Immunohistochemical staining for calretinin is useful in the diagnosis of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumours

TFE3 nuclear expression as a novel biomarker of ovarian sclerosing stromal tumors and associated with its histological morphology

Sclerosing stromal tumors of the ovary are benign and tend to occur in youthful women with lobular structures at low frequencies. Three types of cells, including luteinized cells, short spindle myoid cells, and intermediate cells, are found in the lobules which abundant in the blood vessels. Currently, immunohistochemistry is used to detect normal follicles, sclerosing stromal tumors, granulosa cell tumors, and fibromas/thecomas. Our research results showed that transcription factor enhancer 3 (TFE3) was moderate to strong positive in the theca interna layer of normal follicles. TFE3 was expressed in seven out of eight sclerosing stromal tumors, mainly in luteinized cells. It did not express in 20 granulosa cell tumors. Of the nine fibromas/thecomas, TFE3 was weakly staining in 2 cases and negative in the remaining 7 cases. The expression of TFE3 was also weak in only one microcystic stromal tumor. 8 cases of sclerosing stromal tumors were analyzed by FISH using a TFE3 separation probe, and the results were negative. In short, as a nuclear transcription protein, TFE3 specifically expressed in sclerosing stromal tumors and could serve as a new marker for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of sclerosing stromal tumors. Moreover, we speculate that TFE3 will promotes the formation of the vascular plexus after entry into the nucleus, which can further explain why sclerosing stromal tumors are different from other ovary sex-cord stromal tumors.

An update on diagnostic tissue-based biomarkers in testicular tumors

Testicular cancer is rare overall but comprises the most common solid malignancy diagnosed in young men aged ∼20-40 years. Most testicular neoplasms generally fall into 2 broad categories: germ cell tumors (GCTs; ∼95%) and sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs ∼5%). Given the relative rarity of these tumors, diagnostic biomarkers are highly relevant for their diagnosis. Over the past several decades, diagnostic biomarkers have improved dramatically through targeted immunohistochemical and molecular characterization. Despite these recent advances, most markers are not perfectly sensitive or entirely specific. Therefore, they need to be used in combination and interpreted in context. In this review, we summarize tissue-based biomarkers relevant to the pathologist, with a focus on practical diagnostic issues that relate to testicular GCT and SCST.

TFE3 is a Novel Biomarker of Ovarian Sclerosing Stromal Tumours

Sclerosing stromal tumours of the ovary are benign and tend to occur in young women with lobular structures at low frequencies. Three types of cells, luteinized cells, short spindle myoid cells, and intermediate cells, are found in lobules, which are rich in blood vessels. Currently, immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization are used to detect normal follicles, sclerosing stromal tumours, granulosa cell tumours, and theca fibromas. Our research found the expression of transcription factor enhancer 3 (TFE3) was moderately and strongly positive in the inner thecal cell layer of normal follicles. It was expressed in seven out of eight sclerosing stromal tumours, mainly in luteinized cells, but not in 20 granulosa cell tumours and 1 microcystic stromal tumour. In nine cases of theca cell tumours and theca fibromas, TFE3 was not expressed, except in two cases of weak TFE3 expression. Eight cases of sclerosing stromal tumours were analysed by FISH using a TFE3 separation probe, and the results were negative. In a word, as a nuclear transcription protein, TFE3 was specifically expressed in sclerosing stromal tumours and could serve as a new marker for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of sclerosing stromal tumours.

Cytologic features of sex cord-stromal tumors in women

BACKGROUND

Gynecologic sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs) arise from sex cords of the embryonic gonad and may display malignant behavior. We describe the cytomorphologic features of SCSTs in females, including adult and juvenile granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs and JGCTs), Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLCTs), and steroid cell tumors (SCTs).

METHODS

We retrieved available cytology slides from females with a histologic diagnosis of sex cord-stromal tumor between 2009 and 2020 from institutional archives and reviewed their cytoarchitectural features.

RESULTS

There were 25, 2, 2, and 1 cytology specimens from 19, 2, 2, and 1 patients (aged 7-90 years, median 57 years) with AGCT, JGCT, SLCT, and SCT, respectively. Features common to all SCSTs included 3-dimensional groups, rosettes, rare papillary fragments, abundant single cells and naked nuclei. Rosettes and a streaming appearance of cell groups were only seen in AGCTs, which also rarely featured eosinophilic hyaline globules and metachromatic stroma. AGCTs exhibited high nuclear:cytoplasmic (N:C) ratios, with mild nuclear pleomorphism, uniform nuclei with finely granular chromatin, nuclear grooves and small nucleoli; in contrast, other SCSTs lacked rosettes and nuclear grooves and had generally lower N:C ratios, greater nuclear pleomorphism, coarse chromatin and more abundant cytoplasm. Mitotic figures, necrosis, and inflammation were rarely identified.

CONCLUSIONS

AGCTs show cytomorphologic features that are distinct from those of other SCSTs. Careful evaluation of the cytological features and ancillary studies (eg, immunochemistry for FOXL2, inhibin and calretinin, or sequencing for FOXL2 mutations) can aid in the accurate diagnosis of these tumors.

Therapeutic Role of Annona muricata Fruit and Bee Venom Against MNU-Induced Breast Cancer in Pregnant Rats and its Complications on the Ovaries

AIM

To evaluate the potential therapeutic role of Annona muricata (graviola) fruit and bee venom (BV) against N-methylnitrosourea (MNU)-induced breast cancer in pregnant female rats and complications in the ovaries.

METHODS

A total of 24 female rats were induced with a single dose of MNU (50 mg/kg body weight). After confirmation of positive tumor marker, female rats were placed with the males for mating. The pregnant rats were randomly divided into four groups (n=6): MNU-induced only (group 1), MNU-induced rats and supplemented with A. muricata 200 mg/kg diet (group 2), MNU-induced and treated with two doses of BV 75 μg/kg (group 3), and MNU-induced and treated with both A. muricata and BV (group 4).

RESULTS

In group 1, the breast tissue of mothers revealed pronounced cellular hyperplasia and histopathological signs. Also, the ovarian tissue of mothers and their offspring displayed deleterious histological changes. In groups 2 and 4, histopathological signs and cellular hyperplasia markedly disappeared in breast tissue. However, the histopathological signs induced by MNU in the ovarian tissue reversed to normal in groups 2-4. Also in groups 2-4, levels of serum MMP1, NFκB, and TNFα significantly decreased, and serum caspase 3 significantly increased either in mother rats or their offspring compared to the MNU-alone group. Levels of serum MDA significantly decreased; however, levels of serum antioxidants (CAT and SOD) significantly increased in all groups 2-4 compared to MNU-alone group.

CONCLUSION

A. muricata has a more powerful therapeutic role than BV against MNU-induced breast cancer in rats; however, both have a powerful ameliorative role against ovarian histopathological alterations induced by MNU. Such ameliorative effects of A. muricata and BV are mainly attributed to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiproliferative constituents.

A clinicopathological study of granulosa cell tumors of the ovary: Can morphology predict prognosis?

Objective

Granulosa cell tumors (GCT) are low-grade malignant sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST) with late metastasis/recurrences and long disease-free periods. We performed a clinicopathological evaluation of GCT to ascertain features having prognostic impact.

Materials and Methods

All cases of GCT of ovary from January 2006 to December 2018 were assessed for architectural patterns, nuclear grooves, and Call-Exner bodies. Each feature was graded on frequency of occurrence: not present (0)-very frequent (3). Anisonucleosis, necrosis, and inflammation were noted. Cases were grouped on mitotic count; <10 mitosis/10 High power field (HPF) or >=11 mitoses/10 HPF and Ki-67 index; <10% Ki-67 and >=11% Ki-67.

Results

GCT formed 60.1% of SCST. Sixty cases' ages were in the range of 15-78 years (median 45). Clinical details were available in 37. Commonest presentation was abnormal uterine bleeding. Serum CA125 was raised in 16.1% and Inhibin in 58.8%. Seventy percent were in stage I. Disease recurrence was associated with higher stage (P = 0.007). The most frequent pattern was diffuse sheets (47%). Call-Exner bodies were absent in 22.2%. Grooves with score 1, 2, and 3 were seen in 35.8%, 23.5%, and 13.6%, respectively. Anisonucleosis was present in 26.7%, necrosis in 11.1%, and lympho-plasmacytic infiltrate in 43%. Out of total, 93.3% had <10 mitosis/10 HPF and 43.2% had recurrence, most with high Ki-67 (P = 0.064).

Conclusion

Our study outlines histomorphological spectrum of GCT and emphasizes its frequent occurrence in lower stages with late recurrences. The presence of grooves may indicate granulosa-cell origin. Call-Exner bodies are not a necessity. Histomorphological features are not prognostically important. However, prognostic value of Ki-67 cannot be excluded. Limitation of the study was a small number of cases with follow-up.

Ovarian Sclerosing Stromal Tumor and Müllerian Cyst in an 11-yr-old Girl: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Sclerosing stromal tumor (SST) is an extremely rare ovarian neoplasm that primarily affects young female individuals. Patients with SST often present with pelvic pain and menstrual irregularities. Herein, we report a case of SST of the ovary in an 11-yr-old girl with symptoms of abdominal pain and menstrual irregularities. A preoperative diagnosis of tumors in the left adnexa and right ovary was made by pelvic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, and the patient underwent exploratory laparotomy and laparoscopic cystectomy. The ovarian masses were removed and proven to be SST in the left ovary and Müllerian cyst in the right fallopian tube on histopathologic examination and immunochemistry. To our knowledge, the 11-yr-old patient presented here was the only case with SST and Müllerian cyst simultaneously.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian paraganglioma: Report of a rare case and systematic review of the literature

Paraganglioma is one of the rarest neoplasms involving the ovary, with only 10 previous reports. We present a case of peritoneal carcinomatosis from primary ovarian paraganglioma and a systematic review of the literature. Clinical information was retrieved from medical records, and a systematic review of the literature was performed according to meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines. A 33-year-old woman presented with a 12-month history of hypertension and weight loss. She was diagnosed with ovarian paraganglioma and was treated with extensive debulking surgery to no residual disease after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. She recurred after 6 months and was started on somatostatin-analogue. Following further disease progression with bone metastasis (treated with palliative radiotherapy), a trial with Sunitinib was started. The patient died 30 months after initial diagnosis. Of the cases reported to date, only one had peritoneal metastasis at presentation but none of them had such an ominous prognosis. Ovarian paraganglioma is an extremely rare condition. We report the first case of primary malignant ovarian paraganglioma with an exceptionally aggressive behavior. Clinicopathological correlation with immunohistochemistry is essential to avoid misdiagnosis. A standard treatment is not recommended yet but cytoreductive surgery seems to be a favorable approach to prolong survival.

Uncommon hereditary gynaecological tumour syndromes: pathological features in tumours that may predict risk for a germline mutation

The most common hereditary gynaecological tumour syndromes are hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and Lynch syndrome. However, pathologists also may encounter gynaecological tumours in women with rare hereditary syndromes. Many of these tumours exhibit distinctive gross and microscopic features that are associated with a risk for an inherited gene mutation. The sensitivity and specificity of these tumour pathology features for predicting an inherited mutation vary depending on the syndrome. By recognising these tumour features, pathologists may potentially contribute to the diagnosis of an unsuspected syndrome by recommending referral of the patient for formal risk assessment by genetic counselling. Patients additionally benefit from diagnosis of an inherited syndrome because many also carry a lifetime risk for developing primary malignancies outside of the gynaecological tract. Early diagnosis of an inherited syndrome permits early screening, detection, and management of additional malignancies associated with the syndrome. This review highlights these rare syndromes and their tumour pathology, including Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (gastric type mucinous carcinoma of the cervix; ovarian sex cord tumour with annular tubules); hereditary leiomyoma renal cell carcinoma syndrome (uterine leiomyoma); tuberous sclerosis complex (uterine PEComa; uterine lymphangioleiomyomatosis); DICER1 syndrome (ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumour; cervical embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma); rhabdoid tumour predisposition syndrome 2 (small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type); Cowden syndrome (endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma); naevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (ovarian fibroma); and Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (clear cell papillary cystadenoma of the broad ligament).

Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumours: an update in recent molecular advances

Sex cord-stromal tumours (SCSTs) consist of a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with diverse clinicopathological features and biological behaviour. They often present as a diagnostic challenge as they have varied and occasionally overlapping histomorphology and some may even mimic non-SCSTs. An accurate diagnosis is important for therapeutic and prognostic purposes. The use of a panel of immunohistochemical markers which are sensitive and specific for sex cord-stromal differentiation such as α-inhibin, calretinin, SF-1 and FOXL2, may be helpful in confirming the cellular lineage of these tumours, but is of limited utility in distinguishing between the different tumour types within this category. Additionally, the development of new therapeutic strategies in patients with SCSTs is also hampered by the infrequent occurrence of these neoplasms. Recent molecular analyses of some SCSTs has led to the discovery of novel molecular events, which may have important diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications. The salient pathological features, management issues and recently described genetic aberrations in adult and juvenile granulosa cell tumours as well as Sertoli-Leydig cell tumours are discussed in this review, with particular emphasis on the clinical significance of FOXL2 and DICER1 mutations. An in-depth understanding of the molecular pathogenesis underlying SCSTs may aid in improving tumour classification and disease prognostication and also potentially lead to the discovery of more effective treatment strategies.

Retiform Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor in a 38-Year-Old Woman: A Case Report, Retrospective Review, and Review of Current Literature

Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors arise from the stromal cells that surround and support the oocytes. Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors belong to this category of ovarian neoplasms. We present the case of a 38-year-old woman who was found to have a right ovarian mass. The mass was resected and diagnosed as Stage I Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor, retiform variant, following histopathologic and immunohistochemical examination. This case is unusual given the rarity of the retiform variant of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor and the atypically older age of 38 years at presentation.

Rare non-epithelial ovarian neoplasms: Pathology, genetics and treatment

Rare non-epithelial ovarian neoplasms have posed management challenges for many years. Their rarity means that most specialist practitioners will see one such case every several years, and most generalists may never see a case. The first step in management is to establish the correct diagnosis and this may necessitate specialist pathology review. Here, we review recent developments in the pathology, genetics and treatment of small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) and sex cord-stromal tumours. Pathologically, these tumours often display morphological overlap with other neoplasms; for example, SCCOHT overlaps with many other "small round blue cell" tumours. Specific immunohistochemical stains, while useful, may not always be definitive. The discovery of somatic mutations in FOXL2 (adult granulosa cell tumours) and germline and somatic mutations in DICER1 (Sertoli-Leydig cell tumours) and SMARCA4 (SCCOHT) has demonstrated the value of molecular investigation as an adjunct to traditional histopathological approaches. In addition, the presence of germline mutations in a significant proportion of some of these neoplasms points to the need for genetic counselling and testing, offering the prospect of prevention and early diagnosis. Treatment of these rare tumours, as a group, should be on the basis of sound oncological principles, given that level 1 evidence will almost always be lacking. The rationale for experimental therapies must be clearly established. In view of the complex issues involved in the management of these conditions, expert opinion in pathology, genetics and treatment may be essential to offer the patient and her family the best chance of a good outcome.

Interleukin-2 Production by Cultured Human Granulosa Cells

PROBLEM

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is similar to vascular leak syndrome (VLS), which may be attributable to the massive increase in systemic inflammatory cytokines. The hyperstimulated human ovaries were demonstrated to contain interleukin (IL)-2, which, in turn, was suggested to activate the systemic inflammatory response characteristic of OHSS. As the source of follicular fluid IL-2 is still unclear, in the present study, we sought to validate the presence of IL-2 and IL-2 mRNA expression in human luteinized granulosa cells.

METHOD OF STUDY

IL-2 nuclear expression was detected using real-time PCR and immunofluorescence staining of human luteinized granulosa cell from 6 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Calretinin immunofluorescence staining was used as a marker of granulosa cells.

RESULTS

IL-2-positive immunofluorescence staining was detected within nuclei of granulosa cells, together with positive stain for calretinin, confirming the presence of granulosa cell. Moreover, IL-2 gene expression was demonstrated in luteinized granulosa cells by real-time PCR.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, we provided firm evidence for the IL-2 production by human luteinized granulosa cells, as demonstrated by the presence of IL-2 and IL-2 mRNA expression in luteinized granulosa cells. Further studies are justified in an attempt to clarify the regulation and the cause-and-effect relationship between IL-2 production by the hyperstimulated ovaries and OHSS.

Value of calretinin immunostaining in diagnostic pathology: a review and update

Calretinin is a member of the EF-hand family of calcium-binding proteins. Because its expression is highly restricted to mesotheliomas, calretinin is, at present, the most commonly used positive mesothelioma marker that is most often recommended to be included in the various immunohistochemical panels used to assist in the differential diagnosis of these tumors. Calretinin expression has also been reported to be commonly expressed in a wide variety of other neoplasms, including sex cord-stromal tumors, adrenal cortical neoplasms, olfactory neuroblastomas, Schwann cell tumors, cardiac myxomas, and ameloblastomas. This article reviews the information that is currently available on calretinin expression in tumors and on its application as an immunohistochemical marker in diagnostic pathology.

The Utility of Immunohistochemistry in the Differential Diagnosis of Gynecologic Disorders

Context

Immunohistochemistry has assumed an increasing role in the identification and characterization of gynecologic disorders including lesions with deceptively bland morphology, uncommon and underdiagnosed neoplasms, and neoplasms with specific genetic alterations associated with overexpression or loss of expression of specific proteins. The diagnostic accuracy has been significantly improved owing to the discovery and increasing experience with the tumor-associated biomarkers, and the increasing demand for precise tumor classification to assess suitability for the expanding therapeutic modalities including clinical trials.

Objective

To differentiate lesions of the gynecologic tract through the use of effective immunohistochemical panels.

Data Sources

Literature review and authors' personal practice experience.

Conclusions

The application of diagnostic and prognostic immunohistochemical panels has enabled pathologists to better guide therapeutic decisions and to better predict the clinical outcome. It is now well established that the use of ancillary testing, including immunohistochemistry, has a significant power in the identification, differentiation, and classification of reactive, premalignant, and malignant gynecologic disorders. This article discusses the utilities and pitfalls of the commonly used immunohistochemical markers in the context of overlapping morphologic features encountered in the uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes.

Sclerosing stromal tumour in young women: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical spectrum

AIM

Sclerosing stromal tumor is a benign tumor of ovary. We aimed to review the clinical findings and immunohistochemical results of SSTs through the 7 diagnosed cases in our hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

As immunohistochemical, blocks were applied with estrogen receptor , progesterone receptor, inhibin, calretinin, melan-A, CD10, smooth muscle actin, desmine, vimentin, CD34, S-100, C-kit, cytokeratin , cytokeratin7.

RESULTS

Macroscopically, while 5 tumors had solid appearance, 2 tumors were composed of solid and cystic areas. All the tumors were in shape of ovarian masses with good limits. Microscopically, two types of cells were observed as fusiform fibroblast-like cells and theca-like cells with vacuolised cytoplasm. Immunohistochemical results: vimentin, smooth muscle actin, desmine, progesterone receptor, calretinin, inhibin were positive in all the cases; S-100, cytokeratin, cytokeratin7, estrogen receptor were negative in all the cases; CD-10 was positive in 2 cases; C-kit was positive in 5 cases; melan-A was positive in 4 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The significance of these tumors is that it is necessary to distinguish the histopathology in the frozen section in order to protect the other adnexa because of the characteristics to be observed at early ages (2(nd) and 3(rd) decades). Our findings support the conclusion that sclerosing stromal tumors are benign-character tumors that stem from over stroma and are hormonally active tumors because of the detected clinical and immunohistochemical results, although no hormonal effect that could be supported with laboratory tests was observed.

Immunoreactivity for calretinin and keratins in desmoid fibromatosis and other myofibroblastic tumors: a diagnostic pitfall

Calretinin is an intracellular calcium-binding EF-hand protein of the calmodulin superfamily. It plays a role in diverse cellular functions, including message targeting and intracellular calcium signaling. It is expressed in the mesothelium, mast cells, some neural cells, and fat cells, among others. Because of its relative specificity for mesothelial neoplasms, calretinin is widely used as one of the primary immunohistochemical markers for malignant mesothelioma and in differentiating it from adenocarcinoma. On the basis of our sporadic observation on calretinin immunoreactivity in desmoid fibromatosis, we systematically evaluated calretinin, keratin cocktail (AE1/AE3), and WT1 immunoreactivity in 268 fibroblastic/myofibroblastic neoplasms. Calretinin was observed in 75% (44/58) of desmoid fibromatosis, 50% (21/42) of proliferative fasciitis, 23% (8/35) of nodular fasciitis, 33% (13/40) of benign fibrous histiocytoma, 35% (22/62) of malignant fibrous histiocytoma, and 13% (4/31) of solitary fibrous tumors but not in normal connective tissue fibroblasts at various sites. Keratin AE1/AE3 immunoreactivity was also commonly (6/13) present in the large ganglion-like cells of proliferative fasciitis and sometimes in nodular fasciitis (3/35), solitary fibrous tumor (3/27), and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (9/62). Nuclear immunoreactivity for WT1 or keratin 5 positivity was not detected in myofibroblastic tumors. On the basis of these observations, it can be concluded that calretinin and focal keratin immunoreactivity is fairly common in benign and malignant fibroblastic and myofibroblastic lesions. Calretinin-positive and keratin-positive spindle cells in desmoid and nodular fasciitis or calretinin-positive ganglion-like cells in proliferative fasciitis should not be confused with elements of epithelioid or sarcomatoid mesothelioma. These diagnostic pitfalls can be avoided with careful observation of morphology, quantitative differences in keratin expression, and use of additional immunohistochemical markers such keratin 5 and WT1 to verify true epithelial and mesothelial differentiation typical of mesothelioma.

E-cadherin nuclear staining is useful for the diagnosis of ovarian adult granulosa cell tumor

We recently have demonstrated nuclear localization of E-cadherin in ovarian adult granulosa cell tumors (Histopathology 2011;58:423). The purpose of the present study is to investigate the diagnostic utility of E-cadherin nuclear staining for the differential diagnosis between ovarian adult granulosa cell tumor and its morphological mimics. Tissue samples taken from 81 ovarian tumors and 20 extraovarian tumors were immunohistochemically stained using monoclonal anti-E-cadherin antibody recognizing cytoplasmic domain (clone 36 supplied by BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The ovarian tumors consisted of 30 adult granulosa cell tumors, 3 Sertoli-stromal cell tumors, 14 fibrothecomas, 5 carcinoid tumors, 1 large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 18 endometrioid adenocarcinomas, and 10 poorly differentiated serous adenocarcinomas. Extraovarian tumors consisted of 16 uterine endometrial stromal neoplasms and 4 pulmonary small cell carcinomas. Only tumor cells with nuclear staining were considered positive in this study. Ninety percent of adult granulosa cell tumors, 67% of Sertoli-stromal cell tumors, 64% of fibrothecomas, 75% of endometrial stromal neoplasms, 75% of small cell carcinomas, and the one large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma showed E-cadherin nuclear expression, whereas all the ovarian carcinoid tumors, endometrioid adenocarcinomas, and poorly differentiated serous adenocarcinomas were negative. E-cadherin nuclear staining is useful in distinguishing between adult granulosa cell tumors and ovarian adenocarcinomas or carcinoid tumors. However, it is of limited use for distinguishing between adult granulosa cell tumors and endometrial stromal neoplasms or small cell carcinomas. E-cadherin should be included in the immunohistochemical panel for an accurate diagnosis of ovarian adult granulosa cell tumors.

Calretinin: diagnostic utility in the female genital tract

The utility of calretinin was first described in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. In the female genital tract, calretinin was initially reported in Wolffian remnants and related lesions and later used in the diagnosis of sex cord stromal tumors of the ovary, endometrial stromal tumors with sex cord-like differentiation, and uterine tumors resembling sex cord tumors of the ovary. This review discusses calretinin expression in normal tissues of the female genital tract and highlights its potential utility in the diagnosis of these subsets of neoplasms with emphasis to tumors that may constitute a problem in their differential diagnosis. In particular, the limited utility of calretinin in the diagnosis of sex cord stromal tumors of the ovary, in the differential diagnosis between mesothelioma and serous tumors involving the ovary and/or peritoneum, and in the differential diagnosis between Wolffian lesions and endometrial carcinoma are addressed.

Application of immunohistochemistry to gynecologic pathology

CONTEXT

A large variety of tumors and lesions arise in the female genital tract. Although the majority of these can be correctly recognized on routine hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides, occasional cases present a diagnostic challenge. Immunohistochemical stains are extremely useful in resolving many of these problematic cases. As the knowledge in this area is constantly expanding, it is useful to have this updated information in a review form for easy access.

OBJECTIVE

To present our current knowledge of immunohistochemistry of the lesions of the female genital tract in a readily accessible form.

DATA SOURCES

The review is based on previously published articles on this topic.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemical stains help in reaching a conclusive diagnosis in a variety of problematic lesions seen in gynecologic pathology. As in any other system, immunohistochemical findings need to be interpreted in light of the clinical history and morphologic findings.

Undifferentiated tumor: true identity by immunohistochemistry

CONTEXT

"Undifferentiated tumor" refers to a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with little or no evidence of differentiation on routine light microscopic morphology.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the true identity of undifferentiated tumors by immunohistochemical analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Review of the pertinent literature and the authors' experience.

CONCLUSIONS

For treatment and prognostic evaluation, it is crucial to delineate whether an undifferentiated neoplasm is epithelial, mesenchymal, melanocytic, or hematopoietic in nature. Application of a screening panel to demonstrate the expression of markers of major lineages is fundamental for determination of the broad category of neoplasia. Because poorly differentiated carcinomas and in particular sarcomatoid carcinomas are known to be heterogeneous in their antigen expression, several epithelial markers in combination may be required to establish the carcinomatous nature of tumor. A diagnostic misinterpretation as a consequence of occasional aberrant or unexpected antigen expression is best avoided by using a broad panel that includes both antibodies that are anticipated to be positive and those that are expected to be negative. In this treatise, the immunohistochemical dissection of undifferentiated tumors on the basis of their morphologic features is outlined, supplemented with algorithmic immunohistochemical analysis for each morphologic category of small round cell tumors, carcinomatous tumors, sarcomatous (or sarcoma-like) tumors, and tumors with histologically overlapping features, including hematolymphoid malignancies, melanoma, and sarcomas with epithelioid appearance. The utility of several organ- or tissue-specific markers in the context of undifferentiated tumors is reviewed.

CD10 Expression in Pure Stromal and Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors of the Ovary

CD10 has been recently advocated as a good immunohistochemical marker for endometrial stromal tumors. Metastatic endometrial stromal tumors to the ovary and primary endometrioid stromal sarcomas may show overlapping histological features with pure stromal and sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs). We investigated CD10 expression in a large series of pure stromal and SCSTs of the ovary to ascertain whether CD10 may aid in this differential diagnosis. Archival material from 11 fibromas, 10 thecomas, 10 sclerosing stromal tumors (SSTs), 10 adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs), 4 luteinized AGCTs, 9 juvenile granulosa cell tumors (JGCTs), 9 Sertoli cell tumors, 9 Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors, 11 sex cord tumors with annular tubules, 10 steroid cell tumors (StCTs), and 8 fibrosarcomas of the ovary were immunostained for CD10. The percentage of cells stained (<5%, 5%-39%, 40%-75%, and >75%) and intensity of staining (1+, 2+, 3+) were evaluated. CD10 was expressed in 7 of 10 thecomas (4 with 5%-75% and mostly 1+), 9 of 10 SSTs (7 with 5%-39% + cells, mostly 1+), 9 of 10 AGCTs (<5%-39%, four 1+, five 2+), 1 of 4 luteinized AGCTs (<5% and 1+), 8 of 9 JGCTs (mostly <5% to 39% and +1), 4 of 9 Sertoli cell tumors (either focal or >75% with variable intensity), 4 of 9 Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (mostly <10% with variable staining), with the Leydig cells being positive in only 1 tumor (1+ and <5%), and 7 of 10 StCTs (4 tumors with more than 75% + cells, from 1+ to 3+). All fibromas, all but 1 fibrosarcoma (<5% and 1+), and all sex cord tumors with annular tubules were CD10 negative. CD10 expression was frequently seen in StCTs, SSTs, and thecomas of the ovary, although the latter 2 categories usually showed only faint immunoreactivity. In conclusion the frequency and intensity of CD10 immunoreactivity in pure stromal and sex cord-stromal ovarian tumors are low and contrast with the typical strong and diffuse immunostaining seen in endometrial stromal tumors; however, faint CD10 positivity is consistent with the diagnosis of ovarian SCST. Steroid cell tumors are often positive for CD10, but these tumors do not pose problems in differential diagnosis with endometrial stromal tumors. CD10 may play a useful role in aiding the differential between endometrial stromal tumors in the ovary and SCST and stromal tumors.

Ovarian spindle cell lesions: a review with emphasis on recent developments and differential diagnosis

Ovarian lesions composed of spindle cells comprise a heterogeneous group; most are neoplastic but several non-neoplastic conditions are also composed of spindle cells. This review discusses the main differential diagnoses of an ovarian spindle cell lesion, especially concentrating on the recent literature. The majority of ovarian spindle cell lesions fall into the broad category of fibromatous neoplasms whereas others in the sex cord-stromal group may also be composed of spindle cells, including thecomas, granulosa, and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors and rarer neoplasms, such as sclerosing stromal tumor and signet-ring stromal tumor. In the recent past there have been several major contributions on various aspects of ovarian spindle cell lesions, including cellular and mitotically active cellular fibromatous lesions, smooth muscle neoplasms, and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Other mesenchymal or epithelial tumors and mixed epithelial and mesenchymal neoplasms may also enter into the differential diagnosis of an ovarian spindle cell lesion. Several non-neoplastic lesions may be composed of spindle cells, including massive edema, ovarian fibromatosis, stromal hyperplasia, and stromal hyperthecosis. Morphology remains the mainstay in diagnosis but immunohistochemistry may be invaluable in certain circumstances, one example being the identification of a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor within the ovary.

Diagnostic Utility of WT1 Immunostaining in Ovarian Sertoli Cell Tumor

WT1, the Wilms tumor gene product, can be expressed in various tumors from different anatomic sites, including some types of ovarian tumors. Regarding the latter, most studies have focused on surface epithelial-stromal tumors in which serous carcinomas are usually positive and endometrioid carcinomas are negative. Very few studies have specifically investigated this marker in ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors; however, limited data in the literature suggest that WT1 may be frequently expressed in sex cord-stromal tumors. As pure Sertoli cell tumor can be in the histologic differential diagnosis of endometrioid tumors (particularly borderline tumor and carcinoma) and carcinoid, immunostaining for WT1 might be of diagnostic value. Immunohistochemical staining for WT1 was performed in 108 ovarian tumors: pure Sertoli cell tumor (n=26), endometrioid borderline tumor (n=25), classic well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma (n=23), sertoliform endometrioid carcinoma (n=12), and carcinoid (n=22). Additionally, inhibin and calretinin immunostaining were performed in all cases of Sertoli cell tumor for purposes of comparing expression with WT1. Extent of immunostaining was scored on a 0 to 4+ semiquantitative scale, and immunohistochemical composite scores based on a combination of extent and intensity of immunostaining were calculated in positive cases (possible range, 1 to 12). Nuclear expression of WT1 was present in 96% of Sertoli cell tumors, 16% of endometrioid borderline tumors, 13% of classic well-differentiated endometrioid carcinomas, 25% of sertoliform endometrioid carcinomas, and 0% of carcinoids. In Sertoli cell tumors, expression was diffuse (>50% of positive cells) in all positive cases. When positive in the non-Sertoli cell tumors, the extent of expression tended to be focal to patchy (50% or less positive cells). In Sertoli cell tumors, inhibin and calretinin were expressed in 96% and 54% of cases, respectively. The extent of expression of inhibin tended to be diffuse, similar to WT1; however, the extent of immunostaining for calretinin tended to be focal to patchy. The immunohistochemical composite scores for WT1, inhibin, and calretinin were 11.2, 7.6, and 4.8, respectively. Coordinate patterns for the extent of expression of WT1, inhibin, and calretinin in pure Sertoli cell tumor showed that all 3 markers were positive in 54% of cases; however, 42% were positive for WT1 and inhibin but negative for calretinin. In cases positive for both WT1 and inhibin, expression of both markers was diffuse in 84% of cases, but WT1 was diffuse while inhibin was focal to patchy in 16% of cases. We conclude that ovarian Sertoli cell tumor should be added to the growing list of WT1-positive tumors. This marker is useful for the distinction of Sertoli cell tumor from endometrioid tumors and carcinoid. The diagnostic utility of WT1 in Sertoli cell tumor is similar to inhibin but better than that of calretinin.

CD56 Is a Sensitive and Diagnostically Useful Immunohistochemical Marker of Ovarian Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors

Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with wide morphological diversity, and they can be mistaken for a variety of other tumors. Some types, including granulosa and Sertoli cell tumor, may be confused with a neuroendocrine neoplasm. CD56 is a widely used neuroendocrine marker with a high sensitivity for neuroendocrine tumors and is commonly used as part of a panel to distinguish between a neuroendocrine neoplasm and other tumors in the differential diagnosis. In this study, we investigate CD56 staining in ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors. CD56 staining has not previously been studied in this group of neoplasms. We stained a large series of ovarian sex cord-stromal neoplasms (n = 85) with CD56. Neoplasms studied were adult granulosa cell tumor (n = 40), juvenile granulosa cell tumor (n = 8), Sertoli cell tumor (n = 1), Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (n = 14), Leydig cell tumor (n = 2), steroid cell tumor, not otherwise specified (n = 2), sclerosing stromal tumor (n = 1), sex cord tumor with annular tubules (n = 2), and fibroma (n = 15). Three uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumor were also studied. Nonneoplastic ovaries, including 3 cases of pregnancy-related granulosa or Sertoli cell proliferation, were also included. In nontumorous ovaries, granulosa cells of follicular and corpus luteum cysts were consistently negative. The normal ovarian stroma was diffusely positive, as were the 3 pregnancy-related proliferations. All sex cord-stromal tumors except one were positive with CD56; staining ranged from focal to diffuse but was usually diffuse involving more than 50% of tumor cells. Staining was usually membranous with weaker cytoplasmic positivity. CD56 immunoreactivity is almost universal in ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors of all the major morphological types and is of no value in distinguishing a sex cord-stromal and a neuroendocrine neoplasm. Since CD56 is an extremely sensitive marker of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors, it may be useful in the diagnosis of this group of neoplasms, especially in cases which are alpha inhibin or calretinin negative, and in distinguishing these from mimics which are CD56 negative.

Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumors With Pseudoendometrioid Tubules (Pseudoendometrioid Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumors)

The propensity for ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinomas to morphologically mimic Sertoli, Sertoli-Leydig, and granulosa cell tumors, is well known. The converse situation, mimicry of an endometrioid neoplasm by a sex cord-stromal tumor, has not been emphasized. In this report, we describe 9 ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (5 well differentiated, 4 of intermediate differentiation) with areas containing hollow, sometimes dilated, tubules which resemble endometrioid glands; we refer to these as pseudoendometrioid tubules. The age of the patients ranged from 14 to 57. The tumors, all of which were unilateral except for one, ranged from 3.5 to 19 cm and were variously described as tan, pale, yellow, or gold. The proportion of the tumor made up of pseudoendometrioid tubules ranged from 10% to >90%. When widespread, their presence sometimes resulted in consideration of a borderline endometrioid adenofibroma or a well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma. However, all the neoplasms contained typical Sertoli tubules and one or more of the characteristic patterns of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors as well as Leydig cells, although the latter cells were inconspicuous in some cases. Immunohistochemistry, performed in 4 cases, showed that the pseudoendometrioid tubules, as well as the more typical Sertoli cell elements, were either positive for alpha inhibin (3 of 4 cases) or calretinin (3 of 4 cases) or both, although sometimes focally so. These elements were negative with epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin 7. In all 4 cases, the pseudoendometrioid tubules were positive with the broad spectrum cytokeratin AE1/3. This report illustrates the potential for ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors to contain tubules with a pseudoendometrioid appearance which mimic a borderline or malignant endometrioid neoplasm. The presence of more typical Sertoli cell elements and Leydig cells, an absence of squamous elements, endometriosis or associated adenofibroma, and the characteristic immunophenotype assist in diagnosis.

Comparative analysis of alternative and traditional immunohistochemical markers for the distinction of ovarian sertoli cell tumor from endometrioid tumors and carcinoid tumor: A study of 160 cases

The main neoplasms in the differential diagnosis for primary ovarian tumors with a tubule-rich pattern are pure Sertoli cell tumor, endometrioid tumors (including borderline tumor, well-differentiated carcinoma, and the sertoliform variant of endometrioid carcinoma), and carcinoid tumor. Because traditional immunohistochemical markers [pan-cytokeratin (pan-CK), low molecular weight cytokeratin (CK8/18), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), inhibin, calretinin, CD99, chromogranin, and synaptophysin] can occasionally have diagnostic limitations, the goal of this study was to determine whether or not any alternative markers [cytokeratin 7 (CK7), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), CD10, and CD56] have better diagnostic utility when compared with traditional markers for this differential diagnosis. Immunohistochemical stains for alternative, as well as traditional, markers were performed on the following primary ovarian tumors: pure Sertoli cell tumor (n = 40), endometrioid borderline tumor (n = 38), sertoliform endometrioid carcinoma (n = 13), well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma (n = 27), and carcinoid tumor (n = 42). Extent and intensity of immunostaining were semiquantitatively scored. In addition, immunohistochemical composite scores (ICSs) in positive cases were calculated on the basis of the combination of extent and intensity scores. Cytokeratin 7 (CK7) was positive in 97% of endometrioid tumors, 13% of Sertoli cell tumors, and 24% of carcinoid tumors. The differences in the mean ICSs for endometrioid tumors versus Sertoli cell tumor or carcinoid tumor were statistically significant (P values ranging from <0.001 to 0.018). ER and PR were positive in 87% and 86% of endometrioid tumors, 8% and 13% of Sertoli cell tumors, and 2% each of carcinoid tumors, respectively. The differences in the mean ICSs for endometrioid tumors versus Sertoli cell tumor were statistically significant (P values ranging from <0.001 to 0.012). Among the epithelial markers, EMA seemed to be the most discriminatory but only slightly better than CK7, ER, or PR. Pan-CK and CK8/18 were not helpful. CD10 showed overlapping patterns of expression in all categories of tumors. Among the sex cord markers, CD10 was markedly less useful than inhibin or calretinin; CD99 was not discriminatory. CD56 showed overlapping patterns of expression in all categories of tumors. Among the neuroendocrine markers, CD56 was less useful than chromogranin or synaptophysin. When traditional immunohistochemical markers are problematic for the differential diagnosis of ovarian Sertoli cell tumor versus endometrioid tumors versus carcinoid tumor, adding CK7, ER, and/or PR to a panel of markers can be helpful. Endometrioid tumors more frequently express CK7, ER, and PR and show a greater extent of immunostaining in contrast to Sertoli cell tumor and carcinoid tumor. Compared with traditional epithelial markers, CK7, ER, and PR are nearly as advantageous as EMA. Inhibin is the most discriminatory sex cord marker, and CD10 is not helpful in the differential diagnosis. Chromogranin and synaptophysin are excellent discriminatory markers for carcinoid tumor, and CD56 is neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific enough for this differential diagnosis to warrant its use in routine practice.

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Sox9 in Ovarian Sertoli Cell Tumors and Other Tumors in the Differential Diagnosis

The distinction of ovarian Sertoli cell tumor from other tumors in the histological differential diagnosis, particularly endometrioid carcinoma and carcinoid tumor, may be difficult. Many immunohistochemical markers have been studied for this differential diagnosis, but currently available markers are neither 100% sensitive nor specific. Sox9 is a transcription factor involved in Sertoli cell differentiation in the testis. The role that this molecule plays in the pathogenesis of ovarian Sertoli cell tumors and the potential use as an immunohistochemical marker for differential diagnosis have not been investigated. Immunohistochemical staining for Sox9 was performed in 152 ovarian tumors: pure Sertoli cell tumor (n = 36), endometrioid borderline tumor (n = 38), well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma (n = 26), sertoliform endometrioid carcinoma (n = 13), and carcinoid tumor (n = 39). Nuclear expression was considered positive. Extent and intensity of staining were semiquantitatively scored. In addition, immunohistochemical composite scores in positive cases (ranging from 1 to 12) were calculated based on the extent score multiplied by the intensity score. Sox9 was expressed in 44% of Sertoli cell tumors, 55% of endometrioid borderline tumors, 65% of well-differentiated endometrioid carcinomas, 39% of sertoliform endometrioid carcinomas, and 10% of carcinoid tumors. The mean Sox9 immunohistochemical composite scores in positive cases were 6.3 for Sertoli cell tumor, 5.3 for endometrioid borderline tumor, 8.0 for well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma, 2.8 for sertoliform endometrioid carcinoma, and 6.8 for carcinoid tumor. The differences in the mean Sox9 composite scores between Sertoli cell tumor and the other tumor categories were not statistically significant (p values ranged from 0.092 to 0.523). We conclude that Sox9 is variably expressed in ovarian Sertoli cell tumor and other tumors that are in the differential diagnosis and, thus, is not helpful for immunohistochemical distinction. Understanding the role of Sox9 in the pathogenesis of ovarian Sertoli cell tumor requires further study.

Uterine tumour resembling ovarian sex cord tumour is an immunohistochemically polyphenotypic neoplasm which exhibits coexpression of epithelial, myoid and sex cord markers

AIMS

To describe the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical findings in four cases of uterine tumour resembling ovarian sex cord tumour (UTROSCT).

METHODS

Four UTROSCTs were stained with a wide range of antibodies, including epithelial (AE1/3, epithelial membrane antigen), myoid (desmin, alpha smooth muscle actin, h-caldesmon), sex cord (alpha inhibin, calretinin, melan A, CD99) and neuroendocrine (chromogranin, CD56) markers as well as hormone receptors (oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, androgen receptor), vimentin, CD10, WT1 and HMB45.

RESULTS

The tumours ranged from 0.8 to 19.5 cm. Three were relatively well circumscribed intramural myometrial lesions; the other was a pedunculated mass attached to the uterine serosa. The tumours were variably composed of solid, corded, trabecular, nested, glandular and retiform arrangements of tumour cells. In three cases, cells with eccentric nuclei and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, resulting in a rhabdoid appearance, were a prominent feature. Three cases were diffusely positive with AE1/3 and all with epithelial membrane antigen. Positivity with myoid markers was common with 3, 4 and 1 case respectively staining with desmin, alpha smooth muscle actin and h-caldesmon; 2, 4, 1 and 2 cases respectively were positive with alpha inhibin, calretinin, melan A and CD99. All were chromogranin negative and exhibited diffuse strong staining with CD56. All were diffusely positive with oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, vimentin and WT1. Three cases were androgen receptor positive and all were CD10 and HMB45 negative.

CONCLUSIONS

UTROSCT exhibits a polyphenotypic immunophenotype with coexpression of markers of epithelial, myoid and sex cord lineage as well as hormone receptors.

Applications and limitations of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma

Malignant mesothelioma is an uncommon malignant epithelial neoplasm originating from the serosal surface of body cavities. Because serosal surfaces are a common site of metastatic spread for a variety of malignant neoplasms originating from internal organs, separating malignant mesothelioma from metastatic tumors is of clinical importance. The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma is complex and usually requires a multimodal approach that includes careful clinical history and physical examination, imaging studies, and tissue sampling for multimodal evaluation including routine histology, histochemistry, electron microscopy, and immunohistochemical tests. Of these, immunohistochemistry has emerged as the most valuable and readily available modality for the routine evaluation of these tumors. Unfortunately, no specific antibodies have yet been developed that can be accepted as exclusive for these tumors. The immunohistochemical diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma therefore depends on the use of a panel of stains that includes markers that are commonly expected to react with these tumors ("positive" markers) and markers that are not commonly expected to react with these tumors ("negative" markers). Additionally, the selection and utility of these various markers can vary considerably based on a constellation of circumstances, including patient sex, histologic appearance of the tumor (ie, epithelioid vs. sarcomatoid, etc), and various other clinical circumstances. Herein, we will review the currently available immunohistochemical markers used for the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma and offer suggestions for the use of appropriate panels of stains based on specific morphologic types and clinical circumstances.

Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Ovary

Most malignant melanomas encountered in the ovary are metastatic, and the recent literature has focused on such neoplasms. Primary tumors are rare with most reports being only of single cases. When the tumor is associated with teratomatous elements from which it arises, not only is the diagnosis of melanoma much more likely to be made but also is a primary nature proven. However, although all the primary tumors likely are of teratomatous origin, evidence of such an origin may be effaced resulting in problems both in identifying the tumor as melanoma and in determining if it is primary or not. In this report, we describe 9 primary or probably primary ovarian melanomas and explore the varied problems the cases posed. The patients ranged from 18 to 72 years. The tumors, all of which were unilateral, ranged from 4 to 23 cm; only 2 were black. In 6 cases, there was an associated dermoid cyst or monodermal teratoma (struma ovarii), 5 in the ipsilateral and 1 in the contralateral ovary. The tumors were variously composed of large epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, small cells, spindle-shaped cells, or a combination, and in 5 cases, melanin pigment (Masson Fontana positive) was identified. In all cases, most of the tumor cells had prominent nucleoli. All neoplasms had a predominantly diffuse growth pattern with a focal nested architecture in 3 cases. Other noteworthy morphological features were tumor giant cells with wreath-like nuclei (4 cases), signet ring cells (1 case), clear cells (1 case), intranuclear pseudoinclusions (2 cases), a focally myxoid stroma (2 cases), a pseudopapillary appearance caused by degeneration (2 cases), and follicle-like structures (3 cases). In 1 case in a 21-year-old, there was associated hypercalcemia, and focally, the neoplasm, which contained follicle-like structures, resembled small cell carcinoma of the hypercalcemic type. All cases tested by immunohistochemistry were positive with 1 or more melanocytic markers, and electron microscopy performed in 3 cases revealed intracytoplasmic melanosomes or premelanosomes. The wide differential potentially includes neoplasms within most of the categories of primary ovarian neoplasia, as well as metastatic melanoma, and is facilitated by thorough sampling to identify teratomatous elements, by awareness of the spectrum of melanoma in the ovary, and by positivity with melanocytic markers. This is an area where electron microscopy can still also contribute useful information.

Ovarian Serous Cystadenofibroma With Stromal Sex Cord Elements

This report describes an ovarian serous cystadenofibroma, in a postmenopausal woman, which exhibited extensive sex cord differentiation, in the form of solid and hollow tubules resembling Sertoli cell elements, within the stroma. The sex cord elements, which were located just beneath the epithelium, were positive with both alpha inhibin and calretinin and negative with epithelial membrane antigen. They were also CD56 positive but negative with other neuroendocrine markers. True sex cord structures or sex cord-like elements have been described in ovarian adenosarcomas and pure stromal tumors, especially fibromas. However, as far as we are aware, these elements have not been reported in a serous cystadenofibroma. The endometrium exhibited simple hyperplasia, perhaps secondary to estrogenic activity of the sex cord elements. We discuss the significance of CD56 positivity of the sex cord elements.

Immunohistochemical and functional biomarkers of value in female genital tract lesions

There has been a marked expansion in the literature pertaining to the use of immunohistochemical markers in female genital tract pathology, especially with regard to diagnosis. This review provides a survey of the antibodies commonly used in the diagnosis of gynecological lesions grouped as to function or type. Prognostic or predictive markers are also discussed where appropriate, although few of these are of value in everyday practice. It is stressed that when immunohistochemistry is used diagnostically, panels of markers provide better information than reliance on a single antibody.