The antifibrinolytic effect of lipoprotein(a) in heterozygous subjects is modulated by the relative concentration of each of the apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and their affinity for fibrin

Association of Renal Function and Statin Therapy with Lipoprotein(a) in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

AIM

A high level of serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with kidney disease development in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Recent studies have suggested that statins may affect serum levels of Lp(a). However, the statin effect is not well-defined in patients with T2DM with kidney dysfunction. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the relevance of kidney dysfunction and statin therapy to Lp(a) in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

Japanese patients with T2DM (n=149, 96 men and 53 women) were divided into two groups: statin users (n=79) and non-statin users (n=70). Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with Lp(a) as the objective variable and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hemoglobin A1c, age, gender, and body mass index as the explanatory variables.

RESULTS

Lp(a) serum levels were higher in statin users than in non-statin users (P=0.022). Multivariate regression analysis results showed an inverse correlation of eGFR to log Lp(a) in all patients (P=0.009) and in non-statin users (P=0.025), but not in statin users. In a multiple logistic regression analysis for median Lp(a), there was an inverse association between eGFR and Lp(a) level (odds ratio, 0.965; 95% confidence interval, 0.935-0.997; P=0.030) in non-statin users as well as in all participants, but not in statin users.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that a high Lp(a) level in patients with T2DM, except in statin users, is significantly associated with decreased eGFR, indicating that the increased Lp(a) levels under statin therapy might diminish the relationship between Lp(a) and eGFR.

Atherogenic Lipoproteins for the Statin Residual Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show that decreases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by the use of statins cause a significant reduction in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, one of our previous studies showed that, among eight RCTs that investigated the effect of statins vs. a placebo on CVD development, 56–79% of patients had residual CVD risk after the trials. In three RCTs that investigated the effect of a high dose vs. a usual dose of statins on CVD development, 78–87% of patients in the high-dose statin arms still had residual CVD risk. The risk of CVD development remains even when statins are used to strongly reduce LDL-C, and this type of risk is now regarded as statin residual CVD risk. Our study shows that elevated triglyceride (TG) levels, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and the existence of obesity/insulin resistance and diabetes may be important metabolic factors that determine statin residual CVD risk. Here, we discuss atherogenic lipoproteins that were not investigated in such RCTs, such as lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), remnant lipoproteins, malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL), and small-dense LDL (Sd-LDL). Lp(a) is under strong genetic control by apolipoprotein (a), which is an LPA gene locus. Variations in the LPA gene account for 91% of the variability in the plasma concentration of Lp(a). A meta-analysis showed that genetic variations at the LPA locus are associated with CVD events during statin therapy, independent of the extent of LDL lowering, providing support for exploring strategies targeting circulating concentrations of Lp(a) to reduce CVD events in patients receiving statins. Remnant lipoproteins and small-dense LDL are highly associated with high TG levels, low HDL-C, and obesity/insulin resistance. MDA-LDL is a representative form of oxidized LDL and plays important roles in the formation and development of the primary lesions of atherosclerosis. MDA-LDL levels were higher in CVD patients and diabetic patients than in the control subjects. Furthermore, we demonstrated the atherogenic properties of such lipoproteins and their association with CVD as well as therapeutic approaches.

Lipoprotein(a): Pathophysiology, measurement, indication and treatment in cardiovascular disease. A consensus statement from the Nouvelle Société Francophone d'Athérosclérose (NSFA)

Lipoprotein(a) is an apolipoprotein B100-containing low-density lipoprotein-like particle that is rich in cholesterol, and is associated with a second major protein, apolipoprotein(a). Apolipoprotein(a) possesses structural similarity to plasminogen but lacks fibrinolytic activity. As a consequence of its composite structure, lipoprotein(a) may: (1) elicit a prothrombotic/antifibrinolytic action favouring clot stability; and (2) enhance atherosclerosis progression via its propensity for retention in the arterial intima, with deposition of its cholesterol load at sites of plaque formation. Equally, lipoprotein(a) may induce inflammation and calcification in the aortic leaflet valve interstitium, leading to calcific aortic valve stenosis. Experimental, epidemiological and genetic evidence support the contention that elevated concentrations of lipoprotein(a) are causally related to atherothrombotic risk and equally to calcific aortic valve stenosis. The plasma concentration of lipoprotein(a) is principally determined by genetic factors, is not influenced by dietary habits, remains essentially constant over the lifetime of a given individual and is the most powerful variable for prediction of lipoprotein(a)-associated cardiovascular risk. However, major interindividual variations (up to 1000-fold) are characteristic of lipoprotein(a) concentrations. In this context, lipoprotein(a) assays, although currently insufficiently standardized, are of considerable interest, not only in stratifying cardiovascular risk, but equally in the clinical follow-up of patients treated with novel lipid-lowering therapies targeted at lipoprotein(a) (e.g. antiapolipoprotein(a) antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering ribonucleic acids) that markedly reduce circulating lipoprotein(a) concentrations. We recommend that lipoprotein(a) be measured once in subjects at high cardiovascular risk with premature coronary heart disease, in familial hypercholesterolaemia, in those with a family history of coronary heart disease and in those with recurrent coronary heart disease despite lipid-lowering treatment. Because of its clinical relevance, the cost of lipoprotein(a) testing should be covered by social security and health authorities.

Lipoprotein (a) and the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease in Hospitalized Japanese Patients

Objective Lipoprotein (a), or Lp (a), has been shown to be associated with the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in populations of various ethnicities. This study aimed to investigate the association between serum Lp (a) and CKD in Japanese patients. Methods A total of 6,130 subjects who underwent a serum Lp (a) level assessment for any reason (e.g. any type of surgery requiring prolonged bed rest or risk factors for atherosclerosis, such as hypertension or diabetes) were retrospectively investigated at Kanazawa University Hospital from April 2004 to March 2014. Of these, 1,895 subjects were excluded because of the lack of clinical data. Subjects were assessed for Lp (a), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, body mass index (BMI), coronary artery disease (CAD), and CKD (stage ≥3). Results When the study subjects were divided into quartiles of Lp (a) levels, significant trends were observed with regard to the presence of CKD (p = 2.7×10^-13). A multiple regression analysis showed that Lp (a) was significantly associated with CKD [odds ratio (OR), 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-1.17; p = 1.3×10^-7, per 10 mg/dL], independent of other classical risk factors, including age, gender, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. Under these conditions, Lp (a) was significantly associated with CAD (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06-1.16; p = 1.7×10^-6, per 10 mg/dL), independent of other risk factors. Conclusion Serum Lp (a) was associated with CKD, independent of other classical risk factors in a Japanese population.

Lipoprotein(a) predicts a new onset of chronic kidney disease in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

We investigated the association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level and new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study from March 2003 to December 2004 with a median follow-up time of 10.1 years. Patients aged 25-75 years with Type 2 diabetes and without CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2) ) were consecutively enrolled. The eGFR was measured at least twice every year , and new-onset CKD was defined as a decreased eGFR status of < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) using a Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation.

RESULTS

Of the 862 patients who were enrolled, 560 (65.0%) completed the follow-up and 125 (22.3%) progressed to CKD. The mean age and duration of diabetes were 53.3 ± 9.6 and 7.5 ± 6.0 years, respectively. The baseline eGFR was 101.8 ± 11.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2) . After adjusting for multiple confounding factors, a Cox hazard regression analysis revealed that the third tertile of Lp(a) was significantly associated with the development of CKD during the observation period when compared with the first tertile [hazard ratio 2.12 (95% confidence interval 1.33-3.36); P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study, we demonstrated that the Lp(a) level was an independent prognostic factor for the future development of CKD in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Lipoprotein (a): truly a direct prothrombotic factor in cardiovascular disease?

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] have been determined to be a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease, and may similarly play a role in other atherothrombotic disorders. Lp(a) consists of a lipoprotein moiety indistinguishable from LDL, as well as the plasminogen-related glycoprotein, apo(a). Therefore, the pathogenic role for Lp(a) has traditionally been considered to reflect a dual function of its similarity to LDL, causing atherosclerosis, and its similarity to plasminogen, causing thrombosis through inhibition of fibrinolysis. This postulate remains highly speculative, however, because it has been difficult to separate the prothrombotic/antifibrinolytic functions of Lp(a) from its proatherosclerotic functions. This review surveys the current landscape surrounding these issues: the biochemical basis for procoagulant and antifibrinolytic effects of Lp(a) is summarized and the evidence addressing the role of Lp(a) in both arterial and venous thrombosis is discussed. While elevated Lp(a) appears to be primarily predisposing to thrombotic events in the arterial tree, the fact that most of these are precipitated by underlying atherosclerosis continues to confound our understanding of the true pathogenic roles of Lp(a) and, therefore, the most appropriate therapeutic target through which to mitigate the harmful effects of this lipoprotein.

Lipoprotein(a): Its relevance to the pediatric population

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a highly atherogenic and heterogeneous lipoprotein that is inherited in an autosomal codominant trait. A unique aspect of this lipoprotein is that it is fully expressed by the first or second year of life in children, a pattern that is distinctly different from other lipoproteins, which typically only reach adult levels after adolescence. Despite decades of research, Lp(a) metabolism is still poorly understood but what is abundantly clear is that it is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents does not recommend measuring Lp(a) levels as part of routine screening except in youth with an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or youth with a parental history of ASCVD not explained by classical risk factors. One of the reasons that both the pediatric and adult guidelines fail to include this lipoprotein as part of routine lipid screening is the absence of data to show that lowering Lp(a) will reduce current or future ASCVD risk independently of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering. The cholesterol carried by Lp(a) is included in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement, but a separate test is used to measure the lipoprotein mass and/or cholesterol carried only by Lp(a). Because levels seem to be largely under genetic control, studies of lifestyle modification have been inconclusive although one study in obese children showed a decrease in the Lp(a) level comparable with the favorable effect on other lipids. The most compelling data regarding the importance of Lp(a) in the pediatric population are the increased risk associated with arterial ischemic stroke, a risk that is comparable with that associated with antiphospholipid antibodies or protein C deficiency. Although no specific pharmaceutical treatments are recommended to lower Lp(a) levels in youth, it is vitally important to educate youth and their parents about the excessive risk associated with this lipoprotein and the need to avoid the acquisition of other lifestyle-related risk factors such as smoking, excess weight, and physical inactivity to preserve more ideal cardiovascular health in adulthood.

Lipoprotein(a): a promising marker for residual cardiovascular risk assessment

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are still the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, although optimal medical therapy has been prescribed for primary and secondary preventions. Residual cardiovascular risk for some population groups is still considerably high although target low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level has been achieved. During the past few decades, compelling pieces of evidence from clinical trials and meta-analyses consistently illustrate that lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a significant risk factor for atherosclerosis and CVD due to its proatherogenic and prothrombotic features. However, the lack of effective medication for Lp(a) reduction significantly hampers randomized, prospective, and controlled trials conducting. Based on previous findings, for patients with LDL-C in normal range, Lp(a) may be a useful marker for identifying and evaluating the residual cardiovascular risk, and aggressively lowering LDL-C level than current guidelines' recommendation may be reasonable for patients with particularly high Lp(a) level.

Lipoprotein(a) level as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and small apoliprotein(a) isoforms in dialysis patients: assay-related differences are important

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) assays sensitive to apolipoprotein(a) size may underestimate associations of lipoprotein(a) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and low molecular weight (LMW) apolipoprotein(a) isoforms. This study among 629 dialysis patients compares the value of two lipoprotein(a) assays in predicting CVD events and small isoforms.

METHODS

Lipoprotein(a) level was measured by an apolipoprotein(a) size-insensitive ELISA and apolipoprotein(a) size-sensitive immunoturbidometric (IT) assay; and apolipoprotein(a) size by Western blot. Positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) for small isoforms were calculated, and CVD events ascertained prospectively.

RESULTS

The ELISA assay predicted CVD more strongly [Relative Hazard, RH=1.8; p=0.045, at the 85th Lipoprotein(a) percentile] than the IT assay (RH=1.3; p=0.37). The PPV for LMW isoforms using the ELISA (Whites, 98%; Blacks, 90%) were much higher than the IT assay (Whites, 75%; Blacks, 68%). Relative to the ELISA assay values, a positive bias in the IT assay values was seen for participants with larger apolipoprotein(a) isoforms, which may explain these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

When measured by an apolipoprotein(a) size-insensitive ELISA assay, but not a size-sensitive IT assay, high lipoprotein(a) levels predict both incident CVD and LMW isoforms in dialysis patients. Clinicians ordering lipoprotein(a) levels and research studies of lipoprotein(a) should determine if an apolipoprotein(a)-size related bias is present in the assay they use.

Different apoprotein(a) isoform proportions in serum and carotid plaque

INTRODUCTION

Cardio- and/or cerebro-vascular risk are associated with high lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels and low-molecular-weight (LMW) apo(a) isoforms. Aims of this study were to evaluate the deposition of apo(a) isoforms and apoprotein B (apo B) in atherosclerotic plaque from patients (males and females) who had carotid endarterectomy for severe stenosis, and to identify differences between patients classified by gender and divided according to the stability or instability of their plaques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We determined lipids, apo B and Lp(a) in serum and plaque extracts from 55 males and 25 females. Apo(a) was phenotyped and isoforms were classified by number of kringle IV (KIV) repeats.

RESULTS

Lp(a) levels were higher in female serum and plaque extracts than in male samples, while apo B levels were lower. More Lp(a) than apo B deposition was observed in plaque after normalization for serum levels. Thirty-one different apo(a) isoforms were detected in our patients, with a double band phenotype in 94% of cases. In both sexes, the low/high (L/H) molecular weight apo(a) isoform expression ratio was significantly higher in plaque than in serum. Females with unstable plaques had higher Lp(a) levels in both serum and tissue extracts, and fewer KIV repeats of the principal apo(a) isoform in the serum than the other female group or males.

CONCLUSIONS

In both sexes, the same apo(a) isoforms are found in serum and atherosclerotic plaque, but in different proportions: in plaque, LMW apo(a) is almost always more strongly accumulated than HMW apo(a), irrespective of any combination of apo(a) isoforms in double band phenotypes or Lp(a) serum levels. Moreover, serum and tissue Lp(a) levels were higher in females than in males, and particularly in the group with unstable plaques.

Ethnicity and lipoprotein(a) polymorphism in Native Mexican populations

BACKGROUND

Lp(a) is a lipoparticle of unknown function mainly present in primates and humans. It consists of a low-density lipoprotein and apo(a), a polymorphic glycoprotein. Apo(a) shares sequence homology and fibrin binding with plasminogen, inhibiting its fibrinolytic properties. Lp(a) is considered a link between atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Marked inter-ethnic differences in Lp(a) concentration related to the genetic polymorphism of apo(a) have been reported in several populations.

AIM

The study examined the structural and functional features of Lp(a) in three Native Mexican populations (Mayos, Mazahuas and Mayas) and in Mestizo subjects.

METHODS

We determined the plasma concentration of Lp(a) by immunonephelometry, apo(a) isoforms by Western blot, Lp(a) fibrin binding by immuno-enzymatic assay and short tandem repeat (STR) polymorphic marker genetic analysis by capillary electrophoresis.

RESULTS

Mestizos presented the less skewed distribution and the highest median Lp(a) concentration (13.25 mg dL(-1)) relative to Mazahuas (8.2 mg dL(-1)), Mayas (8.25 mg dL(-1)) and Mayos (6.5 mg dL(-1)). Phenotype distribution was different in Mayas and Mazahuas as compared with the Mestizo group. The higher Lp(a) fibrin-binding capacity was found in the Maya population. There was an inverse relationship between the size of apo(a) polymorphs and both Lp(a) levels and Lp(a) fibrin binding.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence of significative differences in Lp(a) plasma concentration and phenotype distribution in the Native Mexican and the Mestizo group.

High Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Small Apolipoprotein(a) Size Prospectively Predict Cardiovascular Events in Dialysis Patients

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are increased in dialysis patients, suggesting that they may play a role in the elevated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in this population. Few prospective studies of Lp(a) level, apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] size, and ASCVD have been performed in the dialysis population. An inception cohort of 833 incident dialysis patients were followed prospectively. Baseline Lp(a) was measured by apo(a) size-independent ELISA and apo(a) size by Western blot after SDS-agarose gel electrophoresis. A combined prospective nonfatal and fatal ASCVD end point included myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cerebrovascular accident, carotid endarterectomy, peripheral revascularization, gangrene, or limb amputation. Survival analyses were performed with adjustment for baseline demographics, comorbid conditions, ASCVD risk factors, albumin, lipids, and C-reactive protein. Median follow-up was 27.4 mo, with 297 ASCVD events, 130 non-ASCVD deaths, and seven losses to follow-up over 1649 person-years. In multivariate Cox regression models, both high Lp(a) concentration (>/=53 nmol/L) and low molecular weight (LMW) apo(a) isoforms (</=22 Kringle-IV repeats) predicted ASCVD events (relative hazard [RH] = 1.38, P = 0.02; RH = 1.58, P < 0.0005, respectively). In models that included both Lp(a) concentration and apo(a) size, only apo(a) size remained associated with ASCVD. Among those with both LMW apo(a) and Lp(a) level >123 nmol/L, the relative hazard (RH) of ASCVD was 1.73 (P < 0.0005), compared with high molecular weight apo(a) and Lp(a) level <123 nmol/L. No interactions by age, race, gender, diabetes, or ASCVD were present. Both LMW apo(a) size and high Lp(a) level predict ASCVD risk in dialysis patients, but the association of ASCVD with LMW isoforms is stronger than the association with high Lp(a) concentration.

Epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic implications of lipoprotein(a) in kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease is associated with a tremendously increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, however, show a diminished predictive power in these patients compared with the general population. This review provides an overview of lipoprotein(a), which is considered a nontraditional risk factor. The characteristic genetic and nongenetic changes of lipoprotein(a) in kidney disease are discussed and set into the context of risk prediction. In particular, genetically determined apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism is a powerful risk predictor for cardiovascular disease and total mortality in these patients. Finally, the limited interventional strategies available to lower lipoprotein(a) are considered.

High lipoprotein(a) levels and small apolipoprotein(a) sizes are associated with endothelial dysfunction in a multiethnic cohort

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the effect of lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), levels and apolipoprotein(a), or apo(a), sizes on endothelial function and to explore ethnic differences in their effects.

BACKGROUND

Although high levels of Lp(a) have been shown to confer increased cardiovascular risk in Caucasians, its significance in non-Caucasian populations is uncertain. The pathogenic role of the apo(a) component of Lp(a) is also unclear.

METHODS

The relationship of Lp(a) levels and apo(a) sizes to endothelial function was examined in a multiethnic cohort of 89 healthy subjects (age 42 +/- 9 years; 50 men, 39 women) free of other cardiac risk factors. Endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and endothelium-independent, nitrate-induced dilation (NTG) were assessed by ultrasound imaging of the brachial artery.

RESULTS

Plasma Lp(a) levels were lowest in Caucasians (18.3 +/- 21.1 mg/dl, n = 40); intermediate in Hispanics (30.2 +/- 30.5 mg/dl, n = 21); and highest in African Americans (68.8 +/- 46.0 mg/dl, n = 28). Lipoprotein(a) levels were found to correlate inversely to FMD (r = -0.33, p < 0.005) but not to NTG (r = 0.06, p = 0.60). This association remained significant after adjusting for gender (p = 0.002). In addition, subjects with small apo(a) size of <or=22 kringle 4 repeats had significantly lower FMD than those with large apo(a) (2.23 +/- 2.37% vs. 6.26 +/- 4.29%, p < 0.0001), irrespective of Lp(a) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support an independent role of Lp(a) in atherogenesis, an effect that is particularly evident in African Americans. The proatherogenic property of Lp(a) can be attributed in part to its apo(a) component.

Functional approach to investigate Lp(a) in ischaemic heart and cerebral diseases

BACKGROUND

Lp(a), a major cardiovascular risk factor, contains a specific apolipoprotein, apo(a), which by virtue of structural homology with plasminogen inhibits the formation of plasmin, the fibrinolytic enzyme. A number of clinical reports support the role of Lp(a) as a cardiovascular or cerebral risk factor, and experimental data suggest that it may contribute to atherothrombosis by inhibiting fibrinolysis.

DESIGN

A well-characterized model of a fibrin surface and an apo(a)-specific monoclonal antibody were used to develop a functional approach to detect pathogenic Lp(a). The assay is based on the competitive binding of Lp(a) and plasminogen for fibrin, and quantifies fibrin-bound Lp(a). High Lp(a) binding to fibrin is correlated with decreased plasmin formation. In a transversal case-control study we studied 248 individuals: 105 had a history of ischaemic cardiopathy (IC), 52 had cerebro-vascular disease (CVD) of thrombotic origin, and 91 were controls.

RESULTS

The remarkably high apo(a) fibrin-binding in CVD (0.268 +/- 0.15 nmol L-1) compared with IC (0.155 +/- 0.12 nmol L-1) suggests the existence of peculiar and poorly understood differences in pro- or anti-thrombotic mechanisms in either cerebral and/or coronary arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that Lp(a) fibrin-binding and small Apo(a) isoforms are associated with athero-thrombotic disease.

Small apolipoprotein(a) size predicts mortality in end-stage renal disease: The CHOICE study

BACKGROUND

The high mortality rate in end-stage renal disease has engendered interest in nontraditional atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk factors that are more prevalent in end-stage renal disease, such as elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels. Previous studies suggest that high Lp(a) levels and small apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoform size are associated with ASCVD, but none have investigated the relationship between Lp(a) level, apo(a) size, and mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An inception cohort of 864 incident dialysis patients was followed prospectively. Lp(a) was measured by an apo(a) size-independent ELISA and apo(a) size by Western blot after SDS-agarose gel electrophoresis. Comorbid conditions were determined by medical record review. Time to death was ascertained through dialysis clinic and Health Care Financing Administration follow-up. Survival analyses were performed with adjustment for baseline demographic, comorbid conditions, albumin, and lipids. Median follow-up was 33.7 months, with 346 deaths, 162 transplantations, and 10 losses to follow-up during 1999 person-years of follow-up. Cox regression analysis showed no association between Lp(a) level and mortality. However, an association between small apo(a) isoform size and mortality was found (hazard ratio, 1.36; P=0.004) after adjusting for age, race, sex, comorbidity score, cause of renal disease, and congestive heart failure. The association was somewhat lower in white patients (hazard ratio 1.34; P=0.019) than in black patients (1.69; P=0.04). No interaction by age, race, sex, diabetes, ASCVD, or Lp(a) level was present.

CONCLUSIONS

Small apo(a) size, but not Lp(a) level, independently predicts total mortality risk in dialysis patients.

Inhibition of fibrinolysis by lipoprotein(a)

A high plasma concentration of lipoprotein Lp(a) is now considered to be a major and independent risk factor for cerebro- and cardiovascular atherothrombosis. The mechanism by which Lp(a) may favour this pathological state may be related to its particular structure, a plasminogen-like glycoprotein, apo(a), that is disulfide linked to the apo B100 of an atherogenic LDL-like particle. Apo(a) exists in several isoforms defined by a variable number of copies of plasminogen-like kringle 4 and single copies of kringle 5 and the catalytic region. At least one of the plasminogen-like kringle 4 copies present in apo(a) (kringle IV type 10) contains a lysine binding site (LBS) that is similar to that of plasminogen. This structure allows binding of these proteins to fibrin and cell membranes. Plasminogen thus bound is cleaved at Arg561-Val562 by plasminogen activators and transformed into plasmin. This mechanism ensures fibrinolysis and pericellular proteolysis. In apo(a) a Ser-Ile substitution at the Arg-Val plasminogen activation cleavage site prevents its transformation into a plasmin-like enzyme. Because of this structural/functional homology and enzymatic difference, Lp(a) may compete with plasminogen for binding to lysine residues and impair, thereby, fibrinolysis and pericellular proteolysis. High concentrations of Lp(a) in plasma may, therefore, represent a potential source of antifibrinolytic activity. Indeed, we have recently shown that during the course of the nephrotic syndrome the amount of plasminogen bound and plasmin formed at the surface of fibrin are directly related to in vivo variations in the circulating concentration of Lp(a) (Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 2000, 20: 575-584; Thromb. Haemost., 1999, 82: 121-127). This antifibrinolytic effect is primarily defined by the size of the apo(a) polymorphs, which show heterogeneity in their fibrin-binding activity--only small size isoforms display high affinity binding to fibrin (Biochemistry, 1995, 34: 13353-13358). Thus, in heterozygous subjects the amount of Lp(a) or plasminogen bound to fibrin is a function of the affinity of each of the apo(a) isoforms and of their concentration relative to each other and to plasminogen. The real risk factor is, therefore, the Lp(a) subpopulation with high affinity for fibrin. According to this concept, some Lp(a) phenotypes may not be related to atherothrombosis and, therefore, high Lp(a) in some individuals might not represent a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In agreement with these data, it has been recently reported that Lp(a) particles containing low molecular mass apo(a) emerged as one of the leading risk conditions in advanced stenotic atherosclerosis (Circulation, 1999, 100: 1154-1160). The predictive value of high Lp(a) as a risk factor, therefore, depends on the relative concentration of Lp(a) particles containing small apo(a) isoforms with the highest affinity for fibrin. Within this context, the development of agents able to selectively neutralise the antifibrinolytic activity of Lp(a), offers new perspectives in the prevention and treatment of the cardiovascular risk associated with high concentrations of thrombogenic Lp(a).

Impact of apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes on long-term renal transplant survival

The long-term success of renal transplantation is limited because of chronic rejection (CR), which shows histologic parallels to atherosclerosis. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, but its role in CR has not been investigated. Plasma levels of Lp(a) are determined mainly by the inherited isoform (phenotype) of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] and show an inverse correlation with the molecular weight of apo(a). Apo(a) isoforms were identified in frozen sera of 327 patients who received a renal transplant during 1982 to 1992. Long-term graft survival in recipients with high molecular weight (HMW) or low molecular weight (LMW) apo(a) phenotypes were compared retrospectively. Mean (95% confidence interval) transplant survival was 12.8 yr (range, 11.9 to 13.6 yr) in patients with HMW and 11.9 yr (range, 10.8 to 13.1 yr) in patients with LMW apo(a) phenotypes (P = 0.2065). In patients who were 35 yr or younger at the time of transplantation, mean transplant survival was more than 3 yr longer in recipients with HMW apo(a) phenotypes compared with those with LMW apo(a) phenotypes (13.2 yr [range, 12.1 to 14.4 yr] versus 9.9 yr (range, 8.5 to 11.5 yr); P = 0.0156). In a Cox's proportional hazards regression model, the presence of LMW phenotypes-but not gender, immunosuppression, or HLA mismatches-in young patients was associated with a statistically significant risk of CR (P = 0.0434). These retrospective data indicate that young renal transplant recipients with LMW apo(a) phenotypes have a significantly shorter long-term graft survival, regardless of the number of HLA mismatches, gender, or immunosuppressive treatment.

Relationship between lipoprotein(a) phenotypes and plaminogen activator inhibitor type 1 in diabetic patients

It has been demonstrated in vitro that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] increases the endothelial synthesis of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1). However, this effect in vivo is controversial, and the possible relationship between PAI-1 and Lp(a) phenotypes has not been evaluated. The aim of the study was to determine the influence of Lp(a) and its phenotypes on PAI-1 serum concentrations in diabetic patients. For this purpose we include 75 Caucasian diabetic patients (34 consecutive type I and 41 consecutive type II) without late diabetic complications. Lp(a) and PAI-1 were assessed by ELISA. Lp(a) phenotypes were determined by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting, and grouped according to size in small (F,B,S1,S2), big (S3,S4), and null. A linear correlation between Lp(a) and PAI-1 was not observed either as a whole or when type I and type II diabetic patients were analyzed separately. However, significant differences were detected in PAI-1 levels when Lp(a) phenotypes were considered (small: 42.1+/-31.8 ng/mL; big: 37.2+/-26.1 ng/mL; null: 14.4+/-14.4; p< 0.05). The significant differences were due to the low PAI-1 concentrations observed in patients with null phenotype. Our results suggest that fibrinolytic activity might be preserved in diabetic patients with null Lp(a) phenotype. Furthermore, it could be speculated that diabetic patients with null phenotype should be considered at low risk to develop cardiovascular disease.

Lipoprotein Lp(a) and atherothrombotic disease

High plasma concentrations of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] are now considered a major risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. This effect of Lp(a) may be related to its composite structure, a plasminogen-like inactive serine-proteinase, apoprotein (a) [apo(a)], which is disulfide-linked to the apoprotein B100 of an atherogenic low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle. Apo(a) contains, in addition to the protease region and a copy of kringle 5 of plasminogen, a variable number of copies of plasminogen-like kringle 4, giving rise to a series of isoforms. This structural homology endows Lp(a) with the capacity to bind to fibrin and to membrane proteins of endothelial cells and monocytes, and thereby inhibits binding of plasminogen and plasmin formation. This mechanism favors fibrin and cholesterol deposition at sites of vascular injury and impairs activation of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) that may result in migration and proliferation of smooth muscle cells into the vascular intima. It is currently accepted that this effect of Lp(a) is linked to its concentration in plasma, and an inverse relationship between apo(a) isoform size and Lp(a) concentrations that is under genetic control has been documented. Recently, it has been shown that inhibition of plasminogen binding to fibrin by apo(a) from homozygous subjects is also inversely associated with isoform size. These findings suggest that the structural polymorphism of apo(a) is not only inversely related to the plasma concentration of Lp(a), but also to a functional heterogeneity of apo(a) isoforms. Based on these pathophysiological findings, it can be proposed that the predictive value of Lp(a) as a risk factor for vascular occlusive disease in heterozygous subjects would depend on the relative concentration of the isoform with the highest affinity for fibrin.

Characterization of the interaction of recombinant apolipoprotein(a) with modified fibrinogen surfaces and fibrin clots

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in plasma are a significant risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic disease, a property which may arise from the ability of this lipoprotein to inhibit fibrinolysis. In the present study we have quantitated the binding of recombinant forms of apolipoprotein(a) [17K and 12K r-apo(a); containing 8 and 3 copies, respectively, of the major repeat kringle sequence (kringle IV type 2)] to modified fibrinogen surfaces. Iodinated 17K and 12K r-apo(a) bound to immobilized thrombin-modified fibrinogen (i.e., fibrin) surfaces with similar affinities (Kd~ 1.2 - 1.6 µM). The total concentration of binding sites (Bmax) present on the fibrin surface was ~4-fold greater for the 12K than for the 17K (Bmaxvalues of 0.81 ± 0.09 nM, and 0.20 ± 0.01 nM respectively), suggesting that the total binding capacity on fibrin surfaces is reduced for larger apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) species. Interestingly, binding of apo(a) to intact fibrin was not detected as assessed by measurement of intrinsic fluorescence of free apo(a) present in the supernatants of sedimented fibrin clots. In other experiments, the total concentration apo(a) binding sites available on plasmin-modified fibrinogen surfaces was shown to be 13.5-fold higher than the number of sites available on unmodified fibrin surfaces (Bmaxvalues of 2.7 ± 0.3 nM and 0.20 ± 0.01 nM respectively) while the affinity of apo(a) for these surfaces was similar. The increase in Bmaxwas correlated with plasmin-mediated exposure of C-terminal lysines since treatment of plasmin-modified fibrinogen surfaces with carboxypeptidase B produced a significant decrease in total binding signal as detected by ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay). Taken together, these data suggest that apo(a) binds to fibrin with poor affinity (low µM) and that the total concentration of apo(a) binding sites available on modified-fibrinogen surfaces is affected by both apo(a) isoform size and by the increased availability of C-terminal lysines on plasmin-degraded fibrinogen surfaces. However, the low affinity of apo(a) for fibrin indicates that Lp(a) may inhibit fibrinolysis through a mechanism distinct from binding to fibrin, such as binding to plasminogen.Key words: fibrinolysis, lipoprotein(a), plasminogen activation.

Contribution of apolipoprotein(a) size, pentanucleotide TTTTA repeat and C/T(+93) polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene to regulation of lipoprotein(a) plasma levels in a population of young European Caucasians

Several studies indicate that the inter-individual variation in plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is mainly under genetic control. To define the effect of three DNA polymorphisms on apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) expression, we have determined plasma Lp(a) concentrations, apo(a) isoform size, KpnI allele size, the TTTTA pentanucleotide repeat number in the 5' control region of the apo(a) gene and the +93 C/T polymorphism in a European Caucasian population. The simultaneous determination of the kringle 4 (K4) number by genotyping and by phenotyping revealed that the size distribution of non-expressed apo(a) alleles was markedly skewed towards alleles with greater than 25 K4 repeats. This is consistent with the inverse relationship frequently described between the kringle 4 number and the plasma Lp(a) level. Apportioning the Lp(a) concentration from the surface of the peaks on apo(a) phenotyping blots, we have observed that the Lp(a) plasma concentration associated with alleles having more than 25 K4 units does not exceed 400 mg/l, whereas the range of Lp(a) concentrations associated with smaller alleles was broad, from 0 to more than 1000 mg/l. It can thus be concluded that the number of K4 repeats is the main determinant of Lp(a) concentration when this number is more than 25, whereas other polymorphisms may be involved in the alleles with fewer than 26 K4. Analyses of the TTTTA repeat number and of the +93 C/T polymorphism were performed in subjects with KpnI alleles of the same length: low Lp(a) concentrations were shown to be preferentially associated with the presence of apo(a) alleles with more than eight pentanucleotide repeats while no association was revealed between Lp(a) plasma levels and the C/T polymorphism. These results demonstrate that the (TTTTA)(n) polymorphism affects the Lp(a) expression independently of apo(a) size polymorphism.

Role of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) phenotype in atherogenesis: prospective results from the Bruneck study

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies have suggested both atherogenic and thrombogenic properties of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], depending on Lp(a) plasma concentrations and varying antifibrinolytic capacity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms. Epidemiological studies may contribute to assessment of the relevance of these findings in the general population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study prospectively investigated the association between Lp(a) plasma concentrations, apo(a) phenotypes, and the 5-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis assessed by high-resolution duplex ultrasound in a random sample population of 826 individuals. We differentiated early atherogenesis (incident nonstenotic atherosclerosis) from advanced (stenotic) stages in atherosclerosis that originate mainly from atherothrombotic mechanisms. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis in a dose-dependent fashion, with this association being confined to subjects with LDL cholesterol levels above the population median (3.3 mmol/L). Apo(a) phenotypes were distributed similarly in subjects with and without early carotid atherosclerosis. In contrast, apo(a) phenotypes of low molecular weight emerged as one of the strongest risk predictors of advanced stenotic atherosclerosis, especially when associated with high Lp(a) plasma concentrations (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.8 to 14. 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) is one of the few risk factors capable of promoting both early and advanced stages of atherogenesis. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis synergistically with high LDL cholesterol. Low-molecular-weight apo(a) phenotypes with a putatively high antifibrinolytic capacity in turn emerged as one of the leading risk conditions of advanced stenotic stages of atherosclerosis.

Apolipoprotein(a) enhances platelet responses to the thrombin receptor-activating peptide SFLLRN

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are correlated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic disease. We examined the effect of recombinant apolipoprotein(a) [r-apo(a)] and Lp(a) on responses of washed human platelets, prelabeled in the dense granules with [14C]serotonin and suspended in Tyrode's solution, to ADP and the thrombin receptor-activating peptide SFLLRN. No effect of the 17 kringle (K), 12K, or 6K r-apo(a) derivatives (at concentrations of 0.35 and 0.7 micromol/L) or Lp(a) (up to 0.1 micromol/L) on primary ADP-induced platelet aggregation was observed. In contrast, weak platelet responses stimulated by 7.5 micromol/L SFLLRN were significantly enhanced by the r-apo(a) derivatives; eg, 0.7 micromol/L 17K r-apo(a) increased aggregation from 15+/-4% to 58+/-6%, release of [14C]serotonin from 9+/-3% to 36+/-6%, and formation of thromboxane A2, measured as its stable metabolite thromboxane B2, from 7+/-1 to 29+/-5 ng/10(9) platelets (n=3; P<0.04 to 0.015). Significant enhancement of aggregation and release of granule contents was observed at a concentration of 17K r-apo(a) as low as 0.175 micromol/L. Purified Lp(a) (0.25 to 0.1 micromol/L) also enhanced SFLLRN-induced aggregation and release in a dose-dependent manner. Although plasminogen (0.7 and 1.5 micromol/L) and low density lipoprotein (0.025 to 0.1 micromol/L) both exhibited potentiating effects on SFLLRN-mediated platelet aggregation, the magnitude of the responses was less than that observed with either the r-apo(a) derivatives or Lp(a). The enhanced responses of platelets via the protease-activated receptor- thrombin receptor in the presence of Lp(a) may contribute to the increased risk of thromboembolic complications of atherosclerosis associated with this lipoprotein.

The functional and clinical significance of the Met-->Thr substitution in Kringle IV type 10 of apolipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an independent risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis, contains an apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] moiety covalently linked to a LDL moiety. Apo(a) is a glycoprotein homologous to plasminogen as it contains multiple repeats of a lysine binding domain resembling plasminogen kringle IV (K.IV). The multiple K.IV repeats can be differentiated in ten types that show a variation in their lysine binding capacity. Since K.IV type 10 shows the highest conservation of the amino acids postulated to form the lysine binding pocket, this kringle is suggested to be the main lysine binding site of apo(a). Recently, a T-->C polymorphism in the apo(a)-gene was reported, leading to a Met-->Thr substitution at amino acid position 66 of K.IV type 10, in the vicinity of the postulated lysine binding pocket. To investigate the significance of this substitution on some in vitro characteristics of Lp(a), the affinity for lysine-Sepharose and the binding affinity for limited plasmin digested des AA fibrin (Desafib-X) of the two subtypes was determined using plasma of donors homozygous for the polymorphism. These studies revealed a large heterogeneity in the binding characteristics, irrespective of the subtype. The comparison of the allele frequencies of this polymorphism in 155 patients having symptomatic atherosclerosis versus 153 normolipidemic controls revealed no significant differences. In conclusion, this study suggests that the presence of either a Met66 or a Thr66 residue in K.IV type 10 of apo(a) has no consequences for the binding characteristics of Lp(a) toward lysine-Sepharose or Desafib-X, nor is it associated with the presence of symptomatic atherosclerosis.

Lipoprotein(a) isoforms display differences in affinity for plasminogen-like binding to human mononuclear cells

Binding of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) to membrane proteins of the monocyte-macrophage cell lineage may be an important event in atheroma formation. Since Lp(a) with distinct apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoforms may show differences in their affinity with regard to fibrin binding, the existence of such a functional behavior in the interaction of apo(a) in Lp(a) with these cells was explored using the monocytic cell line THP-1. Lp(a) preparations containing small size apo(a) isoforms (M(r) = 450,000 to 550,000) and high molecular mass isoforms (M(r) > or = 700,000) were purified from plasmas containing > 0.35 g/L of Lp(a) obtained from subjects (n = 14) with cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease. Binding of plasminogen to THP-1 cells was performed using the method of radioisotopic dilution. For binding of Lp(a) to cells, the THP-1 monocytic cells were incubated with varying concentrations of the different Lp(a) preparations; cells were then washed and the amount of Lp(a) bound was detected with a radiolabeled polyclonal antibody directed against apo(a). Binding due to kringle interactions with lysine residues was calculated by subtracting from the total bound the amount of Lp(a) bound (approximately 10%) in the presence of 6-aminohexanoic acid. Analysis of data with the Langmuir equation indicated identical and independent (non-interacting) sites and allowed evaluation of the Kd. Binding isotherms of small size isoforms showed saturation and a high affinity (Kd = 25.8 +/- 19 nmol/L) relative to that of plasminogen (Kd = 1750 +/- 760 nmol/L). A similar difference (Kd = 17.5 +/- 7.9 nmol/L versus Kd = 600 +/- 220 nmol/L) was found when binding experiments were performed with a fibrin surface. In contrast, binding isotherms of the high molecular mass isoforms did not show saturation at the highest Lp(a) concentrations used, thus indicating a lower affinity. In conclusion, these results show that apo(a) isoforms may display polymorphism-linked functional heterogeneity with regard to cell binding, which may explain the higher association with cardiovascular risk of small size isoforms. These qualitative differences in the binding of apo(a) isoforms to fibrin or cells may modulate the cardiovascular risk associated with high levels of Lp(a).