigen-specific immunity transferred from immunized donors is detectable early after allogeneic transplantation in myeloma patients

To enhance the therapeutic index of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT), we immunized 10 HLA-matched sibling donors before stem cell collection with recipient-derived clonal myeloma Ig, idiotype (Id), as a tumor antigen, conjugated with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). Vaccinations were safe in donors and recipients. Donor-derived KLH- and Id-specific humoral and central and effector memory T-cell responses were detectable by day 30 after HSCT and were boosted by post-transplant vaccinations at 3 months in most recipients. One patient died before booster vaccinations. Specifically, after completing treatment, 8/9 myeloma recipients had persistent Id-specific immune responses and 5/9 had improvement in disease status. Although regulatory T cells increased after vaccination, they did not impact immune responses. At a median potential follow-up period of 74 months, 6 patients are alive, the 10 patients have a median PFS of 28.5 months and median OS has not been reached. Our results provide proof of principle that neoantigen and tumor antigen-specific humoral and cellular immunity could be safely induced in HSCT donors and passively transferred to recipients. This general strategy may be used to reduce relapse of malignancies and augment protection against infections after allogeneic HSCT.

Clinical evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of PADRE-cytomegalovirus (CMV) and tetanus-CMV fusion peptide vaccines with or without PF03512676 adjuvant

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65-specific T cells can protect hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients from CMV complications. Two candidate CMV peptide vaccines composed of the HLA A*0201 pp65(495-503) cytotoxic CD8(+) T-cell epitope fused to 2 different universal T-helper epitopes (either the synthetic Pan DR epitope [PADRE] or a natural Tetanus sequence) were clinically evaluated for safety and ability to elicit pp65 T cells in HLA A*0201 healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Escalating doses (0.5, 2.5, 10 mg) of PADRE or Tetanus pp65(495-503) vaccines with (30 adults) or without (28 adults) PF03512676 adjuvant were administered by subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks for a total of 4 injections.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events were reported, although vaccines used in combination with PF03512676 had enhanced reactogenicity. Ex vivo responses were detected by flow cytometry exclusively in volunteers who received the vaccine coadministered with PF03512676. In addition, using a sensitive in vitro stimulation system, vaccine-elicited pp65(495-503) T cells were expanded in 30% of volunteers injected solely with the CMV peptides and in all tested subjects receiving the vaccines coinjected with PF03512676.

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptable safety profiles and vaccine-driven expansion of pp65(495-503) T cells in healthy adults support further evaluation of CMV peptide vaccines combined with PF03512676 in the HCT setting.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT00722839.

NCI, NHLBI/PBMTC first international conference on late effects after pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation: persistent immune deficiency in pediatric transplant survivors

Defective immune reconstitution is a major barrier to successful hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and has important implications in the pediatric population. There are many factors that affect immune recovery, including stem cell source and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Complete assessment of immune recovery, including T and B lymphocyte evaluation, innate immunity, and response to neoantigens, may provide insight as to infection risk and optimal time for immunizations. The increasing use of cord blood grafts requires additional study regarding early reconstitution and impact upon survival. Immunization schedules may require modification based upon stem cell source and immune reconstitution, and this is of particular importance as many children have been incompletely immunized, or not at all, before school entry. Additional studies are needed in children post-HCT to evaluate the impact of differing stem cell sources upon immune reconstitution, infectious risks, and immunization responses.

IgG antibodies to ATG early after pediatric hematopoietic SCT increase the risk of acute GVHD

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), raised in rabbits, is frequently used in allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT), to prevent graft rejection and acute GVHD. In solid organ transplant patients, antibodies to rabbit IgG result in an enhanced clearance of ATG. The occurrence of such antibodies in HSCT recipients and their clinical impact is unknown. Concentrations of ATG and anti-ATG antibodies were measured in 72 pediatric HSCT recipients treated with ATG as part of the conditioning. Anti-ATG antibodies were detected in 20 children (28%), all transplanted with a non-depleted graft. IgG anti-ATG, alone or combined with IgM and/or IgA anti-ATG, appeared in 10 children. Four patients developed IgG anti-ATG antibodies early (before day 22) post-HSCT. They had steep drops in ATG levels and showed rapid T-cell recovery, which was associated with a significantly increased risk of acute GVHD. In six patients IgG anti-ATG responses occurred later (range 28-46 days) after HSCT without an increased risk of GVHD. A total of 10 children only mounted an IgM (and IgA) anti-ATG response, which was without major impact on ATG levels. These results indicate that early development of IgG anti-ATG antibodies has a major impact on acute GVHD. Routine analysis ATG/anti-ATG Ab measurement should be considered.

Immunization of hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients against vaccine-preventable diseases

Worldwide, over 40,000 hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT) are carried out each year, with the majority of patients surviving long term. Owing to their new immune systems, these patients are susceptible to a variety of preventable infectious diseases. The 2009 influenza pandemic, the increase in pertussis and antibiotic-resistant pneumococcus, as well as recent outbreaks of measles and mumps in immunocompetent individuals further highlight the need for effective revaccination of HCT recipients. Post-transplant vaccine guidelines, including those published in 2009, recommend immunization of all patient groups at fixed times post-HCT. Although early vaccination to protect against vaccine-preventable diseases is desirable, there are still limited data on whether this approach is efficacious in patient groups whose immune recovery differs from recipients of an unmodified HLA-matched sibling transplant. In the absence of such data, prospective trials are needed to better define the optimal timing for immunizing recipients of alternative donors. Ideally, such trials should be designed to identify biological markers that will predict an optimal and durable vaccine response.

Epidemiology and treatment approaches in management of invasive fungal infections

Over the past 20 years, the number of invasive fungal infections has continued to persist, due primarily to the increased numbers of patients subjected to severe immunosuppression. Despite the development of more active, less toxic antifungal agents and the standard use of antifungal prophylaxis, invasive fungal infections (especially invasive mold infections) continue to be a significant factor in hematopoietic cell and solid organ transplantation outcomes, resulting in high mortality rates. Since the use of fluconazole as standard prophylaxis in the hematopoietic cell transplantation setting, invasive candidiasis has come under control, but no mold-active antifungal agent (except for posaconazole in the setting of acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome) has been shown to improve the survival rate over fluconazole. With the advent of new azole and echinocandin agents, we have seen the emergence of more azole-resistant and echinocandin-resistant fungi. The recent increase in zygomycosis seen in the hematopoietic cell transplantation setting may be due to the increased use of voriconazole. This has implications for the empiric approach to pulmonary invasive mold infections when zygomycosis cannot be ruled out. It is imperative that an amphotericin B product, an antifungal that has never developed resistance in over 50 years, be initiated. The clinical presentations of invasive mold infections and invasive candidiasis can be nonspecific and the diagnostic tests insensitive, so a high index of suspicion and immediate initiation of empiric therapy is required. Unfortunately, our currently available serologic tests do not predict infection ahead of disease, and, therefore cannot be used to initiate “preemptive” therapy. Also, the Aspergillus galactomannan test gives a false negative result in patients receiving antimold prophylaxis, ie, virtually all of our patients with hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. We may eventually be able to select patients at highest risk for invasive fungal infections for prophylaxis by genetic testing. However, with our current armamentarium of antifungal agents and widespread use of prophylaxis in high-risk groups (hematologic malignancy, hematopoietic cell transplantation), we continue to see high incidence and mortality rates, and our future hope lies in reversing the immunosuppression or augmenting the immune system of these severely immunocompromised hosts by developing and utilizing immunotherapy, immunoprophylaxis, and vaccines.

Adoptive cellular therapy

Cell-based therapies with various lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells are promising approaches for cancer immunotherapy. The transfusion of T lymphocytes, also called adoptive cell therapy (ACT), is an effective treatment for viral infections, has induced regression of cancer in early stage clinical trials, and may be a particularly important and efficacious modality in the period following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Immune reconstitution post-SCT is often slow and incomplete, which in turn leads to an increased risk of infection and may impact relapse risk in patients with malignant disease. Immunization post-HSCT is frequently unsuccessful, due to the prolonged lymphopenia, especially of CD4 T cells, seen following transplant. ACT has the potential to enhance antitumor and overall immunity, and augment vaccine efficacy in the post-transplant setting. The ability to genetically engineer lymphocyte subsets has the further potential to improve the natural immune response, correct impaired immunity, and redirect T cells to an antitumor effector response. This chapter focuses on various applications of ACT for cancer immunotherapy, and we discuss some of the latest progress and hurdles in translating these technologies to the clinic.

Post-transplant adoptive T-cell immunotherapy

Immune reconstitution following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an often slow and incomplete process that leads to increased risk of infection and malignant disease. Immunization in SCT is frequently unsuccessful due to the prolonged lymphopenia, especially of CD4 T cells, seen following transplant. The transfusion of T cells, also called 'adoptive T-cell therapy', has the potential to enhance anti-tumour and overall immunity, and augment vaccine efficacy in the post-transplant setting. Recent advances in tissue culture, cellular immunology and tumour biology are guiding new approaches to adoptive T-cell therapy. This chapter will discuss the challenges that face the field before adoptive T-cell therapy can be translated into routine clinical practice.

Reconstitution of the immune system after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in humans

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with a severe immune deficiency. As a result, the patient is at high risk of infections. Innate immunity, including epithelial barriers, monocytes, granulocytes, and NK cells recovers within weeks after transplantation. By contrast, adaptive immunity recovers much slower. B- and T-cell counts normalize during the first months after transplantation, but in particular, T-cell immunity may remain impaired for years. During the last decade, much of the underlying mechanisms have been identified. These insights may provide new therapies to accelerate recovery.

Response to pneumococcal (PNCRM7) and haemophilus influenzae conjugate vaccines (HIB) in pediatric and adult recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT)

Young children and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients respond poorly to polysaccharide antigens, rendering them susceptible to severe infections because of encapsulated bacteria. This study evaluated the responses of 127 HCT patients, median age 23.0 years, vaccinated with PNCRM7 and Haemophilus influenzae (HIB) conjugate, 2 conjugate vaccines highly immunogenic in healthy children. Median time to vaccination was 1.1 years after HCT. Sixty-two percent of patients responded to PNCRM7 (45 of 51 children, 34 of 76 adults, P < .001). Overall response to HIB was 86%, including 77% of PNCRM7 nonresponders. Although PNCRM7 response was adversely affected by older age (P < .001), individuals > or =50 years old responded significantly better if vaccinated following acquisition of specific minimal milestones of immune competence, CD4 >200/microL, IgG >500 mg/dL, PHA within 60% lower limit of normal (11 of 19 versus 0 of 8, P < .006). A similar trend was observed in patients with limited chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). In all patients, higher levels of circulating CD4(+)CD45RA cells correlated with improved PNCRM7 response. These data demonstrate that PNCRM7 is immunogenic in allogeneic HCT patients, including older adults, but suggest that vaccination at fixed intervals after HCT, irrespective of immune competence, may limit its effectiveness. Prospective, multicenter trials assessing the best strategy to administer this vaccine and its impact on pneumococcal infections following transplantation are warranted.

Vaccinations in children treated with standard-dose cancer therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Most children with cancer are immunocompromised during therapy and for a variable period after completion of therapy. They are at an increased risk of infections, including vaccine-preventable infections. There is a reduction in immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases after completion of standard-dose chemotherapy and after hematopoietic stem cell transplant. It is important to protect these children against vaccine-preventable diseases by reimmunization.

Resetting the adaptive immune system after autologous stem cell transplantation: lessons from responses to vaccines

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to treat autoimmune diseases (AID) is thought to reset immunological memory directed against autoantigens. This hypothesis can only be studied indirectly because the exact nature of the pathogenetic autoantigens is unknown in most AID. Therefore, 19 children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or systemic lupus erythematodes (SLE) and 10 adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) were vaccinated with the T-cell-dependent neoantigen rabies and the recall antigen tetanus toxoid after, respectively before, bone marrow harvest. Both vaccinations were repeated after ASCT. All except two of the responders mounted a primary antibody response to rabies after revaccination, and 44% of the responders mounted a primary antibody response to tetanus boost after ASCT. These data show that immunological memory to a neoantigen is lost in most patients with AID after immunoablative pretreatment; however, memory to a recall antigen boosted before bone marrow harvest is only lost in part of the patients. Disease progression was arrested in all patients with JIA/SLE except one, but only in a minority of MS patients. Clinical outcome on a per case basis was not associated with the profile of the immune response toward the vaccination antigens after ASCT.

Immune reconstitution following hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is associated with a profound immune deficiency manifested as an increased propensity to develop infections and probably also malignancies. Innate immunity, including epithelial barriers and phagocytes, typically recovers within weeks after grafting, and B-cell counts and CD8 T-cell counts recover within months. CD4 T-cell counts are low for years, and their recovery is particularly slow in older patients with poor thymic function. Therapies to improve immune function include vaccinations, immunoglobulins for recurrent infections, cytokines, and antigen-specific donor lymphocyte infusions.

A randomized study on donor immunization with tetanus–diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type b and inactivated poliovirus vaccines to improve the recipient responses to the same vaccines after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

The HLA-identical sibling donors of 111 bone marrow transplantation (BMT) recipients were randomised to receive or not to receive tetanus-diphtheria (T-d), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), and inactivated poliovirus (IPV) vaccines 2-10 weeks before BM harvest. Fifty-three (DV+ group) recipients received the graft from a vaccinated donor and 58 (DV- group) from an unvaccinated donor. All recipients were vaccinated with the T-d, Hib and IPV vaccines at 3, 6 and 12 months after BMT. Diphtheria and Hib antibody concentrations were consistently higher in the DV+ than in the DV- group from 6 months post transplantation onwards. The differences were significant at 6 and 13 months for diphtheria and at 12 months for Hib antibody concentrations. Tetanus, PV1, PV2 and PV3 antibody levels were similar in both groups. Patients transplanted from donors with high tetanus, diphtheria and Hib antibody concentrations had higher respective antibody concentrations after BMT than those transplanted from donors with low antibody concentrations. Especially patients whose donors have low-specific antibody concentrations may benefit from donor vaccination with protein and conjugate vaccines.